Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #673 TWITTER FILES 2 CONFIRM Conservatives BLACKLISTED, Bongino, Kirk, Etc. w/Scott Presler

Episode Date: December 9, 2022

Tim, Ian, Luke, & Kellen join Scott Presler to discuss the second batch of the Twitter files being released, Project Veritas releasing one of the most shocking stories to date, Joe Biden releasing the merchant of death, Twitter sued for sexism after firing employees, and Canada's dystopian push of euthanasia for citizens. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun.

And make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, So I think we went live.

Oh, yeah. Hey, there we go. All right, everybody. What you just got to watch is me accidentally pressing the live button while we were still trying to set up the screen. So that was fun for you. Well, we're a little bit frantic here because the Twitter files are dropping as we sit here. So, you know, I come up to the studio and I see Barry Weiss.

He starts tweeting and I'm like, come on. You know, they do this thing where the tweets go really, really, really slow. But we got some big bombshells. This is hard proof that the Twitter execs like Vijaya were lying. I mean, again, Dan Bongino, Charlie Kirk, among those who were actually suppressed and shadow banned on Twitter. Hard confirmation. They even posted images. Now, we've known about this a bit bit but this is direct confirmation of them lying.

A lot of this stuff we've seen and it's always an accident, right? Now we know it's not an accident. There were stories about shadow banning. I think Ronna McDaniel had been shadow banned and other members of the RNC. And Twitter said, oopsie, it was a mistake. It's always a mistake.

And every single time something happened it was a mistake, it was a mistake, it was a mistake. And now we know that their engineering teams are actually like, no, we were actually doing all that on purpose.ating against women because the people who got fired were disproportionately women relative to, like, the amount of women who got fired was a higher percentage rate than the amount of men who got fired or whatever. I think it actually just plays into that meme where Twitter before was a lot of women and Twitter after wasn't. But Elon just said, who wants to work hard?

And if you don't, you can leave. And if you do, you can stay. And now they're suing. So that one's pretty interesting. And you can also go to TimCast.com, become a member and support our work directly. We're going to have a members-only censored show. I'm sorry, uncensored show. Oh, man, what a day.

Coming up for you. No, no, it's totally censored. This one's going to be very boring. No, no. After the show around 11, we'll put up the uncensored members only after show. And I'm sure we'll have some very interesting conversations as it pertains to the election. Smash that like button. Subscribe to the channel.

Share the show with your friends. And the reason I say that is because joining us today is the man who is probably, if there's any one person who should take credit for the Republicans getting the House, is Scott Pressler. Thank you. Well, you know. Can you hear me okay gotta grab the mic am i in yeah yeah yeah you can move the mic around with you when you go excellent yeah uh so so who are you what do you do uh i guess i'm a long-haired conservative activist kind of nomadic traveling

the country and just helping to make sure that we're defeating the democrats and electing republicans i guess that's my story. You've cleaned up cities. You've registered Republicans to vote. And despite everything we saw in the midterms, Republicans are taking the House, meaning we're getting investigations. The AOC is going to be investigated. Hopefully, we see investigations of Joe Biden. They're saying they're going to do it.

And I got to say, I think a large amount of that credit goes to you. Thank you. If you weren't registering voters at the levels you were doing and the activism you were doing, I don't know if Republicans could have even taken the House, to be completely honest. Well, and it wasn't even like blood red Republican areas. I mean, really, it was Lee Zeldin in New York of all states and ballot harvesting in California that really gave us this narrow majority in the House. And I think that says something that let's change up our strategy. And that's in part why I'm

wearing this shirt. And it's not that I'm saying that we're going to do anything illegal. We're going to cross every T, dot every I, but we're going to use the same tactics the Democrats have been doing and if those tools are at our disposal i think we quite frankly would be foolish not to use them to our advantage just gotta gotta stay up on it because by the time 2024 comes around they're gonna have other tactics you know well and let me tell you we're gonna get so good at ballot harvesting that they're gonna try to ban it themselves. And that's the goal. Yeah.

You know, I want them to be like, we should have never done it. It's kind of like Harry Reid with the Supreme Court, right? They busted the filibuster. And it was thanks to Harry Reid, and I'm not talking ill of the departed. I want to say this as nicely and respectfully as possible. It's because of Senator Harry Reid, that we have three conservative Supreme Court justices today that were given to us by President Donald Trump. You know, so every tactic that the Democrat uses can be used against them. Absolutely. For Republican policies. Well, there we go. All right, man, thanks for joining us. We'll talk about that and more. We got Luke hanging out. Hey, guys, my name is Luke Grodowski here of We Are Change. And today I'm wearing a shirt that

dropped Monday and it came in just in perfect time for tonight's Twitter file release, which I'm keeping an eye on. I think we are on number 17 right now, so we still got a lot to cover. The shirt reads, Elon Musk did not Epstein himself

with, of course, the remarks he said this past Sunday and Monday. I think it's worth noting this and highlighting this. If you agree with that, you could get the shirt on the bestpoliticalshirts.com because you do. That's why I'm here. Thank you so much for having me. You know, a lot of people do political science and they talk about politics and they think about ideas and they write stuff on paper. But you're like a political engineer that actually is there building the thing by being on the ground and moving pieces around it's pretty impressive thanks for coming again

thank you last night i had a chance to talk with bryson gray i tapped in at the very end of the uh the live episode we did a little bit after the show but then after the after show bryson and i went deep for like an hour and a half on christianity judaism islam it was fantastic he's very knowledgeable i love you bryson episode is not up though. I think it's going to go up this weekend. We're probably going to put it up, Tim, you were mentioning, maybe this weekend when there's no other videos dropping. Maybe tomorrow. Yeah. Highly recommend it.

It's going to be on timcast.com. Check it out. It was a great, great time. And if you haven't got a copy of my book yet, Writing in the Dark, it's really not, it's very weird. It was just like a man. You wrote it in the dark. Literally in my car when I was homeless in New York in a very dark period of my life. So there's a metaphor there.

If you ever want to get to see some of the inner workings, man, you can go pick up one of those on Amazon. Writing in the Dark by Ian Crossland. What's happening, Kellen? I'll second what you said, Ian. I think that Bryson Gray after show was pretty great. So once we have that up on Timcast, I'll surely tweet it out.

But yeah, please check it out. I'm Kellen, filling in for Serge, and I'm ready to get started. Yeah, Kellen and Serge were with us last. It was the four of us. And us. Actually, Bryson's girlfriend came in at one point. I was talking to her.

It was really cool. Really awesome. Let's get into this big news, ladies and gentlemen. We've got the Twitter thread from Barry Weiss. The Twitter Files Part 2. Twitter's secret blacklists. I will not waste your time. Dr. J. Bhattacharya was arguing that COVID lockdowns would harm children.

He was placed on a trends blacklist and also has this flag, recent abuse strike, whatever that means. Then we have Dan Bongino, who was search blacklisted. And he also had something called a notification spike. I don't know what that means. Then we have Dan Bongino, who was search blacklisted, and he also had something called a notification spike. I don't know what that means. You can see he had no strikes, but they put him on a blacklist. It says multiple accounts, Twitter blue verified, not safe for work view. I wonder what SPMA means. Charlie Kirk, do not amplify. Recent abuse strike and notification spike. Multiple accounts not safe for work view. Interesting. What does that mean?

Multiple accounts? Are they accusing these individuals of personally operating multiple accounts? Sounds like it, but I think that that's a bannable offense. Right. Or maybe it's because he's got like, you know, Turning Point USA is his organization. So he's in charge of several different accounts twitter denied that they shadow banned people they said that they didn't do it and they certainly didn't do it on an ideology but then the funny thing is you get this story first definitely daily dot twitter insists it's not shadow banning conservatives and then i think

is this one we're here twitter appears to have fixed shadow ban of prominent Republicans like RNC chair and Trump Jr. spokesman. So that was July 25th, 2018. And then this story, this was July 27th, 2018, saying they're not they're not doing it. They're not doing it. It was updated, Twitter files are delivering hard proof. Conservatives are being banned, shadow banned, manipulated, deamplified, deboosted, whatever. And the story is currently developing. Barry Weiss says this is funny. They said they don't shadow ban everybody. They do visibility filtering. They call it VF, refers to the ability to limit the scope of a particular tweet's or individual's discoverability to block select users' posts from ever appearing on the trending page and from inclusion in hashtag searches, all without people knowing. Now, I have to wonder, they did this to Dan Bongino. He uses Twitter as a business, for his business. Is this a breach of contract if i enter into a contract with you and you secretly apply restrictions against me are they breaching their contract or is the argument going to be no no the terms of service say that we can do all of these things to you i'm not familiar with the terms enough i would imagine because it's a free to use service that you really don't have any recourse to sue them if they're screwing with you.

But I don't know. I don't know what the promise was. Check this out. This is where it starts getting crazy. Quote, we control visibility quite a bit and we control the amplification of your content quite a bit. And normal people do not know how much we do. How much we do. One Twitter engineer told us.

Two additional employees confirmed. The group that decided whether to limit the reach of certain users was the Strategic Response Team, Global Escalation Team, or SRTGET. It often handled the 200 cases per day. But there existed a level beyond official ticketing, beyond the rank and file moderators, following the company's policy on paper. That is the Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support, known as SIPPES. The secret group included head of legal policy, head of legal policy and trust Vijay Agade, the global head of trust and safety Yoel Roth,

subsequent CEOs Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal, and others. It's where the biggest, most politically sensitive decisions got made. Think high follower count controversial. another Twitter employee told us. For these, there would be no ticket or anything. Take a look at this. Libs of TikTok. It says, do not take action on user without consulting the SIPPES. Really, really interesting stuff. Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live

chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun. And make same-day withdrawals if you win.

Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600

to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. They mentioned that Rychic had been suspended several times. You can see Libs of TikTok has a recent abuse strike, notification spike, and is trend blacklisted. Two strikes, high profile it

says multiple accounts not safe for work view so you know how much of uh how much of this is just kind of like yeah okay we know uh having the receipts here i think is absolutely important i i think there's going to be a bigger implications here because it wasn't just these few accounts that we mentioned here barry weiss in uh the thread number 12 specifically documents and says how there was 20 cases a day of individuals being individually targeted and attacked as twitter was going on and publicly saying that we were absolutely not shadow banning the corporate media was regurgitating their talking points you could see i just retweeted uh the official twitter account from 2018 they said quote people are asking us if we shadow ban we don't read more to get all the facts the fact they're not they're not facts here again this is an official twitter account uh tweeting this

a couple years ago gaslighting, lying to people as they were manipulating our social discourse. And we know that when they do this, they could decide and determine not only the outcome of elections, but have huge major effects on society with the power to essentially control people's minds. This is next level stuff. I want to talk later about Brittany Griner and Paul Wh uh paul paul wellen is his name right paul paul whalen am i getting wrong yes uh there's um this article from jordan shakhtel i think it is uh outlining how the the biden administration intentionally ignored this guy and opted for britney griner and even nbc initially reported i think it was nb NBC, that Russia said you can

have one or the other, not both. And so Biden was like, give us the basketball player, showing that he doesn't care about our Marines or the people who are overseas or whatever. He had the option. He didn't take it. I saw that and I just felt like I need to stress to everybody. Joe Biden does not represent you. He does not represent any of us in this room.

He does not represent the Marines or the army. He represents his cult. The president, the Democrats in the Senate and Congress are cult members. You do not exist to them. There was no consideration for a former Marine when they were doing a prisoner swap with the merchant of death, an arms dealer, because Joe Biden said, why would I care about that guy? I want you to think about it this way. Right now in this country, what's happening? Let's say that you there's a hostage situation and you're outside and the hostage taker says, I'll only release one person, your daughter or John Smith. And you're like, who's John Smith? And they're like, well, he's a decorated war hero.

He saved a box full of puppies the other day. Give me my daughter. My point is, Joe Biden, when he looks at the potential of this, he doesn't think about the American people. He thinks about his cult and his ideology and what earns him those points with his crowd. He is not representing the United States of America. I mentioned this back during the covid lockdowns when Florida was not locked down, when South Dakota was not locked down and other conservative states were not locked down. And Joe Biden came out and said, we're locking down for these reasons and we're going to

have to do this, that or otherwise. And I'm like, well, who's he he talking to he keeps tweeting at me to tell me to get my vaccine get a vaccine he's not even a doctor yeah he's not talking to you he's not tweeting at me you're right he's just tweeting it out and i'm reading it like no no no he's not a doctor what i'm saying is when joe biden came out and said everyone we need to do these things he wasn't talking to any of us in this room or any of you watching. They don't see us as part of the same country as them. I think that's just a reality. And this is exemplified just so hilariously. This is the issue I have with conservatives. Time magazine chooses Zelensky.

And what do conservatives do? They go, I can't believe Time magazine chose Zelensky as person of the year. And it's like, first of all, why would you read Time magazine? They're the ones who published that article about fortifying the election. They don't have any real circulation anymore. They're not culturally relevant. But conservatives view the left as culturally relevant and as the as the the the epicenter of America and American culture for some reason. And the left views them as creepy weirdos have nothing to do with what this country is doing. Well, and I think this is how we're different. Like, this is where I actually get some pushback from my followers.

If I'm America first, that means that I want to put every American first, even the commies, even people that disagree with me because I value upholding my citizens' rights. And so even with Britney, you know, I was getting pushback from saying, yes, we do need to secure her freedom, even if she broke Russian law, even if she doesn't stand for the flag or doesn't stand for our freedoms and freedom of speech. And even when some people are saying, you know, to leave cities and to leave California behind, and they chose this and let them suffer the consequences of their votes. No, I don't think that's an America first perspective. We need to be fighting for freedom everywhere. Now, with that being said,

does does that mean that I think that we should trade the merchant of death and Russian arms dealer while the very country, Russia and Putin, are invading Ukraine. All I can see from this is I think there's a very real possibility that through his connections with his freedom now, we could see Putin gaining even more arms to use against Ukraine, which what does that mean from us? That means that we are going to be sending another $74 billion to Ukraine to solve the problem that was just exacerbated by our very president. And that's kind of where my head is at in this. And I say not another dime for Ukraine. I was already at, if we're securing Ukraine's border, while we're not securing ours why should we be sending them any money but the the fact of the matter is the united states is creating a problem

while also trying to be the solution and the only people that are suffering from this are us i met a guy he was i think he was a captain in the in the army i think i can't remember i don't know how the ranking stuff works but he said he retired he was planning on uh staying in until he was too old he wanted to be you know a careerist or you know first full career and then he's in his mid-30s and he said he was resigning his commission because of the wokeness that's happening in the military and so i see that and i'm and i'll say it, you know, they're shutting down prisons, they're releasing criminals. Crime is rampant. And the politicians keep like the Democrats in these cities keep doing the same thing. And I'm like, isn't it obvious at this point? It's because you are not a part of what they are doing.

When they say our democracy, replace when they say our democracy, replace that with cult. And then remember that you're not a part of their cult. So when Joe Biden comes out and says these far right extremists are, replace that with cult. And then remember that you're not a part of their cult. So when Joe Biden comes out and says, these far right extremists are a threat to our cult, then you need to understand what he's really saying. He's not talking about the United States. He's talking about something that excludes you specifically. Yeah, the United States is a plural. The United States are a thing.

It's a bunch of states that are united. We are united. And if someone in the federal government is trying to override that and act like they're the one that resembles the you the states united then they're failing he's let's uh let's continue on with this thread here the number 17 uh tweet from barry weiss gets really really interesting because now you start to see that twitter was lying about their bias check this out barry Barry Wise says the account, Libs of TikTok, which Chaya Raichik began in November 2020 and now boasts over 1.4 million followers,

was subjected to six suspensions in 2022 alone. Raichik says each time she was blocked from posting for as long as a week. Twitter repeatedly informed Raichik that she had been suspended for violating Twitter's policy against hateful conduct. But in an internal SIP memo from october 2022 after her seventh suspension the committee acknowledged quote libs of tiktok has not directly engaged in behavior violative of the hateful

conduct policy they were lying that's actionable shocker i think that's legal action right there i think this is right here actual malice libs of tiktok uh chaya lawsuit time if they publicly stated you violated the kind of hateful uh their hateful conduct policy but then internally said you didn't that means they knew they were lying but here's's the thing. Does she sue Elon Musk now? Yeah, Scott, you mentioned that before the show too. What's the process of a lawsuit in this situation? Do you go after previous ownership? I would think so.

I mean, you would have to, who was the decision maker? Was it Vijaya? I would go after the individual person as opposed to Twitter, the company, because clearly all of this was done before the Elon Musk administration. Well, there's names being named here, a part of their strategic response team and the group's name and who was heading them. And it looks like Vijaya was at the head of many of these important decisions. We go back in the tweets and the documents are here.

It shows us exactly who was making these decisions, why they were making them, how they were making them up, and how a lot of this was just absolutely arbitrary, especially when it came to hypocritical moves, especially when it came to Libs of TikTok being doxxed. The doxxing of Libs

of TikTok garnered, what was it? I think Barry Weiss says 10,000 likes. And that wasn't stopped. But her doing something that they construed on the technicality was, which wasn't even, you know, correct, which they knew. 10,000 likes on this doxing tweet. And they said, no, it's fine. I had someone post an insane thread with an address. And Twitter told me they would not take it down.

And I was like, okay, whatever. Then it leads to exactly what you'd expect it to lead to. They claimed their justification for removing

libs of TikTok and the suspension was indirectly violating their policies by tweets that either intend to incite or led people to then harass. So not inciting, not harassing, but because she posted video and someone else did, well,

that's indirect. So we're going to suspend her even though it doesn't violate our policies. However, you post an address and sorry, nothing in an internal Slack message. Twitter employees spoke of using technicalities to restrict the visibility of tweets and subjects. Here's Yoel Roth, Twitter's then global head of trust and safety, in a direct message to a colleague in 2021. He wrote, A lot of times, SI has used technicality spam enforcements as a way to solve a problem created by a safety under-cing their policies, which again, isn't a problem per se, but it keeps us from addressing the root cause of the issue, which is that our safety policies

need some attention. Amazing. Six days later in a direct message with an employee, uh, blah, blah, Roth requested more research to support expanding quote, non-removal policy interventions like disabling engagements and de-amplification slash visibility filtering. Roth wrote, The hypothesis underlying much of what we've implemented is that if exposure to misinformation directly causes harm, we should use remediations that reduce exposure, and limiting the spread and virality of the content is a good way to do that. In other words, these people are saying,

Your ideas lead to things that we don't like regardless of what that may be we are going to stop people from being able to see what you post and then they had the the audacity to go publicly and say we don't shadow ban conservatives now here's a funny thing the whole time they were doing this i was saying it's a semantic game they'll say we we don't shadow ban anybody it's called visibility filtering it's totally different they would say we did not shadow ban anyone for being conservative we shadow ban them for misgendering someone of course liberals and conservatives have you know opposing views on what misgendering is so of course they're literally doing it based on the political ideology or political values of the individual. Yeah, I didn't punch you in the face. I just threw my

fist at your, you know, face. You know, so that's technically not the same thing. Right, guys? It's absolutely incredulous. It's absolutely insane. Congress says, you know, Ms. Gade, is there a door on the front of Twitter's building? No, there isn't. There's no door. No,

there's not. What do you mean there's not? Well, what we have is a large pane of glass on hinges with a handle that when you pull, it actually moves on the hinge, creating an opening for which you can move through, but it's not a door. Like, okay, what? It's the deconstruction of language, man.

That's the game they play. And ethically, the idea that bad information, how did they phrase it? How did guy yoel phrase this that bad information get into the i don't know what he said but he basically was insinuating that getting misinformation will make people evil or whatever so show them less information but i think that's like it's like saying that if a virus makes you sick don't don't expose anyone to the virus But we know that immune system is a real thing and you need a little bit of exposure to enhance your immune system

so that you can handle it when it inevitably comes around. Misinformation will inevitably come around. You need to be resistant to it. You need to understand it and be able to spot it and question information when you see it. But just making it so people

don't ever get a chance to be exposed to it is not the way to make people stronger. That's my belief my belief on ethics on this well you know one of the craziest things i love i love the amount of weird flack we're getting from all these lefty organizations about the yay stuff someone super chatted because i don't know i may have missed it that yay said to alex jones maybe i shouldn't have singled out an entire group of people and just pointed out it's the banks. Something like that. Someone commented that. I don't know if they actually said that, but if that is the case, it shows you how these conversations actually do good. It shows how on Twitter, there's that famous story of the Westboro Baptist Church woman who got de-radicalized

by being on Twitter and saying these things and then people countering. And then eventually she was like, okay, maybe I'm wrong. I feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun. And make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions.

19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.

They want villains. You guys, have you seen that? What's that group of feds that marches around pretending to be conservative activists? Patriot Front. Oh, yeah. Are they feds?

Do we know that? I think they glow. You think they glow? So anyway, look, everybody sees that group and they're like, that can't be real, right? They need villains.

They need something to justify their laws. That's why they want people to get violent. Don't get violent. It's the one thing they know something to justify their their their laws that's why they want people to get violent don't get violent it's the one thing they know how to how to respond to so if they can't get it they fake it the fbi gets a bunch gets gets like what 12 fbi agents get two crack pots and then keep elbowing them being like come on kidnap this lady and they're like i guess aha we got you and then they have this big mock trial and then try to lock these guys up they need villains but it's essentially what the cia has been doing with american foreign policy

for the last few decades all going all the way back to the muhajirin in afghanistan that became the taliban going back to of course uh the rebels in north of iraq that became isis and in syria that of course were there against the regime because we needed regime change. And I could keep going on and on and on, but there's a long history of setting up your opposition in order to give yourself an excuse to have a strict, tougher, more brutal force down. Yeah, the Patriot Act is another example of it. But these tweets are still coming in right now. Blair White just tweeted, the Jack redemption arc is over. After, of course, we're finding out through these

disclosures that Jack Dorsey was on board with implementing this for, quote, civic integrity. This is not civic integrity. This is the destruction of dialogue, of conversation, of people being able to honestly have conversations with each other. And they stood in the middle of that and said, no, we're going to control what goes into your mind. We're going to control what you can say and cannot say. We're going to control who gets to see these larger ideas. The best idea won't win. My idea will win. And that's just disgusting, patronizing, messed up behavior of, you know, big brother,

big daddy government controlling every aspect of your life. And that's exactly what these people want. I'm just going to let everybody in on some insider information. It's nothing crazy, but I've frequently hit up Jack and asked him to come on the show. A year ago, he said yes when he had time.

It's been a year, so I hit him up again. I'm like, you know, it's about that time. It's the annual ask Jack to come and have a conversation. And I understand by like coming out and saying this and being critical of him, the likelihood that he actually wants to come on is low. But what I think of Jack Dorsey is that he built a sewer and then he crawled to the lowest point of the

piping, placed his mouth firmly on the spigot and turned it on and just let it all flow into his body. What I mean by that is, in the early days of Twitter, this was a tech bro. He was like a libertarian-style tech bro. He was the free speech wing of the free speech party. He created a platform that just started loading up with refuse

from woke activists spouting garbled nonsense. And then he started consuming that garbled nonsense and buying into it and believing it. And then he ended up, because the machine was going right down his throat, vomiting all that stuff back out into the platform. So when you have a bunch of activists demanding censorship, arguing this is the right thing to do, and you give it a little bit, eventually the only thing you see is their arguments, and then you start buying into their arguments. Then as the person controlling the system, you start implementing rules based

on their arguments. So from free speech wing of the free speech party to gargling on the refuse of woke activists and spitting it back in their faces and everyone else's. I wonder if what he said it was his civic responsibility or for the civic righteousness or whatever he said, why he was banning and shadow banning. I wonder if it's because the government was like, you know, it's your civic responsibility. They're there with handcuffs like dudes. It's your civic responsibility. Better do it like wink wink. we're going to throw you in prison if you don't and that's why he's talking about decentralizing it and creating a protocol instead of a centralized network because if you have a centralized network dea wants to or not the dea but whoever government agency is going to want to control it they're going to try and protect it they'll call it but

i mean they want to get in there and choose what people see and you know what people are told dave rubin just retreated his conversation that he had with jack dorsey in 2020 where jack specifically told him that there's no shadow banning based on political beliefs i just retweeted it myself uh at look we are changed on there on twitter uh but uh again 2020 dave rubin specifically was asking hey uh are you guys shadow banning yes Yes or no? Jack Dorsey responded and said no. They're justifying double speak by saying it's not a ban. By deranking your algorithm intake or your upflow, it's not a ban. It's ridiculous. But it is.

Hold on, hold on. There's some nuance to the tweet we have to address. Dave Rubin said, do you shadow ban based on political beliefs? Simple yes or no will do. And Jack said no. And this is the problem. They're using semantics to lie. No, it's nothing to do with their political beliefs.

You can vote for Republicans, but if you want lower taxes, smaller government, believe that there's only two genders, well, then we'll ban you. But that's politics. No, no, no, no. See, politics refers to who you vote for right those are the games they play yeah you can ask any question and they will find some legalese nonsensical semantic argument as to why they're they're doing or not doing the whatever they're supposed to be doing or not doing well i mean people question elections that gets banned

online i've heard and that's total politics obviously, if you're involved in suppressing people questioning elections around the world, then you're involved in political suppression. Get that straight. Well, I asked Elon when I was on the space with him, and I said, have advertisers threatened to pull money if you didn't adhere to a certain policy or have lawmakers threatened to introduce legislation should you not adhere. And I wonder if that's been going on as well. You know, the threatening of introducing policy or legislation that would hurt Twitter's ability if they didn't censor people, you know, because Twitter came along when President Obama was in office, right? It wasn't just under President Trump.

Yeah, I think so. 2008, maybe. And so maybe he was getting some of those pressures from Democratic control. But I think you're right, Tim. It's not necessarily – they do need a villain, but to expand upon it more, when we aren't the villains that they say we are, they have to create that and then point the finger and say, see, see exactly what I was talking about. And then they can use that as an opportunity for censorship, etc. Did you guys see Malcolm Flex's tweet about Ye?

It was brilliant. He was like, Ye went on with Tim Pool, Alex Jones and Gavin McInnes. These people that the left keeps claiming are Nazis, and none of them would agree with them on the Jews. It must have been very frustrating for Ye. Ye exposed Alex Jones for being awesome. It was a picture of Ye sitting there looking all frustrated.

I retweeted that one, too. It was the Bernie Sanders meme where he's sitting there, but they put Ye's face mask over it and his jacket, and the idea is basically like, I wonder if that was the case. You know, if you're Ye and you're not super into politics this way, like you may have some ancillary view of it. But the activists keep saying like, oh, Alex Jones is a fascist. He's a Nazi.

And then you're like, OK, so you go and hang out with them. And Alex is like, no, I hate all those people. I want nothing to do with it. You're like, wait, what? Everybody told me that was the case. So this is the funny thing. Even Gavin McInnesis who they claim is the far right white supremacist neo-nazi proud boys he's telling yay to stop judging people

based on being a part of a group and to judge them like individuals and i wonder if what yay actually did was just grabbing the overton window and ripping it as far to the right as he possibly could i think so he i mean he really really made Alex look like a good guy. That interview made Alex look like the defender of righteousness, man. Cause yay was throwing some nonsense at him and he knew he was. And Alex was just like, I got,

I got to stop you there, man. Well, they're one bridge too far. They're desperately trying. So there's an article that came out. It's from, I think maybe the independent or something or Yahoo.

And it was like Tim Pool profited off of Ye's anti-Semitism or something like that. And then it was like, because he came on the show and said this stuff, and then I disagreed with him and we made super chats. They're arguing that it was profiting off of hate or whatever. And I'm like, or is it profiting off of opposing hate? They're just going to keep lying they're going to keep trying to manufacture some kind of narrative to create boogeymen and villains because the only thing they have it's a cult it's very disturbing that people think we could create a world where people aren't mean or cruel like that is complete impossibility and insanity to think that we could suppress the human will so much that people will just be nice all the time i want i want to i want to i want to tell you guys something you see the project veritas expose the other day it's it's like this morning

when i wake up and i'm doing my morning segment the first i'm watching the video again because we watched the night the other night i just went on youtube and i looked up 90s commercials and i was like i'm just gonna like 15 minutes of commercials from the 90s just to just to remember the good old days when there were no troubles. And I know my parents probably had troubles and there was war and stuff, but I was a little kid. So I'm going to watch these commercials, forget all about it. That was so disturbing that this dean was talking about how they were giving these kids these adult objects, teaching them how to use them to spit on them and things like that. I can't even say it because you might have kids in the room.

And so I started I posted on Facebook. And here's the funny thing. teaching them how to use them to spit on them and things like that. I can't even say it because you might have kids in the room. And so I started, I posted on Facebook. And here's the funny thing. What do you think the response is from the left when they hear this stuff? Do you think they go, wow, that's a bridge too far for me. I better rethink what I'm doing. No. They say, well, he doesn't seem at all worried about it.

The school seems to stand by it. It must be okay. And I'm like, bro, are you kidding me? As long, it's like that, I don't know what you'd call it, but the story about when there's a fire in a room, if one person has a room by themselves and smoke comes through, they'll go to the door, feel the door and go, hey, there's smoke, there's a fire, they'll yell. But if you have multiple people in a room, the smoke will go under the door and everyone will look at each other, look confused and then ignore it because no one's doing anything. It's like

these collectivists can actually be shown a video of a man bragging about how cool it is that they're doing these things to children. Well, but nobody's mad about it, so it must be okay, right? And that's just like, if you're a person, a leader of strong moral fiber, you're going to be like, no, I have a line. That's beyond for me. I'm sorry.

That's why we have a Senate. That's why we're supposed to have a morally righteous Senate. Maybe that's why they say that this government can't last without Christianity in it, because we need some group of leaders that are critical thinkers that can see it when it happens, you know, see like disillusionment when it rears its ugly head. There's a couple things I want to say about this story, but this is a family-friendly broadcast, and I'm going to save those comments for later. What's your response to stuff like that? I mean, you're in the political world, right? Do the voters see stuff like that? Does it affect them? Or is it, as Tim says, they see it and they're like,

eh, whatever. I think some people are tacitly approving of it because they'd rather not rock the boat. They'd rather not get into political debates. And I think that's wrong. And what Tim just said really shows the necessity that we have to speak out against it, especially we were just talking about this earlier. This book, to people who don't know, Genderqueer, is in schools across the country. And we've had principals, we've had school boards fight to keep it in schools. And it says things that I would never say to a child, let alone my mother or other adults. I think, quite frankly, I would consider this child pornography, and this is in our schools, and what people don't know, they don't know what they don't know. And I think if people did find out that this was in our schools, that they would be horrified and that it would actually motivate them to get involved. And I think we saw that with Virginia and Governor Glenn Youngkin, etc. But you know, even for myself, I was thinking, what is my philosophy when it comes to being a conservative or Republican or just a, I consider myself a freedom nationalist. You know, we've been hearing people say Christian nationalist. No, I'm a freedom nationalist. And usually what I say is,

people should be able to do whatever they want in the comfort of their home, consensually and legally, so long as they're not abridging or infringing on the rights of anybody else, right? But then I thought to myself, but when you use the word legal, well, there have been horrible policies that have been legal in the past. And because it was legal, people use that as an excuse to continue on with it. You know, should we introduce what is moral, what is ethical? And I think that's a conversation to be had as well, because some of the things that are happening in America, like the Patriot Act, for example, just because it's legal, does that make it right? Yeah, a lot of the back to

blue people need to also realize, you know, a lot of the worst atrocities in recorded human history were legal. And when they say, I'm just following the law, I'm just doing what I'm told, they're going along with some of the worst actions that have happened to human beings, whether it's slavery, the genocide, the Holocaust, you name it. All of that was codified by law. So we need to really start seeing things from a different perspective.

A lot more people are becoming godless. I think that also is maybe having an effect on this. I never believe the government will be there to solve any of your problems. I think they're only there to create more problems in your life. So how do you enforce that in a way without using government is a question that I think a lot of people should be asking themselves. Is there a solution without

big force, big government doing this for us? Usually social ostracization. Like if you can get people ground up to believe in a morality. But they control the culture and they're pushing people to not be religious. They're pushing people not to believe in a higher power above themselves.

This is why the left calls people white supremacists. I want you to think about that story, Gore Meltz. You guys heard the Gore Meltz story out of Fredericksburg, VA. There's a,

during COVID lockdown, the guy who owns it says, I'm not doing this. You can't shut me down. That's unconstitutional. Bravo, good sir. Matt Strickland. And,

eventually they say, okay, then we're going to, we're going to shut you down. We're going to take your license from you. So he's in this dispute. It's two years later, basically. And they go into his business, the police, to serve a search warrant and give him a suspension or whatever and try and shut him down. How do you deal with cops like that?

Well, the left figured it out. You call them white supremacists. Why? It's one of the most repugnant things you can call someone. It's also inactionable. If you call someone a white supremacist, they cannot sue you because it's an opinion. And what does it really even mean? The term is nebulous, perhaps on purpose. But for the average voter, they know what it means. It means something. So if you have cops come into your business, they do this to you. Well, my idea was shun those cops, right?

Make sure those cops can't buy a cup of coffee in that town. And if they ever want to eat food again, they'll have to move because they violated the rights of a good, hardworking businessman who was just trying to keep it. He's trying to feed his family, keep his business operating, serve the community. And the cops wanted to violate the Constitution. So the simple solution, nonviolence of disobedience is if you got a business in Fredericksburg, watch the video of those cops and then put up signs in your window saying you are not welcome here. Turn around. Here's the issue. How do you make sure in a large city like that, that you you can stop people from supporting those cops? Well, if you go around and try and explain the nuances of why they violated the

Constitution, how they violated the Constitution and why someone should support your efforts to bar those cops, they're going to say, look, I have no time for this. I have no idea what you're talking about i don't know what that means and then you go they're white supremacists the guy's gonna go oh okay they're not welcome here then that simple that's why the left does what they do they don't want to waste time explaining anything to anybody it's too long it's too complicated no one cares they simply say this guy is a nazi and if you support him you know what happens and they go go, okay, you got it. Yeah, appeal to emotions. Trying to emotionally get someone to be afraid of serving them emotionally. Right. That's why they do it.

Because it's the fastest and easy way to get someone barred from a business, get their bank account shut down, get them banned from social media. It is a functional tactic. I don't know if it's the right way to go. My knee-jerk reaction is i you know again i haven't thought this through but i don't think maybe we should be using the same kind of policies that they used and i and i think there is some kind of you think we should keep serving these cops

and let them eat a burgers at our restaurant i'm not saying that i'm specifically uh going about using this kind of mass generalization and again again, I haven't thought this through. Just calling white supremacists. I said that's why the left does it. I didn't say we do it. I say we have to shun them from our businesses. But the reason they use these terms is because it's very difficult to explain in complicated politics to the other side. Well, I would actually consider using the tactic,

because like you were saying earlier, we use the tactics they use. If there's ever a competition of something, if you don't, you're going to get snowballed. You kind of have to use the same. But then when they start using evil underhanded tactics, you're like the ends don't justify the means in every situation. I got it. Do you guys know where the word rape comes from? Like the root of it, what it means?

No. So obviously in modern society, it means, you know, typically a man forcing himself on a woman, though in modern times it is used woman on man as well. But there's a reason why the phrase raping and pillaging is together, because it used to refer specifically to barbarous hordes going into a village, destroying it, and stealing everything. So that was raping the village, was to take all their stuff. But in the process, like the Vikings, for instance, they would take women with them. And that's how it went to get this specific meaning in today's day and age. But if semantics is all we're really talking about, then those cops raped that guy, right? And then you can say, here's a cop, he's a rapist. Well, that's what rape means, right? The traditional definition. If you want to fight fire with fire and play those games,

that's the game they play. Now, here's my issue. I agree, right? I don't like those tactics. I don't want to live in that world. I don't want to live in a world where people are just saying things to mean something they don't really mean because they're trying to trick people. But how do you, and I mean this sincerely, I'm not saying we should utilize the tactics of manipulation i'm saying how what what is the counter to those manipulative tactics in a way that we can stop bad cops from like raiding businesses like this i mean i i'm kind of guilty i just did it today i posted on my instagram you know some tweets of

mine uh criticizing joe biden freeing the merchant of death to russia and i said on my instagram account joe biden is a russian asset i i don't believe that's trying to trick or manipulate uh i think it's true with the nordstrom 2 and uh and with his policy of trading terrorists for americans because it's going to set precedent but But I think it's a duality. Yes, we need to do those tactics as truthfully as we can. Because look, at the end of the day, we live in a world where information travels so quickly that people just want to be the first at everything. And it doesn't matter whether it's true or false.

They just want to be the first because it means that information is going to travel as quickly as possible globally. But I think Ian and I, well, hopefully everybody at this table would agree that 99.9% of people around the globe are good, decent human beings, but it's the 0.1% that is the loudest minority, which seems to be in control because they're able to say those terrible things about others. And so many are unwilling or maybe unable to speak against them. And I think that we need to lead by example. Yes, speak out, but also lead by example with conservative policy, with passing conservative legislation, showing people. at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption,

UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. An alternative, an alternative to what the Democrats have been using against us. And let's show how we can do it in a righteous and virtuous way. And to give you an example, look at Baltimore. Everybody was having this conversation about trash in the city, but nobody was doing anything. And so I said, okay, I'm going to go pick up trash. And it was that one action, which spurred others to go, wait a second, I can do the same thing.

Why are we going to wait for the government to come in and save us? We can do it ourselves. And that one action of mine empowered so many people to believe that they could do the same. And I think that truly is part of the answer. Lead by example. So to answer, I guess that, and what you're saying,

like boycotting these cops which i am not necessarily agreeing with but it is a way to deal with the situation of people of cops over over their authority like just one restaurant manager at a time one guy tells one guy word of mouth rather than try and lie about these guys and defame them just be straight up they came in they they shut they shut down an aspect of my business against, if it actually violates the Constitution. Or, you know, we could just take photos of them and put up wanted posters saying that there's pirates going around

town, destroying people's livelihoods and business, and that technically is not a lie too, right? It would say not wanted, because they don't want them in there. No, no, no, no. Or beware. Beware. Pirates running around, shutting down businesses on behets of bureaucrats. As long as you're not defaming.

These guys will do whatever it takes to screw you over if they have to. I think even those beware posters might be something. Maybe I should just put up a bunch of billboards all over Fredericksburg with their pictures on it. That could be. Yeah, that could be. Well, you can do that. That's free speech so uh if i put up a if i put their photos from the video on billboards and then put do not serve these men in your

establishment they're bad cops that's my free speech it's not actionable and i and billboards cost between a couple hundred and a couple thousand dollars depending on where they are why don't why don't we just set a budget and put those those billboards up all over fredericksburg virginia yeah i'll make a phone call first thing in the morning. That's absolutely one way of doing it. Doing flyers, passing out flyers, being like, hey, this is a community effort here. I think also meeting with the community, meeting with the restaurant owner and the other businesses and other people in that community and seeing how they want to handle this too. Creating a relationship with them and having them come together

when something bad happens, I think is also something that could be incredibly strong and incredibly powerful of people saying, hey, we live together. We're in the same community together. There was clearly a state

that committed a crime and a violation against a private enterprise and a private business here that was serving the community. Let's come together and let's act together. And you might not even have to buy a billboard. It could be posters. It could be, you know, just a piece of paper with the

photos photocopied, put up everywhere on polls. Yeah, with diplomacy, you could get together with the restaurant owner, the police chief, and then maybe have a conversation publicly where they realize we are going to reinstate the liquor license. That was a bad move. And we're not going to do it again. That would be better than just smashing at people that made you angry and then they're gone and now new people are going to keep making the same issue over and over again. You got to go after those guys. Well, no, no, no, no, no.

I think I want to put the billboards up. And I'll just put beware dirty cops and I'll put their pictures up on the billboard. Warning. They would have to think twice if they're going to do something like that. It's true. Historically, cops would not mess with people in their own environment. They'd have to bring police in from another state or from, like, the government, from, like, a state government. Because local cops don't mess with their friends and family.

Like, those are your neighbors. And for good reason. And that kept things in order. When, you know, the cop had to come down and deal with a brawl, it's like, listen, we've got to stop the fight. Break it up, guys. Look, your dad's going to be pissed. I don't down and deal with the brawl it's like listen we got to stop the fight break it up guys look your dad's gonna be pissed i don't want to deal with this now they bring in cops from two towns over and they walk in and say don't know don't care pull the taser just jab the guy in this instance it's a guy who was standing up for his constitutional rights and two years later they're like we're gonna destroy your business okay those are dirty

cops i'm sorry that that is they're like don't know don't care well you probably have to so you know someone super chatted what about the thin blue line and protecting us from chaos yeah if like in new york a dude steals a school bus and is ramming people then like i got no issue with the cops like that's that's i agree like there's a reason why we have police officers for situations of like a guy running around with a gun but we're talking about a dude who was selling who's operating a business that sold beer and the only reason they went after his liquor license was because he said f you to their unconstitutional edict the cops want to enforce that okay they're dirty they're dirty cops and uh you know maybe maybe i'll just put up billboards dirty cops and i'll and i'll and i'll put them all over the place they protected

walmart they protected costco they allowed all the businesses with connections to politicians I'll just put up billboards. Dirty cops and I'll put them all over the place. They protected Walmart. They protected Costco. They allowed all the businesses with connections to politicians to stay open. McDonald's, you could walk in there, get whatever you wanted, no problem. But this guy who had a small business had to be shut down by these politicians now? Years after

these edicts? Because a politician went to police officers and said, go enforce this, and the police officer said, yes sir, I'll do it right away. And all these back to blue guys need to face the reality because the national security state is being turned around on the people of America. It used to be that they were fighting terrorists, but that again, don't even get me started on all that. But you do a lot of positive activism that you just mentioned in Baltimore. Is there a way to turn this situation and do some kind of positive activism here with this? Well, I wasn't even thinking that way.

Well, I agree that we need to keep it to the individual and, you know, make it known that we're not painting with a broad brush. And yes, we do support the police, but we don't support the police when they are choosing as individuals to enforce unconstitutional legal mandates. But groups like Black Lives Matter, and I want to make it very clear, I don't support Black Lives Matter. But if they were smart, they're working. All of these conversations seem limited to shortterm goals. If I were a part of Black Lives Matter and I really wanted to make a difference, I'd say join the police force. Become a policeman because then you are going to be the enforcer of the laws that you are for or against, right? And same for us as conservatives when we're calling out the sexualization of children within our schools. Well, a long-term approach will be become a

school board member, become a city council member, and become a teacher. Become the solution to the problem you're talking about in the long term. That would be more my positive activism as to actually try to solve this from a long-term perspective. Yeah. Let's jump to this story about Joe Biden. This is from the Daily Mail. Quote, I don't understand why I'm still sitting here. My bags are packed. Devastated Paul Whelan breaks his silence from Russian penal colony

as his brother slams his catastrophic exclusion from Brittany Griner prison swap. I'm ready to go home. Let me show you the truth. Jordan Schachtel says NBC News, a known state propaganda outlet, is participating in the cover-up operation, first edition versus stealth edited. In the original archive, it says, but the official said Russia has treated Wellen differently because he is an accused spy and that the Kremlin gave the White House the choice of either Greiner or Wellen or none. They edited it to say they gave the White House the choice of either Greiner or no one after different options were proposed.

Because the reality is Joe Biden had a choice, this former U.S. Marine or a WNBA star. Now, the WNBA star hates America as much as he does and is part of the cult. So this is what Joe Biden chooses to do. Your values as an American who believes in people sacrificing for the greater good are not held by these people. And these are the people that have near just just absolute raw power in this country through ballot harvesting or otherwise. They control the institutions and they are the I view I view these people as a parasitic cult that is suckling the blood from this country and gutting it, ripping it to shreds. There was another aspect to this prisoner swap deal that a lot of people are missing. And that was the involvement of the Saudi empire, Saudi Arabia, that by the way, the United States just declared immune for the

Kashoggi killing. They literally cited Biden's administration's executive powers and stopped any further investigations and legal responsibility for the killing of Kashoggi with Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia, the country that negotiated this larger prisoner swap, with many people now speculating that this was a part of the deal of the United States getting Brittany Grinder back to the United States. And it absolutely does make sense

because as we know, Biden was trying to do this before the midterm elections in order to try to get political favors, in order to look good to his base. He wasn't able to achieve that. This Saudi Arabian development does make sense now. And it wasn't just this former U.S. vet that was screwed over here,

but it was also the family of Khashoggi, who also was connected to intelligence agencies as well, that was screwed over here as well. So, it's like, oh. I mean, Biden, it's kind of a smart move in my point in my opinion over wayland it's i dislike it but you saw micah parsons on twitter get absolutely roasted for saying why is grinder coming home he's an athlete famous athlete why is grinder coming home and we have a veteran overseas and he got blasted by the the mob the twitter mob so biden knows who's paying attention to him you know i just i just don't

view view the the leftists like the way i described it several months ago was i don't care what they think it's like asking me what the people of france think about my opinions like well we're not france you know i don't view them and and and this is not a thing where i'm trying to say this because i i'm mad at this group of people or I don't like them. I genuinely don't think since the pandemic, when Biden came out and said, we're going to lock down and I'm like, but red states are locking down. I went, oh, man, we're two different countries. That's just it.

The left and right both agree. We are two different countries. But a lot of people on the right don't seem to get it. They keep saying our democracy and people are like, we don't live a democracy it's a constitution no bro they're saying they have a democracy you aren't a part of so we got to do something but it's not a democracy they say it's a democracy but it's an oligarchy they're running it at the top behind the scenes it's administrators and yeah politicians and bankers and bureaucracy that's a good word bureaucracy i don't think bureaucracy really gets to the uh element of the economic function of it, though. That's why I say bureonomy. Because it's like, bureaucracy just implies there's like a system of paperwork and, you know, bureaucrats running things. But it's also the system itself of who gets access to resources is, you know, the economic functions of of it it's not just oligarchy it's uh i guess you can just call it classical communism right like chinese chinese communist

style that's what it is i think they're losing you know so i'm chill the the exposure that we're getting out of the twitter file stuff that seeing what they're doing behind the scenes what the fbi has been doing i'm like oh okay you know going to lose. They can't maintain this. But I think what helps is people realizing that you don't share a system with them. Well, I'm not sure with this story that we need to really be focusing on Britney. And I just thought it was so, and what I mean by that is,

the press secretary today was saying, this is a victory for the gay community and black women everywhere. And I'm like, what? What does that have to do with anything? The fact of the matter is we traded a terrorist, an arms dealer that conspired to kill Americans that is responsible for deaths across the globe to our enemy, our adversary. And I just, I have to point this out. I just, it sets terrible precedent and precedent, quite frankly, that was set under President Obama because I was looking up Bergdahl and correct me if I'm wrong, but President Obama treated five Guantanamo Bay individuals that were a part of the Taliban for that one American,

who apparently, according to sources, had betrayed and run off. And then during President Trump, we had Americans that were freed from North Korea, we had the students that were freed from China, and we had Aya Hijazi and her husband that were freed from Egypt. Three different situations. And North Korea, who could be more hostile? I think that is analogous to Russia or China. And President Trump didn't have to trade an arms dealer or terrorist in order to free those American citizens. And so that needs to be a part of the conversation. It has nothing to do with identity, gender, etc. It has to be at

what point do we concede in order to get something back to America? And furthermore, I just want to also make the point, I think this is not unexpected from the very administration that gave billions in military equipment to the Taliban to begin with. So this is something that I'm not surprised or shocked. Yeah, I was going to say what this guy is accused of doing is what the U.S. intelligence deep state has been doing for a number of years now. So let's just call a spade a spade here. He's a very fascinating guy because he started selling machetes and single-shot rifles to Africa, then moved on to AK-47s. He was charged with conspiracy to kill Americans.

The DAA said a couple months ago that his release would pose, quote, grave national security threat to the United States. He's also alleged to have tried to sell missiles to blow up u.s passenger airlines he is alleged to have stolen 32 billion dollars of weapons from ukraine these are again all allegations this is this is where the movie by um i forgot the title uh by um what's his name that weird face looking guy quentin tarantino. No, no. Sorry, Quentin, I love you. Nicolas Cage.

There's a Nicolas Cage movie. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. That movie was cool. That movie was based on this guy. Oh, really? Yes. The beginning of the movie, is that where that shows the bullet?

Yep. Oh, merchant, God of War? God of War, yep. I think that's, no, hold on. Lord of War? Lord of War, something like that. God of War is a game. Someone in the chat room will tell us,

but his life was depicted in that particular movie by Nicolas Cage. Can I just... You know the first thing I thought of when I heard this? Like Luke's mentioning this guy is like a wanted terrorist. He tried to kill Americans. He's selling missiles to US enemies. We've been warned that he's a tremendous threat, but we got Brittany Griner,

and the first thing I think of is Dumb and Dumber. When the dude rides up on the little scooter, on the moped. And then he's like, what happened? He's like, I traded the van for it, 70 miles to the gallon. And he's like, just when I think you couldn't be any stupider, you go and do something like this. And totally redeem yourself. Trading your van for a pit bike that's what this feels like we had the merchant of death and biden's like well we do need a d-list celebrity

back in the country that's what the that's what the you know corporate media is calling him and it was lord of war the movie if you haven't watched it yet i thought i thought it was a great movie i was very entertained by it and it's based off real life events off of this particular guy now the other side of the story is that a lot of this is trumped up charges that this was personally directed as a major political hit job against putin because he was pretty much working within the russian uh intelligentsia deep state selling weapons where the russian government couldn't officially sell weapons to so again the united states does this as well his main crime was again financing al-qaeda and isis and that's literally what the united states did as well so your tax dollars went to doing that this guy did it as well and he was held and he was he was held in

captive in 2010 and was supposed to send it was supposed to serve a 25-year sentence. I got standards, right? I mean, I got principles. Brittany Griner should not be getting charged and locked up like she was in Russia and all that stuff. For weed, right? Yeah, it was a THC vapor or something. Complete insanity. And so, you know, look, I i think it's silly but she did break

russian law i just don't you know and you gotta abide by the rules but we can we can do some kind of trade i got no problem with that i think britney grinder should be back home the united states um i'm just sitting here being like when it comes to swapping the lord of war merchant of death can't we do a little better this has got to be like the worst biden needs to read the art of the deal yes like he because he has no idea how to negotiate this stuff he just traded i'm saying a van for a pit bike yeah and and when you look at the way that uh donald trump handled negotiations especially when it came to prisoner swaps he did a way better job especially when it came to the situation in. He did a way better job, especially when it came to the situation in Turkey. I believe there was a pastor that was being held there. Donald Trump wanted him

back in the United States. And then he started to tweet about how the lira was a crap currency. The currency started to go down. And Turkey was demanding very tough requests from the United States and then ended up not giving up anything according to the official story. And the way he handled that was, I think, a lot better. And again, I'm critical of Donald Trump. You guys know that, obviously, in the chat room. I see it every single day. But I think the way he handled that was a lot better than what Biden just did now. Biden's looking for a flash in the pan. He constantly looks for these like little shocks, bright light flashes to keep people interested. That's what it seems like. This is a publicity stunt really more than anything for him, I think. Although I'm glad Britney's back.

Let's be honest. She was a political prisoner. She was held there captively, sentenced for eight years in a very tough Russian jail. I wouldn't want to be in her situation. She was there because she was playing basketball. She was getting paid

to play basketball there. And, you know, to me, no one should be charged for eight years for a substance that they wanted to personally use themselves. To me, that idea is just absolutely insane. So clearly, the Russian government was holding her as a political pawn played off and has been incentivized by this larger trade deal, which at the end of the day only incentivizes Russia to do this again to other American citizens that are in Russia, if you really do think about this. I want to lighten things up a little bit. You know, we're dealing with some dark subjects and we got a really dark subject in a bit.

But let's start with something that's going to give everybody a good laugh. Here we go from The Guardian. Twitter sued for disproportionately firing female workers after Musk buyout. The proposed class action lawsuit alleges that after the takeover, 57% of women were laid off compared with 47% of men. The reason why I say that's funny is because there's that meme where Elon Musk, he did this. He sent an email saying, will you make the pledge to work hard, yes or no? If no, you will be laid off and get three month severance. And then this data comes out where they're like 57 percent of the people who got laid off were women.

So first, I understand Elon Musk did lay off a bunch of people immediately without question. But then he came back with that. Who wants to work hard and who doesn't? So you've got a few things here is it that 10 uh proportionally more women were like i would not want to work hard there's an article from the washington post that says elon musk's vision of working late hours at the cost of sleep family and friends is retrograde and it was like it's like written by a woman and i'm just kind of like, you know, the sound, the idea of working 16 hours a day

at the cost of all of those things is appealing to me. Is there something where there's like a difference between men and women on this one? We know that women tend to be subject oriented. Men tend to be object oriented. Is that the cause of this? Or is there just a simple, there were more women working in comms

and more comms people got fired. there were more women working in comms and more comms people got fired there were more men working in engineering so less of them got fired or something like that it's that meme you know what i mean where uh before twitter it's all women and then after it's all men or do you guys think elon sexist what do you think i i don't have a funny answer to it, but I would probably just say that 57% or a good percentage maybe cared about that they had that disamplification or disenhancement. They were taking away visibility from people that they didn't agree with,

and they simply were just saying, okay, if Elon's going to take over, and if he's not going to censor these beliefs that we don't agree with, I don't want to work for that company. And it's not that big of a margin. What is it? 57%? I mean, how do you quantify that? Especially when it's, you know, a few hundred people? What was that? A few thousand people? Well, I mean, here's the issue, too. There were more men working for the company than women. So this means more men got fired than women. But when you compare only men to men and women to women, then the percentages make it seem like more women got fired. Yeah, this feels like it's just a frivolous lawsuit meant to entangle Elon Musk and to stop

him from doing other things and to drain away his resources. That's just my initial reaction to this. I could be wrong, but I highly doubt a lot of the decisions were based off sexist decisions by elon musk uh to me there's no evidence showing that at all and it's a ridiculous claim in my opinion yeah i find um i don't know there's a tendency for men to be more obsessed with science tech and things and women to be more obsessed with people and like things like that especially when it comes to coding especially when it comes to developing uh sitting in a building for 16 hours without a shower and stinking, I'm okay with it. I do that almost every day.

In fact, I like it. But most women I know like to be clean, especially because they need to be clean for health reasons, cleaner than men. Well, it's not just that. But predominantly, men like to, of course, be engineers, like to build and develop. Women like to organize. Women like to keep things orderly. Not always, but more generally speaking, that's the case here. And when we look at the jobs at Twitter, they're going to be not doing what they did before. They're going to be developing essentially what is the next WeChat here in the United States and encompassing everyday life, which is going to include a lot of coding, a lot of hard engineering work in order to develop the app of everything, the X app, as Elon Musk has called

it. So that's not going to attract a lot of people who aren't going to be able to tell people what to say and what to think and to shadow ban them because they can't do that anymore. I think there was a lot of administrative bloat at Twitter, a bunch of middle management, and maybe there were more women in middle management. Maybe there were more guys. I mean, we saw the videos. They're like, oh, yeah, we got free wine. I know. We're going to go on the roof and we're going to hang out. Elon came in and was like, no, if you ever stop that right now.

And then, obviously. This is so retrograde. I want wine and Legos. Yeah. I guess it depends on what you want to do with your tech company. But I find you want about 90% of your employees to be programmers. I don't know. Maybe that's a little off base.

I have only run one tech company. I didn't really run it myself. I helped run it. Remember, what was remember what was it poly pocket you remember that thing yeah what was the dude version max mighty max mighty max was that what it was i was all about it yeah and it was like you had a little thing you'd open it and you're the little guy and then the girl version was the poly pocket you know maybe i'll throw i'll throw a bone to the left people millennials were socialized very, very differently. Young women play with different toys than young boys,

and that leads them to be very different when they're older. That's going to have an impact on how people want to work in their jobs, the way they're raised. I will say outright. So at the very least, that could be the case. I'll also say one of the tricks that the left uses is they turn the obvious and overt differences between men and women into racism, misogyny, discrimination, etc. Or I should say in this instance, misogyny turned into sexism. If women need more sick days than men for, you know, health reasons, you will then see if you look at i'd be willing i'd be willing to bet

but i could be wrong and i'm interested to see do women take off more sick leave than men what do you guys think more time i would imagine just if if raising families is involved but that's not super common no no sick sick leave just take days getting sick and having a hard time working you think men are women more likely to i don't know for sure, but my personal view is like, I bet women would because women have health issues and I got no issue with that. But imagine if I then went into the directory and said, for some reason, all of these women are abusing the healthcare system. Certainly it's what's going on, right? Men and women are different. The genders are bimodal.

That means there's two big bell curves. They overlap greatly, but there are some differences. If this means that women overwhelmingly work in comms and men overwhelmingly work in engineering, then when the layoffs come and they say we're laying off communications and it disproportionately affects women,

they then ignore that fact of the differences between men and women and say, ah, the fact that he fired more women proves that he's a sexist and it's illegal discrimination. But in reality, you don't need a huge bloated comms unit in a tech company. I don't think so. They are obviously, I guess when you get to the level that Twitter's at, you become a bit more of a communications department than you are when you're a startup tech platform because the government wants to come talk to people and have you have departments of people that are doing communications and stuff. So maybe I could see that changing, but you know, for the benefit of the good of the future of the network, I don't think you need massive comms. I was right. According to the department of labor, women take around 32 days,

I think, uh, per year and men take 25. Huh? They got ovaries? Yeah. Well, quite frankly, yeah. Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel

like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today.

You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly if you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you please contact connex ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge betmgm operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario from the very people that have been censoring us and there was no rationale behind it, there was no policy that actually, you know, said that's what we were doing.

I have trouble believing the very people that were lying about the reasons why we were censored in the first place that they are being discriminated against to begin with. And quite frankly, I mean, I don't I don't think I have sympathy for them. You know, it's kind of like when CNN is laying off people. Certainly, I don't want anybody to be out of a job and not be able to provide for their family. But it's like if you've been maligning us and doing horrible things to us, I'm not sure I have sympathy for you when you are losing your job i got i got more data in terms of general leave just not even sick women take uh what is it 34 days versus men's 21 days that's interesting twice as much and it says primarily they take longer leaves for a new

child women take 54 days versus men taking 18 but i totally get it like i don't i don't expect a guy to take 54 days he didn't birth this child you know i think women would i think women deserve that time off i think men should get a good amount of time off to be with their kids don't get me wrong but i mean that's just biological differences it's going to manifest in various ways they want more time off what if elon went in and said fire anybody who took more than 30 days off this year? He didn't say anything about women, but that would get rid of more women than men, right? Are these full-time employees? I see down here at the bottom, it says 3,700. Are these full-time employees? Are these people who are working one day a week? I'd be curious to see those numbers.

I don't know if they have them but i think a lot of people were considered full-time but we're remoting in and we're like you know just doing bare minimum and that's part of elon's issue with it it blows my mind to think that if an owner of a company comes in it's like someone's doing a patch up like you're doing a bad job i've given you some warnings you're fired and they're like you're firing me because i'm white i'm like no i'm firing you because you suck get out no it's because i'm tall you're firing me because i'm white i'm like no i'm firing you because you suck get out no it's because i'm tall you're firing me because i'm a woman because i'm black like dude you suck at your job get out end the story why do you get to pick social politics and bring that into it i don't get it i don't get it

well the woke people live in this world where everything is based on race or identity it's instead of looking at you know instead of looking at the data and being like hmm i wonder i wonder why more women take time off nope nope it's it's it's discrimination you know i bet there are situations where it's not a cop-out so i shouldn't speak for all time but there are many many times when i think the best the worst people will get fired and it has nothing to do with your identity it's purely because of your ability or or because you just your position isn't needed anymore you know you got to be so good that And it has nothing to do with your identity. It's purely because of your ability. Or because your position isn't needed anymore.

You know, you got to be so good that the company needs you. You got to make your position so valuable that the company can't run without it. I mean, that's one way to do it. The left wants companies to keep on bad employees because of the employee's identity. That just doesn't work. Looks good on paper. Yeah, well, you know, and then you get bridges that collapse and stuff like that. You should see the laws that they have in California when it comes to boards and their regulations there, which is, again, absolutely insane.

But, you know, there's a lot of data suggesting that men do work more days in a year on average than women do. Does this have an effect here? Maybe, I think so. I think this cycle has happened a lot in history. And what I don't want to happen is for it to become where people resent, let's pick women, for instance, or some sort of class of human, a female, white, black, you know, whatever.

That people, because the companies start to suffer because they're forced to have a certain amount of women and a certain amount of men, and maybe it doesn't matter their qualifications, that people will start to resent those people those underqualified people that got the position on identity and then if the system really falls apart there's going to be massive amounts of resentment and then you'll start over with this really like extreme system where people are like women are the women people have actually joked about repealing the 19th

amendment because they're so frustrated with this stuff wait wait wait what do you mean joked yeah exactly it's not if some people haven't even joked they just say it's a might maybe we should strip women's right to vote because they're so pissed off well women are being forced in positions they're not qualified for for identity purposes what what is a woman ian good question tim good so i tweeted that um now that we know that biological sex isn't real we should repeal the 19th amendment because it's become redundant right i'm telling you well why would you need it if biological sex isn't real the 19th amendment specifically says the right to vote shall not be uh you know abridged or whatever uh whatever the word is uh so you can't it says sex specifically says sex that the right to vote

will not be stopped because of your sex but if the left's position is that biological sex doesn't exist anymore, well, then we don't need the 19th Amendment. Everybody agrees. No, seriously. If they if so, that's the first question I have. You go to you go to conservatives like, you know, Milo or whatever. He says outright, you know, repeal the 19th. Lydia, she says repeal the 19th. And it's like, OK, well, you know, like I personally don't agree with that. But I'm also not somebody who thinks biological sex doesn't exist. I think it does. So then, fine. Here's my pitch to Milo and to Lydia.

Go to leftists and say, is biological sex a real thing? When they say no, be like, okay, would you like to sign this petition to repeal the 19th Amendment, which specifically grants voting rights based on sex? That's transphobic, isn't it? Okay, great. Then when they sign it, there you go. Getitions get your your your two third two thirds of states article five convention or whatever and then you can repeal the 19th but the reality is men and women are different they have women have ovaries genetically sexually are different creations you know maybe gender is a conversation it's worth having that people have different you know gender

identities whatever but biological sex is very real. It's very real. We were all born of a woman. As far as I know, all of us here probably were. You guys? I was. Had a mom and a dad, sperm and an egg, female and a male. They worked together. You sound like a bigot.

How dare you express these opinions? I mean, I have to disavow immediately. Scott, do you disavow, Ian? Absolutely. Thank you. Not. Yes. avow immediately um scott do you disavow ian absolutely thank you not yes um okay good i think a lot of times personalities get labeled as gender identities too and it's just like people are different men and women are different people are different we all come from different backgrounds different cultures and there's too often people are trying to put you in a little box. Say, this is what you are. And it's just like, yo, be an individual, you know?

Dude, that's awesome. Thinking of it as a personality trait difference instead of a gender difference. It doesn't have to be gender just because your personality feels like something. Yeah, that's a good point. Well, it's just so ironic, you know, because they're looking for these immutable characteristics as diversity, but they won't include diversity of thought, of ideology, of religion. That's too much. That's too much. We've got to keep it superficial here, you know. So they took the video down.

It was a debate between Jordan Peterson and this professor. The video is now unavailable, but the quote was basically, it's not correct that there is such a thing as biological sex. He said, I'm a historian of medicine, I can break that down in great detail, but for the sake of time, I won't. And it was Jordan Peterson

having a debate on gender. And this is 2016. If that's the position they want to take, I mean, man, this is six years ago. Six years ago. This is a long long time that means a 12 year old who was not paying attention to politics back then is voting now that's crazy and they don't think that biological sex exists all right well then the 19th amendment doesn't need to exist either i think it's okay that biological sex exists it's so weird when people conflate sex and gender too i don't like that the sex thing is just blatantly real.

Sex is real. Like male and man and women are, are both here together. I got to say though, I, I don't see how they argue themselves away from that one. The 19th amendment explicitly says on the basis of sex, if they don't think it exists,

then what is the basis for the 19th amendment? Simply put, ask them, ask your lefty friends calmly. And do you think we should have a 19th amendment simply put ask them ask your lefty friends calmly and do you think we should have a 19th amendment yeah the one that you know what that does it affirms in the constitution that biological sex is real that that's transphobic right well then we got to get rid of it it doesn't necessarily affirm because there could be zero women and the 19th amendment could still be there it just wouldn't be affecting anyone so what they see that could be a situation where they're like hey there are no sexes so let's repeal the

redundancy and then all of a sudden they're like actually there are sexes you guys are gonna have to work to get an amendment in the constitution to get to vote again like no no no no everyone's able to vote now that's hey look if they want to remove their own right to vote then people can vote away their right to vote i guess it's their view not mine hey let's move on to the next story yes you guys ready to go on some dark territory yeah man did you guys see that commercial that was glorifying euthanasia where the woman was like i can choose to die and then like they're all dancing around her or whatever she didn't want to die she wanted to live but they wouldn't give her the care she needed so she could live so she opted to die instead. Because the state is California.

I'm sorry, this is Canada. I don't mean like the United States. I mean, like the government state said, well, we can't give you the adequate health care you need, but we can't kill you. And she said, fine. From the National Post, woman featured in pro-euthanasia commercial wanted to live, say friends. Quote, I feel like I'm falling through the cracks. So if I'm not able to access health care, am I then able to access death care? Hatch said in a CTV interview. So when they did the commercial showing this woman about how she

wanted to die because she had a connective tissue disorder, what they omitted from that was that she had given interviews and that her friends had pleaded to give her the care she needed because she didn't want to die. Now in Canada, they're currently having a debate over whether or not to extend euthanasia to children. So, you know, this morning when I see the Project Veritas stuff, I'm like, ugh.

I'm going to put on some 90s commercials. I'm going to do it tomorrow, too. Just zone out and be like, ah, yeah, cheeseburgers for 50 cents. What do you guys think about assisted suicide? What do you think, Scott? Well, in regards to the story, I just think it's disgusting that it's cheaper to kill someone than to keep them alive. And I think that's what it comes down to, money. And, you know, we've seen that from everything from pharmaceuticals, you know, the trying to get rid of competition, because if it means that there's a cheaper solution to keep somebody alive, affects somebody's pocketbooks, they're willing to try to destroy that competition, which is going to make people pay more in order to stay alive.

I just think it's altogether disgusting. It's like the government has an invested interest in killing people and depopulating them and making sure that they no longer exist it's like almost everything they do and they incentivize goes down this one very dark path uh the daily caller has a very interesting article that's headlined euthanasia is now a leading cause of death in canada yeah three three percent 3% of all deaths in Canada were people being killed by the state. At what point is it genocide? That's a good question.

That's a question that I think a lot of people should be asking themselves. The world is just upside down. You know, I recently had a health scare. Very ill, went to the hospital. And because I've been frugal, I recently had a health scare, very ill, went to the hospital. And because I've been frugal, because I've saved every cent, because I'm with mom and dad, I'm in a 2005 Honda Civic, I'm not living the lap of luxury. And because that I haven't spent every cent, I'm actually being penalized for that, where if my bank account said

$0, then I would be getting better health care than being a responsible physical citizen. And it's just every aspect of our society, we seem to reward irresponsibility and we reward not having accountability and transparency. Unemployment is exactly that. They'll say, don't get a job or you'll lose your free money. So don't get a job. As soon as you get a job, you lose your unemployment check. So there's no incentive. Yeah.

And then you're watching and you're saying, oh, I can't make this much money because then I won't receive government assistance. And there's no incentive to better your life. Why should I? I'm going to be taken care of. Tribal life used to be much more hard. I mean, if you couldn't walk, they leave you on the ground as they all have to travel on to find food somewhere else. You can't keep up. Sorry, Grandpa.

Or whatever. Maybe they throw you in the back of a wagon, but if you're just going to eat lettuce and just waste the tribe's food and not contribute at some point, like harsh reality takes over. But now we're in a society where like people are severely obese, severely unhealthy, depressed, not even contributing to society because they're so depressed.

And they're still like trying to support those people and have those people breed and like make more of that, it feels like. No, they're doing the opposite of that. They're trying to make sure that they don't breed, that they don't have families, that they don't reproduce, that they get eliminated and destroyed. But people get money for having more kids.

No, they don't. They'll get more Social Security and stuff or more government payments per kid. It depends on what jurisdiction you're in. It depends on what state you're in. And it's just enough to keep you floating, but never enough to prosper. Just to keep you dependent

on the government. But, I mean, that's what they want. They want a UBI. And in some senses, in some jurisdictions, they already have that. But what they're doing in Canada seems absolutely draconian. Seems absolutely, I would even go as far as to say, evil. There's a new bill c7 that wants

to allow minors to be able to be euthanized by state doctors without the consent of their parents that's literally the laws that they're trying to pass there and they're they're ruling that mentally ill minors are legally allowed to uh be you know euthanized against the will of their parents. So, especially with mental health being so, just incredibly negative. I want you guys to imagine something. You know, we've seen this stuff with Florida, with the parental rights and education.

Imagine it's either you or someone you know or just a third party. Kid doesn't come home from school. Parents get worried. 14-year-old teenage girl or something. So they call the police. They call the school. The school says, we don't have anything to tell you.

We're sorry. They say, what? What's going on? Well, we don't know. They call the police. The police are like, okay, we'll look into it. The next day, someone from from the school from the administration with the police show up knocking the door and say we didn't want to tell you this yesterday

because it's none of your business but yesterday your child opted for medical assistance in dying and we assisted your child in going to the doctor receiving a device which killed them which assisted them in their own death. You can go claim the body. I mean, talk, I know you've said like the violence of like watching kids get sterilized against their parents' will, watching a kid get killed against their parents, like without their parents,

I mean, that's complete topsy-turvy, insane world. If you, look, I know this is Canada, but with the Veritas stuff we saw last night was probably that it was probably one of the most shocking things i have ever heard it's bad enough we see these books like we got genderqueer sent on the table ian bought it and you look at the images in this and you're like amazon says this book is for adults only but they're giving it to grade school kids and putting it in their library then you you hear from Veritas, a guy bragging about how he's got adult objects for children with explanations of how to spit on them to insert them and things like that. And as soon

as I heard that, I said, you can come to me with any political theory, political story. But if you don't think that we're headed towards some kind of civil conflict, then I would just say you're wrong. It's one thing when Joe Biden weaponizes the DOJ. Sure, it's overtly political. But when you hear a story like what came out of Veritas or when you hear these stories about what's going on in Canada, they want to euthanize children without alerting the parents. Quite literally, the state, the government of Canada is proposing they're debating whether or not they can take your child without telling you and kill them what's the name of that bill again b bill c7 kill your kid in a way the government wants in canada wants to kill your child i'm open

i know sorry just i know canada's not the united states but i'm saying we are dangerously close to that line where where people are just going to say, nope. I'm open to, like, assisted suicide. I always have kind of been like, if someone wants to kill themselves, they're going to do it. I mean, maybe not. Maybe not. People have been brought back from the edge. But my buddy hung himself during COVID.

You know, it wrecked me. But whatever. It's still wrecking me right now. But I don't think anyone could have stopped him he wanted he was he was finished and uh but the kid to do it to a kid especially someone on a pharmaceutical drug that's already depressed because of the drug do you know about the documentary on the golden gate bridge we've talked about it before uh yeah yeah every single person who survived jumping off the golden gate bridge said as soon as they jumped they regretted jumping and they realized that all of their

problems in life could have been solved except having just jumped off the Golden Gate Bridge. They were happy to be alive. Most people who get past the depression and suicide are happy to be alive. It is temporary. It can be, you can be saved. The government, they said this in 2017, they could save $140 million by killing people instead of treating them. This is the nightmare scenario of government health care. The system has to be paid for somehow. The system gets strained. People aren't getting, there's long lines, there's complaints.

People start protesting and they say, okay, we need to figure out how to free up the system i got it we just kill people that's what canada is doing to save money and treat people they will kill those this is like it's it's it's it's governmental darwinism well think about or eugenics or democide another way of you it. Sorry, go ahead. No, just think about COVID. You know, we had doctors who were saying that we shouldn't be treating patients who were suffering from COVID because they didn't make the choice to get the vaccine. And, you know, similar to what we saw with the censorship from twitter i think it's really no different who is in control is going to be deciding who gets benefited from the government and same for what we were talking about earlier with the britney decision the marine wasn't chosen the american loving freedom fighting marine was discarded over

the gay black woman basketball player because it was decided by the government that that person was more important than the other person and that's exactly what we would see from government decided health care. You know, just think about a young person versus an old person. If they made the decision, why would they choose to give the kidney to the older person? Because they would probably say, oh, they've got less life to live. They've got less value. They already did that here in the United States when it came to deciding who's going to get care based on their skin color. In Houston, people were denied life-saving treatment because they weren't black, because they weren't in the stereotype. They weren't a minority, according to the group.

And they were saying, well, too bad. You're a young male and you can't get this treatment, which is absolutely insane. This is why I'm going to open a hotel. Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. which is absolutely insane. This is 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out.

Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. That's going to have four floors and each is a suite. And each is a is a decade the 90s the 80s the 70s and the 60s and you'll go in like the 90s hotel and everything's from the 90s you turn the tv on it's good old 90s tv and you can forget about all of the insanity just plug into

this this fake world the windows will have tvs instead of windows so it's not real steak no it is it will be real steak it tastes real but it's not real pizza box from the 90s from pizza hut and the pizza hut guy shows up with a smile on his face 30 minutes or it's free and he hands you a little booket thing for your kid i'm making a matrix reference you know cypher was like why would you go back into the real world when you can live in the matrix and taste this delicious steak and they're like because it's not real in the matrix you're just you know but you know, maybe. And then what we'll do is we'll actually,

we'll build a big complex on like 50 acres and we'll create a 90s city just so that like, think about it, you know, only landlines, no cell phones. Yeah. No, no, no.

Well, I mean, your phone will work because you're there, but it'll be like a theme park and you'll go in and everything's 90s. It'll be like walking into a 90s downtown. There'll be like a TV store. There'll be cassette tapes, people riding bikes all over the place silver diners everywhere silver diners you know you see friends is on tv and then it can just wash away all of the troubles all of the troubles there's no ubers they're just bikes you have to

bike around everywhere get some exercise the 90s i thought were really depressing they were cool but it was like because it was depressing people made the best of it in the early 90s, I thought were really depressing. They were cool, but it was like, because it was depressing, people made the best of it. In the early 90s, Kurt Cobain was horribly depressed. But Ian, just imagine, you're walking down the street, there's a guy, and then he waves to you, and then all of a sudden, he's carrying a boombox on his shoulder, and then you hear the radio DJ say, and now, the big hit, Inside Out, by Eve Six, sweeping the nation, because people carry boom boxes on their shoulders

and that at least that's what TV tells me and then you just you won't remember any of the troubles outside of this theme park and the euthanasia and all that stuff

okay I'm kidding but we gotta go to Super Chats so if you haven't already would you kindly smash that like button subscribe to this channel share the show with your friends become a member

at TimCast.com we're gonna have a membersonly show coming up for you. Uncensored. Not censored. Uncensored. But let's read. Jay Marie says, Ian, you are almost there, brother.

Your desire to find the truth will lead you in a proper direction. My latest is articulating the points you have been saying lately. It's three minutes and called Change the World. Jay Marie Thesis Podcast. Dude, I made a video called Change the World that was about three minutes, too. In 2007. That proves it. changing we are changing the world it was something like that it's on youtube black oh yeah go on i think i figured out i kept saying that if you make me copyright you if you don't believe in if you don't believe in god you're not jewish i was saying that

a couple like last week i'm starting to wonder and i'm thinking about it i'm doing some research on the history of israel and i think what happened is the judaism comes from judah the son of jacob jacob was known as israel god called him israel after he wrestled with an angel and so like they're really israeli like the culture is israeli comes from jacob jake tribe of jacob and then the the but the problem is then the belief in god and the understanding all kind of infuses into the culture and becomes like their constitution. So it's tough to separate. I have a potential solution for you.

Talk to a rabbi. Yeah, multiple rabbis. I'm so down. And again, Bryson Gray last night, fantastic conversation. Let's bring back Hershey. Oh, yeah, yeah. Heshey. Heshey.

Heshey Tischler, my man. Let's bring him on. Love to. All right, here we go. Black Lion Grunt says, Tim, in your 90s hotel, you must have a Nintendo 64 with GoldenEye, Mario Kart 64, Star Fox,

and Perfect Dark. And on one of the TV channels, the Frieza saga of Dragon Ball Z. You know it. I have, I already have an N64 with all those games. But someone sent me this website.

It's like my90stv.com. Was that what it was? Yeah. Something like that. Let me see if I still have it. And I turned it on and it was Dragon Warrior. The anime was on one of the channels.

And it's like, I think Akira Toriyama is the guy who does the art for that. My 90s TV. It's 90s, my90stv.com. And it's like you turn the TV on, and it plays shows. Oh, man. That's a commercial for Friends. It's like Ross is going to ask out Rachel or something. I don't know.

I don't watch Friends. All right. Seth Weathers says, I didn't pay Scott to wear that shirt, but I would have. Ballot Harvest 2024. Seth Weathers. He did.

He sent it to me. Ballot Harvesting 2024. What do we got? Red Wing. Oh, sorry. I would just think that'd be very popular. You know, at your 90s hotel, you have like a Rugrats room. You have like a Mario Party room.

I think, really, that would be a moneymaker. Well, the idea is like, it's an apartment that looks like from the 90s. You turn the TV on and it's playing a bunch of channels, like a legitimate full channel guide of 90s shows, back-to-back, the news, everything's at 5 o'clock. The 5 o'clock news comes on. On the fridge will be like a Pizza Hut thing. When you call it, it just goes to our guys, but then they'll make a pizza for you, put it in the old-school pizza box, and bring it with like RC or whatever. Dude, if we're talking about four-player Goldeneye, man,

Rocket Launcher's in the temple. That's right. Or Proximity Mine's in the complex. I think we'll have a bunch of like 50-year-old dudes being like, oh, man, I remember this back in the day. It's so slow when I play it now. Have you guys played Goldeneye? Did you ever play Goldeneye back in the day i think we'll have a bunch of like 50 year old dudes being like oh man i remember this back in the day it's so slow when i play it now have you guys played golden eye did you ever play golden eye back in the day oh yeah it was so fat it was so awesome now it's real slow like everything moves half speed and they just people keep thinking faster and faster you go in the vents and you plant the mines so when they spawn they instantly die all right

red wing blackbird says elon musk didn't vince foster himself i wonder what i wonder what that one means i wonder what uh what that one means on that that person is in the know they know what's going on mimic says so libs of tiktok was set to not safe for work for sharing things happening in schools full of children so it's not safe for work but totally fine for kids these people make me want to throw up yeah okay rilo says hey tim i pray you're all right man could get a nightly news host only around for one show opener 1950 style dry reporting of national news someone separate from opinion content i get my news here um yeah we could we're we're we're uh sort of inadvertently building out a 24-hour news channel

because uh we you know we do this show every night eight to ten but then we started you know pop culture crisis brett and mary hosting it and they do three to five i believe and now we're doing um gamer maids at uh i think what is that five to seven or something like that i think so i'm not 100 sure uh-huh they chose that name and i had to say it that way on purpose gamer comma maids not not not gamer maids i love it that's the name they wanted i don't know whatever theme is optional and everyone laughed when they heard it but It took me a second, but it's awesome. Yeah. It's because they're gamers and they're maids, like maidens or something, I guess.

So, gamer maids. Maybe gamer maidens might be better. Gamer maidens. This sounds better. Gamer maidens. But is a mermaid in like a lady mermaid or something? I don't know. All right. Okay. like a lady mermaid or something i don't know all right okay um kat osterhout says tim last night in the after show you in and surge gave the most beautifully beautifully balanced scientific

explanations for evolution without excluding the divine for the equation thanks for the deep dive yeah basically last night we had this really long conversation with bryson gray and i'll just try and summarize i think the position that we all had was i believe in god there is a there there is a system in place where things are happening and the mechanism by which god created the universe we only understand a tiny bit of but the formation of the universe atoms particles that's all the structure created by god and and and you you watch it, you know, happen, I guess. At least like we watch it happen in the tiniest bit. So, you know, Bryson was saying

he didn't believe in evolution. He thought that none of this could be random. But my view is like, it's not random. It's God's plan. It's like everything is happening in this way that leads to this conclusion on purpose. Fibonacci sequence, you see it in nature a lot, like this chirality of imbalance of nature where at some point in the growth process, something will just create a differential. Someone left a great comment on timcast.com on the video about chirality. And I think when he was saying like,

why does it become a tree? He was more, maybe he really wanted to know how does it become a tree? And that's a question of like, how is it happening? Well, I don't know if any of us can really answer that. Alright, here's a good one. Eric Miller says, Tim, you and Luke pushed fake news. Y'all said Bryson Gray was the third rapper on IRL,

but you've had Zuby, Rucka Rucka, Ali, and I've heard Alex Stein, Primetime99 has some bars as well. I demand a retracto alpaca immediately. Well, they're not really rappers now. I mean, they're more like commentators, social media personalities. No, no, no.

But the other people are known just for being rappers, right? Zuby's known for breaking the woman's world record. Well, Zuby was doing rap well before any of that. So just because you heard of him from something else, that's a takeaway. Of course. He doesn't fit in a box. He's an everyman. Yeah, and he's got a bunch of songs.

He did a song with, didn't he work with Bryson Gray? And he's on Spotify. So Rucka Rucka Ali, also Fairpoint. But we did say this in the show. We did correct and said, oh yeah, we were wrong about that. So, and it's not a retracto alpaca. That's a, that's a Veritas thing. We have correcto, which is the, it is the legally distinct version of the alppaca and correcto is when we make a mistake we pull out correcto the alpaca to admit it whereas with james o'keefe when he forces someone else to correct their mistake retracto comes out to gloat yeah ours is derivative and a total knockoff that's the gag there's a there's an alpaca farm out here and they sell these little things you can see it's behind scott yeah okay oh some of these taking back toxic says libs of tiktok can sue twitter and then elon can

fire the sip team for cause and terminate their golden parachutes and pay out damages from that but didn't he fire him already you know fire these guys maybe he didn't imagine Magic Noir was talking about how there's some like British intelligence guys working at Twitter or something like that. We got to get him on the show. Magic? Yeah, he has yet to be on IRL, I think. Has he been on once? Didn't we have him on recently? He was at the event with us at Mines.

I don't think, I haven't seen him lately. But Magic, I love, I mean, he's one of my great, I think of him as a great friend. I've only met him a couple times or once, i love him he's just so insightful i could have sworn we had him on but do we not have him on yeah i think we did we did but i want him on again i have a lot of a lot of people on the show like four or five hundred people or something yeah crazy a lot of people come through these doors talent 86 says so do we start a Tim Pool was right jar? No. It's like, I don't know, man. It's a coin toss over here.

Mostly, I'll put it this way. Here's what I say. You know what we get right? We get right the contemporary news. When the Covington kid thing happens, we don't just pile on and jump on the crowd of what was wrong. We say, hold on there a minute, and we try our best to get it right. That also means people are going to call me a milquetoast fence-sitter for not outright just saying this is what happened because I would prefer not to unless I know for sure. So sometimes we get things right, predictions.

Sometimes we get things wrong. But usually when we're reading the news, we heavily fact-check and double-check sources. So we have a tendency on current events to get it right. Predictions are something totally different. No one is always right. Yeah, just Alex Jones. All the time. No, no, no. Absolutely not. No, no. You mean there aren't

fifth-dimensional aliens who are trying to, you know... There's more likelihood that there probably is. I was just talking about his Julian Assange comments before. Oh, really? What, he was opposed to Assange or something? Yeah. Oh, wow. Okay.

What do we got here? NotTheBomb says, HB 5855 Illinois is trying to make felons out of people owning assault weapons. Mags greater than 10 rounds and create registry. Praying GOA saves us. GOA? What is that? I have no idea. I don't know gun owners of america oh okay all right well

there you go that's right well then let's uh read some more because of the moon says first time listener long time super chatter really with the religious conversation yesterday a great guest would be ken ham he's president of answers in genesis and the ark museum in kentucky his lectures speeches are scientific it's really cool stuff i'm totally down for conversations like that i love i love um philosophical questions um conversations trying to understand the universe trying to understand faith and religion that's that's that's the most important stuff to me to be completely honest you know i was last night i was looking at the full moon speaking of spirit and i took my glasses off and it was all blurry and i could see the moon and i

started to see the flower of life in the moon do you know the flower of life it's like this geometric pattern similar to that um but it was at first it was just five it looked like a star in it i was like well i see the star of david with a big circle in the middle it looked like a hand with an eye in it i was was seeing these amazing shapes in the light. How much drugs were you on? I was going to say he was completely sober during this moment. What was that story about like the wolf in the sky talking to you or something? That's disturbing.

I was meditating on my roof and I was reaching out, looking out into space and like, if there's life out there, I'm going to drop my magnetic field and let it experience me and connect with me. And then I felt this wolf man hominid creature, like a wolf that had got a hold of psilocybin and it sensed me and it knew where I was. And I was like, did I just reveal our location to some other species that wants to consume human flesh? Felt like it. And I was like, well, that's dangerous. That's dangerous. Well, all right.

Moral of the story, do not meditate. No, no, no, no. Fair point. Don't drop your magnetic shields while beckoning out to the universe without proper guidance. It's a chance to be kind. Yeah, you need to be ready to be kind to that force

because it's probably like a Klingon force. It will think we're an enemy and treat us like an enemy unless we can befriend it people in the chat think that ian's high but he's not no it's like a ouija board you open the door if you on that roof didn't close the magnetic shield then it's still open i closed it okay after i felt that i was like oh all right we blame you david c yeah david c cronk senior says scott i'm very proud of your work you're a role model for today's youth here's a suggestion ballot harvesting at churches and gun ranges oh i'm all over it baby and i have to give a shout out to our east valley

republican women because they have this office in the Valley, you know, right outside of the desert. And they apparently did tens of thousands of ballots that they had Republicans come to the Republican office and ballot harvest right there. So, yeah, let's do it at churches. Let's do it at gun shops, gun shows. Brilliant. Joe says, Tim and crew, this story has already been told in the Bible.

We are in a spiritual battle against the spirit of the age. We've become a godless nation. It's revival or bust. Call it what it is. Evil. Call it what it is. Evil. Then mock it relentlessly.

Yeah, there's a lot of evil, man. I'm concerned that we don't overcompensate against what we think is evil. Because if you get too extreme with what you think is good it can become another form of evil see mac says oath breakers cops broke oath to their community that's right maybe i'll put that on the billboard beware dirty cops aka oath breakers i think just beware dirty cops with their picture is probably sufficient. You know, they're dirty cops, man. You're a dirty cop. All right. Midas says the time of blatantly supporting cops is over.

So many are just extensions of a draconian elite. No longer are they members of the community. Instead of assuming the best and defending them, let's hold them accountable. Here's my thing. I'm not going to play a stupid game where i'm like you know yelling out a cab or anything like that because i have cops that are that help me to the best of their abilities it's just that their abilities are limited and so uh these cops are cool there are bad cops a lot of them and the system in big cities is completely broken and

in a place like fredericksburg where you, it's just the latest iteration of the story. The other story we saw was the blind guy in Florida. The lady cop was like, what is that? And he's like, it's my walking cane. And then she basically arrests him because he told her to F off. Like, these are dirty cops. And I'm sick of it. And something's got to be done about it. So these police officers that break their oath of the Constitution and spit in the faces of the people who wanted to back the blue need to be reminded that ain't nobody going to be backing you if you trample on those who are actually supporting you.

So, so long as no one actually wants to call them out, the cops are going to be like, I can do whatever I want because conservatives are too stupid to say anything about it. And the left hates me anyway. Do like local cops, if they disagree with these edicts, do they just get together like in private, a bunch of like just of the officers and say, we're going to go to supervisor and just refuse, sir, we're not doing it? I've heard stories of them being like, you can't send me, I won't do that.

And then they just get a different cop to go do it. So they really needed a union of everybody. Well, or they need people to finally be like, hey, we're not going to tolerate this. Well, officers also have discretion and they decide how they're going to be implementing a lot of the things that they're told to implement. It looked like at Gourmel

it was like state police. It looked like local and state. That's a way around unionizing. So there's a clear shot of all their faces, thanks to that video. and i'm going to take screenshots and we're going to put up a billboard uh i'll put them up i'll put them as much as far as i can it's going to be it'll it'll be moderately expensive but it will feel really really good to do if anything if that's all i get out of it is some kind of emotional satisfaction then you know that's good enough for me you know

what else am i going to do complain on the on the internet about it? That works too. Well, I was thinking about it. I was like, what if we just did a segment where it's like we dedicate a week to calling out people doing bad things, be it a politician or... I don't want to just rag on cops for the sake of ragging on cops. That's stupid. In this instance, we have bad cops, but there's a ton of bad politicians. And then I'm like, yeah, but the people who watch this show, they know, right? How do we reach new people?

Yeah, put up a billboard. I'll call up my ad agency and say, like, what have you got in Fredericksburg and the surrounding suburbs? And then we'll put up a bunch of billboards with these cops' faces on it. And then when they go out to eat one day, some guy's going to go, hey, you're that dirty cop I saw on 95. They're going to go, what? Like, yeah, you're the dirty cop. You're a dirty cop. And they're going to be like, why are you calling me that? Because your face

is on billboards all over town because you did something. That'll feel really good. I've always been in the mindset of work with law enforcement because what else do we have? You snitch. When you learn about the Nazis and how they use law enforcement to just annihilate people.

We should have a bonehead of the week award and the person who wins the award gets to be put on the billboard. Right? I mean, that could be something that we could brainstorm together and be like, hey, the worst person this week was...

And then we could have the award and we could give them an actual award. It could be like a dirty sock. Well, we recently acquired a building for the new cafe that we're putting up. It's happening. Remember, I've been talking about wanting to do this coffee house. It's happening. That's why I said we're going to be selling coffee.

We have a coffee brand. Everything's getting set up, but the building's there. I wonder if I could put a big billboard on it. Yeah, you probably can. I don't know about once a week, but once a month. Bonehead of the month. And then just slap their thing up on a know about once a week, but once a month. You know? Bonehead of the month. Yeah. And then just slap their thing up on a big billboard in the middle of town.

There's probably a better creative name that we could think of for this. Dirtbag? Yeah, dirtbag's pretty good. I like that one, too. It's got to be alliterative. If it was a digital billboard, we could do the daily dirtbag. Yeah. That sounds good.

Daily dirtbag. But no, but you need them to be up there longer than a week. So what's a W word that's derisive? Wacko. Wacko? No, but it's got to imply like, I'm not so concerned. Wienerhead. Weird is good.

Wienerhead Wednesday. I'm not concerned about weirdos or wackos. I'm concerned about the corrupt. Dirtbag. Wicked. Scumbag. Wicked. There you go.

That's a good one. The Weekly Wicked Award. Nah, wicked sounds too cool. Yeahumbag, wicked. There you go. That's a good one. The weekly wicked award. Nah, wicked sounds too cool. Yeah, that's true. Weasel. It'd be like, I won. Yeah, Weasley. Weasel award.

It needs to have more oof. The people will figure this out for us. Yeah, I'm not a big fan of dehumanization. The gigantic piece of human crap award. And then it's a steaming crap that we put on their head and billboard. Just big, big billboard. Crap head. Doodoo head.

Dirt bag award. Are people giving suggestions? Weekly wuss is one of them. Tyrant of the week. Yep. Weasels. Weekly weasels. All right.

Vinyl cover 1987 says, Tim, I'm a detective in a major metropolitan area in texas and i'm getting less and less back the blue despite solving on violent crime cases hope luke doesn't hate me ian you're cool rock and roll i don't hate you man but uh you know who is yeah like hates the wrong word loathe is probably better. Who was that? That was a cop in Texas? Yeah, a detective. He's saying it's been rough lately. Sentiment. A lot of people are giving money saying,

do the billboard, do the billboard, do the billboard. It really just depends on, look, I said I want to do it. People are giving me super chats. Just keep in mind, I might not be able to. The billboard agency might be like, no, no, no, we're not going to get involved in this they probably won't because money talks and bs walks they usually just say i'll send it up the chain see what they say and a lot of the billboards on highways and in cities that are just standalone billboards are owned by those companies and they

will take money for basically anything i've been getting a lot of private messages from police officers who are like please don't hate me Essentially saying that I don't hate you guys. If there's a good officer that actually does help the community and does good, you guys are awesome. You guys deserve help. You guys deserve to be complimented. But when an officer does something wrong and abuses their position of power, they deserve to be called out. So I know not to judge, but we got to call a spade a spade here, and the only way to root out the bad people is to call out the bad. So that's what

I'm trying to do here. I don't hate any of you guys. Do you think it would work, right? Do you think that these cops in the Fredericksburg metropolitan area, if we put up like 15 billboards, do you think they would see that and start sweating bullets being like, oh man, I really shouldn't be doing this? Yeah, absolutely absolutely and it would make them you know think twice about their discretion and how they

use their authority over the people and and what they're going to be doing next time because obviously there's no way an average person could look at the situation and be like yeah the cops did the right thing there because they didn't they didn't do the right thing they have no sanctuary with the left none there's not going to be a circumstance where a cop goes to a bunch of leftists and says the right the anti-vaxxers are yelling at me they're going to laugh and be like go cry somewhere else except for j6 right of course they get an award yes but you know good luck going to leftist activists as a cop and being like will you please serve me a cheeseburger the right's mad at me because of covid lockdown stuff they're going to be like screw off you white supremacist well i think

it's similar to i've been listening to people say you know the left uh no i mean excuse me corporations know that the right is always going to have their back right and do tax breaks or whatever or support them and so therefore they pander to the left, because they know they'll always have the support of the right. And it's kind of like the black community, the left knows that the majority of black citizens are going to vote Democratic. And so therefore, they don't really have to do anything to make the black community happy, because they know that the majority of black citizens are going to vote for them regardless. And so the only way to have neutrality or to have police or corporations or politicians actually fight for

us is if we move away from being left or right, but going towards the center, because then everybody is going to have to earn our support. And I think that would actually make society much safer and more equitable i don't want to forget so i literally just texted my uh my ad agent like the ad sales person it's like it's a different company it's not our company it's like the person who does the sales i just literally texted them like you got any inventory in fredericksburg i don't want to forget because i think we have to do it maybe we acknowledge acknowledge an officer that did really well, too. So you're bashing the people that should be bashed and then you're acknowledging. It's hard to do and it's really expensive.

Right. But not a bad idea. My thing is, do we offer a path to redemption first? Like, apologize to this man and say you were wrong. Otherwise, we're going to call you out for being a dirty cop. I think that would be a reasonable way to start. First, see if there's any remorse for what they did. But if they're like, no, I did the right thing.

I didn't do anything wrong. And I'm going to do it again. If in the same situation, yes billboard baby billboard I think probably just to be clean safe and make sure everything's above board you're a bad cop you do something bad I put up a billboard we should create a non-profit yeah you could fundraise

it probably why don't you know what I should do so a lot of people have asked about the fact checking non-profit because it was like two years ago I said we're going to do this thing and everyone's like yeah right and I'm like we're going to do it uh it takes like almost like two and a half years to get certified and get all the paperwork and everything so the the company exists but we're waiting for a non-profit certification because we're trying to get a 501 c3 not a c4 this means it can't be political it's just going to do fact checking it's in the works it exists

the paperwork has been filed it just takes forever It would be great to do the same thing. You know, fundraising to put up billboards to call out people who do bad things. We would take submissions from, you know, the donors like, who do you think is a person of political power who has acted improperly? Send us videos. And there could be videos of cops doing bad things, videos of politicians doing bad things. And then we raise money just to put up billboards the ad agent the ad industry they will love us because billboards are rather ineffective these days and they struggle to sell the inventory because people

are like i can buy on facebook i get it right there on their phone i don't need to be up there but this will get everyone talking about it right and there'll be a lot of media reports and this means the billboard companies are going to are going to have guaranteed sales and they're going to be like whatever brings money into our industry in a dying you know medium so i think that's a that's a good idea all right let's just grab one more all right miguel alvarez says surge did a great job last night in the members only show perfectly explained what many of us were thinking i agree i think he did a much better job than i um But, you know, religious conversations can be frustrating sometimes, but I think they're absolutely awesome. So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like

button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, become a member over at TimCast.com. Head over to TimCast.com right now. Click join us. Sign up. We're gonna have a members only show coming up for you. Should be live around 11 p.m. and it's usually not so family friendly and a little bit spicy. You can follow the show at Timcast IRL on Instagram. We have clips. You can follow me personally at Timcast everywhere and go follow at Timcast News on Twitter because we had a lot. Eliahu, he's our ground reporter at The New New York Times during the strike filming all this stuff. And he routinely goes out and asks real questions of these people. He doesn't do any of the gotcha stuff.

No, none of that phony, make a person look dumb. He actually asked the New York Times Union some legitimate questions about their concerns. You can really learn from this stuff. Plus, we post our stories. Scott, do you want to shout anything out? Yeah, I just wanted to say what I'm going to be working on very briefly for the future. You know, I just came back from Georgia, disappointing results, but you know, that's not going to keep us from moving forward. So here are my goals. For anybody that's more

politically minded, I am working to make sure that we have new leadership at the Republican National Committee. I think six years of losses under our current chairwoman means it's time for change. And that's why I'm endorsing and supporting Harmeet Dhillon for the next RNC chairwoman position. And she's already indicated that one of her first roles would be to hire somebody like me. And of course, I want to look at the stipulations and what would be contingent on my working for such an organization. But that shows understanding that it's important to bring in the grassroots and to not only look at the consulting class or listen to the big donors, but listen to us, listen to the people. It's pure populism,

give the people what they want. And immediately, I'm already working towards going to Louisiana and Kentucky to flip those governorships from blue to red, as well as working on my state of Virginia to make sure that with Governor Glenn Youngkin, if we take the state Senate, if we take the House of Delegates, we're going to be able to pass legislation at the state level to buck against the federal government. Because all these conversations we're having are wonderful, but we need to actually implement those policies into law to affect real change. And I'm also going to be focusing on Jersey. So if anybody's interested in helping, please slide into my DMs in the most wholesome of manner. And you can find me at Scott Pressler, S-C-O-T-T-P-R-E-S-L-E-R. I'm also on True Social, Getter, Telegram, Facebook,

Gab, and Parler. Andy Ngo tweeted something out about a half an hour ago that I have to mention before we go. That's the Twitter's head of the head of Twitter's strategic response team. Guess where he worked immediately before Twitter?

FBI. United States Marine Corps Intelligence. And guess where he worked and guess who he assisted partially during his tenure James Comey the CIA and the FBI and then immediately after leaving those roles

he gets a job at Twitter wow look you want to shout anything out? oh imagine the coincidence that happened there thank you Stuxenhammer for coming on the show i really appreciate that uh my sorry i had to i can't hair you're awesome uh scott that was a great conversation thank you so much for coming on what was your twitter again at scott pressler great thank you so much uh my youtube channel is we are change uh youtube is not showing anyone the video i did today i worked very hard on it i

talked about a lot of the crazy ai stuff a lot of the stuff happening geopolitically check it out youtube.com forward slash we are change and i'll be there talking to you guys in the chat if you don't know the stocks and hammer references sticks hex and hammer 666 the youtuber political i know what that is yes beautiful hair he's supported on some of my work and i'm just glad by the way that i was not on that episode of tim pool because i saw that and it was 666 i was like oh i was like i'm glad i'm not on that one energy in there michael was excited for it yeah that was a wonderful week hey thanks for coming again scott always great to see you man thank you and now whenever i see the moon i'm gonna think of you seeing the flower of life meditating and a wolf spirit and it's just it's gonna do it for me from now on for the rest of

my life open up your field align your chakras you got good posture uh kellen tell me about the evening what's up man um hey scott it was great to meet you it was a great conversation had a lot of fun tonight um you can find everyone watching. You can find me at KellenPDL. I'm mostly active on Twitter. Again, I was filling in for Serge. I don't know if he'll be back tomorrow, but hopefully he will. But yeah, thanks, guys.

We will see you all over at TimCast.com. Thanks for hanging out.