Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #874 KEVIN MCCARTHY REMOVED, GAETZ WINS, McCarthy WILL NOT Run Again w/Lara Trump

Episode Date: October 4, 2023

Tim, Ian, Luke, & Serge join Lara Trump to discuss Kevin McCarthy being removed as Speaker of the House, American's approval of congress continuing to drop dramatically, Trump receiving a gag order over his Truth Social posts, & China continuing to harvest & steal the data of Americans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals if you win.

Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, Today, history was made when the Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, was removed after Matt Gaetz filed a motion to vacate. There were, what was it, 11 defectors, Republicans, who I shouldn't call them defectors, who joined with Democrats and said, Kevin McCarthy, no confidence. You are no longer speaker. We have more breaking news. Kevin McCarthy will not seek the speakership again. Where we go from here, I don't know, but I will

make it very simple for you. In my opinion, obstruction and stagnation in Congress is better than the Republican leadership teaming up with Democrats in defiance of the slim majority that was hard fought in 2022. What's the point of Republicans having won the majority if they're not going to exercise their power over the budget? And in fact, Kevin McCarthy would work secret backroom deals with Democrats to fund war and potentially bring us to World War III. This is going to be a big conversation.

There's a lot here. Plus, Donald Trump, of course, he is still in his hearing, the trial for his fraud lawsuit in New York City, and a judge has gagged him. In fact, there are reports that he's being ordered to remove some of his truth posts about the judge or face jail time. So we're going to talk about all that. Before we do, my friends, head over to TimCast.com. Click TimCast IRL X Miami and come to our event.

If you can, this Friday, tickets have started selling very, very quickly. Of course, as we expected, it's the last week. It's the week of the event on October 6th in Miami at 6 p.m. We are going to have Patrick Bet-David, James O'Keefe, and Matt Gaetz himself. Okay, look, I think it's fair to say there's a strong possibility, considering everything that's going on and the amazing work Matt Gaetz has done. I would not be surprised. I have no reason to say this other than the public news.

Our understanding is Matt Gaetz, he's long been planning on being here. He's been scheduled for a while. He will be here. But I think it's fair to say, considering what's going on in D.C., I wouldn't be surprised if for some reason he couldn't show up. We've talked to him. Everything's good. I also believe that when he shows up, he's going to get a standing ovation. The work he's doing in D.C. is inspirational. It's groundbreaking. And it is some of the most impactful stuff we've seen in this country pushing back against corruption. It is an honor that he will be joining us on Friday in Miami. It's going to be an amazing conversation considering everything we're going to talk about right now. And I hope to see you there. Again, go to TimCast.com,

TimCast IRLX Miami. Also, don't forget to join us. Click join us, become a member, join the Discord, talk with like-minded individuals. And as a member, you'll get access to our uncensored members-only show, which are Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m. We're going to have one of those up for you tonight. It's going to be amazing. And, of course, Friday's show, live in Miami, will also be live for members-only on TimCast.com. That means our typical show will only be happening on TimCast.com. And mainly it's because

we're going to be unleashed. In the event someone yells something or we want to say whatever you want, it's going to be a TimCast members exclusive show

for everybody. So I hope you guys sign up and support our work. Smash the like button. Subscribe to this YouTube channel. Share the show with your friends.

Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Laura Trump. Hello. wanna oh yeah I'll get right in here there you go great to be with you guys there's there's no lack of things to talk about today what I mean what a day what a time to be alive in America quite frankly history being made in some good ways and in some bad ways so it's an honor to be here. Thanks for having me.

Completely agree. Now, I think everybody recognizes your name. Yes. Trump. I guess they do. Do you want to give a brief introduction to your work? Who am I? So my father-in-law, you may have heard of Donald J. Trump.

Married to Eric Trump. We have two children, Luke and Carolina, three dogs, Ben, Charlie, and Tiger. I've been kind of a, I don't even know if you would say a spokesperson, an unofficial spokesperson for a long time for my father-in-law. I tried to talk about the way we're going to save America, and I believe that'll be making sure Donald Trump is the 47th president of the United States. I have a show. It's called The Right View.

It's three days a week. And I recently released a cover of Tom Petty's I Won't Back Down, which folks on the left have loved. So thank you to everybody out there for all the commentary. Cool. Thanks. Right on. Well, thanks for coming. It's going to be amazing. We got Luke Rutkowski hanging out. Hey, guys, do you guys know

what the best form of government is? No government? The least government possible. No government. You ain Ian got it right. I think Laura's got it. No, you got it first. I agree with Laura on this one. The least government possible. And that's why I'm wearing...

No, no, no. I agree with Ian here. No government at all. But that's why I'm wearing a shirt that reads, Be the reason someone stops believing in government. You can get the shirt on thebestpoliticalshirts.com. We're also doing a meetup in real life here for members of LukeUnfiltered.com this October 8th.

And today's a crazy day. I think it's only going to get crazier from here. But I think there definitely has been a major energy shift. And things could go either way from here. But it's absolutely berserk and going to get a lot crazier from here. Ian, how are you? I'm great. Absolutely awesome.

Miami is treating me very well, and I love the weather. Thank you. Mike Cernovich tweeted that out. The energy shifted. Something big. Something's just undulating and moving and changing. It's history. I'm glad you talked about how we can make the country better.

I'm obsessively focused on it. I think a lot of it's in the technology sector, like graphene. We can start pulling carbon dioxide out of the air. Oh, you're starting early. Oh, I don't know anything about that. I'm just talking about the basics, like making sure people can afford their groceries.

We'd like gas at $1.87 again, energy independence, closed border. Unemployment way down. Yeah, like making sure our kids are actually learning the basics in school instead of woke ideology and nonsense. Those to me, I think,

are top of mind. Which takes me to hydrogen fuel. I think we can we'll get into it on the show. Let's talk about the news. Alright everybody, here's the big story. Ladies and gentlemen, from TimCast.com Kevin McCarthy has been removed

as Speaker of the House. McCarthy is the first Speaker of the House to be vacated from his seat in U.S. history. Shout out to Matt Gates. He is doing the Lord's work. I will give you my simple opinion without bearing the lead. In 2022, Republicans won a narrow majority, a slim majority, and Donald Trump was heavily criticized by establishment Republicans and conservatives for tanking them, saying it's his fault that they didn't have the big red wave because Americans didn't like him. I disagree. I think that's not

true. But guess what? That argument makes no sense. As soon as McCarthy gets in, what happens? He starts cutting backroom deals with Biden and with Democrats. What's the purpose of Republicans winning a slim majority if the Speaker of the House is going to cut deals with Democrats instead of his own party? In fact, it's people like Matt Gaetz that help give the Republican Party its majority. So those arguments that Donald Trump is the reason there's no majority, meaningless if you're going to agree that McCarthy should be working deals with Democrats. Because then you may as well just have a Democrat majority. And so this is my argument against individuals like Thomas Massey. I like Thomas Massey. He's a good dude.

Let me play this clip for you of what Massey said in defense of Kevin McCarthy. This is a referendum on this institution. We have tried regular order. Speaker McCarthy has tried regular order. If regular order fails today, if you vacate the speaker, nobody is going to try it again. This institution will fail. I ain't crying about it. Certainly not.

And my understanding is, I've seen reports, Lauren Boebert supported McCarthy, as did Marjorie Taylor Greene. I respect these individuals. I appreciate the work they do in Congress, but I'm with Matt Gaetz on this one. You've got to keep in mind, you're not necessarily supporting the man. You're supporting the office and the function of the office. And maybe what Thomas is saying is that if if and kevin mccarthy has voted out that we won't have a speaker now and we just won't have one and like kevin said

i'm not doing it i'm done other people who who can you even think of that could do it or would do it i trump this guy thomas massey a lot of people like that idea troy nails tweeted that he nominates donald trump to be speaker. Seconded. I'm just some guy on the internet, though. I hope Matt Gaetz seconds it. It doesn't have to be a congress member. It could be anyone.

So I think let's throw Donald Dunkett there. Donald Duck. Let's throw some mystical characters. Let's appoint a dog as the first speaker of the House. And I think the dog probably would do a way better job than all the other speaker of the houses before them. When you when Congress, when the leadership in Congress meets with lobbyists and corporate power in secret to negotiate deals on what's going to be in the federal spending bill and then. Brings out a 5000 page omnibus and tells every member of Congress, just sign it. Otherwise, you're blocking the troops. Otherwise, veterans aren't getting

their benefits. That's blackmail. That is extortion. You are staring down these good people in Congress, people like Matt Gaetz, who are saying, when he came on the show last week, he said, we want to make sure that we get a bill to make sure disabled veterans, veterans, VA benefits are coming out. We don't want them to miss these payments. Right. So this is what they do. They they come to a member of Congress and threaten the vulnerable and the people who have served this country and others and the elderly to force you into funding Lockheed Martin and other big military industrial complex corporations. How is that an institution we care about? Matt Gaetz had a simple proposal.

Propose what you want to fund, and we'll vote on it. That makes a lot of sense. What's the problem? The problem is they know that if they present a bill to fund, say, Lockheed Martin, to fund war, it's going to be debated, and it's going to get stonewalled. There's going to be delays. There's going to be fights, because it's going to get stonewalled. There's going to be delays. There's going to be fights. Because that's the thing American people actually want to fight about. But they know if they

go to you and say, your kids won't get food, the poor people won't get benefits, veterans won't get paid, then what happens? A guy in a wheelchair shows up to your office and says, why is my pay getting cut off? You're obstructing the government. And you try to tell them, we don't want that for you. We're trying to get that funding.

And then Kevin McCarthy actually says when they're moving to remove him, when Matt Gaetz files, hey, if you're trying to remove a guy who kept the government open and got the troops paid, we're in a bad place. It is blackmail for the lobbyists and the multinational corporations. Matt Gaetz did a good thing here. I feel like the American people probably learned a lot today, too, because oftentimes these things, these omnibus bills, they just get passed, like you said, Tim. And people don't really understand. All they know is that the national debt is going up, that we're sending money overseas, that things are tougher here for the American people. So maybe they learned a little bit today and maybe people can can actually start to talk about these things. You're right. It shouldn't just be everyone is forced into this. We should have a robust debate about it. We should be talking about what is actually being spent here and on what. And, you know, I do. I think

overall, this is a positive thing. I feel bad a little bit for Kevin McCarthy, though. He has had a rough go. Man, it was tough for him to get elected in there. I'm sure today wasn't a great day for him. I generally think he's a nice guy, but this was probably a necessity. You know, we were talking about leadership the other day and how there's a lot of stories throughout history of people who don't want to be the executive like George Washington. No, no, I don't want to do it. Well, someone's got to do it. And he's like, OK, fine, I guess I'll do it. And Cincinnati, I think his name was, I think that was, was it Rome?

They had an emergency, said we need someone to take executive authority. I don't want to do it. And they're like, you have to. He took power. He resolved the emergency and then went right back to farming. And we respect that tremendously. Kevin McCarthy should have recognized this immediately when there was the fight over the speakership, that either he was going to have to negotiate and abide by the terms of his negotiations, or he should not do it at all. And he agreed to terms with, what was it, 20 some odd, 21 members of Congress who are saying we want to negotiate these specific terms. Otherwise, we won't support you. One of those terms, my understanding, was not to cut backroom deals with Democrats. If Kevin McCarthy wants to go back on his word and his word is meaningless, then I don't think he's a good guy.

And he should have said immediately, guys, it will be impossible for me to do this deal with you. I'm not going to be speaker. And this never would have happened. You know, as you're talking about all these people who are like, I don't want to be in this position, I'm not the right one. I actually feel like if you go back and look at my father in law for years ago, I mean, we're talking like the 80s, the Oprah interviews, the 90s. He said for so long, I don't want to do it. But if there ever came a time where things got so bad, I felt like I had no other choice.

I would run for president. And amazing to see that he did it, what he did while he was president, the way they fought against him, what is happening now all of it but as you were saying that that's that's the only person that came to my mind because he i don't i mean to see what he's given up and the hell he's gone through man what what is his uh his net worth dropped oh i'm i don't know how much especially significant especially with the judge attacking mar-a-lago, which is really weird for a New York judge to be like, it's worthless. And it's like, OK, well, I think Trump is one of the rare politicians whose net worth has declined by joining public office, where typically you see Dianne Feinstein being worth one hundred fifty million dollars after being in Congress. And the

Pelosi's are worth two hundred million dollars. So, you know, I'll give you my my my personal view is, yeah, there's a big difference between George Washington and Donald Trump. A little bit. Right. Just a skutch. But we've seen all the interviews of Trump being asked since the 80s. And we even had that, who was it? Trump was on a talk show with, I can't remember who it was.

It was one of those morning shows. And who was it? They were like, you got to run, Donald. It wasn't the Oprah interview. There was another one. And he was like, well, you know, I don't know about that. Probably morning joke. It was Roseanne. Oh, was it? They were like, you got to run, Donald. It wasn't the Oprah interview. There was another one. And he was like, well, you know, I don't know about that. Probably morning joke. It was Roseanne.

Oh, was it Roseanne? Yes. Roseanne was encouraging him. Oh, well, she's still a fan. He's been encouraged a lot. And he would always say no. But back to the main story. I think we have this tweet pulled up.

I think it's actually the second. Did I pull this up? Congressman Troy Nails. He's a good dude. We've had him on the show several times says kevin mccarthy will not be running again as speaker i nominate donald j trump for speaker of the house please and matt gates did this the first time around second it and you know i just i i don't see the excuse for any member of Congress to not go for bold changes in D.C. The concern is if someone nominates Oprah and then they win, like because it's a popularity contest. All the Democrats are like, we need somebody famous to get everyone to say yes to it.

I get that. But Republicans aren't going to play that game. And if Republicans have the majority and can win if they just agree. How about the former Republican president? Well, does it only take eight Republicans to side with the Democrats to push someone in? Or nine or something? I think it's five or six, I think, even.

I think it's not five or six. I think it was, it might be 11. It's, what is it? I don't know. I guess my follow-up question is, it might be less than that. It might be six. If Trump were to take it, you know,

would he still be able to run for president as the Speaker of the House? Or is that a conflict of interest? That I don't know. guess my follow-up question is that it might be sick if trump were to take it you know would uh would he still be able to run for president as the speaker of the house or is that a conflict that i don't know it's a good question i don't see why not because he's not a member of congress he would just be speaker i'd be really interesting and even even if he were a member of congress he could still run for president you know i know it's just not reality but people were talking about a few years ago like steve bannon was saying nominate trump for speaker vote him in as speaker and then when you impeach biden and convict biden and kamala trump becomes president what are the what are the qualifications for the speaker like what are the the main things you need from that person what do you mean like uh charisma do you

need intelligence you need like those are are probably favorable, yeah. Connections in business, in the industry? Or is that actually a bad thing? So how do you want these people? Do you want them to be like... I would say their qualifications, their requirements. Not necessarily qualifications, because that implies like a procedural thing.

But the characteristics we're looking for in any leader is going to be integrity, honesty, transparency to the best of their abilities. I understand we have security issues. Something completely lacking in Congress that very few people have in there. But I think someone that doesn't roll over on their back and let the Democrats have their way with them. I think that's the first thing. I think anyone that's not a rhino, anyone that's not a neoconservative, anyone who doesn't want to perpetuate the larger proxy war in Ukraine right now, I think this is's not a rhino, anyone that's not a neoconservative, anyone who doesn't want to perpetuate the larger proxy war in Ukraine right now.

I think this is a larger kind of referendum against Congress failing the American people. Throughout many years now, they never represented the will of what people actually wanted. There was never a public referendum on if we should start a proxy war in Ukraine. There was never a referendum on the debt ceiling. Kevin McCarthy, another thing he did, he made it that the Biden administration could print and borrow as much money as they want until 2025. Right now, just a few days ago, the debt went up $275 billion in just one day. It is set to increase to almost $1 trillion in just one month it just hit 33 trillion dollars america is being destroyed by a lot of the corporate influences that have hijacked congress and this is a referendum saying we had enough stop it let let me pull this up we have this

from gallup right here in uh 2020 is this 2022 2023 i'm sorry. September 1st, 2023, the approval rating for Congress is at 17%. Look at that right after 9-11. I know, I was trying to figure out what that was. I know, look at that. False flags are terrifying. 17%, and my question is,

to Thomas Massey, legitimate, I am not being a dick, I am genuinely asking, for what reason do we want to preserve the current iteration of an institution that has 82% disapproval? Not only does defy any democratic standard, but even if we want to operate on a supermajority principle or just say it should be representative and not direct democracy, I think it's fair to say when 82% of people are like, we don't like what you're doing, it's time to change this system. It's a simple choice.

You know, deadlock or allow the government to steal your money and then finance it and give it to Ukrainian oligarchs that, of course, will be using it for their own purposes. What do you want? I prefer the deadlock. It's not even about Ukraine. I mean, I know that's a big talking point right now, but let's just talk about the problems this country has faced that the left has been screaming about that we've been talking about. How many years did we get the Flint water crisis as big news with Democrats saying we got to fix these pipes? You know what I say? My answer is deal.

We stop funding war in foreign countries, be it Afghanistan, Syria, whatever. And I say we divert that money to the pipes in Newark, in Pittsburgh, in Flint. And you know what? Then, because it doesn't cost that much money to fix the pipes, we launch a commission to start going and hiring contractors to fix pipes everywhere. Better yet, we can build bridges, fix our roads. We can hire American construction workers. Hey, maybe we can build a bollard fence down on the southern border with the money that we're spending overseas. Out of graphene. I like how you're thinking.

Out of graphene. You know what, Ian? Deal. I tell you this. Out of graphene. I like how you're thinking. Out of graphene. You know what, Ian? Deal. I tell you this. Ian, we have a deal. We stop funding the war in Ukraine, Afghanistan, Syria, all of these foreign excursions that have done nothing for the American people and Congress approve secure fencing and homes.

We'll start doing homes. And we'll build it out of graphene if that's what you want. You can 3D print tubes and then lock them into joints and make like domed housing really cheap with that stuff They actually there's yeah, what was it geodesic domes you talked about? They they actually they inflate a big bag and then they they wire they put wire around it and cement it and then deflate the bag And it creates like a smart look at that part of the reason why I'm going a little hand-heavy on it right now is because At a Rice University they figured out how to create hydrogen fuel at that part of the reason why i'm going a little hand heavy on it right now is because at a rice

university they figured out how to create hydrogen fuel um and every kilogram of fuel they're making out of like waste they'll hit it with lasers and make it it produces a byproduct of graphene of four dollars and fifty cents worth of graphene for every kilogram we're trying to find a use for that so we actually make it before this you had to spend money to get hydrogen now you're making money because you're getting a product in the in product and then you can make electronics out of it or you can burn it. And I will grab that particularly esoteric concept

and bring it back to this. If Congress came out with a bill that said we will take new fuel, buy products to produce products here in this country and create American jobs, their approval rating would be higher. If Kevin McCarthy came out

banging and screaming about the need to fund graphene, their approval rating would be higher. If Kevin McCarthy came out banging and screaming about the need to fund graphene, their approval rating would be higher. Ian, there's a bunch of comments right now with people talking about you laying down pipes. I'm not going to get into that one. But you guys are talking about some very interesting concepts

about what you guys want Congress to do. I don't want them to do anything. Stop taking my money. Stop trying to fix problems. Leave people alone. Let the free market fix whatever problems are occurred that usually are occurred by the government. So I think if the government steps away from our life, stops intervening, stops taxing, stops regulating, stops saying you could do this, but you can't do this, stops favoring the multinational corporations

and the banking elite, then I think life would be better for everyone. And I think if they just took a step back, allowed the free market to be a free market, everything would be way better than it is right now. Agreed. And the starting point is not that we just overnight say we no longer have any spending at all. I think realistically, there's so much we don't see in terms of federal spending that we would like and would need at least to get to a point where we can get away from this kind of thing. But the obvious and immediate is veteran benefits. Oh, God, I don't think any anyone in their right mind is going to be like, let's just cut the government off. Like when we were talking about how the government's shutting down, Matt Gates is like, no, it means veterans aren't going to

get paid like that's not a good thing. And we're like, right, right. We're kind of just goofing off. Fair point. But he did say one of the first things we get through if we're not going to fund the government is making sure that our veterans get paid. I do not like the idea that whether you like the wars or the foreign policy or not, I don't like the idea that anybody who served in my name would be left high and dry without benefits. I would gladly pay if that was the case. So when we talk about we want the government spending our money, I completely agree with Luke as it pertains to their corporate buddies revolving to our policies. And then as it pertains to the good men and women in uniform

who served us and our nation, whether or not our leaders have led them astray, I think these people deserve more money, a lot more money. Part of why there's been so much pushback against what Matt's doing to destroy the omnibus spending package concept is that it's literally and i'm using the word correctly here completely and totally impossible for the 430 people in congress or however many to read all those bills they don't have enough time oh god no so we're gonna have

to complete we change the way that our republic functions and let the people read the bills decentralized no no no no they should not be spending that much money. So there were priorities. When, like Matt Gaetz said, you know, they come to me and say, we've got to fund the military. We've got to fund veterans. Like, easy. Get the bill. It's approved. Like, we all agree.

It's done. There's no question. There's no obstruction. Every member of Congress says yes to that. But then they want to fund the Department of Education. Now, there's a debate. The issue is 435, or how many is it 430 or was it 435 i don't know that uh members of congress if they can't read that many bills should not be

voting on them and spending the money or we should have more members of congress because i think we used to have one for every 70,000 people now we have one for every like 900,000 and that's true and they can't function. Well, they don't function. I want people to represent themselves, honestly. And I'm kind of tired of representative thing. I understand the stopgap of you don't want the mob to go crazy, but people have the ability to govern themselves.

And I think we should use modern technology to do it. I disagree. I agree on technology and modern technology, but I don't think you want people who, look, my view is this. We certainly want decentralized power. I like the idea of representatives. I don't like the idea of how they've been basically exploiting and lying to us. But the issue is, if you are a tradesman, if you're a teacher or a nurse, you don't follow politics all day, every day. And that means someone whose job it is to provide a service outside of politics

needs to be able to trust you, to go to you and say, hey, man, I trust you to do what's right. You're a good person. I give you my vote. And that person takes up their whole time and energy focusing on policy issues and making the country work. I'm fine with that. The problem is for too long, corrupt individuals have been like these suckers actually believed me and they're ripping everybody off and they're lying about it it's too easy to bribe because there's so few of them but but ian the pakistani gender studies are not going to fund themselves okay who's going to fund the sri lankan speedboats who's going to fund all these other programs that of course are absolutely pointless and steal your money for no reason at all what who's going to do it okay i like i like the america first idea like you're proposing honestly like there's so

much that this country needs there's so much we could do so much good here that could be done i mean shouldn't we at least focus here first before we send all this money overseas and i think that that's a real frustration i think that that is the good thing that came out of this. And I do agree. The 82 percent who are very unhappy with Congress would probably be a lot happier if they actually saw the impact of all of this exorbitant spending. But no one ever sees it. You go into like LaGuardia Airport. I remember used to fly into LaGuardia if it was raining. There would be like trash cans there to catch the rainwater and i was like god this is what some people see when they first arrive in the united states of america this is the first impression we are supposed to be the leader of the free world and the superpower and yet this is how our country is functioning right now look at

something different yeah i think i think donald trump actually exemplifies the problem of government in a unique way outside of just the uh outside of just the fact that they just strapped weights to him, falsely accused him of tons of things, are trying to persecute him, prosecute him. I think you look at someone who built this empire, knows how to run multiple companies, creates multiple brands. The left tries to argue, but look at all his bankruptcies. It's the stupidest argument ever. 500 plus companies and a handful of bankruptcies. And bankruptcies don't mean failure. It means you're literally preserving the business.

But you take someone like that. He becomes president, still gets things done despite what's going on. And the challenges he still faced show. When you go to the government and say, hey, we need to put up, say, like suicide nets on the Golden Gate Bridge. Half a billion dollars later, it gets done. You go to the private sector and they compete over it. And $10 million later, it gets done. I guess, what was the old saying in 2016?

Under budget and out of schedule. Yeah, well, that was him. That's how he operated as a businessman. And I actually think that when he became president, he believed he could get so much accomplished. And he thought, well, gosh, if I just run things like I did a business, then it will say, I mean, you, he would talk about Lockheed Martin. He renegotiated for the new Air Force Ones, which by the way, will start flying in 2025,

just in time for him to arrive on them as president. But he actually tried to save money. He tried to do all these things. He went to South Korea and he said, why is said why is it that that you know we're funding all of this stuff over here for you guys you can fund it yourself we're going to stop sending a bunch of money over here to you you could fund your some of your own stuff he saved the the country i mean unknown amounts of money that no one ever talks about and it made zero difference no one talked about it no one ever talks about. And it made zero difference. No one talked about it. No one cared about it. And I think it's insane that you can have someone with the ability like he had. And yet this government is in such a mess that it really made almost no difference.

Well, to be fair, he did also spend a lot of money and he did also increase the deficit and the debt a lot. I do think he had a lot of policies that were very favorable towards blue collar workers, I think more favorable than any other president in our time. But the deficit was increased a lot under his presidency. And I think I think we're still dealing with those ramifications today because of that. I kind of see the difference of running the country and a business as like the solution to our economy isn't in money. It's not in finance. It's in the productive capability.

Absolutely. money it's not in finance it's in the productive capability absolutely so you could print loads of money and build graphene factories and start producing massive hydrogen fuel and make us the wealthiest country on earth but just printing the money like it doesn't take money to do that i mean we can print as much money as we want right now so we just need to incentivize people to do it we need our factories back we need manufacturing back we need to produce things here in this country we do you know how hard it is to get anything really made in america for any a decent amount of money everything is so expensive to do here we have to change that otherwise we're we're going to be in a really bad spot look at covid look at the supply chain how much we learned how

much you know we realized we really weren't doing here yeah you need to make it here you need to incentivize business here in this country absolutely the hard chemicals like east palestine when that train derailment went off and it annihilated the community like that's why we moved a lot of that stuff over to china's because like if it spills we don't want to spill next door so i but i do believe the risk of having the chinese producing this stuff is outweighs the risk of contamination but i mean contamination is devastating too i just yeah it's like a two-sided coin that obviously you know what it is i understand it's these climate change policies and so what democrats do is they say okay you can't make a business that has x amount of carbon or whatever so the companies say okay china it is so when when joe b comes in, this is why I think they're lying.

I think they are full of it. Joe Biden says we're going to bring back these restrictions. Climate change is bad. Now you can't produce X amount of carbon. You have these taxes. You have these fees. But hey, we're going to remove tariffs so you can import products for free. He is outright telling businesses, send your factories to China.

Yep. That's exactly right. And I mean, it's so devastating in so many different ways, I think, to our country. I mean, if you look at inflation, if you look at the job situation in this country, this is this is a I don't want to say it's an easy fix, but it seems so obvious. And it was all set up so well. I give my father-in-law a lot of credit. The tariffs on China, the trade deals that he negotiated with China. I mean, who would have ever thought we'd have something like that, honestly? Yeah, he was the guy that actually opened my eyes to the danger of our relationship with the CCP.

I knew it was not good. Terrifying. I just didn't until he was like, China, China. And I was like, OK, I still don't get it. Terrifying. I just didn't, until he was like, China, China. And I was like, okay, I still don't get it. But then eventually I started to realize they produce the antibiotics. You know, if they cut off, if they poison our antibiotics, like with fentanyl, one day they just decide 90% of our- China is waiting right now and salivating over what they see happening in this country. The fact that Joe Biden is our president, that we seem in a weakened state, that our economy doesn't seem like it's headed in the right direction for the long term.

They are ready to pounce and take over as the superpower of the world. And Donald Trump was the first to call them on it. He's been talking about China for decades. And if you go back to his 2015 speech when he announced he was running for president, he talked about China then and people were like, he's so crazy, so unhinged about China. He was right about them. It's actually terrifying if you really think about what their long-term game plan is in China. They're ready to take over. Do you think he knew because he'd been doing business there for so long? Yes. He just knew how they function? Yes, absolutely. Big part of it, for sure. Tim, you look like you're pulling up another story. Well, yeah, Kevin McCarthy is speaking. I can't find the video right now it's live so i imagine yeah it'll be a

second before it pops up on on twitter so we'll pull that up in a second but for the uh for the time being let's jump to this story from our good friends over at cnn judge issues gag order and rebukes trump after social media post attacking his clerk. And we also have this one from Dr. Kelly Ward. Judge is threatening real Donald Trump with jail if he doesn't remove this post from Truth Social. Well, of course, we will highlight that post so you can all know the news. Trump truthed Schumer's girlfriend, Alison R. Greenfield, is running his case against me, this case against me.

How disgraceful, disgraceful, this case should be dismissed immediately. Linking to a tweet from judicial protests saying, why is Judge Engram's principal law clerk, Alison R. Greenfield, palling around with Chuck Schumer? Well, I guess because of this, the judge says Trump is here by gag, which I find funny considering the judge is allowing cameras in the courtroom. This whole thing is very obviously an attempt to drain Trump's energy and resources to attack his circle and cause political damage to interfere in the 2024 election. Absolutely. I mean, that's what they've all been about. This is another example. This one is particularly egregious. If you look at the fact that you have Letitia James, the attorney general of the state of New York, who ran a campaign not on doing what was best for the people of the state of New York,

not locking up criminals, not really going after the hard crime. My gosh, New York City is a mess. You just take that city in and of itself, let alone the rest of the state she's supposed to be looking out for. She ran a campaign where she said, I'm going to be a real pain in his ass. I'm going to go in to the attorney general's office every day, suing him and then going home. She never cared a second about anything other than Donald Trump. So here you have a situation where there is no plaintiff. There is no person that was injured. There is no issue whatsoever on behalf of these banks who made tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars off of these loans that they gave the Trump organization. And yet here we are with my father-in-law now for the second day, and I assume

tomorrow as well, in court in downtown Manhattan over this absolute nonsense. And these people want to dissolve his business. Make no mistake about it. They want to inflict maximum pain. Yes, they want to inflict maximum pain. They ordered it. This judge ordered it in a summary judgment before even hearing all the facts of everything

when he told everyone Mar-a-Lago's worth $18 million. What an utter joke. And then whenever people said, well, what does that mean? What do you want dissolved? He said, I'm not ready to rule on that yet. It is wild stuff. It is banana republic at best.

I got to read this quote here. This is too good. The judge said, this morning, one of the defendants, one of the defendants, posted on a social media account a disparaging, untrue, and personally identifying post about a member of my staff. Although I have since ordered the post deleted, and apparently it was, it was also emailed out to millions of other recipients, the judge said in court. Personal attacks of any member of my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate, and I will not tolerate them. I just love that Trump emailed it out to everybody just to make sure you got it. Hey, look, you can order someone to delete a post on social media, but the email is sent it's sent yeah that's that's that's the benefit of doing of using email i just think it's absolutely absurd that the judge is telling donald trump he can't speak this is unrelated to the trial when when it comes to civil suits it is unsurprising

that there will be uh gag orders right if if if person a sues person b it, it is unsurprising that there will be gag orders. If person A sues person B, it is normal for the judge to be like, guys, don't disparage each other. Donald Trump is talking about the court. So maybe someone might advise him not to do it. I just think the judge putting cameras in the courtroom, issuing a summary judgment, has already shattered the judicial norms we expect. And this makes no sense. What was the personal attack? He said she was palling around with Schumer. It's a picture of her. By the way, that's very relevant whenever this is an individual who's part of his staff there. And this is supposed to be an impartial judge. Are you kidding me? This is like the attorney general supposed to be impartial

as well these people have an agenda they have had a bias obvious bias against donald trump from day one so i think it's very relevant i think it was appropriate yeah yeah to call that that attorney general isn't impartial she's very partial she's very biased she clearly has a political agenda there's so many horrible crimes there's so many many things happening in New York City right now. And for the city to spend their resources going after the former president of the United States for this is just absolutely ridiculous, in my opinion. And a waste of time. A waste of taxpayer money. But also, more importantly, just also at the same time is making Trump more popular than ever.

Didn't this was Letitia James, right? Yes. Didn't she run on going after Trump? Absolutely. Well, just recently, there was a left wing activist in New York City who was with his girlfriend when a deranged man came up and stabbed him twice, killing him. Oh, no, no. He came up to the deranged man.

Let's be clear. The news will have you think that the deranged man approached him. He approached the deranged man. Yelling at him. Right. Saying, hey, hey, trying to get his attention. The deranged man turned on him and was like, what? Deranged guy walks past him, knocks over scooters. This guy gets up and yells something, says something to him. He approached the deranged man. Yelling at him. Right, right, right. Saying, hey, hey, trying to get his attention. The deranged man turned on him and was like, what? Deranged guy walks past him, knocks over scooters.

This guy gets up and yells something, says something to him. The guy gets in his face. The dude stands his ground. Then the deranged man stabs him, killing him. And he's still on the loose. And I can only say one thing. Look, these are the activists that voted in, advocated for, a DA

who is going to go after the former president instead of dealing with a crime in their own city. I think a lot of the thing that scares me, a lot of the part that scares me about this is that some of them, yes, they're emotionally going after Donald himself. But some of them, I think the deep, deep, dark thing, they're going after anyone that would do what he was trying to do by re-nationalizing our industry. Like the people they want, I think there's a global bank. I don't know, man, but all signs lead to the world economic forum and the new world order.

And well, look, look, it is a, the world order is changing and that they want to create this build back better. This, this weird digital technocracy.

You mean no borders. You mean free flow of people all around? Do you mean a centralized yeah banking system you mean you could just like have it in your head you just think it's it's it's actually terrifying you could go down a real dark hole you could have tenfold half but the only thing uh we know about a conspiracy theory is it's like six months until it actually becomes true yeah generally speaking yeah i'm comfortable speaking disperse about it now because of the last two or three years the rus Russell Brand thing was a week.

Yeah. Coordinated. Yeah, they're like, it's a coordinated effort against Russell Brand. The media is like, what a kooky conspiracy theory. And then we get leaked letters from the UK government being like, we want him removed. We're concerned he can make money on your platform. And then he starts getting banned. It's like, oh, OK, the government was doing it. As they're coordinating the hit pieces and, of course, releasing key information,

tidbit by tidbit by tidbit to, of course, build it up and have the maximum effect in order to try to hurt him. I think something very similar is happening with a lot of these district attorneys. A lot of them are usually financed by George and Alex Soros, who have financed them, who have bought them off and have created policies inside of the United States where you can hurt people. You won't go to jail. You won't be in trouble. You defend yourself against individuals trying to hurt you or steal your property, you go to jail. You express political thoughts and idea, you go to jail. But you're a criminal, you could get loose, get free anytime you want because of these policies that were implemented without any kind of vote, without any kind of referendum. And all it took was secret billionaire money that financed these individuals that were a part of the larger ideology that these people are implementing. And this ideology is one that is, of course,

very leftist, very similar to what happened in communism, very similar to, of course, what happens in a lot of totalitarian regimes where people are punished just for their political expressions this is this is the current world that we're living in which is absolutely terrifying and should scare the crap out of everyone because there's no longer a justice system there's a a system that uses power to punish people politically elon musk on twitter on x rather elon uh are we ever going to call it X I'm about to really X I like calling it Twitter still I do it like X also known as Twitter sorry to exactly call it that because a lot of people don't know what you're talking about exactly on X it sounds like ecstasy like I'm tripping on X that's a

good one well he said that's even more confusing yeah he he actually said the word that um uh george soros was figured out how to do politics through arbitrage which is basically send a little bit to a lot of places and just kind of buy the system by getting all these local da's and and yeah that's what he does that's crazy that's nuts what does he do it through multiple businesses or something i i don't know all the ins and outs of the soros uh dynasty and their their multi well there's multiple organizations and multiple ngos and multiple ways that they're just funneling a lot of their money and financing a lot of these woke leftist radicals that are in positions of power and clearly abusing those positions for their own

personal benefit but i i keep saying i i think we are winning and by we i'm referring to the anti-establishment faction which includes post-liberals, libertarians. I always have to clarify this. You look at today and one of the Brian Krasinski, I think it was, just tweeted, this is a win for Democrats, not Republicans. It was eight Republicans who sided with Democrats to oust Kevin McCarthy. The Republicans voted to keep him in. And I'm just like, yo, it was a win for the anti-establishment. It's obvious. We knew it was going to be Democrats voting to remove him.

But and Democrats are looking at it like, I think it's really funny because Democrats should have actually wanted him to stay in. He was cutting deals with them, but they can't. They're politically trapped. You look at the cultural victories. You look at Matt Gaetz's massive historic victory today. Anti-establishment is winning. I hope so. There's a quote from Gaetz. He said something to the effect of, I'm paraphrasing. He said, based on his recent conversations with the former president, he feels like he's doing the right thing.

Something to that effect. Not to say that Trump actually told him to do it, but that Matt Gaetz feels confident this is the move that has to be made. I believe it is. I believe it's about time someone stood up to the corrupt mechanisms of Congress. The challenge we face is that for Congress, it is always easier to kick the can down the road instead of ripping the Band-Aid off. And Ron Paul had that famous quote, I'm again paraphrasing, where he said, you know, we got to get out of Iraq and Afghanistan. They keep saying, oh, well, it was a mistake going in, but now we need an exit strategy so we can't just leave. And he says, if you prescribe the wrong medication, you don't just keep them on the same medication. You get them off.

And it's like, yes, we've been sitting by with Congress broken forever being like, well, you know, it's going to be bad if we change. It's going to be bad if we keep doing it. We can't.'t we got to change it some of some medicines you want to wean off of i know i know basically biden's surrender in afghanistan was like just stopping yeah no i disagree that was that was that that terrible intention deliberate yeah yeah abandoning bagram air force base is not ripping the band-aid off people it's pouring it's pouring sewage onto your open wound that's insane but my point is with what's going on with trump with what they're doing i want everyone to realize these moves are only being made out of terror and desperation they're trying to dissolve the trump organization for what purpose it strips him of resources it ties up his his his

time and energy he should be campaigning right now they're they're they're trying to set this trial which one the federal trial for just before super tuesday they did yeah the day before the day before tuesday that all of these things are so obviously just how can we cement trump's legs down to stop him from winning it is quite literally them cheating to win in 2024 and by cheating what I mean is we expect elections to be a little dirty. But for the most part, it's how many votes can you get? What they're doing now is can we use the legal system to damage Trump's life and threaten his lawyers so that no one works with him again?

You've got in Georgia, his lawyers being indicted, Jenna Ellis, for just literally providing him legal advice. And then you also have, I think it was out of Colorado, two lawyers fined $187,000 by a judge for simply arguing Trump's position. They sued and appealed to the Supreme Court saying, we're lawyers. We were asked to represent this individual.

That's what we do. It's a constitutional right. And the Supreme Court said, shove it. So they have to pay nearly 200 grand for doing one thing. Trump says, here's my argument. They say, we'll craft the argument for you. And now the judge in the case says 200 grand. What they're trying to do is make sure no lawyer ever worked with Trump again. Yeah, well, they want to inflict maximum pain. They want as much collateral damage as humanly possible because they don't want anyone around Donald Trump.

They don't want him to have a circle of people he can trust, he can rely on, who can go out there. I mean, if you look at this case right now, he's been in court over the past two days, this Letitia James AG case. Every person had testified that my husband, Eric, and my brother-in-law, Don, had nothing to do with any of these valuations and yet they got dragged into it too why would you do that maximum pain yep i mean to me it's so much of what that january 6th committee sham nonsense was which was it wasn't really about anything other than warning people if you dare step out of line again, you could be on the hot seat next. Don't ever question anything this government does or tells you to do again, because next time it could be you. It might be Donald Trump today. Next time it could be you. And it will be. I'll

give you an example of the game they're playing when it comes to the judge in this Trump lawsuit. AOC made a video after January 6th where she said someone banged on her door. She went and hid in the bathroom, heard a voice say, where is she? Where is she? She thought she was going to die and all that stuff. What she was doing was making you believe that she thought rioters broke into her office. Immediately, conservatives said her office isn't even in the Capitol building, to which the media responded, there are tunnels connecting it. And then this one surprised the heck out of me. I did the whole timeline. I fact-checked everything and I said,

her story took place one hour before the Capitol was even breached. She was manipulating the context of the day. Most people did not know the timeline. The only thing they knew was that on January 6th, people stormed the Capitol. So when she says on January 6th,

someone banged on my door and I was scared, she is lying to you because she knows you don't understand the basic context around this day. What this judge is doing is very, very similar. He says the tax assessor says the property is only worth around 18 to 20 million at Mar-a-Lago. Trump is inflating the value of his properties. He's committing fraud. What do regular people here who don't pay attention judge rules trump committed fraud but here's the funny thing

anybody paying attention immediately recognizes the problem here depending on how deep you go in terms of paying attention if you're someone like me i just pull up the actual property the comparables in in palm beach and west palm beach and i'm like mar-a-lago 17 and a half acres from from beach to beach and a third acre goes for you know 10 or 30 million dollars with a house on it a lot that's just half acre is like 10 20 million dollars how is mar-a-lago as as just land worth less than this however anybody with a cursory understanding of real estate knows the values aren't set by the individual. It's appraised by the lender. Exactly.

When you mentioned Eric and Donna have nothing to do with the evaluation, right? The bank comes in and says, here's what we think. Yeah, they have their own due diligence. They have a fiduciary responsibility to send someone in. They're not going to take my word for it. If I'm like, yeah, I got a house down the street. It's worth $10 billion. You can trust me on that. Of course, they have to look out for themselves as a business at

the end of the day that's the crazy part of all of this and you're right the the the truth is that the average person out there probably doesn't understand this kind of minutia right all they cared about and all they have ever cared about is that headline donald trump and the word fraud next to it and that's it that's the end game for them they want to inflict maximum damage to him they want to tie him up but luke you said it i do believe it's making him stronger i feel like all of this stuff has shaken people awake that mug shot forget it that mug shot was probably the biggest mistake they ever made. The number of people who have approached me post-mugshot and been like, you know what?

I really have never paid attention to politics. I wasn't sure I liked Donald Trump. But that mugshot somehow to some people represented a system that had been failing them, that was broken, that was working against them, working against Donald Trump. And they were like, wait a minute. I see what they're doing to this guy. And now their eyes are open and they're not going to be closed. And it actually unified a nation.

The Democrats really liked it. The Republicans really liked it. I made a t-shirt of it right away. And a lot of people were buying it on the left and on the right, it didn't matter. But more importantly, every time they do go after Trump, you see his poll numbers go up.

And right now he's higher than he was this entire election cycle, even though he's saying some kind of very interesting things. But just for yourself, I'm kind of curious, as a Trump, do you feel like you're under a spotlight? Do you feel like you're targeted? Do you feel like someone is just waiting to see if you're going to do anything wrong just so they could blow it up in the media? Every single second of every single day.

Absolutely. Yeah. I mean mean these people are disgusting and to be honest with you if it if it weren't my family and i hadn't had first-hand experience with this sort of stuff i would say this is i mean that's really overblown there's no way but it's true they they pick apart anything that any of us do they try to attack us for it and and honestly you really think that if any of us had I don't know obtain a firearm illegally and lied on a federal gun application and then thrown the gun in a garbage can next to a school we wouldn't be locked up right now get the heck out of here that's the that's the frustrating thing is the clear double standard that exists between someone with the last name trump and someone with the last name or just you know smoked crack and uh you know bought ladies of the night and uh you know

took photos of themselves doing it uh i mean i mean there's controversy on on both you know sides there but it's just absolutely crazy how far the media will go and how um they will just in many instances make stuff up in order to try to frame you guys as really horrible people. You want a great example? I was going to ask you, what's one of the craziest ways that the media has attacked you that had no reality at all? So last year, we had a hurricane come through the state. The hurricane hit the western side of the state of Florida. I live on the east coast of Florida.

So anyone with a little knowledge of a hurricane knows there are bands of rain that come through. And in between those bands, it's clear. It's fine. My kids were cooped up inside. They canceled school that day. So I took my kids and my dogs just down the neighborhood on a little walk in between the bands of rain. My son was on one of these little like motorized tractor things that he had and i took a video because all of a sudden we got poured on out of nowhere with the rain i posted it on social media people were calling for child protective services i'm not even joking to come to my house there were multiple stories written about how i was an unfit mother i mean it is so insane. I, yeah, that's one of the probably least faves of my past couple of years.

It's getting crazy, huh? Dude. Yeah. Yes. But I was, as you guys were talking, firstly, you got caught in the rain with your kid. That's, I guess, normal. I said, I captioned it character building experience.

Cause it is. Sometimes it rains. Sometimes it rains. People are like, she's putting her child in danger in a hurricane oh my god okay this uh build back better which is like a world economic forum thing then biden starts saying it okay is it not that's not a coincidence humans well he got made fun of by who was it boris johnson for for stealing build back better i just constantly so so the brits were doing it too it's yeah all over like if this this like organized four different indictments unrelated all and like within the course of like six months on donald trump it's not that's not a coincidence

all the day after a hunter biden or joe biden big information drop happened something yeah but understand it's a standalone complex and a conspiracy. So there's the bigger picture, which is all these indictments happening. I don't think you need New York to coordinate with Georgia and the federal government. These are people who have Trump derangement syndrome who are going to do these things of their own volition. In fact, as soon as the feds make a move, then Georgia's like, now's our chance. Now we can pile on some of this stuff. Like, right every time hunter biden's indicted there's like a ufo leak or some new indictment of trump comes out that seems coordinated

and a group of people organizing that at a high level but all of the attacks on trump it's because these people are deranged and they're going to keep doing it that's look you look at what happened to brett kavanaugh with uh that woman swetick, I think her name was, accusing him of being at parties where they would line up outside of rooms to take turns. Just, you know, having their way with women against their will. Keep it as family friendly as I can. She didn't. No one came to her and told her to say it. Right.

Or my assumption is that maybe I'm wrong. It's just that these people are so deranged. They're like, I'll just do it. And they come out of their own volition. and it looks coordinated when it often isn't man i spent my youth believing in people that they would be honest i just thought like if you're good and honest then more people will be good and honest and we can make a good and honest society and then i'm learning in my midlife that deceitfulness and evil is like the way to lead like it throughout history that's how they've been doing it they kill their opponents they take control and they say that they were the good guys

yeah there's that tweet i referenced about that it was a video of hyenas eating some kind of ungulate alive they were they were eating it from the belly eviscerating it and the tweet said it is not the case that the most vicious and evil people are punished in fact nature shows us that they are often rewarded and that was the point that you watch this poor i think it was like a wildebeest or something struggling to get up being devoured alive and yeah there's an old uh there's an old hacker joke saying if you're not cheating you're not trying i understand jesus in a way from the bible like what they said that he was just like they don't know what they're doing man and he just let it happen because like what can you? It gets to a point where like,

I'm not going to become evil, at least I don't want to. So like, how do I really help society without becoming evil? Yeah. How much crazier do you think it's going to get? Because I think we're, you know, in the middle of the election cycle,

but I think it's going to get crazier. I agree. What do you think is going to happen? Because we have the indictments, we have the court hearings, but they're not stopping Trump. They're making him more popular i really do believe we're in an inroad where the system is becoming more and more desperate how desperate do you think they will become well i think they they become more desperate by the day because i think you

know you look at who they're running on the democrat side joe biden and apparently Kamala Harris, two of the lowest polling favorability. I mean, president, vice president in history. These two are just absolutely horrible, one worse than the other. They have a big problem on their hands. They have no bench on the Democrat side. We seem to have a little bit of a bench on the other other side of the aisle. But I think they're getting more desperate by the day because it must be so frustrating to see all the effort they're putting out against one guy, and it's boomeranging back,

and it is having the opposite of the intended result for them. So I'm sure it's going to get a lot worse. Let me jump to this story. We have this from the Daily Mail. Shock poll shows RFK Jr.'s run as an independent could pull more support from Trump than Biden in 2024. And the poll basically shows it asks if you have a favorable view of RFK

Jr. And they find that Republicans actually have a more favorable view than independents and Democrats. Democrats have a very relatively unfavorable view of RFK Jr. Of course, we're hearing now that he may run as an independent but i actually want to say right away i think this is wrong republicans have favorable views of vivek ramaswamy they're voting trump they have a favorable view of rfk jr they are voting trump as phil labonte said last week trump's bottom is rock solid and i think that's it could probably be phrased a lot better but his his voter floor is not going move 44 of whatever individuals who support trump ain't gonna back anybody else and i like rfk jr i have a favorable view of him i'm not voting for

him right i agree with that yeah i think this the daily mail's view is wrong i think the poll is interesting for sure but i think they're wrong if you look at independents 36 to 37, it's it's within the margin of error. The question is how many independent voters who would normally vote Democrat will end up winning states like maine because he because it'll split enough of the democrats and it could trump could end up winning uh the presidency with like 43 44 percent of the popular vote yeah that's what happened with abraham with lincoln we talked about that it was a four-way split four parties i don't like where this is going um i don't trust polls firstly because they can be used to manipulate public perception i don't and i hate to they can be used to manipulate Public perception And I hate to be the guy that constantly asks But how many people were polled here

Is this like a thousand people And then they extrapolate it And then they tell you that it stands for 300 million And it's like no it stands for a thousand Well they also didn't ask would you vote for him They asked Tim what you said the favorable versus Unfavorable I have a generally favorable view of RFK Jr

I like that he posts workout videos. I sometimes post a workout video. I'm okay with that. I think a lot of Republicans like him because he called out the Democrats for a lot of their crazy nonsense that everybody can see is insane. And he was like, yeah, I don't agree with that.

Or hey, I don't know. Maybe you shouldn't be forced to have a vaccine. That's why I think a lot of Republicans have a favorable view. But you're right. The Trump base, I don't believe going anywhere. But you I mean, and you had people saying Trump, RFK Jr. 2024. I've heard that. Yeah. And it's like, OK, well, probably not. But people like the anti-establishment. And I think that shows you, even though RFK Jr. has had anti-2A sentiments in the past,

one of the biggest issues in the election in 2016, 2020, now even the midterms, is anti-establishment versus establishment. If you're RFK Jr. and you say the machine is broken and I have these political views, people will be like, I care less about your policy positions and more about your opposition to the corruption in Congress and D.C. and the federal government. There was an article released a couple of days ago highlighting how Hillary Clinton was warning Joe Biden in a private meeting that a third party candidate would, quote, prove disastrous for him as a White House insider caused the situation pretty effing concerning. This is the reporting from the Daily Mail that

just happened a couple of days ago. So I think, you know, it is interesting to see RFK Jr., to see where he's going to be going. Allegedly, he's going to be announcing on October 9th in Pennsylvania, an independent run. That's the rumors that are circulating right now. I don't know if that's true or not, but there is a very big stark difference between RFK Jr. and Donald Trump, especially when it comes to COVID, their response to COVID, their response to covid their response to uh operation warp speed and we have to understand here donald trump was advised by rfk jr and was going to launch an investigation into uh these medical procedures that people get injected with and uh then uh donald trump decided to take the

advice of bill gates and not listen to rfk jr and not do that investigation. Now, a Trump RFK Jr. ticket, I think would ease a lot of the concerns of a lot of anti-establishment people. What percentage do you think it's possible that there could be a Trump RFK Jr. presidency? Oh, I don't want to say super high percentage, to be honest with you. But it's funny because people ask me all the time, well, who's he considering as a running mate? Anybody on the debate stage? And the truth is he's kept this one pretty close to the vest, I will say.

And so I don't know who he's considering. And I don't know if it would be RFK Jr. But are there considerations? I'm sure there are. Absolutely. He's considering things, multiple things at all times. If you're thinking about a ticket that says screw you establishment i think it is a trump rfk jr i can see that and i think it would ease a lot of the fears about a new potential covid virus coming back under his presidency if rfk jr was there saying hey i'm here as vice president i here will stand up for the people and for people's uh

owned um individual rights for their bodies to choose what they want to do with them i i agree but i just think there's there's way too much political baggage for that to happen a lot of people have entertained it but i suppose the the bigger issue is i don't know who trump could pick as a running mate. We've said a lot of people thought it would be DeSantis for a long time. And now that's completely not happening. Vivek Ramaswamy, but he says he doesn't want to be VP, but he has to say that. But I don't even know if he would be the right pick.

I think some people are saying Kristi Noem. I have no idea. It can't be someone close to his views and his kind of overall messaging. It has to be someone polar opposite. There's a reason he picked Mike Pence, the neocon. Well, there's a reason Biden was chosen for Obama. Why Obama chose Biden. Because they're completely different from each other.

So if Trump has a choice right now between a rhino, between a Mike Pence kind of candidate for his vice presidency or a Democrat, maybe even a Tulsi Gabbard or an RFK Jr., I think picking a Democrat will help him out more than picking a rhino neoconservative, which clearly, especially with what happened today, a lot of people have disdain for. Yes. And I saw a Twitter poll from, I can't remember who it was, but it was like 10,000 or so votes. And I was surprised to see Tulsi Gabbard got more votes. It's not a scientific poll. I'm just talking about Twitter. Than Vivek, than RFK Jr.

People thought Tulsi Gabbard would be a good pick. I like Tulsi Gabbard. Yeah. She's military, right? Yeah. And she's positioning herself in a very curious way, doing media appearances, speaking tours in a way where she's kind of running, but not running. I got to be honest.

You know, when I think about Noam, I think about RFK Jr., Vivek, I'm kind of like, I don't know. I don't think it's I don't think Tulsi Gabbard has, in my mind, a substantially higher percentage, but it does seem to make more sense he's going to get a lot of moderate old school and post-liberal types who are going to be like with gabbert there i i i i'm willing to support this yeah there still is a kind of bernie bro sentiment within the democratic party of of not liking the establishment there still is the kind of jimmy doors out there the russell brands out there that do glenn greenwald that do represent kind of a leftist kind of anti-establishment ideology that could galvanize a lot of votes and I think would be more popular than a neocon. Joe Rogan said now twice on his show he would vote for Trump over Joe Biden.

Joe Biden is not there. He hasn't gone as far as say, I'm going to vote for Trump. He's like, if it was Trump Biden, I'd vote for Trump over Biden. I think if you had a Trump-Gabbard ticket, and again, we're just spitting in the wind here. I mean, it's all just silly nonsense. It's probably meaningless in the big picture. But just thinking about it now,

Joe's friends with Tulsi. I think you had a Trump-Gabbard ticket, Joe's going to be like, I'm voting for Trump-Tulsi. Trump-Gabbard, Tulsi's my friend. I trust her. I think that's big. You need someone that's going to galvanize more people outside of his base that are going to vote for him as the VP ticket. But I her. Yeah, I think that's big. You need someone that's going to galvanize more people outside of his base that are going to vote for him

as the VP ticket. But I don't even want to entertain that, right? Because it's just like, it's a silly conversation. I mean, six months from now, he's going to pick someone you're like, oh.

But it could be that you're just offering ideas that eventually get around to Don. That's true. No, I hope that doesn't happen. There is someone here who knows him. Yeah.

I'm just saying. Crazier things have happened. Tulsi Gabbard is like, that's a good idea. Because the baggage about RFK. I'm just saying. Crazier things have happened. The Tulsi Gabbard is like, that's a good idea. Because the baggage about RFK. I like your impression. I think it was like two days after he announced

he was running the, it's an anti-vax, really big on a news article about him. And they hadn't said that about RFK before that. And it was right when he announced, I was like,

I'm going to call my mom, get her before the brainwashing hits. Because once people get brainwashed, it's harder to un-brainwash them. So when you know it's coming, you tell your loved ones right away. And then when they see it, they're like, oh, he was right.

And they're ready. And that's what the media is trying to do to you. They're like, we've got to poison the well in RFK Jr. before people can talk to their family about it. Exactly. And there was a coordinated attack against RFK Jr. Now, he's in a very interesting position because he also made some very interesting statements

about the border, which a lot of Democrats aren't really making right now. He did flip-flop on the Second Amendment. He has been pretty solid on his bodily autonomy that he's been standing for almost his entire life. So he's positioning himself in a very interesting way where he's not far left and he's not far right, but he is anti-establishment, which Trump is as well. Here's a question. question i mean we just got a super chat from ginger mcissack saying larry elder for vp what do you guys think about that he did really well in california i like larry elder yeah i think he's a he's a great guy i don't know enough about him he's too similar to trump yeah yeah that's the problem but you have a lot of alpha energy there on both kind It's a hard question. I have to imagine Trump is...

Strategically, you also want to have someone that if they impeach you, you want to make sure that they're not going to be more favorable than you are. So you also want a horrible person like Mike Pence in there or Kamala Harris. And that's why Vice President or Joe Biden. And that's why all the vice presidents are horrible. Dick Cheney. Look at all the vice presidents. They're horrible human beings.

Every last one of them. It's perfect. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's the reason that Joe Biden hasn't been impeached yet. Nancy Pelosi. Because everyone's like, oh, my God, then it's Kamala Harris.

Trump Pelosi ticket. I'm calling it right now. You know what? I didn't want to. I don't want to spoil it. But that's the ticket. There you go. It's confirmed.

We got it. Oh, my gosh. Now you were joking but you're going to get some journalists as speaking on a on a podcast confirms pelosi is the absolutely i'm like we reached out to police office for comment i think i hope they do tulsa's on the pulse tulsi i like the tulsi trump concept because i started thinking of like a sun and moon metaphor when you were talking about that they're're so different, you know, and but complimentary in a lot of ways. I said in like 2019, a similar absurd thing.

I said, if Trump appointed Tulsi Gabbard as national security advisor and Andrew Yang as an economic advisor, 49 state landslide. And what I mean by that in that context specifically was like, I mean, that figuratively, like it's going to be a blowout victory if he does something like that. I personally, for me, my personal approval rating on a Trump Gabbard ticket is very high. And I'm already planning on voting for Trump. You know what I mean? But I'm like, Tulsi's military experience means a lot to me. And she's moderate. You know, she's called out the Democrats consistently,

even going back to 2016. And I respect that she's got a spine. And she is a balancing force, in my opinion. She's younger. I think that actually works a lot. But I'm still kind of like, look, I don't know, man. I don't know what the right thing should be.

I think she would whip the military into charge. She's awesome. She's a beast. Well, they're going to need a lot of work after the past couple of years. God bless them. Sad stories, man. Yeah.

Hearing about people who are retiring because of the wokeness and stuff is a bummer. I mean, why would we want to focus on military readiness, though? It's better to focus on pronouns and things. When we see this funding of Ukraine and the verge of World War III, you've had over the past several months prominent politicians and political figures in Europe saying, we're of World War III, you've had over the past several months prominent politicians and political figures in Europe saying we're in World War III already. And not talking about Russia, I'm talking about the EU. I think the Pope even said it.

At this time, we need recruitment to be up. We need inspiration. We need advocacy. But instead, we get the inverse. We get these ads that are super woke, that are offensive to most people who are in the military and they don't want to join, they're retiring. And now we've got this recruitment shortfall. I want to do a genetic engineering campaign

to make super soldiers. So people will be like, yo, I'm going to get free genetic CRISPR technology and become stronger and faster. I will join. That's exactly what China is doing right now. No, no, no, hold on, hold on. And it will drive recruitment up.

No, Ian, I'm sorry. You are incorrect. All those young kids that want superpowers. That's compete and it will drive recruitment up. No, Ian, I'm sorry. You are incorrect. All those young kids that want superpowers. That's not how it works. China's doing the genetic engineering in pre-fertilization. It can be done on adults too.

But it's nowhere near. The real super soldier program is, China's actually doing this. They're genetically engineering humans pre-born. Because when you're already a human, your DNA has already built a lot of your body. They can change you in certain ways, give you hormones and do CRISPR stuff. But the real

project to make a super soldier is as you're being fertilized, as they're creating a human, they're doing these weird things. Genetic engineering. Yeah. Yep. There's a book called The 100-Year Marathon. It's by Michael Pillsbury. And he documents exactly what the plan in China is. I mean, this just kind of feeds right into it. Basically, they have 100 years that they expect to take over as a superpower of the world. And they go about it in a lot of different ways. A lot of it is very covert. A lot of it is playing the victim. Oh, we need help. Oh, we are not as powerful as the United States.

When in fact, apparently they're doing this crazy genetic stuff and making super soldiers already. Wow. Let's be honest. America doesn't always have the best history when it comes to experimenting on U.S. soldiers as well and using them in horrible experiments that usually end them up dead or worse just a shout out to remember when joe biden was referring to the tuskegee experiments and we're called in the tuskegee airmen yes oh man but continue we we could also do like a tech not like cyber tech super soldiers where you're like

do you want to get like jump suits and like things that can let you lift like a thousand pounds and kids will be like hell yeah dude yes but if you to, right now we're seeing that seniors and high school males are skewing heavily conservative. You go to an 18-year-old male and say, how would you like to have a super suit like Iron Man? And they're like, that'd be really cool. All you got to do is join the military and they're going to be like, that woke garbage? No, we would need to create videos that would propagize it. Propagandize yeah or i'll just shorten to propagize because i'm the man um where it shows it in badassery all around like dudes like lifting stuff and throwing boulders and stuff and then what's gonna happen is seven-year-olds will be like wow but these these these young young males

are gonna be like that's so cool and they're gonna go to their friends and be like dude you see that military video about those super suits and they're gonna like, why would you want to join the military? And then they're going to insert insult about wokeness, whatever joke you want to make. And they're like, I don't want to join. I was just saying I saw the commercial. That social pressure is going to be massive. My point is simply this. Sure, you may convince young people

with super cool videos or whatever, but a lot of these young men, they're going to be like, why would you do that? They're like, what are you, a loser? It is not. To protect the country, really. It's not. But it's not.

In case of invasion. It's not. After Iraq and Afghanistan, after the botched pullout, after Syria, I don't think any sane person is thinking this. Libya. Not to mention, Libya was a disaster. And so you have young people who are going to go to their parents, dad, I'm thinking about joining the military. Why?

So you can go occupy some country for 20 years that does nothing for the american that's what my dad said to me after vietnam he was served in the navy in vietnam he's like if there's anything in your body that you want to do anything that you want to do creatively do not join the military because it will destroy that part of you don't do it if you don't want to well you look at what they did with agent orange in vietnam also very uh horrendous horrible effects on the u. soldiers there. They also had things like the gay bomb. So what you think that they're doing in China, I think it's fair to say that the American military probably has already experimented on and done here inside of the United States. As, of course, Echo Health Alliance, Dr. Fauci have been playing around with genetics

and altering viruses and sicknesses ever since 2001 after the Patriot Act was passed by the Republicans that allowed them to do this without even being punished or facing any repercussions for. And now, I got this. Keep it going. Hold on. It's spilling. Okay, Luke, you're making really great points,

but instead of talking about EcoHealth Alliance, can we point out the men who stared at goats? Do you guys know that one? A little bit. When the U.S. government was experimenting with psychic powers, don't you want point out the men who stared at goats? Do you guys know that one? When the US government was experimenting with psychic powers, don't you want to join the military's psychic powers division? Because at this point, it's not

covert anymore. We know that they're developing psychic technology. We know that those things are real. So propaganda, make that your military recruiting strategy. There's also MKUltra. There's also Mind Control. There's also a whole bunch of stuff and a lot of really inhuman psychological and physical experiments that they've have been doing on a lot of human beings that are unsuspecting of a lot of these experiments that they're participating in that they have been

tested on without even their knowledge there's an article here that's pretty interesting by the south china morning post that's reporting how a team of Chinese scientists are behind splicing animal genes into human genes in order to lead to super soldiers who could survive nuclear fallout and be resistant to radiation. So this is something that's already happening in China, and it's probably financed by the United States. Here's the article that Luke just mentioned. Chinese team behind extreme animal gene experiments as it may lead to super soldiers who survive nuclear fallout.

Modified human embryonic stem cells showed supernatural resistance against radiation, according to a paper by Academy of Military Sciences team in Beijing. Shanghai-based scientist says study may open can of worms, particularly when funding is involved. And they show a water bear there for some reason, a tardigrade.

Now, the funny thing, I just, you know, this was, okay, Fallout video games. This is a component of the story that the writers created for that video game. Fallout is a story where there's a nuclear war, wipes everybody out, tons of people move into vaults. And there's something called the forced evolutionary virus that attempts to make humans more resistant to radioactive fallout, so they give people the virus to alter their genes. Instead, they get sterilized

and their brain capacity diminishes. I don't know about whatever this is all about, but it is funny to me when you see works of fiction in some fashion be replicated by scientists. And I think it's because uh people who are writing fiction are are imagining what the future could be like with the technology we're developing and these stories well i'll give you some fictitious future a bunch of these guys with

radiation resistance get a hold of the nuclear weapons and light the world up so that they're the ones that are left now you're talking about wrath of khan this they actually embedded tardigrade dna into human embryonic stem cells to gain radiation resistance yes it's amazing yes is that's what it was tardigrades yeah yes i thought it was embryonic stem cells they put it into embryonic stem cells tardigrade genes and then they give it to soldiers so now you're talking about wrath of khan where in star trek humans genetically engineered themselves to become better and then the genetically engineered people said we're superior to them and so then the humans were like we got to get rid of these super soldiers they're really bad sent them out of space froze them basically i think i may be getting the story wrong but that's generally the idea military.com has another very interesting article

that's titled the future u.s military super soldier may be closer than we think so these projects again i i was just speculating that they probably are in existence and uh they are so um what year what is this what's the date on this one we have it right here i don't see a date though military.com is great yeah there's no date on this though it may not look like the process that steve rogers went through it may be coming in the next 30 years that's it and then there's a famous saying whatever you think uh the u.s military has it's usually 30 years behind for what it already has right now dudes are going to be able to breathe underwater like not have to breathe they'll be

able to see super far at night but why do this when we already have the robot dogs with guns and those boston dynamics robot people Because robots can't secure street corners and they can get shut down by EMPs. Robots can, perhaps. I wonder if they can do a Faraday shield over some of these robots. They would be pre-programmed AI on how you control them

if their signals are shut down. But yes, they can occupy street corners. Yeah, maybe a street corner, but they can't occupy government. Aerial drones can't, but robots can occupy street corners. Yeah, maybe a street corner, but they can't occupy government. Aerial drones can't, but robots can occupy street corners. You guys have a very bright outlook for what's coming.

First of all, you're giving a lot of credit. There's a movie that I'm thinking of, Idiocracy. Has anyone ever seen that? Where the military doesn't experiment, where this average Joe gets frozen for like a thousand years or something and when he wakes up society has degraded in such a fashion that he is the smartest person on the planet society is in shambles they don't know how to farm they're

running out of food they have no water it's a disaster and their president was a wwe wrestler exactly and donald trump is in the WWE Hall of Fame. So they're wearing Crocs before Crocs became popular. Is that true? Yes. Really? Yes. Yes.

You look at that movie and they were wearing Crocs. I'm terrified we're headed down a path more likely. It's not that we're headed to. We're here. It's happening now. But look, the plastics and the water supply, the weird pharmaceuticals that 14, 12-year-olds are getting put on.

The seed oils, the man boobs. But, but, but, but, but, I gotta hammer this point that Democrats sterilize their kids, abort their kids. So while they're actively, and they actively argue

against having kids. So while they're doing everything in their power not to have children, the right is having more kids and they're fighting a culture war over children's education. So my point here is if it were true that the left had unmitigated indoctrination of children, I'd say, OK, the right's in trouble. Your kids are going to get indoctrinated but if there's a cultural battle over what's happening in these schools and you combine the fact that democrats are actively trying not to have kids give it 20 30 years the country is back on track i hope so regarding poisoning of like fat you call them um forever

chemicals pfas pfas poor floral alcohol stuff they figured out how to get them out of out of the soil you hit it with lasers you convert the soil Into graphene It removes the PFCs The perfluorococcus Out of the graphene Then you put the graphene Back into the soil It fertilizes the soil And you've removed

The forever chemical This graphene is a big deal Yeah it's 21st century steel It's a big deal It'll be the building It's a big deal The material that I'm getting that

Lightweight build in space And on earth We can make clothing out of it I'm not wearing any right now Do you have some graphing clothing? Yeah, shirts. Wow. They're really cool in the heat

and they keep you warm. I'm sure they do. It's pure carbon. That's about the rules. It's just carbon. If we could come back to the point, I think a lot of this genetic manipulation is essentially governments playing

with godlike power and authority, especially when it comes to creating super soldier babies, which obviously has been happening for a very long time. Obviously, the Chinese government is doing it. But technology is really advancing at such a fast pace that it's going to outpace our ability to control it. And I think we have already reached a point

where maybe even artificial intelligence could already be in charge, and we might not even know about it. Terminator. Exactly. But it's not even a Terminator like society. It would be a lot slower and a lot more of human beings acquiescing to it slowly and surely that would be a lot more beneficial for the system to kind of implement their total control on everyone. And you got to kind of ask

yourself, what are they going to be using radiation resistant super soldiers for? That's a question that I think we should be asking ourselves after looking at these articles. To go into the fallout after the bomb drops. Worst case scenario. But to go where you're saying, have you guys noticed,

this is anecdotally, that your map programs are malfunctioning in the last couple of weeks? Have any of you guys had your Google Maps or your Waze? I've just noticed twice in the last two weeks from two different drivers, them telling you to go right and then make a circle and then go back and then

it's like you know this could be ai this could be a hack this could be a this is the long war this is the way that this is the way that well first of all you want to confuse people yours is anyone else reporting that these things are i'm just wondering anecdotally if you guys have experienced it because it's happened to me two times and it clicked like this is what the chinese would do to fight a long where you confuse and disorient the population if ai's tracking do they turn right when we tell them to turn right when they know it's not then they'll know like okay so it's easy to manipulate this one well of course it is you're right this is but I'm not saying it's happening now but you're the strategy you're you're saying is correct what they would do

is they uh our enemies whether it be China or russia or whoever would not disable gps they would not disable communications gps would be off by a degree they would do things like that then we're less likely to notice and then all of a sudden our cruise missiles or whatever hypersonics are missing their targets i asked people on twitter today and a lot of them said yeah it was just anecdotes so i remember during occupy being on the ground covering these protests. You hear this all the time. Even conservatives start saying it in, you know, 2017, 2018, when they started going out more and being in large crowds that, oh, the feds are jamming our cell phones. They're shutting our phones down so we can't communicate.

And I'm like, no, dude, you don't understand. They're spying on you. They want your phones to work. In fact, they deploy mobile cell units to high-trafficked areas in protests to make sure your phones don't go down because they're spying on you. Your phone went down because there's too many people here and the cell towers can't handle it.

People don't understand. They think our enemies would disable GPS. No, that's ridiculous. They would spy on our GPS to track everything we do they want us using these things yeah yeah data is the new oil and data harvesting getting information on people also getting their DNA is something that the Chinese government has been doing uh in a very aggressive way the FBI a couple years ago sent out a memo during COVID saying hey if you're taking a COVID test,

just make sure you're disposing of the swab since there's been Chinese government and Chinese government connected corporations taking those swabs and then data harvesting DNA from the American people in order to, of course, not just game the big pharma system, but more importantly, also just get the genetic information of the American people, which could potentially be used for genetic bioweapons, as we know, are also in progress and in the works by the U.S. Pentagon. Just because I already know those people who are going to say Luke's a conspiracy theorist. Here's the article from NPR. China wants your data and may already have it.

Well, what data are you referring to? Your DNA. That's right. As COVID cases begin to rise a year ago, Chinese company contacted several U.S. states and offered to set up testing labs as a byproduct. The Chinese firm Beijing Genomics Institute would likely gain access to the DNA of those tested. You know, when I tell people that China's stealing your DNA, they go, OK, you're insane. So I don't say it that way. I say, do you see that NPR article, something about a Chinese company taking COVID tests to

get the DNA out of it? And that still sounds insane. But don't worry. I just show them the article and say, I don't know, man. NPR is reporting it. I have a different approach. I say China is stealing your DNA. The U.S. government already has it and is weaponizing it and probably using it against you as we speak right now.

Should I not have done the 23andMe? No. That information also is being found to be sold on the black market. If something is free, you are the product. So every little piece of information, their data mining, the NSA, the U.S. government is collecting them in major servers. And it's not just your DNA. It's also the keystrokes.

It's also your heart rate. It's also your biometric data that's being collected without your permission. What are you pointing at? Point at your wrists. Both of your wrists. But there's a specific strategy that you implement where you don't give your information off and you're someone like

a Ligma Johnson, right? Instead of a Luke Krodowski. This company now just has Ligma Johnson. Hold on, let me pause right there. They don't care about Luke Krodowski's vitals. They care about the, hold on. Let me pause right there. They don't care about Lukradowski's vitals. They care about the anonymized data. When they say things like, we don't take your information, or they say, like, we're going to collect your information for diagnostic reasons, but we do not attach your identity

to it. It will be randomized, and no one will know who you are. What they do when they take your DNA, assuming they do, they don't care your name. They're mapping populations. They're mapping populations. They're mapping characteristics. And because so many people have taken it upon themselves, even me, I'm wearing a Garmin watch, which tracks health. They all do it now. I actually, I like the benefits I get from it, but I recognize all of us are snowflakes in an avalanche. When they collect all this data, they can collectively see detrimental health circumstances.

They can also formulate bioweapons using that data. And they can say when, and the AI knows all of this. People need to understand the depth of AI calculations. They're going to say, we tracked all of the whoops and all the garments and all the smartwatches in Florida, when the smog from Canada came in and we saw a collective 7% decrease in blood oxygenation and a 23% increase in heart rate, they are going to actually be able to map this stuff. They're going to see it was record,

the temperature was 80 degrees. They're going to be able to look at every place on the planet that was recorded 80 degrees, what were the heart rates of the average person? That kind of data can be weaponized in very terrifying ways.

Especially with the Apple Watches, especially with tomorrow's 5G emergency test that's happening at 2.30 p.m. Eastern time. Someone in the comment section also said something pretty funny. Someone said 23 and CCP.

I know. That's over for me. I don't know what I did. The bioweapons are coming. They're made just for you, Lars. What's your ancestry? I I know. That's over for me. I don't know what I did. The bioweapons are coming. They're made just for you, Laura. What's your ancestry? I got to know. Might as well get something out of it.

Oh, what's your guess? What do you think? Swedish. I am part Scandinavian. Yes. I was going to say, yeah, Swedish, but Scandinavian,

that could be Norwegian, Danish. Well, they didn't get specific. It was... Right, it shows the region. Yeah, the region. Eastern European, Scandinavian, could be norwegian danish well they didn't get specific it was it was right it shows the region yeah the region uh eastern european scandinavian and uh apparently england scotland through your dna data you could also find out what kind of diseases and sicknesses you're more prevalent to get and what kind of drugs work for you and don't work for you uh based off your genetics as well we were talking about some of that very similar stuff with some of the friends that we know

that also work in the health industry that are trying to revolutionize it. But there's things that are just double-edged swords. These things are two-way mirrors, man. It's like the value of what you can learn through devices and tech like this, but then they're also learning it, they being whoever, but organizations are also learning your data.

And we're so reliant on it. I mean, honestly, I think about when I was a kid and we didn't have all of this stuff when you used a map and you had to go somewhere and pick up a phone instead of having it in your pocket it was just we're we're so so reliant on these and if your phone dies for like an hour you're like in a panic it is it's terrifying to think of remember not knowing yes kids kids today don't they don't yeah that's crazy they never will it took so long to go to your friend like you know who is that rapper who sang uh gangsters paradise like don't know do you know how long it took me to figure out songs when i would like recite them for people and be like do you now we have tape them off the radio waiting now you can you can pull up the google app and you can sing to it

and it will tell you the song of course yeah so even if the lyrics are wrong i would wait weeks or you could just hold your cell phone up and find out exactly what song it is no but i'm saying if you get a song stuck in your head and you're like what is that song yeah you just go do do do do do and then it'll pop up and tell you what it is so crazy so people are correcting me in the chat it's not 2 30 p.m it's 2 20 p.m And there's a very interesting article from The Verge that's talking about how 23andMe already sold your rights to a drug development company that's working on a genetic database in order to, of course, provide you drugs in the future that you might need. I don't take a lot of drugs. So, what's this test that you're talking about, this 5G test tomorrow? So, they're doing an emergency alert test with FEMA with all cell phones and communication devices using, I believe, 5G test tomorrow. So they're doing an emergency alert test with FEMA with all cell phones and communication devices

using, I believe, 5G. And then this has spurred a lot of people to bring out different theories of what's really happening here. I think it's, you know, a test. It's a test. But I don't want to be a part of it. I don't want to participate in this kind of test.

I will. And all the other devices. And both of your watches. All of them. You can't take your your battery out anymore yep you can't you're used to so i remember during occupy wall street after the big protests and you know i got featured in in magazine stuff i could not turn my phones off so i had an iphone and an android i used the android as my actual phone and the iphone was at

a better camera and streamed a higher quality. iPhone's battery could not be removed. Android could. Both phones could not be turned off. If I turned them off, they would instantly turn back on.

So I took the battery out of the Android but the iPhone would instantly turn back on no matter what I did. I held on the Android 5 for so long because you could still

take the battery out. I just waited until the 9 and I couldn't take it anywhere. It was so slow. It became obsolete. I'm reliant on the thing. You're talking about reliance on this tech.

I don't know if this is real, but this guy, his name is Martin Peltier. He's a Canadian dude. M. Peltier, CIO on Twitter. He's got his, he's got these pictures of,

screenshots of his Instagram, and it says, people in Canada can't see this content. In response to Canadian government legislation news content can't be viewed in Canada I can't tell if it's real it's Breitbart CNN that's real so there people are becoming reliant on this tech and then a government goes and like

cuts your artery to it and like how do you how do you survive if they do that to you the UK is next this is just Instagram but like if it's your bank if it's your direction apps like there was that article saying they want to ban rumble in the uk over russell brand your phone if you just all of a sudden don't have technology like don't have communication technology like that's it's a human rights violation there's all there's already stores

where you walk in and they say credit only card only no cash and you know we're talking about neural link and uh the metaverse and stuff like that and there's every all these conservatives like i'll never do it i won't do it and i'm like yeah you will i mean no no maybe you won't but i'm saying society will why because you're going to walk in a taco bell and you're going to go up to the kiosk there's no human beings and you're going to be like you know cheesy gordita crunch cheesy gordita crunch cheesy gordita crunch extra extra sauce and pay and then it's going to say neural pay. And you're going to be like,

where do I put my card? Where do I tap my card? And it's going to be like, we no longer accept cards. Neural pay only. And you're going to be like, focus third eye here, and it'll show

like the red glow. What they're implementing, they already tested and are using currently in China right now, especially with their social credit score where people have their face scanned. And if they have the wrong political thoughts and ideas, they can't buy groceries.

They can't travel on high speed train. They can't get high speed Internet. They can't, of course, get their kids into the proper schools. And that, of course, keeps society in line and obeying governments and not questioning them. As, of course, course many journalists many activists have been hit with a poor social credit score and in america we already have a very similar system that's not really talked about it's a corporate social credit score as of course a lot of your data is being harvested a lot of your data is being sold and your thoughts and expressions

are also being judged very heavily uh and you just don't know about it yet and it hasn't been fully implemented but the databases the systems in order to fully roll this out are there and i think they're just going to slowly and surely get us used to these ideas and then implement it all for our safety and our well-being and in reality it's it's something that is draconian technocratic and meant to destroy human civilization. Jeez. Yeah, I'm tired of the, I'm doing this for your own good. Like, that's obviously, that's, when someone says that to you in a movie, or that you know that the character's lying if they say that to someone in a movie.

So, like, that people are trying to do this, like, you want to cut down my access to carbon for my own good? Have you guys seen the new Disney movie? Which one is this? It was like Wish or something, I forgot what it's called, where it's the king has magic powers and can grant wishes. But he only grants certain wishes that he thinks will help the country. And then this young girl discovers the ability to grant wishes. And then she's like, we've got to grant everyone's wish.

And the king's like, someone's coming for my power. And it's just like quite, it's so obviously an attack on capitalist meritocracy you can't just grant everyone's wishes but the communists are like yes we can yeah it really can't they play on your desire to free the slaves that's what that sounds like is a movie about freeing the slaves give everyone the the road to perdition but is that the right word perdition but in reality giving everyone ultimate control is not like we're not we're we're slaves to reality we can't if we all had fusion packs it was one of those monkeys is going to drop it on the ground and blow everything up so we got to be maybe not fusion fission packs if we all have fission packs

so we gotta you gotta limit people i i this is a long conversation all right we're gonna go to super chats if you haven't already smash that like button subscribe to this channel share the show if you really do like it and head over to tim TimCast.com, click join us, join our Discord server where you can hang out with like-minded people. They're building, they're working on music, they're working on games, there's an after show, there's a pre-show, there's an after-after show, and, as a member, you'll get access to our

members-only uncensored show, which will be up in about 28 minutes, but for now, we will read your Super Chats. We got NoahSanders.q saying, first, Tim, will Elite and VIP members have preferred seating at the live show in Miami? I'm working on that. Ideally, yes.

I think for Elite members especially, yes. But again, I'm not organizing the event. Our company is and there's people who are in charge of it. There's a lot of paperwork and stuff. Let me sort that out and we'll get back to uh guys in the discord all right fix bayonets says gates should nominate mark levin okay all right well donald trump's in the running

raymond g stanley jr says tim marjorie taylor green's words were hold the line bs let's just stand here so they can beat us back gates on, on the other hand, is forwarding the line. He made the aggressive bet to see if they got the balls, and he won. Seriously. Really, I think he's doing a great job, man. Let's see what we got. Let's see what we got. Big7588 says, police already abused the 5150 hold.

Do not use it for drug addiction. Well, what's the alternative, right? What are we supposed to do about the violent drug addicts in San Francisco and, you know, all throughout California that we're seeing in New York? If someone is mentally unstable, what do we do? Just lock them up? It's a tough question. I don't, I mean, I don't have a great answer, but we have to do something. You can't just, I mean, look at what, look at the result right now.

Take a look around. Does it seem like things are great? They, we used to do something you can't just i mean look at what look at the result right now take a look around does it seem like things are great they we used to have mental institutions yeah now we just have people open air drug markets drug abuse philly has that i forgot what they're calling it where it's like you see this open air drug market of people zombying around you've got skid row you've got san francisco now it's it's everywhere i don't i i think you have to get people off the streets if they're on drugs and incapable of taking care of themselves i don't know what the answer is probably that was argument i was making earlier that's why he's saying no to 51 50s i assume that they tried the jail thing before and it was just too inhumane so they they were like we need better condition jails institutions and then they were like well that's not even humane but then i get vivek's big on this he's saying we need to reopen institutions and but we need to make them actually

good and and clean and like give them access to technology like webcam so they can talk to their families and stuff while they're there all right here's one for uh lara t-rex pet shop asks why did donald trump defend mccarthy and the establishment that's one thing we criticize him for why doesn't he listen to us also he's asking do you have pets we are an anti-woke alternative to woke chewy PetSmart and Petco from T-Rex Pet Shop oh I love that I have three dogs uh I have a Beagle a hound mix and a miniature Yorkie um so yeah we'll check that out thank you why did he defend McCarthy well I think if you look back, McCarthy has been actually an ally of my father in laws while he was in the White House. I don't know today what he has said

about it. It sounds like he actually said that he thought what happened was rather positive and gave kudos to Matt Gaetz. So I don't know, I would have to check with him on exactly where he stands on that right now. Yeah, I think he said something. I'm not sure I didn't see the video but someone said that recently trump said i've got nothing bad to say about him he's always been nice to me or something to that effect and it's like oh whatever yeah it's always got to divide criticizing the man himself and he seems like a pretty cool guy with his his actions in the role he also truth today that the republicans shouldn't be fighting each other but they should be fighting the radical left. Well, we got this one from Load 200 saying Matt Gaetz doesn't have the balls to run for Speaker of the House.

Matt Gaetz just gave the Democrat gave Democratic Party a win. Thanks for thanks. No, for nothing. Gaetz. Thanks for nothing. Gaetz. I think Gaetz did the right thing. But there are a lot of people to share that sentiment.

That was the no votes so kevin mccarthy is doing deals with democrats in defiance of what the republican party actually was negotiating on then you you don't have the republicans don't have a majority i think he had to do the machine he had to become the machine for a moment i don't think he's like happy in any way about who did mccarthy matt no gates matt gates what do you mean he's doing he's doing what needs to be done mechanically for the situation. He knows that it's like

speaker does not comply, speaker must go. And everyone else is like, hey, it's not a video game. It's not a math problem. There's more to it. And he's like, speaker did not comply,

speaker must go. And it's like in some ways you need... He's making the hard decisions. Yeah. Yep. And there's value to that. There's value to people

that are able to do that to set aside their desires and to make those hard decisions. Rivian Creek says, Tulsi for speaker. She's value to that. There's value to people that are able to do that, to set aside their desires and to make those hard decisions. Rivian Creek says Tulsi for speaker. She's an independent now. Yeah, maybe. I think considering nobody wants it, a Democrat is not going to get it. Republicans might have to find an outside speaker.

I know the Donald Trump thing is funny, but he's running for president, so I don't think he would do it. They might need to find someone, former member of Congress who would. It's not a bad idea. I like Dr. No better. Ron Paul. do it they might need to find someone former member of congress who would it's not a bad idea um i like dr no better uh ron paul i think he would be the perfect candidate for this he always voted no on everything all right brap zach says tim i'm a vet and would lose two thousand dollars a month it would be tough but worth it let's go matt gates wow that's right on man i hear you i know not everybody uh and you're in a similar position could agree with that. You know, people who need those benefits. That's why it's tough. Yeah, like what percentage of your net income or net wealth is $2,000? Because sometimes if it's only a drop in the bucket for you, it's understandable. If it's 95% of your income, then that could be a different story. But I'm with you, man. all right we'll grab some more super chats what do we got saddle effing tramp says mccarthy is facing the consequences of his actions as speaker he thought once he was in business as usual matt

gates held him accountable for once i appreciate it man and then uh mr buskill says i nominate ron paul as sacrifice there you go as tribute yeah what do we got violet gray says stop saying vet pay is affected it isn't i am not talking literally about right now i'm saying one of the things matt gates brought up was that this i mean and kevin mccarthy said this as well payment for the troops and veterans benefits so matt said one of the first things they did when it was all going down was making sure they had a single subject spending bill for veteran benefits terence max says vivek ramaswamy for house speaker every everybody who's in politics right now especially those running for president are not going to take a position like this do you need to be non-partisan like is that the are they supposed to be non-partisan who are

people suggesting like justin amash or something and i'm like he'll get removed in two seconds again i don't think you need to be non-partisan i think they've all been i mean it's you know no i don't think i think nancy pelosi's non-partisan no they i have they haven't been non-partisan i'm wondering if they if we got one if that would if they like literally didn't take sides they just kind of spoke the will of the Congress. Isn't that impossible these days? Yeah. It's definitely idealistic. Sir thinks a lot, says Ukraine has every right to self-defense. We have every interest in stopping hostile foreign powers.

We aren't sending Ukraine cash. We're sending equipment, equipment that we could use in our own country. And we could be using our resources, whatever they may be, equipment or otherwise, to, I don't know, secure our southern border and worry about what Americans are worrying about. How about this? Ukraine certainly has a right to self-defense. Good luck, Ukraine. I wish you the best. How about we take those resources and, I don't know, like fix our roads, our bridges? Right now in West Virginia, they shut down 340 for rock slide abatement, and it's causing a major crisis for like the locals. It's not like a national crisis. But now the roads around this highway

are being torn up and destroyed. Why don't we invest back in our infrastructure, which is in serious trouble? Yeah, bit too many. And good luck to Ukraine, man. I wish you the best. It's unfortunate, you know. I don't see what the argument is here.

There are a lot, this is a little tangential, a lot of good technologies to make better roads. But I think the planned obsolescence is profitable for the machine that builds them. So they just keep using asphalt. I can't tell. But you could like put graphene. I mean, all right.

Here we go again. Let's take a shot. It's getting hot. Wow. Scott Braconier says, but Tim still won't speak about defending Israel. They get $880 billion a year. Let's have a real chat, Tim. I am particularly annoyed by the people who are obsessed with Israel for some reason,

which is one of the issues, but we'll talk about that all the time. We've done full segments talking about the various spending that the U.S. has given overseas, and we've talked about wasteful spending in the Middle East. And Vivek Ramaswamy was roasted for talking about how he wanted to get Israel to the point where they could defend themselves. What's the point? My issue often with people who talk about Israel is like, they do these non sequiturs to force you to talk about Israel. And it's so annoying. They'll like, I'll keep it vague. But in the past, there'd be people like in a chat room, and they'd say something like, Hey, did you guys try this new pizza restaurant that opened in brooklyn and this is actually i'm talking about i'm being

i'm being vague but this is a directly related to uh to the work that i'm doing and then someone would be like yeah it was really good you know i've had pizza all over the world really we're at israel you know the thing about israel is and then i'm just like you know what dude there are people who are so desperate and obsessed with just israel and i'm like i get it, man. But the bigger issue I'm talking about is all foreign policy and all foreign spending. I'm not focused on one country. We're talking about Ukraine because Ukraine is the thing they're voting on and funding right now. But yes, I agree.

I think we should reassess a lot of a lot of this. That being said, when Donald Trump was in office, we had the Abraham Accords, historic peace agreements. You actually had commerce from the Saudi Arabia, the Emirates into Israel. Yeah. Amazing. Wow. I know. Thanks, Donald Trump.

Yeah, seriously. So why don't we? That seems like a solution to the problems. If no one's fighting, then maybe we don't need to waste money anymore. And then all these leftists were like, yeah, Trump just bribed them. I'm like, well, look at that. Offer money and say the economic incentives for you to stop fighting

are tremendous. If you guys are not in conflict, you're going to be super rich. And then fighting stops? I'll take it. No new wars under Donald Trump. I'll say that. For me,

just stop all foreign funding. Like, why are we giving other people money? We have a lot of problems at home. Give it back to the American people. It's to ensure that they spend it so they keep using the petro dollar.

That's why they gave the gender studies money in Pakistan. At least that's one reason. It's a big reason. They give our money out so that people are like, I got money. I can use it. And then they spend it. It's to build confidence in the petrodollar to challenge bricks and all that stuff. Like, what a stupid idea.

Dilute the savings of the American people. And the argument is, yeah, but then our our economy which produces nothing is propped up based on the fact that other people use our money and it's just like how about we bring manufacturing back and we do some work secure our borders bring back jobs i'm sure people would rather in west virginia make cars instead of sitting around gambling and and doing opioids we're gonna build a space elevator on the moon you're saying out of graphite yeah graphene graphene sorry when it becomes a hexagonal lattice it looks like a honeycomb yeah it's awesome i'll show you a picture

of it later or maybe we can pull one up i don't think tim will mega glaive says politicians who vote for bills they don't have time to read should be impeached for violating their oath to office they have a duty to verify the bill is constitutional and they cannot do this if they don't know what is in it what what is in it i completely agree but that's not the world that we live in right now matt gates was talking about that today saying we need to read the bills we need to understand what we're passing they don't they just literally put their stamp on approval well we had when marjorie taylor green was on the show she talks about how there's like eight republicans and eight democrats and some guy she doesn't she she comes into congress and she sees like eight democrats a republic Democrats and some guy, she comes into Congress and she sees like eight Democrats, eight Republicans

and some guy in the Speaker's position. She doesn't know who it is and he's just like, here's a bill. Yeah, okay, it's passed. Here's another bill. No, then it's not.

Let's have it for the yeas and the nays. And then they just do it by sound. And then they just go, sure, it's passed. No, they have a voting system. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Marjorie said

the majority of bills, it is only eight of each in the party. No one's there. They're all on fundraising phone calls. And someone who is not the speaker is reading off the bills and they just go, whatever. And then what she started doing with the Freedom Caucus was as soon as they would go, here's a bill, nah, floor vote.

And then have to call every member of Congress back in to actually vote on it. Yeah, and she was describing how everyone was really mad at her because they had to actually go on the House floor. And that's why they removed her committee positions and assignments because they're like, we don't want to do work. Wow. Yep. Nice. I'd like to see a felony that they should under oath testify that they read the bills before you even have a right to vote on it.

And then a felony if they violate. So how do we change it, though? You know you know like what's the what's the plan we could do a convention of states but that can get that can become dangerous because other people could do it um and change the constitution without congress's authority well otherwise we could try and get them to do it to themselves a convention of states will still require voting on proposed amendments and the risk is the states may agree to amend the Constitution, but you don't know how the states will actually vote to amend the Constitution. Because that's where things get more specific. There's fears that they could take away the right

to keep in bear arms or something like that. I'm not concerned about that. If Republican states have the majority and call a convention of states, which they're relatively close and might happen, I'm confident that the amendments would probably be okay they can add to the second amendment or how about what are we on 27 must be the 28th i don't know we can add amendment being like just to reiterate when we said you have a right to keep and bear arms we mean all at any point any accessory any amount of ammunition the founding fathers had private warships so uh we're good they can do something like that or i mean honestly how would y'all feel if they amended the constitution to say the right to keep and bear arms is universal except in the instance of you know biological

and nuclear weapons that's that's fair let's not have those i want my nuclear weapons that's an interesting question because uh private companies are the ones that make them. Exactly. And so, you know, I've had this argument about people have a right. I said people have a right to keep and bear biological and nuclear weapons. And I got all these progressive screaming. Like, Tim's nuts. He's insane.

And I'm like, who do you think makes them? Do you think that, like, a government agency makes these weapons? They don't. It is the military industrial complex like you know lockheed martin and and raytheon these companies are making nuclear weapons for the government which means they're privately owned that's always how it's been yep and selling the technology to other countries as well yeah you gotta love it don't you dick dickerson says malice for speaker yes obviously but come on i don't think he would take it.

No one's going to nominate him, although that would be absolutely fantastic. I think the longer we go without a speaker, the more chance of a radical populist to get put in from outside the system like Oprah or whoever. But someone famous that'll just be like Brad Pitt. He walks in and everyone's like, ah, I just if it gets to a point where people become desperate to get House speakers. The Life of Dye says gag orders are anti-First Amendment. People are allowed to say whatever they want, don't like it, change the Constitution. That is interesting. I've been involved in lawsuits before. I assume you probably have most people to a certain degree, depending on the business you're in. But gag orders are fairly common. And I'm not not i'm not super opposed to it the challenge i find is that when

depending on the court you're in you may end up with a judge being like okay both parties there's a gag order you can't disparage each other one party will do it the judge will do nothing about it so often what we see is hey don't you do this thing your opposition does it and then you're like hey they're doing they're like yes that's whatever who cares and i'm like so should i do it no don't you dare and i'm like so break the rules or what that's the problem i have with it the judge has cameras in the courtroom the judge is like i'm gonna do whatever i want he's gonna laugh and smile for the camera and say trump better not talk about it he better not criticize my staff for their political biases somebody uh it might have been mark twain quote said that it's better to just break, just to do the, I don't want to get this quote wrong, but it's better to like apologize for breaking the rule than to ask if you can break the rule.

It's better to apologize. Ask for forgiveness than permission. Yes. Yeah, I despise that. Me too. I don't like that, just that sociological pattern, what that could create. I don't like that. No, I definitely do not agree with that.

I understand the advantages to doing something and then being like whoopsie daisy after the fact. But when you're running a company and you have a lot of people who have that ethos of I'll just do it

and ask for forgiveness later. That doesn't work very well. Nope. No. Hey, there's like a reason why we said not to do this thing. You went and did it and now the house is on fire.

It's like so, yeah. Well, then you could not forgive them. You we said not to do this thing you went and did it and now the house is on fire it's like so uh yeah well then you could not forgive them you could choose not to forgive them you know i mean i think part of the problem these days every everybody so these kids honestly the the upcoming generations i'm really terrified about they're so soft there's no punishment that i mean the the way that kids are raised today is so, so different than the way I was raised. I mean, it is I'm really wondering if anyone will have any work ethic at all. They'll have any sort of direction as to what they want to do in life. Everybody's just like a free for all of just coddling. And it's it's honestly scary. So I agree agree. Maybe you ask for forgiveness and you don't get it. Yeah. I think the issue is there are some circumstances where you don't need to ask for permission.

And there are some circumstances where you do. And if too many people have this idea that I'm not going to ask for permission to do a thing that could potentially negatively impact people, it's like, well, now you're creating serious risks for others but if it's an issue of like a benign victimless thing of i don't know if this road is open or not i'm just gonna go down it we'll see what happens like okay well the guy don't do it again yeah but if it's like i'm just gonna drink the milk i don't know whose it is don't do that i had to i grew up with a brother that did that it's so annoying this ethos is like you open the fridge at work and you see a delicious ham sandwich that says like you know jf on you're like don't know what that means but i'll just ask jf for forgiveness after i eat his lunch and so and then the guy walks in and it's john fetterman and he's like yo you ate my uh what and then you're like well he can't ever articulate his anger anyway so now i don't go to apologize what do you think about um mass pardons as a political tactic oh well in i mean for all everyone hillary joe hunter donald everyone in prison for j6

uh we could even go deep deep uh deep something that would benefit both sides or all sides well i mean i think that my father-in-law has said that he probably would do take care of the january 6th folks i mean he's going to do something to rectify the abuses that these people have suffered it's really insane but ian's talking about pardoning hunter biden well i mean that's a tactic to consider for sure because then you just level it all and you just say enough with this can we just focus on actually what people care about, which is getting this country back in order? I can understand. I can understand the point Ian's making.

I'm not for it, but I can understand the idea being you go to them and say, stop fighting us. We are taking over. Trump will be president. We're not going to imprison you. And now the conflict is done. And the idea is right now they're leveling everything they have at Trump and Trump supporters in panic and desperation.

And if Trump went and said, you guys leave right now, no more attacks on us. And when I'm president, we won't lock you up for the rest of your lives. You'll get to be rich and be comfortable, but we're done.

We're in charge now. They might actually back down. I don't think they will is the issue. The problem too is, you know, when you look at what is pretty obviously going on with the Bidens, it's really a national security issue at a certain point. I mean, how do you know that the decisions Joe Biden is making in the White House? And we know that that is I mean, we're being very kind by saying he's making decisions in the White House. He can barely string a sentence together are based on

what he thinks is best for the country and not what's best for the Biden pockets. You know what I mean? And so I think if what is being implied has happened with Joe and Hunter Biden, I mean, really selling this country out, that is a really awful place to find ourselves in the United States. And man, we never want to go back there. So we better take care of that problem. And I don't know if you want to just let that one sail off into the sunset unchecked that doesn't feel

right to me right i think we are a nation of laws yeah for too long there's been no accountability and what they're doing the more they do it just like shows like we need to weed out the corruption through a legal process there needs to be legitimate investigations, indictments, and- I would love it, but it's like we investigated ourselves. We found we did nothing wrong. That's not it. Donald Trump getting in office is not investigating ourselves. It's him saying, look at what you were doing when you were in power and investigating.

Look at the Steele dossier. I was going to say, what about the FBI? What about the CIA? What about the DOJ itself? If we just kind of say we're gonna just call it even here we gotta get to the heart of this i mean this stuff is so corrupt it is so rotten at the core to know that the cia and the fbi have now meddled in two presidential elections we know that we can't just kind of turn around and be like, let's call it even. I feel like I know.

So my answer is no. I think of it as like a hostage negotiation kind of at this point, because I'm tired of seeing everybody. Yeah, it's just so exhausting. And it is as five trillion has been printed. And it's still really it's still Joe Biden versus Donald Trump. I'm getting tired of that. You guys like we got to solve this if we're going to survive.

We got Ray Burt G. tired of that you guys like we got to solve this if we're going to survive we got ray burt g stan burt jr saying i swear one day graphene will be a common material used all around the world and ian will be the old man screaming you all called me crazy waving his fist the young people on their graphene hoverboards ian how much did you pay him to write that i wrote that that's my super chat no i'm just kidding um what'll happen is i'll tell everyone i told you so once but then you got to be humble and not be like i'm you so once, but then you gotta be humble and not be like, I'm the one that told everyone to do it. Ian's going to have a gigantic

10-story tall vault where he will climb to the top, it'll be full of gold coins, and he will dive into it and swim around because he's invested in graphene stock. I want it to be free for people. I'll be honest, when Ian started screaming about graphene, I bought stock in a company that manufactures graphene products products and it's one of the only stocks that

i have that's continually performed positively oh it's 2029 you're gonna investigate this when i leave here i'm like i don't know anything about it all i know is i googled company that makes graphene and it's like here's the company and then i'm like i'm up they said everything else is bad but i was in chile in 2018 working on starting a graphene company with this china this chilean billionaire and all he wanted was how much money you're gonna make i'm like that's not why i'm doing this dude and then in our research we saw in 2029 you're gonna start to see peak graphene um inflection which is where society now starts to use it like normal so we still got a few more years to start investing and i'm not giving investment advice he's been in on

this for a while i say see. Yeah. Yeah. All right, Brian B. says, I can't believe I agree with Ian. We currently have reps representing all three, rural, suburbs, and city in their district. A republic can't protect the minority when rep survival depends on ignoring the minority for the majority. Yeah, well, I don't know if more members of Congress

makes it easier. Probably makes it more difficult. Yeah. I don't know what you do. I mean, honestly. It makes it slower. I don't know if more members of Congress makes it easier. Probably makes it more difficult. I don't know what you do. I mean, honestly. It makes it slower. I don't know if that's worse. We got a big super chat from Seth Weathers.

He says, the world may be on fire, but you can still get conservative dad's revenge. The Trump mugshot limited edition beer can. See in Miami. Shout out to Seth Weathers. Did you hear about that? He sold, what is he about to hit? Like $2 million. He launched a beer company called conservative dad's ultra right beer because of

bud light wow and then they launched a limited edition trump mugshot can and he served like half a million dollars in half a day wow yeah love that yep that's the beauty of america right there yeah we we made a we made a graphic of trump's mugshot, but like the Obama hope poster. And then we just told everybody they could have it. It's like, we just made the art, we put it, it's free, it's not ours, we don't own it, it's just a mugshot. And then people are making mugs or making stickers and posters. And it'll be really great. You know, I remember when I was younger, when Obama was running, they had all those hope posters everywhere. It would just be so amazing to see in 2024 revenge everywhere just trump's

mugshot in that art revenge it's how a lot of americans feel man thinker for life says uh-oh youtube just jumped on us they always do that all right here we go inserting trump as speaker equals a triple benefit we'll get a jump on cleaning out the deep state the dems in congress with trump derangement syndrome will short circuit and clear themselves out. The witch hunt is diverting his time anyway. Be on center stage as speaker while running, I guess. I don't know. I think it'd be hilarious if he took it.

It might be worth just seeing the reaction. I would kind of just to get, you know what I mean? Could you imagine like of all people? I just remember like Rachel Maddow after my father-in-law had won and he was officially president elect. And she the next time she was on TV, she was like, this is not a nightmare. You are waking up. This is not a nightmare. Imagine if he became speaker of the House. God, it would be worth it.

Do you remember when Mueller came out and said that the conclusion was Donald Trump did not collude with Russia and she was on the verge of crying? Yes. These people are nuts. I'm sitting there. I'm like, oh, wow. Look at that. Trump was was innocent. Hey and she was on the verge of crying. Yes. These people are nuts. I'm sitting there, I'm like, oh, wow, look at that. Trump was innocent. Hey, you know, the country moves forward and they're like on the verge of tears. Like, no, he needs, they wanted it to be true.

That's insane, man. And then they dug so deep, they found themselves. Yeah, there are a lot of people who have attached themselves to a political movement. And then when that movement starts faltering, There are a lot of people who have attached themselves to a political movement. And then when that movement starts faltering, they're panicked. Like, I've dedicated too much to this. I can't turn around now.

Yeah, but it should be like the scientific method where you want your experiment to fail. You want to poke every possible hole in the thing until it fails. And then you scrap it and start a new process. Same with your political party. That's what it should be. Arthur Charles says, Laura, were you prepared to be on Nerdcast IRL? Was it because you were talking about Star Trek and stuff?

Oh, I don't know. I've never really watched Star Trek. I watched Star Wars. What'd you think? I loved Star Wars. I haven't watched all the new ones. There's too many. I watched the first three,

the originals. That's all I know. But no, maybe I wasn't prepared. Next time I'll watch a lot of Star Trek. Do you guys talk a lot of sci-fi in the house? Not a lot. Not necessarily. Did you get get that did you think i was no actually i

thought you weren't but i wanted to ask because i didn't want to assume no not a lot of sci-fi all right char deets says today was the first bravery from republicans we've seen in years everyone may not like it but we need accountability i guess it was eight Republicans. I said 11 earlier. I was wrong. I think it's eight. And it's Democrat opportunists and eight Republicans willing to stand up and say no to the establishment. In all fairness, there might be a lot of Democrats that also are tired of the establishment that voted to get them out. Yeah, but I don't think so. Like Ilhan, she didn't matter pretty tight. I don't know. There was that photo everyone's sharing. Did you see it? Where she's like licking her lips and looking at Matt Gaetz and everyone's like captioning this.

Oh, excuse me. I don't think she's actually looking at Matt Gaetz. She's probably just sitting there and someone caught an awkward photo. All right, everybody. He's not her brother. Okay. Okay. If you haven't already, please would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel,

share the show with your friends if you do like it, and head over to TimCast.com. Click join us. Become a member because the members-only uncensored show will be up in just a few minutes, and we will take your questions. You can follow the show at TimCastIRL. You can follow me personally at TimCast. Laura, do you want to shout anything out? Oh, sure. You can follow me at LauraLeeTrump on all of them.

X if we're calling it that Twitter, Instagram and truth. Thank you. This was fun. Thank you so much for coming on. If you want to support me, check out take the chill pill dot com. It's my own line of supplements that I use under high stress. It helps me. It might help you do your own homework, do your own research.

Take the chill pill dot com. And Ian Freeman of Free Talk Live was, by the way, sentenced to eight years in jail yesterday. I think that's pretty crazy. For what? Essentially selling Bitcoin without a license. I'm just generalizing

the case here. Find out more about it and learn about this case on freekeen.com. And yeah, I think it's outrageous that he was sentenced to eight years.

You have a podcast or a show? I do, yes. The Right View. It's therightview.com. You've heard of The View. dot com and yeah I think it's outrageous that he was sentenced to eight years you have a podcast or a show I do yes the right view it's the right view comm you've heard of the view this is about a hundred and eighty degrees in the opposite direction so we hope people get smarter watching it not dumber when is it it's three days a week Tuesdays Wednesdays and Thursdays what time 8 p.m. Eastern yes look at you over on it and when people follow you on twitter x it's lara lee it's l-a-r-a-l-e-a which you found out the hard way yes i had to ask i'm still humiliated thanks for coming laura it's great to meet you man thank you guys and thanks

for letting me be weird you guys i promise you in 15 years graphing will be normalized i'm not gonna be talking about as much and your machines will be a lot more lightweight ian really came from a time traveling machine so he knows what he's When I look into the sky I see the future bounce back at me so

let's keep it going. Splurge? Yeah I'm just hanging out here. I'm ready for the after show when you guys are. Alright everybody we

will see you all over at TimCast.com in a couple minutes. Thanks for hanging out. you