Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #896 Sam Bankman-Fried GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS, Democrat Donor, FTX Founder w/Josh Smith

Episode Date: November 3, 2023

Tim, Ian, Hannah Claire, & Serge join Joshua Smith to discuss Sam Bankman-Fried being found guilty on all charges, a Connecticut judge overturning election results in a mayoral race, Tucker Carlson warning RFK Jr will hurt Trump's 2024 presidential run, & Trump's new idea to create a free online America Academy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals if you win.

Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, As we're preparing to publish this show, we got breaking news. FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried has been found guilty on all charges, including multiple counts of fraud, conspiracy and money laundering. It's kind of funny. He's a big Democrat donor.

And there's also talk about it. Wasn't he the guy who was like offering Trump, hypothetically, billions of dollars not to run for president? Was that him? Hypothetically, yeah. That was what was going on. It was never confirmed, but people were saying, hey, he might have offered. How much would you like to not run for president? I think there was a bunch of people that were close to him that actually said that he was doing it.

He was offering that or something. Okay, so this is breaking news right now. The other story we were planning on leading off with is that a judge in Connecticut overturned a Democrat primary after a video emerged of ballot stuffing. And the interesting thing about this is that it's not a victory. The general election is still happening and it is presumed that the candidate who should not be the candidate on the ballot

is still going to win. So this is a really, really interesting story. We'll talk about that. Plus the invasion in Gaza is, it's interesting. We had on the show, someone talk about the strategy that Israel would take in gaza if they were to invade and that would be to bifurcate the gaza strip i think it might have been max blumenthal but this is exactly what israel is doing right now so we'll talk about that

we got a bunch of other stories the uh the house passed a bill for israel funding but no ukraine funding and they're saying it's going to be dead in the senate now because of that but i think it's hilarious that ukraine's basically been cut off. Poor Zelensky. Before we get started, my friends, head over to castbrew.com. If you want the best cup of coffee you've ever had, go to Cast Brew and pick up our re-rise with Roberto Jr. Halloween special limited edition blend.

Now check this out. There's only a few thousand of these, and there will never be any more after this. This is the plan. This is our Halloween edition where you got a chicken foot emerging like a zombie from the earth. Pick it up while you can. Of course, everyone's favorite is Rise with Roberto Jr., but I'm hearing now that people

really do like Stand Your Grounds, which is our medium roast. When you buy Casper Coffee, yes, Serge, that's the best. When you buy Casper Coffee, you're actually helping fund our coffee house project. We are going to be building a bunch of cafes hopefully soon. One's currently in the works. All of the profits that we're getting from Casper basically go into the staff and the equipment and building this coffee shop. So if you like the idea of a hangout where you can hang out

with people in the real world, support us at casper.com, but also go to timcast.com, click join us, become a member to support our work directly, and you'll get access to the uncensored members only show. We're going to have one of those up for you tonight at 10 PM, where you as members can call into the show and talk to us and our guests it's gonna be a lot of fun so smash that like button subscribe to this channel share the show with your friends joining us tonight to talk about this and a whole lot more is joshua smith hey thanks so much for having me again tim i appreciate it who are you what do you do uh i am currently a candidate for president for the libertarian party uh i am the host of Break the Cycle podcast on YouTube every Thursday evening at 730 Central Time. And I am a father of six, was past National Committee for the Libertarian Party and anti-war activist since 2008.

I'm also a anti-communist and counter-revolutionary, in case Phil's not here tonight. That's a very original idea. Wait, but what kind of musician are you? A failed musician. Very failed musician. Right on. Well, thanks for hanging out. Yeah, of course.

We got Hannah Clare hanging out. Hey, I'm Hannah Clare Brimlow. I'm a writer for TimCast.com. You should follow at TimCastNews on every social media platform ever. And Ian's here, of course. Hi, everybody.

Actor and very successful musician Ian Crossland coming at you hard. Subscribe to me on YouTube. Hi. I'm Serge.com. Good to have you back, Ian. Thanks. Yeah, most energy.

Your hair looks great. Thanks, bro. Appreciate it. All right, Sam Bankman-Fried. Here's the big breaking news. As of 7.51 p.m., CNBC, Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty on all seven criminal fraud counts. The month-long trial of Sam Bankman-Fried wrapped on Thursday. A jury has found him guilty

on all seven criminal counts. The former FTX CEO faces a maximum sentence of 115 years in prison. Bankman-Fried, the 31-year-old son of two Stanford legal scholars and graduate of MIT, had pleaded not guilty to charges including wire fraud, securities fraud,

et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. We get all that stuff. The trial ended, blah, blah, blah. We get it. Okay, all right. All this, this is just like the bits and bobs we don't care about. Who was this guy? What was he doing?

He was a big Democrat donor. And there's a lot of speculation that he was basically using these schemes to help fund Democrat politicians. Yeah, he donated to over 300 political campaigns and directly to the DNC. There's another big conspiracy theory that the money that was going through Ukraine was coming back through him to the DNC. That was the big conspiracy theory. I don't know if it's been proven yet

or not, but it wouldn't surprise me at all. At all. Yeah, I can't remember what that was. There was something. Man, it's been so long. Like, we're seriously getting ready for this show. Like, oh, look at this big voter cheating story. And then,rael boom breaking news bankman freed is is found guilty on all counts but i but it is a fact that uh he was this big democrat donor the money he was making what was he like he wasn't that well off and then he started ftx and all of a sudden

he skyrocketed in net worth and capital yeah billions and then he immediately starts funding a bunch of democrat politicians now i'll just i'll be nice i shouldn't be but i'll be nice that doesn't implicate any of these politicians but it certainly shows that the people at least some of the most powerful people here it is who are funding these politicians are criminals who are using dirty methods of funding these politicians and then i've got questions about how act blue operates james o'keefe with the omg media group did a big story about uh and this is coming from them that money from china was flowing through act blue so i got a lot of questions about what uh what these people are

up to that wouldn't surprise me either i gladly trade uh spf for for uh ross olbrich today to the federal prison we should get ross out there. He created an e-commerce website. Did he, though? Did he actually create it? Yeah. I mean, maybe. So, for people who aren't familiar, he's the Dread Pirate Roberts. Well, yeah, they say that.

But he was the creator of Silk Road. But they don't know if he was. There were several Dread Pirate Roberts. But they don't know if he was the one that had to do with the the murder for hire stuff they just brought it up in court dragged him through the mud and then dropped all those charges and then put him in the prison for two and a half life sentences right this is the silk road this is where people were buying and trading a bunch of stuff whether it was legal or not and uh the username was dread pirate roberts so one of them yeah one of them the argument was was he makes this or someone made it and they pass

it off to someone else and they just share this name. You guys have seen the princess bride. Oh yeah. The truth is I am not the dread pirate robots. Yes. The real dread pirate robots died years ago. It was really genius. I mean, if you think about it, the way that they ran that, but, but he said in prison for two and a half life sentences for an e-commerce website and nothing more really. I mean, that's basically what it was. Tucker Carlson went to meet Julian Assange. You see that? I did see that.

I have not watched. I mean, the episode hasn't come out yet. Right. Yeah, I saw that he went to meet with him. But I don't know if they're filming anything. I don't know if he's able to film in prison. God, I hope they let him. Yeah.

That'd be interesting. But either way, I'm curious if y'all think this is a blip, this guy getting caught, getting busted, or I think this may be a component that we've seen of the faltering of the neo, the neocorporate liberal neocon neolib establishment. It's, it's, it's schemes are failing. I mean, some people like to say since Epstein got taken down, it started to look like it's unraveling, perhaps. I don't know.

Maybe this was their attempt at creating some kind of alternate creepy international funding scheme. No idea. But when you see stories like this, it certainly is a grain of sand, at least in the heap of all of these like surreptitious plans and like shady deals they used to do are getting exposed every day. I mean, you look at the Biden stuff. they're not saying forty thousand dollars went to joe or something like that you know like more money is being found traced to him you i kind of feel good about it i don't know what do you think i i definitely think that this is just one of many i don't think this is the only instance like this and you know these people absolutely hate us and and want us sick and tired and dead mostly um no

but i mean these are the people that are funding them i think it's probably going to be if the mainstream media can they'll spin it to be like this is why you should fear crypto this is what the issue is never trust crypto don't look for alternative currency people who push alternative currencies are you know scamming you or whatever else they'll try to avoid the fact that he was ultimately in the camp of the dnc and that's what i am concerned about they're only going to break they're only going to avoid the fact that he was ultimately in the camp of the DNC. And that's what I am concerned about. They're only going to break the altcoins because the Bitcoin community is way too strong. Yeah, but what he was doing is running an exchange.

Yeah, it was an exchange. The cryptos themselves are legit. Some of them are extremely legit. I believe that, but I think the average American is not so well-versed in crypto to understand the differences. So we got to get them more well-versed? Yeah, I think that's great. But you are now racing the mainstream media who's trying to protect the DNC, right? So we got to get a more well-versed. exchange and the coins and all currency or whatever else you're going to say this guy scammed a lot of people and the mainstream media embassy says that i can't trust them and that's

what they want you to believe they don't want you to make the political connection well then we need to be ready with the counter narrative that that's fine just bitcoin's much safer they can't they can't stop crypto they can't stop crypto because too many people are just sitting there waiting for their get rich quick scheme because they don't quite understand how it works but uh i think you know when i when i talk to regular people who don't get it the only thing the average person i like when i talk to regular people i typically hear first and foremost do you think it's going to go up because everybody remembers when it jumps to like 20k and people got rich overnight everybody remembers when it jumped to 60k and people got rich overnight and everybody is just waiting for that opportunity to jump on

the next wave and then it goes back down i mean it went to like 60 it went down to what like 17 yeah but zoom out it's never actually gone down i mean we've right it's had a pullback it's like kaboom spike spike spike and well it's because the way bitcoin operates operates. We're due for a halving soon, aren't we? I'm not sure. I heard that last week. I mean, schedule. I just don't track the schedule. Is it next April or something?

Something like that. Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from,

including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. I'm not going to pretend to know what that means, but a lot of people are like, oh boy, get ready. Because basically what this means is the super simple, not, I don't run a Bitcoin company, but the super simple version is the amount of energy to produce, the amount of energy required per Bitcoin is going to double. Yeah.

Block rewards are cut in half, basically. And that means if it costs, let's just do dry units. 100 units of energy to create one Bitcoin. After it's cut in half, it's going to be 200 units of energy for one Bitcoin, meaning your costs will double and you're going to have to charge more. No one's going to want to sell. Like for this reason, that's basically forcing the prices to go up. Not to mention it's the attrition of Bitcoin itself. Yeah, specifically in April 2024, the block rewards will decrease from 6.25 to 3.125.

What was this? Max Keiser offered Alex Jones 10 000 bitcoins at last week or whatever did you see the twitter the twitter of him going we're not selling i was like screaming on stage we're not selling yeah wait wait he so the story is max offered alex jones 10 000 bitcoins 300 something million dollars by today's standard and alex like didn't care and like lost it or something it's like whatever whatever. And then Max told him, I'll give you another 10,000 if you can answer five Bitcoin questions

and Alex couldn't do it. And apparently they were like not complicated questions, but they're questions like basically if you're in Bitcoin, you knew. Right. And he offered him $300 million. Well, that's not even enough to cover half of his fines, unfortunately.

No, but a third. Yeah, that's the funny thing. Like if he actually gave him the crypto, it'd be gone in two seconds the government sees it yeah by the way i did a show with chase geyser this morning i love chase yeah info wars that's what made me think about it early this morning check it out um also when you're wondering is crypto going to go up you also got to ask yourself is the u.s dollar going to go down yeah because it's they're inversely proportionate we really need to be we need to get out of this like is it going to go up and down narrative?

I'm not in that. We've got to figure out a way to pass this dream of mass adoption, because it's going to be so important. Look, if the central banking system ever fails, and it's not about when, it's about if. I believe that it will eventually. No, you mean to talk about if it's when. Yeah, that's what I meant. I mixed that up.

But yeah, absolutely. When it happens, if you're on something that already has a framework worked out, you're going to feel a lot less blood than the normal person who has no other investment. I could see like Amazon, Jeff Bezos, just being like, now you can pay with Bitcoin. I could see something like that. I mean, that's a part of mass adoption. And the more people that accept Bitcoin, the closer we get to that mass adoption. The more that people start buying Bitcoin, the more Bitcoin stabilizes

and you stop seeing these price fluctuates. The big pullbacks and stuff like that. And people got to start thinking about it as what it is. It's a unit of money. It's your, you know, when you can start making purchases with it, it's- El Salvador.

Yeah, and people in Salvador are doing great things. I mean, the economy has been pretty well off since they've done that as well. What gets me though, if you look at the entire crypto market, all of them, according to coinmarketcap.com, the entire market's $1.3 trillion. That's like nothing compared to the US. US could print that up and buy it all. It's just a matter of finding it, but it doesn't seem stable to me that it's that little and it could be that moved around by the

global governments. Why do you disagree? I don't think that they will. I think that they want full control over the blockchain, right? And think that they will. I don't, I think that they want, they want full control over the blockchain, right? And so that's why they're going to push CBDCs because those, they'll have the opportunity to shut down your money on the spot. You know what I mean? They could take, if you said the wrong thing on the internet, they could shut down your money.

Boom. They want that kind of control. They don't have that kind of control with Bitcoin. But they could easily get it. I disagree. I just don't think they, I don't think, I don't think that they, I don't think they, I don't think, I don't think that they, I don't think they care enough about it to do that.

I think that they want to find a way to tax it, but there's also other, there's other ways to have a anonymous Bitcoin exchange as well. You know, level two and, and a lightning network and stuff like that too. It's becoming more anonymous. It's not,

it's not becoming more like government friendly as we, as time goes on. The issue is once there is, look, it's, it's really this simple new york city says if you accept bitcoin from our banned list then we are going to fine you a ten thousand dollars a day and we already saw what happened with masks they will all immediately bend the knee so you so you can't stop someone from having bitcoin sure but government can stop you from being able to use it but But Miami actually is encouraging it. And what they'll do is if they really want to ban you, they will issue a mandate to all terminals at stores. These addresses are on the ban list.

And they'll argue these are terrorists and criminals. And if you facilitate through these. So what will happen then is a smaller level businesses will say, can we get a, can we get something that will instantly add these addresses to our terminals? Cause we can't track all this. Then a company will be like, we're terminal safe. Make sure you're not funding terrorism,

upload our government approved, uh, you know, ban list. And you're only banning people who are terrorists. And then they got it. Well, and that's also why we need like government officials that are going to

like ban chain analysis and, and like, you know, uh, Bitcoin trackers and stuff that the federal government is now we can't get there the federal government will absolutely but the decentralized the decentralized revolution is gonna eventually find a way around it whether whether it's a new kind of web development or something it's gonna come along that will it's it's continue to go away i feel like people make this mistake with a lot of things politics and technology are not as relevant as culture

and morals. And so when you look at everything in this country that people are complaining about, I'm like, yeah, our culture has completely decayed. Our morals are gone. And you've got people who are willing to lie, cheat, and steal to take whatever they want because they don't care. Of course. Not completely, though. What do you mean? I'm watching the, I want to

save a little bit of this for later because I was watching some of the trial, the Minnesota Trump hearing on the 14th amendment and we know what's going to happen with this the judges don't care what's right they care about winning for their ideology yeah they're partisan now and and so right i'm like the whole thing is nothing your technology doesn't matter okay the guy with the unless it's a civil war, New York city will simply say in a mandate, if you accept from these Bitcoin addresses, we will find you $10,000 and every business will drop to their knees and beg daddy government, please make it easy for us to not accidentally give facilitate these transactions.

But if you did that, you could send, the person could send their Bitcoin from that address to a different address and all they have to do is say any any bitcoin that transfers from this edge to the next is now non persona non grata it's and then you're going to be like dude are you on the list i don't don't screw my bitcoin bro i can't trade with you that'd be like shooting yourself in the foot if if an economy did that to themselves they'd be like they'd be in the dust. They are trying to push for stuff like that currently. It's a legit thing that's going on right now.

I guarantee you, by today's standards, with AI and machine learning, they can easily create algorithms tracking active blockchain transactions. They know who you are. They know what you're buying. And even if you create a new wallet, they will know because they're spying on your phone. They're going to know if the addresses are being operated from the same device, where the transactions are. They're going to know it's you.

Yeah, but you can get around that, too. You can get around the device stuff. You can use Tor and all kinds of different stuff. You are not going to be able to beat an AI. You are not going to walk into a McDonald's and be like, my burner phone's going to beat the AI. It's going to go, and you're going to go, what? Why isn't it working?

I just bought a burner phone and put money because they're tracking you. Put your phone in the freezer. Put it under running water. Ditch it. There's cameras everywhere. I mean, you look at these Amazon stores. My point is, it is possible that we find a way to overcome this. I'm just saying.

Well, they're actively working on ways to overcome it now. I mean, the Lightning Network was part of that. way to overcome this my i'm just saying they're actively working on ways to overcome it now i mean that's i i know the lightning network was part of that so there needs to be a cultural shift in what we are willing to accept and tolerate right now because humans absolutely americans especially tolerate being spied on and we are walking we are zombie walking into social credit scores sure i don't disagree with you at all i i absolutely 100 think that america has headed towards social credit and i think they're going to market it to something that's good for you right it's convenient i think about that this girl on instagram chip girl and she's got like

whatever in her hand and she can pay for stuff and this is her whole social media influencer you know i'm sure she talks about other things but the fact that she is chipped is a big deal and it becomes glamorous right she's also constantly showing off her luxury goods, et cetera, et cetera. It's going to be part of the CBDCs, though, is what it's going to, it's all going to come down to that, CBDCs. Chipping is not going to be a thing,

at least for now. And the reason is rejection. So when you put a chip under your skin. They can reject it. Yeah, people can reject it. And so that's not foolproof. Some people will be fine. Some people will not be fine.

It'll be part of your CBDC wallet. What I mean is that, that's what they do in China now. They'll market social credit store as like, well, it's so convenient for you. Look, it's easier and faster to do things. I think people won't see it coming because it'll be misrepresented to them for what it is. Right. Sure, sure. My theory is that what happens is we're going to have a financial crisis.

We're going to have a banking collapse. Maybe only 20% of the U.S. banks collapse. That's a huge percentage. It is. It is. But it's not 100. It's not 30. It's not collapse. That's a huge percentage. It is. It is. But it's not 100. It's not 30. It's not 50.

It's going to be at least 20 for sure. 20%. There's no doubt. And then what happens? Let's say you're, give me a bank that's not too big, but big enough. I mean. I don't know. It's tough, right?

I mean, let's do, we're out here. They're all so big now. What do we got? PNC. PNC, sure. PNC, I see them in PA. A little bit smaller, but they're still kind of big. A bank like that fails.

And then what happens is everybody who's got this account says, my business, the payroll for my employees. Look, my business, we had $500,000 in the account. I've got to pay my server staff. I've got to buy new pizza rolls. What am I going to do? My bank account's gone. Federal government

immediately snaps their fingers. Within a couple days, days they say we are bailing out the american people this is not about big business this bank went under we're mad but we are going to ensure all of the money for all of these people 100 not up to 250 000 like fdic says we're going to ensure all of it rest assured small business you will pay your employees tomorrow. Simply download CBDC app at GooglePlay.com and download FedDollar. And they're going to say, in order to get access to your account,

input your social security number, your account number, and your information into CBDC app, and you will get the US dollar equivalent of FedCoin. I'll tell you right now, if CBDCs had already been a thing during the COVID crisis, the passports would have been a thing.

Let me slow down for everybody. Central bank digital currency. Yes, correct. Because I know a lot of people are like CBDC, we're going too fast. You're in the jargon now. Central bank digital currency. The idea is Bitcoin is decentralized

and everything I explained about how they'll try to take it over is what they'll have to try to do. If the federal government or the Fed can launch a central bank digital currency like FedCoin, they will have instant access and control to everything. And then you get social credit scores. But they don't need to tell you they're rolling out social credit scores. They will just exist. You'll get a notification on your app and it will be like,

we're concerned about some activity on your external profiles. They've already introduced the idea of off-platform behavior. All your healthcare stuff's going to be on there too. I mean, that's the scary part. You'll have no more privacy. It just sounds like they're setting up for a black market

if they try and do stuff like that. People get pissed off. They don't want a pissed off population right now but but a black market doesn't matter okay like you know seamus makes this point about abortion when the left says yeah but if you ban abortion there'll be black market abortions and it was right and most of it will still be illegal and that will stop most of it great there's always going to be a legal activity that's that's that right so the the the concerning thing i suppose you're going to have this app and we've already seen

on Twitter and Facebook and YouTube, you can be banned for what they call off platform behavior. Right. Yep. The CBDC app is going to have terms and conditions and it's going to say, you agree that if you use this app, you can't do these things. And the people who are in a crisis whose bank accounts have been, you know, have collapsed and are gone, they're going to sign anything.

Oh, what do you do? They erased your business overnight. Oh no. And it's no one's fault. The bank just failed. Do you remember PayPal trying to do that? Trying to find people for off platform behavior? Oh yeah, for hate speech.

Yes. They try to find them. And this is, these are all triumvents. Instead they just ban people who do stuff they don't like. They have this provision on PayPal. It's $2,500 for some kind of hate speech provision. They will fine you for saying naughty words.

Not just take your money. They will fine you. They will give you a fine. If you have no money in your PayPal, you will be negative $2,500. The crisis scenario is scary, but how about the tax benefit scenario where they say we're rolling out a federal banking app. they're going to say

something like these predatory lending companies and banks are charging an arm and a leg why is it that if you're poor the bank charges you money you look at your bank account you've only got 25 bucks the next day you look at negative 15 they charged you they charged you for that because you didn't have enough in your account now you're're negative. Now you owe them money. But if you're rich, they pay you. That is unfair. The post office will be opening holdings accounts. Yes, right. For all Americans, download the post office app.

It is a no-fee bank account for you, the American people, with interest rates. No more overdraft charges. Now you've got a federal government banking system. You download the app. You agree to their terms of service. Don't say naughty words. Then they're monitoring every single transaction you make. Every single thing you buy.

Let's jump to the story from, we'll jump into the news here. As we're talking about, you know, Sam Bankman, Freed and political corruption. This is a big story that broke yesterday. Connecticut judge overturns results of mayoral primary just days before election. Why? Because they got evidence on camera of a Democrat ballot stuffing. Wednesday's ruling is the latest twist in an election centering on allegations of absentee ballot abuse. The election captured widespread public attention after a video surfaced online appearing to show a supporter of incumbent Mayor joe gannum stuffing stacks of papers into an absentee ballot drop box i wonder if uh i think

we have the there's a video of it yeah there's a video so uh this is an image these are the people that govern you by the way you know these news outlets are they really do not want to play the video you gotta get the video on twitter i'll pull it up in a second but uh here's what's interesting they're not stopping the election no this guy won the primary they've now overturned the primary doesn't matter he's still on the ballots the general election is about to happen it's presumed he's going to win and they they speculate that when he does this will end any challenge to the primary well with electioneering like that how could you lose you know it's just crazy i suppose the answer is you can't exactly that's that's the game boys that's what they do they want sorry i just i just think about like every time they're like

this doesn't happen this is something that republicans made up because there's they're just crazy they're sad they lost or whatever else and then there's this video of this woman doing exactly a thing that people fear and believe happens in their elections. Well, my favorite narrative is like everyone when Joe Biden got elected and everyone's like, oh, it was totally above board. That stuff never happens. And I'm like, you're the same people that were doing this when Trump won, when Bush won. You're talking. Everyone's talking about the voting machines when Bush won.

I mean, you've been doing this for decades. And now all of a sudden they're above board entirely. There's no election interference. All right. I found the video. It's not even easy to find this video. Here you go. Here's the video that allegedly is of a Democrat ballot

stuffing. Who is she? We'll pull up the name from the article in a second. And they have several videos of her doing it. Right, right. This is a minute and 53 seconds long. So let's jump. They said that she and 53 seconds long. Yeah. So let's jump. They said that she came back several times. Yep.

Drop number two. And how many ballot boxes are they? Look at this. Well, how many ballot boxes are they doing? They got her name in here too, I think. Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience

to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out.

Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement

with iGaming Ontario. Here she goes again. This is Wanda. Wanda. That's all we get, I guess. I think we should say her full name so people know. So here's the crazy thing. Let me see if it's in this article.

Is it... They don't have it no they don't have a name in the article uh here's here's the thing people didn't understand when donald trump and his supporters were suing over stories like this it is a lie that they were all thrown out right Right. Of the majority, I think the majority of the cases were thrown out on standing, arguing the individuals who filed the suits did not have a, they were not affected. In this case, therefore,

they had no legal right to sue. It had nothing to do with the contents of the lawsuit at all. Which is insane. Any voter, any citizen in this country has standing, in my opinion. Of the cases,

I think there were 30 that were ruled on the merits 22 were found to be in favor of trump however because in each of these individual cases either the number of ballots or some other issues uh for instance one example is the number of ballots did not equal a large enough number to have changed the election it was ruled moot right it doesn't matter if we win for you anyway because you still lost the election but it doesn't mean there was no election nearing going on there was certainly fraud bill barr said there was fraud the question is was there enough to overturn the election the courts courts said look yes you found 300 ballots in fraud but there's a 7 000 margin here so what's the point of this? Because these courts do not take action on those, it keeps

happening. And then what happens when you get 15 judges in one state and you get 15 instances where it's 100 votes or I'll say a thousand and the margin 7000. And now there's 15000 fraudulent bouts confirmed by courts. But because each individual judge looks at one small individual individual case, they dismiss all of them. Right. I don't I don't think that is the case for the most part. And when it came to Trump, my point is on a granular gland, a granular level, we can see directly local elections are easily, easily flipped with one person doing something like this. And this is Democrat v. Democrat. This is a Democratic primary in a blue state,

and they are still stuffing boxes. It's the only reason we're hearing about it. I know, but that's what's interesting. This is the thing that when it happens, when conservatives or Republicans or third-party candidates say, hey, we were in some ways, there was fraud in our elections, it's typically left-leaning candidates and left-leaning supporters who are like, no, it never happens, but it happens in their own primaries. How can they argue

against this? I promise you it's not the third party who's doing it, so I just want everyone to know. Everyone knows the Libertarians are the ones secretly rigging the election for Democrats. We're the ones rigging it. For Democrats. Absolutely, we're rigging it for the Democrats. And the funny thing is, the Democrats should be just as worried about it, not just because it's happening in their own primary, but because

maybe Republicans in small towns are doing it too. Oh, for sure. Everybody should be worried about this. There's no chance that this is a isolated event. We know that. And like, everyone should wake up and be worried about these things. One of my favorite things in elections, every four years, you'll get conservatives being like,

if these libertarians just voted for the Republican party, then we would have won. And I'm like, my guy, the libertarians don'tarians don't like you we don't like you at all libertarians are like if republicans just voted for us we would just win yeah if you guys would just stop voting for this like deeply entrenched corrupt party that you'd have a better chance of changing the nypd by yourself than you would have getting like you know 700 people together and trying to change the republican party at a federal level at least the republicans of state and local can do stuff like my governor and iowa's been great on a lot of things you know but like this you know there's a lot of little small like positions that the libertarians can

win and do win we win 200 election cycle or something like that do you feel like the libertarian party focus is not enough on the small i've heard this argued before that it often is like trying to be at the top of the ticket when really they should focus on capturing key positions our biggest problems is resources i mean with the national the national party runs on like 1.7 million dollars a year um they can't help a presidential candidate almost at all presidential candidates tasked with keeping us ballot access um raising all their own funds all that stuff but we do run a lot of down ballot candidates and i think in 2022 with the mises caucus takeover, that became the bigger focus was the localization nullification of, you know, federal law at the state and local level. And that's the really important thing that, that any like presidential

candidate for the libertarian party should be doing this media tour talking about how, Hey, you can take over your local guns. You can take over your school board, you know, all these terrible policies that the schools are doing. You have the opportunity to run. If you've got a Tuesday and a Wednesday free every week, you can go run for school board. You know, it's not that hard. And you should. And you should, yes.

Even in West Virginia, woke people are masquerading as Trump supporters to get elected. Of course. And then introduce weird crackpot adult content to kids. Yeah, you should be running. You should be running. If you have two weeknights free a month or something, I mean, you can really run for some of these small positions in small towns and change everything.

So where do you see the most libertarian activity in the U.S.? Like, I always think New Hampshire. I've interviewed a couple libertarians from North Carolina in the past. I can tell you the most registered libertarian voters per capita is Nebraska. But that's because New Hampshire, like, when they did the Free State Project, they all registered as Republicans and Democrats to take over those positions as Republicans and Democrats. So that's changing now in New Hampshire. Of course, a lot more people are joining the Libertarian Party there.

But, you know, the Libertarian. They just have, they're a pretty Libertarian state. I don't know. We're in Iowa. We're not far behind them in Iowa as well. But we're, Libertarian Party is a national major political party in Iowa because of our gubernatorial candidate who ran in the last election he got a high enough percentage made us we don't have to worry about ballot access or anything like that anymore but now we need a presidential candidate that can step up and do those things so that we don't have to worry about

it anymore you need like five percent right it's there's there's some speculation it might be a little bit higher closer to 12 but um it every state's different it's the thing right like every state has a different threshold so there's like half the state over half the states if we were to get five percent we'd never have to worry about ballot access again at least not for another four years so um it's an important it's an important thing you know if you're in a swing state and you're not worried about your candidate losing their throat throw a vote at us let us let's get seven seven to twelve percent you have to register as a libertarian in some states some states are all states are different they all have different election laws.

So it just really depends. Yeah. So what do you expect going into this cycle? I mean, where are you expecting to spend the most time? It's going to be an interesting cycle with RFK running for sure. But there's a chance, you know, everyone's really worried about RFK, but there's a chance he doesn't get on the ballot, right? He's running independent.

It's going to cost him millions and millions and millions of dollars to get on the ballot in all 50 States. He may get on in a few States, but I don't think he's going to be on the ballot in every state. So it's going to, it's not, it's not as big of a deal as some people are making it out to be, but, um, we're focusing on 50 States. I mean, that's, that's the thing. We want as many votes in the popular vote as possible all the way across the country so that we can hit like at least a 5% or maybe we do well enough in the media and we get that 15% and some of the big polls and we can get on the debate stage because that's really what we want. If we can look Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the eyes and tell them how bad their policies are hurting the middle class in America, like that's what we want to do, you know, because that's what

really what this is all about. So that's, that's the focus for me. It was my campaign, all 50 states, no foreign wars, no foreign wars, uh wars uh you know try to dismantle the federal reserve as much as possible of course take down as many of these federal agencies as we possibly can um and and vivek is right about this i mean we we can't as a president you don't have the power to go out there and abolish all these federal agencies but you can lay off 70 of the workforce or just relocate them to unalaska well you can you can get rid of 70 and then take the last 30 and relocate them to maintenance departments and mail rooms at little precincts around the country

and then maybe we get the FBI small enough to where they stop focusing on trying to infiltrate Catholic groups and go after Mexican drug cartels. Soccer moms at school board meetings to call them extremists. I'm telling you, I got a plan to revitalize this country and it's easy. How many federal

employees are there? Do you know? A lot. I don't know. It's one of the biggest jobs programs in the world. Oh, yeah. I got an idea. We'll start with the FBI. How many FBI agents do we got? I don't know. I'll look it up. Let's pull up those numbers. You got the FBI,

ATF. You want to abolish the IRS, right? Well, I mean, as much as possible. Don't worry. I got a plan. How many do we got? FBI, ATF, you want to abolish the IRS, right? Well, I mean, as much as possible. Right, the first one. No, no, don't worry. I got a plan. How many do we got, Anna Claire? I haven't found it yet. I'll tell you in a second.

Enough to infiltrate Catholic groups. No, well, look, look, look. They're saying they employ 35,000 people, but I feel like it's got to be more than that. Yeah, it's got probably more than that. Here's what you do. You don't got to fire them all. You don't got to fire them.

What you do is you take 1,000, you get 35 units of 1,000, and you relocate them into rural nowhere places like central Alaska. I'll tell you why. Because then those federal dollars will go towards creating cities where it will require the development of industry. Right, sure. Not only are you going to force people to live in areas, you're basically colonizing Creating cities where it will require the development of industry right sure you'll create you not only Are you going to force people to live in areas basically colonizing our own country?

So you know we got a bunch of stuff in Alaska We should go up there and and resource our own resources stop worrying on China You've never been you never in Alaska in the winter heavy. I don't care This is great. They can quit if there's a reason why people don't live there Tim But before you fire them you say we're gonna're going to give you, you know, like four more years of employment, but it's going to be in Alaska. Sure. Have a nice day.

And then when they're there, you're going to have to build housing. You're going to have to build infrastructure. Then what happens is these people, they need to eat, right? So someone's going to open a store. Someone's going to open a restaurant. Then when you have workers there, you have the opportunity to colonize our own country instead of seeing our cities die. How about this?

I was looking at this city, Renovo, Pennsylvania, and I was like, this is a really cool town, but it's dying. It was a railway town. And like I think like a thousand people live there. Just send send send 500 FBI agents. You got to live there now. You're stationed here. And then all of a sudden you're revitalizing that town and giving these people their jobs back you see what you said i'm saying and after four years you fire them there's uh there's do we have to give them a full four years team can we do like

maybe one but here's my point it's my point you're basically using them as a means to help middle americans revitalize their towns and create some kind of like revitalization for these areas that need industry and then you get rid of it we're simply not going to have the funding for that there were 2.87 million federal civilian employees in 2022 wow two point how many 2.8 they're like soft gulags a giant well and then and you got to add to that okay so that's a huge jobs program right probably one of the biggest jobs programs in the world but then've got to add to that all the government contracts for people who get government contracts. That's the very largest employer in the history of the world, maybe ever, right?

So, I mean, it's really wild to think about. I mean, there is a reason that as the federal government grew, you saw expansion in Maryland and Northern Virginia, right? Because other businesses came there. So to Tim's point, if we were to say, you know, what was it? The Department of the Interior, they moved it to Colorado under Trump and then under Biden, they're like, no, no, we're going back to DC.

We don't want to be here. But theoretically, if you were to station these federal outposts somewhere else, eventually shut it down or whatever else, you're making these contractors who want these contracts or want anything else go where they are. They're not just centralized in DC.

It's so crazy to think about these government contracts. Because like, basically, if you're making a lot of money in america right now it's probably through a government contract this is the the most the biggest employer in the world and they put that eo joe joe uh joe biden put the eo back that said that all these uh government contracts have to have a dei program then you guys know about that no so like if you're if you have a government contract with the federal government your company has to have a DEI program. You guys know about that? No. So if you have a government contract with the federal government, your company has to have a DEI department. Yep.

Yep. Absolutely. 100%. Trump had ended the EO, and Biden brought it right back. Yep. And so when we talk about DEI and ESG and stuff in America right now, that's where it's all stemming from, is from the federal government. They're literally pushing this on everyone.

Let's jump to this story. We've got this on everyone let's uh let's jump to this story we got some post-millennial tucker carlson says rfk jr will pull votes from trump not biden there's no person who's thinking i'm gonna vote for either joe biden or bobby kennedy and tucker is wrong yeah he's definitely he's absolutely wrong on this i think this is more of a passive statement he made speaking on a podcast because it does not seem like he actually looked at the data or had real conversations i think ian's a good example because ian's talked about how his mom is a big fan of the kennedys yeah yeah she loved uh bobby and she would never vote for trump no i don't think so so this is if she met him this is perhaps this is a very simple piece of math

it's probability let's say uh your mom's probability of voting for biden is 80 and voting for kennedy is 20 and voting for trump is zero percent that's the kind of math where if you have enough of those people it can only pull from from joe biden it can never pull from i remember when uh robert kennedy announced he was gonna robert kennedy jr announced he was gonna run for president within like three days they slandered him or smeared him with anti-vax on the news and I called my mother like right away and I was like, hey, watch out for this anti-vax crap they're going to start calling him now that he announced. And she's like, yeah,

but I don't know. I just don't know how I feel about it. I'm like, dude, two years ago she was saying how much she loves Robert Kennedy Jr. and it's like the news started to get to her right away. So there might be something there where they're tainting people's opinion of the guy. He's going to pull from both of the big parties. I believe.

Yeah, but it's going to be, it's going to be 65 from Democrats and 30 from Republicans. If, if that, I just got to say, man, I've not met a single person who said,

who's, who, who, who will say publicly, I'm voting for Trump who has now been like, well, I'm going to vote for our instead. Oh,

you go ahead. I was going to say, there was a poll done in New Hampshire a couple of weeks ago, maybe a month. And it was asking people, you know, who you're voting for, whatever else. We saw that Chris Christie was intensely unpopular there. But when they asked about RFK, he did have really high support from Republicans, but none of the Republicans planned to vote for him,

and none of them planned to vote for him if their first choice candidate left, right? It doesn't change the fact they like him. Republicans are excited that he's in the race, but ultimately his support is still among Democrats. And we saw that when he announced his independent bid, it still leaned left in the language. I believe that if RFK, and this is a wild conspiracy theory

that's not going to come true. It's just theoretical. But if RFK was to drop entirely and start trying to run as Donald Trump's vice president, I think that that he could get that i believe that talk about that last night too rfk jr is pro reparations pro gun control eco-fascism i don't yeah i mean he's big he's big time we've talked about trump rfk in the past but this was only in the context of the the covid response as a means of helping

correct the image of trump's failures on it but now rfk's pivoted in recently much more heavily especially with reparations and as an on his announce at his announcement he said it's indigenous people's day it was columbus day but right right he's he's jumped off well you also talked about government-backed bonds to save the housing market i mean this guy's just like he's a run-of-the-mill progressive that's good on healthcare and the deep state. I mean, really, that's what it is. So it's only Democrats. Give him a cap.

He might be like in charge of the EPA or something, right? If he really wanted to be like, no, I know you guys like him, it's exciting, but I don't see him. I saw it being floated around Attorney General too.

Yeah, maybe. I mean, I think it's just not a close enough bond. I'm sure there's probably some sort of respect there for whatever cordial reason, but I don't think that there is a close enough uh camaraderie between the two of them and also i think trump's gonna be really careful about who he picks for his vp because look at what happened

with mike pence right right i mean he picked someone who he thought was neutral and that ultimately ended very badly he's only going to be a four-year president if he's elected and that's uh he needs someone who's really going to back him the fly was a better vp than bike pants for sure so yeah yeah pence was such a did you guys see the did you guys see the poll on twitter that he needs someone who's really going to back him. The Fly was a better VP than Mike Pence for sure. Yeah. Pence was such a miserable choice. Did you guys see the poll on Twitter that was Chris Christie or a hoagie sandwich? And the hoagie sandwich beat him like 69%. I'm hungry.

Yeah, it was hilarious. I'm hungry. I'll take the hoagie. There was like 30,000 votes on there. And the hoagie beat him like almost 70%. Dude, Christie would be a good interview. Christie is the most pathetic you might end up seeing him sit across from you so be careful whatever you say say it to his face

he keeps doing this donald duck thing oh and yeah dude it is the cringest thing because he's so excited when he says it on the debate stage he's like donald duck and then everyone's like you're an idiot yeah he wants to be donald trump so bad like he really does he wants to be able to insult people like that. He's just not quick enough because he's too overweight. If he was thin and healthy, he would have a way better chance. A lot more people would like, you know, healthy. He wouldn't be funnier.

If Donald Trump was in a one-on-one debate with Christie and Christie was like, this guy, Donald, keeps ducking all these questions. He's Donald Duck. Trump would go, you're fat. And that's it. And everyone would go roaring. Take care of yourself, Trump. That's all it would take. That's it. That's all it would take. Absolutely. 100%. That's all he would say. Because Trump has no, he has no filter

at all. Zero filter. I can hear you breathing in the microphone. Exactly. Yep. He'd say something like that. He'd make that face and go, Lord over here. You can hear him breathing and then everyone just busts out laughing and he's done donald duck is not funny it's not clever it's stupid and trump would just do the most crass bottom of the barrel yeah and you're fat yeah and then everyone would start roaring with laughter like it's all we take i've i have

seen trump rallies i have seen that man speak he's a stand-up comedian. The shut up, silly woman thing is all over the internet still to this day. The you'd be in jail one from the debate with Hillary Clinton. Shut up, silly woman. Yeah, that's all over. That's all over the internet still. Was that to Hillary? He said that to Hillary? No.

He was at a rally and he was telling a story. Yeah, it was a rally. Yeah, if you've not seen a rally, this is what I hear from people. They're like, I wasn't a big trump fan and i decided to go to his rally and now i'm a trump fan like because the guy you're going to a comedy routine man he's doing what john stewart basically did back in the day he's up there and he's saying he i'll give you the formula it's like you got problem i know about problem i'm gonna insult the people who make problem and everyone starts cheering for it i kind of like

and he does it well watching old trump videos because you his personality like you see who he was when he was young you see who he is now i think it's a lot you get a better like more well-rounded idea of who he is super cool shane gillis can literally go up on stage and impersonate donald trump verbatim and the whole crowd dies laughing and he's just saying what trump said yeah that's it. Exactly. Verbal. And Shane Gillis is one of the best stand-up comedians in the world right now. I tell you, the key to getting your friends and family to go over the line on like, I don't know about Trump.

They complain about him. Just come with me and see what he says. And they're going to leave feeling great. I don't want you to vote for Trump, though. Oh, I know. You don't. But I'm saying for people, when you actually see the guy, it's the entertainment value that he's making you have a good time. This is like kind of, this is a little bit of an off-tangent metaphor, but like the whole mean tweets thing.

They're like, instead of a guy with mean tweets, I'd rather have a warmonger. It's kind of like on YouTube, we can talk about death and destruction and that, but we can't say the F word. I mean, you can obviously say it, but like, what the f words like the mean tweets of the internet censorship like yo bro i'm not sure what effort you're talking about there's a lot of funny ones fanny oh okay sorry australians anyway we say the f word on on break the cycle all the time so i love it you were saying before the show that charisma is one of the deciding factors and it's very important you can't be a presidential candidate without charisma. It's a giant popularity contest. It is the most important thing.

Trump, like, how would you define wit, right? Like, what's like the colloquial? It's just a quick, it's a quick brain. I mean, it's really what it is. It's quick enough. It's quick enough to quit with people. I mean, back and forth. You don't need to be super intelligent and articulate.

You need only be quick with it. So, like, the point I was making with Chris Christie being like Donald Duck and then Trump going, I can hear fatso over here breathing in the microphone. And it's not the smartest thing in the world, but it's a verbal smackdown. He knows how and when to say things. It's timing. Quick-witted. It's a timing thing.

It's a timing issue. I think it's intelligence. It requires, like, at least 16 intelligences a timing thing. It's a timing issue. I think it's intelligence. It requires like at least 16 intelligences. The thing about... On a maximum of what? The thing about politics... 18 is maximum human potential

and then you become super... Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games

with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually We'll see you next time. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun. And make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only.

Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. We're human above that. I'm sorry to interrupt. No, it's fine. I was interrupting you. Just clarifying.

I was literally interrupting you. No, I, so the thing is, is like in politics, you only have to have like a minor understanding of most issues and then be charismatic enough to talk about those. Exactly. Because the vast majority of the American public has no idea what these issues mean anyways at all maybe you only have 14 intelligence this is the aleppo moment in a nutshell yeah when uh gary johnson was asked about a lot when he goes and what is aleppo it's just charisma one right and then everyone all anyone saw was this guy doesn't know anything about what he's about what's going on he could he could have said he could have

he could have made up nonsense yeah he could have said well you know the economic standard with aleppo is is is troubling to me to be completely honest but we're gonna we're gonna get a policy in place in washington it's gonna solve that problem they go wait what yeah but the average person would be like oh okay because they just need to have an answer the other part about that it's a city in syria it makes him seem like he's not surrounded by people who are saying these are the most important issues because we all know a president gets, you know, an intense number of briefs. And theoretically, they're surrounded by experts on each. Well, I'll tell you the biggest, the biggest problem with libertarians.

Literally, this is the biggest problem is we are all extremely well read at libertarian philosophy. We've read Murray Rothbard and F.A. Hayek and Mises and all these great economists and Austrian economists and philosophers and just everything you could possibly imagine. Henry Hazlitt and blah blah blah blah blah. And then you want to go out and you want to lecture this to people. And no one cares. Literally no one cares. They want to hear about how you're going to make their cash prices go down. That's what they care about.

I just wanted to clarify too because I wasn't sure on that. It's not the capital. Is it not the capital? Well, I have my own level moment. It's Damascus. I thought it was Damasascus but you said that i was like let me double check before you're right it's damascus one thing the libertarians a problem they have too i think is that they're not like obsessed with global military like you got to be in order to be a great commander in chief of our military you got to understand like how are we going to dominate and annihilate everything on earth so we don't have to no but we're not going to do that that's that's we're not going but you

have to know how so that you don't sure so you know how not to we'd be much we'd be a much safer nation if our you know two-thirds of our military wasn't stationed around the world because if the president doesn't understand it if the president's not a military expert then someone else is going to run the military the thing is they just have to know enough about it and have the the reality is whoever is the president may be really well versed on a couple issues. Right. They might have, let's say, five that they know backwards, forwards. They know everything about. But realistically, they're going to need a staff that is huge. Yeah. That that relies on expertise and is able to brief them quickly.

And so that's why, you know, when Gary Johnson gets the Aleppo question wrong, it means he did not have anyone around him to say this is a current issue that you should know about and that's one of the problems going forward i mean this was a criticism people had of trump when he was in the white house was that the people he surrounded himself with did not look out for his best interest and we were not guiding him in the right direction it's unrealistic to expect a president to know absolutely everything yeah but a lot of that was his fault too because he i'm not saying it was he was going to drain the swamp and then he surrounded himself with the swamp. I'm not saying it wasn't,

but ultimately this is a problem that could be true for a libertarian president, could be true for a Democrat president. It is not actually the person on stage who knows everything as the people they're surrounding themselves with. Yeah, the president does have generals, but the commander must know military doctrine

or at least rapidly learn it upon. But under that, in that logic, we would only want people who had served in military to be presidents which could be true in some eras right but theoretically right now i mean as far as i know joe biden didn't serve in the military maybe he'll tell us something different uh trump went to military boarding school right but he didn't actually serve in the military so theoretically both of these people have the what that's right yeah when was last time

we had a military commander like a military ex-military guy or woman guy? George Bush. Was it George Bush? Was he in the military? Yeah. The first, the dad? You mean H.W.? Weren't they both in the military?

They were both in the military. Yeah, but W, wasn't his story that he didn't go to Vietnam or something? Something like that, but he was in the military. I mean, was it, how far back are we going? He's in the Air Force, I think. Did Clinton serve in the military? Not that we know of. No, Clinton was in the military, yeah.

So, we have to work backwards. Reagan was a movie star. Oh, John F. Kennedy. Kennedy would definitely serve in the military. That was a huge deal. Kennedy was in the Navy, that we know of so we have to work backwards reagan was a movie star john f kennedy kennedy was in the navy i think in vietnam and he received i think was he like he wasn't purple heart but he received like some very serious award for saving people yeah literally he like saved a bunch of dudes off what a sinking ship or some crazy story that would be a great story george w bush served in the navy during world war ii george bush george george hw bush okay maybe wow well let's jump to the story from the AP. Ladies and gentlemen, you may not be aware. Donald Trump is facing eligibility questions for the 2024 presidential

race in Colorado and in Minnesota and in Michigan and probably a bunch of other states. But we've got updates on the Minnesota hearing. The AP says Minnesota justices appear skeptical that states should decide Trump's eligibility for the ballot. I watched some of this live and I got to say this. These hearings. What we are watching right now with the question of Donald Trump's eligibility is an attempt by Democrats to run a stake through the heart of the United States. And the arguments made in Minnesota really spell this out. I'll give it to you very simply. I believe it was Trump's lawyers who was arguing this, who was arguing this. States do not have the constitutional authority to determine eligibility.

They state legislatures are given wide, a wide capability or wide responsibility and governance over elections in their states, but not eligibility, which is a federal question, meaning if someone's eligibility is challenged, it must be in a federal court. Donald Trump was questioned over this in his impeachment hearings and was found not to have engaged in insurrection. Therefore, the question is done. They're not taking it to the states to argue he did. The argument was actually really simple. If someone's 27 years old, there's no question of fact. You're not eligible to run. Nobody has an issue with it. Insurrection is different. Insurrection has to be determined. But the Constitution at the federal level determines the eligibility for a federal elected official states don't decide who is eligible or not if it becomes that if democrats succeed in even a single state set a precedent then the precedent will be there will never be a u.s election again now hold on

we'll have north korea style elections where you'll have one person on the ballot why elections will become instead of, hey, let's go get as many votes as possible. It's time to go vote. That's what we do now. But don't get me like, don't get me wrong. I know it's all about harvesting. Now it's it's it's months of work knocking on doors. And the goal is get a bigger number than the opponent by any means necessary. If this goes through and Democrats succeed, future elections will be like this. OK, sir, it is one year before the general, which means it's eligibility season. We better get those arguments ready for court to determine whether or not you're eligible to be in the state. A president will then have to win

eligibility hearings in all 50 states. And if they don't, their name will not appear on the ballot. A dummy candidate will and it will be like a north korean election in every state you will then get every blue state saying joe biden and you know uh bobby bobby doe the republican no one's ever heard of him doesn't matter it's joe biden versus bobby and everyone's like who's that well that means that there's not going to be a popular vote for trump then the red states will do the same thing well joe biden's not eligible actually it's probably the republicans will do nothing and it'll only be the blue states that are cutting off all the republicans but theoretically then red states say nope we had we had eligibility hearings a year

ago and we found joe biden to be ineligible for these reasons therefore the belt will only be donald trump and the democrat will be rK Jr. And then Trump wins easily. And then you're going to get red-leaning swing states and blue-leaning swing states. And that's going to be the battle where instead of an election, appointed officials, hired corporate lawyers will argue to judges who the president should be. I don't know about you, but it sounds like a great segue to national divorce myself. I'm a fan. It ain't happening. I'm a fan. This ain't happening.

No, this isn't going to happen. And if this goes through. No, no, no. This could happen. I don't think. These judges are hyper-partisan. I know they are. Look, the judge in Colorado is a donor to a PAC specifically to remove Republicans who

supported Trump on January 6th. Our whole entire justice system has become hyper-partisan. I'm not under any illusion. What's going to stop this Colorado judge who already donated money to stop Republicans over January 6th? What's going to stop that judge from being like, I don't care what you said, Trump, your name's off the ballot. You're going to stop him. The Supreme Court. I don't get argued in the Supreme Court.

And how many years will that take before the Supreme Court takes it up? I don't know. It could be fast. It probably would be pretty fast concerning uh elections like and then what happens if in colorado my fear is november uh let's say october 2024 a state like michigan will just take trump off the ballot and say sue us then the trump campaign will sue and win and then by december 15th they'll get injunctive relief oh what's that joe biden already won sorry we can't undo the election it was one state any one one state's moot true that one state would have wouldn't have changed the election but

then they then they argue yes but your honor here's four other states where it happened too well you got to take up with those judges in those states that has nothing to do with us it's it's only seven electoral votes here so you don't win then he's gonna go to that state oh it's only 13 here so you don't win yeah i just i don't see it i don't see it getting that far i really don't i don't i honestly don't think i get that far i gotta be honest man you think it's not gonna get that far considering and i'm like i'm pretty black tilled on a lot of the stuff and i'm saying i i would be very surprised if that if that got that far and i'd be very and i'd be very surprised if it did go through that it wouldn't be taken up. Was January 6th surprising to you?

Yes, of course. It should be surprising to everybody. Viscerally surprising. I cannot believe that someone would be surprised by what is literally happening right now when you have Colorado, Minnesota, and Michigan all happening at the same time. Where they're all arguing Trump should not be on the ballot. And a judge literally donated to a pact to get republicans removed from congress for supporting trump i mean we are we are one centimeter from okay when you have judge donates money to target trump supporters specifically over january 6th then you have

presiding over whether trump is eligible for january 6th it is a slight nudge true to trump ruling trump is not out there's also there's a huge difference when we talk about jan January 6th, it is a slight nudge to Trump ruling Trump is not eligible. There's also, there's a huge difference when we talk about January 6th, there's like a huge difference between the federal courts and the state courts too. Federal courts always throw the book entirely at everybody they have coming in, hoping they'll take a plea deal. And like 80 something percent of the people who go through federal court take a plea deal because the consequences of not taking one are so high, astronomically

high, that you can end up in prison for two and a half life sentences for building an e-commerce site like Ross Ulbrich, right? And so, like, there is a distinction there, for sure, and I don't, I just don't see a state court going that far. I don't think they can. I don't think they, I don't, I think at some point

someone's going to say, Judge, you absolutely cannot do this. Yeah, that's what I think is happening right now. Well, that's what's think is happening right now. Well, that's what's happening now. So when the judges in Pennsylvania ruled that their own constitution did not bar them from passing universal mail-in voting, I don't understand how you go from point A to point B on that one. In Pennsylvania, a lower court ruled that universal mail-in voting violated the constitution of Pennsylvania. Texas filed their lawsuit. The Supreme court refused to

hear it so there wasn't even a hearing over what was clearly a violation of state constitution and the and the justices of pennsylvania said we think absentee ballots and mail-in votes are a different thing so we're going to allow universal mail-in voting despite the fact the constitution clearly says you can't the upside is we've got a year to talk about how insane this crap is yeah that's true we need elections yeah we have well even if they're getting twisted behind the scenes 5149 we still need them look at arizona what's what what happens with carrie lake yeah how many machine voting several so disgusting several hundred machines did not read ballots because the ballots were printed on the wrong

paper proprietary machine wrong size printing on the wrong size paper and but now we're getting into like the shadow vote this like this shadow voting stuff no no no we're no we're not we're i'll keep it real simple for you in arizona it is a fact no one disputes the voting machines were not accepting ballots in certain areas because the wrong size image was printed on the wrong size paper that right there to any honest and reasonable person is stop stop the election stop paper that right there to any honest and reasonable person is stop stop the election stop stop stop we got to start over yeah we don't have to rush elections these exactly these ballots are wrong people are complaining if we're gonna have a free and fair election we got to have you know like it's got to be universal and uniform the ballots

instead they said don't know don't care yeah get out carrie lake but we also got to remember that this this uh election fraud thing has been going on for a long long time it's deeply entrenched right like it's been deeply entrenched in our government for many many many years but this is my point this is new and this is going to be visceral for a lot of people a lot of people if we know for a fact that i think it was several hundred locations in arizona the ballots were not properly being read and they and they argue, no, no, no, we counted all of them. Trust us. I'm like, no, that's not how elections work. This the courts. I mean, Carrie Lake is winning very narrowly in

a few areas and it's advancing. Now she's running for Senate. So we'll see if there's ever an answer. But I mean, they basically just said everyone knows the election was broken, but we don't care and no one will do anything about it this is the same component they're just going and saying we're going to win through lawfare and not an actual election and i'm not putting it past them i don't want anybody to think that i'm like downplaying this at all i just we do nothing yeah but if we do nothing it's definitely what's going i do want to stress i'm not saying it is absolute that they're going to rule against trump i don't know but they're trying and I would not be surprised at all

if they succeed considering, I'll just keep it very simple, the judge in the Colorado case donated money specifically to remove Republicans who supported Trump over January 6th and is now presiding over the trial to determine whether or not Trump is ineligible to be president because of his

actions on January 6th. I think we know the biases of this judge. I think he needs to be removed for conflict of interest. Well, she was asked to recuse herself, and she said, oh, I don't remember making that donation, so I'm fine. Yeah, it doesn't matter. It's still a conflict of interest. It was up to her, and there's no oversight.

She said, no, no, it's not a conflict of interest. I bet there's a lawsuit hanging in there somewhere for conflict of interest. Well, they appeal. But my friends, my fear is, first, I'll say, and I got to stress, you have to go vote. You need a tidal wave of votes. You need everyone, your grandmother, your kids, you know, whoever, legally allowed to vote. I don't care who they vote for.

Just go vote. Go vote. I don't want anyone to be dissuaded from voting because of these issues. But I want to make sure you understand the importance of the lawfare going forward, that it may be two months, three months, four months before the election. One of these hearings hits a state like Georgia. The lower court agrees and then orders the secretary of state to print ballots without Donald Trump's name on it. Trump files an appeal. The appeal goes to a higher court who reverses the decision. Secretary of state says, OK, well, now we got a a higher court who reverses the decision. Secretary of State says,

okay, well now we got a bunch of ballots one way and the other. Then the state appeals or the Democrats appeal and it goes to a higher court that then says, no, no, no, Trump's ineligible. Then Trump appeals

and it goes to the Supreme Court who says you can't take Trump off the ballot. He is eligible and it's a year after the fact. So maybe it's good that this is happening now so we can get up to the Supreme Court and they can shut it down.

I mean, if that goes through, it's going to the supreme court there's no doubt about it in new york during covid but when is the question the uh cuomo the governor shuts down churches he gets sued saying the first amendment guarantees our right to assemble you can't shut down churches the courts agree and say you you can't shut them down they're reopened and he goes okay i'll make a new executive order slightly different sue me again that's the problem and then even if it happens now what's what's happening now especially with like people like sydney powell and jenna ellis apologizing and saying yep we did it we did it you're now going to have in these hearings

especially in colorado they're going to say look here's trump staff saying they were instructed to present misinformation and disinformation for the purpose of subverting the election with fake electors, blah, blah, blah. OK, well, there's your evidence. Then one court says yes, and then they use it everywhere else. It'll have to go to the Supreme Court. But the issue then becomes what's the Supreme Court? Is the Supreme Court ruling going to be broad or narrow? Right. Well, the Supreme Court say in the instance of Trump's eligibility as it pertains to anything related to January six, it is not in dispute. Trump did not engage in insurrection and is eligible. OK, or what they could do is issue a narrow ruling where they say as to the question raised specifically by this one group, this one time in Colorado,

we say that they are wrong and Trump is eligible. And then what happens? Another organization says, okay, well, they didn't answer the question of January 6th. So we're suing again. And then it just keeps happening until the Supreme court issues a broad ruling. But I got to tell you, I think it's also a strong possibility. The Supreme court says, nah, we're not going to get involved in this one because states can run their elections as they see fit in Texas v Pennsylvania, 2020 Texas said Pennsylvania violated their constitution, violated the federal constitution by altering the rules of an election without the approval of the state legislature. And therefore we are negatively impacted. If we are going to participate in an election, everyone has to have these elections done fairly. Texas is basically saying if our

elections are fair and theirs are not, then the system is broken and the votes are not legit. For, I think it was something like 48 states get involved in this lawsuit. And the Supreme court said, go F yourselves. So the question's never been answered. And now you've got chaos in, in our election system because of pathetic cowards in the Supreme court. Why didn't I, why did they not take that up? Did they say Thomas and Alito were pissed? They issue a Thomas wrote this like scathing opinion where he's like, we must take up questions in original jurisdiction. The states need to know they need these questions answered. And by rejecting this, we're leaving this question in limbo.

And now all the states are in a free for all as to what is or is not constitutional. Alito agreed. He wrote his opinion and the rest were like, no, we're not getting involved. The real reason was the Supreme Court. Cowards are scared that this country is on the brink you're talking about national divorce of course yeah you you've got the boston globe story where the democrats were proposing west west west uh west the west coast seceding from the union in the event of a donald trump victory and so you likely have people like kavanaugh being like well if i rule on this i mean it could it could affect

history right i don't want to be involved in that. I don't, I don't, quit, quit right now. Resign. All of you resign. If you're unwilling to take up a, no, they could have taken the court case and said, no, you're wrong, Texas. The ruling stands, Biden's president. They just are cowards.

And if you're on strip court, that's kind of your job to affect history. I mean, that is why we put you there. Yeah, but when far left extremists show up to your house and threaten to kill you and the and the police and the judges are like we're gonna let it happen yeah i have tremendous i have tremendous sympathy for the fear on the other hand if the fear uh is now too great for you to complete your job you should step down if not otherwise you have an obligation to continue to push forward that's why these issues aren't you have a fiduciary duty i mean this is you have a duty of the people to rule on these matters that make it to the supreme court there's no doubt about it because they didn't rule on it the question remains open and will be an issue again in 2024

and it's going to be it's going to be apocalyptic lawfare now there's going to be like 3 000 lawsuits everybody who watched 2020 they're gearing up for lawfare right now and the democrats are already in it republicans are not going to be as strong as democrats on it but they're gearing up as well it's going to be tens of thousands of lawsuits well what's the fix for that public opinion shift in public opinion of course but uh our culture is broken public it's terrible it's absolutely it's cultural fragmentation to where these judges not these ones in minnesota they appear skeptical we'll see what happens uh and and minnesota being you know it's it's not like the furthest of left states it's you know a little it's a midwestern so but uh with with

colorado with california the culture is so divided let me just put it the left is a cult they are uh either malicious or or or the banality of evil. And they go along with whatever gains them power. So I didn't mean to interrupt, but what do you think is the solution? Building culture. That's exactly why we're doing it. Now, granted, I see these problems. I think in the meantime, we need legal, we need lawfare, you know, return legal fire,

file lawsuits, challenge these things. And everyone needs to vote in a massive tidal wave. But the real solution is always going to be that politics is downstream from culture. So what do we need? A cast brew coffee shop

in every shopping center. But this is the truth. And I'll tell you why. Because right now, everybody, older, you've got younger people getting their information

from TikTok, older people getting their news from mainstream media, and you're getting propaganda across the board. No one, No one is getting an honest shot. Even on YouTube, you get partisan propaganda stuff, but at least as it pertains to the quote unquote freedom faction, I like to say, we all try to be honest about what's going on and then let people form their own opinions and we have a real free and fair election. The reason why we want to do Casper Coffee, lady walks into the coffee shop to buy her

coffee and you've got a TV playing on the wall. And guess what? Josh Smith is on doing an interview. Now they're hearing another voice. Now they're getting a wide range of opinions and views, not just one hyper partisan or manipulated opinion. And they're learning about things. I hope more people open a whole bunch more brick

and mortar locations but we need to create spaces in the physical world where people can meet congregate and hang out used to be church it'd be great if it was we're gonna do this cash brew coffee we're gonna saturday morning cartoons invite families to come and hang out their kids and let people start rebuilding their communities again you said josh smith interview so i'm listening now you know yeah i think we we need to put this show on Rumble and or I think the YouTube admins should start shoving this show to the front of the network.

But they're doing the opposite of that. Good luck, buddy. Good luck. Well, yes, it is good luck. YouTube is. You should do it because people need to know about this stuff. This needs to become invigoratingly entertaining.

YouTube doesn't want you to know about this stuff. No, no, no. YouTube's not a guy. YouTube's just a network. The Google executives cried when Donald Trump trump won or i should say the google executives held a meeting where staff cried and they said we will never let this happen again and we had uh dr robert epstein on the culture war explaining it's really really crazy how he explains it's not complicated how they how they can rig elections people seem to think they hear

the story about cam Analytica, right? Right. Oh, they were stealing data from Facebook. They weren't supposed to have and using that to target people and figure out who they were voting for. No, it's much simpler than that. On election day,

Mark Zuckerberg sitting there with his paddle ball went, oh, can you send out a notification to all Democrats to go vote and top Republicans to go watch Friends? Yeah, but what's happening right now is the people, the admins and the executives are fucking terrified right now, dude. He said in his data set

of tens of thousands of people, he found 100% of Democrats were given a notification to go vote and only 59% of Republicans got the same. You don't need to trick or convince anybody. You just need to remind one side and not the other. There was that study that, I don't remember

what university students did, sorry, but uh analyzing gmail and gmail would show uh emails from democratic campaigns but it would hide or mark spam uh republican campaigns i mean this is something that is alive and here's the best part when i think it was ted cruz sent a letter to google over this he said in their data set, they saw instantly the manipulation turned off. That indicates Google is intentionally doing it. But what's happening right now, people are terrified. Biden screwed this country hard. People know that. People are freaking out that we're going to get slaughtered because of this shit show of a leadership that we have. And they're willing to open and listen. So we are the voice and we need to inspire people and and get people

excite people to put this shit on the front page make people hear it it's super important we cannot let go of our elections you know that we need you this is where it's a team man people who are watching msnbc cnn and Fox News aren't hearing this. I don't even see anybody tweeting about the Minnesota case. No. I like Colorado is getting a little bit of airplay, especially because they showed a clip of this show. So we were like, hey, look, it's us. I saw that. Cash Patel.

Colorado seems like it's picking up. I mean, I was just reading about like Ken Buck's testimony today. It's getting underway. Whereas, I mean, this is true for a lot of cases when it's the early stages of like, well, judge is hearing this, whatever. There's sort of less for the journalist to report on. But then when you're able to say, oh, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump are reporting today, these things might pick up. It is a reason to me, it seems obvious that these cases are all hitting at the same time. So it's hard to keep track of them. You don't know which case is presenting what information because they're arguing very similar things in different

jurisdictions. It's intentionally to confuse anyone who might be trying to follow it so they're again you can retain control of the narrative that gets out well now they have 24 7 world war 3 coverage to watch too to keep them completely in the dark on everything else would you rather fight one horse-sized duck or a hundred duck-sized horses jeez you know the meme yeah i know it's silly but here there actually is a really simple answer a horse-sized duck you know why you can run from it yeah so the reason i bring that up is donald trump is currently fighting a hundred duck-sized horses and they're surrounding them in every direction true that it is amazing sorry it is

and it's important too because what's happening right now is a single Democrat voter in each state files a lawsuit with only a couple thousand dollars, and it forces Trump's team to expand nationwide to every state and set up a legal operation. It's asymmetrical warfare. Yeah. It also means that, you know, and this is not to be cruel to any of the lawyers working on these cases, but theoretically, the best lawyers that Trump can get can't be in every single state all the time. So Trump, as a single individual in a single campaign, will need to hire probably 300 lawyers.

Let's be real. Maybe that's not even enough. OK, if you're talking about election eligibility, you're not going to have one lawyer do it. You're going to hire a lawyer and he's going to have a team of like five or six. He's going to need that in every single state. The Democrats. No, no, no. it's not top down there's one pack in colorado that six voters file a lawsuit then in minnesota some random three random guys file a lawsuit and they do it over and over again and and here and the crazy thing is there's going to be different versions of the same lawsuits

filed in multiple states and trump as a single entity will struggle to compete against all of that sure yeah maximum lawfare so what's the what's the answer for trump then i mean what he can't fight all these lawsuits he has to just fight he has to file the lawsuits and he has to do this and uh they're gonna lie they're gonna cheat and they're gonna steal but once again i tell you first and foremost everybody needs to vote in a tidal wave and convince everybody to go vote bring your friends uh to vote tell them you know whatever is legal in your state. You know, if you're allowed to ballot harvest, ballot harvest.

You should be knocking on doors. And then the real answer is going to be building culture. Don't stuff the ballot box illegally, though. Don't get caught doing that. It's legal in a lot of states. People need to understand that. I'll tell you about rollerblading is a really great analogy on this one. Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck.

Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions.

19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Rollerblading was the biggest action sport in the world in the early 90s. Had something like tens of millions of participants. And they did not inspire young people to get involved. So 10 years goes by and what happens? You're still the best. You're a pro. You're doing the bigger tricks better than ever, but there's no one buying any products around what you're doing, no sponsorships.

And then finally the X game says, guys, you're not selling tickets anymore. We're cutting your event. You're gone. You're still the best in the world, but there Games says, guys, you're not selling tickets anymore. We're cutting your event. You're gone. You're still the best in the world, but there's no one coming behind you. Republicans need to be inspiring young people, indoctrinating young people. This is the funny thing. Don't fall for the left's trap. We absolutely want to indoctrinate all of the young people towards values of personal responsibility, meritocracy and liberty and the foundation of this country

and all the bad stuff can go away when the right says oh it's bad the schools are indoctrinating kids i'm like actually that would be good if it was like for american values but it's not it's weird woke garbage yeah i i i get kind of caught up on this this republican democrat talk obviously i'm a libertarian but the problem for me is like all the worst like policy that's ever passed in my lifetime has always had bipartisan support but i'm not trying to make it seem like republicans and democrats i don't like the republican party or the democratic party you've got a handful of republicans right now seven who are very libertarian leaning and populist and so that's why i'm saying american values if you believe in the constitution if you believe in individual liberties rights and meritocracy that's the indoctrination we want.

I'm a libertarian American first populist candidate. That's what I've been telling everybody. And some of the libertarians don't like that I us through the the academia and and uh you know the corporate news media and the rich and the and the politicians we're speaking to the middle class and lower right like these people that are everyday americans that get up every morning and put on their work boots and go to work that's what a populist message is speaking to those people not not the elite and american first here's the thing like libertarians are like oh you know anti-borders and and and oh you can't say america first but it's the thing. Like libertarians are like, Oh, you know, anti borders and, and, and,

Oh, you can't say America first, but it's like, you're running to govern Americans. How could you not be an American first? And in fact, if we're going to be this anti intervention, interventionist,

right? Like these anti war guys, then you have to be America first. That's the, one of the most important principles of that is that we've got to stop like meddling in these foreign interventions. It shouldn't be shameful to be no if you're an american first is a good thing if you're running to be a politician in america and as as a libertarian candidate i may be one of the first guys that actually gets that and that's you know that's

just who i am well uh your your chief rival in the presidential election has a new policy this story from the post-millennial trump create free, freedom-focused online American Academy as president, and he'd make the woke IVs pay for it. It will be strictly non-political, and there will be no wokeness or jihadism allowed. I see a lot of people cheering for this, but I'm going to be completely honest. This is a stupid idea. Sorry. It just is. Let me play the video for you. In recent weeks, Americans have been horrified to see students and faculty at Harvard and other once respected universities expressing support for the savages and jihadists who attacked Israel. We spend more money on higher education than any other country, and yet they're turning our students into communists and terrorists and sympathizers of many, many different dimensions. We can't let this happen. It's time to offer something dramatically different. Under the plan I'm announcing today, we will take the billions and billions of dollars that we will collect by taxing, fining, and suing excessively large private university endowments.

And we will then use that money to endow a new institution called the American Academy. Its mission will be to make a truly world-class education available to every American, free of charge, and do it without adding a single dime to the federal debt. This institution will gather an entire universe of the highest quality educational content covering the full spectrum of human knowledge and skills and make that material available to every American citizen online for free.

Whether you want lectures or ancient histories or an introduction to financial accounting or training in a skilled trade, the goal will be to deliver it and get it done properly. Using study groups, mentors, industry partnerships, and the latest breakthrough in computing, this will be a truly top-tier education option for the people. It will be strictly nonpolitical and there will be no wokeness or jihadism allowed. None of that's going to be allowed. Most importantly, the American Academy will compete directly with the existing and very

costly four-year university system by granting students degree credentials that the U.S. government and all federal contractors will henceforth recognize. The Academy will award the full and complete equivalent of a bachelor's degree. In addition to help the 40 million Americans who have some college education but no degree, the American Academy will grant credit for past coursework at legacy institutions and give you the chance to

complete your education at the American Academy for free and much more quickly than is now possible or available. This will be a revolution in higher education and will provide life-changing opportunities for tens of millions of our citizens. Enjoy it, learn from it, and thank you. I just want to say real quick, the most important thing here is room tone, guys. When you're shooting these videos, you need to record about 30 seconds of what's called room tone silence so that you can mask the jump cuts.

But anyway, what were you saying? Is this like a GED, but for a bachelor's degree instead of high school diploma? And I think, look, I can respect the colleges are garbage. They're making kids communists. But the government making another program is not the solution. Yeah, this is the same dilemma you had when you were talking about the central bank digital currencies, except with education.

It's the same exact thing. Oh, the government's going to swoop in and create government college for you. Don't worry. Trump says it won't be woke. No way. He'll get out of office and then some crackpot woke person will bang the gavel and it'll turn into woke you. And then the government's funded it.

It can never die. It can never go away. No. He likes to say that everything woke turns to shit, but really it's everything the government touches turns to shit. Also, the government touches,

puts the woke in it. He's saying, you know, I want people to have opportunities to get whatever, but why don't we just stop giving out student loans? I feel like that's the thing that I'm more interested in seeing, right?

I mean, there are tons of- Stop going to college. We'll stop subsidizing the whole system entirely. It doesn't make, you could solve a lot of issues that way. In fact, you could make college affordable. I do love how he came out with his own right-wing version

of free college for all though. That's hilarious. And if he fails at president, we'll definitely see the ads on Facebook where he's like, give us your email address and we'll send you an email. Subs's hilarious. And if he fails at president, we'll definitely see the ads on Facebook where he's like, you know, give us your email address and we'll send you an email. Subsidize for free. Subsidizing college was one of the biggest mistakes

our society ever made. Yes. Because what happens now is young person says, oh, I can get a loan to go to college. I'll learn. I'll take something. I don't even know. Most kids don't even know what their major is going to be. I don't even know what my major is going to be. Then why are you going? So they go thinking they're going to get a job.

That kid, that 17-year-old, I say kid because they're 17, they're planning college. They turn 18, they go to college. If they just went and got a job working at their local, with a handyman. Sure. Local mechanic, engineer, electrician. They said, I'm just going to go for work heating and air conditioning. They'd learn real skills that translate. They'd have an actual job and then they can figure things out as they're getting older or they can work these skills and maybe i don't know being an electrician is a great skill to have and they

could have learned that they didn't have to go to college they go to trade school or something instead they graduate four years later and go oops you know what's a better idea than going to trump's uh america school it's just running for your local school board and changing the school district in your own in your own locality literally it's it's gonna be just as easy if we could change everything if they never subsidized college young people would not have gone and wasted their time generating debt and then learning nothing there there are so what happens is i read this great article this is when i was a kid they said you need an iq of at least 110 to go to college and the problem is subsidized universities

is telling everyone of any capability to go to college. You end up with people who are not bright enough, who can't understand the material. I think we're talking about the other day, like college was supposed to be, you sat down and experimented and worked with like-minded individuals and you wrote a thesis.

You were saying this. And now it's gen ed. Now it's like, here's your homework. Come back. Yeah, it's like being in high school. I mean, and this is also different than let's say like the British system, right? Like in the equivalency of high school in England,

you are already narrowing down what you want to study. In America, we keep students taking everything for as long as possible. And now that basically lasts until they're, you know, if you enroll in college at 18, that's the first two years of college. So when you're 20,

you are still taking general classes instead of specializing in a skill but the longer you're in the more money you owe the government exactly i mean that's the thing about subsidizing is that you were able to say to colleges name your price and we will write a blank check and we will force them to agree to take it that's crazy that also means that there's no uh incentive for colleges to say hey we're going to make this quick and efficient for you i mean there are schools that will say oh we're revamping our general ed criteria. So actually, you can't graduate unless you take, you know, summer courses, which cost additional money, or you you spend an extra year here. I mean, they're trying to make it last as long as possible, because they don't care that

you're going into debt. And in fact, while I was sitting here, my college called me to try and get a donation. This is just, you know,, you will always be a meal ticket for them. And I think it's sad because there are probably professors who are really dedicated to things that they're interested in. You know, there are students who are genuinely interested in learning. Yeah, but it's the administration. Well, and also if we did not have college, would you have, you know, people who spend money buying tickets to lectures instead? Like right now we trap all of learning in college when it doesn't have to be that way. You can do all kinds of things.

I mean, you can get free lectures online as it is. I don't know why we need American Academy, except for the fact that now they're saying you could potentially get the equivalency of a GED, but for your bachelor's. So if you've gotten some college somewhere, but also to what end? If you've been able to find a good job

after having left college, why would you've been able to find a good job after having left college why would you then go back and get a degree except for like i guess wanting to seem sort of elite and good i don't really get what the benefit of this is uh i like that he said they would rush you could rush through so kids that are really smart they want to work 10 hours a day can get their degree in a year you can do that with enrollment programs while you're in high school i mean you can get i've known kids who graduate high school with dual enrollment programs while you're in high school. I mean, you can get, I've known kids who graduate high school with their AA degree if they're getting dual enrollment during college credit, like

through their local community college. There are tons of ways to go through college faster. I think we don't talk about them because ultimately everyone wants you in this pipeline where you go into debt. Yeah, but you're talking about things that don't need college. For things where you need to get a degree, like being a doctor, for instance, you're not going to do it online. You have to go and do medical practice and rounds. You have to learn how to actually save lives

You should be able to do it online though medical work Yeah, sure Because you got to learn how to tie our would you go to a doctor that got his education online? No, of course not Of course nobody would this is my information age. We know if we know where somebody was So you think the average person would then, it's the responsibility of the individual to check onto the practice in the real world. I don't disagree. You could learn a lot of the information, the book information online, but then you

do need to go practice. You've got to have labs. You've got to have labs. I had a friend in high school who put himself through college while working as a paramedic all four years, or first-time, I can't remember, in EMT. If he wanted to be a doctor shouldn't he automatically get real world credit like he doesn't he shouldn't have to take certain classes because he has the practical skills i get that eventually maybe he has to go to medical

there's a big difference between an emt and a doctor by the way but like at the same time he's had more hands-on experience than any kid who anyone who just took a biology class right there should be some recognition of real world skill i think if you get if you're a doctor if you're good at it and it took you two years to become an expert doctor i'd rather have you than a guy who was 12 years in school and doesn't know what he's doing i really don't care about how long it takes i mean that's why there are like standardized tests that all of them go through to say yes i am now a good doctor i am qualified to be a good doctor when i say i want the government out of education i don't just mean my kids education i mean all education entirely that's why i'm like never should have been involved in Now he good doctor. I am qualified to be a good doctor. When I say I want the government out of education, I don't just mean my kids education.

I mean all education entirely. That's why I'm like never should have been involved in education. Trump saying free university is exactly what he's trying to do. It's terrible. But there's something like you don't want one school teaching that two plus two equals five and another school teaching that equals four. You got to have some government oversight because then everyone will be confused. Would you put your kid in the school that teaches two plus two equals five?

I wouldn't, but if my parents thought it equaled five, they probably would have put me in that school. Yeah, well. And so we have a federal government that's like, no, we're going to have some standardization. It's terrible. Kids aren't standardized at all. Well, some of it like-

You ever been around children? Yeah. They're all different. Everyone- Yeah, but if they were being taught that words meant different things, that would be a big problem. So we need some standardization. Otherwise, we'd go to war.

We need that standardization only because parents have become entirely disinterested with their children's education. That's the only problem. They're disinterested in their kids. Yeah, entirely. Also, if a private school

wanted to tweak kids and there was no government oversight, they could like make little terrorists or make people think the wrong thing slightly. The government is doing this now in a bunch of states. Well, that's a problem. It is. The government is doing this now in a bunch of states. Well, that's a problem. It is.

The government is the biggest purveyor of what you're talking about right now. I think the government's too involved, but I don't think no government in education would be a good thing. There should be no government in education at all. At all, 100%. There used to be no government in education, and kids could go to their local schools. They could go to any school they wanted to.

They learned all the things that helped build this country without the government in any state telling them what they had to their local schools. They could go to any school they wanted to. They learned all the things that helped build this country without the government in any state telling them what they had to do in education. What year? Oh, I don't know. The majority of the federal government got involved in the 70s, but the states have been involved for quite some time. But prior to that, the state governments weren't involved in education.

Do you know when they started getting involved? No, I don't know. 1980. DOE. That's the Department of Education. That's the federal. But there's been state involvement in schools much longer than that, but not that much longer than that.

1867 was the Office of Education. Yeah, that's probably because the Civil War happened, and they were like, we can't let that happen again. We need to teach these people the same thing. I don't know. I think just ultimately government doesn't want you to have an independent life outside of its purview, right? And so maybe it was a Civil War, but ultimately as soon as they started saying, hey, it turns

out we can have a say in your domestic life if we mandate that your children go to school, right? There has always been a tendency toward creeping reach into influence. And I think the issue is ultimately that the government doesn't know better than parents. I could get the argument that you want to say that information is standardized, but knowing that two plus two equals four is basic logic. I mean,

that's irrefutable. I live in Iowa. It's like one of the, the most free education States in the country. I mean, as far as education freedom goes, you can homeschool your children and you don't have to tell the government anything at all.

You can just petition your local school district when they're 18 and you think they've gone far enough to get them their diploma. So like, do you think the government should come in and tell us we can't do, we can't homeschool our kids anymore the way that we are? I don't know. It depends on what you're teaching them, I guess. Why? Because if you're teaching them that killing is good, that's a big problem.

Okay. Well, murder is good. That'd be a big problem. Sure. Murder is illegal. So if my kids kill somebody,'re gonna get they're gonna get arrested that's already illegal but if like a state was teaching their kids like it's okay to steal this like there are some laws you just said a state though that's a that's a government yeah if there

were children within a state all being self-schooled to think that things that were illegal were legal like you need some some oversight of some structure we don't have any in Iowa at all everybody's just fine. Some of the only compelling argument I've ever heard for having, you know, minimal government involvement with homeschooling and because, you know, Iowa doesn't have any, but some states have more than others. So you can look these up online. There'll be, you know, blogs or whatever that rate it.

Like New York state has high regulation. It's very difficult to homeschool in New York. West Virginia is sort of middle tier. And one of the things that comes up when you regulate with homeschooling or when you enroll in homeschooling is some states require you to do a certain number of standardized tests to prove that your kid is learning or meeting certain criteria or you have to submit your curriculum some some state governments require that i contend that putting the the government into education has had a huge huge time i've ever heard anyone make a compelling argument was this one social worker who said, the thing is, I just wouldn't want a student to not be enrolled in any school and for

us to never know what happened to them. And I find that interesting because they're making a direct child welfare argument, right? If a kid is in a domestically violent home, if they just get lifted out of the system, if they never go to school, you wonder what happened when you do hear cases like that. But to me, that that speaks the fact that we don't have strong communities around them that would let children just fall off the map yeah and that's what I was gonna say it's it's definitely contributed to the downfall of like strong families and strong communities entirely yeah just putting just putting the government in education at all and forcing families into education uh kids if you if a kid doesn't go to school, they'll arrest the parents.

Yes. That's crazy. It's kind of like this is a good piece of the argument of centralization versus decentralization. We need some of both. I mean, I think I err towards decentralization on a whole. But without any centralization, we would have no federal authority. We would have no state. We'd have no United States.

States wouldn't be united because there was no central authority. You don't have to sell it to me i'm already a fan a bunch of small small states instead of one big country yeah i've heard 50 you're 5 000 lichtenstein's buddy yeah absolutely that's that's from hans herman hoppin himself i think one of the hard things about the balance and i i always had a hard one of the struggles i had with libertarians is that i was really interested in uh foster care and seeing foster care reform but ultimately the question is always like does the government get to say you're a bad parent although we know there are people who should not be parenting who are not safe parents who are you know at what point do we intervene and what frustrates me is that libertarians will always fall back on well aren't there churches or

non-profits to nonprofits to fix that? But we know, of course, any institution of power could be potentially corrupt. And it's very challenging to deal with children. And so I think you come into the same kind of obstacles with questions about education, which is that as much as there are lovely, strong parents who, even if they don't know something, they are willing to push and help their students. There are also parents who just don't care and who have these kids who are, they are ultimately not that interested in or they're detached from. And how do you make sure those students have, you know, something better? Yeah, we adopted, we adopted two.

We have, we have two adopted kids. They're actually my oldest daughter's younger siblings. And part of that, when we adopted them from Arkansas, part of that deal was that they had to be in some type of public education when we got them. Yeah. And, uh, but thankfully we're in Iowa where they have community choice charter schools, which are super community based. You have the opportunity to go down and be a part of the curriculum and you get to join the administration team and all kinds of stuff. And so we were able to use those because we live in Iowa as a public school and they got a better education that way. But even then they were like, my, my son was nine when we got him and he had, um, never

been to school at nine years old, not a single day of school. Nobody had taught him nothing. He taught himself how to read in the back of a car. And so we, you know, putting him in the public education system was very hard for him, like extremely hard for him because they were like, well, he's supposed to be in fourth grade we want to put him in fourth grade i'm like whoa man he's never been to school you know and so we had to like do a bunch of wraparound programs and i was at school with him and my wife was at school with him and and you know it took him some time but he's caught up now it's in seventh grade um but you know if we had had the chance to just

homeschool him we could have got him through it a lot better. And maybe more smoothly. Yeah, much more smoothly with less, with less frustration from him too. But homeschooling is a big, I mean, I think homeschooling is great. You know, I feel members who homeschool, but it's not without its sacrifices, right? It's an extremely difficult thing to do. I understand that there are families that rely on, you know, a community school or a public school in town because otherwise they can't work jobs or do whatever they need to do. It's the fact that ultimately the state knows

that that's where families are vulnerable and sees as a place to influence your children when you need community support. I mean, that's what theoretically your local elementary school should be. It was like Dewey who kind of started this really like, this Dewey of the federal, like really like authoritarian school structure that we have now.

I think it's gone too far. I think we're going to super chats. I could tell Tim's about to raise the bar. Well, it's going to super chats. If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel,

share the show with your friends and head over to Tim cast.com. Click join us. Cause the members only uncensored show is going to be lit. And we'll take calls from you, our members, and you can talk to us on our guest. Christopher Lambert wins the first super chat of the day. He says, the members only uncensored show is going to be lit and we'll take calls from you, our members, and you can talk to us on our guest. Christopher Lambert wins the first super chat of the day. He says, I fell asleep. Well, you did, but you beat everyone else to the first super chat.

Congratulations. Sammy Spills the Tea says, absolutely love this podcast and all that you do, Tim. The crew you have is amazing. Thank you. The crew is amazing. They do excellent work in making all this possible. Grofty pops in saying, I will be waiting for a few minutes, but I'm here. Thank you. Discover the magic of Bad MGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more, make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun and make same-day withdrawals if you win. Download the BetMGM Ontario app today.

You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. All right. Timmy J says,

Eric Erickson called you and Candace Owens anti-Semites on his podcast today. He said he don't know you enough. Eric Erickson, who is that? I don't know. I don't know him enough to comment on that. I'm really sick of people saying anti-stuff. The anti-Semite thing just makes me laugh at this point. Anti-crap.

I'm done with it. It doesn't mean anything. Tell me what you are. Yeah. I honestly don't care if you call me an anti-Semite I'm done with it. It doesn't mean anything. Tell me what you are. Yeah. I honestly don't care if you call me an anti-Semite or a Nazi or any of that stuff. I'm still going to give you my entire, like, truthful opinion on geopolitics. No matter what you call me, I don't care. Anyone saying that, that's just like your opinion, man. Like, you can say that, I guess.

I've been called an anti-Semite more over the last three weeks than I ever have in my entire life, ever. And it's only because I'm like, hey hey maybe children shouldn't be dying for your wars of of politics right like it's it's absolutely insane crazy positions i think the palestinians are semites too yes that's the other thing they are a lot of arabs are semites as well it's just a it's all about language it's really what it is most of these labels don't mean anything because they get thrown around all the time anyways. Well, it's so funny to me because obviously Israel's huge right now. This is a big, giant topic, right?

But they've always framed it, at least for most of my life, as this giant holy war. We were talking about this before the show, but it's not a holy war. It's not the Muslims versus the Jews. It's the Zionists versus the Palestinians. It's a war. It's a political war. 100% it's a political war. 100% it's a political war. Meaning that it's the state is trying to take land?

They have. I mean, they have been. If you look at the history of the Zionists, they've, and the funny thing too is, first of all, this divine claim to Israel. Israel is actually in the Bible. It is the descendants of Abraham. It's a citizenship of the heart for anybody who accepts Christ as the Messiah. And the people who live there today do not accept Christ as the Messiah.

Well, the Jews don't follow the New Testament. Right. So. Right. But they're saying that they have this divine right to. In their book, they do. Well, but you got to understand that to say that that's Israel when it wasn't Israel was Palestine. Right.

But it was it was Israel. And prior to that, it was the land of Canaan. Right. It was a Syria before that. It was a Syria before that. It was the Ottoman Empire. I mean, you're talking you're talking thousands of years here. So.

So, again, once again, it's a weird thing for me because Max Blumenthal brought this up. He was like this is it was Palestine. And before that, it was the descendants of for me because Max Blumenthal brought this up. He was like, this is, it was Palestine. And before that, it was the descendants of the Jews who were conquered by Muslims. And I was like, okay, so the Jews are conquering the land back. Like, bro, there's no argument of someone being like, you want to Hatfield and McCoy this thing all the way back to the dawn of time. Fine, so be it. But if your argument is it was conquered before, so therefore it's Palestine. I'm like, oh, okay okay so they're getting conquered now nobody sounds like the colonizers

are getting colonized and they're getting comeuppance is that the argument no but you gotta but you do also have to understand when the zionists moved in to to israel they were living with the muslims right but there was also christians that lived there that have been displaced as well and there's still today seven percent of palestine is christians right now the third oldest church in the entire world. None of that matters. It does. I think it does matter.

I think when you're talking about the geopolitics of it, if in this lifetime, in this generation and the last generation, those people lived on that land too. It doesn't matter. And then they got displaced. These don't present any solutions to the conflict. It's come in and choose a side and then start fighting about it. One thing that's important is, and I don't want to choose a side at all you really want to distinguish israeli and jew it's very important that they're two completely different the country of israel and

the zion zionists meaning the people that wanted to create a country of israel it's totally different than someone that's jewish they're not the same in fact there's a lot of jews today and we saw there's video of it all over today that there's jews being beat in the street by zionist police for protesting against the dead children in palestine right now it's happening right now do you know that for sure yeah i saw the videos of it i watched the videos of it watching a video doesn't mean you know why why the fight happened well and i'm so fed up with all of the lies okay there's no refugee camp that was a lie on both sides what what was what was the what was the lie from israel i mean there's they're not saying they're none i mean like look i can tell you the examples we have right now how about this how about this i know they're saying that war war

was declared on october 7th right by hamas i nobody's going to dispute that okay i think i think netanyahu is the one who declared the war sure but well come on they hamas attack hamas attack and yeah so clear war but do you know that since january of this year in times of peace 200 palestinians have been killed by idf right i don't i don't know that matters does it does it yes because hamas flew over tore down fencing execute killed a bunch of civilians in october 7th october 7th right and then saying something like 200 palestinians die i'm like okay what happened how many how many hamas soldiers died on october 7th. On October 7th. Right. And then saying something like 200 Palestinians die, I'm like, okay, what happened? How many Hamas soldiers died on October 7th? I don't know.

A lot. You should know, right? I mean, if you're going to use this as an argument, because the argument would be- No, I'm not. This isn't my argument. My argument is that these tensions have been going on for years and years and years and years, and they've been killing, both sides have been killing each other for a long time. Yeah, yeah, yeah. There's a big difference between like over the span of several months for a reason we

have not yet determined 200 Palestinians died. It doesn't answer how many Israelis died. It also doesn't correlate with. And Israelis prior to January as well. And Palestinians prior to that and Israelis prior to that. And that's why that number doesn't mean anything. It doesn't mean anything. So when I say that the history of the region in terms of like it was this country before this country before this country doesn't solve the problem sure so you've got israel and palestine fighting we say what's the solution to stop the conflict right now okay well hamas attacked israel on october 7th in a in a brutal a horrifying way now israel is air air striking gaza thousands of civilians are dying if so so you've got i i think there's a fair argument for cease fire only in the context of we do not want regional conflict which is happening it's starting it's already yeah sorry we're hospitalist firing shells today i mean it's already and then and then

the houthis in yemen are launching attacks iran's gonna get back in all of them and now it's pulling everybody and plus israel's been bombing syria this is bubbling up it's getting massive the only reason to call for a ceasefire is not because of a moral stance on who is allowed or not to do it. It's because, guys, stop fighting before the whole world blows up. We're not going to get a ceasefire. And do you want to hear my conspiracy theory on this? This is a conspiracy theory. I have nothing to back this up.

But the West has wanted war with Iran for a long time. That's undisputable. Yep. Right? And so putting boots on the ground, West Western boots on the ground in Palestine is going to, they're doing it hugely. Yes. And it's going to hugely increase the chances of terrorist attacks in the West, which is

exactly what happened on nine 11 that gave them all the support they needed to go into Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, later Yemen, all these places that they needed to go, right? This, this, this, uh, what was 11 countries or whatever that they want to go to war with there. They know 100% that when they put boots on the ground in Palestine, there's going to be, there's going to be terrorist attacks in the West. They're already there. They're going to get the support that they need for, for war with Iran.

That's what they've been special. It is a fact, according to the New York times and the times of Israel, that us special forces are in Israel assisting with recovery of hostages. Now, that's the extent of the statement. Right. But you'd be insane not to think that as special forces, Israel is exactly they don't stand there and liaise with Israel. No, they go get them. And with Israel now cutting Gaza in half, the assumption is U.S. forces are forces are already fighting plus there have been reporters on the ground who have stated this already rumors because it's hard to confirm these things but if the official reporting is special forces are there then reporter says hey americans are in gaza

fighting it stands to reason that's likely the case the according to bloomberg the u.s held secret meetings discussing u.s troops occupying gaza after this operation ends so yes right iran they know we should go deep on the after show that's what they're trying to do on israel palestine conflict i want to go deeper yeah we can go deeper on it for sure there's a lot i got a lot more to say let's read some more so i looked up eric garrison he's a person hello whoa what was that what was that awesome your phone no that was uh we're in the discord channel someone went oh i see yeah why are we in the discord channel that's not supposed to happen well that was terrifying yeah just a bright hello from someone who popped in and there you go no thank you yeah sorry that

well there you go let's read uh eric erickson is like a conservative personality or whatever i think it's funny that i'm getting a bunch of people calling me an israeli zionist shill and then eric erickson allegedly according to this tweet is calling me an anti-semite or something yeah it's either way there's no there's nothing you can do about it i guess make no one happy yeah you've been like pretty you've been pretty pro-israel to be calling it anti-semite right i mean i'm pro-israel in the extent of october 7th like i'm not going to get into the history of the region and i can only tell you now that when people make moral arguments about what Israel did in the past versus what Hamas did

on October 7th. Or what Israel's doing right now, too. I'm just like, none of this is solving anything. Right. You know, and then they're like, yeah, well, Israel's right

to defend itself, blah, blah, blah. And I'm like, sure, like, I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is not going to solve any of the problems. No, it's going to make it much worse. It's all going to get way worse.

So I don't have any moral answers for anybody other than Hamas did a whole bunch of awful things, and then the left keeps lying about all of it. And so what bothers me is that, oh, a hospital was bombed. Psych! Not really. Oh, a refugee camp was bombed. Psych! Not really. And then I'm like, I'm done.

And then they're like, yeah, well, Israel is bombing civilians. I'm like, yeah, but all of those stories turn out to be lies. No, they're definitely, there's a lot of civilians. For sure. Of course, Of course. Except the two big ones that were Cassius Belli for these other countries and militia groups get involved were fake. And I'm just like, at this point, I'm done listening to people who in their own doctrine say lie to me to gain political power.

I don't care about Israel. Like there are country that exists. There's a war going on. You should care more about. I care about Israel as much as I care about Myanmar. Because Israel has a ton of influence on your politics here in the United States. And I care about Israel as much as I care about Myanmar and Armenia. Are there problems in Armenia with the Christians?

You bet. It's horrifying. We should talk about it. I care about Israel as much as that and these other countries. Nobody's talking about those countries. The psychotic, psychotic, psychotic obsession with Israel is the most annoying thing in the world to me it's just like you there are some people who just cannot talk about anything else and i'm like geez you you have people on twitter that will have a calm rational conversation with you about anything and then as soon as israel

comes up they'll start talking about nuking gaza and I'm like, oh, yeah. And calling you an anti-Semite if you don't want any dead children, too. And I'm like, can we talk about Burma? You're not passionate about Burma. I mean, like Yemen, Yemen. My top passion is 1948. The Burma Myanmar conflict. Two hundred plus thousand dead. Nobody cares.

Yeah. The Yemen. I mean, the Yemen humanitarian crisis just just stopped, like literally five hundred thousand dead children due to foreign policy, like US foreign policy in Saudi Arabia. And like nobody said a word. I always say this. Our priority should be what's happening in the US.

It's not, you can't be compassionate or empathetic to what's going on outside the US, but how can we have this conversation about what we should be doing in an interventionist fashion when we don't secure our own border? It's ridiculous. Let's read some more.

We got this. Bender the Offender says, Tim, I do not think that a majority of states would abolish or ban no-fault divorce due to the fact that states get a financial percentage from the divorcees. However, I did see that the GOP was going after no-fault divorce thoughts. No-fault divorce should be abolished. And I believe that along with it, it will take child support with it. I think child support is overwhelmingly a really, really awful and evil thing.

Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. This is part of my platform for President, by the way. So the lamest, most basic terms for Title IV-D of the Social Security Act is for every 66 cents that a state spends on child support, enforcement, welfare programs, stuff like that, the federal government returns them a dollar for every 66 cents they spend. So essentially what the federal government has now done has subsidized the state to separate families so they can treat one custodial parent that has the child all the time and one as a visitor so they can take revenue from them. And for every dollar they collect from them or for every 66 cents they collect from them, the federal government gives them a dollar back. But also through no fault divorce and other things, including these programs that states have, we've incentivized women most of the time, 96.7% of the time, it's the woman to

split up the family and get paid. And you have to pay for her life and your child's life and your own life. And then you get to see your child every every other sunday night child support in almost all almost all forms should be abolished because it is an incentive it is an incentive and a safety net to tell anyone but typically women that if you break up your family for with no fault the man is on the hook you have don't worry't worry about it. Yeah. Title 40 of the Social Security Act would take care of a lot of that. Divorce should be only in the instances of fault, abuse, infidelity. And if a it will typically be men.

If a man is abusing his wife. Sorry, buddy. You got to pay child support and a lot. If a guy is committing infidelity, you broke the rules. You broke the terms of your agreement. You got to pay child support. But if you have a man and a woman who are married, and the woman just says, I'm not into it anymore, I'm getting a divorce and you have to pay, nope, that should be abolished. And the guy should be like, well, you chose to break the family up,

here's how it should work, joint custody. And then the guy says, I'll pay for the kids when I have the kids and you pay for the kids when you have the kids. No question. There should be no incentive. Equal responsibility. Equal responsibility and no incentive for anyone to get a divorce knowing the other partner, typically the man, has to pay for it. I talked a lot about this on the last show I was on with you already, but the amount of fatherless homes in America is one in four. One in four kids lives in a fatherless home. 82% of all violent youth offenders sitting in jail today are from a fatherless home. 82% of all violent youth offenders sitting in jail today are from a fatherless home. 92% of mass shooters

are from a fatherless home. These are undeniable statistics. This was Larry Elder's big thing. He announced his candidacy. He led off with the fact that the fatherless epidemic is the thing driving social destruction in America.

The worst part of, is the worst, absolute worst thing that we face as Americans today is bred an entire generation of apathetic violent children and it's the hardest i mean we could change the culture and the stats are undeniable and we have to but we'd have to acknowledge that this is an issue and you'd

have to fight the idea that like no it's great if we have you know unmarried couples single moms who depend on the government which is obviously not what one party in particular wants i want to read this uh federali actual says i'm literally out of discretionary funds, but had to tip one last time hearing that Tim is hiring skaters who speak out. Keep going, guys. Spiral out and vote for Josh Smith. Was I first? You were far from first. But I want to stress this point.

Yes. I don't know if it's up yet, but it's called the boonies. It's our skate show. We were just having a meeting over the new skate park designs. We are bringing on a series of pro skaters we filmed with a bunch of uh semi-pro ams and we're doing tips for tricks cash to skateboarders oh it is the most glorious thing ever because there are some skateboarders who are just cowards absolute cowards and they're like i'm scared to come and skate your park because

then someone might yell at me on the internet and i'm like then there's no money here for you but it's your choice then there are other skaters who are like i someone might yell at me on the internet. And I'm like, then there's no money here for you, but it's your choice. Then there are other skaters who are like, I don't care how people on the internet say, let's go. And they show up and do awesome tricks. The point of this is, you know,

the hardest thing in the culture war is inspiring young people. So many people, uh, I don't have kids working on it. None of your business, but, um, everyone's always like,

where are your kids? Well, it's a private family matter, but not that you're asking uh but making sure that the next generation holds our values is quite literally the the the apex of our mission that's the only thing that matters you can say right now i wish the system was this way what you need to be saying and understanding is the system changes when you share those ideas with young people who can then start working towards expanding those ideas as they grow older and growing into it if you do nothing they're all communists also let me say

uh if you're waiting to for things to get better to have children don't they're not going to get any better you gotta have kids now right yeah the guy who had who had seven kids while living in the middle of the woods 300 years ago was not waiting for it to get better no actually the kids were making it better he was like we need kids who can help do work if we're gonna survive build a tribe strong men create good times and uh you can only make strong kids if you're if you're having them but so this is the point when federale says he's out of money but he's tipping anyway i really do appreciate it and i just want to stress this is the the point this is the mission we are we were talking about,

you know, money before the show. And I'm like, man, if I just did my one YouTube channel in the morning and the morning show podcast, I am wealthy and I have the rest of the day off and I don't got to worry about any responsibility. Instead, I've decided to take on a whole bunch of extra work to try and build culture, music, skateboarding, coffee shop, whatever we can, because that's the key path to victory. And it is arduous. It is strenuous. It is stressful, but it's worth it. I don't want anyone to get the wrong impression. Obviously, building a company builds my net worth at the same time. It's not like I'm just flushing money down the toilet. But there's a lot of other easier things i could do with all the money made from just one youtube channel and just

programmatic ads yeah but if you just sit around and do that they'll make cbdc and then ban you for saying something like you gotta move exactly exactly yeah that and i don't know i just i just feel like doing diversify your portfolio if someone if someone's personal yeah your ability portfolio is a lesson i learned a long time ago i'll ask you right now if you woke up tomorrow and you had a million dollars clean cash in your bank account what would you do invest 75 of it so there's three tiers of answers that so this is a question typically asked of like uh venture capitalists. There's three, three tiers of the answer. One is the, the ideal answer is the direct response of, oh man, a million bucks. We are looking at this new property where we can start producing more of our product. If I had

300,000, that's the answer they're looking for. The second answer is what you said. I would invest. Okay. Well, it's a little vague, but that's good because it means if I give you money, you're looking to make money with it. And the answer which is 95 of the answers is oh man vacation vacation like oh dude i'd get a new car and i'd pay off my bills and it's like i will never give you a penny and so when people ask if someone were to ask me like if you if you were given a million dollars tim right now what would you buy with it i'd be like i just hire someone to make a couple documentaries try and win the culture war i guess that's all that's literally the only thing i care about you know i could i could live in a van down by the river and be happy but in terms of what i want to buy with things is people doing

awesome stuff to win just also remember the the other most important thing you can do to win the culture war is to have children and raise them to be free thinking independent humans yeah very very important going places you don't normally go and interacting with people you don't normally interact with sure vastly powerful yeah it can be for sure absolutely all right here we go let's read some more riley lewin says ian freeman was sentenced to 96 months in federal prison for selling bitcoin without sufficient investigations into his willing customers in early October. Not the first or the last, unfortunately.

Yeah, there's a few. The Crypto Six or something like that from New Hampshire. He was part of that. And I don't know all the details of the court case, so I'm not going to comment on it too much. But I know Ian Freeman has a podcast community that he puts my podcast on for me all the time. He's a pretty cool guy.

Reby Cheap says, to be honest, $2,000 isn't enough. This is in reference to a video I made where a woman says she won't sleep with a man until he spends $2,000 on her. And I said, she's right. He says, you shouldn't sleep with a man unless he also buys you a $9,000 shiny rock and swears in front of both your families to love you forever. Bingo. I don't know about the $9,000 shiny rock. And the money isn't necessarily what's important this woman wrote an article where she was like i heard that some women are saying they'll only sleep with a man if he spends two thousand dollars on her

and she's like i think it's probably a good idea because i've slept with a bunch of guys and then they ditched me the next day and if i wait until they spend this money maybe they'll stick around and i'm like women are starting to rediscover standards again you know it's crazy thank goodness full circle she she says at the end of the article, actually, what's more important than the money is, what is their job? Do they have debt? Did they go to school?

Do they have a stable career? What's their future plans? What's their relationship like with their family, their parents? Yes, and I'm like, these are all the questions we always asked. And then we got rid of it for hookup culture. And now you're realizing that was bad. And hooking up with random guys was bad. And now're like maybe i should actually stop ask these guys about their lives and if they don't stick around they weren't worth in the first place i think women are also

discovering that when you have standards for men men men like to meet the standards they like they like to pursue and achieve right so if i say like i want to be with someone who's high achieving that's desirable for someone who also wants to be high achieving. And that is better for both of us in the long run. If you're expecting very little and the man doesn't have to do anything, like maybe hang around for a while, but ultimately he is dissatisfied with his life anyways and we'll move on. It doesn't benefit anyone to have low standards. Sure. I said the other day, all this stuff popped up originally with that tweet of the, I don't know, what was it? $ 200 on the first date or whatever yeah you retweeted my my tweet but i i said when i stopped dating for a fun time and started dating for a long time i stopped having dates that didn't need reservations and that's true like when when i

when i wanted that quality like i changed my whole life to go get quality i've been getting into chastity lately which is just really sex with a purpose. Like instead of just lust. True. It's stressful because testosterone is nuts, but like it's really rewarding. You got to meditate. You got to discipline. You have to be the warrior. You know, there's.

Or get married. There's two kinds of people. There's the. And you can do it whenever you want. The person who's the, who's the, look, you're either in control of yourself or you're being controlled by your, by whims. Right. When you when you wake up, do you decide I like I am me and I decide what I do.

Or do you just face compulsion within you and say, I'll do whatever I feel? You know what I mean? I think the things you do in life should have purpose. And dating is one of those things. Are you an NPC or are you a player character? I'm a player character. That means you, when your body says,

I want a large chocolate cake, you say, I'm not eating that. Yeah. When your body says, I don't feel like working out, you say, you're damn right,

you're working out. Yeah, it's kind of nice. That's what Rogan said. He has a great quote where he's like, I think it's Rogan, where he said,

that inner bitch says, no, I don't feel like working out and you got to beat it into submission and then go work out. Beat it earlier in life into submission. The ends were worn out. All says, no, I don't feel like working out. You got to beat it into submission and then go work out. Beat it earlier into submission. Yeah.

All right here. I love this one. The real hydro PX. We don't read enough of your super jets. It says, Tim is such a pompous person who thinks the people around him don't understand things. It's his insecurities from not having a GED. I had to read it because I love it. And real hydro.

I really do appreciate it. I think you've given me like $5,000 at this point from just blasting these super chats all day, every day, just insulting me. Is he right? He's not right. Is he talking about when you explain things that, you know, everyone involved in our conversation listening at home may not know? Like when you explain whatever the acronym. Yeah. Like, is that what he's talking about?

Maybe your guests or something. Some people in the chat were like, what cbdc that's why i said it's crazy do you know josh denny podcast host maybe the comedian josh denny redheaded guy he was on the food network for a while he's been really canceled from a lot of sounds familiar i had him on my show once and he's got like this dedicated group of like troll haters that will go to any media that he does and super chat questions to make fun of him. And before the show, he goes, listen, you're going to get all kinds of super chats of people asking me questions that are derogatory, calling me Uber driver and all these things.

Ask every one of them. He said, I'll stay on for three hours and get you every super chat you need. I was like, all right, man, let's do it. That sounds fun. And we did. We sat there. It was great. He's like paying for his own ticket out there.

He paid for everything. Yeah, absolutely. First of all, the main reason I don't read a lot of Hydro's super chats is because there's too many of them. And I try to read a bunch of different ones. But I also have no problem reading super chats from people who don't like me. I think that's kind of the point, too. But I do think it's just like this one was particularly good.

Like, I don't have a ged or whatever i'm literally complaining about school saying stop going like the multi-millionaire who doesn't have a gd i mean tim cries himself to sleep about it his life is in ruins it's not it's not that i'm just begging people to stop going to school and it's like haha you wish you did and i'm like i genuinely want the school system to be destroyed. That's why I like that one. Cause I have such a hard on for hating institutionalized learning facilities. That one really, I got my G went in military, like a dumb,

dumb GED. What does it even mean? Like dude, good enough diploma. It's, but it's not even it. Look, I don't know.

I don't know where I learned this or how I learned this, but if you can convince someone you don't need anything, you know, you can, you can walk into any venue you want meet any celebrity you want so long as you know how to speak words that's all you need and so i'm like what is this piece of paper going to get me that i can't just say so you know you know what i did you want how easy it is i went to college for one month at a community college and then i checked off on every job application some college they never asked for a diploma again. No.

Didn't need it. No. All right. Let's read some more. Daniel Caldwell says, hey, crew, I'm logistics coordinator guy in Pittsburgh. I've been site manager for seven Super Bowl halftime shows and best boy for local rigging crews in the Berg. May I be of assistance in your upcoming visit? I'd love to help.

The answer is yes, but I don't do the coordination for the live events. We have a live event coordinator, and then it's going to be like we're a month, maybe two months out from which venue it's going to be and then which production company we're going to use. And so it's hard to just take a super chat and be like, we'd love to have you because we don't even know what we're doing. And then

what's likely going to happen is that one guy will say, here's the next guy, and the next guy says, here's the next guy, and then it all falls down like dominoes. All right, we'll grab one more Super Chat. For some reason, Super Chats just aren't loading. I don't know why. Yeah, I see that. Yep.

All right, Matt Kinder says, today's my birthday. I watch TimCast every single night. I love the show, and I love what you're doing for the culture. Keep up the good work. Happy birthday, Matt. Happy birthday. Is that Matt Kinder work. Happy birthday. Happy birthday. Is that Matt Kinder? Yeah.

Happy birthday, Matt. Happy birthday, Matt. Last one. Waffle Sensei says, Josh, why should I vote for a libertarian when it will not result in a libertarian president? It will help Democrats win. Voting for Trump saves him from false imprisonment and stands up for the principles of liberty itself.

I love these questions. These are my favorite questions. They ask me every single day. First of all, I don't care about your your candidate honest to god i've lived through reagan uh bush clinton trump biden and my life has never been enriched by a president not once not one time has they have they ever made my life better they never made my family's life better and like i said earlier in the show every single piece of bad legislation that's ever gotten through the house and the executive branch has had bipartisan support every single time and i don't care i don't care about your candidates anymore truthfully but the the other thing too is like is like we your candidate it doesn't deserve

the votes they have to earn the votes. That's literally what politics is. And here's the best part about this, voting for a libertarian, especially if you can waste your vote. Because libertarian candidates are not going to win presidency in 2024. That's just insane. If somebody's telling you they are, they're a liar. Yeah, with that attitude. Well, crazier things have happened, I'm sure. But if you were to get us that percentage that makes us a national major political party, now you have another party swimming around in the water

that actually makes your candidates have to start governing the way that they campaign. And that's a really important thing, right? It's like we've been lied to repeatedly in these campaigns, these high-dollar campaigns, while they're stuffing their pockets and doing all this bad stuff and sending all your tax money around

all these different countries, 200 countries every year, right? They never govern the way that they campaign. But if you've got the 40-year-old blue-collar working class guy that puts his boots on every morning, now coming for your long-held position of power, well, you might have to start doing the things you said you were going to do. And so it's just a challenge to the system, man. Competition. Yeah, absolutely. Political competition. If you believe in the free market, which I like to call the consumer-driven market, you know that competition breeds innovation and breeds success.

The argument is, typically, if you're in a blue state and you know it's going Democrat, then you can help the Libertarians get a higher percentage and increase their competition. Or you can always vote Libertarian locally. It's not always just about president. Yeah, there's a lot of local candidates that are really good. That's what we need. We win local candidates. We win a lot of local candidates that are really good. And we win local candidates. We win a lot. People think that we don't win any races. We win at least 200 in an election cycle

of mayors and city councils and all kinds of stuff. All right, everybody, smash that like button, subscribe to the channel, share the show with your friends. Head over to TimCast.com. The members-only uncensored show

will be starting in a couple minutes. You don't want to miss it. It's fun. It's not family-friendly. It'll be a little spicy. And you can follow the show at TimCastIRL can follow me personally at timcast everywhere joshua do you want to shout anything out yeah absolutely go follow my show to break the cycle with joshua smith it's right here on youtube you can find it at uh youtube.com backslash fight the despots of course the campaign website's joshua smith

2024.com you can find all my info there donate to the campaign become a volunteer all the good things that we need. And follow me on Twitter at Joshua at large. That's awesome. It's been so fun having you here. I'm Hannah Claire Brimelow. I'm a writer for Timcast.com. You should follow at Timcast News on Twitter and Instagram.

If you want to follow me personally, I'm on Instagram at HannahClaire.b. And I'm on Twitter at HC Brimelow. Guys, thank you so much. And of course, Ian. Tonight is the night. You're going to subscribe to me on YouTube it happened i'm fully monetized tomorrow is one of my most exciting interviews i've ever had it's at 3 30 p.m eastern standard time with james tour one of the leading graphene scientists on earth at rice university they're doing flash jewel creation of graphene and hydrogen

for fuel this interview is going to be incredible the The guy's brilliant, and I want to see you there. Come join me at 3.30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time at Ian Crossland on YouTube, and I'll catch you there. And I am Serge.com. I enjoyed today's show. Pleasure seeing you. I guess meeting you for the first time. Meeting for the first time, yeah.

I follow you on Twitter, man. Yeah, that's right. That's what you said. Anyways, guys, follow me on Twitter, too, at Serge.com. We'll see you all over at Tim timcast.com in about a minute. Thanks for hanging out.