Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #932 SECOND EPSTEIN Drop Implicates Bill Clinton In COVER UP of Epstein w/Mona Salama

Episode Date: January 5, 2024

Tim, Hannah Claire, Brett (Pop Culture Crisis), & Serge join Mona Salama to discuss the latest Epstein documents suggesting Bill Clinton threatened Vanity Fair over Epstein reporting, A-List celebrities being named in the Epstein Documents, Elon Musk saying Joe Biden is facilitating illegal immigration, and bomb threats being sent to 11 different State capitols in the last 2 days. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals if you win.

Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. A new batch of documents related to the Epstein case have been released. This is the second trove. And oh, boy, we got some juicy stuff in here.

A bunch of A-list celebrities were named. But of course, it doesn't mean that anything wrong. It just means that Epstein liked to walk around claiming he was friends with a lot of celebrities. But, you know, maybe we should take a look at who these people are. Because it's been known for a long time what Epstein was doing. But the big story is that according to one of the emails in the documents, Bill Clinton went to Vanity Fair and demanded they not report on what Epstein was doing with his trafficking, if you know what I mean.

And so this appears to be an accusation, a report, a claim. Be very careful here. Bill Clinton was trying to cover up what Epstein had been doing. Questions are why? So far, it's only speculation, but oh boy, we better talk about that one. We got some political news as well. The other day, there was a wide, there was reporting of widespread bomb threats, numerous state capitol buildings sparking evacuations. For the second day in a row, this has happened. It's happened again. Many more evacuations. Things are getting crazy out there. And then, of course, political news. According to Newsweek, Joe Biden's volunteers are quitting in droves. They're abandoning the campaign.

This is going to get real crazy. And I'm hoping it gets crazy in the sense that it becomes so overwhelmingly positive towards Trump that there's not even a question of political conflict at all. And everyone's like, yeah, Trump wins and everybody wants him to. But we will see what happens. My friends, before we get started, head over to Timcast.com, click join us, become a member to help support our work. And as a member, you see that banner right there. Timcast at the Iowa caucus, January 15th.

Buy your tickets now. Members only. Now, we launched we're doing a town hall with Vivek Ramaswamy on the 10th. Very, very difficult to pull all this off, but we're going to do it. And it's expensive, but we're going to do it. And we sold out those tickets instantly. I'm not kidding. There's not that many tickets.

They're all gone right when we posted it. This time we're posting only for members. You've got to be a member if you want to buy the tickets. They're a bit more expensive. They're $150 but the Iowa Caucus IRL show is going to be longer. It's going to be an extended show where you're hanging out and we are absolutely

going to be taking questions from people in the audience. So this is more like directly engage and interact with the show. We have a multitude of guests that are going to be joining us, not just Vivek. It's a caucus so everyone's going to be there. We've got an... I don't even know who we're going to have, but a lot of guests that are going to be joining us, not just Vivek. It's a caucus, so everyone's going to be there. We've got it. We've got an I don't even know who we're going to have, but a lot of really great people.

Of course, Seamus and Luke will be joining us and it's going to be a lot of fun. So become a member as a member. You can then also get access to tickets, but you also get access to our uncensored members only show, which is coming up tonight. And I will address for those last night that are wondering what happened to the show. It is not just YouTube's rules, but there are rules that every single social media platform, even X, has that if the rules are broken, the show is gone. We talked about exactly what happened when we moved to the uncensored show. And whenever a show gets taken down here on YouTube or any other platform for that reason, we we will move to the uncensored members only on timcast.com to explain what's going on and the reason we do that is because that is quite literally where you can say almost anything you want unless you're breaking the law we don't we can't we know you know no one allows that

my point is this there's a reason why x rumble youtube all have rules against doing things that are illegal and so there's nothing we can do about it if the show is off it's because usually what happens is something was said and uh you know show gets pulled but it will be on timcast.com and for all that are all those that are wondering the episode is up in full on rumble on itunes on spotify and all podcast platforms it was available as soon as the show wrapped for free for everybody. So become a member if you want to support our work. Also go to castbrew.com, buy Cast Brew Coffee. We sponsor ourselves.

It's the best coffee you'll ever have. And buy it if you want to support our work. Smash that like button. Subscribe to this channel. Share the show with your friends. And yeah, do all that. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is mona salama

hey what's going on everybody uh who are you what do you do all right so i used to be a reporter i'm analyst right now i took a time off so i'm trying to get back into everything but yeah this way i'm a reporter truth seeker truth teller right on you've had a lot of experience with uh politics to say the least yeah okay covering you know you know what you call the tea party network um movement covering the trump campaign covering trump presidency covering 2020 and then everything went downhill from there because you know the new america hopefully it's going up uphill from here yeah what we want to happen going uphill it sounds hard uphill sounds exhausting i don't want to go what we want to happen? Going uphill? It sounds hard. Uphill sounds exhausting.

I don't want to go uphill. I want to be on top of the hill already. Going downhill? Well, you got to go back up at some point. But anyway. When things come up, things go down. Should be fun. Thanks for hanging out.

Hannah Clare, of course, hanging out. Thanks for having me. Hey, I'm Hannah Clare Brimelow. I'm a writer for SCNR.com. That's Scanner News. Hey, I want to say thank you guys for following at TimCastNews on Twitter. We just hit 100,000 followers today So we're really excited about that

Couldn't do it without your support And I'm very excited because Brett's here tonight What is going on guys? Yes, my name is Brett Dasavik I am the host of Pop Culture Crisis Monday through Friday, 3pm Eastern Time Right here on YouTube So I saw somebody talking about when New Year's came

And they mentioned, they're like Wow, I hope we have a really, really uneventful 2024 I said, in an election year. Yeah. Yeah. Let's, let's not. It's not going to happen. It's off to a rough start.

It's off to a rough start. Four days in. And here's what we got. Here's what we're going to do. We're going to, we're going to, we're going to do it. Everybody, check out Pop Culture Crisis on YouTube right now. You want to, you want to show this, Serge? We got it right here.

Pop Culture Crisis, 91,700 subscribers. Y'all go subscribe to pop culture crisis because the show format is very similar except when you super chat on pop culture crisis money guns fire 20 bills into the air and it's really funny when it lands in the guest's drink or hits them in the face but uh as you can see pop culture crisis talks about uh pop culture issues so it absolutely does it overlaps it overlaps like we uh they're like we're gonna be talking about celebrities and epstein's island tonight and all of these things there's like i mean you you end up talking So it absolutely does. conservatives are of this opinion that pop culture doesn't matter well you know your your kids are getting information from somewhere and they're pushing these ideologies on the next generation somewhere and you have to be aware of what's actually going on if you want to fight back against what time are you guys live 3 p.m eastern standard time so this this is the point of pop

culture crisis not everybody cares about the headline of this of this video is epstein list right you know a bunch of people who are going to be like, oh, I don't care about that. But when you get a new song that comes out, a new movie or new show, most people are like, oh, I want to know about that. And these are the people, when these shows come out, it's these personalities that are influencing the younger generation. So that's why Pop Culture Crisis exists, hosted by Brett and Mary Morgan. So go subscribe and let's crack 100,000 subscribers and get that silver play button. Also, we got Serge hanging out. Yes, indeed.

You should check out Pop Culture Crisis. I should be on there eventually in the future. I know that I haven't been lately. When you've got the time. When you've got the time, my friend. One of these days it'll happen again. I'm Serge.com. Let's get into this episode, Tim.

From the Daily Beast of all sources, Bill Clinton pressured Vanity Fair not to write about Epstein, new docs claim. An email from the newly unsealed court documents reports, quote, B. Clinton walked into VF and threatened them not to write about Epstein's sex trafficking. Yo, we actually have this. The Calvin Coolidge Project tweets out the email. It says, good points, all of them. I'm looking at both sides of the picture.

On the upside, I will give exposure to build up publicity for the case etc etc we'll skip over and then it goes uh goes down to say uh let me find this point it must be carefully written and not give any notions about the upcoming book for any new info when i was doing some research into vanity fair yesterday it does concern me that they could want to write about me considering that b clinton walked into vanity fair and threatened them not to write about sex trafficking articles, and his good friend Jeffrey Epstein, should I be asking, what is this story they're writing pertaining to? I just thank goodness for having a friend like you on the inside who knows how to deal with the viciousness of today's world. There's another email.

It says, I would let Vanity Fair buy your picture via Brad. The big gamble would be to let him also give the statement saying your interviews with us were accurately reported. And you have no more to say this time about how you were trafficked to P.A. and other men, including two of the world's most respected politicians, redacted and redacted, as well as women. The scenes with Ghislaine, because you are writing a book. P.A., of course prince andrew and the the other crazy thing is in the documents yesterday there was a statement from a witness about who they had been trafficked to and one of those names was still redacted and the question is why why what so you of course had prince andrew you had jean-luc brunel and then there

was a name that was redacted. And everybody wants to know what was that one name? Who do you think it was? If you had to put money on it. Bill Clinton. I feel like Bill Clinton is the most obvious, but, you know, the fact is that it could be a lot of people, which is even more disturbing. I disagree.

I agree and disagree. It could be a lot of people. Fair. That's obvious. Who knows? But how is it that Jean-Luc Brunel's name is released Prince Andrew? How is it that a document released that's supposed to have these names unredacted for public interest, one name still gets redacted? Maybe they weren't informed that they've been subjected to being, that they were called out by the witnesses. No, that wouldn't matter

there actually is a fairly easy and obvious reason that would something that would supersede a civil claim so you have these documents journalists file a lawsuit saying freedom of information release the names the court says yes and redacts one name why Why? National security. What could supersede a lawsuit on freedom of information that would result in the documents being released keeping one of those names covered up? National security reasons. And that person's still in office. Bill Clinton. No, not still in office. If that comes out, we know Clinton's named in these documents, but he's not named as actually having done anything related to trafficking, just having been flying on the plane and been around these people.

And Jeffrey Epstein said Clinton likes them young. And now we're learning from the latest document dump that Clinton allegedly went to Vanity Fair and tried to cover up the Epstein story. What year was this email? Oh, let's let's pull it. Let's pull that. It's probably like what do we have? 2011. OK. I mean, none of this is surprising at all. oh let's let's pull out let's pull that it's probably like uh what do we have uh 2011 okay i mean none of this is surprising at all who remembers when amy roback got caught on the hot

mic talking about how she had the story about epstein and that the her producer killed it said she couldn't wasn't allowed to do it right that was what 20 2015 or something like that there was a i mean there was a long time where epstein was being covered up. This is post one of his sex offender convictions though, right? Like there was a time when everyone knew that Epstein had a history. He had been convicted in Florida

and yet we still weren't willing to talk about him. It's a very strange time. Some people think it's Joe Biden. That's, this is my like current theory that actually Joe Biden is going to be on the list. I know we were floating Hunter

earlier before the show, but I think Joe Biden joe biden is is going to be on the list i know we were floating hunter earlier before the show but uh i think joe biden is sort of a more precarious variable it can't be because he was too long yeah it's too long it's too long no no that's it brett nails it take hillary clinton can it be hillary clinton no uh it's not long enough so uh take a look at the length of the black bar but that's not what matters because when you're doing redactions look at the length of the black bar but that's not what matters because when you're doing redactions the the the placement of the redaction could be it's it's someone clicks it and drags it we don't know it'll be like the same size as prince andrew that name but right so you look at the commas of where it's placed in the document because the spacing of the text is not

altered and then what you can do is you can go from comma to comma and you can actually determine how many characters exist in this person's name. You don't know. It could be three in their first name and seven in the last name or seven in their first name, three in their last name. Who knows? But it looks like it's about the length of probably not Jean-Luc Brunel. That's too long. Maybe, though.

Maybe, though. Prince Andrew. Bill Richardson seems to fit rather well in that spacing. We know it's not. I'm not saying it's literally Bill Richardson. I'm saying a name of that size. So it doesn't seem like it would be Bill Clinton. No, Dershowitz is named outright in his documents.

So I don't need to redact that. And his name's longer. Yeah, I don't think Clinton, because if it said Bill Clinton, you can tell it would be shorter. So not Bill Clinton. And it won't be Hillary. Right. it said Bill Clinton, you can tell it would be shorter. So not Bill Clinton. And it won't be Hillary, right? Hillary would be longer. You never know.

She could be part of it. Like the madame of the madame. But these are guys. Right. That's what I'm saying. This is me not looking at the emails and just depending on it. I mean, yeah. Because you know what I really want?

You know why I'm not really like depending on the documents? Because a lot of this is like hearsay. I really just really want to see the J.P. Morgan list and see who he paid off. Because that's where you find out where the real crimes were hidden. Damn, maybe that's where Stephen Hawking is. Maybe that's his name right there. Do you think that's enough, Letter? I was very sad that I didn't get to talk about the Stephen Hawking stuff last night.

Colin Rugg tweeted this yesterday. He said, A single name is redacted in a list of individuals who Ghislane maxwell allegedly directed underage girls to have sex with who is this person the redacted name was next to former new mexico mexico governor bill richardson billionaire hedge fund manager glenn dubin uh prince andrew model scout jean-luc brunel and computer scientist marvin minsky released the name i think it's a national security thing prince andrew is not a national security issue for the United States. Right.

I'm willing to bet it could be someone who's currently still in office. But then you're saying like, oh, it's national security. That means it has to be somebody current because Bill Clinton is over there. Like it's out there.

It doesn't have to be current. Like Clinton, former president still have secret service. Yeah. And so they could argue that like information retained by the president. Could you, I mean, they'd say this, like if a former president was directly implicated in these documents, the national security implications for this country would be nuts.

Treaties could be at risk. Border disputes could ignite. Anything Bill Clinton had done could start to unravel. It could cause problems in the stock market. So absolutely. You could say Jimmy Carter for all we know, and they're going to going to be like no way but i don't think it says bill clinton i think the redaction bar is too long the spacing is too wide it says joseph biden joseph r biden yeah but it would uh it's it's rr biden isn't it no what is it what he has more than one middle name doesn't

he no it's robertina something like that i think it's just joseph robert joseph r biden it's even worse if the fact that they're a serving president gets to keep them off the list for and then using national security as a crappy excuse i in this day and age and oh you're right yeah joseph robinette biden jr oh yeah the junior so then i don't think that uses middle his middle name though and i think joseph r biden would be too long yeah it's too and then he's popularly known as joe i think right the same way that they're listing you know that's why they did hypothetically prince andrew has a last name too there's no reason to say joe biden people are only saying joe biden because he's president right now right and well one thing i can tell you we know it's not donald trump for a fact can it be barack

obama yeah barack Barack Obama may fit. Because think about it. This is 2011. Well, Obama was serving as president in 2011. This document's actually not. This is 2016. Yeah, it's 2016. So the question is- But like you said, everything could be unravelled.

Why is this rejected now, though? I don't think Barack Obama. No? No. I have this weird thing where- I think Barack Obama's into other things. I don't think this Obama. No? No. I have this weird thing. I think Barack Obama's into other things. I don't think this is kind of his jam is. And this is, I mean, I can't flesh this theory out totally right now.

I'd have to do some research. But Prince Andrew, Bill Richardson, they're actually closer in age. From what I understand, Barack Obama's slightly younger than them. So there is sort of a similar age group of people. That means they were running in similar circles. Barack, in some ways, was sort of outside that. And I think he has different proclivities. I can't speculate on his proclivities, partially because my mind.

I'm half joking, actually. And I'm sure like the chat is just igniting over what that means about. You just got my mind thinking like the guy at the bar, him and the guy at the bar. I'm just thinking about national security. And I'm just trying to think who worked in Obamaama's administration that's now working in um tons of them the thing is obama that's biden biden now is heavily staffed by former that's what i'm saying you got my mind spinning but it's not it's not just it doesn't need to be a president it can yeah but it could be a like a dude named like john jackson yeah but his name is redacted because he worked for the cia

but like if you could think of, what's his name? Secretary of State. Blinken. That's a national security. It does say on the next line another prince. There's Prince Andrew, John L. Grinnell, Bill Richardson, another prince. Which one? Somebody named this prince.

Another prince? The petty little one or the one that doesn't know what he's doing? He'll have to be British monarchy. Wait, wait. That's actually a really good point. Nobody pointed out. It says,

other than Glenn Dubin redacted, Prince Andrew, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, Another Prince, the large hotel chain owner, and Marvin Minsky, is there anyone else?

What do you mean, Another Prince? As long as it's not a musician prince. As long as he asks who that Prince is. That's my breaking news journalism who is the second prince and it doesn't have to i mean like the the queen of denmark just announced kind of

abruptly on new year's day or eve that she was gonna gonna resign so there's this moment where i'm like is it someone in the danish monarchy because there are princes there like her her son the prince is about to become king like i i'm not here to slander him i'm just saying hypothetically we're thinking British monarchy. But there are tons of princes out there. Yeah, how come nobody... And nobody's famous like the two brothers.

I didn't even realize this. The princesses. Nobody cares about royalty the way I do, but... No, that's true. That's... But... I like the queens.

Who's the large hotel chain owner? I mean, that's also interesting, right? Like... What's his name? Cassimides. Because he's a really... John Cassimides. Because he... Yeah, he's his name casimates because he's a really um john casimates because he uh yeah he's based in new york and he donated to a lot of republicans and

democrats he's he's what a billionaire based out of new york his daughter's like the the chair of the new york manhattan republicans i just think i'm like i don't look look look colin colin rug tweeted this and he's like who's the redacted name? And I'm like, who is this other prince? Who's the other prince? Now we got this prince. Yeah. But then maybe if we knew who the redacted name was, we might also know who the other prince was. What if it said, like, and an artist formerly known as Prince? That's what I said.

As long as it's not that prince. It's not him. It can't be that prince. As long as Minnesota is safe. Leave Minnesota out of this. I don't want any besmirchment to his name. Hotel. Okay, check it out. Someone actually did the work. They said, using Courier New, the redaction

is 16 characters long. Now everyone's going to be sitting here like, This is the best crossword puzzle ever. I know, right? I was like, can we just play Tetris now? Interesting. Now people will have to start looking at politicians and getting characters uh character

limits on all of their names so they can start putting them in there to see who it ends up being to i i think it's important to point out however letters across yes it's oh the name has 15 characters because there's a space yes between the first and second and last name uh there's one there's one uh source reporting or one publication the messenger's reporting that one of the victims said she had sex with Hyatt Hotels billionaire Tom Pritzker. I thought it was Pritzker. I thought it might be Pritzker. So that's probably the brother, the brother of Chicago governor.

I mean, not Chicago, Illinois governor. I doubt they're related, but I will check. Yeah, he's. They're related? I mean, no, I don't know. They have the same name. But that family is. That proves it.

You're going to say. I'm kidding. And then that brings in Obama, because again, Eleanor Trump got it. Nailed it, guys. That's right. Close the gate. You heard it here first, ladies and gentlemen. And his sister worked in the Obama administration. All right, here's what we're going to do.

We've got the power of 45,000 people right now. Ladies and gentlemen, a name with 15 characters. Okay? So it's 16 total characters characters but we assume there's a space there because i doubt whoever they're naming goes like a single name because usually single names are small like bono but uh we've got so so someone who's got a name with 15 characters and i know between the 45 000 people someone can figure it out or at least make some good guesses so uh crowdsourcing good luck crowdsourcing

prominent high-profile individual here's what we're thinking someone who has the ability to get a foyer request release redacted still this potentially could be one of the does that has requested so let's take a look at who are the remaining people that have got to stay on their names being released it could be the name was not released because they've got an appeal but then we're going to know which doe john doe or je or Jane Doe it is, who's getting that delay. Is it possible that they're rejecting the name because that person is cooperating with whatever investigation? So is the investigation kind of mostly over? I don't know.

I thought it was never happening. This is not an investigation. This is a civil lawsuit for defamation. It never actually went anywhere. It was settled out of court the documents get released and now people are speculating as to the criminal elements that may have may be involved in this so my my first speculation is is i would say this in in starting the investigation the assumption i would make is something related to national security allowing the name to remain redacted so we're thinking uh law

enforcement politics uh you know like law enforcement intelligence agencies uh it could be however also related to those who requested a an extension on having their name remain redacted so this is here's the important thing the people who said said that there's the Jane Doe 107 saying don't release my name because I live in a conservative country and it'll be bad news for me. These are accusations of child trafficking. Yeah. Who would get who could get their name redacted? And Prince Andrew couldn't. Prince Andrew could not get his name withheld from this, but this person could.

But then his family excommunicated him. Sure, sure. But still this person could. But didn't his family excommunicated him? Sure, sure. But still. Before all this happened, they excommunicated him. That's why they were able to release his name like that. Am I wrong in thinking that he already faced a lawsuit in England about it? So in some ways, like his connection to this situation has already been established. Oh, this is interesting.

You were right about the Pritzkers, by the way. JB Pritzkers related to the Hyatt family. Yeah, the only reason I knew about that is when that Harvard thing and then apparently the sister is in the board. Yeah. And I was like, when I started like trying to find out who's connected to who, a lot of them are like Democratic donors. Harvey Weinstein fits. People are pointing that out. But why would he be redacted?

Exactly. He would not be. Of all the people, he's the least likely to be redacted so i'm that's why i'm thinking like but i'm loving the brainstormer fbi cia guys that worked in the clinton administration obama administration even bush administration bush had a bunch of democrats so i mean theoretically i would be military then right there are a couple military, like secret or heads of military organizations that have carried over through several administrations. Yeah.

But no, I was just thinking about it. Like think of like the guys who worked in the CIA, worked in the heads of the CIA, FBI to be like national security. Let's jump to the next portion of this story. I love this headline from Fox News. Jeffrey Epstein documents name A-list celebrities. I hate this. A little clickbait. Brickstein documents name a list celebrities hate this a little click baby news okay just a little bit just a little bit because it is factually true

and it's relatively vague but i gotta be honest i don't know how you would actually title this story while trying to provide the context that they're not potentially wrongdoers tmz just listed like the name like names and then just said no wrongdoing. It just listed in the headline that there was no wrongdoing found. And then the crone underneath, it was like they had no wrongdoing. No, they put it right in the headline, right in the main headline on the website. It listed it almost like a lot of people would say,

depending on what your opinion on the media is like, oh, they're just covering up for them. Because my favorite thing to always point out is like, whenever they talk about Epstein, like there's like several documentaries on epstein they're all on like hulu and all these things and they all have pictures of him and trump on there because the media hates trump and they want to tar him with the mz is like these people are bread and butter you cannot disperse their good name we need them to create our beautiful content i mean the fox story is is i agree with him it can't be really hard to headline because like you're trying

to get it out quickly. You know, a long headline is wordy. On the other hand, it was annoying. Oh, my gosh. Scrolling through this article because they'd be like, oh, yeah, somebody asked if you had ever met George Lucas from Star Wars. And she was like, no. And so that's the mention or something. Exactly.

Exactly. The only thing I'm just shocked about this whole thing is that there's no bank executives named. But so like Wall Street is like clean from all of this. So it's only like, you know, I mean, this is just who they asked about in the deposition. There's not one single. This is not. This is these are not the Epstein client. No, I know that.

I'm just saying, like, I mean, that obviously would be part of it. Well known, like wall street executives that's what i would say these documents don't get anywhere near the majority of the clients that we want to see exposed because this is this was part of a defamation lawsuit a lot of these documents that are being released are related to the original investigation into epstein that were used as evidence in the defamation trial that's my understanding could be wrong i think that's what's being reported we'll'll be very, very careful here because you got a lot of people's names

are getting wrapped up in this stuff. For that deposition, it was Paul and Beach who did the investigation, right? I don't know. Was it? Yeah. I remember Paul and Beach

did this thorough investigation and then that's what only... It didn't lead to any state or federal charges. Only it led to that civil. That's why I was like, there's so many missing pieces to everything going on in this. I love how that... Okay, so let's go through the list. There's so many missing pieces to everything going on in this. I love how that.

Okay. So let's go through the list. They say Naomi Campbell is named Leonardo DiCaprio, Cate Blanchett, Bruce Willis, and Cameron Diaz, George Lucas, Michael Jackson,

Kevin Spacey. Okay. Now that last one. All right. Now the last one. Okay. Did you watch his thing with Tucker? Oh yeah.

I don't know what's going on. Kevin Spacey. I'm just mad he ruined House of Cards. It was so good. And then the last season just sucked. Technically, he didn't ruin the show. No, but whatever happened. His bad life choices are what ruined the show.

And that's why the show was so good. He's got to win an award for when he was accused of all this wrongdoing. He should win an award for his response. Where they're just like, Kevin Spacey, you've been accused of rape on several instances. And he goes, I'm gay. I am a gay man. I'm choosing to live my life this way. I thought that was incredible. But also, he doesn't, he's not interested in the flavors that Epstein seems to be offering, right? So I don't know that this is actually, he is not a good person necessarily, but I don't know that he's actually someone we'd expect to see on the list at all there are a lot of people who are accusing him

that have mysteriously died in the last several years four or five have uh passed away before you know being able to take him to court but he was acquitted what now twice in in the uk and in more but that video with with tucker carlson i was like we were watching we're like who is this like i legitimately can't figure out who it's for it almost looks fake like if you watch the video full screen on a larger tv it almost it almost doesn't look real and it feels like this weird like like he he almost it almost looks green screen in a way like he greenshine tucker carlson in or yeah like they added him there and it doesn't and like he makes these great allusions to house of cards in the show when he talks about uh you know pushing journalists in a certain direction which

is a very clear push to the end of season one it was just it was it was rough but it was it was really weird to watch because i'm like who is he tucker carlson's wearing like acid wash jeans i'm like is this you're trying to say this is an ai generator video i don't think it is but like there was just like if it was surely t Tucker's team would have spoken it. Yeah, yeah. He's wearing acid wash jeans in there, though. Maybe he's just trying

to explore his sense of fashion, though. But no, because in the thing, Kevin Spacey basically alludes to, he's like, do you ever watch Netflix anymore? He says that Spacey goes,

probably as much as you watch Fox. That's funny. I do want to say, I am fascinated that of all the names that are in there jimmy kimmel is not uh and i'm so sad but the reason is not because i think you know i want outright i'm not accusing jimmy jimmy kimmel of doing anything wrong it's that he was actually

business partners with epstein's chef and so when aaron rogers said you know jimmy kimmel must be worried about this and then jimmy kimmel threatened to sue him i was like well hold on yeah yeah like what do you have to hide? It's not that. It's what Roger said was completely reasonable. This guy worked with, what was the guy, Chef Perry Lang or whatever the guy's name was. He was Epstein's personal chef. And my understanding is there was a report that said that they were co-owners of a restaurant

or that Jimmy Kimmel was in some way involved. There's videos of them. They're friends. So if Jimmy Kimmel appeared in this document, I would not be surprised. I'm not saying he did anything wrong. All these celebrities that are being named, 99% of them, there's no accusation of wrongdoing. They just ask them, did you ever see Bruce Willis there? No.

But just the way how he's named. Anyone who's named, I'm sure does not actually want their name to come up in this, even if it's completely innocuous. It would be nicer to not be involved at all. But just look at his reaction. He was like, if you keep mentioning my name, I'm going to sue. It was just like, why are you getting so jumpy about this? The average person, but the thing is, though, is we're pointing out the fact that when you read these documents,

a lot of these people aren't accused of wrongdoing. Just putting your name and Epstein's name next to each other now is enough to tarnish you. So it doesn't matter if they're not being accused of wrongdoing just by being associated with the media's gonna cover you up because they have trouble so you feel like Kimmel's like fear was somewhat reasonable yeah I think if you're not doing anything wrong and your name comes up in something like this then it's probably a pretty reasonable response to be like I don't want to be attached to this at all and there's no legal recourse right yeah it's like it's not like you can sue the documents for a lot like there's kind of nothing you can do about it you feel like it's it's like there's a lot of like ghoulishness to all of this like people were talking about how

all of these names coming out has been like album drops for like it's been made light of so much that it's kind of hard to when you you have to read you have to read what's actually happening here to reacquaint yourself with just how horrific so much of this stuff is and if if we were to get a client list in some ways would people be like but we already kind of got this weird list that sort of meant nothing is in some ways this this weird drip of information actually making people less interested in what was going on the fact that there were people you know who potentially were promoting human trafficking and using their wealth and status to get get terrible things so we were talking just a moment ago about there's there's this you know this list of names

and one of them's redacted we think it's probably a name with 15 characters including a space giving a total of 16 characters and somehow this name got redacted i'm loving all of these all the speculation some people are saying like harvey weinstein fits sure but of all the names to be redacted his would be the last yeah because he's he's locked up or i don't know is he still in jail he's in still in jail and uh but someone just super chatted stephen colbert and i'm just like okay well i really do appreciate the hatred we have for the corporate press. I don't think Stephen Colbert has the national security level to keep that redaction. It's a lot of clout for Stephen Colbert. A lot of clout for Stephen Colbert.

Considering like billionaires and millionaires and even Prince Andrew couldn't keep their names out of it. That's why I'm assuming national security. But good guesses. But it's all highly speculative. I mean, we got no idea. I mean, really the best way to do it would be if you had, you know, somehow compiled a list of people who have been known to have flown on the airplane and then you go through and you count the characters. Because otherwise, like, I could just shout out names for the rest of forever and probably

wouldn't necessarily hold you. It has to come from a list of people that were already known or rumored to have ties to Epstein. And I don't know necessarily that Stephen Colbert was. There's a lot of names that fit. And it's kind of crazy because the chats lighten up. And they're saying a bunch of names. And I'm like, these names all fit.

I just wonder at the end of all these document drops, at the end of it, we're just going to come out and be like, at the end, what is this? Everybody's just going to be speculating. Anything's ever going to come out of all of this? The at the end what is this everybody's just going to be speculating is just anything's ever going to come out of all this the way how they're just dropping this like nothing changes i don't think so i i don't i do not believe that we are in a period where we can say nothing changes because everything has changed yeah for the first time in u.s history the former president's been indicted there it's not just an indictment i mean they're coming after him ways they're trying to keep them off keeping off the ballot isn't is is is a deck it's it's soft war yeah it is but the side down the election the side that's doing that to him is the side that's on the list so they're going to prevent

anything from changing because they're not the ones that they're people are if now trump's name was on the list then yeah sure no but but this is the point they've never been threatened before and now these people on the list are doing things that have never been done. It's changed. Something happened in this country that has put these people in fear for their for their lives. Social media and the generation is making up. Or yes, perhaps that's what leads to a Donald Trump election in 2016. They never thought possible.

Yeah. And I do believe there's a strong possibility that should Donald Trump get elected. Yeah. The names that get released in this go to jail. I do believe that's possible. I'm not saying it's probable. I'm not saying it's a strong possibility that should Donald Trump get elected. Yeah. The names that get released in this go to jail. I do believe that's possible. I'm not saying it's probable. I'm not saying it's a guarantee. I'm saying I would not be surprised.

Look, there's that clip going viral right now where Donald Trump was asked about Bill Clinton and he goes, nice guy, but he's got a lot of stuff coming up with that Epstein, you know, and everyone's like, what did Trump know about this? So what happens if donald trump look donald trump says i am your retribution this guy's pissed there's a possibility maybe it's 0.1 i don't know he gets elected and the first thing he does is he says i want to know everybody who works with epstein and we're going to lock them all up well he has to get the fbi guys to do it well i think part of it is that would be one of the only ways to restore public trust i think

that if an average america i mean, with everything I have with Hunter Biden this year and him, his plea deals and this very obvious two tier justice system. I think if Trump were elected, actually seeing someone who is on Epstein's, a known associate who partook in all of this stuff, being sent to prison is actually the only way to get the American people to think maybe there is a reason to trust people in power. We have a good answer. we have a good answer we have a good answer uh someone said uh this is um barrett 1313 it's alan dershowitz and the reason why his name was redacted is because jufre uh recanted her accusations against him in 2022 so that could ease but you know what i gotta push back on that his name is all over these documents right all over them with accusations of raping children.

So that being the case, I don't think this one time they redact his name. Does William Burns fit? No. No. Okay. He was CIA. He's CIA right now. Yeah.

But he's like theoretically someone who flew on one of Epstein's planes. Oh, interesting. So. No, that's too short. Too short. But look, even if I'm learning something amazing. There are a lot of people in government who have 15 character names because people are posting all this stuff. I'm like, oh, that's actually a really good point. Like, there's too many of them.

I don't know when you pick talking about the hunts of Biden. Did you see the reports from the Democrats from the Democrat oversight? They released a report. Talk about like Donald Trump obtained like seven point eight million dollars from foreign governments because they all stood in his hotels when he was president. So they're trying to say that was former collusion that what the Republicans are doing and attacking Hunter Biden. Donald Trump did as president. And nobody's really talking about it except for like if you watch it in the MSNBC. But they're trying to really make it this as now the biggest deal ever.

It was Jamie Raskin. He's doing this. It started today. But because of everything with the Epstein, everybody was really into this. I wouldn't be surprised if they're going to try to turn the tables and use that report against Trump as another way. They're trying to throw everything to make it stick at him. And they were already doing that when he was in office. They tried to argue repeatedly that he was making money off of them.

Yeah, but no. But now this release is 150 pages. Someone said, ask Grok, this is Joshua Park, ask Grok for powerful people with 15 letter names. So I went to Grok and I said, give me a list of politicians who have 15 characters

between their first and last name. Ladies and gentlemen, this list is damning. Okay. Is this American or foreign? Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, George Washington, John Adams. No, wait, wait, hold on. list is damning okay you're right is this american or foreign alexander hamilton benjamin franklin thomas jefferson james madison george washington john adams no wait wait hold on actor none of these none of these people have 15 characters in their names oh so grok is covering up for epstein i knew it i i knew this was corrupt i knew musk straight to the top free speech my ass over there oh that's crazy becoming a foreign concept nowadays i mean i think part of like first off i feel like this is the new version of wordle

and i'm really expecting it to like vibrate be like you got some of the letters right if one of these if if uh like they should do a crossword puzzle in the new york times and actually include this in there who is the i'm sure bill cl said don't. I wouldn't be surprised. Bill Clinton has already marched in it. They're like, do not dare. Don't you dare. That would be so fun. Wasn't there a case where he wanted delegates to stay at Mar-a-Lago and host an event there

and they made him not do it, Trump, during it when he was in office? What was that for? Do you remember that? I don't remember deals. I mean, there was also a report I saw a long time ago that Joe Biden had personally hosted diplomats and his home in delaware but then i had a really hard time tracking that down i think that there are probably reasons people ask for

things like that but you know it's very easy to be like no mr president that is a violation of reverend he's like okay they can't see my golf course i mean like there were all kinds of things like there was a reason that trump put his sons in charge of the business and left off. You know what I mean? Like, I think you did as much as you could to mitigate potentially having conflict in that case. The thing about Hunter Biden is that the more that comes out about his case, the more obvious through his emails. I think that he was specifically saying, I am the son of an influential American politician. And give me my money.

If if if you do it, if you bet if I get benefits, you get benefits. I'm the son of an influential American politician. Give me my money. If I get benefits, you get benefits. And there's no evidence that anyone in the Trump organization has done that. Yeah, but that's what they're trying to do. They're trying to say like he didn't recuse himself, which he actually did. I remember that press conference right before during the transition. And they're trying to say like he didn't recuse himself. His name was still the trump organization they were trying to still i mean his name was still literally trump and to a certain extent yes of course that name gained even more prominence than already had but on the other

hand you know as far as i know and i'm not an expert on his business dealings it's not like he was like i am president trump now eric go tell everyone tell everyone in Ireland that I'll open a golf course there because I'm the president. Like, it wasn't that way. That's very different. They act like the Trump Hotel was created in 2015. It's not like he was doing this, you know, for decades beforehand. It's very, very strange. But, you know, I obviously think it's important to hold politicians, their families accountable.

I mean, this is what's interesting about all of the legislation that's getting pushed in congress right now saying we should be really wary of the stock trades being made by politicians i'm sorry grok is so stupid i asked it for a list of politicians with 15 characters in their names and it gave me a list of just 50 first it gave me like james so i gave you the first 15 people so then i said give me a list of politicians alive today and it gave me a list of random politicians and i said none of those i wrote none of those people have 15 letters in the name and it goes oh i'm sorry that list didn't uh actually adhere to what you would ask and then it went i i said so make a list with 15 uh letters and uh let me see if i can pull back up i closed it's 15 characters right because obviously there's gonna be space in it and then and then it

said apples bananas cherries dates elderberries, grapes, honeydew, iceberg. I just put it. I'm like, okay, this thing's an idiot. Those are like code names. It's on regular mode. It's not on fun mode. Should we ask, what's the other one? Gemini?

Chat. GPT? Chat GPT. No, let's jump to this next story here while we discuss the darkness that is happening in this country. We do have good news. This is from Newsweek.com. Joe Biden campaign volunteers are quitting in droves. Take a look at this because a group of staffers working on President Joe Biden's reelection campaign warned the president that his volunteers are quitting in droves over his handling of Israel's military response in the Gaza Strip.

Biden has faced immense pressure from members of his own party over the U.S. policies in light of the surprise Hamas attack on October 7th. You know, look, we have a lot of people come on the show are Jewish. That may be surprising to for many people who watch to know. Well, other people think it's too many people who are Jewish. Well, we have criticized both. I think we have 10 times the national average of Jewish people, of guests who are Jewish. So what if someone did a thing is like it was 21% of our guests are Jewish or something. And I'm like, yeah, that's probably because they're Abrahamic conservatives. I don't know, whatever. And they're prominent social media personalities or whatever.

But I literally don't care. However, we talked to a lot of these people. And it's really fascinating to hear what they'll say behind the scenes about their family members. They'll say on the show, lot of a lot of progressive jewish individuals are waking up to what the left is and what democrats are doing because of the the attack on israel behind the scenes they'll say the same thing but be a bit more specific because they don't want to put their families at risk i can respect that and they'll say like i got i got an aunt she's liberal and she came freaking out like what's going on and i'm like i told you i'm just

imagining all of the hanukkah dinners where you had these liberal jewish people meeting with their conservative relatives and the conservatives like we told you this was going on and you didn't believe us and now they do and now you take a look what's going on with joe biden's campaign this split is insane joe biden is losing staff members because he won't support hamas but who are they they're not staff members i mean they might be paid but it's they're saying volunteers which probably sorry volunteers which is probably people who are they? They're not staff members. I mean, they might be paid, but they're saying volunteers, which is probably people who are volunteering in their early 20s, mid 20s, maybe up until early 30s. And that group of progressive liberal people tend to be very anti-Israel.

Not even liberal, leftists. Leftists. Yes, leftists. And so it's interesting because it's actually a huge age divide. That's what I think the Democratic Party is starting to realize that the older members, basically the boomer Democrats, have a very different position on this this international issue than their younger cohorts. The catch may have just dropped right now within the past few minutes. That's why you see such an outsized influence of that discussion on social media now. Why, when you look at comment sections on Instagram, it's all Free Palestine. And TikTok, right? This is what we've heard reported over and over again, that the mainstream media might be presenting a more pro-Israel presentation, but TikTok was predominantly pro-Palestine.

Those Gen Zers do love osama bin laden but it was actually the media on 2023 but it was actually the media that blew that up that story because like it was only like a few people who had it was like tiktok it was like only like few million and then the media talked about it and next you know it blew up to like billions of views yeah it's a i mean a few million is still a lot to me. Yeah, I know. But compared to TikTok views, that's like nothing. Like right now, you're seeing a live feed. We've had however many decades of colleges that have told you that the place that you were born from is evil and that your ancestry is evil. And all of those things that your progressive and leftist professors have indoctrinated into the previous generations is finally coming to pass as the new generation hits all of these

problems in society right now. There's no love of old Americana or what this country used to be. There's no sense of identity here anymore. And all they're left with is a deep burning hatred for this country. Yeah. And a lot of its allies. It's not surprising that Joe Biden is losing his young volunteers. And I'm presuming they're young. I haven't read all of this. I guarantee you they're on the younger side.

The same way that Harvard is losing its older billionaire donors who are saying the things that you're teaching the students, the positions the students are taking are incongruous with my views and I no longer want to support you financially. The thing that young people have to offer any sort of influential campaign is their time and their energy. It's not the billionaire donor that's out knocking on doors, although they contribute in a different way. Their financial contribution means a lot to Harvard, but that it is saying one thing. Like, it bothers me a lot that people always like the Republican Party is about to fall apart. It's crazy. And in my position, you know, I think conservative movements have lots of different parts that occasionally make basically become allies at times on certain issues, whereas Democrats tend to be very lockstep.

You believe these things, but they no longer realize that they are the party that is preaching things that the older leadership doesn't believe in. It's interesting to see them fall apart in front of our eyes well we saw that starting with when aoc got elected and when a lot of these younger progressives got elected right that there was great divides but she kind of ended up being more of a she fell along party lines and a lot of issues eventually the fact that she voted for the ukraine aid you're supposed to be a progressive yeah like at least thomas thomas massey didn't even vote for that yeah but massey's really interesting because he is ultimately principled he has certain things that he believes in and he will not back but that's when i think you lost the progressives right there

the minute they said yes to this and they said we're never going to fund any war no matter how strong their allies are or how fake our allies are with them we're not supposed to be funding this wars we have to be like we have to fund health care we have to fund this and then all of a sudden you started seeing like they voted no problems they didn't even like use it as a bargaining chip like they did with the build back better like they were using that over nancy pelosi's head that's why it was never been able to pass and then it took a while that like had to come back and then joe mansion got involved and all that so the fact that they didn't use that over the nancy pelosi's head that was really telling about the progressives so i think now they're

using this to show to like bring back the power that you once had but then it comes to the fact that like what is your principle are you for the war are you against the war like what are you exactly for like it's a lot of i think you look at a story like this and this it's the year has only just begun and i see two things from this the first is you know we are winning by a lot you know with with the uh the purchase of of x the boycott of these big companies the organizational power of the anti-establishment and the pro-constitutional republic uh faction is tremendous and seeing more and more victories every single day and then you see that joe biden's volunteers are quitting over an ideological split the democrats are fractured they're falling apart we've already gone through

years of the viral story democrat quits party how many times did we see a story like that remember when they were calling into cnn being like i am quitting i will never vote again no no this was last like a year but i'm saying like every time there's a war going on they always say i'm gonna quit the democrat party do they really do and they do and so in the past few years you had that viral story where they were calling in a c-span complaining about what joe biden had been doing what democrat yeah it was crazy yeah and and it goes viral we get more and more of that now we've got you, you know, every couple of months, Democrat quits and switches to the Republican Party. Now Joe Biden can't even keep volunteers on because they're far left extremists. It's kind of fascinating if you think about it, because a lot of this is fueled by foreign interference using social media manipulation.

And I love how the left claimed that for so long over Trump. But the reality is it's targeting them. They always project. You get these apps that are advocating for hamas and then these young people become pro-hamas and then all of a sudden they quit joe biden's campaign creating a direct like probability of americans uniting around actual american values so if all of these young people are being subverted into supporting things like hamas but it's not the majority all that will happen is these people have no political power america will prevail the constitutional republic will prevail donald trump will get elected but are they really like going back are they really supporting hamas or they're are they really trying to like support the palestinian cause like the palestinian people so there are

there yes hamas yeah look a week we can start talking about all the people who are like pro-palestine i am specifically referring to people who are pro-hamas why why am i referring to them because they in new york were marching around chanting and for hamas and calling them heroes oh well okay i get what your point but when they had rallies in new york over what happened rallies you talk about people who are when they had rallies rallies in New York and, you know, several hundred people show up, the speakers at these events would get up and say the freedom fighters fired 5,000 rockets landing in Tel Aviv and they all clap and cheer and scream. So those are pro Hamas protesters in New York City. Okay. Sure.

If you want to argue that there is an individual on social media who's not, who doesn't like Hamas and they're pro Palestine. I know many of them. I'm not talking about them. You're allowed to be pro-palestine but the problem is these most of these people are calling hamas freedom fighters okay that's why they're mad and the idea is that it will uniquely leech votes from the democrats as soon as assuming that they don't end up just following and falling in line when the next election comes because a lot of them do right like as much as they hate it, they end up following

a line, vote blue no matter who, doesn't really matter. But it's really tough at least. The hope would be that they're so ideologically inclined that for once they won't just end up voting on party lines because they actually have a problem with the... They actually do support Hamas. But did you see the recent USA Today

poll? They said young voters, younger than me younger than 35 trump leads by like about two or three points yep and that's really shocking i always thought poll i always thought that like you know between 20 and 30s you're gonna vote blue because you're like so lost until you start paying taxes and you're like holy crap i gotta vote republic because i cannot anymore like the democrat party so you're wondering like these gen z's like a lot of them are crazy but a lot of them are actually waking up yeah i think they're very divided yeah i think that you'll have uh there'll be an extreme generation where some

people sit very far one end of the political and ideological spectrum and some people end up sitting unfortunately extreme far on the other side and so i i think that it's it's sort of like when you talk about the economy of the disappearing so i i think that it's it's sort of like when you talk about the economy of the disappearing middle class i think there is a the disappearing moderate class of gen z's and you know the question would be are they able to reconcile or do they ultimately meet on the other end of the political horseshoe and their norms that we would view as extreme the things that they agree on are are out of the. We're not going to expect them. Also be very, very, first of all, be very, very careful of any polls

that are conducted this early in the election season. No, but it's too telling. I always think of it as like a quiz. But also like be very careful because what happens a lot of time is if they start projecting that Trump is super far ahead, then people get complacent and they think I don't have to go out and vote. So I'm not going

to. So don't lose if you you know, depending on what your thoughts on voting are, if you're really, really pro-Trump, whatever it is, don't allow that to make you complacent. Because I do think a lot of times they end up doing that. I mean, theoretically, it would, I mean, I wish, I don't think this is the case. It would fuel a sort of down ticket sprint where people are saying, well, I know exactly who I want to vote for. Even if he's ahead, who else do I care about? Who do I care about on the state level? Who do I care about representing me in the Senate and Congress? You know, who who is my governor? Because we feel

like you've locked up one office. That shouldn't be enough. I don't think this is actually how voters operate. I this is my my idealistic worldview that you if you feel like, well, I definitely know who's going to be president. you want to send them into their term with strong support both in the in congress and in the states uh but we'll see but going back what you said like you said be careful but maybe you never know maybe they're using to say they want to vote for trump so they could get rid of biden and put somebody like gavin newsom a younger a younger democrat you never know that could be telling that's why i say i always think of these polls as quiz. And then like the,

then when you start going into the, all these votings, I think of it like all the delegates are like the midterms, like the midterm, like when you take a test in college and then, so the general election, that's your final, that's how I see it. So when people are like writing off the polls,

I'm like, no, gotta be careful. These polls are do telling. Also, was that a nation? Was that done nationwide? Was that done? Okay. I polls are due telling. Also, was that a nation? Was that done nationwide? Was that done in a specific area?

Yeah, the USA today was nationwide. Okay, it was nationwide. Okay. But it was telling like, Joe Biden's losing support by blacks by 25 points from like 2020. He's losing Hispanics.

Trump is leading with Hispanics. Young voters. And Trump's gaining in all these areas. And he's gaining. So like he went, like Biden went from like 80 to 60. But do you think that's people who would, you know, part of it is are what I'm curious

to see is if there's a large number of voters who sit out this election, like what is voter turn? I think that I think the young ones are if it's going to be Biden. So I'm thinking that's what I'm saying. Like, because just because they're not voting for Biden doesn't mean that they're nationally gained by Trump. Yes. That's what I'm saying.

Remember, a lot of people sat out 2016 because they said, like, I don't like Trump or Hillary. I'm just sitting this one out. But the same thing in 2020. They sat out too. But I'm saying... Not anymore. Yeah, not anymore.

That's the thing. These polls can be telling as a way of, like, trying to push Biden out. Donald Trump is, in swing states, winning amongst people who did not vote in 2020 by double-digit margins,

some up to 40%. That's what I'm saying. Like these polls could be telling. I think it's Michigan. To push him out. In Michigan, they poll people who did not vote in 2020 and Trump has a 40% lead. So he's like, it's like 60, you know, 30 or something. And the whole thing going back to the Hamas war, like.

Probably 60-20. The Israel war, like Trump is leading with the arab american votes and like the republican party cannot take that for granted they have to understand both sides of it it cannot be all 100 pro israel they i think the republican party is much more tolerant of different views i think the democrats are way way more at each other's trump is very um for both sides but you see look at the debate stage they're both like the like the stances between the stances and Haley, they're both groveling between trying to get

like the Israeli and AIPAC, you know, endorsements. They're more worried about that than they're worried about the American people. But that's because they're so far behind in the polls.

I mean, it almost doesn't matter what they're trying to do because ultimately the popular vote indicates that they support Trump and Trump is taking a position that is attempting to be moderate,

which also Joe Biden has attempted to be moderate on the issue and it's failed because people don't trust him. But I'm saying, but like going, if the first time ever, this poll has a Arab American community and Trump is leading. And remember, they try to push the whole Muslim ban and they try to like everything with Trump.

The fact that he's- What? The Muslim ban. What was that? The whole, like they were trying to like the like if you look going back to michigan that's a heavily populated area of arabs and trump is leading and and that's what dearborn dearborn but what what muslim ban you the muslim ban they try to push that against like um they try to try to push it they're trying the media they

remember the first you're saying the media was lying about trump claiming he wanted a muslim ban right so that's the one thing when it comes to arabs and muslims like they that's the one thing they just don't like about trump but they love everything about his economic policies and stuff like that but when it came to like israel like even though he was very trump was very pro-israel he did have an understanding of working his first the first country he visited diplomatic with saudi arabia yeah so abraham accords yeah yeah and he worked on that so but the fact that the republican party is taking for granted and they're only picking one side and they're groveling and then you say like yeah well they're behind the polls look at like the stances he's like bashing i just think that republicans

take a third side which is to say that they don't really want to have an interventionist position at all there are a lot of republicans they sound like bush in the debate stage they sound like bush jr or dick cheney with three inch shells and lipstick so it just reminds me like the republican party and even like the rnc like they have no f's give it about the minority and the people the color people who are choosing to be republicans because they only want to pick the side that they're used to the whole establishment. That's what I'm saying. We have to be careful with this.

Like the polls, it's Holly, but Republicans, they're very known for fucking shit up. I always say that. Like, I mean, this is again,

why I think it's interesting that there are so many Republicans right now who, you know, theoretically they could be divided. They could say, I support this side of that war. I support this side of the war, but there are a fair number right now who, you know, theoretically, they could be divided. They could say, I support this side of that war. I support this side of the war. But there are a fair number of them

who are like, the thing is our focus has to be domestic. Our first focus has to be on what's going on. And I don't really hear a similar echo in the Democratic Party. It might be there and just might not be as loud. But Republicans have another position to take

that is not available to Democratic politicians right now. Democrat politicians have to pick a side. That's what their voters want. Whereas if you're a Republican voter and, you know, maybe you feel real strongly about one side, maybe feel strongly with the other. If you have a Republican saying, well, obviously, this is a big conflict. There's a lot going on there. But my priority is to secure our border.

But theirs is like we need to fund Israel. We need to make sure we need to eliminate them like this is water combat like and then you have the santa's insulting arabs which is now you're like triggering me and like you're losing people's respect and like you shouldn't be talking like talk about like arabs wearing man dresses i wouldn't be talking when you're wearing three inches boy and you're down in the polls by 55 points yeah so you're trying to like catch up with a girl who's like an Alibaba version of Hillary Clinton. But do you think, like, for minority voters

that are joining the Republican Party or who are likely to support a Republican candidate this time, do you think they're looking for candidates who support a certain side of the war? Or would an America First position appeal to them? It has to be America First agenda. That's the only reason why they want to come to first agenda. He also has to start. Why do they want to come to this country?

He also does need to bring up the Abraham Accords a lot. Like I think a good amount, cause you're going to, the people who are voting America first are going to be all in on your domestic policy. If you're putting, you know, if it's talking about closing the border and insuring up things there,

right? Sure. But right now with international conflict being such a big part of the story, pushing them to see that there was a time not that long ago when we did have a more stable, you know, world. Yeah, like we have the Republican Party's on the stage pushing to fund a country that has a budget surplus when we're running a budget deficit and we can't even keep up. We just hit. That's the best argument.

We just hit 34 trillion. We just hit 34 trillion yesterday. And we're growing. Everybody here owes $105,000 in debt. For what? I didn't pay for that for college. I didn't own that for my mortgage. But I got to pay that for some war. So Israel's got a budget surplus? Yes.

Do you know what it is? I mean, their budget surplus, their GDP is about 4% a year. And we're funding their military. We fund, what, $3.8 billion a year. And we're funding the military. We fund, what, $3.8 billion a year. They run a budget surplus. And between two wars right now,

the American people... For the first time in 35 years, as of January of 2023, Israel posts a budget surplus driven by higher tax revenue. So what are they looking at? They're like,

a budget surplus of $2.85 billion. How much do we give them? $3.8 billion. So they actually we give them? $3.8 billion. So they actually, they could cover a good portion of that at this point. But we want to get the $14 billion. And right now we have no money. They're like, you can pay a little bit more of taxes, can't you?

You can go ahead and do that. We're going to have to pay taxes. We're not going to be able to save the Trump taxes. The American politicians have no problem bleeding us dry, right? So they don't have a problem with that. And that's an issue right now. The fact that they want to tie it to border security. And I'm sick and tired of these Republicans running and trekking down to the southern border. Check your ass back to the Capitol right now and get something done.

The border is out of control. Well, let's talk about this. We have a tweet from Elon Musk. He says, at this point, there is no question that this administration is actively facilitating illegal immigration, the numbers speak for themselves. Let me just say that one more time. Elon Musk

says Joe Biden is facilitating illegal immigration. Let me one up that for you, Elon. The Biden administration is actively colluding with human traffickers. That's a fact. They've been doing it for years. There's multiple news reports loading children. They're smuggling children. They're trafficking children on planes in the dead of night. There's videos of this and you can look at all the statements from politicians. It's been a story for five years now take a look at this graph by all available metrics this administration's border policy

is a disaster take a look at this under trump there was a major spike in encounters and we know this because that's when we got the caravans trump went nuts then we see a massive decline to the lowest level we've seen in a long time because trump said we're going to shut this down as soon as joe biden's elected he opened doors. Just take a look at the numbers. They speak for themselves. We have unprecedented illegal immigration. And right now, the Biden administration is suing Texas, attempting to do everything in their power to stop the border states from putting an end to the invasion, the incursion of 10,000 plus people per day at the southern border. This is sedition against the United States. It is a direct violation of the Constitution.

And I will say this. I've said it several times. The only reason it happens is because there are people in law enforcement who say to themselves, I know it's wrong, but I've got to feed my kids. That is the argument made by every corrupt individual who exemplifies evil. They cut a deal with the devil to save their families. And I totally understand why they would, because they want to make sure their kids have full bellies. And they took the deal with the devil, figuratively or literally, however you want to see it, to sell out and destroy this country for themselves, for their short-term gains. The only thing is, those kids will inherit a pile of embers because of what they've done.

Yeah, I mean, this is a really interesting argument because if you work for, you know, customs war and trial, if you're working at a federal level, theoretically, Texas is really trying to do the opposite, right? Texas is trying to enforce border law. So you could maybe leave your job for a state level position and still get to work in your chosen field and also have a governor who is willing to back you. There are ways that, especially with the border, that you don't have to be necessarily supporting the Biden administration, who is trying to undermine all immigration laws that are on the books. I just got to get a little biblical with it. And I'll say this again. If you are an atheist, by all means, you're allowed to be.

I'm not a Christian. Take this all as metaphor. Take it figuratively. If you are an atheist, by all means, you're allowed to be. I'm not a Christian. Take this all as metaphor. Take it figuratively. If you are religious, take it literally. When we had the guys from Angel Studios talking about the film The Shift, where the benefactor transports a guy to a reality without his family, and he says, I'll give you everything back. I'll give you everything you've ever dreamed of. Just serve me.

And instead, the man begins to pray and refuses to serve what is figuratively the devil and I believe they said it was it was it was effectively like the story of Job you know and I'm not it's been a really long time since I studied these stories but no matter how bad things got he would never just give in and and take the assistance of the of the devil so this is what I see figuratively, literally, however you want to cut it. There are federal law enforcement agents that are actively working against the local residents and law enforcement of Texas to stop them from protecting their homes. And these people are doing it. And I would say full well, they know what they're doing

is evil, but they're saying to themselves, yeah, yeah but if i leave this job my kids won't have food because we hear it all the time it's true your kids won't have food so as you are in service of darkness and evil and cutting that deal with the devil you know i certainly understand why you did it not like anyone's going to forgive you though no i mean i think especially with the border crisis as bad as it is i wonder if democrats look themselves and say i'm going to vote for joe biden even though that's a vote to continue human trafficking across the border right it's a vote to continue drug trafficking that issue they consider a lot yeah do you think up until now right now they'll say all the time you know human trafficking is bad and this awful and whatever else, except when it's on their doorstep and they could theoretically do something about it.

I mean, I can understand where if you've been told shutting the border makes you racist. Yeah, they don't think they're afraid of it. But that's what they should think of it as. Those are the real world consequences. You know, a lot of Republicans talk about the drug trafficking across the border, which is obviously awful. It affects a lot of Americans. The opioid crisis is, you know, just a of Republicans talk about the drug trafficking across the border, which is obviously awful. It affects a lot of Americans. The opioid crisis is, you know, just a complete assault on our nation. On the other hand, if that argument won't do, if you don't care what happens to Americans, why don't you care what happens to young children and women who are trafficked across the border?

Like, at what point do you recognize that you are advocating for a international violation of any kind of human decency. And instead, they're like, no, it's bad. We got to keep the border open. It's great. I mean, this is the thing. This is my favorite topic, actually, to talk about with people who are left-leaning, because it's like a lot of people who would vote Democrat are bleeding hearts, right? They believe that they're trying to help people.

And if you're able to say these policies harm people. They are more likely to be open to them. I think the border is the border is a crazy issue because there were so many Republicans who would not talk about it. They were afraid to be called racist. They're afraid to do whatever. I mean, the Republican House, I think, or Congress wouldn't necessarily. They fought giving Trump funding for the border wall when he was in office because they were like, well, it's not that big of a priority. Because the government shut down for that. Right. And look at us now. Like, this is a major issue. We are paying the prices. And in fact, we had a president that wanted to intercede earlier, who wanted to stop this. And even if you don't like Trump, right, don't you care about human trafficking? Don't you care about neighbors in your communities dying of drug overdoses?

Like, this is the big reckoning at the border, which is it messaged messaging around it was like if you want to close it you're racist and the reality is actually it's a huge it's a hugely compassionate issue to say we are not going to have this this uh finish line at which point people are incentivized to send their families to people who want to traffic and harm them but are they getting that message because you have all these organizations that are saying like they're screaming the racism yeah so and they there are a lot of organizations that are built around encouraging people to cross like non-profit organizations that are yeah structured around encouraging even across the border yeah right and so why would you turn off that cash flow if you if the purpose of your non-profit is to solve an issue like trying to

get people to cross illegally puts them out of business if they solve the problem can you guess how much the cartel has made in december alone with the record breaking of 300 000 a day i'm talking about in a day a day how much is it 32 million dollars a day from this it's also an issue of framing like i think this has a lot to do with the echo chambers that most people who follow politics find themselves in. So you can frame that issue in that way and it's accurate, but sharing the horrors of what's going on is not going to be how they receive that information. They're not going to get the information from somebody who's willing to share all the facts of what it actually means to go through a border crossing, right?

Not the coyotes, not all of the drugs that come through. It's being framed to them, whether it's by MSNBC, CNN, any of these places, as a humanitarian issue that they have to be a bleeding heart on. So therefore, they don't get the full breadth of what's actually happening, which is why their views don't change. They kind of switched last month. I got an idea. I got a really, really great idea.

When these people come to the border and they demand asylum what we do is we get them a very comfortable bus really nice one you ever see those luxury buses that go from New York to D.C. and they got recliner chairs so about the Greyhounds? Greyhounds are not comfortable but they got these really nice ones

and then they got these big chairs up top and you got this glass ceiling it's really great you can see everything we'll put all the migrants on there and we'll bring them to Native American reservations these big chairs up top and you got this glass ceiling. Oh, this is really great. You can see everything. The Megabus. Yeah, Megabus. We'll put all the migrants on there and we'll bring them to Native American reservations. And then when the left, you know, advocates for immigration, we'll say, absolutely.

Yeah, we'll send them to the Native American reservations. Isn't that... What's wrong? Why are you upset about it? Aren't they like federally protected? Sure. So here's the solution. The reservations are federally protected,

federally recognized. Texas is upset about it, doesn't want people there. Here's the solution. The reservations are federally protected, federally recognized. Texas is upset about doesn't want people there. Here's a solution. The left thinks migration is a good thing. So who would complain if we send these immigrants to Native American reservations? Everyone should be happy, right? Sure. Well, this idiot mayor of mine, well, former idiot mayor of mine, because I don't live in New York City anymore. He's suing the Texas bus company. So I mean, how much damage is that going to do? I think the answer here is just for Abbott to send the migrants

to Native American reservations and then ask the left why they're upset if they get mad about it. They should be very happy because migration's a good thing, right? If you like it so much,

why don't you encourage it everywhere? It's weird, right? I mean, this is- We know it'll happen. The left will call him racist and start attacking him because it's- That's what they're doing. If the migrants come to this country, it know it'll happen. The left will call him racist and start attacking him because it's- That's what they're doing.

If the migrants come to this country, it's a good thing. But you know that if a governor sent them to a Native American reservation, they'd say, how dare you? You're racist. Blah, blah, blah. I mean, look how fast they cleared out Martha's Vineyard, right? Oh, man. That was hilarious.

We don't like migrants going to certain places. Literal NIMBYism. The liberal banshee shrieking over the martha's vineyard thing was hilarious the most nimby of nimby there is but they're more yes no i think it's crazy i mean the other part that bothers me about this is like where were you guys back in the day i love that republicans have gotten on board i will be a little bit cynical right now and say this has been an issue that anyone could have spotted for a long time. And I just don't understand why people didn't embrace it sooner. I can never understand that. And it was also something that at least back in the early

2010s and earlier that Democrats at least paid lip service to, right? They pretended to want to close the border. Clinton, anyone of his city of New York is like, let's close the border. It's important. Obama mentioned it. Obama had the most support choice here in any democratic presidency in the last 30 years deporter in chief right so it's not completely look at his immigration rate this is like the fight his biggest accomplishment it's not the economy or not the stock market that like you know recuperated all 2022's losses it's the fact that he's broken the the migration encounters every single month and he even decreased their one month because of title 42 oh he should get a like a guinness world record shouldn't he i know right for for least secure

border under presidency joe biden and you broke every single record even broken bush's record and that it was not really hard to do people who are like good more this is a great idea i mean the fact that they could just walk in and there's no like you know background check there's nothing going on like the house had their press conference the other day there were migrants crossing in the background and that's not even the first time that has happened where there's been a live press conference the republicans need to stop with this like lip service and like pull the strings like stop with this like shenanigans and make it happen in capital but that's what they were doing with like when they

had that ukraine funding bill and they were like okay if you want to pass this you have to increase border security and democrats were like crazy absolutely not now we don't support ukraine also we haven't talked to you about ukraine in a while i feel like uh it's just throwback i just find it funny like the senators that are really trying to get the push the uh immigration and the ukraine have the only one is like cinema she's only doing this because of election year for her then you got a guy from like what chris where you got um connecticut and then you got um langford from oklahoma and like they're really just really

mostly push it for ukraine fund there's nothing really about anything for the border because they're really not really talking about it no i mean the border is something republicans alone talk about which is crazy they'll talk about it but they want to attach to something can we stop attaching things to things well right now they're using it as a tool to stop other things right because they know democrats won't give in on it they the democrats see supporting a closed border or even you know enforcing book laws that are on the books how dare we as a death as as as the uh you know end of their career so republicans are using it to stop things and i think you're right they should do things to move it forward unfortunately i think they believe that the biden administration would veto or stop

anything no because you know why they're gonna cave the same way how they did with the whole that's the um the debt ceiling we caved and we added more to the deficit than we did to try to like you know cut down and reduce it i mean it's possible republicans are all lip talk and they all bark they're like little chihuahuas. And they think they're like pit bulls. And it's just like, all right, stop with this lip service. And what Chip Roy said is true. There's nothing we could take back home and say that we accomplished anything because we haven't. Let's jump to this story.

This is big from NBC News. State government buildings face bomb threats for a second consecutive day. Buildings across Mississippi and Arkansas received bomb threats on Thursday, one day after similar threats for state capital complexes across the U.S. to evacuate. So yesterday was eight states, nine, nine states. Yeah. All Republicans over what? All Republicans. It's a mix and it's not all like so. Well, what's going on? You do tell Santa Clara. Oh, well, OK. So as you guys know, this is one of my favorite stories right now. So yesterday, the Capitol buildings in, I'm going to read from my list, Connecticut, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, Maine, Minnesota, and Michigan, Hawaii, and Hawaii all received bomb threats. They were all evacuated.

Most of them were in the morning based on local time. Maine was like afternoon. Some of them were in session having come back from the winter holiday. Some of them weren't. So they all had these sweeps. The majority of the ones that I could track down, the law enforcement that were releasing information said the hoaxes were received via email. Typically, it seemed like it went to someone who worked at the state government building

and it triggered an evacuation. Today, there are other government buildings in multiple states. So like Mississippi has several, not the state capitol, but other affiliated government buildings that are receiving similar threats. The interesting one from yesterday was that Maine had received, I think it was 60 schools in Maine, mid-December had received bomb threats via email. So this is something that's going on. You know, it's not exactly the same thing, but it's very much like a swatting for these government buildings. In some cases, and you're asking about patterns so some are republican states some are are democrats some are in session some are not in session it's not really

like there's a consistent pattern from what i can see but it is interesting that now it's spreading throughout other states that were already affected are seeing other and you're saying this is all like swatting i mean they're bond threats so they're not sending in the swat team necessarily but they are disrupting business remember when target faced a bunch of these these threats i wonder if this is related i wonder if whoever did in the casinos right casinos really what reminds me of the when the casinos had am i wrong in remembering the story they received some like not bomb threat but it was like you know we've hijacked all your data please pay us and oh no that's way different my only point is it's interesting because it's all cyber crime like no none of the buildings

that were affected yesterday and as far as i know i haven't done all of my due diligence research on the buildings that were affected today none of them actually had explosives in them so you're saying this is a cyber crime because they just found out like russia has been hijacking our cyber security for the past 13 months. These were emails that were sent. No, that's what I'm trying to see. I'm just saying all of it is done online. It doesn't, there's no clear indication. It's not like four people walked into buildings, you know.

Right. Or sent letters. Just all emails. Theoretically could all be one person or it's a coordinated cyber led attack. I mean, you just don't know. And some of it is testing the response from these capitals. I i think it's foreign i think it's an act of war uh i i should say that's the that seems the most probable outcome because it is it is crippling our our ability to govern it's shutting down our institutions we have the weakest cyber security system we have out there and we

pretend we do we have the strongest we have the weakest the fact that they hijacked the congress website they did it like last year in two seconds and the reality is there's there's no defense no one has any defense anywhere in the world defense is hard offense is super easy when it comes to cyber warfare there is uh it just there's no way to defend a system it's just not possible there are certain things you can do but man i love how all how all of these, every business will have their cybersecurity policy. When I worked at Vice, they have this. They're like, everybody just do not click links in your emails. And the next day, it's like, oh, we got

12 more people clicked the links. We got phished again. Passwords got... Oh, nonstop. No matter how many times you tell the person not to do something, they'll do it anyway. And then they'll lie about it and say they didn't do it. Or they'll click on the email for the Nigerian prince because they think they're going to be a billionaire. You know what the most basic way people breach systems is?

Back in the day, it used to be that the quote-unquote hacker would drop a floppy disk in front of a bank. And then what happens is someone will pick it up, walk inside, stick it in the computer and go, what's this? Computer infected. Then it became CDs. Then it became USBs. And USBs are the commonplace thing. Now someone will just, they'll put a virus on a USB. They'll walk in front of the building target building and they'll just drop

it. And then all they got to do is wait because sooner or later, someone walking into that, that building for their job, we'll see the USB and pick it up and stick it right in their computer on the network and infect the network. And no matter what you do, no matter how many times you tell these people,

they don't care because that guy who works in the mailroom goes, I know we're not supposed to, but what do I care? Clicks it in and goes, oh crap, it was a virus. Wasn't me. And throw a stick away. Nothing you can do about it. Nothing. So these kinds of vulnerabilities we face, look, if they can shut down state capitals and what are we dealing with? Like 13 states in two days? How many states is this? It's definitely nine state capitals. Today, some of them are happening in the same place. So let's say if there are two, I only saw two new affected states.

So that'd be like 10 or 11, but still. Evacuating our state capital buildings, inhibiting our ability to convene and govern. Imagine if they do that, and they will, when an actual attack happens. Right. And then all of a sudden, our centers of power are unable

to coordinate and figure out what's going on i get asked this all the time people are like how could a civil war really happen oh my it's just so insane how how how easy it is to break a machine i give you a million different scenarios but imagine what would happen if there was a terror attack and then at the same time the foreign adversary who did it shuts down communications in the united states what happens when multiple law enforcement agencies show up to the same scene, unable to communicate? How many stories have there been where police show up on scene and shoot the wrong guy? accident it is chaos and if they can't coordinate communicate and there's an explosion in dc and then one jurisdiction says we we've lost communications we got to figure out what's going on and there's no way to communicate effectively then a bunch of random people show up and no one knows who anybody is yeah now i i do think the our security at president states

has plans for things like this i'm just saying you bring this on the federal level not the state but i'm talking about dc you bring this to the to the to the border of Texas and then it's chaos. The feds respond. There's an attack. The border's in chaos. People are running and screaming. State law enforcement shows up. You got some plainclothes guys.

Nobody knows who's who. There's a story going viral. It's just dropped about Trump that Trump supporter who got arrested by the feds. What's what's his name? Actually, I don't have it pulled up. It was the guy who ran that Trump group in Georgia or whatever. And two plainclothes guys brandish a firearm at him and he runs and he tries to flee from him. It turns out they were FBI agents.

And everyone's saying they did it in this way because they wanted him to get shot and killed to fight back, not realizing they were law enforcement. Plainclothes FBI show up to an attack with guns drawn. State law enforcement doesn't know who these guys are. They show up and they say, drop your guns. They're all screaming at each other. You ever see that video of the ATF guy getting detained by the cops? Every libertarian loves this video. It's the meme.

It's when they got turned into the meme. He walked to the guy's house because the guy reportedly bought a shotgun and he's like, you know, give me, give me your information. Bang on the door. The guy who lives there calls the police as a strange man with a gun is banging on my door. The cops show up and they're like, I'm the ground now. And he goes, no, I know, give me your information. Banging on the door. The guy who lives there calls the police. There's a strange man with a gun. He's banging on my door. The cops show up and they're like, I'm on the ground now. And he goes, no, I'm law enforcement.

They're like, shut your mouth. I'm on the ground now. And the ATF guy is like, no, I don't have to. And then they throw him down. He's screaming, oh, I can't breathe. I can't breathe. Don't they have like a cold word for each other? Or I just watched so much Blue Bloods.

No. I don't know. I'm just saying. Watch the video. They throw this ATF guy on the ground. They pin him down. He's screaming. He can't breathe. They don't care.s no i don't know i'm just saying watch the video they throw this atf out of the ground they pin him down he's screaming he can't breathe they don't care yeah they don't care now this was one atf guy and a handful of cops so it gets resolved afterwards but imagine if this is federal law enforcement subverting the law on the border texas state level trying to enforce the law on the border an attack happens communications go down it's

serious man it's like that meme. It says like cops arrest undercover cops for drug buy. That happens all the time? Yeah. All the time. It has happened on several occasions. It's been documented. Your tax dollars at work.

The FBI is setting up a fake drug sale. And then the DEA is doing a fake drug buy. And then they all turn out to be like, oh, we're all law enforcement. You, the taxpayer, paid for all of it. You got to ask yourself, why is this happening this week? I mean, I think it's the start of the new year. What's your theory? I'm just saying, like, it's just trying to, like,

ploy to show how, like, the capitals are just being... Oh, bro. I think this Saturday something happens. Maybe. I mean, one of the things I found interesting about this is it's not like they picked the swing states and then everyone would have to pay. They picked a bunch of state houses of various sizes, not all of our most populated states across the country, and not all of them were in session. And so in some ways, to me, this is all just testing, right? This is to see what the response is.

That's why I made the comparison to the casinos, right? To a certain level, like when you do that kind of thing, and especially if you do it to two major different casino brands, you're ultimately trying to see which one will give you money and which one won't. You want to know what their response is. You want to know what their security protocol is. And, you know, effectively, obviously in this case, no one's hurt. Everything's fine. But on the other hand, there is now an obvious way to get, you know, state capitals to close down as fast as

possible well think about like it's like an election period and somebody just calls in or does something like this at like a voting at like some place where people vote right yeah at a polling center right so there's a lot of ways where you can just merely disrupt something at a time when there's a finite amount of not to to throw too much shade on him but you know if jabal jamal bowman could just pull the fire alarm this is effectively what anyone could do to stop a vote that they don't like in one of the states um i can't remember which one on top of my head uh their their supreme court the state supreme court was in session so theoretically if you didn't want business to take place you don't even need to be in this country to be able to say i don't i'm gonna disrupt the

day how is bummer not in jail well the thing is he was a school principal and he would never ever now seriousness how is it that this man committed a crime because on camera how is it that this man committed a crime everybody saw on video commit the crime he lied about committing the crime and republicans have done nothing because technically it didn't really stop if it technically i asked the one lawmaker and he told me... It had nothing to do with what I asked. No, no.

I asked one lawmaker why he didn't get arrested and he told me... Pulling the firearms is illegal. Right, yes. But they said because it didn't... When he pulled a fire alarm, it didn't happen when they technically was voting. That has nothing to do with what I said.

But that's what I'm saying. That's the only reason why they were able to skid that loophole that's what they that's not a loophole right that's that's wrong so pulling a fire alarm falsely anywhere is illegal right i don't it doesn't matter if you're in congress or in a school jamal bowman didn't lie about it the only reason he's not in jail is because there's a criminal information that he told me yeah right but that that's that's like that makes no sense that's like saying why didn't the guy get arrested for stealing the sandwich because it was friday what the the location of the capital has nothing to do with whether or not it's illegal

to pull a fire alarm the issue is that there are criminals occupying the government and there are no there's no good men or men willing to do their jobs not a single capital police officer took it upon themselves to make an arrest look if a capital police officer has the ability to arrest someone for walking you know entering the building unlawfully like breaking security if a cop has the ability to issue a citation for driving of their own volition, if a cop has the ability to arrest you because they witnessed you obstructing a roadway, a Capitol Police officer could just walk up, arrest Bowman and say, we saw you on camera, do it. There's no investigation needed.

But there is not a single good man in the Capitol Police who will actually criminally take it upon himself to enforce the law. Yeah. And George Santos was the only one who introduced expulsion papers for for what? What is this reality we live in where. In order for a crime to be for a law to be enforced, you require some kind of act of Congress. Yo, if a cop witnesses someone falsely pull a fire alarm, he will arrest that person. No question anywhere. Jamal Bowman did it. Yeah.

A single Capitol officer nowhere just said, I'm going to arrest the guy. I haven't looked at it a couple of weeks, but he did get some kind of plea deal where he's on probation. He has to go to court in three months. Like there was something that he got sighted. Right, right, right, right. Fair point. Fair point.

You got to slap on the wrist. Then right. But that was the thing. He pled to this plea. It came out, whatever else. He released a statement being like, right, right, right. Fair point, fair point. You got to slap on the wrist. Then right at, but that was the thing. He pled to this plea, it came out, whatever else. He released a statement being like, I basically did nothing wrong, but of course I respect whatever.

And then the evidence came out. And then the evidence came out that it wasn't just that he pulled the fire alarm. It was that he removed the sign saying, don't use this door or whatever. Right. And then pulled the fire alarm. He lied.

And that was sort of where I wanted more furor from the Republicans. But I guess that that, again, they're chihuahuas. And again, the Republican that introduced them has now been expelled from congress it's kind of crazy it doesn't really make sense uh but again like at a certain point there's the lack of follow-through like you're kind of alluding to this with the border stuff like the republicans need to see things through to the end and i just don't know that that's what they're gonna do they

need to stop barking and start biting yeah it's not now time is like game time to start being like trump like if you really want to like back your action you've been barking we had the most embarrassing um republican-led house in congress to have the least amount of bills passed last year you know how much time is that it's going to be used against republicans i mean we're used against republicans this year for the House seats but I don't know like that's the only you're saying that

they should have done more stuff because I don't feel like they didn't pass a lot of bills first of all is that necessarily awful like what do we want I mean it looks bad

the headlines looks bad the headline looks bad but like in effect do we want the government to just be continuously passing tons and tons of bills more than the year before like I don't necessarily

want more laws the only bill they passed was like changing the post office name and adding a new street. That's what I'm saying. They were the least productive Congress in the past couple of decades.

That's actually a good thing. Right. But I'm saying, they can't say that like, we've done this, we've done this, we've done this. They can't point to their record. They can't point to it. See, we did nothing.

We don't want them to pass bills. We want them to pass criminal referrals. Right, but I'm saying, you can't say we did this, we passed the most border-enhanced security bill ever. We've done this. We've helped pass Ukraine aid. We've helped pass Israel aid.

You look at all the Republicans that made all these videos for Christmas. Let's not pass more aid. And again, they passed it in the House, but it's not going to go to the Senate. Stop taking credit for something that didn't happen. But the thing is, it's not going to go to the senate stop taking stop taking credit for something that didn't happen but the thing is like it's not that i don't think i think they should be productive i think there are certain things that they should prioritize like i said

with the border it seems like they're using it to stop democrats from getting more funding out of the country and also they know that ultimately everything will fail in the senate i mean it's a weirdly unproductive time because we're sort of staring down the barrel of another presidential election. Republicans only have control of the House by a very slim majority. I mean, when what's his name? Bill Johnson, the guy from Ohio who just announced he's retiring in like three weeks when he leaves, there's only 219 Republicans to 213 Democrats. So there's a certain level of like, yes, I would like them to do more. On the other hand, I don't actually believe this could be a highly productive time. Just don't make it seem like it's semantics that you actually did

something when you actually did nothing, you know, back up your claims. Yeah. We need the ones that are like limited government. Look, we did nothing. Hooray.

I'd rather be like, we passed no aid bills. How about that? But I think there will be Republicans that Canada, they're like, look, I successfully block the Ukraine, additional Ukraine. that is doing something by doing nothing you've done something yeah it's i don't want laws just to be like nothing i i don't just don't want like

the the goal to be like congress has to say we passed more bills than last year because what is with the average american it looks so bad if you're a political guy like us like we're so into this stuff like we we cheer this on but then you ask like the regular average joe in america they're gonna be like we pay their salary and they did nothing it's just the semantics look bad maybe i don't know if all americans would feel that way though i mean i think there is enough distrust of government because like we want to look back at covid when they passed all kinds of things and said all kinds of crazy stuff like i think there are there is a growing distrust of the federal government where

people would say like, maybe we don't want a lot of stuff. But if you saw average American, like, Hey, this was the least productive Congress. Just leave it like that. There's where the, maybe that's how you just have to twist one word and then it changes everything. The only productivity you want is criminal referrals, investigations, and subpoenas. But where's it leading to? Well, they're not doing it. It won't matter anyways. We're coming up at a time eventually

where nothing will matter unless either party has a super majority because everybody's voting on party lines so often now anyways. The hyperpolarization in this country, there's a chart going viral on Twitter showing political ideology by profession. And in the 10 years, it's just just there's no middle anymore it's gone and i've been saying this for all there's no middle anymore it doesn't matter you're left or you're right and that gen z is proving this that's what i was saying earlier on the show like gen z is also

drifting apart from itself there is a disappearing moderate class in this country well remember the it's gone already the data shows it's gone. But remember the voting statistics which said like women said the biggest red flag is if the guy they might date supports Trump or Republicans. And the men said like the biggest red flag is if she's a communist. Yeah. Hey, listen, my biggest red flag, I'm on the dating app and he says he's a liberal.

He has he, she, they, we, or what, when, where, why. But you know what I realized is really funny is that, you know, growing up, the trope was that men are sex obsessed. And the meme is, you know, men only want one thing. It's disgusting. And then you start to realize when you watch comedy videos, it's actually totally the other way around. Guys are object oriented and totally interested in sports numbers. They actually don't talk all that much about women.

And women talk about nothing but guys. Men have like a lot of like unique hobbies that end up binding them together with their friends. So I look at I look at these comedy videos. And so I follow a bunch of comedians on Instagram. I get a ton of comedy videos. Ninety percent of the of the clips that come from a guy will be about an issue. And like it'll just be it could be about anything like, you know, with with Dave Chappelle. Look at his jokes.

He's joking about Madison Cawthorn handicap. He's he's talking about andy kaufman and jim carrey telling life stories all of these female comedians the joke is they're always just talking about their vaginas yeah and so i mean that's a crass way of putting it for the shock factor but every single female comedian when i'm on instagram and i hit refresh and i'm seeing all these comedians i if i if there's a female comedian i know that that if I hit it, she's going to be talking about dating a guy. I know if it's a guy, it could be anything. And the reason I bring that up is because as we're looking at the bifurcation of politics

between men and women, I believe it's going to result in this country moving conservative for the reason of women are more subject oriented and more time constrained on having a partner. Men are not. So if a guy says, I don't like commies, he just won't date anybody. But around 30 to 35, when women start women start getting you know the biological clock is ticking and they want to have kids they have to start trying to find a guy but if guys are skewing to the right those women will have to adapt themselves to the guy not the other way around yeah okay so you ever heard of the book uh men are from mars women are from venus yes so my one of my favorite points in that book was the psychologist john gray points out that when men go to lunch, they're typically going to talk about a specific problem.

They're like we have a there is a purpose to it. Right. They're meeting. It's something there's something you do. Women go and they just sort of gather a lot of information. Right. So one of the reasons like the stereotypical girls can be on the phone with their friends for hours and hours because they're wired to do different things. And I think both are valuable, but they play out very differently in society. Like, well, look at a family guy is the joke where Peter Griffin gets injected with the gay gene as part of a clinical trial. And then he calls, I think he calls Quagmire and he's like, hey, Glenn. And Glenn's like, yeah, what you doing?

What do you mean? You called me. And that just shows you like the joke of the difference between the feminine approach to calling someone versus the guy. It's like, you called me? What do you mean? You called me. And that just shows you like the joke of the difference between the feminine approach to calling someone versus the guy. It's like, you called me. What do you want? Yeah. Yeah.

But it's just totally different. And I think that, you know, these things could be good. The problem is that feminism has really made it so that women are trying to compete with men in male spheres. They don't just do things that are natural to women and like them. It sort of makes it so, like the best female comedians that I know actually have some really interesting

social observations, right? Like when Ali Wong, who does talk about her vagina a lot, would talk about trying to trap her Harvard educated husband or Harvard business school husband, it was really funny, right? Because the way women talk about like

the way they approach dating when it's not necessarily about their sexual approach to dating can be really nuanced can be really interesting because it gives you an insight into something you may not know it's the same thing i don't i don't i don't watch female comedians anymore i don't know why you would because a dude i she's gonna be talking about a guy she dated and i'm just like all right that's that's look you can ask a random girl on the street and she'll tell you the same thing that comedian just had. But it's totally fine if this is what women find funny. Hearing another woman talk about her boyfriend.

For me, I'm like, you know, that's why we were talking on the Members Only show about this one female comedian who made a joke about homelessness. And I'm like, that was a really, really good joke. But it's just like, yeah, we talked about this. But I swear I'm on Instagram and I'm going through it and I'll hit a guy's joke and he'll be like, you know, so my car broke down or something like that. And you're like, oh, wow, what happened to your car? And I'll be telling a story like I was going to the supermarket, and this guy was trying to buy this Coca-Cola, right? And I'm like, oh, what's this story about buying a Coca-Cola, something that happened. And then I clicked the woman, and she's like, so my boyfriend, here's the trick, my boyfriend. I'm like, okay, well, I don't know, it's unrelatable to me.

And that's fine. You're allowed to like these things. But anyway, aside from all of that, no more whinging about female comedians. The is what i what i what i've started to see with these social trends uh when we've learned we've learned this from instagram women care substantially more about social uh uh how you fit in socially than men do i think we've known this for a long time what this means is a guy will be 35 sitting there like yeah you know what i i want to vote for trump these women don't like it. Whatever, I guess. And these women are going to be going,

I'm 35 and I need to find a husband, but all of these guys are into Trump. What do I do? Yeah, but then when you find all these guys that are, you know, they vote for Trump and then they find a girl that votes for Trump,

they're scared shitless what to do next. I think that's somewhat true. I don't agree with that. I'm speaking from experience. Right. That sounds like not, that sounds like an anecdotal thing, not a data thing. I'm trying to experience. Right. That sounds like not, that sounds like an anecdotal thing,

not a data thing. I'm trying to say like, no, I'm just trying to say like alpha and alpha. See, I think it's that men will tack more conservative. There will be more men who are openly outspoken about what they believe, but because women are socially observant and that's what they're doing,

there will be generations of women after that who move more conservative to keep up. Right? Because ultimately what you're saying is true. What I'm saying is the pressure is on women, not men. will be generations of women after that who move more conservative to keep up right because what i'm saying is the pressure is on women not men so you're gonna have women who are not alphas they're gonna be saying something like guy i will say whatever you want me to say please i don't have a lot of time and there's gonna be a guy like bro i can have to sell it for less than what she believes in what she doesn't believe i'm saying she probably doesn't believe in anything she's influenced by social media to a great degree to just say Joe Biden, because it's all the people on social media are saying.

But then when it actually comes down to it, she's going to say, I don't care. I want to have a family. I think it really depends on her social exposure, right? Because if she's largely socializing with women, like maybe she does want to marry a man, but ultimately she works in a female dominated industry. She hangs out with all of her female friends and all of her female friends naturally tack left. They're all voting Democrat.

She is likely to hold on to beliefs but as soon as you put women into more balanced or uh social environments where there are more men i think that changes really quickly and i don't necessarily think it's because of dating i think it's because of social compliance which is higher among women but there's a lot of liberal women that they're like in their late 30s early 40s and they're out there bragging about like being a feminist and being a girl. Yeah, they don't care. And like they're single. That's the norm. And they have a cat.

And they don't have kids. And I'm like, why is your greatest accomplishment that you don't have kids? So that's breaking down now. Because you've got these articles from say Business Insider. Where this woman says, I was lied to by feminism. And she said she wants to go back to all her feminist college professors and says, when was this supposed to happen? You lied to me. Because now she's realizing

none of it made her happy at all and it was a trick. Let's go to Super Chats. If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, head over to TimCast.com, click join us to become a member. Why? We got tickets to the Iowa Caucus event. That's right. On the 15th of this month

when the Iowa Caucus happens, we will have a live show and you can be sitting in those chairs and we'll probably That's right. On the 15th of this month, when the Iowa caucus happens, we will have a live show. And you can be sitting in those chairs. And we'll probably even throw some questions to the audience. That is the plan. We'll see how it plays out. But the only way to buy tickets is to be a member. And the link is available on the front page of TimCast.com. We're doing this mostly, it's partially for a vetting reason.

And it's also because members get first priority. So as soon as the link went up, the members got access to it. And if you're not a member, you got to become one. But also we're going to have that uncensored members only show at 10 p.m. where you can hang out with us behind the scenes where we say things that are not so family friendly. And that'll be up at TimCast.com. So smash that like button, all that good stuff.

Let's read your super chats. User Main says, hi, join the Discord. Yes, we have a Discord server. If you go to TimCast.com and become a member, you can get instructions on how to join the Discord server. And what does that mean? It is an active 24 a member, you can get instructions on how to join the Discord server. And what does that mean? It is an active 24-7 chat room with like-minded individuals who watch the show and run their own chat shows, pre-shows, after-shows, guests, and everything.

It is a vibrant community of people who are discussing all these ideas. It's good fun. You should definitely join. I really like the Discord. They're always doing stuff. And then over Thanksgiving, they were like, hey, you want to come talk to us? And they very kindly guided me through how to use it.

Was that fun? I remember because we were, you were on our show that one time and they were like, we're going to get you to do it. And sometimes you're like, I don't know if I want to sign up for all this. Yeah, I joined Discord,

got immediately overwhelmed by the interface. You're like, technology, no thank you. But Raymond G. Stanley Dierner was like, hey, I'll explain to you what to do. All right. RJ McDougallime says, Tim, I'll explain to you what to do. All right. RJ McDougalime says, Tim, how can I work for your new skate park? I ran one that hosted many comps, jams, and events. I can be a helpful addition.

Who can I reach out to? It is a private park. And there will not be skate park people working there because there's not going to be anybody showing up to come in and check in. It's going to be a, I say semi-private because we will invite some people sometimes. That just basically means it's private. But we're going to do a, I say semi-private because we will invite some people sometimes. That just basically means it's private. But we're going to do a bunch of really cool stuff. We are planning a party for the official completion of the skate park.

The good news is the structure of the new studio, it's done. The rooms are done. The green room is done. The kitchen is there. The bathrooms are all there. We are really excited. And it may be mid-February when we are officially inside. So the new TimCast IRL studio is being built in two weeks.

And I don't know how long it'll take, but I can't imagine it'll take that long. It'll be a couple days. And if that's the case, February 1st, we might be in the brand new studio. It's a much bigger room. It'll be really, really cool, really fun. And we're adding a bunch of new cool, crazy features. One of the features we're adding is called a delay button. Do you guys know what a delay button do you guys know

what a delay button does so let's just say for instance we're talking about epstein and someone on the show just can't hold it in any longer and they scream out of top of their lungs how much they want to commit an act of violence when that happens we press the button that portion drops and it never goes live you see all big networks already have that yeah every network has that so if you're watching cable sometimes they'll be doing a live interview and they'll be like joining us live to talk about this issue is john smith and then they'll be talking and then all of a sudden it'll just jump to the host being like sorry about that everybody but moving on and you're like wait what just happened or they'll say like the call dropped

right no they'll they'll actually i mean like the connection dropped no they don't know when they hit no i'm saying they use that as an excuse no they will actually just say we had to release the guest because of the language they use we apologize to people who are listening they actually admit it wow shock yeah when the calls drop the calls drop sometimes the calls drop and we roll our eyes like i can't remember it was like um i think it was, what's his face? Cuomo has that famous viral video where he's talking to someone. They start bringing up some sensitive issue. And then all of a sudden it does that.

He's like, oh, geez. And that looked really fake. But no, no. My point is quite literally. Networks all have these delay buttons. And then they'll say, sorry about that, everybody. It'll just be mid-conversation. Then it'll just jump to those going, sorry about that, everybody. That language just be mid-conversation that it'll just jump to those

going, sorry about that, everybody. That language is not acceptable on this network. Moving on to the next story. Is the new studio going to have money guns that shoot at us during Super Chat?

No, only the pop culture. If you're going to have a money gun, you have to have neon lights. We do have neon lights. I want you to put them to add like a smoke machine. A smoke machine. The next thing we're adding

is a stripper pole. That is not happening. Can we make it rain? We will charge far more for that. You guys should release a calendar. Do not invoke that right now. Can somebody please tell me about this calendar? That's how you know I do not

follow social issues. No comment. Serge is fired. We're going to keep going. Let's read some more. Hans Gruber says the missing name is Joe Biden. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Everybody wants a Joe Biden, but it's not the missing name. Ethan Helms says, have you seen Vivek's review on NBC review interview on NBC News, as well as his response to condemning white supremacy?

Strong start to 2024. He's looking better by the day the fake rama swami was asked to condemn white supremacy and he gave this excellent response about i'm not going to bend the knee to your religion i condemn all forms of racial discrimination but what you're asking is you know he basically says you're playing a game of trying to this gotcha game i'm not going to play i'm not going to bend the knee to your religion i'm not asking you to bend the knee to mine but i know you're going to run this anyway we know exactly what you're going to say you're going to bend the knee to your religion. I'm not asking you to bend the knee to mine. But I know you're going to run this anyway. We know exactly what you're going to say. You're going to say that Vaik refuses to condemn white supremacy, despite the fact I will tell you again, I condemn all forms of racial discrimination. And then, of course, what did the Washington Post writer do?

Tweeted out, when asked, Vaik Ramaswamy refused to condemn white supremacy. Because these people are, well, look, it's not her fault she's developmentally disabled. It is her fault she's evil. And it's her fault that she's racist. She's asking the minority candidate to condemn white supremacy. Like, that's a bad look, it's not her fault. She's developmentally disabled. It is her fault. She's evil. And it's her fault that she's racist. She's asking the minority candidate to condemn white supremacy. Like that's a bad look team. I know it's white lady doing it too. Yeah.

All right. Mr. Nickers gaming says finally joined the members discord last night. I'm upset that I didn't join it sooner. It was a blast and stayed up way too late. I'm currently running on three hours of sleep in the past 48 hours. You see, this is the challenge. That's the story of my life. When you sign up at TimCast.com and join the Discord,

you can never leave because once you start arguing with someone online, you can't stop. But we're not a cult. You're free to go anytime. Well, we're not a cult. It's just... That's not true. I get in the Discord sometimes and I argue with people and then I just leave.

I just... I just ghost. Boom. I'm a phantom. I'm out of there. You're here for like one really you're wrong and then i'm just gone like one zinger yeah i'm back and then you're out gone you're ghosting huh they're going ghosting so we have a whole bunch of super chats of people

giving potential names but uh you know sheldon adelson is a name alejandro mayorkas 17 letters 17 is not what we said. Jessica messaged me, Stephen Kaufman, but one, and I guess it's on Twitter. Christopher Wray. He was acting chief counsel for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. But there was two different spellings of it. One with two N's and one without. So I don't really know what.

You can't just name a person you don't like who's got 15 letters in their name. Yes, you can. You absolutely can. Yes, you can. That is can. Yes, you can. That is your right. Can somebody please make this into a wordle game? Yes. What was his name

from the National Security? Sullivan? Jake Sullivan? Yeah. I don't think that's 15 letters. That's what I'm trying to think in my head. Make it a wordle game

with the court and the court and it's like if we figure it out you have to the name is really If we get the letter you have to let us know.

Can we imagine this is a female? You you have to let us know. You guys agreed to make this fun. All right. Thomas Wright says, what happened to yesterday's show? Why isn't it at least on Rumble? And it's fascinating because he said this at 826 and it is on Rumble. The show from last night is in full on Rumble.

Check again. And it's also on all podcast platforms. I tweeted this out as well but i will tell you the challenge my friends um you know a lot of people will say like i'll say something and let's say tim said that yesterday but what but the people who say that don't realize the average person doesn't watch every single show and every single clip and most people this is the funny thing i'll tweet out we released We released a song. I tweeted this out like the other day, like our fourth song hit billboard. And they went, I didn't know you made music. And I'm like, it's kind of wild that we had four out of five songs chart on billboard,

which is like most bands don't even get one song on billboard charts. Big names do big names do. And then they're like, I didn't even know you did that. And I'm like, every week we do a release. We like do this long promo and there are people who had no idea we made music. So how about that? So when the show goes down and I tweet out three times, the show will be free and available on all podcast platforms.

Find it here. When we say like, we're going to put it up on Rumble and all these things, people still go, where's the show and what happened? Because there's no way for us to inform everyone all at the same moment.

It's not possible. It's why people get mad when you have to constantly tell people to, when you mention like, subscribe, all these things, because they have to hear it multiple times because not everybody's paying attention exactly at that moment. Other people are doing other things.

You have to constantly use repetition to really get it across. And it still doesn't connect. Not always. Whataguy says, JetGPT says, Elizabeth Warren, she certainly has the power to stall a foil.

Nine and six. I want to know who the other prince was. Like, that one just is so random. As long as it's not the artist formerly known as Prince.

Elizabeth Warren is 15 letters. Yeah. But I don't see a reason why she would be on the list. I think it has to be, like... Probably gonna be a dude. We gotta cross-reference it

with people that were, like, known to have an affiliation. Yeah. Steven Bachmeier says, they mentioned redacting because of security risks in home country of people which is why some people think the prince is from sa said arabia these drops are not legally damning they are culturally and morally damning that is correct absolutely and it may be a prince the other prince the other prince that's so intriguing to me also prince andrew must be livid right now that everyone was willing to name him but they're not willing to name the other one

well you gotta blame your mommy for like dropping you out of the whole royal family for able to open that kind of worms let's grab some more super chats there's a whole lot of names here we go what do we have here uh more names more names more names another name i think we got like 15 super chats saying christopher ray okay a lot of them like 15 right samuel brooker says what if instead of a famous person is an unknown person whose very existence is evidence of something much worse than all of the grape fair point it might be a name that as soon as people figure out a name you've never heard of and you look i say who's that you google search you go oh my stars and garters the missing link yeah yeah perhaps perhaps it could be anything perhaps indeed oh another person said christopher

ray yeah again like 15 of those all right b vips as alan dershowitz claimed the allegations of a teenager being forced into sex with them was categorically false i hear this phrase a lot is this a diversion or hmm uh yeah i don't believe dershowitz you know he denied it it is what it is i don't believe him i i don't know i don't know how you're the lawyer of this guy not aware of what's going on you know what i mean like there are there are a lot of lawyers out there they know their clients are guilty but they're going to provide the best events they can they're going to be like yes but so you did punch that man but how did they find

out you did the video they got was taken from your camera without a warrant that's fruit from the poison tree and we're gonna get that thrown out and the case will be dismissed but everybody knows you did it i'm pretty sure dershowitz was aware of what was going on i mean in my opinion all right it was a different time pete says just like to say i was the first in with ray congratulations cam pete the name uh i don't you know i don't know we don't know who it is we don't know who it is richard klein says it's safe to assume it's not a conservative that's redacted. It could be a foreign leader

of a state that's being protected. Yep. Do you think we'll ever find out who it is? No. Yes. Well, I mean, not right now. Maybe like another two years.

Two years. But what I should say is I believe there is a possibility we get the Epstein list. It just means we have to win the culture war. Is that our October surprise? The October surprise is someone coming out and claiming Donald Trump did the whole thing.

And they create an org chart with Trump above Epstein. But that's for the Democrats. But, you know, if Trump wins, I do think there's a possibility that that information comes out. So if you want to know who's on that list, look, what do we learn from the first release? Donald Trump was not there. He had not met these women. He wasn't around. He didn't sleep with any of these women.

It's it's it's it's very strong evidence for Trump. He was involved in any of this stuff. It's good. Considering he was in the proximity of these people on the left is trying to claim he was involved by showing videos of him like at a party with Epstein. And I'm like, yeah, Epstein went to parties. Epstein famously moved in elite social circles yeah that doesn't mean every single person involved did something wrong fair point i just don't trust bill clinton you know what i mean like sorry he likes him young

how young is too young that's the question epstein young is too young no i meant bill clinton it's kind of creepy when epstein is known for doing what he does and then he says the word young because you assume it means younger than he's already involved in i know it's disgusting there are demons out there man there are demons blue de gollier says it's a saudi prince remember there was a redacted name because of being from a conservative country okay but we have to remember there's the redacted name there's some other names and then it says the other prince so which is not the redacted name, there's some other names, and then it says the other prince. Which is not the redacted name.

And it can't be the prince. They're separate things. Like, someone on there was guessing like, oh, this prince's name fits the number of syllables, but they are two separate mysterious people.

And the Saudi prince has like five names, so they would have to put his whole name out there. I mean, but theoretically that's a transcript, so they wouldn't say like all of the names.

They might just refer it by like the common name. They'll name him like prince or they'll probably put his MBS, whatever. Who knows? That's probably over 25 letters. Dark World says, have your children skip a meal or two, or have your grandchildren not eat for a week. Pick your poison. I'm not condemning people who do a deal with the devil to save their kids.

I'm making the point that when the devil offers you the deal, it's not going to be for a luxury car. It's going to be to feed your children. It will be the hardest decision you have to make. And I think it's fair to say, perhaps the majority of men would sell their soul to the devil knowing they would condemn themselves for eternity if it meant their kids got to eat. That's not, I'm neither condemning nor condoning.

I'm pointing it out. If that's who you are and'm neither condemning nor condoning i'm pointing it out if that's who you are and you take issue with that statement perhaps you should reflect on your morals because some people might actually suggest it is noble to sacrifice your eternal soul to save your children i don't think working in service of the devil figuratively or literally is a good thing i think it condemns your children but sure when you say have your kids skip a meal or have your grandchildren not eat for a week, you pick your poison. Yeah, you got to understand what we're talking about is exponential returns. If today you sell out your country so your kids can have a full belly tomorrow, it means your grandkids will not have anything. It means your grandkids will live in the pot and

eat the bugs. But if that's worth selling your soul to the devil, okay. I mean, think about it. The idea would be that you are offered the Faustian deal or the deal with the devil. We will keep your children fed, but serve evil. You say, sounds good to me. It's better than my child starving. What you're actually doing is making sure that your child grows up in despair and desolation and your grandkids are slaves living in pods and eating bugs. Or your kids can go hungry today and you can fight the hardest fight you've ever fought. And then maybe in 50 years, your grandchildren will live in prosperity and thank you for your sacrifice. A society grows great when men plant trees whose shade they know they will never sleep beneath.

So, you know know it's whatever not condemning or condoning what do we got here neglectful sausage says native americans wanting to stop mass migration to their territory was racist they should have welcomed the xenos bulldozing their culture no no hold on there a minute i think we've solved the entire thing there sir all of these non-citizens who are coming in, we just place them on the Native American reservations. And there we go. The Native Americans will be glad to see the migration culturally enriching their reservations. The left will agree that it's not colonization. Migration is a net benefit for everybody. And these migrants who are coming in will require goods and services. So what will happen is businesses will start popping up on the reservations. The casinos, some of these reservations have will flourish. And for those that don't, you'll see Walmarts popping up in no time because obviously these migrants want jobs and also want to buy products. It will boost the economy. And in fact, many of these deeply impoverished reservations could use an influx of a new population. I think everyone's going

to recognize it's a win-win, right? many people are saying merrick garland a lot of people are saying merrick garland okay but i mean just because you don't like a guy doesn't mean his name fits i don't think the name's fit no because everybody's like saying chris ray and i can't see from far like it's hard to know what do we get hammer one one says unfortunately if trump gets into office he is going to have to round up all the illegal immigrants and it's going to look like the nazis hunting jews in 1940s it's exactly what i said i think two days ago on this show and i think many other people have alluded to already dreams of a strange man says did anyone say mark zuckerberg with the space between his names that's 15 excuse me not national security related but i don't know

i mean wealth related yeah i have this whole thing where like i think walker zuckerberg is slightly younger than most of the people who are coming up like you have to remember there was a chance that he we know that he's big and powerful now but when this was all happening was he the person of influence that would have been quartered by someone by epstein and this was 2011 right so facebook was like already no those documents are 2016 oh 2016 okay and the redaction is today the email was 2011 but the but the but the the release is now right no no i'm saying i got confused with the email and then that one the question is who's who exists today to prevent their name from being released because the documents were released now yeah all right josiah everdeen says hey

i've been listening for a couple years now huge fan listen to your daily segments while working i'm curious what do you mean when you say i think something will happen this saturday thanks it's uh january 6th saturday is the day that lives in infamy that's what they say well we got swatted on january 6th in 2022 i think it was oh yeah yeah so like it's 2024 maybe january 6th get a lot of snow and everything's going to be cool. No, it's going to rain. It's going to rain. Yeah, I just checked.

They're saying that the high is going to be 53 degrees and we're not going to get snow. We're going to get rain. We're supposed to get 10 inches of snow. Not anymore. I predicted this. Wait, that's so upsetting. Because we were warned, like, a few months ago there was going to be a snowstorm and then it rained for three days.

Yeah. And so, you know, Allison really wants it to snow so we can go snowboarding and stuff. And then we get this warning of a nor'easter and 12 inches of snow. And then I said, you know what's going to happen? It's going to be a few days out and they're going to say it's going to rain. Sure enough, I checked again and it said a high of 53 degrees and rain. Tim's a witch.

He controls the weather. New York says a mix of snow, rain and snow, highs, mid-30s, lows, watching a potential winter storm. All right. Toosin Loram says men and women are not equal. Men can make long term decisions beneficial to society. Women cannot.

Men will hold each other accountable for wrongs. Women will give each other attention and reasons for why they were right when wrong. Feminism and women's rights were wrong. I completely disagree with you, sir. I appreciate the super chat, but I can tell you why you're wrong because there are law enforcement officers facilitating the invasion on the southern border with smiles on their faces because they would rather their kid eats today and the united states burn and your families burn and your culture and community burn these men don't care about what is wrong they care about what protects their family so long as those men

exist you can't tell me that men can make long-term decisions beneficial to society sure care about what is wrong. They care about what protects their family. So long as those men exist, you can't tell me that men can make long-term decisions beneficial to society. Sure. They can also make decisions of personal benefit because they care more about their kids than you and what this feature has for their kids. I mean, that's the grand mistake. Short-term gains for long-term losses is what it is. My kid will eat a cheeseburger today, but then we'll eat the bugs and live in the pod in 10 years. That's what they're building. I think there are all kinds of women that make good choices for society too.

Sure. They are more social, they're different, but generalizing them too much is a mistake. Yeah, there are good women and there are bad guys. Like how many male feminists are out there? You can't tell me that men are capable of making these decisions

when half of millennials are, like 45% of millennial men are identified as like male feminists or whatever oh these guys can't make good decisions because even women call them creepy like even is that a real number is that a real number 45 i i i think that's going back that's disturbing going back to the border thing do you think the um the whipping um story really like haunted them? And there's the reason why they're not being agents like they used to be? The thing about that story.

So it was when there were migrants from Haitian. 43% Who were gathering under a bridge. And no one was actually whipped. They were just. I'm sorry. We got a correction. We got a correction here.

52% of millennial men identify as male feminists. Gross. And we wonder why the birth rates are collapsing. got a correction here um 52 percent of millennial men identify as male feminists gross uh and we wonder why the birth rates are collapsing those border agents did nothing wrong but they were so reprimanded like if they did something so highly i think yeah i mean that was one of the reasons that alejandro mayorkas is uh being accused of dereliction of duty which is that he went and told congress yes that was awful and they did things. And it wasn't even true, right? He condemned his own agents. I think the fear is a big part of it, right? There are people who want to lose their jobs. But also, there are people who just don't want to be canceled for theoretically being an evil law

enforcement officer doing something they shouldn't. And when you know the ultimate authority is contradicting itself, that we have these border laws on the books, but that the federal government is not going to back you up if you are in your professional capacity enforcing them then your hands are really tied what are you supposed to be doing those ages were like that's why i say they didn't get paid for like 10 12 almost a year and maybe they should go work for a state border agency at this point tom pant says sometimes the delay button doesn't work as shepherd smith found out during a police chase several years ago you guys remember that no yeah i do the the guy died on live on fox news and he was like wasn't he like cut it cut it oh yeah something like that it was

like too late yeah that's what we need a dump button everybody yeah that's what it's called a dump button correct yeah yeah because we we operate with like almost no lag i think it's like we have a very very minimal so short it's like 10 seconds 10 seconds at most 15 seconds yeah which we just like this studio is duct tape like it's good duct tape literally but it's duct tape yeah it does a lot of duct tape everywhere uh the lights duct tape so we have a professional studio production company coming in in a few weeks for the new studio and they're going to have professional lighting. Technically, it's gaff tape. It's gaff tape.

We're not heathens here. I'm just grateful that the lights are white and not yellow. The yellow ones are in the middle. The white one is on me, so the eyes are not on her. They're both on you. We control the level of warmth. For me, the lights... I can't even wear my glasses in here because I get a headache.

The pop culture studio has great lighting. Well, the lights, like I can't even wear my glasses in here because I get a headache. The Pop Culture Studio has great lighting. Well, the Pop Culture Studio, isn't it like a bunch of different lights aimed in different ways? Yeah, well, yeah. There's like there's four to six different neons that are all pointed in different directions to give different lighting. Purple and green. So this is the fourth IRL studio. The first studio had a few stand-up lights. Second IRL studio had a few stand-up lights. Second IRL studio had a few stand-up

lights. The third IRL studio, which is now the Pop Culture Grounds studio, had like 12 lights in a bunch of different random positions. We slowly removed them and streamlined it. I'd like to get soft boxes up there at some point, just to have less stuff up there.

You're moving around a lot of stuff and depending on what time of day is and how tired you are you bump into a lot of lights what we did for this studio was in the corner of the ceiling there's led bars that wrap around the entire room so all light is balanced and then in the middle is warmer lights they're more yellow and then we control the amount of warmth that we have in the center of the room versus the white on the outside of the room. So everything is uniform and there's no shadows. Yeah.

That's interesting. Yeah. But the new studio is going to likely have shadows. Are they going to bang it out all at once to do it? Or are they going to do it in between your shows? No, we won't go there if they're under construction. Oh, I thought they're doing it here. Sorry.

No, no, no. It's a good building. Yeah. Totally new place. Totally new building. But yeah, man, we're really excited. That should be in a couple weeks. All right, everybody. they're doing it here sorry no no it's a good building yeah yeah totally new place yeah but uh yeah man we're really excited that should be in a in a in a couple weeks all right everybody if you uh what do we got here let's uh let's grab one more tnhp podcast says hey tim huge fan been a fan since 2019 just want to know uh want to know i have accumulated 11 000 followers on a different

app called meet me is there anything i can do to help let me know i'm not sure what that is but i appreciate the support uh yeah and we're gonna go to we're gonna go to the uh is that what isn't that like hinge no 11 followers 11 000 followers on like a dating app i don't know all right everybody if you haven't already would you kindly smash that like button subscribe to this channel share the show with your friends head over to timcast.com click join us become a member and you can purchase tickets if you haven't already if they're still there i think we probably sold out of the tickets for the 15th show i gotta be honest probably sold out as soon as we launched it i gotta check but it's very likely it's sold out within like 10 minutes so if you want to show up sit in the audience in person

for timcast irl hang out with us and not just vivek there's going to be a bunch of people there at the caucuses so we're gonna have a rotating panel of special guests hanging out with us talking about what they think is going on. You can be there too. And it will be intimate. We'll put it that way. Meaning like a small amount of tickets and, you know, relatively private event. But go to TimCast.com because the members only uncensored is also coming up. You don't want to miss it.

You can follow the show at TimCastIRL. You can follow me personally at TimCast. Moni, do you want to shout anything out? You can follow me on Twitter Timcast. Moni, do you want to shout anything out? Oh, you can follow me on Twitter at by Mona Salama. And same thing on Facebook.

And we'll see. Hopefully, can I sneak inside your suitcase and go back to Iowa? Because I just realized there was a town hall like Haley and DeSantis on CNN.

This election is so boring. They're doing a debate. The debate right today. So on the 10th, CNN is hosting a debate between Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, and we are going to

counter their programming with our own town hall featuring Vivek Ramaswamy. They're saying Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley asked a question so Iowa voted and back-to-back

CNN and town halls as the state pivots to Iowa Congress. Yeah, they have something about tonight. They have it right now. This is how boring both of these guys are

I remember like 2016 okay yeah right so Hannah Cleary do you want to say anything else oh yeah well I want to shout out if you follow

at TimCastNews on X and on Instagram but on X we just reached 100,000 followers it's been a ton of work from the team

I really appreciate it and it really is ultimately all of you guys and your support so keep following them there because you can see all the work from scnr.com. That's scanner news. Again, same cool team. Really proud of what they're doing. There's a lot of fun stuff coming up this year. And it's going to be a very, very busy news year if you haven't already picked up on that. So we'd love to

be a part of the people that inform you. Yeah. And if you want to follow me personally, I'm on Instagram at hannaclair.b and I'm on Instagram at HannahClaire.B, and I'm on X or Twitter or whatever it's called at HCBremelow. Guys, thank you so much for everything. And Brett, thanks for being here. Oh, well, thank you so much. Yeah, guys, if you want to follow me, you can follow me on Instagram and Twix, at Brett Dasavik on both of those platforms.

And please go and check out Pop Culture Crisis. We are live at 3 p.m. Eastern every day during the week, Monday through Friday. Not just pop culture and celebrities, but we get into a lot of things to do with social media trends, things to do with Instagram, TikTok, all of these things, Gen Z, Millennials, all of it. It's a lot of fun. Come check us out. I think you guys will enjoy it.

And please go follow their show, guys. PCC is great. I'd love to see you guys get over 100K. That'd be sweet. Is there a URL? Do we have a.com for you? I'd love to see you guys get over 100k. That'd be sweet. Soon. Is there a URL? Uh, like, like the, it's at, like it's, no,

like a, like do we have a.com? Like a YouTube? No, I don't think there's like a URL for the show specifically, but you can find it also on timcast.com, but also just, uh, look it up on,

on YouTube. Yeah. Uh, that natural growth is always good. Uh, yeah, guys, um,

I'm surge.com. I hope you enjoyed today's episode. Thank you for coming very much. Appreciate it. Go to pop culture, crisis.com. Perfect. Yeah enjoyed today's episode. Thank you for coming very much. Appreciate it. Go to PopCultureCrisis.com. Perfect. Yeah, you didn't know that? PopCultureCrisis.com redirects to the YouTube channel. Oh, okay.

And everyone should go and subscribe to that. Bump them up to 100k. 100k. Let's do it, y'all. Please. Alright. We're gonna go to TimCast.com for that uncensored show in just about one minute. We'll see you all there. Thanks. you