Timcast IRL - Timcast IRL #973 Biden Admin ARRESTS Opposition journalists, HE IS NOW PUTIN w. Gen Tony Tata

Episode Date: March 2, 2024

Tim, Ian, Phil, & Serge join General Tony Tata to discuss journalist Steve Baker surrendering to the FBI for covering J6, NATO warns that giving into Putin could cause WW3, the wokeification of the CIA, and the botched Afghanistan withdrawal. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Discover the magic of BetMGM Casino, where the excitement is always on deck. Pull up a seat and check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer. From roulette to blackjack, watch as a dealer hosts your table game and live chat with them throughout your experience to feel like you're actually at the casino. The excitement doesn't stop there. With over 3,000 games to choose from, including fan favorites like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Blitz, and more. Make deposits instantly to jump in on the fun, and make same-day withdrawals if you win.

Download the BetMGM Ontario app today. You don't want to miss out. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Steve Baker, the journalist, surrendered today. And man, it is wild to see. They put the guy in handcuffs for no reason.

The FBI charging documents over this journalist show that he was doing journalism. This is a crazy story. The Biden administration has ordered the arrest of an opposition journalist. What makes the story so wild, Steve Baker was at January 6th. It has been years and he's not been charged. He was clearly recording the charging documents outright describe him walking towards the Capitol, recording himself while narrating what is going on. And that's the description of everything he's doing. He is now an investigative reporter for the blaze. It's a wild story. something happened a few years later he began investigating inconsistencies and testimony of capitol police officers and then lo now he's being charged as if he is a rioter or january 6th participant it's absolutely fascinating but man you know we did a really great show over on the

culture war podcast this morning about the roman empire so i'm reluctant to say biden is crossing the rubicon because you know figure of speech it's not literal or it's not even heavily literal in that this may be the point of no return but it is a major major uh i don't know inflection point it's not the first journalist we've seen but this is this may be the first journalist who directly exposed lies and potential perjury being targeted which in what appears to be retaliation and there's and their misdemeanors we got we're gonna go through that that's the big story here we do have got we do have information on the fannie willis hearing about disqualification and then this is absolutely wild we're now being told here we go

corporate press that if we don't actually uh go into ukraine then we'll have nuclear world war three whereas obviously if nato were to actually send troops in ukraine you you run that risk vladimir putin warning he he has nukes and he will use them what is the west thinking we're gonna talk about that before we do my friends big news uh eyes of advice our first week out and i said i was gonna i was gonna give $1,000 to whoever got closest to the description of what the video was about. I decided to give $2,000. And I commented on those posts. If you are one of those posters, I commented on them.

It's the best way to get in touch. I gave you my email. You can reach out to me and I will Venmo you or whatever and I'll send you the cash. Because a couple were the closest that I saw. I think one thing most people missed in the music video was the deal with the devil. While a lot of people pointed out correctly, drug addiction, addiction, social media are big components of this. And they all are. There's multiple layers.

So for those that aren't familiar, we released a music video video eyes of advice had this you know pseudo contest kind of thing the general theme of the video if you've watched it it's it's on the nose it's very obvious there's a guy whose life is good and bright and it's slowly decaying as he keeps going into this world and then it turns out he's taking drugs that's the overt and obvious but there is the more subtle metaphor of the devil has offered him greatness. He had offered him this deal, come into my world and I'll give you everything you could ever want.

And then it ends up destroying his life. So shout out to the couple of people, two people instead of one. And one person mentioned the symbolism of Christianity and the devil and Satan, the things they offer you. And the other person mentioned drugs and social media. I thought that was good.

So thanks everybody. It was off the cuff. It wasn't planned. I didn't plan and social media. I thought that was good. So thanks, everybody. It was off the cuff. It wasn't planned. I didn't plan it in a contest. I just saw everyone trying to speculate as to what they thought the meaning was, and I thought it'd be cool. So Eyes of Advice is the song. It is our most Shazam song.

We are the number one song in Edmonton in Canada. Rock on, Edmonton. You guys rock. That's a million people in that city. That's huge. Edmonton Oilers. Wow. That's so cool.

All right, everybody. But also, don't forget to go to castbrew.com we sponsor ourselves pick up some cast brew coffee we are unfortunately sold out of appalachian nights it's wild how fast we are selling i can't keep up this is this is crazy we gotta we gotta order more i can't believe i'm looking at now our coffee pods are sold out mr bogus pumpkin spice experience still available k pods we got a promo code going on our newsletter for the re-rise of the Berto Jr. You'll get 25% off two different bags. Just buy the coffee. Check out Stand Your Grounds. If you like Appalachian Nights, you will like Stand Your Grounds

to medium roast. But when you sponsor this or when you buy from us, Casper.com, you're supporting our physical location, which March 5th, oh boy, Tuesday, live event, Martinsburg, West Virginia. We will see you there sponsored by Good Ranchers dude uh Good Ranchers is you basically you you go to the website you pick

a box they send you a bunch of these farm fresh meats shout out they uh sent a sample meats and I had a burger and it was like it was a Wagyu burger and it was basically like the best burger I've ever had I mean granted I made it I put grilled onions on it, mayo and cheese, but it was an amazing burger. Casper.com helps support the show. Also become a member at TimCast.com to support our work. Smash that like button. Subscribe to this channel. Share the show with your friends. Joining us tonight to talk about this

and, I don't know, World War III is General Tony Tata. Great to be with you, Tim. Who are you and what do you do? Tony Tata is my name. I'm a retired Army Brigadier General, formerly performed the duties of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy under President Trump in his last year there. Businessman, Secretary of Transportation for North Carolina, Superintendent of Wake County Public Schools in Raleigh, North Carolina, former chief operating officer of DC Public Schools.

Wow. And I also write novels. And I've got my 16th novel coming out this week, Phalanx Code. And it's a story about, you know, think the worst instincts of Google and Facebook and their digital carnivores trying to crush the little guy and de-platform people like everybody sitting around this table and silence the voices. And you've got, you know, think on the other side, maybe X and Musk trying to defend the little guy. And our hero, Garrett Sinclair, gets pulled into trying to help defeat the Phalanx Corporation, which has all these assassin squads out there trying to kill people like this team right here

that are trying to speak truth to power. Man, busy guy. 16? 16. The book over my shoulder is number 16. Tell me in the book the guy falls to his knees and he's like, Free the code! Does he scream that?

I've been screaming that for like two years yeah so you know in the story the phalanx code is actually a kill list right of that the phalanx corporation has has encrypted of all the people in the optimist project think musk and x that are trying to do d phi and dy and all of that and trying to write the code to allow people to decentralize Wi-Fi, decentralize finance, and protect those people. And they're trying to break the phalanx code. Cool. So they can understand who's going to die next.

This is going to be fun. Thanks for hanging out. We got Phil Labonte. All that stuff is great. You know, they say that generals are, you know, once you get to the general officers, like they're doing it because they want to coast. But you just sound busy as hell. Anyways, I'm Phil Labonte. All that stuff is great. You know, they say that generals are, you know, once you get to the general officers, like they're doing it because they want to coast. But you just sound busy as hell.

Anyways, I'm Phil Labonte. I sing for the heavy metal band All That Remains. I'm an anti-communist and a counter-revolutionary. Ian. Oh, hello. Ian Crossland. Great to be here. We already did our intro, so let's keep moving.

Serge. Yeah, let's get to it. I'm Serge.com. We also have an obscene amount of leap year candy. Basically, it's just blue and yellow packaged candies. I've done it with Butterfingers, Starbursts. I'm it definitely sound like i'm chewing all just push the mic away don't eat candy i'm like all right here's here's the news no more joking this is wild fbi charging documents in steve baker january 6th case show he was working as a journalist let's start from the

beginning for anybody who doesn't know the context what we're looking at right now is the biden administration it would seem retaliating against a journalist for exposing inconsistencies in capitol police testimony let me give you the quick version steve baker is a reporter he's an investigative journalist he works for the blaze he was uh working as a journalist an independent journalist on january 6th i. I have personal friends of mine were there with him. He was there as a journalist. He was ignored by the feds and the Capitol Police. He was not considered a suspect for years until he started doing reporting on inconsistencies in statements made by certain individuals involved.

And I'm trying to be a little bit vague, but basically he's speaking out and exposing as a journalist, corruption in government. All of a sudden he gets a call. You're going to be charged. They play dirty games with them. And then finally ordered him to surrender today. He surrendered. They put him in cuffs. This is where it gets wild. Now I can tell you right here the the charging documents even show and i'll show you all that but i want to pull up a tweet here which um i don't know actually i don't here we go daniel horwitz says as you watch them arrest steve baker realize that last november jackson green a climate activist attacked the shaw 54th regiment memorial in the national gallery gallery of the art arts west. Yet he was out on

the streets undeterred to then paint bomb the exhibit of the sacred U.S. Constitution at the National Archives a few weeks ago. Two-tiered system doesn't begin to describe what is going on. Now take a look at this. In the charging documents, they actually say that he is walking around. I love this. From the exterior steps, he's walking around. I love this from the exterior steps. He's he's walking around narrating and recording FBI charging documents in the arrest of Blaze Media investigative journalist Steve Baker over his coverage of the January 6th protest and riot at the U.S. Capitol show that he was working as a journalist. Charging documents describe Baker working as a journalist while at the U.S. Capitol. The documents state that Baker had been video recording the event and providing commentary as to what had been occurring inside and outside the Capitol building.

In figure three on page four of the charging document, it states at approximately 119 p.m., Baker recorded his approach toward a double fence manned police line at the base of the West Plaza. Baker moved past a black damaged half fence onto steps leading up to the police positioned bicycle racks. In figure 10 on page eight, the FBI describes Baker as performing the actions of a journalist. This includes the federal agency referring to Baker as a narrator in a video that has been captured from both inside and outside the Capitol. In the video, Baker reports the events that had been occurring, specifically the police killing of conservative veteran Ashley Babbitt.

The U.S. Capitol Police Department's response to the riot and city officials announcing that a curfew had been set. Now let's just add one more layer to this. There are dozens of other journalists, some who were even with this guy as they were covering January 6th, who have not been charged, face no charges. In one instance, one individual doing the exact same thing in the exact same capacity didn't get charged and the speculation is when he reported this he called them insurrectionists and by doing so they said okay you're fine you're good but this guy's on the other side he's an opposition journalist he covers january 6th he says here's what's happening. They say, you're under arrest. You're an insurrectionist. My outrage is no longer with the the essentially opposition inside the

government to president trump and and anything he was trying to get done i am no longer outraged with the government i am now outraged that people are accepting this and not that there are not enough people standing up and saying this is going to literally ruin our country because if you can't if we if we cannot trust that our government can be trusted at least generally right like you know now if the government is dealing with a conservative you know they are not going to be dealt with fairly 100 there is no doubt in anyone's mind and if you do get treated fairly or get treated well it becomes something worthy of making a remark about oh wow you know they actually were nice to him oh wow look man kyle rittenhouse got off amazing no it should have been plainly obvious and he shouldn't

have even been in jail the the idea that the government does not target and attack conservatives, anyone that doesn't isn't politically correct. Essentially, like it is no longer acceptable to say, oh, we're angry with the government. It is now time to start looking at our fellow Americans and saying, why aren't you paying attention to this? Why aren't why are you allowing this? Why are you accepting this? But I think I think that's not this that's not true when we went over that story yesterday uh they did a poll and found 65 percent of 18 to 24 year olds believe that donald trump will shake up this country for the better you look at the presidential polls trump is winning it's an inversion from where we were

four years ago i think more and more people are actually paying attention and the hope everyone has is i think the far left extremists of this country are begging for someone to act a fool to act out to help them destabilize the country and i think the people who are paying attention are listening to shows like this or shows like you know listen to people like glenn greenwald stick sex enamor steven crowder and they know we have to muster up everything we can to win in november i which is and i want to stress this we're not i'm not gonna play a game and say november is an election november is the battlefield it is political it is it is political tactical warfare this means you have to register as many voters as possible. You have to get your

friends and family to vote. You have to, the RNC, which is failing, but people on the right who support Trump and or just any members, any member of Congress opposing the machine, we need to be in the lawfare game 100% filing every piece of paper. Now, the one thing that does have me worried is all of the court cases against Trump, and there's nothing in response. Yeah. So I certainly hope people are paying attention because we need the lawfare on our side right now to get ready for what happens in November. Yeah.

And this is not the time to like, maybe you're realizing what's going on is a little bit insane, no matter what political party you adhere to. You're like, talking to your friends about it is not enough time to like maybe you're realizing what's going on is a little bit insane no matter what political party you you adhere to you're like what talking to your friends about it is not enough right now you need to speak up publicly these are the things that make people get in the street and riot or you use your voice on the internet now we don't have to riot as much because we have internet video so we can complain and protest on the internet we'd have to form these dangerous mobs but you got to be loud publicly about this right now if you want to be one of the ones that spoke up yeah i don't i don't think this is complicated

at all the framers of the constitution did not trust the government they did they believe that the people we the people had the right to hold the government accountable and that's why they wrote the document particularly about the free press And right now, the press is not free if you're standing for freedom. There's a corporate press. They're not journalists. They're operatives. They're part of the influence operation that's going on right now. Baker and others, they're journalists actually trying to do what the framers of the Constitution intended for journalists to do, to hold accountable these governments, our government, the federal government, because corruption is rampant.

And right now, we've got the most corrupt federal government we've ever seen in our lifetime. So you served in the Trump administration. I did. How long were you in the trump administration i did you all how long were you uh uh in the army 28 years it's a long time to serve your country and now to have said what you just said a corrupt federal government i i can't i don't even know what the right question is how does that feel like what's your what's your frame of mind so uh yeah how i feel you know i try to capture it in some of the you know this book i book behind me is in first person.

And the big dilemma that I see for how I feel and what I capture with Garrett Sinclair and the Phalanx Code is that is everything that I have done that Garrett Sinclair fictionally has done losing people in combat, is it worth it? Was it worth it? Was it worth it? And, you know, after the Afghanistan folly that went, you know, when everybody was on vacation, you know, three Augusts ago, and, you know, all of that unraveled so quickly. I had soldiers calling me that had served with me, crying, saying, sir, was this all in vain? They broke a generation. This administration broke a generation of soldiers, 20 years of soldiers, rotating in and out of Afghanistan, believing that they're doing the duty that was asked of them to preserve and protect our nation and this administration this secretary of defense

this president abandoned those veterans by not holding anybody accountable for what transpired and they fundamentally broke nato which i know we'll talk about in a little while yeah can you explain that you were talking about that before the show the breaking of nato yeah so i mean when i was the undersecretary performing those duties, I always talked to my, you know, Brit, French, you know, other NATO counterparts that we had come in together to NATO or into Afghanistan as NATO. We adjusted together, and we were going to leave together whenever that was. And this administration, they just left. They did no coordination. They left 29 other partner nations, allied nations, to fend for themselves.

And, you know, Afghanistan is a big country with very poor infrastructure, and the Taliban was sweeping across. I know for a fact there was a lot of anger throughout many, many NATO nations. And soo was fundamentally broken coming out of afghanistan and so why do you think biden and blinken etc did nothing as russia started moving to the border of ukraine and through belarus what unifies any entity the best? And that's a common threat. And so in the wake of breaking NATO, they saw an opportunity,

political craving opportunity, to do nothing. There was no engagement. There was no conversation. You know, Russia just moved to the border. There was no, you know, summit, moved to the border there was no you know summit try to intervene or stop it because it brought nato together with a common enemy and then think about what happened at the very beginning of that war biden and blinken offers Zelensky a ride out because their intelligence was so bad, as bad as it was in Afghanistan. And Zelensky said, I don't need a ride out.

I need ammo, man. And so think about that headline, though, if that had been Trump. It would have been Trump offers to Putin to de the ukrainian government on the eve of invasion instead these information operatives in the in the corporate media just let it go let me let me pull up this story so we can get into the foreign policy stuff we have this from express.co.uk nato warned that giving into vladimir Vladimir Putin could spark nuclear World War III conflict. I love this because what we are being given by the press right now is no option. If we give in to Putin, it's nuclear war.

And if we win in Ukraine, it's nuclear war. So what are any of us supposed to be thinking right now? It seems like, okay, I guess World War III is an inevitability? Well, you know, the information operation going on right now is to get the Congress, to get the United States to support war in Ukraine, perhaps even boots on the ground. But why? to support war in Ukraine, perhaps even boots on the ground. But why? Because there's this narrative out there that you gotta stop Putin,

and the left has been successful in saying, "'Putin is Trump, Trump is Putin.'" And so the more they can keep that alive, the more they can beat it over the head and shoulders of the American people for the next nine months. And so that's what they're trying to tee up here. It's a craven political domestic move. It's got nothing to do with Ukraine. It's got nothing to do with Russia.

I'd say Biden is Putin right now. Oh, yeah, totally. Having multiple journalists arrested. But I don't know if you can provide deeper insights, perhaps. Why? Why are we so why is NATO in the West so hell bent on taking Ukraine? say what's our vital interest in ukraine well the vital interest is sort of secondary because it's the integrity of nato that is the real u.s vital interest in western europe so ukraine is somewhat threatening that so let's let's make sure that we maintain the integrity of nato that doesn't mean go to war in Ukraine. That means doing all the diplomatic stuff you got to do, economic stuff you got to do.

Yeah, maybe provide some military stuff. But you work it around the fringes, and you let that play out. And you can't have a conversation today like, where's the diplomacy? I was on some TV show and the anchor snapped back at me when I said, hey, we got to sit down. We got to hammer out a deal. We got to do like we did in the Balkans with Clinton and Wes Clark and draw a line in the sand here and bring in peacekeepers and all of that. And, you know, he snapped back at me and said oh so you just want to give putin everything i'm like well why why was there not this cacophony of bs when uh obama let uh russia have crimea was that the more flexibility after the election comment right

and so what what's what's the issue now that it's, you know, potential, and it's all about Trump is Putin, Putin is Trump. That's the lie that they got to keep going because they're running on fumes into this election year. The squandering of resources, the potential brinksmanship that's going on here is all based in domestic politics. Like, look at, let's shift over to Hamas and Israel. I mean, what's Biden doing in Michigan? Right? He's trying to win the Muslim vote. And he's trying to get Netanyahu not to get his hostages back. He's trying to...

They're American. This is something that people forget or ignore or whatever. There are still Americans over there, too. Yeah, yeah. There are Americans that are still being held hostage. So anyone that says, oh, you know, ceasefire now, you're literally saying ceasefire and bargain with the terrorists that currently hold americans hostage that like this is insane yeah so we gave six billion for six hostages and now there are more americans held hostage by iran proxies than before the six billion unreal

unreal my attitude is america first i don't i don't but you know I don't care about what Israel does or wants to do I don't care about Gaza everyone's saying oh it's genocide or whatever you had that airman who lit himself on fire and I'm like we're the United States let's secure our border let's bring back jobs let's help the people of this country who are working hard

every day and wondering why they can't pay their bills and if there are Americans being held hostage we rescue them right i like the american first uh mentality but with the caveat of at what cost because if it's going to be like we're going to level everything around us to death to dust in order to be put ourselves that's not the way to go that's so extreme exactly no but to even present the idea is so extreme it's to be unrealistic like no american we're not going to be like let's just nuke everybody that's not america because we're america like that's ridiculous that's that's i would hope i would hope that we wouldn't invade we got the nukes we got to use them do they have an expiration date damn it we better not waste them

that's a joke it's a joke calm down so some guy in the military is like this nuke's gonna go bad in a month we gotta fire off i know that they put expiration dates on body armor so that way they buy new body armor because that stuff doesn't go bad unless you leave it in the sun my thoughts with putin and the war in the ukraine what i've been trying to figure out is why firstly they took crimea i think what they're trying to do is take those freeways east 97 and 105 to go down into crimea and have established like a land bridge east of the uh they did so then putin goes on this tucker carlson interview and he's like russia ukraine is part of russia from ancient times and i don't know if he said it needs to be reunified but he's indicating like a greater

reunification war which is more like hitler tucker i never thought that that was the case i thought it was pure economics they want that seaport. Tucker said in the intro to the interview that he believes Putin is expressing historic claim to Ukraine as a territory. So if that's the case, okay. But if he just wants Sevastopol, that means that they're going to end up wanting Turkey or alliances with Turkey. Because they got to get through the Bosphorus. An alliance with Turkey, maybe. Yeah, an alliance. They need to get with Turkey on good terms.

Turkey's in NATO. So what is the plan then to take over turkey what is what do you think his plan is have you derived a mission yeah so i you know what i think um putin's plan is everything east of the neeper river um he he believes that he he can he can secure um he's not there yet that's like the right third of the map of ukraine in the center right or in the more to the left to the to the uh western side yeah well the nipper uh comes so you know it's like a football it's about a third of the way from the the eastern boundary from crimea um and so you know it's about a mile wide it's it's you know you're saying everything east that's that's like half the country yeah roughly one-third yeah so and i think that was his original goal and i think right now what he wants is the coal the oil the natural gas the

mario pool the you know the port and to pull all that together with Crimea and have a little operating base where he's got natural resources. And I think that's what he ultimately wants. I got to tell you, I've been like all throughout so many different countries, the Balkans, all these different countries that have had the Ottomans, the Turks, the Persians, the Roman empires crisscrossing. There's a lot of territorial claims out there. I was in Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, and everybody I would talk to would say, okay, well, in 1582, this was my land, and now it's not. And so I don't know who we are to impose on this being sorted out. I know that from a NATO perspective, we have an obligation to NATO nations because we're part of a collective security arrangement.

And to the extent that we have that obligation, we should do what we can to ensure the integrity of NATO. And that ought to be a collective decision. I think bringing in Finland and Sweden, all of a sudden, we took that on. And if Russia pokes into one of those those countries all of a sudden were were article fives activated right and so there wasn't a whole lot of deliberation it was just okay we're expanding nato which in and of its own right it's not a bad thing but when you have a belligerent russia you gotta you gotta work your way through all this so i i i think that you know ultimately look at nato do what we got to do where's the diplomacy that's my big question you got diplomacy

military economic we got to bring diplomacy in here blinken is the most incompetent secretary i was just gonna say it's like we've got blinking and you've got actually president biden himself like who can do it because the the president is not like the commander-in-chief that's out there making the decisions now i do believe that he's making some decisions because i think he made the decision to do the um do that that presser at night when he botched it after the uh what news was that came out oh the uh the the doctor gave the uh the came back and said that he he or no the the press release about his biography or whatever anyways if blinken is as incompetent as he seems and the president isn't even cognizant like who who's running the show like who do you think

is actually doing it because lloyd austin isn't there either so like who the fuck is in washington dc running the country and if there's no one why can't we just fucking close the whole place right right right yeah well i mean i think we all know the answer that's susan right susan rice is in control at the moment and it's early too it's only 8 30 so if diplomacy i like this idea because if if for some reason like the soviet union got split up by a bunch of oligarchs in 89 they gave that area of sevastopol to ukraine on purpose because they wanted to defeat russian hegemony in the region they didn't want russia to be so powerful have the mediterranean as well so they did that on purpose now if that happened in

the united states and we were broken up by some oligarchs and they gave the entire West Coast a strip all the way down the West Coast to Canada and we had no Pacific access, we would have invaded decades ago to get that land back. So that's what Putin's doing. He wants the access to the ocean, to the sea. But what that's going to do is cause

Turkey, it's going to force Turkey and Russia to come together. So maybe that's why the U.S., why this alliance is so against giving them that Black Sea access. So Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are going to cede California. Is that what you're saying? And that we're going to invade? Yeah, just a thin strip, all the coastline so that we can't get in the Pacific. Can I still go surfing? That's my only question.

As long as you're friends with the oligarchs, I guess. This is the pitch for the separation of California breaking into two states, is the coastal regions become a state. You know, a lot of people initially were saying it would be like the north and the south of California would become North California, South California. No, no, the actual argument right now is the coastline is its own state. Congratulations, you get what you want. And then the eastern farmland becomes its own state. And the only problem with that is those cities would all starve to death.

Right. I mean, not if they became their own state. They would just not have a good time of producing resources and generating. They got a bunch of income with Silicon Valley and with the entertainment industry. So, though, but I, like, I wouldn't have, I was talking to my buddy about the, um, homeless problem in, in California.

I'm like, look, California has plenty of money to handle a home homeless problem. California has plenty of authority to pass all the laws they want. California can handle it. If California wants to take care of their problem, they can take care of it. Who am I to say anything about it? Whatever. Um, but you know back to the the situation with nato and stuff like the point of nato isn't to say don't get close to nato or we'll start a

fight it's to say don't invade nato countries so like the idea that we have to engage russia because they invaded a country that borders a nato country i mean like is is that even i mean obviously that's something we can't do but i mean we have to we i just don't understand what the thought process is we're trying to pick fights when nato's there for a reason it's a great question in the in the military you have a thing called an area of operations and you have what's called an area of interest ukraine would be in the area of interest. And I hope it stays there and it doesn't become in the area of operations. So it's an area where you collect intelligence, you figure out what's going on, you try to

determine second and third order impacts, and you do what you can to preserve and protect your area of operations and position to make sure nothing impacts your area of operations. And that's what I have consistently advocated for in this conflict. I don't want one American boot on the ground in Ukraine. I don't want one son or daughter, mother, father, et cetera, to be killed in Ukraine for any reason whatsoever. Right now, it does not fall within the legitimate, vital U.S. interests that are codified in the national defense strategy. It's just not there. Like giving up all those resources is that's that's okay like national defense wise it it's it's okay to lose that well i what are we losing that right exactly because technically ukraine's

not an american puppet state technically right but realistically with barisma i mean they've been running they've been working together with the body i mean well i mean what we've shut down and uh limited restricted energy production in this country so we could buy it from Venezuela, Iran, and Russia. So, you know, the America First policy is to expand energy production so we don't have to have people in the Middle East. And we can begin to look more inward and fix our domestic policies. And I fully support that. And the insanity of shutting down energy production in the United States, going from net exporter to net importer, importer from rival nations like Venezuela, Iran, and Russia, it's just upside down. It's insane.

And the media does nothing to expose it. It's really counterproductive, and it's a national security issue. And I'll just give, for the normies that play video games, if you're playing a game, Civilization, and you're importing all your oil, you have battleships, cruisers, submarines, bomber planes. You're importing your oil from countries that then declare war on you. Your equipment stops working. That's all of it this is fantastic i really do think civilization should be required teaching in schools i'm not kidding you get some you know 13 year old boys and you say play civilization and they're like school's awesome but what are they going to learn they're dildos in civilization no that's what they're going to learn instead of civilization

i'm saying if you give them civilization okay that's the point yeah what are they going to learn they're going to learn that so you start the game off as a nomadic tribe you build your cities you expand your borders but you don't know where the oil is you don't know where the nuclear uh the uranium is because your civilization has not discovered it what happens when the game advances to a certain point and your scientists discover uranium you find you have none the guys next door do and they're building nuclear weapons so what do you do the game gets wild you you like either they're gonna bomb you or you're gonna invade them and i think you learn a lot when i was a kid i had civilization too and i learned a whole lot getting pissed off playing being like why are

they invading me and they didn't even have the same kind of resource development as the modern one does but it's like because you have access to things they want like your country could be cutting them off from water access and they're going to stampede through to take what they want for their people did you when you were serving as a general or i don't know what your career um promotion rate was. Track record. Track record. Were you full on like what we're doing in the Middle East is good in the early days?

Did it feel good after 9-11? Or did it seem like it was more conquistador? Yeah, so I'll tell you. I was commanding in the 101st Airborne. I had my troops in Kosovo doing that sort of low-intensity conflict mission. We were fighting. And 9-11 happened while I was over there. And the commander of the 101st Airborne says, okay, you're coming back in November, and you're going to do some quick training.

You're going to go to Afghanistan. And so we were in that quick training, and he comes down, and it was January of 2002, and I was in Louisiana about to wrap up training, and we were supposed to go to Afghanistan. He says, you're not going to Afghanistan. You're going to Iraq. I'm like, what's in Iraq? There's nothing in Iraq.

It makes no sense. He says, that's what we're doing. And so I i actually being a writer i went home and i wrote a couple of pages just to sort of get it on paper and and and and the essence of it was it just makes no sense the one time our country asked for a hit on a platter with osama bin laden and we're going to squander the goodwill of the people uh that that want that um that vengeance for lack of a better term and and just you know they they want that they they want osama bin laden's head on a platter and we don't and we take that goodwill and we direct it at Saddam Hussein. I felt like Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, they were dead set on doing that.

And I think it was the wrong thing to do. It forever changed Middle East policy, U.S. policy in the Middle East, and set us on a path that today we're still dealing with. Put us for 20 years in Afghanistan, killed thousands of soldiers, maimed thousands of soldiers. And I'm not, I was never happy with that. But I saluted and moved out, and I did my military duty. But I've got that document today. And I just, you know, I went home and I vented because we were supposed to go and serve justice to Osama bin Laden. And instead, we used all that goodwill of the American people to go to Iraq. Where do you think we're heading? I mean, there's big talk of World War III.

It's been nonstop for the past year. Well, I think with this group, with Biden and Austin and Blinken in charge, I think there's a real potential that things could get even more out of hand. I talked about the Afghanistan intelligence miss, the Ukraine intelligence miss, the um ukraine intelligence mess the the um uh hamas intelligence mess what's the one thing that you know hasn't manifested yet and that's our border um that's a huge intelligence mess right as bad as these people are with afghanistan what thinking that you know offering zelensky right out the exact opposite instinct on uh ukraine that, you know, offering Zelensky a ride out, the exact opposite instinct on Ukraine. You know, we have agreements with Israel, and we miss that as much as they miss that. And so the border, what don't we know right now?

Because that's just been wider. Millions of people coming in and and you got this president going to going taking texas to court to try to stop them from stopping people from coming in yeah and and so what how is that going to manifest where is it going to manifest that's the one thing that really worries me and then then you've kind of got sleeping over in the pacific china taiwan and i'm not sure what's gonna how that's gonna manifest itself i think china's a pretty crafty player they may try to do more of a soft takeover like they did with hong kong as opposed to you know nuke it because what happens if we lose taiwan semiconductor that makes a good chunk of the

world's semiconductors do you so there's there's one thing that we've kind of like haven't really touched on but it seems to be a recurring theme is what's going on at cia like why did cia why does cia not know about ukraine why do they get left flat-footed on ukraine why do they get left flat-footed with the attack in israel and does it have anything to do with things like dei which everybody's terrified that it does have something to do with that first of all and second of all does it is is it also is it something that you believe a new administration could change or is it something that because of the way that dei works it gets into your human resources departments is it something that you need to really clean out the entire bureaucracy to fix?

You know, there's a lot of stuff. Yeah, yeah. No, I think Vivek Ramaswamy makes a lot of sense when he talks about getting rid of one of every three people or whatever. And I think there's a lot of merit to that. I think you've got to come in and be ruthless about your federal government, your bureaucracies, because they are bloated. They are, you know, serving their self-licking ice cream cones where they serve themselves, essentially. You know, with regard to DEI and all that, of course, that's impacting performance everywhere where we're, you know, where we're

focused on how people feel as opposed to the raw uh facts about okay what's our national interest how we're going to get it done let's get it done work all night until you got it done and because the thing is if we're going to hate cia let's hate cia because they're doing things that help america as opposed to things that hate that hurt america yeah let me let me play this clip This is from 2021. I hope I have the right one. I'm going to play it anyway. I used to struggle with imposter syndrome, but at 36, I refused to internalize misguided patriarchal ideas of what a woman can or should be.

I am tired of feeling like I'm supposed to apologize for the space I occupy rather than intoxicate people with my effort, my brilliance. I am proud of me, full stop. My parents left everything they knew and loved to expose me to opportunities they never had. Because of them, I stand here today a proud first-generation Latina and officer at CIA. So this is just one of these woke commercials where she was at.

This is 2021. You got to fight the patriarchy. The patriarchy has convinced her that she can't do it. But did Russia go into Ukraine? 22. 22. Yeah, was it February?

Yeah, and then there was the thing in October. Yeah, that worked out real good. Real good. Yeah, and it's either incompetence or intentionally... It's intentional. Like they're just like, just let them attack so we'll have a reason to build up our military to fight back.

Well, I mean, why? There's more. Can I play more for you guys? Yeah, absolutely. There's more here. When I was 17, I quoted Zora Neale Hurston's How It Feels to Be Colored Me in my college application essay. The line that spoke to me stated simply, I am not tragically colored. There is no sorrow dammed up in my soul nor lurking behind my eyes. I do not mind at all. At 17, I had no idea what life would bring, but Zora's

sentiment articulated so beautifully how I felt as a daughter of immigrants then and now. Nothing about me was or is tragic. I am perfectly made. I can wax eloquent on complex legal issues in English while also belting guayaquil de mis amores in Spanish. I can change a diaper with one hand and console a crying toddler with the other i'm a woman of color i am a mom i am a cisgender millennial who's been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder i am intersectional but my existence is not a box checking exercise i am a walking declaration sounds like it is a woman whose inflection does not rise. Okay, we get it. The CIA is woke.

This is what, this is their recruitment videos. This is why they're, they're getting the rug pulled out from under them on all these things. They are moronic. And the scary thing is their interest,

the interest of woke people are absolutely in misalignment with this country. And anyway, you cut it. So why is the border completely open in the country being ripped to shreds and gen z struggling to pay their bills because of woke cia the you're 100 right i was talking about this on pcc a little bit today the that's pop culture crisis yes pop culture crisis on every day at three on the youtubes popCultureCrisis.com So, right now, we're starting to see

the crisis of competence in a lot of places. So, I think that we all think that, you know, this is part of the reasons that CIA has problems. It initially started in the entertainment industry. You saw it where people were complaining about video games being uncreative, unoriginal, complaining about the way the characters were drawn and then they responded and you start having these these big games come out that aren't done

when they get released and they have to be updated and blah blah blah people are unhappy with them same thing is happening with the with the movie industry keep putting out re remakes that aren't as good degrading quality and stuff like that it's because of the fact that you end up with people that are unqualified to do jobs getting hired to do jobs because their friends end up in the human resources department of this now this is happening in at this is obviously happening in the military it's happening at cia it's currently there was there is uh i saw the the stuff coming out about the plagiarism at harvard that is directly connected to the dei stuff the the there is a a problem at

stanford university the medical university in california i believe uh ben shapiro was talking about it there's there's problems with kids not knowing the courses or the the the basics and and stuff that they need to know in high school all of this stuff comes back to the fact that we are taking a portion of time that people are supposed to be given to one particular discipline right whether it be uh flying airplanes air traffic controllers or see you know intelligence or whatever it is that discipline is now being the time that's supposed to be dedicated to that discipline is now being eaten up by dei and and by by critical theories and social justice stuff and those kinds of programs do not get smaller they only eat more and more and more of your time and funding and that means your your intended

discipline or whatever continues to fail and have more and more problems and that's this is exactly the reason that socialist countries fail their economies fail because they are not productive because they end up eating up the time trying to make sure that everybody is a good communist or a good socialist this is this this has happened multiple times in history. You've got all kinds of examples of it. Yeah, what's Canada's calling, or was it the Toronto Star or whatever the paper was, calling for food price regulation? Yeah. We know where that goes.

There was someone talking about that. What's her name in New York? The New York AG was talking about the climate crisis and beef and stuff like that. Oh, she's going after a beef manufacturer because beef is bad for the environment. Listen, if you let the government get in total control

of food production, millions of people will die. That happens every single time the government gets in control of food production. There has been famines every single time in history. But I gotta tell you, there has been famines every single time in history. But I got to tell you, there's a lot that has been going on in this country that people won't fight for. But if you take away a man's cheeseburger, I really think you might be asking for trouble on that one. Because, I mean, if I went to a restaurant and I said I would like a medium rareburger. And they said, is an impossible burger good?

I would say, no, no, it's not. You guys are talking about like what you're just talking about feels kind of like incompetence at the CIA, which could be leading to like inability to collect data and intelligence. I'm concerned with the more nefarious like, you know, the easiest thing to do would be let's let them just attack a little part of our country a few thousand people are going to die and that'll give our entire nation cass's belly to declare war and focus the force of our gdp on anything we want and make so much money and god bless those 3 000 sacrifices and i i don't know if that's what's going i'm concerned that that's where this country's been in the last decade 20 23 years i get that vibe-11. I don't like that they had to stand down that morning and immediately went into Iraq, Afghanistan, and sold all that metal off to China in three weeks,

immediately all that evidence. And then now we're seeing seven hours in Israel. They're just tearing up. Hamas is tearing them up for six, seven hours with no response. I think the DEI stuff is way more dangerous because it gives them justification. They're using it to get justification to,

you know, essentially to get into every aspect of your life. If they're going to use the climate and, and climate justice is what they're going to call it. They're going to call it climate justice. It's going to be connected to all of the left, left-leaning stuff. And there's more than that.

It's going to be connected to all the left-leaning stuff. If they're going to use that, that's way more of a threat than, than a false flag. It's like, it's like a the left-leaning stuff. If they're going to use that, that's way more of a threat than a false flag attack. It's like more of a chronic threat, that behavior. But the acute threat would be the false flag that gets everyone in a moment to sign on the dotted line to go send the – DEI, critical race theory, Green New Deal, all of this, it's just Marxism. And it's led to this recruiting crisis that we face today because you know

having run large school systems and you know parents vote with their feet kids you know teenagers vote with their feet they if they love what you're doing they're going to come they're going to be in your school if not they're going to go to charter or private or whatever same thing with the military if if the military you know unifies offers a positive message and and is focused on a good mission you're you're going to get oversubscribed if what it is is divisive um you know here swallow this ideology go get six shots then it's going to do um the exact opposite what are the you know we saw this courage to serve act they want to give these illegal uh these criminal aliens coming across the border citizenship by joining the armed forces do you do you see was there ever talk of that do you see that as a possibility yeah there'd have to

be significant vetting i i know that there are some um well you say there'd Was there ever talk of that? Do you see that as a possibility? Yeah, there'd have to be significant vetting. I know that there are some. Well, you say there'd have to be, but of course there would not be. Right, right. Well, you mean if it was going to be good? No, we're not talking about that. Yeah, well, I mean, to make the mission, you know, they'll do whatever but um i i do know that uh in my commands i've i've had you know these uh they call them dreamers and that kind of thing that come in and they serve and you know many of them are very good they got to be mentally fit physically fit and they and they do get their citizenship that way but they've been there for a while they've got the proper documentation and

and they and they meet the requirements um uh you know the wholesale you know these are all military age males so you know um keep keep your friends close your enemies closer you know but um i i i think that uh with this i think they're going to send them all to Ukraine. I mean, I don't know how likely that is, but it really is a problem that solves itself. You get millions of fighting-age males crossing the border at a time when you're like, we've got military deficit, we need troops in Ukraine. Here's what they can do.

Load up all of the fighting-age males, make promises to them, drop them off in Poland and say, oh, geez, they're not Americans. But think about this. If these illegal immigrants end up fighting in Ukraine, the U.S. just says they're not Americans. There's nothing to do with that.

I mean... We're not fighting there. And it's not NATO either. These are Guatemalans. Send men with all-American gear, just no American flags. Tim, you're advocating Guatemala invading Ukraine. I mean, look, we have quote-unquote volunteers, Americans

volunteering to fight in Ukraine. It's like, come on. As if Russia is going like, drat, these American veterans who are being paid to fight in Ukraine, if only they were actually on paper American soldiers so that we could declare war. No, Russia knows exactly what's going on. So I want to excite people to apply for the military and i'm thinking like what are some good

ideas is one is like super soldier program you want to get like bionic implants you want to get crisper technology you want to run you know three minute miles breathe every 20 minutes see 7 000 there are laws against that stuff yeah the chinese are doing it so we need to counter that and be public about it to increase um increase uh i i i i hear what you're saying the only problem is if the current military was to offer some kind of crisper technology or like gene editing super soldier program it would be like to make your skin darker or something like that yeah it would be simple do you regret being white because of your privilege we can change that i think taking less breath needing like less oxygen seeing further having better hearing they're not going to do that though and they're also going to

make you dumber yeah like it also like if this stuff was possible i mean i understand that it's it's still you know something that they're thinking of but like if it was possible to like fix someone's eyesight or give someone better eyesight think of how much money like you could make by just making that available to the public because i had some laser beams shot in my eyes to fix my my vision if i could get my vision fixed without that or if i could have i would prefer to not have gotten laser beam shot yeah i can see why they would want the tech to be secret well the thing the thing is if they had that kind of tech like crisper tech and stuff i not that it's not coming i just don't think that it's here now and i think that you're talking about stuff that's still a couple decades yeah be part be part of the prototype be the prototype

that would be the message you know and just shows the super soldier but either that or like just global peacekeeping missions where we go around building wells and like solar powered water condensation for countries that don't need it necessarily that don't ask for it but we're there to help anyway like use the military to create goodwill we already do a lot of that i mean what i what i would say even in afghanistan and you know 80 percent of combat is building wells building schools diplomatic relations the young private the young sergeant young lieutenant out there acting as an ambassador for the country, and they do a fantastic job at that. And so when we are deployed en masse in scale, you know, that's the big effort is to build infrastructure because part of the exit

strategy is to leave it better than we found it, let this entity, you know, stand up on its own and and execute and and so um that's that's the goal but when you have a a folly like iraq in my opinion um you know you're gonna now it's shia muslim and there's a land bridge into um is, you know, it used to be the Persians and the Arabs were fighting right at that border there. And what we did through, you know, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld and Cheney's idiocy is eliminate that. We eliminated the major hedge against the Persian hegemony on the Arabian Peninsula. And now what we have is Hezbollah, Hamas, Shia militia groups in Syria, Iraq, and the Houthi rebels. Hezbollah's Persians?

No. No, okay. They're supported by Iran. Okay, the Shia. Yeah, they're all Shia Muslims. Okay. And that was what... Go ahead.

When we debased the Ba'ath Party in Iraq is basically when they all just went and created a paramilitary Shia organization, and that's what we have now is ISIS? Yeah. Well, ISIS, Sunni is ISIS. ISIS is Sunni. And ostensibly, that's why we still have some troops over in Syria and Iraq, up in the Kurdistan area and so forth, to defeat that. But the major point here is that this destabilization going on in the Middle East is fueled by Iran in Lebanon and Gaza and Syria, Iraq and Yemen. I mean, they're disrupting supply chain through the Red Sea, where Maersk, the biggest shipping

company in the world, saying, I'm not moving through there. So Trump was planning on, he's had a timeline for withdrawal out of Afghanistan. You think that, do you believe there was a way to do that properly? What's your vision for how we could have worked this? Well, I was there. I was part of that. And around Christmas time, we said, look, we got 29 other partners there.

Let's go to 2,500 people. The plan is to go to bogram and then we can collapse from there um i was even advocating for bringing in the 82nd airborne to the three major areas allow for nato partners to move in and then you collapse and you collapse everything up at bogram and you either hold bogram and cut a deal with the devil there so you got some real estate it's a major platform we put in hundreds of millions of dollars there or you get out of dodge but if we would have kept air power there we could have prevented this um taliban overrunning instantly instantly oh yeah you know i i mean i my helicopter shot up in the coringal valley the one thing a general can do in a in a captain's

base camp i got on the radio and i said we're in a dog fight right now in five minutes i had a b2 bomber two a10s and two apache helicopters and you know that captain said sir you can fight with me anytime but that's the most immediate delivery of ordinance ever the general is called and said get a fast mover in the air they're up there real quick but but my point is like as you know, these Taliban convoys going around the country could have easily been stopped in their tracks to support the army that we had trained. Why did they abandon Bagram in the middle of the night? Because, you know, everybody in this administration was on vacation and they're incompetent. And they, you know, even.

It sounds intentional. I mean, I don't know how you accidentally do that. Yeah. I just think they, you know, everybody was. So part of the drill was Austin purged every board. So there's lots of boards in the Pentagon. There's a defense policy board. There's an acquisition board.

There's a defense policy board there's a acquisition board there's technology board and you know like on the policy board was madeline albright henry kissinger and a bunch of other names and tony tata was added by president trump i'm sorry he purged all of those um because and and what what did that do it ensured there was no overlap because they didn't value the hard work that all of us had been doing. And they assumed arrogantly that they knew everything and they knew better. And so all these plans that we had worked on were just gone. To the point, I had been in Riyadh January 6th. That's where I was with the ambassador and met and meeting with Khaled bin Salman.

We signed a major defense cooperation plan with the Saudis. It was very important. When I, about a month after I had left the administration or, you know, the administration had changed, I get a call from the defense attache. And they said, hey, do you have a copy of that? I'm like, I didn't take any documents with me. You know, it's like it wasn't classified, but it was sensitive. What do I look like, a politician? Right, exactly.

And they said, well, nobody in your old office can find it. And so what they had to do to recreate the document was take the Saudi version in Arabic and translate it. And then they had to put it back together and reconstruct it. That's how damaging this arrogance of this administration coming in the way they did. And it's been nothing but chaos. And it's essentially, it's just motivated by we're just going to do everything that Trump wouldn't. Yeah, it was the exact opposite. And so all of the things we're talking about here, like even Austin testifying about his absence, right? I mean, I worked directly for Austin twice. I was a deputy commanding general when he was a commanding general of 10th Mountain. I was an airborne battalion commander for him when he was airborne brigade commander.

And so I know him pretty well. He knows very well that you got to let the boss know you're not going to be at work, right? I mean, it's not, you know know but when i went on that trip to six different nations as the undersecretary i had to sign a piece of paper saying i was going to be away and i was appointing this guy to be my deputy or my deputy was going to take my duties the deputy had to sign it and it was witnessed by a third person the processes are in place and so as he was testifying yesterday listening to him say well we've now put in you know there were processes in place and it's not like you know the career civil servants there

do a pretty good job like i had a a woman that ran the undersecretary's office she'd been there for 30 years she knew everything she and she was is awesome she made sure i signed all that paperwork and she filed it and it's a notification a big email goes out this was all cloak and dagger they didn't want anybody to. They didn't want it to get out. And why these people, you know, the chief, the deputy, the secretary, why they still have jobs, I have no idea. Is this when he went to get surgery? Mm-hmm. And they just didn't tell anyone because they didn't want to? Yeah, yeah.

He was in the hospital under anesthesia. Nobody was in charge. And he said at no time was there lapsing coverage. I think he's pushing that perjury line wow i kind of feel like you know we were having conversation this morning about the roman empire and everyone's like are we are we in a similar time and you know i think you ian were saying was 1913 it was the federal reserve the republic republic's been gone for a long time well i don't know about all that but i can tell you is right now since the biden administration began the like something has gone missing from this country and you know a lot of people uh

have speculated that someone someone else is in charge of joe biden and i've made the argument no no i think it's joe biden you know maybe it's 50 50 but i imagine it like joe biden mutters some gibberish and then the people in the room look at each other like whatever you say and then do nothing. And then that's why it's chaos. Well, there's no accountability. And when you have no accountability, then anything can go. But think about this unelected bureaucrat, 30-year-old, whatever he was, that was calling Twitter and saying, hey, we don't like these people. Let's de-platform them.

And Twitter says, you know, oh, okay. Yeah, sure. And, and then, okay, let's roll the FBI in on that too. And to make sure that, you know, we de-platform these other people. It's that kind of thing. You get, you get these people in the White House and they think that they're elected, that they have the power and they just start doing stuff and and if there's no accountability particularly from the media it's it's out of control and so i you know i think biden is particularly incompetent

uh and i think he's corrupt and i think he's first and foremost how does he maintain power how does he aggrandize himself financially um how does he help his family and friends and political party then way down the list is how do i how do i uh help america and the citizens uh he he you know from my point of view every decision he makes kind of follows that that uh hierarchy do you think uh the uh accountability should come from biden it should come from the president himself i think it should come from the press and and i i think that then they should make decisions uh based from congress should hold people accountable the system ought to work as the framers designed it and yeah i think the president should say, you know what? It's unacceptable not to tell me you're going to be gone for a week.

You're out of here. I think it should be. I think the president should say to Frank McKenzie of the CENTCOM commander or to to Lloyd Austin or, you know, whomever, you know, it's unacceptable what happened in Afghanistan. You're out of here. You know know the one thing i love about the navy if the captain runs the ship into a coral reef he's fired the next day they put somebody else in charge now we got uh what was it that space force video saying respect my pronouns oh boy do you see that one no i think it was space force oh god yeah i'm kind of just like

you know our board our southern border is non-existent you've got looming international conflict world war three maybe and our military is very concerned with uh pronouns and not confidence well well i mean in that video that she ties pronouns to combat readiness god that's and and that's the insulting part and how you become combat ready is real simple you train train train and you have very tough training and you eviscerate people when in this training they make mistakes so that they learn and they don't make that mistake when they're in the real game so let's we uh we have this video i think this is the video let's play it oh god libs of tiktok tweeting lieutenant colonel brie fram a trans u.s space force official spoke to the u.s air force about inclusion and demanded everyone to

respect lgbtq people and their pronouns too often, I hear leaders talk about providing everyone with dignity and respect like it's an aspirational goal. That's not good enough. Dignity and respect is the bare minimum. Wrong. Respect is earned, not given. It's the floor of where we can be. We must set our sights higher and focus on intentional inclusivity because there are still far too many people out there,

not just LGBTQ individuals, that feel marginalized, shut out, or discriminated against. So for all of you out there, I ask you to set out your symbols of pride, share your pronouns in your email, particularly if you to set out your symbols of pride, share your pronouns in your email, particularly if you're a person who doesn't think they need to, initiate difficult conversations about racial and gender barriers, and share a bit of your vulnerability in a way that draws others in. This is insane. You all have the power to take intentionally inclusive actions

to ensure the multiple perspectives that we know make us stronger as we devise winning warfighting strategies get heard. Okay, so my assumption is that China or Russia or Iran or whatever is poisoning our water supply, hacking our internet, uh, sowing mis and disinformation all across the internet to indoctrinate people into strange ideologies, which inhibit their ability to win wars. So I think it's corporations doing it and they're just doing it for profit. And the by-product is endocrine disruption.

I, I want to ask your opinion about like, so the military used to have a standard for mental health, right? And now they've clearly stopped paying attention, not just because of the trans people. And that's not what I'm getting at. Just last week, a man immolated himself in front of, you know, in Washington, D.C. How is it that that is getting by people in the military? How is it that someone that is not only clearly mentally ill, if he caught himself on fire, the guy was so brainwashed by the leftist dogma that they're allowing in.

Obviously, he if he had a the kid had a Reddit profile and you can go down the list of anarcho-communist gripes whether it be pro whether it be profit or property or uh environmentalism literally he hit every last single topic that a woke person could hit and then he again he is supporting an enemy of the united states who is currently holding americans hostage by burning himself alive in front of an ally's you know embassy phil i i think um the word is not allowed i think the the word is right here we're looking at it's being promoted right and so the this um uh in in the name of inclusion i think they've sort of opened the aperture inclusion and then you have the recruiting challenges and look if somebody wants to raise their right hand i don't care what they dress like what they do if they're physically and mentally fit to carry a machine gun or a radio

good on them let them execute you know that's that's sort of my view but as an infantry officer though do you do you think that women are as capable in a combat role as dudes wouldn't you wouldn't you if you're going if you're you're commanding you would say on average if you're yeah if you're but if you're okay stop at this if you're goinging, you would say on average. Yeah, but if you're, okay, stop at this. If you're going into combat and you are leading a platoon, would you prefer a platoon of men or would you want a mixed platoon? I would want the platoon that is able to train together and execute together and carry, you know, do fireman's carries and carry the ammo and all that.

And if there are some women in there that can do that, then, you know do fireman's carries and carry the ammo and all that and if they're you know if there are some women in there that can do that then you know whatever um but but the bigger picture to me is that this kind of you know bs is is taken a very fringe piece and it's promulgating a a a dogma that um as part of the recruiting challenge and so they they must be under they must be underwriting they being the senior leadership in dod this erosion of of values and erosion of unity in the name of five ten years from from now having more of this. This video is why recruitment is down. Right. Yeah, absolutely. This is it.

Yeah, yeah. We had that Newsweek poll the other day. 65% they found of 18 to 24-year-olds favor Trump. They think Trump is going to shake this country up for the better. You think those 65 people are going to want to enlist for this? No, I was thinking. But to be, I want to add this real quick. It's not just that i mean if you were too young to enlist after 9-11 because a lot of people did when they

saw what happened and then you saw what happened with iraq and afghanistan yeah you're you're you're not going anywhere near that stuff so there are probably a lot of young people seeing the failures especially now with afghanistan and they're like i'm not joining that garbage for that for what and then you add this on top i'm not surprised we're seeing what we're seeing i i i i've often referenced this guy i met he was a captain he resigned his commission he says i don't want to work out he wanted to be in there for his career stewart schiller right no i don't know i don't remember his name um but uh we were having dinner and he said that he was a captain he intended to be uh his whole career here and now he's in his mid-30s and he's resigned his commission because it's woke i get it like national defense military

is national defense so why are we overseas and you could say well it's like sometimes if you just sit still you're an easy target for people to come across your border so you got to go out in forays and fortify the areas around where you live so that those things the romans did it that was but they used as an excuse to constantly expand expand expand they might attack us later so let's attack them first it's not you the argument is it's national national defense that's why they send the military but like i when when people look at it like it doesn't feel like we're defending ourselves when we're aggressing east through europe and conquering it i don't know it doesn't feel like defense yeah so so i'm going to probably get it wrong but if i remember right the the the constitution says

we shall raise an army and we shall maintain a navy and those two words i believe um are intentional you scale the army up and down because the framers were worried about the big land wars going on in Europe and the abuse by the federal government of those big armies to oppress people. The Navy maintained, meaning permanent, protected commerce, helped go overseas and increase the markets for the country. And, you know, remember, piracy was a big thing back then, and the Navy helped protect all that commerce because we were shipping stuff everywhere. So the Army can scale up and down as required,

but the Navy is really what's needed. And so the, you know, you're exactly right is what i'm saying and the constitution sort of bears out this idea of you know let's let's have a big army when we need a big army but let's keep the navy so that we can keep our sea lanes open we can keep the trade going we can keep the commerce going is a big problem that they've just kept a big army and it's cost the country unfathomable amounts of wealth? The major cost to the country is not military expenditure. The major cost to the country is entitlements.

If you're talking about, if you talk about the Fed or you talk about like the debt and stuff like that, it is all driven by the entitlements. Like our unfunded liabilities is where our actual debt is. The amount of money that we spend on the military, while it is large, especially compared to other countries, it is nothing compared to the amount of money

that we have to spend on just servicing the debt. Last year was the first time that we spent more on servicing the debt than we spent on the United States military. Man, that's nuts. Do you know what the budget is off the top of your head? Servicing the debt. And remember, that's just paying the interest on the debt.

That's not paying off the debt. The Department of Defense is $715 billion. Yeah, yeah. When I was undersec, there was around $720 billion, and it's probably up around $800 billion right now. Okay, that's not, was it just too much? Is it the reason you scale the army or the military up and down because you don't want to go bankrupt in a time of peace?

No, no. Standing armies are a threat to liberty. Yeah, right. up and down because you don't want to go bankrupt in a time of peace standing armies are a threat to liberty yeah right that's that's the point the framers were making is that a large standing army is a threat to liberty and that's why they had the national guard the well-regulated militias which not to cut you off which a lot of state police forces right now are basically armed like the army and or like the military and there's a lot of people that have a problem with that sorry for good right right no but that that tension should be between states like texas and the federal government that's that's built into the constitution that's what it's all about that governor has certain powers you cannot

federalize the national guard unless you you you know deploy the inter the insurrection act and he mentioned tension that's part of what the second amendment is for too is part of that tension right against right right no no that's it's it's all all i just like what you're saying so i'm like yeah no no and and there should be more of that there should be more governors uh opposing and saying to the federal government because this marxist ideology wants a strong federal government they want uh to to increase the size of federal government so that they can oppress and control. And that's what it's all about. That's where we are today as a nation. And it's a very scary time right now.

If our military was below recruiting standards then there some grand scale conflict erupted overnight would we be able to pat our numbers draft it would be like the draft the next morning i would imagine would get signed uh and then i i nominate david hogg for first in line you ever see edge of tomorrow when tom cruise's character is like i'm a pr guy and they're like that's why we're putting you on the front line we're gonna put you on the front line give you a camera so you can film it and uh i nominate david but i guess like you were saying and that hairy guy whatever his name is if you're whoever attacks the creative attacker is going to win or at least they're going to get their strike off first so it's like no

matter how big our military is if someone's creative look at israel okay they got attacked they got surprised um you know they're shutting down businesses because they're using everybody from 18 to, you know, 70 to go defend their country and fight in Gaza and be on the border with Lebanon and fight Hezbollah. I mean, you know, that's an existential threat right there. And people get lost in the politics of all of that. But, you know, I've been to the Golan Heights. I've been down to the border with Gaza. I've been into Jerusalem. i've been to the golan heights i've been down to the border with gaza i've been into jerusalem i've been along the west bank so i i mean you talk about a country that every day has to worry about surviving when iran says death to israel death to the united

states believe them believe what they're saying don't try to deal with them like this you know administration's trying to do just believe that they want israel to not exist and that they want to harm the united states as much as possible to that point that was what that was one thing that frustrated me when barack obama was in in office he refused to believe the jihadis wanted what they said they wanted he was constantly saying well it's economic it's because they don't have this or they don't have that and it's like you know the when isis was around they put out dabik with like literal explanation of this is why it was entitled this is why we fight you this is why we hate you this is why we fight you and it was like that's really what they believe and i feel like

liberals can't at all wrap their head around people believing other things and it's something that i've seen when it comes to like now this the whole marxist stuff like the philosophy that underlays like our society and the western society is a an enlightenment philosophy whereas marxism and stuff like that and especially the stuff the lgbtq stuff and stuff the the philosophy that underlies that is all counter enlightenment it's all says that it doesn't you know it can't interact with reality and it's people just don't believe that people think differently to them and have very very different ways of thinking to be fair like you know what i was thinking there are these videos of people getting really angry because their pronouns aren't being respected

if that if that righteous indignation is can is funneled into combat infantry i think you know we'll win some battles there right so maybe the space force individual is not incorrect maybe you know and service should guarantee citizenship so yeah i know isn't that funny i agree with that but it's actually a one-up on where we currently. It's funny that they're talking about the Courage to Serve Act, service guaranteeing citizenship, but doesn't work when you're bringing in people who are not from this country who are going to vote against your values. That's just it. concept of someone comes into the united states and or joins the military and becomes a you know serves a service serves a certain amount of time in the military and then is allowed to become a citizen i don't have a problem with that particularly if they are vetted if it was a situation where it's like you got to find people that actually want to be you know someone comes here legally yeah well i mean well the thing is that if they wanted to like so they would say you're you live in guatemala and you're just like i want to join the u.s military

so i'm going to send an email i want to join the u.s military i wouldn't have a problem with the u.s military grabbing a dude from guatemala putting him on a plane shooting him over here vetting him making sure that he actually does want to join the military and he actually believes the things that we do put him through significant training and then put him in a unit and after he serves his time if he serves his time honorably and he gets an honorable discharge, then I wouldn't have him have a problem with him becoming a citizen. I would. He should. Legal resident permits fine.

But the issue with citizenship is the more people you bring into your country who don't have your values, they will vote against you no matter what. That's why I said that's why I said vetting. But vetting is fine. I mean, if if a guy is from Guatemala, but vetting is fine. I mean, if, if a guy is from Guatemala, he's going to know Guatemalan history, Guatemalan superheroes,

Guatemalan food, and he will vote for those things. Those things aren't bad things. They're just not American things. So you bring someone in, they serve the country amicably. They help us. They assist us legal resident work rights and everything,

but you're not voting. There is the, the erosion of voting is gutting and destroying this country. We do have the phenomenon of internet video. So like a lot of Guatemalans are huge fans of Spider-Man, for instance, and watch American TV from the age of three. So they know English really well. Whereas 200 years ago, these people are coming off the boat,

not knowing what the hell's going on. So the vetting might be a little easier. It might be... Look, the math is simple, okay? You have 100 people in a small town. Their grandfathers built the bridge. Their great grandfathers tilled the fields and they deeply care about the statue of the town's founder.

And you bring in a hundred people who aren't from there and they're going to say, why are we, why are we funding 10% of the budget towards maintaining the statue? And then the people who live there say, because this is the person who made it all possible. We don't want to forget them. And they say, okay, well are we funding 10 of the budget towards maintaining the statue and then the people who live there say because this is the person who made it all possible we don't want to forget them and they say okay well we outvote you now so we vote to tear it down to stop wasting money and now your statues are gone i heard someone taught someone i forget where i heard it someone maybe maybe it was a super chat or something like that on another another podcast or whatever either way they had what i thought sounded like a halfway decent idea. Local elections, anyone can vote, like any citizen can vote, right?

But then as you get up to state level and then federal level, he was talking about having some kind of service to be able to vote on a state or a federal level. And I think that that might actually not be a bad idea. Local level, because local is the stuff that impacts people most. And actually, if you vote in your local elections, that's when you'll feel like your vote matters the most because so good no just to clarify my point i'll wrap up your point but i want to go back well i just think that that might be an idea worth discussing so what i'm saying is there is nothing evil or inherently bad at in a basic level to someone saying okay so we're going over the town's budget and I see that we're spending a thousand dollars a month to clean and maintain the statue.

Someone says, I don't think we should. You're allowed to. You're allowed to think that my point is, if everyone agrees, the statue is a good thing and we like it. When you bring in people who are not from there and they now have the right to vote they're not going to value the traditions the morals the ethics of what was built in this town what made it good i don't like that people would come to this country and say who cares about the constitution what does that mean for me you've got these videos of these people who are like i'm the child of immigrants and this country is racist and blah blah and all that stuff and i'm like why do you hate what like you're voting against us you're voting against what we want you're

voting against what made this country good we obviously want to progress we want to get rid of bad things we want to expand civil rights but coming here and just calling it's it's remarkable you have people who would come here and say this country is absolutely racist we hate it we want reparations it really just comes down to the simple fact. If you like that your town does a certain tradition, okay, just understand the more people who move in who don't have that tradition, the more likely it is that will be done away with. So this means if we go to Guatemala and say, join the military and we'll give you citizenship, they're going to come here and they're going to say, I don't care about baseball. So why would I support baseball?

Why would I support anything having to do with it? It then comes down to a vote. Surprise, surprise. The hundred people who live in this town who always vote to have a citywide baseball game are now finding themselves outvoted by people who are nice people, who are good people and hardworking people who say, no, no, no, no. We don't want to waste money on this. We're 51% of the population now.

And we hereby vote for a football game instead and now the people who like baseball are like but we don't we don't like football too bad they came in they changed their traditions they changed their way of life and what you had and what your parents built for you and your grandparents built for you has been erased that is not an act of evil is an act of change not all change is bad my point is simply when it comes down to the issues like the constitution what the values of this country are bringing in people who don't have those traditional values will fundamentally change the country and the more we bring people in like that the more the country

changes to the point where it is it cannot be saved i don't think the points that you're making like there's no i don't have any argument with those but i do think that historically we have been able to have people come in and assimilate them. I think the problem has been legal assimilation. And I recently just talked to a person in their 90s saying they came here from Italy. Their grandparents said, you will learn the language. You will learn to be an American. We will learn what it means to be an American.

And I love that. That's fantastic. You should not like society should not allow our society the united states should not allow people to come here and then demand that they set up an enclave where they can have where they can behave like their own uh like you know like their like their own culture independent of the united states we should encourage people to come to the united states and assimilate you should not we should not allow people to come to the United States and assimilate. You should not. We should not allow people to come into the United States that don't share our philosophy. If you are a communist, if you don't believe that in liberalism, I don't care what your religion is.

If it's if you have an extremist view and you believe that your religion is going to take precedence over the laws here. So if your religion says something atrocious then you're going to do it no you're not welcome because let me let me give you another scenario we say okay anybody who wants to serve in the military will and and is vetted and is a good person no criminal record you can serve you come you become a citizen what's another issue there let's say this person is 20 years old. They come in, they serve four years, they get out. Congratulations, sir. Welcome to America.

They say, awesome. The first thing they do is they say, they walk up to the voting booth and they say, I want my mom to come next. Bang. Now what happens is their community is outside this country. You're going to see sponsorship. So now they're going to say something like, I assume responsibility for my mother, my brother, my sisters, and you get chain migration. Immigration inherently is not a bad thing. It's a good

thing actually, but it has to be done legally. The people have to be placed properly. They have to assimilate. That means no enclaves. That's bad. And that means no chain migration. That's bad as well. But where it currently stands right now, you bring in one young man. The first thing he does is he offers to sponsor a family member, which means he assumes tax liability and debt liabilities, and they can come and live in the United States sponsored by him. This is what we end up getting. Those people who come here, their community is still their home country, and they will vote to benefit their home country like they're going to vote to keep the door open they're going to vote we saw this in california in the 90s when the republicans said public services cannot be given to non-citizens there

were riots there were protests and the state has never been republican since it's it's it's now just strongly democrat and it could be because Republicans left, maybe. But what basically happened was you had a bunch of young people who are American citizens whose parents were not and whose family members were not. And so when the state said tax public coffers are not for non-citizens, this young guy goes, my mom's not a citizen. My dad's not a citizen that means if they're ever sick and in trouble they can't get help no way i oppose that we hereby vote to give money to non-citizens that's what you get yeah i mean it has been policy for a long time where if

you join the military you can join the military and you can become a citizen that's not new um right but i'm saying plucking from another country, someone who enlists and then bring them in. If someone's a legal immigrant to this country, meaning they're already legally here as a resident and they want to go through

that process, I agree with that. Absolutely. I believe that's part of assimilation, right? Joining the military, serving, basic training,

learning what it means, swearing an oath to the Constitution, all that good stuff. Fantastic. I'm saying you pull someone from a foreign country and you bring them here and then after a few years they're just if we

took a bunch of like illegal immigrants and just were like we're creating new platoons we're gonna 10 000 dudes is are there chances that they'd be like yes yes excellent and they get in there and they're like sleeper cells for you know some lebanese terrorist organization and they turn on their commander in the middle of combat and they overthrow their platoon and take control movie like is that is that actually potentially possible that's my next book that would be a good story yeah yeah well you know i i i'm listening i mean it's such a rich conversation uh yeah the the idea of of of taking illegal immigrants and weaponizing them, giving them weapons, training them within a structured environment. of training on just the laws of the country, sort of like the citizenship process. And then there would have to be a heavy-duty

weeding out process as well. And I think Tim makes some very, very good points about that erosion of your values or your culture, your system, that's what's happening right now in the country, right? So, I mean, we're seeing this. So I want to bring up, like, schools, because I think that's where it's coming from,

and you have so much talk to mention. I just want to put a pin in it. Go ahead, finish what you were saying. I'm sorry. No, no, no. Go ahead. Well, so, like, my impression is that the the department of education has basically been used to ideologically indoctrinate literal generations of kids now

in my opinion there's two generations that we've got basically indoctrinated seems like gen z is rejecting it but um i don't know if i think that we've already got such a significant output of students that graduated that were taught using basically Marxist power dynamics to base their schooling on. I personally am in favor of getting rid of the Department of Education completely. But I also am aware that the reason that it got so ubiquitous through schools is because it's in the schools that teach teachers so it's not just that it's in schools for your kids the teachers are being taught this is how you teach kids they're being taught the palo frearian method so my idea now is we should not abolish the doe and i think thomas massey is wrong what we should do is mandate gadsden flags ban pride flags so when trump gets elected you're never going to abolish the doe the congress not congress not gonna allow it but

maybe trump or somehow somehow we get an appointee in there who says you know i'm gonna bang the gavel here's uniform policy across the country what you got to do let them all protest and whinge and cry but welcome to the system you're a part of thoughts yeah well you know i was the superintendent of the 15th largest you know school system in the country uh wake county 150 000 students 170 schools 18 000 employees half of whom are teachers 9 500 teachers, 12 municipalities within this very large county, Raleigh, and then you had 11 others like Cary, Morrisville, Wake Forest, Apex, et cetera. And some were very rural, Zebulon, et cetera, and some were obviously dense cities like Raleigh and southeast raleigh and it was about 35 percent

um what what they call free and reduced lunch students right which was representative of low-income students and so that became the euphemism really because unfortunately there's a big racial overlap there black hispanic white asian it's a typical achievement gap as they call it in education so that the the you know this was 12 years ago i was a superintendent so you were there when they were going through all the stuff right uh it had just come out it had just got i i left kind of right as all that was coming out and and um you know i have to say that the the um there's a corporate mentality just like anywhere it's a bureaucracy and to move up in the bureaucracy, you kind of got to be approved by your boss.

And so there's a lot of groupthink that happens. And that groupthink is influenced by, even though there were no unions in North Carolina right-to-work state, they had the North Carolina Association of Educators, which was a quasi-union-like entity. People paid dues to it. And it's very liberal, very pro-Democrat politician,

very much tied to the American Federation of Teachers and the teachers' unions writ large at the national level. Those extreme policies get funneled through each of the state and local county because education is mostly a local deal, right? It's mostly the Department of Education at the federal level has very little influence on things at the local level. Do they have influence on the curriculum that's picked? Unless it's common core.

You know, this curriculum that, you know, I was able to implement. I created two leadership academies with public service. I created career technical academy. I was fighting against charter schools. Did you feel like you had good results with those programs? Well, the two leadership academies, they were single gender. I was fighting against charter schools. Did you feel like you had good results with those programs? Well, the two leadership academies, they were single gender and, you know, a young men's and a young women's leadership academy. I had a lot of parents telling me, I'm worried about my kid going to a 1,500-student middle school. And, you know, the mayor of Raleigh last year emailed me and said, Tony, your two leadership academies have the highest graduation rates and the highest proficiency rates in the state of North Carolina.

And the Democrats on the school board fought me on creating those. And it was, you know, they didn't want that change. They wanted to kind of do lockstep on whatever it was that, you know, the teachers unions were talking about. So that's the real, there's this ideology that's force fed. And then the promotion rates or the promotion within the system, you kind of got to go with that if you want to get promoted. Right. And then it just becomes ossifies. And all of a sudden you get what's happening. And like, you know, a couple of counties over here and the school board that. Loudoun. Yeah.

Loudoun County. That's 30 seconds. 30 seconds. You drive down the road, you make a left turn. You're in Loudoun. Yeah. Right. Exactly.

Yeah. All right. We're going to go to Super Chats. If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to the road, you make a left turn, you're in Loudoun. Yeah, right. Exactly. Yeah. All right. We're going to go to Super Chats. If you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to the channel, share the show with your friends, and head over to TimCast.com. Click join us. Become a member. No members only show on Fridays, but Monday through Thursday.

But you can also get access to our Discord server to hang out with like-minded individuals. Our first ever live event in Martinsburg, West Virginia is on Tuesday. And if you want to come to any future events you have to be a member because notice for tickets it's members only it's their private events and we only send the notice out to members it's the only way you can actually buy a ticket because it is a private event all right here we go tracer says not first tracer you were first nice job tracer nice job shanage wilder says happy friday gang great culture war today also do you think biden is trying to pull an obama by going after journalists

with anonymous sources oh katherine harridge man oh yeah that's another great 800 fine per day unless she gives up her source is it nuts i was under the impression that judges usually respected when a... No? No. That's not the case? Okay. When it comes to journalists and sources, judges will use the amount of legal force that they believe will compel a person to comply. What's supposed to happen is, after a certain amount of time, if the individual does not comply and it becomes apparent the court cannot compel them they're supposed to stop there was a journalist who uh he went to jail i think

for like 180 days for refusing to give up uh some like video footage or something that was i think we may i think we might have had him on the show was his name uh something wolf i think you want to look it up was it josh wolf that was a while ago i don't know yeah from epic times i don't know it's just a very famous story of a journalist who refused to hand over video footage and got locked up so josh wolf from medium i have no idea i don't know uh it's been a while but basically what ends up happening is the court eventually the you know the lawyer says there is no amount of time you can hold this person in prison that will compel them to do it. So they have to be released. And then that's what happens.

Catherine Harage is being charged $800 per day. Good for her for sticking to her guns, though. Real journalist. Yes, real journalist. Jacob Paradis says Narbar's candles on Public Square now has a line of scented laundry detergent. Ooh, really? Let's go. Also, our candle inventory has been restocked.

I got to tell you, Super Chats, you know, it's give or take. You never know. But if you're like one of the first super chats, they usually get read. And that means we're going to shout out your your your advertisement or whatever. Cheapest way to get a sponsorship spot on the show, I suppose. All right. The emperor champion says, congratulations, Democrats, you have become what you despise. Tyrants and despots who refuse to congratulations democrats you have become what you despise tyrants and despots who refuse to see what you have become yeah but i don't know if they despise tyrants and despots i think they're kind of into it you know what i mean they just don't like it when there's a statue of lenin in in seattle they're very happy with it yeah you're right

guy's name is joshua wolf he served 226 days in prison wow nearly the longest of any journalist in u.s history for protecting source materials yeah crazy let's go i'm not your buddy guy says i hope people realize the true stakes of 2024 the u.s isn't the only country making decisions as though they're about to be going after people it's gonna get wild man the new world order what's it gonna look like t-rex pet shop says you should get a mormon on the culture war to debate shamus since they both believe they're the only true church oh speaking of mormonism i talked about mormonism last night i was incorrect i was saying that there was some passage in like the texts which were the text that i was referencing was called the doctrine and covenants from 1835 which I actually bought a copy of last night. I'm looking

forward to reading this. But I was the guy that told me said it was Mormonism that stuff I was quoting. Was it Islam? The Talmud. No, it's like Old Testament. Judaism. Deuteronomy? Yes. The quote that I was reading about having to pay if you rape a woman, a virgin, you've

got to pay her father $50 and marry her. That's from the Talmud. That's not Mormonism. All right. Thank you. Let's grab some more. Siri Design says, you see the documents that,

how do you pronounce this? 50 shekels. Revealed in Kennedy yesterday. Trudeau actively covered up, how do you pronounce it? Pierre Polyavra. Polyavra? There you go.

Trudeau actively covered up Canadian biolab leaks from CCP operatives. What? Is that true? Shout out Pierre Poyave. That guy's awesome. That's crazy. He's giving me hope for Canada. Patrick De Niro says it's not Biden crossing the Rubicon, it's him seizing Caesar's

assets and silencing gelling his supporters. You gotta watch the Culture War from this morning. So, Tenet Media on YouTube, the culture war podcast uh take a listen on youtube we we talked about rome the whole way and there's really interesting things but i think the general consensus is trump is not caesar and we're and they and we actually discussed like what period of rome we may be in and it's really interesting. A lot of really, really interesting stuff happened in Rome. More than most people even know.

So I recommend it. Sean Brown says, Tim, check out Kentucky Bill 500. They're trying to pass a law to make it where employers don't have to give you a lunch or breaks at work anymore. That's nuts. Come on. You don't get to eat.

All right. The Authentic Hydro PX says, Tim, I, as the Authentic Hydro PX, am your biggest fan. You don't get to eat. All right. The Authentic Hydro PX says, Tim, I, as the Authentic Hydro PX, am your biggest fan, and I can't wait to see your honest and genuine work covering the news tonight. Wow. Thanks, Hydro.

That's very nice of him. That's very nice. The Authentic Hydro, wow. He's very kind. Yeah, big fan. Big fan. I'm a big fan of him, too, actually. There's some fake Hydro account.

We're not going to read those. Some controlled opposition. big fan i'm a big fan of him too actually there's there's there's some fake hydro account for those that don't know in the super chats hydro is just every night sending hundreds of dollars to smack talk the show but i consider that a a form of endearment yes dudes insult you if they like you tisnallorum says and how we burned in the camps later thinking what would things have been like if every security operative when he went out went out at night to make an arrest had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family alexander solzhenitsyn crazy man you guys ever see that meme where it's uh the the women are like oh you're so great i'm gonna miss you so much oh you're so lovely okay bye and then as soon as the woman walks away they're like what a bitch and then the guys are like you dumb a-hole you're an idiot yeah screw you and then when he walks away they're like that guy's great my dad my dad

used to give my friends that he liked the most amount of garbage just constantly giving them crap you know and we're metal kids so we're all walking around with long hair and stuff like so my dad was just constantly laying into him and there were kids that he didn't like that he never addressed like he barely would look at them like hey you know that's the guy code yeah right you learn that guy camp right so i actually i read something funny maybe you know you'll know this better i read that uh in basic training men start by fighting with each other but in the end they figure out their their structure and order women start by being cooperative but but in the end they form

cliques and they're mad at each other yeah well i i hadn't heard the women part because i spent most of my time in the infantry i did command um i had women in my command at the higher levels um but uh yeah that's that's interesting not surprising yeah i don't know how true it is just uh the dude's not getting along in the beginning as part of them figuring out who's competent and who should be in charge little boys will play like that anybody who's had chickens knows should be in charge. That's how babies play, too. Little boys will play like that. Anybody who's had chickens knows this. The roosters will puff their necks up and talk like this at each other.

And then eventually they figure out who's the boss. And the girls do it, too. Right, right, right. And then we actually had our first annual TimCast Cockfest today. Allison made rooster chili. I hear it was good. It got annihilated. So we had a full roast rooster, and i had a little bit of it and it was good it's chicken i don't there's

no other way to describe it we literally ate chicken and uh but allison's rooster chili everyone as soon as they tasted it they were like that's it wow cleared out if you guys finish it off it's gone the other thing is it was soaked in vinegar, like pressure cooked in vinegar. They're like four- Marinated overnight. Vinegar is the secret MVP. It smelled- We looked it off the top.

It smelled rough. I can't do it. But I bet it tastes good. Well, I don't know about the other- I have a feeling. It's still marinating, right? The one that was roasted, I don't think was marinated in vinegar. Yes, that one was kind of bland.

The one that was just sitting out yeah there was nothing on it nothing no flavor that was that was straight up roast rooster it was like rooster was taken out putting them put in the oven for several hours and it was good i people were saying it was like tougher than normal but i'm like i can't tell you just put in your mouth you eat it's like chicken it was a little tougher i obviously got it too late yeah a little bit too late yeah the rooster roast you know the crazy thing is when we cut into the rooster so much cream that came out that once it was once like it sat for a little while there was like a layer of fat congealed on the plate it was not it was a lot of fat interesting yeah i think there's something different about real homegrown backyard chicken

granted we're eating roosters you know they're not like broiler hens or anything chicken tender kim was saying a lot of the chickens you eat are are six week old chickens so these roosters you know they're not like broiler hens or anything chicken tender kim was saying a lot of the chickens you eat are are six week old chickens so these roosters are like years two years old some no no no year and a half no no no uh some of them eight months nine months so you got fat roosters you got to put them on a training regimen or you just feed them no i think these ones are like eight months okay yeah but older much older than what normal chickens you eat maybe that's why they're so tough yeah but they inject those chickens with weird hormones, make them grow faster. That's nasty stuff, dude. Yeah, but also it explains why when you order wings, they're really small.

Oh, young chickens? I mean, I always wondered this. Like, if you go to a bar and you're like, I'll take the wings, you get these little drumsticks. And then I'm like, the drumsticks on our roosters are like this. They're big. And you go to the fried chicken place, you get big drumsticks. It's like they're giving you baby chickens, man.

All right, we'll read some more. Well, enough chicken talk. Enough chicken talk. Dave Collins says, the people with TDS would rather start World War III and ignore President Biden's dementia than see President Trump elected again.

It's a mental disorder. Dude, that's how I'm feeling. That's how I'm feeling that's how i'm feeling i'm like all this weird afghanistan stuff seems to be rooted in domestic policies like you were saying they just hate trump so much they'd rather the whole world burn down yeah yeah man shocking it's a combination it's a weird combination of people that hate trump and they are willing to burn the world down to prevent trump and then people that want to burn the world down so they're supporting the people that hate trump yeah the the new they're like this world order thing we're gonna

make make it and change it one way or another and trump's in the way i'm i i'm yeah i personally i think it's it's a whole lot of marxism that that's going on but you know yeah i do too all right blazalot says factory worker here you help keep me aware of the world outside of here and for that i am grateful as a kid that in married with children that grew up with married children that al hated his wife and family as an adult i'm not i i generally get the idea of what you're trying to say. Because I realize that he actually loves his family. Yeah, I guess, like, the problem I had with Made With Children was that certainly when the family was threatened, they'd band together.

You know, it's like outside. But the show was basically just him complaining about being married and hating his family. They were all hating each other, yeah. I just, I couldn't do it. I hated that show. It was kind of, I think that it was it was fairly a new concept too at the time like i don't recall a lot of there's like the no man was funny what was the bunker archie bunker no ma'am yeah but archie bunker was archie bunker was was a very different thing archie bunker was like a comment uh was a

comment on a society excuse me a comment on society in a very different way. They used Archie as like the thing not to be and all the people surrounding him were like- Was he the guy who wanted to beat his wife? Yeah, well, no, no. That was the honeymooners to the moon, Alice. That was prior to Archie Bunker. I love the, on Futurama, when Fry, they go to the moon exhibit

and they show the honeymooners and he's like, one of these days, bang, zoom, straight to the moon. and they show the honeymooners he's like one of these days bang zoom straight to the moon and then leela's like i didn't realize early astronauts are so fat and he's like he's not an astronaut and he was just using space travel as a metaphor for beating his wife it was it was one of these days i thought that's that's a messed up thing to say what the the uh the honeymoon or the um archie was more like uh the simpsons than than married with children was like the archie archie bunker he's kind of like homer simpson he's kind of the archetype of homer simpson like a dumb lovable angry kind of stupid dude but like everyone around him is really awesome maybe whereas married with children

was just a bunch of scum buckets that just treated each other like dog shit it's tough to watch we weren't allowed to watch it growing up i mean i thought it was a great entertaining show when i would watch it but it's just cheap laughs all right michael brown says pesky constitutionalist here keep on keeping on tim caston crew everyone support independent journalism god bless you all shout out to steve baker best of luck sir uh let's see we got i think we're gonna have him back on the show to talk about what's going on because this is nuts for the fbi to be like there he is walking up with a camera filming and narrating what's happening he's parading it's like come on man right it's just ridiculous yeah it's so ridiculous i suppose the argument from

the left is that but he was doing that while supporting j6 and it's like he's not smashing things yeah he's not fighting with cops what you think about who he supports and doesn't support is immaterial to the fact that he is performing an act of journalism alongside other journalists and it's not illegal to say i support the things that are going on at j6 if you're not actually doing the things you're not breaking the law by saying man i don't think they did anything wrong like you may be saying something dumb or something one of the one of the journalists who was alongside him who didn't get charged well he called them insurrectionists so that's all it takes now you're a journalist yeah man this country

all right federale actual says just like i won't delete twix i'll never stop listening to this cast you got truth bombs dropping everywhere with the most based retired bg ever and a rock god dropping f-bombs in the first hour loot cast needs a rock god i've already said i'm sorry oh yeah i mean we didn't get into it but uh x has banned misgendering yeah specifically uh repeated targeting misgendering and that was always the rule that was the original rule the original rule that we all complained about was they said you can't harass someone and misgender them the rule was never simply calling someone the name would result in you getting banned they always qualified about by saying it's repeated targeted harassment yeah and then shut they were

still banning people for saying things like, what did Zuby say? Okay, dude. Okay, dude. And they suspended him for it. I think Megan Murphy said, but a man's not a woman, though. Yeah, Megan Murphy said, men aren't women, though.

And she got banned. She responded to someone, which was where the targeting comes in. It's like, oh, she responded to someone. But I, so, how do you define harassment? Who gets to say what words

you got to be called like do i get a protected class the rule says if you as the victim report it i just don't think it's going to fly for very long but it's an interesting concept i mean harassment in general you ban it but yeah but like hell's harassment on the internet it's slippery slope man there's there's no reason for this rule to exist elon the rule does not make sense. I will stress this right now. I appreciate the things that Elon has done and is doing. But the idea of misgendering is inverted in the political spectrum. The left thinks it's misgendering to call someone who wants to use a pronoun something else.

And the right believes it's misgendering if you call someone who is male, female pronouns vice versa so the definition of misgendering this is the problem with the rule in the first place it shows a leftist woke bias so you want to complain look i'm gonna say right now that rule being in place shows x is woke period no questions i don't care what elon says he's like it's going to be targeted harassment doesn't matter elon you woke that we're not going to get an argument of degrees of wokeness there should not be a policy against calling someone the wrong pronoun that's wokeness x go woke yeah or calling someone any name like if i call tim a monkey over and over and over on Twitter. He can block me. And I'm going to say this right now. I will likely pull the Timcast News' official corporate pro account and I will cancel Blue over this.

I'm not kidding. There should not be a misgendering policy on any social media platform. So I will cancel verification. I will shut it all down. I'm over it. I get about a thousand bucks every two weeks and who cares? I'm over it. I get about a thousand bucks every two weeks and who cares?

I'm done. And I encourage everyone to cancel their Twitter pro so long as X is saying they will shadow ban you for misgendering. Delete the policy or I'm done. I will shut it down first thing. I'll give it a weekend. We'll see what happens. Maybe they'll come out and apologize for doing it, but I'm going to terminate the TimCast corporate account. Do you know how expensive it is to run a business account on X? It is not $10. It's thousands of dollars. Thousands.

And every time we add people, it is more expensive for a business to add a verified account than it is for the individual to verify their own account. We are spending a lot of money on X. And I will also say this. I am hereby canceling my pledge to put in the remainder of the quarter million dollars in advertising on X because of this.

And I don't care if people are like, you said you were going to do it and I'm not doing it anymore. Done. They want to put in a misgendering policy. I will not pay for that. So I'm going to cancel that ad right now, actually. I did that ad last night.

I'm pissed about this. It makes sense. You know, if you're endorsing a company and you're spending money on their uh their website you're spending money to to advertise and stuff um and one of the reasons is because of this kind of thing this kind of commitment to free speech and stuff like that um i'm not sure what he means by harassment i'm not sure if it is just like using a the wrong uh pronoun one time

or whatever don't care i i understand that clearly um but uh i don't know i'm not sure what it is but that doesn't change the fact that the reason that people have embraced elon so much is because he really does try to get it right about not censoring ideas and i think that if you're saying you must use someone else's prone use the pronoun that someone else requests if it's if it is a a requirement then you're getting into the you know getting into regulating cognitive liberty it's it's and cognitive liberty is what is at at stake here the reason that the left the leftists and the lgbt lobby demand that you use the pronoun is because they want you to conceive of them as man if they're a trans man or It is about your liberty to think for yourself. The point is to make you think the way they want you to think.

And there's no two ways about that. The point is to make you think what they want you to think because the way we think is in words. I love Elon. Love what you're doing. A lot of it, man. But firstly, you're not the arbiter of free speech. No one has a control of what that is or how that works.

So value and effort, you cannot contain this thing. It's like the one ring. So you got to free the code of that network and let other people spin up versions of Twitter that they can share your code with you. The code is free. You can see their code. You need all of it.

You can't just, some of it is open, but it's not all of it. You need algorithms. You need front-end code. You need the back-end, lots of need algorithms. You need front-end code. You need the back-end. Lots of back, different types of back-end code. And you give, that's freeing the speech, is giving that code to people so that they can make their own versions of the networks with their own terms that they can ban misgendering on. And then we'll leave that one and go to the one where they don't ban misgendering.

That's the way you do it. You've got to release this beast, dude. You don't do that with something you paid $44 billion for. I mean, Tim just canceled a $250,000 ad read because of this stupid trying to control free speech. I had committed last year, because of the good things they were doing, $250,000 in the first quarter. I launched live on the members show a $25,000 campaign for my account. So far, the ad run has a $25,000 campaign for my account. So far as the ad run has committed, has spent, 5,336. I am terminating it right now.

That's it, man. This is the next century. It's the evolution of what the First Amendment is. It's on the internet. It's the code base. You need access to code bases. That is free freedom. Yeah, I still don't think that uh i'm still of the opinion that

you can free the code but most people aren't going to be able to read it that's that's likely now maybe next generation they'll have better understanding teach kids code that's a big big deal um i think we nobody i think we should teach kids how to farm because you know what yes we should and cook no one network can like make the right Terms are just kind of variable from person to person. And they should be because it's your company. You can have whatever terms you want. But that's the point. That's the point.

Elon, he owns, he spent $44 billion on it. He's not going to just give the code away. I mean, literally, if he gives the code away, he's going to default all the people that he borrowed money to loan to buy. He didn't just buy. He didn't just liquidate stuff to buy it like he was he's secured funding he got financing from multiple people that's how these things are done he like he's not he's just not gonna there will be no freeing of the code in uh in an x so that way someone can make a competitor that's just not gonna happen and there's no reason for like no one would go to the competitor um if if the twitter terms go haywire then you would use the other

service someone just sent me something saying they got locked out for calling someone he someone's basically saying i got suspended for it for calling a woman for referring to someone as a he this is like if i call somebody like a wolf man am i gonna get in some sort of misgendering trouble because he's a it's a guy with red hair but i i was like he looks like a wolf man, am I going to get into some sort of misgendering trouble? Cause he's a, it's a guy with red hair, but I was like, he looks like a wolf to me. You know, topically,

this is the, this is a problem, you know, for, for X and for us and stuff like that. But this is obviously not the only, uh, only attack on free speech,

uh, in the West. You look at what Canada is doing and that's serious stuff because you can get, they're talking about life imprisonment for hate speech and they're even talking about preventative imprisonment if you might commit hate speech or something like that so it's new to me it is it is really really really crazy the the law that they're trying to pass in in canada and that's something that is you know you can go to jail for stuff in in if you that you post on the internet in england and you can go to you know i believe you could probably do the same in like new zealand and and uh australia so the idea that you should

be allowed to say whatever you want um that's something that we still need to fight really really ferociously for i don't think there's been any significant change as much as as much as it's great that musk bought the x and and it showed potential and and you know hopefully this is not a consistent problem that they have and things do uh gets you know solved in a way that's that's satisfactory to people of our uh opinions um but there is no uh no guarantee all right well uh i'm to have to log in, and I deleted the tweet. I don't know if that deletes the campaign. Probably not.

I don't know how the campaign could exist without the tweet, but I'll still have to go into the back end and make sure I shut that down. And you know what I had said was, by the end of quarter one, March, we don't do ad spending in January because you're doing budgeting. And then I was like,

well, we didn't get through much in February either, so March will be a big ad spend for us, and I actually was talking to some of our clients and partners about the big ad spend we were going to do. It's canceled. Officially canceled. And The Hill's reported on this. It's been reported far and wide. X has reinstated their misgendering policy.

Feel free to do it, brother. I ain't giving you money for it, so that's it. Smash the like button if you like the show. Subscribe to the channel, share the show with your friends, head over to Tim cast.com. Click join us because of the work we do is made possible. Thanks in part to viewers like you. And this means that, uh, everyone at Tim cast will lose their verification badges. The Tim cast news account will lose its golden badge. Then they'll likely D rank and drop us. Don't know. Don't care. I'm not paying for this garbage. Rumble exists. And, uh, you know, right now the big free speech competition is

between X and rumble rumble. It is, I guess. I know we do the live show on YouTube, but I'm talking about if we're going to be considering anything for, for any kind of new platform, X is gone. So long as they have this misgendering policy in place, Elon will have to personally come out and announce it's been rescinded, revoked. Otherwise, I'm not interested. Anyway, thanks for hanging out. You can follow the show at TimCastIRL if you'd like. And you can follow me personally at TimCast if you're still using the platform.

General Tata, do you want to shout anything out? Thanks for a great conversation. I think we really hit on some key topics that we were able to drill down on. And thanks for pimping the book, Phalanx Code, where we actually, it's the struggle between big tech and the little guy. And so it's very apropos to end on that note. I am Phil that remains on Twix. I'm Phil that remains official on Instagram. The band is All That Remains.

You can follow us on Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora, YouTube, you know, the internet. And don't forget, the left lane is for crime. That's right. When you gotta pass that dude, you're just breaking the law for a moment. And then you're gonna be right back to the speed limit, I promise. Real quick, this is the game. The big

brands threatened to pull their ads off of X because of... because he didn't have a misgendering policy. Okay, well, I'm doing the same thing. I'm not living in this world, man. I think that's... I mean, it makes sense. We should have him on the show.

I know, obviously. And I had Octagon1975 on Twitter ask me to ask you, Tony, what's that ring represent that you got on? This ring. That's it. I have to leave right now. Oh, literally? You're going out the door. I'm leaving right now.

It's a West Point ring. 1981 graduate. I'll talk to you more next time. Good to see you, man. Serge. Yeah, I'm Serge. See you later. Have a good weekend.

I'm sorry. I'm just really pissed off over X right now. I'm losing my temper. Dude, this is what happens when people try and centralize authority. You always fuck it up. You cannot give power to one guy like this. It's insane. Okay, we're going to wrap it up.

Go have a good time. It's Friday night. I got to get out the door. Go see family. Thank you all so much for hanging out. We'll be back Monday, and we'll see you all then. you