Timcast IRL - Trump Border Czar Hints He'll ARREST Leftists Aiding Illegal Immigrants w/Mark Dubowitz

Episode Date: February 12, 2025

Tim, Phil, & Raymond are joined by Mark Dubowitz to discuss Trump's Border Czar hunting he will arrest leftists who aid illegal immigrants evade ICE, a judge facing impeachment for blocking DOGE investigation, top FEMA officials fired after sending millions to house migrants, and Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says there were two shooters in JFK assassination. Hosts: Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Raymond @raymondgstanley (X) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Mark Dubowitz @mdubowitz (X) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Oh, boy. We got a lot of news, my friends. You know, we were going to open with this JFK story. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said that after going over the new documents and in this meeting, she believes there were two shooters in the JFK assassination. But ultimately, it looks like there's a much bigger story as Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, outright said that they're going to start rounding up these leftist groups that are aiding illegal immigrants. And so we figured, hey, that's massive and we should probably lead with that story. When asked, there are a bunch of leftist groups aiding these illegal immigrants and they're protesting. Are there any plans to ground them up? He says, watch, watch and see what happens.

We're working on that right now. It's a question that we asked when we see these Democrat politicians. Well, let's just say dancing on the line of aiding and abetting people who are illegal immigrants. And some would argue that, well, they have the legal right to tell someone else their legal rights. The question then becomes, but where is the line of inducement, inducing an illegal immigrant to reside in this country? When you say you know they're illegals and here's how you avoid detection and law enforcement, would that be inducement? So it's going to be interesting to see this. We'll break that down. But there's massive news today. One of the higher ups at

FEMA and a total of four individuals were fired after Elon Musk uncovered that $59 million were sent to luxury hotels in New York to house illegal immigrants. It's crazy, my friends. There's so much news. And, of course, none of that's even the biggest. Well, actually, all of that is really big news. But for us here at TimCast, we have some pretty big news. So before I get into everything with the normal introductions, we have a major announcement some of you may have seen. TimCast has joined

Rumble Premium. Let's go. We're really excited. We've been talking with the guys over at Rumble, trying to figure out how we can make this work best. And so, from this point forward, we are going to have all of our exclusive TimCast content on Rumble Premium, and we will be

expanding those offerings. So the Green Room show, all new episodes will be appearing on Rumble Premium, and we will be expanding those offerings. So the Green Room show, all new episodes will be appearing on Rumble.com slash TimCastIRL in the Green Room playlist for Premium members. We're going to be producing feature-length documentaries. We've got two that will be going up on Rumble for Premium subscribers. Our uncensored call-in show will now be a seamless transition for those watching on Rumble. It will just go members only, just like that. A lot easier for us, by the way. Now, you may be asking, what about everybody who's an existing member of TimCast.com? What happens to that membership?

Well, you guys are in luck. If you were a member before today of TimCast.com, you will be getting Rumble Premium for free so long as you stay a member of TimCast.com, and you will get access to the Discord, the call-ins, the member community events, and all the offerings that Rumble Premium has, which of course, it's more than just me. You got Dr. Disrespect, you got Dan Bongino, you got Charlie Kirk, you got everybody. So for those that are TimCast members and have been legacy TimCast members, you guys will reap those benefits with a massive offering of content from Rumble Premium. For everybody else, if you want to sign up, you can go to rumble.com slash premium slash Tim. I think Tim 10. Use promo code Tim 10,

sign up, and you will get 10 bucks off a year, an annual membership. And here's how it's going to be working moving forward. All of our exclusive content and all of the offerings we're going to be expanding. Like I mentioned, we want to do eight feature-length documentaries in the next two years, which will be on Rumble Premium. We are going to be working on skate shows, a sporting show, and all this premium content will be on Rumble. However, one of the big challenges, of course, is that we have the Discord community. At TimCast, there's tens of thousands of people who are chatting every single day. And this is something we have to maintain that's not within the same space as Rumble

is. So from this point forward, if you want to watch the exclusive content and everything we have to offer, you're going to get that and much more with all of the amazing creators over at Rumble by joining Rumble Premium. For everybody else, if you'd also like to call into the show and talk to us and our guests, if you'd like to attend our Culture War member debate shows, which are currently in the works, and all the other community events that we're planning, the goal with the TimCast Discord community is to create culture and bring people together. That's still going to be available at TimCast.com. So this basically means, you know,

if you get both memberships, you're active in our community. You can come to our exclusive in-person events. You can participate in the content. And if you want to watch the member-only content, that'll be at Rumble. So we're super excited. There's lots more to more to break down. I'm sure there'll be a lot of questions. I will answer them all for you. But we are here, of course. There's a lot of people saying to him, I don't know what you're talking about. We want the news. So we're gonna get in the news. Aside from that, of course, head over to castbrew.com and buy coffee. We got delicious cast brew coffee. There's Alex Stein screaming because he wants the coffee so bad. Ian's Graphene Dream now massively back in stock.

Guys, we got a viral sensation here with the Ian's Graphene Dream low acidity coffee. Ian, I think, has sold 200 bags just today alone. And I don't even know that I promoted it. This dude just go to go to Casper dot com. Check it out. It must be the best coffee in the world. And as I mentioned, go to Rble.com slash premium, become a member because that exclusive show is going to be coming up for those that are watching on Rumble and all

of our future members only content. Don't forget to and we are going to be here on YouTube. We're going to be streaming on both platforms. We want to make it easier for everyone to access. We want to make it so that everybody can participate. This is mostly just going to be members only is now on Rumble. And we've got a lot more in the works. So I don't want to just sell it short. So shout out to the Rumble crew. Chris Pavlovsky has been absolutely amazing and working this out, making sure that our existing members get a tremendous benefit for supporting us for all this time and that they stay on and we continue to get your support. It's been really, really fascinating. I'm sure we'll talk a bit more about it, but we do got to get to the news. So smash that like button.

Share the show, of course, with everyone you know. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more, we got Mark Dubowitz. Hey, Tim. Great to be here. Thanks for coming. Who are you? What do you do? So I am a swamp creature.

I live in Washington, D.C. Been running a national security think tank for about 20 years, working on Iran, Middle East, foreign policy issues. 2019 got sanctioned by Iran, kind of a fatwa for my hard work. And yeah, so I've been in America for over two decades, born in South Africa, raised in Canada. I heard you and Serge speaking Afrikaans.

We were. We were. I think we were cursing at each other in Afrikaans. That's probably all the Afrikaans we know. It's the fun stuff. A lot of fun. And everybody knows the swears. Yeah, everyone knows the swears.

And great to be on the show first time and launching my own podcast pretty soon called The Iran Breakdown, all about Iran. So big year 2025. I think this is the year that we may see either the United States or Israel bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, or we may see Trump do the greatest deal of the century. So the podcast is going to follow the details of this every week. We actually and we did talk a little bit about this more, more so I actually ranted to you about the Israel stuff. I thought it was fun. But that's going to be on the Green Room show, which will be up on our Rumble Premium channel for premium subscribers. It was interesting. We had a conversation about Israel, and I think it

was interesting because we both agreed we need a tapering off of subsidy of Israel. They need to become self-sufficient in some capacity over time. Interesting conversation. I won't spoil it. Maybe we'll get into a little bit, but it's going to be fun. Thanks for hanging out. We got Raymond G. Stanley Jr. What's up, friends? It's Raymond, your local USMC veteran and blue-collar fella. Excited to talk to Mark a bit. It was a great green room, if I'm going to be honest. You got to watch out for the Jews, but it was very fun. It was good to listen to. Phil. Hello, everybody. My name is Phil Labonte. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains. I'm an anti-communist and a counter-revolutionary. Let's go.

Here we go, ladies and gentlemen, from Daily Mail. Trump's border czar gives wild answer on if ICE will round up leftist groups aiding illegal immigrants. Before I read this quote, I just want to say we asked this question as many Democrats had been instructing illegal aliens on how to avoid the avoid law enforcement and the question so that there is along the books i believe it is um u.s code uh title 8 u.s code 1324 section a section 4a which says that inducement of an individual who is here illegally knowingly other or otherwise that you know with reckless disregard for whether or not they'd be committing a crime, if you induce them to stay here, that would be a crime. Now, in the debate and sort of the argument, it was, yeah, but if you're informing someone of their legal rights, you're not really committing a crime. The issue is, of course, when we see Ilhan Omar and these other Democratic reps, we know their intention. So I put it like this. You know, we've all been to those parties, those keggers when we were young, where they're selling cups.

They're like, I got a red cup for five bucks. I'm not selling beer. I'm selling cups. Good luck. You're going to go to court and they're going to be like, we knew exactly what you were doing. You were selling beer to minors. I do think because it's a congressperson that's actually making these statements and informing these people that would would imply to people obviously not not directly tell them but imply to people look this is an

authority telling me that it's okay for me to do these things for me to come this is someone in a position of authority saying it's okay for me i can get around the law if i do these things so i think that if it's if it's just someone, you know, just a Joe on the street saying this is what you can do, you it might be one thing. But I do think that people in positions of authority should be held to a higher standard because that position as a congressperson comes with the the implied knowledge that you would think that the government has. And and the main point I'm making is we know the intention of these members of Congress when they're doing this. Yes. They're not just telling

your run-of-the-mill American citizen how to make sure their rights are being protected. Certainly, if you're an American and you get stopped by law enforcement, depending on the state you're in, it's always different. But you typically don't have a requirement to give your information to cops or show them your ID unless they suspect you've committed a crime and are detaining you for such a thing. Usually you're just free to go. You say, am I being detained? If they say no, you say thank you and have a nice day. Appreciate it. That I understand. But here's what what we're seeing is activist groups, even I think AOC did this. They're putting out information specifically intended for illegal immigrants to to skirt the law. Here's the story. They're going to mention since Trump took office, hordes of protesters have descended on L.A. and

other major cities, waving Mexican flags and those of other Central and South American countries to decry the president's illegal immigration crackdown. These protests have involved protesters blocking freeways, though many demonstrations have been peaceful. Quote, Sir, is there any plan to go after these leftist groups and these protests across the nation where those likely illegal aliens are flying foreign flags to be rounded up? A journalist for the Gateway Pundit asked Homan. The Borders are had seemingly answered a share of questions, began walking away from the scrum. But the question piqued his interest.

I do want to point out they chose the wrong peaked in. You guys need a copy editor. They wrote P.E.A.K. Homan stopped in his tracks and flashed a brief smile before delivering a verdict. Watch and see what happens. He shot back, followed by we're working on that right now. Homan added before striding away. Some of the groups seen protesting include Centro CSO, an undocumented immigrant advocacy organization, and the Freedom Road Socialist Organization. During the questioning, the Borders are also shared that he is deeply unsatisfied with the rate at which immigration and customs enforcement agents are able to arrest illegal immigrants residing in the USA. When posed the question of whether Trump is happy with the pace of ICE enforcement, Homan shot back, I'm not. If you look at the arrests in the interior enforcement, it's about three times higher than it was a year ago today.

Three times higher is good, but I'm not satisfied. There's more criminal aliens that need to be arrested. Hundreds of thousands. Sanctuary cities are putting up roadblocks. We got leaks. The borders are continued. The question is, what are they going to do about these sanctuary states, these sanctuary cities, where you have a government official outright saying we will aid and abet illegal immigration in violation of federal law?

Well, a couple of things strike me, Tim. First of all, I don't understand why these immigration groups are flying foreign flags. I mean, I'm an immigrant to America. Proud American was naturalized in 2015, came here 20 years ago. I mean, if I were advising these folks on public relations, you fly American flags. I mean, that's number one.

Number two is if you're inducing somebody to commit a crime, if I'm inducing someone to commit a robbery or armed assault or murder, I am as complicit in that crime as the perpetrator. So it is remarkable to me if members of Congress are actually encouraging this. And don't get me started on Ilhan Omar, please. We could have a whole hour on her. Oh, man, I heard the FBI is investigating her over, this is recent, over her marrying her brother, because some people claim those DNA events. I'm not, let's not get into that. Let's not. But maybe maybe we can later.

But, you know, a lot of questions here. And when we brought this up last week about whether or not it's illegal to provide this information. I'm curious if you are not a lawyer, you have no legal authority to be giving legal advice to anybody. Not that no one's allowed to do it. I'm just saying, like, lawyers have, there's, you know, what's, I can't think of the word. I mean, you have an obligation as an attorney to provide. Privilege. Privilege. Right, right, right.

That's what I was thinking of. And you have a right to counsel here. That's fine. But let's say you're a regular person on the street and you see a guy about to rob a bank and you walk up to him and say all right here's what happens after you go and do this the cops are going to come from these these places do not speak to them and here's how you can avoid detection after you've committed that crime wouldn't that be plotting with them to commit the crime like wouldn't you get in trouble for that accessory 100 right you're you're basically saying here's

how you can get away with it and avoid detection after you've broken the law right i mean that that's that's conspiracy to commit a crime yeah you're actively engaged in the plotting of a of a crime and you are you would be complicit you would be indicted so that the challenge here is illegal immigrants in this country have broken the law already and it's it's it's one thing to provide blankets. Legal advice, constitutional advice, all those things that American citizens saying to all of my to all of my American friends out there. And I'll say this legitimately. Don't talk to cops.

That's the rule. Everybody knows you don't talk to cops. You get a lawyer. Don't be stupid. Yep. And it is kind of rough because it's like you can literally never know. Like there's some circumstances, obviously, where you talk to cops, like if you call them. But the point is, when there's a crime being investigated, you don't know if you're the

suspect. You just I'm sorry. I mean, this is the way the way it works. But there's something different here in that we have. The intent we know for a fact and no reason, if you go up to a random person on the street and say, hey, AOC just provided this information on how to avoid ICE. Was that intended to help illegal immigrants avoid deportation? They'd say, yeah, of course. Oh, OK, well, that's inducement. That's illegal. The question is, is Trump going to have the gall to actually go after Democrat politicians who have long broken the law and skirted our federal codified law to induce illegal immigration. Because let's be real, as Phil was pointing out, these people from a position of authority saying this, what did we see?

We saw people come to the border wearing shirts saying, please, Biden, let us in. Yeah. I mean, Joe Biden said that from the in one of the debates, he said surge the border. And the result was, you know, 15, 20 million illegals came in in the four years or something along those lines. I mean, it was it was it was record breaking and an astronomical number. these kind of statements, there has to be a higher standard that they're held to because of the because of the implication that they're telling people the legal right thing to do. You know, I understand that, you know, everyone is free to whether they be in Congress or a regular citizen, you're free to say whatever you want to say but there are certain responsibilities that come with your position in congress and i think that that kind of that kind of you know interaction with with

people that are that are illegals saying look these are the things you do to avoid detection and these are the things the rights that you have so that way you can avoid having to, you know, interact with police or whatever. I do think that that does at least approach a crime. And it should be something that Congress and I know I'm going to sound like a fossil for even saying this, but maybe Congress people need to be censured for it. We haven't censured anyone. I know in ages and ages, most people don't even know what a censure is. Right. ages most people don't even know what a censure is right but like there should be some repercussions because they've enabled people to come to the u.s illegally and help and they're helping them stay

for those for those who don't know just real quick uh if you don't know what inducement means it's a inducement of federal orders can be illegal if it involves improper financial arrangements which is if you get away from ice and you keep collecting money from the state, the government, that might be that, or actions that violate federal laws, which is them telling them, the bad, the illegals to get away from ICE. That's, if there is someone in jail and they are to be stayed there and the police let them go and the Congress people tell them that they should go and hide somewhere, that's definitely violating federal laws. It's basically encouraging them. I believe it says encouraging and inducing. So encouragement would be we know what that means is a literal. It's like saying to someone like,

hey, come here, do this thing and you'll be safe. You can do it this way. Inducement would be providing some kind of incentive. Say if you do this, we'll do X. So this is encouragement potential under the inducement statute. But I think the issue is for these Democrats, they have largely longly for a long time operate with impunity as it pertains to the law. Like sanctuary states and sanctuary cities is one thing where they say we're not going to participate in law enforcement nor communicate with them. And it's like, OK, well, I feel like they're violating the spirit of the union of states by basically saying we're going to break the law, which negatively impacts all of you disproportionately gives us power in congress and the presidential elections whatever but now when they're at the federal level actively

helping illegal immigration advocating for it outright now we're at a point where we have to ask ourselves a question can we as a nation can we stop that that? It's illegal. It violates the spirit of the union. Let me explain it. California offers free health care. They call it Medi-Cal. Free health care to illegal immigrants, not to American citizens. That's inducement. That is inducement.

You come here, we'll give you free health care is inducement. The state is doing that. When those people come, they then say, we will not deport you, nor will we assist federal law enforcement. Then the census happens. They get extra congressional seats, extra votes at the Electoral College, and we all have to abide by them breaking the rules and violating the Constitution and committing federal crimes. How do you stop that? I mean, unfortunately, it seems like there's one strong way and it's going to be DOJ accountability. Perhaps Trump can cut off all funding. The federal government

will no longer provide a single penny to any state that is not enforcing the law. Look, I grew up in a country, Canada, where I mean, the political game in Canada was that the Liberal Party for decades would let in as many immigrants as possible, legal immigrants. And basically the quid pro quo was we're letting you in, you're going to vote for us. And that's why Pierre Trudeau stayed in power for two decades, right? Democratic politicians in America understand that game. I mean, AOC, Ilhan Omar, and the Democratic Party understand that the more legal immigrants they bring in, the more pathways to citizenship they provide, the more votes they get. And that secures them a Democratic majority. I mean, I think at the end of the day, Donald Trump is president of the United States and Republicans

control the House and Senate because it is in effect today an 80-20 issue. The 80% of Americans want to control their borders. They don't want illegal immigrants. By the way, they want legal immigrants. They were a country of, I mean, a number of us, you know, who came from different countries. We understand the power and the strength, and in some cases, the beauty of legal immigration. What we don't want to do is have our borders violated, the legals come in, and one political party in America basically piggyback on illegal immigration in order to ride to a permanent political majority. And that's the Democratic game. I mean, let's face it.

At the end of the day, that's behind everything. Let's jump to the story from the New York Post where it gets a lot worse. Border Czar Tom Homan accuses FBI of leaking information about ICE raids, lives at risk. Kristi Noem made a similar comment, pointing out that information was leaked to the LA Times about raids that were gonna be happening all over this country. Tom Homan pointed out that if this information gets out, there's gonna be some criminal, a gang member,

a cartel member who's concerned about getting caught, lying in wait, and when the law enforcement shows up, they get ambushed. Now, this is where it gets crazy. Tom Homan said that they've narrowed it down. They think they know who it is and there's going to be an arrest. So they're going to go after the leakers in the FBI. But in the previous segment, we were talking about Democrats largely in California. But there's many states that are doing it that are violating the law. That's a U.S. Title VIII U.S. Code 1324, Section A, Subsection 4,

encouragement and inducement of illegal immigration. California provides free health care to illegal immigrants. I would call that inducement. They refuse to deport or cooperate with law enforcement. They use the illegal immigrants to bolster their census numbers so they get more congressional seats, more electoral votes. You have an inside job. Yes. States violating the law for power and at the federal level leaking information to aid and abet those states and the people who have broken the law illegally entering the country and those that would help them.

The question we asked in the previous segment was, will the DOJ have the gall to go after these states for doing this? When Tom Homan says they're going after the FBI, it's actually a terrifying prospect if you think about it. This means you have rogue states. We've known this. And you have rogue FBI. We've known this. What happens when the DOJ starts going after arresting FBI agents, state officials, people who are who are within our state government and federal government who are actively trying to cause harm to this country? I think you have the makings for a very serious constitutional crisis and potential intrastate conflict. I mean, so what's going on here, if I understand this, is that FBI agents are leaking information about ICE raids to information that's ending up in the hands of not only illegal immigrants,

but gangs who get the heads up that ICE is coming in and then can flee. I mean, that has got to be a violation. Or worse. I mean, it's got to be a violation or worse. I mean, it's got to be a violation of every duty that the FBI holds. I would also say probably a violation of their actual security clearances, because this is information that is classified information that they are leaking and they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law as anybody who holds security clearance and violates that clearance has been and should be. Well, I don't know about anybody that'sates that clearance has been and should be well i don't know about anybody that

has that's that's had that clearance and violated it let's talk about that that'd be interesting but but i do think that um i do think that in this context it's not it's undeniable if if those things have happened if the if the fbi is leaking about know, ice rates and stuff, I think that that is ample evidence that we need people like Kash Patel, people that are outside of the bureaucracy going into these organizations and looking for the people that are not on board with the administration there's a lot of people that are up in arms about elon musk and the thing they say over and over is he's not elected he's not elected there's only 435 members of congress 100 senators and one president that's 536 elected representatives that's it like in the federal government everybody else all the other millions and millions of people that work for the federal government they're all appointed none of them are elected so this idea that that an elect an unelected person you know going in and trying

to fix the problems of other unelected people is beyond the pale is ridiculous if you and the president needs to have the authority to fire people and this is something that i'm not sure if we're actually going to talk about it but it's it it's something that that will come up in the future because a lot of these there's a lot of judges that are blocking things that the president has said you know as as executive orders he's made and the the argument is well the president does that doesn't have the authority to do that the president doesn't have the authority to do that. The president doesn't have the authority.

And essentially what they're saying is if the president is of the opposing political party, he has no authority and will use the judiciary to prevent him from doing anything we don't like. I mean, there's a list. I have it of specific things that have been blocked so far. We're definitely going to talk about that because the judge is being impeached. Good. But the impeachment, the articles impeachment are being filed. Good. That's important because we need to be able to fix like the problems at the FBI. If this is the case, if the if the president. You want me to just say it, Phil? Go ahead. Yeah.

Let me say what we're talking about when you have states defying federal law cheating the constitution fbi agents opposing the executive administration and judges going rogue to shut down executive authority it's been a long time give it to me civil war that was my first time on the show you're getting it all right it's been a while it's been a while it's been a while but it's back baby civil war is back on the table or at least on the podcast um but you're not wrong like how the and thankfully we we there we do have and this is something that i said before a couple months ago when we were talking about about these problems these possible problems i would prefer there to be some kind of conflict like this when the party that i prefer has the levers of power than when the other party has the levers of power so if there's going to be

if the democrats want to be like oh well we're going to go ahead and and resist etc etc and want to want to do all that stuff fine then we'll go ahead and allow the executive to do executive things. Send the FBI to go ahead and pick up the people that are not following the rules and put them in front of the jury, in front of the courts. I would love it. Right. But and this is the crazy thing. Trump, what are the moves he's made? He said, we're going to put you on leave. And they said, no, he's not even firing me. We're going to keep paying you, but you're not going to be here. Nope. Nope. So what? And this is what they did during Trump's first term, but this time he's not playing around. They, they've repeatedly tried to act like the president has no authority at all,

as if the president himself is a ceremonial position. That's what they've been doing. Yeah. Now we will get into more of that. Of course, to go back to the, the immigration thing, we'll center this around like, you know, what we're talking about now. Law enforcement at the federal level that has been aiding and abetting criminals. And I got questions. I got questions because certainly we can look at what Tom Homan said. According to the story told Fox News, Hannity, some of the information we are receiving tends to lead toward the FBI saying it's it's they're quite certain it's coming from the from inside the FBI. He said he's been promised not only will a person lose their job and pension, but they will go to jail. I'm glad to hear it. But I got questions for for Tom. There were CBP agents that were facilitating child trafficking. Yeah. We're going to forget that. No, it's the argument that because

Biden told him to do it, we're OK with that. I'm not OK with that. So I don't know how far any of these people want to go, but I'll tell you likely what I see happening. Tom Holman, Trump, they're going to say if we've got cogs in a machine that are the banality of evil, but they're going to do their job now as we go against, they're going to let these guys go. The CBP agents that were bringing these children and knowing that they were being trafficked into sex slavery, they're not going to see any charges. And the argument is going to be, oh, well, you know, they're just doing their job and we need their assistance and we don't want to lose these officers and things like that. I don't accept that. But I don't think Trump or Homan or anybody else is going to actually take action against them. I think they'll take Homan is

definitely the right guy for the job because he worked for the Border Patrol agency, and then he worked as an assistant special agent for immigration for ICE, and he's made his way up. He is tough as nails. He is hardcore, and he would go after people today. I can see him – to answer your question, Tim, yes, he will do that. But I don't see – I'm really worried about him not going – him going back and not taking all the agents who did facilitate facilitate all the child traffic sex working. Let me say something I think is going to be controversial with this audience. But look, I think there's I think you're I agree with everything you said, but there should be some legal consistency, right? I mean, FBI agents violating their clearances, providing classified information to drug cartels to give them the heads up that ICE is coming in is beyond the pale, immoral and illegal.

But the guy named Snowden, who had high security clearance, the highest security clearance in the land, instead of going to the inspector general of the CIA and saying, I believe there's a legal activity taking place that violates America's constitutional rights, decides on his own accord to leak highly classified information to the press, putting people's lives in jeopardy. And there are people, I think, who want to see Donald Trump issue a pardon of Snowden or think that he was, you know, illegally convicted in the first place. I mean, I believe at the end of the day. Was he convicted, actually? I don't know if they held a trial or anything for him. Well, he certainly I mean, he should be he should be put on trial. I think that I mean, we'll see what the what the evidence points to. He says a presumption of innocence. But at the end of the day, if it's shown that he violated his security clearance and he leaked information that he was not allowed to leak, it's no different than FBI agents leaking information about ice raids, putting lives at risk. I agree. And I

think a lot of people watch so completely agree because we've talked about this before. I'm not here to give you, you know, there's a lot of people who are going to say, I hate the U.S. government or I think they're corrupt. Therefore, what Snowden did was good. I'm not gonna play that game. I'm going to talk to you about what is and what is not. Snowden is not a whistleblower. He is a leaker. There's a difference. Bradley, a.k.a. Chelsea Manning, is a whistleblower, not a leaker. There's a difference. The difference is when it came to Bradley Manning at the time, releasing information on specific actions, Blowing the whistle is saying this one thing that happened was illegal and people need to know this illegal thing happened.

Now, that's a broad definition of whistleblower. Some might prefer that you go through the official channels of saying I have uncovered something illegal. But when you're dealing with superiors or whatever, I'm not saying this is exactly what happened, but it's not so easy to do. If a person goes to the press and says, I've uncovered a direct action that is illegal and needs to be revealed, you're blowing the whistle. That's not what Snowden did. Snowden found a handful of programs, X-Key Score being one notable example. There was spying going on.

So did Edward Snowden then take that program individually, go to the press and say, look at this one thing that is illegal? No. Snowden took tens of thousands of documents without checking any of them or redacting any of them and leaked them to a bunch of different news organizations in which Snowden admitted this in an interview saying, perhaps I should have actually gone through them. And so there's a big difference between being a leaker and a whistleblower. Certainly, I can say I am I am glad to an extent Snowden revealed information on NSA spying and these illegal programs. That's good. We learned about it, but it happened in many occasions. I don't think anyone lost their lives. But the identity of a U.S. operative was compromised in the leaking of this information without redaction. Snowden was challenged on it.

And Snowden said, yeah, I probably shouldn't have done that. And it's like, right, well, you did wrong. You did wrong. Okay, so I can accept the good but say it was still done improperly and there's got to be some penalty for it. However, I will add at this point, I don't know. I think we're so far past it with the Snowden, Assange, with the Manning stuff where it's just like, I'm not going to sit here and try and litigate the past. I don't want to go backwards. And I know sometimes you have to, depends on the severity. In this case, I don't know that we are served by prioritizing that. There's a lot of other things that I want to

prioritize. I'm not saying necessarily give them a blanket part and bring them home and give them a ticker tape parade. Maybe we just say, we've got bigger fish to fry right now. And we can acknowledge there was wrongdoing in that regard. But instead of ranting on all of that, because I can go on a million years on all that stuff. Can that be said? I mean, I agree about going back to the past when it comes to the Border Patrol agents, but that can be different. OK, that's what I think. This is the point.

Edward Snowden leaking information from several administrations ago, of which it included some illegal activity but was done improperly is not child trafficking. Correct. So I don't think this is this is like this is my moral line. Edward Snowden did something wrong. There was some good in it. The CBP agents did nothing good. Children were coming off with numbers on their arms to child sex traffickers. And they were like, oh, well, Biden told me to do it. And I'm like, Edward Snowden being doofy and being like, well, I'm going to leak all these documents is a more of a banality of evil. But some good was in it. It's it's it's more nuanced. I'm not happy with the way he did it. I have no problem saying he is a leaker and not a whistleblower because people keep they keep trying to say he's a whistleblower. They try to compare Snowden with Assange. Assange was a journalist. Assange was

getting documents from sources, redacting information where need be and publishing it. Don't compare the two. Snowden did bad things. He did wrong, but there was some good in it. There is a moral line in that CBP knew children were coming across the border, had numbers on their arms to sell them into slavery, sex slavery. And they went, oh, well, there was no good being done there. And I will take no statute of limitations on that. Snowden, I'm just kind of like, I don't I don't care at this point. You know what I mean? I mean, some people might say we can't allow these kinds of leaks to happen. You made a good point. Look, the FBI is leaking information. They think they're doing the right thing. We know it's not. It's bad

for this country. So perhaps we need to say to Snowden, like, look, you leaked. And if we're going to hold them to the same standard, you will get held to it as well. The penalty probably wouldn't be too severe, so maybe fine. But for those CBP agents, for this FBI agent, I'm like compromising national security, aiding and abetting cartels, drug smugglers, fentanyl, all that stuff. I don't tolerate that. That is that is killing people. One is administrative, bureaucratic, high level national security stuff, which is which is scary. And one is directly eroding and ripping the country apart at the at the base level. And I don't know, man. Look, I the child stuff with CBP, I think, is just like no way. No way rough. Let's do this, though. Let's jump to what Phil was talking about.

The story at Newsweek. Judge Paul Engelmeyer faces impeachment for blocking Musk's Doge. Good. Absolutely. So this is Rep. Eli Crane of Arizona posted on X that he will be filing articles of impeachment based on Engelmeyer, who was attempting to stop White House employees from axing the very systems they oversee. I'm in favor of this. You know, I'll put it this way. I was watching a segment from CNN earlier. I know, I'll put it this way. I was watching a segment from CNN earlier. I know, I know it was rough. Caitlin Collins was saying that we're facing a constitutional crisis, potentially, within the first three weeks of Trump's presidency. Of course. But the issue at play was he wants to put federal employees on leave. And OK, like, I don't see why it's a problem. But there have been lawsuits to stop that.

There are things that Trump wants to do that they're saying you can't do. You can't fire people. Well, Trump didn't fire people. He put them on leave. Right. There's a difference. They say, well, you need to act to Congress, blah, blah, blah. For Doge, this is a federal agency tasked with performing an audit of another agency

and a judge intervening from outside the executive branch saying you can't audit your own departments. That doesn't make any sense. If Trump tried to fire here, here's how it's supposed to work. Let me explain. If Trump tries to fire a bunch of employees, but Congress has codified legislation saying you can't fire these employees in these circumstances, the courts as a check and balance would then come in and say, no, Trump, you can't do it. There is a law passed by Congress. Congress says federal employees are protected in this way. So in this way. So that's a check on the executive branch. You may not like it, but that's how we're supposed to do it. When Trump says I have the U.S. Digital Service now called U.S. Doge Service with executive branch employees who are going to go in and review

documents from another branch. A judge can't block that. There's no codified law. There's no check on that. It's literally federal executive employees who serve at the pleasure of the president looking over documents in a department of the federal government to look for fraud and abuse. Here's where it gets crazy. A judge has now blocked Trump from pausing federal grants. So Trump basically signs his order saying we're going to stop spending all this money, the federal government, because of the because there's a lot of fraud, waste, fraud and abuse. The judge said, find the fraud first.

You can't shut these payments down. Then when Elon Musk and Doge go to the Treasury because they suspect fraud, a judge says you're not allowed to look at it. So how are you supposed to stop the payments that are fraudulent or you suspect to be fraudulent if another judge is blocking you from investigating fraud? These people are corrupt all around. Impeach them. Or Trump should just say you are outside of your purview. The Constitution grants you no authority to stop me from doing an audit of a federal department that may or may not be spending money fraudulently. And you know what? They've already uncovered fraudulent spending.

They fired several FEMA employees over it. Money should not be going from FEMA to luxury hotels for illegal immigrants. Especially when FEMA was specifically targeting conservatives and Trump voters, people with Trump flags or Trump signs in their front yard after Hurricane. I forget which hurricane it was. It was the most recent hurricane in Florida. Ed Markey has a tweet that says, Birthright citizen order blocked. Federal funding cutoff blocked.

Illegal feds resignation plan blocked. Access to Treasury's vital data system blocked. Firing 2,000 USAID workers blocked. USAID workers blocked. Drastic NIH grant cuts blocked. Removing public health websites blocked. This is literally in direct conflict with the will of the American people. The president was elected.

He was elected. Clearly, he had the Electoral College and the popular vote. And the Democrats didn't pick up one individual county. They didn't pick up any counties in the whole country. They only lost. The whole United States shifted to the right. Now, you don't have to like President Trump, but I do recall that when President Obama was elected, one of his famous tagline or one of his favorite lines was elections have consequences. This is what the American

people want. This this obstruction by federal judges. This is literally obstructing the will of the American people. And I don't see, and I don't see how you can see it any other way, because this is like, I mean, the, the USA ID stuff is, is egregious in and of itself, but all of this stuff, it's just essentially an audit and they don't even want to allow an audit. And the American people are almost consistently like this is an 80-20 issue. Like everybody says, OK, yeah, it's OK to audit the government. It's OK to shrink to shrink the size of government a little bit, because we know that there's some kind of waste, waste, fraud and abuse all the time.

Look, I mean, Trump's political genius is is finding the 80-20 issue, taking the 80 and letting Democrats go crazy about the 20. And it's a great political strategy. And if he follows that, Democrats will never come back into power. I would say the other thing, President Obama- But it's also the right thing to do. No, it is the right thing to do. It's the right thing to do for America.

President Obama also said that if Congress is gonna block me, I'm gonna rule by executive order. So, you know, another example of hypocrisy. I would say just on the other side, and it's personal, it's a passion of mine. I don't know how this will play with you guys or the audience, but what's going on with TikTok, right? TikTok, controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, right? I mean, it's akin to having like Joseph Goebbels control every radio set in America during World War II or Joseph Stalin controlling, you know, ABC, CBS, and NBC during the Cold War, Congress on a bipartisan basis overwhelmingly

passes a law requiring ByteDance that owns TikTok, that's owned by the Chinese Communist Party, to divest within a certain period of time or face a ban. It gets challenged by TikTok in the courts. TikTok loses to the Court of Appeals. They go to the Supreme Court. They lose 9-0, Supreme Court. The day before inauguration is the time where the clock has run out. President Trump comes into office, and he decides not to enforce the law. Now, Tim, I want to ask you because you were talking about the checks and balances in the system. I think the example you gave was a perfect example where the checks and balances can work. And there are many examples here where this is the executive branch's prerogative to do what it wants to do with the executive branch. In the case of TikTok, I don't know where you are on the issue, but not a fan, not a fan of TikTok. Should President Trump be enforcing the law passed by Congress and

helped upheld by the absolutely. I don't think we're going far enough on China. In fact, he is. So while Trump has come out and claimed he's put an executive order pause on TikTok, TikTok has and is still banned on all app stores. So when when the law was put into effect, it triggered Google, Apple and all the other ancillary digital and TV stores nuked TikTok from their platforms, as well as CapCut and other apps that are owned by that company. Trump issued an executive order saying we're putting a pause on it. TikTok pulled this stunt where before the law went into effect, they shut themselves down. Then Trump came out and said, I'm going to work with TikTok. Then TikTok turned themselves back on and said, thanks to President Trump, you know, we're back. All of these young people on TikTok who don't understand how the system works started cheering for this, saying, I can't believe I have to support Trump now. He just saved TikTok.

And then a day later, all the app stores banned TikTok. And to this day, they have been banned. You don't need enforcement when the insurance companies tell big tech, we will drop you like a sack of potatoes if you break the law. So the argument I had made when the TikTok thing came in was Trump can say whatever he wants. He put a deferment on enforcement saying, so I believe the penalty is, was it $5,000 per user per day or some ridiculous? It's like, it's insane. It's like, it's like trillions of dollars, billions of dollars a day or trillions of dollars a day. And he said, you know, for for this amount of time, we're not going to enforce those fines.

And my point was, you know, running a company, you're going to be hard pressed to find an insurance, an insurer who's going to say, so let me get this straight. You intend to violate federal law, but because Trump said he won't come after you for the liabilities you incur in a short amount of period, you're willing to incur the liabilities over a greater amount of period. I ain't sure on that. If you get a grace period on a month for let's say let's just simplify it. The law says if you do bad thing, million dollar fine per month. President says, yeah, yeah, but we won't enforce against you.

So you mean after 30 days you will? Yes. So that means if Amazon, if Oracle, whatever, if any of these big tech platforms provide a service to to bite dance to tick tock, they're going to go after him. Every single insurance company that's operating in that chain, of which I bet there's 30 to 40 of them for for Google, for instance, would cut them off in two seconds saying there's no way we are going to take the risk that Trump is going to just not enforce that against you. And then we have to pay it. What happened? They all dropped TikTok in a second. Enforcement doesn't even matter at this point. Nobody's getting involved in that. But you do ultimately support the proposition that the Chinese Communist Party should not be controlling the most important media platform. TikTok just gave us. So we launched another channel. We've been banned 87 times. TikTok's

outright told us this time around, they didn't do it the first time that our conversations are not allowed explicitly. So our social team got a warning saying that while we allow opinions, we exist in a shared reality and your opinions have to adhere to ours. That's what it said. And I'm like, this is a talk show. We do a talk show where we have conversations, not on TikTok. This is this is the problem. Instagram's got no problem. Now, the annoying thing is Instagram doesn't let us promote the show because it's political. They have rules. You have to go to like a special thing to promote or whatever.

But TikTok bans us every time because TikTok does not want. This is the Chinese control. This is the communist control, in my opinion. They don't want these conversations to reach the masses. They don't want Gen Z to hear this. So that's why they're like, sorry, those opinions aren't a lot on TikTok. So much for free speech. And then you get all these people claiming that, yeah, but TikTok lets you badmouth Israel. And I'm like, and they ban everybody else. I don't care. Look, Rumble exists, right? You can say whatever you want on Rumble. You know, you can't break the

law, obviously. But there are platforms and you can navigate them so i am i am i i am i am no tiktok another thing about the i think i think the when i said earlier the u.s doesn't go far enough when it comes to the chinese communist party i think the chips act was a good intentioned policy but i think the fact that we don't make enough uh chips here in the United States to take care of the federal government and the military, I think that that's actually one of the biggest threats to the United States there is. It's not controversial to say that almost every piece of equipment that comes from China can be compromised by China. And I would not in any way be surprised if the Chinese had the ability to either access or to cripple vital software or vital hardware in the military that's used in the military. Look, because of the FAA, we can't make drones in the united states

we don't make any drones all of the drones that are built they're all made in china because the faa says that to have a drone to build a drone you have to be a it has to be line of sight or you have to have a pilot's license so the chinese can make drones sell them in the united states but you can't have an American company make them. That means that the US military, which is using drones all the time, and is only going to use them more as AI becomes more prevalent, because when you

can have a drone that literally will just be following a squad around. So you got four dudes and you got one drone that goes with the squad over their shoulder, giving them heads up of possible threats in the in the you know down the down range or if you can send the drone into a building that you're trying to clear so that you can you can assess what's going on that kind of stuff china will have all the access to that it

wants not only that it'll have access to all of our planning and all of our our methods and all of our uh you know all the training that we do it'll know all the stuff the united states does on the ground and the idea that we don't have an infrastructure to make sure that the f-22 has the chips that it needs that to make sure that all the drones that we fly have the chips that they that we need to make sure that all of the drones that are going to be assigned to just infantry guys like your your you know your your o 0-3-11s, you know, all your your riflemen, your your squads. All of that stuff needs to be it needs to be made in the United States and it needs to be made. And it honestly, it should be TS.

It should be top secret. It should be there should be significant security placed on all this stuff, because if not, we're in a losing game. You know, so I personally I don't think one quick point on that. I mean, the greatest threat to our economy and our national security is when we lose Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party. Absolutely. Because Taiwan is the leading center for semiconductor design and manufacturing in the world. If you break ground on a semiconductor factory in the United States, you shouldn't pay taxes at all, ever. Ever. Period.

They are trying to get those plants up and operating. You're right. The CHIPS Act was a good initiative, but because of all the regulation that everything takes, we can't get it done. Well, maybe Trump is going to, you know. I would love to see it i would love to see you know i know david sacks is on is working with the uh with ai stuff and i know that he's working with crypto i hope that there are other people in the in the administration that are as focused on this stuff

because it is the so i'm i'm regularly i say that the the greatest the only existential threat the United States faces is our debt is our national debt. Right. The Social Security, the unfunded liabilities, those things can blow up our economy. There is one other thing that maybe it's not an existential threat, but a major threat. And that's our inability to produce semiconductors in the United States. Let's jump to this next story from The New York Times. Top FEMA official is fired over payments for New York City migrant shelters. The Trump admin fired the Federal Emergency Management Agency's chief financial officer and three others after Elon Musk misleadingly claimed the agency had used disaster relief funds for migrant services. Ah, let's play the game, New York Times.

They say, blah, blah, blah, we get it. The firings kept a startling chain of events. Elon Musk claimed misleadingly that FEMA recently sent $59 million meant for disaster relief to New York City to pay for high-end hotels for migrants and who called the expenditure unlawful. New York City officials raced to clarify that the federal money had been properly allocated by FEMA under Biden last year, adding that it was not a disaster relief grant and not been spent on luxury hotels. Nonetheless, just two hours after Mr. Musk's post, FEMA's acting director, Cameron Hamilton, announced the payments in question have all been suspended, even though most of the money had already been dispersed and that personnel will be held

accountable. By Tuesday morning, roughly 24 hours after Musk's post, the Trump administration had followed through on one part of its pledge. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA, said that the four employees have been terminated for circumventing leadership to unilaterally make egregious payments for luxury NYC hotels for migrants. Ms. McLaughlin did not specify the employees that undermined leadership or how making payments previously appropriated by Congress amounted to unilateral conduct, but she said those fired included two program analysts, a grant specialist, and the agency's chief financial officer, Mary Comins, whom FEMA's website identifies as a longtime public servant.

Under President Trump and Secretary Noem's leadership, DHS will not sit idly by and allow deep-seat activists to undermine the will and safety of the American people, McLaughlin said in her statement. The suit firings underscored Mr. Musk's growing influence, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Now I'm going to pause real quick and ask the New York Times a question. Where in this story do they explain how Musk was wrong other than just saying he was? Honest question. Please tell me what was really going on with this money. Now they say Biden had already, what is it they say under Biden? It had already been appropriate. Yet Trump sent an executive order freezing these these payments. I know a judge

has put a pause on the suspension and there's an appeal, an ongoing thing. But we do have a conflict here. What they said was that he's misleading them. It didn't go to high end hotels, but they're not explaining to us how he was wrong, what actually happened. So I don't tolerate this from news organizations. Elon Musk made an assert asserted this issue. I want to know why it was wrong. But this is what the media does. They say he was wrong. And I say, oh, really? Why? What was the truth? And they say nothing. They say nothing. So so which is it? It's debunked. It's debunked. That's it. Like everything. Debunked. Well, I'm going to say this. I don't trust these people at all.

And I think in all likelihood, they actually were trying to fund this. And the New York Times is simply claiming it's wrong because they're probably going to cite some technicality as to why it wasn't technically going to high-end hotels. Because the hotels aren't really high-end because their stakes only cost $70, not $75. I don't know what they're actually talking about, and I'm not falling for it. So you can come to me and you can say, no, no, no, Tim, here, look. Here's what was really going on. The money wasn't disaster relief. It was meant to go to insert this or whatever.

And that's fine. And you're allowed to do that. My point is we don't trust you at all. The media plays these games. Elon Musk will say luxury hotels hotels and they'll say these are only four star, not five. That's not luxury. Luxury is five stars. And it's like a four star hotel with $50 stakes is luxury. And they'll say, no, it's an opinion. And then I'm supposed to take their word for it. At any rate, it is big news to hear that one of the highest officials at FEMA has been nuked from their position over this payment. So this is absolutely fascinating. And I'm curious what you guys think about,

you know, the moves Elon Musk is making and if it's a good thing or not. Well, just one quick point about the New York Times, not to get to sort of my issues, but I've been reading the New York Times for decades, particularly on the Middle East. What's that? Condolences. Condolences on the Middle East, on Israel, on the Palestinian conflict, on Iran. And it's not shocking to me at all after reading the New York Times for decades on something I know a lot about, to find the New York Times continuing to mislead the American people about all of these issues. I mean, it should have been a red flag a

long time ago that this is not news reporting. There are ideological agendas at work here. There are editors who have ideological agendas and find reporters to fit the story. And for those of us who support what Elon Musk is doing, for those of your audience who voted for President Trump, you should not be surprised that The New York Times has a deep ideological hostility against the president, against Elon Musk and against Republicans. And every story you should read with a skeptical eye. Let me do this for you guys, because to make my point, you know, often I'll use CNN, The New York Times to make that point. Here's ABC7. This is your typical corporate press news outlet outright saying Department of Government Efficiency had Elon Musk on Monday sounded the alarm over a $59 million payment by FEMA to house migrants in New York City. They're going to say that the finding comes

as Doge continues to uncover controversies of taxpayer dollars. So there's numerous outlets asserting this as true. And the New York Times just simply said it was false and then didn't tell us why it was false. So you pick. That's the world we live in right now. I'm going to tell you what I pick. I pick that Elon is largely correct. USAID has been funding garbage. We've exposed a lot of that garbage. Donald Trump was elected specifically to go out, go after waste, fraud and abuse, among other things. So in the New York Times, which has lied numerous times about Donald Trump and actively worked to stop him from getting elected, comes out and says Elon Musk is lying.

I'll be like, oh, wow, the New York Times is lying. That's the knee-jerk reaction that only makes sense. You know, the New York Times has been, I mean, look, it's been garbage since the Soviet Union, since they were shirling the Soviet Union in the, what, 20s was, when Duranty was writing, i think it was you know and just straight up lying for ideological purposes so to believe to believe the new york times is to intentionally accept the propaganda you know remember when uh i have this story actually limp hold the story this for me i was an interesting point telegraph wrote fema officials sacked over $59 million payments for migrant hotels.

Oh, that's weird that it's being reported as fact by The Telegraph and by ABC. But they make an interesting point. They say, in November, a FEMA official was suspended after allegedly ordering disaster relief workers to avoid homes owned by Trump supporters as they worked to clear devastation wreaked on Florida by Hurricane Milton. Remember when they the media lied about that and said it wasn't happening? Then you ended up with an interview where the woman said, well, I mean, if someone feels uneasy and they don't want to go to that house, you know, they can't. That's ridiculous. It's so ridiculous. I can't I can't believe that they actually make that argument like, oh, well, you know, they're literally, it was the people on the ground. Like, come on.

If your house is underwater and they feel unsafe going there, just try to help out a fellow American. Oh, yeah, the Trump sign. It's insane. It's insane. Well, I just think that these kind of things are there happens so regularly and and the bias from the media is it's not it's look in the early aughts it was like oh well you know there is a left-wing bias in the media it's because they're based in cities and the people live in cities and so they have city kind of mindsets. And the difference isn't really intentional because you want you wanted to believe that you weren't being propagandized.

And that honestly, you wanted to believe that people on of the opposing political opinions weren't actually being targeted and attacked. But then when Barack Obama had the IRS scandal, the Lois Lerner scandal, when they were targeting conservatives and and then every single, you know, nor legacy media outlet went all in on Donald Trump's a Nazi. And they all were doing the, you know, the very fine people hoax and all that stuff. It's not only did it become undeniable it became common knowledge but they were doing they were doing the whole you know like socialists and said like they're lying we know they're lying and they know that we know we're lying and yet they keep lying and now with the USAID stuff and all the the doge uncoveries we know that they were being paid and I know there are people that are going to say,

oh, well, you know, they weren't being paid. They weren't or they weren't getting, you know, just getting free money. They were buying, you know, buying subscriptions and blah, blah, blah. Yeah. But they were still making tons of money off of the government. Well, where do you think all this goes? Do you think Elon is going to stop anytime soon? I hear the rumor going around now that they're just going to gut all the departments, all the agencies. Look, I don't know how far Elon's going to go. I'm certainly a huge supporter of this kind of accountability. But I was thinking just as you guys were speaking about the media, and I hate to invoke my age, but I'm old enough to remember what the media used to be like and what the media is today. And I think what saddens me is there's so much disinformation.

There's so much fake news that I think young people have lost all trust in the media. And I think to be skeptical today, to be a critical thinker today, you know, is what will make America great. What I worry about is because we've lost so much faith in mainstream media and their reporting and their ideological agendas, is that it is now so easy to be influenced by conspiracy theories, to go down rabbit holes, to start to accept things that I don't believe anybody, I don't believe anything, our government is evil.

And from our government is evil to America is evil is not a far leap. So for that reason, I mean, great to have shows like this one. I mean, the explosion of social media, of podcasts, of opportunities for people to go and get another perspective. It's no longer the days of Walter Cronkite,

where Walter Cronkite declared one thing, and that was the universal truth. And it's certainly not the days of where now the New York Times, the paper of record, it's no longer the paper of record, because I think it has delegitimized itself. I agree completely. As have, you know, as the Washington Post,

I think the Washington Post is even a more egregious example of this than the New York Times. Democracy dies in the darkness. Well, so do subscribers when you're not reporting the truth. Yeah. But I do worry about where this is taking us as a nation where we no longer believe anything we hear. And I think it's very easy to go from that to we no longer have faith in our own country. Speaking of skepticism. Let's jump to this story from the Post Millennial. Anna Paulina Luna believes there were two shooters in JFK

assassination. Oh, boy. We were originally going to lead with this because it's massive. You know, it's really remarkable to me. I mean, let me start by saying we got it. We got a couple of big stories here. We got Daily Mail saying FBI uncovers hidden JFK assassination files after Trump orders full evidence release. I don't believe it for a second. They knew they existed. They just weren't disclosing they existed until Trump's making them do it. Yeah.

But in my lifetime, you weren't allowed to question the JFK assassination. How dare you? Oliver Stone got a lot of hell when he made the JFK movie. Yeah, right. And then we sat down with Dr. Paulul dr ron paul uh and he said it was a cia and we were like wow well right away and i believe when we sat down with rfk jr he he said he said the same thing didn't he yeah he did so so in our lifetimes uh in our lifetime we have shifted dramatically from the how dare you question the narrative to it's widely accepted that this

was an inside job to take out a president that had been causing problems. And there were a lot of special interests that wanted to see this man lose his life. Well, in a press conference, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said this. What's your priority? This is Epstein 9-11. Our first investigation will be announced, but it's going to be covering on a thorough investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination. And I can tell you, based on what I've been seeing so far, the initial hearing that was actually held here in Congress was actually faulty in the single bullet theory. I believe that there were two shooters and we should be finding more information as we are

able to gain access into the skiff, hopefully before the files are actually released to the public. Now, I believe she's also getting roasted by many on the left because she mentioned something about wanting to bring in the Warren Commission. Did you see that video of which they're they're dead? There's no one left. I think the old the last person died at 2006 or whatever. So I'm just assuming she misspoke or is just incorrect. But that's OK. I'm curious to see what they uncover from these documents. And I think largely the reason Democrats are singling out one misstatement or whatever is because they don't want to address the meat and potatoes here. Yeah, that is there are a lot of documents. Trump ordered them to be released, then offered up the pen to RFK Jr. that he used to sign the order. And everybody, oh man,

insert conspiracy theory, they believe they're going to find what they want. Of course. The UFO people are like, oh, I bet the documents... It was aliens the whole time. And then, of course, you've got the Israel people who are like, it's the documents.

They're going to claim it was Israel. It was the Jews. It was the Jews. But that's legit. There are people who are saying that the documents are being or only covered up because of Israel's involvement. It's going to include them. I think likely we're going to find is there were very many groups that were interested in this. And I think the most likely reason for a cover up is government involvement yeah so my my tertiary understanding after the bay of pigs kennedy was

like maybe the cia is not all that and maybe we should think about disbanding or significant cuts or whatever and cia didn't like that that's my he didn't say he said he was going to what it was splinter them into the wind or well more scatter them into the wind so then i mean is that is that is that does that wrap up what your sense is, Mark? Do you have an opinion on this? Look, I don't know. I mean, obviously, I'm also, again, old enough to remember Oliver Stone and his film and the conspiracy theories that we all grew up with.

I mean, I think many of us didn't believe there was one shooter and many of us believed believed that there were, you know, whether it was angry Cubans or the mafia or the Soviets. I would just like to say this. I hope to God that it doesn't demonstrate that it was an inside job. I hope to God the U.S. government was not involved. I hope to God the CIA was not involved in the assassination of the U.S. president, because I think that will rock this country. Do you think so? I think so. I mean, we were talking earlier about just my fear that this sort of new generation of Americans is not proud, is not patriotic, doesn't love this country, is skeptical about their government. And I just think that if that becomes true and that the cia was

involved in killing jfk i mean i think we are as a i don't know if the country we recover from that do you have a sense of what people believe now like i know obviously nothing's confirmed but and the reason i say this is because the there was there's been a long time where people were talking about us, right? And UFOs were something that the government didn't comment on, etc., etc. Now it's come out that, hey, look, they've changed the name. They're UAPs or whatever, but they talk about them openly. And some of them, they say, we don't know what these are, blah, blah, blah, etc.

And the American people are kind of just like yeah we know and i feel like that might i feel like that that would be the the sense from at least most young people like if it was like oh cia did it yeah we know i i mean if if that's if that if you have a different you know outlook i think it's one thing to have a theory of the case you know based on uh your own views your own ideologies i think it's another thing for the U.S. government to release information after all these years that demonstrates that the CIA was responsible for the assassination of the U.S. president. So I worry about our country if that's true. Hypothetically. Me too.

I think it's true. Hypothetically, what happens? What does what does the Trump administration do if that turns out to be the evidence? Well, look, I think part of the problem with this this this whole issue has been the lack of transparency over decades, which has fed so many conspiracy theories. And I think the Trump administration is right to finally disclose this to the American people. And now, if it's true, again, I'm skeptical, but if it's true, we're going to have to reckon with this quite possibly one of the ugliest episodes in American history. You shut down Langley. Do you do you do you? I mean, because and and I got to say, there's a strong incentive for Trump to want this to be true, considering what happened with him, with the 51 intel officers who said the laptop and all that stuff. Maybe the real reason Trump is like we're

declassifying the JFK files is that you are going to find either willful negligence at like at minimum. There's going to be some implication, I think, for government failure. And you could you can go the official route and say, how did they allow this guy to get a shot off on Kennedy? Or you can go to the most extreme end saying it was quite literally the CIA that orchestrated the whole thing. Either way, it looks like it'll be damaging. Trump could use that damaging to say we need an overhaul of this agency, an agency that largely targeted him.

That's revenge. Look, I've always what's always puzzled me about I'm not an expert on JFK assassination, but so Lee Harvey oswald is the single shooter kills jfk um jack ruby right who works for the mob kills lee harvey oswald and goes to jail for the rest of his life and never breathes a word and it just always fascinated me i mean lee harvey oswald took out i mean mean, Ruby took out Lee Harvey Oswald. Why? Right. Why did he not want him to testify and publicize the involvement of somebody in that assassination? It's always fascinated me and puzzled me.

Well, he didn't go to jail for, I mean, you can take jail for the rest of his life, but he died right away. In jail, right? Within like, what is it? He died that year. Interesting. Yeah, he died in 67. Yeah. So, I mean, that's always intrigued me.

But again, I just want to get back to this. Several years later, sorry. Trump may have an incentive. Trump may want to, you know, go after the CIA for the things that were done against Trump. And certainly there are, you know, 51, as you say, senior intel officials who not only deserve to have their security clearances revoked, which he did. against Trump and certainly there are 51, as you say, senior intel officials who not only deserve to have their security clearances revoked, which he did, but should have their reputations

permanently damaged. They should be prosecuted. Let's just – let me tell you. Having said that, I do think the CIA performs an important service in defense of America. I think the FBI performs an important service in defense of America. I think U.S. military – I do not. I don't want to see these institutions gone. I think it's dangerous for our country. I do, however, want to see— What does the FBI do? A massive overhaul. FBI?

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, FBI, you said FBIC. I'm going to tell you, certainly, we can take the Kash Patel route and say these people should be enforcing the law. Go out and fight crime. That's what you should be doing. But they're operating like it's COINTELPRO. What is the CIA doing? Why is our what benefit? Let me put it this way. There is a country, the United States, the vision for this country and the perception of this nation in the minds of the people for a long time has been that it is the will of the people through a constitutional republic that the structures of government will abide by what the people largely vote for, who the representatives they send to Washington and to their states, to their capitals. That's what it's supposed to be. For the longest time, the CIA took it upon itself to do what it thinks is right.

And the American people have no idea. It's become a zombie state. So if you were to make the argument, the CIA does good to protect this country. No, the CIA does good to protect CIA. The CIA has interests. The FBI has interests. The NSA have interests. The American people do not agree with those interests. If if if the if the CIA, FBI, the intel agencies were actually operating under what the American people wanted, we would have a secure southern border and no war in Ukraine. Instead, what we get the whole time is the CIA protecting only itself and what it perceives the people in the CIA and the FBI, what they perceive to be the right thing

to do. If the American people vote to shut down the petrodollar resulting in a unipolar communist Chinese party state, the American people voted for it. I do not believe we should live in a country where a deep state bureaucracy operating behind the scenes dictates for us what it thinks we should get. And that's what we've got in our whole lives. Maybe that maybe that means we lose. Well, that's what America is. And that's what America is supposed to be. And I do not accept that we should be a nation of secret institutions guiding the blind American public into war and conflict because the best thing for them. So say I, the secret cabal of individuals working in intelligence. The American people voted for Donald Trump. They want these institutions brought to heel.

They want a secure southern border. And it's about time we got it. And if that means these corrupt institutions that largely only believe in themselves stop doing what will make Americans prosperous, will will stop making us the big name all around the world, whatever it may be. American people never wanted that. American people never wanted to be at war in Ukraine, never wanted to be at war in Israel, never want to be at war in Afghanistan, never want to go to war in these places. But thanks to the corrupt, unelected bureaucrats and intelligence, that's what we got the whole time for the entirety of my life. Tim, can I just say something? I actually think it's worse than that. Because I think the reason

we have a southern border that's not secure, the reason that we went to war against Russia, the reason that we went to war against Iraq and against Afghanistan is not because of a deep state, it's because elected officials decided on a policy decision to do that, right? Joe Biden decided to open up the southern border. Joe Biden decided to- I don't believe that for a second. I mean, at the end of the day, there was some American, I think it was, I can't remember actually who it was. It was an American politician who said, you know, you get the politicians you deserve, right? And the American people have elected presidents who've made terrible decisions that have undermined American national security.

Now, does that mean that these security agencies, the CIA, the FBI, and others should not be brought to heel? Does that mean they should not be held accountable? Does that mean that corrupt officials should not be fired? Absolutely. Absolutely not. They should be. They need to be. And I think Donald Trump and I think his appointees are going to do this. However, and we elected a Donald Trump in 2016. Right. And the CIA colluded and conspired to destroy this man. And now we've we've re Donald Trump, and now he has the opportunity and should have the authority to do everything necessary in order to make sure that doesn't happen again. Shadow the CIA and splinter it into the wind. Yeah. I guess maybe I'm old-fashioned here, and I've said it a few times this evening. But I do believe that there are serious, patriotic, hardworking men and women

in these agencies who committed their life to defend us and defend our country. I mean, the fact of the matter is, we have enemies. We have enemies abroad who want to destroy our way of life, the Chinese Communist Party, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Putin in Russia, the North Koreans, and their enablers around the world, including Sunni jihadists and Shiite jihadist groups who want to destroy us and bring 9-11s over and over again. We need people who are going to defend us, and brave patriots have stood up for decades to defend this country. And those people are still hard at work. The problem is, and you're absolutely right, there are political appointments that have been made of people in these agencies who have undermined our democracy and undermined our elected officials. There are elected officials who've come in and have made terrible the Democrats freak out and let the radical left freak out. That's fine. Changes

need to be made. I guess at the end of the day, I'm not a rip it all down kind of person. Rebuild it. I think you're going to be left with no institutions to defend us. And I think our enemies abroad are just waiting for the opportunity to strike a blow at a divided America, a weakened America. And I completely agree. And I blame the CIA, the FBI and the other intelligence agencies. How about when Eric Chiaramella filed that complaint against Donald Trump and Vindman brought it forward? This is CIA agents lying to the American people about what Joe Biden was doing with Burisma. And you know what? I know it's only surface level, but I'm going to say it again. The American people have a right to know

to a great degree what is going on with our government and why we are involved in foreign countries. Joe Biden flies to Ukraine. His son's involved in an energy company, largely, presumably having to do with the Gazprom gas monopolies. I bring it up 800 million times. So the U.S., through the CIA, with a CIA counterterrorism director on the board of Burisma, along with the president's son, is trying to operate in what they call American interests, despite the fact the American people reject it outright. And when Joe Biden flies over there right after his son called saying, please help, the prosecutor in Ukraine is investigating the founder of the company that we're using as a CIA

front to go up against the gas monopoly. We want to build a pipeline through Qatar and Turkey. I'm not going to get into all of it. Let me put it this way. The American people do not want to be involved in Ukraine, do not want the vice president flying to Ukraine offering a billion dollars in loan guarantees for any reason. And no matter what the American people say, they keep doing it. And when Donald Trump got elected by the will of the people through the electoral system, the CIA, not just through the whistleblowers falsely accusing Trump of wrongdoing, but through these intel officers who lied to the press. And now the email's been released where they said they were doing it to assist Joe Biden with a talking point during a debate. This is the intelligence agencies conspiring and committing sedition against the American people. If I live in my house and I want to operate in my house as I see fit,

police should not be able to walk into my house and tell me I have to live the way they want because I'm wrong and stupid. The American people voted for a secure border for our jobs. We are tired of the extraction. We are tired of our jobs being sent to China and to Mexico. We are tired of seeing Michigan be gutted and destroyed. We are tired of seeing, as Ro Khanna described it, this leftist globalist dream, a multicultural dream of bringing in all of these people to create this multicultural utopia, which failed. That's Ro Khanna's words. And it left the middle class gutted. But for some reason, my entire life, no matter how many times we said no more war, no matter how many times we said stop sending our jobs overseas, they kept doing it. And then Donald Trump gets elected. Why? Well, Bernie Sanders was the first choice for a lot of people. He was the guy saying we got to secure

the border. It's the Koch brothers who want the free trade. They want the illegal immigration to come in so they can pay in pennies and the dollar. Donald Trump was saying a lot of similar things in the 2015, 2016 cycle. The media was comparing Trump and Bernie. Bernie got crushed by the DNC. They forced him out. He bends the knee and gives into the machine. And now he makes no sense. And Donald Trump wins. He wasn't supposed to win. So what happens? Intel agents conspire against Donald Trump, along with powerful interests at law firms in D.C. to destroy what the American people voted for. And that's why I agree. There are men and women at the CIA and FBI who are deep, patriotic Americans. I know they exist. I've met some of them. I've met them years ago. I talked to a guy who worked at Intel in D.C. and he said, you know, there are a

lot of people in these departments, in these agencies who love Trump and want to see him succeed. And then I said, but is your department being run by these deep state bureaucratic elements? And the response I got was it's the same inside as it is outside. And at the time, woke was law. Nobody wanted to speak up. So the people at the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, these other you know, there's all the other intelligence agencies of which I believe there's 17. The the people who like Trump wouldn't speak up in his defense. Certainly, I think many of those people are good. But here's the problem. Now Trump's in office. He's gonna have to go to each one of these agencies and say, for one with the FBI,

he's looking to terminate a bunch of them. Why? What is it like 40 percent of FBI agents were hunting down J6ers? I mean, that is absolutely insane, considering we had thousands of far leftists across this country ransacking everything in the George Floyd riots. Trump sent out a memo that got leaked or a memo was sent out, I think it was from Trump, saying, we don't believe you can uphold the Constitution and do your duty because of the biased political actions you took during the Biden administration. I completely agree. Trump's going to have to. That's why they said, tell us who was involved in this.

They turned over 5000 names. Judges and Democrats are desperately trying to stop that. Why? These institutions are majority deeply corrupt. You either have the banality of evil or evil. There certainly may be good patriotic FBI agents who sat by and watched as corrupt institutions went after the president in the most corrupt ways and hunted down nonviolent protesters. You want to complain about the violent people in J6? Please do so. I think if you hit a cop, you deserve jail. But what about the people who are walking around on the grass? What about Owen Schroyer?

So those FBI agents go after those people while other agents sat back and watched. That is not the kind of person I want upholding my constitution, or at least pretending to. Donald Trump's going to have to go into these institutions in whatever way he can, shatter them, splinter them into the wind, and maybe we can rebuild them. Maybe if we get Pam Bondi and Kash Patel start going through and firing all of these people that were complicit in this corruption and the targeting of the American people, maybe then we can actually have a resurgence of deep patriotic Americans in Intel we can trust. But let me let me let me just finalize this this January 6th point. The American people voted for Donald Trump.

It is a fact, a fact that Intel officers lied to the press for the purpose of benefiting Joe Biden, lied about the Hunter Biden laptop story, which would have benefited Donald Trump, lied about what Trump's involvement was in the Burisma scandal because Trump discovered Joe Biden broke the law with a quid pro quo and CIA agents conspired to blame Trump for that and impeach him, damaging his image. The FBI raided his home over a spattering of random documents in memo boxes that he had while ignoring that Joe Biden did substantially worse. Admittedly, Joe Biden said on recording he did it to make money. He said, I want these documents to make a book so I can make money. And his ghostwriter tried to delete the evidence. The FBI did nothing to go after these people.

The FBI did not go after the far leftist to firebomb the White House. No, the FBI went after the people who protested in D.C. angry that the intelligence agencies were trying to gut this country. These people are evil. We live under a deep state bureaucracy, or we did, where these people say, you Americans are stupid. You're morons. And if we actually enacted policy the way you wanted it, China or wherever, whatever country would crush us. And then we'd get 9-11s all over again, whatever it may be. So the simple point is the American people should be the ones dictating what we want. We should not have a secret unelected bureau deciding how the government should be run, using the press and lying to the American people so they can do whatever they want. Because as it turns out, through USAID, the State Department and other NGOs, they are basically using the system to their benefit while

they extract from us our value, our working class, our morals, our cultures. And it leaves us with nothing. We have left. We are left now with a listless generation of lazy individuals who don't want to work, who are supporting communism, who are so overweight they're injecting themselves with a drug because they can't stop eating. This country has become deeply sick. And now for once in my life, I see something truly amazing. RFK Jr. And what happens? The entirety of the Democrats try to shut him down. Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth. This has been absolutely fantastic what we're seeing. And now Trump's going to have to go in and make sure he shatters out the corruption. And maybe then, as I said, he can rebuild it.

Sorry, everybody, rant over. Hey, Tim, let me just say one thing. We're talking about 80-20. I mean, I agree with 80% of what you said. We can quibble over the 20. But I think the important thing to focus on, in addition to that, is we have real enemies abroad who want to destroy our country and our way of life. And they are, and let's just not whitewash this, there's Vladimir Putin in Moscow, there's Ali Khamenei in Tehran, right? There's the Kim family in Pyongyang. And most importantly, in Beijing is Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party. What I as an American want to do is I want to support allies who are willing to fight and die in their own defense against common enemies. I don't think there's going to be much dispute. Maybe there will be that Israel's

a good ally, good democratic ally fighting against common enemies. It's not asking for U.S. troops. We can talk about military aid. I think you and I probably agree we can taper that off over the years, even though at the end of the day, the Israelis are spending all of that military aid in the United States on U.S. companies and U.S. jobs. But I think Israel is a great ally. And I think I wish we had more allies like Israel around the world fighting the Islamic Republic of Iran. It has killed Americans, maimed Americans, taken Americans hostage.

And if the Israelis are going to fight against our common enemy using their men and women, their boys and girls, thumbs up, great ally. This will be more controversial with you, given what you said. With everything you said about the corruption in Joe Biden and Ukraine, the Ukrainians are fighting against Vladimir Putin. And it's cost a huge number of Ukrainian lives, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men and women against a brutal enemy that has used force without compunction and deliberately targeted Ukrainian civilians. And the Ukrainians have been fighting the Russian military, an enemy of the United States, with no American soldiers. No American soldiers have lost their lives.

That's not a bad ally. That's a bit manipulative, I would say. You think so? Why? Well, there are American individuals who are operating as volunteers, and there's U.S. special forces on the ground. So to a large degree, I think it's fair to say U.S. boots are not on the ground in an official capacity. But U.S. personnel are operating in Ukraine as private contractors and volunteers. And that's just to get around the fact that Congress hasn't declared war since World War Two. So when the U.S. is providing the weapons, the intelligence and telling them when to press the buttons, but we're using the Ukrainian people as drafted cannon fodder, I wouldn't necessarily praise what's going on. Well, no, that's fair enough. And we can have a whole discussion about and I think it is about time for the Ukrainian war long past the time of the Ukrainian war to end. And I think Donald Trump is taking exactly

the right approach by saying of Vladimir Putin, we can do a deal. I got Zelensky on board. Do a deal with me or I'm going to punch you in the face, quote unquote. Right. But at the end of the day, I don't believe any Americans have died fighting in Ukraine. And that is the kind of ally that we want. So if the Ukrainians and the Israelis are going to fight American enemies and we're not going to lose American men and women in that fight the way we did in Iraq and Afghanistan and Vietnam and other wars. I think at the end of the day, we want Ukraine as an ally. I'd rather have Ukraine as an ally, fighting Russia and preventing the Russians from taking over Eastern Europe from taking over Poland and why would Russia go near Poland or Lithuania? Well, Putin has said very clearly, and he says it at length, and he says it often, that he wants to rebuild and resurrect the Russian Empire.

Sure. And the Russian Empire does not stop with Ukraine. It goes further. And so, look, I can't read Putin's mind, or as George Bush once famously said, I can't see into his soul. I have no idea what his ambitions are except what he has stated. And I'm not a student of history, but I'm an observer of history. And I believe when brutal dictators say something, take them seriously. And he said it, and we should take him seriously. And I do not think we want to send US troops because we will

be obligated under treaty to defend our NATO allies under Article 5 if Putin moves into NATO. And God forbid we do that because then American men and women will be dying on the plains of Europe. I got to say, I don't see indication of that happening right now. I don't think it's happening right now, number one, because I think the Russian military has taken a serious beating from the Ukrainians. But when were they ever going to go into Lithuania or these other countries? So if Putin had done what Putin had intended to do and what his intelligence community told him he could do, if he had moved in and taken Kiev in three days and moved into Ukraine without a significant cost, if you take him at his word, I'm not saying you should,

but if you take him at his word, he was going to go further. And at some point, he was going to be on the NATO border. And then the question would be, and that would be- He's on the NATO border. Oh, NATO border.

No, no. And he would have moved into NATO. And at some point- Kaliningrad borders two of these countries as it is. Look, at some point, we would have- And the Baltic. No, I hear you. What we want to avoid at all costs, okay, is an invasion of a NATO country that obligates us under treaty to send men and U.S. men and women to defend these countries under Article five.

Sure, then we want to avoid that. allies nor are they in NATO. They're not in NATO. They're not EU. And all we've done is convinced Russia, as they've now stated over and over again, they're at war with NATO already because of our involvement. It is the U.S. military weapons and intelligence under the asking Ukrainian to press the button guys that sunk the Russian flagship in the Black Sea. That was the U.S. and NATO that did that. That wasn't Ukraine. And Russia knows it. So how about if the U.S. is involved in this? I should say U.S. I want to say NATO. I want to say the EU is involved in this fight over Ukraine's future, whether it's going to be an EU Schengen zone state, et cetera, or it's going to be Russian Trade Federation. When Russia says, I will not allow NATO expansion on my border to this degree, we say, well, they're not an ally of ours. Why are we going to get into a war which would create the exact scenario we're saying we should avoid? If Putin went in and seized the

Donbass and Mariupol and Luhansk and all that going down to Crimea and he took control of Crimea, largely was the motivating factor because the U.S. influence in Ukraine and them joining the EU would cut off Russia from their Black Sea port. If we didn't get involved in this at all, the war would have been over, as you as you said, in three days. And Russia, sure, maybe in some hypothetical scenario would try and make a move on Lithuania or something. I think it's strange considering they already border Poland. And I think it's it's is it Estonia with a Kaliningrad and the Baltic? I don't see why they would make that military move directly confronting NATO. If they moved into Ukraine and we did nothing, there'd be no war, there'd be no death. But instead, what we're dealing with now is you this this goes well beyond just Russia's expansion and some noble effort by the West to stop an evil dictator.

Zelensky's not having elections. He won't have them. He's saying he's not going to do it. You've got Joe Biden committing crimes in Ukraine. You've got questions about Hunter Biden and Mykola Zashevsky's involvement in the crimes they committed and why the U.S. government was involved in stopping a prosecutor from investigating corrupt elements. And this goes back to to great geopolitics. And it's not so simple to say illegal, legal, right, wrong. What you have is power structures competing for power. The Western Russia and its allies, they want to say Russia wants to sell gas to Europe. It makes a lot of money.

Germany wants to buy it. The U.S. doesn't want them to because it gives Russia more power. So the U.S. and NATO is trying to offset their control, sending natural gas through Ukraine. The U.S. wants to do it. Russia is already doing it. So the U.S. was trying to gain control politically of Ukraine so they can put controls on Gazprom and cut out their ability to sell gas. Then once they control Ukraine and they cut out Russia from the Black Sea, Russia's ability to sell fuel in the Mediterranean through other nations in North Africa gets shut

down and it extremely damages the Russian economy. Russia then says, we're not going to let you do it until war starts and the U.S. gets involved in a conflict the American people do not want. It has created a potential for World War III. It has convinced the Russian people and the Russian government and their media that they're at war with NATO, not Ukraine, while the American media keeps lying, claiming we're not involved at all. And it's Ukraine doing it. And then you end up with the president of Ukraine refusing to hold elections, coming to the U.S., getting our Congress to fly Ukrainian flags, us spending hundreds of billions of dollars on their war under some strange guise of Putin, maybe Hitler. Putin is not some comic book villain. I do think he's a bit of a I'll avoid swearing. He's not a good person. I'll put it that way. He's a he's a very bad person, in my opinion. But I don't think that justifies why the U.S. is running the risk of Russia actually having an incentive to strike

a NATO ally, triggering Article five and making us go to war. We shouldn't be involved in Ukraine. The argument is on the surface, again, I could be wrong. Maybe the intel agencies hold they absolutely do hold classified information on this in this regard. But on the surface, it's largely we want cheaper gas into Europe. We want to expand the European economic bloc. Russia makes it more difficult because they control gas into Europe, largely about 24 percent. We can't convince Russia to drop the prices. So we tried building a pipeline through Syria. Syria said, no, we're allies with Russia. So then we destabilize the Syrian government, sent troops in without congressional approval, by the way. And I have no idea what you guys remember when we announced we dispatch we dispatch U.S. troops into Syria.

How crazy. We end up sitting against their government. Their government collapses. The U.S. wants to build a pipeline. That's the next domino to fall is Ukraine. Let me simplify everything. There is no right. There's no wrong. There's war. They say all is fair in love and war. The issue I take is not with whether or not it's right or wrong to defeat Russia, China, Iran or any of these other countries. The issue I take is the American people are supposed to largely decide. It's not supposed to be a nation of direct democracy where a random person just says, we should do this thing. And then you're like, bro, you have no idea what you're talking about. We're not going to do that. It's supposed to be, as the founding fathers envisioned,

we elect representatives who keep us informed to the best of our abilities. They have the skiff, they have classified intelligence, and they try their best to explain to us why we have to do certain things. Instead, what we've got is a largely corrupt state of permanently elected bureaucrat politicians who raise money from special interest groups, never seem to lose elections, intelligence agencies that when we actually get a popular president, defy the will of the people to go against them. If this is what we are fighting to preserve, we're burning down the country and the world as it is. So we've got ourselves an impasse. We can say this corrupt nation of bureaucracy, garbage and self-infliction and corruption should exist for the sake of itself. Or we should say the American people

should get a grip on what's going on. We should reassess our priorities, not be involved in these foreign wars. And that may result in Russia gaining more economic power. It may result in China making a move on Taiwan. I don't see how we are served as a country by having open borders, weak generations who don't want to do work, don't have kids. And then we dump our funds into ridiculous USAID programs. We have intelligence agencies backing all of that up. Democrat politicians panicked that our slush fund into ridiculous gender studies NGOs. I mean,

this is abject corruption. I would liken what the United States is right now to a Jackson Pollock painting. No one can make heads or tails of why any of it is happening or why it should exist. We need to get a hold on all of this. And it starts with saying, secure our borders, bring back our jobs, have a moral resurgence. We want people to get back to work. We want them to understand the value of hard work. We want people to have families. We want them to understand what it means to have moral tradition and believe in the American culture and the American dream.

Once we can reassess and rebuild what America is supposed to be, maybe then we can be a player on the grand stage. The way I see it right now is with Donald Trump and with Biden, Clinton, Obama, whatever it is, you have two visions of what the world is going to be. And the Obama, Biden, Clinton system that was being built was America doesn't matter. It's an economic block. We are going to build power. And effectively, they created an extra

national entity of military intelligence power. Donald Trump's system is the United States is breaking apart. It's not going to be sustainable. And eventually we will get World War Three, most likely. And the war that I blame Biden for in Eastern Europe, which is exacerbating this, not to mention it's spreading with North Korea getting involved. Now we have we have the makings of potential World War Three. Donald Trump's vision seems to be let's make America functional, get our young people back to work. Work is not a bad thing. It's a good thing. Build up a great nation, build culture. Once we are strong, we can build powerful economic ties around the world, which can prevent the

collapse of these nations into war. Yeah, but there's one other element of Trump's strategy, which I think is worth highlighting. And I think this is why a lot of Americans voted for him, because he absolutely believes in peace through strength, strength at home, strength abroad. And I think Americans saw that under Biden, completely agree with you, under Obama, we were heading to World War III. The world was unraveling. Our enemies were emboldened, whether it was Eastern Europe, the Middle East, or the United States of America. I don't want to go to war. I don't want to send American soldiers abroad, but I will use American military power if you test me. And I think that's exactly the message we should be sending. Not that we are withdrawing from the world, not that we are not going to be involved in the world,

but we're not going to waste blood and treasure over wars that don't advance the American interest. But we are absolutely a powerful country with a powerful economy and a powerful military. So dictators around the world, Vladimir Putin, Ali Khamenei, the Kim family, Xi Jinping. Zelensky. Well, listen, we can talk about Zelensky,

but at the end of the day, I don't put Zelensky in the axis of aggressors, right? I think there are four main members of the axis of aggressors, and they are Iran, China, Russia, and North Korea. And then we've got a bunch of allies. Some are great allies. Some are awful allies. Some are imperfect allies. But at the end of the day, they're still allies. And Donald Trump is saying to the axis of aggressors, don't mess with the United States of America. And I think that's

restoring pride in our country. I think it means that we don't have to fight stupid wars because they fear Donald Trump in ways that they didn't fear Joe Biden. I agree. And I think largely this just means if we don't get a handle on what our our intel agencies and our law enforcement institutions are doing, if Trump can't get confidence that they'll operate under the as to the will of the american people we'll never get any of that doesn't so uh you want to hit a point before we go to super chats because i think i think you're to add to the point i think you're right but i think that part of what needs to happen because he needs to have the the bureaucracy needs to be something that the administration can trust that's why we need to have the president be able to fire people and put in the people that

he wants agreed and rfk uh or jfk is cool and all that baloney but i want to know about butler what happened with down there absolutely you know i hope trump declassifies as much as he can the american people knowing as much as they can is extremely important for too long we're kept in the dark let's go to super chats my friends smash that like button share the show with everyone you know and heads up at 10 o'clock we're gonna have the members onlyensored show, exclusive on rumble.com slash timcast IRL. That's where you can check out all of our offerings. And I will also point out the Green Room show we did, where we discussed Israel and Gaza. I think it's about a half an hour long. It is up now on the Green Room playlist, premium only.

And you can check that one out. But for now, we will read your super chats. Let's go. We got Shane H. Wilder who says, as a longtime Timcast member, I'm happy to see the Rumble announcement. I'm excited to see the fruits of this deal. It's going to be legend.

Wait for it. Dairy. Aha, let's go. Thanks for the premium, by the way. So the way it works is if you're a member at TimCast.com, the email that you use for TimCast.com, if you log into Rumble with that email, just like create a free account,

you will instantly have premium access. Boom. Just as a member of TimCast.com. That's why I was telling everybody, just become a member at TimCast.com. You're not going to regret it. We had a lot of people, you know, who had lapsed credit cards and things like that.

But it should be that easy. So for now, here's the plan. If you are a member as of yesterday, you're going to have everything. TimCast, Discord membership access, community access, and all of the newsletter we're going to be sending out to everybody. And you will also get Rumble Premium, which includes all of their other creators. So you're getting a massive library of content. Moving forward, if you want to be a member of the community involved in the Discord, coming to in-person events, that's going to be a TimCast.com membership. We're not going to be

pushing it as hard. We really want people to watch the content. But if you want to call into the show, if you want to be involved in our events, the reason we're doing it this way is because one of the challenges we had in trying to work out a deal is how do we maintain community growth and engagement? It's not the same thing as a content deal. So there are effectively two different things. All of our exclusive members only content is going to be Rumble Premium. That means we're going to have documentaries, which we already do. All that's going to, we're going to put that up as soon as possible. We're going to have the Green Room show. We're going to have other behind the scenes stuff, as well as the Uncensored Call-In show. But if you want to be actively involved in the Discord community, where we have staff

and we have, you know, events managers and stuff, that'll be a membership at timcast.com. So we're not, you know, we want to maintain that. We, one of the big concerns we had was moving forward. It's like, well, we can't lose the discord. We have tens of thousands of people that hang out every day that there's they have shows among themselves. And so we have to

make sure it's maintained and that costs money. And so we want those members to benefit and rumble super cool. The guys are rumble. We're just like, then we're going to make sure that all of your members get both. And then anybody who wants to join you in that, they can do so. And anybody who wants to watch the condo, we'll do it at Rumble. And I was like, bro, this is epic. It's the perfect mix. And all of those OG members who support us to this point, they're getting it all.

So it should be great. I absolutely love that. When we first started, you first started, you wanted to do the culture where you wanted to bring in everyday guys. You were talking about having interviews with them. And now you finally we're getting to that point you're getting to the point where it's going to be a thing and that's beautiful this is what we're going to do yeah so the culture war show that uh we we've never actually got to the point in full development but we're looking at venues in the dc area we are going to book guests and and have

the culture war debates as we do but there will be a live audience of the TimCast Discord community members. And you can submit your talking points because we're going to have the subject matter of the debate. It'll be like immigration, abortion, whatever, you know, kind of simple, but it might be UFOs. And then we're actually going to bring you up to join the debate. You'll get five minutes to like make your points, challenge some of the positions that were made. We'll debate with you for a few minutes. And then you get to, you step down and, you know, give a shout out. It's basically in person, join the debate.

And it's because we wanted to bring in regular people, but we also wanted to bring in tons of other ideas and give people who normally don't have a chance to be in that debate to join the debate, which means there's going to be some crazy. Yo. Upsiding. I know.

We thought it would be fun. Like what if some guy comes up and tells us we're wrong on Israel because it was actually the reptilians who took over. And we just – it's like, well, okay. We think it will be an entertaining show. So let's grab some more. Matthew Emmons says the swatter that went after Tim Cass and other YouTubers caught and sent to federal prison for four years per Jeremy at the quartering. First of all, maybe the story about this water that went after us had been reported a while ago. So maybe he has just been convicted. But I will tell you this.

My understanding is the person who went after us was for hire. That's the information that we had we thought was reasonable based on the evidence we'd seen. And so when people started telling us, hey, just want to let you know the swatter was caught. I said, well, not the people who instructed him and gave him the information, because one of the addresses that was swatted is not publicly available. And somehow the swatter got access to that address, which is very interesting. Yeah. And there's only a handful of people who knew the address, which, of course, easily helped us understand who was leaking the information. So we, hey, told the FBI and they did nothing. So when people show when 16 guys show up to your

house with rifles pointed through your windows and you say, here's evidence suggesting who did it. And they say, we don't care. Makes you wonder. Makes you wonder. Not the first time I've asked the FBI for help and they refuse to do it. But hey, I guess I don't matter.

That's fine, I guess. Jason Dixon says, hey, Tim, please shout out the Discord. Building culture over here. Also shout out to It's Based Gaming. They are from your Discord. They make games. Very cool. Sick. Yeah, shout out to It's Based Gaming. They are from your Discord. They make games. Very cool.

Sick. Yeah, we're in the early stages of setting up a sports show. I'm glad you did that. I brought it up a couple weeks ago on the show. I asked about sports, and yeah, I do skateboarding, but I was talking about more bigger. We'll see. We don't want to launch too much at once, but Kellen and Chuck, big football fans, and with the Super Bowl, they were expressing interest in having a sports show.

And I was like, really good idea. We can set up an area with couches and do a sports podcast in a similar element. I think that'd be super cool. Heck yeah. A lot of us folks who are newer to the political world, we're Normie's sports ball guys for the last freaking 20 years. Normie's sportsball guys for the last freaking 20 years. Normie's Sportsball. Alright. Ebud says, even though I have it set to receive all

today, marks the first day in over two years where your live show has actually admitted to my notifications. I've only been getting clips until now. Interesting. Yeah, I don't know how that stuff works, man. You know, YouTube does what it does. I want to, let me see here.

Let me see here. We have a bunch of amazing chats as well over at Rumble. Just Cause I'm Free says, welcome to Rumble. Glad to finally be able to watch you live over here. Now get PCC over to Rumble and I can do away with CommieTube. My Rumble stock is going to do so good this year. Well, I'm glad to hear it. You know, you know, what's really cool about Rumble is that I know the CEO. It's like with Rumble, when we have issues, it's just like a text message away

to try and get these things resolved. And that's really a component of smaller companies versus larger companies. I think youtube's got political interests but there's really no one to talk to when you have a glitch i'll do air quotes do air quotes but uh for the time being like we're not we're not intending on changing anything we're gonna we're gonna fish where the fish are we're gonna post the on youtube we have a large youtube audience you know but um all of our exclusive premium members only stuff it's gonna be on rumble which um i'm to be completely honest. It's a load off our back.

The infrastructure stuff is so hard to do. People don't understand running a website. The IT development and all the code stuff is just, it's expensive. It's a lot of work. So I'm like, hey, this will make things a lot easier for everybody. No one's got to worry about crashes and things like that.

So it's going to be a lot easier and a lot more fun. And I'm excited too because it frees up budget because we really want to do these documentaries. And, um, I'm just going to say it anyway. I don't, I don't, you know, cause you go,

well, cause Milo was like, he wants to go to Israel with Ian. And I was like, I think that would be very, very fun. We'll see. Entertaining for sure.

That's right. Great content. That's right. But you're also helping, uh, you know, the parallel economy from back in the day. Build up Rumble, YouTube, Google.

All those guys can go back their own way and start. I mean, we've got the show on Apple, Spotify, everywhere. You know what I mean? Yeah, people were asking. It's going to be still available on all of the podcast platforms as well. It's going to be everywhere. And we want it to be bigger and better everywhere. The only specific thing is that

we were using TimCast.com for exclusive member stuff because that's what supported the show, basically. That's going to be part of the Rumble Premium family. So you got Bongino, you got Charlie Kirk, you got Dr. Disrespect, you got a bunch of really awesome people, and we can collab. I think a big thing about it was

we've been the TimCcast island for a long time. It's like we have a show. I don't do a lot of collabs or anything like that. And it's, you know, you can only last so long. You got to strategize. You got to network. You need a team, as it were. And so this was the best way to get things done.

We've been talking with a bunch of companies about ad sales and things like that. And then we worked a deal out with Rumble that was really good. And I benefits everybody very fun go team super excited for the stuff we're going to do especially with skateboarding all right nathan says bring taiwanese chip engineers to the u.s project paper clip oh in the style i mean that's not nearly as um horrifying as operation paper clip right that was the Japanese scientists we brought over, right? Or was that the Nazi scientists?

No, the Paperclip was the Nazis. Well, they built rockets. We're in space now, thanks. Good news, we are bringing Taiwanese semiconductor. Oh, yeah? Jump up on the... Get closer to the... Yeah, we're bringing them here.

I mean, and the Taiwanese understand why they need to be here, because if the Chinese Communist Party takes over their island. Yeah, I've heard it by company. Yeah, I've heard stories that that Taiwan is part of the reason why China hasn't moved on Taiwan is because as far as like the the practical invasion and taking of Taiwan, it would actually be very difficult. Is that correct? Do you know anything about that? Yeah, I mean, I've been to Taiwan many times, you know, talked to the Chinese military. Look, it's not going to be easy. I mean, it's going to be logistically over the Taiwan Straits

for the Chinese Navy, for the Chinese military and special forces. Not easy, terrible weather. And look, I think the Taiwanese people are going to fight for their country. Now, at the end of the day, I think what's deterred Xi Jinping from launching an invasion for now has been his fear that the United States is going to step in. And this goes back to my original point. I mean I don't know if we're going to step in. I'm not sure if we should step in. But at the end of the day, we must create the perception in the eyes of Xi Jinping that we will step in. And that will keep Taiwan independent.

It'll keep Taiwan's semiconductor crown jewels away from Xi Jinping. Because if he gets that, that's like dominating the oil of the 21st century. He controls the global economy. You may not like America. You may think we're flawed. You may think we have a lot of problems.

I don't think any of us want to live under the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese security state. So we definitely want to keep semiconductors away from him. Bike Colin says, Tim, you should give downhill mountain biking a try. Coming from a skating background, you'll be a shredder out the gate. Welcome to Rumble. Agreed.

Nah, I'm not going to do downhill biking. Allison likes downhill mountain biking stuff, but I have a really nice mountain bike. You guys love your bike. And what happened was Allison said, you know, you should get a bike so we can go on a bike ride. I said, okay. And then she said, let's go for a bike ride. We went, and it turned out it was like a 30-mile bike ride, and I never went again. Yeah, it was brutal.

It was like, hey, we're going to, you know, I won't give out too much of the private details, but we're going to go from this point to this point. Should take, you know, not that long. I was like hey we're gonna you know i won't give out too much of the private details but we're gonna go from this point to this point should take you know not that long and i was like okay and then as we're riding it's kind of nice you get lost in the start of the bike ride i'm looking at the trees and the river and everything having a good time and then eventually i'm getting tired and i'm like are we there yet we finally get there and then i was like yeah we're not riding that all the way back that was, and there was literally no other way back. Were you in West Virginia, up the mountains? Maryland.

Okay, Maryland. Yeah, up hills around and all that stuff. And so then we started riding back, and I was like, my legs feel like they're being stabbed with a thousand knives of fire. I need to ride home, and there's no signal. There's nobody who can pick us up. And so we just had to go for it, and that was the last time we rode our bikes.

And I'm in shape. I got real low resting heart rate. I skate all the time. You got them thighs. But it's a different kind of exercise. I do high bursts, right? You stand on the board and you jump, bang. With the bike, it's endurance.

It's nonstop. I get it downhill, though you're not really pedaling you're breaking but i don't know i can barely snowboard and ski as it is it's it's worth noting that like the different type it's a good idea to do different types of cardio because your body does get acclimated to whatever type of cardio you're doing so it is a good idea to throw in variation because like Tim says, you'll get used to one thing and then you do something else. And it's like, whoa, this is totally different. All right, let's grab some more super chats. Iggy the Incubus says, reminder, JFK turned down Operation Mockingbird. I know he turned down Operation Northwoods. I don't think Mockingbird was turned down. I think maybe you mean Northwoods. You're familiar with Northwoods?

I'm not. Tell me. That was when, what was it, L.L. Lemnitzer? Was that his name? L.L. Lemnitzer? I don't know a whole lot about this. I've just seen tidbits on the internet. Wanted to stage false flags in Florida so that we could justify conflict with Cuba. Wanted to blow up a plane near Florida and say Cuba did it and things like that.

And JFK was like, no, we're not doing any of that stuff. And so that often gets brought up by people to point out that false flag attacks do exist. People, one thing that people need to, or you should understand about Northwoods is it was, it was actually proposed by the DOD. Right. The CIA was going to carry it out, but it was DOD. So like when Mike Benz talks about quote unquote the blob he's talking about state department dod and cia it's three different means of exercising power state department soft

power dod is hard power and then the cia is when they don't want anyone to know the u.s is exercising power it's it's supposed to be covert and when things go right you don't find out about it but things don't always go right. Indeed. True. Yeah, but I always like to point out you don't need Northwoods because the Gulf of Tonkin happened. It did. And we know that it was fake.

So, you know, there's your special police action in Vietnam for you. Oh, I'm sorry, Iggy. You literally superchatted right afterwards saying, correct to myself, Operation Northwoods. I apologize. You corrected yourself. Shout out Iggy. There you go. All right.

Sean P. says, your own spy agencies want to destroy you. That is unfortunate. The Dexvet says, so we leave the alphabet agencies and we continue having our country destroyed from within or we dismantle them and we have foreign intervention. I'll take the bad guy I know

over the bad guy pretending to be my protector. It's not easy. You know, I told my friends this back in like 2015. I was like, if you want to live in America where you watch the red carpet, listen to whatever weird R&B pop is on the radio, eat dollar slices of pizza, vote for the machine state. Vote for Hillary Clinton. Because they're going to go

blow up kids in foreign countries so that we can maintain the petrodollar. And then you don't got to think twice. But if you're actually concerned about what this country is going to turn into

and how long it's going to last, then you probably should vote for someone who's interested in what actually happens to this country. And that's going to be Donald Trump. So take your pick. Yeah, you can wear your blinders

and only see in front of you and see what you're doing. Or you can take off the blinders and see everything that's around you. Do you want to be a chicken in a chicken coop? Yeah. Or do you want to be a farmer who has to do the hard work? Hey man, our chickens, they don't do nothing. They want for nothing

but they live in a box and, you know. A nice box too. It's very nice. Yeah, they're wealthy, 1% are chickens. But when Mr. Muttonchops jumped out of the chicken coop, he was killed by a fox. Now, you know what? He was breaking free. You know that.

I would say one thing. Again, I don't want to be the voice here of opposition. I'll say one thing. This podcast, which has been a pleasure to be part of, can only take place in one country in the world. This podcast could never take place in communist China, Putin's Russia, and Khamenei's Iran. Never mind, by the way. It wouldn't even take place in the UK.

Exactly. I was just going to say, the UK would never allow it. It would be in January for the UK. And if we were in Ukraine, I'd be dead. Like Gonzalo Lira. Well, all I can say is what makes America great, and maybe make it great again, or make it greater greater is the fact that this conversation can take place where you can literally sit here in this amazing studio and say what you have about the CIA and the FBI and other institutions. And at the end of the day, they'll falsely accuse you of being a Russian.

Maybe, but probably not. And you're going to have an incredible, successful podcast. You're going to be on Rumble. You know, your great personality, you're provoking people to think you got a lot of people out there listening to you and imbibing this. And that's phenomenal. That's what makes America great. I agree. And the problem is when you look at like the James O'Keefe videos, you see these people who work in the bureaucratic state outright saying we will defy the will of the people outright, outright. And so how we fire those people who are breaking the law, it's going to be a challenge to actually go through and figure this out. But Trump's got active opposition from judges and from Democrats. And it's it's it's well, it's it's it's a tough challenge.

I'll put it that way. Isn't the president supposed to be, you know, he's in charge. And it's a tough challenge. I'll put it that way. Isn't the president supposed to be, you know, he's in charge. He has a plan, going to get stuff done. Why are these other federal employees? I don't want to go on a big old tangent. These other federal employees that got elected are working for the United States government. Are saying, no, don't listen to your leader.

Because they're activist judges. They're trying to legislate from the bench. And the point is to to obstruct their obstructions. They're trying to obstruct what the the individual sure our uh positions to say for sure but there is the the power of um judges to to put stays on but even the idea of a nationwide stay like that's all fairly new like that started in the 60s fdr made massive changes to the government that were some of them were unconstitutional and i believe there were some things that were struck down eventually but none of the stuff that he proposed none of the the executive orders that he made none of them were prevented or stopped or put on hold by any judges they just went through the president said this is what we're going to do and it happened this is all new and this really

this idea of a you know a judge in Ninth Circuit putting a stop to something the president does nationwide. That's honestly new in the past. I think it started really started to get ramped up during the Obama administration. But it's honestly it's an innovation in the past 20 years. It's not something that has a long history of happening in the United States. The the separation of powers is supposed to actually be a separation of powers. And if a judge can say, no, you can't do this, Mr. President, there's actually no separation of powers between the president and the judicial branch. All right, let's grab one more here.

We got Good to Her. Triple Eight says, The difference is that Snowden did this on behalf of a privacy breach of the citizens of the U.S. The others are illegal immigrants committing absolutely heinous crimes against Americans. Yeah, so, you know, again, that's why it's like a triage thing. It's a priorities thing. And it's a moral line thing. I look at what Snowden did and I'm like, man, he sure did find a lot of malfeasance

and then went about it the very wrong way in leaking all this information without redacting it. And so that's bad. At this point, now, what has it been? Over 10 years? It's like 13 years or something. I'm kind of like, yeah, it's not my biggest priority right now. We're well past that. Some of it was good.

A lot of it was bad. It is what it is. The illegal immigration stuff is child trafficking, outright breaking of our laws, and it is in mass. So enforcing that is deeply important. My friends, smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know. Make sure you head over to rumble.com slash timcast IRL. Become a premium member because that uncensored members only show is coming up in about

a minute. And for those that are watching, there will be a seamless transition with a small, you know, I don't know, 30 second intermission or so. But you can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Of course, the discord membership if you want to join our community and actually call into the show is available at TimCast.com. Mark, do you want to shout anything out? Again, shout out to, first of all, thank you for having me. Please follow me on X if you can at M Dubowitz. And yeah, I mean, if you're interested in Iran, it's kind of my obsession, but I've got this Iran Breakdown podcast that is going to be launching in the next week. It'll be a limited series, 10 episodes to start. It gives me an easy off-ramp if it fails to say it was a limited series, and that's why I'm ending it. But if it succeeds, we're going to obviously continue it. And I think all Americans should understand more about Iran, more about the threat from the Islamic Republic of Iran, and how we can actually stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons without risking U.S. lives. Awesome. My name is Raymond G. Stanley, Jr. You can find me around the world as Raymond G. Stanley, Jr. I want to shout out the Quiet Part podcast, another fellow podcast started off from the Discord.

It's a great launching pad, and I would suggest you join the Discord, Tim Kess Discord. Mark, thank you for hanging out, man. Thanks for having me. Sir? I am Phil that Remains on Twix. I'm Phil that Remains Official on Instagram. The band is All That Remains. The new record dropped January 31st.

It's called Anti-Fragile. You can go check it out on YouTube, Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora, and Deezer. Don't forget, the left lane is for crime. We will see you all on the Uncensored Call-In Show on Rumble.com slash TimCastIRL in about 30 seconds. Thanks for hanging out.