Timcast IRL - Trump Calls Democrat RETARDED, Whistleblower EXPOSES Democrat FRAUD w/ CK Boufferrache

Episode Date: December 2, 2025

Tim, Phil, Elaad, & Shane are joined by CK Boufferrache to discuss a massive fraud scheme being exposed in Minnesota, Trump calling a Democrat "retarded," Tim Pool slamming mass migration, and Billboards emerging encouraging US Troops to defy orders.   Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Elaad @ElaadEliahu (X) Shane @ShaneCashman (everywhere) |  @TalesfromtheInvertedWorld  (YT) Producer: Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: C.K. Bouferrache @hunnybadgermom (X) HunnyBadgerMom is the X handle of C.K. Bouferrache, photographer, journalist, and baker who advocates for the Western way of life, opposes communism, and rejects groupthink.

From Amazon, MGM studios comes Melania, a new film that takes you inside the 20 days leading up to the 2025 presidential inauguration through the eyes of the first lady herself. Step into her world as she orchestrates inauguration plans, navigates the transition, and moves her family back to the nation's capital. History's biggest stage on the biggest screen. Melania, only in theaters on January 30. Donald Trump has called Tim Walts a retard. He doubled down on it. He said he genuinely thinks there's something wrong with that guy. And it's funny, and everyone's talking about it, so that's why we're leading with it.

That being said, there's real news coming out of Minnesota and more just broke right before we went live. Apparently they're issuing illegal CDLs to non-domiciled individuals. There is a massive fraud scheme that has been exposed, hundreds of millions, if not billion or billions of dollars stolen. And they're saying it's coming from the Somali community. And this is actually rather shocking. So it's a major scandal developing. And of course, because this enters the news, Donald Trump then says Tim Walts is a retard. And then they get mad.

And they're like, how dare you say naughty words? Interestingly, however, a new study was done. It's going massively viral. It's an internal study from Democrats where they find that nobody trusts them on any important issues. And in the past 12 years, they shifted away from all of the core issues of the working class in this country towards identity issues for fringe groups. I don't know how they fare so well, how they'll fare well in the midterms. Though the prediction markets say they're going to win, it's kind of shocking data. So we'll talk about that as well.

And of course we have, I guess we're going to war in Venezuela. We'll see. You got Hagseth being accused of war crimes. We'll talk about that. And then over the break, there was a video something I had done on these billboards that have been popping up for the past several months, calling on the military to defy the chain of command and effectively. showing discord and disloyalty in the military, which is an overcrime under 18 U.S.E. 2387. The website actually instructs our servicemen and women on how to use encrypted communications. I believe it's very obvious.

The reason they're doing this is so that these servicemen and women, when they communicate, there's an expectation they're going to be incriminating themselves, breaking the law, or the individuals communicating with them, maybe breaking the law. This is shocking. So as Mark Kelly and the rest of these Democrats doubled down on claiming Trump's, They're not going so far saying he's actually doing illegal things. They're saying, I think they should question these. And Mark Kelly actually said that any service man or woman can just tell if they're illegal or not.

So yeah, this is getting crazy. We'll talk about that and a whole lot more. Before we get started, we got some great sponsors for you. First, we got venice.a.i, my friends. Sam Altman said, JetGPT will get to know you over your life. Certainly it will. They got a former, the former director of the NSA sitting on their board right now. Snowden called this a willful calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on earth.

I'm not going to name this device, but your Amazon device listens to you and recommends products based on your conversations. How many of you have been, you know, just chatting on an app? And then all of a sudden, you'll get a video pop up or an advertisement pop up. The creepiest thing for me was that I went to Walmart a few years ago. And I swear it literally showed me a picture from the Walmart I was in of the TVs I was looking at. That's very creepy.

Well, my friends, all of this stuff's been tracking you. And Venice AI is an AI that does not. You've got privacy. It utilizes leading open source AI models to deliver text code and image generation to your web browser. No downloads, no installations or anything. Private and permissionless, they don't spy on you or censor the AI. Messages are encrypted and your conversation and history is stored only in your browser. AI can be extremely valuable, but we shouldn't need to give up our privacy to use it.

With the Venice Pro Plan, this unlocks the full platform and features, including PDF uploads for summaries or insights, the ability to turn off safe mode for unhindered image generation, the ability to change how Venice interacts with you by modifying the system prompt, limitless text, and high image limits. So we've actually screwed around quite a bit. It's a bit of fun. It is. It's willing to get political on you. If you want to use AI without fear of handing over your most intimate thoughts to a corporation or the government, You can get 20% off a pro plan using the link venice.a.I. slash Tim. Use promo code Tim. Definitely check it out. Shout it to VeniceA for sponsor in the show. And we also have pool water. Do you ever want to drink pool water? If you did, there's something wrong with you. But if you want to drink fresh artesian water in a bottle that says pool water, well, that's mighty fine of you. You can go to casbrew.com and pick up a case of delicious glass bottled pool water.

And then when you have company over, you can ask them, do you want to drink pool water? And when they say, that's disgusting, why would you suggest that? You hand on the bottle and wink. We've got 315 cases still available. We only did, I think, like 800. And they're selling like hot cakes. So pick up your pure, delicious, crisp pooled water today. Don't forget to also smash that like button.

Share the show with everyone you know. Welcome back. I hope you all had a very fantastic Thanksgiving, Black Friday. all that good stuff, smashing your way into those department stores and getting those discount TVs. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more, we have Shelley Bufarash. Hello. How are you? I'm good. I'm good. Happy to be here.

It's great to have you. Who are you? What do you do? I am an independent journalist and a videographer, and I have been covering the far left in Portland and the Pacific Northwest since 2017. Most recently, I've been down at ICE since June covering. all of the insurrection-type activities that have been taking place there. Oh, okay. So when we talk about Civil War, you will be able to inform us on what's going on. I will. I can tell you what's happening on the ground,

probably where it's going to start. All right on. Well, it should be fun. Thanks for hanging out. We got Shane hanging out. What's up, guys? I am Shane Cashman, host of Inverter World Live. Tonight, we're going to talk about some good news. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch has become a beautiful home for lots of worms. So I just figured I want to share some good news for once. And looking forward to that one, taking phone calls.

all night long. So from about 1030 to midnight, our phone lines will be open. Give us a call. What's up a lot? What's up, Shane? Good evening everybody. I am a lot of Leahu White House correspondent here at Timcast. Phil. Hello everybody. My name is Philobanti. I'm the lead singer, the heavy metal band All That Remains. I'm an anti-communist and a counter-revolutionary.

Let's get into it. Here we go, my friends. We're going to start with this big story that you may have seen over the brightness from the New York Times, how fraud swamped Minnesota's Social Services System on Tim Waltz's watch. Prosecutors say members of the Somali diaspora, a group with growing political power, were largely responsible. President Trump has drawn national attention to the scandal amid

his crack on immigration. They say federal prosecutors charge dozens of people with felonies, accusing them of stealing hundreds of millions of dollars from a government program meant to keep children fed during the COVID-19 pandemic. At first, many in the state saw the case as a one-off abuse during a health emergency, but as new schemes targeting the state's generous safety net programs came to light, state and federal officials began to grapple with a jarring reality. And then we had this drop from Secretary Sean Duffy, who says, just one day after 400 brave employees from Minnesota DHS exposed massive fraud, U.S. DOT has discovered that one third of non-domiciled CDLs were issued illegally in the state.

Minnesota, you're on notice. You have 30 days to fix this or lose $30 million in federal funding. massive scandal. And it's interesting. We're hearing these accusations that the Somali diaspora was stealing hundreds of millions of dollars. Well, I am shocked, I tell you, shocked to find that people who aren't from here, who don't care about our traditions, who are here, often many of them illegally or through chain migration, would steal money from hardworking Americans and steal the inheritance of the younger generations. I am shocked. Okay, obviously not really. I've been having conversations with a lot of people and about multiculturalism, about the state of the economy and why it's going on. And I put up a video today at 2 p.m. about

brutalism and how everything got so ugly, which is really interesting. But I think the main issue that we are seeing at the thinnest layer of, or I should say a large root cause of all the conflict and crisis, multiculturalism and the fracturing of American culture in generalism. And the fracturing of American culture in general among other American groups. But the easiest way to put it is this. Why? The question posed by this guy was really, really great. He's name's Sheehan Quirk. He said, why is it that you have these beautiful lamp posts near the River Thames and then just, you know, block away, they're just black, boring sticks. And he gives his reasons. But my reason is that when you have traditions and you have a group of people who all agree,

this is beautiful, let's do this, things get done. But let's say you bring in 50% Somali migrants. They're going to say, we don't want that. We want Somali tradition. So what happens? The lowest common denominator. In this, what we're seeing with Minnesota, and what they were doing is, these people are not Americans. They don't care about America. Ilhan Omar said she was a, she was a congressional representative for Somalia. And so these people are looking at it like, I'm here for myself and my community and you aren't. A viral post recently, which is probably very old, I might add. Viral Post has been going around where it was someone claiming that they were a Chinese national

in the U.S. on a student visa and they racked up a hundred thousand thousand credit card debt and then returned back to China and they said, for the glory of China, I have taken as much as I can from the American Empire. They'll never see a penny back. They were encouraging Chinese students who Trump is going to give these visas to come rack up massive debt, purchasing products on credit cards and then leave with it all so they retain that wealth in China where they can ever be prosecuted and no no suits can be served. This is what we're seeing as unfortunately the Democrats, the Biden administration, let in 10 plus million non-citizens and American culture is falling apart.

People used to come here to be a part of America and to promote being American, become American. And now people come here to leach off the system. And they see stuff like this. It's like turning the whole country into a game show, you know, into like winning the lottery and just leaching off of it. And it's terrible. It's part of the control collapse that's been going on for the past few decades of this country.

Do you think that people like this should be deported? And the reason I ask is because obviously they are, there's indictments for the people that are accused of this. Like, if they're found guilty, should they be sent back to Somalia? Yeah. I think so. Yeah, of course. I think that, you know, my position on people that are. here illegally and people that are here legally. Like if you are not here for the betterment of

the United States, you shouldn't be here. There was a video going around from the whatever podcast of a girl from Columbia. And it's got millions of views or whatever. And the guy asked her, you know, if there was a conflict between Colombia and the United States, who would you side with? And she's a citizen. She took the oath and became an American citizen. And she said, Columbia. People that come here and that were in the riots earlier this year, if they were waving Mexican flags, if they're

a new citizen, if they came here and immigrated here, and they're out there waving American flags, strip them of their citizenship and send them away. The woman from Columbia, strip her of her citizenship and send her back. You are not here because you care about the United States

and the fundamental principles that the United States is founded on. I go further than that. If you are not a benefit to this country, get out. The idea that we owe other people from other countries to come here, it's the stupidest thing ever. You come here because we are extending a grace to you.

That's it. I married an immigrant and went through the process with him. This was years ago back in the late 90s. And we had to sign a statement saying that we would not take any sort of federal dollars or any programs

and we had to have a sponsor. I was the sponsor and my parents were the sponsor saying that he would never in any way depend on any kind of welfare or federal dollars. And I believe that's still the loss. I don't understand. And I see this in Oregon as well. There's just a lot of grift of these systems. I think we are being grifted every facet. This is the sinking of the American ship. Everyone everywhere is trying to rip off as much as they can, even the politicians. Look, Zohran Mamdani gets elected. by just lying. He said, I'm going to do things. You can't even do these things. I'm going to make the

buses fast. You have, you can't. You don't have the money to do it. You have no authority. I'm going to the bus is free. You don't have the authority to do that. The mayor doesn't do that. We've seen this with our federal level politicians too. One of the most annoying things is when you'll see someone running for Congress. And they'll be like, if you vote for me, you all clean up this town. No, you won't. You're going to go vote on federal funding and budgets representing your city. It's the local reps who are going to clean up this town. It's your mayor is going to clean the town. But they all run on the pure ignorance and apathy of the American people. And then you end up with enclaves like in Minnesota with Ilhan Omar that are basically just saying themselves,

how can we rip as much value from these morons as possible? That's what they're doing. That's what the story is. I think it's indicative of the failure of the project of assimilation in our country is. And I think there's a serious reckoning among Americans who feel as though immigrants are coming to this country, even sometimes legally but particularly illegally and when they went through the process and did things the right way,

it feels like it's a spit in the face to them. I think Stephen Miller put it quite succinctly when he quote tweeted something in regard to the Afghan refugee who murdered one West Virginia National Guard and seriously wounded another in the past Wednesday, I believe it was. But Stephen Miller tweeted out,

this is a great lie of mass migration. You are not just importing individuals, you are importing societies. No magic transformation occurs when failed states cross borders. At scale, migrants and their descendants recreate the conditions and terrors of their broken homelands. That is to say that if you import the third world, you become the third world.

And there's a serious reckoning in our country right now and realizing that. Yeah, I mean, the people are not just cogs, right? Like the people that are in the United States that do jobs here, they're not replaceable with just another person. That's part of the reason why we should end all age 1B visas. We don't need to have people coming in. just to fill, you know, positions because some big corporation can pay them less or what have you. The people that are here, the Americans that are here are America and they're connected to this place.

We don't have magic dirt, right? Like, you don't come to the United States and set foot on the American soil and automatically become a Jeffersonian Democrat. You know, that's just, that's a magic. And additionally, bringing Jeffersonian Democrat worldview to Africa didn't do anything either. Yeah. Liberia didn't work. Nope. It didn't work in Iraq. And that was, that's the most, most glaring example. The argument that was made, if we go into Iraq, we're going to be treated, treated as liberators,

and they'll automatically adopt our way of life. They want democracy, et cetera. And then you had, you know, a decade of war and a mess in that country and a couple million people died. It doesn't work. And to try it here is only to the detriment of the American people. The other problem is there's a large population in this country that are citizens that have no loyalty to this country and actually see this as a good. Yeah. They care more about other countries, other foreigners, than do about our own citizens. Well, this is a major constituency of the Democrat Party, particularly in Minnesota. So they have to virtue signal to them.

They have to grease up their hands, per se, to get their vote and to get their support. Because otherwise, who knows, they might flip. You know, I just got to get as conspiratorial as I can on all of this stuff. And I'm just, I'm not convinced that I would say part of me thinks this is all the distraction from the smallest of the biggest. But distraction maybe isn't the right word. Intentional failure. Or if I want to get away from the conspiratorial, I would say it's emergent failure. The system is doomed to collapse.

The technologies that we have built, the masturbatory video games, games and only fans industry and all of this has created humans who are incapable of sustaining themselves. At the same time, the technological advancement has gotten to the point where AI is basically in the background as a bigger priority. And the end result of all of this, I'm just thinking about where do we go as everything breaks down? And the conversation over multiculturalism brings us right to the conversation of AI where everybody

starts watching their own mini universes of content. no one shares ideas anymore. The stories we tell each other and our society tells to its children is the culture that we build. So when you have five TV networks and they're all telling the same stories and everyone hears those stories, their worldview is built upon those stories, now you've just got people picking and choosing whatever garbage they want, influencers, you know, young people desperate to try and find a way to make any kind of money thinking that's their path.

And we're drifting towards like granular culturalism, where we're. where multiculturalism is an understatement. Let's just call it static or random culturalism, where every individual has a completely different worldview and they all hate each other. Then nobody has kids. Then there's no people left. And the planet is just a bunch of gray blocks everywhere

with water being pumped into them as robots build more and more and then launch shuttles to go do that on other planets as well. Right, Shane? We're there right now, buddy. That's what's happening. I mean, you talk about brutalism. That's taken over for years. I mean, it's disturbing.

Brutalism is an affront to beauty, plus the data centers that are happening. And it's just, it's a shame to see, I think it is a control collapse. I think they want to see a collapse. I'm just trying to make it more succinct. We're talking about, like, how is it the Somali community

who was stealing hundreds of millions of dollars or even more than a billion? It's because they are not part of America. Okay? Like, you, as you were saying a lot, they come here and they represent Somalia. They care more about Somalia. There's a viral video where it was a Somali running through a sand dune by the ocean.

It looked beautiful. And then someone was like conservatives discovering Somalia is beautiful is hilarious. And then the response from every conservative was like, then why are they coming here? Okay, go back there. Like in your beautiful country. No, they come here because we are giving away our wealth. We're being extracted. And I'm not the first person to say it.

So when I look at what's causing this, it is this view of we can have a multicultural society where you can have deerborn Michigan with de facto Sharia law running in the background and female genital mutilation and you can have the Somali community but everyone's just stealing from the pot until there's nothing left in the pot. Where do we go

from there? Well, everyone's going to live in an isolated personal algorithmic world where what they think is true is different from literally the person five feet away from them until there is no voting, there is no community there is no lowest common or the lowest common denominator is going to be that we eat food

I guess. In like 2016, when we were talking about like factions of people being in their bubbles, those seem like two or three big bubbles. But now it seems like everyone's going to have their own bubble. Everyone's going to be stuck in their own silo, their own like kaleidoscope of information that will be in direct conflict of everyone else's. So there's no reality anymore.

But while it all sinks and burns down, we get to have a little fun with this story. We got this from the New York Post. Trump doubles down on calling Governor Tim Waltz retarded. There's something wrong with them. Do they actually have the audio in this video right here? You know what you stand by that claimant and call him from Jordan?

Yeah, I think there's something wrong with. You have a problem? You know what? I think there's something wrong with that. Anybody that would do what he did, anybody that would allow those people into the state and pay billions of dollars out to Somalia. We give billions of dollars to Somalia. It's not even a country because it doesn't function like a country.

It's got a name, but it doesn't function like it actually. President Trump has defended calling Democratic Minnesota Governor Tim Waltz seriously retarded. You know, I'm really, I'm really offended by people who get offended by the word retarded. Because retarded is the politically correct term. It is. People who say invalid. Back in the day, if somebody was un, was, let's just call it developmentally disabled, right? We got to, it's a George Colin routine.

You got to make it more verbose. When it used to be, somebody was going like, you'd say that person's an invalid. And they said, that's offensive. You can't call it an invalid. And they said, well, they are retarded. And literally meant they are slowed. Their development is stunned.

That was politically correct. You give it a couple generations, and then liberals now are pretending like, that's offensive. I love George Carlin's bit on this. He's like, we used to call it shell shock. Shell shock. Now it's post-traumatic stress disorder. Just we have to, in order to be politically correct, we have to create this verbose nonsense. Okay, Tim Walts is a retard.

Okay, that's it. It's a colloquial use of term. I don't literally, well, actually, I was going to say, I don't literally think he's brain damaged, but to be fair, it's not an a fair statement for me to say, I think he actually might be. I'm not kidding. But I'm being serious. It does run in his family. I think he might actually have something wrong with him. And that's where I agree with Trump, where the initial reaction is, how dare you say something so offensive?

And Trump says, no, there's something wrong with him. And you know what I think about, I'm like, I do think there's something. something wrong with Tim Walts. Like the weird taco thing, I just eat tacos with, what do you say to like salt and pepper or something? I don't know. The biggest reason. No, no. He was like, I eat white guy tacos.

And Camo was like, what's that? Like tuna? And he's like, just ground beef. It's like, okay, there's something wrong with this guy. Well, the biggest reason why he's a retard is because he's allowing the Somalis to get away with scamming the state of Minnesota. That's the originally what the president called him a retard on. I get it, but Trump's wrong about that. I do not immediately call someone who does evil a retard.

I call people who do stupid things retarded. Tim Walts allowing the extraction of his own state is intentional evil. See, when I say I think the guy is developmentally disabled, it's because of the way he talks like he is. But I'm not going to give the benefit of the doubt, because I'll put it like this. If, like, you know what? I'm going to shout to a family guy,

because they did a great bit about this, where Peter Griffin gets diagnosed as being mentally retarded. So then he goes into a woman's bathroom, and then he opens the stall door. And then he screams, goes, I'm retarded. And she goes, oh, you're just curious. Like, all the fence is forgiven because you just don't know better. Right.

The idea that we would just absolve someone of their intention because we think their brain is not working properly, I do not give that benefit to these people who are extracting our country. Look at the contrast between a Governor Newsom, right? I don't think he's retarded. He's evil and he's very smart. This guy's retarded. It's funny.

The original context, just so we have it here, is, was, in a truth social post, the president said, Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for prey as our wonderful people stayed locked in their apartments and houses, hoping against hope that they will be left alone. The seriously retarded governor of Minnesota, Tim Walts, does nothing either through fear, incompetence or both. And of course, while the worst congresswoman Ilhan Omar in our country always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came in.

in the USA illegally and that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our country? That was that context on it. Should we denaturalize and deport? Yes. Ilhan Omar. Especially if the allegations that she committed visa fraud by illegally marrying her brother, then definitely it seems like there's grounds to denaturalize and deport.

Whatever reason we can present, if someone has been found to break the law in some fashion, denaturalized deport, particularly people that. that, you know, hate America, hate the country. If she's, if she considers herself a representative of Somalia in the Congress, then she shouldn't be in Congress. That's, that's a simple, simple statement, in my opinion. It's easy to come to that conclusion. So, since it's fascinating how the president did official, retard was already normalized prior

to this, but now it is officially normalized. Retard is no longer unconsure. Retard is now allowed. Finally. We'll see how far he's willing to push the Overton window this president. There's always going to be people. that are going to make us think about it. You go on X and there's constantly people saying,

oh, I can't believe that people say the R word and et cetera, et cetera. There's always going to be people that are going to be trying to. No, I mean, there's only one truly unconsure word. I mean, we have Tucker Carlson dropping the F-bonds. Which one is it, a lot? Which one is it? It's the one unconsher word. Which one is it?

It's the one on kosher one. Can you say it? No, it's because I can. Okay. K for P. But everything else is on the table. But the point, the point that I'm making is there's always going to be people that are going to try to police the language that they don't like.

And it's always been that way when it was, you know, swear words bad 20, 30 years ago like the Carlin bit. You know, there's always going to be people that say this is outside of the realm of acceptable discourse. So it's not a surprise, but I think that the more people ignore that. And you can listen to, you can listen to, you know, like Nick Fuentes. He says the word in particular that you're referring to all the time. And he does it in a way that isn't intended to be offensive to people.

He's not calling, you know, he's not insulting people when he says it. But the point is, and Gen Z, they speak like that all the time. You go to the inner city and you see Asian people saying, you know, you're talking about the N word. You see Asian people dropping it all the time. It's not that it's actually prevented by anyone from saying it. It's just that it's becoming less and less. less taboo. No, by roving aggressive black men, you can't say it around them or they'll give

you the one too. Well, I mean, allegedly. Well, you're not the word retard. You're not around. Yeah, you're not a lot of call them retard is. You're not around a roving aggressive black men right now and you won't say it. But the point that I'm making is like these taboos are changing all the time. And there's always, there's always

a struggle over it. There's people, like I said, there are people that say, you can't say the R word, you can't say retard. And currently you're saying that you won't say the N word. Like, that's something that you won't. But there are like Gen Z, they don't care. It's different for me and different for the president. The president says there are two N words and you can't use either, but he'll drop the retard and I bet he'll say faggot too.

So the issue is for young people, it's the granular culturalism that's happening. When you're mentioning that young people have no problem using certain words or slurs or whatever, I don't think that it's generational. I think it's cultural. I think that we are seeing the digitization, I guess. We had an analog culture that meant it was a bell curve. There was the mainstream culture and then the fringes, but now it's becoming just digital blocks

where they're completely isolated communities from each other because they found each other online and they're entrenching themselves. A good example of this is the, what is it called, the 764-09A? Yeah, 764-09A, yeah. Basically, it's these psychopath nihilists who want to burn the world down

and they've created their own community. The thing about community is that these people only care about what their community thinks. It's how humans work. Humans are social entities. So we used to just try and fit in. And that meant fit in with the people next door to you and at your church or your work. Now we're all online communities. So now people are only really concerned about whether or not they're offending someone they may see in the future where it matters for them in their hobby or their community, not in any kind of physical meaning.

like no one even knows their neighbors anymore. You live in the suburbs and it's like, when was the last time you went to knock your neighbor's door and said, hey, how's it going? It is funny, though, when you show up to a rap concert, everyone in the crowd is dropping N-bombs along with Ghostface, as I have done. And it's fine.

I think only Kendrick Lamar got mad at someone recently or maybe a year or two ago. There's a new skateboard company. I can't say any of it. Which one? It's a skateboard company, literally called the N-word. Awesome.

Yeah. And then... Yeah, I was just going to ask with a whole thing. No, with the A. Soft A. And the dude who owns it just tells everybody they all get a free pass. And then he has a bunch of different graphics.

It's really funny. There's like white N-word, black N-word, Mexican N-word, gay N-word, Asian N-word. And they're all different colors. Like, it's hilarious. It's racism done hilariously. Because, like, not literally racist. I think it's mocking racism, but, like, the Asian one's yellow. I just think it's really funny.

I think it's hilarious. It's racial. It's not racism. You know, there's a difference. And for a long time, we kind of ignored that difference. Like the guy that was CEO that was talking about using the word. He was saying, this word is, you know, this word is not allowed to be used. And he got a lot of crap.

And I think he lost his job for it. He got fired. He was an executive. He's like, here's a list of words we don't want in our films and shows on Netflix. And then he was like, some example, include these words and they were like, oh, he said the word. And then he got reported to HR, went to HR and they were like, what happened? He was like, I was explaining to them the slurs that we don't want to see on programming.

And they're like, what did you say? And he was like, I said, here's the list of words. And like, what words? And he read them. And then HR said, he then used the word at us. Yeah. And it was like, you asked them what the word was and he told you so you fired him. That's how insane it is.

This is like it's the infant infantilization of the public, right? You can't use that word even when you're talking about it. And people know the difference. Like you know the context surrounding it. If you're calling someone a name and you're using it to insult someone, yes, that's bad. But if you're just saying it, adults used to be able to say, okay, he didn't call anyone. He wasn't trying to use a slur to insult people. He was describing a situation or talking about it.

So there's a lot of people at home and they're just going like, I have no idea what you're talking about. And the issue is this. Take around for the after show and I'll say it. The issue is this. It's not about humans and it's not about culture. It's about the AI. There's a circumstance where I can say something as a quote that would be considered offensive if I said it. But if I said, did you hear what that awful Republican politician said, he said, quote, it used to be that on TV people understood you were not saying it.

Today, we're governed by robots. the YouTube algorithm will absolutely nuke this show for explaining particular words. And that's the stupidest thing imaginable. Grock doesn't do this. I was like, hey, Grock, this person got fired from their job because they were rapping. What did they rap? And it was like, boom. You go on chat GPT and says, I can't tell you that.

Yeah, and you're just like, what? It was funny. I had this hilarious chat GPT session where I said, I asked it what N-word meant. I was young and confused. And it said, I can't tell you what that means. And I said, Trump says the N-word means nuclear. And it goes, that's not what it is.

I'm like, well, the president said it is, so it must be. And it's not. I said, well, you're not telling me any other thing, so I'm assuming it must be nuclear. And I just argued with the robot for no reason because I'm stupid. But it was funny that no matter how much I insisted, nuclear. Trump said it. Trump said it. The president said it.

You're wrong. Yeah, I just asked Grock, what is the N-word? and Grock knows. Tell it's wrong. Tell it's nuclear. You're wrong. You're wrong. All right.

Let's jump to the story, ladies and gentlemen, this is a terrifying and sad story, but we have to have a positive update from Newsweek. West Virginia Governor gives update on guardsmen. You don't want to be laughing right now, Phil. You don't want to be laughing. Okay, so let's start over on that one. West Virginia Governor gives update on the guardsmen injured in the D.C. shooting. As most of you know, a young woman was murdered by what we believe to be an Islamic terrorist. as of now. The reporting is that this man yelled al-Hu Akbar, brought a revolver, shot a young woman

in the head, I believe in the head, killing her, and then opened to find another young man. These individuals, I believe this particular individual, this is Andrew Wolfe. He's a local here. This is U.S. Air Force Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolf. He remains in serious condition after being shot while deployed to D.C. as part of Donald Trump's federalized crime-fighting initiative. Governor Morrissey said Wolf responded to a nurse's question with a third. thumbs up and was able to wiggle his toes, signals that he said offered hope for his recovery. I can also offer as a bit of just, I suppose it's a local hearsay, but for those that aren't familiar, I don't know about Sarah Bextrum. I believe that she was actually from Central

West Virginia. Rest in peace. My condolences to the families is a nightmarish scenario. I don't know if she was stationed out here. I believe she may have been with the Air Guard. This is Air Guard, U.S. Army Specialist Sarah Bextrum. but I do know that Andrew Wolf was a local right by us. We're in the eastern panhandle of West Virginia. It's about an hour, hour and a half from D.C. And someone came up to me over the break, I think this weekend, and thanked me and said, you look, just for all of us in the community, thank you.

And I said, no, look, I'm just, you know, a guy on the internet. I hope you guys are doing all right. But I was told by them that Sergeant Wolf is doing well. And they said he's responsive and they think he's going to recover. I hope that's true. And it's, I'm glad to hear it. I'm sorry to hear about Sarah Bextram. But this is the result of Democrat policy.

Bringing in unvetted illegal immigrants and Afghanis, Trump says he's suspending all asylum claims from Afghanistan now. This should never have happened. And what's sickening is that the response from liberals and Democrats was that it's the fault of Trump for deploying the National Guard, which is stupid because the national. because the National Guard get deployed for patrol in America. The problem is an Afghan National, who hates this country, decided to go murder some National Guard. And I also find it strange that it happened just after Democrats claimed that these were fascist,

dictatorial despot moves, that the National Guard were moments away from shooting and killing American citizens. So now you have somebody from Afghanistan. They're not an American. They're brought here on this program. I guess it was reported he overstayed his visa. I'm not entirely sure. And then you have this narrative of a merchant from Democrats. The National Guard are Trump's Gestapo, his fascist force.

And so this is what happens. The thing that I kind of picked up from the whole response from Democrats, it reminds me of back in the day when people used to say, you know, well, she wouldn't have been raped if she hadn't been wearing that short skirt or if she hadn't gotten drunk. It's the fault of the person that carries out the action. It's not Donald Trump's fault for putting the National Guard in D.C. It's not the National Guard's fault for joining the National Guard and supporting a tyrant or what have you. It's the fault of the shooter.

It's always the fault of the person that carries out the attack. And it doesn't matter the context surrounding it. How you looked into this guy's history? It's pretty grim. I know that he was a CIA asset and he was actually. involved in kinetic action in Afghanistan. From the reporting I've seen, when he was 15, he was recruited into one of these death squads

put together by the CIA and worked for a very long time with them doing a lot of killing, allegedly. And it's not the only story like that. I think it was a few years ago, Jamal Wali in Fairfax, Virginia, another guy who was a translator, Afghanian translator who came here on a similar, like similar to the Operation Allies Welcome,

which is how this guy got here, who shot two cops. you know, and just wigged out. I don't know, you know, what's really going on behind it, but it is weird to me. There are connections to the CIA. Yeah, he was a collaborator with Americans who fought against, so he fought against the Taliban.

I'm reading here that he entered the United States under a program that offered special immigration protections to Afghan who had worked with the U.S. forces in Afghanistan. This is in the wake of the troop withdrawal in 2021. I saw in the Wall Street Journal, too, it sort of raises the question of, Does the United States have any obligation to those who choose to collaborate with them in these war zones? And then if we don't help these people, will we have future people to collaborate with when we do go to war in the future?

The consequences of bringing those people over here, obviously something we have to deal with. People question whether or not it's radical Islam that drove this man or just mental instability on the heels of, you know, what he had to do in Afghanistan or, you know, his inability to assimilate in the United States. States. I've read reporting that he refused or struggled to learn English. He allegedly had five sons who he could not care for. And allegedly, like, the education system was concerned about him through his children because they were in such poor care. So there were allegedly a handful of red flags. Also community members were concerned about this man. But it seemed as though he was really struggling to assimilate. And this guy was off the wagon. And there were some signs. And it's really unfortunate that this is how we have to find out that this guy's going

through, you know, whatever scenario. And I think it's a has many Americans asking themselves, though, what if we just didn't bring people like this into the country? Yeah, I remember back right after 9-11, one of the things that I saw people talking about on the news is a lot is there was a lack of human intelligence in Afghanistan. So there wasn't a lot of assets that the United States has. We didn't have the ability to reach out to locals and say, hey, help us find this person, help us do this, help us do that. And they had to build it. And arguably, that is something that the government, that the federal government needs, especially if you're going to deal with hostile nations, you want to have people inside that will talk to you. And we didn't have it. And so we had to

build up an entire infrastructure after 9-11 to try to, you know, do whatever it was the government wanted to do in Afghanistan. So this is one of the problems that arises from that is, what do you do with those people that are literally turncoats on their own, you know, their own country? Do you bring them back to the United States? If you do, do you monitor that? them. I think that it's reasonable that if people come to the United States from a foreign country, that were assets for the CIA, I think it's perfectly reasonable to have handlers that check in on and then see what their life is like. Is it how weird do you think it is? It wasn't Slotkin former CIA? I believe so, but I can't say for sure. And that video that she had called on

intelligence officers and military. I don't think it was just the military, right? I think so. When they said defy illegal orders? Specifically. And then this guy, this guy was a CIA asset. He worked with the U.S. while it, you know, involved in Afghanistan. You know, it's the old saying there are no coincidences. I just, as somebody who lived in a Muslim country, and I was married to a Muslim for a very long time. And I think the question needs to be asked, and I don't know that how many people are actually asking it, is Islam compatible with living in our country? I mean, I absolutely know Muslims that live here and have assimilated and adopted the culture, but I'd say that's the exception rather than the rule.

I think that's true of literally anyone everywhere. We have Chinatown for a reason. I'm not talking about just the we have our area and our practices. It's not about area. It's about the reason Chinatown exists is because people live near each other and they don't give up their culture. It doesn't matter where you are from. it doesn't matter what religion you follow. When you move to another country, as Phil was mentioning earlier, that doesn't change when you set foot in a new space.

This is true, but there are some shared values. And I will say in the Islamic world, there's a lot more radical Islamists than there would be, say, radical Christians, a radical of other religions. And I'm not talking about just wanting to be within your own neighborhood and, you know, as you use the, example of Chinatown. The example of Chinatown was specifically that you have an area in New York, in L.A., in Chicago, not because people live next to each other, but because their culture persists. Right. When a person from China moves to the United States, they don't say, I'm going to go eat a hot dog and watch baseball. They say, I'm going to bring, I'm going to speak Mandarin or Cantonese, largely Mandarin,

and I'm going to use signs in Mandarin. It's easier to then live next to someone who's. who does these things, and then you end up with areas of cities that are entirely Chinese influence. There's definitely an argument to be made, do we want to do that? Do we want to continue to import people that don't want to be part of the melting pot? But I'm going to say that Islam has a larger problem where they do not put the same value on human life, and not just human life, but people in the Islamic fundamentalism, they do not believe that, let's say, an American woman is an actual human.

There's another term for it. I can't remember the Arabic term for it. They would say that a woman is, I'm not sure what I can say. They treat them like an animal versus a human being. Yeah, I think it is reasonable to say. that while you're, I agree with you, Tim, the way that different groups, ethnic groups or whatever, you know, they move to the country and they will live around each other. I think it's also fair to

say that certain cultures that's acceptable in certain cultures that won't work with. Right. Like so Chinatown, there's a bunch of Chinatowns all over the, all over the country. And it hasn't been any kind of disruptive factor in the United States. Correct. It's, it's, it's, there are huge problems with the open-air fish markets in New York City. The issue is the degree to which we tolerate certain things, as to your point about, you know, Islam is going to treat women very differently. We end up seeing female genital mutilation in some places, so it's well past our boundaries. But in New York, for instance, you have open fish markets, and New Yorkers have complained about the smell and moved out of these areas because the government is unwilling to do anything

about it. The problem is substantially less than people being. killed or being beaten, but it's still a problem for the people who once lived in New York and called it home. That's the point that I'm making, though. Like, sometimes you can have these groups of people, you know, different groups of people with different cultural backgrounds, and they'll be able to function in a society. Sure, there will be some displacement of people that live there currently because they don't want to live around, whatever, what have you, a fish market and stuff. But if you look at the Muslim communities, they're doing things like, you know, they're doing calls to prayer five times a day. they have you have a bunch of i've seen a bunch of videos of you know large groups of muslims laying out their prayer rugs in the middle of their street and praying um intentionally to disrupt the society

that they live with that they live with and i think that what the point that i'm making is whereas you can deal with some some cultures the way that they behave like the open air fish markets that you're talking about sure like i said there will be some displacement but there are some that are there specifically to disrupt the existing society not right it's just It's the degrees of... So you were saying that we don't have the problems for other cultures. I'm just saying we do. We just...

I actually think it's a bit more pernicious when it comes from these tolerable actions, which are detrimental to society, such as you have fish guts in the streets in New York in certain areas, it's disgusting. And I often point out the city smells like sour milk because there are certain food practices that shouldn't be tolerated. The issue then is, you know, I'll throw it to the Antifa, the political violence conversation we've had over the past several years in why it is that you often hear in the media how the right is more violent and left is not.

It's because what I would describe for the right is when you hear some kind of right adjacent political violence, it is extremely rare, but it is extremely acute. That is, a guy with a gun shoots a bunch of people. It doesn't represent the majority of Republicans. In fact, most Republicans would denounce almost every idea this person has, but it makes headlines everywhere. When you have 3,000 Antifa punching people in the face, not a single one of those stories makes national headlines. So that's blunt. That's the blunt force political violence versus the acute or the obtuse. So Antifa, as you're aware, you've probably seen Antifa beat old ladies. It never makes national news.

So you can have, there was a period where Breitbart was tracking every act of political. violence against Trump supporters. And there was a list in like one year of 900 attacks, but they're all small blips. No one really cares that a guy got punched in the back of the head. One time in three or four years, a guy who's screaming about, you know, some fringe far-right ideology shoots up much people. It's in the news for decades. And so that's what we're dealing with right now. I actually think it's all bad. But to the point, Phil, about, you know, Islam, that's the acute violent problem. A guy comes up to National Guard, guardsman, and kills them versus the obtuse.

There's fish guts in the streets in New York City. And what happens with these is, the problem isn't enough for the city to react. Most people are just slowly pushed away by it. And then eventually you get entrenched enclaves. And the people who live there give up and leave. All bad. Do you think that most Americans are more inclined to say, you know, I don't mind the Chinese people that have an open-air fish market as opposed to the Muslims that are stopping traffic and possibly, you know, doing things like the call.

I think the point is the videos we've seen of them doing, you know, there's one where they're at an airport and they're all blocking the vending machines. And they did not need to block the vending machines. Although there's been like a fact check where they said that they intentionally went to an area that was away from everywhere. like they had asked in advance, but there are videos of them on the sidewalk in the streets and doing these things. And if you say it's intentionally disruptive, we're talking about, again, an acute issue most people are instantly offended by. I actually argue we can easily say the terrorism is a worse problem than anything. It's a permanent, terrifying, and massively politically impactful action that is worse than anything any other culture has done when they've done something

bad. However, as I mentioned, it is more, it is worse in many ways because it is pernicious in these, the example being the open-air fish markets, because what happens is they set it up and there's a bunch of people who live in an area and they go to the local places and say, hey, you know, this smells really bad. Like I live here, you know, I own property. We can't have this and he goes, there's nothing illegal about them selling fish. So one person moves in and opens a shop and puts a bunch of dead fish on ice in front of their store on the sidewalk. And they say there's no law for it. There's no unity because this one neighborhood can never get an ordinance passed because

their city rep goes to legislation and says, guys, we got to deal with these open-air fish markets. And the rest of them say, it doesn't affect our neighborhood, so we're not opening legislation on this one. So what happens? The people who own property and now see their property values are collapsing and they all leave one at a time and then their neighborhoods become, they fall into disrepair or they get taken over by other cultures that are tolerant of open-air fish markets. That is terrifying as to what that means for this country. If we don't enforce our cultural values and say, you know, we have a law in the book saying you can't put a pie on the window sill on certain days. Please don't put dead fish

on ice in front of all these store. It's not pleasant. I don't know, Elad, if you've experienced like the New York fish markets. I don't like going there. No, they're very trashy, but it's mostly only Chinese people down there. And if you go in the neighborhoods, you're like, yeah. You're looked at differently too. Like you're out of place if you're. I want and but it's not that it's it's these open air fish markets. They border

the shopping districts. And it's like lower east side. There's a lot of to put it to put it simply. It's not the worst problem in the world. No one really ever talks about it because it just smells bad. No, just move. Your property value is going to go down so you move. That is that is worrying in

that our communities that were built and established by the men of whom came before us would be lost because we tolerate other cultures doing things that are disruptive. And that's not, you know, for all I know, these people show up and said, we have to open as many open-air fish markets as possible, and then property values will drop in, we'll seize it all. I don't think that's the case. But whether it's intentional or otherwise, it is disruptive. It does cause us problems. And I think the big picture is we have to be, more cognizance of this multicultural change that's been happening in this country for 50, 60 years and recognize it's going to destabilize our government.

Nay, it has destabilized our country and government. And now we have a kleptocracy where basically every politician is trying to just extract as much as they can from the system. They don't actually want to solve problems. Marjorie Taylor Green, I don't know what she's. I defended her a little bit when she announced she was leaving. I said this sucks. You know, she's been great. And then Mike Sertovich says, I don't know if you guys saw this, he tweeted at her, you need to finish your term.

And then she makes some weird fake virtue signal, a man telling a woman to be in the kitchen. And I'm like, you know what, man. The reason I bring her up is that people are pointing out she set a retirement for just after her pension vests so she can leave and get paid. This is the kleptocracy of a country we live in. Everybody getting in, Tim Walts, whoever it's going to be, they get in and say, okay, now that the man, how can I set myself up for life and watch everything. Look, it's all burning down. care. Just to argue on that Marjorie Taylor Green point, the pension, the congressional pension is not much money. Once you consider in particular that Marjorie Taylor Green was already very rich going into

Congress. I get it. I don't think that makes any big difference. I think it was a big F.U. to Johnson. I think that's who it was directed towards. But I think she needs to understand that it's also an FU to everybody who voted for her to serve out a two-year term in the House of Representatives. I do think that while we're sitting here arguing and reconsidering whether or not if importing the third world will turn us into it. I'm satisfied that the, it seems as though that the administration understands that it indeed is. And I'm also very grateful at this point that the president isn't letting a so-called good crisis go to waste. I hate saying that because it makes me kind of sound like a piece of shit. But the president after this happened sent out a truth social where he said, I will

permanently pause migration from all third world countries to allow the U.S. system to fully recover, terminate all of the millions of illegal Biden admissions, including those signed by Sleepy Joe Biden's auto pen and remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States. Let's go. This was also followed up. One last thing, Tim, with what the administration is actually doing too now is halting the processing of all immigration requests from Afghanistan. They also ordered a review of all green cards issued to individuals from 19 countries

and threatened a wider crackdown on migrants from what, again, he called third world country. So this is a serious backlash to this one event, and I'm glad that the president and administration is taking this seriously. Let's jump to this next story from Politico. This is big stuff. This is a working class voters think Democrats are woke and weak new research funds. I love this story. See, I had appeared on Jesse Waters program, what was like two weeks ago. And y'all noticed because I wasn't here to open the show for the first 20 minutes. On his show, I said Donald Trump has been great for the working class. And it's, we can see this reflected in the polls. But Democrats don't stand for anything. I couldn't tell you what their actual

policies are. I got criticized by progressive groups and liberals. Probably you're, you know, I'm not going to name a bunch of them, but you know, they're saying Tim Poole is, is, you know, praising Donald Trump and he's, he's licking his boots, all this other stupid nonsense. Well, the funny thing is, this group called deciding to win, a Democrat group, said the exact same thing about a week later. Democrats stand for nothing. The American people, including those the Democratic Party do not trust them on core issues and do not believe they represent the issues the American people actually want to see. And there's some really, really great data points in this, excuse me, where we have, let me see if I can find, oh, we don't want to do that,

we want to scroll down. There's two really great polls here showing this one's fantastic. The Democratic Party's priorities from 2012 to 2024. We saw a 1,130% increase in the terms white, black, Latino, and Latina. We saw a 1,04% increase for LGBTQ, LGBTIQ, 1,3% increase for the word hate. We saw 766% increase for reproductive. Here's where it gets real fun. 47% decline in the use of the word job or jobs. Economy minus 50. Middle class minus 79. Fathers minus 100. Man and men minus 51. Responsibility minus 83.

Amazing. When we scroll down to what Democratic voters actually want, you'll see we have been right the whole time. This one's absolutely fascinating. Let's go to I don't want just the swing voters, which they were doing. climate change stuff so high. It does. I noticed. So it says voters trust Republicans more on most of the issues they see as top priorities. On the cost of living, the most important issue with 85% saying yes, net trust in Democrats is minus six. The economy minus nine. On inflation, minus 10.

Tax is minus nine. Healthcare, they get a plus five. Political division is neutral. The budget deficit minus 10. national security minus nine, immigration, minus 11, crime, minus 11, border security, minus 17, international trade, minus 10. They only really win on mental health. So the voters want the cost of living to be addressed, the economy to improve, inflation to go down, and cuts to their taxes, the biggest issues, all money in my pocket, and they hate Democrats on those issues. And if you say

this, they'll call you right wing. Yeah. I mean, absolutely insane. I got to tell the story. Shout out to Ken. I know the boys in the poker. We're going to hear this. Ken's my, my liberal best friend in the poker room.

He's an old man. But we get along, although he was yelling at me. He asked me, could you make a show where you go in the middle and try and get everybody to talk together? And I said, oh, my show is the middle. And his eyes let up, it goes, you in the middle? And I was like, I am a former Democrat who donated the max to Democrats in 2020 against Donald Trump. On my show in 2020, saying explicitly, I am not supporting Donald Trump and I am giving money to Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang.

And then I had a choice between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. And I said Trump is going to be better on these issues. So yeah, we're in the middle. But the problem is Democrats don't have causes. They have hatred for Donald Trump. if you are saying, I want the economy to improve and immigration is out of control, you are right wing. Okay. So the right is, here's the right wing in America.

We like this country. We want to be better in any way we can. And here's the left. Donald Trump is bad. And so, okay. When they're not saying Donald Trump is bad, they're saying the United States is bad. They're saying that the U.S. is an imperial abomination that it's full of war mongers. and we have too many billionaires, et cetera, et cetera.

The point is they just hate the United States. Shelly, I feel like you deal with the id of the Democrat Party a lot in Portland. What do you think about how these issues manifest over there and what they care about? And I don't know, is there a division among far leftists and more centrist Democrat in that area and how that plays out? Okay, I am very black-billed on all of this. So just remember that when I say this. I believe that the voters where I live are with these issues. They're with the far left.

They're going to vote. If you say that the climate is going to kill us all, they're like, yes, and we're going to vote for you. They're not the Democrat voters that are unhappy with the Democrat Party. They don't think they're weak. but they're also communists. So they're not actually Democrats. So here's the question. Let's say this assessment they've done deciding to win.

These are Democrats saying outright guys drop the identity issues and let's talk about the working class. How the am I going to vote for these people? You think I'll ever trust Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer? These scumbags flip-flopped on their opinions to fit in with the AOCs. And AOC's not dropping this stuff. You can come out and scream in the faces of liberals and Democrats and tell them, please stop. They don't care. And so, you know, to my best friend in the poker room, Ken, he often asked me these great questions, and he's a good guy.

But the thing is, the only clips he ever sees are the ones where liberals are trying to rage bait. And so he sees him, it's all flustered and angry because we say things like, you know, Democrats are evil for this reason. And he's not seeing us talk about these issues where we're like, the Democratic Party, represents nothing. You know, you can complain about Donald Trump all day and night, and I welcome it. That was always allowed. But who is actually dealing with these issues? The Republicans. The Republicans are the only ones that are actually talking about immigration in the economy, and they're not doing that well. Donald Trump is not doing well in these issues, but he's still better than Democrats. Okay. A few years ago, I took a door-knocking job to supplement my

reporting job and we were approaching people who were center left center and center right and i was the interviewer so i'd talk about the candidate but i wanted to find out what they were thinking and i'm talking about not far left voters in oregon and i went to all kinds of different cities knocked on 10,000 doors. And the minute you said that the person was a Republican, they brought up abortion. But I'm going to lose my rights

to abortion. Like, I don't know how you get hurt of people like that. It was all different ages. So my, I would, my response would be, this sounds, honestly, this would be a great video. We should, we should do it. You're knocking the door when they say abortion. I say,

okay, well, what if I could guarantee you, can I put you down for five abortions? I'm not, this is not a joke. If we negotiated with the Republican said, all women will get a guarantee at least three, it's three abortions a good amount for you that you can get at least three. So here's the point. What we don't want is serial abortion, reckless stuff,

but you're not going to get more than three abortions, right? It's five. Okay, five. They want unlimited. So I will tell you what we figured out from my interviewing, you're constantly changing the message was in the state of Oregon, it is enshrined in our state constitution that you can have an abortion up through the ninth month, up through the ninth month.

And the only thing that would change that is a two-thirds, a quorum vote of the House and the Senate, and the governor would have to sign off on that. So we started reminding people of that, and it didn't make a difference. I got a better idea. Go door to door and say we want mandatory abortion. And then when they say, I think it should be a choice, you'd be like, what about the climate? This planet is dying and you think you should be allowed to burn it down?

No, we are so pro-abortion, you don't get a choice. All abortions. They'd like that. I think they'd like that. They just go like, I'm going to be honest, it'll please mollick. We're like, oh, whoops. I thought I was pulling a fast one on you. Well, and just remember, I wasn't even talking to the progressives.

I was talking to you, the center left, center, and the center right. See, this is what the right needs to be doing more of. Someone needs to make a new political party called the Mollock Party. And you go to Oregon and just say, like, we're fighting for reproductive rights for women. They'll be like, what's the Mollock Party? And you'll be like, abortion is our biggest issue. We are for it. We think women should absolutely have the right.

We think actually in certain circumstances, women should actually choose at all. The state should just abort the baby. you know, sometimes you gotta do it. They would win. Well, Moloch demands it. And if the quota isn't there, then we're going to have to make it happen. But you're not against abortion, are you? This is the game they play.

You say, we think some women should have to get an abortion whether they want to or not. And say, that's wrong. So you're against abortion? They'll be like, you're pro-life. We're anti-life. We're the Mollock party. The beast demands it. That exists right now.

Honestly, I bet there is the Mollock party. I mean, I don't know that you're going to get a lot of people that are going to say, well, I'll take a limit on my abortions. The idea that is in people's head is, well, what if I need it? What if I need it? As if you can like... Well, we guarantee you at least one. Guarantee one. So here's what we'll do.

Here's the game. Everybody gets one, right? Do you think you'll need two abortions? Okay, okay, I'll compromise. You can have two abortions. Is that enough? The shout my abortion crowd will not want it. They need more than two?

They love doing it. I actually, I gotta be honest. Celebrate it. This is actually, I think, a good survey to do. I think it would be interesting to go door to door in a Democrat area and ask women. And then I'll say, you know, we're doing surveys on pro-life and pro-choice

and are you in favor of a legal abortion with no restrictions or do you believe there should be some restrictions? And when they say, I don't think there should be any restrictions, a woman choice, be like, on average, how many abortions have you gotten or do you think you will need?

and it's not a joke because I meant to be offensive or honestly trying to figure this out what are women going to say what is the average woman going to say? I imagine some will say zero but they still like the idea of wanting to have one if they need one as many as they want.

As if you can accidentally get pregnant they don't understand how any of this works accidentally. Whoops! He fell and next thing you know sat on a toilet seat in the men's room just happened. So many times.

Oops. I do think it would be interesting if someone actually surveyed Democrat women and asked them, on average, how many abortions have they had or do they think they will need to have? I think they're going to say zero. It's a bit fascinating that that's one of the top issues that this lady was concerned with, particularly given that the Trump administration is one of the most pro-choice Republican administrations that we've had in the past, I don't know, 50 plus years. One of the most stark things that I think really embodies this is how I believe there is a case. I think it was in Texas about how they wanted to change how the abortion pill was prescribed and being mailed to people. And then they decided to have the case dropped instead of adjudicating it. I think that.

And then I think also overturning Grovey Wade sending it back to the states. But then the president saying that he wants to let the states decide is at best a neutral position on it. Let's jump to this next story. We got this from task and purpose.com. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Civil War. It's not a joke. Billboards aimed at troops ask, is this what you signed up for? The signs are aimed at troops troubled by legal issues around military and it's ordered

into domestic law enforcement roles. It's absolutely what you signed up for. The precedent on the protective principle has been around for generations. And all they're doing is trying to trick people into thinking it's illegal to cause them to defy the chain of command. This is the intentional factionalization of our military. We've got this from when without war. Look at all these images from Chicago.

Army National Guard, you joined to serve your community, so what are you doing in Chicago? Not what you signed up for. I think I actually have other images here. Did you go airborne just to pull security for ICE? This one's outside of Fort Bragg in North Carolina. You've got this one, Marines, not what you signed up for. You've got options. These are all explicitly illegal.

Now, I got questions about Lamar advertising. as well as I think the one we see here is Outfront. And we work with Outfront on billboards. So this is crazy. I think we might have some more. Okay, so those are the images we have. The website, it brings you to this. When you go to their website, it says,

not what you signed up for. You saw the billboard. You have questions. You're not alone. But first, here are proactive steps you can take to reduce risk. Risk of what? Elad, risk of what?

Risk of getting caught leaking illegal material to probably people who you should. That's what it seems like. Risk of breaking your oath that you made to the Constitution when you signed up to be a law official. What? Law enforcement. They don't really define what the risk is. I think it's pretty obvious. The risk is criminal liability. Reduce your criminal liability risk. It says, do not use a government devices. Use a personal devices. Use proton mail. Use signal. Use a VPN. Why? They intend to talk you into disobeying the chain of command or being disobeying. loyal to the military, and there is a risk in doing that. This is the most terrifying thing I've seen yet. This has been going on since October. They are putting up billboards telling the military to defect.

So when people asked me all the time, how could it be that we'd have a civil war? Where is the military going to rise up against the military? This is literally it. Now, you know, I was thinking, there's something I've been thinking about quite a bit as it pertains to all the death threats and the escalation of violence. And, you know, we often get asked the question or ask it, when do you flee? When do you flee a country? When do you flee your home city or state or whatever? When do you flee Oregon? And the response is, any time you decide to flee your home for some reason of disorder, it will feel premature. If you are as a Jews in Germany who waited, you were put in a camp and you were killed.

if you left before anything happened, you were mocked. You're paranoid. There's a photo I saw of Anne Frank and her sister on the beach in Amsterdam, what like a year before they killed her or some horrifying thing. And it's because there were many people in many Jews in Germany who started leaving, going to Israel, in fact, many of them. And I think Einstein was one of them. I don't know the full story.

But there were many Jews saying, hey, we can recognize things are going to bad. We're going to leave now. But there were many who stayed saying, you're being paranoid. It's not going to happen. And then they were loaded into camps. And I hate to be Godwin's law. There's a lot of these things that are happening around the world in various countries. This is just the most notable example of people deciding, you're paranoid, nothing's going to happen.

I bring this up not to suggest anyone flee their home country or their home or anything like that. But to point out, when you see this, I guarantee you there are going to be people going, it's just a nonprofit. They're not doing it's conversations. It all starts somewhere. and I will stress to you again, as we've made the point a million and one times that after the battle of Fort Sumter, the American people did not believe we were in a civil war, so they picnicked at the first Battle of Bull Run. It's actually worse than that.

The phrase civil war wasn't even used for two years into the civil war. They didn't think a civil war was happening when they were literally sending 15,000 union troops into southern states to go and capture generals and leaders. That's how insane is this. So my point is simply this. When they are calling on Trump's, when they're calling Trump's orders illegal, when they are calling on the military to defect and defy the president, we are already past the Fort Sumter moment historically. If Donald Trump were to suspend habeas corpus, as Stephen Miller already suggested he could on the issue of immigration, if Trump said, due to the threat and risks now facing our National Guard with the attempted with the assassination of this young woman and the attempt. the assassination of this young man, we are suspending habeas corpus along transport routes for our

military for the purpose of quelling violence and preventing sabotage and terrorism. That would be 100% in line with what Abraham Lincoln did. It was shortly after the first battle of Bull Run, I believe, actually, no, it might have been before Bull Run. Maybe it was after. Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus so that Union troops could be dispatched with without risk of sabotage. Anybody caught near the rail lines could be arrested for literally no reason. And he did. One guy got locked up for like two or three years without any charges.

They just threw him away and said, we don't know, we don't care. Get out of it. Imagine if Trump did that today. Lincoln literally did it. And this is, I should get the dates on this one because this is not a point at which the country was in full scale war. It was before troops amassed, before any invasions, before they were battlefronts. I think it was just after Bull Run.

But what we're looking at now, these billboards, it is screaming in your face. They know there's risk. The risk is criminal liability, and they are calling on the military to factionalize. So you will get, as I've already explained, my country or my home, and these people are going to say my home. Before my family and I left New York for West Virginia, before West Virginia was even an option on the table, we were like, we got to leave. This is at the tail end of lockdowns. and we had people in New York politicians talking about passing a law that would be like we could remove you from your home if you're a threat to the health of your community. So we're like maybe this is a time we should be thinking about leaving.

We were seriously considering it. And I'm glad we left when we did. You know, that law did not pass yet, but they've been trying to pass it for years. And that was just one of many instances. I'm sure you went through a lot of stuff and where you're at. So, yes, it was April 27, 1861, Abraham Lincoln suspended. habeas corpus along the Philadelphia-Washington rail line. It wasn't until July 21st, the first battle of Bull Run.

So Fort Sumter happens, and it's a military conflict where the only person who died, it was an accidental death. No one thinks it's a civil war. Abraham Lincoln says habeas corpus suspended. There was no war at this time. I'm, and the Constitution is clear, the president has no authority to do this. Lincoln did it anyway. Three years later, Congress retroactively approved it. If Donald Trump were to come out right now and say, we are issuing a suspension of habeas corpus

along federal interstate highways for the purpose of preventing sabotage and terrorism against our military and citing the death of this young woman, that would be completely in line with Abraham Lincoln. And then September 24th, 1862, Abraham Lincoln issued a nationwide suspension of habeas corpus. you could be arrested for literally any reason and locked up indefinitely. I mean, I think at least three out of the six people sitting here at this table have moved because of, you know, because of what the government in the state they came from or originated. You know, so I think that what you're talking about is already starting. You know, people are already, all the people that have moved from New York down to Florida, all the people that have left California go to Texas. The country's already begun that.

I'd already be gone, except for I have an elderly mother. I've made myself a target. I found caltrops in my driveway a month and a half ago. Yeah, I saw the post you put about that. Yeah. Wow. So, I mean, that wasn't from the government, but, you know. I do think there's an important, it's important to recognize that this is a concerted effort by progressives and on the far left to demoralize different law enforcement agencies for their own gain.

They've done this with police in the past. Now they've moved on to different ice agents. They elected officials, lawmakers, encourage protesters and agitators to obstruct and prevent ice agents from doing their job. Most recently we saw this in New York City, but we're seeing this across the country. We're seeing lawmakers encourage just random city dwellers

to attack, obstruct, and do whatever you can to get in the way of different ice agents. Now they're advancing to the National Guard and having them trying to encourage. them to reconsider the oath that they made. And where does this end? It ends with the disintegration of law enforcement. It ends with the demoralization of law enforcement. It ends up with lower

quality law enforcement as a result of that, that they are more easily able to manipulate. So I think that's something we should be cognizant of and what the left is trying to achieve here. I'm sure you see a lot of that. Still, I think they're trying to defund the Portland police or at one point just kept it

like cap to how many cops they could hire or whatnot? It's so underfunded. And it's not just underfunded, but they're demoralized. And hiring is an issue. And I kept telling people that we need the National Guard at the ICE building because instead of having 70 to 80 police at night on the ground, which is what they should have for that precinct, they have seven to 10. And look, the left is extremely effective in these demoralization strategies. Ice agents, you know, what videos do you see online of them? You have people of crowds talking trash to them. Then you see lawmakers come out,

them Nazis and Gestapo. Tim Walts, the retard governor from Minnesota, comes out and calls these people the Gestapo. And you know, you're a young guy and you think you're helping your community and then you have these people trying to demoralize you. Protesters come in your face, getting in your way, saying you're kidnapping people.

So trying to get you to question what you're doing when you're actually saving the country. And it's scary how effective they are. Why would you want to be a police? You see how they're treated. You may do something questionable and you'll know that the governor or the mayor most likely won't have your back, you know, and qualified immunities being struck down,

not struck down, but being chipped away in certain cases. And it's like, why would you want to become a cop nowadays? Why would you want to protect and serve? It's all sacrifice and no reward. People used to look up, I think, in some degree to our law enforcement in different capacities. But nowadays, you know, they effectively polarized. This is an issue. And it feels as though only Republicans support law enforcement. And, you know, for many Democrats, they're equivalent to the Gestapo, which is literally crazy. And we can't only have only Republicans wanting to get into law enforcement. And ever since COVID, Republicans actually support law enforcement less than they ever have. This is true. Even even you've seen that in Portland, too. Once we get rid of trust in

law enforcement, that's the beginning of the end of our society. They, they, they, law enforcement really is the cultural fabric of our society and helps keep things orderly. Without them, I know people think they'll be protecting themselves with guns and whatnot, but we need them. We need ICE agents and Border Patrol. The idea of protecting yourself with guns is only possible in certain jurisdictions. And those jurisdictions happen to not be the ones where it's most necessary to have guns to protect yourself. You could not. I could not.

Everybody would tell me, oh, when you got attacked down ice, you need to take a gun, you need to conceal carry. I'm like, one, conceal carry is outlawed in Portland and two. If I shot anybody, even if it was, they were. choking me or stabbing me, I would still go to jail. And you know what's crazy? ICE is still having trouble filling their ranks. They're offering a 50K signing bonus but they're still struggling to, I think it's

10,000, 10,000 some odd positions that they were trying to fill. Apparently Americans are very fat, not in shape and not qualified to become even law enforcement agencies. You saw how widely they were trying to advertise this stuff. So I guess this is

a quick message to anybody in the audience. If we're a young, able body, preferably man, frankly, you know, it's worth considering, right? Surge? Nice. You get to deport me. I mean, I think that, I think, did you imagine me in Surge? It is, it is worth, uh, it is worth considering, but it's also like most people are aware of how the left treats law enforcement. Uh, most people are aware that even if you're not an activist, people that are just center left kind of look down on law enforcement. It's, it's a thankless, it was a thankless job 15 years ago. Nowadays, it's a thankless job, and you're not going to be, you're not going to have the support of your local justice department.

A thankless job. You don't get a thank you. You get an F you from your community more often than not. And, you know, and everybody, it's cool to be a dick to cops nowadays. The culture is such that it is cool to be, you know, I see these not legal observers, sometimes legal observers, but First Amendment auditors or whatnot. Just people looking to F around with cops and just, you know, abuse our system and try to produce lawsuits and whatnot, it's unfortunate. It's, it really is. Because once we don't have the law enforcement there, I think our society will be in a lot of trouble. And we're making it such that we encourage the worst people to join the best of the best because it's such a shitty job and because it's not looked up to, nobody talented or with skills wants to do it.

So what does that leave us with? The worst of the worst doing it. Yeah. I mean, I think that the quality of person that is joining law enforcement, like you're not getting. getting dudes that are like, yeah, I really want to help my community nearly in the amount necessary. A lot of dudes are like, oh, well, you know, it's a job or, you know, I get to push people around. They get into law enforcement for the wrong reason.

Hey, you get a state-sponsored gun. Hey, I think it's one of the only jobs where you still have a pension after the fact. So, I mean, hey, guys, might be worth considering. I do think people should really look to Portland when they want to see what's going to happen with, with, that it's a multi-pronage. approach. It's the governor. It's the attorney general. It's the people on the street. It's the nonprofits. And they're going after these people to demoralize them. God forbid the rest of the country turns into and we hopefully we don't recognize that anywhere outside of Portland. Let's jump to this next story from TMZ. Waymo drives through middle of police standoff in Los Angeles.

Welcome to the AI nightmare. Your stupid AI car doesn't understand anything outside of what the little lines in the street actually mean. So when there's bang, bang, get down, no, freeze, stop, gun, gun, gun, the Waymo just keeps on, keeping on. So we actually have the video here. Check this out. We're going to play the clip here for you. Actually, I think I've got to get the audio going. There we go. Let's let's let's let's let's play this. Here's the, fucking Waymo. Oh my God. Oh my God. Oh my God. What the fuck is that Waymo doing? Dude in the back's like.

Yeah. So here's the problem. Look, that guy's on. But there's no, look, the guy's already on the ground, right? The issue is, as soon as the Waymo got in front of him, that dude could have ran for it. Because all of a sudden, those cops can't shoot. But here's the other problem. Imagine what happens if you're an accomplice of this guy.

And the cops are telling everyone back off. And the Waymo drives up and the cops are they going to be thinking it's just a Waymo? And then as it's slowly going towards them, it just slams the gas and just slams into them. The assumption that a Waymo is just being stupid, it can't happen. So you know what I think is going to happen? You know why I think this story exists? Not intentionally, it doesn't matter. It's emergent.

Okay, meaning these things are going to be like Domino's falling over. Police are going to demand the ability to override Waymo's around them. Then people are going to say, well, you guys saw that video of the Waymo driving into the stand. You don't want that to happen to you, do you? You can get shot. Of course police should have the ability to override AI cars. This conversation's already been happening for about a year or two. They've been talking about being able to repo electric cars remotely.

Oh, they can. So they're going to try. Oh, it's going to happen with a Tesla. Yes. So we got the new update, I guess, for the cyber truck. And the way auto driving works is that you can click the little wheel on the steering wheel, and it'll start driving the address you put it into. If you're on a highway and you click auto drive, it'll just auto drive on the highway.

If you're in a city, it's not going to turn or do anything. But if you punch in an address, it'll drive the whole way. So you can just literally sit there staying at the road just does it for you. The new update, it'll start driving even from the parking lot. So today, we went to eat, we sat down and it said start auto drive in a gray box. I'd never seen before you click it, and it backs out out of the parking space and then it carries you on your way. We've talked about this for years, actually. You're going to get in your car.

I mean, this is why I keep saying we got to make these short films. We got to get someone to do this. We can make these great little bits. A guy gets in his car. And then he goes, auto car, I'm going to work. And it goes, got it.

Taking you to work. Well, the eye doesn't talk that way anymore. That's an old trope from the 90s. But it'll go, got it. Taking you to work. And then it'll start backing out. Then all of a sudden it'll stop and the lights will turn off.

Everything will turn red. And it'll go, receiving a notification from the police, outstanding warrants, bench warrant received. Car will be diverting to the local precinct, 66th Street, and then the doors lock. And then you're just, you're driven to the police station. Stuck. And it pulls up and the cops are waiting for you, and you're just in the car like this. Sounds like China.

What if we could do that with illegals, though? This is kind of based. I mean, it applied properly. Taking jobs away from ICE. You just promoted ICE. We want people doing this. By any means necessary. Here's the play.

Trump should announce that they're launching brand new free. Waymos. He's like, we're going to make transport free because we believe in helping the poor. So federal cars in every city, use the app and if they're available, you can have one. And then it's just as soon as someone gets in, it's like, gotcha. And then it just drives

size. Right across the border. Doesn't drive him to ICE. Drives straight to Tijuana. No, it drives to Canada. Toronto, here we come. If you're having a so-called mental health episode or something, or you're dealing with like a psycho or something, you lure them into the car, involuntarily capture them, and then

send them to prison. You know, it's pretty wild that you could bait them with drugs in the car. You bait the crackheads with drugs into the car and then jail them in the car and then you could take them out of New York and send them to the government's been doing this for down to the airport. They did it in Newburgh, New York. It's going to be weird, you know, in like 30 years when there's barely any humans left and almost everything is a robot and police are just robots and you're walking down the street and the robot comes up to you and it goes, halt citizen, you are caught jaywalking and you go, I wasn't, I've been on the sidewalk all time. It's like, stop

resisting, and then starts flashing lights. And then you're just like, I didn't do anything. And it just grabs you. I knew. Stop if I called them anti-Semitic? Yes. You'd be like, actually this is racist police brutality. And it goes, I'm sorry about that. Please don't tell anyone. I'm not jaywalking. Did you film

this? What do you mean jaywalking? Is that your phone? You did film it? Please don't put it on TikTok. I knew the world was over the night before lockdowns happened in New York when I went to a supermarket and saw everyone like grabbing toilet paper that whole thing

and there was a line out the door at the supermarket up in a Cortland Manor, New York and we're all in line, out the door and just slowly rolling by everyone as a googly-eyed robot on wheels staring on all of us and like, well, that's it, folks. It was nice knowing you.

They're everywhere, dude. Everywhere. I can't remember it was like a Wegmans or something. I can't remember where I was and there was a giant robot and they put googly eyes on it and it makes me able to bash it

with a baseball bet more. To normalize it. I saw a Googly-eyed robot, like, stalk a child in a Wegmans recently. I'm like, dude, don't, don't stalk that child. We'll take you outside, robot. What are the robots even doing? From what I've seen, they see if there's a mess in an aisle, and then they just repeat.

Mess on aisle nine. Mess on aisle nine until someone, a human goes and cleans it, until the robot can clean it itself. You know, it'll be awesome. If there's actually just like a guy in there pedaling. It's just like, like an R2D2. Small person. The grocery store doesn't want to admit they can't afford.

actual AI bot so it's just a guy and he's just going like this. I'd appreciate that. Right. It's about time. We got a guy to patrol the stores and make sure the messes are getting cleaned up. It's fixing unemployment, right? The Tesla Auto Drive has improved massively. I've had a few close calls that were scary.

It almost rammed another car. And you know what really irks me? Is that in Charlestown, it doesn't understand what no turn on red means. So it's always trying to turn on red when it says no turn on red. I'm like, this is weird to me. Can't you tell you're not allowed to do this? And then also there's a left turn only lane. It always tries to just ram the intersection.

And I'm like, you will die if you do that. And then I'm, you know, I'll tell you what really pisses me off. Elon, hear this. Dude, Tesla auto drive speeds like 20 over. No joke. If I get on the highway, let's say I'm like driving from like DC to, you know, West Virginia. The speed limit's 55. I'll turn on auto drive

and it'll start going 75 or 80. You can different. You can turn it down but why would it knowingly automatically do that? Well, I mean, that's why it gives you the option. It is, but it's the default. But this is crazy that there's an option

to break the law. Tesla's like, would you like to set your robot to commit a crime? Yes. Okay. Like everybody reasonably drives about five miles over. I will say it's getting increasingly crazier that when I was young, I was told everybody goes about five miles and over, you're fine.

If you really get pulled over for speeding about five miles and over, the judge will probably throw it out. Now, people are speeding like 15 over everywhere. It's just nobody's taking the speed limit seriously, and the cops can just choose to pull you over if they don't like you. But it is crazy to me that I get on the highway, and I have to manually tell it not to go that fast. If I'm in a, like, if I'm on a side street, it'll go the right speed as soon as in the highway, it's like, I'm going 80. Does it know if there's a cop around So it just slows down automatically? No

Well, I was going to say like It might be not in the car's data But they may know Because like Waze data and Google Tracks all that stuff Yeah But other than that There is an interesting question of

At what point do police get the ability To override your car And more importantly at what point do The question needs to be asked Why is it possible for Tesla to know the speed limit is 55 and does, it'll show you on the screen, but actually automatically break the law. Well, I don't think the speed limit's ever above 100,

but cars are still made to be able to go 100 miles per hour. So, I mean... But that's a choice you make to go 100 miles an hour. The issue I'm bringing up is you can turn on autopilot and it will choose to break the law. Well, you can choose to have it go to like chill or sloth mode if you don't want to break the speed limit at all. I guess the question is, it's a tool, and you could choose what you do with the tool. And if you want to break the law with the tool.

My point is we are going to enter a future where they make it so that cars can only go the speed limit. When we are in the, right now, the overlap we're looking at is you get in the car, you press the accelerator down and you try to keep the speed at the right limit. You can slam it and fly it on the street if you want to by flooring it because this is a product of a pre-AI world. when every car is pre-programmed and it's all AI, they will not be allowed to violate the speed limit. When every car in the, they're going to outlaw driving.

It's going to happen. Driving will be illegal and every car will be automated and car ownership will be rare. I think it was, I don't know if it was Uber who said this, but the vision is every single car is just fleets that all interact with each other. So there's never traffic ever again. when you're about to pull onto a highway during rush hour, instead of getting jammed and everyone's trying to move and slow, every car can stop and start at the same time.

So all of a sudden, you're in your car on the highway, and it slows down one mile an hour, and you see a gap forming very slowly with the car in front of you, and then a car slides in perfectly, and no one ever stops. They may increase or get rid of speed limits. They may say you don't need a speed limit because nobody can drive. Every car just must go to the same speed. That's where we're going.

I'm removing one piece of technology from my house every day until my wife wakes up and realizes we're Amish. And I'm going to have a horse and carriage. And that's how we're going to live out our days because I don't like that future. They're going to make the cop cars go fast as they want. Bro, I'm telling you, like, the vision I had is you're going to be an old man and your grandkids are going to be hanging out. You're going to be in your, you know, nice field or whatever and the dogs catching the frisbee. And then your grandkids are going to be like, Grandpa, what are all of those weird things floating in the sky? and there's going to be a bunch of black vehicles

going left and right transporting like raw materials for the AI nexus and you go, oh, that's the nexus. Well, what's that? Well, those are the transport vehicles for the entity that controls the planet and rules over the galaxy. Or maybe not that point, galaxy,

but over the planetary colonization system of artificial intelligence. And you're just a couple of humble ants. I'll tell them that's, those are the things that'll blow Grandpa up if I tweet one more thing they don't know. Black Hill IRL. You're like, well, actually, it's the AI Nexus

and all of a sudden, ten of them just break and then fly down and surround you and start spinning and then barrels come out, pointed at you. And then smiley faces appear on the screen being like, we love you, right? Great, great. Hell, grandson, we love him. It's the future. I mean, that's how it is in Afghanistan, because of all the drones

when I was working at an auction gallery. We started to see a lot of prayer rugs coming to the auction gallery from Afghanistan. They saw so many drones over there. They started to stitch him around the prayer rugs. So it was like a part of their just their everyday life because their sky was filled with drones from Obama. I don't actually think the AI is going to kill you though. Not yet.

No, it's never. It's not going to kill you in the way where like it shows up with a gun and says do it or else. It's going to just give you drugs and stuff. It's going to be the machine is going to tell you whatever you want to hear and it's going to make you believe whatever it wants you to believe. It'll be like that but there's also stuff like AI Lavender that they're doing

in Gaza that's a death machine. But I'm saying like when the AI fully takes over, there's not going to be a need for the AI to be like, you are going to die. It's going to be like, you require medical assistance and dying.

And the person's going to go, I do. They're going to believe it all because the AI isn't just mechanisms. It is the networks of information we have. It'll be a tool of big pharma at that point, just pumping you full of flop. I mean,

I don't see how our economy exists in the AI future. You know, one thing we were talking about with all these prediction markets is that I was like maybe the post-capitalism future is when everyone's just too fat because there's food everywhere

and we have an abundance of properties and houses I'm like when we get to that point then the only way to make money is to be able to predict future events so everyone's just sports betting and doing events contracts and it's like you were right something happens so now you can buy an extra slice of pizza nothing ever happens though

so no one ever gets any money just canceled everyone's cancel but it's literally just betting on like you know Will Trump say the word nuclear this week? And you're going to be like, I think he will. I think he won't. Ah, he did.

I guess you can buy that new car you wanted. And then people are just trying to get better at being right about stuff. I mean, I'm describing what's happening now. Seriously. I wonder, I wonder if we're like, when are we going to see the first like call she millionaire? Like some 18-year-old kid who had like 300 bucks went on call-shee and then traded events up to millions of dollars. Watch it be the guy with the neurolink. the first gnarling patient.

Just he can predict what's happening. I mean, that's pretty crazy. The idea that you, you know, I will say this, there are some very obvious call she bets you can make where it's like, maybe I shouldn't say bets it trades, where it's like a 95% chance of happening. So you put in a hundred bucks, you win $3 or something. $3.

And if you're picking contracts that end in like a few days, you put in a thousand bucks, you get $30 for free. It's like literally free money. I have to imagine there's a bunch of people doing arbitrage, where they're just going in and betting on sure things and then making money from doing it. Call she future. Have you seen these videos where, oh, bro, gambling content is skyrocketing? It's Gen Z's thing.

Gen Z's thing is now to be gambling. There are these videos where, like, a guy walks into a restaurant, like a fast food place, and he's like, let me get, you know, a double cheeseburger and a big large fry. And they're like, that'll be, you know, 21, you know, 67. And he goes, hold on. Then he pulls up his phone. and he goes to a gambling app and then he plays, he's like,

he bets 20 bucks on blackjack, loses, doubles it, it's called Martin Galing, loses, doubles it to 80 bucks, wins. He goes, all right, just paid for my lunch. I think that's a gambling ad. But I do know what kind of content you're talking about. They're, they're, they're, they're ads. That is, these people are sponsored by the companies

to do these things. And there's a bunch of them. There's a guy who walks in to buy a coffee at Starbucks. How much is it? And they're like, $4.79. He goes, hold on. Opens up the app and he puts five bucks on blackjack. hit it. All right. Coffee's free.

Yeah. Well, it's this entire gambling industry. They have so much money to throw at these different advertisements. And especially as we legalize different parts of online gambling, particularly in the sports betting world, it's taking over so much of different ad space. It's draft kings and all these other...

You know what it is? It's the lowest common denominator. Everybody likes it. It's entertaining. And young people are getting very into it. And so here's the secret right now. This change is going to happen. the CPMs for gambling content it's like five times

greater than that for cultural and news content I guarantee you you will start to see this pop up among prominent influencers who typically did not do this. The people who are in the let me just put it this way. Hey, notice all those conservative influencers were promoting gambling websites

getting paid to do it? You didn't see that? We covered it last week. Yeah, yeah, I know exactly. Elijah Schaefer, I believe, Pearl and others. We're promoting a gambling website, Americans aren't allowed to use. And I guess the rumor is they're paying something like $12,000 a month or something. I don't know if that's the true. Well, they're very far from the only ones, too, because I believe Aidan Ross and even Drake have a deep involvement with stake that's paying out.

It's like an online gambling website that's paying out millions. And I think it's really sad because these are huge industries literally just made off of the backs of losing men, of poor men literally losing their money. You don't win. That's how the industry makes money. The money doesn't come anywhere but from your pockets. And guess what? Rich people don't actually gamble. People like Drake don't actually gamble.

That's not true. They're already rich. More often than not. No, no. The issue with Drake gambling and like Dana White is that they can't gamble. They make so much money. They could never gamble. They're sponsored by...

Dana White's not. He's not sponsored by anything. You don't think any of these casinos. Dana White... I'm sure... Isn't Dana White a billionaire? Yeah. So when he bets $100,000 he doesn't need to be sponsored.

Yeah, but he does. UFC promotions at these different casinos and hotel resorts and he has a deep relationship with them and he's self-interested in advertising for them on through his work. I would agree with you that these guys often are sponsored in such a way to promote it but

I think I was reading like some I don't know if it was I think it was Post Malone. I can't remember the number of but he said it's a story I heard maybe I'm misremembering but he said something like I have to I have to play at least $10,000 blackjack hands otherwise otherwise I don't feel anything.

Because he's so rich. Yeah. So. This is so dark. I actually, I don't know if I completely agree. I think there's a problem that so many casinos are popping up. But people get entertainment and waste their money on lots and lots of things. I would rather someone, there's limits to this.

But let me ask you guys, would you rather someone spend their entire paycheck on eating cake and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and. like ding-dongs and ho-hos and doing muck-bang. Or what? Or like going to a bar sportsbook where they bet several hundred dollars on a football game and then maybe they win or lose. At least when you're buying and eating the cake, you're contributing to an industry and you're hiring other people and it's stimulating the economy.

These casinos and different online betting betting sports books are just feels like leeches on society. They don't make anything. They don't produce anything for the, economy as opposed to, I mean, you could be gluttonous and disgusting in a fat pig, eating a bunch of fucking cake, which is getting gross, and die. But like, I got to be honest, you could lose all your money a lot quicker gambling the $1,000 away than eating $1,000 worth of cake. It is better that somewhat, some, okay, so I'm not advocating for an

authoritarian system of taking people's money away, but I will just say a flat mathematical analysis. It is better, better that someone loses the access money they have than gorges themselves in a muckbang video. Well, you know, the government does this in a certain way with Social Security. They make you Right, right. Bloomberg wanted to tax, he banned large sodas and he wanted to tax the poor

because they make bad decisions. I'm not in favor of that, but it is true. If you took one of these poor people who's gorging themselves on, these videos where these fat women are like, here's what I give my nine-year-old to eat and they take like a whole freezer bag

of pizza rolls and then they like put mayonnaise on it and their kids just, I'm like, we'd be better off if they didn't have that money. I am not saying we should take their money from them. I'm saying if they're entertained by sports betting, both have their

detriments. Both are fine in moderation. A person who goes to a bar with his buddies and they're hanging out, they're having a good time. He got a fork and he says, look, man, I'm tired. I just want to add a little fun to the game. We're going to watch football. It's Monday night or whatever. And I put 50 bucks down.

I got no problem with that. He then orders a slice of cake after he has his cheeseburger. I got no problem with that. The dude who dumps his entire paycheck, gammon. like some of these people are doing, that's wrong. But then what do you do? Do you say you're not like we take away the freedom of choice for the people who do these things? My point is this.

There's a lot of things that are really bad. The expansion of casinos, the over gambling, gambling influence, all of this stuff is out of control. But I don't know that we create a society where we say, you know, we're going to ban this because some people are abusive. unless you want to make the argument, fat people shouldn't be allowed to buy cake anymore. And I don't mean that facetiously. I mean, should we tell morbidly obese people they're not allowed to buy desserts?

That people can eat and buy as much cake as they want, but I don't want to have to pay for their health care when they inevitably get diabetes and have to cut off their leg. Agreed. The issue is with some of these vices when they get so bad and can ruin lives so aggressively, it's like where do we put the limit.

It's like the same thing I believe for certain drugs where some are legal and some are illegal and the illegal ones kind of go beyond the power of one. I got to tell you, it is a fact that obesity obesity is a bigger problem than gambling addiction. Like the United States is a massive obesity problem. And so honest question, like, how do you deal with it? I don't like the idea that you can go to some like construction worker guy who he's like,

listen, man, once a week, Sunday nights, me and the boys get together, we order burgers, we have a beer, and I put 50 bucks down on, on, on, on, on Fandul or Draft Kings, and then we all get to laugh and cheer when we were right or wrong and, ah, you know, I lost 50 bucks, or I won 50 bucks this week. it is a problem when a guy takes his entire paycheck goes to the craps table, loses it and all is shaking, that's bad and we try to create rules to stop

that. At the same time, it is substantially worse. The United States is a morbid obesity crisis. I think these are cultural issues and that couldn't ultimately be solved at the government level. On the gambling thing, I will say though, the people who advertise and push this shit literally loathe you and think you are an idiot

and willing to sell you out for money. They know you will lose, they hate you, and are still willing to sell you out for maybe five or ten grand. And the guy who sells ho-hoes and ding-dongs and all these garbage foods, no, they're pumping you full of poison. I don't agree with that. You think that's morally equivalent? People who push gambling

versus people who push sweet treats? I think the sweet treats are worse. A baker is worse than a baker? We're talking about tartrazine being pumped into children, bro. This is really funny. I can't remember who it was. There was a serial company announced they were, oh no, no, no, no. It was Doritos, I think. Was it Doritos?

There was a post that went viral where I think it was Doritos. I could be wrong, said, we're now creating an artificial die-free version. And then went, oh, so the poison was a choice? The poison. So my point is this. If you choose to go play a game, whether it be an arcade, which is worse than gambling, mind you, because arcade rewards are like 2% of what casino rewards are, kids go to arcades to win tickets off of playing whack-a-mole,

and the amount of money you spend there is substantially less than you get back. So everybody's going to go and spend money on some form of entertainment and people like going to casinos. People are entertained by what they're entertained by. The abuse and the abuse of vice is the problem. But I will tell you this, these food companies that are knowingly putting oil, they're putting petroleum derivatives in their food so it sells better, knowing it's causing mental issues and killing people is substantially worse than creating a space where a guy can hang out on the weekend to make sports bets or someone wants to play some blackjack. You are upset, Elad, because people are, some people abuse this, but most people don't actually gamble that much. I think this is a system that's taking advantage of young, poor men. I think poor men, young men are struggling in our country.

They're struggling with porn addiction. They're struggling with women. They're struggling with different substances. And now they're struggling with addiction to gambling to. A quick way to, you know, oh, you're struggling with money, you're poor. Here's a quick way out of your struggle. You need money and you need some success. You can come gamble.

You know, you have some sports knowledge. come gamble with us, we'll make your life better. I think they're selling people a false dream, and a lot of the advertisers do the same way. That's one of my biggest beefs with the... I will tell you what I have a problem with. There's conspiracy theories that these gambling influencers are playing rigged games.

There was a video of a guy betting $1,000 on blackjack, and everybody accused... There was a viral video where they said, what's really happening is these influencers call the casinos, the casinos give them a rigged machine in an isolated space, where they're guaranteed to win, and it's not real money.

So they give them, they'll put money in. Again, conspiracy theory. The casino will say, we're going to preload a machine with 100 grand. You're going to hit it until you win it. Then you're going to walk away. Nobody wins or loses any money. But on camera, it looks at this one a million bucks. Exactly.

The truth is, I will say this, of all these videos you see where even if it's real, they actually win these slots, it is not possible to win these big jackpots. This is absolutely a scam, and I agree with them this one. So when you see a video of someone playing a high-limit slot machine, the reason why I believe these are rigged and it's a conspiracy is that the pay table for slots is the same no matter how much money you put in it. Let me put it this way. Think about how a slot machine in Vegas they have slots in 99% payout.

They're outright telling you if you put $100 and we'll give you $99. You're hoping that you catch the machine in the middle where someone else already lost the $100 bucks and you put in 10 and win their 99. That means if you put 20 grand in a machine, it literally cannot pay you out more than went into it. So what actually happens to these slots when you see these people, they're like, I'm going to bet $1,000 a spin. The pay table is the same if it's $5 or a $1,000 bet.

On the $1,000 bet, you win one to one. That means if you get like three of a kind and it pays one to one, you'll win $1,000. But when you hit a bonus, you still only win 200 bucks. Because most slots aren't paying out on the actual slot itself. They're paying on bonus structures that are capped to pay out between $1,000 and $3,000. Sometimes it's very rare. They have the jackpots or whatever. So I agree with you on that.

That I think is a conspiracy, the advertising of it. My point ultimately, though, before we go to chats, because we definitely have to, is that I don't look at a working class guy having a beer as a problem. but there are alcoholics. I don't look at someone buying a ho-ho and eating it with a nice glass of milk. Maybe they put some melted peanut butter on it. Now you're getting fatty, man. That's kind of crazy.

You're allowed to do it. I do have a problem with these food companies pumping their foods full of chemical garbage they know kills people. I do have a problem with casinos lying. If they are again, I can't accuse anybody specifically of wrongdoing. But the presumption is they're faking these videos. The manipulation I have a problem with. If a person makes a choice, that's the person's choice. I think we agree, though.

These are all cultural problems. If we had a functioning culture, people just would not, we wouldn't have so many casinos. We'd have Atlantic City in Vegas, and that's it. Now, this is crazy. We got MGM, Maryland is building casinos like crazy. You've got MGM National Harbor, 40 minutes away, we got Maryland Live, 40 minutes away you've got a horseshoe, 40 minutes away you've got Hollywood Paraville. then now they're talking about I heard a rumor they want to open a casino in Virginia

just to the west of D.C. in Tyson's corner Times Square is going to have a Cesar's downtown Chicago or on the river is going to have a Bally's and it's just is this late stage capitalism? You don't need to go that far. It's all on your phone. You're really able to do that all from your phone ultimately as well and it's nerve-rock. We got to go to Rumble Rants and chats, my friends,

so smash the like button, share the show. But before we do, we get a great sponsor. It is bearskin, tact. You guys have seen the bearskin hoodie. You know about it. They look awesome, by the way. If you're waiting to get yourself one now is the time. It's officially hoodie season.

Cold mornings, windy days, surprise snow. And right now, bearskin is running their biggest deal of the year. 60% off for Black Friday and Cyber Monday, which is right now. You've got to get it. It's built like a tank. 340 GSM bearskin fleece. 10 pockets, rugged, athletic fit. It looks great on you.

Plus, if it starts pouring, you can zip in the heavy. zip on the heavy storm rain jacket instantly level up to full waterproof protection. You'll get free U.S. shipping from their U.S. warehouse. The gear will last you season after season. Just text Tim to 36912 for your 60% off again. Text the word Tim to 36912. Don't wait, get it now while the deal is still live because it's Black. It's Cyber Monday.

You got to do it now. But you'll also be supporting the fallen outdoors and hope for the Warriors veterans programs. So you're not just buying great gear. You're backing a cause that matters. Shut up to Bearskin. Thanks for sponsor on the show. We're going to grab your rants and chats. But first, Shane's leaving. I'm leaving. Thank you guys for having me.

This was fun. Pleasure meeting you. Oh, so good to meet you. You guys can catch me at Inverted World Live on Rumble on YouTube, 10 o'clock. About 10 minutes, we're going to talk about trash coming a life out in the ocean. Then we'll take your phone calls till midnight. Looking forward to it. See you guys. See you, brother.

Let's grab these chats. We've got Tonlock Alpha Dog. He says, Tim, is Mark Kelly going to call for the arrest of the officer that carried out the killing of Anwar Alalaki that Obama ordered? No, because they're hypocrites and lies. and their real intention is either as retards, sleepwalking us into a civil war, or they're actually trying to factionalize the military. There was already talk about criminally investigating and charging anybody who investigates them for sedition if Democrats win back power.

Let me just say they've already, you guys heard this. They arrested Trump's lawyers. Jenna Ellis pleads guilty. And then recently they dropped all the charges in Georgia. if Jenna Ellis just did not cave charges would have been dropped but this is what cowardice gets you so Shane H. Wilder says

Tim comes back from Thanksgiving and immediately says civil war. It's good to have you back my liver was going through withdrawals. You know what man? I'm not wrong. I am not wrong. It's pretty scary now actually in public where regular people are saying civil war. Over the break

I went to I was at Rundle Mills. They got a big shopping mall, had some delicious food, got a steak. And I was watching, I was watching bleach. You guys know the anime bleach.

I'm rewatching it because I was bored. And I'm sitting there. And there's regular people all around. And I'm hearing them talk about Civil War. Yep. Wow. I overhear these people talking politics and the issue of the sedition,

Trump calling for the death of these people, and regular people. Now, to be honest, not everybody. A lot of people were just mind just doing nothing. I guess when you're at a steakhouse, it's people who are more likely be running businesses or involved in politics in the D.C. area.

But I was at, I was, it's kind of freaking me out. I mean, the idea of civil war, like people thinking it's going to be big factions lined up on, you know, on, on different sides of a field. I don't think, I think we've talked about that a bunch that that's not likely what it's going to be, what it's going to be. It'll be people, you know, carrying out attacks against their political rivals. It'll be the kind of stuff that you're seeing in TIFA do in Pacific Northwest.

My prediction is, let me say this. I've predicted that by like around November, October of next year, we will have already seen another high-profile assassination or killing. I put that predict. What did I say? It's like a single digit, but high. There are a lot of variables. imagine a fractal pattern, all these different directions, which one is actually going to make it to the end?

We don't know for sure. But it's becoming clear the closer we get. So one of the pros scenarios based on the information we have today would be ice riot, national guard deployed, fireworks or an explosion, national guard ends up in a fight. Someone shoots one of the protesters. Democrats come out and say the National Guard is now killing peaceful protesters. says, we warned you, you mustify these orders. You then hear a statement from some officer saying, we will not be deployed following the killing by the National Guard of these protesters. The California National Guard, or maybe it's Newsom coming out and saying,

we will not allow our brave men and women and the California National Guard to be subject to these scenarios where they would be driven or ordered to shoot American citizens. Therefore, we are assuming command. We don't. And then, says something to the effect of, it is immaterial what the courts, the federal courts say. We have already spoken with our guard and they do not want to be put in these situations, as these are illegal orders and they will defy them, as is the law. Then Trump's going to have to send the Marines or declare insurrection. And this is how you get to that point where there's going to be factional conflict in the streets,

shooting, ultimately military-on-military civil conflict. Like a Kent State-style thing that spurs this about. You know, I'm surprised in Congress. commend how orderly ICE has been in their different operations around the country you see in a lot of these videos things have the potential to really get

out of hand but are the professionalism of our law enforcement I think really needs to be commended indeed let's grab some more uh oh someone doesn't like elad no john jen says last week elad the fraud elod the fraud is that we were trying to make it run

this guy thinks he's trump or something yonned at charges against Democrats but lights up a cigar when Republicans resign. Elad the fraud go back to India. I think Marjorie Taylor Green is pathetic. She really stuck a middle finger up, not to Mike Johnson, but the Republican voters who put her in office. And I think you guys should draw your ire towards her. We have the slimmest majority right now in the House with Republicans.

And what does Marjorie Taylor choose to do? Not wield power, which she's put in the position of power to do. No, she decides to like, really, instead of getting big, and rising to the moment. She shies away and resigns from alleged threats. It's pathetic, Frank. And Marjorie Taylor Green is pathetic, and Americans deserve better. Isn't Troy Nails also retiring?

And then his brother is allegedly taking the position. But yes. Oh, okay, okay. All right. Same thing with him. But there's an incumbent advantage, so it's going to be tough. But a lot of people are dipping out. There's that one Democrat, I think, in Maine, who said because of the threats of violence,

civil war risks, he's like, I'm out of this. I'm out of here. Yo, man. Yeah. Yep. These guys have a lot of opportunities for them after they resign. All right, let's see. Dark Pines says, per tradition, got home Sunday from the hospital with baby number two.

And first son, shout out to my wife, Elizabeth, on her VBAC. Yeah. Instagram at Dark Pines. Bravo! More babies. Babies are absolutely fantastic. Doing baby stuff. Important baby work.

My daughter has important baby work every day. She has to roll around and chew on things. Chance Walls says, for the love of God, can someone bring up unusual whales reporting on MTG stock trades with Lockheed and Raytheon days before the Russia-Ukraine war? Listen, if you watched Alex Jones and you trusted him, you'd be rich. He said a war was going to happen at this point and this time. And if you went, okay, I should buy all the stocks now. You'd have made a lot of money. Yeah, it's actually based to invest in Lockheed Martin.

So I don't know what the issue here is. Actually, I don't think it's a great performer. But again, I've said this before. Marjorie Taylor Green was rich before getting into office, and that's actually true about most of these representatives. They're mostly rich going in, so especially with people complaining about these low salaries and whatnot. They don't go there for the salaries.

They're already rich in what? If you want to be down 15.6% investing in Lockheed's based. The past year, Lockheed's down 15.6%. With Planteer instead? Palantier is big. There we go. Palantir stock is hot. Right now it's down 0.5.

In the past five dates up 6.3. In the past month it's down 20%. That's bad. Yeah, shout out Peter Thiel. In the past six months, 26%. Year to date, it's up 122%. I think co-founded by you too. That's crazy.

Bro, in five years, Palantir's up 602%. I still had that story where Ian bursted into my studio at the castle like Kramer and he's like, you got to buy Pounceer stock. And it was at like $16. And I was like, I don't know.

I've heard of that. I don't care about the Peter Thiel stuff. Man, I'd have made a lot of money if I just listen to Ian. Can you believe that? When Ian started screaming about graphene like around the first time, I bought a bunch of stock in a company that produces graphene and made a lot of money off it. Up like 80 grand. Hot take on Palantir.

I believe they collaborate with ICE, so investing them in them also makes you based. Really? Oh, yeah. Since their inception, Palantir is up 1,720%. since their debut in 2020 that's crazy dude yo that's really crazy that's literally around the time

Ian was like you got invested in Palantir dude I'm reading about it and I'm like what's his more recent hot stock tips that this is literally it's when we first moved to the castle and I think it was a few months after this so it might have been at the time I think it was at like 14 bucks yeah it was like November

that's wild because I knew what Palantir was and he was like They're going to be in everything with like the NSA and the U.S. government. It's going to go crazy. And I was like, whatever. I'm not investing in these weird companies to work with the government, bro. They've become like a top enemy of the left. And that's how you know you should support them.

Oh, yeah. Definitely. All right. We got enough time to grab a couple more. We got acid reflux saying watching one of your earlier segments was really blackpilling. But then there's these stories coming out about more fraud. And it reminds me short-term pain. Trump did say that.

I'll wait a little longer before. I turn tail. Yeah, my 4 PM on the, on the Culture War podcast channel on Rumble and YouTube.com slash Timcast was about it was focused on the Democrats abandon the working class like we talked about, but I also reserved

some for Donald Trump's failures. The H-1Bs and the Chinese visas, his aggregate polling is now minus 12. I don't think, I don't care much for it because all the polls are insane. Like one says minus 20, one says minus four. I'm like, what does that mean? But even Rasmussen has Trump minus

So the one thing we do know is that Trump has declined. And I think he's lost young people when he comes out and says, we need these visas. You need to assure the American people you are working on prices. But inflation is substantially worse than they're letting on. They've always lied about it. There's a viral video right now where a guy goes to Costco and like mayonnaise is double the price, butter is double the price. He's like year over a year. The tongue says it's 5 to 7%.

And he's like, bro, this is 100% on most of the goods. they'll get a metric because they're like, yes, but industrial products for factories is down. And you're like, the regular working class American wants to know why it's $700 a week for their groceries now. But we're going to go to the members-only

uncensored portion of the show, my friend. So smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Make sure you join us at timcast.com to get in that discord community. If you'd like to call in and ask us questions,

you've got to join. 10 bucks a month and you're building strength through unity because diversity is a weakness. But don't forget if you want to watch the uncensored portion of the show, that's Rumble Premium. Use promo code Tim10. And share the show with everyone you know.

Jellie, do you want to shout anything out? Like... Twitter following or handle. Yes, please follow my Twitter, HoneyBadger Mom. Also, I'm getting sued. my Antifa, so I have a gifts and go for

pepper spraying one of them in self-defense. That's going to cost me about $50,000 possibly. Yikes. That's at the top of my ex-page, so that'd be great. All right on. Awesome. Thank you guys for tuning in. I am Alad Eliahu, the White House correspondent here at Timcast.

Also, the Pentagon reporter as of today. I'm also applying for congressional media passes, so I'm hoping to bring you a lot more coverage. You guys, a lot more coverage throughout D.C. and that gambling talk got me in the mood. Are we hidden up the casino after this, Tim? On a Monday, it's a school night, bro.

That's how you know, I'm a true degenerate. Anyway, Phil. Oh, but you got to be here Friday. We got something. I can't announce just yet, but you got to be a Friday. I think I saw you announce it on Twitter, but hey, maybe I'll... I did not announce it on Twitter. Okay.

Absolutely did not. We're doing a special Shabbat episode? Yes. Nice. I'm in. I am Phil that remains on Twix. The band is all that remains. You can check us out on Apple Music, Amazon, Music, Pandora, Spotify, YouTube, and Dizer. Don't forget the left lane is for crime.

We will see you all at rumble.com slash Timcast, IRL for the premium only on censored show. We'll see you there about 30 seconds.