Timcast IRL - Trump SUES CBS News For $10B For Helping Kamala, Election Interference w/Joel Valdez

Episode Date: November 1, 2024

Tim, Phil, & Seamus are joined by Joel Valdez to discuss Trump suing CBS for deceptively editing Kamala Harris interview, a video of paranoid Kamala Harris voters making up lies about Trump going viral, Joe Biden biting multiple babies at a White House Halloween celebration, and NYC legalizing jaywalking after woke activists claim anti jaywalking laws were racist. Joel Valdez is a conservative activist and media personality. He also serves as Senior Advisor to Rep. Lauren Boebert. Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Seamus @FreedomToons   Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Joel Valdez @realJoelValdez (X) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

$10 billion. Yeah, that's right. It's a silly number, I guess, but he is. And this has to do with CBS creating, I guess we can put it at a baseline, two different versions of the Kamala Harris interview that he argues was selectively edited to benefit Kamala Harris because she looked real bad. You see, they put out snippets from the interview. Everybody roasted Kamala. Then they edited and changed how she responded. Trump says this is basically election interference. And for this, he is suing. So we'll talk about that. Then Joe Biden bit a bunch of babies. I'm not kidding. He literally was biting babies. I think he bit two of them. I will stress this again, ladies and gentlemen.

It's true. Yeah, he bit two babies. You may be thinking, ha-ha, it's Halloween. Tim's doing a joke or something. No. No, he bit babies. So we'll talk about that. And then, of course, J.D. Vance appeared on Joe Rogan. I only got to watch a little bit of it, but it was pretty good. But also, don't forget, TimCast.com.

Head over there now. Click Join Us. Become a member to support our work directly. If you're looking for friends, a place to hang out, maybe you want to meet some people who have similar ideas or you want to challenge your ideas, the Discord server is the place to be. So you become a member at TimCast.com.

You get access to our Discord server. And as a member, you also get to call in to our members-only uncensored show, and we will have that for you tonight. So smash that Like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with everyone you know, and leave us a good review on the audio podcast site if you're listening on Apple Podcasts or wherever you may get your podcasts. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Joel Valdez. Hey, everyone.

It's Joel Valdez. Great to be back on the show. As you can tell, this isn't my normal wear. I am dressed as Steve Bannon for Halloween. So I got the three pens. I got the three shirts. I got the barber. It is slightly hot in the studio. It is hot. We'll make it. We'll make it. It is very hot. Bannon got the three pens. I got three shirts. I got the barber. It is slightly hot in

the studio, but it's hot. We'll make it. We'll make it. It is very hot. And it does it every day, day in and day out. For those who don't know me, I'm a senior advisor to Congresswoman Lauren Boebert on Capitol Hill, previously with Rep Matt Gaetz, and just excited to be back on. Thanks for having me. We had the heat turned on because it was like 30 degrees last week, and now it was 80 today. So we had to turn the air conditioning back on. That's fall. Seamus is hanging out.

Good to be here. I'm Seamus Coghlan of Freedom Tunes. We just released a cartoon today, which is one of my personal favorites. I think you guys will really enjoy it. It's about Doug. It's about Kamala's wonderful husband who's reshaping masculinity. And I just really want you all to check that one out. I think you're going to enjoy it.

Tell me there's a training montage. Listen, I don't want to spoil anything. I don't want to spoil anything, but I think it's pretty good. Like the Rocky montage, right? Lifting weights, getting ready for the big fight against his girlfriend. How you doing?

My name's Philip Bonte. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains. I'm an anti-communist and counter-revolutionary. Let's go. Here's the big news from Axios.com. Trump sues CBS News for $10 billion. With a B. That's a B over a Harris interview.

Now, you may have heard the story because the corporate press was lying about it. Well, that's what they do. They said Donald Trump wanted to arrest CBS, have CBS News arrested because interviewing Kamala was illegal. Of course, that is not what Donald Trump said. What Trump said was that the selective editing, the different versions that were released were in essence aiding Kamala Harris. The first clips of the interview that came out made her look really bad.

Maybe they didn't realize. I don't know. But she looked pretty bad. They then released a totally different response. According to the lawsuit, this is election interference. Axios says former President Trump filed a lawsuit against CBS News Thursday, alleging the network engaged in election interference by doctoring 60 Minutes interview with Vice President Harris.

Trump is seeking $10 billion in damages for CBS alleged partisan and lawful acts of election and voter interference, which the lawsuit claims were intended to confuse the public and attempt to tip the scales towards Democrats in the 2024 presidential election. Lawsuit was first reported by Fox News. So we actually have it right here. This is the scribbed jury trial demand. Jury. And it's it says this action concerns CBS's partisan unlawful acts. And let's go down a little bit and get the the actual claims here. On October 20th, 2024, attempting unsuccessfully to stop the bad press without providing transparency, CBS News released a statement conceding that President Trump was

accurate in his assertion that the interview with Kamala was doctored to confuse, deceive and mislead the American people in order to try and interfere in the election on behalf of Kamala. As President Trump stated and has made crystal clear in the video he referenced and attached a giant fake news scam by CBS and 60 Minutes, her real answer was crazy or dumb, so they actually replaced it with another answer in order to save her or at least make her look better. A fake news scam, which is totally illegal, take away the CBS license. Now, I have to wonder,

maybe CBS did this not because of what Kamala said, but because of how it made them look as a news organization. What do you mean? They had a bomb of an interview. I mean, imagine you're like, we're going to sit down with the sitting vice president and she just goes...

People are going to be like, this is the worst garbage I've ever seen. How could you produce this? Yeah. So what if CBS was like, we need to make this more appealing? Well, and especially if you don't push back sufficiently. So if this person is giving ridiculous non-answers

and babbling on and they refuse to say anything about their actual policy positions and they generally sound moronic and then you just sit there and don't push back against anything they're saying it does look pretty bad for you or even worse you pretend that what they're saying is compelling i mean kamala harris is very used to having her handheld by corporate media and being spoken to in the most gentle possible terms this is why she considered it such an insult and why her fans considered it such an insult for Joe Rogan to not give her special treatment relative to Trump.

To them, if they're not getting special treatment, they're being persecuted. So look, everyone knew that if anyone in the corporate press talked to her, they were going to baby her. And that's clearly what happened here. Though, to your point, Tim, if it was because they were embarrassed by their own performance that wouldn't entirely shock

me either to your point about the about having her handheld and stuff you saw that pretty clearly on display when she did the Brett Baer interview and she was like essentially asking him to throw her a lifeline when she was like you know what I mean and he was just like no I don't know what you mean do you hear what Rogan said

that and I'm trying to paraphrase because I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I'm pretty sure what he was saying was that he knew if he traveled to her for the interview, her handlers would be in the room controlling how the show went. And I'll add to that, he wouldn't be able to pull up or fact check anything she says. That's, so they knew they couldn't come in and sit down. See, here's the thing. Why does Kamala Harris go to call Her Daddy and Shannon Sharpe at Breakfast Club they don't fact check anything

Rogan in real time says Jamie pull that up it would be interesting to see if CBS says that they interview other people's interviews as well I'm sorry if they edit other people's interviews as well what would be the precedent for them to be doing this

was it only Kamala or was it other people as well? That's something else to consider. That might have to be their only defense. No, we do this all the time for everybody. We had everyone's interview. Yeah, it's all fake news. Yeah. No, I mean, it's true.

It's true. And to your point about her not wanting to be fact-checked, what her and other left-wing candidates do is they will just smugly state that something is misinformation or has been debunked even when it hasn't and oftentimes without any without ever providing a source for that claim actually actually Seamus that claim has been debunked already oh no all right you got me that makes it true I have no proof when you call something debunked that means it isn't true that's all you have to say right and so it would be very

embarrassing for her to plainly and arrogantly state that something was debunked and then have joe pull the information up in front of her kamala can't respond to basic questions such as how many people do you think have entered the country she would completely crumble if she was fact-checked on air and shown to be wrong that's why she won't answer exactly exactly uh But there's this other hilarious phenomenon we see with these left-wing pundits where they'll go, this is insane. J.D. Vance and Donald Trump said they didn't like the fact-checking at the debate. They speak about fact-checking as if there are these arbiters of truth who are totally

non-biased and not bought into one side or the other when they clearly are all leftists who work for the corporate press or are adjacent to them. And then they act as if we have just found these oracles of pure truth who are going to fact check everyone equally. And it's nonsense. People since the beginning of time have been claiming that their opponents said things that are factually incorrect. But for whatever reason, when you use this phrase fact check, they fact checked him. It just shuts down all thinking. Oh, it was a fact checker? A fact checker said it? That's true. It must be true.

He's a fact checker. He says that he has the label. They gave him this label, fact checker. He checks the facts. Why disagree? It's all fake, though, because people on the right have tried to create fact checking organizations. It doesn't change anything. The left is a cult, and people on the right need to stop trying to

suck up to these cult members. It's the same thing with the Ryan James Gerduski thing. Dude, I could have predicted this when he got offered a gig at CNN. We all know where this is going. The cult is going to start balking like chickens, hooting and screaming the moment you say anything out of

line with their deranged worldview. Being familiar with Ryan's content, I was surprised that he lasted that long. But it was good while it lasted. I mean, it was interesting to—I do actually like Abby Phillips' show on CNN. Why? I mean, I just find it more interesting than some of the other just, you know, left-wing slop that's on CNN. So it's a low bar. It is a low bar. It is a low bar.

It is a low bar. The bar is very low, maybe underground. Yeah, but I mean, the way that they kicked him off the show was just totally stupid. But this is, I mean, this is the other thing, too, with the double standards we see in politics right now. Whenever legal action is taken against Trump, the fact that legal action was taken is proof that he's guilty of something. Whenever Trump or any Republican takes legal action against somebody else, that's lawfare and they're bullying. Well, this is this is true for literally

everything, though. I mean, for the longest time, anytime someone's accused of a crime, it's proof they did it. Yeah, exactly. People like people at J6, there are people who lost their jobs just for being indicted. There was no nothing was proven. Doesn't matter anymore. I mean, that's clearly a feature of the age of social media whereas if you hear something that's enough for you to say oh i don't like that person and so i i'm sure they did it and you know whether it be whichever side it doesn't really matter um the presumption of innocence has entirely evaporated in the united states and i mean that's that's a significant problem because the presumption of innocence is, not only is it foundational to our legal system, but it also speaks to a high trust society. It's like,

we assume that people are generally good. And if we don't assume that, you're going to continue to see the degradation of trust in other people in your society. And that's part of the reason why you have to have more and more laws. If you have a society that's high trust, you have to have authority to push, to make people do things, as opposed to you have a society where people just generally do do the right thing, then you don't need as many laws to tell people what they have to do. People are free to do what they want to do because you can trust them to be generally good people. Now, another thing I think is interesting about all of this is not just the fact that, you know, CBS edited this. It shouldn't shock us that they would be carrying water for the Democratic candidate in an election,

especially when they're running against Donald Trump, who's the most evil, fascistic dictator who has ever lived. But it's the fact that they felt a need to edit her answers, right? I mean, that really does speak to something. I don't think that this is a new phenomena. I don't think the media lying for Democratic candidates is unprecedented by any stretch of the imagination. But the fact is, even they think that she's so unlikable and incompetent that they have to edit their answers. So this isn't actually revelatory on a moral level. We already knew that these were immoral people and these were liars.

This reveals that they believe they have a weak candidate here. Indeed. And that it feels political, too. I mean, the content brain in me thinks that if she had such a bad interview, wouldn't you want to draw some of those eyeballs to your channel? Unless you just wanted to save Kamala. I was watching some of the J.D. Vance on Rogan.

The first 15 minutes are hilarious. Yeah, it was cracking me up. I know, it's so funny. He just seems like a normal, relatable guy. He told a story about he was on a plane and he's a senator. And he's like he's like with my kid. And it's like people don't really know but you're kind of a senator. And then his kid dropped a plane and he's a senator. And he's like, he's like with my kid. And it's like, people don't really know, but like you're kind of a senator.

And then his kid dropped a cookie and then said, oh, expletive. And then it's just like, everyone's looking around like, Senator, your son. It's just, it's a really funny story about, and it's wholesome too. It's like family and stuff. But it wasn't just an expletive.

It wasn't just, oh, expletive. It was like, well, expletive. Like looks at his dad and says, well, expletive. It was good. It was really good. The reason I bring that up is like, it is entertaining to watch J.D. Vance tell these stories.

He's very normal. That's just it. Watching it, he mentions in six days, I think I'm going to win because I think they recorded it yesterday or whatever. Or I guess technically, we're going to get the data. Who knows? We're not going to have money.

Vibe check, I don't see how Kamala Harris wins this. I can understand Or I guess technically we're going to get the data six days. Who knows? We're not going to have money. But I, you know, vibe check. I don't see how Kamala Harris wins this. I can understand shadow campaign, but in any real sense, this is what was it like what Ryan Long was asking the other day. If Kamala Harris ends up winning, then what is your argument for how she won? You know how they won this time, how Democrats won. And I'm like, I got nothing. Like in 2020, I could make a bunch of arguments. People didn't like Trump.

COVID was bad. They wanted to change parties. If Kamala Harris somehow wins this, I'm going to be like, I got nothing. Like in 2020, I could make a bunch of arguments. People didn't like Trump. COVID was bad. They wanted to change parties. If Kamala Harris somehow wins this, I'm going to be like, literally nothing makes sense. Just like the polls, the prediction models, sentiment on the ground, Trump flags in Philadelphia, in Philly, in central Philly. I'm like, I can certainly understand people are going to vote for Kamala Harris, but if she wins, I'd be like, I have no idea how that happened. Well, and if she does, because Republicans are winning early voting as well, too. And they've been about about harvesting, too, in certain areas.

Yeah. But what I would say is this. If Kamala does win, I would explain it by saying not enough people voted like we needed to get people out there to vote and they didn't. So this is what I'm saying to everyone in the audience now, especially young men. Young men have to get out voting right now. The data that's come back is that young men aren't voting. Exactly. And that's a big problem. Men in general are coming in way behind women in early voting. And that's a massive problem because men are far more likely to vote Republican.

So if you're a young man watching this, if you are a man watching this, get out and vote. You have to get out and vote because it is possible for her to win. And if she does win, it's going to be because so many men stayed home. What I'm saying is if young men get out and vote you have to get out and vote because it is possible for her to win and if she does win it's going to be because so many men stayed home what i'm saying is if young men get out and vote they can actually turn this around like they can save this country we have so many issues right now and it's funny because i see all these memes where people are will post uh videos of guys fighting in wars and they'll go like oh me and the boys when some girl votes for kamala because taylor swift endorsed her that's right and like that's funny but honestly bro the reality is that if that happens is because you didn't get out there and cancel out the vote of someone who

only voted because taylor swift told them to so you know what you got to do for every person who went out and voted because taylor swift said they should vote for someone you got to go out there you got to make sure you cancel their vote out the data that i've seen so far in some of these swing states people have been tweeting about is that men are not voting at large enough numbers right now. Women are out voting men. And that's always been true that women are high propensity voters and men are low propensity voters. And so look, man, you know what I see? I suppose that might be it. If the data comes back and shows that women voted at like five to ten points higher than guys, then I can understand, okay, well, that's how Kamala Harris won, I guess.

The women went in the voting booth, winked at each other, and then voted against their family's wishes. Exactly. So, you know, there you go. So, fellas, get out there. You've got to get out there and vote. You've got to get out there and vote. Be a patriot.

Be a real patriot. Can we do a poll and check? Can we get a one if you've already voted? Yeah, yeah, let's do that. If you have not voted yet. Yeah, and if you put a two, you're going to be shamed. No, I'm kidding. We're going to shame you.

And mods will ban. Mods will ban. Yeah. You know what, man? People got to, you got to get out there and do it. But here's what I'm thinking. If Kamala Harris does win, then it's just like, okay, here come the hard times that have been predicted. And so I wonder what happens to a society where there are a lot of jobs women will not do.

And then when the system starts breaking down, men will not do those jobs for other people. What happens then? I mean, we're already starting to see that in so many ways. Yeah, we're already starting to see that in so many ways. Yeah, we're already starting to see that in so many ways. Initially, you have the breakdown of the family. Everybody's saying they voted. Oh, everyone's saying they voted? Well, that's...

I mean, listen, I'm happy to hear it. I've seen some twos in there. I've seen some twos, but it's overwhelmingly ones. I'm just saying, like... I don't want to see any twos, boys. Get out there and vote. I would prefer a comfortable American society with wealth and technology. But I'm also just like, you know, man, if the collapse comes,

I'll just do what I got to do, I guess. But that means a lot of these guys who won't go vote and all these male feminists are going to be crying. Bro, if you can't even get out and vote, how are you going to survive Kamala's America? How on earth are you going to survive the world war she's going to start if you can't even get out of your house and vote dude you're done get out vote I find that Kamala's project 2021 kind of sucked and I don't want to see her project 2025 you know what I mean

yes yes that's right when Kamala said that men need to be deported we need to get rid of all the men boys if you don't vote did you see that video where they're like oh I'm too political for you? I'm sorry. I just don't know if I'm allowed to have a credit card in seven days. Did you see those? It's so

ridiculous. First of all, if you're that stupid, you should not be allowed to have a credit card right now. If you are that easy to trick, if somebody convinced you that you having a credit card seven days from now hinges on who gets elected, I don't trust you with a credit card. So you know what?

Maybe you're right. Let me play the video. The Avengers endorsed Kamala. Oh, we're done then. We're done. We're done. All right, you guys ready? All right, so we got this clip.

It's like a montage of paranoid, delusional individuals, and they're claiming that Trump is going to, like, I don't know, ban women from owning credit cards. Here's the clip. Not too political. My bad. I just don't know, ban women from owning credit cards. Here's the clip. Not too political. My bad. I just don't know if I'll be able to own a credit card without my husband's permission in seven days. Oh, did I get too political?

My bad. I just don't know if I want to get rid of overtime in seven days. Can I just pause real quick? There's a lot of these. I'll just say things. They're just making things up. There's no indication. Trump comes out and he's like, I'm going to get rid of taxes on your overtime.

And he goes, Trump said he's going to ban overtime. He's like, look, oh, am I too political? I want to know if I'm going to be able to own a dog. I want to be allowed legally to own a dog. Oh, I've gotten too political? My bad. I just want to make sure I have access to birth control in seven days. Did Trump say he's going

to ban it? He said no more. He says anyone who uses birth control is getting deported too. And I'm talking about condoms. Everything. Not pills. Everything. So dumb. Seamus, was it you who brought that up? That birth control debates in the 30s were about condoms? In the 40s, yeah. Were about condoms in the United States. And lefties

go, you know, we're just like the guys who won World War II. They would vote for us. And then you read magazines from at the time and they're like, oh yes, Catholics fight against legal birth control and they're talking about condoms. The guys who fought in World War II were trying to ban condoms. They're like, oh yes, Catholics fight against legal birth control and they're talking about condoms. The guys who fought in World War II were trying to ban condoms.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, I get it, but here's another guy. Oh, I got too political? My bad. I guess I don't know if I'm going to be a U.S. citizen in seven days. You're not legally a U.S. citizen? You evoke citizenship?

Come on. If you're illegal, you got five days left. No, that guy's just tweaking. He's a citizen. He's like, I'm a naturalized citizen, but Trump's going to take it away? Well, no, to be fair, there's a more charitable reading, which is he's applied for citizenship, and in seven days, he's just going to find out whether it was approved.

Oh, right. It has nothing to do with Trump. That's all he's talking about. Nothing to do with Trump. We just take the paper, just rip it up, and it just never exists. Here we go. Here's more. Oh, I got too political? My bad.

I'm just worried I won't be able to love who I love in seven days. Well, no, because Trump has a device that can, it's an orb that drains your love from your body. A crystal. It's a crystal that takes your love away. So, you know, because in her mind, let me just. Hey, boys, she voted. She voted she voted boys i'll just make it serious there is no there's no means by which you can stop someone from loving someone else like unless she's implying that trump will come by and then maybe like share disparaging remarks about her lover and then she'll not like him anymore well i don't know

if you know how will you stop loving this person what do you hear how so project 2025 actually stipulates that we're going to use 5g to pick up people's thought waves and they're going to broadcast that to trump towers which is where the white house is going to be relocated and from there donald trump will determine whether you can keep loving who you love or whether you are getting but how do you crystals take away whether you are getting put in the crystals and if you love the wrong person we will put you in the crystals baby. I heard that Project 2025 Trump is going to have a bunch of these collars that they put around your neck and it makes it so

you can't love anyone. That's right. You're not able, you're not allowed to love anymore. Your ability is gone. You just can't. You only love Trump. You love anyone but me. Do these types of ads actually move the needle?

For people who don't pay attention and want to be part of some cult, sure. Here's more. Did I get political? My bad. I just don't want my mother to be denied her healthcare because she has a pre-existing condition. I just want to, real quick, nobody's ever brought that up. They've all repeatedly said they will defend it. Here's more. I'm too political?

My bad. I'm just fighting for the future of my daughter. What does that even mean? She's like, oh, am I too more. I thought he was going to... My bad. I'm just fighting for the future of my daughter. What does it even mean? She's like, oh, am I too political? I'm sorry. I want to know in seven days if I'm going to be allowed to wear sunglasses anymore. The sun is bright. We all just have to get our eyes hurt by the sun? I like this one. This one's pretty good. Listen. Too political? My bad. It's just that I

don't know if my family in western North Carolina will be warned of the hurricane coming in seven days when the National Weather Service is gone. He's going to shut down the weather channel. Like Donald Trump, he's throwing his mustache. We're going to make sure the hurricanes come and wipe them out. Hurricanes are going to be much bigger under me. We're going to make sure they do much more.

Trump will never see it coming. You know what would be really funny? If the first thing Trump does when he gets elected is he flies to Alaska and goes to Harp and just cranks it. Everyone's like, I knew it. Okay, wait. There's more. There's more. I'm sorry, everybody. There's more. I got too political. My bad.

I don't want them to start rounding up immigrants to deport in seven days. 70% of the immigrants. It's half right. I am in favor. Illegal immigrants. Nobody's going to go round up regular immigrants. Yeah, they're criminal alien invaders. There's a difference between a criminal alien invader and a legal immigrant.

But let's not be charitable. If she doesn't want to be charitable with what Trump's actually saying, I won't either. She's basically saying, do not deport Trendy Aragua. If Trump says, I'm going to get rid of Trendy Aragua, I don't want him doing that. Okay, well, then you support. Yeah, I think she's being loose with the language, though. I think she would totally want to keep illegal immigrants in the country. Oh, I agree.

I agree. She would probably want, no. Especially Trends de Aragua. Whenever this comes up, they will defend people who are guilty of capital offenses from being deported. What would be mean to do that? There you go. Oh, I got too political? My bad.

The only reason I have a daughter is because of IVF. I just, no one, Trump says he's the king of ivf and wants to make it free so look at his eyes like my guy your eyes can go back to the normal opening width or whatever if you just google it you will your eyes will close halfway just they'll go you won't shocked. No, he'll be shocked that he was misinformed. It'll get even wider. His eyes pop out. Oh, I got too political. I just don't really want J.D. Vance tracking my periods in seven days.

I heard that. On the Rogan podcast, J.D. Vance, the first thing he said was, well, the first thing I'm going to do is get a big list of every woman in the country's periods to monitor on my calendar. I remember when he said that, and that's one policy I agree that he went a little too far on. But let's just think this through for a second. You're going to get flagged for election misinformation. One thing people do, which just drives me nuts, is especially when it comes to abortion bans, which are good and protect children from being murdered. One thing they'll do is they'll create all of these insane, weird, fictional scenarios that they claim will come about now that Roe has been overturned.

My guy, for 200 years of our country's history, we existed without Roe v. Wade having been decided. For 200 years of our country's history, there was not a federal law. This was not until 1973 that the Supreme Court decided that every state had to have legal abortion. And guess what? Before 1973, we were not tracking people's periods. We did not have a pregnancy database. That's what you think. Yeah, no, it's true. I guess I don't really know about the secret handmaid's tale that was happening before 73.

Well, I got too political. My bad. I don't want Trump to take over the Board of Education, put in his lackeys, his loyalists, and have y'all continue to think that Puerto Rico is not a part of America. Okay, I got to stop. Right. You are wrong. It's get rid of the Department of Education. I don't want Trump. I agree with her. I completely agree. I do not want Trump to put his lackeys in the Department of Education. I want it gone. Gone. 100% agree. Dismantled Thomas Massey's bill on December 31st, 2024. What is it? January 1st, 25. The Department of Education's operations will cease. Absolutely. It's just a one line thing. So I agree, ma'am.

Thank you. Thank you for the last one. Welcome to the modern era of politics. OK, I would be fair and say there's probably like 2% truth in this thing. There's like one or two grievances that actually map on to something either Trump or Vance have proposed. But most of it is just nonsense. And there are things in there I wish were true. I wish they were going to ban IVF. They're not. They haven't said they're going to do that. No, Trump says he's going to give it for free.

Yeah. Trump said he's going to have government-funded IVF for everybody. And then they're like, he's going to ban it. We have a leftist and a moderate running right now. I wonder if these people just literally don't watch anything. It's crazy. We're in the social media era

and these people don't actually watch anything. Yeah, information has never been easier to attain. Accurate information has never been easier to find and to spread and people have absolutely no interest in finding any accurate information they just want to go ahead and find things that that entertain their paranoia and their their fears man so i i joined i joined tiktok last month because that's where i'm hearing that

young people are getting their source of news now. And you can follow me at RealJoelValdez, by the way. But on TikTok, it's insane how these people argue. Like, I'll tune into a few live streams. And it's more delusional than I thought some of these X-spaces are. And, you know, to are like videos like this are influencing millions of young voters is crazy well listen i i'm sorry if i'm getting too political but in seven days i don't know if i'll be able to use social media i don't know if social media will be there i don't know seven days going to the bathroom is not legal anymore what do you do

then wish you'd voted i'm sorry shamus am i too political i just don't know if Donald Trump's going to come hang out with me in seven days. Oh, I'm sorry, Tim. Am I being too little? Am I... Jeb Bush? That's all. I can't. I'm done. I don't know if I'm able to speak in seven seconds. The Tower of Babel.

Yes, this show is doing so well. This show is doing so well that we're all going to start speaking different languages. Did I get too political? I just don't know if all humans will be cast from the sky and have the languages split so that they will no longer be able to communicate. I don't know if I'll still be able to go to speech therapy in seven days. I'm sorry, am I too political right now?

I kind of feel like they went to these people and said, we're going to film you and just make it up. Yeah. Just say something. They allow that, though. I don't know. Sorry, am I too political? I just don know if hitler is getting elected in seven days it's like well you can google it he's not but what they do for credibility is they they throw in one or two

things that uh sound vaguely like something trump or vance would do this is another issue too we have a similar problem in reverse which which is Republicans have trouble discussing things that Democrats are doing because what they're actually doing sounds so insane. Yeah. People don't believe you when you tell them. Dennis Prager went on Bill Maher and said, well, look, they're putting tampons in men's room. And then they all laughed and they're like, oh, you're so crazy. Dennis Prager. And then Bill Maher said, I've known you for a while.

You were a reasonable guy, but this is nuts. And he's like, what? The funny thing about that story is that I believe it was three years before Prager brought that up. It had been viral. Campuses were putting tampons in men's rooms. And Bill Maher's like, no, it's so they could have them for their girlfriends. You're making that up. These people are dangerously stupid and arrogant at the same time.

Well, they push for things that are so unbelievably disgusting and psychotic that you sound crazy for even mentioning them. And then they shame you for mentioning it. But this is what happened with giving sex change operations to illegal immigrants, which is like that sounds like something a parody of fox news from 2005 would have in the chiron it is actually something that kamala harris has proposed and so there's a problem republicans have you will point out things democrats are actually doing and have said that they're doing and people will go that's crazy there's no way you know whereas they will just make things up and say trump's trying to do them even though he said no such thing you know it really bothers me about horror movies it's like every single one i swear if a person could just write a sane horror movie for once it's like there's like a zombie is going around and it's just like it's like a mummy frankenstein

and it's punching dogs and it's throwing geese or whatever and then like the cops show up and they're like what happened he goes you're not gonna believe me but it was a frankenstein mummy monster zombie that was attacking their back okay this guy this guy's nuts. And I'm like, how come there's just no intelligent saying people in any horror movie where you could literally just be like, I don't know, I think it might have been a wild animal of some sort. Please, officer, come and help. Then they'll be like, OK, this makes sense. I'll help you. And then they'll see the monster. The reason I'm saying this is Democrats have this insane stuff they're pushing like the like you mentioned sex changes for inmates and then it's like they're goading you into going to regular people and going listen

to me they're trying to give sex change operation to illegal immigrants who are detained on the border and then these moderates are like you have gone insane you've gone insane yeah exactly so don't take that bait just go i go like this i go oh what is this oh, what is this story? Do you see this story from CNN? Ah, this is weird. CNN must be making stuff up. And then I just show it to them. And then they can go around saying to people like, oh, I'm sorry. Did I get too political? I'm just not sure if in seven days Donald Trump's gonna

round up every obese person and send them to fat camp all at once because he says he doesn't like people when they're overweight. No, he's gonna make sure that they all love him. Alright, we got another story, my friends. This is from Fox News. Who wants to read the headline? I can't.

Biden bites babies visiting for White House Halloween trick-or-treat celebration. I'm sorry, am I getting too political? I just don't know if Joe Biden's going to try to eat my child. Biden bit a couple babies. How many was it? Did he bite two of them? Dude, any amount is too many. There's no number that would ever make this story less bad. Biden bit a couple babies. How many was it? Did he bite two of them? Dude, any amount is too many. There's no number that would ever make this story less bad.

It's not like, well, it was one baby. Let's call it. It wasn't babies. He bit one baby. No, it was more than one. It's plural. I know, but it almost doesn't matter. It's like, all right, any amount of baby biting is too much for the sitting president of the United States.

For anybody, this is somebody, if you had to give people background checks to get a butter knife, I would deny him. This is somebody who should not be able to use like children's scissors that you're issued in kindergarten. It's along the line of cute aggression. It's the urge to squeeze or bite things perceived as cute without the desire to cause any harm. It is a common type of dimorphous display where a person experiences positive and negative expressions simultaneously in a disorganized manner. Individuals experiencing cute aggression may find themselves clenching their jaws or fists with the urge to squish, pinch, or bite an adorable baby, animal, or object. Well, it's like people go like, oh, you're so cute and like pinch a baby's cheek.

You don't bite a baby. You don't bite a baby, Joe. Apparently Joe Biden does. There's like no outrage over this. It's just weird. It's just a very weird thing to do. He's getting real close to an angina chrome conspiracy. No, no, no.

He's baby biting. He's so desperate. He's aging. He's like, I just need it. Snopes is going to come out and be like, an infant which was deceptively dressed as a chicken to look delicious was bit by Joe Biden in a gotcha, in a sting operation. So come on, man.

I thought you had a little chicken there, man. I thought you brought me my lunch. I thought you brought me chicken. I take a nibble, man. Dude, he bit two babies. He bit two babies. Look at this. Why are you?

What's he doing? Well, the thing is, he has. Look at this. Biden was photographed playfully biting at least two babies dressed in Halloween costumes. Zero impulse control. Imagine the Kamala aides, like the George Bush man, where it's like, sir, he bit a second baby. Dude, is it... He bit a second baby.

Oh my gosh. He bit another baby. But there's also a level where you go, it becomes so obvious that this is elder abuse. Like, when someone starts biting babies, turn the camera off. We don't need to... Like, this guy, believe me, it couldn't happen to a nicer guy. But he is so out of his mind

at this point. It's like, this is cruel. Don't show him to people. I'm worried he's at the point where he's gonna mix up the shaking hands and kissing babies. No, apparently he's gonna the point where he's going to mix up the shaking hands and kissing babies. No, apparently he's going to, yeah. He's going to start shaking babies. Shaking babies and kissing hands. It's just, look, he's old.

He's clearly totally out of his mind. He's on the biting babies stage of dementia. And they're letting him be in front of cameras. I'm saying that's mean. That's really mean to do to him. When people started sharing this image of him biting the baby, I thought it was AI. I thought it was AI at first too.

I was like, ha, ha, ha, very funny. And then I saw a bunch of people posting that it was more than one baby, and I'm like, what do they mean more than one? I thought it was like an AI thing. I thought it was like a gag of him biting a baby. Come on, man. I mean, it's a lack of impulse control at the end of the day.

I mean, it's one thing to have this kind of urge, which is kind of ridiculous, but at the same time, apparently it's somewhat normal. But the president should be able to say, I probably shouldn't bite a baby. I don't think it's normal. I'm going to take it a step further. A president should be able to say under oath, I have never bitten a baby. Ideally. Ideally. Right? But listen, maybe I have never bitten a baby. Ideally. Ideally.

Right? What's he fighting? Maybe I'm a utopian here. He's got the baby's foot in his mouth. Yeah. Okay, look. He's always putting his own foot in his mouth. This one is the baby dressed like a chicken, and he's biting its leg.

This one, he's got the baby's foot in his mouth. Did you think you were an arse of chicken leg, man? Try to make a little joke out of it? I just, do people, you're saying that's normal, Phil? Well, I put it up. Don't put that on Phil. He didn't say that was normal. Yes, he did.

I googled cute aggression, and it's something that I've heard of before, and there's a Wikipedia article on it. Cute aggression? Yep. I can put the link in the slide. Look at this chat GPT. Yes, sometimes people sometimes bite babies playfully or affectionately, but usually gentle and harmless.

They didn't start saying that until Biden did it. They didn't start saying it until Biden did it. Yeah, I get that. It definitely sounds strange. It's usually just a soft nibble. Like, is it weird if the president puts the baby's foot in his mouth? It's definitely weird. And again, it's...

Yeah, that would be pretty weird, even in playful interaction. That's definitely unusual behavior, especially for a president in the public eye. He should have impulse control. He should not be doing that because it is weird. Dude, isn't it weird, though, that we also talk about the sitting president of the United States as if he's some has-been celebrity? He just came up. He did something, you know, like you're reading about it in TMZ. This is the sitting

president. He's just faded into obscurity while being the president. We, you know, I'm making my plans over here. I hope y'all are, because you can buy your gold, you can buy your emergency food, but I think there's a single-digit percentage chance that you may be hunting sometime soon.

People in cities. Get out and vote so you don't have to. If you can't get out to vote, you're not going to hold a line. Oh, bro, you know what's crazy? Quite literally, it's like if you vote for Donald Trump, you're voting for chicken wings, beer, and football games. Yeah. And if you're voting for Kamala Harris, it's like rationing, conscription, and probably the collapse of the U.S. economy. Yeah. And for biting babies, apparently. If you're the president and a baby, please the U.S. economy. Yeah. And for

biting babies, apparently. President bit a baby. Please get out and vote. Please, we gotta get rid of this. The president bit a baby. He bit a child. That was not normal. Two of them. Two children. Yeah, but I'm just saying, like, you make a really good point about how the president

is not actually the president right now. He's clearly just lost his effing mind. Yeah. And nobody is talking about it. No, it's been it's been it's been a year and a half or longer where Joe Biden's just been completely fried. And his brain is cooked. The thing is, at some point, they're going to admit it. So at some point, a few months from now, it's definitely not going to happen until well after the inauguration of the next president but they'll start publishing stories about things

that are happening right now that will make you terrified like you would be terrified if you're hearing them now like oh yeah no he almost pushed the button or like he like some insane megan kelly said that she doesn't think the October surprise has come yet. Really? And we were talking before about how the October surprise would be Joe Biden stepping down and Kamala Harris assuming the presidency

right before the election. I don't know if that matters though because early voting is so pronounced right now. Yeah. Yeah. I think it would be a bad idea to wait this late for the October surprise too. People who are going to vote on election day

I think are nuts. You got to go vote early. Guys, vote early, boys. If you're one of the fellas watching this, you don't want to get drafted to fight in World War III, go out and vote, dude.

Definitely don't want to fight. Go out and vote. Because when I went there, there were 30 people in line and it took about 20 or something minutes. 20 something minutes. And then we got B-dubs. And listen,

if you can't even get out and vote right now, you are definitely going to die if you get sent to World War III. You're not one of the guys who survives. Bro, they're not draftable. Did you see this? Like 70% or something, ridiculous number, can't be drafted?

Yeah. So they're going to, like, you know, it's funny because I make the joke. I'm like, I'm 38. I'm going to be 39 in five months or whatever, four months. What do I care? I ain't getting drafted. It's actually like, no, Actually, by the time they make it through all the young people who are

flat-footed and morbidly obese, they're coming for the athletic late 30s people. But it's okay, because Seamus is a canary in a coal mine. He'll go before me. No, they would never. I'm not physically fit. Are you kidding me? I thought you were kidding. It's not about that. They're like, this is cannon fodder. This man is cannon fodder. That's not why. They're going to be like,

and what's your occupation? Cartoonist? We won't need any of those. No, they'll have me make, like, this is cannon fodder. This man is cannon fodder. That's not why. They're going to be like, and what's your occupation? Cartoonist? We won't need any of those. No, they'll have me make modern war props. They're like, frontline infantry now. We need you. That's right. This is a tough guy.

He'll win the war for us. You're going to be like, what was that dude in Full Metal Alchemist? Joker? Was that what they called him? What was the comedian guy? I never watched Full Metal Alchemist. I don't watch those animes. They would be like, gee, Seamus, you're real funny.

We can use plucky comic relief when we're... That's right. That is what's going to happen. Yes. No, but in all seriousness, going back to the thing about, you know, Joe Biden's brain being melted, can we talk about how serious that is? It's very serious. That's what I'm saying.

You're going to start to see stories published in the media long after it's possible for anyone to do anything about it, which will... Oh, there's a video of it. Just genuinely horrifying. There's a video. Oh, yeah. With the... Oh, now what's he doing? Alright, dude. Have we considered... The rubber gloves

on the feet, that's adorable. That's crazy. I didn't even catch that. That's hilarious. They got yellow rubber gloves. They're eating the babies. They're eating the babies. Dude, that's adorable. It's crazy that Joe Biden's not even a factor in the election right now.

He's not campaigning for Harris. He's the sitting president. He's biting babies. What is he even doing, and who's the president? Well, I'm not sure who the president is. I imagine that it's probably just a panel of people, depending on what's going on, whether it be if it's something that the Defense Department has to worry about. It's the secretary of the Joint Chiefs or the SECDEF. If it's something that State Department has to worry about, it's Anthony Blinken.

It's not Joe Biden, clearly. And I'm sure that there are plenty of policies or directives that go out with his name signed that he never even, he has no idea they're going out. They must have stopped giving him those drugs. They're not wasting those on him. They're giving him a Kamala now Kamala's pumped up Joe must have been getting something for clarity Not necessarily uppers I think they're definitely giving him IV treatment

But I don't know about uppers He's got the plates in his brain I feel like they have to give him some kind of He's probably getting it from Hunter No, he's the president He's probably got a lab under the white house where they're like concocting scientists yeah just all sorts of crazy nonsense but if they really had something that could make biden work certainly could make kamala work and

she ain't working well i mean could you imagine kamala if she was like on like meth or coke yeah i don't like multiply her i like have i i feel i've seen that have you ever talked to somebody who just did cocaine? Yes. I mean, not that I know of. Like, it's very possible that I have and just didn't know. Well, they talk like this. Like, oh, my God. Let me tell you a story.

Like, I was with my friends. We were at the bar. Oh, my God, it was crazy. This guy gave me so many of these. I was like, I'm going to get you a drink. And I was like, dude, I don't even want a drink right now. But this guy bought me a drink. And I'm just sitting there. Yeah, so you've met people who have.

If they're not talking, there's a lot of teeth grinding. Yeah. Could you imagine Kamala Harris talking in circles, but ten times faster? She does sound drunk. That's why SNL calls her a drunk. I don't imagine, like, I don't think that you can make Kamala Harris better just by giving her uppers, because I think that

the content isn't in her head. Like, Joe Biden, at some point, was a reasonably sharp statesman, right? Like, he's been in D.C. for a long time. He understands how it works. He won a lot of elections. You know, he's held multiple jobs in D.C.

Yeah, go back to some of his debates at the floor of the U.S. Senate. You know, and so he had at least had the ability to do his job. Kamala Harris, there's no reason to believe that she's qualified to do anything at all. No. Have you seen, I just want to mention, for anyone who either wasn't around then or didn't follow politics,

if you watch the Biden versus Sarah Palin debate, or even the Biden versus Paul Ryan debate, he looks like a completely different guy. He talks like a completely different guy. I mean, he has aged horribly. I want to, we're we're gonna get to the next story. But I want to say something first. I want to say my friends, we're a few days away from this election. And I know it is trying times. Costs of goods are way up. Energy prices are way up. You struggle every day. And now you're probably very stressed out about this election. So the one thing that we wanted to make sure we

could bring to you is some levity and humor, which is why we have this next story. Distraught Rosie O'Donnell quote on the verge of pills at prospect of a Trump victory. Yes, the the the crackpot psychopaths have begun their rants already. And, you know, I have long expressed my fear that y'all will not be prepared for this. We'll not take it seriously. And then come election day, your phone batteries will be dead. You will have no Internet service and you will not be able to record all of these psychotic behavior. But rest assured, my friends, they are filming themselves already. OK, so how's everybody's nerves about this election? You know, let's say on a scale of 10 being can't think of anything else and may need some additional medication.

I'm like at a seven. Additional, she said, because they're already on pills. So that's all right. I can handle a seven. I'm trying not to watch so much of the news now i'm trying to recite that amazing prayer you do when alan on and aa about you know this is actually just making me sad i know things you can and cannot change well and you know if you voted if you donated if you could she's like saying like it's like she's giving a speech like she's leaving Middle Earth.

I'll say, like, there is a sense in which we really need to re-stigmatize mental illness. Because these people will just talk about how they're on pills as if it's a badge of honor. Dude, that's not something you need to broadcast to people. And by the way, if you are mentally ill to the point where you require medication, listen, I'm sorry. That's a tough break. It's not necessarily, in many cases, a moral failing. You could just have real issues. I get it. But if you're mentally ill to the point where you can't interact with reality without drugs,

then I'm not going to take your advice on who to vote for. I'm sorry. Should we ban people from voting if they are currently on psychoactive medication? That's an interesting thought. I mean, the challenge to it is always that the government would forcefully medicate conservatives. But I still don't think that the pitfalls is a good enough argument to allow people who are clearly disturbed to vote because both prospects are horrifying. It's just people will like brag about being mentally ill nowadays.

It's a badge of honor. Yeah, exactly. It's like, well, neurodivergent, Seamus. Yeah, then like It's like, well... Neurodivergent, Seamus? Yeah, then like believe... I know, and listen, I... Yeah, we're all... They're neuro atypical, and me with my typical neurons over here, I could just never understand.

It's like, if you're going to sit here and brag about being mentally ill, I'm sorry, I'm not going to take your advice on how to live my life or how the country should be run. People are not only bragging about it, but they will self-diagnose just so they can say that they're mentally ill. They may not actually have a mental illness. They might just be a little on the neurotic side. And they'll say, oh, well, I have this, I have that.

And they'll tell everybody. They'll put it in their bios on X or whatever. So that way they get the attention from other people saying, oh, I'm sorry. And the virtue points, you know. Because victimhood is a currency. That's exactly it. Yeah, aside from the fact that she looks like the love child of Keith Olbermann and Mark Cuban.

You know, in the 2016 debate, Trump rose to prominence because he roasted her on the debate stage. So it kind of makes sense that Rosie O'Donnell, out of anyone, would be taking pills as a result of Donald Trump becoming president. It does make sense. She got significantly embarrassed by him. But I mean, I don't know that there's a great way to figure out

who should and should not be prevented from voting because of the medication they're on. It would be weaponized. Any power you give to the government is going to be weaponized against you. I mean, look at what's happened with the Patriot Act. Everyone was gung-ho about it back then. Whereas I understand the impulse. You don't want people that are crazy or neurotic or whatever deciding uh the direction of the country at the same time

any power you give to the federal government is a weapon that you're giving to the federal government yeah and by the way i don't think anyone's like actually seriously suggesting that but it's kind of an interesting question to ask and in part because we have this default assumption right now that voting is this it's this very important thing that can decide the future of our country and every vote counts, but also our default position should be that every adult is allowed to vote. And I just think that's ridiculous. If voting is this very important thing, then it needs to be taken seriously. And we need to ensure that somebody is of a certain level of consideration or concern or status to actually have any kind of stake in

the future of the system. So, for example, I just think it's an insane idea that a father of six who's worked hard his entire life to provide for his family can have his vote canceled out by some 18 year old who just took out two hundred thousand dollars in student debt to go to art school. I think it's silly to say that everyone should just get an equal say. And by the way, there is no justification for that argument I've heard, which doesn't just apply to communism as a concept. It's always, well, everything needs to be equal for everyone. We need to ensure everyone has an equal say.

I'm sorry we don't. Some people are more qualified to make decisions and have more of an incentive to make choices that are in line with the long-term flourishing of our country. That's why I feel I should be in charge of Freedom Tunes. That's true. Yeah, exactly. No, we need to equally distribute all of the decision-making power for Freedom Tunes. Yes. So, even the leftists

can help write you jokes. Yeah, exactly. We have to allow that. We have to allow that. You know what's kind of crazy is, um, I was just thinking about the olden days, like, you know, 1600s or whatever and it was uh quite difficult to survive relative to today that just meant that like mentally mentally ill people did not survive no and so all the people of sound survival mind survived and they would vote and they would have kids but over a long enough period of time with technological

advancements we've created a society where we now have a critical mass of people who are otherwise incapable of making decisions for themselves. And they do vote. The weight of that becomes a lot to bear for any society, I believe will ultimately result inadvertently into a system that once again becomes harsh and chaotic, resulting in people losing their lives. Yeah, I actually have a slightly different take. I agree with the general sentiment, but I would say that our modern life incentivizes and promotes and even just flat out pushes people into ways of life that are so unnatural that people who would otherwise be mentally healthy become mentally ill. What is an illness?

Well, sometimes you have congenital illnesses you'll have mental illnesses that are just a product of a person's genetics or birth but just like with physical illness sometimes many times you're sick because you've treated yourself improperly you've behaved improperly you ate the wrong kinds of foods or didn't exercise enough like gluten and well and i think the same thing is true of mental health but we don't want to acknowledge it people will actually see a same thing is true of mental health, but we don't want to acknowledge it. People will actually see a deterioration in their own mental health when they live in immoral, unnatural ways. So many of us are right now.

I actually think a large component of mental instability right now with identity crises is due to mass media and to a great degree cartoons. And I'm not joking. So for almost the entirety of human civilization, moving pictures didn't exist. Humans identified with other humans for the most part. I'm sure there were people who identify with animals in weird ways, but they probably would not survive very well or they just grew up surrounded by wolves or something.

But now you have people who actually identify as cartoons, things that are not real. Don't look at me. But they begin to identify things in the real world as if they were cartoonish, or should be... You know, I just think like, I saw this tweet about Mr. Rogers,

and it said, watch Mr. Rogers and compare to children's programming today, and that's exactly what I'm talking about. I saw the same tweet. Yeah, Mr. Rogers is like, hello there, neighbor. This is a train. Trains carry people from one place to the next and it's like he's a calm adult talking like an adult to kids now you look at modern kid stuff on youtube and it's like i mean that's not really for kids but kids watch it but you had elsagate joker running around chasing a pregnant elsa with a giant syringe and stamping her in the butt with them it. That's not exactly what it was. Very weird.

Or like, there's like big fat guys who make weird noises and scream at the camera and kids, like, parents put their kids in front of it. I'm like, these kids are gonna grow up with severe mental disabilities because these kids, okay, do you guys remember that video where it's like the 1950s and the kids, they're talking like this. I quite find the politics of Liechtenstein a bit appalling when you bring it to tax policy. And everyone's like, how are they sounding so smart? A kid's like nine years old. It's because they grew up surrounded by people who talked like that, and they talked the way they were raised to talk.

Now kids are growing up watching weirdo cartoons and crackpot BS. And with the modern school, this is why we got to go to the Department of Education. Kids are being raised by other kids. It's like you take two people who have no, like two young people who have no idea how the world works, put them next to each other, and they're going to keep bouncing nonsense off each other and then developing crazy ideas. That's what we're getting. Yeah, and things have gotten progressively worse over time, right? We went from teaching Latin and grammar school to remedial English in colleges and universities. I blame media. Yeah, I think the media is a big part of it. I think another part of it is just the idea of mass education

in general and not structuring it in a way that actually took into account the fact that different people have a different capacity for learning. But that said, media is a large part of it. Even just the medium itself, watching something as opposed to reading, obviously reading something is something that requires a bit more discipline and it'll build brain power. And we're all guilty of this, right? It's just easier to watch something than it is to read it. But the content of what people are watching,

you mentioned Mr. Rogers. He spoke to kids in a very grown-up way. And then when I was a kid, we had like Teletubbies, which is just the most insane acid trip ever placed on television. And it's for kids. And they don't even speak. They don't even speak.

They just say gibberish. It's like, that's probably not good for developing brain. Yeah. And there's a burning baby head flying through the sky. It's a horrifying world. There are people that believe that if you read to your children, you're giving your children an unfair advantage over kids that don't have parents that can read to them. Good. And yes, absolutely, you should read to your kids. Make your kid read to your children you're giving your children an unfair advantage to over kids that don't have parents that can read to them and that's and yes absolutely you should read to your kids make your kid read to you well once they can make uh it makes sense but the point is like children should

be like you should engage with your children as if they are small adults not expect them to do things that adults do but you should talk to them slowly and clearly, and you shouldn't do baby talk with them. You shouldn't do any of that stuff because they're going to absorb what they hear. So you want them to hear properly articulated English so that way they can absorb that, and that will get them to the point where that will give them an advantage when it comes time to learn. You can start teaching your children about letters when they're like two.

You don't have to be like, oh, you must know this, but you can start exposing them to things that they're going to need to know when they're a year and a half. It's like you don't have to wait until they're like four or five to be like, okay,

well, now you're going to start learning. Stop putting these... Don't give them an iPad. Or, actually, I think the iPad's fine, so long as you're playing, like, BBC Wildlife Earth, or quantum physics or something. The problem is parents put the iPad in front of the kids, press play on some random psychobabble nonsense where there's a dog going... And then the kids just like...

I worked hard on that. I worked really hard on that video, and I don't appreciate you denigrating it. But no, it's... Sorry, I totally interrupted. What's Attenborough's first name? David. David Attenborough?

Okay, so I thought... Like, if you're a kid, you want to be entertained, here's a video about frogs. Yeah. Like, play things that's actually... You know, I still remember the Nintendo Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2 password for level select. And 10 lives.

It's B-A-B-A, up, down, B-A, left, right, B-A, start. Play that on Nintendo. Go find one. Play Ninja Turtles 2. Put that in at the start screen, and you will get the level select. Why do I know that? Because you were a kid. You absorb it.

I know. And it stays there. Yeah. And I'm just like, the things that kids are, you're telling your kids, they will never forget. And if it's not something they can consciously remember,

it'll be the fabric of their being. And it's extremely dark when you consider the fact that there are many things that we used to consider to be very inappropriate for children that we're now trying to expose children to.

So we try to slip sexual perversion into basically everything now. There will be children's shows that show mastectomy scars as the result of sex change procedures that will have to show a character with two dads. But then we won't expose kids to realities that we used to be comfortable exposing them to. So if you watch children's films from the 80s or 70s or earlier, people die, right? And there are scary situations. We've done this strange thing where we've sanitized children's media to the point where there are no stakes and there isn't any real lesson to learn beyond be yourself. And nothing

unfortunate or terrible or permanently bad happens to the protagonist. So no real message has any kind of impact, but then we'll slip in a bunch of really disgusting perversion that children really shouldn't be exposed to. Yeah. Is that it? We've solved it. Yeah, I solved it.

Well, no, I mean, but it's funny because we'll say, well, like a child is too innocent to see a film where something scary happens no they aren't kids get scared all the time kids get scared all the time and it should be something that's embraced in the sense that you can package a moral lesson into a story that has frightening elements but what kids should not be exposed to

are like mastectomy scars because of a sex change, or this sexual pervert identifies as a woman even though he's a man. Those are things children should not be exposed to. We got a story here from the Daily Wire. New York City legalizes jaywalking period. Okay, I'm going to stop and say, oh, it's about time. Everybody does it. And then supporters complain laws against it had racial implications. How?

So now we're at the period where if the law that exists is the right law, but for some reason it's disproportionately affecting one racial group, the law must be done away with. So it's like if one racial

group commits a bunch of crimes, the law cannot be allowed to exist. Can they say the same about daylight savings so we can get rid of that? Say that it has some racial implications and maybe we could keep they say the same about daylight savings so we can get rid of that? Say that it has some racial implications and maybe we can keep the time the same all year.

Yeah, but I think what they're trying to do with daylight savings is keep the daylight longer. So it's like, they want the day to be longer. They don't want to go back. So right now what I'm hearing is, because I think this weekend is daylight savings, right? Yes. Yeah, people are like, no, no, we shouldn't do it.

I'm like, no, no, we're going back to the normal time. We are in daylight savings, okay? If you get rid of it, it will instantly go back to being darker earlier. And I always hated it because I'm like, just wake up early. It's like the stupidest thing imaginable. It's like, we need more daylight for the harvest. Why don't you just wake up an hour early? What are you doing?

Yeah, there was that old joke. This was attributed in a meme to a wise native american man but you know people make things up so who knows but the line was like oh they think that they care like the europeans think that they can make a quilt longer by cutting off of the bottom and then sewing it to the top which is effectively what daylight savings time is that is indeed that is indeed well here's the story despite the fact that roughly 200 people have been killed in new york city in the last five years while jaywalking, the city has now legalized jaywalking outlawed since 1958, with supporters claiming the laws against jaywalking were racist. The city council passed a bill last month permitting jaywalking. Democratic Mayor Eric Adams never vetoed the bill, and it became a violation costs as much as $300, bro.

Everybody in New York jaywalks. There is no circumstance where people aren't jaywalking in New York. That's the stupidest thing I ever heard. This law doesn't need to be racist to get be gotten rid of. But if this is the way they're going, quote, jaywalking is not genuinely associated with traffic safety and instead is often used as a pretext to stop black and brown individuals decriminalizing. Actually, I think that's um half true if you are in like manhattan and you jaywalk nobody stops you

but in the uh black neighborhoods cops will use jaywalking as a means for a stop and frisk and so that that does happen that doesn't mean you make jaywalking legal it means you just enforce jaywalking laws dude i would crash out if i got a 300 fine for jaywalking it happens all the time in missouri yeah for real yeah yeah people get i mean i've done it all the time when i was in chicago i knew you're a criminal i mean if that makes me a criminal so be it jaywalking criminal shame on you it's part part of a broader decriminalization of everything joseph borrelli the republican minority leader in new york city council stated fellow gop council Shame on you. It's part of a broader decriminalization of everything. Joseph Borrelli, the Republican minority leader in New York City Council, stated, fellow GOP Councilwoman Vicky Palladino echoed that the move would promote chaos and make streets far more dangerous.

I actually agree with that because now people are just going to be crossing randomly all over the place, all over Manhattan. And that's actually going to be like kind of messed up. Maybe. I mean, listen. A hundred people just crossing it once. This is another issue that I think people don't consider often enough. They'll point to some law, and it'll be a law that actually makes sense. I mean, for example, telling people not to cross the street in a busy city

is probably a good policy. But they'll say, well, a lot of people don't follow that law. People jaywalk anyway. For sure, that's true. But people are always going to fall below what the standards are, right? We have to set standards anyway. The reality is we're never going to set a standard and have everybody meet it. We should still have those standards. It's still probably better to have a rule that says, yeah, don't just cross the street when there's cars driving there. I don't know. Any thoughts on that? Well, does legalizing jaywalking mean that

whoever is jaywalking has the right of way automatically? That's an interesting thought. Well, the pedestrians always have the right of way, right? I mean, that's fucked up if that's the case. I'm stoked because they're going to get self-driving cars soon. They got them in Austin and San Fran. Just imagine the chaos of everybody just walking. Dude, have you seen how people treat

the self-driving cars? There's no one in it to affront so people don't care. There was one homeless lady sitting on one and the car couldn't go anywhere and she's laughing because there's nobody in it. No one's going to do anything. No one's going to call the cops.

The car just doesn't move. So people are going to be just walking around and No one's going to do anything. No one's going to call the cops. The car just doesn't move. So people are going to be just walking around, and the cars are going to be stuck. This is how they're going to get rid of cars. I imagine that it's always going to be the people have the right of way. Because if a person steps—you have to incentivize people to stop, people that have cars, to stop. Because the car versus a human, the human's going to lose every time. Should we look up the FBI crime stats to see what other laws are racist?

Yeah, well, they're all racist, right? Any law that you write is racist. The law is just inherently racist because this country is inherently racist because it built up slavery. Whatever, yeah, man, the stats are racist. It's all racist. Oh, wait, wait, wait, hold on. Guys, guys, wait, stop. Shut up. Seamus, stop. What?

Gun laws disproportionately affect black and brown people in New York, so we have to get rid of gun laws. You know they're never going to fall for it. They're never going to fall for that. You know what you're doing, and they do, too. It's true, though. In New York, the gun laws in Chicago disproportionately affect black and brown people, so that's racist. And therefore, the law must be abolished. We have to let everyone have guns.

Well, we all know that this is just something they use as a tactic, right? Well, that's racist, so we can't allow people to do it. But again, they very selectively apply it. Way more black babies are killed by abortion. Margaret Sanger was openly racist, but they never decry abortion or Planned Parenthood as racist. It just doesn't matter to them. When they see an excuse to decrease stability and promote lawlessness, they will try to turn a law into a racial issue. But the reality is it has nothing to do with race.

It's just all about tearing the system down. Yeah. I mean, they'll say it's restorative justice or something like that. And really what it is is an effort to disrupt the system that exists. Well, it's like I just don't listen. I can understand saying, you know, there aren't enough police. It's hard for us to enforce these laws. But the idea that what we need right now is to give more criminals a pass. It's so backwards. So. So. So, guys, look, I just pulled up the New York City Government 2023 Enforcement Report. I got some shocking news.

All law is racist. All the laws are racist. So what we have here, it says misdemeanor, criminal mischief, victim, suspect, arrestee, and ethnicity. This is really interesting. So American Indians are 0.8% of victims, 0.3% of suspects, but 0.4% of arrestees. It's a very small number. Asian Pacific Islander is 11.6% of victims, 5% of suspects, and 5.1% of arrestees. Black New Yorkers are 38.9% of victims, 49.7% of suspects, and 43.1% of arrestees. And then white is 20,panic is 28 29 34 i think it's fair to say that the law

itself must be abolished all of it because no matter what it is it is disproportionately affecting black people you're noticing too much to stop noticing i mean it's race i mean every law is racist it's inherent racism law is racist then that the issue here is not that any one of these individuals is more likely to commit a crime. It's that they're only suspects because the system is racist and the laws must be abolished. And that's actually the argument that leftists are making and trying to get rid of prisons and police and all of that stuff. Every single disparity is... I'm for it now. I'm just, I'm for it.

You know what, man? Defund the police, abolish the police, all that. And then there's no laws, and then the strong will survive. I mean, that's just not the way it's going to work out, though. What do you mean? Because they'll still enforce...

You know what they're doing. They'll still enforce laws against people that are not... No, no, abolish the police. They won't do it. They'll say they abolish the police, but then they'll send a social worker with a nightstick over to your house to beat you for defending yourself. Who's going to stop me from having a gun?

A social worker. Social worker. With a gun. A social worker with a gun will be like, yeah, I'll make this society work. Social worker with a gun. Yeah, a cop. Yeah.

Yeah. There you go. I mean, we talk about this all the time. It's anarcho-tyranny. Right? So you have this guy who'd been arrested upwards of 30 times in one case for grabbing a child. He's on the subway screaming in people's faces, saying he's going to kill them. Daniel Penny steps in.

Oh, my God. Saves everybody there. And now he's going to be potentially kept off the street for the rest of his life, even though the guy who he had to restrain had 30 something arrests and was still out on the streets. Yeah. New York City is racist. Is it?

Absolutely. Look at this. Fifty seven percent of suspects in murders are black. That proves they're racist because there's substantially less black people that living in New York and 57 percent of the victims are black. That proves that New York is racist. There's no other explanation. Including the mayor. They gotta get rid of these laws.

You know, laws that say you need a driver's license and that... They say that. They say if you have a law that says you need a driver's license to vote, it's racist. I know! They literally already say that. I'm saying it right now. I just gotta get rid of it all. Get rid of all.

You know what? No more. And anybody can vote as many times as they want. Just all laws. Seamus, you can vote. Seamus is in charge. I did. I already did.

Well, all right then. Believe it or not, I voted. Did you at home vote? Young men watching. You got to go, did you? Did you vote? And then switch to Phil because Seamus is pointing at at Phil and Phil says, yes, I did. I did.

I did. I already voted. I voted last Monday. My man. This past Monday. What do you think is next on the chopping block for laws they would get rid of in all seriousness? Right.

Jaywalking. I'm actually excited to see what happens in New York now that people are told that right, like jaywalking is illegal. Well, part of what they do with their really like the most egregious offenses, they just try to redefine what the offense is so they didn't write a law saying weird perverts who get off on dressing as women are allowed to go in women's changing rooms they just redefine the terms and said well this is a trans woman and this trans woman should be able to go in the women's restroom so i think

often it's not even a matter of repealing the law. It's just about redefining things in a way that allows them to give people a pass on bad behavior. And we see that, too, even with they're literally showing pornography to children in schools. But it's not like they repealed the law that says you're not allowed to show pornography to children. They just redefined something that was obviously porn and started calling it sex ed, even though it was rated as M.A. by Amazon. That was the whole. And the author was creating it to indulge their fetish. That's the whole reason that the left wants to control like definitions and stuff is because if they can't change the law, they're completely happy with changing the words. So the law means something different. Yeah. I mean, something something else.

And that's one of the reasons why they want to have, you know, you hear people on the left constantly saying, Oh, we have a living constitution, it should be interpreted. So that way, they don't even have to change the laws, they just have to say, Well, we understand it differently today. And it's one of the reasons why I will forever assert that the Constitution is not a living document. It is dead, dead, dead. The words mean what they say. And if they don't mean what they say, then they don't mean anything at all. And there's no point in having a constitution. I think a step above that too is not just like how they'll be changing the laws, but how they'll be choosing the lawmakers. We're seeing efforts in state by state trying to move away and embrace ranked choice voting.

And that system in itself would radically change how people choose their elected officials. And I think, you know, both the Democrat establishment and the Republican establishment are out against it. But it's, you know, seeing what it's done in other states is terrible. And so if they can't get their way with changing it, changing the law itself, I think they're going to be changing the system of how we choose our lawmakers. Let's jump to this story from the New York Times. Look at this. Ew, look at that guy in the middle. Michael Knowles.

Is that who you're talking about? No, I meant the guy next to him. Oh, Rudy Giuliani. Yeah. No, no, no, no. The other guy on the other side. Michael Knowles is a very handsome man. That guy leaves me speechless. It's me from Milwaukee. And now No, no, no, no. The other guy on the other side of Michael Knowles is a very handsome man. That guy leaves me speechless.

It's me from Milwaukee. And now you got Ben Shapiro over here. I stuck around the bottom. But look, they made me very prominent. But Michael Knowles is the go-to guy. They put him in the center. I don't even think they mentioned him in the article. Can we read lips?

What is he saying? He's saying, you subscribe to Freedom Tunes. They just released a very funny video today on Kamala's husband. That's what he's saying. So this is the infamous story that was coming out where everybody said that they were trying to censor prominent right-wing channels right before the election. But, you know, the thing is

the article itself is nowhere near the front page. It's in the technology section, and it was actually kind of hard to find. So this is probably just some, like, young, new, higher guy who was like, I got a story, and they're like, sure, whatever, dude, we don't care. And he ended up publishing just basically nothing.

Do you think they kind of buried it because, like, everybody, like, Benny Johnson and Ben Shapiro and everyone was talking about it before the thing came out? No, because they wouldn't have messaged everybody. Like, by sending a message to literally everyone, it was like, the issue is that they failed the story. Uh, 30 conservative channels was a 286 videos containing election misinformation.

I post like 15 videos a day. So out of 30 people, there's an average of around like nine or so videos per person over the span of like six months where we're all posting like eight to 10 videos per day. They're basically saying you have one days out of one quarter where you may have made an error. It's like, oh, and so YouTube in the New York times has never made an error. Not once.

So the YouTube just responded like none of these things break the rules. If they break the rules, we'll take care of it. But none of these things do. Thank you. And have a nice day. here's the funny thing when they mentioned me they mentioned uh me and benny johnson and uh tenant nowhere in the article to say i said anything at all it just says that uh you know benny johnson actually this is really this is

factually incorrect this is fake news it says uh tenant paid popular pundits to create content that is factually incorrect. First of all, if you want to get real technical, a production company was paid by tenant media for a licensing agreement. There was never an exchange

of money to me personally, but that's just picking hairs, right? The reality is that I, my company, or any entity I own was paid by anyone to create content for anyone. We already made the show.

They just wanted to redistribute it. That's it. But that being said, he then doesn't even mention me. After that, he's just like, Mr. Poole did not respond to a request for comment. And then nowhere else am I even mentioned in this. So fine, I guess. What is this? A correction was made.

An earlier version of this article misstated the number of videos that YouTube reviewed when asked for comment and whether they contained misinformation. YouTube said it reviewed eight videos, which were identified by the New York Times and referenced in the article, not all of them, and found that those eight did not violate its community guidelines. It did not comment on whether they contained misinformation. Well, I got news for you, buddy. You published fake news. That is election misinformation during an election, and I think YouTube should ban you. Yeah, I think YouTube should ban them.

Listen, I think that the New York Times is a horrible publication with a long history of being terrible. And that goes far, far, far beyond this. But yeah, the Holodomor is a great example. But they have a history of denying these kinds of things. They even get criticized for not properly covering the Holocaust back during the World War II era. So the Holodomor specifically, though though they had a foreign correspondence reporter with the ussr named walter duranty who it literally came out just made up basically everything that he said and everything that was published because he was a communist who wanted to deny the fact that

millions of ukrainians were starved to death and he won a pulitzer he was was a staple at the New York Times. FDR decided to officially recognize the Soviet Union as a nation in large part because of Duranty's reporting. This man who covered up the starvation, the death, the intentional murder of millions of Ukrainians by the communist government. And I'm just going to be honest. I don't think the New Yorkork times has gotten better since then i really do not think they've gotten better since then they've had so many things throughout the year oh they've gotten much better at lying oh yeah fair enough they have gotten a lot better uh-huh yeah yeah i would agree they've gotten better at lying i mean they're looking they were looking for uh looking to Media Matters for information on the people in this particular piece. I mean, going to Media Matters, they literally exist to be a—basically to do hit pieces on people. New York Times, you're posting fake news.

You've got to issue corrections. And it's easily verifiable because if you just read the indictment it literally says that we had a non-exclusive distribution license we were never paid to create anything so they just make things up i mean and that's actually a very serious and egregious false statement yeah oh man i don't know i might have to uh call my lawyer over here and see what's going on and see what we got here. He's got a message. Oh, we're suing Kamala Harris. Well, listen, part of that's true.

You are. I think the other thing is the New York Times is probably I mean, the New York Times is desperate to retain its relevance. And this has been a problem for many years, long before any of us were on the scene commenting on these kinds of things. As soon as journalism started shifting towards the Internet, people started publishing online and print media was becoming less viable. The New York Times has been very worried about how they're going to stay afloat. I remember some years ago I was in a media literacy class and we watched this documentary on The New York Times.

And I believe it was the chief manager there at the time was speaking to a crowd of other people who worked at The New York Times about how print media wasn't out and the New York Times was still fantastic. And the answer that he gave to them is, you see all these popular stories online. Well, I'll have you know that even though they got all these views in these different news websites that are purely digital, many of these stories were broken in traditional print media or on the New York Times. And you just go, okay, you dingus.

The whole point is they're moving away from traditional media and there's nothing you're doing right now that digital journalists or people publishing online can't do. So they're trying to cling to relevance. They're very upset because they're not just losing profitability, right? Like they are losing control over a narrative. They've had a tremendous amount of power for a very long time. They abused that power horribly by covering up genocide and lying to the American people and supporting totalitarian regimes. And it's crumbling down around them.

Couldn't happen to a nicer group of people. The fact that they're trying to regain that control over the narrative is probably the key piece to what they're doing here. I mean, it's not just X x is is was kind of leading the charge um but you see the the reverberations of x being a platform where other voices are actually heard like we would mention the uh new the washington post and the bezos um op-ed the other day you see youtube turning this you know turning them down or saying, no, there's nothing that they've, that these groups have done, they haven't done anything wrong. So we're not going to do any kind of strikes or anything.

If this was five years ago, YouTube would have bowed as soon as they said, hey, do this, because the narrative was totally controlled. It was, there was almost hundred percent control by the the establishment i mean you had the fbi lawyer an fbi lawyer was leading the uh the i forget what the the desk was called but he had he had a desk at twitter i mean the the there was no distinction between the federal government and the essentially the tech companies and the media it was all one it was all part of the blob you know so the the fact that twitter has or x has made it possible for dissenting voices to be heard without being you know um just booted for having a dissenting voice

it means that other other organizations and stuff are going and stuff are going to have started to fall away. Yeah. Well, and I think there's an additional piece here, which is that as of 2023, YouTube has a new CEO. So aside from this being an election year and them desperately wanting to remove conservative content because they don't want the vote to be swayed or just dissident content in general, it's possible they also want to send a message to the new CEO of YouTube. Yes, we will try to get advertisers to boycott you.

We will make your platform look bad. We will smear you if you allow dissidents to express opinions that the New York Times doesn't consider to be acceptable. Yeah, when you start to understand that the New York Times is just a bulletin board, a blog for the deep state intelligence agencies, then it makes seeing through the

bullshit like some of these articles way easier. In fact, you should probably subscribe and watch all the people that are on that thumbnail. Indeed. Yeah. They're good. Good people. That's right. Let's take a look.

Listen, the New York Times trashing you. Yeah, maybe not Steve Deese, but everyone else. New York Times trashing you is honestly. You got Cash. You got Elijah. Knowles, Tucker, Ben, me. Who's the guy on the top left? Stinchfield. Ah.

You got Cash. And that's Steve Deese. There you go. But these aren't the 30 channels. The interesting thing is, who are the other people that they reached out to? They don't say. Researchers found. Yeah, and interesting that they couldn't name them in the article or wouldn't name them in the article yep yeah researchers the the people that at medium matters they're calling researchers

they're literally just people that you know scour twitter they're not researchers at all oh yeah yeah a bunch of white dudes for harris yeah well yeah indeed that's probably all it is yeah so when the story broke i was like ah who cares like i get like i hear stuff like this all white deeds for Harris. Yeah, well, yeah. Indeed. That's probably all it is. Yeah, so when the story broke, I was like, ah, who cares? I hear stuff like this all the time. So everyone was acting

like it was going to be this big deal. But I do have an update. I do have some news for you guys. Let me just check over here with my messages and then I'll give you

some breaking news. One second. Just some breaking news over here. We have sued the Kamala Harris campaign, as most of you know. If you would like to support our work, go to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member. The Kamala Harris campaign has been served, I believe, actually some time ago, not that long ago. And let me just make sure I can double check my notes real quick again.

We are expecting a response December 15th, which is very, very likely. This stuff takes a very, very long time, and it'll be interesting to see what happens. I don't know what's going to happen. I'm curious as to what happens if Donald Trump wins handily on the 5th and Harris just concedes. I don't know. But going to be another month and a half before we get any more updates. I guess my understanding is that they requested the ability to reply by December. I wonder what that means.

I don't know. Interesting. But yes, the lawsuit is moving forward as it does, and these things often take years. So we will see what happens. Lawsuits take forever, and it sucks. Yep. Indeed they do.

Can you give a recap on why you're suing them? The Kamala Harris campaign took a post of me out of context and claimed that I was a Trump operative who supported Donald Trump having extrajudicial authority to round up and execute Democrat voters. They posted a clip.

Classic Tim, always saying those kinds of things. Absolutely crazy. Insane. In the shows with Laura Loomer, I said that if there, just the full context is, if there are Democrats that have committed crimes, and we know some who have,

they should be criminally charged. There should be an investigation, evidence, criminal charges. There's got to be real warrants. There's got to be real evidence. And then after the trial, if they're found guilty among a jury of their peers, then they will be sentenced. Laura Loomer then said that the people who committed treason should get the death penalty. Ending the show on that remark, we talked about in the extended after show that I don't believe any of these people actually committed treason, sedition perhaps.

But we're talking about like Joe Biden with documents. It's not treason or sedition. That's a document charge. If they're going to charge Trump for it, they're going to charge Biden for it. And so you need legitimate charges. And I went on to say that I don't agree with the death penalty. I believe that that death penalty is wrong. I believe that the current law prescribes a death penalty and that if someone commits

a crime under the current law, they should, under the law, receive what the law prescribes, though I don't agree with the law prescribes a death penalty and that if someone commits a crime under the current law they should under the law receive what the law prescribes though i don't agree with the law the law prescribes and uh for this i have uh filed suit because they have made false claims about me it's actually absolutely insane and it's the basis for which why sam cedar will be here tomorrow because he made a video where he opened it saying that i said something about people should get the death penalty if they commit crimes or whatever. And it's a it's a it's an absurdity out of context. And I'm just like, either this dude only gets his news from clips he hears like a three second clip,

completely like I could be quoting someone who's going to claim I said it. And that's the problem with a lot of the stuff they think it's true. So upon seeing that, I said, OK, Sam, you can come on the show and we'll talk about it to me tomorrow morning and we will talk about it. And then he can sit here and I can say, here's exactly what I think. Next question. Here's exactly the issue. And so it is not confusing. But if you read the actual lawsuit, you can see all of the details and our arguments. We laid all out and the Harris campaign knew what they were doing. I think I think they absolutely knew what they were doing. So we'll I think they absolutely knew what they were doing. So we'll see. We'll see.

Well, I mean, they're so accustomed to just being able to lie about whatever they want. This is why we just saw that ad a little while ago where people were saying, in seven days, I don't know if I'll be able to own a dog anymore, things that aren't even political issues and that nobody's talking about. They feel entitled, firstly, to say that Donald Trump is the author or person who commissioned Project 2025. And then when he hasn't even read it and has nothing to do with it, and then they will make up all sorts of false allegations about what's in it. So they've just gotten used to being able to flagrantly lie. And then eventually they tell direct lies about

people and misrepresent things that they've said. And I really hope that you're able to take them to court and that they lose because they need to learn a lesson for this. And the establishment is where you hear people complaining the most about misinformation and disinformation. And yet they're every bit or more guilty of spreading falsehoods as any podcast or anything. Way more so. Name a podcaster who lied us into a war. Yeah, it's true. It's true. Name a podcast that came out and said,

we fortified an election. Mm-hmm. A podcast? Yeah, yeah. Name anyone in independent media who's done anything like that. That said, we fortified an election? We fortified an election that went out and bragged

about trying to change the results of an election. Isn't that where fortified came from? What? Leftist podcast? No, no, no, no, no. What I'm saying is the New York Times, or I'm sorry, Time Magazine, traditional media, literally published an article saying that they went out of their way to have a shadow campaign to save the election. The fortifying, was that an article?

They said they ran a shadow campaign to save the election. The fortifying, was that an article? They said they ran a shadow campaign to fortify the election. They were calling it fortification. So they talk about misinformation that's spread by podcasts and new media, but they have told far more harmful and consequential

lies than anyone in independent media. This is one of the most obvious things I've ever said, but the problem is the fact that there is new media. Yeah, they were fortifying it. Yeah. There's new media that is, you know, countering the narrative that they want to spin. And because of the internet podcast and social media, they no longer control the narrative the way they did.

So, I mean, I guess it's obvious. If Kamala is saying that Tim supported Project 2025, can we say that she's supporting Project Diddy? There's a lot of weird stuff coming out about Kamala Harris probably being at one of these Diddy parties. Well, hopefully what we learn from the lawsuit is that she was not allowed to say that about Tim and they lose in court.

So I wouldn't want to take her strategy. I mean, it's wild. But this country's falling apart. And so the sad reality, I think, for a lot of people, and a lot of people don't want to hear this, is the country may have already hit that point. So understand it this way. You're driving in a car on the side of a cliff.

You're going very fast. You're sitting in your chair. Everything seems fine. At some point, that car flies off the cliff. You might not notice right away. You're just like sitting there on your phone, not paying attention. Eventually, you start to feel weightlessness and you're like, whoa, whoa, what's going on? Like, we better turn around. At that point, you're already off the cliff. The next stop is just the bottom. So when I think about lawsuits, you know, when I talk to a lawyer and they say, which jurisdiction? I'm like, hey, we're going to sue. And they go, okay, which jurisdiction can we sue in? Because if you sue in this jurisdiction, you lose. If you sue in this one, you win. I'm

like, wait, wait, what? I thought there was like a law. Doesn't matter. Was the judge appointed by a Democrat or Republican? What does that matter? Won't they listen? No, they won't. A Democrat judge is going to sign with Democrats and corporations. A Republican judge will sign with Trump supporters. That's it. Thank you. Have a nice day. So it's like, if you're going to sue and you and someone wronged you, like if I had if I if someone in New York, for instance, I don't know, committed fraud like I like copyright infringement or something against me, the likelihood that I'd be able to sue them if I went to New York committed fraud, like copyright infringement or something against me, the likelihood that I'd be able to sue them if I went to New York, it's like zero.

They just win. New York would be like, we don't know or care who you are. He gets your stuff. Is there a certain jurisdiction you're suing her in? It's all in the paperwork. You have to go read it. It's federal, I think. But being in West Virginia, we would sue in West Virginia.

And guess what? West Virginia has got a lot of West Virginia judges. So right now with you guys here, Jimmy Kimmel saying vote late. Yep. Yes, that's what he was. Yep. Yep. Yeah. He actually he actually went on his show and told Trump supporters to vote on the day that's after the election day without clarifying that the joke was not to vote late, was to vote past. Like when you can't vote, you literally can't vote. So people are saying he should get charged. And I agree.

A red state needs to go after him right now. A meme. A guy shared a meme. Douglas Mackey. And went to jail over it. Yep. So there needs to be some red state DA who files charges and says, this breaks the law. I mean, yeah, Jimmy Kimmel has a huge show.

Yep. I mean, and they put Douglas Mackey in jail. Was his reach even that close to Jimmy Kimmel's? Absolutely not. Not even remotely close. What if several thousand people show up at their voting location on Thursday or Friday, like Jimmy Kimmel said, and they're like, what do you mean I can't vote? Jimmy Kimmel on his show said we could vote Thursday and Friday.

He said it was just, you were late doing it, but you could do it. And they're going to be like, no, he lied. This will be more of the, more evidence that there is a two-tiered justice system in the United States. If you are a conservative or if you are not a, of the preferred political persuasion, the law applies to you differently. And look, normally I would say it was ridiculous to even talk about going after going after somebody for a joke like this but a republican went to jail for it a guy literally went to jail for sharing a meme that made effectively the exact same joke they charged him with election interference indeed they did if there was any justice the it wouldn't be jimmy jimmy kimball that was being tried it would be the people that actually put the uh but what's his name douglas yes i seriously they would be tried and put in jail and they would they, it would be the people that actually put the, what's his name, Douglas Mackey in jail. Yeah, seriously.

They would be tried and put in jail, and there would be repercussions for that kind of violation of his rights. Yep, yep. That's the whole idea. Yeah, exactly. It's a two-tier system. Two-tier system. And I don't know that there's anything that we can do to actually restore, you know, Douglas Mackey's.

I mean, he was he was in jail for how long? Seven months was it? But it's that's not the worst part of it. The worst part of it is that the efforts to chill free speech, to chill people that would criticize the government. There's a lot of people that would be more critical of the government if it wasn't for the fact that they're afraid of what the government will do. Isn't this wild? In the Time Magazine article about the shadow campaign, their words, there's a photo of Trump supporters looking through the windows and them covering

it so they can't see inside, which makes literally no sense. And it says Trump supporters seek to disrupt the vote count. It's like, bro, they're looking through the windows. Why are you, yeah, right? Is this quantum physics? Does observing it change the outcome. Yes. Yeah, exactly.

That's crazy. Schrodinger's vote. So what I'm hearing now is that people are saying the Republicans are on top of things. Since then, Republicans have been filing lawsuits and been engaging in, you know, counter lawfare and things like that. The Supreme Court sided with Virginia. You see that? Yeah, to remove non-citizens. It's crazy because lefties, you'd imagine, would have the sense to say, it's going to be really bad optics

if we complain about illegals and non-citizens being removed from voter rolls. But they're still doing it. They're going, what's election interference to remove an illegal immigrant from voter rolls? But also, they don't vote, but it's election interference to stop them from voting. They're constantly saying, what it is is it's to get rid of people that are that are already that are actually legally allowed to vote and and which is just ridiculous this this law

in virginia uh it was it was a democrat was in office when it was put into effect and the last time that they used it to clean up the voter rolls, it was a Democrat that was in the governor's office. So it's all just a narrative that they're trying to spin about conservatives. It has nothing to do with the reality of the situation, which is typical, but that's the situation that's going on now in Virginia. Yeah, no, well, look, I mean, I'm glad we're on now in Virginia. Yeah, no. Well, look, I mean, I'm glad we're on top of it.

Let's hope we're on top of it enough. We're not going to know until after the election if we see all sorts of abnormalities that people didn't catch beforehand. It's going to be very disheartening. What do you think is going to happen? What do you think? You work in government, right? It is so close.

Is it really close, or is that just what the polls are saying? I don't know. Intuitively, I think it's close. I think it's close. Every single vote is the deciding vote. People are going to sit there and be like, my vote doesn't matter, and it's going to be like Kamala one by one. That's true.

Boys, get out and vote. Men are not voting as much as they need to. Men need to get out and vote if Trump's going to win. We really do. Men have not been turning out in large enough numbers. Of the few pollsters, Dave Wasserman on Twitter, I think in the past from 2016 to now, he is,

is his tweets that were previewing election day, a few days before the election 2016, he said it was leaning Trump 2020 said it was leaning Biden. I think he just put out a tweet, quote, tweeting those same tweets and said, it's going to be close. He doesn't know either way.

Yeah. Wow. So. I mean, the vibe check is Trump. Yeah. Listen, I think I'm definitely leaning Trump, but you never know what's going to happen. You really never know what's going to happen. Men can fail to get out and vote.

Well, that's because Anna Kasparian is a woman and women vote apparently, but men don't. Boys got to get out there. Got to vote. Yeah. Well, Seamus, guess what? You know what other group doesn't vote who Catholics well unfortunately when Catholics do vote they they vote for people who are like in favor of things that are totally in opposition to church teaching it's crazy Catholics for Trump right here we need to get

our evangelicals our Protestants Christians Trump is far Trump is far from listen Trump there's definitely flaws with his candidacy there's problems with it from a Christian perspective. But without question, Harris's is worse. Kamala Harris's platform is infinitely worse than Donald Trump's. And it's not even close. It's not even remotely close. That's crazy, man. There's a funny story that Congressman Gates told me.

And he says it sometimes on the campaign trail. I think he was in Iowa or New Hampshire when it was in the very early primary days when Nikki Haley and DeSantis were still in the race. And he went to a coffee shop and there was a waitress there who recognized Matt Gates and was like, she was so hype. And she was like, Matt, can I take a photo with you? Obviously he said yes. And she was like, man, my boyfriend's going to be so jealous that he wasn't working today. And Matt said he was like, or I'm sorry, when she was initially asking for the photo, she was like,

he was like, I will take a photo with you if you get your boyfriend out to come vote for Trump. And she tells Matt Gaetz, she's like, he was like, I will take a photo with you if you get your boyfriend out to come vote for Trump. And she tells Matt Gaetz, she's like, not only am I going to get my boyfriend out to vote for Donald Trump, I'm going to get all of my ex-boyfriends to come out and vote for Donald Trump. So it's very important this election. You should also go not just to your best friends, but to your exes and your family and everyone. Get them all out to vote. Hold on. It depends on who your ex is and why you broke up.

It's too important. Because you might tell her, listen, you've got to vote for Trump. And she's like, well, then I'm voting for Harris. Then I am voting for Harris. It really does depend. Alright. What you do is, if you have a former an ex who really hates you, you text her and being like, I bet you're one of those Trumpsters. Well, I'm voting

Harris so we can stop people like you. And she'll be like, I'm voting for Trump now. And strategically look at your past and if you have any good thoughts. All right, everybody. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Leave us a good review on the audio podcasts. It would be hilarious if every review on the iTunes review was like, this is

the greatest show. Everyone agrees. At least that's what I've been told. And then go to TimCast.com. Click join us. Become a member. That members only show is going to come up. And Seamus promised to say something naughty. Wait, what? Yeah, he was like, I'm going to TimCast.com click join us become a member that members only show is going to come up and Seamus promised to say something naughty wait what

yeah he was like I'm going to say bad words no I didn't he did yeah no very bad words maybe alright

well you talked to me I didn't have to show maybe and then I've got a naughty joke to share with you guys I'm not allowed to share it on YouTube

but I can share it on the members only how bad is it it's not bad at all the one you've told me before no it to share it on YouTube, but I can share it on the members only. How bad is it? It's not bad at all. It's not bad at all. It's going to trigger the left quite a bit. And it's going to reshape culture in a way that's going to make the left very angry.

I hope they don't watch. We'll save it. I'll tell you on the members only. And it's actually pretty fun. But what were your superchats first? Polly Pure Race is my first you are! Polly you've done it! you are first! congratulations

Jason Dixon says first I win and then he says nope indeed not sir YouTube just crashed he says damn it second, third alright The Clayway says Tim you think Rogan Vance interview was better than Trump's? Trump's going to go. You did good, but I had more views.

I do think I only I only saw the first 15 minutes and it's way better. It's just way better. The Trump interview is interesting to see Trump. But the J.D. Vance ones genuinely like I'm in the first few minutes and I was like, wow, I need to watch. I want to know the joke that his kid told Trump. I know. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So he said, like, when he got the call, oh, this is such a good story. He was like, yeah, so I got a call from Trump. He asked me to be his VP.

And Rogan's like, oh, is that how it went? And then J.D.'s like, well, no, actually, I missed the call. Like, it's a bit more of that. And then I get a call from a staffer saying, you just missed a very important call. So I went straight to voicemail. I was like, I called the president. And Trump goes, I'm sorry, J.D., you missed a very important call. So I went straight to voicemail. I was like, I'll call the president. And Trump goes, I'm sorry, J.D., you missed a very important call. I'm going to have to pick somebody else.

Trump's a funny guy. And then Trump heard his seven-year-old son talking. And he's like, who's that? He's like, it's my son. He's like, put him on the phone. And then he gives the phone to his kid. And then Trump reads the statement to the kid instead. Very good.

He's like, what do you think? The kid's like, it's all right. Yeah. The Trump interview was great. It was cool to see these two dynamic guys finally in the same room together. But I feel like I learned a lot more about J.D. Vance in this new interview. I feel like I really didn't know him that well beforehand. But you really do get to learn a lot about J.D. in this interview.

I haven't seen the full J.D. Vance interview. Did you watch it? I watched the majority of it. Did he really say that Emily in Paris is a masterpiece? He did. He did. He did. He first called it a dumb thing.

He was like, I was looking for something stupid to watch on Netflix. And he was like, wait, wait, wait. Let me go back. Emily in Paris is a masterpiece. And the women loved it on X. Oh, really? But was he saying that jokingly because he didn't want to offend them? It sounded like he liked the show.

As far as I could tell. My understanding is that Emily in Paris is just, like, the fictional version of Married to Strangers. Like, you know women love that show, Married to Strangers? I've never watched it. You know, like, there's, like, a bunch of different versions of it where, like, just women marry strangers? Bad idea. Women love that.

Bad idea. Don't do that. What they do, they love that show. And then, like, Emily in Paris is basically the same thing, but like a fictional version. You know, to be fair, I've never married a stranger. How could I tell people it's a bad idea? Who knows? Maybe it's good. I've never done it. You know?

I've never actually done it. What is Emily in Paris about? Is it like Fifty Shades of Grey? Oh my gosh. I have no idea. Women loved that book. Well, some of them did for sure I mean, it's literally just pornography

Yeah, but it was written word, you know It was written word, so I guess it doesn't count It still counts, don't read it Didn't they do like a bunch of movies or something? I'm pretty sure they did a film So again, also, that's literally just porn Did you know that it was originally Twilight fan fiction?

That's right, I did know that That's insane What's the guy's name? Edward Cullen. You know what? Here's the thing. We need to start calling women perverts more often. If you write a Twilight fan fiction that is so gross that it ends up turning into a BDSM

porn novel, you're a pervert. You're a pervert. Erotica. Oh, I'm sorry. We call it a fancier word, so now it's not gross. It's porn. This woman wrote a best-selling article of porn.

I don't even want to call it a porn book. I guess it is a book. She wrote porn. She made a lot of money writing it. She's a perv. People are into it. They're pervs. I love reading those jokes on Twitter where it's like, you know, men are gooners.

Oh, my God. But women are reading erotica. So what does that make them? That's super gross. It's super gross. All right. Zerosopher says, Saitam, could you share my gifts and go? I'm caring for a childhood friend after her three kids, one with autism and their father left.

I've taken on debt to support them and given up so much to help. But I see them as family, even if not blood. I think the link is in IRL live discord. All right, right on, shout out. I don't have the link, but good luck, sir. Frankenkug says, congratulations on the baby. Interested to hear your perspective one to two years post baby.

My kids changed mine. It's only right that you super chat in from the delivery room. Yeah, I don't know. I don't know about that. I mean, I might have to, but we'll see. We'll see. I already have – it will be interesting to see how my thoughts and opinions change. But I've already got great plans for my uh chess playing poker champion ninja

daughter so you know we're gonna be great and then you know in 20 years she'll look back at these videos here's the weirdest thing okay this is not true for most people but my kid is going to be able to watch every effing day of my of my thoughts it's just like a weird thing that's kind of a crazy thing that record will exist exist. It's going to be like I'll be saying or I'll be like if you want to know what I was thinking like what happened in 2019 with Trump like there's literally 300 videos you can watch every

day tracking the news and my thoughts on the matter. I hope she doesn't find that. And my weight fluctuations. I hope she doesn't find that video where you're like if I have a daughter I'll be so mad my child better be a boy. Oh I hope not. Someone in the chat says that they bet I have moobs.

Oh, man. Moobs. Do I give up that impression? That I'm overweight to the point of having man boobs. That's what I was just accused of in chat. Can you believe it? This internet needs to be regulated. There are people in chat suggesting that I have boobs.

We have the silicon muscle suit. You should wear that. You will sweat your ass off. I should do that. I just like to insult. And then for Cast Castle, we got the big fake boobs. And someone bought a pregnancy belly for some reason. Someone bought a pregnancy belly?

Yeah, it's just sitting on a chair at the castle. I don't know why. It's because men need to develop some kind of empathy for what women go through, Tim. Sure. You need to wear the pregnancy belly. Get to wear the pregnancy belly. Let's go grab it. Just see what it's like.

Grab it on the way to Nashville, and then we'll have you on the show. And then I'll be able to say I understand women. Whenever a woman talks about being pregnant, I'll be like, I know. I've been there. I understand. Me and my moves in my pregnancy belly. I get it. To Be Better says,

check out the To Be Better podcast. Curious if this will get read live. LOL. It sure did, buddy. $100 well spent. Appreciate the super chat. There you go. I always tell people, like,

probably one of the most effective ways to get an ad read is not necessarily just buying a sponsor spot, but crossing your fingers that you do a big super chat and then we get to it. I can't read everybody's, you know? All right.

Freddie says, vote for the boys. Grabs American flag and swords and runs to the door screaming. The boys. Boys, boys, boys. Boys, boys, boys. Boys, boys, boys. Yeah, Ryan Long's a funny guy. He's hilarious.

It's always great to have him on. Beavis McLean says, fact check. CNN is okay with their contributors eating human brains, but they are not okay with their contributors making dark humor jokes. But, yeah. Yeah, Reza Aslan ate human brain. Isn't that crazy? It's nuts.

They were trying to be edgy, you know? And he wanted to punch the MAGA kid. Yeah. The MAGA hat. But the story was that this is back during the vice era where vice was doing all these edgy shows and cnn was trying to do it everybody wanted to do it they're like how do we make these fun exciting travel adventures like vice is doing they're getting so many views and they still don't get it um so they had reza aslan go and

meet with these like this sect of hindu cannibals and then they were like eat the brain and he was like i don't want and they're like he was like, I don't want it. And they were like, eat it. And he was like, they didn't say it in English, of course, but then he ate the brain.

But this is also, he's a cannibal. Yeah. I mean, this is another great example of how depraved traditional media is because,

or as wild as YouTubers and TikTokers have gotten in terms of doing insane things to get views, like they're not eating human flesh. That's crazy, dude. I think he went nuts from it. CNN saw that people got a little, well, I can see that.

No, I think he went nuts from it. Because he was like, before this era, he was considered like a Stoic scholar, like a religious scholar who would calmly discuss these things. Now he's like foaming at the mouth fervent, saying he's going to punch little kids. Well, if you eat someone's brain, you get their mental illness. Or you get prion

disease or you get encephalopathy. What is it called? Shakes. Remember in the Book of Eli? How much does it take? You ever see Book of Eli? Yeah, yeah. And they're like, hold your hands up and he's got to hold it. And if you're shaking, they're like, you're a cannibal. How much does it take in order for that to happen? Can that happen just from one

bite? Because Joe Biden bit a baby. So maybe he's got it all. But seriously, how much does a person have to eat? Well, I don't know exactly what causes the shakes, how that happens. But, you know, like mad cow disease. Like the cows eating other cows. Yep. And then it's a prion disease where the proteins fold and then cause a breakdown and then you just die.

That's crazy. That's crazy, man. It's terrifying. All right. Freddie says, someone please make the meme of Mel Gibson's William Wallace. Instead of screaming freedom, it says, go vote. Just saying. Get out and vote, boys.

Yes. Get out and vote. Just Cause I'm Free says, remember, remember the 5th of November. If you seek as I seek, if you feel as I feel, then it's not about winning or losing, it's about making your voice heard. I was so excited that the election day fell on November 5th, because I said that in one of my videos the other day. Because you know the line. If you see as

I see, and if you would seek as I seek, then I ask you to join me, not at Parliament, at your voting booth, November 5th, and vote for Donald Trump. You have to get out and vote. There's like some dude sitting in his basement eating November 5th, and vote for Donald Trump. You have to get out and vote. You should be... There's like some dude sitting in his basement eating Doritos and drinking Mountain Dew and being like,

Who cares? I don't need to vote. Oh, God. I mean, we've been saying it for the past couple weeks at the very least. It cannot be overstated how important it is for you to go out and vote. Because women have the propensity to vote more than men. And it is more likely that women are going to vote for Kamala Harris. That is that is probably going to be the deciding factor. It's going to is the deciding factor will likely be if men get out and vote.

If men go out and vote, Donald Trump will likely win. If men stay home and they don't get out and vote and they can't be bothered, then Kamala Harris will likely win. And if Kamala Harris wins, that will be a terrible, terrible four years and it possibly could be the end of, like, we could end up in a one-party system like California.

RT says, did I get too political? My bad. I just don't want a girl in a well to crawl through my TV in seven days. That's actually hilarious. You should make this, bro. Just a bunch of insane, like, oh, am I getting too political? Am I getting, no, honestly.

It's all just movie references. I just don't want to go to sleep and have a guy with knives for fingers kill me in my dreams. It's fitting for him. What was that movie where the ghost was just like the grudge oh yeah that terrified me dude i saw that when i was i saw that when i was in fourth grade and it horrified me so badly that terrified yeah i mean listen i was 10 okay but yeah i've not seen a real scary movie in a long time the the innkeepers is that the movie is that a movie i could be wrong no No, we watched

a really scary movie a couple weeks ago. Two weeks ago. Do you remember? For sale. There's a movie, I think it's called The Innkeepers. I could be wrong. Where it's about this inn is closing down. And then it's actually really good. It's from 2012.

It was an indie film. I don't know if that's what the movie is called. I know i don't know maybe you checked that one out i mentioned this before i think someone gave me that name but that was that was pretty good i wouldn't say it was like overtly scary but i thought it was pretty good in that it's like yeah i don't know because most scary movies like they're zombies they're coming i say nothing scary about zombies dude no it's just general conflict well and my thing is it's just like when it comes to horror i feel the same way about horror as i do comedy in a sense where like if your punch line is bodily fluids you haven't written something right but it's like a guy got stabbed and there was blood

everywhere it's like that's not scary man it's just gross all right i got it i gotta i'm gonna write you a horror movie seamus okay it's about a uh a mom and her son and they move to a new town and the house is a oh oh man let's make it that's that's every single horror movie right now I know I know well and that's why there's certain shows in movies that we still cherish like people are still really into the twilight zone and in part it's because it wasn't relying on cheap jump scares or horror. Or, I'm sorry, or cheap jump scares or gore. It was really just trying to create a frightening scenario. To be fair, a lot of Twilight Zone stuff, it can kind of get repetitive.

But still, still, there's effort put in. It's not just like, wouldn't it be scary if you got stabbed? They're eating the dogs. They're eating the babies. Kay Spencer-Jones says they're eating got stabbed? They're eating the dogs. They're eating the babies. K. Spencer Jones says they're eating the babies. They're eating the cats. Eat the cat. Eat, eat the cat.

Biting the babies. That's just so wild. Alex says biting can no longer contain himself. Sniffing just doesn't do it for him anymore. I didn't sniff all this time to never eat man all right paul taskalos is the video and acts of a haitian migrant claiming he got to the u.s six months ago already has citizenship and just voted for kamala in gwinnett county ga must be investigated i don't know tell you man i don't know what happens to this place god you know, it really is true that Christians and men vote in low numbers relative to other groups. This is why the country is where it's at.

There you go. Get out there and vote, boys. Well, a majority Christian nation that is slowly becoming not a majority Christian nation has only itself to blame. Even if people say that they're Christian, I don't think we're a majority Christian nation anymore. I don't think there are a majority practicing Christians. Well, I mean, our president's a Catholic, so. And that's why he got Roe v. Wade overturned. Got overturned under Biden's watch because he's Catholic.

That's right. Biden did it all. Biden did the whole thing. All right. Gitch says, I don't mean to get too political, but what is oatmeal? I don't mean to get too political here. A. Merrick says, congratulations, Tim, on a step towards replacement. Fixing count is easy. Paper ballots and a camera over every count.

Live stream and record it. At any moment, thousands of people could be watching. Yes, but privacy. When I did my ballot ballot they had the big long sheet did you guys have this one and then they have like a gray plastic thing and you put the white sheet in it covers it up and then you stick it in upside down into a machine that eats it and they're like you're good you voted no i gave mine to my uh town clerk and she took care of it for me what if she went like this she's going away she's I trust her her name's Kim

my town there's like 4,000 people in my town like everybody kind of knows each other so that's based yeah it's great Noah Price says I take Zoloft for PTSD should I not be able to vote I think there are like I said there are situations where you have people who have some kind of mental illness for reasons that they aren't to blame for but i think when you have these people who go out and boast about

their mental illnesses and they talk about the fact that they take these pills in a trendy kind of way it's a massive uh red flag to me the point is they want the social credit you know they want the uh they want the the points the virtue points the the points. You have something you're struggling with, and you're somehow a victim, so you get social kudos. Yeah, and having PTSD, and there's people I know have PTSD from things that are genuinely traumatic, people who have it from serving our country or taking medication for it. That's obviously well and good, but then you'll have people

who will literally claim that they got PTSD from Twitter and stuff, where you're like, OK, if you claim that and you want to get medicated for it, then like, yeah, you're not someone who I trust to make decisions. Many people are asking when I'm getting married. I am. I will not give you the dates. So it would have already happened if not for just like, I don't know, bureaucracy, I guess. It is what it is. Would have been a long time ago if not for just like, I don't know, bureaucracy, I guess. It is what it is. Would have been a long time ago if not for work. Mr. That One Guy says, Seamus, you don't watch anime?

What about the official Catholic anime girl named Luce? I've seen this. Is it Luce? Yeah. Are you shaming the official Catholic anime girl and anime girl? I've seen that. I've been so busy with election stuff. I haven't looked into it too much, but have been some like hilarious memes of her burning heretics

it's just like little i guess it's this little listen from what i have seen and again i haven't paid much attention to it but it's this little um mascot that like the vatican made to appeal to top the popular culture and uh it's been relatively controversial, but I think the memes have been hilarious. Can we reskin the game Heretic to make it a Catholic going after the Heretics? You ever play that game? No.

It's basically when Doom came out, you had Wolfenstein, Doom. There were a couple other games. One of them was called Heretic, where it's basically doom but it's re-skinned it's like really game is what happens in it so you're like a wizard going around blasting people with magic oh yeah exactly yeah i don't like i'm saying we got to re-skin it so it's like a catholic a crusader yeah i mean i could very easily make a crusader platform game

that would get banned on steam 100 so uh behind me this second row of magic cards is the racist 100% of your choice get like plus two plus one or something. Basically what that means is the Crusades is all of your white creatures are one point stronger and one point more life. And they were like, nope, that card's banned. And it's like not even that good anyway. I guess back in the day it was. But white doesn't mean Caucasian. It means like white magic. So it's like Gandalf the White being banned for being white.

You know what I mean? Should be. And can we talk about how racist it is that he was grey and not brown? It's also true. They called him Gandalf the Gray. It's like, well, if he's mixed, he's brown, isn't he? Didn't they have in the Rings of Power, they like... Yeah, they were blue and brown wizards. Yeah, yeah, exactly.

They canceled that show because it was trash. Is that why? I thought it was because of racism. Well, they did this weird thing where in the Lord of the Rings films, I believe you only had white people, right? And then what happens is when you start adding in black characters of the Rings films, I believe you only had white people, right? And then what happens is when you start adding in black characters into the prequel

is you create like a canon where something happened. Where they genocide. Yeah, yeah. Which seems like a weird, deranged thing to have in Tolkien's universe. So it's like, yeah, if you follow the natural timeline

of the Rings of Power to Lord of the Rings, there was a period where there was great diversity and then later on, it's just only white people what happened in middle earth that's why they're fighting sauron also they did this thing where they they tried to make orcs like human yeah so in that's right yeah in in lord of the rings orcs are they take sauron and the mordor whatever kidnap elves then torture them for years and twist them into disgusting monsters.

And they're just all men. And then in the show, there's like orcs with wives and children. Yeah. And it's like, what? Well, do you remember? They were legitimately written to just be evil monsters. That's the whole point. But we live in this society where we're actually extremely uncomfortable with the idea that some people are bad and do bad things.

And so what we have to do is create these really boring boring morally gray stories where we can't point to anyone as bad it's like dude sometimes that can work as a story but it's also still entertaining to have stories where there's there are just obvious good guys and obvious bad guys that's also enjoyable people also like to see that that also speaks to us simple stories are good sometimes exactly exactly and oh yeah um we have a song coming out at midnight. Oh, yeah. Hunger Inside. It is quite based.

The music video is about a chicken fighting aliens. It's pretty based. I saw it. Yeah, the chickens are fighting aliens. Is Carter planning on doing anything? I don't know. Because last time we did, Carter was in the Discord or something like that. You guys posted it on TimCastMusic?

Yeah, it's going to be on YouTube, TimCastMusic, HungerInside.com, you can pre-order it. And this is like a dancey, upbeat song, which is about zombies, nothing else. It's a cool thing. Nothing else at all. It is very, very catchy, and it is very dancey. It's significantly different than most of the other stuff.

Yeah, and it's a chicken fights alien. So I encourage everybody to watch it when it comes out on YouTube. Maybe I should post it or something. All right, what do we got here? We got more Super Chats. Chris Lewis says, all the fellas remember, remember

the 5th of November. Yeah. We're going to have to make our own version of it. We're going to be on a watch list for repeating that. What do you mean? You know what's funny? Do you know what the 5th of November. Yeah. We're going to have to make our own version of it. We're going to be on a watch list for repeating that. What do you mean? You know, it's funny. Do you know what the 5th of November

was about, Seamus? Yeah, he was actually trying to instill a Catholic theocracy. Ah, I know. You're excited. Guy Fawkes wanted a Catholic theocracy. That's right. And you have all these

Reddit atheists wearing a mask of his own. All right. Cool. All right. Yeah. CJ Hansen says, I figured it out. Those psycho nonsense, I'm sorry people are all IRS bureauc right. Yeah. C.J. Hansen says, I figured it out. Those psycho nonsense.

I'm sorry. People are all IRS bureaucrats. Yeah. McCain says, I plan on voting for Trump, but why is it important to vote early as opposed to voting on Election Day? Please explain. Because you may show up to your polling location on Election Day and they go, oh, a pipe borough. So you can't vote today. Sorry.

It's the only day available. Guess you should have voted early. And then you're going to go, available. Guess you should have voted early. And then you're going to go, holy crap, I should have voted early. Or it's going to be like Cary Lake in Maricopa and they're going to go, for whatever reason,

200 ballot machines have the wrong printed paper. So sorry, you can't vote. You have to vote by provisional ballot and put it in a box somewhere and then half the people leave or whatever. So you vote early to make sure you get it done,

get it out of the way. And you also decentralize the process, making it harder to cheat. I don't like early voting. I don't like mail-in voting. But as long as we have this system, it is better to decentralize the process. If all Trump supporters voted on Election Day, which they count on, it's easy for one crazy person to take one box and go, this box is going to be 80 percent Trump thrown in garbage. Yeah. Yep. Yep. Get out and vote, boys. If everybody voted early, they'd be like, we don't know which ones are which.

We could they could actually. Here's the other thing, too. Let's say they go, hey, we found a big thing of mail in votes today. They're going to go. It could be more Republican. What do we do? If we sneak if we bring this one in, it could end up being 51% Republican because Republicans voted early. That's why you got to mix it up, mix them up. All right, everybody smash the like button, share the show with everyone. You know, become a member at TimCast.com to join that discord server and find friends. They'll be friends with you. They'll say, wow, new friend. How come you didn't join earlier? We love you.

You're the greatest. So go to TimCast.com if you want to feel that way. And we got that members only show coming up in about a minute or so. And I've got a naughty joke for you. But it's okay. It's not that bad. But it is funny and I'm very proud. So again, you can follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast. Hungerinside.com at midnight. The song drops on YouTube.

TimCast Music. Where a chicken fights aliens. And it's a Halloween special. There's zombies in it too and you know whatever uh so uh yeah joel do you want to shout anything out yeah i mean guys we got to get out and vote if you live in arizona wisconsin michigan virginia north carolina nevada it's going to be critically important that you guys get out to vote so if you can vote early go ahead and do it if not get your butts to the poll on Election Day. Make sure we get it. Bring it home for Donald Trump. If you want to follow me, follow me at Real Joel Valdez.

I'm primarily on X Instagram and TikTok. I post behind the scenes content of me on Capitol Hill and at Trump rallies and, you know, traveling across the nation with Lauren Boebert and Matt Gaetz. So thanks, Tim, again for having me on the show. It's a pleasure. Amazing. I'm Seamus Coughlin. All I have to promote right now, besides getting off your butt and voting, young men, is Freedom Tunes. If you want to help us continue to do what we're doing, become a member at freedomtunes.com. You'll be helping to create more art and culture that isn't being produced by the left.

Go over to Freedom Tunes, watch our newest video. I think you guys are going to crack up. I think you're going to like it. I am Phil that Remains on Twix. I'm Phil that Remains Official on Instagram. The band is All That Remains. You can check us out on Spotify, Apple Music, Pandora, Deezer. You can check out our new videos for

No Tomorrow, Let You Go, and Divine, all are available on the old YouTube. Get out and vote, and don't forget, the left lane is for crime. We will see all of you over at TimCast.com in about one minute. Thanks for hanging out.