Timothy Keller Sermons Podcast by Gospel in Life - Access to the Father (Part 1)
Episode Date: September 7, 2026This sermon was preached by Dr. Timothy Keller at Redeemer Presbyterian Church on March 14, 1993. Series: Salvation From the Outside In. Scripture: Ephesians 2:18. Today's podcast is brought to you by... Gospel in Life, the site for all sermons, books, study guides and resources from Timothy Keller and Redeemer Presbyterian Church. If you've enjoyed listening to this podcast and would like to support the ongoing efforts of this ministry, you can do so by visiting https://gospelinlife.com/give and making a one-time or recurring donation.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to Gospel in Life.
We tend to think of faith as a personal matter, a relationship that's just between us and God,
but the Bible presents a much bigger vision,
one in which God brings people into a relationship with himself
and brings them together into a new kind of community with each other.
This month, we continue going through an extended series of teachings from Tim Keller
that explore the core truths of the Christian faith
and what they reveal about God's purposes for our lives together.
I'd like to take you again to a single verse we looked at last week.
And of course, you don't even have to turn to it if you've got a Bible
because you know it so well because I preached it so completely last week.
Ephesians chapter 2 verse 18 talks about a great privilege that we've got
if we approach God through Christ.
And that verse reads this way.
For through him, we have act, we both have access
to the Father by one spirit.
For through Him, we both have access to the Father by one spirit.
Now, remember what we said before, that the context of this verse that talks to us about access,
and that's what I want to look at one more night, so that you get an understanding of what this great privilege is.
If you understand access, you'll be able to, on the one hand,
judge whether or not you really are a Christian.
When you consider what access is,
you'll have a good way of telling whether you're a Christian or not.
And if you are a Christian, by thinking of access,
you'll realize how little you are dipping into a deep and wonderful well
that God's given you and how little you're drawing on it.
But don't forget the context.
The context of this verse is Paul is making a case
that the Christian church is such a remarkable thing.
He says one of the reasons why
how people can see the power
of God in the world is by looking
at the church. He says in the church
you've got people. Now he uses the case
illustration of Jew and Gentile.
People who ordinarily cannot live together
cannot get along. They do get along
in the church. And he says
there is a bond so
strong that's created between
Christians that it transcends
all other differences between us. Class
differences, race differences, gender differences,
career differences and so forth.
Now, admittedly, I want to admit right off here,
that most of the time, in most places,
the church does not exhibit that remarkable life.
But when the message of Christianity spreads the most effectively,
it's when the church's corporate life is remarkable
to the point of inexplicability.
When the church's corporate life,
when the relationships in the life of the church,
when a congregation, when the relationships in the congregation are remarkable to the point of inexplicability.
See, Jesus was a human being.
Sometimes we forget that.
And he knows how hard it is to believe.
He knows that the claims of Christianity are fantastic.
He knows that they're too good to be true.
That's the way it appears to us.
And he knew it was going to be very, very difficult, and therefore he decided
to set up Christianity in such a way that there was a plausibility structure that made it easier for skeptical people.
I mean, whenever I meet somebody who's skeptical of Christianity, I immediately say, I understand completely.
I understand exactly.
Who doesn't understand skepticism?
Jesus understood it, and therefore he prayed to the Father,
O Lord, O Father, I pray that you will make them one, even as we are one, that the world may know.
you sent me.
What's that mean?
He says,
Father, it's going to be very difficult
for the world to understand and believe
the claims that I make.
But let's create
an entity, the church, in which
the oneness and the unity, the quality
of the corporate relationships,
the quality of the corporate life,
is so remarkable that even skeptics
have to say, maybe there's something going on here.
Most of the places,
most times, that remarkable
corporate life is not evident.
And yet, and yet, you know, I'll never forget an interview I had with somebody in the very
earliest days of this church. I met somebody, and I've never seen that person again, never had
this conversation with this person again. But I met a person who'd been hanging around with
Christians, and this person won't mention the gender or anything like that, took me aside at one point.
We sat down and had an hour talk. This person, it revealed to me what the hadn't revealed to
Christian friends and so on. This person made a lot of money doing sexual favors in a very high-class
environment. And this person says, you know, I'm thinking about Christianity. And I said, why?
What's brought you to this? And the answer came this way. You know, I know most of all of my friends
think the Christians are strange people. Anybody who invites you to have a personal relationship with Jesus,
they think they're all weird. But you know, if you actually watch how they relate to each, you know,
other. If you spend time, you'll always see some flaky ones. Of course. He says,
you know, any group's got their flaky people. He says, but as a whole, as a rule, if you're
honest and your objective and you can stand what they believe for a while and just be
objective and watch, they are, she said, more, no, there we go, they are, she said,
on the whole, more tolerant, on the whole, more tolerant, more kind, basically more open
more patient, less out just to use you.
And as a result, she said, I've really got to find out a little bit more than what they believe.
Now, I wasn't getting a statement that said, boy, it's amazing, the quality of the relationships.
There must be something to this.
Nor was the particular crowd this person was hanging out with.
I don't think a group that was just so characterized by love that was going to turn the world on fire.
and yet here was an objective, skeptic, looking and saying that there is a oneness there,
there is a quality to the corporate relationships that I really can't quite account for.
Even at that level.
And therefore, Jesus says, that is the plausibility structure that I'm giving the world.
And what that means, of course, is that, frankly, we who claim to be Christians
better look at our relationships.
The church and they see us just using each other, like any other.
corporate body. People using each other. They just see birds of a feather flocking together.
If they see people just sort of breezing in to get their fixed, get what they need, and out again,
and no commitment and so on, then they have every right to say, you know, the fantastic claims of
Christianity really are fantastic. They're just not tenable. They're not plausible.
Now, this text tells us two reasons. Two reasons for, two grounds for these remarkable,
this remarkable oneness that can happen between Christians.
The first one we spent a couple weeks looking at,
and that was that the blood of Christ brings us near
and gives us the same legal position.
I just can't recount that at all.
Don't have time tonight.
It said in the earlier part of the chapter,
some people are far and some people are near to God.
This is what so great and radical about the gospel,
but this is the kind of thing I love,
that early part of the chapter.
Some people are far from God that means they're immoral,
they're skeptical, they're violent people.
Everybody knows they're not religious, they're immoral.
and some people are near to God.
They're moral, they're decent.
They might be religious.
They're upstanding.
And Paul says,
Christ came and preached peace to you who are far away and you who are near,
which means that whether you're a good person or a bad person,
a moral person, you're lost.
That every human being on the face of the earth
wants to rebel against God
is actually at war with God, whether they know it or not,
and is simply expressing their rebellion
and expressing their rebellion in two different ways.
Some people express it.
Some people keep control of their lives by being very moral.
Other people get control of their lives by being very immoral,
but it's the same thing.
God knows.
We're fooled by that.
We see some people as far and some people is near.
We're all lost.
Remember Flannery O'Connor talked about a character.
There was a deep, black, nameless conviction
that the way to avoid Jesus was to avoid sin.
the idea there was that a lot of people express their self-mastery i am master of my fate and captain of my soul
bloody but unbowed we all feel this way that's the root of our hearts i don't need a savior
and some of us express that rebellion by being decent and upstanding so that we don't feel we need a savior
and other people express it by being very immoral it doesn't matter we're all lost we're all alienated
from god that's the radical gospel it's the beauty of it so cuts us to the quick and the cross
Because brings us all to God by giving us the same legal standing.
Whether you're high or low, whether you're decent or indecent,
whether you're moral or immoral, whether you're a goody-two-shoes or a high-class prostitute,
in Christ you come to the same spot.
Because apart from Christ, you relate the same spot.
So in Christ, we legally are brought to the same position.
And secondly, Paul says, this union that we have, this unity that Christians have,
is that experientially we're given the same experience.
and that's what we began to look at last week
one of the things that makes Christians together
is they have the same experience
think of all the movies and plays
in which you get a bunch of motley people
a bunch of very, very diverse people
who can't get along but they all go off on a mission together
like the dirty dozen, okay, or something like that.
You know, there's an awful lot of films that are basically
have the same plot as the dirty dozen.
A bunch of people, they can't get along,
people that traditionally can't get along,
but they're all thrown into this situation
of danger and they all pull together and they make it through and in the end, you know, they're
pals. Well, why? They've all had the same experience. Well, that's just a dim reflection of what Paul
saying here. Paul says there is an experience, a mystical experience. It's called access to God
that Christians share and therefore draws you together regardless of how different you are.
Now, let me just say, to finish up what we started last week, we talked a great deal about the word access, won't go into that at all.
Tonight, I'd just like to say two other things about the need and the nature of this experience.
The need for access and the nature for access.
Two ends, easy to remember.
Okay?
First, the need.
I'm going to say this because I realize I'm talking to modern people, people who live in the modern Western civilization.
And therefore there's both a need and a danger when I talk about experience.
I realized afterwards, you see, what access is, is a real experience of God.
It's an amazing claim.
The great God of the universe, the biblical God.
See, the biblical God is the uncreated creator, a personal yet infinite being that's infinitely greater than the universe,
to whom the stars and the galaxies are just like grains of,
of dust on a scale, who is uncreated, infinitely transcended above all creation.
This is the God, the other Bible.
And the word access means you can have a heart-to-heart knowledge with this one.
You can have an intimate, personal dealing and relationship with him.
That's the claim.
You can have mystical oneness, an experience of God.
Now, the reason I want to start off by talking about the need that we modern people
half for access is just to show you how dangerous it is in our modern context because we're so
hungry for it and we have it we may approach it in the wrong way you see there was without being
able to go into much detail on this in the early part of the 20th century an awful lot of philosophers
and a lot of scientists confidently asserted that religion was basically a response in the human
soul to fear that the real reason human beings
were religious was because of fear. Now I can't go, I can't give you the quotes. They were very
condescending, they were very naive, and there's very many of them, but people like H.G. Wells,
people like Bertrand Russell, Huxley, people like Sigmund Freud, but they all had their different
twists on it, but they essentially said this. They said, the reason that human beings have been
so religious for so long is because it was a way for human beings to deal emotionally and
psychologically with the overwhelming and confusing and terrifying forces of nature.
That the reason human beings were religious was because we were out of control.
And if we thought of nature as an impersonal force, then there was nothing we could do about it,
nothing at all.
And in the face of diseases and natural disasters, we were helpless.
So what we did was we personalized nature by either believing in numbers of deities,
you know, the tree god and the water god and the lake.
God and the jungle God and the sewer God and things like that.
Or we believed in one God behind it all.
In any case, we had to believe there was a way to personally appease and deal with the
foreshunders of nature.
Ah, but in the early part of the 20th century, latter part of the 19th century, again and
again, you hear people saying, leading philosophers and thinkers who said, through science,
through empirical investigation, we're getting rid of the fierceness of nature.
we're coming to see that we can control nature.
We're coming to strip nature of its mystery.
And because of that, you're going to see that as science advances,
as we become a less and less of afraid of nature,
and as we are more and more able to control nature,
make it do what we want it to do, religion is going to wane.
Oh, look, they say, look and notice how the more scientific society gets,
the more religion and superstition and all that seems to go down.
The more it goes down.
And that's the belief.
And therefore, they all predicted that the more technology and science went ahead in Western civilization.
Over the next 50 years, they said, you're going to see religion go down and down and down.
What little is left will not believe in the supernatural at all.
It will become very philosophical, sort of ethical.
Thomas Jefferson believed, for example, now this goes way back even further.
Thomas Jefferson truly believed that 40 or 50 years from the time that he was writing,
which is, you know, in the early 1800s,
that essentially everybody in the country would be a Unitarian.
That's what he said.
He says, we're basically religion, as we know it, is going to die out,
and people are simply going to believe in science and rationality,
and they're going to desupernaturalize the idea.
They're not going to believe that Jesus is God.
They're not going to believe in all these sorts of things.
Something happened.
Something went wrong.
You see, the more technology advanced,
this is what went wrong.
As technology advanced, people became to see more and more
that the real things that make us unhappy, technology couldn't get to.
There's at least three things we can mention.
We all have a tell it need.
That means we need to know what we're living for.
We need to have meaning in life.
We also have social needs.
We need to find and keep love.
It's not enough to find it.
You want to keep it.
And how do we do that?
We also have moral needs.
We need to know what is right and what is wrong.
And science, you see, in the early days,
For a good while, there were scientific disciplines, like psychology and sociology,
that insisted that on the basis of empirical investigation, we would be able to help people meet those needs.
You just do not have thoughtful scientists saying that anymore.
You just don't have them saying that.
They realize that empirical investigation can't even define love.
Now, there's some people who still insist on it, but this is what's happened.
Just the other day, I don't even know which talk show I saw it on, but briefly I was going through, and I saw a guy,
he was a psychiatrist
and he was an MD
and he said
I just saw three minutes
get this he says
he says we haven't quite isolated it
but we're getting down to the place
where we're going to be able to define love
love is one or two
chemicals in our neurosystem
and we're on the verge of a breakthrough
he said
because when we can identify those things
finally
see here's the spirit of technology
finally we will be back in control
of ourselves because he says
you know with all of how sciences
has tamed the viruses
and tamed all these things
science hasn't been able to tame the emotions, but we're ready to.
Because all love is, is the influence our mind of a couple of chemicals in our neuroscience.
And when we can identify them, we'll finally be in control.
You won't be able, you won't have to fall in love with anybody anymore who you don't want to fall in love with.
He says, you'll be able to only fall in love with people.
You'll be able to identify the people who are feasible.
to be in love with.
And you're, not only
we'll be able, they'll be feasible, but you'll also be able to control how much in love you are,
so you won't do stupid things.
And he says, you're going to be able to be in love when you want to,
to the degree and with whom you want.
What was the response to the audience?
What do you think the response the audience was?
Just like that.
You know, it was a completely visceral response.
The fact is that it's not a very scientific view at all
On the other hand, they didn't know that.
All they knew was they hated it.
Woveen into our slogans, songs, and social media feeds are the stories that our culture tells us about life's biggest questions, like, what gives my life meaning?
Can I have a happy and fulfilling life?
And why is there so much suffering in the world?
We don't really choose these stories, but our culture is telling them to us every day.
So what are these stories our culture tells us about who we are?
And do they actually deliver what they promise?
Tim Keller and his son Michael Keller explored this in a brand new book, The Stories We Live By.
Tim began this book before his death, compiling hundreds of pages of notes and collaborating with Michael before giving it to him to complete.
In it, they explore some of our culture's most prominent narratives about topics like identity, freedom, happiness, and progress, unmasking how these narratives shape our lives.
They examine why these stories resonate with us so deeply, and yet how these narratives ultimately aren't able to,
to help us through the hardships and sufferings of life.
The stories we live by offers a challenge to skeptics and to Christians alike
to examine the underlying narratives that drive our lives
and an invitation to discover a story that's big enough to make sense of the beauty
and the brokenness of the world.
When you give to Gospel and Life during the month of September,
we'll send you this new book, The Stories We Live By,
as our thanks for your gift to help Gospel in Life share the love of Christ with people all over the world.
request your copy today at gospelonlife.com slash give. That's gospelonlife.com slash give, because the
gospel truly changes everything. Why? Because you see, the spirit of technology says everything can be
reduced to commodity. Everything can be controlled. Everything can be abstracted out so that we can move
it around and so we can use it. Everything can be turned into a product. I can help you find meaning if
you push these buttons. If you read this book, five easy steps, I can help you fall in love
to the degree you want to fall in love if I can just isolate these two, one or two chemicals.
And there is something inside human beings that has not gone away, the more that talk goes on.
Instead, there's a feeling of violence. I'm being violated. I'm more than chemical bag of chemicals.
Meaning is more than a bag of chemicals. Love is more than a bag of chemicals. And what's happened?
The thinkers who said religion is simply a response to fear.
Have been proven totally wrong.
To everybody's shock, religion in our modern Western society is on the rise.
All kinds of religions, every kind of religion.
As D.K. Chesterton says,
when people stop believing in God, the biblical God, they don't believe in nothing.
He says they believe in everything.
what happens is when we got rid of the classic christian religion
which was totally against the spirit of technology in many ways
and in place we found out instead of people losing their religious impulses
these religious impulses were not based in fear
because the less and less people have anything to fear the less unless there's any mystery left
the more and more people still feel like i am more than a bag of chemicals there's got to be more than this
a perfect example of how things didn't go the way the expert said
is all this Huxley himself, the one who wrote Brave New World.
In the early part of the century, in the 1920s and 1930s,
he basically taught that eventually religion would die out
and we would be able, essentially, through science and empirical investigation,
to meet all of our needs.
By the time he was in his...
By the 1950s, and of course, you know, he committed suicide in 1963,
by taking an overdose of LSD,
he had become a Buddhist,
a practicing Buddhist, and he said,
the only way we're going to get people to stop destroying themselves,
the only way we're going to stop destroying each other,
the only way that there is any hope for humanity,
he said, is through mysticism.
Because he realized that we were a great,
a human being is a greater totality than he'd thought.
More than just an intellect, more than just the body,
we cry out for the unseen.
And one of the real questions
that a lot of these original thinkers should ask
but they're all dead, they're gone,
and nobody's asking it,
is if there is no God,
if there is no unseen world,
if there is no supernatural world,
then the only way to really explain religion
and the religious impulse is the idea of fear,
fear of nature.
Okay, that's gone pretty much.
Now what do we do?
How do you explain our inveterate religiousness?
Now, having said all that, here's what's so dangerous.
People are going back and flocking more and more and they want access.
They want experience.
They know just what Huxley has said, and that is there's more to me than what I thought.
I'm crying out for the unseen.
There's got to be a meaning beyond commodity.
There's got to be a meaning beyond possessions.
There's got to be a meaning beyond the material.
Well, what is it?
Where is it?
But here's the danger.
We have been modernized in that
we like technology, we like
being able to push buttons and we like to make things
into commodity. And so so many
people who are going back to everything.
I mean, people are inventing religions
in their backyard. People are doing
anything they can because they want experience.
Many of them come back into the church.
But look at them. In fact, in their vision, say, look at yourselves.
Watch out that you don't want to be.
an experience of God that's just a commodity.
I'm going to put it to you this way.
Sex is a commodity today.
300 years ago, the problem with sex was you couldn't use it as a commodity because sex went
along with a lot of other things.
Sex went along with marriage, with family.
It was difficult to avoid having sex and having children.
It was very difficult to avoid.
We can do that now through technology, but what that meant was back then, sex was not
something you could abstract from commitment. Sex was a great feeling. Sex was an intimacy,
but you couldn't make it a commodity because you couldn't abstract the thing away from commitment
and responsibility to building a family and getting to know somebody. You couldn't do it. Now we do.
We've learned through technology, we've learned to be able to have sex without really having
those, what we call, consequences. But what it means is we've turned sex into a commodity. The great
danger is when what i know this because when i preach on this when i teach on this people get hungry
they say i want an experience of god i need it there's an emptiness in me i want love i'm crying out
for the unseen you know every more more people are realizing what what huxley says is right
basically and that is there's no hope there's no hope except through the unseen world
but people come back and they want god as a commodity in other words let me be i mean about this
It's to be very stark about it.
They want to sleep with God, but they don't want to be married to God.
See, they want the experience of intimacy with him.
But as soon as you say, now, in classic Christian teaching,
if you want to have this great experience of God,
you've got to believe what the Bible says.
There's doctrine, you see.
You know, the deity of Jesus Christ,
and one person with two natures, he's human and divine,
in the doctrine of the Atominee.
died on the cross.
And some people say,
oh, I can't believe
in all those superstitions.
I just want an experience of God.
See?
Or you can talk to people
about the fact that if you want to know God,
you've got to make yourself completely committed to him.
You've got to obey the Ten Commandments.
You've got to say,
I will obey the Ten Commandments.
I will do the Ten Commandments.
I no longer have been charged my own life.
Oh, well.
You see, that doesn't go over so big
with modern people
who, in the spirit of the technological age,
have learned to see everything
is commodity. Everything becomes a product. Everything is something I can manipulate. They want an
experience of God, but many, many people will not come into Christianity. They'll go into some
other homemade religion because homemade religions, watch very carefully, are unbelievably technological.
In spite of the fact, they say, oh, we're going to get beyond science. We're going to give you
mystical oneness. Look at the various zillions of various New Age derivatives. There's never,
ever, ever, ever any obedience in them. You never have to obey anything.
Look, read the books.
Watch the cable TV shows.
All they're talking about is now, you know, if you've got to think in this way,
you've got to be authentic in this way,
you've got to get rid of your fears, you've got to let go of this,
you've got to channel, you've got to let the energy come through.
Where do they say, you cannot, you've got to forgive people.
You can't just sleep around with everybody.
You've got to tell the truth.
you've got to submit.
Oh my gosh, who wants that?
Because, you see, I want to sleep with God without being married to God.
I want an experience of God without having to submit to him intellectually
and submit to him personally
and submit to him totally and exclusively.
That's what's so dangerous about talking about experience.
I tell you, through Jesus Christ, you can know God personally.
You can know Him intimately.
You can have heart-to-heart sense of His love on your life.
life. Don't you want that? I know you want that because you're modern people and you're
starved for it. You're alienated people. We are. We're lonely people. We don't have the intimacy with
each other that people used to have. We don't have, we don't have the solid families that we used to have.
We don't have the intimacy. We're, we're islands. And we desperately are calling out to be
touched. And so when as soon as we talk about this, oh, you know, the most incredible thing
about the Christian faith is this. It avoids the danger and the mistake of the Western faith.
The Western religion, the problem with Western culture is that it believes that religion,
I mean, truth can be known through the rationality. It can be learned mainly through cognition.
And the mistake of Eastern religions in Eastern culture is they say truth cannot be known through
cognition. You know, in Zen Buddhism, one of the things that you have to meditate on is
Coans. You know what co-ans are? Things like, what is the sound of one hand clapping?
See, a co-an is designed to frustrate your reason. And of course, many people now go that way.
Eastern culture has always said, you can't know doctrine. It's silly to talk about the difference
between orthodoxy and heterodoxy, right doctrine and heresy. That's ridiculous. Truth is
beyond all these things. Truth is beyond rationality. You know, you can't, but trouble is you can't
say that without using rationality.
You can't say truth is beyond
the difference between orthodoxy
and heresy. If you say, I disagree, they'll say that's a heresy.
In other words, you can't deny rationality without using
it. It just doesn't work.
Christianity,
Christianity refuses. It's really not an eastern or
Western religion. Have you noticed that?
God was extremely interesting
in where he put
all of the main
incidents of redemptive history.
right on the border between the west and the east, right on the border, between what?
You know, between Europe, between Africa, between Asia.
Was Jesus an Easterner or a westerner?
What was he?
Do you see?
The fact of the matter is, Jesus said to the Samaritan woman,
you will worship me in spirit and truth.
Christianity means you've got to believe, you've got to obey,
you've got to think it out, and you've got to submit your intellect,
and you've got to submit your will to him.
But Christianity is also a deep mystical oneness with God himself.
So beware how you come after it.
You can't have this experience of God without giving yourself to Him.
Beware, because you're coming in, all of us, including me, certainly.
I mean, I see it in myself all the time.
We want commodity.
I would like three pounds of God, please.
Not so much that disturbs my, my...
my life, not so much that it really upends my goals, not so much that it's going to really
affect who I marry, who I date, not so much that it's really going to affect how I get things
done, how I work at my business, not so much that it's going to make me give away an awful
lot of my money to an awful lot of other causes so that I'm not going to be able to have as
higher lifestyle as I want. I would just like three pounds of God, please. Not so much that
is really going to disturb me, just enough to get me over the humps. I'm sorry. It's going to
disturb you if you want it. You can't have three pounds of God because God's a person.
Can't have three pounds of Tim Keller. You get all of me or none. You can't say, come in, Tim, stay out
Keller. I'll say, huh? What? What is this? You can't do this. You can't abstract. You can't make
these abstract distinctions. We've done it to the family. We've done it.
It's not in all these other areas.
You won't do it now.
You can't do it now.
You won't be a Westerner or an Easterner if you come to Christ.
One last thing.
And as you can tell, I didn't actually get into the nature of access.
So I got something to say next week.
Okay?
But let me point it to, let me just point this thing out.
When I talk about the difference between West and East, yeah, I can close up with this.
You know, one of the reasons why.
You know, ministers, we pass books around each other,
and that's the reason why we all sound alike.
Jeff White and I, when reading about Pascal, the great French philosopher,
he was a man who really was, at least intellectually, a Christian for years.
Intellectually, he was a Christian for a long time.
He believed it.
He believed it.
He was a brilliant man and a tremendously rational man.
He was actually the inventor of the computer, you know,
and the inventor of the calculator,
and he was one of the greatest minds of all time,
one of the greatest mathematicians of all time.
The last few years of his life, something changed him.
He had a formal kind of Christianity
because he was a classic Westerner.
He believed in truth, and he had it all worked out,
but he didn't have access.
When he died, some of you may have heard of this,
it's very interesting.
When he died, someone found,
sewed into his coat, a parchment,
a journal.
It was a piece out of a journal.
He had had an experience that moved him forever from being just a Westerner,
and certainly not an Easterner,
but into full-bodied Christian experience.
He'd gotten access one night to change his life forever,
and he really became a Christian.
And what he did was he wrote down everything that he experienced that night,
and it was so precious to him so that he never forgot what kind of access you could have.
He wrote it down, put it into a kind of amulet,
in which he, and he sewed it inside his shirt, not his coat.
So he took around with him all the time.
When he died, it was brought out, and this is what it said,
it was written this way.
This day of grace, 1654, from about half past 10 at night
to about half after midnight, then one line, fire.
God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob,
not of the philosophers and of the wives.
security security feeling joy peace god of jesus christ thy god shall be my god forgetfulness of the world and of all save god
he can be found only in the ways taught in the gospel greatness greatness of the human soul
greatness oh righteous father the world have not known thee but i have known thee joy joy joy tears of joy
I have separated myself from him.
My God, why hast thou forsaken me?
That I be not separated from thee eternally.
This is life eternal, that they might know thee, the only true God, and him whom thou hast sent.
This is life eternal, that they might know thee, the only true God and him whom thou hast sent.
Jesus Christ, Jesus Christ.
I've separated myself from Him.
I fled Him.
I renounced Him.
I crucified Him.
may I never again be separated from him.
He maintains himself and me only in the ways taught in the gospel.
Oh, renunciation, total and sweet.
What happened to him?
He got access.
Big shock.
Not the sound of one hand clapping.
Not something he couldn't talk about.
Not some mystical thing.
Not some anti-docturnal thing.
Not getting beyond truth.
Not the God of the Lord.
philosophers, not the goddess of the wise, not the abstractions of the philosophers, God of Abraham,
God of Isaac, God of Jacob, fire. That's what Christianity is about. Let's pray. Our great God,
we thank you that you're a God who can be known. It's almost inexpressible. It's almost too much.
And yet we thank you that you offer this to us. Tonight, all we've done is, in many ways,
is just to think about our need for you.
Just think about our need for access.
Would you make us this, O Father?
I don't just pray for individuals, though I pray for that.
I pray that everybody in this room might know you,
not just know about you,
that everybody in this room might have access to the Father
through Jesus Christ by the Spirit.
What I really ask is that we might become a community of people who have access,
so that when people come into our services,
when people come into our midst,
they sense a presence,
not the God of the philosophers,
the God of Abraham of Isaac, of Jacob, fire.
Would you make us a community like that?
So when people come on in,
they sense the God is here, and they fall down,
and the secrets of their hearts are revealed,
and they realize that God is present among us.
Would you be a God to us like that?
We need it.
But we would not ask simply to have the experience
without giving ourselves to you, intellectually,
volitionally, personally in every way. We do that now, and we ask for this access only through
Jesus and in the Spirit. It's in Jesus' name we pray. Amen.
Thanks for listening to Tim Keller on the Gospel and Life podcast. If you'd like to see more people
encouraged by the Gospel-Centure teaching and resources of this ministry, we invite you to
consider becoming a Gospel and Life monthly partner. Your partnership helps connect people all
over the world with the life-giving power of Christ's love.
To learn more, just visit gospelandlife.com slash partner.
That website again is gospelinlife.com slash partner.
Today's sermon was recorded in 1993.
The sermons and talks you hear on the Gospel and Life podcast were recorded between 1989 and 2017
while Dr. Keller was senior pastor at Redeemer Presbyterian Church.
