Tin Foil Hat With Sam Tripoli - #658: Was Einstein A Fraud With Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Episode Date: April 5, 2023

Thank you so much for tuning in for another episode of Tin Foil Hat with Sam Tripoli.  This episode I welcome Christopher Bjerknes to the show to discuss his research into the truth about Albert Einstein and whether he was a limited hangout or not.  This is a crazy episode and I hope you enjoy. Want To See Sam Tripoli Live? Grab Your Tickets at Samtripoli.com! April 11th- Comedy Chaos Live At The Comedy Store at 8pm and 10:30pm https://thecomedystore.com/calendar/the-main-room/ April 13-15th: Headlining the Royal Comedy Club in Toronto, Canada http://royalcomedy.ca/ June 8th-9th: Headlining the American Comedy Company in San Diego https://americancomedyco.com/products/sam-tripoli-live-thu Please check out Christ Jon Bjerknes' internet: Website: https://cjbbooks.com  Youtube: @cjbbooks8622- https://bit.ly/3MsLrnk     Please check out SamTripoli.com for all things Sam Tripoli. Please check out Sam Tripoli's Linktree: https://linktr.ee/samtripoli   Nuked.Social: Please check out Nuked.Social and join our decentralized social media that allows you to connect with telegram and the discord. Check out all of our premium content on ROKFIN.com. Tin Foil Hat Premium: https://rokfin.com/tinfoilhat Zero: https://rokfin.com/zero Conspiracy Social Club: https://rokfin.com/conspiracysocialclub Broken Simulation: https://rokfin.com/brokensimulation

Timfoil Hat. Oh, what the fuck are you guys even talking about? Global controls will have to be imposed. And a world governing body will be created to enforce them. Welcome to Tinfoil Haas. We go deep, home, boy. Aaron, open your mic. Drink from the fountain of knowledge.

There's lizard people everywhere. That's some interdimensional mind. Wake up, Aaron. This is only the beginning. There, you just blew my mind. Are you ready to get your mind done? Right. Revolution will be podcasted.

Duh! Marty Worm and welcome to Tim Paul. You know what I'm here to do? I'm here to rock. That's right. And here's another one hour banger for you. I told you I was putting out three episodes this week. And here's the number two. So it's with th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, the author, th, th, this week and here's the number two.

So it's with author Christopher Burekens and he has a book in which he discusses the legitimacy of Elber Einstein. Was Elber Einstein a limited hangout? Was he a fraud? There's a lot of data out there about it. So I hope you guys enjoy this episode. I've been wanting to play out this episode for a while and here it is so I hope you enjoy again if you want to see me live I'm going to I have an amazing two shows at the world famous comedy store April 11th at 8 p.m. and 10th then I'm in Toronto that is April 13th through the 15th. Okay, and then in June, not till June, guys, I'm in San Diego. I don't have a lot of rogue gigs.

I gotta start putting that together again, but the tour shall continue enjoying living my life. So go to Sam Tripoli.com for everything, all my dates, you can get tickets at all my shows. And then if you want premium content, rockpin.com, just put Sam Tripoli, everything will come up. Conspiracy Social Club, zero, Timful Hat, AMAs, and only conspiracies. All my affiliates that I work with, whether it is WiseWold, Gold and Silver, Harley, Ray, crystals, and then Brown Gas, of course, which is a really great product that I am currently about to start using.

So, and then all my free contents, all there, all my videos, all my audio, you can find it all there at Sam Tripoli.com. So enjoy the show. Again, at the end show, just enjoy the show. Just enjoy what Chris are Birken and we will see you soon. Enjoy the show. Guys, welcome to another only conspiracies here on Rockfin. I am so excited to have this guest on to talk about this subject. This is something that we've kind of dance around on Timfall Hat a lot. And you hear Eddie Bravo. And you hear Eddie Bravado. And, the the the we, we, we, we, we, th, we, th, th, we th, we will, th, th, th, we will, th, th, th, th, th, we will th, th, th, we'll th, th, th, th, we'll to see th, th, we'll th, and we'll th, and we'll you th, and we will th, and we will th, and we will th, and we will th, and we will th, and we will th, and we will th, and we will, and we will th, and we will th, we will th, we will th, we will th, we will th, we will th, we will th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, to to to to see to see the to see to see to see the to see the to see the to see the the the to see the to see the the the the the the the thee, the This is something that we've kind of danced around on Tim Foll hat a lot and you hear Eddie Bravo talk about this all the time this subject so I'm excited

to have a mind. He is an author. He's been, he wrote a book 20 years ago about this subject, got a lot of pushback but people are waking up to what he's been saying for the last 20 years. Please welcome this to the show. Author Christopher Bjorkness, how are you brother? Very good and thank you so much for having me on. It's great to be on. Honor and a privilege, man, these are one of these dangerous conversations that I just don't feel should be dangerous, but for some reason it is, and that is, Albert Einstein. Who is Albert Einstein? What was that about Einstein? And what did he represent?

And that's why I'm very excited to have you on, because you've been talking about this for a very long time. So before we get into that, can you please tell us a little bit about yourself and where our listeners can find you? As you said, I've been working on this project. It has been a mission of mine for 20 years to expose the facts about Einstein to the general public. For many reasons, I want to give due credit to the scholars who created the theory of relativity and I want to open up physics to the idea that Einstein is not a god he was failable and that we should be pursuing all kinds of theories as Nikola Tesla did and he was an advocate of ether theories and make it possible to understand the physical mechanisms of gravity and magnetism and I think the physical mechanisms of gravity and magnetism.

And I think the physics community has been hamstrung by Einstein's opposition to ether theories. So there are many practical reasons that people should latch on to why it's important to understand this history and how it came about. I agree with a lot of this. You've been hearing this story a lot about for some reason the powers that be like to push certain people over other people for whatever reason that is. And, you know, for me, man, I'm very spiritual man. And, you know, I'm really into the hermetic principles. And I think they took the laws of physics and really hard in them.

So to take away all the magic that really is where we are. And, you know, when you talk about alternative theories, that's why I'm talking about, like that we live in such a magical place. And for some reason, Einstein has been made the face of this science that everybody just 100% does not question and accepts as the law. And I've always learned that, you know, there's always an alternative story. And so what is the name, is this the name of your book in the background so the people after this can, if they want to read more about this, then go find your book? This is the 2,900- page magnumopus I published in 2006. How many pages? 2900 pages. Oh my god, is that the biggest book ever? It's heavy. You could kill somebody

with it if you wanted to. How long did it take for you to write that? Oh, I was probably working on that for about 10 years and I incorporated my book, Albert Einstein, the incorrigible plagiarist and anticipations of Einstein in the general theory of relativity into it. But I added the full history of how the Einstein myth was created and how it was used politically by various factions to promote their own interests. The physics community has always theeee theded thed thed thed thed thed the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the to to the. the to the, th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. the, the, to the, to to the, to the, the, the, the, the, th. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I th. I th. I th. I th. I th. I th. I the, the, the, the, the, to thean. to to thean to to to to toean toean. thean toean. thean thean. thean. thean. thean. the politically by various factions to promote their own interest. The physics community has always benefited from the Einstein brand and they've been very dishonest about the history of the development of the theory of relativity and there were many

other forces who had personal interests in promoting Einstein. Very early on, the Germans wanted to promote Einstein for the benefit of German science. And Einstein copied the theory of relativity from a French scientist on Rie Poncaire, so the Germans wanted to appropriate that. And that's how he initially got away with it. And then his friends, Max von Lauer,

Moritz Schlich, Ervin Froinklich, Alexander Moskovsky, Einstein himself, Herrmann Weil, etc., etc., etc. published books about the theory of relativity. So they were all making money off of it. And that's what really started kicking it off. And he had a friend named Alexander Moskovsky, who wrote to him that he wanted to make a cult of Einstein out of Einstein. And he was a famous literator, and he had access to the newspapers.

So he started to promote Einstein as the genius who had surpassed Kepler, Galileo, and Newton. And that began in 1917. And then in 1919 had some eclipse observations, which were taken to be verifications of the general theory of relativity. And that's when Einstein became an international celebrity, and there was all kinds of hype publicizing him at that point. It's, you know, it's so funny, I'm a stand-up comic. I live in Hollywood. I wish I didn't, but I do. And I've been part of the comedy community here in Los Angeles since, you know, 2000,

19, 2000. And what you're talking about, I've seen happen so many times in pop culture and entertainment where somebody's just pushed ahead through by the powers that be and everybody just gravitates to them and some people like, why is this ever happening? And there's always this alternative motive of, you know, being able to control the message, you know, I'm playing people who play ball, get rewarded and all that stuff. So if I had to, if I, I want to start up by saying because this is, this is the question that whenever I talk to anybody who's somewhat interested in, in conspiracies and I'd say this is a conspiracy or people who are against the conspiracies and I'd say this is a conspiracy or people who are against

the conspiracies. What they always say to me and I always have to answer why would they do that? So if someone came up to you go, why would they do this? Why would they perpetrate this giant lie? I have my own feelings but what are your feelings on that? Well for the physicists who represented relativity theory, it was overthrowing previous concepts of geometry. So anyone who wanted to believe still in Euclidean geometry and in the classical physics of Newton, resisted it. And they had to overcome that resistance.

So they formed kind of a paranoid click, and they started to defame and attack anyone who questioned relativity theory, because it was so difficult for them to get people to accept relativity theory initially. And they claimed that only 12 people in the world could understand it, and therefore anyone who contradicted it or rejected it was being malicious and vicious and inhibiting the progress of science. And they utilized the press to smear anyone who opposed it. And there were Nobel Prize winning physicists who opposed it. So it kind of broke down into a war, a factional war, where you had to take sides. And it was going to be one side was going to win or the other side was going to win.

So both sides started employing dirty tactics and really vicious tactics, and the Einstein camp won out because they had better connections in the press. And then eventually the other side won out through the viciousness of Nazism. So it went back and forth, and there were great debates about it. Einstein was challenged to a debate in 1920 in Bod Nauheim. And he was confronted by Philip Leonard, who

won a Nobel Prize for his Cathode Ray research. And Lainard slaughtered him in the debate. And Einstein panicked and ran away. His friend, Max Plunk, called a break. And Einstein ran away to Max Plunk called a break, and Einstein ran away to the train station, went back to his place, started writing people that he was planning to flee Germany because he had been so badly embarrassed in the debate.

But then the next day, the newspapers rescued him and slandered, Philip Leonard, and that created a great hostility between Leonard and Einstein that passed all the way through the Nazi years. So I think that's why it was so important for those who promoted Einstein to prevent any exposure of the fact that he was a plagiarist. But from very early on, from like 1907 on, Johanna Stark accused him of plagiarizing his work. Henri Pancare ignored him. Ernst Gerica and Philip Lainard started publishing,

republishing the original papers that Einstein had copied. And it was a huge scandal in Germany in 1920. And then in 1921, he tried to escape that scandal by coming to the U.S. And an American scientist from St. Paul, the College of St. Thomas named Arvid Reuiderdahl, accused him of plagiarism in the United States and challenged him to a debate. And he said that the only reason he had come to America was to raise money for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and therefore he wouldn't debate Arvid Reuterdahl.

And he lied and said he had never heard of Arvid Reuter doll. And then Reuter doll produced interviews where Einstein discussed Arvide Royd. Oh my god. Now when Einstein arrived in New York, there were massive crowds to meet him but after Arvid Reuterdahl slaughtered him in the press he had access to the Dearborn Independent after Scientific American refused to publish his articles he turned to Henry Ford's organ the Dearborn Independent and Ford reached 750,000 people through his Ford dealerships and ReuterDalt had banner

headlines calling Einstein the Barnum of science and saying that he was a career plagiarist. So Einstein was exposed in 1921 and then he fled and he went on a world trip in 22 and 23 to the Far East and to Palestine and to Spain. And the whole time, the press stuck with him. But there was always an ardent, hardcore of major physicists who rejected both Einstein and the theory of relativity. And there were many, many people who constantly accused him of plagiarism and offered up the proof of his plagiarism. And all of this history was lost after World War II and it was primarily me who resurrected all of this knowledge in

2002 with my book Albert Einstein the incorrigible plagiarist. Holy cow bro. Holy cow, bro. That's insane, man. And you know, if I didn't see this happen in my lifetime in just my world of comedy and acting and all that. So I'm not an actor, but, you know, I'm a stand-up comic and I've seen this exact thing happen in real time. The press, the media, the mechanism, the machine gets behind somebody and for some reason promote somebody that really shouldn't be promoted. And it blows my mind.

So it is your theory that Einstein was pushed forward because the Germans wanted to be seen as scientifically superior to others. Is that the biggest reason he was pushed forward? That was the biggest reason all the way through World War I. And initially, of course, the idea was he and his wife got together. They were collaborators and we can discuss all the other months that's been turned up about that. And they decided that they were going to steal credit for the Poincare-Lorenz theory of relativity, as it's

been called by many people. Okay. And then they got away with it, yes, I, because the German scientists wanted the greater glory of their institutions and their publications. And then the physics community in Germany that grabbed onto the theory of relativity formed this click. And they won out in their war with the anti-relativity click. There was a book published in 1931 called A hundred authors against Einstein. And there were many, many prominent people who were opposed to this. Ernst Mach, Nikola Tesla, Hendrick Anto and Lorenz himself opposed the theory of relativity. And the biggest opposition

was the idea that Riemannian geometry was an abstract concept, a four-dimensional abstract concept. And the mythology is that Albert Einstein came up with the idea of space-time. But it was originally published in 1901 by Melchior Pallagi, then Henri Puancaire, developed it much further in the theory of relativity in 1905, and then Hermann Minkovsky published the formal and most highly developed form of it in 1907, citing Henri Poncarae.

But Albert Einstein rejected the idea of spacetime. And in 1907, he wrote a couple of papers with his friend Jacob Laub saying that, thated the idea of space time and in 1907 he wrote a couple of papers with his friend Jacob Laube saying that the concept of space time was nonsense. And yet today he is given credit for formulating that concept. He neither formulated it nor promoted it, but instead opposed it initially. So there are many, many lies told about Einstein to try to promote him as if this great genius. And he also did not create the atomic bomb. He did not believe that atomic bombs were even possible. And if we can share a screen, I can show you, um,

headline articles. Yeah. Where Einstein was shown in the press saying that atomic energy and atomic bombs were impossible as late as 1934. Are you able to do it? Yeah. Yeah. Perfect. Let me, can you see that? Yeah, yeah. Why do you keep the Pittsburgh Post Gazette?

Adam Energy, Hope is spiked by Einstein. He said that the energy of the atom is something that can never be tapped because the atom can't be shattered. Again, this is 1934. And he was quoted in 1932 stating there is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will. This was long after Otto Hahn had shown chain reactions that the atom could be shattered. And in 1920, he told his friend Alexander Moskovsky that atomic energy was impossible. But during the same period, and then after the war, he said, I do not consider myself the father

of the release of atomic energy. Oh my God! My part in it was quite indirect. I did not, in fact, foresee that it would be released in my time. But S. Tolver Preston formulated E equals MC square and designed an atomic bomb in 1875. And he utilized the formula, E equals MC square, where C is the speed of light. And he described how an atomic bomb could be made by subdividing matter into subatomic particles.

And this was before subatomic particles were even known by other people. And then Gustav LeBone in 1905. before subatomic particles were even known by other people. And then Gustav LeBone in 1905 talked about how if you took metal and broke apart its atoms, the scientist who did that with one gram of metal would blow up his whole neighborhood. So Einstein is falsely given credit for creating the concept of atomic bombs when he didn't even believe in it, he rejected it and he came along much later. Frederick Sadi forecast atomic energy in 1908 and his lectures were published in 1909. And then H.G. Wells wrote a book about atomic bombs and he called them atomic bombs

in 1914. In his book, The World Set Free. So all of this history, as you can see, has been terribly corrupted to favor Einstein and to make of him this great genius that he really wasn't. It's so crazy! It's so crazy. I mean... It is crazy. And it's in that book that I talked about 100 authors against Einstein. They talked about something called the Einstein terror.

And because there was this war between these two forces, the Einsteinians would set about to network together and destroy anyone's career who opposed the theory of relativity, or who accused and demonstrated Einstein's plagiarism. In the Soviet Union, in 1964, the Presidium of the Academy of Sciences effectively made it illegal to criticize Einstein or the theory of relativity. And they would put people in political psycho prisons and mutilate their brains with surgery and toxic drugs. And there was a man named Yuri Bravko who was subjected to this treatment, who wrote a book about it. And he led me to two articles by VA, Braunscheden, and E. Lifshitz, where they bragged

about the fact in scientific journals in the Soviet Union in 1968, that they would take people who demonstrated no abnormalities who were completely normal in every aspect, but had criticized the theory of relativity, and then put them into psychoprisons and treated them as if they were psychotics with surgery and psychoactive drugs and destroyed their minds. And that has always been referred to as the Einstein terror. Schipan Mohorovic, Mahorovich, forgive me for mispronouncing his name.

You're killing these names. You're doing great, by the way. I would be butchering every name you said, so you're doing awesome. Thank you. In the early 1920s, he began to expose the fact that that, that, that, that, that, that, that, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, th, to, th, to, to, the fact, th, the fact, to, to In the early 1920s, he began to expose the fact that he believed that Einstein had plagiarized the Puancare-Loren's theory of relativity and had plagiarized general relativity from Johann Georg von Soldner and Paul Garber,

and his life was threatened and his career was destroyed. Ernst Gerka published a Souden's paper. He and Philip Leonard published Soulner's papers and Gerber's papers to show that Einstein copied their Gerber's formula and Solnier's prediction from 1804 that the light passing around the sun would be bent by the gravitational field and that the light passing around the sun would be bent by the gravitational field and that the deflection would be twice what Newtonian gravity predicted. He predicted that in 1804 and Philip Leonard Skierka set up a meeting in the Berlin Phil Harmonic to expose all of these facts, and they republish these papers in the same journals that Einstein had published his papers plagiarizing these formulas and ideas.

And Einstein's only response was to personally attack them and defame them in the press. You know, again, if people would be like, why would they do that? I just think the powers of B love to make us feel that we are powerless, right? And even the most powerful and the most intelligent of us, they just want us to know that they're in control and that if you come up with this great idea, they have no problems. We're taking one of their people. Whoever that is, a puppet or anything like that if you come up with this great idea, they have no problems, we're taking one of their people, whoever that is, a puppet or anything like that, and putting into the floor and giving them all the credit, because it just causes, you know, division and fighting within each other, and we're all fighting with each other. We're not focusing on the bigger issue here. Now, for those who may not be familiar with the law relativity, what what exactly is the law relativity?

Onri Puancaire starting in 1895, right on through to 1905, but before Einstein published his paper on the theory of relativity in 1905, said that there would be no experiment that you could conduct which would show motion relative to absolute space. And therefore all motion is relative. It can only be determined based upon other objects that you correlate it to. And this came about because they believed in the ether. And the ether is the idea that space is either a fluid or a gas that transmits electromagnetic waves or transmits waves which generate gravity. So they try to explain how light propagates by means of this ether.

And they assumed that the ether was at rest. And because if the ether was at rest, light waves in that ether could be detected with apparatus called an interferometer on the earth, which would bounce light back and forth. Let me get a drink from a moment. So they assume that since the earth is traversing through this ether, the speed of light in one direction would be the speed of light plus the speed of the earth, and the speed of light in the other direction would be the speed of light in one direction would be the speed of light plus the speed of the earth, and the speed of light in the other direction would be the speed of light minus the speed of the

earth, so that as the light bounced back and forth through this interferometer, if you rotated the interferometer, the interference fringe patterns on the interferometer would change because the effective speed of light would change. And two gentlemen, Michelson and Morley conducted these experiments in the 1880s, but they weren't able to detect any change in the speed of light. So it began to appear that the speed of light was a universal constant, and you could never determine the frame of the ether, where you could get an addition of velocities together

with the speed of light, and that blew people's minds. Because you could have the Earth moving relative to the planet Saturn, but the same light source would be measured at the same speed by both even though they were moving relative to each other. So they started to conceive of the idea that perhaps bodies got shorter as they passed through the ether and that clocks would run slower as they passed through the ether so that when they measured the speed of light, it would always be measured to be the same.

So Poincare formulated this as the principle of relativity that there was absolutely no way to find which person was actually at rest relative to the ether. And then he eventually came to the conclusion that the ether didn't exist and that the laws of physics would be exactly the same, including the laws of electromagnetism and electrodynaics, would be the same for all observers, no matter what relative motion they had to one another, or if there is such a thing as absolute space or the ether, no matter what motion they had to one another, or if there is such a thing as absolute space or the ether, no matter what motion they had relative

to that. And then Einstein copied Poincaray's principle of relativity, verbatim. And Poincarrette in 1898 in a paper on the measurement of time, and then in a lecture he gave in 1904 in St. Louis, described a method for synchronizing clocks, where you would send light signals back and forth, and you would assume that the speed of light was 300,000 kilometers per second, and that therefore you could determine and synchronize your clocks based on how much time it took for the light to go from one messenger to the

other messenger. And then you could also have a different system in motion relative to that frame of reference where they would do the same process. And all the people would measure the speed of light to be the same, but the clocks would appear to be running slow relative from one system to the other system. Einstein in 1905 copied that exact synchronization method, virtually verbatim, and didn't mention Poincare. And then Poincare had a famous paper that was published in an Italian mathematics journal called Rondacanti about the dynamics of an electron, and he created the idea of spacetime

that if you took all these different reference frames and correlated them with what is called the Lorentz transformation, you would get a spacetime group and that nothing would actually move within this space-time, but the intervals would be absolute, so the universe itself is actually timeless, and nothing moves within the universe and everything coexist. And it is our consciousness when it makes measurements of events which separates time into the time of events and into temporal time and into spaces relative to the speed of light. And then Kofsky picked up on that

and created and highly developed the special theory of relativity, which Einstein has given credit for even though he never understood it. Unbelievable. That is unbelievable. But this idea that time doesn't really exist goes all the way back to the ancient Greeks.

Parmenides and Zeno and the Elyatics said that the universe is eternal and it is our only our process of becoming in consciousness which separates individual times and perceptions of our senses, create the illusion that we are traveling through time, but our bodies themselves are never the same from one moment to the next. So in effect, the universe is a giant block, and our bodies and our consciousness, are every moment that happens is eternal

and is simply a part of this space-time manifold, which is eternal, which is eternalthat happens is eternal and is simply a part of this space-time manifold which is eternal and contains within every instant that we perceive as part of the arrow of time and the flow of time. But in reality, nothing is ever changing and it is only the construction of our consciousness which creates the illusion that things are changing. That is crazy and I get it. That is just get, oh man, the universe is so interesting and all these man-main constructs just blow my mind. Time is an illusion is such an interesting thought, man. And I get it.

Not only time, but the nature of matter passing through time to the Greeks was considered an illusion. We are not the same person and the same stuff moving from one place to another. We are simply a consciousness which exists in different forms and different stuff that correlates through memories and premonitions and sensibilities of the present, all of these things into an image of time passing. This is very high-level stuff, which is difficult to understand. No, I love it. I love it. So like, there's no like 1978. Is that what we're talking about? No, it's the opposite. 1978 exists forever. Just as this moment that we are talking right now exists forever.

Everything is simultaneous and exists. It's almost like a book in a weird way with the pages all going on at one time in. Exactly. That's a wonderful analogy. And I'm going to steal it from you in the future. You can have it. I won't, I won't, I won't, I won't, Einstein you, you can have it. So that is so interesting. It's like 1978 is right now, just like 22 is right now. And it is an illusion that it's a different time, or it is a different time, but I'm just in a different part. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That's it. That. That. That's it. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It. It's it. It. It's it. It's it. It's it. It's it. It's it. It's it. It's it. It's it. It's that. It's that's that's that's that's that's that. It's that's that. It's that. It's it. It's it. It's it. Itthat it's a different time or it is a different time but I'm just in a different part.

That's it. That's it. Just as it, just as there are different places, like there are people on the other side of the earth right now, that's the way it is with events in time. But they're all part of the same manifold. And it is simply our consciousness, which is a part of that construct, which contains within the structure of our brain, the image, that we are the same psyche passing through these changing events. But the events aren't changing. We simply exist in different phases of this whole thing.

And Minkowski called them world points and world lines. But I think the great the grain, but I they they they they they they they they they they they they they they they think. they the they they they the they think. they they think. they they think. think. the they think think the think the think the their think. think the. the. the. the. the. the. the. th. th. th. their their their their their their their their th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. they they they they they they they are they are they are they are they are they're they're they're their the. the. the. the. theateate. theate. theate. the. theate. the. the. the. the. the. they're the of this whole thing. And Mankovsky called them world points and world lines, but I think the Greeks had a better understanding of it. And they didn't actually believe that it was the same matter being transported to different positions in space and time and space time. They believe that it was different matter, but everything coexisted. So right now, the future is happening as well. What we want to conceive as the future. Absolutely, yes. And your entire lifespan is not your mind moving through space and time. It is the sum total of all through space and time.

It is the sum total of all those leaves of that book. And none of them ever passes away or dies. Everything exists forever and has always existed. That is such a complex thought. That's one of the reasons why so many people rejected the special theory of relativity, because they didn't believe that. They believe that matter is conserved and a matter cannot be destroyed. Gustav LeBon blew all that out of the water.

Gustav Lebon was the first one to say that matter is energy and that matter evolves and slowly devolves and releases its energy into the ether and slowly disappears and that's why he predicted atomic bombs because he said that if you could release that energy for like example the half-life of plutonium, you have it slowly releasing its energy over the course of hundreds of millions of years, but when you can get it to release all that energy instantaneously, you get a nuclear bomb that explodes, and Gustav LeBone understood that. And he believed that the universe is undergoing a process of evolution where all atoms are slowly decaying and

Eventually will release and lose their energy into the ether and then cease to exist So he destroyed the concept of the conservation of energy and the conservation of matter, but Einstein never really understood that And that's why Gustav LeBong could conceive of atomic bombs, but Einstein couldn't. And it wasn't until 1939 that Leo Sillard and Eugene Vigner wrote a letter that Einstein signed to President Roosevelt saying that an atomic bomb would be possible. Einstein still didn't believe it. But he was persuaded by Cillard and Vigner to sign that letter because his prestige could be used, as you've described as you've witnessed in the comedy industry. His prestige was more valuable than his knowledge or his insight. And then when Jay Robert Oppenheimer started the Manhattan Project after Roosevelt

approved the letter and got it kicked off, he wanted nothing to do with Einstein. He excluded Einstein from the project because he knew that Einstein was a fraud and could contribute nothing to it and would be a security risk because Einstein wanted to create a world government. After World War II, he used nuclear bombs as a pretext to say that we need a world government to safeguard us from atomic bombs and it should be formed out of the United States, Great Britain and the Soviet Union. So again, it was always his prestige, which was more important than his insights, and it was very useful to people. And it was very useful to all those

who wrote books about Einstein and made all kinds of the thii. And they could assert all kinds of money out of it. And it was very useful politically. Do you think that he had a certain level of intelligence? Like he wasn't completely lack of an ability to articulate thoughts to a level that would allow him to be accepted as a leader in physicist and all that stuff? Do you think he had a certain amount of talent? That's a wonderful question that I have been chewing over for these 25 years that I've been

looking into this? I can read German and his written German is wonderful. He expressed himself very well in a very high standard of Hoek Deutsch German. But the people who met him said he had kind of a fog in his eyes. He looked dazed. He acted childlike. He gave very poor lectures. His lectures were scripted. He would contradict himself in his lectures. He described himself as having difficulty with mathematics and with language. He had difficulty with English and could never

speak English well. So there's this contradiction. And a lot of people who met him said that he was very childlike. And instead of being able to explain his own theories, when he would meet other scientists, he would grill them about their theories. And I've seen many scientists who said that he asked them to explain their theories to him as if they were explaining it to a child. And then after they would explain it to him, he would publish a paper mimicking their words for a baby.

Oh my. And this has been documented time after time. So I don't know. And there are many anecdotal stories about Einstein. He told Peter Bucky that he decided to live in a one-room apartment instead of a four-room apartment so that if he lost a button off of his shirt, it would be easier to find. And he said that he didn't brush his teeth because pigs' bristles could bore through diamonds and would destroy his teeth.

Oh my God. And there was a joke told about him, it's that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he decided that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he that he his teeth. Oh my God. And there was a joke told about him, it's an old joke, but that he bore two holes through his door, front door, one bigger than the other so that both the small cat and the big cat could go through. Oh, that's so funny, dude. So it's difficult to answer your question, and I don't know. If we can get into Malava Marich and the evidence that she co-authored his papers of 1905,

she was always viewed as the more intelligent one of the two. And Einstein wrote her a letter in 1902 stating that he would be happy and proud when the two of them together. And Einstein wrote her a letter in 1902, stating that he would be happy and proud when the two of them together had led their theory of relative motion to a victorious and successful end. So he himself, we have documentation stating that he identified her as his collaborator. And we have another letter in which he asked her to engage in this scientific collaboration on the relativity theory of Lorentz. In that book I showed you by Alexander Moskovsky, he has a section where he relates that Einstein told him

that Malévaava March was his scientific collaborator, but even now, more telling than all of that, one of the people who saw those manuscripts in 1905 was a physicist named Abram Yoffa. And Abram Yoffa went to visit Albert Einstein and he recorded these events in one of his articles. And he said that Einstein wasn't home, but he met Einstein's wife, Malayvamarich. And she told him that Albert Einstein was a nothing and he had no serious thoughts about science,

much less about experiments. And those words are directly from Abram Yaffa. But even more significant than that, Einstein died in 1955. Abram Yaffa left Germany during the Bolshevik Revolution to join the Bolsheviks, and he became one of the most prominent physicists in Russia. He wrote in Einstein's obituary in physics Uzbeki which was the major physics journal in the Soviet Union that the papers were signed not Einstein but Einstein Mariti. Well he said that the author of the papers was Einstein-Mariti. The only person to have ever gone by the name Einstein-Mariti was Malava Einstein-Marit. Her gravestone, the headstone says Malava-Einstein-Marity. Her death

certificate says Malava-Einstein-Marity. Her papers were all signed Malava Einstein-Mariti. So Yaffa revealed the fact that the real author of the paper was not Albert Einstein. It was Malava-Einstein Mariti. And then one of Yelfa's colleagues, Danil Dane wrote a book and he said that the papers were signed Einstein-Mariti. The famous papers of 1905 on the special theory of relativity, Brownian motion, and the photoelectric effect were all signed Einstein-Mariti, and the only human being to ever go by that name was Malayva Einstein-Mariti. Another telling fact is that when Einstein won the Nobel Prize, he didn't win it for the theory of relativity.

Because Oscar Edvard Veston, who was a prominent professor in Sweden, published an article in 1921 in the Naya Daglick Alejanda calling Einstein a plagiarist and saying that he was undeserving of the Nobel Prize premium. So they couldn't possibly give Einstein the Nobel Prize for the theory of relativity. But there was a corrupt director of the Nobel Prize Committee named O'Sayan who insisted that Einstein be given a prize. So he was given a prize for his quote, general contributions to science. And it was scandalous because Nobel himself said that the prize for physics could only be awarded for

physical discoveries, and Einstein had made none. So this created an international scandal that's never spoken of. My God! That is another interesting aspect of that is in the divorce agreement between Malava Einstein and Albert Einstein. It specified that if he won the Nobel Prize, all the money would go to Malava. So that indicates, and they anticipated it would be given for relativity theory. So that's further proof that it was Malava who wrote the prize and therefore deserved,

wrote the papers and therefore deserved the prize winnings. And when Einstein won it, he honored that and gave all the money to Malava. Then later in 1925, Malava wrote to Albert and we don't have her letter, but she said that she was going to publish her memoirs. And Einstein told her to shut up and keep her mouth shut because he was famous, but if she wrote her memoirs and told the truth that she had written the papers, and he didn't say this, and he didn't say this this this this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, thi thi thi thi thi thi thi thi thi thi thi thi thi thi, thi, this, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, th...... th, th, th, th, th, th, th. thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thi, thin, thin, thin, thin, thin, thin, thin, thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. thi. thi. ths and told the truth that she had written the papers, and he didn't say this, but this can be interpolated from what he said, that if she revealed the fact that she had written the papers and that the papers were plagiarized,

especially from Poincari and Lorenz, that Einstein would no longer be famous so there would be no more value in what she wrote. And he did say that that that that that that that that that th th th th th th th th thuui th thui thui thui thui thui thu-tod thu-s thu-a thu-o-mse tho-mo-mo-mo-mou-mo-mou, their their their their the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the their their their their their their thu. thu. thu. thui, thui, thui, thui, thu. tru. tru. trueu. trueu-mooooooooooooooo'-mo'-mou-mo'-mo'-mo'-mo'-s thui. longer be famous so there would be no more value in what she wrote. And he did say that, that her memoirs would be valueless if he ceased to be famous. And I'm just scratching the surface on all the proof that there is that it was Malayva Einstein Marriage, who was either the co-author or the sole author of these papers. Here's a thing, man. This is such an amazing discussion that I kind of want to hold off on any more deep, deep dives into it and bring you on my big, big show, which is Tim Fall Hat, which gets over 100,000 people listening. And I think you would really make a great impact

on that because you've really blow my mind here and I want people to be able to hear what you have to say. We could continue here but I just really want to get you on the big show to have you have a discussion. Are you open-minded to that? Oh, thank you so very, very much. That's one of the best opportunities in my life. Okay. So, so Are you open-minded to that? Oh, thank you so very, very much. That's one of the best opportunities in my life. Okay, so we'll make to happen. I'm gonna tell Mark that rush you on and get you on ASAP. Christopher, this has been a great show.

And I could, we could keep going. It's late nine to Friday. I don't want to keep up any later. And I would love to just to just to just to just to just to just to just to just to just to just to just to just to just just into this what we talked about and then hear any of the other info that you have on this because I know people are going to love this. Because I've heard this, I haven't heard the details you bring, but I've heard people talk about, you know, especially when it comes to Tesla and all that stuff and how people, I mean, I've heard this story so many times in entertainment.

It just blows my mind, man. And it just, it's crazy. It's crazy. Now, the final question I'll have, was he, did he have like, famous parents? Like, why him though? Like, I can understand them wanting to push a scientist. But why Einstein? What about, was his uncle, Chancellor, was like there was there something about Einstein

that he was just in this privilege group that they made him the guy? I don't think that was it. I think it's that Henri Poincaret created such a revolutionary concept of space and time, and also Bernhard Riemann created this theory of an ether sink and space and the idea of four-dimensional curve non-Uclidean geometry that Lobachevsky initiated. That was so mind-blowing and so revolutionary that when Einstein plagiarized it, it was seen as such a significant advancement in human thought that it got widely promoted and the ones who had originated

it got forgotten. And it all got concentrated on this one man. And again, they said that it was so significant and important, but it didn't change anything. Nobody's lives changed. Nikola Tesla created alternating current, which enabled power plants to transmit electricity to great distances, which Thomas Edison couldn't do with direct current. So Nikola Tesla impacted humanity, everybody's life around the world. Nothing changed when Einstein did it. It was

all hype, but it was hype based upon these concepts. For example, they would say you could have a hundred foot pole within side of a 50 foot barn and that just blew people's minds if the pole was traveling fast enough passing by. Like I said, when one thing moves relative to another, it appears to contract, and its clocks appear to run slower. And it was things like that that that people found so intriguing. And I think another big aspect of it was after World War I, people were super depressed. World War I sucked. It cost millions and millions of lives. People were disenchanted with the monarchy. Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany, Nicholas the second the Tsar of Russia and

George the 5th of England were all cousins. They thought that this family had conspired to bring the world into world war. Young men were slain in the prime of life. They lost their childbearing years and people thought the world sucked. So all of this enthusiastic hype about Einstein in 1919, right after World War I ended in November of 1918, gave people a lift. And they liked it. And they liked the idea that the English scientists had confirmed something that a German scientist had predicted.

So it enabled this rapprochement between the entant, the allies, and the German powers. And I think that played a huge role in promoting all of this. Unbelievable. So crazy. All right, Christopher. I appreciate you coming on. You've literally blown my mind. This is one of my favorite discussions I've ever had. And I look forward to you coming onto the big show and being to help you reach a lot of people to get this out because it blows my mind. And I think you're 100% correct. And it just sucks. It just sucks. You know, they've rewritten our history.

They've, you know, they've just put deceit and deceit and deceit in front of us. And it just makes me sad because there's some wonderful, brilliant mind people out there that never will get recognized for how incredible the discoveries are and how powerful their minds are. And then you got frauds out there getting all the discoveries are, and how powerful their minds are, and then you got frauds out there, getting all the glory, and it just sucks. And on the other side of it, if we can go back to researching theories of the ether,

even my own relatives, Wilhelm Björniss, had very significant physical theories, Vilhelm Dirkness significant physical theories. Wilhelm Bierkness is considered the father of modern meteorology. He created the whole science of meteorology. And his family members? Yes. Carl Anton Bjerkness had a theory that within the ether there are bubbles which pulsate.

And if space is a ideal frictionless fluid, these pulsations can explain magnetism and gravity. And he created machines where he would show pulsing spheres that would attract and repel based on how they were synchronized when submerged in fluids. Now I don't necessarily believe that's the correct theory. There are problems with it, but there are many really brilliant ether theories that we ought to be exploring instead of doing what Nikola Tesla and J.B. Stallo called reification of abstract non-Nuclidean geometry. And that really set physics back and prevented us from understanding how gravity works and

how magnetism works. And I think the ether theories can explain it and lead to actual physical experiments instead of mental experiments that will advance science far beyond what we understand today. So I've always had this understand like I've asked people to explain to me ether because I think it's such an interesting thing. I've had like discussions with people about what is ether And like for me some people have tried discover it but like like my between me and this phone right like that that whatever is between me and this phone is the ether. It is a conduit of energy that exists right at all times. What what is your thoughts on ether? I would love to hear and then we can wrap up.

But what is your thoughts on ether? It is a myth that space is nothingness and is empty. Even better example than between your phone and your hand would be between the planets. That empty space contains something and contains a tremendous store of energy. And there are many theories. It could be densely packed plasma of opposing charged particles, which transmit waves through the transition of those polarities with amplitudes of oscillation.

Think of it just like the air, that just between your mouth and my ears, if we were in the same room, it is the air which is the conduit of those sound waves. It is the medium. Yes. Yes. That is what the ether is.

It's the medium through which those vibrations, those waves pass. And there were many theories that matter itself is simply vortices that are spinning within that ether. And that's why they have inertia, and that's why they continue to exist. And there were concepts called vortex rings within the ether, in which it could be modeled that these would exist forever because they would be spinning vortices like smoke rings. Have you ever seen someone smoke a cigar and blow a smoke ring? You can see it spinning and pass through the air. That would be the same way that atoms are composed and they spin and pass through the ether. Thank you. I finally... So the ether is just a giant ocean.

Space is not empty, it's just a giant ocean and we are like fish in the ocean. We're not aware of the water around us. Yes. The fish cannot conceive of the water that they're within and we cannot conceive of the tangible nature of the ether that we're in. So, like, is ether only in space? I'm sorry, is this ether? Is the air ether? The air is particles within the ether. Okay, I got it.

You can compress it and weigh it. But it is, it is likely that those particles are themselves motions within that ether. It's so complex. Christopher. I appreciate you. This has been such a blessing of a conversation. You're probably one of the smartest people I've ever talked to. So it was a very, it was an honor to talk to you. It was a a conversation. You're probably one of the smartest people I've ever talked to. So it was a very, it was an honor to talk to you. It was a wonderful conversation. Do you have a website you'd like to send people to social media? Where is your book on Amazon?

Where would you like people to come and find you? Yes, my books are on Amazon and the best place to get to them is my website, C.J.B. Books.com. It is my initial C.J.B. Books.com with no spaces, hyphens or underscores. All right. And thank you so very much for that high praise. It was really a pleasure to speak with you and to get to meet you. Pleasure to talk to you. And I look look forward to the next our next conversation, which will hopefully happen in very, very, very soon. So I'm going to make that happen because this is a great topic. And I know my listeners and my fans and the people who love my show are going to eat it up. So we're going to get you on there and spread the word. So I appreciate you. Christopher. We'll talk to you soon. the the the the the the the the the the the the th. th. the th. th. th. the th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. to to to to to to to to the. to the. the to to to to to to to to to to toe. toe. toe. to be to be to be very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. th. the. the the. the. the. the. the. te. te. te. te. tea. tea. tea. to. toooooooooooo. Very. Very. Very. Very. te. So I appreciate you, Christopher. We'll talk to you soon and everybody else. Thank you so much for coming and joining us on this conversation. I have my mind blown all the whole, well, almost hour we went, man. So thank you guys so much for tuning in. I love you very much.

Have a great holiday weekend if you're in the United States. We'll talk to you soon. Take everybody.