Today, Explained - Bringing back the SAT

Episode Date: March 8, 2024

Four years after a pandemic pause, some colleges and universities are again requiring applicants to submit standardized test scores. Inside Higher Ed’s Liam Knox and the University of Delaware’s Dominique Baker explain. This episode was produced by Avishay Artsy, edited by Matt Collette, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Rob Byers, and guest-hosted by Jonquilyn Hill. Transcript at vox.com/todayexplained Support Today, Explained by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Do you remember taking the SATs? I remember it. I can't say I remember it fondly. I remember walking into the testing site with my perfectly sharpened number two pencils, my calculator, a lot of butterflies in my stomach. That's very relatable. But in the early days of the COVID-19 lockdown, colleges and universities dropped requirements for the test. Because of coronavirus, schools and colleges across the U.S. have closed their campuses

and now college standardized tests like the ACT and SAT exams are being canceled in an effort to prevent the spread. But now some schools are bringing the tests back. They're saying that SAT scores help them select a more diverse incoming class. Other schools are saying that, actually, looking at SAT scores is bad for diversity. Why the standards are changing for the standardized test and what that means for college-bound students. Ahead on Today Explained.

The all-new FanDuel Sportsbook and Casino is bringing you more action than ever. Want more ways to follow your faves? Check out our new player prop tracking with real-time notifications. Or how about more ways to customize your casino page with our new favorite and recently played games tabs. And to top it all off, quick and secure withdrawals. Get more everything with FanDuel Sportsbook and Casino.

Gambling problem? Call 1-866-531-2600. Visit connectsontario.ca. It's Today Explained. I'm Jonquan Hill, filling in as host today. Students across the U.S. are taking the SATs tomorrow, but not like how we remember them. Students have been walking in with those number two pencils up until this week, actually. Liam Knox covers admissions and enrollment at Inside Higher Ed. The college board rolled out its new exclusively digital SAT on Monday nationwide. And now no more pencil sharpeners, erasers, pencils. It's all done on the Bluebook app. It'll be done on tablets and laptops. It's a brave new world. The revamped exam will also be

shorter, shrinking from three hours to just over two, and will average out to more time per question. These changes are possible because the new version of the test is adaptive. This means questions will get harder or easier based on how a student does as the test moves along. So it's a really pivotal time, a time of great change for testing in more ways than one. Yeah, I want to talk more about that change. Bring us back a few years. When did colleges drop requirements for standardized test scores? Colleges started dropping those requirements in the spring of 2020, so about almost exactly four years ago. The next session of SAT exams is canceled due to coronavirus. The

College Board announcing today it's canceling SAT testing on May 2nd, and students will get a refund. When colleges started to realize it wasn't going to be feasible for students to get to testing sites in person, they essentially recognized pretty much universally that it wouldn't be fair to require the tests in the application process. I don't think colleges at the time had any sense that it would be more than just one application cycle. But the important thing to keep in mind is that for these colleges, pretty much across the board, that initial decision to go test optional was not an ideological one. It wasn't a policy decision. It was an emergency protocol. And so now we're starting to see colleges make their actual policy decisions, bring out research, and start to plan for their testing policies long term.

Where do things stand now across the country? You know, what are most schools doing right now when it comes to SATs? Most schools are still test optional. Obviously, the recent big news is that Yale and Dartmouth have reverted back to test requirements. Yale University tonight is the latest school reversing course, now requiring standardized test scores for college admissions after hundreds of schools shifted to test optional in recent years. Dartmouth College issuing a similar decision earlier this month after a study revealed

standardized test scores were a better predictor of academic success than a high school GPA. Other colleges, MIT and Georgetown, were the first to go back to test requirements in 2022. So some colleges have a mixed policy. Yale's is actually what's called test flexible, which means that they'll accept AP and IB scores in lieu of SAT and ACT if students want. It's similar to the University of Michigan's pandemic policy, which they just abandoned. So there's no real sign

which way colleges are going to go in general. But the vast majority are still test optional. Forty-something percent of colleges were test optional before the pandemic. It's just a question of how many will actually go back to test requirements after four years of this being the norm. It's kind of hard to put the genie back in the bottle. Are there common denominators between the schools that are choosing to be test optional and, you know, also between the schools that are choosing to bring the SATs back? The common denominator to a lot of the schools that were test optional before the pandemic and are very likely to stay test optional now is that they're much more open access. They may not, you know, have very low acceptance rates, but they are the schools that

serve the vast majority of college-going students in the country. They're much more affordable. They're often public institutions. The ones where it's a really open question are the more highly selective institutions. They represent a much smaller portion of colleges in the country. They also serve a much smaller portion of college-going students, but they are also very well-known names, and they tend to be flag bearers for these kinds of policies. And so they have an outsized impact in that way. Why are some of these schools bringing back test requirements if so many schools are remaining test optional? How are they explaining that decision? It's varied. MIT and Georgetown had similar reasons in 2022 for going back to test requirements. Theirs were mainly about academic standards, about ensuring student success at their institutions and beyond.

There are many students who attend schools where they do not have access to that advanced coursework. And for them, the SAT or the ACT are the best way for them to demonstrate their readiness to succeed in our curriculum. For Yale and Dartmouth, which made their decision this spring, they had another very significant consideration to make, which was last summer's Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action. You know, there are a lot of kind of backdoor conversations happening right now about what kinds of tools, whether it's income or doing away with standardized testing, what as a potential race-neutral way, so legal way, to increase or maintain diversity in the admissions process. Research has long shown that there's, at the very least, a socioeconomic bias to test scores,

that wealthier students do much better on the test on average. There's more debate over the racial correlation, but there's a lot of data that shows that it also skews toward white students. And so that's been a big subject of the discussion around testing as colleges reevaluate what they're doing going forward in light of the Supreme Court decision. So Yale and Dartmouth actually led with diversity and equity as their reasoning for returning to test requirements, which might seem strange to anyone who's been paying attention to the discussions and research around testing for the past decade or so. But they did their own kind of in-house research,

looked at their own applicant pools over the past four years with the test optional policy, and according to their research, having everyone's test scores or having some standardized measure on every application was a way to level the playing field and a way to see promising students from backgrounds and from districts that they maybe don't see a lot of. What's interesting is that the University of Michigan and a number of other colleges that have decided to go test-optional long-term came to the exact opposite conclusion in their own research. Michigan's research said that test-optional helped them recruit and admit a diverse class of students.

It diversified their applicant pool, so more students applied there who maybe didn't or couldn't for some reason take the SAT or the ACT. And in their admissions process, they were able to diversify their incoming class more successfully with a test-optional and test-flexible policy than they were previously with requirements. Okay, so that's a little confusing because how is it that you have two sets of schools taking opposite approaches to the SATs and

both are doing it for the same reasons. They have different research with different results. Like, what's happening here? What actually does help underserved students? It is enough to make the average reader or listener's head spin. But the short answer is that these institutions are conducting research specific to themselves and their applicant pools. They're using different metrics. And a lot of critics of standardized testing believe that essentially these are foregone conclusions supported with research to justify a decision that was made regardless. You know, I also remember being a high school junior with butterflies in my stomach, getting ready to take those SATs. I took them twice. I took the subject test too. I was fretting over GPAs and essays and all these things about my future. It's a lot to navigate.

And I wonder, what does this range of testing policies mean for students and families who are navigating the application process right now? It seems like so much is in flux. It absolutely is. And what it means is a lot more confusion to a process that is already very confusing, especially for students who come from families that maybe haven't had a lot of experience navigating the college-going process. It's not a world where there is one expectation across the board for what a student is going to want to include in their admissions packet, in their application. For some students in some states, taking the SAT is a graduation requirement. For students in California, if you are planning on even applying to the University of California system or the California State University system, two of the largest college systems in the country, you don't have to take the test at all. In fact, it won't benefit you if you do because those two systems went test blind in 2020.

They don't even consider it if you add it into your application. So I guess the 1600 score question is, you know, how important is the SAT these days? That is a question that I think won't be answered for another few years. It definitely depends on what kinds of schools you're applying to. For students applying to the very selective institutions, a lot of them have made it pretty clear, even if they are going test optional, that they value the test score, that it gives them another data point that's useful to them in making admissions decisions. But in terms of how ubiquitous tests like the ACT and SAT are, which have been ubiquitous pre-pandemic, a lot of colleges are waiting to make those decisions.

That's in large part because the data that with learning loss, with the struggles of adapting your admissions process to a crisis like that. So it's a question that's very much still up in the air. And I think it's going to be up in the air for the next few years, at least. That's Liam Knox at Inside Higher Ed. Coming up, are we a little too focused on the Ivy League? Support for Today Explained comes from Ramp. Ramp is the corporate card and spend management software designed to help you save time and put money back in your pocket. Ramp says they give finance teams unprecedented control and insight into company spend. With Ramp, you're able to issue cards to every employee with limits and restrictions

and automate expense reporting so you can stop wasting time at the end of every month. And now you can get $250 when you join Ramp. You can go to ramp.com. ramp.com. Cards issued by Sutton Bank. Member FDIC. Terms and conditions apply. BetMGM, authorized gaming partner of the NBA, has your back all season long. From tip-off to the final buzzer, you're always taken care of with a sportsbook born in Vegas. That's a feeling you can only get with BetMGM. And no matter your team, your favorite player, or your style,

there's something every NBA fan will love about BetMGM. Download the app today and discover why BetMGM is your basketball home for the season. Raise your game to the next level this year with BetMGM, a sportsbook worth a slam dunk and authorized gaming partner of the NBA. BetMGM.com for terms and conditions.

Must be 19 years of age or older to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have any questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Support for this show comes from the ACLU. The ACLU knows exactly what threats a second Donald Trump term presents. And they are ready with a battle-tested playbook.

The ACLU took legal action against the first Trump administration 434 times. And they will do it again to protect immigrants' rights, defend reproductive freedom, fight discrimination, and fight for all of our fundamental rights and freedoms. This Giving Tuesday, you can support the ACLU. With your help, they can stop the extreme Project 2025 agenda. Join the ACLU at aclu.org today. Pencils down, everyone. Time's up. Time's up?

I haven't even started. It's Today Explained. I'm Jonquan Hill, sitting in the host chair today. Dominique Baker is an associate professor of education and public policy at the University of Delaware. But she actually got her start working in admissions at her alma mater, the University of Delaware. But she actually got her start working in admissions at her alma mater, the University of Virginia. The SAT score was just one of many different pieces of information that I was using to try to better understand the education context of students. So that included thinking about the courses that they've taken based on what's offered at their school, their grades, test scores, yes, but also their essays, their extracurriculars, there's a whole host of

piece of information that had to be filtered in and the test score was not on its own more important than those other pieces of information. Have the SATs become more or less important as a deciding factor through the years? How has their impact on, you know, admissions changed? It really depends. There are some institutions that will really weight heavily students' test scores. And there are other institutions that like, oh, sure, that's one piece of the pie. But like this doesn't tell the entire academic story of a student. So nothing happens in a vacuum. And last summer, the Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions. How is that factoring into colleges' current decisions on whether or not to bring the SAT requirement back? I think a lot of institutions are trying to

create an environment where both students can feel that they might be welcome at that institution, and so they're more willing to apply, and trying to give themselves as many tools in their arsenal as possible to be able to assess what an incoming class would look like that fulfills their missions and goals. And I think that's what we're seeing a number of institutions do is say, are there ways that we can potentially make some of our requirements more flexible in light of the Supreme Court's decision in order to give us the best opportunity possible to create a strong incoming class with strong being whatever is defined by their mission. So there's this handful of elite schools that say they're bringing back the SATs and

they're doing it in part to ensure a diverse campus. But in light of the Supreme Court ruling, what else can schools do to ensure diversity in their incoming classes? I mean, it depends on the university. There are some universities that operate within states that have top X percent plans, right? So they say sort of, if it was the top 8%, then the students who are ranked in the top 8% of their high school have automatic admittance to a certain institution or a certain set of institutions in the state. There are institutions that have decided to go test free or test optional, as we've talked about. There are institutions that have decided that they will add an essay question that explicitly asks about students' experiences

with their race, their income, et cetera, et cetera, and to talk through sort of what has led them to this point, the ways that they might want to engage with the institution, etc., etc. So there are a lot of these types of steps, but part of the really big challenge is the best decision for one institution may not be the best decision for another institution. Colleges say they want a diverse campus, and that is a good thing. But I guess the question that, you know, we don't really talk about a lot is why, you know, there are all these different types of institutions. There are state schools, there are HBCUs, there are small liberal arts colleges, there are elite institutions, public institutions, but they all talk about diversity.

What is the ultimate goal of that diversity on campus? lines, but including diversity along racial ethnic groups, you see that people are able to learn better. They are more creative after taking classes that are racially diverse, diverse along income lines. There's actually really strong social science evidence that is just sort of all piled up that points to the fact that diversity enhances the learning mission of colleges and universities. But even beyond that, for some institutions, right, they see themselves as a part of upholding the sort of democratic fabric of our country. They are interested in contributing to the health and sort of social advancement of our country. And for institutions that care about those types of things, diversity can matter a lot because those types of institutions frequently see themselves

as linchpins in ensuring that higher education can fulfill those goals. The thing is, though, the majority of institutions that are typically doing that type of work are often sort of community colleges and regional public institutions, which are not institutions that use holistic admissions or are using test scores in the way that we are talking about when we think of Harvard and Yale and those places. I'm glad you brought up, you know, the Harvards, the Yales, because when we're talking about the SAT coming back in particular, we're talking about schools that serve a small percentage of students, right? I mean, your Dartmouth's, your Yale's, your Georgetown's, your MIT, that's not where most graduates are coming from, are they? That's completely accurate. You know, I'm currently doing a study where we

are looking at the institutions in the United States that have an acceptance rate of 50% or less. And that's only around 185 institutions in the country. Wow. Out of the thousands of institutions in our country, the majority of institutions that educate students in the United States, except the majority of people who apply to them, period. Like that is the reality of the American higher education system. And so in some ways, I think it can be valuable to talk about the types of, you know, sort of quote unquote elite institutions, because they have sort of stranglehold on pathways to certain types of jobs and opportunities. But the ultimate reality is that if you care about social mobility in our country, and if you care about what the democratic

aims are of higher education, then you care about community colleges and regional public universities. Are we thinking too much about these elite schools instead of these other schools that, you know, the other 99% of students go to? Like, I did not go to Harvard, but I kid you not, I feel like I have heard more and talked more about Harvard than I have talked about my own alma mater, probably since homecoming. Like, I did like, who went here? Why are we like, ain't nobody go here? Why are we still talking about this? You know, it's just, it's very silly. So yeah, I think we focus a lot on the institutions where quite frankly, a lot of the people who work in the media or the people who have jobs like me attended. And that creates a sort of lopsided environment where we don't always focus on the sectors of higher education that in some ways might be the most important.

Like I was just reading about the transition from the coal industry to renewable energy in West Virginia. And one of the biggest points that they mentioned was that some people who were trying to reskill were going to community colleges to learn about how to work with wind turbines. that is the goal and the mission and the power of higher education way more than thinking about who got the chance to go to a fancy school. How do you see the SATs kind of fitting into that vision when you look towards the future of college admissions? I think the challenge becomes that I often find that a lot of institutions are not necessarily honest with themselves or their sort of stakeholder groups social desirability space if you as an institution right like it's hard for an institution like to go out and with their whole chest say we like rich people yeah love them rich people are dope they come here they'll give us money for this little building right like it's hard to say that um some institutions do it with their actions, but it's challenging for them to flat out say that. So I think that realistically, what we are frequently seeing is that the SAT, the ACT, that these test scores

generally, the decision about whether or not to include them in a part of an admissions process, I think that it's presented in a way that what one institution does, all institutions must do. That sort of there is a one capital T truth when it comes to college admissions. So if Harvard says that they went test optional during the pandemic, and now they've decided that they want tests again, that that means that that's right for every institution. And sort of, you know, the hope, again, to come away from this is holistic admissions is about each institution making decisions for itself. And when I think about that vision of what a future society looks like, I really think

that's a matter of institutions saying, what do we think our actual role is in the larger fabric of our society? And let's be honest about that. And then we make our decisions about our admissions process based on that. And that includes that institution's unique context, their applicant pool, what their goals are. So I think that really emphasizing institutions having a hard look at themselves and then suiting their admissions to that is the clearest pathway forward. We'll see if that can actually occur. That's Dominique Baker at the University of Delaware. Today's show was produced by Avishai Artsy, edited by Matt Collette, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, and mixed by Rob Byers. I'm John Glynhill, and this is Today Explained. claimed.