Today, Explained - Pop culture is conservative now

Episode Date: December 12, 2025

Why books, movies, music, and fashion all took a turn to the right. This episode was produced by Peter Balonon-Rosen, edited by Jolie Myers, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and David Tatasciore, and hosted by Noel King. Actors Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in the movie "Rush Hour 2," circa 2001. President Trump reportedly has been lobbying for another installment of the movie. Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images. Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. New Vox members get $20 off their membership right now. Transcript at ⁠vox.com/today-explained-podcast.⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

President Trump said many wild things this year, but one of the wildest was on Pod Force One, where he talked about this multi-day aptitude test. He took at the age of like 11 or 12. They said, your son is brilliant at music. He'd be an incredible musician. Alas. This is not what my father wanted to hear. Right out of college, Trump tried producing Broadway shows, and he has taste. You can argue about whether it's good taste, but Trump loves music and movies. and architecture, L.O.L. And he's been using his time in office to shape popular culture.

The culture was already moving right. It was embracing the trads and the chads. And so in the waning days of 2025, we're looking at how the counterculture long the province of lefties and hippies moved swiftly and sharply right. And we're going to ask if it'll ever move back. That's coming up on Today Explained. Today is going to be... Explain. See you. My name is Max Tani.

I'm the media editor at Semaphore, and I'm the co-host of our media podcast Mixed Signals. So, we have Warner Brothers. We have Netflix. We have Paramount. Walk us through what exactly happened here. So Netflix announced that it was acquiring Warner Brothers. Netflix has inked a deal with...

with Warner Bros. Discovery. Netflix is about to buy Warner Brothers, and it's actually a huge deal for the Lord of the Rings community. Let me explain. I hate this. I don't want fewer studios. I want more studios.

This goes back to earlier this summer when the Ellison family finalized its purchase of Paramount. As soon as the merger was completed, they moved and turned their attention to Warner Brothers. Warner Bros. Rejected not one, but two bids from Paramount.

Paramount made three bids to buy the company over the past couple of weeks. It has now made six different offers for Warner Brothers Discovery. It's been rejected each time. So they made this attempt to kind of quickly combine with Warner Brothers with the idea that then they could be a true competitor in streaming with Netflix. Netflix, on the other hand, realized, saw that this was coming and also saw an opportunity to get its hands on one of the major Hollywood and entertainment companies in the Warner Bros. Studios, which has produced some of the most iconic

series and franchises and movies in the world, you know, Casablanca. It is looking at you, kid. They have the rights to the DC cinematic universe, which is Batman. Why so serious? As well as a lot of prestige television in HBO, in The Sopranos. All this from a slice of gabagal. And White Lotus. These gays, they're trying to murder me.

These great television properties. And in the end, I think a lot of people see that. this as the CEO of Warner Brothers, David Zazlov, preferring the bid from Netflix. And yet, Paramount, being Paramount, the Ellisons being the Ellisons, had to respond. How did they respond when Netflix won? They announced that they were launching a hostile takeover attempt of Warner Brothers and that they were going to essentially appeal directly to the Warner Brothers shareholders saying that they have a better deal. It appears that maybe the seventh time is the charm for Paramount. We literally submitted $30 a share in cash, never got a phone

call, never got a response. And that's why we're here today. We're here to finish to make sure that we can take directly to shareholders the offer that we sent to the board. So you never got a response. They have offered an all cash bid for the entire company. So Paramount is saying, hey, we're willing to go directly to shareholders. They're also hinting that they have a better relationship with the Trump administration and federal regulators. It was revealed this week, that Jared Kushner is one of the individuals who is providing some money, backing Paramount's bid for Warner Brothers discovery. Trump, crucially, when he was asked about this, this week, said,

I don't know. I've never spoken. We don't really know if that's true or not. There is a world in which the president of the United States is not remotely involved in business dealings such as these. However, that is not the world in which we live. Donald Trump is the president, and he is involved here. How, exactly? Trump is being overt about how he wants to be involved in this deal.

He literally said in an interview. I'll be involved in that decision. And all of the parties who have some sort of a stake in this deal are acting that way as well in appealing to Trump. Ted Sarandos, the CEO of Netflix, has made multiple trips to the White House, one in which he met with Trump and talked about this. The Ellison's David and Larry Ellison have both appealed to Trump saying, arguing their side of this situation. Both sides are staffing up with lobbyists and people who are

from Trump's orbit, thinking that they can kind of get the inside track that way. And Trump is repeatedly kind of weighing in here, saying that he is going to take a look and that he is concerned about some monopoly situations, at least in the case of Netflix. I have to see what percentage of market they have. But that, as he put it... None of them are particularly great friends in mind. You know, the narrative around the Ellicons, you know, a month ago, two months ago was Donald Trump is friends with the Ellicons and he is going to allow them to get what they want here. Ted Sarandos and Netflix do not seem to have accepted that as fact. And so it's worth asking, Max, what does Trump want here?

Hilariously enough, that's the big question and the one that none of us really know the answer to. You're right that the Ellisons have a longstanding good. relationship with Trump. And that's something that they've made no secret of. And Trump has spoken very highly of the Ellicence and said that he really liked the way that they were stewarding Paramount. On the flip side, Trump has been reportedly has been very impressed by Ted Sarandos and seems to like him. And, you know, crucially enough, Netflix doesn't also have a news division. So there's not like this nightly or daily stream of content that's pissing off the administration and the White House. And so I think that that also plays a role

here. All right. So President Trump clearly wants to be involved at 3,000 feet in the business of all of this. But the president recently has also expressed some interest in being in the mix of what is getting made in Hollywood and elsewhere. Tell me about rush hour for, Max. Yeah. So last month, I got this amazing. tip that Donald Trump had been telling people that he was lobbying the Ellison's to make another installment of the movie Rush Hour. The amount will be $50 million. $50 million?

And who do you think you kidnap Chelsea Clinton? It was one of those tips that I was like, this is too good to be true. There's just no way. And it turned out it was exactly true. Trump had been talking to Larry Ellison saying that he should bring back this a buddy cop comedy series starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker. And, you know, I kind of raised some questions for me, like, is Trump a huge fan of this series? Is he like watching the reruns of this on TNT or something? But actually, it turned out as at all, as many things do with Trump,

to have a lot to do with his own personal relationships. The longtime kind of overseer, creator director of the Rush Hour series, Brett Ratner, also has a personal connection to Trump. He is the director of this upcoming Amazon documentary about Melania Trump. You know, I have heard that he's spent more time hanging around Mara Lago and has a friendly relationship with the president. One imagines that that played a certain role here. Brett Ratner kind of got drummed out of Hollywood because he was credibly accused of sexual misconduct. And this is one of those things that for the Trump administration, feels like a bit of a hobby horse. You find someone who's been accused of, you know, Me Too or racism, whatever, and you're like, the woke warriors went wild. This never should have happened.

Do you see the attempted rehabilitation of Mr. Ratner as like part of a whole when we talk about the Trump administration's approach to culture? I think that certainly Trump has no scruples and many of the people in his circles have very few scruples about. bringing back or working with people who've been credibly accused of serious misconduct. And they've found that often some of these folks have common enemies in the kind of

censorious media, as they kind of put it. I think also in a certain way, they feel that some of these figures can be kind of like acquired on the cheap, essentially. And you see this in a lot of cases with people who Trump gets close to Mel Gibson, who has not been accused of those things as far as I know. You guys maybe should check that. The comedian Russell Brand and others, certainly. What do we know about what kind of culture President Trump really likes? Donald Trump's taste in culture and entertainment really is all over the place with a few

uniting themes, I would say. Trump loves classic action. macho kind of content. You see this with the people who are on his Hollywood Council, Sylvester Stallone. Hi, my name is Rocky Balbo. They're tired of time. John Voight. Do not tell me it can't be done.

Mel Gibson. They may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom. He's definitely proven that he is interested in this kind of testosterone and fueled a version of the world. Now, that doesn't keep him from blasting cats. And the Phantom of the Opera.

At campaign events and at the White House. But he's a classic fan of both Broadway and macho movies and movie stars from the 80s and 90s. You wrote that Trump's return to power marked the triumph of a cultural red lash that has been brewing for years. What did you mean? I think a lot of people close to Trump and a lot of people who supported him believe that 2024 and his re-election was a vindication of their worldview.

And they saw this in the strength of the growth of independent podcasters and the kind of Manosphere figures like Joe Rogan and Theo Vaughn and, you know, their willingness to openly support Trump and kind of chop it up. So you're way up with cocaine more than anything else you can think of. Okay, it'll turn you into a damn owl, homie, you know what I'm saying? I always got more publicity than other people, and I didn't, it wasn't like I was trying. In fact, I don't know exactly why. Maybe you can tell me what you can definitely tell you.

You said a lot of wild shit. They saw this as a vindication that this was really the mainstream culture and that, you know, kind of this anti-Trump culture, cultural backlash that had kind of emanated from the traditional gatekeepers in Hollywood and these other places just had lost some currency with a lot of mainstream Americans. You know, they pointed at the popularity of country music. You know, there's been these big debates over whether people like Morgan Wallen, you know, do they, is he kind of a. Trump supporter. You know, I think that a lot of people who like Trump and are very pleased by this have pointed out all of those signs and the popularity of country music, bro, podcasters, and Trump's re-election and said, this is mainstream American culture. That was Semaphore's Max Tani. Coming up, everyone's a critic. JK., JK, JK, JK. But our next guest is,

and he's going to explain how culture moved so far to the right. Support for today's show comes from Give Well. It can be hard to know which nonprofits have the most impact on people's lives, says Give Well. That's why Give Well focuses on measuring impact. Givewell says it is an independent resource that offers transparent research about great giving opportunities. Givewell's been around for 18 years researching global health and poverty alleviation and says it only directs funding to the highest impact opportunities that they've found. They say they've spent more than 70,000 hours on research to help donors fund highly cost-effective programs that save or improve lives and ring the most out of your every dollar. So when you're giving to charity, you can check out Givewell. it's an independent resource for rigorous, transparent research. To make a tax-deductible donation today, go to givewell.org and pick podcast and enter

Today Explained at checkout. Make sure that they know you heard about Givewell from Today Explained. Again, that's givewell.org to donate or to find out more. Canada can be a global leader in reducing the harm caused by small. but it requires actionable steps. Now is the time to modernize Canadian laws so that adult smokers have information and access to better alternatives. By doing so, we can create lasting change.

If you don't smoke, don't start. If you smoke, quit. If you don't quit, change. Visit unsmoked.ca. Get you and your crew to the big shows with Go Transit. Go connects to all the main concert venues like TD Coliseum in Hamilton and Scotia Bank Arena in Toronto

and Go makes it affordable with special e-ticket fairs. A one-day weekend pass offers unlimited travel across the network on any weekend day or holiday for just $10. And a weekday group pass offers the same weekday travel flexibility

from $30 for two people and up to $60 for five buy yours at go-transit.com slash tickets. Today explained W. David Marks, no relation, is a cultural critic and author of the new book, Blank Space, a cultural history of the 21st century. So David writes that in the waning years of the 20th century, pop culture got very stale, that dominant culture was liberal, it was centrist, it was Clintonian,

and so a counterculture emerged embodied by Vice Magazine. And Vice Magazine in the 21st century in New York City was primarily a hedonistic and nihilistic kind of downtown subcultural product, but Gavin McKinnis, one of the founders, started inserting very quietly these right-wing transgressive ideas into it. But what I enjoy most is infiltrating different subcultures to figure out what really makes him tick. And that started with boldly using racial slurs in which he, you know, became very controversial. I don't think there's anyone who knows Gavin in any way that hasn't heard him drop the unbomb.

Oh, constantly. He loves it. But then also doing an essay for the American conservative in which he said he was going to convert hipsters to conservatism. Finally, the dumb community's days are numbered. Young liberals are slowly but surely being replaced with a new breed of kid that isn't afraid to embrace conservatism. I don't think necessarily that everything starts from there, but it begins the idea that in the 21st century, if you want to be transgressive, which is a big part of cool, that right-wing supplies more fuel for the, that. And so then you get to 4chan and these internet, anonymous internet sites where people are trying to be as transgressive as possible and where they end up is being often quite bigoted and anti-liberal. And as that kind of, you know, snowballs into the broader culture, there's

the sense, you know, with the ascendancy of woke to break the chains of this liberal oppression that we have to be very conservative. And so white men in particular have kind of reembraced this transgressiveness is their call to power. What leads me to look at something like Vice at that time and think, oh, that's so cool? I'm having a response to what came before. What was it? So I think especially in the Bush years, with the Iraq War and the Iraq War being increasingly a disaster, you have things like Green Day's American Idiot.

Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9-11. Of course, not a single member of Congress. wanted to sacrifice their child for the war in Iraq. Hail to the Thief, the Radiohead album. So this kind of anti-Bush, sentiment powers a lot of the pop culture that is happening. Obama really comes out of that groundswell of looking for somebody who can be a new form of resistance

against conservatives. Yes, we can. Yes, we can. Yes, we can. Yes, we can. And yet the culture that follows from those years, I think, is more marked by what you would call kind of pop-thamist music and culture, which is a real kind of embrace of earnestness and straightforward pop and melodies. And so you have things like Katie Perry's California Girls. You have The Rise of Taylor Swift.

And you have shows like Glee. 25% show tunes, 25% hip-hop, 25% classic rock. 100% gay. Ideas of liberal inclusivity did float to the top. HBO Girls is kind of like a hybrid of that bisesthetic and the earnestness. I am 13 pounds overweight, and it has been awful for me my whole life. The kind of anti-liberal side of the right wing was getting more and more alienated from what they're seeing on TV or the music they're listening to, which is it did not reflect their particular values.

And so so much of the backlash against the Obama years was not just even a political one. It was a cultural one of a giant swath of the United States feeling like they were being left out of the culture and they really wanted someone to come back into power and give them a little bit more symbolic glory and it's easy to see Trump in those kind of cultural terms. So in many ways, this swing to the right

is inevitable. There's just a natural pendulum swing. If you have transgressiveness be the central value of popular culture and the coolness is the supreme virtue of consumer culture, then if you have a sense that liberals have the power and that power can be political power, it could be economic power, it could be cultural power, then transgressiveness obviously can be re-enpowered and reinvigorated on the right because they're fighting against that system. I remember hearing someone talk about Charlie Kirk after he was assassinated, and they characterized it as he would go to a college campus and say, you are allowed to have sex out of wedlock, you are allowed to drink, you are allowed to do drugs, you are allowed to do everything that the kids in the 60s and 70s like marched in the streets so that they could do. Like this was cool, but it's not anymore because you don't have to fight. You don't have to fight the authorities. to have sex with your boyfriend or girlfriend.

You don't have to fight the authorities to smoke weed. The true rebellious thing is to get married. The truly rebellious thing is to go to church. The truly rebellious thing is to not smoke weed. Help me understand the relationship between a guy like Charlie Kirk understanding, kids today don't need to rebel to smoke weed. They actually need to rebel and tell their parents like, guys, we're going to go to church.

and where this country is politically. Culture is about conventional decision-making. And so there's a part of everything we do where we're asking, you know, what is the group that we're in and what is the beliefs that we have? You know, we imitate the people in our group. At the same time, what that breeds

is something called counter-imitation, which is that a group that says, we're not that group, just does the opposite practice to show that they're different. And so I think so much of conservative, conservative politics, all it is is counterimitation. Now we're at a point where premedital sex and drugs are not taboo anymore. And so if you want to show that you're not part of that group, you do the opposite of that. And so the idea that it is to be cool and rebellious by going

to church is just a very simple counterimitation of the counterimitation. So at the end of the day, the pendulum is going to keep swinging, right? President Trump may be in the Oval Office demanding to have rush hour for and doing whatever he's doing at the Kennedy Center. But I wonder if already, we're 12 months into his second term, I wonder if already you see the pendulum starting to swing back in the other direction, or do you think a kind of conservative culture will hold on for a while longer, be cool and transgressive for a while longer?

I do think the fashion trend, and it really feels like a fashion of being anti-liberal, it has some legs in the sense that if you compare the women's march and the no kings rallies, no kings, the general aesthetic sense of that rally is that it is boomers, it's people's parents. Yeah. It's very normie. So we now move on to the Antiquefa portion of our coverage of the no king's rally. These inflatable suits everywhere you go. People are party. Where'd you get that suit? I bought it. Amazon, but you know, I don't really. It doesn't really they have this kind of pop culture edge to it. And then you go back to the women's march.

Massive crowd of women marching behind me. This is the front line, and they're pretty aft. Obviously, there's the use of Beyonce's formation. It's kind of a major pop cultural moment there. There's the pussy hat. And then you have things like Black Lives Matter, protest, and Kendrick Lamar is all right being associated with that. so there was more of a linkage between pop culture and the resistance in 2016 and i think

we're not quite there in terms of pop culture going back to full resistance mode that's still in people's memory quite fresh and there is something cringe about it in that it feels like an old stale fashion trend and so really until that gets forgotten or there's a new kind of resistance that does feel properly transgressive i think it's because hard for this political wave against Trump to be fully enmeshed in a pop-cultural moment. W. David Marks. His book is Blank Space, A Cultural History of the 21st Century. Peter Ballin-on-Rosen produced today's show, Jolie Myers edited, Laura Bullard checked the facts, Patrick Boyd and David Tadishore engineered. Many thanks to Vox's Constance Grady, Kendall Cunningham, and Christian

Paws. I'm Noelle King. It's Today Explained. Support for this show comes from Odu. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing O-DU It's the only business software you'll ever need It's an all-in-one fully integrated platform That makes your work easier CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more

And the best part, O-Doo replaces multiple expensive platforms For a fraction of the cost That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch So why not you? Try O-D-O-4-free at O-D-O-D-com That's O-D-O-O-O-O-com Thank you.