Today, Explained - Should we privatize TSA?
Episode Date: March 30, 2026The US government shutdown has left TSA workers unpaid, airports a hot mess, and a lot of people wondering if it's time to privatize airport security. This episode was produced by Danielle Hewitt, ed...ited by Amina Al-Sadi, fact-checked by Andrea Lopez-Cruzado, engineered by Patrick Boyd and David Tatasciore, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram. A TSA agent looks on passengers at New York's LaGuardia airport. Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP via Getty Images. Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. New Vox members get $20 off their membership right now. Transcript at vox.com/today-explained-podcast. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
By this point, you've surely heard that we're living through the longest government shutdown in the United States history.
It's the reason for all the chaos at our airports. Democrats don't want to give ICE any more money.
The president has shown little to no interest in negotiating.
But then ahead of the Easter recess, the president said he'd find a way to pay TSA agents.
So all of a sudden, maybe the shutdown was sort of bunk.
Early Friday morning, the Senate was also busy.
They unanimously pass a funding deal.
Then they take off for their two-week recess.
But then far-right Republicans in the House hated it because it still didn't fund ICE.
so they reject it, pass a version that funds ice, and then they take off for their two-week recess, fixes nothing.
Around this time, TMZ enters the chat, posts a call-out for photos of lawmakers vacationing at our expense while we have to suffer through airport chaos.
Pretty quickly, they get a shot of Lindsey Graham and Disney World.
You might remember Lindsay from helping kick off the war in Iran.
The latest news is that TSA agents got their back pay at some point today,
but we're still not sure if they're going to get regular paychecks moving forward, so we're going to check in with a TSA agent on today, Explain from Vox.
When is the AI bubble going to burst?
How do you AI proof your job?
How should colleges handle AI and prepare students for a shifting job market?
I'm Henry Blodgett, and on my show, Solutions,
I've been exploring all of those questions and more with experts who have actual answers.
We hear enough about our problems.
Let's solve them.
Follow Solutions with Henry Blodgett.
My name is Satyana Finley.
I am the American Federal.
of government employees, local 556, fair practice coordinator that represent transportation
security officers from central Florida all the way to the panhandle.
Wow.
I am also a TSA officer.
Perfect.
So it seems like you're a good person to talk to in this moment where there's a lot of people
frustrated with what's going on with the TSA.
And of course, TSA agents must be wildly frustrated.
How long have you been a TSA officer?
I'm almost at 22 years.
Wow. Wow. That's a long time.
Correct.
And what made you want to be a TSA officer? Why'd you join?
I remember when 9-11 happened.
I used to work at the airport in one of the food joints,
and I was supposed to report to work on the day that 9-11 happened.
Of course, we got there, we got turned away.
I was just, I had just turned 17.
when 9-11 happened.
And I'm like, well, what's another way of serving my country
without actually joining the military?
And this was my answer.
So I ended up growing up there.
And a lot of the people that, you know,
were part of my class ended up shaping sort of, you know, who I am today.
You know, I'm really proud of my job.
And I was in the whole, you know, this is a stable job.
It's a federal job.
not everybody can have a federal job.
This is just a stepping stone.
And so here we are still, almost 22 years later.
Okay, so you like the stability when you start.
Do you remember your first government shutdown?
Yes.
When was it?
It was 2013.
Did it change how you felt about the stability of your job?
It didn't because it was very short-lived.
But, you know, things have changed since then.
And then we didn't experience another shutdown until 2019, actually end of 2018, 2019.
That was a little bit longer.
At that time, I had already met my now husband.
And we were living together.
We're both working for the agency.
And we're like, oh, there is no income coming in.
So what started as a fun office romance,
turned into something kind of scary.
Correct.
This shutdown that we're still in, as we're speaking right now on Monday morning,
is the longest in TSA history.
What's been the hardest part for you and your family,
presuming that you and your husband both still work for TSA, obviously, right?
Yes, yes, yes.
It feels so helpless.
Like, I felt helpless in certain situations.
where I've heard of my officers talking about, you know,
not having electricity and having children at home.
Facing eviction, not having life-saving medication.
And it angers me because that I'm like,
no one should have to face this.
Not when they're employed.
Are you and your family facing stuff like that, too?
Thankfully, we haven't.
yet. Shutdowns kind of have become a cycle. It's become a norm. Now it's do we also have to prepare
for another shutdown in October. If appropriations were to pass at any given time now, right?
In October, our fiscal year ends. Do we need to prepare for another shutdown then?
I have heard of officers saying, listen, this is no longer a stable job for me.
Whether I am a single, you know, a single parent home and not able to make ends meet because we don't know when my paycheck is going to come or they're being sole caregivers of their household.
And, you know, they depend on their salary to be able to provide care for their family members.
They're like, if this continues, I don't see myself lasting long.
Yeah, what kind of a toll does this take on you mentally to have to go through this over and over again?
So much uncertainty.
It's gotten to the point where in my head, like, sometimes, sometimes days feel harder than others.
I can say that much.
For me, especially on those days when things are hard,
I'm like, you know, I can only deal with one thing at a time.
And, you know, today's not the end of the world, so we still have tomorrow and see where things go.
That's hopeful.
Yeah.
Because otherwise, I mean, if I allowed the helplessness to take over, I wouldn't get out of bed.
Right?
and that is not an option.
It sounds like somehow you're an optimist in all of this.
Would you consider yourself an optimist?
I have to be.
I have to be for the sake of my officers.
I have to be because, you know, I signed up, when I signed up for the union,
I signed up to be an advocate,
and you cannot be a pessimist if you're going to try to be an advocate.
You cannot be like, the world's coming to an end.
It sounds like at your level, this is just about doing a good job.
like serving your country, serving your community and honest work.
And yet here in Washington, D.C., the way they've treated TSA agents, the whole thing is extremely
political.
And I wonder, you know, when these shutdowns happen, it's all about the perception of who's
being blamed.
You know, that's what politicians are paying attention to.
And I wonder, who do you and your colleagues blame?
Do you blame Democrats for holding out in this shutdown?
Do you blame Republicans for wanting to give ICE a blank check?
Do you blame the president for being the president?
I think that elected officials have been put in place to represent us as a whole.
And it is their job to make sure that they do what they signed up for.
Just like I swore an oath, almost 22 years.
years ago to go and do what I got to do, which is exactly what we've been doing, right?
We've been showing up to work with no pay. It is their job to go and do what they got to do.
I don't think at this point it falls on anyone party. It's everyone there. They are using
our workforce as a bargaining chip. And it is 100% time.
for them to stop the little tantrum.
Because it is affecting the federal officers.
It is affecting any agency that has gone unpaid.
And you think who's throwing the little tantrum exactly?
It's all of them at this point.
All of them.
All of them.
Your equal opportunity when it comes to blame.
Absolutely.
The mess at our airports has some people going full libertarian on the TSA
privatized airport security.
and we're back on Today Explained.
Support for Today Explained comes from Built Rewards.
If you've got to pay rent, you might as well get rewarded for paying rent, says Built.
And you can with Built.
Built is a loyalty program for renters that rewards you monthly with points and exclusive benefits in your neighborhood with Build.
They say every rent payment earns you points that you can put toward flights, hotels, lift rides, so much more.
And now it's not just for renters.
Built says that members can earn points on their mortgage payments, too.
Plus, Bill says you can unlock exclusive benefits with more.
more than 45,000 restaurants, fitness studios, pharmacies, and other neighborhood partners.
You can redeem built points for built home delivery services, gift cards at over 120 brands,
and they even say that you can use those points on your student loan balances.
Basically paying rent or your mortgage can feel a whole lot better with built.
You can join the loyalty program for renters at joinbilt.com slash explained.
That's j-o-in-b-l-com slash explained.
Make sure to use our URL so they know we sent you.
Support for today, Explain, comes from American Giant.
Perhaps it's time for a new favorite hoodie.
According to American Giant, perhaps the most dependable piece of clothing in your wardrobe.
If you're looking for a new hoodie, you might look toward American Giant.
According to Slate Magazine, it's the greatest hoodie ever made.
In quotes, they say they obsess over every detail in designing it from cotton to Zippa.
And it's not just hoodies.
All of their apparel is made to be super comfortable and last for years.
Our colleague Andrew Maldizek has worn their pants.
American Giant just sent me a pair of their roughneck pant.
The material is great.
It's made up of a cotton canvas.
It's one of those types of pants where you can just wear it while really doing anything.
Going for a quick height outdoors, go to the movies, or even Friday night, date night.
They just look really nice.
Stay ready for anything with the American Giant classic full zip and save 20% off your first order at American-dash-Giant.com when you use code explained at checkout.
That's 20% off your first order at American dash giant.com.
Code Explained.
Support for today, explained, comes from Bombas.
Perhaps you want to get in shape this year.
Bombas wants to tell you about the all-new Bombas sports socks engineered with sport-specific comfort for running, golf, hiking, skiing, snowboarding, and all sport.
Meanwhile, for the loungers among us, Bombas has non-sport footwear available.
But Bombas doesn't just offer sport and non-sport socks.
They also offer super soft base layers that they claim will have you rethinking your whole wardrobe, underwear, t-shirts, flexible, breathable, buttery, smooth, premium every day.
Go-toes, they say you won't want to leave the house without.
Here's Nisha Chital.
I've been wearing bambas for several years now.
I have several pairs.
My whole family loves to wear bambas.
I have several pairs of bambas, ankle socks, and I have some no-show socks as well that are great for.
things like loafers and ballet flats.
For every item you purchase,
Bomba says an essential clothing item is donated to someone facing housing and security.
One purchased, one donated, over 150 million donations.
And counting, I'm told, you can go to bombas.com slash explained and use the code
explained for 20% off your first purchase.
That's B-O-M-B-A-S.com slash explain.
Code explained at checkout.
I'm T-S-Mu-Fucking A.
We handle shit.
That's what we do.
Consider this situation.
Today, explained.
Daryl Campbell writes about aviation for the verge, and most recently he wrote about privatizing airport security, which, it turns out, is the thing we already do.
So it's probably airports that you don't fly a lot to unless you're taking the super budget airlines or unless you fly out of San Francisco and Kansas City.
But there are about 20 airports in the U.S. that take part in what's called the...
screening partnership program or SPP. And that basically means that they hire a private company to do
all of the exact same things that TSA officers do. So the ID checks, the pat-downs, the scans.
They do it to the TSA standard, but they actually staffed them with private security contractors.
Okay. And you mentioned San Francisco and Kansas. Two spots with different politics.
Does that mean that this is not like your typical conservative libertarian approach, privatize it, privatize everything?
Yeah, it's really just based on whether the municipality or whichever is the controlling entity of the airport wants to do it.
So TSA officially doesn't object if a company wants to come in and privatize it.
But for the most part, they don't because PSA is kind of an out-of-the-box solution.
And there is a political component to this, I imagine, because,
TSA privatization was, is a stated goal of the infamous Project 2025.
So is this something that breaks down on the, you know, ideological left-right spectrum?
Project 2025 really doesn't like the Department of Homeland Security.
They say it was an overreach of government authority, a vast expansion of the bureaucratic state.
And, you know, if you've been through TSA in the last 20 years, you probably find some truth.
in that, that it is kind of this expansion of powers and intrusive ways that doesn't really do a ton
to actually keep people safe. That being said, if you look at what Project 2025 actually says about
TSA, it's pretty small. It says the Transportation Security Administration, TSA, be privatized.
Right there, Project 2025. Until it is privatized, TSA should be treated as a national security
provider and its workforce should be deunionized immediately.
This is the recommendation of the Heritage Foundation in Chapter 5, page 134 of their mandate for leadership,
better known as Project 2025.
So it's like one bullet points on the overall section about the DHS and then about a page
and a half of stuff.
And it really just amounts to libertarian bona fides about privatization.
is great, it saves money, it creates a better solution, and kind of the devil is in the details
with that sort of thing. You could get a good security company, but you might not. And so it's not
this magic bullet that's going to solve everyone's problems with the TSA. Much like air travel itself,
TSA hasn't always been with us. It's a gift we got after 9-11. So we asked Daryl what airport
security looked like in a time before TSA. So in 1998, let's say, which is I think the first
memory that I have of flying.
I went to the airport, and you could actually go up to the gate and meet people without a boarding pass,
but you still had to pass through a medical detector, you still had to put your purse or your backpack
or whatever through a scanner. But it was pretty non-invasive, pretty low touch. Really, the goal was
to prevent the kind of armed hijackings that were common prior to 9-11, which is where people would,
you know, take a plane and fly it to Cuba or that sort of thing. So everybody wasn't really doing it
to the same standard. So infamously, the private security company in Boston's Logan Airport
let some of the 9-11 hijackers on board with knives and with things that they really weren't
supposed to have or they didn't think to look at that might have been caught in other areas of the country.
So the TSA came in, they federalized everything, and more importantly, they federalized the standards.
No knives, including plastic knives, on board airlines.
Only ticketed passengers will be allowed past the metal detectors,
higher standards for security personnel as well,
and there will be more federal air marshals at large airports.
And a new team of federal security managers, supervisors,
law enforcement officers and screeners will ensure all passengers
and carry-on bags are inspected thoroughly and effectively.
Okay, so TSA clearly bureaucratic.
But, I mean, we haven't had a 9-11 in this country at least, you know, since 9-11.
How good a job has TSA done?
I mean, I guess they're there to prevent us from bringing explosives and weapons onto planes.
Do we have data that suggests how good they are at making sure that doesn't happen?
Yeah, you'll also recall that we had zero 9-11s before 9-11, so under the previous security retreat.
Choucher. So that's not the best data point, but they actually do have these what they call red team challenges where they send federal officers with fake weapons and fake bombs through there. Most recently, the ones that have been publicized didn't make the DHS and TSA look great. They said they had between like an 80 and a 95% failure rate.
Excuse me? Yeah. 95%. Yeah, which is shocking to me because you think, you know, an x-ray, you could find a gun in there really easily.
And you hear about this all the time that, you know, TSA is finding, so I live in Texas, this happens a lot.
TSA does find guns that people try to bring through, but they're still letting them through and onto airplanes at a rate that is kind of alarming when you consider that's their job.
Do other countries have privatized airport security, or do they do it the way we do it?
There's a couple different models, and there really isn't a one-size-fits-all opportunity.
So there are some countries in Europe that have 100% federalized security regimes.
Some of them do the privatization.
Canada is probably the closest example to the U.S. where it is still primarily federalized,
but they do have a couple of airports that have private security.
And there was actually a recent scandal at the Calgary Airport in Manitoba.
And you'll have to correct me on that if I got the wrong province.
I think it's Alberta.
I'm sorry.
Okay.
Sorry.
Calgary, Alberta, they had a company called Paladin Security takeover the airport security in 2024.
And a lot of contractors came back and said, hey, not only are they severely understaffing us,
they're also not letting us take bathroom breaks or have water on the line.
And that's both causing unhappiness in general.
But also, it's meaning that a lot of people are calling out.
And Calgary actually had one of Canada's worst TSA equivalent security.
lines of like 30 to 40 minutes being standard when the rest of Canada was about 10 to 15 minutes.
And so that's just something that you can pretty easily point to that privatization isn't
this magical answer that's going to solve everything.
Okay.
So, yeah, what are the drawbacks potentially in the United States if we did this at scale?
The devil is really in the details.
And what worries me specifically about doing this under the Trump administration,
is they've shown, number one, a pretty strong disregard for the details.
And number two, this kind of cronyism where they'll give the contract to their friends or someone
within the Trump family or someone who just happens to have a connection to Mara Lago.
And that doesn't mean it's a fair contract bidding process or even they're getting the best
possible answer.
It's just whoever has the president's ear or whoever can get a line into them.
And that usually means that you're getting a lot of bloat, a lot of inefficiency, and a lack of
quality, which perversely is exactly the thing that privatization proponents point to as the
problems that gets solved by doing it.
But at the same time, you know, as you said when we started out here, San Francisco does
this. That's got to be one of the biggest airports in the country. I thought top 10, but I just
looked it up in my preliminary research suggests top 15. It's number 13, I think, maybe.
But if they're doing it and it's working for them and we're having this crisis for the past few weeks,
Does it not suggest to more of our major airports in the country that there's another way to just figure it out yourself and not even wait for the federal government?
On principle, I don't hate the idea of TSA privatization.
But the way that the debate gets framed almost locks us into this false choice that you can either accept the status quo or you can accept privatization.
There are workarounds.
Probably the easiest one would be just to protect that line of funding that pays TSA officers so that,
when the government gets shut down, they still get paid.
It's conceptually easy to do.
They did it for ICE.
Why can't you do it for TSA?
And they do it because it's a useful political football.
And it's a useful way to lock people into this idea that this is the only alternative.
It's pretty clear that, you know, someone got the memo from the Heritage Foundation because all of these right-leaning publications, not just Fox News,
but some other think tanks have been blogging pretty extensively for the past couple weeks.
about privatization is the only way. This is exactly why we're pro-privatization
because they see the political environment is receptive to it and you know this is
the third shutdown in six months so people will have it very fresh in their
memory that if they pay attention to nothing else about airport security and
the FAA and airplane crashes the average person's experience is going to be
closer to I had to wait for three hours so TSA is terrible then oh there's a lot
of nuance to the vagaries of budgeting.
Is this just pie in the sky, though?
Like, is there any likelihood this happens?
It feels like, I mean, the one time we saw a dramatic shift in how our airport security
was run was after 9-11.
Does it take a 9-11 to hit reset and go back to the drawing board?
I mean, it's not a terrible question.
It did take that to really re-look at airport security.
But if you think about the experience of these TSA workers, you know, they've had these
three shutdowns in the last six months.
high callout rates suggest to me that they are starting to think about alternatives.
And so maybe the crisis is these TSA workers, you know, being so vocal about how unhappy they are
that it forces people to actually pay attention for a change.
I do think there's, it feels like there's something tangibly different about the public
willingness to pay attention to this particular shutdown that wasn't there two or three ago,
specifically because now people are understanding,
okay, this doesn't have to happen.
It didn't happen for the 20 years prior to the Trump administration.
Now something is going on,
and it's tied to the politics of what's happening today.
And maybe that's what it's going to take
to really rally politicians around it,
even if Trump himself wants to keep using this as a political football.
Daryl Campbell is the author of Fatal Abstraction,
why the managerial class loses control of software.
want to know how Tatiana, our TSA agent from early in the show, felt about privatization of her job?
Do you want to guess?
I understood the idea of privatization, but I was not aware of all the things that came with it.
And at the end of the day, it comes down to someone who wants to gain a contract, its bidding, to pay less.
They're not bidding to pay more.
They're bidding to pay less.
In order for me, as the owner or CEO of that private company, to fit a profit, I have to make cuts.
And what am I going to cut?
Is it going to be the background checks?
Am I not going to vet the people enough?
Am I not going to have enough people because I can't afford?
Am I going to cut their salaries?
Am I going to cut their benefits?
Am I going to, just the quality of individual.
At the end of the day, that puts a traveling public at risk.
So she's not crazy about the idea.
Danielle Hewitt produced our show today.
Amana Al-Sadi is flying later this week.
Thoughts and prayers are being accepted.
Patrick Boy, David Tadishore, and Andrea Lopez Crusado are grounded for now.
I'm Sean Ramos from. This is today explained.
