TRIGGERnometry - Epstein, CIA, Mossad, Trump - Mike Benz

Starting point is 00:00:01 We're really not very conspiratorially minded people. But then the other day I woke up, and I started reading about it. And I was like, oh, oh, there's actually like a there there with this Epstein stuff, particularly, you know, this letter that was reported. The entire trajectory so far of Epstein's career, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but dot, dot, dot. I'm going surely, like, this is CIA, isn't it? He was told to back off Epstein because Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone because it was above his pay grade.

Starting point is 00:00:34 People are going to invent their own Epstein story unless there's an official one. And the only people who can provide the official one are the people we just elected in this past election who ran on giving us the

Starting point is 00:00:49 official story. Lots of places can expose you to identity theft. Oh no. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity, which is way more than any can do on their own. If we find anything suspicious, like new loans or changes to your financial accounts, we alert you right away, all through text, phone, email, or the LifeLock app. Get the alerts

Starting point is 00:01:15 that could make all the difference. Save up to 40% your first year at LifeLock.com slash special offer. Terms apply. I wrote a little song to remind you, choice hotels get you more of the experiences you value. The Canberia Hotels got it all. A rooftop bar, have a ball. Bring a date. your squad or even your mom book direct at choiceotails.com. Mike Benz, welcome back to the show. Thanks for having me. Oh, it's good to have you on. Listen, I'll be honest with you.

Starting point is 00:01:43 You know, Francis and I, we're really not very conspiratorially minded people. It's not something we pay a lot of attention to. There's been a lot of this Epstein stuff flying around for a long time. And to be honest with you, I've tuned most of it out. I see that, you know, the people who hate Israel are talking about Epstein and Israel, the people who are about this, talk about Epstein and this. Everyone's got their own hobby horse, right? But then the other day, I woke up, and I started, for some reason, something came up in my

Starting point is 00:02:10 news feed, and I started reading about it, and I was like, oh, oh, there's actually, like, there with this Epstein stuff, and particularly, you know, this letter that was reported, I think it was in the Wall Street Journal about Donald Trump, supposedly sending some kind of note with a picture of a woman and all of this. And then when I started reading it, I was actually starting to go, wait, wait, there's actually stuff in this that sounds kind of legit. So we thought we'd have you back on the show and to break it down for us and also explain how it ties in to a lot of the intelligence community and institutional stuff that you're always talking about that we discussed last time you were on the show. But first of all, I thought it'd be really helpful

Starting point is 00:02:53 for people who are like me, not particularly into this stuff, not particularly aware of it, who've heard the name Jeffrey Epstein, who kind of go, oh, he had this island, that he was a paedophile, etc. For you to just tell us who the man was,

Starting point is 00:03:09 what is his biography, how he did get to his positions, and who actually was in, and what role did he play in a lot of this stuff that we're now talking about? Well, Jeffrey Epstein is this kind of international man of mystery figure

Starting point is 00:03:22 who has sort of done a Forest Gump tour through strange areas of U.S. politics for about four decades. So he's a guy who was recruited versus a math and physics teacher to the Dalton School, a prestigious New York City private school in the mid-1970s by Donald Barr, who was the former, he's the father of William Barr, the attorney general, the head of the U.S. criminal justice system during the second Trump administration, then also was also Attorney General in the 1990s. Donald Barr started his career in the CIA. It was the OSS, the predecessor to the CIA before he went on to Columbia and then the Dalton School.

Starting point is 00:04:09 His son, Bill Barr, was also started his career in the CIA, then was a lawyer for the CIA, told his high school guidance counselor, his dream job was to be. the head of the CIA. This is in his own autobiography. And then you have this kid, Jeffrey Epstein, who by all accounts, was, you know, did not come from from much before the Dalton school. He got this job teaching math and physics without a college degree, which is somewhat unusual. But he was very charming and charismatic and had the opportunity to tutor the son of Ace Greenberg. Ace Greenberg was the head of Bear Stearns. Bear Stearns, Bear Stearns, Folks may remember from the 80s through the early 2000s was one of the marquee investment

Starting point is 00:04:57 security brokerage firms and investment houses on Wall Street. It went down in flames in 2008 in the mortgage-backed securities crisis. That was also the year that Jeffrey Epstein was first arrested, the plea deal for his first indictment. But essentially, as the legend goes, what's been publicly reported in terms of how Epstein got into the finance business was he met Ace Greenberg through Greenberg's son that he was tutoring and when when Epstein got fired from the Dalton school Ace Greenberg gave him a chance at Bear Stearns and Ace Greenberg at

Starting point is 00:05:36 the time had this corporate philosophy that he called the PSD poor smart driven to make money and he liked the hustler types so he brought Jeffrey Epstein on and Jeffrey Epstein started kind of as a junior floor trader and then quickly made his way up to a partner status at Bear Stearns primarily running family family in the state accounts for tax handling taxes and you know creatively using the offshore banking system in order to maximize you know minimize the tax liability for big family accounts reportedly these included big accounts like the Bronfman family and others. And you have to remember, so this is 1976 to 1981 is this first phase of Epstein's launch of his career.

Starting point is 00:06:32 And something very important happened in that period for U.S. geopolitics, for British, for Israeli, because this is what's happening right now, and I'll just back up to say that right now, many of these, there's a little bit of a revolution in the MAGA base under Trump as people feel like they're insufficient answers. And one of the lingering questions has been

Starting point is 00:06:57 Epstein's intelligence ties. And so I'm going to sort of tell this story to sort of connect where the intelligence touchpoints come into this as as well as his adjacent financier story. And so 1979, there were in the middle of Epstein's Bear Stearn's tenure, a couple of big things happen in the world of

Starting point is 00:07:21 intelligence and geopolitics. The Jimmy Carter years smashed the CIA's traditional covert action capabilities. Jimmy Carter rode to power on the back of the Church Committee hearings, which was the first time that the CIA ever had congressional oversight. Frank Church famously held up the heart attack gun about how the CIA kills people with effectively a dark gun that makes it look like a heart attack. Everything came out from Operation Mockingbird in terms of control over the media to Operation Chaos in terms of infiltration of student groups to M.K. Ultra in terms of messing around with ways to psychologically influence people. And chains were put on the CIA in terms of its traditional covert action. Jimmy Carter fired 30% of the CIA's Operation Division

Starting point is 00:08:11 in a single day. He then crippled its budget. And it was also during this time that the U.S. suffered numerous setbacks in its foreign policy vision. Most notably, the loss of Iran. Iran had been a obviously massively geostrategic pivot point for pretty much most of the 20th century. Obviously, it's the second largest reserve of oil, third largest reserve of natural gas. And in 1979, there was a Islamic revolution in the country. And a lot of people in the national security space felt that that would not have happened if the CIA had had its traditional powers back. And in the background of that, there were joint intelligence networks that were being formed

Starting point is 00:09:01 to try to offset the cuts to the CIA. Very famously, folks can look up a group called the Safari Club, which was led by French intelligence, actually. but it swept up the Egyptians, the Moroccans, the Portuguese, and also the U.S. and Israeli intelligence functions were junior partners on that network as well. But you essentially had the outside financiers and outside weapons dealers who were being tapped to informally coordinate what the CIA itself was banned from doing directly. So these networks were already lurking when Epstein went out on his own in 1980.

Starting point is 00:09:44 Mike, I'm just going to interrupt you very briefly, just to crystallize this. So one of the things that I've learned from watching some of your stuff is essentially what you're saying is, as you're talking about now, the CIA had its wings clip. There were certain things that it could no longer do legitimately. And so it started using various kinds of agents, assets, contacts, etc. to effectively do the same things, but outside of its formal structure so that it could never be pinned on CIA itself. That's basically what you're saying, right? That's exactly it.

Starting point is 00:10:18 And this structure would come to a head in the biggest scandal of the Ronald Reagan White House in the 1980s. So Ronald Reagan was the U.S. president from 1980 to 1988. And he came to power essentially on the heels of the Iran hostage. situation and people feeling like America was weak under Jimmy Carter. And President Reagan wanted to get the CIA's old powers back, but was hamstrung by the Democrats in Congress who were still stinging from the revelations of the CIA targeting the Democrat Party during the 1970s. And so there was a difference in foreign policy between the Republicans and Democrats in the 1980s. that's quite similar to what's happening with the Democrats and Republicans having a difference over Ukraine today.

Starting point is 00:11:11 And that was notably around the issue of Nicaragua, which is, you know, in Latin America, the Republicans wanted to do a regime change against Nicaragua to take out the Sandinista government and back a group of rebels called the Contras. But the Democrats did not want to do that. They called that, they said that that was sort of imperialist, colonialist, and also the CIA should not be done. doing this sort of thing. And so the Democrats passed a congressional amendment that banned any U.S. government money going for the overthrow of Nicaragua. It was called the Boland Amendment. So this meant no State Department money, no Pentagon money, no U.S. aid money. But the Ronald Reagan White House still wanted to do it. And so they found a very creative mechanism to do this, which is really part, this is where the Epstein story, where he's first getting his leg. So just to back up

Starting point is 00:12:05 for a second. Jeffrey Epstein leaves Bear Stearns in 1980, late 1980, early 1981, under circumstances that are disputed, but effectively he either left or was fired after the, after he got in trouble with alleged violations of a private securities offering. It's called Regulation D. But regardless of the circumstances of how he left Bear Stearns, he remained very close with Bear Stearns. He remained in close contact with Ace Greenberg. He was reported at least still a client of Bear Stearn services, but he went out on his own at that point. He's 28 years old, and he starts a one-person consultancy from his New York apartment called Intercontinental Assets Group. And he has that company for the next 12 years, but particularly throughout the 1990s, this is

Starting point is 00:12:57 his primary financial vehicle. And what he says that he does through IAG, Intercom. Intercontinental Assets Group, is provide two adjacent services to the same function. His clients are high net worth individuals and governments who either want to shelter money from creditors and other governments or who want to find hidden assets of debtors who owe money to those high net worth individuals or governments. So it's basically taking advantage of the offshore banking system, the Cayman Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, the, you know, Jersey, the like, in order to do the same sorts of work that he would have been adjacent to when he was running family estate accounts in terms of, you know, the Bronf and the like. But he's doing this at a time when the U.S. gets intimately involved in the Iran-Contra affair.

Starting point is 00:13:58 The Iran-Contra affair was from effectively 1983 to 1988, and it gets its name Iran-Contra because the U.S. did try to hit two birds with one stone, the Republicans in the Ronald Reagan White House. The Iran-Iraq War had popped off between 1980 and 1988, and the U.S. was at, on the one hand, sort of in a cold war with Iran, because of the 1979 revolution, but did not want Iraq to just steamroll over Iran because they had twice as many forces and there were concerns about Saddam Hussein and him having regional hegemony. So one way to get in with the Iranian government in order to get them to be more amenable to

Starting point is 00:14:47 U.S. foreign policy was to sell them arms against the Iraqis. But the problem was that was illegal under international law because of an arms embargo against Iran. So what happened was in 1983, Adnan Khashoggi, who was at the time the largest arms dealer in the world by a large, large margin. He was at one point rumored to be the richest man in the world. He, just for one weapons company alone, for example, for Lockheed Martin, he made three times more in commissions as an arms dealer for Lockheed Martin than every other commissions agent of Lockheed Martin combined, three times more than every other. arms broker on earth. And he was a Saudi high net worth individual connected to the royal family. In 1983, Adnan Khashoggi travels to the U.S., and he and the Ronald Reagan National Security Advisor, Robert McFarland, work out this creative structure in which Adnan Khashoggi would

Starting point is 00:15:47 serve as a middleman between the U.S. and Israel for U.S. weapons to be effectively smuggled to Israel and sold to Iran. and then they skimmed the profits of the arms deal to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. So the Reagan White House thought that this would basically knock out two birds with one stone. This would advance their foreign policy in the Middle East through the weapon sales to Iran. And it would also satisfy the Boland Amendment restrictions. It would not be U.S. money that was funding the Contras. It wouldn't be U.S. aid money or official DOD money.

Starting point is 00:16:26 this would just be skimmed money from a private transaction that had nothing to do with the U.S. officially because this was all coordinated through the National Security Council and the Central Intelligence Agency under its plausible deniability doctrine. Now, at that time, Jeffrey Epstein was claiming that Adnan Khashoggi was one of his marquee clients at IAG. In 1987, Jeffrey Epstein gave an interview where he reiterated that Adnan Kishoggi was one of his. his main clients for his for his IAG business and in fact when Jeffrey Epstein's safe was raided in January 2019 by the FBI they found they drilled a hole in his personal safe at his residence and found a series of fake passports that Jeffrey Epstein had had throughout his life and one of them was a passport that was it was a fake passport so it had his ID but it had a fake name

Starting point is 00:17:24 and it was issued in 1982, expired in 1987, and it listed the residents of Saudi Arabia. And this fake passport in the early 1980s, so again, Jeffrey Epstein is just now 30 years old, it was so good that he was able to, there were four stamps on the passport, including to Saudi Arabia, to France, to the UK, and I believe to Spain. So this passport was so good that he got in and out of four different countries under a fake under a fake name, but again, listed the residents of Saudi Arabia, where Adnan Khashuyi was, and showed visits to Saudi Arabia on the stamp passport. But at this time, you have this multi-intelligence agency operation that's running this. You had the U.S. and UK interests in Iran at the

Starting point is 00:18:15 time. You had the Israeli interest in Iran at the time. You had the Saudi interest in Iran at the time. So right there, you've got four different sort of pools of joint intelligence work that's happening before Jeffrey Epstein's 30th birthday. Now, he continues that relationship throughout the 1980s. And it's noteworthy here just to note that the primary CIA vehicle for running transport of guns and at the time illegal narcotics, because this was another way that U.S. intelligence was funding the war in Nicaragua was because they couldn't get U.S. aid money. They had to work through the black market goods economy in order to fund the Contras.

Starting point is 00:19:02 The Contra sat on the supply chain for illegal narcotics, especially cocaine. This gave rise to a series of scandals about alleged CIA drug running to support that war. This was covered by then Senator John Kerry, who would in something called the Kerry report on CIA drug running at that time. John Kerry would then go on to be the Secretary of State, and he would also run for president against George W. Bush in 2004. But as well as these were also the Gary Webb allegations, in fact, the head of the CIA in 1996, John Deutsch had to travel to Compton, Los Angeles, to do a Mia Culpah to explain

Starting point is 00:19:46 how it was just an isolated incident. This is not a systematic thing the CIA does. But the main transport mechanism for that was a CI proprietary airline named Southern Air Transport. It's formerly Air America. This is all declassified. Everyone can look up Southern Air Transport. And it was primarily, it was a CI proprietary. This was something that was done by the CIA in the 1950s and 70s.

Starting point is 00:20:11 You don't see this very much anymore because of the reforms in the 1970s. This type of subsidies will usually now come from USAID. or the U.S. Development Finance Corporation, you don't really see large companies being originated or birthed by the CIA anymore after the Carter reforms. But what's important about the story is that Southern Air Transport was the bag airline for deposits of weapons, drugs, and cash for Iran-Contra for the Republicans during the 1980s. One of its bases of operations, one of its main touch points was the U.S. Virgin Islands. It was St. Thomas that it had an exemption to charter large freight to. Now, the U.S. Virgin Islands, of course, would be where Jeffrey Epstein would famously purchase his Lolita Island, the famous Little St. James, just two miles from St. Thomas.

Starting point is 00:21:07 It's actually right across the water from it. If you want to get to Little St. James, you fly to St. Thomas, just like Southern Air Transport, and then you take a ferry across the water, and you're right there. The U.S. Virgin Islands is important because it is the money laundering, It was the money laundering front end for the CIA money laundering that was done at that time. Before U.S. funds went to Swiss bank accounts or Panamanian offshore bank accounts, they would be run through the U.S. Virgin Islands, which was still continental United States, but had much more lax anti-money laundering and know-your-customer rules.

Starting point is 00:21:44 And so this was a place that cash would be deposited and then into local branches. the U.S. Virgin Islands and out from there. But what's very interesting is that after the Iran-Contra chapter of Jeffrey Epstein's life concludes, he links up with Les Wexner, who is one of the wealthiest business. Mike, I'm sorry to interrupt. Before you move on from that section, I just had a couple of questions about what he was actually doing. So he was, he, Keshoggi, who is this arms dealer, is a client of his. But what is his level of involvement in all of this? Is he actually doing things that are illicit? Is he just managing money for this guy? Is he helping these weapons

Starting point is 00:22:24 shipments? What do we actually know about Epstein's involvement in this intelligence operation at this point? We've been doing trigonometry since 2018, and over that time, we've come to understand what matters to you, the audience. One thing we know for sure is that the idea of your private data floating around online, your name, address, even a national insurance number, etc., to put it mildly, does not sit comfortably for many of you, and rightly so. That's why we're pleased to be sponsored by Aura, a brilliant, all-in-one digital security service that helps keep you and your loved ones safe from identity theft, fraud and more. Did you know data brokers compile your private data which they have taken without your

Starting point is 00:23:10 knowledge and consent and sell it to the highest bidder? Legally, they have to remove your information if you ask. But they make it really hard to do. Orra helps protect your personal data by doing the hard work for you and removing it from data broker sites where scammers and identity thieves often shop for their next victims. They'll even alert you if your information is being sold on the dark web. Plus, Aura doesn't just stop there.

Starting point is 00:23:36 They'll notify you in minutes if someone tries to open a credit card or loan in your name. You can lock your credit file with a single tap. ORA also provides best in class antivirus software to protect your devices, a password manager to keep your login secure, and up to $5 million in identity theft insurance for you and your family. Our team here at Trigonometry Use Aura, and it's such a relief knowing we're protected. No more second guessing. Every unknown call or wondering if our online info is being exploited. Protect yourself and your family today. try Aura free for 14 days and see if any of your personal information has been exposed.

Starting point is 00:24:18 Head to Aura.com slash trigonometry to start your free trial. That's A-U-R-A dot com slash trigonometry. Don't leave yourself vulnerable. Click the link in the description or scan the QR to take control of your digital safety today. Looking for the best place to shop this Mother's Day? Go with the brand that makes it easy to send something thoughtful to everyone on your list. 1,800flowers.com. Right now at 1,800 flowers, order one dozen roses and get another dozen free.

Starting point is 00:24:49 More flowers mean more smiles, all backed by the quality, attention to detail, and trusted delivery experience that make 1,800 flowers my top choice to send something beautiful mom will love. Make Mom's Day at 1800flowers.com slash Spotify. That's 1,800flowers.com slash Spotify. Well, the record is unclear other than that he was moving money for them. We don't even know, for example, with Khashoggi whether or not the funds that he was managing for Kishoggi were related to Iran-Contra or to Kishoggi's other business dealings. So, and this also included he was moving money around for people in European royal families. But the Khashoggi part of the story, I think, is interesting because Kishoggi was the linchpin of the Iran.

Starting point is 00:25:38 He was the middleman between the U.S. and Israel for the whole operation, and therefore all of U.S., British, Saudi, and Israeli security, and, you know, the success of their operation depended on Khashoggi. And you had, you know, Khashoggi is one of Epstein's marque clients. But what happens at that point is 1988, the Iran-Contra affair concludes, Jeffrey Epstein gets involved in, the Tower's financial scandal, which was the largest Ponzi scheme that went down in flames in the U.S. before the Bernie Madoff affair. This is 1989 to 1990. The Tower's financial, he gets hooked up to them through a British arms dealer, Doug Delease.

Starting point is 00:26:32 He gets connected into that network through John Mitchell, who was the, the former Attorney General of the United States under Richard Nixon, John Mitchell went to prison during the Watergate affair. He was, again, the head of the Justice Department. So you have the Jeffrey Epstein story sort of sandwiched by Attorney Generals of the United States, the highest levels of U.S. criminal justice. John Mitchell was from 1969 to 1972. He was the Attorney General.

Starting point is 00:27:02 And then he stepped down to run the re-elect Nixon campaign and then was busted as the guy who was running the political intelligence fund that funded Watergate, which was, you know, Watergate itself was a bunch of X-CIA plumbers that went in and, you know, bugged and raided the DNC headquarters. John Mitchell's was, John Mitchell was arrested for that. And then when he came out, he became a kind of wheeler dealer in this kind of underground, overground, underground network. And he was who connected Epstein to Doug Lees. After Tower's Financial goes down in flames,

Starting point is 00:27:43 the CEO of Tower's Financial end up spending something like 20 years in prison, but Jeffrey Epstein skated out of that. Jeffrey Epstein then linked up with Les Wexner in Ohio, and this is sort of the period that is more

Starting point is 00:27:57 that is more robustly, I think, discussed in present discourse because Les Wexner was the was the head of the limited, which was at the time in the early 1990s, the largest retail chain in the United States. It was Victoria's Secret. It was, I believe, Bed Bath and Beyond. It was all of these different sort of mall retail chains, Abercrombie and Fitch. And so it was a huge public, you know, these are all giant retail companies with vast logistical chains in terms of

Starting point is 00:28:35 transport and logistics. In 1991, Jeffrey Epstein gets durable power of attorney over Les Wexner's financial affairs. And this is... Mike, sorry again. Let me pause you here for a second. I'm just trying to fill in a few blanks and obvious questions that people will have on their minds. Who is this guy? How is he jumping from one thing to another and getting all these crazy jobs? And before you know, he has power of attorney over a guy who owns the largest retail chain in America. How is this... What is he? Is he some kind of genius? Is he charismatic?

Starting point is 00:29:10 Is he, as some people are saying, like using blackmail over these people? Like, what's going on? This is quite an extraordinary career. Well, I think what's important to keep in mind is that he maintained close ties with the Bear Stearns network when he went out on his own. At 28 years old, you wouldn't be capable of singularly running the tax affairs for some of the most high net worth. you know, individuals and family offices or, I mean, why would Adnan Khashoggi, for example, you know, trust a, you know, trust a 20, 29, 30 year old kid to run these affairs? The fact is, is he maintained client services at Bear Stearns. Bear Stearns was still one of the most aggressive but marquee names on Wall Street.

Starting point is 00:29:57 What he, you enter the realm of speculation is what I'm trying to say in terms of how he was able to, you know, like Les Wexner, for example, was not, was never deposed by the, by the Justice Department or, or ever really publicly answered how it was that he, or why it was that he gave power of attorney to Jeffrey Epstein. I can, I can speculate as, you know, as to the reasons. But, but, but, but, and I can either do that now or I can do that after I lay out all the facts. It might be a little bit more. Well, give us, and give us a sense, because I think at this point, a lot of people will be going, How is this guy bouncing from one, like insane opportunity to the next at these young ages with without an education, et cetera?

Starting point is 00:30:40 Well, what's noteworthy is in 1991. This is the reported time that Jeffrey Epstein links up with Galane Maxwell, whose father, Robert Maxwell had just died. Robert Maxwell was a towering figure, really, in British statecraft and also a question. seriously involved in the early Zionist movement in Israel and was, you know, given a very famous funeral in Israel with heads of state saying that, you know, that Maxwell has done more, you know, for the state of Israel than can, then the story can presently be told. Maxwell ran a big publishing house and was a billionaire, was highly influential in British state craft affairs as well as with many touch points to the Israeli government. Sorry, Mike, there's something that I want to ask you here, and then we'll get back to it.

Starting point is 00:31:38 But this is a point on Robert Maxwell. There's a lot of people, and I'm told a lot of credible evidence that says that Maxwell was heavily involved with Mossad. Is this true? Well, there's so much smoke there that it's, again, like when you look at the state funeral held for Robert Maxwell, where you have all the senior heads of state, I mean, essentially Robert Maxwell was a guy who, you know, who helped in the founding of Israel itself.

Starting point is 00:32:04 He started off in, I think, Czechoslovakia under the Iron Curtain, and then fled to the UK, and then helped run guns to the stern gang in the early Zionist movement as during the period of the creation of Israel itself. And what's interesting about that is just how fascinating that dovetails with Jeffrey, Epstein's own work, himself. Again, Iran-Contra was a situation of gun running to two different countries in a covert action. This was weapon sales to Iran and gun smuggling to the Contras in

Starting point is 00:32:49 Nicaragua. And then you would see this repeated in the dealings with Doug Lessie, again, how he was, or Doug Lise, how he was actually, you know, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, himself was a major British arms dealer. So you have this kind of covert military logistics pipeline. And this also is, are some of Epstein's closest relationships with the government of Israel that have these adjacencies to Robert Maxwell's. Like, for example, 43 times it was reported that Ehud Barak met with Jeffrey Epstein and stayed at Jeffrey Epstein's home. These are 43 reported times that this happened. Ahud Barak was the prime minister of Israel, but he was also the defense minister of Israel.

Starting point is 00:33:38 So he was the head of the Israeli military. Before he was prime minister and defense minister, Ahud Barak, was the head of the Amman. That's Israeli military intelligence. That's actually the largest of the Israeli military, of the intelligence agencies. You have the Amman, which is the military intelligence. you have the Mossad and then you have Shinbet. This is sort of the equivalent of the NSA, the CIA, and the FBI. And so, and Houd Barak before that had been the commander of Israel's most elite,

Starting point is 00:34:14 covert military special operations force. And so this is the guy that is tightly connected to Epstein. You know, again, over 40 reported meetings. Houd Barak is staying at Jeffrey Epstein's house. but this is again connected to the military establishment, just as Iran-Contra was a military affair, just as what Robert Maxwell was doing between British and Israeli intelligence was military. And so, you know, this is another part of this story is that as, so as Epstein links up with the Maxwell family in the early 1990s, you have this period of turmoil in the 1990s.

Starting point is 00:34:53 Bill Clinton became president in January 1993, and 17 times on the White House visitor logs, Jeffrey Epstein visits the Bill Clinton White House. So, and this is also, in the late 1990s, it should be noted, is when Ihu Barack was the Prime Minister of Israel. So you have this guy who's got high-level dealings with the highest level of the U.S. government

Starting point is 00:35:19 and the highest levels of the Israeli government. Now, we don't know what they told. talked about in these meetings. We don't know, you know, if Epstein was, you know, just bringing coffee to the White House to talk with Bill Clinton and his National Security Council. But the fact is, is this was also a period of considerable turmoil in Middle East Affairs. You have, you know, the Camp David and Osloch. You have the many of these U.S.-Israeli economic integration zones that are set up by Bill Clinton in order to try to bring security as well as economic development to both partner countries as they try to solve many of the

Starting point is 00:36:02 flare-ups that were happening in the Middle East. But at this time, the main asset that Epstein appears to be able to bring to the table is that he's very close with what's reported to be the highest net worth individual in the state of Ohio, Leslie Wexner, who was the head of this giant retail conglomerate, the limited. Now, it's very curious as to how someone gets durable power of attorney over such a far-flung international business empire. Now, this is where we enter, again, the realm of speculation. One reason to assign durable power of attorney to somebody other than yourself, durable

Starting point is 00:36:46 power of attorney means you have a static ability to sign documents on somebody else's behalf, and they are then legally obligated. This is something that's often assigned, for example, when somebody is 80, 90 years old, or they're on their deathbed, but their transactions, you're not transferring equity to them to somebody else, but they are effectively running your affairs.

Starting point is 00:37:09 Now, you know, Wexner was, you know, healthy. And there's no reason to do this other than the, I should say, there are very few reasons to do this other than the kind of legal protection that you get by being able to maintain plausible deniability, that if somebody else signed something under durable power of attorney, that you did not agree to that. And so, because you're not the authorized signatory at that point when that happens. You can claim, for example, if someone was involved in an illegal weapons purchase or some sort of business fraud, that it would be the person who executed the contract who would be legally liable for that.

Starting point is 00:37:49 So many speculate that the reason for this is that Jeffrey Epstein was in very deep with these international high net worth figures as a financier and a middleman between different governments. And he sort of came to Wexner vetted, and Wexner then assigned durable power of attorney to him for Wexner's international business affairs. Now, what's very interesting about this. So can I just pause you there, Mike? So what you've just explained and the entire trajectory so far of Epstein's career, that to me seems like something out of a movie, neither plausible nor realistic. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but dot, dot, dot, dot, I'm going surely, like, this is CIA, isn't it? Isn't it?

Starting point is 00:38:37 I mean, how else has this man been able to do all of these things? Well, it's really not that crazy. I mean, so first of all, I do agree with that. assessment that that Epstein, can I just make one more sort of factual thing about this? And then come back to my question. The CIA's story, I think, is a very important one. And it's one of these things that they're very actionable things that the attorney general Pam Bondi can do to get answers to that.

Starting point is 00:39:05 And the failure to pursue those has made this question, I think, linger in Maga World. And one of the things that I've been trying to advocate for is, you know, transparency measures so we can put this to bed to sort of quiet, I think a lot of the, satisfy, I think a lot of the concerns that have popped up in domestic U.S. politics on this. But what happens in 1994 is Southern Air Transport, if you remember, the exact CI proprietary airline, proprietary meaning it belongs to, it was created by, it was run directly by the Central Intelligence Agency. when the CIA used to do that sort of thing in the 1950s to the 1970s, today that money would come from USAID or the Dolan Finance Corporation or these other sources. But when Southern Air Transport got in trouble over Iran-Contra, it moved its base of operations from Miami because Miami was the major transit point because it touched the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Starting point is 00:40:04 It touched Colombia, Nicaragua, Guatemala. It was the nearest flight path. when Southern Air Transport's business essentially ran out after I ran Contra, it moved in 1994 to Columbus, Ohio, which was exactly where Jeffrey Epstein was domiciled with his residence there. It's exactly where the Limited was headquartered. It's exactly where Les Wexner owned the largest residence in the state of Ohio. It was in Columbus, Ohio, the head of the Ohio Development Office for Franklin County. where Columbus resides gave juice to this big tax incentive deal for Southern Air Transport to move to Columbus, Ohio. Again, Epstein and Wexner's hometown. And it was specifically to service the limited. And this, again, these are statements on the record from the head of the Development Office of Franklin County, that Southern Air Transport moved from Miami, where it was transiting guns and drugs and cash for the Central Intelligence Agency.

Starting point is 00:41:08 agency. It moved, well, directly to Columbus, Ohio, specifically to service the exact business conglomerate that Jeffrey Epstein had durable power of attorney overrunning. And so, you know, there is this curious kind of, you know, anecdote here where I don't think you and I could just negotiate the transfer of a CI proprietary airline, you know, to service our lemonade stand if we if we set it up now now the the argument was because the limited was the world was the country's largest retail chain at the time it had very serious charter flight and logistics needs in order to you know do the logistics uh from columbus ohio where the flagship was to all the supply chains around the world what's notable is it was around this time that that the limited

Starting point is 00:42:00 started buying up sporting goods stores which sell guns and hunting equipment been it actually in 1994 the limited bought one of the largest bought six branches in Ohio of one of the largest gun stores now of course this is not unusual in intelligence work this is what happened in Operation Fast and Furious for example which took down the attorney general Eric Holder under the Obama administration if folks remember 2012 to 2014, there was a famous CIA gun running operation while it was technically run by the FBI and ATF, but it was approved at the interagency level, meaning approved by the White House interagency, the CIA State Department, the National Security Council. And these were a ring of gun stores

Starting point is 00:42:49 in Arizona and parts of Texas that were running guns to the Sinaloa cartel, a narco-trafficking cartel in Mexico, ostensibly for that cartel to do battle with another cartel called the Zetas, who were stealing oil from pipelines that Exxomobil and Chevron had partnerships with Pemex, the main state oil company in Mexico. At the time, the U.S. couldn't just go in and bomb Mexico to take out a narco cartel there. The only way to stop the problem of U.S. companies being robbed by one narco gang was to build up another gang in the country to take them out themselves. And so that, of course, had blowback on the U.S. intelligence state when one of those guns was used to kill a U.S. border agent. And then those guns were traced to those very gun stores.

Starting point is 00:43:43 And then Eric Holder famously was held in contempt of Congress for failing to discus for stonewalling Congress about the, effectively, the intelligence ties and how deep they went. went in that operation. So Eric Holder was then ejected from the Attorney General's office. And you see these same types of things, I guess, is what I'm trying to communicate here with John Mitchell and Bill Barr around jumping on the grenade. So at the same time, the Limited is buying up these gun stores in Ohio. They get the CIA's gun running airline to go directly to Columbus, Ohio. it should be noted that five years earlier, Jeffrey Epstein, when he was at Towers Financial,

Starting point is 00:44:25 the Ponzi scheme I mentioned, one of the companies they made a play at to purchase was Pan Am, Pan American Airlines, who was not a CIA proprietary, but was one of the commercial branches that the CIA frequently used for commercial cover during the Vietnam War era and earlier. So this was not a CIA proprietary,

Starting point is 00:44:47 but Jeffrey Epstein seemed to have a thing for purchasing airlines that were logistics for intelligence hubs. And then in 1998, Southern Air Transport folds up in October 1998 on the very day that the CIA comes clean on the Iran-Contra scandal. Again, the CIA in the late 1990s was under a lot of pressure, particularly from the black community in America, because of the disclosures from Gary Webb around CIA narco-trafficking with Southern Air Transport. This was the same time that John Deutsch, the CIA director, traveled to Los Angeles to speak to the black community about apologizing effectively for those operations that put crack cocaine on the streets of Miami and L.A.

Starting point is 00:45:32 But on the very day that the CIA concedes Southern Air Transport's role in weapons and guns dealing is the very day that Southern Air Transport declares bankruptcy and cuts off operations in Columbus, Ohio. At this point, Epstein appears to move into his third phase. So you can think of it as phase one is he's sort of a scrappy kid who's willing to take chances on murky financial dealings and is sort of the long arm of the Bear Stearns network for work that touches high net worth individuals, family offices, and governments around sensitive geopolitical operations. And then you have sort of the less Wexner period where he is, running, you know, this kind of vast retail chain and running the money and finances for that. And then he sort of enters this statecraft and philanthropy period around Bill Clinton and the

Starting point is 00:46:29 Clinton Foundation. So after Bill Clinton leaves office in the late 1990s, Jeffrey Epstein flies Bill Clinton around to Africa in these various African development initiatives that were done. In 2002, for example, Bill Clinton flies on Jeffrey Epstein's jet and flies around publicly with Jeffrey Epstein for an HIV-AIDS humanitarian relief tour. On that as well was Bono and I think Chris Tucker. And that very year, Bill Clinton starts the Clinton Foundation, which would then spawn the Clinton Global Initiative, which would boomeranged back on U.S. politics in a big way with its various scandals during the 2016 election cycle. But Jeffrey Epstein's attorney testified in court that Bill Clinton was a co-founder of the Clinton Global Initiative and pitched the idea of it to Bill Clinton.

Starting point is 00:47:31 Now, the Clintons have not either confirmed or denied that, but the fact is, is the Epstein estate felt that that was such a such a noteworthy thing to mention that they you know that that that you know there's testimony under penalty of perjury that that that epstein helped set up the clinton global initiative and of course this would be a international philanthropy pools of tens of millions of dollars that connected world leaders for joint um philanthropic efforts that also dovetailed with state craft initiatives happening at that time This was a frequent cover, for example, for intelligence work after the reforms of the 1970s, much of this work moved into USAID and private philanthropies. And it's around this time also that Epstein is deepening his ties with high-level figures

Starting point is 00:48:27 in his Israeli statecraft as well as with the British royal family. Jeffrey Epstein goes in on a deal, for example, with a... Houd Barak to purchase shares in Carbine, a major technology and surveillance firm. But a lot of this came to a halt in 2006 when Jeffrey Epstein was indicted the first time. I should note a few other notables before I talk about this 2006 event, which is really what we're living in the aftermath of. Jeffrey Epstein was also many of these networks, the Les Wexner networks, as well as the Leon Black networks.

Starting point is 00:49:11 Leon Black was the CEO of Apollo. Apollo is one of the largest investment firms in New York. It's got tens of billions of dollars of assets under management. I think about $500 billion of assets under management. Leon Black, the head of it, personally paid Jeffrey Epstein $170 million for you have so-called tax advice and restructuring. Hang on a second. Sorry.

Starting point is 00:49:38 Let me introduce you to the people I work with to protect my family against financial instability, inflation and turmoil. For me, one of the best ways to safeguard your wealth is by investing in gold. And that's why I trust the pure gold company. Here's a tip. If you buy UK-minted gold coins like sovereigns, you won't pay VAT when you buy them or capital gains tax when you sell them. All the profit is yours to keep.

Starting point is 00:50:04 And the best part, gold is completely private investment. It's outside the banking system, so it can't be manipulated by governments or anyone else. Unlike digital assets, it's yours in the truest sense. The pure gold company is trusted by first-time investors and seasoned professionals alike. What I really appreciate about them is their knowledgeable pressure-free approach. They explain everything clearly so you feel confident about your decisions and they never push you to buy. Physical gold has stood the test of time as a store of value and it offers peace of mind that other assets. can't match. It's reassuring to know that even if the banking system falters, your gold and its

Starting point is 00:50:43 value remain safe. Whether you're looking to diversify your investments, protect your savings, or just gain the security of owning a real physical asset, we highly recommend the pure gold company. Click the link in the description or go to pure dash gold.co slash trigger to get your free copy of the investor guide. That's pure dash gold.co slash trigger. Take control of your financial future today. This episode is brought to you by Ultima Replenisher. Health is all about balance, like a salad with fries. So why not have balance in your hydration?

Starting point is 00:51:18 With six essential electrolytes and no junk, Ultima provides balanced hydration you can enjoy every day. That means no sugar, calories, or carbs, and it's not loaded with sodium. Just delicious plant-based flavors you'll actually look forward to drinking. Shop Ultima on Amazon or in store at Target and Whole Foods Market. But there are times. when you're telling this story, Mike, that I'm going, okay, that sounds plausible, that sounds plausible.

Starting point is 00:51:44 And then he goes, $170 million for tax. I mean, if that's the case, shouldn't we all become tax advisors? Well, of course, being the tax advisor in that way is about creative structuring. If there were things that Apollo management was doing as a kind of liquid middleman for various, various, that could have been brokered, you know, internationally. Because a lot of what hedge funds or a lot of what private equity funds and alternative asset managers do is, you know, they're moving in these illiquid assets that then become very easy fronts for money laundering through the debt schemes that they do. Like a lot of ways that, for example, the CIA structures these money laundering operations as debt instruments, as these complex loans, back-to-back,

Starting point is 00:52:38 loans between different banks or different portfolio companies in a common fund, and then you simply never pay back the money. And so it's effectively, the bank ends up going bankrupt or the asset ends up going under. This is what happened with BCCI, the big CIA bank that Adnan Khashoggi was heavily involved in that got in a lot of trouble in the 1980s during the Iran-Contra affair because it was the CIA's sort of primary bank. house for the Iran-Contra operation. But just to, I guess, bring this back a little bit. In 2006, because the Leon Black Jeffrey Epstein affair is noteworthy, particularly because it happened after the first indictment. And the first indictment of Jeffrey Epstein,

Starting point is 00:53:29 which is being relitigated right now in the United States, started in 2006. And at this time, Epstein's dealings with a lot of these networks ended up getting fractured because people don't want to really do business with them anymore after the allegations in 2006. For example, this is around when Donald Trump sort of severed ties with Epstein

Starting point is 00:53:54 when these allegations... Mike, can you give us some details on that indictment? What is he indicted for? What is the accusations? What is it that's being revealed to the public at this point? Right. So in 2006, after Donald dozens of reports from local families in Florida, Jeffrey Epstein ends up getting indicted by the

Starting point is 00:54:15 state, the Florida state prosecutor for effectively prostitution and trafficking of women for sexual acts. And the state prosecutors end up watering down the charges brought against Epstein after some sort of mercurial moves are reportedly made by Epstein's defense lawyers. And at that point, the FBI and federal justice department moves in on Epstein and says, okay, we're going to actually make this a much more substantial case. And so that's when the underage child sex trafficking charges start to come in. And in May 2007, the lead prosecutor at the Justice Department, Maria Villeneuva, as well as the FBI, are prepared. They prepare a 60-count federal indictment, 82 pages worth of charges, and they alert the head of the Justice

Starting point is 00:55:15 Department in Miami at the time, a guy named Alex Acosta, that they are going to, the FBI is going to arrest Jeffrey Epstein the following week in May 2007 while he was in the U.S. Virgin Islands judging a beauty pageant at the time. So it's May 2007, the FBI is ready to go. They've got the, you know, this massive indictment and they're ready to make the formal arrest. When Alex Acosta, according to the Justice Department's own investigation of this in 2020, stops, stops the arrest and says, no, you're going to observe the chain of command here. You're not going to arrest Jeffrey Epstein until I say you can. I'm going to meet with Epstein's defense counsel first.

Starting point is 00:55:57 And at this point, Alex Acosta effectively takes over the Epstein investigation and then cuts a sweetheart deal for Jeffrey Epstein in which Jeffrey Epstein, they effectively drop the criminal charges at the federal level for Epstein to agree to the state level charges and plead guilty to them and get a year and a half in prison where effectively for the last six months of that, Epstein can walk in and out of the prison to do his own kind of business dealings. So basically gets a sweetheart deal where they, he, the whole federal charges end up getting dropped for Epstein to plead guilty to the state level ones. And he's completely, you know, free and clear within two years, despite this massive, I mean, it's been reported in the Glein Maxwell trial, for example, it was about a thousand women who were, who were trafficked in this. And so to only, many of them underage.

Starting point is 00:56:59 So to have effectively under two years of prison for that, and maybe. then be back out on the streets was seen as the sweetheart deal of the century. And it was very unusual the way it was cut because Acosta cut the lead prosecutors out of the plea negotiations. And he also cut the victims. So the victims, this is highly unusual in a plea deal of this kind. The victims had no say in the, the Justice Department didn't even ask whether or not the victims were okay with that, you know, as. But the details of this plea deal were never known until 2018. when the Miami Herald, one of the big mainstream news outlets in Miami, reported the details of this plea deal.

Starting point is 00:57:41 And the Miami Herald began investigating this because it was in 2017, 2018, when Alex Acosta would go to be a cabinet member. He was the Secretary of Labor for the Trump administration, which is a cabinet-level position. It's the head of the Department of Labor, which is effectively the touch point between the federal government and unions. Unions, which be noted, are one of the ways that logistics are done for intelligence work and also have many touch points with organized crime.

Starting point is 00:58:14 But the fact is, Alex Acosta went from running this Miami Justice Department office to being elevated to sitting in the cabinet meetings and being, you know, the highest, you know, person for all things labor in the U.S. federal government. So Miami Herald begins digging into this and gets a hold of this secret plea deal and publishes its contents. And so Alex Acosta is having to deal with this scandal for the Trump administration. In February 2019, the Justice Department launches an internal investigation into the contents of the plea deal and whether or not it was on the up and up. And then five months later in July 2019, Jeffrey Epstein is indicted for a second time. with much more extensive charges.

Starting point is 00:59:02 He's indicted on July 6th, and then on July 9th, so just three days later, July 9th, 2019, a bombshell was published, which we are living in the aftermath of, which is Vicki Ward, who is a prolific investigative journalist at the time for The Daily Beast, publishes a piece saying that Trump transition officials spoke with her and told her that when Alex Acosta was being interviewed by the Trump administration for the Department of Labor job, he was asked by the Trump transition team if the Epstein plea deal was going to cause embarrassment to the Trump administration, and why did you cut this plea deal? And what the Trump transition officials told Vicki Ward is that when Acosta was asked that question, he replied at that time in that interview that he was told to back off Epstein,

Starting point is 00:59:56 because Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone because it was above his pay grade, and that was the reason he cut the sweetheart deal. Told by whom? This we don't know. This we don't know. And this is one of the lingering questions for the Justice Department today to answer, because that was July 9, 2019. The very next day, Alex Acosta is under the gun now.

Starting point is 01:00:20 He is being attacked by the media. He's eventually going to resign over this. over this affair and step down as Secretary of Labor. But the very next day, Jeffery, Alex Acosta gives a one-hour media press briefing to answer questions from the media about the Epstein plea deal. And the very last question, you can look this up on YouTube, it's Alex Acosta's July 10th, 2019 press conference.

Starting point is 01:00:47 He's asked by a reporter, I believe, from Reuters, whether or not there was any truth to what was published the very day before by the day. Daily Beast, that he cut the plea deal to Alex Acosta because he cut the plea deal to Jeffrey Epstein because Epstein belonged to intelligence. And Alex Acosta kind of shuffles nervously and says, I am not allowed to answer that question because of ethics rules by the Justice Department. So don't believe everything that you read in the media, but I can neither confirm nor deny. Richard Lardner from the Associated Press. Mr. Secretary, were you ever made aware at any point in your

Starting point is 01:01:26 in this case if Mr. Epstein was an intelligence asset of some sort? So there has been reporting to that effect. And let me say there's been reporting to a lot of effects in this case, not just now, but over the years. And again, I would, you know, I would hesitate to take this reporting as fact. This was a case that was brought by our office. It was brought based on the facts. And I look at that reporting and others.

Starting point is 01:02:01 I can't address it directly because of our guidelines. But I can tell you that a lot of reporting is just going down rabbit holes. So this sort of set US media in a tizzy. What possible reason could Alex Acosta have to not answer whether or not this whole affair be attributed to something much bigger than just child sex trafficking or prostitution, but that this was actually sanctioned by U.S. intelligence agencies or potentially international intelligence agencies. We don't know what intelligence branch that was. And the fact that Alex Ocasson, when asked publicly by mainstream media reporters, didn't even deny that that's

Starting point is 01:02:49 what he said. But now arguably, you could argue that because of the the Justice Department Office of Professional Responsibility investigation that, specifically about the plea deal, that Alex Acosta was bound by some ethics guidelines related to not jeopardize the ongoing investigation of the Justice Department. But this had been a cold case for 11 years at that point. That case was already over in 2008. And in previous questions, in that same. press conference, Alex Acosta would cite, and everyone can go back and look this up on YouTube.

Starting point is 01:03:28 He would preface things by saying, well, I can't answer that question directly because of, because of the ongoing Justice Department investigation. But let me try to answer your question from a different angle. He would use phrases like that to try to give more information about other things. But on this, he was totally mum. And so there's been no public statement from Acosta on this million-dollar question. question. All we have is what came out in the OPR report, the Office of Professional Responsibility report when in November 2020, which happened two weeks after Trump lost the election. So this report

Starting point is 01:04:06 took 21 months for the Justice Department to write. It was a review of the plea deal that Alex Acosta struck in order to decide whether or not disciplinary action should be meted out on Alex Acosta and his associates for violating Justice Department protocol, what they ultimately found is that it was unseemly and it did not perfectly observe Justice Department protocol, but they would not be pursuing disciplinary charges. That was what came out of that. And that was a 348-page report, a 21-month investigation. And the only reference to asking Acosta about the intelligence question was a single footnote on page 169, it's footnote 244, where OPR writes, we asked Alex Acosta if he had any knowledge about Epstein being an intelligence asset, direct

Starting point is 01:05:01 quote, and Epstein, and Acosta said, quote, the answer is no. Now, now there's a lot of problems with this. First of all, the way they teed up the idea of an intelligence asset in the report, is that there were rumors that Acosta was an FBI informant and was providing informant testimony to the FBI covertly as the FBI was investigating the collapse of Bear Stearns because Bear Stearns and Jeffrey Epstein were. Acosta or Epstein, Mike? You said Acosta was an FBI informant. And so in the 348-page report, they say there were rumors that that lenience was cut by Alex Acosta because Epstein, there were media reports that Epstein was an FBI informant in the FBI's Bear Stearns probe. And this is very common. One of the ways to get your sentencing cut down or to get a plea deal on favorable terms is to become an informant for the FBI, who's the investigative arm of the Justice Department. And so, you know, even within what Acosta was seen as denying, it did not appear to be CIA or international intelligence. The other part of it is they use the word asset, which is a very limited term in this sense. Most figures who act as fiduciary go-betweens financial middlemen for the CIA in covert action are not given, you know, 201.

Starting point is 01:06:38 human intelligence asset files. They are not considered assets in a classical or technical sense. They are not recruited by the CIA. They are not beholden to. They are not salaried by it. So, for example, if you look at figures like Bruce Rappaport or Mark Rich, or I did a study of a... What you're saying, Mike, just to save people all the details is essentially Alex Acosta can deny that he is a CIA asset, but at the same time, he could be somebody that the CIA works with. Right. And that denial is a technical use of the term asset, and if he's just somebody that they used

Starting point is 01:07:20 as a go between, he might be somebody that they used, but he wouldn't be labeled an asset. And that's what you're trying to explain. Right. And they never published the transcript. Again, this is in a single footnote on one page, you know, this is. is completely buried. Now, the media reported this as being, okay, Acosta walked back

Starting point is 01:07:40 the statements that Epstein was, you know, belonged to intelligence. But what's very curious about this is, even in the footnote of this report, it doesn't say what question they even asked Acosta. Like there's, they quote Acosta as saying the answer is no, but they don't

Starting point is 01:07:58 even quote their own question. And so, you know, and this is another thing. if somebody asked me a question and the answer is no to something, I'll typically say no. If I say the answer is no, you've usually worked me up to it. Like I might say, well, I don't know. It might be yes. It might be no.

Starting point is 01:08:15 I heard that he belonged to intelligence, but I didn't know for sure. So how do you want me to answer that question? Well, only answer this question if you have firsthand knowledge that you were shown, you know, a document. Okay, well, in that case, the answer is no. You could see it going like that and then it being dangled out as only reporting the, you you know, the four line quote. But the fact is, is at that time, OPR reports directly, the Office of Professional Responsibility conducting this investigation,

Starting point is 01:08:43 reports directly to the Attorney General of the United States. It's an independent branch of the Justice Department that doesn't have all these bureaucratic layers. It reports directly to the Attorney General. The Attorney General was Bill Barr, who again, father was CIA, who recruited Jeffrey Epstein, who Bill Barr himself, started his career in the CIA was a CIA lawyer. He was referred

Starting point is 01:09:07 to by the New York Times as the cover-up general of Iran-Contra itself when Bill Barr was the CIA lawyer during Iran-Contra and then pardoned everyone involved while he was the Attorney General the first time. This is the last person that you would expect. I mean, Bill Barr should have been conflicted

Starting point is 01:09:26 out of that entire investigation because of his own history in that exact network. But that it was who was shaping the OPR report. And what I'm saying is, Pam Bondi could answer this question for us right now because she's the attorney general.

Starting point is 01:09:41 And OPR reports to her, that report was less than five years ago. She can go directly to the OPR office. She can pull the transcript of what OPR investigators asked Alex Acosta about Epstein's ties. She can publish that for the public. And we can see exactly what was asked about the intelligence ties. We can see that transcript and see

Starting point is 01:10:03 did they ask about, did it go the way, for example, I just posited that it might have. It's impossible for me to believe that they asked a single question about that, given that it was what Alex Acosta resigned over, and given that this media reporting dominated an entire year's worth of election cycle dialogue in 2020 about Epstein's intelligence ties. In that question itself, you would have had traffic from the central intelligence. agency's Office of General Counsel who would have coordinated with the Office of Professional Responsibility in order to run that question down. What came out in the CIA name trace? All this information can be made public if the Justice Department wants to provide an answer. And Pam Bondi was asked this question at a White House press briefing just two weeks ago

Starting point is 01:10:57 where Pam Bondi was asked, was Epstein an intelligence asset? then it was, again, that's the wrong question as I see it. You're going to want to run a broader sweep because most of the time, these sort of financial middlemen are not formal assets. But Pam Bondi was stopped by President Trump when she got asked that question. Trump then leapt in and said, Pam, you don't need to answer that. Why are we talking about Epstein? And then he said, well, listen, if you want to answer it, you can, but you don't have to. And Pam Bondi then turns back to the questioner and says, I don't know the answer to that. We're going to try to run it down. I'll revert to you. But look, a CIA name trace only takes two weeks to get the results of.

Starting point is 01:11:43 This is something... Okay, Mike, so what's going on? Why would President Trump interfere in this information coming to life? Well, there's lots of reasons that... And I've been a very vocal Trump supporter. I think that it's been a phenomenal presidency in terms of so many different policies that the admin has been able to get through. But the Epstein one is a very sensitive one for pretty obvious reasons.

Starting point is 01:12:10 The fact is, Jeffrey Epstein, so Trump's concern that he's stated is that if you publish the list and we still don't know exactly what that is, there's a little black book that the Justice Department held up during the Galane Maxwell trial, but that is under seal. The Justice Department has said there's no other client list,

Starting point is 01:12:32 but the fact is there's many of these documents that would implicate Epstein's business dealings with many other people. It doesn't necessarily mean they were involved in a child sex trafficking ring, but it's still embarrassing to be seen as doing business with someone who is indicted that way. The fact is, is there are many, many people around Trump world

Starting point is 01:12:53 who were doing business with Epstein for many, many years. And I'll run through a short list of this. Now, before I do, it's worth noting that Trump himself, in February 2015, everyone can look this up in YouTube, in CPAC, the Republican, you know, Republican, you know, conservative action network that's highly influential in U.S. Republican politics. In February 2015, when Trump was first considering running for office, he said to Sean handed he at CPAC, he was asked his opinion of,

Starting point is 01:13:26 Bill Clinton, and Trump says, Bill Clinton, nice guy, but I think he's going to have a little problem, the little guy named Jeffrey Epstein in his famous island. Bill Clinton. Nice guy. Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein. A lot of problems. In 2025, more than half of all companies are using AI. Microsoft, Amazon, and Google have laid off thousands of workers because of it.

Starting point is 01:13:54 No wonder 40% of people are worried AI could take their job this year. But here's what often gets missed. These companies aren't just cutting jobs. They're also hiring. They want people who understand AI who know how to use it and who can build with it. If you want a business, freelance, or want to future-proof your career, AI is no longer optional. It's a tool that gives you an edge. That's why we're recommending this live two-day AI training from Outskill.

Starting point is 01:14:24 It's 16 hours of hands-on learning normally priced at $895, but we've partnered with them to offer the first thousand of you completely free access. Click the link in the description to save your seat now. You'll learn the key skills for working with AI, including prompt engineering, data analysis, building AI agents, using AI in Excel, and automating your workflow. All without writing any code. Over 4 million people across 40 countries have already joined this training.

Starting point is 01:14:57 Sales professionals, marketers, HR teams, freelancers, business owners. This is for anyone who wants to stay ahead. Our team is doing it too. Spots are filling fast and the introduction call and first session for the two-day training happens this Friday at 10am EST. So sign up as soon as possible. Click the link in the description to save your seat now. And so Trump back in 2015 was sort of using the Epstein connections to Bill Clinton as a kind of sword against the Democrat nexus. And of course, you know, Trump was running against Hillary Clinton for president. But Trump world itself is deeply interlaced in this. As I mentioned, this, the Epstein story goes back to much of the, um, the Republican nexus around Iranian foreign policy from the 19.

Starting point is 01:15:52 1980s, many of these senior figures from Iran-Contra, like Elliot Abrams and many others, were involved. They went from the Reagan White House in the 1980s to the Trump White House running high-level policy in 2016. Many of Trump's donors come from that world. You have, I mentioned Leon Black, a Trump donor who was the head of Apollo management, one of the biggest most powerful, you know, funds on Wall Street was a Trump donor, was a Trump VIP at the inauguration, a kind of gadfly figure at Mar-a-Lago. Leon Black, as I mentioned, gave $170 million to Jeffrey Epstein. I believe it was in 2013 to 2015.

Starting point is 01:16:42 This was after Epstein had been indicted and was a, you know, was a child, was a sexual predator, you know, formally with a predator alert, whatever neighborhood he moved to. He was a formally indicted sexual predator at the time that Leon Black was doing, you know, giving him $170 million. Leon Black's son, Ben Black, is now in charge of the Development Finance Corporation, which is the exact place that was involved in many of these scandals from the 1980s. It was in the so-called Iraq gate, the Iraq oil pipeline scandal of the Reagan administration, when once again the Reagan administration used an Israeli middleman for a U.S. statecraft initiative. This was the case where the U.S. Iraq and Jordan wanted to have Bechtel, a major U.S. engineering firm, constructed billion-dollar pipeline from Iraq through Jordan.

Starting point is 01:17:48 so that U.S. business interests would take advantage of Iraqi oil rather than it going to the Soviets. But they were afraid that Israel might bomb the pipeline because it was right in their face and Israel wasn't getting any cut of it. And so the central intelligence agency by way of the National Security Council in 1988 hired a Swiss financier with deep ties to the government of Israel named Bruce Rappaport. And again, these Swiss bank accounts is also how Jeffrey Epstein was running his affairs. But Bruce Rappaport was engaged because of his connections to the Israeli defense sector and his closeness with Shimon Perez, the Israeli president and the head of the Labor Party, just like Jeffrey Epstein was close with Ahud Barak, the head of the Israeli Labor Party and prime minister at the time in the 1990s. But Bruce Rappaport was the formal conduit in order to secure. a guarantee from the Israeli government not to bomb the pipeline, and he secretly negotiated a 30%

Starting point is 01:18:51 cut for the Israeli government in that. But Bruce Rappaport, by the way, it should be noted when all this came to light, and a special prosecutor was stood up to investigate the U.S. Justice Department had admissible over this. Bruce Rappaport did not have a 201 file. There was a CIA dossier on him. There was a CIA, um, uh, uh, CIA, um, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, go-betweens that were setting up the financing, but they said Bruce Rappaport is a contact, but he's not an asset. So we don't, so initially they stonewalled the investigation and refused to turn over files to the Development Finance Corporation. Because at the time, what happened was the National Security Council wanted the Development Finance Corporation,

Starting point is 01:19:36 which again today is run by the son of Leon Black, Epstein's biggest client. They wanted the Development Finance Corporation to put up $400 million to finance this, pipeline to subsidize it, but the Development Finance Corporation said, we don't want to do that. This money could go to nothing. This is right in Israel's face. It's going to, they're going to, they're going to sabotage this pipeline. Why would they allow this to run right over their border? And the National Security Council said, put up the money and shut up. They said, well, why are we doing business with this guy, Bruce Rappaport? This guy's got an extremely checkered past. He's allegations of fraud. The Development Finance Corporation queries the CIA for a name trade.

Starting point is 01:20:16 on Bruce Rappaport. The CIA spits back nothing but public news clippings. But so the CIA hides from the Development Finance Corporation that actually they were doing business with Bruce Rappaport and that they had a whole dossier

Starting point is 01:20:32 about Bruce Rappaport's ties to the Israeli government. And this all came out because of a special prosecutor probe. But what I'm saying is, is in that case, you once again have four different governments. The U.S., Israel, Iraq, Jordan, And you have, and at the time, they didn't want to make public the U.S. government support for this deal because it cut Turkey out of the money. So they didn't, they wanted Bechtel to construct this pipeline.

Starting point is 01:20:58 They wanted the consent of the Iraqis, the Jordanians, and the Israelis, but they didn't want the State Department to acknowledge it. So they couldn't tell the Development Finance Corporation, which is the U.S. government agency, that they were supporting this deal. They just wanted it financed. They wanted to happen on its own, but then to covertly put it. push it in the background. And so, again, but that was the Development Finance Corporation. Today, that's being run by the head that the son of Leon Black. Howard Lutnik also, you know, has reported connections to this as well because, you know,

Starting point is 01:21:30 his residence, you know, he was basically Epstein's neighbor and there were some strange financings around that. But again, that doesn't mean that, you know, no, Lutnik, of course, was the head of, you know, the head of, you know, Mike, can I just stop you there? Because what you painted is a very, very detailed. picture of all these people who stand to lose significant status, reputation, possibly criminal charges, have all of these things come out. If we look at Elon's tweet, how much of that do you think is accurate, where Elon basically said Trump's mentioned on the Epstein files,

Starting point is 01:22:12 that's the reason it's not going to be released. Sianara and goodbye. Well, I don't think that Trump was involved in, you know, any underage prostitution or even prostitution or anything illegal about the Epstein network. But you do have these ties. I mean, I'll give you just the historical record of this. So I mentioned that in 1987, Jeffrey Epstein bragged to the press, that, you know, one of his top clients was Adnan Khashoggi, the CIA's middleman. for Iran-Kashoggi at the time was one of the richest men in the world. Adnan Khashoggi owned an $86 million yacht. Trump purchased that yacht in 1989. He's been connected to this network.

Starting point is 01:23:03 I'll give you another one is if you look at the flight logs from the 1990s, I had a birthday party about a month ago where one of the guests at my birthday party brought the famous binder for influencers that was handed out by Pam Bondi, which contained the flight log records. And I skimmed through the flight logs of this. This is a pub. This was handed out. This is only a months ago that this thing was, well, you can, in those flight logs, Donald Trump's name is mentioned probably two or three times. So he flew on Jeffrey Epstein's planes in the 1990s. Now, again, And this doesn't mean that, you know, Donald Trump was involved in some sort of child prostitution ring. But Jeffrey Epstein was the money guy.

Starting point is 01:23:52 At the time, Jeffrey Epstein was, had power of attorney over Les Wexner's entire estate. Les Wexner is a, is a giant benefactor in Republican politics. You know, very influential in the whole Ohio politics region. Jim Jordan, the, you know, highly influential head of the House Judiciary Committee as an Ohio guy. Vivek Ramoswamy is, you know, apparently running for office in Ohio. These are networks that go to the highest levels of Republican power. They also go to the highest levels of Republican foreign policy, especially vis-à-vis Iran. And, you know, the U.S., you know, the Iran foreign policy issue is one of the major pivot points that distinguished Trump world from Obama world.

Starting point is 01:24:39 If you look at, so you have this complicated relationship where on the one hand, Epstein is intimately involved in the Clintons and the anti-Trump side of the Israeli government. Houd Barak, for example, was very close with Westexec, which was essentially the government and waiting for the Biden foreign policy team. This is where Avril Haynes and Samantha Power and Tony Blitz. Lincoln were all, you know, kind of parked in this consultancy firm that effectively did in the private sector what they were doing for the Obama State Department and ODNI and White House. And then they all got senior placements in the Biden administration. And Ahud Barak was a consultant for them while he was meeting constantly with Epstein. You also have the fact that Ahudu Barak is one of Netanyahu's chief opponent.

Starting point is 01:25:39 in Israeli politics. You have Netanyahu in the Lakud Party. You have this kind of war going on between the labor side and the Lakud side in Israel. And so in the present day incarnation of Epstein world, it seems to be Trump's enemies. And I think that's probably what Trump was alluding to in 2015 when he used that Epstein connection as a sword against Clinton.

Starting point is 01:26:03 But historically speaking, Epstein really started off much more on the Republican side. and with these GOP networks. And so it looks like basically around the Clinton era in the late 90s, early 2000s, Epstein really started teaming up more with the Democrats, but you still have these connections throughout, you know, about 20 different high-level members of Trump world. And I think Trump's point on this is that he was initially leaning into the disclosures.

Starting point is 01:26:34 And then I think he got startled. And I don't know whether someone in, you know, Trump donors or personal friends, leaned on him to do this, whether or not part of that concern came from the national security community. But effectively, I think his stated answer for not wanting to do maximal disclosures is he said, if you put these names out, it's going to go out without context. And the media never reports context, and so it'll all be out of context. And I don't think he's wrong about that. I mean, you take the Leon Black situation, for example. I've mentioned that a couple times here, because Leon Black is a powerful figure in conservative politics and, you know, has a, you know,

Starting point is 01:27:14 is like I said, a family placement at a high level, you know, Trump world. I think that doesn't mean Leon Black was, you know, involved in anything illegal. He's, you know, his stated reason was that he thought that Epstein told him it was a one-off thing and that he was a new man now and he'd never do it again. But the fact is, is like if publications come out, for example, about Howard Lut, and the like, doesn't mean Lutnik is involved in that. Trump himself flew on Epstein's jet and, you know, reportedly had Epstein at Maralago several times before he kicked him out of the club.

Starting point is 01:27:49 It doesn't mean that he's involved in that, but you get tainted by association. And so I think that the levels of association are deeper than what the Trump White House wants to let on, but there's so much that's come out publicly that it's hard to make this go away. Well, it's not just hard to make it go away, Mike. I posit to you that it's impossible to make it go away. And this is the biggest challenge that Trump has faced so far in his presidency. This is bigger than Elon. This is bigger than the war in Iran.

Starting point is 01:28:22 This is bigger than the fallout with the tech right and Vivek and all of that. I mean, this is really serious. You're looking at the Wall Street Journal running that story. You're looking at some of the things that Trump has. said and look. Francis, maybe just let's pause on that story, shall we? Because it's one thing we haven't fully addressed, but the story alleges, and it's kind of interestingly written, because on the one hand, it sounds kind of plausible. On the other hand, it is secondhand information. They say that according to a person with knowledge, so they themselves have not seen this,

Starting point is 01:28:57 for one of the Jeffrey Epstein's, I think it was his 50th, maybe, one of his birthdays, Jelaine Maxwell arranged for a bunch of powerful influential people to send in various notes for him. And according to this rapport, somebody with knowledge of this said that Donald Trump sent in a letter which had a kind of suggestive image of a woman with rather a strange kind of message about,

Starting point is 01:29:24 you know, we have a shared secret and all of this sort of stuff. And immediately a bunch of people came out, very high level, which to me was quite significant, right? Because if the story is just BS, you often don't, you don't even acknowledge it. J.D. Vance, President Trump himself, I think, and they all said, well, I've never drawn a picture. Someone immediately showed a picture that he drew of something, right? I've never used the word enigma. Again, there's video of him using that word, right? All of these things. And you're kind of going, uh, what's going on here? Is this, is this real? Because if it is, that message

Starting point is 01:30:00 It's kind of weird, Mike. All right, a bit of an unexpected one for you, but this actually got my attention. The other day, I was scrolling online and came across his video from none other than Chuck Norris. Yes, that Chuck Norris. He's in his 80s now, and according to him, he still feels like he's in his 50s.

Starting point is 01:30:20 And honestly, watching it, I could believe it. The video goes through three specific foods he says you should avoid like the plague. And a few other things he's doing to keep in short, shape and stay sharp. I was skeptical at first. The stuff he suggests is genuinely simple and actually makes a lot of sense. If you're interested in health, energy, or just curious what Chuck Norris swears by a 80 plus, this is worth your time. Watch the video now at chuckdefense.com slash trigger. That's chuck defense.com slash trigger. And we put the link in the description below to make it easy.

Starting point is 01:30:58 Right. And it was, I mean, Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against his formerly close ally, Rupert Murdoch, you know, over this. It's just a huge amount of money immediately. Now, now, you know, reportedly this was entered the way the Wall Street Journal got a hold of this was because of a Justice Department exhibit, I believe, in the Glein Maxwell trial that was leaked. And so the, so the Wall Street Journal said, well, listen, we're just publishing what the Justice Department itself. did. And I don't know the truth or falsity of it, but you can certainly, I think the speed at which the Trump train moved legally on this speaks to the perceived vulnerability around it. And, you know, this is an issue that is tearing the base apart. not in a way that I think will make people who are pro-Trump anti-Trump because I think that there's so much goodwill there. But there are all these unanswered questions. And I think everyone can see because of the proximity of the Epstein network to the highest levels of power on both sides of the U.S. political aisle, be they the Reagan administration, the Clinton administration, the Trump administration, as well as other international governments. I think everyone has been excited about these disclosures and that it would kind of give a blueprint about many of the shadow elements of the administration of power that ordinary lay people are just not privy to.

Starting point is 01:32:38 They're not a member of the billionaire hedge fund class. They're not a member of high-level governments. But that by getting the disclosures around Epstein, you would be able to sort of peer through the veil. and this was something that was teased and ran on by Trump in 2015, by J.D. Vance on the campaign trail in 2024, by Pam Bondi, Cash Patel, Dan Bongino. And I think when the big man himself, Trump echoes, why are we still talking about Epstein?

Starting point is 01:33:11 I'm not going to do a special prosecutor, which he's come out and said. Now, he has signaled that he supports unsealing. grand jury indictment evidence. And to their credit, Pam Bondi did file that motion. But the problem is, is there's enough smoke. There's not enough smoke to say exactly what the fire is. But there is so much smoke that you can't ignore the possibility. You can't ignore that there is some sort of fire there,

Starting point is 01:33:43 whether that is from the Trump donor world network, whether that's from the intelligence community thing. And this gets back to, you know, so when you talk about the intelligence side of this, you know, in my view, I mean, I see what people obviously see about Epstein from all the different different linkages. And in my view, I actually think it would be better to put that to bed by simply publishing it because I think that the conspiracy theories that will abound about it will be worse than what it actually is. And the fact is, it's like you see all these touch points. For example, there is a, there's a big part. of the Trump base that is just, that is, they're in bed together, but they are sort of bound in bed together because of political necessity. You have these kind of domestic-focused, America-first folks who want to, America to invest in its own infrastructure and its own education, and wants out of kind of financial or geopolitical entanglements in foreign wars and the like.

Starting point is 01:34:45 And you also have a kind of international foreign policy class who likes Trump for his foreign policy dealings, who likes Trump, for example, for his policies on a maximumist against Iran. Both the Obama and Biden administrations were seen as brokering a pro-Iran network from the Iran deal that was struck by Barack Obama. This is what bound Israel and Saudi Arabia together because by allowing Iran to have. sanctions relief and export oil and gas. It could then pump up the, you know, Hezbollah and the Houthis and Hamas with tens of billions of dollars worth of exports. And then you also had the Saudi network, which was, which is, which is vehemently against the Iran deal together with Israel, because Iran being able to export all this oil and gas would undermine the Saudi, you know, the Saudi hegemony in the, in the region over oil and gas. And so this is what gave rise. And so, this is what gave rise to the Abraham Accords. And this is also what put both Saudi and Israeli government interests behind Trump against Obama, Clinton, and Biden. And so you have this kind of foreign

Starting point is 01:35:59 policy focus and this domestic policy focus in the MAGA camp where the foreign policy side of Trump world needs the MAGA base for the votes. And the MAGA base needs the Trump foreign policy world for the money and the institutional clout, and I don't think either of them can win an election without the other. If you don't have the base that turns out for the votes, then you're going to end up with an Iran deal. You're going to end up, you know, with the foreign policy that isolates Israel from, you know, from the Biden administration and Obama administration. And if you don't have the, if you push it too far the other direction and you don't account for the sentiment of the MAGA base, you're not going to have the votes. So you're going to end up with

Starting point is 01:36:43 Democrats and, you know, the sort of Iran-based foreign policy. So both of them need each other. And they're both, I think, at loggerheads over this because they're lingering issues about the intelligence side of what Epstein appeared to be involved in. The fact is when you look at the Ace Greenberg networks, the Edgar Bronfen networks, the Adnan Khashoggi networks, the Leslie Wexner networks, the Ahud Barak networks, the Robert Maxwell networks. Every single, step in the link of this chain from the time Epstein was 25 years old till the day that he died, ran straight through this nexus of U.S., Israeli, Saudi, as well as, you know, sort of Western European intelligence agencies. And it's, or at least government affairs that connected

Starting point is 01:37:34 them to, you know, to the money side of that. And so I think people are looking at this moment and there's, I think that they are kind of presuming, like a lot of what you'll hear is like, you know, Epstein was this high level, you know, Mossad agent and that he was effectively blackmailing, you know, high level U.S. politicians on behalf of Israel and this sort of thing. And I think that that people look at that because they see what appears to be, you know, the guts, if you will, of a potential blackmail scheme given the, you know, the, you know, the guts, you will, of a potential blackmail scheme, given the, you know, you know, you know, the underage girls and the video equipment and the like, and the fact that the Justice Department has kind of sat on a lot of that or said that they won't be publishing it to protect the victims, and so none of the names have come out. And as I see it, you know, what you have here is something, which is still a monumental scandal if indeed the plea deal was cut to protect Epstein

Starting point is 01:38:34 because he was a node in this network, but something that is much more ordinary course insofar as how the intelligence angle relates to this, which is that this is how business is done, even in these situations. You don't know whether or not it was an asset or an agent. I would not expect it to be an agent. You don't know who was the junior or senior partner in any of these. So one of the things that happens in these kind of statecraft operations is you have junior and senior partner. For example, in the Safari Club network that ran through Bear Stearns and ran through this 1970s, Iran and foreign policy network, that was primarily led by French intelligence.

Starting point is 01:39:23 And then you had junior partners from the U.S. and Israel. Now, of course, Epstein would go on to have a residence in France. One of the high-level guys who supplied women to him was Jean-Luc Brunel, who himself died mysteriously in prison. while he was under investigation. You have these French connections around the Epstein network. You also have, for example, with Iran itself. Iran was obviously in the 1953, the U.S. participated in a regime change operation through Kermit Roosevelt to install the Shah. But this was also largely a British-led operation where it was Anglo-British petroleum that was being nationalized.

Starting point is 01:40:08 at the time that, you know, led to that series of events. And so you have, you know, to the extent that you have, you know, U.S. and Israeli participation in that affair, you could argue that it was a senior British role in it. For example, if you look at things like Iran-Contra, that was primarily a U.S. intelligence operation, where the Israelis played a junior partner in the deal. You have, you know, the case of, you know, the Iraqi oil pipeline that I mentioned in 1988, Once again, that's primarily U.S. intelligence, and you do have an Israeli intelligence touchpoint, but again, it's in a junior role. It was initially a U.S. intelligence idea. They needed a broker to the highest levels of the Israeli defense and state craft sphere in order to negotiate that. You don't know in any particular Epstein dealing who's senior and who's junior on these things. And I would prefer that the records simply come out. And I see this as being one of these things where losses loom larger than gains.

Starting point is 01:41:14 There's more market instability when there's uncertainty than when there's certainty and things are simply priced in. And so I think that what's been done to date has been an attempt to kind of blame other governments in power for not disclosing this and using that as campaign talking point. but then once you're in power, simply sitting on everything. And the fact is, there are just very easy answers that we can get without having to do a whole, you know, we don't need to spend four years on this issue. There's a number of disclosures that can be made immediately, as I mentioned, the results of a CIA name trace. You don't, you're not able to subpoena the British government or the Saudi government or the Israeli government. But you can publish what's in the CIA files, you know, to the extent that you have a special

Starting point is 01:42:06 prosecutor who or some sort of Justice Department investigation that makes this public, you know, through a Justice Department investigation, you can get the Alex Acosta transcript so that we know at least what the Justice Department asked the guy who cut the sweetheart deal about the intelligence question. But I think right now people are assuming the worst about the Epstein story that are, like that the U.S. government is totally controlled through this. blackmail nexus that's got, you know, foreign into, and the fact is, is at this point, it's so far gone that I think you're going to have depressed voter turnout in 2026 from a lot of people who are going to hear all these things and not really know how, you know, the state craft works.

Starting point is 01:42:55 And there are easy things the Justice Department can do that it isn't. And people are going to say, well, hey, this was easy to get. You didn't do it because there's something in there you don't want us to see. And so I think that you can, there's a way to do this that kind of would be best for the administration and best for the American public that, that for whatever reason, is not being pursued right now. I think, you know, sometimes, Mike, there happens to be an issue which covers and triggers your family, your base. and it covers every single point. And I think Epstein for the MAGA base is that issue, which is why it's so toxic for Trump.

Starting point is 01:43:43 Trump talked about draining the swamp. I mean, you can't get any more fucking swamp than this, can you? Number one. Number two, there's the abuse of underage girls. Particularly when a lot of MAGA are sort of the earth, working Christian people, they quite rightly find that abhorrent. When Trump came to power, he was, you know, he spoke about this,

Starting point is 01:44:07 he used it as a sword against other people. The dismissive way that he is in, on social media, attacked the base. And also lastly as well, I mean, it just by refusing to deal with it, you're refusing to deal with a cancer. Yeah. And it's only going to grow. So you either deal with the cancer or you let it engulf your party and your reputation. Is that an unfair assessment of what Trump is dealing with now?

Starting point is 01:44:41 I think that's spot on. And Trump is in an unusual place because there's so much love for Trump from the base. I mean, we watch this guy get 91 felonies on totally BS grounds. the first president to ever be arrested, indicted, have a mugshot. We were all there through that. You know, we were there when he got shot in the face. You know, it was, we were there when he got spied on by the Central Intelligence Agency and who placed spies in his campaign in 2016.

Starting point is 01:45:13 We were there through the FBI Special. There's so much love for Trump, and we're so used to seeing him be attacked on pernicious, illegal or immoral or unjustified grounds. And I think Trump is used to having the base be dogmatic and persistent in defending him against alleged scandals that are non-scandals. And this is one of the first times that Trump is kind of on the receiving end of that same kind of persistence and aggression that it feels like has been trained into the MAGA movement. And it's very, it's very, you can see how Trump is between Iraq and a hard place here, because

Starting point is 01:45:56 depending on what exactly is motivating, I mean, it could be coming from the donor world, they could be coming from his personal friends, it could be coming from foreign governments who don't, whose own operations are wrapped up in this and don't want disclosures. You know, it could be coming from the high finance world, from current business partners. But Trump has been just kind of screaming about this and even using, some pretty strong language, like saying that he doesn't want, that there's a portion of the base whose support he doesn't even want. This was embedded into one of his truth last week. I don't think he really means that. But I think you're exactly right on that. But Trump has, as a weird way

Starting point is 01:46:40 of being able to surf these things. And, you know, they, that's saying, you know, post through the scandal, just keep posting through it. You know, Trump, Remember, Trump in 2016 had one of these major scandals that no one thought would go away when, you know, this was the famous grab them by the blank thing with the CBS tape. And everyone thought, oh, this is going to dog him the rest of his life. And when's the last time you heard that thing? So it is possible that Trump can simply post his way through this. But Mike, surely, this is, look, that was a cross-lude off-the-cuff comment made, which, you know, sometimes men say, say those types of things, fine. Not ideal, as we would say in Britain, with our sense of

Starting point is 01:47:27 understatement. But this is something very, very different. And the big difference is that was all the people that already hated Trump attacking him. This is his own side now going after him, really. Well, because when you don't have an investigation, even though you are the only, because Trump and Trump's Attorney General, these are the only people that we, the people, can petition for answers on this. Otherwise, we have to come up with our own. And if you have the internet come up with its own answers, they're going to come up with something as, you know, extremely wild. And the issue is, is if it was less wild than what the internet thinks up, then you would think that the Justice Department would give those answers. And their failure to do

Starting point is 01:48:14 so leaves the base with either, you know, trusting what they read on the internet, which is, which given everything Epstein was involved in, you know, a billionaire financier connected to the highest levels of Wall Street, multiple, you know, multiple powerful world governments, both sides of the political aisle, presidents on both sides, attorney generals spanning back 50 years, you have, your people are going to invent their own Epstein story unless there's an official one. And the only people who can provide the official one are the people we just elected in this past election who ran on giving us the official story by having the Justice Department do an investigation and unseal everything, make available all the,

Starting point is 01:49:06 everything that was behind the curtain of the Justice Department, of the Central intelligence agency, of the FBI, of, you know, international entries. The only, the only official biographer of the Epstein story who can tell this with any completion is the Trump government that we elected who told us they were going to do this. So in the absence of an official biography, the internet has to invent one. And that is going to, as years and years go by, that story is not going to get any less fantastical. And it does not, that story that's being written by the internet does not look good for Trump world. The best thing they can do is come clean and rip the band-aid off. Tell us exactly who Jeffrey Epstein was. Mike, it's been a pleasure. We could talk for hours.

Starting point is 01:49:57 In fact, we have talked for hours. We've got some questions from our audience that we'll put to you from them on our substack. Before we do that, what's the one thing about this, entire thing that no one is talking about and should be. I think it's the Alex Acosta transcript at OPR. The fact is, is it, when you look at something like CIA stonewalling, the files, which is a very, very common thing, I've, I've even had, you know, meetings around this with, with folks in government about just how, how difficult it is to get files from the central intelligence agency when they don't want to show you something.

Starting point is 01:50:36 of bureaucratic tricks. I mentioned this in the Bruce Rappaport case where they stonewalled, you know, even official requests until it was yanked out of them under threat of criminal punishment by the Justice Department. In this case, Pam Bondi could walk down the hallway to the Office of Professional Responsibility. There was a 21-month investigation about Epstein's intelligence ties that was already done by the Justice Department. And the fact that all of the files around that investigation are still under seal at the Justice Department is not right. That is something we have a right to know, and it's so easy to do. It's not going to require sifting through four decades of CIA financial transactions. It's not something that you can blame anybody else for. It reports directly to the

Starting point is 01:51:27 Justice Department. I think that everybody needs to demand this, and Pam Bondi, the next time there's a microphone, you know, interface, you know, at a post, you know, a post, podium needs to be asked, did you retrieve the Alex Acosta transcript from November 2020 that specifically asked Alex Acosta about Jeffrey Epstein's intelligence ties? And if you haven't asked for it, why not? It's the office that reports directly to you. And if you have asked for it, when are you going to make that document public? Mike, it's been an absolute pleasure. Make sure to head over to our substack where we carry on this very interesting. interesting conversation.

Starting point is 01:52:09 Early in Trump's current term, the Kremlin sanctioned media inexplicably released naked pictures of Malignia Trump. Do you believe that this photo release and the recent Epstain Ferorei are connected? This episode is brought to you by Netflix's remarkably bright creatures. What if a Pacific octopus held the key to a mystery that could heal your heart? Well, that's Tova's reality. An elderly widow working at an aquarium. Tova forms an unlikely friendship with the cramudgeonly Marcellus, who's remarkable.

Starting point is 01:52:50 whose remarkable intelligence leads her to a life-changing discovery. Remarkably bright creatures is now playing only on Netflix.

TRIGGERnometry - Epstein, CIA, Mossad, Trump - Mike Benz

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.