TRIGGERnometry - Porn, Only Fans and Bodycount - Candice Horbacz

Episode Date: January 29, 2025

Candice Horbacz is a former adult film star, host of the Chatting With Candice Podcast, a wife, mum and philanthropist. SPONSOR: We use Ground News to escape the echo chamber and stay fully informed. Go to https://ground.news/triggernometry to save 40% on the Ground News unlimited access Vantage plan. SPONSOR: Express VPN. Go to https://www.expressvpn.com/trigger/ to get 4 months FREE Follow Candice on X: https://x.com/CandiceHorbacz Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Substack! https://triggernometry.substack.com/ OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here: Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5 Shop Merch here - https://www.triggerpod.co.uk/shop/ Advertise on TRIGGERnometry: [e-mail] Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media: https://twitter.com/triggerpod https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/ https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/ About TRIGGERnometry: Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

I'm so getting, this is actually something I can get cancelled for, even though it's absolutely true. How do you give a woman the ick? It's anything. It could be the way that your fingernails are clipped. It could be the way that you pick up your tea. Well, I just think it's... We work really hard. I know me, too.

And like I said, I really appreciate how brave you guys are doing. Yeah, but if I held the mug the wrong way and now a woman's got the ick. Can you see why it's easier to be gay? So you mentioned something very interesting there, which is all day foreplay. Yes. Talk to us about that. Candice, great to have you back on the show.

Thanks for having me. We really wanted to talk to you because you're kind of in this super unique position in your former adult actress, but you also kind of, you know, in a more center-right-leaning space, I guess. So that's a combination in itself. And then there's all these weird conversations now

happening online and like body count and only fans are all this and the, like, what do you make of all the stuff that's going on? So I think that there are unhealthy examples of sexuality on the fringes, and that even most people kind of in the middle of that bell curve also have an unhealthy relationship to the sex and sensuality and pleasure in general. I've existed in both extremes, so one which is like shame, purity culture, purity rings, and then the other, which is all sex is meaningless, have as much of you of it as you want, be gluttonous, there's no consequences.

And you can do it all without getting attached. Like, that's not true for most people. So before you're going to tell it, what is a pure? I hope it's not something that I don't want to have the visual. What is a purity ring? So purity ring is given to you by a boyfriend or a dad. That's weird. I know.

You put it on your wedding ring finger and you make a promise to that man or boy and God. And you say that you're saving yourself for marriage. Right. And so you wore one of it? I wore one. Okay. So you were kind of in that. shame bit.

Yeah, for a long time. And I left a long-term relationship. I felt a weird calling and pull to express myself sexually in what I thought was a safe container of the porn industry. And I think that you can learn a lot about yourself through sex. You learn a lot about yourself when you're thrown into the fire because that's obviously still a very taboo industry to be in. So it forces you to look at yourself.

But what I've learned through all of that is that there is no right answer. for everybody. You have to kind of come to that on your own. And you have these people that are preaching you that there is this one and only way to have a healthy lifestyle. And I just don't find that to be true. I don't think that we need to hold on to this shame. Like, yes, there are certain versions of shame that are healthy and useful, but that's not what I'm seeing. Like, I'm seeing it used against you weaponized. It's meant to make you detached from yourself, from your pleasure, from your life force. And then this other thing is equally much of a problem, which is telling mostly young women to just sleep with everybody, be the cool girl, and do it all without

catching feelings. And that's not possible for most women. That's, you know, one of the interesting things that I really took away from our conversation with you and with Ayla, who we had on some time ago as well, was that like, I don't think most women are wired like you or her. No. Because I remember talking to her and it was just, it was very authentically her, the lifestyle that she leads that most women absolutely do not want to have, right? So it seems like all of this advice that people are seeing on the internet, young men, young women especially, it's like this generalized stereotypical thing as being imposed on everybody when people are different. And then there comes the uber shame part of it, which is when someone is wired differently, they're like

a whore or a slaughter or whatever straight away. Does that ring true to you? Yeah, and I would agree with Ayla. She's wonderful. She's like one of my favorite people. And I think that she is living her life authentically. And she was posting one of her outrageous tweets that she typically does. It might have been around like an orgy party or something like that. And I think it was Michelle Chen. Is that the right name? Melissa Chen. She tweeted she's like, this is a lot of words to say my father wasn't in my life. And then everyone in the comment section actually came to Ala's defense because she came from a traditional background, super religious, conservative, traditional, dad was very present. So maybe let's not just put your blind assumption on this because people

do, there are that the fringes do exist in authenticity, but it's about 5% and 5% right. So they've done studies and it's literally 5% of women that tend to have a sex drive very similar to a man where they can have casual sex not get attached emotionally and it really doesn't leave them feeling used. Most women, when they have sex, they leave feeling used, dirty, discarded. So the context of does a woman want casual sex, like the safety parameter has to be there too. So a lot of people will use this study incorrectly, the findings of this study. And they'll say, well, we took, we went to a college campus and we asked a bunch of men, would you have casual sex with this girl that they don't know? Almost all of them said, absolutely. They did it to women. And they're like, absolutely not. They're

like, see, women don't like casual sex. But like, hold on, hold on. You're like missing a really important factor here. Like, there's a safety element. So what they did is they found a really attractive man that the girl knew and trusted. And they're like, would you have a one-night stand with this guy? Changed dramatically, flipped on its head. Almost all women said yes. So you have to include the safety element when you're talking about women. We're smaller, we're weaker, we're more fragile. So, of course, most women who are doing cost-benefit analysis, you're not going to take some random guy home from the bar,

go to his place and have sex. That's a terrible idea. Now, introduce, or, like, swap out random guy at the bar for some guy that you've been friends with for a long time, but you don't really see a long-term relationship. Well, she might consider changing her tune on that. Yeah, it's really interesting you say that. Plus, as well, there's also the societal element of it,

where a woman knows that she will be shamed and people will say certain things about her name-calling. And let's be honest about it, a lot of it ain't going to come from men. A lot of it is going to come from women. Oh, absolutely. I think women are the harshest on other women. And I think there is this thing that's going around

in the evolutionary biology crew, and they're saying, well, that it's bringing up the expectations for all other women. Now you have to play at that. I kind of think that that's bullshit. There's always been prostitutes. There have always been sex workers. there have always been women that are more available than others, right?

So that never cost the high esteemed ladies of the court to change what they were doing. I think that we are sexual beings. Everyone has a different amount that they require or that they need. And again, it's not to fall into one pre-prescribed bucket that someone's telling you. I think the whole shame concept is really dated. You have to say, like, what is healthy sex to me and what do I want? Is this even mine? And I have so many people that ask me all the time where do you regard?

regret anything that you've done or are you ashamed of anything or is there any lingering shame. I was like, none that's mine. People want to give me there's all of the time and it's this fallacy of I couldn't see myself doing it therefore no one should be doing it. Well, I'm not you and you are not me so you can't tell me that my decisions are incorrect because you can't put yourself or like superimpose yourself into my position. And I see this time and time again with the body count discussion where I see lots of people on the right going, oh you know women can't commit because their body count is too high. they can't. And a lot of these people are all about all facts and logic and stats. And I'm going,

where are you getting this from? Yeah. Well, so the average woman, it's five people. So all these men that are in the red pill community that are up in arms saying all of these women are now e-girls and they're all whores and everyone's got this body count. You need to ask this on the date. The average number is five. So everyone needs to calm down. Like most people, that is where they're scoring. Also, what is what are you trying to gain from that question? What is it really telling I don't think it's a whole lot. I mean, again, there are extremes. There's this girl that's going super viral

because she's trying to sleep with a thousand guys, I think, in a day. That's not normal. And she knows that, and she's capitalizing on it because it's not normal. She's not normal. Yes. She's literally, but you see that, and then people are like, that's all women.

No, the reason that she's doing that for, and she's gaining so much attention because it is such an abnormality. So that question to me is really crazy. I don't think that you should bring it to a first day. I think that says that that person's really sexually immature if they're asking that or they're probably really jealous. You can ask what are your values, what are your principles, what are your goals for the future? Those seem to make a lot more sense.

If you have questions around sexuality, it's like, what do you like? What do you like? You can talk about those kind of experiences. No, not a first date. No, no, no, no, no. But like, later on, if, like, you're interested in that person's, like, sexual experience, then do that. But if it's like, how many, it's like, does that, I don't understand what that's really providing you at death. Here's the thing that never gets said about this, Candace, that since we're friends, we might be able to discuss kind of amicably and in a friendly way, which is a man's concern about his potential partner's number of sex encounters

is based on essentially an attempt to assess how faithful she is likely to be in the course of their relationship. And the reason this matters evolutionarily is that paternal certainty is the thing that really matters to a guy. Like the worst thing from an evolutionary perspective, you know all this, for a guy, is that you're raising someone else's kids. Because from a genetic point of view, you know, we know that it's the genes trying to replicate themselves. Well, if I'm investing all my resources into replicating someone else's genes, that's kind of a bad deal for a guy, right? So men are going to want to assess how likely their potential partner is to cheat.

Right. Now, I'm not saying that sleeping with many people in the course of four. consensual blah, blah, blah, blah, is an indicator of faithfulness, but that's probably where it stems from. Do you agree? That would make a lot of sense, but to kind of emphasize your point, I don't think that there's any correlation to being faithful in part and how many partners you have. Do you think there's no correlation at all? I don't think so, because if you look at marriages specifically, men and women tend to cheat equally, and then it's about 30% of marriages, I think after five years, someone is cheating. So if you go back to the statistic that most

people have only slept with an average of five people, that's not a lot. I don't think by anyone's standard, especially if you're getting married later on in life. So if both people are at five and we're agreeing that that's not really a lot of people, then it's not really telling you a lot about whether they're cheating or not. And then also when it comes to how many partners a person has had, people tend to kind of find each other where they're similar. So if someone is more conservative and they tend to be more limiting with their sexual encounters, they find someone that matches that. And then promiscuous people tend to find promiscuous people. So you'd kind of have your partner. And then that tends to lead to a lot less judgment. You know what I mean? Because

someone's like, well, I did that too. And that's fine. I don't see a problem with that behavior. So I think where the issue would be is if you have a discrepancy between how both of you look at sexuality. And that should be a conversation. But no one has that. There are so many married couples that, I don't want to say it's an average of 70% of married couples are not comfortable talking about their sexual desires, needs, and fantasies with their married spouse. And then we know that being able to have that open communication about what your fantasies are with your spouse leads to relationship satisfaction, which leads to health and longevity and yada, yada, yada.

So we have to have the conversation of, like, why is this shame still lingering, even in the context of married people? And why do you think that is? Because, you know, again, looking at it from a societal point of view, this is, what you were saying, really is where the needs of society, I'm using my hand vertically for a purpose, right, from above, is kind of somewhat oppressive to the preferences of the individual. That's kind of what that's society does. That's how society works, right? So historically, we've always, we, society, has always not only wanted but needed to control female sexuality. And the more traditional the society, the more that, like,

Burke as a perfect example of this, right? So, as I said, our conversation was with you and with ELA, I see that some people are wired differently. But I do wonder when you start saying, well, everyone's different and whatever, it's almost like we do need some kind of standard because otherwise, I think, like you said, young women in particular get misled into thinking, oh, just go and have as much sex as you want, and there's no consequences. So how do we strike that balance?

I think you have to check in with yourself. I think we have become so detached from our own inner knowing. Like we all have intuition. We all know when we shouldn't go down that alley or that's maybe a dodgy person, whatever it might be. But we're so disconnected from that that we don't listen to that intuition. If you are the type of person that if you're engaging with someone, even if it's not sexually, and it's just you're starting that romantic endeavor,

and you feel like needy. I don't like that word a ton, but you feel needy and you have these unmet needs and you're reaching out all the time and you feel that connection. Well, maybe casual sex is probably not a good idea for you. And then if you're the type of person that you can do that and it really doesn't bother or ruin your day, we'll then explore that. But I do think you have to get down to first principles of sex, pleasure, sensuality. What is all of that, right?

It's life force. And you have authors like Napoleon Hill and David Data that talk about sexual transmutation. So I think it's when you talk about oppression coming from the time, top, I think it's really intentional. And I don't think it was only directed towards women. I think that we wanted to disconnect people from realizing their agency, their autonomy, their own inner power, because if I can connect to God, if I can connect to source and, like, find my own abundance internally and with my own tribe, I don't need the church, I don't need the government. So it does make a more, like a more, what's the word I'm looking for, like obedient society in a sense.

and women traditionally have been the gatekeepers of sexuality. You had the old high priestesses, the mystics, the healers, and they did use sex for a lot of those things. The church didn't like that. So there's a whole bunch of reasons that we've kind of gone after the witch or gone after the sexual woman. So again, I think it's going back to like, what does this mean to me going down to first principles?

And do I want to treat it like it's something sacred and something that I should only be sharing with people intentionally? Do I not look at it that way? I think that it is. I think that if you are going to be sharing that space with someone, that person needs to deserve it, right? Like, they need to deserve that time and that moment with you, and that can mean different things. Like, it doesn't mean a lifetime with that person, but it does mean that you should check out some of that man's characteristics. And, like,

again, is he a safe person to do that act with? So it's interesting you say that because, forgive me, you're an adult, former adult actress. So how do those two things connect? Well, when I got in my My view is not the same. That has evolved. So I was under the guise that it meant nothing at all. And I think I was so numb to a point that I was able to do it and not have any feelings. And it was fine. Like I left without any trauma or any wounds.

And I was like this. So, you know, I don't look back with any negative light. But the way that I approached sex then was very different than I would now. And I know that it's going to sound crazy to most people. but it is different, and you would only know if you've been able to experience both when you have sex, and it's for a performative piece, it's for entertainment. It's very different than having sex with someone because you want to connect with them, whether that is for a moment or for a lifetime.

So imagine that you're being intimate with someone, and there's 20 guys in the room, some guys eating chips, another guy's wiping off the counters. It's a very different experience. It's very sterile. So maybe that was also part of it, too, and why it was easy to disconnect, because it's certainly not intimate. You know, we're talking about performing for camera, and one of things that I found particularly worrying is the only fans phenomenon. And I think it's, look, for a small number of people,

it's absolutely fine to do only fans. But it just seems that more and more young women are going down this path in order to make money and monetize. And my concern is, look, that may work for the short term. Long term, if you want to go and become a surgeon, if you want to, look, even be a mom, and then these images get repeated, this is a short term. This is a short term. a reputation destroyer, isn't it? Well, there's a lot with that one. So first, I have been a very big proponent of raising the age for adult

content to 25. I think that the fact we allowed at 18 is insane. I don't think that that's responsible at all. I got in when I was 21, and that was still probably a little bit too young. You mean for, sorry, for participation or from viewing? Participation. Yeah. Yeah.

Why? Can we just start with why, and then we'll go on to the other stuff? I don't think that you can understand second, third, fourth order of consequences of making that decision. It is impossible. Even now as a 35-year-old woman, like, I still get things that come at me. I was like, didn't see that coming from this thing. So if you have a decision that that is that immense, it's going to affect every part of your life that you touch, like your family members. If you have kids, where you work, your future, it's something that you can't wash away no matter what you do unless you become a billionaire and just like swipe the internet clean. So you don't understand that

decision. You also don't understand what your value is, what the value of money is. So you might see 300 bucks and you're like score this is better than working at my nine to five well temporarily right and it's also extremely hard to see the numbers that you're seeing so it's almost intentionally misleading for a lot of young women so you'll see like the coronas and she's like i made 65 million dollars over the last three years that is an anomaly there are 500 creators in the world out of five million that are pulling seven figures a year that's it and i know about 15 of them so the chances of you doing that are almost impossible. You're better off playing like the power ball. So if you're doing it for money or for fame, there are a million other ways that you can do that that cause way less

stress to you and your future. So I agree. I wish it wasn't as accessible. I think that back when movies were like the primary source of adult entertainment, that made more sense because like the gatekeepers were so immense. Not anyone could just do it. So you deal with that. You deal with suitcase pimps, which they put on ads online. And then you have girls that are showing up to really dodgy apartments or basements and they're shooting this thing. So, yeah, it can be super unsafe. I wish that it was 25. I don't see that passing because there's way too much money in it.

I use Ground News every day to cut through the noise and find the truth. They gather articles from over 50,000 news sources around the world and help you break free from big tech algorithms and echo chambers, something that's incredibly important in our polarized time. Go to ground. dot news slash trigonometry to see how it works. A feature I rely on is the blind spot feed, which highlights stories that are disproportionately covered by either the left or the right. With this, I know I'm never missing important news. It's great for recognizing your own biases

and gaining a balanced perspective. Here's a story that is getting no coverage on the right whatsoever. Russia open to hearing Trump's proposals for ending the war, an official says. And here's one that doesn't appear in left-leaning outlets. Majority of Americans support Trump's plan to declare emergency at the border. Ground News helps you see the bigger picture with insights like the number of sources reporting, their reliability and their biased distribution across the political spectrum.

You can't get this type of news analysis anywhere else. Trigonometry viewers who subscribe through our link can get 40% off their unlimited access vantage plan, the same plan that we use. Just click the link in the description or scan the QR code and subscribe at ground.new slash trigonometry. Your subscription helps.

ground news bring transparency back to the media, which is something I fully endorse. And what we now see is younger and younger women taking part, but also more and more women taking part. That is a real problem, isn't it? And that's going to have repercussions way down the line for society, not just the women involved. So there's, everything comes with the cost, right? So you have to decide if that cost is, like that juice is worth the squeeze or if that cost is worth that action. When it comes to making adult content, like, I'm not anti-adult content. I just, like, wish more people were doing it in alignment. And that is going to sound crazy to some people, but you can do something that is art or self-expression, and you can do something

that's, like, for a paycheck. And I've done both. Like, if you Google me, there's stuff that I will die on the hill that it was art, and then there's other stuff. I was like, no, absolutely not. It's like, it's obvious that that was just, like, a quick, whatever. If you have someone that is doing it as an authentic expression of themselves. And it brings them fulfillment. It's nothing about money. It's nothing about followers. I don't see a problem with that.

And then what other people judge or do is not my business. And that's kind of how I would look at it, right? It's become undeniable in some kind of way. Use that money wisely. And then how do you want to evolve past that? Or maybe you don't. Maybe that is like where you see yourself. I know some women that they're going to do it until they're 80 years old.

That is what they want to do. But if you do have the young woman that's doing it because she's in a hard spot where she, again, wants to get, like, a quick on-ramp to fame or money, I would say, like, this is not the way to do it, because, again, the cost is so high. Additionally, I think we have to have a bigger conversation of why we are casting these women that make this decision out of society. And somehow we're saying because they were sexual, they can no longer participate in civilized, like, discussions, businesses, and industries. Because just because your sexual doesn't mean you have a low IQ or you're incapable of working, like, a Da Vinci surgery machine, you know what I mean? And it's also as well, there's a fundamental hypocrisy there of men shaming these women, go, look what a horsey was back then.

It's like, dude, you watch porn and you've watched her content. So you're just as guilty as her. Well, here's the funny thing is no one watches porn, and it is really terrible for society and all men, but somehow porn abets 150 million unique viewers a day. So I don't know where they're getting those numbers because no one's watching it. Yeah. Yeah. You know, it's such a profound point because there's something that we need to talk.

about here is if you look at suicide rates of a lot of the girls who take part in this, it's horrific. There's something else going on here. Or maybe there isn't. What do you think about this? So I think a lot of people that especially are on the conservative side of everything tend to link that to porn. And obviously this industry is toxic and these women can't handle it and there's a lot of trauma and that's why that's happening. Sure, I'm sure that exists for some of the cases. But what I see as well and I don't know how you would delineate which one is which is that it is impossible to go back into society. If I wanted to go be a teacher, absolutely not. If I want to be a doctor, I'd probably get laughed out of whatever school I was in. Like, anything that I tried to do

that wasn't me being self-made is just not going to work. So if you have that and you have all of this judgment and we don't have any room for grace, redemption, or like transmutation, then what are we doing? Like, what is that saying about us as a society as whole? Is our shame so innate and so powerful that anyone that tries to escape whatever that conditioning is, we have to reel them back. in because that forces us to like challenge ourselves and look at ourselves and say do I really want this or not because your existence is a threat to everything that I've been told is right and good. Well this is what I was going to ask you why do you think that is because whether like I think your former career was the right thing or the wrong thing I don't see how it would be

disqualifying to another career now I just I don't see it make I can see why people might argue about a teacher because you're around kids, they're going to Google you, blah, blah, blah, blah, right? But with most other things, I just don't see why there would be that reluctance. Like, again, whether I thought porn was right or wrong, I wouldn't, if someone applied for a job as like a producer on our show, I wouldn't be, oh, that person did porn, therefore no. Like, I don't see it that way. So why do we as society seem to think about it in that Again, I think it goes back to our own shame that a lot of people are holding on to, and there's still so much hypocrisy. It was during the pandemic, there was this woman, and she was like a paramedic or an EMT, and it was found out that she started an OnlyFans.

She was a single mom. She was doing it because her shifts got cut in half. I think it was during lockdown, and she needed to make money to literally keep the lights on. So one of her coworkers found her OnlyFans account, tells her boss, she gets fired, but he doesn't. So he's obviously on the site as a consumer, and there's no repercussions for that, but because she was the one that was making the content, she's now fired because that's not okay. So if you're going to have rules, at least have it be the same for both parties, right? Either you are making some claim for your company and you stand against this, whatever. Okay, well, then that also applies to the consumer, not just the woman.

And you use words like shame and guilt and all of this stuff a lot. Where does that come from? So I think, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Europe tends to have a much more open relationship when it comes to sexuality. Like there are PSAs that I've seen in Germany where there's two naked people and they knock on the door with a laptop and this mom opens it. And they ask, do you know where your kid is? And she's horrified and they go like this. He's upstairs. And then they teach her about internet safety.

So they're approaching it from a really responsible and pragmatic way, right? These kids and their safety online are your responsibility as a parent not ours. as the performers. They shouldn't be watching us. Here, it's, let's ban everything, which is so funny, especially in Texas, because we're supposed to talk about freedom, but only for freedoms that we agree with on certain topics. But when the United States was settled, we had King James that had, like, the Puritans, and they were insufferable.

And he's like, I gotta get these people out of here. Even the Christians were like, these people are nuts. And the Puritans were calling all these other Christians the others because they thought they were so much better. So they shove all these Puritans on a boat, take them over, the United States and then there, like some of our founding fathers, and they developed our first cities and our first towns. So that is still here. And we're relatively new, right? Like 300 and some years old as a nation. So that does leave a certain frequency and expectation on a people.

But I think the shame exists not just in the United States and not just in countries with a Puritan mindset. I think it's probably quite universal around the world. And I think it's got to be something about what Francis mentioned earlier, which is the existence of women who are available in whatever shape or form that is, is a threat to the wives who or whoever. And as you talked about, it's also a, it's kind of like you're devaluing the currency, right? When there's more sex, more of something is available, the price goes down, right? Do you think that's also what What's driving this? That's driving what?

That's driving the shame and the guilt that exists because it's a way to basically make sure that the value of sex is high so you can exchange it for marriage, safety, money, whatever, in that way. Well, yeah, it's absolutely being weaponized for sure. But if you look at, you know, one of our closest primate relatives, the bonobo, like those females use sex all the time to get what they want. So they'll pretend that they're an estrus and get a guy to help make them a nest or to bring them meat or whatever it is

because they have that need and they're like, oh, just kidding, I can't get pregnant. So that's always existed. And women's sexuality, I think, before Christianity kind of swept through the world, it was treated a little bit different. Like, yes, it was sacred, yes, it was important, but it wasn't necessarily within marriage.

Marriage itself is relatively new. And then even once that became institutionalized, the average marriage was 10 years before someone died. So this whole concept of monogamy, Esther Perel has a really good bit on it. She's like it doesn't exist anymore. So monogamy was one person for the rest of my life, and now it's one person at a time.

And then it's also one person at a time. There's also Jill and Sally on the side. So this version of monogamy has been kind of ever-changing. So you look at these divorce rates, and you can say that these promiscuous women are the cause of it. Well, no, the whole idea of marriage is relatively new, and I think we're just trying to navigate it.

And I think the biggest problem with a lot of marriages and why they're failing is no one is looking at it and saying, what are my needs? We're trying to just take this blank, like this blank canvas and say, this applies to everybody. And it's like, no, well, like, I have different needs. What do you expect?

What is infidelity to you? Because that's different across the board. Some people, it's watching pornography is considered cheating. Some people, if you go to a hooters, that's cheating. So you have to have these conversations of expectations for the relationship. What are your needs? How are you showing up in this?

And then, yeah, so I don't, I think blaming porn and promiscuity is, it's kind of like lazy thinking in a way. way and that when you have a certain group of people that are constantly blaming the same buggy man we can't take this seriously I think most of our problems are super layered and complex and that's not to say that porn's not a problem I think the accessibility is a problem right there should be paywalls again the age is a problem but I don't think that the answer is creating these bands that we see in I think it's eight states now that are putting up this paywall and it's in my opinion

it's actually creating more dangerous behavior online and doing so so tell us more about that when you say so in Texas it's illegal it's not illegal but there if you try to access a site it'll say like Pornhub for example they pulled out because they're suing the state so they made the choice but they they list the legislation and it would require you to upload a government issued ID and in some states it's also a facial scan before you access that's you have to verify your identity right but then who's holding that there have already been data breaches and then the other issue is that these main companies that everyone kind of wants to target have the most above board content. Like they have the most legal content and they're listening. So you force these kids to then

go to these dodgy honeypot sites that are not following the same rules and you don't know how ethical that content is. And that's actually where you don't want them. And then additionally, it's over 80% of littles that like minors that come across adult content for the first time. It's not even on a porn site. So it's on Facebook, it's on Instagram, it's on TikTok, it's on telegram. So you do this thing under the guise of safety and protecting kids. Now you have parents that are like, oh, I don't need to worry because the state just put the filter on. Well, no, you actually do need to worry because that's not where they're going to find it anyways. It's such a good point because I remember when I was in, I was a primary school teacher and the kids had sex ed lessons.

And for people watching this, what that actually meant was it taught kids how to be safe. It said to them, look, if somebody tries to talk to. you here, this is bad, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, this is how you protect yourself. And I remember one parent saying to me, like, oh, that isn't going to happen, that's not a problem. I shield my parents, I shield my kids from everything. And I was like, well, okay, but your kids got the latest iPhone. What do you think they're watching on it? And you just saw the light come on in their eyes. So I think the problem is, is like people don't realize. They hand everything over, for instance, to the state and go, oh, the state will keep me safe,

Without realizing that kids are smart, they're far more technologically adept than them, and they're going to be able to get around these paywalls, for example. Oh, and they're using VPNs too. So it's super easy for them to get wherever they want. I think it is mind-blowing and reckless parenting when you see parents that are giving an iPhone unrestricted to their child. You are that lazy of a parent? Like you cannot play or entertain or engage with your kid to the extent that you have to give

them a phone. That's crazy. That's bonkers to me. I think at some point, yes, they need to have access and they need to learn safe protocols, self-controlled, delayed gratification. How do I feel when I watch this amount of screen time? But that's later. Like you don't give a tool to someone who's not ready or mature enough to handle it. And an eight-year-old, absolutely not.

Do you think part of the problem as well with the way that we're having this conversation? And I see the way that men behave online. And it kind of makes me think there are very few people that can make a man feel inadequate than a woman. So if a woman rejects a man, it's hard. It's hard for men to deal with, and it's, you know, men then start to question themselves. So women have this power, and a lot of men are uncomfortable with it, and it makes them angry because they realize that they are not in control. Well, no one has control.

That's all an illusion anyways. But, yeah, I think rejections got to suck. I don't know how you guys do it. I have no, like, I applaud you because if I were in charge of dating, would die alone. I would be way too terrified to approach anyone out of fear or rejection. It just wouldn't happen. So I think it's very brave to be a man and be in the dating pool. Yes, I think there are a small group of men that see women that are that don't need a man, right? Because now they can provide for themselves in every, like, realistic way. But those men have always existed. So I think

we're giving them way too much power and like we're listening to their voice a little bit too much. I think that there's a problem. I mean, I've seen some girls that are like, I'm going to milk everyone dry. That's kind of a gross attitude to have. I try to be really conscientious about how I do content. I'm not online all the time. If I see unhealthy behavior, I stop it really quickly. And even just from a safety standpoint, I think that that's necessary. But we talk about these girls and how easy it is to make this money. A, it's not, because again, only 500 people in the world are making like serious money off of this. But then you have to look at the bigger infrastructure because if you look at all of the industries, they're still ran by men.

So what these women, even the one that's like $65 million over three years, that's laughable to the guy that actually owns only fans. So no, women are not taking over, and they're not trying to eradicate men, I think, at scale. I think it's just a bunch of what you would call incels that have always existed, but now they don't have wars to go fight or villages to go raid. They just have the internet. And also as well, I've just been looking at the way that women and men

have been interacting in real life. seems, and maybe this is anecdotal evidence, but women are complaining that, you know, men don't approach anymore, that it's becoming harder and harder to date, you know, people are becoming ever more increasingly lonely. Surely that's an effect of porn. Porn must have a massive impact on that, because if you're a young dude, why are you going to take the risk? Why are you going to risk being rejected? Why are you going to risk potentially, you know, being humiliated? Why are you going to risk any of that? When you can stay at home, watch porn, get that out of the way, then go about your day? Well, no, so that also doesn't track because the average man goes to a

porn site two or three times a week and he's on for four minutes, four to six minutes. Those are the numbers. Unimpressive, gentlemen. Unimpressive. Four minutes. Is that all you can do? Yeah. So maybe they're busy. So those are the stats. Like if you have a guy that's only going on two or three days a week, I don't think that that's sufficient enough for him to give up on dating, having a human connection. And then also the neurochemistry that releases when you have an orgasm by yourself is entirely versus when you're with someone else. I think everyone who's had both experiences can attest to that. So it's almost like comparing, like, lighting a match to a fireworks.

So, yes, one thing is temporarily satisfying, but I don't think it's going to satiate this greater need that we have, which as human beings is to replicate, right? It's to connect and replicate. We're here to make more of ourselves. So, yes, I do think that that might relieve some pressure, but I see that as a good thing, because I know so many guys that have so much anxiety

before they go on a date, so they'll do that, and they can show up calm. and collective and see the woman for something other than a sexual being. Like, am I interested in this woman? Can I build a life with this woman? Do I find her interesting? Because I think when we over-sexualize people, that that can kind of hide a lot of red flags.

And then you can dismiss a lot of really bad behavior because you're really attracted to them. So if you can do this, get the edge off, you almost see the person more authentically. I think you made a really good point a little bit earlier where you talked about the fact that we listened to certain people a bit too much. The way I think about it is like in every pub in England, there's always been like a Gary the Wanker in the corner, right?

That would say stupid shit and everybody would know that's Gary the Wanker. We ignore him, blah, and get on with their day. And now you've got like 400,000 Gary the Wankers who've been assembled in one place, all talking to each other, reinforcing each other's beliefs. And suddenly you're hearing all this stuff that just doesn't seem to me to make any sense. The issue is there are people listening to this stuff. and it's changing how people think.

And that's scary to me. It's really scary. And I don't know what you really do about it other than try to offer this group of people some hope and something better. I think that's why Jordan Peterson became the worldwide phenomenon that he is is because he's trying to speak to these people.

It's hard because if you feel hopeless and you don't have connection and you don't see a future and then someone is pointing out one thing or one group of the population and saying they're the reason you don't have. have it, how dangerous and effective is that? Like, we see it and we've seen it throughout history.

So if you're always blaming the same thing or the same gender, like maybe it's a you thing because the whole thing is women are supposed to be picky, right? And if they are bringing things out in you and they're showing you your insufficiencies or your deficits or their challenge you need to rise up, don't get mad. That's like a call to action. Like, what a beautiful gift that the feminine can give the masculine is showing you where you're not showing up. because what we see in you is all of this potential. And maybe sometimes that harshness is the thing that some men need

in order to re-evaluate and say, no, she's right. I need to be doing more with my life. And I think it's simply a mindset change and a reframe. So instead of saying all these women are rejecting me, like ask why, why is she rejecting you? And then what can I do to be a better man that is worthy of love and affection from a woman? I think that's a really great point.

And actually, that is historically how men have been encouraged to think about these things. like you're supposed to be better, and then everything else happens. Right. Going online with our ExpressVPN is like forgetting to mute yourself on a Zoom meeting. Do you really want your co-workers to hear you trash-talking them? Sorry, Constantine. ExpressVPN reroutes all your internet traffic through secure encrypted servers.

So no one, not your ISP, mobile network or Wi-Fi admin can track your browsing history. It also hides your IP address, making it. nearly impossible for anyone to trace your online activity. Plus, it's super easy to use. Just fire up the app, click one button, and you're protected on all your devices. At trigonometry, online security is a big deal for us. As you can imagine, since 2019, we've relied on ExpressVPN to keep our online research and communication secure.

Right now, our listeners can get an exclusive deal for extra months free. when you sign up for a 12-month plan at ExpressVPN.com slash trigger. That's ExpressVPN.com slash trigger for four months, absolutely free. Changing tax slightly. One of the things we were just talking about the other night is just how much power a beautiful woman has in the world. And it's interesting because we do live in a world where it's like we've got this weird form of feminism where women are like really powerful, but also the victim of everything.

What do you make of all of that? Because I imagine you know that you have a lot of power over some men at least. Right? I don't know because I don't fall into that victim trap. I try very hard not to be there. I don't understand the use of it.

I think it maybe goes to the damsel in distress archetype. And some women find power in that and they feel that someone's going to swoop in and try to help them and claim them in some kind of way. so maybe it's a mating tactic. I'm not really sure, but there's that one quote where that beauty is a short tyranny or something like that.

And I would agree it, but we were talking about it a little bit earlier. And yes, it can be used for you or against you, so I'm gonna choose used for me, because no matter what, it's there. So it's like if someone gave you this beautiful gift and this tool and you're like, you have this for maybe like 40 years, 30, something like that, use it or don't.

Of course I'm gonna use it. But you're silly not to. It was given to me by God. Yeah, look, I completely agree. Like, you know, I sometimes see comedians complaining because there's a good-looking comedian on stage. They're like, oh, he's only, you know, he's only dressing like that because he looks like that. I'm like, dude, if you had the discipline, the hard work and the genetics to look like that, you'd wear the tight t-shirt too. Let's just be honest about it.

You've got to use what God gave you. I think so. And I've met some female comics that tried to dumb themselves down because they say that they want their comedy to be the only thing people are looking at. And yes, that's admirable, but no one else is playing by those rules. And I'm not saying go out there in lingerie, like, if you want to, go for it. Go for it. But it doesn't make sense to downplay who you are or what you look like because you feel that that's going to take away from your skill.

I think you can have both. I think you can be talented and beautiful. And the people that say it's a cop out or say, she's only there because of her looks or he's only there for their looks, well, they're saying that because they're not anywhere. Do you think that's true that you can be, see, you can. be beautiful and talented, but I think what people are on to, and this is like a super controversial thing to say that everybody knows is true, it's like with a guy, I think. I may be wrong, I may be corrected by the internet, but with a guy, it's like when a guy sees a beautiful

woman, it is very difficult, at least initially, for him to see beyond that. You see what I mean? I'm one of the good guys, right? Just saying you know, I just, I just see the soul. I think this is, yeah, Yeah, sure you do. This is one of the reasons I think it is probably extremely difficult for a female politician to succeed, especially if she's attracted. Because it's like it's not that you can't respect someone who's attractive. You can, but it's just kind of hard to get there. You know what I mean? So do you think that there's...

I'm so getting... This is actually something I can't get cancelled for, even though it's absolutely true, having spoken to guys. there's a gradient though so is can you be a seven or an eight and it's faster to move it versus a nine or a 10 and then there's also the halo effect so the halo effect applies to men and women and it's if you're perceived as generally generally good-looking that people are nicer you make more tips you're more successful your salaries you have more friends your life is kind of better than other people so it's beauty privilege right so that there's that too so there is right so but but it comes with trade-offs right it's like there's positive so My father, for example, when he was in his early 30s,

he became wealthy overnight, basically, like in the space of a year. And I remember him telling me how actually unpleasant he found that women would now look at him completely differently, right? Because it's kind of like, oh, so that's what they want from me, right? And I imagine the same if you're an attractive woman. Like, there's some massive benefits to it, but you also get some attention that you probably don't want, right?

Right, for sure, there's a ton of cost, because the way that you go throughout the world, you have to kind of be a little bit more guarded and shielded because most of the time it does have an effect on a lot of men and a lot of people. And then you have to ask, am I here because I earned this? Or am I here because he's trying to sleep with me? And a lot of times it's the latter, and then that sucks.

And then as of the woman, you're asking yourself, how do I navigate this? Because I still want this job or this opportunity. And now he just made it kind of awkward. And you don't want to, again, dismiss him or turn him down, because then you're not going anywhere. So it's this really delicate dance of how do you exist, use this superpower in a way that is not also welcoming unwanted behavior.

It's very tricky. I'm sure. And by the way, with guys, I know, again, from speaking to guys about this, there's also a thing where it's like a guy might not want to sleep with you, but it's going to sound so terrible. But it's nicer to have an attractive woman around than some other mutant hairy guy. Do you know what I mean?

No, for sure. It's such a terrible thing in the modern world to say, but I think it's true. No, it's absolutely true. And David Data writes about this too. So this goes into, he writes a lot about polarity and like how the masculine and feminine work together. And he specifically talks about the relationship of an attractive woman or one that is perceived as attractive by a man and in her proximity to him. So what like an aligned, mature masculine will do is instead of just like uggling this woman. and just seeing her as something to kind of like use as a whole,

he takes that life force, that creative energy, and he, like, sends it upwards in a way and uses it for creativity. He uses it for drive, and he uses it for appreciation. So it's almost like this gift that she's giving him, and he's like, oh, thank you, this is beautiful, and I'm going to use it somewhere else. And that's such a good point, because you can find a woman beautiful and be respectful and have an enjoyable conversation or interaction. You don't have to go to the other extreme,

you see some men doing, you know, because let's be fair, flirting is fun, and actually it makes the, sometimes tedious humdrum of life that bit more enjoyable. Oh, yeah, it's great. It's a love language. I think flirting is absolutely a love language. But I think that comes down to compulsion and just self-control, which a lot of people are lacking. So it's not being able to see the woman as this muse, essentially, which women have always been to men, like the thing that inspires them. So take it as amused, but they're like, no, I actually have to capture this and make it mine, which is more of an immature way to look at a woman. That's really interesting. You know something? I'm absolutely shocked that it hasn't gone super viral on the internet.

Now that I have said this, it will. Because what I'm trying to say is men are really dumb. There is a bit in our conversation with Ayla when we ask her, how do you become, I don't remember the exact question, but something like, how do you become seductive to a man or whatever? And it's really interesting because lots of people find outly attractive and great. Personally, not my type. And I don't say this with any condescension whatsoever. But both me and Francis, the moment she started demonstrating it, we were like, oh, hello. Yeah.

Yeah, the lizard part of my brain went, right? Come on, boys. We're getting ready. And I'm like, what the, no. I got to see it. Yeah. I got to watch it. And it was actually kind of humiliating the way she said it because she was like basically

you have to like use smaller words. And it was really like men are really fucking done. Yeah, open the eyes. You talk slower. You go a little bit deeper. You sink into it. And we're just there going, tick, tick, tick. Yeah, it's just like it's all working automatically.

So what I mean is like that this is why I mentioned the power thing. It just feels to me like the disempowering conversation that we've got to. I don't know. It's really difficult to negotiate all of this because I just see a lot of bullshit being like people go, oh, you're objectifying women. Well, when you dig down to the very bottom of it, what they mean is you find a woman attractive, usually. That's what they mean, right?

And it's like, that's what men's brains evolved for. Like, we're not, there's no way to shut that down. I haven't found one. You know what I mean? So when I hear objectification, I don't think finding someone attractive or checking them out, like, like... That's not what people mean. That's not what I would interpret.

What do you mean when you say? When I think that, I think it's being dismissive of the whole person and only putting them in one bucket. So whether it's because they are online showing themselves or whether because they're just an attractive person and then that's the attention that they're garnering, it's that that's the only thing that they're allowed to be. And then if they try to come out of that, they get, like, they lose respect

or you treat them differently, right? It's not seeing the whole person. So I think that you can find someone sexually appealing, and again, you can check them out. I don't think that there's anything wrong with that. I would totally agree you're wired to do that. It would take probably 20 years of Zen Buddhism for that not to be.

There's in Buddhism. They're still doing it. They're still doing it. They're still doing it. I think it'd be really hard for you to get rid of that behavior entirely. But to me, when you talk about that, it's more just dehumanizing the person. But I don't understand what that means. So let's say I see an attractive woman walking down the street and I go, hello, right?

Have I objectified her that? I don't think so. But I haven't seen the person. I just see her body, right? No. So I think it's more like predatorial than that. Like I think it's when someone maybe is expressing some kind of sexual violence in a way and that can be different things. So some people would say cat calling is,

I'm on the fence about it because I think context is really important. If it's the middle of the day and there's a bunch of people out, no, I'm not going to feel threatened if it's at night. And it's only me and you and you're doing that that is so inappropriate. And that to me is kind of that's going into sexual violence territory. So context is really important. I think when it comes to objectification, I'm not expecting you to ask her name, her sign, her family history. I don't think any of that's required, but I think it would be anything that was more inappropriate or dehumanizing. So if you're talking to someone at a restaurant or at a bar and like, I don't know, you're just kind of being, like you're just being a dick. I don't know how to explain it.

And we all know that guy. You know what I mean? Where he's just like, you are a thing to be used versus that woman's really beautiful or she's really hot or whatever that narrative is. So you talk about something very interesting, which is all day foreplay. Yes. Talk to us about that. So it goes back to the responsive desire. versus spontaneous. So I'm sure you guys can walk in the kitchen and you see your lady and you're like, yes, right? She's like she's wearing sweatpants and you're just immediately ready to go. What is it about sweatpants? It's not sweatpants. What kind of point is, you see a woman.

No, but sweatpants, there's something about sweatpants. I think it's vulnerability, like safety comfort, right? She doesn't leave that way. So it's more of like a youth, you intimate moment. Yeah. Look, I'm judging you, but I'm not judging you. No, I'm not. I think that that's a thing. Yeah, definitely. Definitely.

Wait, sweatpants are a thing? Yes, sweatpants are sexy. And women love gray sweatpants. Yes. Yes, women love gray sweatpants on men. Gray sweatpants. It's like fall if you do that, yes. This is the beauty of trigonometry.

You get an education. Right, anyway. In the kitchen, she's wearing sweatpants. Right, so guys can be spontaneous and they don't really need a lot of revving up and they can get where they want to be. You guys also tend to have less sensitive breaks. So there's a lot less things that will interact. your flow. Women, a lot of us, have very sensitive breaks, like the birds start, starts tripping. It's a man's worst nightmare. It's like a car drove past, that's it, it's over.

Why? What happened? We were having such a nice time. So you have to think about threat detection, right? So we are constantly surveying everything. We have a much wider focus because we are more likely to get eaten. We menstruate, we attract bears. It is just wired in us to constantly be doing these things. You guys are hunter, so you have direct focus. you guys can focus on one thing. Maybe not you and I so much, but you can focus on one thing and it's very hard to distract you.

Wait, wait, wait. That's not going to make sense to anyone. Oh, we were talking about ADDs. Right, right, right. Yeah, so. Otherwise, that could be confused in a very interesting way. No, we're talking about ADD. Your brains both jump from place to place.

That's what Candace were saying. Yes, thank you for clarifying. Nowadays, you don't know, right? So women, in order to feel safe, it's all of these little touch points throughout the day. So what you think is her name, nagging, that sock on the floor, you not taking out the trash. If you said you were going to go get milk and you didn't, well, these in the modern era are versions of you not being reliable and not

being a safe partner. So if you're not doing this, element of safety is out the door, right? Now you're creating a lot of stress for her. It's being impossible for her to relax and be present with you, which is required for her to have arousal. It's the intimate touch. She wants to know that you're connected and that you're invested throughout the day. So it's little grazes, little eyes gazes, how many times can you walk by your partner and not even look at or acknowledge them, right? So it's if she talks, you respond. You know, just ignore her.

All of these little things now kind of equate safety and modern era. So you want to make sure that you're spending like the two seconds it takes to just like, yes, babe, I heard what you said, yes, I'm going to take out the trash, like do all of these things. And you will be so grateful you did it

because she will be relaxed and more receptive so when the kids are in bed or everything is done and you're winding down, like she's in this place where she wants to engage with you. And there's something that I want to talk about, which is, because we're talking about that, and that's really interesting. And then there's this thing called the Friend Zone. And you get lots of content now about people, men being too nice in particular.

What does that actually mean? I just think it's attraction. I think that's a secret sauce that no one knows. Like, why do you fall in love with the people that you do? Why are you attracted to the person that you are? I don't think anyone has figured that out. so women get the ick very easily. So I don't know if you've heard of that.

I don't think anyone's ever come back from the ick. So once that happens, it's over. So how do you give a woman the ick? It's the easiest. It's anything. It can be anything. I'm so sorry. Can you see why it's easier to be gay?

Yeah, absolutely. Yes. Yes. I do. And they're called gay because they're happy. Exactly. No, they deal with a lot less bullshit. So it's anything.

It could be the way that you're figuring. nails are clipped. It could be the way that you pick up your tea. It could be the way that you bend down to pick up something. Everyone is different. You know I'm going to say something that's going to sound unfair, but that's not right. No, it's not fair. It's not fair. Well, I just think it's... We work really hard. I know me too. And like I said, I really appreciate how brave you guys are...

Well, well, well, yeah, but if if I hold... Well, I held the mug the wrong way and now a woman's got the ick. For some woman, yeah. Do you know what? A woman once told me that I... She goes, you're perfect. I think you're such a great guy. You've got everything. She goes, I'll be honest with you.

I can't. And I'm like, why? She went, just the way you eat pizza, you fold it like this. Actually, you know what? That's how I feel about you as well, man. How do you eat the pizza? I just fold it like that, so I've got it, and then I eat it like that. So the cheese doesn't drip.

And she just said, I thought that was weird. Is that the egg face? Not for me. No, no. All right. But yeah. Yeah. So it's the way you,

the way you hold the mug. It could be. I'm happy. married, I'm still upset for men everywhere. That's unfair. Well, I think in a weird way, maybe it's your body just saying that that's not the right person. And then when they do the attraction experiments,

they had the women smell the t-shirts that the guy was wearing for three days. So they would smell which one, and then they would rate attraction based off of that. And what they found is that the women that were picking certain t-shirts, it was actually the most genetic differences. So that is to create viable

offspring that are more resistant to any kind of illness or plague and viruses, et cetera. You don't become a medieval royal. Right. So maybe part of that is clicking into your olfactory system and maybe it's actually pheromones, like just you get a waft of, and then he's doing a thing. So instead of you realizing it's really pheromones, it's like, no, he ate his pizza weird. Do you know what I mean? Yeah, absolutely. But there's also the other element of it, which is, like, and I've had female friends say this to me, she was like, yeah, I knew he wasn't the one that I wanted to go out with him. I'm like, why, she went, he saw a spider

and he let out a little scream. Well, yes, I would agree with that all day because that goes back to masculinity and polarity. So men have a relationship to death. You're supposed to. Women have a relationship to life. We're supposed to. So when it comes to killing the bug, that is the masculine. It does have a significance in our psyche.

It's not just killing a spider. It's, well, he killed a saber-toothed tiger. Or another man who's coming on. Right, exactly. It's about safety. So coming back to the friend zone, do you think, see, this is the conversation. I'm actually really glad we're having this chat, even though it doesn't really apply to me,

but it's still very interesting theoretically because the conversation about the friend zone from a male perspective, there is a dimension to it, which is like a woman wants a bit of danger and unpredictable. She wants her man to kind of be like a little bit hard to read and for there to be a little bit of like unpredictability to him and like he's not going to bow down to my wishes.

He's kind of like, He's his own man and he, I know, you don't, whereas the advice a lot of men get, oh, it's just be nice, just be nice. And then when a lot of guys do that, they then find themselves in a position when they feel that maybe what they're not is they're not sufficiently interesting and not sufficiently unpredictable, not sufficiently, even sometimes, some might say, not sufficiently dangerous to be attractive to a woman. Well, I think women want a man that has purpose, and I don't think any woman wants that purpose

to be her. So if that is the center of his world and he's bending over backwards or she's like, oh, babe, don't work on your project tonight or can't you just call out? And he's constantly bending to her will. Well, now she's the center of his orbit and I don't think any woman truly wants that.

So we want a man that has a purpose that's outside of us, right? And still to show us love and affection and still give us time, it's not to say don't give us any of those things, but there has to be something bigger. So I think if you do have a man that is a yes man, he's so agreeable. And again, it's almost love bombing in a sense that she's like he doesn't have a purpose. And I think that's what it is.

Yeah. And also, let's talk about testing because apparently this is a thing, women test all the time. Shit testing. Yeah. Well, there's healthy versions and then there's toxic versions. I think, again, that's the role of the females is to test the man. It is to demand a higher performance of you in every single way. Right.

So it's, you can't test the strength of a, of a pillar or a cliff unless you have a wave that's crashing on it. And the feminine is that wave. So every time it's can you handle the fullness of the feminine, can you handle the fullness of chaos? I want to see how you're going to show up in those conditions. Yeah, yeah, I've been that. That's so. I've had that experience. And most men haven't.

It's something that you have to say thank you and look at it with love and gratitude. And again, a call to action and a call to being a higher elevated man. But if you have someone that's over-testing, I saw this one woman. She pretended she passed out in the shower, out cold, laying there and hit her camera, and this guy is losing, like for way too long she's sitting there. And he's losing it. He's trying to resuscitate her. He's looking for his phone.

He's panicking. That's an unhealthy test. That man needs to leave. That woman needs an unhealthy amount of attention. That's really odd behavior. I think that you'll be able to know if you check in, is she testing me because she loves me and she knows what I'm capable of? Or is she testing me because she's insecure?

here and she wants to make sure I'm not going to go anywhere. Or is she testing you because that's just what women do. Yes, yes. Women do tests. But again, I think that that is our position. That's our role and responsibility. And understandably so. I mean, you have to use indirect ways of finding out certain information, right? Right, absolutely. Yeah, I think it's inherently bad.

Candace, what a pleasure. Thank you so much for coming on the show. Final question is always the same. What's the one thing we're not talking about as a society that we really should be? Before Candace answers the final question, at the end of the interview, Make sure you click the link in the description, head to our substack to see this. The way that Europeans have sex is very different than American men. Really?

Yes. What's the difference? What's the best chat-up line you've ever heard? How much foreplay do women generally need? What does sexual wellness look like and what do I want my relationship to pleasure to be? What does sexual wellness look like? I think the first step is removing shame and the second step is getting down to first principles and deciding what you want that to look like.

And not living your life based off of the fear of everyone else's response, like to live your life authentically for yourself through agency, finding that passion, that play. Because pleasure isn't inherently sexual, right? It's how you play with your kids. It's how you cook food. It's how you garden. And it is uncoupling the shame or the guilt or that you have to work to earn that.

And that's inherently yours. You were born into this world with, like, love and love. light and joy and pleasure and then that slowly kind of gets chipped away to where I have to earn my piece or I have to earn my play and I disagree with that. All right, head on over to substack where we ask Candace your questions. We recently reached a huge YouTube milestone with a million subscribers. Amid the celebrations, however, there have been a few cynical voices too. Some people are asking, how did two guys with weird hair and no obvious talent manage to create some of the most sensible, balanced, non-partisan conversations on the internet?

How do they attract massive guests? Some people have even gone as far as to ask, Who funds you? And the time has come to confess the truth. For the last six years, we've only been able to produce the show because of financial support from some nefarious, problematic people of highly questionable moral integrity. You, many thousands of you.

That's why the show no longer looks like a, Beatles Tribute Act doing a seance. Now it looks like this. This and this. The guests keep getting bigger, the conversations keep getting better. And this is just the beginning. We're excited to announce that we will be moving our locals' community, including all bonus content, to our new home at Substack.

If you're already a supporter, your subscription will be moved over automatically. As for the rest of you, this is your chance to step up and join us as we go to the next level. Give me money! Chill out, mate, we need a bit of finesse here. What he's trying to say is that the show will only keep getting bigger and better with your help. You already know about the bonus content we have for supporters. For just seven bucks a month, or 70 bucks a year, you get ad-free extended interviews with a chance to ask our incredible guests, your questions.

But with Substack, you're going to get a lot more. Insightful articles on upcoming guests, a weekly newsletter, the ability to chat with each other on the app, both privately and in threads. You'll also be able to connect your podcast listening app, like Spotify or Apple Music, and enjoy the extended ad-free interviews on the go. Your support will mean that we'll be able to do more incredible US and other overseas trips with bigger and better guests. That means more phenomenal extra content for you,

as we get the best minds in the world to talk about the issues that truly matter. No bullshit, no fudging, just an honest conversation with a fascinating person. Plus, I'll be able to afford a proper hair cup. He's not going to get one, but at least you'll be able to afford one. Good point. Click the link and join 40,000 people like you to make the show you love better again. How much of the body count discussion do you think is driven by men's fears that a woman with many sexual partners in her past is more likely to cheat?