TRIGGERnometry - The Technology War You Don’t Know About - Declan Ganley

Episode Date: September 10, 2025

Declan Ganley is an Irish entrepreneur, telecom innovator, and political activist best known for founding Rivada Networks and leading the Libertas movement against the EU’s Lisbon Treaty. Follow Declan on X - https://x.com/declanganley Triggernometry is proudly independent. Thanks to the sponsors below for making that possible: - Dream by Beam: go to https://shopbeam.com/TRIGGERPOD and use CODE: TRIGGERPOD for 35% off - Evening Being by Verso. Get 15% with code TRIGGER at http://evening.ver.so/trigger - Augusta Precious Metals: Protect Your Retirement with Physical Gold. Rated #1. Click to learn more: https://bit.ly/triggergold Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Substack! https://triggernometry.substack.com/ OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here: Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5 Shop Merch here - https://www.triggerpod.co.uk/shop/ Advertise on TRIGGERnometry: [e-mail] Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media: https://twitter.com/triggerpod https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/ https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/ About TRIGGERnometry: Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians. 00:00 - Introduction 01:22 - What Is the Technology War—and Why Haven’t We Heard About It? 10:48 - The Outernet And The Encounter With China 26:03 - The Quantum Singularity Moment And Quantum Computers 31:06 - What Is Salt Typhoon? 37:00 - Chinese Lawfare 41:57 - Will China Will Invade Taiwan? 48:43 - How Covid Highlighted The Lack Of Care For The Young 01:01:59 - How Do We Solve How Risk Averse People Are In Britain? 01:07:45 - What's Happening In Ireland? 01:12:35 - What's The One Thing We're Not Talking About That We Really Should Be? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The archeries of the internet of the global communication system are subsea cables. There are approximately 500 subsea cables on the whole planet, which for about 60 million bucks you could take out. I am building the outer net, which is the world's first completely self-contained global communications network. In the fight that I'm in with the Chinese, we have been subjected to 157, losses. This tactic of using the laws of Western countries against them, it is a legitimate method of warfare and it's in their published military doctrine. They are preparing for a major event. God willing, it will never happen. What do you mean by a major event? A war.

Relax, relax. This isn't an ad. If you're not a fan of ads but love Trigonum, Join the thousands of Trigonometry members who get extended interviews, no ads, early access, and the ability to submit questions for upcoming guests. Sign up now at Triggerpod.co.uk. Or click the link in the description of this episode. Declan Gannler, welcome to Trigonometry. Thank you for having me. Great to have you.

We met in D.C. we're a private event. I didn't know who you were, but this guy came on stage, stood up, gave a 10-minute speech. I know a thing or two about speeches, if I do say so myself. You just blew the roof off the whole place. You talked about your business that you're working on, dealing with the Chinese Communist Party and all of that. But actually, your story is even more rich than that. So just tell us, who are you, how are you where you are?

Why are you here? I'm an entrepreneur. I'm Irish plastic paddy, born in Watford, north of London in 1968. I grew up there until I was almost 13 years of age, moved back home to Ireland. With my parents, they're both from the west of Ireland. I'm a Catholic. I'm married to a girl from Staten Island, New York, who's Italian-American. We met here in London in February 1993. I proposed to her three weeks later. We'd be married for 32 years.

I have four adult children, one of whom lives here in London, three of whom live in the United States at the moment. And I am building the Outernet, which is the world's first completely self-contained global, communications network. It's a laser mesh network of what will become 600 satellites, orbiting the planet and polar orbits to provide cyber secure communications to those that need it, amongst other things. Well, you've also had a political journey as well, particularly in Ireland. Very much so. I, back in 2003, 2004, I thought that there was a great opportunity to do a roll-up of the power generation industry in Europe.

And it's a long story. So I'll fast forward to. It led me to read the draft European Constitution, which was being drawn up at the time, because I thought, while there isn't really a single market now for these kind of things, there will be, and I want to see the roadmap in the draft European Constitution,

so I can factor that into how I do the roll-up of the power industry. So I start reading this thing, as a very enthusiastic, unquestioning, then enthusiastic European Federalist. And as I read this thing, I realize I'm reading something that's much more like the Communist Manifesto than I would like it to be.

And I ended up contacting people that were on the Presidium drafting the Constitution to say, is it just me or is there something wrong with this. And two of them told me, oh, there is something really wrong and gave me the background on what was happening in the Presidium that was drafting the Constitution. So that Constitution faced votes in the Netherlands and France at the time, and it was voted down. And so it was not an issue anymore. And then I found out that Frankenstein's monroe,

was being dug up again and renamed and relabeled the Lisbon Treaty. So I read the Lisbon Treaty, which was exactly the same as the European Constitution, same problems. And I approached the then the party that I had the closest affiliation with in Ireland, which was the Fina Ful Party, and I said, look, guys, there's a real problem here, we need to stop this. And they were very interested and listened carefully and then said, well, Don't be silly. Of course we can't stop it.

But this is going to be really bad for Europe. It's going to be really bad for Ireland. It lays a foundation that is flawed. This will be the biblical house built on sand. And if we actually want Europe to work, this is not the way to do it. This doesn't form a Europe that coincides with Irish values, Irish traditions, and the things that we hold dear,

and I believe the same would apply for people right across Europe, be they in Lafeyer or wherever else. They said they wouldn't fight it. I said, well, then I'm going to have to fight it because I realized that Ireland would be the only country because of a constitutional requirement that would have to have a referendum on the relabeled European Constitution,

which was the Lisbon Treaty. So I ended up leading a campaign to vote down the Lisbon Treaty in the Irish referendum of 2008. Because if Ireland voted it down, the whole thing would have to be renegotiated, re-looked at. And I thought, okay, this is a way to force the issue. Ireland becomes the pass of Thermopylae for this issue. And, okay, if I sort of do the Leonidas and get my head chopped off or whatever, it's worth the sacrifice. but we need to form a phalanx. We need to stop this.

We need to force a reconsideration of the foundational formula for the future of Europe. Well, we won. And then they decided, well, we're just going to make you vote again. So it was like, oh, okay, that's how it works. So that was my introduction to politics. I ran for the European Parliament in 2009.

I came, I was about 10,000 votes short of winning the seat. I got 67,000 first preference votes in our system in Ireland. And I would say that was a blessing that I didn't get elected because I would have been in the European Parliament from that time forward, at least for one term and probably for more. And instead, I was able to continue to focus on my business. And because I've been able to focus on my business, to focus on my business, you know, the outer net became a possibility, even was something that I

embraced and really, really have thrown myself out to get it done. And I, of course, every entrepreneur believes that what they're doing is important. And, you know, mission comes before money. I think for successful entrepreneurs' mission comes before money. And so I'm very passionate about the out-of-net mission, and that's something that I couldn't have been, I couldn't even have begun had I being elected to politics at that moment. That said, I did weigh in heavily on another referendum, which was to do with the so-called fiscal treaty, which were the terms that we would sign up for for the European Fiscal Pact, which came about because of the knock-on consequences of the bailouts of the banks, which was something that I decipherously.

opposed at the time. I was ardently opposed to the bailouts. I felt very strongly and said so publicly. I've been on Twitter since 2009 and really actively since 2012. I remember being interviewed by Faisal Islam. He was a reporter, I think for Sky News at the time, outside government buildings in Ireland on the night of the bailout when Ireland did the bank guarantees. And I was saying we must not do this. These are not our losses. This is socializing private losses after they have failed. This isn't passing the buck.

This is passing the burning on fire, melted thing into the hands of people that had no involvement whatsoever in taking on those risks. The downstream consequences of this is, I think if you look at Draghi's report, Mario Draghi's report that he sent into the European Commission about a year ago now, if you want to look at reasons for the lethargic growth in Europe, you will find many of the routes, not all of them,

but many of the routes in the bailouts of the banks, because it was like the Soviet re-engineering of the river system that dried up the Aral Sea. We redirected flows of fiscal flows. We incentivized money to go to all the wrong places, where you then had this absurdity of capital being provided at negative interest rates, meaning you get paid to borrow the money. Would you sign up for that deal? You get paid to borrow hundreds of millions, billions,

given to companies that were the biggest dinosaurs in Europe, but they had the balance sheets that could support the free, literally not just free money, free money plus bonuses. Meanwhile, that capital would have flown otherwise to where growth is, which comes from entrepreneurs, from risk takers, and you had this perversion of a complete reversal of the risk equation where chronic risk aversion got rewarded and taking risk got punished. So it's a very long answer to your question. But a very good one. We'll maybe talk about Irish politics, especially in a bit. But talk to us about the outener, because this is part of the thing that this is what you're working on. Nobody knows anything about this, first of all. So you should explain what it is. And also, in doing this, you've discovered quite a lot about the nefarious activities of the Chinese Communist Party in particular. And this was one of the interesting aspects of the story as well. So talk to us about that.

I have. So the outanets is, it's not. not just a, it's called the out-net because it's not the internet. So at the moment, every global communication system, data communication system is really a patchwork quilt of different people's networks stitched together with protocols, different owners, et cetera, et cetera. And it works very well. It's also extremely vulnerable. So the archeries of the internet, of the global communication system are subsea cables, there are approximately 500 subsea cables on the whole planet. That's it. And some of them are getting cut every now and again from what I've seen, just to emphasize

your point. Very much so. So if we double the number of subsea cables, we'll have a thousand subsie cables. These archeries are highly vulnerable. And without mapping out how I would do it, you would not even need to. to be a state actor to take out the internet. I know that a non-state actor could do this for about 60 million bucks. And they wouldn't need a computer, they wouldn't need a phone, they wouldn't need internet access, they just need cash and airplane tickets. That, I can't say that will happen,

but I will be very surprised if it doesn't happen at some point. And certainly any state actor is capable of pulling this off. You wouldn't have to be a rich country to do this. Now, there are reasons why states wouldn't do this, but if you are a power that has your own completely self-contained internet that doesn't touch anybody else's internet, if you have complete control of your own information systems and you are a continental power that you don't really need to be able to have real-time communications

outside of your own area of immediate control. If you have stockpiled materials, steel, rare earth metals, electronic chips, so on and so forth, if you have the power to wage kinetic warfare, then, of course, you're going to cut all the subsea cables, because everybody else is dependent upon all of the supply chains and everything that is attached to and downstream of the internet, which is most things in your life right now, be it your credit card, this show,

your groceries, the logistics supply chains that supply your groceries, the way that all of those payments are made, everything, all of it. is dependent upon 500 subsea cables, which for about 60 million bucks you could take out. And by the way, when they get cut, there are only so many ships in the world that are capable of doing these repairs. The list of guys that do subsea cables

cable repairs is very short. It's not a big list. You can be sure anybody that wants to do this has got the list and knows exactly who they are, where they live, where the ships are, the handful of them that are involved. And if you cut those cables in more than one place, the ocean currents will take care of the rest. You'll be looking for it for months. So you have to lay new cables if you've got ships that are operating to do it. So you could be in a situation with a severance of subsea cables where it won't be days that it will be out.

it will be at least months, and it could be a year or two. Well, a lot of things can happen in that kind of space of time. Can you imagine the chaos that would ensue? This would make 9-11 look like a picnic compared to something on this scale. I don't want to scare monger, but the possibility of this happening is high. It's very, very high. So as I looked at this, I've been focused on the area of being able to prioritize emergency communications, something that I really worked on following our experiences in Hurricane Katrina.

I did a deployment in Hurricane Katrina, 2005, so 20 years ago, actually, like this week, I was in Camp Shelby, Mississippi, I was in New Orleans, I was in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 20 years ago this week, leading the restoration of communications for Louisiana State Police, Louisiana National Guard, First Marines, 82nd Airborne, Coast Guard, and other agencies that were responding. We got a medal for it, we got paid for it, and we ended up providing these systems to 33 states. But one of the things that we learned that we had to do was prioritized radio resources for the most needy, urgent communications. And we invented and patented technologies to do that. And then move on 18, 19 years down the road from Katrina, and you're in a situation where you realize that you need a global communication system that is not dependent upon the Internet.

that will survive the event that I've just described. And so, as it would happen, a brilliant team of German engineers had done a lot of work to develop the technology to put a space-based out-in-net in place using polar orbits. So you go from the North Pole to the South Pole. You have 25 satellites in each ring that goes around the planet. each satellite's got four lasers on it, so linking to satellites in an adjacent ring. You put 24 rings around the planet. Imagine going from the North Pole to the South Pole.

The satellites are flying like this, about 20,000, 25,000 miles an hour all the time. You put them at 1,050 kilometres, so you don't need thousands and thousands of them. You just need a few hundred. Thousands and thousands of satellites isn't good, because you have to launch them. And that's expensive, even though the cost is. coming down, the other reason is it isn't good is you want to be not too close to the planet, because once you put lasers connecting the satellites, you want to have a bit more altitude so your horizon is greater. So what you end up with, imagine like a fishing net cast around

the whole planet that's going like this all of the time, and that mesh of lasers ends up being the fastest way to communicate in the world, because light through a fibre is slower than light through a laser in the near vacuum of space. We then secured the licenses from the ITU, which is part of the UN, first in Liechtenstein and then in Germany. The German license is called Alternate 1.

But what had happened is the Chinese had spotted what the Germans had done, and they had done a hostile takeover, breaking all sorts of rules of this German company. And I ended up doing a counter hostile takeover, fired the Chinese directors, we saved the project. The Chinese had already launched two satellites without consulting, with the Germans without notification, being done the proper way. And clearly what was underway was a mission to mirror and then move the whole thing to China.

And when one looked at the background to what was going on, for example, there had been, in the months prior, a hypersonic missile test. This is public that the Chinese did where they flew a missile around the planet, a hypersonic missile around the planet. And then there were two papers published on this confirming that they used the CA band, which is the band for these satellite frequencies, to communicate with the missile. And the properties of the CA band, the wavelength, apparently being that it can penetrate the plasma layer that develops around the missile when it's flying at that speed. So one doesn't need to have too much of a, too wild of an imagination to understand how important the world's lowest latency, fastest and most secure communications network, the kind of advantages that it would provide, whether you are a high frequency trading platform or you are a government

that wants to be able to communicate with things going very, very fast around the planet and be able to do so from a laptop anywhere in the world without having to have ground relay stations placed in Chile or Argentina or on a ship in the Pacific or the Indian Ocean or the Atlantic or whatever, which is traditionally how you do this. Why do I say that? Because every satellite system that you've heard of right now is anchored to the internet. They all use gateways, meaning when you communicate with a satellite, you go from, say, you're a Starlinked, You go from your Starlink terminal up to the Starlink satellite.

And the Starlink satellite looks for a ground gateway. It sends your signal back to the ground gateway. And then once you're at the ground gateway, you're on the internet like everything else. You're on the subsea cables and so on and so forth. Now in fairness to Starlink, they have added lasers for inter-satellite links, but it's still to get you to the closest gateway. So ultimately you're offloaded onto the gateway and onto the internet. The out-inet has no gateways.

It does not touch the ground. You go from the terminal up to the out-in-et, you stay on the out-net, you get rooted around the planet to the end destination, and you get landed. You do not touch the internet at all. And that is unique, but it also gives you, makes it the fastest in the world, the lowest latency in the world, and very importantly, it has the tiniest attack surface of any global cyber attack surface of any global communications network because you can't cyber attack something if you haven't got a connection to it. You have to be on it. And when you go through those gateways,

I was in Japan this week and I was giving a talk, a little bit like the one you heard in Washington, DC. And at the end of the talk, and there were people that were flying in from all over the world. And at the end of the talk, they said, you know, do you have any immediate recognition? for us, apart from the fact that, you know, we all need to use the Osset when it's built. And I said, quite a few of you will have flown from Europe. And because of the rerouting of the flights, we don't fly over Russia because of the war that's on. So right now, if you look at a flight, say, from London to Tokyo, you fly down, you go across

the Black Sea, you go across the stands, then you're over Xinjiang, and you come in west of Beijing, you cross down, you banked down over Beijing, and then you cross over, you go out over the bay and on to Korea. So you spend hours flying over China, and everybody has their aircraft Wi-Fi turned on. But what they don't realize is, and in fairness, the Wi-Fi providers, it says, this is an unsecure connection, da-da-da. When you're flying over China, all your emails, your WhatsApp, you're everything, are going to be able to. going up from their satellite terminal on the aircraft to a satellite, a commercial satellite, that's not the internet, is being landed in a Chinese ground gateway, and everything is being

intercepted. Now, it doesn't mean they're reading it in real time, but it might do if they think they were an important enough person, then, you know, people that fly on those planes, you know, some of them, they know who they're looking at. Um, but, the ability to use AI to decrypt that stuff, and once the quantum singularity moment of quantum computing comes, there is no encryption in existence that will survive the quantum computer, because they will all be cracked in, what, seconds, because you can do a million years worth of computing in seconds once we have that quantum singularity moment, and we are really, really close to that. Most of us know what it feels like to go to bed exhausted, only to toss and turn and wake up groggy.

That's why so many people are turning to beam dream. A luxurious all-natural sleep beverage that has already improved over 18 and a half million nights of sleep. The results speak for themselves. In a recent study, 97% reported a better nighttime routine. 90% experienced less restlessness and 80% said they were. sleeping more deeply. What sets dream apart from everything else I've tried. For melatonin gummies to herbal teas is how it combines clean, clinically studied ingredients with a simple ritual. You just mix it into hot water or warm milk and you've got a warm drink that tastes

just like hot chocolate, but with only 15 calories. Plus it has no added sugar and comes in both melatonin and melatonin-free versions. For me, it's a combination of reputation of reputation, natural ingredients, and real customer results that make Beam dreams stand out. It's not about a quick fix. It's about building a routine that helps you fall asleep faster, sleep more deeply, and wake up refreshed. Go to shopbeam.com slash trigger and get up to 35% off with code triggerpod. That's shopbeam.com slash trigger.

Code trigger pod. Get ready to ride. The Rocky Mountain Jamboree returns to Richfield, Utah, September 14th through the 18th, 2026. Join hundreds of OHV enthusiasts for five days of guided rides through Utah's legendary Paiute, Gooseberry, and Great Western Trail Systems. Enjoy daily breakfast, prize raffles, a light parade, and a closing dinner with fellow riders. Experience Utah's trail country at the Rocky Mountain Jamboree. Register today at Richfield, Utah.com. I assure you that neither Francis, myself or most of our audience have any idea what the quantum singularity moment is. Can you explain that?

It's when quantum computing becomes the reality, that they are really working, that they're not in an experimental phase, that basically they're turned on and they're doing what they're supposed to do. And quantum computers are? They are beyond supercomputers. So they are. It is a new rules of physics, well, the rules of physics are the rules of physics, new applications of physics being applied to a computing environment that means that the speed and scale of information that can be processed will be the equivalent of what it would take us a supercomputer at a million years to do right now.

But it will happen in seconds. I mean, that means that if it can crack any form of encryption, then how do we communicate? How do we communicate ideas that are sensitive? How do we communicate ideas that are state secrets? That will be the end of communication, won't it? As we know. It won't be the end of communication. It means we have to communicate differently.

I mean, meeting someone at your mom's house will still be a great way to go and communicate. You know, just the quantum confusion is not going to be there. we will have to be more aware and more careful about how we communicate. Now, here's something to dwell on. Everything that's going onto the internet right now is being picked up somewhere. It's not that they've got teams of people sitting around listening to your conversations, not happening. But it's being stored. And as it's stored, the combination of people.

of AI with quantum computing will be able to go through the library of material that's been stored and it will all be decrypted. And then it will be able to say, go find every conversation that, what do Constantine and Francis think about this in private that they've never talked about in public? And it will be able to figure it out and give you the answer. So the way that you use, you know, GROC or Chat BT or Chat Chitty or anything else, think about that where if you put it in electronic format and it's ever been on, it's ever crossed the internet, no matter how well encrypted it is, that it becomes, that that encryption is taken away and then AI can go and hunt it out and find it. We will be able to communicate, but having data sovereignty,

ownership of your data, where you always own it and you never give it up to anybody else, data residency, so you have possession of your data, you know where it is all of the time, that's going to be what data security is. And of course, I would say this, wouldn't I? And the out-in-net is not going to be for everybody. It's certainly not going to be for most private people. but having a completely separate communications network where you can communicate the world over without touching any of this stuff where it can be intercepted and stored

gets to be pretty important, especially if you're a bank, financial services, a government, and a farmer company, a myriad of other sectors. And of course there will be private individuals who will want that level of security. as well. So how long are we away from this particular moment? We're probably not as close as some experts would tell you.

We're definitely within a decade window. Are we six months away? Probably not. I would say three, four years, something like that. Because the worrying thing is, is as you've just explained, all this data is stored somewhere. And a lot of, well, the British government used WhatsApp, didn't they? You know, America, you know, the American government, you know, some of them are on signal. So you go, well, this is a... Well, the irony of that signal thing, no, I don't know that.

Maybe people have said this. A signal's probably more secure than the thing that they officially are required to use. I mean, if you look at what's in the public domain on the salt typhoon, which is the Chinese intelligence services penetration of American networks, it's everywhere and on everything. So I was not surprised to, and there was such a hoopla about that signal chat going on. I was like, okay, they're actually using something that's more secure than the thing that they're supposed to be using. Because Salt Typhoon has penetrated everything.

This isn't a conspiracy theory. I would ask your viewers and your listeners, look up Salt Typhoon. And this is out there. I mean, what is out there? Tell us about it. What is Salt Typhoon? Assault Typhoon is the penetration of the Ministry of State Security, the Chinese Spicer espionage service, where they have penetrated US communications networks and compromised them by putting in what they call backdoors

and other forms of software manipulation so that they have been able to not just pick stuff up general traffic, but actually target everybody, including Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, his own phones and Bidens and they can single out, if they want to listen and pick up your stuff through Salt Typhoon, they've been able to do that. They did it and it has been proven. They're getting everything. So as worrying as that is, and let's be fair, apart from that, everything is, and it is incredibly worrying, do the Americans have their own equivalent of Salt Typhoon? I'm assuming they do. I wouldn't know. I think you assume too much.

I have to be polite and careful in what I say. We, when I was in my early 20s, I had, look, as a kid I grew up, you know, who was Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Gorbeth, of Pope John Paul II, coal, metering. There were people that looked competent. I might not have agreed with them,

but I knew they knew what they were doing. And I went to the collapsing Soviet Union, January 1988. I was 19 years old. I saw what was a giant Potemkin village, and I just knew it wasn't going to last. I just immediately knew it. As soon as I was there, saw people queuing for sausage.

What's that cue for sausage? What? And you knew that this thing could not continue. And I believed that the West was competent and knew what it was doing because it had done so much to defeat Soviet communism. That alliance between Pope John

John Paul II, Reagan, you know, that time was inspired me. And seeing the collapse of the Soviet Union made me believe anything was possible. It actually made me a passionate optimist in life. That anything is possible. The number of people in this town in London that said to me, it will never change. The Soviet Union is around forever. Person said it to me on Red Square. I asked for a picture to be taken.

I was at 19, 20 years old. And the big hammer and sickle, red flag was over the criminal. I said, can you get a picture of me with that in the background? And it was a Brit, a guy that was taking the picture. And he said, well, what do you want that for? And I said, well, that's not going to be there for much longer. He said, young man, that flag is going to be there long after I'm gone and long after you're gone. And it was gone within a very short period of time after that, a very short number of years.

And then I assumed that we would have something like the Marshall Plan, which is what was done after World War II when you had competent administrators. And I thought the Soviet Union, or much of it, would come into the West like Germany did. And it didn't happen. And I remember a dialogue going on when Latvia had just declared its independence, and I was made an advisor to the first Latvian government, not that I could. had any experience on noise to advise them on anything. They didn't have experience to be a government. No one knew what the hell they were doing, but people were passionate and idealistic.

And an American said to me that the Germans are going to have to recognize them first diplomatically. I was like, well, why? And they said, well, Monroe Doctrine, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And you just saw people running for the hills when decisions had to be made fast and in real time. And I realized then that we lived in a world that was becoming chronically risk-averse when nobody wanted to take responsibility. And I was having this discussion with my sons the other day in terms of when did this start? And yeah, I think August 1914 is a very interesting point of, I think that that's arguably Europe's suicide.

Hopefully not. We have to find out. The surrender of Singapore, I think the surrender of Singapore is a very interesting moment where you have an elite that takes a decision that affects huge numbers of people and literally cost them their lives, where they just decided we're not up for the fight. We're not going to take the risk. It's easier to not do the job that we're being paid to do. And so fast forward that to why, why you're...

Are we out there? Are we doing these things and are we being effective? I would say, I hope so, but I can see, for example, in my case, little sort of subset of things that are going on. In the fight that I'm in with the Chinese, we have been subjected to 157 lawsuits, different legal actions. from the courts in Liechtenstein, Germany, Luxembourg, Belgium, France, the United States. And what they do is, take the US, for example, so they will sue you on a completely flaky thing. And they lose. And then they appeal it. And then they lose.

And then they appeal that. And they lose. And then they appeal that. Knowing full well that there were. was no point at which they had any chance of winning, but that's not what it's about. The process is the punishment. Bleed you out. Yeah.

So we have spent, I don't want to say the number, but tens of millions fighting Chinese lawfare, real lawfare. This tactic of using the laws of Western countries against them and their private sector companies to achieve an objective of the People's Liberation Army of China is. in the written published doctrine of the People's Liberation Army of China. It is a legitimate method of warfare and it's in their published military doctrine. So guess what? They're doing it. They'll surprise. And yet how many governments have come and the cavalry never showed up for us. We've had to keep doing it ourselves. And the brilliance of the brilliance of it is, is by suing in all of these different countries and in different courts in the

same country. So you will face the same lawsuit five different places with five different judges, and then you're going to them, well, actually, we've already argued this over here and they're what? No one does that. We're like, yeah, they do. They do it. The German Ministry of Economy published a really interesting paper on this about a year and a half ago, but lawfare is, the war is on. It's It has started. They want to dominate technology. Any technology that will give the West the edge, they want to take it off the West and take it for themselves.

And they are preparing for a major event. God willing, it will never happen. What do you mean by a major event? A war. A kinetic war. Kinetic war. Metal on metal. over Taiwan, and I am certain that China wants to take Taiwan.

It would love to take it where Taiwan just puts its hands up, you know, Sun Su and all of that sort of thing, and just doesn't even fight. And they're certainly trying to achieve that. But if they don't achieve that, that they will take it kinetically. And if they can take the internet down for six months, I mean, let's say the internet went out right. now. Are you going to be thinking about Taiwan? No. You're going to be thinking about how am I going

to get home? What about my family? How are we going to get food? I can't contact my family because my phone isn't working. So everyone's got to head home. Actually, everybody should have a plan for what happens when all, when the internet goes down, because it's probably going to happen. The last thing you're going to be thinking of or that you're going to be giving a flying hoot about is what's happening in Taiwan. And let's say that that happens, Taiwan is taken, and you find out about it six weeks later, and it's now just a fact on the ground. Who's going to do anything about it? Sleeping less than six hours a night can double your risk of early death. It's also linked to heart disease, depression and a weakened immune system. If you struggle to sleep,

then you're not alone. The CDC report, over 35% of adults in the US sleep less than the recommended seven hours a day. That's why more and more people are turning to evening being by Verso. Check it out at VER.S.O. Unlike typical sleep aids that rely on melatonin and cause dependency or groginess, evening being is a clinically formulated drink mix that uses patented, well-researched ingredients that help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer.

No melatonin involved. And customers are seeing results. Olivia says, my sleep tracker shows I've been getting more deep an REM sleep. Robert Roe, great stuff. Both my wife and I recommend it highly. Click the link in the description or head over to v.r.so and use our code trigger at checkout to save 15% on your first order. So I understand with the Taiwan thing, but why do you think, why are you so certain that this is what the Chinese want? What makes you say that?

Everybody projects, I'm 57 years old. I've been around the block a few times. Maybe I'm a bit jaded in terms of my attitudes. But people, the, one of the great hacks and weaknesses of Western liberalism, neoliberalism, whatever you want to call it, is that we think everybody thinks the same as us. It's true. Do you know, we talk about this on the show so much.

Because I'm from the Soviet Union, Francis family from Venezuela. And you just, I look around at these people who think everyone is the same. And I go, what the fuck are you talking about? You know it. You know it. What are you talking about? I was years ago. So this was 1993.

Now, there's also too dark of a view of humanity. So years ago, I'm in Yakaterinberg. And I had been to a place called Asbest, which is out near Siberia. And we're driven for hours and hours from this place called Asbest to Yacastryanburg. And we've got to have some meeting or rather waiting to get into something. And I'm sitting in a vulgar car. And there's a guy in the back that I knew had been a colonel in the KGB. A very interesting guy.

Won't say his name. And I said, you know, we'll call him Conrad his name wasn't Conrad I said there's good people in Russia he said no come on

I said you know there's good people no there are no good people in Russia I said what are you taught course there are good people and I know there are he said they killed them all I said what do you mean they killed them he said they killed all the good people. They killed all of the good families. Anybody that was left, it was an accident.

He said, they killed all the good people. The Bolsheviks killed all of them. He said, Stalin killed all of them. He said, the good people in the villages would save flour, and they would save honey and food, and they would store it, and they used to hide it in lakes. I didn't even know this was a thing. Apparently, the flour forms a cake around the bag of flour, so you can put it in water, but the flower inside would stay safe and they would hide it. And he said, the worst bastard in the village would spy on the good families and the good people who would not just feed themselves, but they'd feed the whole village through the wintertime when the authorities were seizing food.

And he said, and they would give them up to the authorities. And he said, those people would be killed. And he said, and the bastard would get half the flour. And he said, that happened in every little village in Russia, in the Soviet Union. Now, I don't subscribe to that gentleman's idea that there are no good people in Russia because there are. There are most certainly are. But that mentality, the idea that such people can exist and did exist, and not only did they exist, they thrived.

They were empowered. They were in power. You had to be an evil so-and-so to rise to the top. You couldn't get to the top and have your soul intact. You couldn't. You literally, almost literally, had to do a deal with the devil. And it's a long way of saying, if you look at somebody like Xi Jinping, you look at the cultural, so-called cultural revolution. anybody that is at the top of a communist party is a fundamentally flawed human being

and does not think the same as pretty much anybody watching this podcast. Yeah, it's so true. And you know, it's interesting you mentioned the lawfare because, and the way you explained it made me think of something else because he talked about the fact that the laws of Western countries are being used again. them by hostile forces. And I go, I look around at our country now, and I go, well, the laws of the the ECHR, for example, are being used against European countries to flood the country with illegal immigration than nobody wants. So nuts. I mean, the writing is on the wall, to use that biblical

term. We are the authors of our own destruction. It's not that anybody is doing this to us. We are ultimately doing it to ourselves. If you do not prepare, I mean, this is not even a matter of not being prepared. We are inviting our own. This is civilizational suicide that we're going through right now. And the chronic risk aversion that is allowing it to happen is it exists all the way through the system, right down to the private individual. People don't want to get married. People don't want to have children. Oh, I'll defer it. I'll put it off. I'll go and have an extra holiday. I want to go and climb Machapitia or something. Stop deferring life. If you're a man, be a man. Make a decision. Take a risk. Make a commitment. Life is one commitment after another.

It's all about rising to and enjoying the thrill of embracing the risk and taking a chance and doing something bold, like having a child, like making a commitment to one person for the rest of your life, like committing to a belief system, whatever it might be. Those are the things that save us. The foundational building block of everything ultimately is the fact. It starts from there. And if that isn't right, nothing else will be right, and you end up seeing all of the edifices crumbling of civilizational because the support structures have already rotted away that we're supporting them from the outset. I agree with you, Declan. There was one element of pushback I would put to you, which is our governments, and particularly the UK government, prioritise the rights of the elderly over the the young. And this was quite clearly seen during COVID, where we were like, protect the elderly, protect the vulnerable, which we can all agree with. But we shut down society. Young people were asked to sacrifice the literal best days of their life, their youth, to sit in a room, watch their

youth get dribbled away as long as we protected the elderly and the vulnerable. And you go, that can't work. And then you look at house building, the fact that young people can't get on the property ladder because of planning laws, nimbism. So I agree with you. But we also have to accept our part in this and the government's part in this that we're also not helping young people. A hundred people. I agree. I mean, let's take the lockdowns. So if you'd look to my Twitter history over that period of time, we see this thing kicks off in Wuhan. And And it probably started in September. And the leak, if it was a leak, probably took place earlier than has been said.

And by the way, it's almost universally consensus now. Well, there's satellite imagery around that centre that shows a lot of traffic, a lot of activity in September. And I'm in this satellite business. There is a lot of activity. There's something kicking off, whatever it is, whether it's an effort of containment or whether it's something else. You want to be a conspiracy theorist. Hong Kong was destabilizing the Communist Party of China at that moment. The protests in Hong Kong were massive, and I think the Communist Party of China saw them as an existential threat.

threat. I don't, I think it was a leak rather than a deliberate leak. Um, but I certainly think it was harnessed. Um, and anyway, we didn't know what it was. Coming into Christmas, I was seeing these things coming out, you know, buildings being welded up in Shanghai and people shouting from their apartment buildings. And I said to my, my parents, I said, there's something bad happening here. And my kids, they're adult kids, they're all over one of my, my daughter, my youngest daughter was going to Notre Dame University in the US at the time. So I'm, I'm stockpiling at this point. And what day I'm carrying in ammunition? My daughter looks very disapprovingly at me. And she goes, Dad, you're not going to need that. I said, no, I'm probably not. I said,

but if I do need it, I won't be wishing I had it. So I was being a prepper in that regard in having, you know, months and months of supplies. I planted crops. I did all of these things. I planted more stuff than we needed or a lot of other people. But once it became clear, and it was quite quickly clear, that the lethality of this thing was way below the worst expectations. the lockdowns were just completely uncalled for. In fact, we should have been doing the opposite.

I mean, when I was a kid in Watford before we moved back to London, I remember we had a measles party where all, someone caught the measles. I can't remember who it was that called it was me or my friend Ian or Chris or somebody else. And the mums would put us all together to play together, and everyone would get measles at the same time. And it was like, okay, we've done that. And then you move on to the next thing. and that's how we built immunity.

Now, I'm not saying that people shouldn't get measles vaccines or whatever, but that's how we dealt with it back then. Then we got into this repressive Orwellian situation. Now, I was very familiar with the Irish Constitution because of Lisbon Treaty and everything else, and I knew that the constitution in Ireland particularly protected the place of public worship at mass because of the penal laws where the Irish weren't allowed to practice Catholicism for that period of time

when practicing Catholicism was illegally in Ireland, up until penal laws were finally lifted in the 1820s. And so in the enshrined in the Irish Constitution is this even elevated right to public worship, learning from the lessons of that time, understanding that religious freedom is the ultimate freedom. from which many other freedoms actually end up being derived. So I sued the Irish government on that point of public worship, that we should be allowed because the churches had done all the mitigation and everything else. And this is when this system really gets you.

So I knew I had a slam dunk case. They couldn't win. there had already been successful cases taken in New York and a few other Scotland and a few other places. Switzerland, there was another one where there were cases in process where it was clear that they were going to win and they did. I get to the Irish High Court and they just didn't hear the case. And it was a high-profile case. They didn't hear it. The judge kept deferring, deferring, deferring, deferring, deferring, deferring, deferring, until the restrictions were lifted.

And then he ruled the case and said, well, there's no restrictions anymore, so don't need to hear the case. So it's like you don't even let me get onto the pitch and play. You're just going to say, well, we're not playing today because games been cancelled. So those restrictions were appalling. What we did to our kids was terrifying. What the conservative government in this country allowed to happen under their watch is unforgivable, in my opinion. They resigned their rights. to rule here for what they allow.

I mean, people out for a walk in the room with a bloody well drone following them around. I mean, this is, this is, this is Orwellian. And not only do I agree with you, I passionately agree with you. One of my kids, he'll be furious to me for saying this. But, I mean, in Ireland, they did away with the exam evaluation process

where you sit the exam and then you are anonymous. You're just a number. I love the Irish system, the way it works. Nobody knows who you are. It is purely meritocratic. It's like, this is what you got. Instead, they said, well, we're going to give you an estimated grade. So he got an estimated grade, which is certainly where the guy would have been,

maybe even better, and he got downgraded. And the university that he chose and that had accepted him on condition that he made the grades, not only he made the grades, he exceeded them, they downgraded him to a point where the university couldn't allow him to attend that particular university. So he went to another one, which is very, very good university. Thankfully, it's worked out really, really well for him. But the injustice that was done to these kids

is appalling to the very important point that you made. How so it should. If we are not, not allowing the next generation to put a roof over their head, to be able to get married, to have kids and everything else, what are we for? This has to be fixed. Now, the reason we are in that situation, I would say, is because of the misallocation of capital that we talked about earlier in this interview, that we so corrupted the system that the PE firms and pension funds and entities that ended up with the liquidity are sitting there with a very, very small

group of people running them. And they're trying to allocate capital hundreds of billions at a time with a team of a few hundred people to high-performing assets that are going to provide a return. But when you're running a $150 million pound or $150 million fund, you need to have good performance. You need growth of 20 percent, so on and so forth. If you're running a half a trillion dollar fund, you don't need performance like that to make your management fee. You need a 0.1%. You don't have to blow the doors off in terms of performance.

You can just provide mediocre performance, and you can make out like a bandit in terms of you will live the life of a billionaire. So what do these funds allocate for? They'll go and they will inflate and buy up housing stock, land stock, the lowest risk assets that they can do, and they end up inflating the values outside of where a normal. healthy economic biome would have housing values. So we have totally artificially priced housing that is completely out of whack where a 22 year old or 23 year old can earn, pay a mortgage, borrow the money, pay a mortgage and have a home. And it's because there's a great parable in the Bible. It may be my favorite one, which is called the Parable of the Talents. And for those of your

listeners or viewers that haven't heard it or read it, read it. And it's about the boss who's going away and he allocates money, talents, the unit of currents, to each of his servants and says, look after these while I'm God. And one of them goes out and he speculates and he takes risk and he does extremely well. Another one takes a bit less risk and he does okay. And one of them buries the talent, actually buries it. When the master comes back, the guy that buried the talent says, you gave me the talent, I buried it, I've dug it up again, here's your talent. The next guy that says, look, I was very careful and da-da-da-da, but here's your return. And then the guy that blew the doors off goes, you gave me these talents, I took all of these risks, I made this

many more talents, here's you. And what the master says is, take the talents off. The other guys give them to overperformer. And as for the guy that buried the talent, he says, throw him out where there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. And that is a lesson of capital allocation. And our society now is the servant that is burying the talent. Let me introduce you to the people I work with to protect my family against financial instability, inflation and turmoil. For me, one of the best ways to safeguard your wealth is by investing in gold, and that's why I trust the pure gold company. Here's a smart tip. If you buy UK minted gold coins like sovereigns, you won't pay VAT when you buy them or capital gains tax when you sell.

All the profit is yours to keep. And the best part, gold is a completely private investment. It's outside the banking system so it can't be manipulated by governments or anyone else. Unlike digital assets, it's yours in the true sense. The pure gold company is trusted by first-time investors and seasoned professionals alike. What I really appreciate about them is a knowledgeable, pressure-free approach. They explain everything clearly, so you feel confident about your decisions, and they never push you to buy. Physical gold has stood the test of time as a store of value, and it offers peace of mind that other assets can't match. It's reassuring to know that even if the banking system falters, your gold and its value.

remain safe. Whether you're looking to diversify your investments, protect your savings, or just gain the security of owning a real physical asset, we highly recommend the Pure Gold Company. Click the link in the description or go to pure-dash-gold.co slash trigger to get your free copy of the investor guide. That's pure-dash-gold.com slash trigger. Take control of your financial future today. Well, it speaks to your point about risk aversion, and I suppose the question is, how does that get resolved? Because I was just talking to my friend Chris Williamson on his show about this this morning, actually.

The risk aversion, in Britain it's particularly, I go to America and people who think like you are much more prominent there, much more prevalent there. But in Britain, we just seem to have completely lost that. We had it in Europe. We had this country had it more than anybody, more than anybody. This is the country that sent out the Cussie Sark, the East Indianmen, that set up the East India company that did all of these things.

I'm Irish. I'm not supposed to say this. But, I mean, this country took insane risks and built successes out of them. And then it turned on itself. And the whole West has ended up doing this. We've become this self-loathing society. How do we fix it? Ultimately, it has to be fixed, not by the government, not by societies. It's got to be fixed by us. At the most granular, private individual level, we have to fix ourselves first. And this, by the way, is where I think faith and religion comes into being, because what are your gods? What are the things that you hold to be? worth sacrificing for.

What's worth dying for? And when you do die, momento mory, remember your death. Who do you want around you when you are dying? Because it won't be your boss. It won't be the people that you made money for. It won't be your advertisers. They will be sorry when they hear about it,

but they're not going to be there. who do you want around you when you are dying? Your family. That's the most important thing in the world. I do see what you're saying, and I agree with you. But it is also as well with the government aspect of it, unless we change the legislation around planning laws, unless we relax them,

unless we get that moving, then it's just people aren't going to be creating family. We have to tear the whole thing apart and start again. This is a broken system. It is not working. It is not working for the young. It is not protecting our national integrity. It is not protecting our culture.

It is not protecting our traditions, our beliefs. It's an empty, hollowed out thing. And it's, yes, we have to fix planning laws and all of those things. But these are just small symptoms of a disease body. I think your point is that all of that stuff is downstream. If people were more risk-taking and act. Because then somebody would take the political risk. Yeah.

You look at the situation now. I mean, we mentioned the ECHR. The way the consensus on that is shifted, you've now got people like Jack Straw, former Labor Home Secretary. We've been told for last 10 years, you can't leave the ECHR. You'll ruin Ireland. It'll do this.

And now suddenly it turns out it's all possible. Why? Because there's people on the street. Right. Because the moment you get people on the streets, it turns out, suddenly the legal realities all change overnight. And now it's possible. And by the way, they're said in a very bad example with this. Because if you don't adjust your course because people are simply saying things, they have to go out into the streets. Well, you're going to get a lot of people in the streets a lot of the time. This is true. I agree. I think that's correct. I mean, And the ECHR is one example of the loss of democratic or popular control over the instruments of power.

And as we've seen them, and this happened with the Lisbon Treaty, you know, and I said it at the time, we are moving Europe to a, and this is happening beyond Europe, but we are moving Europe to a situation where we are making the positions of decision-making more distant from the people. Now we have somebody like Ursula von der Leyen. I'm sure she's actually a very nice person. I really am sure she's a very nice person. But she is no mandate from any electorate anywhere. And she's going in and making the president of the United States and the president of this and the president of that as the representative of all Europeans. It's like, how do we get to this place?

What happened to democracy? Now, is democracy the ultimate crucible? I would say no. But democracy is a means to an end. It's Churchill, I'm paraphrasing him now, but it's the least worst system out there. So, but to your point about people on the streets, people end up on the streets when they have found out that the levers that they have been presented that allow them to control what's happening, they don't work. They're not attached to anything anymore. There's actually nothing.

It's like one of those Fisher Price, you know, driving toys that might be. kids used to have. It's got an engine noise. It makes noises, but actually there's nothing there. Yeah. And it's a very profound point. And we're talking about people on the streets. And it's one of the things that I really want to talk to you about. And so there's Constantine, which is Ireland, because we've been looking at what's been happening in Ireland, but I haven't been following it very closely because I'm more concerned of the BIM fire that is my own country, if I'm being honest. So what's happening in Ireland and why are we seeing this footage of demonstration? and angry people on the streets, et cetera, et cetera.

It's exactly the same thing as is happening here. In fact, indeed, it's probably the consequences of exactly the same action. So those boats, when they come across the channel and all those young fellas come piling in, as they do, some of that wave ends up going to Ireland. Why? because there's lower hanging fruit there. We are called amongst the trafficking community and their customers, Treasure Island.

I better not say this out too loud. We are known to be mugs, to be the softest touches that are out there. I mean, we had a minister in our last government, Roger Gorman, do an ad in multiple languages, Urdu and all sorts, saying come to Ireland, you will get your own free, own door accommodation, benefits, galore. It's like, I mean, you couldn't make it up.

We did an ad saying, come here for free stuff. Well, what a surprise. They came. And this is a different type of, you know, somebody that will come in, you have genuine refugees that we are more, I believe we have a moral obligation. obligation to deal with. But so much, if you look at the statistics of this stuff is false, is economic migration where somebody will come in and will lie and falsify and claim asylum taking up a spot that is on the boat, if you will, that should be for somebody that's

genuinely fleeing, real threat to life persecution, and they will take the spot. And they will take handouts and dolls and accommodation and homes. I mean, right now, today, back home in Ireland at my place, back gate into my place, there's a bit of land that I have on a 99-year lease with some other neighbours in the village, and there's a Traveller's caravan on it. And it's a family, and they're looking for accommodation, they can't get me. So now it's my problem and my neighbour's problem because so much of our housing stock has been given away to people who shouldn't be given free housing or subsidised housing. When my father was a young man, he's 84 now, when he looked at emigrating to America in the early 1960s, he told me, he said, you had to put up whatever

I can't remember the numbers, X number of dollars. You have to show you had in your bank account. You had to give the name and address of the sponsor. And they had to show that they had the means to look after you and to accommodate you if you became sick and unable to look after yourself. There were all of these conditions to be able to just go to America, to emigrate to America. Now we're in, is it surprising that people will show up for free stuff? And if you're self-starter and you want to make a go of it, we're attracting exactly the wrong sort when we're saying, come here for the free stuff. I mean, you do need immigration. You need to choose who comes to your country. You need to control immigration. You need to make sure that it does not get to a scale

where it destroys the fabric, social fabric and cultural fabric of your own society. and the ability of whatever country you are in to be able to support it. I have immigrants working in my company. They're brilliant people. Brilliant people. You're phenomenal talents. We pay them very well. Highly skilled people.

I've got people from more than 30 countries working in Ravala Space Networks. But there's a difference. And treating all immigration as the same and saying we have to take anybody that shows up is it's suicidal. It's nuts. And the, we can't keep doing it. We can't afford to keep doing it. Declan, what's the one thing we're not talking about that we should be? Oh, there are so many things. But one thing that's, and this is very niche area, but we are massively overpaying for data. So the way that radio spectrum is allocated by regulators in the Western world, means that you are paying probably 90% more for data services and mobile connectivity than you should be.

And if you were to allow data to be based on according to supply demand basis, the prices of data, wireless data would drop to a fraction of where they are now, and we would have whole new industries, services and applications that would naturally be being developed by risk takers. And China would not be in the dominant position it is now with quantum computing, things like TikTok and other areas of information technology. They would lose all the advantage, and that economic advantage would shift back to the West. That would be a game changer economically for us. All right. Head on over to Substack where we are stacking your questions.

Artificial intelligence will create as many new occupations as it will destroy. What do you think will be some of those new high-paying occupations? The right window treatments change everything. Your sleep, your privacy, the way every room looks and feels. At Blinds.com, we've spent 30 years making it surprisingly simple to get exactly what your home needs. We've covered over 25 million windows and have 50,000 five-star reviews to prove we deliver. Whether you DIY it or want a pro to handle everything from measure to install, we have you covered. Real design professionals, free samples, zero pressure.

Right now, get up to 50% off with minimum purchase, plus get a free professional measure at blinds.com. Rules and restrictions apply.