TrueLife - Technocratic Takeover via Supply Chains: Exposing the Hidden Control of Global Flows

Episode Date: July 23, 2020

One on One Video Call W/George https://tidycal.com/georgepmonty/60-minute-meetingSupport the show:https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US🚨🚨Curious about the future of psychedelics? Imagine if Alan Watts started a secret society with Ram Dass and Hunter S. Thompson… now open the door. Use Promocode TRUELIFE for Get 25% off monthly or 30% off the annual plan For the first yearhttps://www.district216.com/Speaker 0 (0s): All right. My friends it's Wednesday also known as hump day, depending on how you want to define hump, that could be a, something on a camel, or it could be an act of lust, maybe. So are you guys all wondering what the answer to the riddle is? Never the little we did yesterday, it was a, what, what is something that not even the strongest man can hold for nine minutes, but is lighter than a feather. I bet you, that was just driving you guys crazy, huh? Well, is there any, any guesses, any guesses? Do you guys think of anything? The answer is your breath because no one can hold their breath for nine minutes and it's lighter than a feather. I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday who was asking me about the podcast and what I'm going to talk about. And he says, Hey, you ever talk about conspiracies? And I said, I talk about them all the time, but I've yet to really kind of get in depth on any kind of podcast and talk about one. So today my friends, we're going to step out onto the Wu tree. For those of you that don't know the Wu tree, the Wu tree is a lot, think of like a large, like a large tree with all kinds of branches, but the branches as they grow longer, they grow thinner. And my argumentation is like going way out on a thin branch. And the reason that is, is because if you were to go out on a very thin branch, that branch would not be able to, that that branch probably would not be able to hold your weight and it would break. Thus, my foundation for the conspiracies is like the Wu tree. It may not hold up. So let's just, let's just jump in here with both feet and try to cover some ground today. You know, one of my favorite conspiracies is the magic Johnson conspiracy. You know what I mean? Remember that guy? Great basketball player. Number 32. I always think of chick Hearns. When I think of magic Johnson, remember whoever every time they would be about to win. You'd hear chick Hearns, just say, all right, well, it's the jellos jiggling. The eggs are getting hard. The butter's cooling time to put this one in the fridge. Speaker 1 (3m 1s): This game is over. I think it was something like that. The jellos jiggling eggs are cooling and the butter is getting hard time to put this one in the fridge. I miss that guy, but magic Johnson. Remember that when I was growing up, he was a, he was a bad man. I think he's still in the, I think he's in the hall of fame, right? Doesn't he own the Clippers. It doesn't own part of the Lakers now. However, when I was coming up, I was in high school and it was right when they, the AIDS crisis was coming in. And for people that don't know the height of the AIDS crisis, it was considered mainly like a gay disease or a disease for intervening, his drug use users. Those are the two main groups of which the majority of people inflicted with AIDS. That was the tool. Then one day, there's this big press conference and magic Johnson comes out and he says, you know, I knew standing there with his wife and his teammates. And he was like, you know, I just want to let everybody know that I tested HIV positive. And the whole world was like, Whoa, magic Johnson, HIV positive. And it kind of, it was big news. It was big news. It was all over the news channel. No, there's, there's two major conspiracies here. Let's, let's go over the first one. First. The first is that he never had AIDS. He's never HIV positive. He did it as a publicity stunt to draw attention. Okay. And get money to help come up with a cure for AIDS. That's one, one spot. And there's a lot of evidence. Like if it was mainly a disease for gay people and drugs users, I'm sure there's plenty of people that would call magic Johnson bag, but he's not gay. And he never, he never participated in that kind of sexual activity. At least not to my knowledge. He's definitely not a heroin addict. So he's not shooting drugs. However, he I'm sure that that guy got around. Right. I'm sure all of those athletes have a number of women they've had sex with. And that number is probably well into the triple digits. If not quadruple digits, it was kind of odd though. I mean, he's standing up there with his wife talking about, Hey, I got AIDS, you know, the fruit, his wife's gotta be like, well, how did you get that? How'd you get that magic? Oh, you know, I think it was the fifth number five Oh seven. The 507th woman has said was gave it to me. That's another thing like how does a out of the women's stay with all those pros? They just are constantly cheating on, I guess it's the money, right? Anyways. So that's one idea. One idea is that it was a publicity stunt to, to draw attention, to, and get money for the cause. The second conspiracy theory, which I think is much more interesting is that magic Johnson, he was HIV positive. He had AIDS. Now magic Johnson does not have AIDS. He's not HIV positive. He no longer has a trace of the virus in his body. Pretty amazing. Right. He had it no longer has it. He had it. He no longer has it. He had it. He no longer has it. That in itself is worth study. But even more interesting is that his name is magic Johnson, magic Johnson, magic Johnson. It's a euphemism for a magic penis. This man has a magic Johnson. He got his magic Johnson, gave him AIDS and then his magic Johnson allowed him to get rid of his AIDS. You see what I'm saying? The guy is a magic. He's magic to the, I made HIV disappear with his magic Johnson. That is pretty funny. Right? I thought that was pretty funny. You look at it though. He probably never had it, right. He probably thought, Hey, I'm going to raise money. I'm going to raise awareness. I'm going to help out these communities. Then he goes out and he tells the public, Hey, look at me. I got AIDS, but now he doesn't have it on his body. You know, you got to think that maybe the insurance companies are, can you imagine, like you go out and you tell the world, Hey, I'm HIV positive. Here's my test. And then you try to get life insurance and they're like, Hey, fuck you. You're HIV positive magic. And then he's gotta be like, well, you know, I'm, I'm actually not. And they're like, well, fuck you. Why'd you say on TV? Oh, well just trying to raise awareness for the group. Well, we're going to want you to take a test. You know, you got to imagine that just probably the stigma that comes with that disease probably cause that guy a lot of grief, but I don't know. I think that he, I don't think he probably ever had it, but I like to think of the second one about him having a magic Johnson and, and not getting rid of it. I think that's a kind of a funny one. That's one, that's one conspiracy theory. People don't talk too much about another conspiracy. How about the new world order about those guys? What the hell is the new world order? People talk about it a lot. You know, it's all over YouTube. And I think Henry Kissinger wrote a book called world order. A lot of people talk about the new world order and the deep state shadow government. I thi...

Darkness struck, a gut-punched theft, Sun ripped away, her health bereft. I roar at the void. This ain't just fate, a cosmic scam I spit my hate. The games rigged tight, shadows deal, blood on their hands, I'll never kneel. Yet in the rage, a crack ignites, occulted sparks cut through the nights. The scars my key, hermetic and stark. To see, to rise, I hunt in the dark, fumbling, fear. through ruins maze, lights my war cry, born from the blaze.

The poem is Angels with Rifles. The track, I Am Sorrow, I Am Lust by Kodex Seraphini. Check out the entire song at the end of the cast. All right, good morning, my friends. It's a beautiful morning. Time to get up and go to work. You guys going to work? Some of you going to work on some coffee.

Some of you going to work on a... In your car, in your truck. It's Thursday. That's what time it is. You want to know what time it is? It's Thursday time. Unless, of course, you're a different part of the world. Then it could be a different day.

Shoot, it could be a different year. You know, in Saudi Arabia and like the Islamic calendar, you know what year it is? 1441. It's 1441. Now, this is probably going to be wrong. I probably shouldn't say this. But sometimes, and this is just from a Western point of view,

albeit a non-educated Western point of view, but there are some people that think some of the customs in the Middle East are from the Middle Ages, which would make sense because the year is 1441. So why wouldn't it be in the Middle Ages? And that kind of gets you thinking if indeed that is the middle ages, people in the is,

some people that belong to that calendar must look at us and go, oh my gosh, if that's what the future looks like, I want no part of it. I want no part of it. It's so, like the whole time thing, right? We should have a talk on time.

Hey man, you got the time? Yeah, I got the time. What time is it? When? When you asked me or right now? What time you want to meet? Different time, different calendars. It's 2012 in Ethiopia on that calendar.

It's year 5-780 on the Hebrew calendar. I guess, I think I read somewhere that each, you know, when you look at a map and you see the lines of latitude and the lines of longitude, on each meridian, It's technically a different time. However, in order to streamline business and communication, we just had to do what we do best and lie to ourselves about what time it is. How would you define time?

I think one good way to define time is the movement of objects in space. And the way it was described to me is that if you had a telescope and you were looking up into the abyss, and all you saw was one planet. You couldn't really tell if that planet was moving because you have nothing to compare it against. So you would need another object in space. So you would need another object out there to see, to compare and contrast movement.

And you would need a third object up there to truly understand the dynamics. thus time is a measurement of objects in space it's a man-made concept it's a way we in some ways I think it is

a tricky concept to help human beings understand their environment but it's been used pretty sinister I think you ever have people say hey man I don't want you to waste my time Hey, you're wasting my time.

No, you're wasting my time. In the immortal words of Jeff Spacoli, if you're here and I'm here, doesn't that make it our time? If anybody, like, that's a, that's a good argument, or that would be a fun one to be in. Like, next time you have someone complained to you about you wasting their time,

you tell those people to fuck off. That's our time, God damn it. you and me. I'm not wasting your time. You're wasting my time. Why does it get to be your time? Why does it get to be their time? What about lunchtime?

Break time? Beer 30? That's a good time. Of course, it's always five o'clock somewhere. Concept of time. That is a strange one. We're so enamored by time. People wearing watches.

I got a clock in my... I got one on my phone. I have one in my car, there's one on the wall. We're obsessed with time. You only get 100 years to live. Is that enough time? There's not enough hours in a day. This day drags on forever.

Everything we do is, has a time component to it, I think. That guy's a lifer. He's a short timer. Hey, remember that one time? I guess everybody has enough time, right? So let me shift gears. in here and talk about education a little bit. Because I think it's time.

See what I did there? Ha ha. I was thinking today, I was listening to a lecture of this professor, and he was really good. I think it was Jordan Peterson. And he was just talking about meaning and behavior and motivations. As I was listening to that lecture,

I was thinking about my kid getting ready to go back to school and how they are going to establish coronavirus procedures for children. And so I'm thinking about those two things. And I'm kind of listening to the lecture, but thinking about education. And I began thinking about how education is going to change forever. And how might that look and might there be a way to unchained teachers from a coronavirus. that is sponsored by Authoritarians that maybe don't want the best interest for our kids. Does that make sense? Let me just back it up a little bit because I know what's a mouthful

The modern public day school system, aka Horace Mann is built on the Prussian System of Education Which is all about training obedient workers. That's why you got bells. That's why you got whistles. That's why you have a 20 kids sitting in a class staring up literally having their heads tilted up looking at an authority figure they're training kids from a young age to be obedient workers and that is bullshit we don't need obedient workers and if you think we need obedient workers i think you should be punched in the face and in fact i if i will do it for you okay so how do we create curriculums where we we

We teach kids to be statesmen. We teach kids to understand communication. We teach children how to magnify the human relationship. That's the purpose of a relationship, is to magnify the human experience. And that should be the foundation for modern day curriculum. So one thought that I had is if you look at the school systems, and now we're going to talk about the university systems and the teachers. there and professors and getting tenure and and whatnot.

And the way I want to introduce that is to briefly talk about a movie that I saw as a kid that you may have seen. And if you haven't seen, you should, you should watch it. It's with Rodney Dangerfield and it's called Old School. And it's about this kind of a blue collar working guy. who owned his own business, you know, became really rich from it, but he never finished college. So he thought it would be a great idea now that he's,

his kid just went away to college and him as a father says, you know what, I never finished college. I'm going to go back to college and finish it with my son. So, you know, it's pretty funny. It's the interaction between his son and him and then him as a businessman with a lifetime of experience, going to college and kind of confronting professors and teachers there.

And there's some really funny parts where he's in an economics class and the professor is talking about economic theory and building a fictional product. And Rodney Dangerfield is the businessman. He's like, well, what are we going to build? And the guy's like, we're going to build tape recorders. And Rodney Dangerfield says,

tape recorders! Are you kidding me? We're going to get killed by the Japanese economy on labor. People in China will destroy us on labor. We can't make that here. The economy professor is like, okay, fine. We're going to make a widget. And Rodney Dangerfield says, well, a widget, what's a widget? And the guy says, it's a fictional product. It doesn't matter. And then Rodney Dangerfield says, well, if it's a fictional product, we might as well make it in Fantasyland. And it just goes to show, like the whole movie talks a lot about reality

and education. Theory versus reality. And it seems to me that a lot of the people who are in academia for their entirety of their life have spent their entire life trying to get approval for their PhDs and trying to get approval for their theoretical ideas from other people who have been in the academic system for their whole life, who in turn had to kiss the ring of the previous person who was in. a position of authority in academia. It doesn't take too much thought to understand that what a bubble that is. So might it be better that, you know, if the gold standard for a college professor is to have a PhD and have tenure at a prestigious university,

maybe we should change that, gold standard to hey you can't have the PhD degree until you've graduated a series of college courses and then gone out into the world and actually excelled the very field you claim to be an expert in only then can you get tenure only then can you get the prestigious spot at a prestigious school and that would be the beginning there could be a like a follow-up maybe that would be the Maybe that would make you have a master's degree. But you could only obtain the doctorate level if you were to have, say, 100 or a thousand or 50 or whatever the magic number is.

You have to have at least a thousand students become masters in that field you teach. The students you teach have to excel at the highest levels in order for you. as a teacher to achieve the PhD you see now we're at the level where like that's what Talib describes

about having skin in the game I think it could redefine the university experience right there's too many there's too many people buying their way into the university systems

that don't really belong there you know what I mean by that like remember there was that girl who just She paid like some headhunters. I don't know. What'd she pay him? $200 grand each to buy a soccer scholarship for her daughters that weren't even that good at soccer. Remember that?

One of the funniest parts about that was that after that whole scandal was going, Dr. Drake tweets out, yeah, I'm so proud of my baby. She did it on her own. And then right underneath that dummy's tweet, it was like, hey, didn't you donate a building to that school, dumbass? And then he took his tweet down. Oh, Dr. Dre. That's funny. It's funny.

It's funny to me because I think I laugh at the egotomaniacs because I'm kind of an egomaniac. And I laugh at it because I'm like, ah, that's so dumb. What a stupid person. And then I think to myself, I probably would have done something like that. It's just weird how you see that stuff.

But yeah, that's one idea on education. I think we could change that. I think we have to change that. Another part of education I was thinking about is that at an early age, this is the one I've kind of, I've been toying with a few different educational ideas in my head and I try to work them out on my daughter.

And one for communication that I have found is that, you know, you can watch people have conversations and learn a lot. So I was thinking about designing a curriculum where, you know, you bring in a couple. Let's say a man and a woman. And that man and woman have a conversation, one where they talk about, you know, maybe a 20-minute conversation about, it could be about whatever. Let's just say they talk about current events. and so the couple would come in

they would sit down in front of the class and they would have that conversation simultaneously the conversation would be videotaped so they would have their conversation and the teacher would write down notes the the people would

the man and the woman would talk it would be videoed and there would also be a transcript of what happened and the couple would get up and they would leave and the teacher would talk to the students about what happened in that conversation. And everybody would get a chance to talk about it and the teacher would talk about it. And then they would, directly after that, they would bring the couple back in and they would have another conversation.

Hey, here's what we noticed about your guy's conversation. And now the couple could give feedback on what they thought about the conversation to the children and the teacher. then after that little Q&A, they would play the tape back to the entire group and they could point out things that were brought up. And I, after that, they would play the video again without any sound. And the students, the teacher and the couple would just watch the video without any sound. So you have the initial conversation, you have the video with sound and the video without sound. And I believe that if you're engaging different stimuli, you're engaging different parts of the brain,

you're engaging and understanding language on a different level, even though it's the same conversation. And it may seem redundant. However, I think it's far from that. Because what happens in a conversation is a lot of nonverbal cues. And I think that you could point out like, let's just say that, you know, in a lot of conversations, there is, especially between a man and a woman, there is an underlying, an underlying nonverbal communication of attraction.

just like between a man and a man there's an underlying level of communication that is violent between a man and a woman on some underlying level there is always a level of attraction or maybe a level of repulsion

but it's a different side of the same it's opposite sides of the coin And always, between men and men, there is a threat there. That's just part of our nature. Which brings up the quick anecdote. Remember the scorpion? The scorpion and the frog, they go down to the river. And the, maybe it's not a scorpion and a frog.

Maybe it says, scorpion and a beetle. And the, the beetle says, hey, I can't really swim. And the scorpion says, no problem, I'll take you across. And the Beatles like, no, man. He's like, I can't go with you. You're a scorpion. And the scorpion's like so? Well, you don't like scorpions?

And he goes, no, you're a scorpion, man. I'm going to get halfway out that river and then you'll sting me and I'll die. The scorpion's like, come on, man. You're going to believe that old trope. And so the beetle doesn't want to be like a racist or anything. So he's like, okay, fine, I got to get across. So he jumps on the back of the scorpion. They get halfway across the river.

The scorpion, pow, pow! flings it sting over and just, pow, stings them, kills the bug, kills the beetle. But right before the beetle dies, he's like, why'd you do that? And the scorpion said, it's in my nature. It's in my nature. So getting back to the conversation, the children, when the video is off, I'm sorry, when the video is on, but the sound is off, I think that you could see that attraction. that the man and the woman were flirting on a small scale, the chances are there's going to be

some pupil dilation. The chances are there's going to be some flushing in the cheeks. And I think if you could point that out to the children in the class, hey, at this point in time, they were talking about the weather. Remember that? And the kids speak, oh yeah, this is where the man said, it's a beautiful day out there. It reminds me of your smile. Right? And you could point that out in the conversation and then when the sound was off, instead of hearing those words, the children could see the man's smile and they could see the woman's face, maybe get a little flesh. They could see the woman's eyes dialy and they could understand what was happening there. They could understand that these are the underlying dynamics in conversation that make people feel,

believe or act in a certain way. The same thing could be done between women and women and men and men. If you have two men, you know, you could show the same thing, but maybe there was a challenge in there where one guy decides to put the other guy down a little bit and maybe his fists get clenched. You see, in a verbal conversation, if you're making eye contact or you are just someone who is watching that conversation, especially, as a child, you're not going to be tuned into those cues.

But if you learn at an early age by watching the actual conversation, by watching a taped conversation, and then by watching a tape conversation without any volume, you could cue into those specifics. And children who are taught to look for all the different cues in a conversation will indeed be effective communicators later in life. I would argue that that is a foundation. for statesmen. That is a foundation for politics. That is in fact a foundation for a successful life as being a successful communicator. And if you're not taught the basic ideas of communication

at an early age, you are at a loss. You are already behind the times. I would also argue that learning these particular parts of communication help to help to cultivate the skills of critical thinking. They helped the artist paint the picture of passion. They helped the sculptor sculpt the Venus de Milo of validity. They help the poet put out the precious, fragile picture of purposeful love. and communication is the foundation of every subject. If you can read the verbal cues of people,

if you can read their anxiety, if you can read their emotional state, then you can better know what techniques, words, or ideas would be most helpful to that person at that time. In order, the best way to predict the future is to create it. And the only way we move forward from the fall of man is to have a return

to the golden age to have a return to the classical structure a sort of renaissance a rebirth rebuilding the world with new materials

that seek to make beauty the very cornerstone of our society. You know what I mean? Like if you're surrounded, you are your environment. You are the people you surround yourself with. If you can create beauty around you, if you can have the critical thinking and you can have the, the engaging conversations and you can have the belief system, then you can build the world.

you want. And I think that that is something that, you know, as I get older, the more I think about one of my purposes here on the planet is to try to leave it better than we found it, right? Too often we get, whether it's consciously or unconsciously, we get our beaks stuck to the chalk line where all of a sudden we're just doing things just to do them. It's a habit. And there's plenty of, of authoritarian societal structures that try to keep us on that, on that wheel, right? Like, you could argue that's what taxes are about. You know, they don't need our money. They can just print that shit.

But they want you to be in debt. They want you. Okay, let me clarify they. Anytime someone says they, you should always say, well, who are they? So in this case, they would be the government. They would be the social engineers that aim to keep our economy moving. The central bankers, the IRS, the people who control the money supply. You know, there is a real form of behavior modification in taxes.

Right? They, they, they, the, when you have. as an individual pay taxes, when you as an individual are in debt, you're stuck. You're an indentured servant, right? You have to pay or they're coming to take your house. The more debt you have, the more of a slave you are. You know, if you have a, here's like, think about it from this perspective. So many people when they buy a house, they're so excited like, yeah, I got this house. It's so great. And let's say you have like a, I don't know, $450,000 house. You're paying. in what,

4%. So, you know, the first few years, you're paying like seven grand a year on your $450,000. Seven grand a year, that's nothing, man.

That's what goes to your principal. The rest is just all profit for whoever holds your loan. Like seven grand, that's all you're paying on the house. And on some level, you're like, man, this housing payment's killing me.

It's $2,700 a month. You start doing the math. You're like, wait a minute. That's two, that's 25. Jesus Christ, you're looking at 30 grand a year, but only seven goes to the principal. You see, it's a, it's a system designed to keep you working. It's a system designed to keep the people on the bottom at the bottom. I'm not saying you can't rise to the top.

You definitely can do that. If you're willing to work hard and make sacrifice, and not listen to the crowd, then you can definitely find ways to climb that ladder. And for those of us, you know, everybody's at a different level in life. Everybody's at a different economic point. However, because we are in the situation we're in now,

it's a good time to start trying to redesign your life and the life of your children and the life of your community. These are all ideas that you can have. These are all ideas that you can implement today. These are all ideas that the person next to you would probably be receptive to. These are all universal ideas that regardless of race or gender or color, all human beings, would be susceptible to.

And that is the kind of ideas we need to bring us together and move forward. I had another thought I was thinking about the whole coronavirus. I talked about a little bit yesterday, so I'll just talk about it briefly today. The more I think about it, like we're at war, right? This is clearly some sort of a soft war. Did you see the Chinese embassy in Houston

on fire burning documents? everything in the Middle East is heating up. The presidential race is a dog and pony show. There's secret police in Portland, picking people up? Is that even federal police or is that like a private security company? Remember Kissinger? Kissinger wrote in a book, I believe, that the American troops are not going to go and arrest Americans.

But that doesn't hold true for United Nations troops. They don't give a fuck about dragging Americans away. The same goes for private security forces that are made up of special forces from around the world. They don't give a fuck about Americans.

They don't give a fuck about the Constitution. They don't give a fuck about the Bill of Rights. And I think that's what we're beginning to see. Like, the world health organization, get the fuck out of here, dude. We're not, We're the goddamn United States of America. We got our own stuff.

We don't need the World Health Organization. That's for fucking everybody else. The United Nations beat it. We fucking, we pay you. You work for us. But see, that's being brought over here. All of these world organizations are being brought to this country

to supersede our local government and our federal government. you know and on some level I could understand why people may think it's a good idea hey maybe you know you could say like well America uses way too many resources and it leaves the rest of the world in a position without resources and it's not fair it's a valid point it's a valid point

so then you follow that rabbit hole down a little bit and you go okay well how how could it be more equitable well you know we could have, you know, if we have people from other countries all participating in a, you know, a world Senate or a world court or whatever it is, things could be distributed more effective and efficiently. And you know what scares me about that. Okay, now, this may be naive on my part. But I think, and I could be wrong, this could be totally naive.

I think a lot of people come to the United States for education, be it the Ivy League or a lot of other really good schools. A lot of people come here. I think it was Mugabe, right? The guy from South Africa, his wife had a PhD in economics. But then when you research, maybe it wasn't economics, but she had a PhD from somewhere. But then when you looked at the place where she got her PhD,

it was like a goddamn diploma mill. Right? So if you have some third world countries handing out fucking PhDs like their Tic Tacs to people that are unqualified, what happens when that unqualified Tick-Tac diploma motherfucker

is sitting on top of a fucking organization that is very important. They're going to squander fucking everything. They're going to lose all that shit. They don't know what the fuck they're doing. And how many people around the world Fuck, even in our country.

Have a goddamn TikTok diploma. Have a fucking a tick-tack diploma and sitting in charge of shit thinking they know things. Have you seen some of... Men, this might sting a little bit, but have you guys seen some of the people that graduate

from private colleges with a fucking master's or like a goddamn PhD in business or marketing? Like, dude, all they did was pay their 50 fucking grand. Like I've looked at the syllabus. I've looked at the courses.

I've listened to the lectures of some of the private colleges where people come out with higher education. And I got to tell you, these people are fucking morons. But they walk out with this piece of paper and this inflated ego and then they walk into a place of business and think they know what the fuck they're doing. They don't.

They don't. And that's, see, this gets me back full circle to how we got to change the education system. People that haven't excelled in the field in which they claim to be a master at should not have the title of master. You should not get a master's degree without being successful economically, socially. There should be some sort of metrics we could judge that on before you can become a teacher. You can't teach people what you don't know. And how can anybody know what the hell you know?

If all you have is a theory, I get it, I get it, they're all, everything's theoretical, George, everything's theoretical. But if you could point to, yeah, hey, maybe this is a theory, but I started right here at the fucking very bottom. And in 25 years, dude, no one can touch me. So let me tell you my theories about how you go from there to here. I'm not saying they're accurate, but I'm saying here's a set of strategies that I used backed up by experience. that got me here. That's a real teacher. That's a real mentor.

That's a real pathway for someone to use as a path to get where you are and hopefully past you. That's how you, right? Each one, teach one. When you make it to the top, reach back and offer your hand. I think that's one way we can move education forward. But yeah, it's, I think we're in that war. And we are, it's a, it's a global war right now.

It's a global software. And I would say, I would argue that it was, it's like a, a technocratic takeover. And I, I don't, it's so hard to know who's on what side. Like, there's no clear enemy. And it's by design, right? If you knew who the enemy was, you could fight them. it's by design and it's I can't say it's a flawed strategy

because I don't truly understand the long term winners and losers I don't truly understand the war that's happening I know what's happening you know but I don't know if whose side is Bill Gates on right let's think

let's just let's just try to unpack this part okay if if you read the research on that guy that guy is a billionaire. He gives the most money to the World Health Organization. He's the number two behind the U.S. government. His father was big into eugenics. Bill Gates is big into eugenics. I don't necessarily think eugenics is a bad thing. That might land me in hot water. It depends on how you define

eugenics. Is it a slippery slope? Absolutely. Absolutely. But if Bill Gates' father was a eugenicist and the idea of eugenics was big in World War II, who was it that the eugenicists tried to get rid of? Who was it that the eugenicists decided were inferior? I'm not saying I agree with their theory. I am just pointing out some ideas so we can get a better handle on who Bill Gates might be and whose team he may be on. Well, if you think about it logically,

I think that most men travel a pattern similar to their father, whether they know it consciously or unconsciously. As a man who rebels, as a boy who rebels becomes a man, who becomes a father, who becomes his own father. You know what I mean by that? Like, you become your dad. you find yourself telling stories, you find yourself making decisions, and you find yourself understanding why your dad did the things that he did. So, if we just say that that is probably true,

then it's probably safe to say that Bill Gates thinks a lot like his father, who believed the old theories of eugenesis. If you think about it logically, okay, think about it logically. Bill Gates is all being smeared all over the media, right? Like that guy's enemy number one. People hate that guy. He's trying to kill people. He wants you to give you this crazy vaccine. He wants to inject you with the goddamn micro dot.

He wants to, you know, test out all these things on people and whatnot. Well, who owns the media? The people that are smearing and trying to destroy. Bill Gates are the same people that Bill Gates' father wanted to get rid of. Does that make sense? You got to, I want to keep it vague so that you can do your own critical thinking. Right. So that, if you just think about that, if the people trying to destroy Bill Gates are the same people that Bill Gates' father was trying to get rid of, what, how do, how do those two camps break up. Is Bill Gates on the side of big tech? Or is Bill Gates have his own

faction of big tech? You know, are each of those industries is is Bezos and Gates and Teal and Zuckerberg and Ellison? Are these like the new JP Morgan and Chase and Rockefeller? Are these the new Robert Barron's? Are these the new crop of, you know, putting on the rich billionaires? And if so, where do they align? And if so, where do their paths diverge? Who is fighting shoulder to shoulder? Is anybody fighting shoulder to shoulder?

It seems to me that there's a lot of division. and I just, I don't thoroughly understand the alignment. I know that this election is critical. And it doesn't matter who gets in. There's going to be an event. There's going to be something catastrophic after the election, regardless of who gets in. Right?

Let's face it, just the fact that we're not going to see any debates, the fact that we don't even get to, have any say in the candidates at all, obviously. The fact that the biggest swing states right now are being locked down and prepared to vote in a fashion that can be manipulated. You know, the fact that all these states with the biggest hits are all democratic states

with democratic governors. You know, I don't know, I don't truly understand the ramifications. don't think anybody understands what's about to happen. Like, it's going to be catastrophic. The election is going to be contested. Both sides have a plan for upheaval if they don't win. Could this be? Could this be the last American election?

I think it could be. It could be. Let me, let me unpack that a little bit. This may be the last presidential election, presidential election of its kind. I think that's more accurately stated. There is a book by Paraganaana, and he is a, I believe he's out of Singapore. And he is a really interesting guy that wrote a book called connectography, connectography.

And on the cover, it looks, it's the world and it looks, it has all these lines. lines around it and it almost looks like a a brain map. You know what I mean by that? Like where have you seen like a like an fMRI image of a brain that has all the connections in there? If you haven't look it up and then look up Dr. Paragana's book connectography and you'll see that it's supposed to look like that. And the point he makes in the book is that.

is that, and this book was written, oh gosh, 10 years ago, eight years ago, seven years ago. But it was in the top five of the CFR book list. It was heavily pushed by people in the tech community. And it's a book about supply chains. And it makes the argument that a shift in supply chain, will have catastrophic effects for the countries of the world. And in that book, he made the case that supply chains change governments. You know, the only reason Singapore is so successful is because of where they sit geographically.

They have a big harbor right there. But if there was another place that was built similar to Singapore in a more strong, strategic area, Singapore would die. And by die, I mean, it would be economically weak into the point where they would be back to third world status, unless they institute some sort of, you know, business-friendly tone like Ireland did. So if you think about Paragana's book, you start thinking about the China's built-in-road initiative, right?

This is China creating a new Silk Road throughout the world. And if you think that that is only taking place and either. Eastern Asia, think again, you can look up China's Silk and Road project and you can see the infrastructure being built in South America. In fact, you can see the proposed ideas for China's Silk Road that come up through South America and into North America and into Canada. And China's been very aggressively promoting this project. And the way their system works is it it doesn't care about the rules

of the nation in which it invests it just says look let me build the fucking road through here man I don't do you hate all fucking purple people I don't care I just want to build a road man oh you like to shoot anybody that's fucking over six feet tall I don't care just want to build the road

they don't try to enforce any morality or any rights they're like look we just want the resource. We're going to build this thing here. And you know what? We're going to use the road for resources. But if you want to use the road to transport six foot people you're going to shoot in the head, we don't care. We don't care. And that's very attractive to companies that don't want to play by an ethical rulebook. It's very attractive to people that care about money for money's sake. And it plays well with the dummies that are like, you know all the free markets, man. And best idea wins. Well, the problem with that is that the best idea is usually the person

with the most money. And those are two different things. Another interesting point in Paragana's book is that he talks about the future of world power will be broken up into smaller units. so that they're going away from nationalism and the seat of power will lie in the city. So instead of having the real power being in the federal government, you'll have the power being, instead of there being California, there will be L.A., San Francisco, San Diego. You know, the city will be the seat of power. instead of the state being the city of power. And it's complex.

Like in some ways you're like, well, maybe that could be better. Maybe. Maybe. But the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I'm all for change. I'm all for things getting better. But it's really easy to tear shit down. It's hard to build things up.

So it's important that you have a plan before you start tearing shit down. And I don't like getting, back full circle. I don't know. I'm not sure what's the right side to be on. Like, I love my country. I love the people in my community. I love, I love it. I know there's problems, but I still love it. And when people start talking about, we've got to tear this fucking thing down. Well, what are we going to put it in its place? What's it going to look like? And what makes me upset is the fucking people that are tearing it down don't want to share that fucking idea. Hey, fuckers, what are we going to build?

Peter, Zuckerberg, fucking Newsom, Pelosi, Trump, what the fuck are we going to build? Why don't you fucking let us know what your goddamn plan is? The fact that they don't want to tell us what the plan is makes me not like it. Like if you want to fucking win,

why don't you try to rally some fucking people to your cause? Instead of just divide and conquer, why not try to build some shit? See, I don't get it. You know, divide and conquer. That just leads to fucking profit and mayhem. You can't build a better city by dividing and conquering.

You can't build anything better by dividing and conquering. All you can do is enslave and trap and intensify the chaos. It's a good book. Dr. Prague-Connetigraphy. It talks all about supply chains. And his point is that that's what we're seeing, now is a war for supply chains. Kind of dovetails nice with the von Klauschwitz.

The German general had a book on war. And he said that anybody who want, okay, think about geography. The United States is like a big island. It's not an island, I know, but just it's surrounded by ocean, right? So it's kind of like the biggest landmass that's protected and it's united. the only bigger one would be Europe and Europe is known as the world's island and there's a long-term strategy that says

in order to control the world's island you must control the world island heartland and that is the Middle East and that's why there's always war there that's why when Russia went down to try to unify Europe and Russia in Asia they try to connect the Middle East and that's why the US goes in there

and just fucking throws a goddamn wrench in that shit you know that's the divide and conquer strategy hey we can't let people rule that area because then they have an opportunity to unify the world's island that's why we're pushing all the ideas about the weger population in china like we're trying to destabilize them we don't want those guys fucking running too much shit but we're spending so much goddamn time destabilizing everybody else that those same tactics are being used against us Well, that being said, my friends, I think we said a lot today. And I love you guys, man. I love you. I hope that your day is filled with thought-provoking ideas that are your own ideas.

I hope you go home and you kiss your wife on the cheek or you kiss your husband on the cheek and you give your kids a big squeeze. Fellas, I'm going to leave you with this one right here. Here's something you should do. When you wake up next to your girlfriend or your wife or right before you go to bed just snuggle up next to her and get in her ear and be like, baby, I love you. I just want you to know I'll fucking kill people for you.

I will fucking murder people for you, my love. I love you. Now, I'm not saying you go do that. But every man's woman should know that you'll kill people for her. I'm not saying kill people. Don't get me wrong. Don't take that out of context.

I'm saying as a man, you should tell your woman that. And you should tell your woman that right before she goes to bed or right when she wakes up in the morning. So it's the last thing she hears or the first thing she hears. And while we're at it, here's another thing you can do. Pick a day of the week, say Sunday, and wake your wife up with one of her favorite songs. My wife likes Mariah Carey.

And so, you know that song? And then a hero comes alone. So what I do is on Sundays, sometimes Saturdays and Sundays. Like I'll wake her up, but she'll be sleeping and I'll put that song on, and specifically that part. So my wife wakes up to it. Now I want you to think about that. She wakes up to a song she loves, being played by a man she loves. But the message of that song says, and then a hero comes along.

You see, that is neurolinguistic programming. I am reinforcing on multiple levels that I am that hero coming along for my wife. And now every time she hears that song, she thinks of me coming into the room to wake her up. When she hears the word hero, she thinks of her husband. You see, you can make people think things about you if you're willing to take the time to understand how behavior works. So do it! I love you! Aloha!