Trump's Trials - Republicans call for "revenge" in response to Trump's conviction
Episode Date: June 8, 2024For this episode of Trump's Trials, host Scott Detrow speaks with NPR senior political editor and correspondent Domenico Montanaro.It's been a little over a week since a jury found former President Do...nald Trump guilty of 34 felony counts in the New York hush money trial. Unsurprisingly, Republicans and conservative commentators have stood by Trump claiming, without evidence, that the trial was "rigged." Along with those false claims, conservatives are also calling for Trump to exact "revenge" if he's elected as president and back in control of the Justice Department.Topics include:- Republican response to conviction- Threats of revenge - Trump fundraising Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From NPR, it's Trump's Trials, I'm Scott Detro.
This is a persecution.
He actually just stormed out of the courtroom.
Innocent to proven guilty in a court of law.
For the first time in American history, a political party's nominee for president will
be a convicted felon.
But that's not causing Republicans to shy away from Donald Trump, who you may recall
will be sentenced next month, just days before the Republican convention gets underway in
Milwaukee.
In fact, the opposite is happening.
Republican officials and conservative commentators are not only defending Trump, they are also
casting doubt on the judicial system itself.
This case was rigged from the very beginning.
Corrupt, rigged, and un-American, the weaponized justice system has become under Joe Biden and Democrats.
This was not law, this was not criminal justice, this was politics, this was a political smear job.
They're eroding the people's faith in our system of justice itself.
Yesterday was a conviction of the American legal system.
Allowing his agencies to go after political opponents.
Democrat jury, Democrat judge, Democrat prosecutor.
To be clear, we do not know the party affiliation
of any members of the jury.
Political details like that were carefully screened
out of the process when it was being seeded.
Judge Juan Rashaun did give the Biden campaign $15 in 2020.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is a Democrat, but since it was a state-level
trial, the Department of Justice and the Biden administration had no involvement or say in how
Bragg's office handled the case. In fact, the DOJ chose not to prosecute Trump for any of these
crimes. The details of the criminal justice system have often been flattened out as conservative
politicians and pundits have responded over the past week and many of them have also
repeatedly focused on one thing retribution and revenge.
Sometimes revenge can be justified. And these Democrats will rue the day they
decided to use lawfare to stop a presidential candidate. We're going to vanquish the evil forces that are destroying this republic.
Buckle up guys and also lawyer up.
It's a terrible, terrible path that they're leading us to and it's very possible that
it's going to have to happen to them.
Is every Republican state AG opening investigations into voter fraud right now?
Is every House committee controlled by Republicans using its subpoena power?
There are calls from some corners to find charges against prominent Democrats like
President Biden and Hillary Clinton or Alvin Bragg.
And even as Trump has repeatedly falsely accused Biden of manipulating the justice
system for political purposes, he has been clear, as you just heard, he would use the Department of Justice to target opponents if he returns to the White
House next year.
What's it all mean, especially in the context of an ongoing election?
We will talk it through after the break with senior political editor and correspondent
Domenico Montanaro.
Stick around.
On this week's episode of Wild Card, comedian Bowen Yang says you don't have to feel bad
for falling short on mindfulness.
I get in my own way by like over privileging the present.
That's so interesting because everyone wants to be in the present.
I feel like being present is overrated.
I'm Rachel Martin.
Join us for NPR's Wild Card Podcast, the game where cards control the conversation. I'm Rachel Martin. Join us for NPR's Wild Card Podcast, the game where cards control the conversation.
I'm Rachel Martin.
After hosting Morning Edition for years, I know that the news can wear you down.
So we made a new podcast called Wild Card where a special deck of cards and a whole
bunch of fascinating guests help us sort out what makes life meaningful.
It's part game show, part existential deep dive, and it is seriously fun.
Join me on Wildcard wherever you get your podcasts,
only from NPR.
When the economic news gets to be a bit much.
Listen to the indicator from Planet Money.
We're here for you, like your friends,
trying to figure out all the most confusing parts.
One story, one idea every day, all in 10 minutes or less.
The indicator from Planet Money, your friendly economic sidekick from NPR.
We're back. Domenico Montanaro, how are you?
Hey, Scott. I'm good. How are you?
I'm good. None of this that we just heard is really a surprise. We've been talking
about it for years. We were seeing it play out in real time minutes after the verdict came down.
I still think it's worth taking a moment
to examine how specifically Republican officials
are responding here.
Yeah, I mean, as you heard there,
I mean, they're entirely behind Trump.
They have his back.
In fact, if anyone speaks out differently,
MAGA is coming for them basically.
I mean, case in point here, Larry Hogan,
who's the former Maryland governor
running for the Senate now. The Republican who's been critical of Trump in the past said that people should
quote, respect the verdict and that quote, all leaders should quote, reaffirm what has
made this nation great, the rule of law.
Didn't go over very well.
Immediately, Trump's campaign manager, Chris LaSavita responded on Twitter saying quote,
you just ended your campaign and that H, quote, doesn't deserve the respect
of anyone in the Republican Party at this point,
and frankly, anybody in America.
Which is wild because first of all,
that is just a mundane statement, right?
And secondly, this is a Republican
who has a decent chance of winning
in a deeply democratic state.
You would think that Republicans
would be on board with that, but no, the opposite.
No, and I think that you heard that
in some of the clips there,
you know, are Republicans doing everything they can,
Stephen Miller, using their subpoena power,
almost telling them, instructing them
how Trump wants them to be acting,
how they could have Trump's back better,
taking those instructions.
I think it's really instructive
of how Republicans are rallying around Trump.
I mean, including, of course, the Republicans who are auditioning to be his vice presidential
running mate and members of Congress who are taking some, I'd say, performative actions,
really, because these are not things that are going to really pass.
It's still worth kind of hearing out what they are, though, because I think that says
a lot.
Yeah.
I mean, take Jim Jordan, Congressman from Ohio.
He's chairman of the Judiciary Committee.
He's targeting cutting funding, for example,
for Trump prosecutions.
We know that there are two federal cases
that the Justice Department is pursuing
related to January 6th and classified documents case,
neither of which is expected to come before the election now.
A bill was introduced by a Republican from South Carolina
that literally would allow a former president or vice
president to, quote, remove to federal court a civil action or criminal prosecution brought against
them in state court.
Of course, because a president can't, you know, get rid of anything that a state does
only has control over federal pardons.
Eight Republican senators are also vowing to vote against all Democratic legislation,
which by the way is not that much of a change, I have to say, because Republicans in the
last 15 years have been more obstructionist than really looking to work constructively
with Democrats.
And when some have, they've been blocked, especially on, I'm thinking of something like
immigration, even this past year, having James Lankford from Oklahoma working with President
Biden to try to get some stricter border enforcement in and having that blocked by his
peers.
You know, Trump was tried and convicted by a jury
of his peers.
Of course, Republicans justify their actions
echoing Trump's language saying that the trial
was rigged.
Everything that does not turn out his way seems
to be rigged.
Yeah.
Yeah.
This podcast is rigged.
You talk more than me.
I think you talk more than me, but.
That might be, but too bad.
Look, we've been focusing in on Republican lawmakers,
high level Republican officials,
the conservative media ecosystem here,
but you have been making the point all year
that that is an important part of it,
but that is not the entire universe,
especially in electing a president in an upcoming election.
A lot of people outside of that.
How does this rhetoric play with the broader electorate?
Well, look, I think a lot of people are gonna be reading
into all the polls that are coming out,
what's happening granularly.
Let's get into it a little bit,
but I will say just overall,
I think we can definitely say it's been a net negative
in polling overall for Trump, but really on the margin.
For example, New York Times and CNN recontacted 2,000 respondents and found that Trump had
a reduced advantage by one point.
Echelon Insights, which is a Republican pollster, found that Biden was gaining two points.
Same for a Reuters Ipsos poll.
An Emerson College poll found that Trump's lead declined from three points to one point.
And the ABC News Ipsos poll showed
that half think the verdict was correct
and that Trump now should end his campaign.
OK, but another 47% think that the case
was politically motivated.
I guess not surprising, since that sort of mirrors
the divide in this country over Trump.
And you are often cautioning us to not over-read things
within the margin of error. But look,
especially in the states that will decide the election, it's going to be a margin of error
election. Yeah, I still say though, don't over read the margins. I mean, this is really, I hate to,
you know, echo the, the, the cliche of turnout was most important or whatever. But it really does
come down to that because you have these base groups on either side that are not happy with Biden,
for example, younger voters, younger black voters, Latinos, they do seem potentially movable by this.
We found in our polling that about a quarter of people under 45 years old were less likely to
vote for Trump. If he was convicted, he's been convicted, but they were always less likely to
vote for Trump anyway. And just saying that you're less likely doesn't mean that's what you absolutely will do.
And again, like you said, these changes are marginal within margins of error, literally,
but this is expected to be a close election.
The shifts could be important at the margins.
We'll have to wait and see at least, I think, a couple of weeks.
I like to talk about how these shifts, whether or not they hold or if they're just temporary
bumps.
And remember, we've seen temporary bumps that have then declined previously, things like
good State of the Union addresses by President Biden, the Axis Hollywood tape in 2016.
Trump really declined by a few points at that point, but his support bounced back and he
still won the election.
Yep.
And then we spent eight years later, a month litigating that moment in a courtroom.
Yep.
It was an interesting full circle moment in the world of Trump.
Going to credit our producer Tyler Bartlem here, who not only went through hours and
hours of conservative media to pull all the clips that we heard, but also went through
a lot of the Trump campaign fundraising emails that were sent out in the last weeks.
I will read just some of the headlines. My father is a political prisoner. I've been convicted in a kangaroo court.
Crooked Joe Biden threw the book at me. So on and so on and so on. Really directly appealing
to core supporters. This has worked. This has raised a lot of money for Trump and that had been
a problem for him up to this point. Well, the campaign is saying that in May that they've
raised $141 million, which will make a significant dent in helping the Trump campaign catch back up to the Biden
campaign has had a pretty significant advantage all along in this.
That includes what the Trump campaign said.
And I can't honestly believe this number, but it's apparently real.
$53 million.
The Trump campaign said it raised in the 24 hours after the conviction.
I mean, that's a huge number, probably record setting,
single day for maybe any campaign.
They raised $12 million a campaign,
also says Thursday night at an event in Silicon Valley.
So there's not gonna be a shortage of money
for either of these campaigns.
How they spend it though, very different at this point.
Including Trump's run a presidential campaign
and will be spending the money politically,
but we know he has spent millions and millions
of these campaign dollars on his legal fees.
Yeah, groups supporting him for sure.
But Trump's certainly using this conviction,
as he did during the indictments,
to try to help him shore up his base and raise money.
Again, does that mean that independents,
persuadable voters, and key states
are gonna look fondly on this?
We don't know, but again, the economy still remains,
prices, inflation, people's ability to buy houses,
interest rates seem to be more of the top issue
and the biggest concern for people than Trump's conviction.
On the topic though of attacking the judiciary
and on this ongoing theme of parallel paths playing out in the courtrooms and on the campaign
trail.
It's worth taking a moment again to point out how differently Trump and his allies talk
about these things when they're under oath, when they're in a courtroom, than when they're
on conservative media or on the campaign trail.
Oh, no doubt about it.
I mean, Donald Trump himself, if you watch depositions of his, the things that he'll say outside the courtroom are not the things that he would say under oath with his hand raised and having to be subject to the rules of perjury.
It's very, very different. pushing fraud as something that happened in 2020, even though there's plenty of evidence to support the fact that it was not. More than 60 court cases show that the election
was free and fair and the most scrutinized election in American history. But when Rudy
Giuliani went to court, he was saying, this is not a fraud case. We're not talking about
fraud. And including somebody like Jenna Ellis, who was also a Trump attorney.
Right. One of Trump's co-defendants in the Georgia election interference case,
which is sprawling with many, many co-defendants.
She's one of four who've already pleaded guilty in this case.
And she said this when she made a statement to the court.
What I did not do, but should have done, your honor,
was to make sure that the facts the other lawyers alleged
to be true were in fact true.
I look back on this whole experience with deep remorse.
And I think a point that Kerry Johnson has made several times is the Georgia case for all of the
controversies that's gone through multiple people have already pleaded guilty and jury after jury
when they have taken up these cases that Trump and his critics attack saying that they're being
targeted have come back with guilty verdicts. Yeah, what's remarkable is Trump will say,
well, when you're facing jail time, almost anybody will plead guilty to take the plea.
I find that to be really fascinating as a political spin
because these folks don't have to plead guilty.
If you're innocent, you're not going to necessarily
plead guilty because you're afraid of potential jail time.
She's admitting here, saying that-
Especially the resources to hire a good lawyer.
Right, I mean, she's admitting here, and she's a lawyer,
saying that, you know, that she should have checked
to see if things were true.
And that's true of all of the folks who undertook this effort
to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results.
And really, at this point, it's really ironic
that the only conviction, the only trial we're likely to see
is this one in New York, which people thought was the weakest case and not related to the 2020
election at all. When those cases seem to have, you know, Trump has been able to death by a thousand
cuts sort of delay these cases to be on the election. All right. So a week later, just taking
a look at how this is all affecting the political moment. We will continue following that. We will continue following the possible likely appeals in that case. And a reminder to
everybody about the next big courtroom moment in all of these criminal cases against Trump. We are
waiting for the US Supreme Court to issue a ruling on whether or not sitting presidents have legal
immunity. This is an argument that Trump was trying to make to avoid prosecution in one of the federal criminal cases he is facing. We're expecting
a ruling in the coming weeks. We're in that June stretch where the Supreme Court issues
all of its major rulings of the term. That will affect a lot of things, including when
Trump would face a criminal trial in that case. So when there's a ruling, we will sort
through it on this podcast. Domenico Montanaro, thanks again for joining us.
You're welcome. We'll be back next week with another episode of Trump's Trials. Thanks
to our supporters who hear the show sponsor free. If that is not you, still could be.
You could sign up at plus.npr.org or subscribe on our show page and Apple podcasts. This
show is produced by Tyler Bartleman, edited by Adam Rainey, Krishnadev Kalamore,
and Steve Drummond.
Our executive producers are Beth Donovan and Sammy Yenigan.
Eric Marapotti is NPR's vice president of news programming.
I'm Scott Detro.
Thanks for listening to Trump's Trials from NPR. I love the dialogue as ridiculous as it is sometimes.
We're talking about the romance and the clothes and the nudity and obviously the queen's hair.
Listen to the Pop Culture Happy Hour podcast from NPR.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is the most powerful man in Indian politics, but big questions
remain about how he's held onto power.
India is really in danger now.
All the democratic structures have been compromised.
Cyber hacking, mass arrests,
and what it means for India's democracy
on the latest episode of The Sunday Story
from NPR's Up First podcast.
When you hear Birmingham, Alabama,
you might think about the civil rights movement,
but maybe not about baseball.
But as the oldest pro ballpark in America, Rickwood Field saw the struggle for freedom
play out right there on the dirt and grass.
I'm Roy Wood Jr.
I grew up in Birmingham, and I'm going to tell you this whole story.
Listen to Road to Rickwood from WWNO and WRKF, part of the NPR Network.