TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Adam Schiff Could Be Expelled From Congress for Lying About Trump

Episode Date: May 18, 2023

California Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff was a leading advocate of the false accusation that former President Donald Trump colluded with Russian agents. His outrageous lies were finally officially debunked when Special Counsel John Durham released his report into how the false allegations became the basis of a federal investigation of Mr. Trump that dogged him throughout his 4-year term in the White House. Mr. Schiff has not apologized to the American people for lying. Florida Republican Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna is not waiting for Mr. Schiff to confess he lied. She introduced a resolution to expel Adam Schiff from the US House. Mr. Schiff is currently running for the US Senate to replace retiring 89 year old Senator Diane Feinstein. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 5/18/23 You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969. It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. Now available in eBook and audio formats! Order Final Day from Amazon today! https://www.amazon.com/Final-Day-Characteristics-Second-Coming/dp/0578260816/ Apple users, you can download the audio version on Apple Books! https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/final-day-10-characteristics-of-the-second-coming/id1687129858 The Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today! https://tru.news/faucielf

You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles. We appreciate you tuning in. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at www.truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, P.O. Box 690069, Faroe Beach, Florida 32969. This is True News, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help us God. California Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff was a leading advocate of the false accusation that former President Donald Trump colluded with Russian agents to, you know, defraud the American people in the 2016 election. His outrageous lies were finally officially debunked when special counsel John Durham released his report into how the false allegations became the basis of a federal investigation of Mr. Trump that dogged him throughout his four-year term in the White House.

Mr. Schiff has not apologized to the American people for lying. Florida Republican Congresswoman Ana Paulina Luna is not waiting for Mr. Schiff to confess that he lied. She introduced a resolution to expel Adam Schiff from the U.S. House. Mr. Schiff is currently running for the U.S. Senate to replace retiring 89-year-old Senator Dianne Feinstein. Let's start with this report from the New York Post. You see the headline, GOP lawmaker introduces resolution to expel Adam Schiff from Congress. Doc has more from the New York Post article. Yes, the New York Post is reporting that Representative Anna Polina Luna from Florida on Wednesday unveiled a bill

that would seek to remove Representative Adam Schiff from California from Congress over his claims of collusion between former President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia. You remember all the media tours that he did during that particular time saying that he had direct evidence of the

Trump campaign and the Russians never revealed that evidence, never brought it out, never said anything about it. Because he didn't have any evidence. That's right. But he had a lie. That's right. And also remember, Doc, when he introduced into the congressional record the fake transcript. Yes. And read it through and actually put it in the congressional record. And he was never censored for that. Never called, really called out for that. There were a few that were critical of him for doing it, but really he should have been censored in Congress for it. And so, well, Representative Luna from Florida, she had, she posted the House resolution on Twitter, and this is her personal account. First of all, she said,

knowingly using your position on House intel to push a lie that ripped apart our country, cost taxpayers millions of dollars, and authorized spying on a U.S. president, and then proceeding to double down on the lie within days of the Durham report coming out, makes you unfit for office. Ethics should investigate. She also tweeted from her congressional account as well. Schiff lied to the American people. He used his position on House Intel to push a lie that cost American taxpayers millions of dollars.

He is a dishonor to the House of Representatives. Well, Doc, you know, if the Republicans would discover a backbone, and I'm not ruling out that they might do it. I mean, it would be one of those rare occasions where the Republicans actually act with courage. They have a very thin majority margin in the House. It's only a handful of votes, what, four, five, six votes? Right. If every Republican voted for the resolution, Adam Schiff would be expelled from the U.S. Congress. They could do it. They could do it tomorrow. If they had a backbone. If they had a backbone. But what happens when they go to... Well, they could go to see the Oz,

the great wizard, and get a backbone, but they do have a majority. Well, it seems like when they get up to D.C., they have their backbone surgically removed somewhere along the way. And so, well, that's not the only news about removal of members of Congress or the administration. Marjorie Taylor Greene today, well, that's not the only news about removal of members of Congress or the administration. Marjorie Taylor Greene today as well.

She came out and says she is going to file articles of impeachment, not only for Joe Biden, but on several members of the Biden cabinet as well. So you see this headline. This is from Fox News. We have a clip of her and her announcement here. Let's watch this and Rick and I'll have some comments. With the highest amount of solemnity that I announce my intention to introduce articles of impeachment today on the head of this America at Last executive branch that has been working since January 20th, 2021, to systematically destroy this country. The President of the United States, Joseph Robinette Biden. Joe Biden has deliberately compromised our national security

by refusing to enforce immigration laws and secure our border, allowed approximately 6 million illegals from over 170 countries to invade our country, deprived Border Patrol of the necessary resources and policies sufficient to protect our country, and his administration has willfully refused to maintain operational control as required by the law. He has allowed fentanyl, the number one killer of Americans between the age of 18 and 45, to overwhelmingly flood into our country and kill around 300 Americans every single day. These aren't just Americans. These are people's family members. These are their sons, their daughters, their brothers, their sisters, their mothers, their fathers, their cousins, aunts and uncles. These are American families. His administration has lost complete contact with approximately 85,000 unaccompanied illegal alien children.

And his policies have forced tens of thousands of illegal children into slave labor. Where are these kids? No one even knows. It's horrible. It's horrible. Joe Biden has reinstated catastrophic and disastrous catch-and-release policies, which have allowed illegals to flood our country and our communities. He ended remain in Mexico and reinstated catch-and-release. Under Biden's command, the Secretary of Homeland Security has illegally granted mass parole to aliens

when U.S. federal law only permits parole to be granted on a specific case-by-case basis. He endangered the lives of Americans by allowing illegal aliens who had tested positive for COVID-19 to enter our country and infect American citizens, yet while enforcing strict COVID policies on American citizens. His policies, directives, and statements surrounding the southern border have violated our laws and destroyed our country. Biden has blatantly violated his constitutional duty, and he is a direct threat to our national security. Therefore, Joseph Robinette Biden is unfit to serve as the President of the United States and must be impeached. Out in the real world, where American taxpayers live, employees are fired when they are corrupt or aren't adequately serving their

employer or purposely destroying a company. In this case, the employer is the American people because they pay the salaries. They pay the salaries of everyone in the federal government. The Constitution outlines a very simple process to fire the corrupt officials serving in the federal government. The Constitution outlines a very simple process to fire the corrupt officials serving in the federal government. Impeachment. Matthew Graves, Christopher Wray, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Joe Biden are all corrupt and unfit to hold office,

and they all must be impeached. This concludes impeachment week. Well, it's about time somebody filed articles of impeachment on Joe Biden. Once again, Doc, the Republicans could impeach him tomorrow morning. Right. They have the votes. If they chose to. If they chose to do it. If every single Republican would fall in line and vote yes on impeachment they chose to do it. If every single Republican would fall in line and vote yes on impeachment, they could do it tomorrow morning. I don't expect it to happen. I might be shocked. I would be pleasantly shocked if the Republicans suddenly started acting

like they had strength and courage. But everything that she said is true. The Biden administration has had a systematic agenda plan to dismantle the country. I mean, you look at where we're at right now, that seems to have been exactly the agenda. So who do they work for? Who do they work for? Who's paying them to do this? I read a report the other day, and I don't remember the precise number, so I'm not going to quote a number because I'd be making it up. But I was shocked when I read the number

of wanted terrorists who have been apprehended at the Texas border in the past 30 days. I'm talking about foreign terrorists that the U.S. government is searching for. Found at the border. Apprehended at the border in the past 30 days. And what did they do with them? We don't know that, but the fact that they're coming across the border. And those are the ones they caught.

Those are the ones that were caught. And the ones that we know about. The Biden administration knows about it. They encourage it. They want it. You cannot tell me that they don't want this to happen. No president that loved this country and wanted to protect the American people would allow these things to happen. They're doing it because they are not loyal to this country.

They're loyal to some other country or some other entity, some other powerful force that has control of them. But they are deliberately implementing policies that destroy this country. I mean, just look at Afghanistan, the withdrawal from Afghanistan. What a debacle that was. How many Americans are still there? How many of them have died in the past year we don't even know about? We don't even talk about it. We just abandoned them. We just abandoned thousands of American citizens and said, tough luck. Too bad you can't. We're not coming back for you. And the public has forgotten about it. But those people are still there, or they've been killed off.

They left behind billions of dollars worth of military equipment. They turned over a vast Air Force base to the Chinese. That's absolutely true. Who does this other than a traitor? I mean, the articles of impeachment, this is really late in the game. The damage has been done. But I'm not going to hold my breath expecting the Republicans to pass

these impeachment articles. I don't expect them to kick Adam Schiff out of Congress. I doubt they'll even have a vote on the resolution. That was going to be my next question. What happens next? Does it go to the House Committee to get lost there?

Does it come to the House floor? In any committee, they have a majority. The Speaker is the one. Mr. McCarthy has the power to move those resolutions forward so if anybody could make these things happen it would be Speaker McCarthy

now will he show that kind of leadership I don't know I'm not going to I'm not going to I'm not going to pretend that I know because I don't know I would like him to surprise me. But you're not expecting to be surprised. I'm not expecting to be surprised, but I would like to be surprised. I would like to come out here and say,

wow, Kevin McCarthy stepped up and led and has expelled Adam Schiff and has impeached Joe Biden. Doc, if they impeach Joe Biden, I mean, he's got to go into the 2024 campaign under impeachment. Well, he would be the first president to have to face that, would he? So now is turnabout fair play? Now the Republicans do it? I just don't believe the Republicans will do it. I just,

I don't trust the GOP. I mean, I just don't. Well, again, it only takes, what, five or six members of the Republican caucus to back out, to get cold feet.

That's all it takes. And it would lose. And Biden would be laughing. Adam Schiff would be laughing at everybody. The next one, this is from a Daily Mail. Republicans demand new probe into Bill and Hillary Clinton after report reveals FBI top brass shut down

four criminal investigations. Four of them. Over foreign donations and speaker fees. Right, Rick. So the Daily Mail is reporting that the FBI had at least four, at least four criminal investigations into Hillary and Bill Clinton that were ultimately shut down months before the presidential election in 2016. And that's coming from a new Justice Department report revealing that the disinformation and Republicans want to reopen those probes. Now, a long-awaited report by Special Counsel John Durham released on Monday shows the FBI began investigating claims in late 2014 from a well-placed confidential source that two foreign governments were trying to make illegal donations to buy influence with Hillary during her presidential campaign. Now, investigators were even offered documents of one alleged $2,700 illegal contribution that led to a substantial further donation. Now, the bombshell report also reveals that three FBI field offices in Washington, Little Rock, and New York

launched investigations into the Clinton Foundation in early 2016 for possible criminal activity. One of the investigations was partly based on statements made in journalist Peter Schweitzer's 2015 book, Clinton Cash, remember that book, claiming that Clinton's charity was taking millions in donations from foreign governments trying to change the U.S. foreign policy while Hillary was Secretary of State. But despite making progress, all four criminal investigations were shut down by senior officials, Durham found. So who did it, Doc? Four criminal investigations in federal agencies looking into the Clintons, and all four shut down.

Well, of course, that was the Obama administration that shut that down. And Joe Biden was vice president at the time too. And so let's just face facts. I mean, they weaponized the FBI then. Now, the new revelations are prompting calls from current and former Republicans for renewed investigation into the alleged criminal activity involving the Clintons. One is Florida Republican Representative Matt Gaetz, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee's weaponization of the federal government subcommittee, which has been probing claims of political bias in the FBI. He said the Clintons had a team of people in the FBI running interference for them to avoid criminal culpability,

Gaetz claimed in a statement to Daily Mail. These matters absolutely warrant additional exposure and review. Now, the former Republican congressman and ex-House Oversight Committee Chair Jason Chavitz expressed similar sentiments, saying the FBI didn't complete the job and probes into the Clintons should be reopened. They had dissent, they were on the trail, and they were shut down by the higher-ups who had an obvious political desire to see Donald Trump lose and Hillary Clinton win, he said.

It's disgusting, really. Absolutely, these investigations should be revisited. There's no reason why Congress can't have a series of hearings with the field agents who are pursuing the Clinton Foundation and public interviews with them as well. But I hate to break it to them. Ain't nothing going to happen to the Clintons. None to the Clintons.

They got to get out of jail free card. Who paid for it? Who paid for their get out of jail free card? They've used that card for decades. Going back to Arkansas. And the Clintons don't worry. They know. They sleep. Whoever paid for their get out of jail free card has so much power and money that the Clintons are absolutely assured they will never go to prison. They never lose a minute of sleep wondering if a SWAT team's going to come through the door and ransack their house looking for documents

and handcuff them and take them away. They don't worry about that. It's not going to happen. They know it. But who owns them? Who has the power to tell the FBI director shut down for criminal investigations who has that power someone higher than the FBI director who is it they go from one administration to another doesn't matter who's in the White House is it a person is it an entity what is it

whatever it is it's effective in its ability to suppress investigations. I still remember we were the old office and still doing the radio show. And we were watching TV the day that James Comey was making the big announcement. And we actually believed for a brief moment in time, just a really short moment in time. He's going to arrest her. They're going to arrest Hillary Clinton. And doggone it, if they just didn't send the FBI agents

over to their house and have some iced tea. Literally, that was what happened. After Comey read basically the indictment of all the criminal activity Hillary had done involving the emails, then he says, no reasonable prosecutor would investigate her. No reasonable one that wanted to live a long time.

And so he shut it down. But who is his boss? Who told Comey to shut it down? He didn't do it on his own. He was ordered to do it. So who does it? Who has this power? Matt Gaetz also came out with something about the FBI field office involving January 6th. Yeah, shocking information here. Yeah. So he said an FBI field office has confirmed that there were undercover federal officers, informants, and FBI assets present in the U.S. Capitol on January 6th.

This is about a four and a half minute video. It involves some whistleblowers, but I think you really need to see it. Let's watch. Mr. Allen, we just astonishingly heard a Democrat on this committee question your allegiance to the United States. How many tours in Iraq did you do? I did two tours in Iraq, sir. And for how many decades have you held a security clearance? For two decades, sir.

Ever been called into question before? No, sir. Ever been called into question before? No, sir. And you also received the Employee of the Year Award for the Charlotte Field Office, is that right? That is correct, sir. Did you receive any medals during your service for the Marine Corps and the United States Navy? I did, sir. As a member of the Marine Corps, I received a Navy Commendation Medal and a Navy Achievement Medal. Seems to me your allegiance to the United States is pretty well established over multiple decades, wearing the uniform, fighting for our country. And I am proud that you continue to fight for our country as a whistleblower here, making a disclosure to the United States Congress. And Mr. Allen, is it your belief that you were retaliated against

because you shared an email that questioned the truthfulness of FBI Director Christopher Wray. Yes, sir. And you believed that he wasn't truthful based on testimony given to the United States Senate. Isn't that right? Yes, sir. And in that testimony to the Senate, you believe that Christopher Wray indicated that there were no confidential informants and no FBI assets that were present at the Capitol on January 6th that were part of the violent riot. Isn't that right? Yes, sir. Please play the video. We're now going to hear from George Hill, who worked at the Boston field office. The SSA in Boston said they were going to a political rally, which is First Amendment

protected activity. No, we're not uploading. We're not starting cases with these people. To which they said, well, we're going to call your SAC. And the SSA said, go right ahead. Because when you're pushing back, you want to make sure that you have your six covered. So the SAC and the ASAC were intimately aware of these kinds of exchanges that were going on. And again, to his credit, Joe Bonavolante said, no, we're not opening up cases on people who went to a rally.

And I forgot a key part. The SSA for CT2 said, happy to do it. Show us where they were inside the Capitol, and we'll look into it. To which WFO said, we can't show you those videos unless you can tell us the exact time and place those individuals were inside the Capitol. To which the SSA responded back, and I was privy to these conversations firsthand, why can't you show us, why can't you just send us, give us access to the 11,000 hours of video that's available? Because there may be, may be, UC's undercover officers or CHS's confidential human for confidential human sources on those

videos whose identity we need to protect so Mr. Allen you got retaliated against for the very thing for saying the very thing that the Washington field office was telling Boston when the Boston field office was saying we're not going to go and investigate people that just showed up at a rally without sufficient criminal predicate. The Washington field office told Boston, well, you know what? We can't give you the evidence because it might disclose the very CIs and UCs that you are concerned about. But that doesn't surprise you, Mr. O'Boyle, does it? No, sir. And the reason it doesn't surprise you is that in a different part of the country, you saw that same pressure from the Washington field office. And did they ever try to get you

to do something that was outside the normal order of law enforcement activity? Yes, sir. And what did the Washington field office try to get you to do that violated the law and regulations? It tried to get me to serve a federal grand jury subpoena when there was no proper predicate to do so. And the reason there was no predicate was because it was based on an anonymous tip, right? That's correct. And time and again, the Washington field office was trying to pressure you without corroboration to go start process on people. Isn't that right? Yes, sir. And so while I agree that January 6th was a violent day, a bad day, a day that nobody wants to relive, violence on January 6th doesn't justify weaponizing the government against people who were innocent and did nothing wrong. Thank you

for blowing the whistle on that. Now that Garrett O'Boyle was later on questioned about whether or not he would go through this whole process again. And he was being truthful. He received a lot of pressure from the FBI. And he said, you know, the FBI will crush you. He says the government will crush you and your family if you try to expose the truth about things that they're doing that are wrong. And because they locked up his possessions for weeks after he moved to another field office. Incredible story on that last gentleman. But, you know, he's right.

There is incredible pressure. Obviously, there were UCs and ICs that were involved in January 6th. I mean, it's almost common knowledge at this point. That's why they don't want anyone looking at the video. But this is... Well, Tucker Carlson only was able to devote one night on Fox News. And it shut him down really fast, didn't it? Right this is you know i'm grateful whistleblowers are coming forth once again will that change anything um i keep hoping i keep a flicker of hope out there that truth prevails but in our current system of government truth is suppressed if anything doc i think this is going to continue for another decade.

I'm talking about the dribbling out of truth where our worst suspicions about the U.S. government is confirmed,

but only confirmed after years of agony of squeezing them to get the U.S. government is confirmed, but only confirmed after years of agony of squeezing them to get the truth. And then more truth is revealed, and more truth is revealed. I think this is going to continue over the next decade into the early 2030s, and then there will be a break, a break in the Constitutional Republic.

And I'm just, I'm just... Talking out loud. Yeah, I'm just speculating. You're not being prophetic. Not being prophetic, I'm just speculating what most likely will happen. And at some time in the 2030s, early 2030s, the country will break up into multiple, multiple countries. There may be three, four, five countries come out of the United States.

You can't continue like this. You just can't continue. You cannot have a republic like this. You cannot have a free and independent nation like this. Everything is going on. The corruption, the sexual immorality, the open border, the spending of trillions of dollars that we don't have, the funding of a war that we can't afford.

You just can't do this and think the country will survive. My belief is that what will happen is that we will split apart in about the next eight to 10 years. We'll just split apart. If we survive that long. If we survive it. If we survive that long. If we survive it. If we survive it,

there will be something here. But we're not going to regain the country that we had years ago. That's not coming back. It's just not coming back. And the federal Hydra government isn't going to get curtailed. It's only going to grow even more intense.

Until a number of states simply say, we're done, we're finished, we're just not going to accept you anymore, the country splits up at that point. New constitution, constitution for four or five different countries. What do you do if California becomes a separate nation and they sign defense treaties for China

and you have Chinese military bases in California? That's what this is looking like. That's what it's looking like. We're not going to be able to pull the republic back without a spiritual awakening in a country. It's still possible. Oh, I believe it's possible. It's still possible to have.

It's still possible, but not probable. It's not probable right now. And so the body of Christ, those citizens who are in America, you have to resign yourself to the reality we're never going to recover the country as we knew it in our childhood,

in our youth. It's not coming back. We're living here. We have to live in the reality of what we have right now. Basically, we're living in foreign countries right now. Yes. That's how I feel. I feel like I've moved to a foreign country,

and I'm just trying to figure out how to survive in a foreign country. Like, it's populated with space aliens. I felt that way when I came back from Korea. So I was overseas for four years, and when I came back, it was like a different America. It was four years of Obama. And the country had radically changed. Obama said in his first inauguration speech that he was going to fundamentally transform America.

He did it. Yes, he did. He did it. He's running a show with Joe Biden. He's running the show. The dismantling of America is being managed by Barack Obama. He's the man with the power behind the scenes. But he's not the ultimate power. It's who does he report to. Right. Who's he answer to? They are dismantling the country. But where are we going in the future?

Maybe the South will rise again. You know, maybe the Southern states will become a separate country. California and Oregon and Washington will become a separate country. Texas could declare its independence. But we can't go on.

There's no way we can go on 20, 30, 40 years like this. Everybody's miserable. Everybody's miserable. And the misery index is going to continue to climb and at some point, something stupid is going to happen. Something crazy is going to happen that's going to divide everything. That's right.

It just cannot go on like this. But we have a responsibility as believers. The Great Commission didn't say, go into all the world and reform governments. Right. Jesus said to go into all the world and preach the gospel and make disciples of all men and women

and baptize them in his name. That's what we're supposed to be doing. And if we carry out that responsibility and enough hearts are changed, countries are changed. And actually in the Great Commission where it says going to all the world, it's really saying going to all nations. Yes. And so, listen, there have been a lot of nations since, you know, A.D. 33.

A lot of nations, some that still exist today, some that have gone onto the dustbin of history. And yet he's told us to go into all those nations. There might be new nations in the future, too. And so we keep that in mind and keep reminding ourselves that our loyalty is to a kingdom and not to a nation. Yes, we live in a nation, but our loyalty is to a kingdom. We're pilgrims passing through. Yes. That's all we are here.

We're pilgrims passing through this land. Keep your eyes on Jesus Christ in the kingdom of God. We're talking about shadow governments and hidden powers and entities. And right now there is a meeting of such people. I don't think it's the ultimate power group. I'm talking about the Bilderberg Group. And they are meeting May 18 through the 21st in Lisbon, Portugal. Doc went, in my early days of True News, you couldn't say Bilderberg.

Because you were immediately called a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. Right. There's no such thing as Bilderberg. You couldn't even say it to get what you're looking at. Right, yeah. So now it's out in the open. They have a website now. Yes.

So at some point they decided, you know what? Let's quit pretending. Let's quit pretending that we don't exist. We'll just go ahead and put up a website.

And then to get the agenda, you had to have, you know how they used to get, back in the early days of True News? You know how we got agendas? You had to send someone there and actually get an agenda from somebody? You had to, you got the agenda. Yeah, yes. You'd send somebody. Like Joan Vion? Yes.

No, they couldn't get in. Nobody could get in. Oh, in. Nobody could get in. Oh, really? Nobody could get in. So how would you get the agenda? They would have to get a waiter or a waitress or somebody in security, somebody that would sneak out the agenda

and pass it off like a secret document. That's the only way. And same way with the attendees list. Right, and we have the current one too. And if you said that you had the list of attendees, the media would go after you and say, you know, ludicrous. This is outrageous that you're saying

that these important people are in a secret meeting. But now they just publish it. It's right there. It's not difficult to get the list because Bilderberg wants you to know who is ruling over you. And we've talked about a lot of these people through the years.

There's Albert Burla from Pfizer. Joseph Burrell. And so Mark Carney, former defense chief. And so Christopher Cavoli, the current Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, he's going to be there. Other names that we've talked about on and off

through the years, but these are the who's who, the ones that are invited to the Bilderberg meeting. And it's broken down to about two thirds of political and industrial leaders and one third journalists, Rick, if you go down through the list. But they're not there to report. They're not allowed to report. Absolutely. This is under Chatham House rules. You cannot speak publicly. Once you leave the meeting, you are not allowed to tell anybody what you heard in the Bilderberg group gathering. It's top secret.

But they're not there to rule the world. That's what they tell you. It's just a bunch of powerful, influential people getting together to talk about the way the world should be run. And these are the ones that run it. Yeah, and let's go back. Let's put up their agenda again,

and we'll see what they were talking about. So there are different topics for discussion this year. Right at the top of the list, artificial intelligence, the banking system, China, energy transition, Europe, fiscal challenges, India, industrial policy and trade, NATO, Russia, transnational threats, of course, Ukraine. And interesting, U.S. leadership, Rick.

Meaning, who are we going to choose to be the president in the next election? That's what that means. That's what they do. So this gives a short blurb about their designed history of the Bilderberg Group. They say the Bilderberg meeting is a forum for informal discussions about major issues. The meetings are held under Chatham House rules, as Ricketts says, which states that participants are free to use the information they receive, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speakers nor any other participant may be revealed.

All right, so if it's a, I mean, if it's not a big deal, why keep it a secret? In other words, you can talk openly about an idea that you heard, but you can't say where you heard it or who said it. You can just say, I was in a meeting, I heard this. That's as far as you can go.

Those are Chatham House rules. One thing that came out of the original Bilderberg conference, that goes back to 1954. Bilderberg was a CIA operation. Our Central Intelligence Agency set up Bilderberg. They met in the hotel, the Bilderberg Hotel. That's where it all starts. That's why it has the name Bilderberg.

And out of that original meeting came the concept for a future European Union. And so the Bilderberg Group really is the parent of the EU. Right. Well, the EU is falling apart. And even though they've had Brexit and they've done everything that they can to tie wires and ropes around the feet of the British people to prevent them from leaving, they haven't left yet. The poor British people, they voted for Brexit. And the ruling class said, no, we're not going to allow you to. They're still tied to the EU. They're still tied.

But I was surprised today to read two articles. The first one is from Reuters. Head of Sweden's number two party calls for a rethink of relations with the European Union. So now Sweden is thinking about getting out of the European Union. And this article is actually from earlier in the month. It says Reuters reported that Sweden should seek more exemptions from EU laws as part of a reset in relations with the 27-member bloc. That's coming from the head of Sweden Democrats, the country's second largest party and an informal part of government. So echoing criticism from Euro

skeptics across the continent, Jimmy Ackeson said the European Union's ever-expanding power meant German, Polish, or French politicians in practice decide what car you can buy, how expensive petrol should be, and which tree you can cut down on your own property. That sounds like America. That's right. Now, today there are good reasons to seriously reevaluate our membership in the union, Ackerson wrote in the daily Aftenbladet. Our general elections in Sweden will soon cease to have any significance in Sweden's development. Naturally, we can't allow that to happen. So he's saying, basically echoing the same sentiments,

do the elections here in the U.S. really matter? And he's echoing that same sentiment there in Sweden. Pretty soon it won't matter what elections we have in Sweden because the rest of the European Union will decide what happens in Sweden. That's right. Now, I didn't realize that there were several other countries that had been considering leaving the EU.

This is an article from May the 9th. And they're actually quoting a Daily Mail article that I tried to track down. You too? I couldn't find it. They pulled it. And so, but News AM still had the story up. And they were saying that Greece, Italy, France, Hungary,

Sweden may leave the EU in the foreseeable future. And went into some details about some of these different countries. I would bet money on Hungary. Hungary is getting pretty fed up with the EU right now. Is this, Doc, a story that we haven't talked about this week? Because each day we had other articles ahead of it, and I kept putting this story about hungary aside do you know that through those uh pentagon documents that were leaked zielinski was was planning he wanted the ukrainian military to blow up yes hungary's energy pipeline.

Hungary is a member of NATO, right? Yes. Member of the European Union? I think so. And he was going to blow up their pipeline. Wouldn't that be an attack on a NATO member? Article 5? I would think so.

But Zelensky can say that, Rick. He's allowed to say that. It's got no publicity in the United States at all. But it was in those Pentagon documents that were released. And we may be, I may have a story in here where the Hungarian, one of the Hungarian officials is demanding an explanation from Zelensky. Like, why are you talking about blowing up our energy pipeline? But Zelensky had an active plan underway to carry out sabotage. Let me go now to number 24. This is how Rod's in Israel.

Jewish House Democrats, that's in the United States. So this is an Israeli newspaper saying Jewish members of the United States House of Representatives, all Democrats, are demanding that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy censor Republican Congressman Paul Gosar. For what? What did he do? Well, he said something he shouldn't have said. That's always what gets you. No, actually, he didn't. He didn't. No, he was censored because staff members. Two of his staff members were friends with Nick Fuentes. And not even necessarily friends, just followers.

Followers, that's it, just followers. So Horatz reported that six House Democrats, all of whom are Jewish or have Jewish heritage, urged House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to censor Representative Paul Gosar on Wednesday, days after it emerged that two of his staffers are supporters of Nick Fuentes. Now, he says in that article,

the incident is the latest of several scandals related to the Arizona Republicans' proximity to anti-Semitism in recent weeks. Previous incidents include comparing the Ukrainian government to Nazis. Can't do that, Rick. I do that every day. And on Israel's Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Or sharing a link in his official newsletter leading to an anti-Semitic website that deemed senior U.S. officials Jewish warmongers. He wasn't lying. And speaking at a major international conservative summit in Hungary. A CPAC summit, Rick. In Hungary attended by some of the world's most prominent, prominent far-right figures. So if you attend a CPAC meeting and you work for a congressman, that congressman should be censored. Using that logic, yes.

Who's behind the censorship of Americans? Who is leading the charge to censor, to censor American citizens, to de-platform people all right this article is out of a jewish newspaper in in israel this accusation is being led by six members of the house all democrat jews why is it that when you follow the trail, the demands for censorship always goes back to Zionists who want to shut down anybody in the world who criticizes their behavior? Right. It's not their race. It's not their DNA.

It's not their religion. It's their behavior. And remember Dennis Prager said it's a behavior-based religion. Yes. We'll agree with you on said, it's a behavior-based religion. Yes. We'll agree with you on that. It is a behavior-based religion. Your behavior is bad. Yes, and I can critique it.

Speaking of bad behavior. Oh, my goodness. So today is so-called Jerusalem Day in Israel. And this is the day that hardcore radical extremist Zionists celebrate the 1967 conquering of Palestine. And what they do every year on what they call Jerusalem Day is that they march around in East Jerusalem, which is Arab. In the city of Jerusalem, in East Jerusalem, the Palestinians live in the East Jerusalem neighborhoods. So the hardcore radical extremist Zionists deliberately march up and down the streets of the Arab communities to provoke them. And so today they did it again, and they were shouting death to Palestinians, death to Arabs, a lot of name calling that we

aren't going to say here on this program today. But these are things that you will never, ever see on Fox News or CNN or CBN or TBN, none of them, secular news media or Christian broadcasters, none of them will show you these videos and these stills of Zionist behavior on Jerusalem Day as they beat and kicked and harassed and intimidated innocent Palestinians who all day long had to put up with tens of thousands of violent Zionists marching in front of their homes and shops, shouting that they wanted to kill Arabs. You will not see this. But just for me showing you

this, I promise you I will be attacked next week. There will be an attack on me. It'll be a quiet, silent attack. They don't do it out in the open. They'll do something against me within the next seven days. And that's usually a vendor. Somebody that does business with us will be under pressure to cancel our account. I promise you it will happen. It's like clockwork. Every time I defend the Palestinian people, the Zionists in America attack me. But God is my defender. And they cannot shut me down. I'm not at war with the Zionists in America attack me. But God is my defender. And they cannot shut me down.

I'm not at war with the Zionists. I'm just defending the Palestinian people who have no one to defend them in America. And so we're going to show you some things that happened. Again, we're taking, we'll read a few lines from the, well, this article is Times of Israel. So this was out today, Times of Israel. Look at the headline. At Jerusalem flag march, chance of death to Arabs and assaults on Palestinians. At least they're being truthful about it.

The national religious broadcasters are meeting next week in Orlando. Are they going to condemn this behavior? No, they have a banquet to stand with Israel night. Yes. I've gotten my invitation already. How about stand with the Palestinians? How about tell the Israelis, stop this kind of despicable behavior? What you're doing to these people is wrong. And it's not Christian.

And as Christians, we can't ignore it. And we cannot fellowship with you until you stop assaulting these Palestinian people. You've taken away their rights. You've stripped them of their human dignity. You're taking their homes from them. And what the Zionists want the Palestinian people to do is just give up and leave. The Palestinians that are in East Jerusalem, in the West Bank, in Gaza, they are the holdouts. They are the descendants of the Palestinians who did not leave their homeland after the Zionists took over in 1948. After the Zionists got control of more land in 1967. These are the Palestinians

who said, you can kill us. We're not going to leave. And believe me, zionists have killed a lot of them and if they could get away with it they'd kill all of them right but their strategy is to wear down these people until they just give up and surrender their houses and their farms and their olive groves and their their businesses and they just walk someplace and try to start over again as refugees. We'll read a couple lines from this Times of Israel article, because it was so bad today that even the Jewish newspapers couldn't ignore it. So thousands of Israelis took part in Jerusalem Flag March Day, and that was today on Thursday, with the highly controversial annual event again featuring racists, chants and scuffles.

They call them scuffles with Palestinian residents as the largely teenage religious nationalist participants made their way through the old city's Muslim court. Now, notice how they frame this. You know, it's just a bunch of Jewish teenagers letting off some steam and everything, getting into a few scuffles here and there. We're going to show you what those scuffles look like here in a little bit. Now, the particularly charged aspect of the flag march is its route through the Damascus Gate Muslim Quarter, which, of course, are overwhelmingly used by Palestinians. Critics say the rally is designed to provoke Palestinians who are forced by the Israeli police to shutter their shops to allow for the demonstration. So the police come through, shut down all the stores and

shops along the way to allow this rally to take place. And so different groups of flag march participants clashed and beat Palestinian locals and harassed journalists. They also sang racist chants such as, death to Arabs, may your village burn, and Arab as a son of a, as they danced near the Damascus gate both before and during the rally on Thursday afternoon. Keep in mind, this is a Jewish paper that we're reading. Right.

They're telling the truth. Even they tried to tone it down a little bit. A bunch of teenagers getting into scuffles with Palestinians. Now, what it is, Doc, what you're going to see in these videos, this is raw white supremacy. It's white supremacy. European white supremacists. I'm sure we'll be getting the letters on that one. Oh, no, let me explain.

Let me explain. These people that are living over there in Palestine, they're white European settlers. Their skin is white. They're Europeans. They immigrated. Oh, they immigrated, or they didn't immigrate, they infiltrated

into Arab Palestine. The Palestinians, the Arabs are Semitic people who speak a Semitic language. The people that came from Europe, they spoke Yiddish. There was no Hebrew. They had to make it up.

And Yiddish is a mixture of German and Russian. Yes. So these are white European nationalists, white supremacists. You know all this white supremacy accusations in America against conservatives and patriots and Christians? It all originates from the Zionists. Whatever they say you are is what they are. Whatever they accuse you of doing is what they are doing.

They are the ultimate white supremacists. went from Europe and the United States and other white culture countries and they infiltrated into Arab Palestine and took over the land and then beat the people and then tell you and me, if you criticize what we're doing, we will call you a bigot. Or anti-Semitic.

A white supremacist. Right. But they are the white supremacists. They are. In Israel. They are the white supremacists. They're the white supremacists here. They're the top tier, aren't they?

You better believe it. Just watch some of the video. The first one. Well, there was, out of all the six pointed star flags that were being marched down through Jerusalem there was at least one and maybe more of another flag that was flying. We've got some video here. Let's watch this see if you can spot what's on the flag. of course the title of the video kind of gives it away a little bit but

we've got a zoomed in picture of the flag here that helps us out a little bit. So that flag there represents the new temple. That's right. There are supporters in Israel that have a flag for plans for the Temple Mount. And that would be built on the site of the Asghar Mosque, which means they have to tear down the Islamic mosque so that they can build that temple. What do you think is going to happen when they tear down that mosque? There's going to be...

Bloodshed. Yes. But they don't care. It's probably not going to be their blood, though. They want to kill the Arabs. Doc, they want to kill the Arabs. They need to kill the Arabs. They need to ethnically cleanse Palestine so that they can take over all of it. But they can't build that third temple

until they tear down the mosque. And you have major prominent Christian leaders in this country who fully support those Zionists in tearing down the mosque and building a temple which would be dedicated to Antichrist. And you've got churches raising money for it. Yes. And we'll celebrate it. Now, next video we have here for you, it's actually from 2021, but this shows you how the flag days have been celebrated over the past couple years. That way you get context for some of these videos that came out today. So let's watch this one first. ענק בעלתניה אנטריק!

ענק בעלתניה! מחנה פליטית עגור! עם טעותים נחמד שרעות אספר! ערבי טוב ערבי בכבל ערבי ובן תונה ערבי ובן תונה תודה רבה. I think what surprised me most about that video in particular was the number of children who were participating in the chants and the cries of death to Arabs. Training them to be haters of Arabs.

And what are we told here in the U.S. that all the Muslims are doing every day is this indoctrination their kids put on dynamite vests and blow up somebody, right? But who were the aggressors in that video? And who were the victims? The Arabs were the victims and the Zionists were the aggressors. All the aggressive behavior came from the Zionists. The one Zionist was shouting, a second Nakba is coming to you. A second Nakba. What is it? It means catastrophe, calamity, disaster. That's 1948.

Right. And so he was saying, a second 1948 is coming. Well, what happened in 48? When the Zionists rose up, they had infiltrated Palestine for decades, bringing in weapons. And then they rose up at one time and began the Arabs and millions of Arabs fled on foot, left their homes, left their farms and went to Jordan, went to Syria, went to Lebanon. And it's their disaster. It's their calamity day. And so the Zionists were saying a second calamity day is coming to you. A second, a second Nakba. Meaning, we're going to get rid of the rest of you. We're going to clean out the rest of you and you'll all pack up and leave. Now, just so you can't accuse us of just isolating stuff that happened a couple years ago, let's fast forward to today.

Today. So, next clip we have for you here are, and this is part of the Jerusalem Flag Day March, yeshiva students sing the ultra-nationalist hymn and vengeance song about Samson toppling a temple on the Philistines in the Muslim quarter. So watch this. So if you were, if you're a Palestinian, whether Christian or Muslim, you're Palestinian

and you live in East Jerusalem, what you had to put up with today is thousands of Zionists marching in front of your home or your shop shouting, we're going to kill you. Yes. You had to go in and lock your doors. While a Zionist mob was in the streets shouting, we're going to kill you.

We're going to burn your villages. Imagine if a group of white people marched through a black portion of a city here in the U.S., let's say Chicago or Detroit, saying, go back to Africa, you know, or death to you guys. Well, they would call them white supremacists. That's right. Well, that's what those are. Those are white supremacists. That's exactly what they are. They're European white supremacists. That's exactly what they are. They're European white supremacists.

And I'm against white supremacy. And I denounce white Zionist supremacy. They are victimizing the Semitic Arab people. And it's being done by white European Zionist supremacists who believe that they are that they are superior to the Arab people. We have more. All right this next one actually shows some of the violence that's taking place in the Muslim quarter of East Jerusalem. Watch this. Hello, YouTube. Hello. Hey. What you saw was a Jewish mob beating up an Arab Palestinian man in front of his own property.

And the police were right there. You saw the police to allow it to happen. That's right. We have this this tweet from Twitter and the scene right now. Marching settlers spit at Palestinians. Sold soldiers intervene and then beat up Palestinians. Then settlers asked soldiers to beat the Palestinians who hadn't already been beaten. Then soldiers followed the orders of the settlers and beat those who got pointed at. We actually have some of that video that went along with this particular tweet here. Watch this. I think we'll keep this up. That's what it looks like when Jewish white supremacists attack an Arab community. That's what they are, Jewish white supremacists. Jews from Europe who infiltrated Arab Palestine

and then beat up the local Palestinian people to take their homes from them. I demand that Christian Broadcasting Network show these videos on the 700 Club. I demand that TBN show these videos and all the Christian broadcasters who will be gathering next week in Orlando to extol the virtues of Zionist Israel.

Show these videos. Be fair. Be fair and be upright. Many of those Palestinians who were beat today are Christians. It doesn't matter if they're Muslims or Christians. It's wrong.

Nobody should be beat like that. Neither should Jews be beat. I don't want anybody beat up. But the news is lopsided. It's not fair. It's not balanced. And we're always told bad, ugly things about the Palestinian people. And we're told that the Jews are always the victims of

white supremacy. All right. So let's show one more still here. This number 38 for control. All right. So this is Jewish people being victimized here, Rick. No, these are Palestinians. These are Jews beating Palestinians. And that young man on the ground is a very young man. He's maybe late teens, early 20s. And you've got a group of Jewish men beating him. And what I thought was significant about the picture when I saw it earlier, Rick, look in the background there. You have four people taking pictures and video. Because they were proud of it.

They were proud of it. Jewish white supremacists. We got to stop it, Doc. We got to stop this white supremacy stuff. I'm on board with you on that. I'm against this white supremacy stuff. And that's white supremacy. And I'm against it.

I hope the ADL will come out and join me in opposing this white supremacy. Violent, violent white supremacy. Nationalistic. That was white nationalism unleashed in Palestine. White nationalism unleashed in Palestine against the Palestinian people. I denounce it. Another thing I'm denouncing is the fact that Dennis Prager, who justifies pornography, justifies watching pornography,

even justifies watching animated child pornography. That's true. He is a prominent speaker next week at the National Religious Broadcasters Convention in Orlando Wednesday morning. And I am calling on the NRB to rescind his invitation. He's unfit to speak at a meeting of Christian broadcasters. And I'm also calling on Salem Media to terminate that company's relationship with Dennis Prager. Salem Media is supposed to be the nation's

largest Christian broadcasting company in radio. And yet they are elevating Dennis Prager to a lofty position where he is defending watching pornography, even saying that watching animated child porn is not morally wrong. Dennis Prager should not be given a platform. He needs to be deplatformed and silenced. That's my view. And yet he will be speaking at the NRB next week. Apparently there are no Christians qualified to speak at the NRB. So you got to bring a Zionist in who believes that pornography is permissible. A Zionist who rejects Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, rejects the commandments of Christ, and they elevate him to speak at the convention. And yet they will silence anybody that criticizes him.

Who controls the NRB now? The NRB has been infiltrated. It's been infiltrated and it's been taken over. Well, I guess I've said enough today. I probably should go home. All right. Well, before we go, I want to remind you of our address. Always, you can visit us on truenews.com and find out more information about what we do here. And also we are able to give there. You can call us 800-576-2116. And you can always write us at True News, P.O. Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969. Don't

forget our app as well. You can give on the app, find out additional information as well. One of the things we have going right now, of course, now the audio book is on Audible. It sure is. We're very happy about that. And people are responding and downloading the audio book and we're getting some about that. And people are responding and downloading the audio book. And we're getting some great feedback on Final Day. So go to Amazon and get your copy of Final Day. The paperback version, the e-book Kindle version, and the audio version is now available on Amazon.

And whichever one you like, get your copy and enjoy final day. And it will, I'm telling you, it will revolutionize your thinking about the second coming. It's a very easy book to read. It's not complicated. It's not, it's easy to digest. And I'm really looking forward to getting the feedback from those who are listening to the audio book. I'm curious to know how you like. Right now, the audio book is outselling the other two versions. Right now, about 52% of the sales on Amazon

for this book is the audio book. That's good. Yeah, so it's doing really well. We're glad. Thank you so much. We'll see you tomorrow. book. That's good. Yeah, so it's doing really well. We're glad. Thank you so much. We'll see you tomorrow. Bye. God bless you.

You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles. Thank you for listening. To find out more information regarding this podcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at www.truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondents is True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969.