TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - COP26: Corporate Execs and Politicians Commit to World Governance Scheme

Episode Date: November 3, 2021

The much-ballyhooed COP26 summit to stop global climate change ended with a pledge by corporate executives and political leaders to reimagine the world economic system. If the Green Communists are successful in maintaining their alliance with the Capitalist Communists, our lives will be radically transformed over the next decade. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 11/3/21

The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit nothing but the truth, so help us God. The much-ballehooed COP26 summit to stop global climate change ended with a pledge by corporate executives and world political leaders to reimagine the world economic system. If the green communists are successful in maintaining their alliance with the capitalist communists, our lives will be radically transformed over the next decade. Doc Burkhart and I have some very important observations to share with you today. Doc, the more that I looked into COP26, the more I realized this was not your normal environmental conference

where world leaders come together just to talk, photo ops, get the headlines, the pictures, you know, the newsreels going. This one, they really did come together to do something with an agenda. Yes. I was going to say the very same thing when you opened up. I'm glad today was the last day of it before they can do any further damage because some of the things that they're proposing, Rick, are so far, I mean, so radical that as we share throughout the Godcast here today, you're probably just going to sit back and go, whoa, wait a minute. They are actually moving ahead with this? It's no longer proposals. Now they're implementing the plan. Yes. The headline I saw today, very early this morning, it caught

my attention was it had to figure $130 trillion in it. And here's the Reuters version, COP26 coalition worth $130 trillion vows to put climate at heart of finance. And the other one that I saw, which was number 16. This is Boris Johnson. He did a tweet earlier today celebrating this new deployment of $130 trillion. He says governments can mobilize billions to fight climate change, but the private sector can mobilize trillions. Today's commitments at COP26 will deploy $130 trillion to build the global green economy of the future. Now, Doc, this is what got my attention early this morning. It was around about 5 a.m., and I'm looking at this and I'm seeing $130 trillion deal. Because on the surface, it appeared that they had a slush fund with $130 trillion, not billions, trillion, $130 trillion set aside to fight climate change, which was just an astronomical figure.

But when you look into it, Boris Johnson and others, they were not entirely factual with what they were saying, because they want you to believe that they're going to spend $130 trillion to fight climate change. What it actually means is that banks and financial institutions. Investment companies. And investment companies that are managing an aggregate amount equal to $130 trillion have agreed that they are going to make financial decisions based on the agenda that they agreed to at COP26. Yes. This is significant.

Did you understand what I just said? Yes. The biggest banks, the biggest financial houses in the world agreed that they are going to reorder the global financial system to fight climate change. Right. So when we say that, we're in line with the principles laid out at COP26, which really is an extension of the previous agreements from the Paris Accords, the Paris agreements from a few years back. But that's just one example. Think of hundreds of investment firms, banks, you name it, all now aligning themselves,

saying as we move forward, we're going to make decisions based upon green investments. Now, Rick, you and I, we're familiar with that term green investments because we started hearing it four or five years ago when we would travel to tech conferences, mobile device conferences. They would always seem to sneak in a seminar or presentation on green investments. And so this has been in place, the plan has been in place for a long, long time. But to see it bear fruit like we did over the past few days here, I mean, when I saw this, Rick, it was like, we knew this four or five years ago the extent that the corporate executives were going to take this, their commitment to fighting global climate change. If you believe the climate has been changing since Noah's flood. Yeah, it's called the weather.

Well, the climate and the weather are two different things. Right, I know, but there are cycles too. Yes, the climate has changed on the planet ever since Noah's flood. Yes. We had a stable climate system on the planet up until the flood. It has never been stable since. That's right. It has changed in cycles. So anyhow, that's another topic. These guys know it. They're using it as a cover for global governance. But this is what today, what I realize they're doing, Doc.

So you said they're making a commitment to green technology, to green ventures. Okay, that sounds wonderful. Right? Who's against solar power? That sounds wonderful. Right. We all want more solar power. Okay, that's fine.

Okay, more efficient products that use less electricity. That's wonderful. That's great. Okay, I'm not against that, that's great. But that's not what they're talking about. Right. Doc, where they're going with this is they are going to shut down the supply of money,

investment, capital to any industry that they decree to be unfriendly to the environment. All right, so one example would be the coal industry. Yes. There's a lot of investment in coal because coal works. Coal produces. Coal does what it's supposed to do. And most coal, by the way, is clean.

It's not dirty coal, okay? They capture a lot of the byproducts of coal now, and so they'll try to fool you and say, no, it's dirty. But now they're going to shift away from, they'll just to fool you and say no, it's dirty But now they're gonna shift away from they'll just say no investments in coal Eventually, they'll say no investments in any petroleum products that that's the game plan. That's the agenda that they have so last month in California state legislature and the governor signed the governor the legislature passed the bill the governor signed it um maybe they didn't pass maybe maybe he just did a decree i i lose track these people don't even need legislation anymore they just signed executive orders but anyhow in state of california um gasoline powered lawnmowers right are going to be outlawed. A lawnmower. Okay?

They're outlawing lawnmowers and anything, any yard tool that's gasoline powered is going to be outlawed in the state of California. So eventually where they'll go is that banks will say to a manufacturer of lawnmowers, we're not giving you any capital.

Why not? Because we have decided that your product is harmful to the environment and we no longer will support you. We will not give you any working capital. We will not provide bridge loans. There will be nothing coming from the global banking system for your corporation.

This is how they're going to shut down thousands of companies. If you have investments in oil, coal, any carbon-based product, if you have investments, you need to think long and hard about how long you're going to keep it because I'm telling you the decision was made this week in Glasgow to shut it all down over the next 10 years They're going to completely Remake the global economic system This the Wall Street Journal, okay is a

Excellent story today financial system makes big promises on climate change at COP26. So notice it's the financial system. Can I just insert a different title there? International banksters. Yes. International banksters make big promises on climate change. The international banksters have made an alliance with the green communists to reorder the global system. And don't be fooled. It's not to have a green environment. It's to make money. That's the reason. So they have to create chaos and disorder. No, I disagree, Doc. You really think they're genuine about it?

No, they're genuine in controlling the world. They're already making money. They're making a lot of money now. They're sitting on top of $130 trillion that they manage. I mean, what do you want to take it up to, $160 trillion? No, this is about power. I have said for a long time that the future global government is not going to be politicians. It's corporations. I have said that the ten kingdoms, the ten kings in the book of the revelation of Jesus Christ, we have to consider the possibility that the ten kings are not political kings, but corporate kings. Like CEOs of multinational companies. Why couldn't one king

be Bezos and another one Zuckerberg and you have ten kings of the world? We have to start thinking differently and interpreting Bible prophecy. So, the world government is going to be corporate.

Well, didn't Boris Johnson halfway admit that today in his tweet? He said governments have billions. Yes. Corporations have trillions. They know who is running the show now. The politicians are there only to codify their, the decisions that these banksters make in private meetings then is codified into law by the politicians that are their little flunkies and so the only reason why the politicians show up is to hear what the banks what they're supposed to do yes you now you're getting it okay okay the global government that is being constructed right now is a corporate government we're We're going to be, and we're all, we're there right now,

we're under a corporate dictatorship. No rights, no freedoms, no participation in it. International banksters are making the decision. Technology companies, you know, at the level of Amazon and Facebook and Twitter and Google and Apple, and then with the corporate, you know, the finance companies, Goldman Sachs and so forth, they are making the decisions. The politicians just say, yes, sir, we'll get it done for you. We'll get a law passed. We'll make it happen. But they have so much power now, Doc. They don't even need the laws passed. You don't need a law passed that says all fossil fuel industries have to be shut down.

You don't need a law to do that. You just cut off the money. Cut off the money to those companies and they will go out of business. The capital, the banking capital is the blood that flows through the economic system. So without that capital, a coal company can't buy new equipment. They can't buy boring machines. They can't do anything. There's not going to be any machines. They're going to cut off the companies that make the machines, Doc. Yes. You go into a large

bank and you're presenting a proposal for a bridge loan of $100 million to get you through six months. What do you do? What's your company do? Well, we build big machines. Well, what do these big machines do? Well, we sell these big machines to coal mines. Well, what do they do with it? Well, they dig holes in the earth and get coal.

Well, we're not giving you any money. You're done. Because coal's bad. Coal's evil. Yes. So your big machine that digs holes in the ground is evil. That's what these people are doing. Wow. that digs holes in the ground is evil. That's what these people are doing. They are going to control everything. Eventually, they don't need you and me, because we're going to be declared threats to the climate.

Right, because we're producing CO2 as well. And we will have to be euthanized and done away with. It's coming. It may take 10 years 20 years that's where they're going the kings of the earth will have the whole earth to themselves and the work the labor will be done by robots they won't need people people just get in their way people are blocking their view of oceans and mountains. You've got poor people living in huts on oceanfront property. Get rid of them. Just get rid of them. I mean, this is the way these people are thinking.

And they also will be thinking, too, these are the people that are slowing down our progress as well. Yes. So I want to show you who opening today. I want to show you the man who is in charge of this operation. Pay close attention. Financial Times, Carney led finance coalition has up to one hundred trillion of funding committed to hitting net zero. Now, Rick, why does that name Carney sound familiar? Because it's Mark Carney, and he was the governor of the Bank of England. Then after he finished that job, he moved to Canada and became the governor of the Bank of Canada right before he was at the Bank of England he was at Golden Sacks a Goldman Sachs and

worked worked for them for I think 12 13 15 years something like that deeply committed to the international banks and can move from being the head of the central bank of one nation and just move across the Atlantic and take over the central bank of another nation. And then to move from that into a new central bank, a central bank for climate change. Yes, exactly what he's doing. So Mark Carney is a very powerful player on the international money scene. And we have been following him for just about as long as True News has been around. That would be 22 years, because I talked about him years ago when he was at the Bank of England, then the Bank

of Canada. So I'm going to show you something you're going to pay attention today. Just mark this down somewhere and say, oh, Rick told us in November. What is today? November what? November 3rd. Rick's told us on November 3rd, 2021, that this is going to become important. We're going to hear about this for many years. It's called GFANS. There it is. The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero. GFANS.

And basically, this is the central bank for climate change. You got it, Doug. And Mark Carney is the co-chairman. And his comrade as co-chair is Michael Bloomberg. And also on the board of directors is Mary Shapiro, who was chairwoman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under President Obama. And so all climate experts, I take it, right? Yes.

Or financial. They're financial people. But you notice this is on the website, bringing together the financial sector to accelerate the transition to a net zero economy. All right. Now, a lot of people aren't going to be familiar with this term net zero economy. What do they mean by that, Rick? Net carbon, zero, zero carbon. So they're trying to get carbon emissions down to zero.

That means no coal, no oil, no gasoline, no coal, nothing that has carbon. Zero. This is the transition to a global system that they will design and they will own it. And of course, it'll make them very rich. Because if you get to build a brand new financial system and you designed it and you own it, you get to keep the money. That's right. What a system.

So our audience is going to be hearing this term a lot now because they've really promoted this in COP26 this week, that term net zero economy. So keep that in mind as we're moving forward because that's all they're going to talk about. You know you hear of OECD particularly in the attack on offshore banking offshore tax havens. And, you know, you'd read these headlines of over the past 10, 15 years, OECD issues report, OECD calls for elimination of tax havens, OECD. And you would think somewhere out there, there's a global government organization called the OECD. No, it was a French think tank. Right. But they became a police power. They would issue a report against a country and some little country would just melt because their inspectors would show up.

And I've seen this happen, Doc, particularly in the Caribbean, where these island leaders would just be terrified that these French officials were coming in to inspect them. Like it was some kind of government agency. This is what GFANS is going to be like. Right. They're going to issue a report. Your company's bad. You have to, we have to put sanctions on you. We have to shut you down, Doc.

We have to, we have to deny you funds. Right. So they don't have to come to you and say that. They can just say to all their member organizations, which be every single financial investment institution in the world, do not invest with this company. Here's your hit list. They're on the blacklist. Here's your hit list. And they're actually talking about economic sanctions against companies. So we're going to take a break. When we come back, we'll tell you more about this new financial system that is being built and the decisions were made this week in Glasgow. You're watching True News. Having good, nutritious food ready in case of natural disasters or shipping disruptions is part of the wisdom God gives to us and Heaven's Harvest is your resource in preparedness. Our food kits have a 25 year shelf life

and come in a variety of stackable sizes with handles for convenient storage or transportation. The nutritional value of the food is preserved by freeze drying and not dehydrating it. Heaven's Harvest offers heirloom vegetable seed kits with the highest quality non GMO heirloom seeds simply created by nature. With 39 garden staple varieties, you can grow and produce an astonishing yield of hearty vegetables and fruits that have tremendous flavor. Heaven's Harvest also has water filtration and storage solutions and gardening and other resources that will offer you and your family peace of mind. Visit Heaven's Harvest online at heavensharvest.com. That's heavensharvest.com.

Or call 800-516-4773. That's 800-516-4773. If you missed yesterday's true news, our lead story was that the China communist government urged all Chinese citizens. What is that, 1.4 billion people? Yes. To stockpile food. The Chinese government did it.

It wasn't a PSA announcement on Chinese television, the government, the Ministry of Commerce or something, put the message out to the entire country that all Chinese citizens should stockpile food and necessities for the winter. So we're going to talk about it in a few minutes. Nobody really knows what's going on, why the Chinese suddenly want the entire nation to go into prepper mode. But if you are a true news viewer, then you know that this happened because 99.9 percent of the people in this country never heard it yesterday. Right. Only the true news audience. Very few people heard it. It was not reported on Fox News, CNN, ABC News.

It wasn't anywhere. Bloomberg News carried it. Few people there, you know, I'm sure, picked up on it. The Wall Street guys saw it. But the man and woman, you know, in everyday town didn't hear about it. And certainly not people in the church heard anything about it. No, but that's our job. This is why we're here.

And the Lord keeps true news going day after day for 22 years. And he uses people just like you to keep this ministry going. We are financed by the generosity of our audience. We don't make big appeals. I don't have a fundraising department. I don't do anything like that. I just pray and ask the Lord to speak to people. And there are people who hear the Lord's voice and they send gifts. That's how it works. And it's been working that way for 22 years. We would like to have you as a partner. You can donate online at truenews.com or you can send a check or money

order to the address that's on the screen, which is post office box 690069 Vero Beach, Florida 32969. So we're talking about Mark Carney, very influential man in the global financial system. And as I said, I've talked about this man for many, many years. And I'm going to recall some of the articles that we've talked about in recent years. This next one was the Financial Times. And let's see, this was August 23rd, 2019. And we actually covered this story. We sure did. So, Doc, what's the headline? Mark Carney calls for global monetary system to replace the dollar.

Mark Carney, the man who yesterday announced the $133 trillion financial alliance to remake the global economy. That Mark Carney. Yes. When he said this in 2019, we need a new global monetary system to replace the U.S. dollar. I talked about it on True News. I said this man is working to undo our way of life. He wants his, the globalists, the international banksters are determined to have a new financial system. Here's what I'm trying to tell you. COP 26 in Glasgow,

that's where they did the handshake. That's where they happened. They did the handshake in Glasgow, Scotland this week. That article that you saw from 2019 they they inked it this week in glasgow he's been working since 2019 to put this together he didn't just come up with this idea last week no and say i'm going to go to scotland and propose this and greta Thunberg is probably going to be so excited about this. No, he was working on this years ago. And so they

inked the deal this week in Scotland. Most people who knew about that story in 2019 forgot about it. Oh yeah, that's right. Mark Carney called for a global system to replace the U.S. dollar. Wonder whatever happened to old Mark Carney. Well, now you know. Yes. He started GFANS. Which is going to be not just the central bank for climate change. It's going to be the central bank for the world when we're all said and done. That's what they're doing. So and he's qualified to move into that position. Yes. So another story. This was from Bloomberg. Right. This from 2019. I remember this story, too, Rick Carney urges Libra like reserve currency to end dollar dominance. And so the idea here, of course, this is an implementation to get rid of the dollar and to come up with a new global currency of some kind that would allow a central government.

In order to have a central currency, you have to have a central government. It's the first step toward global government. Yes. So what's the point in a global currency if there's no government over it? Right. But notice this is a 2019. He envisioned a Libbra like reserve currency well what was libra libra was the name of mark zuckerberg's proposed uh facebook crypto

crypto digital coin which went nowhere and we were in Singapore. You and I were there in Singapore. Yeah, November 2019. Yeah, and the story was 2019. Yes. And I was in the session where, in fact, one of the top officials of the Chinese central bank was on the stage stage and there were other

officials there. And when, when people brought up the, when the panel moderator brought up Mark Zuckerberg's start his cryptocurrency. Right. Yeah, I mean it was just a just an absolute shutdown. Because they already owned that game. Yes, but they're not gonna let they more than anything, Doc, what I saw was we're certainly not going to allow Mark Zuckerberg to run the world with his currency. But what did Mark Carney want? The very thing that he was talking about was a Libra-like type of currency. So is is Carney working with Mark Zuckerberg? Zuckerberg renamed his currency. He's been very quiet about it. They've not

talked too much about it because they had so much opposition to it. But you're going to have some type of privately owned cryptocurrency not owned by governments, not owned by central banks. These guys are outside of the central banks. They're creating, you're right, they're creating their own central bank for the world. That has nothing to do with governments. They're going their own central bank for the world. Yes. That has nothing to do with governments. They're going to become the government. They don't need these little country governments anymore. These little countries are going to become counties.

Yes, because something like this, they'll be able to finance their own armies, their own air forces, their own navies. They'll be able to have their own private armies. You're going to have $130 trillion under your management? I hope our audience really understands the impact of the decisions I've made this week. Nothing in my lifetime has been so obvious that this is global government without calling it that. That's right. I mean, this is global government now. They just did a global corporate tax a few days ago.

Now they're telling you we're going to have a global investment scheme that's going to finance all this. And we're going to shut down entire industries. And we're about to tell you in a few minutes what they're going to do to farmers. This is wild what they're planning to do to ranchers and farmers. Here's a Reuters story. Mark Carney is the key man, risk for bank, net zero club. And there's a quote in this Reuters story that I want Doc to read.

So Mark Carney, the UN Special Envoy for Climate Change and Finance and COP26 Private Finance Advisor to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, said that the architecture of the global financial system had been transformed to deliver net zero. We now have the essential plumbing in place to move climate change from the fringes to the forefront of finance so that every, listen to this audience, every financial decision takes climate change into account. Only this mainstream focus can finance the estimated $100 trillion, as we said earlier, it's actually $130 trillion of investment needed for the next three decades for a clean energy future. Every, every financial decision will be made based on climate change. So if I'm at McDonald's, let's say, and I'm buying, you know, chicken nuggets or a cheeseburger, that financial transaction at some

point now had to pass approval by these overlords so at some point that approval let's say the hamburger for instance are they going to start weighing well is that hamburger a green hamburger yes and we'll be talking about that here in a little bit too so by the way in that story that reuter story said that mark ke Mark Carney was the private advisor, the private climate advisor to Boris Johnson. Yes. On climate change. Yes. Now we know who authorized Johnson to give his scary speech in Glasgow. Remember? Yeah. Doomsday machine. The doomsday machine. Yes. You get out there, Bojo, and you scare the people. You tell them there's a doomsday machine. The time is running out.

What are the banksters doing? They're scaring the world. The oceans are going to overtake the islands in just 10 years. We've got to do something now. We've got to change the entire financial system of the world. We've got to put a group of international banksters in charge of the entire planet just to stop this horrible climate change. That's the message that there's that they're driving right now. So this is, by the way Bill Gates is a shopping for more farmland right now. This was in the New York Post today. Gates shops for climate

saving farm, but he's doing his farm shopping while he's on his super polluter yacht. Yes, and isn't this the case with all these guys, Rick? They have no qualms about taking private jets or driving expensive limousines, all these things, super polluter yachts. They have no qualms about that at all because they're saving the planet. Yes, Doc. You would have one, too, if you were as smart as Bill Gates. He can't help it that he's a genius and you're not. That's why he has a yacht.

That's why you don't. And that's why he gets to pollute while I don't. Yes. Now you understand the way the system's working doc so uh canada has pledged to reduce methane emissions because methane is bad now yes now this is going to get at first it's at first it's silly, and then you realize these people are serious, and it's scary. Years ago, when I would think about the lefties and the green radicals, you just would laugh and say, they're just funny little clowns, and thank God they don't have any power.

Well, guess what? And don't let any firearms or anything with sharp edges around because they might hurt themselves, you know, because they're such idiots. But now they have power. But the carnies of the world aren't idiots. But they're mobilizing the idiots in the green movement. Yes. They are mobilizing the green communists to give them what they desire, which is the green money. Although they share something about green money.

So so the the the guys like Carney are capitalist communists. See, like China, China's run by communist capitalists. Yes. And America's run by capitalist communists. All right. And then you have the Green Movement, which... They're just communists. They're just communists, but their communism is to save the planet.

And how are they going to do it? They're going to take away your rights, take away your private property, take away your wealth, transfer your wealth to somebody else. They're going to prevent you from using your property as you see fit. That's their version of communism, but they're doing it to save the planet. Now, this is where this starts to get really weird because we're going to show you how they're going to attack ranchers and cattlemen and farmers. So this article was from CBC Canada and talks about how dangerous cows are to our future. Right so this is just one little portion of the whole plan, folks. But so this is

a quote from CBC Canada. Nearly 30 percent of methane emissions come from the agriculture sector where methane accounts for more emissions than any other GHG, greenhouse gas, according to Canada's greenhouse gas inventory. Cattle burps make up a significant portion of these emissions. What does? Cattle burps. Burps? Burps and other noises. We're going to outlaw cow burping.

Well, whether they outlaw it or not, Rick, they might have another plan in place. Let me think. They're going to install catalytic converters on the cows. I like your pun. All right. You were waiting all day for that. I did. I did. All right. So Karen Bochemin, a researcher with Agriculture and AgriFoods Canada, who is exploring ways to reduce these emissions, says roughly a third of all greenhouse gas emissions from the ag sector

come from the digestive activities of cattle. That's more than 3% of Canada's overall GHG emissions. Now, notice that last line there. It's only 3% of Canada's overall GHG emissions. But listen to some of the radical steps that are going to have to take to address just that 3%. This next quote here. If the sector wants to improve, said Buscemin, we need to decrease livestock numbers or we need to decrease the emissions from those animals. Whoa, whoa, whoa, Doc.

The international banksters and the green communists have made a decree that worldwide they're going to decrease the number of cows on the planet or they're going to find a way to make cows burp less. This is what they're saying, right? Right. So this is the kind of stuff that was talked about in Scotland this week. This is the serious thing. They're very serious about this. Now, tie that in with the investments that are made. So are you investing in a technology that is promoting the cow burping, let's say? You mean like ranching?

Right. Or are you trying to reduce that either by reducing livestock or reducing the emissions? Which is easier? Think about this. Which is easier? Think about this. Which is easier? Your bank may cut off your banking services if you're a cattleman. That's where this is going. I mean, seriously.

This is what I'm hoping our audience, I hope you grasp what we're trying to relay to you today. A monumental decision was made in Glasgow. They're going to reimagine the entire world economic system. And over the next 10 years, they're going to drive a lot of people out of business. And they're going to drive others into the businesses that they own. Now, they do provide some ideas here on how they can reduce the emissions. So in this next quote here, we have, that's from the same article. So mixing additives like sunflower oil into cattle feed can reduce

their emissions by around 15%. An additive called 3-nitroxopropanol, I practiced that three times before I came out here, shown to reduce methane emissions in cattle by an average of 30%, according to Beauchemin's research. But 3-NOP has not been approved in Canada and Bo Schemin says the regulatory system prevents these additives from being approved in a timely manner. There's definitely ways of reducing methane emissions by 15-20 percent but those additives they are still going to bring 30, 40, and 50 percent reductions are still stuck in the proverbial pipeline. So Rick, basically what it comes down to,

in order, before they can even get to that point of the reduction that they want, they're going to start making decisions on, well, wouldn't it just be easier to reduce the number of livestock that are producing the emissions? Okay, so obviously that gets rid of cattle for food, for beef. Right. Well, will there be a food shortage?

No, because they have a solution. They have fake meat. They're going to have fake meat. And I'm not talking about plant burgers. I'm talking about laboratory-grown meat from cells. They're going to grow it in in factories meat factories completely total fake not one thing natural in it right and that's what's going to be on your grocery shelves fake meat because they're going to get rid of the cows and if they're not having

you do that they're going to be having to eat bugs and mealworms as protein replacements. You know, they're doing that now. And so one of the other issues that if you know anything about cows, they produce methane from manure. And so it also says methane is also released from manure, which is used on farms to fertilize crops. Think about this. So they're going to eliminate the fertilizer process, Rick. There are two ways to deal with these emissions, reduce or harness them. Emissions can be reduced by covering manure pools with straw or by altering the acidity of manure

to deactivate the microorganisms that produce methane. Andrew Vanderzag, who researches methane emissions on farms, says at least 30 farmers in British Columbia are capturing methane from manure storage systems and selling it to energy companies. They're able to reduce the methane emissions from their manure management system to very low levels. They're producing renewable natural gas for the energy cribs. So there's that benefit from that side as well. But that's not their goal. Their goal is not to raise cows to produce methane. Their goal is to reduce the methane.

And so the only practical way that they can do that is to somehow compel ranchers not to raise cows. Okay. So how are they going to do that, Rick? Well, there's been proposals here in the U.S., here in the United States of America, about putting a tax on every head of cattle that is raised for beef. Let's say a tax. Let's say you have a cow. I don't know how much cows cost now, so don't quote me on this. But let's say a cow costs $2,500.

You could potentially have a tax up to an equal to that amount. Okay. And so that now your cow starts costing you money because you've got to feed it. You've got to water it. You've got to provide, you know, area for it. And now you've got to pay a big giant hefty tax on it. Now, so the farmer either makes a decision. Well, if I keep raising cattle, I've got to raise, the prices have to come up that I sell this, that raises the price of hamburger, let's say. So right now, hamburgers run about $5 a pound, which to me is just crazy. But in a scenario like that, hamburger could cost $20, $25, $30 a pound when you add that extra level of price per head tax on it. And don't think they can't do this. They just did a global tax this week on

corporations. They can just as easily do a global tax on every head of cattle that's raised anywhere in the world. Why not? They did a global tax this week without you voting on it. So why not a global tax on cows? So that's where I see things headed. And the farmers, the ranchers, they're going to make decisions. I can't afford to do this. I can't afford to make a living doing this. And the only ones that are going to be able to afford to do it are the corporate ranches and the corporate farms and they're going to make a decision. We can just grow our own meat in the lab a lot cheaper. So this is a major economic shift that we're undergoing here. It is going to totally disrupt everything we know about how we get food, how we buy food,

the cost of food, what food we're eating. It changes everything. Everything that's made with oil. Yes. food, the cost of food, what food we're eating. It changes everything. Everything that's made with oil. Yes. If they eliminate oil as a product, how many things that we're sitting here right now have petroleum in it? This table, this laptop, my jacket, it's a synthetic jacket.

Synthetic, it's oil. This is all from fossil fuel. Look, I knew it was about five, six, seven years. It hasn't been that long, six years ago when the Rockefeller family sold off all of their oil stock. I knew then. The decision's already been made. It's already been made. The Rockefellers got out of oil. And I knew something has happened behind the scenes.

A decision has been made that the world will shut down the oil industry over the next 10, 15 years. And they got out. Okay. So what we're trying to get across to you today is a monumental decision. A monumental deal was made in Glasgow that will radically transform the world over the next 10 years. You will not recognize this world a decade from now if these men and women are allowed to carry out their scheme. Only time will tell. And I don't know if it can be stopped. We don't have a say in it, do we?

Not really. Have no voice, no say whatsoever. We're going to take a break. When we come back, we've got some COVID news to pass on to you. Don't go away. You're watching True News. Having good, nutritious food ready in case of natural disasters or shipping disruptions is part of the wisdom God gives to us.

And Heaven's Harvest is your resource in preparedness. Our food kits have a 25-year shelf life and come in a variety of stackable sizes with handles for convenient storage or transportation. The nutritional value of the food is preserved by freeze-drying and not dehydrating it. Heaven's Harvest offers heirloom vegetable seed kits with the highest quality, non-GMO heirloom seeds simply created by nature. With 39 garden staple varieties, you can grow and produce an astonishing yield of hearty vegetables and fruits that have tremendous flavor. Heaven's Harvest also has water filtration and storage solutions and gardening and other resources that will offer you and your family peace of mind.

Visit Heaven's Harvest online at heavensharvest.com. That's heavensharvest.com. Or call 800-516-4773. That call 800-516-4773. That's 800-516-4773. Well, the president of the Philippines is frustrated that local government officials throughout the Philippines are too slow in vaccinating the entire country. And President Duterte warned them. He threatened them yesterday. And Dr. Burkhardt has the information. Right. President Duterte, he orders all military and police to ensure delivery of COVID-19 vaccines.

What's unique about the Philippines, Rick, is that it is a very multi-layered government system. They have people in different positions of authority all the way down really to the local neighborhood level. So if you would think, you know, if you live in an urban area of any kind, several city blocks, they call that a barangay. You have a captain over that barangay, and the levels keep going up all the way through the government. So politically, they are very organized on that level. And they call them LGUs, local government units. And these barangays have access to some police powers.

And so basically what President Duterte, and I'll be honest, when he was running, I liked the idea of having President Duterte there. He was a person coming in that was going to deal with the traffickers, the drugs. He was going to drain the swamp, wasn't he? That's right. He was the Philippine Trump. But what has happened now since COVID has come along is that they have had drastic lockdowns in place. They're only now beginning to ease things up. Even to this day, Rick, if you go out in public, you have to wear a mask and a face shield in public. It doesn't matter. The police will pick you up and arrest you and find you and fine you for it. What about

in your front yard? It doesn't matter. You step out of your house. The barangay captain could have the police come over. And so that's the kind of power that they have. So there are elderly people that haven't left their house in a year and a half. I know one in particular because. A year and a half? I'm related to her. She snuck out a few weeks ago. A year and a half? She hasn't left her house? Yeah, so it was crazy. Well, we got some quotes from this article. So President Duterte has asked the armed forces of the Philippines, listen to this, everyone, and the Philippine National Police to mobilize its assets in delivering anti-coronavirus vaccines across the country. Duterte said this is to ensure that all local government units, LGUs,

reach their daily goal of administering one million jabs en route to achieving his administration's target of having at least 55 million citizens fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by year's end. Now, it means some threats, Doc. Yes. And what did he threaten to do to local government leaders who act too slowly in jabbing people? Well, he said to this end, I have reiterated my instructions to all agencies to make sure that our local government units will receive their daily jab performance so that our country can reach that target of one million jabs. He lamented the slow rollout of vaccines once supplies leave the Capitol. To make sure every qualified Filipino will be inoculated

against the deadly respiratory disease, listen to this, everyone, the president reminded Interior and Local Government Secretary Eduardo Año to hold accountable local officials who will be proven remiss in their duties and fail in utilizing the anti-coronavirus jabs efficiently. And so basically what they're threatening them with is either removing them from their positions of authority or maybe something even more drastic, fining them, jailing them. I don't like to think any further than that, but they are implementing this. Because the local government officials aren't meeting their vaccination quotas. Yes.

That's what it's all about, a quota. Down to the neighborhood level, down to the street level. So they will have police going, knocking on your door, where's your vaccination card? Because they have to hit their quota. Yes, they now have an incentive. And that incentive is, I want to stay that incentive is I want to stay in power. I want to stay in office. And so now this is very foreboding because if it can happen in the Philippines,

it can happen anywhere else in the world, including the United States of America. And basically what President Duterte has done is he has mobilized the power, the military power of a nation to force everyone in the nation to be jabbed, every single person. It breaks my heart for the Philippines because that just simply means within a few months, a few years, you're going to have hundreds of thousands of people that are dead. And they will, they'll be going, I wonder how that happened. Two things happened yesterday, Doc, involving Pfizer's COVID-19 drug. Number one, a whistleblower exposed multiple issues with Pfizer's vaccine trial and said fake data was presented. They covered up serious problems with Pfizer's product. This report was published by

BMJ Investigations, which says researchers blow the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial. Now, this right here, Doc, wouldn't you think that story comes out that they submitted falsified data to government agencies that they were going to approve the use of Pfizer's product? Wouldn't you think that would be a major scandal and the FDA and the CDC would immediately call for a halt of all vaccinations using Pfizer's product? You would think it would. On a normal day, fake data falsified numbers. And this is directly from the documents where it says they falsified data entries, daily data entries. They took shortcuts where they didn't verify information. Any other day, any other time, any other safety protocols would be in place, but not for this. And what was the fake data? Covering up side effects.

Yes. Adverse side effects. They knew that Pfizer's product was hurting people. So that story came out yesterday, but another story about Pfizer came out. Guess what the CDC in the United States said yesterday? Well, let's give kids the Pfizer shot. That's right, folks. The CDC has approved Pfizer's junior-sized jab for kids 5 to 11. On the same day that a whistleblower

report came out that Pfizer lied. The CDC said, we don't care. We're going to stick it in little children. In spite of the fact they don't have verifiable follow the science? Yes. If you follow the science, Pfizer executives would be in

prison. You can't falsify data and then say follow the science what they did was criminal but the whole the whole COVID thing is criminal by the way going back to Mark Carney you know what?

His fascination, his mantra for this year are the three Cs. Credit, COVID, and climate. Those are his three Cs. He just combines them all together, doesn't he? He can rule the world with those three C's. Control the credit, build it around the climate and shut the world down through COVID. Carney's three C's. That'll be easy to remember. Yeah, Carney with a C and his three C's. Okay, I'm gonna take the last couple minutes and I want to answer some of our folks.

I said last week we were talking about the border situation in Texas. Particularly the border wall. Yeah. It was, I guess, last Friday or so when we were talking about the drug cartels building an army on the border. And, you know, I said, look, President Trump, you know, he made a deal. He made a deal with the Democrats that he wouldn't build the wall. And, you know, after that, it was just obvious it wasn't going to happen, even though he pretended he was going to build the wall. Well, a lot of people got upset with me, and I understand it. They weren't mean.

They weren't upset. But they were just, they still support President Trump, and they thought I was unfair in saying that the president made a deal not to build the wall. And they go, Rick, that's not true. He deal not to build the wall. And they go, Rick, that's not true. He did want to build the wall. And I do believe he wanted to build the wall. I don't doubt that. But I also know he made a deal not to build the wall. Because that's Donald Trump.

He makes deals. He made a deal not to build the wall. But inside, he wanted to build the wall, but he made a deal not to do it. Because he had to get something else done, and so he made that deal. Now, some people, some of our audience members said, you know, if you can't prove it, then you need to retract it and say you're sorry. Well, I wouldn't say it if I couldn't prove it, then you need to retract it and say you're sorry. Well, I wouldn't say it if I couldn't prove it. So I went back through my notes to see what I got. What can I show you?

This is NPR September 2017. Now, for people with short memory, there were a lot of people that were upset with Donald Trump because he made a deal with the Democrats over DACA. All right. And so what was DACA? Well, DACA was that Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Basically, the kids coming across the border. The dreamers. Right. And so so he made a deal with the Democrats. OK. And that caused a lot of conservatives that this was back in 2017. Remember to finally start saying, well, what is it that we've got here?

Why is he making a deal on this? Well, then the following year, December 2018, here's BBC. Trump supporters angry at his retreat on border wall. Right. And a couple of quotes from that article in particular there. So supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump have turned on him after he was yet again denied funding for a border wall. So late on Wednesday, the U.S. Congress approved a spending bill to keep federal agencies open until February. The Republican president was foiled in the Senate by his own party, which refused to grant him any of the $5 billion he wants for a U.S.-Mexico wall. And just hold it right there. Remember, this is 2018. The Republicans were still in control of the Senate. They had lost, because this is December, they had lost the election, the midterms. But Mitch McConnell was still the majority leader of the Senate. Yes. Mitch McConnell and the Republicans refused to give Trump the money for the wall. Right.

So, again, Trump was trying to build the wall, but at the same time, he signed bills that prevented him from building a wall. So the next one, this is Washington Post. Let's see. No, this is a quote from. From Ann Coulter here. This is the BBC article. So it says right wing columnist Ann Coulter. And remember, this is December 2018.

Author of In Trump We Trust. Recently predicted he will not be reelected. 2018. Now, at that point, it just looked like there's no way he could lose coming up. Without a wall, he will only be remembered as a small cartoon figure who briefly inflamed and amused the rabble, she wrote. A lot of conservatives, a lot of Republicans were furious with Ann Coulter in 2018 when she made that statement.

And it really hurt her. Her career was damaged. Her popularity went down. I don't think she's ever recovered from it to this day. I don't think she's ever been able to pull it out. She's still around. She's still speaking. But her star fell because she said, Donald Trump will not be reelected because he won't build the wall. And you remember, this is quite a drastic shift for Ann Coulter because

she was one of the very first ones out there. 2015. 2015 is saying, you know, with the candidates coming out. I still remember the clip from Bill Maher's show on HBO and Colter was on there and he asked her, who do you see as winning the primaries? And she said, Donald Trump. And audience just laughed and Bill Maher just about fell out of his chair and everything. When she said it, she was right on the money. She was right about him being elected. She was one of his first supporters and she was also one of the first Trump supporters to jump ship and say he won't be reelected because privately he has made a deal not to build the wall.

And if he doesn't build the wall, he's not going to win. She was right about it. Now, we'll go to The Washington Post, January 2019. Right. So this is Ann Coulter. And basically he said, she says, Donald Trump lied about the wall, that he had no intention that once he got in to actually finish building the wall. So in that, she says, he promised something for 18 months. He lied about it. She said that on bill maher's show too yeah in that month

and so um then the next month yes february 2019 this is news week okay so trump's fox news allies hannity ingram and dob dob savage congress border wall deal an insult to potOTUS and the American people. Now, right there, this is it right here. The border wall deal. This is when the conservatives went ballistic on Donald Trump because they knew he signed this border wall deal. This is what I was talking about. So this was February 2019 and in that in that law that he signed he knew that he was prohibited from building a wall. Now what he did is that

he we're going to show you here in a minute what he did to keep his supporters fooled. He kept talking about building a wall, but privately he knew that he agreed to not build the wall. Yes. This is in February of 2019. A new Congress has been installed. They're in power. So this is what's happening. And so this is when Lou Dobbs and Laura Ingram, Sean Hannity, of course, Laura Ingraham was already saying I told you so, but now others were saying what's going on here at Donald Trump? He just sold us out, he just made a deal with the Democrats not to build the wall. This is what I'm trying weeks before the election of 2020 between

Trump and Biden. How much of the wall did he actually build? Well, Doc, I think most of us thought, you know, in October 2020, certainly Donald Trump has built that wall all the way across Texas. He's just got a few more feet to go. The Democrats won't let him finish it. But, man, he's been trying to figure out ways to get that wall built. That's what I thought in 2020. Because he talked about how many miles that he had built. And I would think, how could that be true? Because in 2019, you signed a law that prohibits you from building the wall. But you can keep talking about it.

But he actually would say, we have built this many from building the wall. But you can keep talking about it. But he actually would say we have built this many miles of the wall and I couldn't figure out what's true. How could this be true that he's actually building the wall and yet he signed a law that says he can't build a wall. Right. We're gonna show you the trick that Donald Trump did that fooled his supporters. So this is number 42. This is from the BBC. Mind you, again, this is October 2020, weeks before the election. How many miles did he actually build? Fifteen. build 15 say it again Rick 15 miles of new primary barrier where none existed before right now look at the next number 350 miles of replacement or secondary barrier and here's where the trick is on that Rick those funds were funds were already earmarked for that before Donald Trump came to office.

Yes. On that 350 miles. And the wall was already there. Yeah, they just replaced it. They replaced the wall. 350 miles of replacement wall, which Donald Trump would claim that he built. But only actual, in number of actual new miles of wall. 15 miles.

15. And the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency, they'll confirm this. Before Donald Trump came into office, there were 654 miles of barrier along the southern border. After he left office, 669 miles of primary barrier. He built 15 miles. And he just replaced 350 miles, and then under construction was 221 miles of new or replacement primary or secondary barrier, and then pre-construction. So the trick, Doc, was he was putting up replacement wall and claiming it was new wall.

Right. And technically it is a new wall. Yes, it's brand new replacement wall. But it's not new miles of wall. That's right. And that's how he fooled the people because his hands were tied. It doesn't mean that he didn't. I don't believe Ann Coulter.

I mean, I'm not in agreement with Ann Coulter that he never intended to build a wall. I really believe he intended. When he was running, I believe that he actually thought. But he said a big, a big, beautiful wall, big, big, big, beautiful. That's not what they built. They built steel barriers. All right. And to add insult to injury on that, this isn't like, you know, take that 15 miles and that 350 miles, so it's 365 miles. It's not a line of 365 miles of wall.

You've got some wall here and then a big giant gap. Some wall here, another big giant gap. Some wall here, another big giant gap. What is a wall with a hole in it it's that's a door because he was not permitted by federal law to finish the wall right he could put up sections as long as he didn't connect that's right you got do you understand the trick now as long as he didn't connect the wall sections, he was within the law.

And at the same time, he can go to the rallies and say, look at that big, beautiful wall, the 15 miles of it. I hope this makes sense to our audience. OK, the next thing I heard about this last week and I thought it was a, and I really didn't pay attention to it. People talking about they were going to go to Dallas-Fort Worth, the Dealey Plaza. Yes. And John F. Kennedy Jr. was going to appear and, I guess, announce that the swamp creatures were going to be rounded up and the pedophiles were going to be imprisoned and whatever I really I thought it was a joke until I found out that really a lot of people did go to Dealey Plaza and wait for John F Kennedy jr. to appear this really happened was it Monday I don't know what

day the this would have been so yeah it would have been Monday that it occurred this really happened. Was it Monday? I don't even know what day. This would have been, so yeah, it would have been Monday that it occurred. I hope nobody in the True News audience went there. If you did, then I realize I have more work to do because my job is to keep you

from being fooled. And this was quite the event. And I told you for four years, QAnon is a deception. I personally believe it was run by an intelligence agency. And they kept a lot of people completely fooled, believing. Look what the plan was. Don't you do anything. Don't organize.

Don't do anything because you've got to follow the plan. Over here in secret, Donald Trump is rounding up the pedophiles. Over here, Donald Trump, they've got secret subpoenas, and they're going to lock up Hillary Clinton. You've just got to trust the plan. And so they kept people fooled for four years, and the people didn't organize. But the left organized.

The communists organized. Black Lives Matter organized. Antifa organized. But the Trump base sat there because they were told, trust the plan. But you never had to tell them the plan. Yes. That was the beauty of it. Trust the plan.

The communists did the same thing in the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. They did the very same thing the Russian patriots, the Russian Christians were told there is a plan to stop the revolution. Tell me the plan. We can't right now.

It's secret. It's secret. You just have to trust but the communists did it to the russians in 1917 and they just did it to the americans and they they carried out their revolution in 2020 so um anyhow we got some video of people at dealey plaza waiting on john f kennedy j. to walk out and announce whatever he was supposed to announce. Just take a look at this. It is almost 1229. Any minute now.

The big reveal. Crowd is big. Ready to go. We are the people of the nation! We are the nation! Open your eyes! We'll tell nothing but the truth to help them die. Or should I say help them see? Let's go make news! Let's go make news!

Let's go make news! Let's go make news! Let's go make news! Let's go make news! Let's go make news! Yeah. People got played for a fool one more time. Just believe the Bible. Believe Jesus Christ. And stop believing these silly tricks that I honestly believe intelligence agencies are spinning to keep people diverted and not taking action. The action we should be doing

is preaching the gospel of the kingdom. If Satan can put up a circus tent over here and get a bunch of people to go over there and wait on something to happen, they're not preaching the gospel. And that's what's taking place. We need to be focused on the mission that our king gave us. My king is not Donald Trump. My king is no politician. I'm not following any of these people. My king is Jesus Christ. And he gave a commission, go into all the world and preach the gospel, make disciples of all men and women. This is what we're supposed to be doing, doc. But unfortunately, it's like P.T. Barnum said, there are a lot of people that like to be fooled and they will run to be fooled rather than believe.

Yes, but P.T. Barnum and I have a lot of his old books in my library. Right. And he said, I always tell people, I'm going to fool you. He would, he felt it was his obligation. He was an entertainer. He would say, I'm going to fool you. Give me, buy this ticket,

but I'm telling you right now, I'm going to fool you. And then he said, people would still give him money. Yes. But he said, I just told now, I'm going to fool you. And then he said, people would still give him money. Yes. But he said, I just told them I'm going to fool you. These people don't tell you. They just take your money. All right. They fool you and, and people are believing it. So stop, stop fall, falling for this kind of stuff. Oh, let's see. What can we, how about, let's wrap it up with something mysterious. How about a giant whirlpool off the coast of Great Britain? Right.

So this is a mystery whirlpool, either a hole in the ocean or who knows what it is. We actually have a close-up of it here, Rick. And so. I don't know where it came from. It just appeared. What is it, Doc? It could be a sea cave that collapsed. It could be an old lava tube that finally opened up.

The water's going down. It could be. It might be where John F. Kennedy parks his spaceship. Okay. I wasn't going to go that far with John F kennedy jr today and so but there's a lot of people who do and so um this is but this is a weird story hey there's a lot of weird things in the world some of the weird things are the things that people do and that's what we observe here every day well i'm ending with this because i just want to show the world is full of mysterious things that really

are mysterious. We don't know. The planet is huge. The universe is huge. There are things in the natural world that we can't even understand and explain. Let's just stay focused on the real things that we can see and touch and not believe silly stories that people are spreading on the internet. Just use your brain. Do you really think John F. Kennedy Jr. is alive? Do you really think he's going to walk out on the street and announce? I mean, just use your brain.

You're being played for fools. And this whole QAnon thing is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen in my lifetime, that sensible people just threw away their common sense. Some of their livelihoods. Just completely believed a fabrication and allowed wicked, evil people to get away with their deeds. So we're not going to take back control of anything if you can't even control your thinking. So get your mind under control first. That's it.

Love you very much. We'll be back here tomorrow with more true news. God bless you. the preceding program was made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support