TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - How to Be Arrested: Mention Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates at Berkshire Hathaway Shareholders’ Meeting

Episode Date: May 9, 2023

Berkshire Hathaway shareholders recently convened their annual meeting in Omaha Nebraska to hear Warren Buffett report on the company’s success and future plans. An unusual thing happened that received no media attention. A shareholder was arrested while addressing Warren Buffet. What did the man say that prompted billionaire Buffet to call the police? He said two names: Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates. Before we tell you what happened in Omaha, we're going to set the stage by referring to an article published last week by the Wall Street Journal. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 5/09/23 You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969. The Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today! https://tru.news/faucielf It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. You can order the second edition of Rick’s book, Final Day. https://www.rickwiles.com/final-day

You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles. We appreciate you tuning in. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at www.truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, P.O. Box 690069, Fairview Beach, Florida 32969. This is True News, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help us God. Berkshire Hathaway shareholders recently convened their annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska to hear Warren Buffett's report on the company's success and future plans. An unusual thing happened that received no media attention. A shareholder

was arrested while addressing Warren Buffett. What did the man say that prompted billionaire Buffett to call the police? Well, he said two names, Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates. Before Doc and I tell you what happened in Omaha, I want to set the stage by referring to an article published last week by the Wall Street Journal. Here's the headline, Bill Gates, Leon Black, Thomas Pritzker, one day in the life of Jeffrey Epstein. And so the Wall Street Journal published a series of articles last week about Epstein. And this particular article article which was May 4 yes they they just took one day from Jeffrey Epstein's calendar and showed who he met with the

the fascinating thing doc is that on that particular day, was it September 8th? Of 2014. 2014. And we actually have a screenshot of that day, what it looks like. Yeah, there we go. Mr. Epstein met three times with Bill Gates in one day. Yes. So you're getting just a brief screenshot here of the people that he rubbed shoulders with.

Several days ago, we reported that the Wall Street Journal published a series of articles about Jeffrey Epstein's connections to powerful, wealthy, and influential people. The journal said that on Monday, September 8, 2014, Jeffrey Epstein had a full calendar. He was scheduled to meet that day with Bill Gates, Thomas Pritzker, Leon Black, and Mortimer Zuckerman, four of the richest men in the country. That's according to schedules and emails reviewed by the Wall Street Journal. Now, Epstein also planned meetings that day with a former top White House lawyer, a college president, and a philanthropic advisor. Three of the dozens of meetings that the journal reported, he had with each of them. And so there is definitely a connection between Bill Gates and

Jeffrey Epstein. Now, there's no denying it. No one can deny it. He's had dozens of meetings with Bill Gates. It wasn't a casual encounter. Bill Gates can't say, well, I was at a fundraising event to fight climate change, and Jeffrey Epstein was there, and I shook his hand, and that's all. That's the only time I ever met with the man. Neither can he say that, oh, I just met with him once or twice over the years. They went three times in one day. Right. Doc, have you ever met with one person three times in one day? Only if there's a problem.

Right. It had to be an extremely important subject to meet morning, afternoon, and evening with the same individual, which means that they were doing things, Epstein and Gates were engaged in some important project. And I have a feeling that the other billionaires that he met with that day- In one day. In one day, were all being invited to come in on the project that Gates and Epstein were working on, whatever it was. we'll never know. Here's why we're starting out with this Wall Street Journal report, because something happened last weekend at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting of

shareholders. A shareholder who was on the agenda, legally on the agenda, to address the shareholders and to ask questions to Warren Buffett. And he was one of the sponsors of a proposition that was before the chair. A corporate resolution to be voted on by the shareholders. And he was given three minutes to make his point and he was engaging in conversation with warren buffett who was sitting on the stage yes he made it to about the two minute mark and the police came and hauled him away. Right. So what did he say? Well, as I said in the intro,

he mentioned in one sentence Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein. All right. So let's walk through this. So you see Peter Flaherty on there. He's with the National Legal and Policy Center. During the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting on Saturday in Omaha, Peter Flaherty had his microphone cut, was arrested,

and forcibly removed from the arena. Flaherty is the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, which was the sponsor of Proposal No. 8 to require hereafter that two separate people hold the office of the chairman and the office of the CEO. Now, in support of this resolution for an independent chair, Flaherty attempted to assert that Berkshire would be less identified with Mr. Buffett's personal political activities and cited Berkshire Chairman CEO Warren Buffett's support for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, among other factors. Now, resolution proponents were allowed three minutes each to speak in support of their proposals, and three other proponents spoke before Flaherty without interruption, including Michael Fredericks, treasurer of Illinois. Now, video of that event shows that the

one-minute, eight-second mark into his remarks, Flaherty was approached and interrupted at the microphone. It was by Kathy Willems, a Berkshire official who was a designated liaison with proponents for the meeting. At the 155 bark, Buffett attempted to start talking over Flaherty and appeared to give direction to other persons in the hall. This portion of Flaherty's remarks concerned Bill Gates' relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Yes, he dropped that name. Immediately, two representatives of Clark International Security approached and stood in front of Flaherty. He was told to leave or he would be arrested. And Flaherty replied that he would leave when he finished his statement.

At this point, Flaherty was not fully aware that his mic had been cut and was still under the three-minute limitation and had already received a favorable ruling from the chair. One of the Clark representatives summoned a uniformed Omaha policeman who was nearby and requested that he arrest Flaherty. He grabbed Flaherty by the arm, advised him that he was under arrest, and led him from the arena. Flaherty was the arm, advised him that he was under arrest, and led him from the arena. Flaherty was transported by Omaha police to the Douglas County Correction Center, where he was searched, handcuffed, and charged with criminal trespass. He was absolutely allowed to be there.

He's a shareholder. Yes. He's on the agenda. Yes. He was within his allotted time. But he said the wrong words. Words's a shareholder. Yes. He's on the agenda. Yes. He was within his allotted time. But if you say the wrong words. Words, Doc, words will get you sent to prison. All right. So we're going to play a portion of the video here. This is Mr. Flaherty addressing the chair and Mr. Warren Buffett himself regarding this particular proposal and then

talks about Mr. Buffett's connections to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Watch this. Senator presents a proposal. I am Peter Flaherty, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center. If we had an independent chair, the company would be less identified

with Mr. Buffett's political activities. He's donated tens of billions to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. As Bill Gates explained when the company was still together, although the company bears our names, basically half our resources have come from Warren Buffett. If woke culture is the disease, then philanthropy is the virus. The Gates Foundation bankrolls the teaching of critical race theory around the country, including that math is inherently racist. The Gates Foundation offers a gender identity toolbox which asserts that gender is a

result of socially and culturally constructed ideas. This is a lie. Gender is not a cultural construct. It is a genetic and biological fact. You're not going to censor what I say, man. I'm very sorry. And I'll appeal to the chair that I be allowed to continue. Sir? You may continue, but you're under a three-minute limitation. Of course.

All right, so this is where we're at. Someone actually tried to cut him off at that point, but he appealed to the chair, and that's Warren Buffett, and said, may I continue? And the chair had recognized him and said, you may proceed. You're still under the three-minute mark. Doc, I learned something in that video I didn't know, that half of the Bill Melinda Gates Foundation money comes from Warren Buffett.

Yes, it does. I mean, I knew Buffett was a contributor, but not at that level. Yeah, this was a deal they set up a couple years ago. I remember there being a big announcement about it and everything that Warren Buffett had decided that most of his legacy funds would be transferred to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. But the other thing that I learned is that the Gates Foundation is a major funder of the critical race theory, socialist propaganda, and gender transitioning. There you go. I thought most of it was in vaccines. And we have that aspect of it too. So Warren Buffett is actually one of the, I mean, you'd have to put him up there with George Soros

in terms of the influence of money to promote socialist ideas against the American people. I mean, you'd have to put him in that category, yes. Now, it was at this point in the meeting, already they've tried to shut him down directly on the floor. He's appealed to the chair,

appealed to Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett has given the okay for him to proceed. This is where the show got very interesting. Watch this. We know how much Bill Gates cares about children. He met and traveled with Jeffrey Epstein many times. The Gates Foundation may be the largest single donor to the dark money machine known as Arabella Associates. It funds deposits like DeepMoney for police, making American cities a little. Money goes also to groups conducting threats... Thank you. Just lost a lot of faith.

Dr. The shareholders booed when, when Mr. Flaherty connected Bill Gates to Jeffrey Epstein. Well, they're pro Bill Gates and they don't want to hear the truth that Gates is connected to Jeffrey Epstein. I'm not defending their response. I understand that.

But also understand, too, that these annual meetings that they have, you've got people coming in from all over the world. Right. They don't know all the story on Epstein and Gates and things like that. Because they're outside the bubble. And so there's some aspect of that, okay, I would think. But Bill Gates was on the floor. That's right. He was there. Yes. So we got a little clip of Bill Gates hanging out on the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting floor.

Watch this. I. Sales. I. Sales. the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting floor. Watch this. They're at the annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway. I wanted to also show the actual arrest, well, not the actual arrest, but him, Flaherty, being escorted out of the building here. So let's watch this. Our manager should not treat the shareholders money in a good or wrong way. He should treat the shareholders money in a good or wrong way. He let them make the decisions for what they do not.

They do not let them decide that they refuse to file their own charges. This is like the Chinese Polar Bureau. This is like you offended Xi Jinping. You're going to be hauled away to the concentration camp. So in certain settings words can get you arrested.

In America now. But we're fighting for democracy in Ukraine. Yes. So you can say for democracy in Ukraine. Yes. So you can say things there, right? No. No, you can't say things there either. It shoots you. Or the tie you to a light post there. But certain names

will get you arrested in America. If you connect Bill Gates with Jeffrey Epstein, something bad can happen to you. Doc, who is in control of this country? You had an Omaha police officer who carried out Buffett's command? is Buffett the chief of police? Was that man threatening the people there?

Did he have a gun? Nobody had words. He had words. What crime did he commit? The police officer is there to maintain order in a meeting. All right. Was that man disorderly? No, he was following the rules. He was at the microphone where he was supposed to be.

Was he hitting people with chairs? Absolutely not. Then why is the police officer involved? Because he said words. He said Gates and Epstein. So which side is the police on? Every police officer needs to ask himself that question. Whose side are you on?

You're on the side of the child molesters. Now, it's very possible that Mr. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway could get in some big trouble for this. Because all these meetings have rules set by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Yes, and the state of Delaware. Even though the meeting was in Oklahoma, Berkshire Hathaway is a Delaware corporation. So Mr. Flaherty could appeal to the state of Delaware. And he's got video. Oh, lots of video.

There's evidence. He was not only removed, he was taken to the police station, handcuffed, arrested, and searched. Like a criminal for words. He was treated no differently than someone who tried to hold up a liquor store.

Yes. Well, right now, thieves are getting, they're being released. Right. Especially if you're in California or New York State, they're not even arresting people

for theft anymore. So words will get you in more trouble than theft. Well, we wanted people for theft anymore. So words will get you in more trouble than theft. Well, we wanted people to see this. And it's the state of America today. This is where we're at. Words will get you arrested. Another big story today, most of you have probably heard this. This is NBC coverage. Donald Trump found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll in a civil trial ordered to pay $5 million. The jury did not find him guilty of raping her, but sexually molesting her and defaming her. Now, remember this is a civil case. It's a civil case. It's not a criminal case. Mr. Trump says he doesn't remember ever meeting the woman.

The woman, however, Mrs. Carroll, called in witnesses, not witnesses who saw the act, but witnesses who said she called them immediately after the accusation took place. So the jury believed her. And so now Mr. Trump will campaign as a, basically a convicted sexual abuser. Right. So NBC News reported that a New York jury on Tuesday found former President Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll in a Manhattan department store in the 1990s, but not liable for her alleged rape. The jury awarded her $5 million in damages for her battery and defamation claims. Asked on their verdict sheet if Carol, 79, had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carol, the nine-person jury

checked the box that said no. Asked if Carol had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carol, the jury checked the box that said yes. So both allegations were elements of Carroll's battery claim. So how does this affect Mr. Trump in the presidential campaign? I think it just provides more fodder for the Democrats.

The people that are behind Mr. Trump, they're not going anywhere. They're just going anywhere. You know, they're just going to say this is all just part of, you know, the whole attack on Donald Trump. What if it's true? Well, but according to the jury, it is true. Right. So what if it is true? Will the Trump supporters at least consider the possibility that it's true? I don't think they will. Does it it fit his behavior does it fit his personality could you imagine donald trump sexually becoming sexually aggressive with a woman they would probably try to defend him and say that was a long time ago right right you know he's a different person now, or whatever you might say.

I understand that. And they would say he was never convicted of anything. Right. And she waited a long, long time to file a lawsuit. By the way, her legal bills were paid

by the co-founder of LinkedIn. That's right. He bankrolled that lawsuit. So she didn't do anything when did this happen i think it was in the 90s yes and according to her it happened in a department store i don't know how you sexually abuse somebody in a department store but that's her claim but obviously there was enough testimony there to convince a jury a a New York jury, that something had happened. But not rape. Not defending sexual abuse by any stretch of the imagination.

That's right. But the accusation was that Donald Trump was a rapist. He rapes people. Right. So they can't say that, but they can say he abuses people. Right. Okay. So just to be fair to both parties republican and democrat

because i i don't want anybody to think i'm beating up on mr trump i'm just asking uh honest questions so another story that's out this is from fox news senator ron johnson of wisconsin calls out the corrupt news media for ignoring Hunter Biden's sex trafficking allegations. Yes. So you've got the media refusing to deal with this situation. I mean, the headlines are everywhere about Donald Trump today. Everywhere. Trump found guilty.

Yes, it's all over social media right now but you have you have very serious you have proof not allegations you have proof on hunter biden that he was paying tens of thousands of dollars to underage prostitutes who were being trafficked from other countries and that his father was subsidizing him with something like a hundred thousand dollars. So why is the news media report? We know why, but I have to ask the question, why isn't the media reporting this? Why aren't they asking Joe Biden about his son's proclivities with underaged prostitutes? And if you knew your son was doing this, Mr. President, why were you giving him tens of thousands of dollars to support his habits? Did you know about his habits?

Were you encouraging his habits? What were you doing? Every time he talks about Hunter, he talks about how proud he is of him and how he trusts him and all these other... But there in Hunter Biden, you have evidence. You have emails. You have his own videos.

He made porn videos of himself. You don't have any video of Mr. Trump, but you have videos of Hunter Biden. The evidence is there. And yet everybody involved who knows about law enforcement, the media, the Justice Department, they have worked overtime to cover it up. That's what's not fair. If Mr. Trump did what Mrs. Carroll accused, then he needs to be held liable for it. There's no physical evidence, but there's physical evidence that Hunter Biden did use and pay for underage prostitutes,

meaning teenage girls who were being trafficked around the country, just like Jeffrey Epstein provided underage girls. Well, and just as the elements within the administration are running interference on the Hunter Biden situation, Senator Johnson on the Faulkner report today with Harris Faulkner said, listen, the media is as much in bed with this as anyone else. And he called out the media for refusing to dig in on the Hunter Biden story. Watch this. President once again insisting his son has done nothing wrong ahead of possible federal criminal charges for Hunter Biden. Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley responded with an op ed quote. Joe Biden says Hunter has done nothing wrong. Really? Let's count the ways. He lays out a host of evidence pointing to criminal acts. He argues the tax and gun charges federal prosecutors have been investigating are only the beginning.

House Oversight Chairman James Comer says he and his colleagues plan to drop a bombshell. Some evidence against Hunter and the Biden family tomorrow. Let's watch. It's going to be Judgment Day tomorrow for the's watch. It's going to be judgment day tomorrow for the White House. We're going to present the American people with the facts, the facts about what the Biden family has been doing. We're going to present bank records tomorrow. We're going to also talk about the different people that they were taking money from, their ties to foreign nationals in some of the worst countries on the planet. And I think the American people are going to have a lot of questions for Joe Biden. The U.S. attorney investigating that

tax and gun case is expected at any point now to announce whether he will file charges. Senator Johnson, I'm hearing it from both sides of the aisle. If you've got something, start subpoenaing people, Democrats especially, because the president's approval rating is so low. And how can they run him if they can't if they can't move forward? So what's your thought on just go ahead and bring forth what you have in subpoena people? Well, first of all, Senator Grass and I in our September 2020 report laid out as much evidence as anybody would need to lay out that the Biden family is corrupt, that President Biden would be highly compromised. But again, the corrupt media ignored it. They censored it. And we elected President Biden.

So here we are. One thing that we don't talk enough about, I know President Biden is just so proud of his son. But let's, you know, we have the evidence that Hunter Biden paid for, paid tens of thousands of dollars for prostitutes there were sex traffic through an international sex trafficking ring. I mean I mean yes ick and President Biden during about a four or five month period offered to pay for about a hundred thousand dollars of Hunter Biden's bills when he was spending tens of thousand dollars on these women who are sex traffic. Now if that is it at a minimum morally reprehensible and wrong, and the president's defending that,

and the media isn't even looking into it. Well, wouldn't that be a fail? Well, I now know what we're going to be talking about tomorrow. Right. They're going to make the announcement tomorrow of what they've got on Bidens. And it's very possible that the U.S. attorney could also come out tomorrow with charges on Hunter Biden, or at least an announcement on Biden's. And it's very possible that the U.S. attorney could also come out tomorrow

with charges on Hunter Biden, or at least an announcement on Hunter Biden. So the Trump verdict today is going to have a short lifespan. Right. As far as a headline. And then tomorrow evening, Donald Trump is having a town hall on CNN. And so this story on the Trump situation and the civil suit and stuff, that's going to be old news within 48 hours. People won't even think about it. But CNN will be trying to bring it up tomorrow night. They will. But the Republicans, what it sounds like to me, they're going to tell us where the money came from in China.

And who the other Biden family members are that were receiving Chinese Communist money. That's going to be the other shoe that's dropping, as Mr. Comer says. Remember what I said, March of 2017, right after Mr. Trump was elected. I said the race is on to see who goes to prison first. And it's still going on. And it's still being fought out. Okay, we have more on Robert F. Kennedy. He's continuing to talk about the death of his father and the assassination of his uncle, President John F. Kennedy.

I have great admiration for Mr. Kennedy having the courage to bring up a subject that is not permitted to be talked about in America, the land of the free. But a Kennedy can bring it up. Yes. Anyone else, I don't think anyone else at that level can talk about deep state intelligence. No, you cannot do it. No one. He's getting away with it because his name is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And if John F. Kennedy was still here, junior, he would be talking about it too.

But he's gone. And we'll never know why. We'll never know. But Robert F. Kennedy appeared on a podcast, I believe yesterday. Day before yesterday.

Was it? Okay. It made more references to his belief that the CIA murdered his uncle, John F. Kennedy, and most likely was involved in the murder of his father. Let's listen to... This is part one. Do you believe they murdered or were involved in the murder of your uncle? What have you come to personally?

The CIA, yes, they were definitely involved in the murder and the six-year cover-up. They're still not releasing the papers that legally they have to release. But I don't think there's any doubt if you look at this huge, you know, mountain, monumental mountain of evidence and confessions and, you know, so many people have confessed to their involvement and, you know, we understand. If you look, I mean, for anybody who has doubts about that, I would recommend a book by Jim Douglas called The Unspeakable because I think he's done a better job than anybody else at kind of assembling and distilling all of the millions and millions of documents that have been released over the past 50 years. And these things, these revelations are released incrementally. And so nobody really takes notice of them.

When you put them all together, the story is very clear. So you would definitely rethink the CIA, the FBI, DOJ, you know, the whole intelligence? Would you like to talk? Well, I mean, to have a Kennedy say the CIA was involved in the Kennedy assassination, that's a big deal. But like I said, the- Have you heard any senators demanding an investigation? No. The release of all the documents?

No, none of them. It's radio silent out there. Now, Mr. Kennedy also was asked questions. You know, if you're going into the presidential race, you're going to get asked questions on foreign policy. And the biggest foreign policy issue right now is the Ukraine war. He had some interesting remarks regarding Ukraine that felt like we wanted to share with you. Watch this.

How did we end up in this proxy war with Russia from your standpoint? Well, you know, first of all, let me start by saying this. I supported the humanitarian aid to the Ukraine, which is what we were told initially was the mission, although I was suspicious of it. And my son, as I've mentioned, actually went over, left law school, did not tell us where he was going, and went over and joined the Foreign Legion and fought in the Kharkiv offensive with a special forces group. He served as a machine gunner. He was in engagements with the Russians. But he feels the same way, essentially, that I do, that this is no longer a humanitarian mission, that all the decisions the United States has made since the start

have been about prolonging the war, about maximizing the violence of the war, and being absolutely intransigent against the many opportunities to actually settle the war. And my understanding of the war is that not that Zelensky is pushing this war as hard as he can, but that the neocons in the White House want this war. They want regime change with the Russians. They want to exhaust the Russian armies. This is what Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in 2022. Our objective is to exhaust and degrade Russian forces so they cannot fight anywhere else in the world. And President Biden acknowledged that one of his objectives in the war is regime change in Russia,

removing Vladimir Putin. Well, if those are the objectives, that is the opposite of a humanitarian mission. That is a mission to maximize casualties, to prolong the war. It's essentially a war of attrition, and that's what we're seeing. And the brunt of this is being paid by the flower of Ukrainian youth. There have been over 300,000. This is something that the U.S. government and the Ukrainian government have worked hard to hide, the number of casualties, which has been catastrophic. This is the most violent conflict since World War II that's taken place probably anywhere in the world. And the casualties are enormous, over 300,000 Ukrainian dead.

The Russians are killing Ukrainian, depending on who you believe, at a ratio of five to one to eight to one, which is the seven to one in the recently the recently leaked whistleblower leaked Pentagon documents. And the Russians cannot lose this war. We're being told they're losing. They cannot afford to lose this war. This is existential for them. And they have been building up their forces. They have a 10 to 1 artillery advantage on us, and this is an artillery war.

It's simply, and we do not have the artillery to replace what we've lost up there. He just summed it all up. Yes. So as president, he's not going to allow the neocons to get the country in another war. I mean, this is Vietnam all over again.

Yes. We weren't fighting the Vietnamese in Vietnam. We were fighting the Chinese. That's right. That's who we were really fighting. Of course. And same thing here. You know, we're not, you know, it's not really the Ukrainians that are fighting.

It's the Russians. And who were we fighting in Korea? The Chinese. Now, I like the way Mr. Kennedy is talking. So far, he's impressing me. You know, I have, Susan and I, we have ten grandchildren, and eight of our grandchildren are adopted. Two of the boys, they're young men, they're not boys now, they're young men,

they're in their 20s, early 20s. One is from Russia, one is from Ukraine. Doc, if these, if my daughter had not adopted these boys years ago, both of those young men would be in war today fighting each other. That's right. And I've told them that. I've told them that.

So have you stopped to think about if you were not adopted? Today you would be, you know, you, Blake, you would be in the Russian army, and Grant, you would be in the Ukrainian army, and you'd be fighting each other. That's how war is a horrible thing. What did you think about RFK's remarks about his son joining the Foreign Legion? Yes.

So he's got a personal investment in this war. His own flesh and blood. Where's his son at now? I could not determine that today. I tried to find out. He might still be serving in the Foreign Legion, but I know he dropped out of law school to go to Ukraine to fight the Russians. Maybe he's had a change of heart. Mr. Kennedy also had some remarks, not anything that we didn't know, but he tells an interesting story in the interview about his relationship with Roger Ailes at Fox News. And you're going to find this really

interesting, Rick. I'll just show it and then we'll comment on it. You know, Robert, what's your take on the media? Why can't we get what seems to be honest media coverage? How does this fit into your theory of regulatory capture? Who are they sort of carrying water for, and why? You know, in 2015, I wrote a book on Zymaris, and there was a documentary that came out at that time called Trace Amounts. It was a really good documentary on the mercury-based preservative that was in a lot of vaccines at that time, and it's been removed from most except for the flu vaccine now.

But I took that. I had a very close relationship with Roger Ailes, who was the founder of Fox News. I had this weird relationship because when I was 19 years old, I spent three months in a tent with him in East Africa. And when he started Fox News, he became like Darth Vader to me, and we were antithical on every issue. But he was a very funny guy and very clever.

And he was also very loyal to his friends. And he would make all of the hosts of Fox News put me on. So I was the only environmentalist who was going on Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and Neil Cavuto, et cetera, regularly, like weekly. And he made them do that. But I went to him with this movie and showed it to him, and he found it compelling. And he had a relative who he believed was vaccine-injured, a very, very close relative. And he bought, he believed what was going on and what the documentary, you know, the thrust of the documentary was. And he said, I cannot let you talk about this on Fox News.

I'm sorry. It was the first time he ever saw me this. And he said, if I let you, if any of my hosts let you on to talk about this, I would have to fire them. And he said, and if I didn't fire him, I'd get a call from Rupert within 10 minutes. And he said to me at that time that 70% of the revenues for his not on network news, on primetime, were pharmaceutical ads. 70%. 70% of the advertising in prime time on Fox News came from pharmaceutical companies. And Roger Ailes said, if I allowed you on Fox News to talk about vaccine injuries, I would have to fire the host who invited you. Or be fired by Rupert Murdoch.

Yes. That's Roger Ailes. Darth Vader at Fox News. You know, it was interesting. He said that he knew him at age 19. Yes. He spent three months in a tent in Africa. In the Peace Corps. In the Peace Corps.

That's interesting. Yeah. And so I thought you'd find this story fascinating. The two parts, the Roger Aile part and the 70% part. So RFK is interesting. Hey, we've made it this far. As true as we've made it this far without pharmaceutical money. But it's a tough road.

It's a tough road. The big money for news comes from the pharmaceutical companies. Or you have to just look at what we went through with COVID. All the news channels were telling you the vaccines are safe. You need to be vaccinated. Anybody that tells you anything opposite is spreading disinformation. And the truth is, they were being subsidized by the pharmaceutical companies that were making the vaccines. I want to turn our attention to today's coverage of the Victory Day parade in Moscow yesterday. It was today. Today was the parade. And Mr. Putin gave a short speech,

about 10 minutes. And he attacked the global elite. He said they are provoking bloody conflicts and organizing coups against governments around the world. So RT reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said Western leaders have forgotten the consequences of the ambitions of World War II Nazis. Mr. Putin made the remarks during his Victory Day parade speech on Red Square in Moscow. He said the globalist elites keep insisting on their exceptionalism. They pit people against each other, split societies, provoke bloody conflicts and coups, sow hatred,

Russiophobia, and aggressive nationalism, destroy traditional family values that make humans a human, Putin said. Now, according to the Russian leader, all of this is being done by the US and allies in order to further dictate their will, their rights, and their rules and implement what is basically a system of robbery, violence, and suppression on the international stage. It went on to say, if it seems like that they have forgotten what the insane ambitions of the Nazis led to, they have forgotten who defeated this monstrous total evil, he stressed. The aim of the West is to achieve the disintegration,

destruction of our country, nullify the results of World War II, completely break down the system of global security, international law, and strangle any sovereign centers of development, he insisted. The U.S. and its allies are to blame for the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine. Overwhelming ambitions, arrogance, and permissiveness inevitably lead to tragedies. This is the reason for the catastrophe that the Ukrainian people are now experiencing. Now, he went on to say that the Ukrainians had become hostages of the coup that took place back in 2014 and were turned into a bargaining chip by the West which uses the country to implement its cruel plans and he basically really took the West to task

regarding their ambitions for world domination let's watch this clip the Western globalist elites still talk about their exclusivity. They provoke conflicts, they provoke bloody conflicts and coups. They sow seeds of hatred, Russophobia and aggressive nationalism. They destroy traditional family values that make humans humans. They do all this to continue dictating and enforcing their will upon nations, their rules, which is essentially a system of pillage and suppression.

They seem to have forgotten what the Nazis' crazy claims for world supremacy brought to, who unleashed this total evil and who stood to defend their home, their motherland, and sacrificed their lives to defend and protect nations. So, Doc, the same people who have attacked the American patriots, the Christians, the conservatives, the defenders of traditional American values, our heritage, our history, our beliefs, the same people who have attacked basically half of the American people. Call them deplorables. You know, you're seeing people put in jail now for saying words. The same people who are doing that to us, deplatforming Americans, silencing them, closing their bank accounts, taking away their freedom of speech, wanting to confiscate guns. These are the same people who are attacking Russia. I don't know how many American conservatives, patriots, make the connection that we're fighting the same enemy.

And then where does that put us? That Vladimir Putin is a stronger defender of our values than our leaders are. Yeah. What leader here in America today talks about traditional family values anymore? Not even among conservatives. I know. Because you can't do that anymore. You can't talk about traditional family values. That means you're white, you're Christian, you're an oppressor, you're a slave owner, you're all these things. It's traditional family values.

The leaders who believe in those values are intimidated and won't speak out and defend them because they're afraid of being labeled. But Mr. Putin is fighting the people who are doing the very same thing to him right into his country it's our country that's trying to make russia change its laws to accept homosexual marriage and pedophilia and the whole lgbtq agenda he's fighting it it's our country that's trying to break down his national system, his country's culture. Why? Because they want the natural resources. Because, I'll offer another point of view. They've already seen that America has fallen. They don't want it to happen to them.

Yes, Yes. I've said for years, the only reason I can come up with in my mind of why the ruling class of America and Western Europe hate and despise the Russians so much, because it does not make sense. It doesn't make sense to me. The Russians have not been a threat to America for decades. The Soviet Union is gone. The Communist Party is gone. Yeah, celebrate the victory. You guys won. Yes. But we won't allow Russia to become what it desires to become.

And they're doing it against our opposition. But the Russians, and I've said this for years, the Russians are returning to their pre-Bolshevik values. The Bolshevik revolution of 1917, when wealthy American banksters financed a Jewish communist revolution in Russia. In the middle of the world war. In the middle of world war, took over Russia, turned it into the Soviet Union, and the Russian people, they closed the churches. They killed the pastors. They imprisoned pastors. They persecuted the Russian Christian population.

And for 70 years, the Russian people had to whisper God's name. They had to whisper. They couldn't go to church. They couldn't be baptized. Putin was baptized secretly as a child. His mother secretly baptized him. That was a Jewish Bolshevik revolution. And I've said for years,

the only reason I can come to a conclusion about why the American ruling class hates Russia so much is they despise them because the Russian people finally threw off the shackles of Jewish Bolshevik communism and said we are returning to Christ. And now they have to teach them a lesson. But America has already fallen. We have fallen as a country. We've been taken over. We're in the mess that the Russians were in decades ago. Right. Europe fell first, then America fell. Yes. So our minds have been captured. And if you don't think your mind isn't captured, go to a Berkshire Hathaway meeting and say Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates. You will be arrested.

We have been taken over in this country. We've been taken over, Doc. Words will put you in prison. Words will cause you to be deplatformed. Words will cause your bank accounts to be closed. Words. We have been taken over. The Russians are fighting the people

who are now trying to bring them back into subjection, bring them back into bondage. The rulers of this country despise Russian Christianity. That's what they're opposing, Russian Christianity. The Russian people are saying, we're not going back under that system. We're returning to Christ. We're returning to being a godly nation. We're not going to allow Western perverts to come into our country and indoctrinate our children to become little perverts. We're not going to allow it. And the Western perverts have declared war on Russia. Think about it. The sex perverts that run this country declared war on Russia to force them into submission to allow the West to pervert their children.

Say Jeffrey Epstein at a meeting, you'll be arrested. Draw the connection to what's happening. Say Jeffrey Epstein in a public meeting, you will be arrested. Draw the connection to what's happening. Say Jeffrey Epstein in a public meeting, you will be arrested. The sex perverts run this country. We've been taken over by a sex cult, a pervert cult. It runs this country. The Bidens are sexual perverts. I'm not giving the pass to Donald Trump. He was a friend of Jeffrey Epstein. That's right. Let's get real.

I'm not giving him a pass either. Let's clean house. Let's clean house in this country. Don't tell me my pervert's better than your pervert. That's the argument, right? Isn't that the argument? My pervert only molested people. Your pervert raped people. I'm voting for my pervert.

That's what we have in a political system today. Which pedophile do you want to elect? How about if we just clean house? And the best thing that we do to clean house is to have an old-fashioned spiritual awakening where the nation repents of its sin, calls out to God, pleads with God, forgive us for what we've become, save us from ourselves. That's what America needs. We need to be saved from ourselves, Doc. We're condemning ourselves.

We're condemning ourselves. We are condemning ourselves. We need to cry out to God, save us from ourselves. Deliver us from evil. Deliver us, oh God, from the evil that we have become. What else we got before we... Oh, so at the World War II Victory Day over Nazis. Right, in Poland. War II victory day over Nazis. In Poland,

the Russian ambassador attempted to lay a wreath at a grave site. At a memorial for veterans. And an angry mob of Poles blocked him and would not

allow him to do it. So RTA is reporting that an angry crowd prevented the Russian ambassador to Poland, Sergei Andreev, from laying a wreath at a military cemetery in Warsaw on Victory Day earlier today. The mobs rounded the Russian delegation as it arrived on the site Tuesday. They demanded that Andreev and others remove their St. George's ribbons, which are a symbol of World War II victory celebrations in Russia. The ambassador refused to take off the ribbon and had to leave the cemetery without laying a wreath.

Now, remember, this is a memorial for Russian soldiers that perished defending Poland, defending Poland in World War II. And now this is how the Russian ambassador to Poland was treated. Watch this. Maybe the Russians should have allowed the Poles to stay under the Nazis. Really. Maybe they should have just said, hey, you know what, if we could do this over again, we'd allow the Nazis to control Poland. Maybe they should have allowed Ukraine, hey, you know what, if we could do this over again, we'd allow the Nazis to control Poland. Maybe they should have allowed Ukraine to stay under the Nazis.

Why liberate them? I mean, this is what the Russians are saying right now. The Nazis have come back. They're back in Ukraine. They're wearing Nazi insignia. They're goose-stepping like Nazis. Maybe the Russians are thinking we did the wrong thing, liberating the people. We should have just held them off at our border.

There's a resurgence of a spirit Doc, that this is hard to like, what has gotten into the Polish people? of a spirit, Doc, that this is hard to... Like, what has gotten into the Polish people? What's made them so belligerent? This is like in the past year. They've become belligerent. What is it?

Do you have any idea? What is... Do you think it's maybe a throwback to... You know, Poland has a long history. I mean, it didn't just pop up a few years ago. Of course, they were under Soviet domination for a number of years. But Poland has a history going back about a thousand years, various kingdoms that are associated with Poland and how it's situated. So they do have a rich cultural history. I think with the alliances that they've made militarily with the U.S. in particular,

first under Donald Trump and now currently under the Biden administration, has given them that sense of confidence now that they could be a dominant player in Europe. I mean, on par with Germany and France. I think that's what's happening here. And really, they're seeing the decline of Germany. Germany, I mean, we've just about put their lights out. All right. And Poland's demanding reparations from Germany. That's right. So there's this opportunity for Poland, maybe they're seeing this, for them to be a new major player. Right. So I think that's part of it.

And I also think they see the end game with Ukraine. That the end game with Ukraine is they're going to get half of Ukraine at the end of the day. And so they have to be, if you're going into negotiations, you don't want to have a weak hand. So they're negotiating right now,

like you've drawn out in the picture. So they're negotiating right now, like you've drawn out in the picture. We're in negotiations right now. It may be shooting each other, but really we're negotiating right now for the strongest position at the end of this conflict. And Poland, even if they're not

directly involved in the fight, they're going to come out winning in this. Yes, and Medvedev has several times sarcastically said, when the war is over, Zelensky will be president of the Republic of Kiev. Right. The city. Yes.

The city. That's all you're going to have left. Because he was implying all Poland's going to be divvied up and given to other countries. Because that's what happens after every big war. Yeah, I think it's ironic that the Poles have aligned themselves so much with the U.S. in particular. When we basically handed Poland over to the Soviets at the end of World War II, I mean, really, when it came down to everything, we just said, all right, Poland, you can have it.

We'll work on everything else in Europe. So anyway, that's just a history lesson there. Well, I'm going to tie together the next two headlines. I want you to see the connection. Washington Examiner, Pentagon announces $1.2 billion long-term military assistance to Ukraine. This just happened today. Long-term military assistance to Ukraine. This just happened today. Long-term. So the Washington Examiner reported that the Department of Defense

is announcing a new $1.2 billion long-term military aid package to Ukraine. Now, this package includes additional air defense systems and ammunitions and 155-millimeter artillery rounds and equipment to integrate Western air defense launchers, missiles, and radars with Ukraine's air defense systems, among other weapons.

Okay, so, Doc, the United States taxpayers, we've given Ukraine over $100 billion, military aid. We're paying their pensions. Right. We're not just propping up their pensions. We're paying their pensions. We're not just propping up their pensions. We're paying their pensions. We're building their infrastructure and their utility plans and everything. And that's not even counting the dark money that's getting found.

Oh, yeah, we don't know about the dark money. So the taxpayers have spent over $100 billion in the past year in Ukraine propping up that corrupt government so that Zelensky can siphon off a couple billion dollars for himself. So look at this headline. Pentagon announces $1.2 billion military assistance. This is another, these are pennies compared to everything else that's been spent for the past year. But now look at this next headline. Secretary of Treasury Yellen says the failure to raise the debt ceiling would be an economic catastrophe. Doc, if we have to raise the debt ceiling, it means we have to borrow more money. If we're borrowing more money, it means we're spending money we don't have

but yeah where is the money where does the money come from to send to ukraine a hundred billion dollars where did we get that money we borrowed it we borrowed so much spent so much we have to raise the legal debt ceiling that the government has saying we're going to allow the government to borrow more money than we said last year we would never allow it to borrow and you notice they're always raising the debt ceiling they're never lowering never lower but wouldn't you think the treasury secretary would be the one person the treasurer she's the treurer. Wouldn't you think she would be the one who would say to Joe Biden, Mr. President, as your treasury secretary, I have to tell you, you're spending too much money. Your excessive spending is going to lead to an economic catastrophe.

She says failure to borrow more money will lead to an economic catastrophe. Unfortunately, that is the case now. Yes, but we're eventually going to have an economic catastrophe because of people like her. They're deliberately breaking the system. Excuse me. They are deliberately breaking the system. They want the country to implode. You put it all together, the massive spending, the open borders, the LGBTQ

defilement of children. Put it all together. The divide between classes in this country, between races, the animosity that they've generated. We would fight an enemy doing this to us. Yes. We have an enemy.

The enemy is the same people who are bombing Russia. The same people who are trying to take down Russia are taking down our country. They are not Americans. They might have an American passport. They may have been born in this country, but they are not Americans. They are enemies of this republic. And they're trying to take down Russia.

They have seriously wounded the United States of America. Their plan is to bring this country to its knees. And we're not far from falling right now. It's a deliberate plan. It's not that they're incompetent. It's not that they're liberal.

No, these people are evil. They're wicked and they have a strategy to implode the allow them to do more of what they've done to America and we have to stop them from doing what they're presently doing to Russia. I am not going to be told that I can't be friends with the Russian people. Do you realize that it's illegal in America to say that you're friends of the Russian people? Doc, it's illegal in this country. Because you're colluding with them. Yes. By being their friends. Yes.

So once again, words. If you say that you are a friend of the Russian people, then you are suspect. Well, who said I have to hate the Russian people? Who said it? Who came up with this rule? I'm not an enemy of the Ukrainian people. I'm not an enemy of the Russian people. I don't hate anybody. And I don't want to go to war with anybody. I just want to mind my own business. I just want to live a peaceful life in my country, and I don't want to be at war with anybody. And I don't want people in this country messing with me. I want them to leave me alone. Who are these people that are always in

our business, always seeking to control you, always seeking to tell you what you can say, what you can do, where you can go. Who are these people? They're weird. They really are weird, weird, weird people. What drives them? What is this evil that drives them? That they're always just agitating, agitating. Got to start a war here.

Got to start a war there. Got to get a race riot going here. Got to get conflict and fighting and argue. Who are these people? And then they have the audacity to say to the people who oppose them, you're a hate monger. They're the hate mongers. They're the one engendering the hate.

Yes. I'm going to finish with one more story. Jerusalem Post, Bibi Netanyahu, bin Natai, says Israel is prepared for a multi-front war with Iran. Sure you are. Well, there's another. Look, here we go. Here's another country that just can't wait to have a war.

They just can't wait to have a war. They just can't wait to have a war. He says every day he gets up thinking, how can we start a war today? How can we get more conflict? How can we have a big war? You know, if the headline here was Israel's prepared for a multi-front war with Israel, people would be pulling their hair out, wouldn't they? Does Iran get up every day and say, we're going to have a war with Israel?

No, but Netanyahu can call meetings and say, hey, we're going to have a war. So Jerusalem Post reported that Israel is ready to fight Iran on multiple fronts if it needs to. And that's coming from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Following the launch of Operation Shield and Arrow, it's clear that 95% of Israel's security problems come from Iran. No, I would say it comes from Israel. Netanyahu said this at a conference for Habitha Nitzam, a right-leaning forum of former senior defense officers. He said, we are dealing with an attempt by Iran to start a

multi-front campaign against us. My instruction to the IDF and security branches is to be prepared for a multi-front campaign. If we need to, we can do it. Netanyahu also said that Israel will do all it can to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and will try to prevent Iran from establishing terror fronts around us. Our principles are clear. Whoever hurts us, we hurt them with extreme force. Well, if they want the IDF and other security forces to help out in this war with Iran, they're going to have to pull them off the Palestinians from shooting them and beating them. How about bulldozing their schools? I didn't bring the article out here today.

I had it scheduled for yesterday, and I forgot to bring it back out today. But Mr. Netanyahu's government bulldozed a Palestinian school over the weekend. The children went to school there last week. Now, Friday is a holiday for Arabs. Friday and Saturday is their weekend, their holiday. Okay, Friday is their religious day and Saturday is a weekend. So the kids went to school. This school was near Bethlehem where Jesus was born.

They went to school. There it is. There's the school. That school was there last week. Nothing fancy about it. Nothing intimidating about it. You want to know why I get upset with the Zionists? That's a school for Palestinian children near Bethlehem

where my Savior Jesus Christ was born. Their ancestors met Jesus. Think about it, Doc. The children that go to that school their ancestors knew Jesus their school's next to Bethlehem okay

just go back in time their ancestors saw and heard Jesus Christ so what happened the children went to school there last week but this week Their ancestors saw and heard Jesus Christ. So what happened? The children went to school there last week. But this week, when they walked to school, there was nothing there. Because Netanyahu's radical Zionist government bulldozed all the buildings of the school. And declared it an illegal construction site.

Illegal. Why is it illegal? Because the Jews want the land. It's just that simple. Now, this has involved the EU. If you put the still back up on the screen, please, real quick, you see a flag flying there. That's an EU flag.

Because they paid for the school. That's right. And they were given a heads up about the demolition. The EU commission that funded the school asked, don't do this. Don't do this thing because it's illegal under international law. But that international law doesn't matter. Netanyahu's radical Zionist government is bulldozing the homes, the farms, the businesses, and even the schools of the Palestinian people. I will defend the Palestinian people. I am a friend of the Palestinian people. I am not an enemy of the Jews. I am a friend of the Palestinian people. I am not an enemy of the Jews. I am a friend of the Palestinians.

You can be both. Because you're a friend of the Palestinians does not make you an enemy of the Jews. I simply want the Jews to treat them like humans. They're not cattle.

They're not livestock. They're not varmint to be chased off the land. You don't have the right to come in and bulldoze a school. I'm simply standing for the Palestinian people who have no one in America that will fight for them, that will stand for them. I've been there. I've been to Bethlehem. I've been will stand for them. I've been there. I've been to Bethlehem. I've been on the West Bank. I've been to Georgia.

They are good people. They're good people. And they don't deserve to be treated the way the Israeli Zionist Jews are treating them and have treated them since the 1940s. And I am not

wanting anything bad to happen to the Jews. I simply want bad stuff to stop happening to the Palestinians. Isn't that a fair thing to say? Isn't that a fair thing to say? But I'm hated for saying that, Doc. I'm hated. I'm hated for saying it. Because it seems'm hated. I'm hated for saying it.

Because it seems like you're saying we're attacking the Jewish people. No, I'm saying to the Jews, stop being mean to the Palestinians. And then I'm hated. I'm smeared. My name is smeared all over the internet. My name is mud in churches in this country

because I defend the Palestinian people. Hey, it is what it is. I'm not going to back down. And I am going to defend them until they have freedom and dignity. And I will stand with them until they see it. I hope I see it in my lifetime. Okay, that's it for today. Thank you. Appreciate your support and your prayers. Tell people about

this program. Become our evangelist for us and spread the news of this alternative newscast. It's done without pharmaceutical money. Can we tell people about the news today, about Final Day? Or are we going to hold? Oh, I forgot. Thank you, Doc. Final Day audiobook is on Amazon. We just got word before we came out here. The audio version of Final Day is on Audible through Amazon.

So you can now listen. Okay. So everybody that's been waiting for the audio book, today is your day. Yes. Thank you for reminding me. It's there. And there's been a lot of people been waiting on the audio book. So it is right there.

Audible. Go to Amazon or Audible. And you can listen to Final Day and tell friends about it. Spread the word about Final Day. One other thing is that we are, it's really not the right time to tell you everything that we're doing. We're rolling out a new format, a new name, a new format, remnant ready. The marching orders I have from the Lord is get the remnant ready. Get the remnant ready, the remnant of Christ. Get them ready. Devote your time and energy to getting the remnant ready. Those who don't want to be in the church,

you just got to stop begging them. Begging and conjoling. Look, there's a lot of people watching me every day and they're not saved. They don't want to be saved. They just don't want to be saved. They like being rebels, but they like getting the news from us.

You know what I'm hearing from the Lord? It's time to let you go. It's just time to let you go. Say goodbye to you. I am to focus on the saints who love Jesus Christ and know that the time is short, that he's coming back and they need spiritual help, spiritual food. That's what we're doing. So for Morning Manna, we are going, starting tomorrow, we're going to start repeating some of our earlier programs so that Doc and I can devote the next 30 to 60 days working on the new format, the new program that we're rolling out. We've got a new app. It is exciting. I am really, really pleased and excited about what we're going to bring forth very, very soon. But keeping the hamster wheel running every day with two shows, it's really wearing me down physically, mentally, preparing two different shows every day, plus all the meetings that we're having and everything that we have to do to expand. So for the next couple of months, we're going to be running some repeats of Morning Manna going back to the beginning.

And so if you say, hey, I think I've heard that before, you have, okay? It's simply we need some extra time to get ready for the new rollout of Remnant Ready. I'll see you tomorrow. God bless you. You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles.

Thank you for listening. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at www.truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondents is True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969.