TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Illuminati Message for Putin: Biden Speech On “Tuesday” At 2:22 on 2/22/22

Episode Date: February 22, 2022

It appears that the Illuminati sent a cryptic message to Vladimir Putin today. The US President’s speech was on “Tuesday” at 2:22 on 2/22/22. Was it a coincidence or was there a hidden meaning in the timing of President Biden’s speech? Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 2/22/22

The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit nothing but the truth, so help us God. I'm Rick Wiles. It appears that the Illuminati sent a cryptic message to Vladimir Putin today. U.S. President Joe Biden's speech was on Tuesday at 2.22 on 2.22.22. Was it a coincidence or was there a hidden meaning in the timing of President Biden's speech? Doc Burkhardt and I have a lot of news to share with you today. And this is the strangest one. Right. So it was unusual, or as I like to say, a coincidence that happened to start at that time.

But is there any such thing as a coincidence? I don't believe there is. I don't think so either. And so I think everything is either the sovereign plan of God or man's interpretation of that. That's right. One way or the other. Well, before we talk about the twos, let's talk about what Mr. Biden said. We got several video clips from his remarks today as he addressed the nation about what happened in Ukraine. Here's the first one with the president.

Yesterday, Vladimir Putin recognized two regions of Ukraine as independent states. And he bizarrely asserted that these regions are no longer part of Ukraine and their sovereign territory. To put it simply, Russia just announced that it is carving out a big chunk of Ukraine. Last night, Putin authorized Russian forces to deploy into these regions. Today, he asserted that these regions actually extend deeper than the two areas he recognized, claiming large areas currently under the jurisdiction of the Ukraine government. He's setting up a rationale to take more territory by force, in my view. And if we listened to his speech last night,

and many of you did, I know, he's setting up a rationale to go much further. This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, as he indicated and asked permission to be able to do from his Duma. So let's begin to, so I'm going to begin to impose sanctions and response far beyond the steps we and our allies and partners implemented in 2014. So that was the introduction of his presentation to the American people today, Rick. And basically he's saying, you know, Vladimir Putin is laying out the rationale to take more territory, even though Vladimir Putin has said that that's not his intention to this point. So basically, President Biden is laying out the case. We're going to be laying sanctions on Russia. He did have an interesting turn of phrase here during

the presentation, Rick. And I think it ties into part of our conversation later in the Godcast today. Watch this. Who in the Lord's name does Putin think gives him the right to declare new so-called countries on territory that belong to his neighbors? This is a flagrant violation of international law and demands a firm response from the international community. A little bit of the pot calling the kettle black there, isn't it, Rick? IT IS A VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DEMANDS A FIRM RESPONSE FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY. A LITTLE BIT OF THE POT CULLING THE KETTLE BLACK THERE, ISN'T IT, RICK? BECAUSE NATO HAS DONE EXACTLY THAT IN THE PAST. AND SO IT WAS INTERESTING THEY SAID WHO IN THE LORD'S NAME? YOU KNOW, HE OPENED UP WITH THAT.

BUT HE DIDN'T SAY WHO IS THE LORD. THAT IS TRUE. AND SO HE DID ANNOUNCE THAT THERE IS A NEW ROUND OF SANCTIONS THAT ARE GOING TO BE IMPOSED. Who is the Lord? That is true. And so he did announce that there is a new round of sanctions that are going to be imposed. It's interesting what he included and what he didn't include. And so here is President Biden's outline of what those sanctions against Russia will be. So today I'm announcing the first tranche of sanctions to impose costs on Russia in response to their actions yesterday. These have been closely coordinated with our allies and partners and will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates.

We're implementing full blocking sanctions on two large Russian financial institutions, VEB and their military bank. We're implementing comprehensive sanctions on Russian sovereign debt. That means we've cut off Russian government from Western financing. It can no longer raise money from the West and cannot trade in its new debt on our markets or European markets either. Starting tomorrow and continuing in the days ahead, we'll also impose sanctions on Russian

elites and their family members. They share in the corrupt gains of the Kremlin policies and should share in the pain as well. And because of Russia's actions, we've worked with Germany to ensure Nord Stream 2 will not, as I promised, will not move forward. As Russia contemplates its next move, we have our next move prepared as well. Russia will pay an even steeper price if it continues its aggression, including additional sanctions. The United States will continue to provide defensive assistance to Ukraine in the meantime. So basically three areas of sanctions against VEB Bank. By the way, VEB Bank right now is down. Their website is down as if something happened after the speech.

And their military bank, the blockage of the ability of Russia to get financing on its debt, at least in Western banks, and then sanctions against the elites, he says, in Russia. Notice he didn't say sanctions on Vladimir Putin himself. I wonder why he left out Mr. Putin himself. Yeah, maybe that's something they're holding in reserve for later on. I don't know. I was hoping maybe you'd have some insight on that. But he mentioned elites, but he didn't specifically mention Vladimir Putin and those sanctions.

But NATO's not going to war. No, they don't appear to be ramping up for anything at this point. In fact, it looks like if Vladimir Putin did decide to go into Ukraine, they'd throw more sanctions on him. And, you know, I'm not endorsing President Putin doing that, but why not? If he sees there's no response from NATO on this, he could. Now, whether he will or not, that's yet to be seen. All right. Okay, so, Doc, I mean, we're not surprised by the sanctions. It's the same stuff that's been going on for years.

Right, we saw it under Obama and everything. Yeah, so nothing new here. And it seems like the Russians have learned how to live with sanctions. They just adapt to it. It doesn't seem like it's really affecting them. But there's something unusual here. And it's just, you know, I hesitate to go this direction because it just opens up the door to all kinds of criticism and things. But I've been around long enough to know that there are powerful people

who believe in Kabbalah, mysticism, numerology. Right. I've seen it over these two decades I've been here doing this job that certain things happen on particular dates. Right. And so today just happened to be 2-22-22. Yes. The second month, February,

the 22nd day of the second month, the 22nd year of the 2020s. And then the speech began at 2-22 p.m. Eastern. Which is weird in itself because the speech was originally scheduled to start at 2 p.m. And then we got an announcement early this morning, No, they're going to move it to one. And so starting at one o'clock this afternoon, we were monitoring all the different feeds for Joe Biden to come out. Well, an hour and 22 minutes later at 2.22, he finally comes out at 2.22 p.m. on 2.22.22. On Tuesday. Right. Even the day has twos in p.m. on 2.22.22. On Tuesday. Right.

Even the day has twos in it. Right. So Tuesday, 2.22.22 at 2.22 p.m. Right. Okay. Is it a coincidence? Or was it planned that way? Again, I've seen the masons at work for many years, and I don't believe in numerology.

I don't believe in astrology and all this thing, but there are people that do. Right. And they make decisions based on astrology and numerology. And numbers are a message in themselves, a language in themselves. AND NUMEROLOGY. AND NUMBERS ARE A MESSAGE IN THEMSELVES, A LANGUAGE IN THEMSELVES. AND SO SOME GROUPS COMMUNICATE TO ONE ANOTHER USING NUMBERS AND MAKE THAT A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THEIR BELIEF STRICT,

SUCH AS FREEMASONRY. THEY USE NUMBERS A LOT. YES, AND A CERTAIN SEGMENT OF THE JEWISH POPULATION IS DEEPLY COMMITTED TO A certain segment of the Jewish population is deeply committed to gematria, numerology. Right. Those who practice Kabbalah mysticism, that's certainly not all Jewish people, but among those Jews that do practice Kabbalah, gematria, numerology is extremely important to their beliefs.

So we're just bringing this up because there seems like something very strange here today. And then you notice something. Doc always pays attention to body language, and he'll always tell me, hey, did you see the way? And I'm not talking about people in the news. I'm just talking about people in the news, I'm just talking about people in general, you know. So you noticed a couple things in Mr. Biden's speech today. Right. As I was sitting there watching, his speech was about nine minutes long compared to Vladimir Putin's 54-minute speech yesterday. So he was in and out pretty quick. And he was speed reading the prompter today for someASON. BUT I COULD BE WRONG, BUT I COUNTED THAT HE TOUCHED HIS EYE

TWICE AND TOUCHED HIS NOSE TWICE ON 2, 22, 22. OKAY. AND I COULD BE WRONG. OKAY, WAS IT JUST HIS EYE IT WAS ITCHY OR WAS THERE A MESSAGE? WELL, YOU KNOW, ALWAYS,

THERE'S ALWAYS A MESSAGE WITH OUR BODIES. AND SO I READ A LOT OF BODY LANGUAGE BOOKS AND EVERYTHING. THEY JUST KIND OF ARE LIKE, you know, symbols on a dashboard. They don't mean they don't tell you everything, but they give you kind of some clues on people. People do things subconsciously, just like if I was holding my hands, you know. Well, people get this. Right. All right.

I wouldn't dare do that because somebody watching go,, oh my gosh, she's sending a signal. People do things subconsciously that they don't even know that they're doing it. But if you understand body language, you know the message. Because law enforcement studies this. They look for tales of lying, deceit. But there are also people who deliberately do certain signals like holding their hands a certain way. Masons stand a particular way. They turn and face a particular direction with other masons. They're sending signals to masons in a room. I'm a mason. I recognize you as a mason because of the way you positioned your feet, the way you turned your body. Most of us don't think that way.

And so we're unaware of these secrets messaging that's going on around us. So from a strictly body language perspective, touching your eye means you're trying to create THIS? SO FROM A STRICTLY BODY LANGUAGE PERSPECTIVE, TOUCHING YOUR EYE MEANS YOU'RE TRYING TO CREATE A THOUGHT. YOU'RE TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, IMAGINE SOMETHING THAT'S HAPPENING, ALL RIGHT? AND TOUCHING YOUR NOSE IS ONE OF THE LYING TELLS IN BODY LANGUAGE. AND YOU KNOW, I'M NOT SAYING THAT JOE BIDEN WAS LYING, BUT IN GENERAL BODY LANGUAGE, THAT'S A LYING TELL. NOW IF WE LOOK AT LIKE FREEMASONRY OR THE OCCULT, THE NUMBER TWO HAS A LOT OF MEANING. IT'S THAT DUALITY THAT IMPLIES CONFLICT, WAR.

IS IT TWO OR 22? WHICH ONE HAS THE MEANING? TWO HAS THE DUALITY MEANING TO IT, GOOD VERSUS EVIL, LIGHT VERSUS DARKNESS. BUT IT'S SIGNIFICANT THAT WHEN YOU STAGGER NUMBERS OR STACK NUMBERS TOGETHER, IT MULTIPLIES THE MEANING. OKAY. AND SO IN THE OCCULT OR FREEMASONRY, TOUCHING YOUR EYE IS, YOU KNOW, SYMBOLIC OF YOUR SUBMISSION TO THE ALL-SEEING EYE, ESPECIALLY IF YOU'RE TOUCHING THE LEFT EYE. DID HE TOUCH HIS LEFT EYE? HE DID. AND SO, AND HE ALSO TOUCHED HIS NOSE. AND THAT IS SIGNIFICANT FOR SOME LODGES OUT THERE IS SUBMISSION TO A PARTICULAR LODGE. AND SO...

I HAVE NO IDEA. I'VE NEVER, I'VE NEVER DONE ANY RESEARCH WHETHER JOE BIDEN IS A FREEMASON. WELL I KNOW HE'S A ZIONIST. HE'S SELF-CONFESSED AS A ZIONIST, BUT THERE IS A LOT OF CLOSET FREE MASONS TOO AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A FREE MASON TO BE SUBMISSIVE TO MASONRY. BUT THE DUPLICATION OF THE NUMBERS IS AT LEAST IN THEIR MINDS GIVES IT SIGNIFICANCE AND POWER. ALSO SOMETHING ELSE TO THINK ABOUT TOO RICK, THESE TOOLS SHOWING UP LIKE THIS, WE TALKED ABOUT YOU KNOW JEWISH NUMEROLOGY, YOU KNOW, THE SHABOD WEBSITE, SHABOD.ORG, THEY'VE GOT A WHOLE PAGE WHERE YOU CAN LOOK UP SEQUENCES OF NUMBERS. SO IF YOU PUT IN THE NUMBER 222 FOR INSTANCE, IT WILL COME BACK

OUT AND TELL YOU THE MEANING THAT SHOWS UP IN HEBREW LANGUAGE. AND SO WITH THE HEBREW LANGUAGE THEY USE THAT AS THEIR NUMBERS BOOK, RIGHT? AND THE NUMBER 222 IN JEWISH GEMATRIA CAN BE HITLER, IT COULD BE DRAGON, OR IT COULD BE ARMAGEDDON.

OH, WOW. AND SO IT'S INTERESTING ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS HAPPENING TODAY. NOW, DO WE THINK THE NUMBER TWO HAS POWER IN ITSELF? NO. BUT AS RICK SAID, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO DO THAT, YOU KNOW, CHART THEIR DAY BY THIS. There are people who do that chart their day by this. So, Doc, instead of Hitler, could we replace Hitler's name with Antichrist? Antichrist, Dragon, Armageddon, those three go together. Right. And so the idea is, of course, that the numbers, if they are conveying a message or a code or a language to others that recognize that, then they are alert. Now, you've got to know that there are people in Russia right now that are

dissecting this speech Joe Biden today gave, not just the content, but everything Joe Biden did and the time because it has meaning to people. Yes, that's right. They're trying to discern what message was sent. One other thing before we move on, and again, we're not into numerology or astrology or any of these things, condemn it, but astrologers are very excited about something involving Pluto. I don't mean the EXCITED ABOUT SOMETHING INVOLVING PLUTO. RIGHT. I DON'T MEAN THE DISNEY DOG, WE ARE TALKING THE PLANET RIGHT? WELL WHEN WE WERE KIDS

PLUTO WAS A PLANET, NOW IT IS SOMETHING ELSE PLANETOID NOW. IT IS A PLANETOID? YES, BUT IN ASTROLOGY THEY STILL COUNT IT AS SIGNIFICANT IN DETERMINING THINGS. SO THIS WAS AN ARTICLE FROM YESTERDAY, ASTROLOGERS EXPLAIN POWER SHIFTS SIGNIFICANCE OF significant in determining things. So this was an article from yesterday. Astrologers

explain power shifts, significance of 2-22-22 for the United States. And once again, like we said, we are not endorsing astrology. We're just telling you what they're saying about 2-22-22. But one thing that came out in this article, it says astrologers say that the United States will experience its first Pluto return. What does that mean? THAT CAME OUT IN THIS ARTICLE. IT SAYS ASTROLOGERS SAY THAT THE UNITED STATES WILL EXPERIENCE ITS FIRST PLUTO RETURN. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? WELL, THAT MEANS THAT THE PLANETOID PLUTO IS

BASICALLY IN THE SAME PLANET POSITION AS IT WAS IN A CERTAIN TIME IN THE PAST. OKAY? NOW IT'S RETURNED SEVERAL TIMES, BUT IN THIS CASE, THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THAT THE PLANET PLUTO, WHICH IS ASSOCIATED WITH TRANSFORMATION IN POWER, WILL COME BACK TO THE POSITION IT

WAS WHEN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WAS SIGNED AND RATIFIED ON JULY 4, 1776. NOW AS A RESULT, THE ASTROLOGERS, THEY PREDICT RADICAL POWER SHIFTS. AND ACCORDING TO HOROSCOPE.COM WRITER SHARINE CAMPBELL, PLUTO RETURNS IN FRANCE AND RUSSIA they predict radical power shifts. And according to horoscope.com writer Shereen Campbell, Pluto returns in France and Russia mark the deaths of Napoleon and Stalin. Spanish dictator Francisco Franco relinquished power during Spain's last Pluto return. And then some even argue that the UK's last Pluto return coincides with their unofficial fall from world leader status. THE U.K.'S LAST PLUTO RETURN COINCIDES WITH THEIR UNOFFICIAL FALL FROM WORLD LEADER STATUS. THEY GO ON TO SAY, HISTORICALLY THIS TIME IS MARKED WITH A LOT OF CHANGE AND MOST BELIEVE THAT FOR THE U.S. THAT WILL BE NO DIFFERENT.

OKAY, SO THAT'S NOT, IF YOU DO BELIEVE IN ASTROLOGY, THAT'S NOT LOOKING GOOD FOR THE U.S. BECAUSE PLUTO IS COMING BACK TO ITS POSITION WHERE IT WAS 1776. YOU COULD SAY WELL HEY THAT TURNED OUT GOOD FOR AMERICA BUT ACTUALLY IT WAS THE FALL OF BRITAIN. YES. BRITAIN LOST THERE. THAT WAS A MAJOR FALL OF THE PREDOMINANT WORLD POWER AT THAT TIME.

YES. I MEAN THE BRITISH EMPIRE WAS IT. I MEAN THEY WERE COMPETING EMPIRES OF SPAIN AND FRANCE, BUT THEY WERE ON THE DECLINE AT THE TIME. BRITAIN WAS AT ITS PEAK, BUT IT WAS THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION THAT SET THE TRIGGER POINT THAT ALLOWED FOR THE FALL OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE. OKAY. SO WE HAVE PLUTO, THE PLANETOID, COMING BACK TO ITS POSITION THAT THE ASTROLOGERS Pluto, the planetoid, coming back to its position, that the astrologers say this heralds a major political shift in the world and most likely negative for America. And Mr. Biden gives this cryptic speech on Tuesday, 2-22-22 at 2-22 p.m. Yes.

Other than that, there's nothing weird in it. Nothing weird about it at all. In the first 15 minutes of this newscast. Now, God's not concerned about the date and the time or anything because the dates and the times and the seasons are in the Lord's hands anyway. That's right. But Satan's people work on these things. That's right.

Absolutely. So we need to be wise and serpent about this and understand that they operate in this realm, PEOPLE WORK ON THESE THINGS. THAT'S RIGHT. ABSOLUTELY. SO WE NEED TO BE WISE AND SERPENT ABOUT THIS AND UNDERSTAND THAT THEY OPERATE IN THIS REALM, THAT THEY USE THESE THINGS FOR MANIPULATION, COERCION AND COMMUNICATION. AND THEY THINK THAT CERTAIN DAYS HAVE POWER AND THAT THEY

NEED TO DO THINGS ON CERTAIN DATES BECAUSE OF THE POWER THAT'S IN THE NUMBER. YES. I BELIEVE. THAT'S WITCHCRAFT AT ITS ROOT. YES, IT'S WITCHCRAFT. on certain dates because of the power that's in the number. Yes. I believe. That's witchcraft at its root. Yes, it's witchcraft. Manipulation of nature through words, language, or numbers. That's essentially what witchcraft is.

You got it. You got it. All right, so now we're going to turn our attention to the propaganda offensive against Russia and Vladimir Putin. So when I got up this morning I started scanning the news around the world and I'm going to show you just a selection of articles but they were all same all yeah yeah the message is Putin

is a monster he's crazy NATO must stop this man we got to do it now. So the first one is the New York Post. Look at that. Look at that picture. Yeah. The New York Post editorial board said Putin must be stopped now. Yes. Okay look at it. He's going to eat the West. And so there's your first one. The next one is the London Times, also owned by Rupert Murdoch, who owns the New York Post. So you understand, folks,

Rupert Murdoch owns both of these newspapers. One is in New York, one is in London. Owns Fox News. Putin's rambling speech, that was often a bizarre history lesson. Doc, if you got up in the morning in London and picked up the Times of London and looked at that headline, what would you think about Vladimir Putin? You'd think he was crazy, that he's talking off the top of his head, that he's making any justification to do whatever he wants to do. Once again, I'm not a fan of Vladimir Putin, but I did not see that in his speech yesterday.

You watched it yesterday. Was it bizarre or was it rambling? No, he laid out the case on why they're doing what they are doing. And whether I agree with every point of it or not, that's beside the point. But it was not rambling. He was very coherent. He of it or not. That's beside the point. But it was not rambling. He was very coherent. He delivered it with confidence. He went into it knowing what he wanted to say and the message that he wanted to convey.

It was not rambling. And it certainly wasn't bizarre. Let's go over to BBC and see what they said. Putin's angry speech, rewriting Ukraine's history. Was he angry? No, he wasn't angry. PUTIN'S ANGRY SPEECH, REWRITING UKRAINE'S HISTORY. WAS HE ANGRY? NO, HE WASN'T ANGRY. IN FACT, MANY TIMES HE SOUNDED LIKE A COLLEGE PROFESSOR LAYING OUT THE HISTORICAL CASE FOR THE STATUS OF UKRAINE.

I CAME AWAY WITH A WHOLE NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE SITUATION, YOU KNOW, HEARING IT FROM RUSSIA'S PERSPECTIVE. NOT ENDORSING RUSSIA. I'M JUST SAYING I HAVE A NEW APPRECIATION FOR WHERE THEY'RE COMING FROM. OKAY, LET'S GO TO PARIS AND SEE WHAT FRANCE 24 SAYS. Russia's perspective. Not endorsing Russia. I'm just saying I have a new appreciation for where they're coming from. Okay, let's go to Paris and see what France 24 says. Paranoid is what they're saying. Putin is paranoid. So he's rambling.

He's mad. He's angry. He's paranoid. They accused him of breaking promises to Macron. And so you see the theme that the West has in place here, of trying to diminish Vladimir Putin, making him sound crazy, making him sound bizarre, angry, paranoid, all these different things. Doc, very early this morning on BBC Radio, the Health Secretary of Great Britain, Sajid Javid, told BBC Radio 4, and this is one of the first things I heard this morning. I was like, oh, I wish I maybe had watched a cartoon or something before. Because I always put this up on the screen.

I'll give you an idea. So this is what he was saying. Oh, they changed it. They changed the headline. And so look at that. That's not what I saw. And they changed it within an hour after you had posted it this morning kidding yes so down at the bottom is what i saw around 6 a.m yes uk will be at war with russia if it attacks nato right and that was the headline that was the headline and they

changed it within an hour after you had posted it. We got a quote from that story. Yes, we still have the quote. Once again, this is from the health secretary. I'll ask you about that here in just a moment, too. Russia will be at war with Britain and other NATO countries if its forces enter any of the alliance's 30 nations, including the Baltic states, said Cabinet Minister Warren Moscow on Tuesday. Health Secretary Sajid Javid told BBC Radio 4's Today program,

if the territorial integrity of a single NATO member is violated, then that is tantamount to declaring war on every member of NATO. His warning came as Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the first barrage of UK economic sanctions against Russia would be revealed today as he warned Vladimir Putin is bent on a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Well, here's how I interpret that statement. NATO commandos are going to make sure a rocket is fired from a small NATO nation that kills Russian troops. And we will force Putin to enter a small Eastern European nation that's a member of NATO to get even with the troops who did it. And then we have the right to activate Article

5 and declare world war. Get everybody in. Get everybody in the war. That's the way I see it. As it stands right now, Russia has not done that to any NATO member. And even if he went into Ukraine, I don't want him to, but even if he did, Ukraine's not a member of NATO. Right. And, well, I mean, he does have troops in Donbass.

Right. But to the Russians, that's not ukraine anymore it's russia they well no no they i mean they're recognizing a doc that that those two provinces are independent independent states right but you know where it's going they're going those states are going to ask to be annexed yes by Russia right that's where it's going like Crimea like we're the Crimean people voted they they were in Ukraine and they voted like 90% to be annexed by Russia right and I think the same thing's going to happen in in those two provinces that broke

away in 2014 declared declared their independence. Right. And Russia has already recognized them. Russia has signed peace agreements with those two provinces today as well. And I expect that you'll see Russian military bases there. Now, Rick, I wanted to ask you a question about this particular quote by Shajid Javid. He's the health minister. Right. ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR QUOTE BY SHAJID JAVID. HE'S THE HEALTH MINISTER. RIGHT. WHY WOULD HE HAVE

ANY COMMENT ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON WITH RUSSIA? I MEAN, THAT WOULD BE LIKE DR. FAUCI HAVING AN OPINION ON RUSSIA. RIGHT. I MEAN, I WOULDN'T CARE WHAT DR. FAUCI THOUGHT ABOUT IT.

I DON'T EVEN CARE WHAT HE SAYS ABOUT COVID, BUT IT WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING COMPARABLE WITH THAT. BUT HE IS A MEMBER OF BORIS JOHNSON'S CABINET. AND HE IS SPEAKING FOR THE CABINET. HE IS SPEAKING FOR BORIS JOHNSON. HE IS SPEAKING FOR THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT. IT IS JUST UNUSUAL THAT THEY TROTTED OUT THE HEALTH MINISTER TO SAY THIS ON BBC RATHER

THAN THE DEFENSE MINISTER OR STATE MINISTER. IT IS STRANGE, BUT MAYBE HE WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO WASN'T. UP THAT EARLY? on BBC rather than the defense minister or state minister. It is strange, but maybe he was the only one who was- Not that early? Well, this would have been, I heard it around 6 a.m., so that was lunchtime. So maybe he was the only one who was not in a war planning meeting. That's it. Since his main warfare, COVID restrictions has been lifted. Got to give him something to do, I guess. He doesn't have any work. So maybe everybody else is planning the war. WARFARE, COVID RESTRICTIONS HAS BEEN LIFTED. GOT TO GIVE HIM SOMETHING TO DO I GUESS.

HE DOESN'T HAVE ANY WORK. SO MAYBE EVERYBODY ELSE IS PLANNING THE WAR. WELL ONE OF THE BIGGEST REACTIONS THAT WE'VE SEEN SO FAR TODAY WAS THE RESPONSE BY GERMANY TODAY. AND GERMANY HAS PUT THE PIECES IN PLACE TO HALT NORTH STREAM 2, WHICH to me like shooting your own foot. It is. It is.

It's really dumb because it's Nord Stream 1 and 2 moving Russian oil and gas to Germany, to Europe. And we've got a quote from German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. So the chancellor did say on Tuesday that Germany has taken steps to halt the process of certifying the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline for Russia. Construction of the pipeline project has been completed, but the project still needed regulatory certification from German authorities before the gas could be delivered. DORNSTREAM 2 WOULD DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF GAS FLOWING FROM RUSSIA TO GERMANY AND WOULD BYPASS UKRAINE OWING IT TO RUNNING ALONG THE BED OF THE BALTIC SEA. OKAY, SO TWO THINGS. IT DOUBLES THE AMOUNT OF NATURAL GAS COMING FROM RUSSIA TO GERMANY. RIGHT. AND NUMBER TWO, IT BYPASSES UKRAINE WHICH MEANS THE CORRUPT UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT CAN'T SIPHON OFF THE GAS AND NOT PAY FOR IT. And number two, it bypasses Ukraine, which means the corrupt Ukrainian government can't siphon off the gas and not pay for it.

Right. Which they've been doing for how many decades now? So really, it's a win win for both Germany and Russia. Russia doesn't lose money because of theft going through Ukraine. Right. And Germany gets twice as much gas supplies coming into the country. Right. So why would they shut it down? At higher prices, too. Why would they shut it down? Because former Russian President Medvedev tweeted something today, basically, hey, get ready for very expensive gas. Right. So this is Ditri Medvedev. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has issued an order to halt the process of certifying Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. Well, welcome to the

brave new world where Europeans are very soon going to pay two euros for one cubic meter of natural gas, which basically triples the current price right now. And that's just the beginning. Now, Rick, they didn't shut down Nord Stream 1. Right. But they halted the certification of Nord Stream 2. Right. Which means, really, nothing is changing at the moment. It's just that they're not opening.

Nord Stream 2, the construction's done, but they don't have the German government permission to officially open the valves, let the gas start moving. And President Joe Biden had said such about two weeks ago. He said, we are not, as if he was the one in charge, we are not going to let he was the one in charge, we are not going to let Russia open up Nord Stream 2. It's not going to happen. I bet if Putin shuts down Nord Stream 1, they're going to have a rethink on it. Or, and shuts off the valve in Ukraine. They haven't shut the pipeline down in Ukraine, and they very well could. I mean, they have that power. It's their gas.

That's right. And the only thing that would happen is if they did shut off the valve, let's say they did shut IN UKRAINE AND THEY VERY WELL COULD. I MEAN THEY HAVE THAT POWER. IT'S THEIR GAS. THAT'S RIGHT. AND THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD HAPPEN IS IF THEY DID SHUT OFF THE VALUE, LET'S SAY THEY DID SHUT OFF NORTH STREAM ONE AND NORTH STREAM TWO, RUSSIA WOULD STILL HAVE ALL THAT GAS IN RESERVE AND THAT GAS IN RESERVE WOULD ONLY INCREASE IN VALUE BECAUSE OF LACK OF SUPPLY. IT ACTUALLY ENRICHES RUSSIA TO SHUT OFF THE VALUES. BUT THEY ALSO NEED THE CASH FLOW. THAT'S TRUE TOO. BUT IF WE'RE WATCHING THE WIND HERE TODAY, THE FINANCIAL SANCTIONS MAY BE THE NEXT THING TO HAPPEN. DID WE PUT THE MAP OF NORTH STREAM 1 AND 2 ON THE SCREEN?

I DON'T THINK SO YET. Nord Stream 1 and 2 on the screen. I don't think so yet. So there we go. So the dotted line, that's Nord Stream 2, right? Yes. And Nord Stream 1 is the solid line. So it's the dotted line that is a brand new pipeline. It has not been open for business, and that's what Germany said today we will not grant the license for it to operate for the time being but it's showing you the the route that that Russian oil and gas is taking to get to Germany and again it bypasses Ukraine and it takes the corrupt Ukrainians out of the equation.

Now, the next one, I want to show you, this next one is loaded, loaded with propaganda. This is News Australia. Theories emerge on how Russian President Putin amassed $200 billion fortune. There he is. Look at him. He's just laying back, dreaming about conquering the world. PRESIDENT PUTIN AMASSED $200 BILLION FORTUNE. THERE HE IS. LOOK AT HIM. HE'S JUST LAYING BACK, DREAMING ABOUT CONQUERING THE WORLD. HE HAS $200 BILLION IN HIS SECRET SWISS BANK ACCOUNT. AND THIS IS THE BIG STORY IN AUSTRALIA TODAY.

NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PROPAGANDA IN HERE. ALL RIGHT. SO STARTING OFF HERE, WITH EVERYONE CLOSELY WATCHING RUSSIA'S EVERY MOVE AS IT SITS POISED FOR AN INVASION OF UKRAINE, FRESH QUESTIONS HAVE BEGUN TO SWIRL ABOUT THE COUNTRY'S LEADER AND HIS MYSTERIOUS FORTUNE. QUESTIONS OVER RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN'S PERSONAL WEALTH COMES AS U.S. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN REVEALED PLANS TO IMPOSE NEW SANCTIONS ON TWO BREAKAWAY REGIONS IN UKRAINE. Joe Biden revealed plans to impose new sanctions on two breakaway regions in Ukraine.

This has brought the focus back to the Russian president's vast personal wealth, though his exact net worth is still unclear. Okay, freeze it right there. Though his exact net worth is still unclear. Let's go back to the headline. It's not unclear. No, they have a number. They gave you a number.

See, this is the way propaganda works. People only read the headlines. They wanted people to see 200 billion. They want to see there's Putin laying back in a fishing boat, dreaming about his $200 billion, and then in the article it says, we really don't know how much money he's got. That's the truth part. That's the truth. But you have to dig in for the truth. But they lied in the headline. All right, so let's go deeper into this story. All right, so a recent investigation by Forbes has uncovered three main theories

into how Mr. Putin amassed his multi-billion dollar fortune. One theory relates to a Russian oligarch named Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was once believed to be the richest man in Russia with an estimated $15 billion fortune. Now, in 2003, he was imprisoned on charges of fraud and tax evasion, accusations which he has continually denied. All right, stop right there. Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Putin put him in prison. I followed this story for a long, long time, going back 20-some years, Doc.

I was following this story when I was in Texas. Mikhail Khodorkovsky, he was a billionaire Jewish Zionist who Mr. Putin believed was trying to take over the natural resources of Russia on behalf of the global Zionist movement. I just said what you're not supposed to say. He put Khodovsky in prison. Right. Because he wasn't going to allow Berezovsky, Boris Berezovsky, and Khodovskyki and all these other Kowalskis. They were Jewish Zionists attempting to corner

the natural resources of Russia. And Putin stood up to them. You want to know why they want to destroy Putin and Russia? Because he stood up to the Zionists who were stealing the natural resources of Russia. That's a story you can't talk about. Except on true news. Except on true news. So I'm not surprised they put it in. So what they're saying in this story is,

well, one theory of how Putin got that $200 billion is that he stole Khodovsky's $15 billion. Well, how do you take $15 to $200? Well, you've got to steal from a whole bunch of people. Oh, okay. Well, former Russian government advisor Stanislav Belkovsky recently estimated his fortune to be around $70 billion, while U.S. hedge fund manager Bill Browder told the Washington Post it was more like $200 billion. Okay, stop. Stop again. Bill Browder told the Washington Post it was more like 200 billion. Okay, stop. Stop again. Bill Browder told the Washington Post Putin has 200 billion.

Now we see where the 200 billion comes from in the headline. Who's Bill Browder? Well, go back to when Mr. Trump was in the White House and he met with Mr. Putin. And Vladimir Putin wanted President Trump to allow Russian agents to question Bill Browder, an American. Yes. And Trump, Mr. Trump was going to do it. And then the deep state in America went berserk on him right I went totally berserk on this is probably 2017 right we did stories on it yes then so who's Bill Browder the accusation I don't know

if I have this story I don't think I dropped it in. The accusation was that Vladimir Putin made a claim. He openly said it, that Bill Browder laundered $400 million to Hillary Clinton. And that he got it in Russia and he didn't pay taxes on it. Right. That was the gist of it. And they actually even issued arrest warrants. Yes. And he was actually arrested by Interpol.

That's right. And so the U.S. has been hiding Bill Browder, refusing to send him back to Russia to stand trial. So when you see Bill Browder's name in an article, there's more to the story. So that Australian news organization, they know the truth. They didn't tell the rest of the story. They didn't say, were there accusations against Browder? Now, I don't know whether they're true or not. I'm just telling you what Putin said. He said Browder somehow moved $400 million of untaxed money to the Hillary Clinton campaign.

And $400 million in 2016 would have made a big difference in that election cycle. To defeat Trump. Yes. Okay. And what was the whole attack on Donald Trump? He belongs to the Russian stooge. But it was Hillary. Yes. It was Hillary. It was Hillary that sold American, was it uranium or plutonium that she sold to the Russians for pennies on the dollar. Okay, so there's a lot to this story that is not coming out. Okay, so we'll get back to this propaganda piece. So Mr. Kordovosky's fortune was frozen, and his hugely successful company was broken up.

Mr. Browder believes Mr. Putin may have used this arrest to cut deals with all the other wealthy oligarchs. So this was the deal, Rick. The deal was, you give me 50% of your wealth and I'll let you keep the other 50%. Mr. Browder told Forbes, if you don't, he'll take 100% of your wealth and throw you in jail. So he was, according to Mr. Browder, Mr. Putin was acting like a crime boss, basically. But that does have a familiar ring to it, though. Isn't that what Joe Biden and Hunter did? That's what I was just going to say.

It sounds very, very familiar. It's the same stuff. Hey, we're going to take a break and when we come back we're going to stroll down memory lane and revisit some of the great propaganda from nato over the past 20 years you don't want to miss part two we'll be back in a minute having good nutritious food ready in case of natural disasters or shipping disruptions is part of the wisdom god gives to us, and Heaven's Harvest is your resource in preparedness. Our food kits have a 25-year shelf life and come in a variety of stackable sizes with handles for convenient storage or transportation. The nutritional value of the food is preserved by

freeze-drying and not dehydrating it. Heaven's Harvest offers heirloom vegetable seed kits with the highest quality non-Gmo heirloom seeds simply created by nature with 39 garden staple varieties you can grow and produce an astonishing yield of hearty vegetables and fruits that have tremendous flavor heaven's harvest also has water filtration and storage solutions and gardening and other resources that will offer you and your family peace of mind visit heaven's harvest online at heavensharvest.com. That's heavensharvest.com. Or call 800-516-4773.

That's 800-516-4773. Well, welcome back to True News. We're going to visit some of the best propaganda from NATO over the past 20 years, just to refresh your memory, because I want you to see how the globalists, whatever you want to call these people, Illuminati, globalists, Bilderbergers,

Masons, they're all the same, all right? It's all the same group. I want you to see how they use the same tactics, THEY'RE ALL THE SAME. IT'S ALL THE SAME GROUP. I WANT YOU TO SEE HOW THEY USE THE SAME TACTICS, THE SAME PLAYS, THE SAME STRATEGIES. IT'S JUST A REPEAT BECAUSE PEOPLE FORGET WHAT THEY DID 10, 20 YEARS AGO.

THEY FORGET WHAT THEY DID A YEAR AGO. FOR INSTANCE, YOU KNOW, WE SAW THESE STORIES ABOUT RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN, $200 BILLION FORTUNE. WELL, IF YOU WATCHED THE CYCLES BEFORE THEY'VE DONE THIS BEFORE

TO OTHER DESPITES THAT THEY WANT TO KNOCK OUT. THEY ACCUSE THEM OF ATROCITIES AND THEN SAY, LOOK HOW RICH THEY ARE. THEY CAN'T HAVE ALL THAT MONEY. FROM STEALING. YES.

STEALING AND KILLING. ALL RIGHT, SO WE GOT TO HAVE A WAR. DOC, I REMEM was I think 1999. God had just called me into this ministry. I entered this ministry in September of 1998. The first radio show that we did started May 24th, 1999. If I recall, this was in May or June, something like that. The Kosovo, the Yugoslavia war had started.

Right. Okay. Up until then, I was a red blooded, patriotic American guy that didn't believe the US government did anything wrong. The only thing that I can remember that I questioned was the Kennedy assassination. Other than that, even that, that you allowed yourself to put that kind of on the shelf. Yeah. I just knew something was weird about the Kennedy assassination. There was something that wasn't being told. But other than that, I was a, I'm an American. My government is right. My government wouldn't do anything wrong. We're America. Okay. And I remember the day, I was at home and walked past the television and CNN was on and Jamie, what was his name, NATO press secretary, first name was Jamie. I forget his name. He was holding a press conference about Yugoslavia. And I was just walking by the TV. And the Holy Spirit said, he's lying. Jamie Shea. Jamie Shea, scott jamie shea and i heard the holy spirit say he's lying don't believe what they're telling you and it it startled me because you had bill clinton

tony blair and jamie shea representing the Western countries. And even though I knew Bill Clinton was personally, you know, a little scoundrel, he was the president of the United States. Certainly he wasn't going to lie to the world. All right? I mean, that was my mindset. Right. So I understand people today who hear me for the first time

and they're very skeptical about what I'm saying because your mind is in that same paradigm that you were you know you're living in the masonic matrix like I was so I get it I understand it people don't understand what I'm talking about today I've just it's taken about 24 years to be deprogrammed to become this cynical. Hopeful. Let's put it hopeful. So I was like, Lord, what do you mean they're lying? And I just heard the Holy Spirit said, just keep watching. I'll show you.

And that was when my eyes opened up that the U.S. government and the Western governments in Great Britain and NATO were lying to the world. And I remember that period of time, too, 98, 99, that period. And I would see the news reports on Yugoslavia, Serbia, Kosovo. And I would question, what would Yugoslavia do to us? Yes. Right. But like most Americans, we see it on TV. It doesn't impact us directly. We see the bombs and missiles and everything. And we just kind of put a gap in it

because we got to go to work. And we rationalize. We rationalize. Well, the government leaders know a lot more than we do. Right. There are things that they can't tell us and there's a reason they're bombing that country so I'm going to show you some news articles and video from that war and I want you to see the propaganda that was used on you and me in the whole world and then you're going to understand how they're using the same propaganda today to start a war against Russia. Because all these wars have been leading up to the big war with Russia. Right. They've been on the march.

Little country after little country. Where is it going? A big war on Russia. That's what they're leading up to. So our first one, and this one, this is from October 2016. And this is Vladimir Putin being questioned by reporters. You'll see the English subtitles. You can read along. But notice that Mr. Putin said in 2016, all the trouble that Russia is having with America and NATO, it all started with the NATO war on Yugoslavia.

In his mind, that's where things went south, Doc. That's when things started to get bad. So why would he say that? So we're going to lay out the case for that. Let's watch. Продолжение темы. Вот отношения дипломатические с Америкой расстроились из-за сирийского вопроса. Что? Что? Что? Отношения с Америкой расстроились по сирийскому вопросу в последнее время?

Вы так думаете? Мне так кажется. Вы ошибаетесь. Но вы вспомните, что происходило в Югославии. Вот оттуда все и началось. Я еще и президентом-то не был. А что, я что ли развернул самолет над Атлантикой? Это, по-моему, Примаков сделал. Ну так вот, мы разговаривали, разговаривали. Кстати говоря, и Ельцин Борис Николаевич, все был хорош да хорош.

Как только занял позицию достаточно жесткую по отношению к Югославии, сразу все начали припоминать, что он и выпить любит это и все это и пошли его и пошла компрометация вот все и началось то что вы знаете но я уже только что сказал мне нравятся независимые позиции вот что вот чем проблема а потом и дальше пошло по ираку кстати говоря мы не были не были инициаторами позиции по ираку это же нас на самом деле меняешь хорошо это знаю меня убеждали в необходимости занять такую позицию по ираку это же нас нас на самом деле меняешь хорошо это знаю меня убеждали в необходимости занять такую позицию по ираку которую мы в конце концов заняли лидеры германии и франции после как саддама хусейна повесили все радовались и помните что говорили вот вы были

против они пришли победили победили ли вот в чем же как и Ливия, никогда не были центрами терроризма. А после ликвидации государственных структур, они превратились в рассадник терроризма. Вот сейчас нужно штурмовать Масул, где миллионное население, применяя авиацию, танки и артиллерию. Вот результат. А в Ливии вообще непонятно, что делать. Государство прекратило свое существование. Рассадник терроризма. Массовый поток беженцев пошел. Ну и что, вы считаете, что из-за Сирии у нас изменились отношения со Штатами? Нет. Не из-за Сирии, а из-за попыток одной стороны навязать вс но мы против того, чтобы решения принимались в одностороннем порядке и не были продуманными до конца, без учета исторических, культурных, религиозных особенностей той или другой страны, даже если в этой стране есть конфликты и противоречия. So Vladimir Putin in 2016 corrected the reporter and said, no, our trouble didn't start in Syria. It started when NATO bombed Yugoslavia in 1999. So this is where we're going to, with that as the pretext, we're going to go through some history. So this first one is the New York Times.

All right. And this is from 2008. Okay. SOME HISTORY. SO THIS FIRST ONE IS THE NEW YORK TIMES. ALL RIGHT, AND THIS IS FROM 2008, OKAY. AND IT SAYS, THE U.S. AND MOST OF THE EU RECOGNIZE KOSOVO. NOW THAT MIGHT JUST BE, YOU KNOW, AN ORDINARY HEADLINE TO YOU,

BUT LET'S READ THE QUOTE HERE. THE UNITED STATES AND THE BIGGEST EUROPEAN COUNTRY SAID MONDAY THEY WOULD RECOGNIZE THE INDEPENDENCE OF KOSOVO IN THE HOURS OF SUSPENSE AFTER PRIME MINISTER quote here. The United States and the biggest European countries said Monday they would recognize the independence of Kosovo in the hours of suspense after Prime Minister Hashim Tachi assured his new republic of swift Western recognition. The United States has totally today formally recognized Kosovo as a sovereign and independent state. Secretary of State Condoleezza

Rice said, we congratulate the people of Kosovo on this historic occasion. All right, so let's stop here. Kosovo was a region of Yugoslavia. Yes. The war on Yugoslavia started in 1999, and then by 2008, the United States and Europe recognized a breakaway province and said, this is an independent state called Kosovo. And not only that, but they got rid of Yugoslavia. They erased Yugoslavia. We get rid of it. We're not even going to recognize that Yugoslavia ever existed. We're going to create new nations here. So for NATO to be so extremely upset that Putin is recognizing the independence of two breakaway provinces in Ukraine is sheer hypocrisy.

Well, to quote Joe Biden, who in the Lord's name can recognize a new nation, just create new countries out of thin air? NATO. NATO can, because they've done it. That's right. So there's an example. Now, the next story, this is Washington Post, May 1999. NATO bombs Serbia into darkness.

Yes. And they were proud of this. Okay. This is from Washington Post. NATO airstrikes on major... By the way, Doc, before we jump into... Jesse Jackson. There's Jesse Jackson there.

I remember that trip. Reverend Jackson went to Yugoslavia and negotiated the release of several U.S. airmen. Right. Okay. And so that's why Reverend Jackson is in in that story but here we are 1999 may so yeah i was right so it was around may i was saying the war had started that's when the lord spoke to me and said they're lying i'm going to show you rick just pay attention they're lying nato bombs serbia in the darkness well let me tell you folks, Serbia was Christian.

Yes. Do you understand? Christian. Yes. Your government, Great Britain, France, Germany bombed a Christian people. They made war against God's church. Let's go to the story. So NATO airstrikes, like I said, they were proud of this accomplishment. NATO airstrikes on major electrical power plants blacked out Belgrade and large areas of Serbia tonight, hours after Yugoslavia released three captured American soldiers in what it said was a goodwill gesture. Well, that didn't work, did it?

No. The attack dramatically brought the Allied air campaign home to millions of ordinary Serbs. And so I'll give you an idea of what that looked like that night, because we actually have video of people who were there and witnessed it. Now see what you think about this night of darkness as they light it up first. Storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av storting av All right. I apologize for the audio, but of course they were getting bombed. Yes. And so that might have impacted things. But that scene from Belgrade that night where people, they had already been under attack,

and that strike that you saw there was a NATO airstrike in Belgrade. And so... And what was the... Tell me, remind me, what did the Yugoslavia people do to the United States? Was I supposed to be afraid of them? Were they attacking us? Were they... It was a Christian nation.

Were they threatening us on terrorist attacks? What were they... It was a Christian nation. Were they threatening us on terrorist attacks? What were they doing? But Bill Clinton and Tony Blair said, that nation has to be destroyed, and we're going to use NATO air power. We're going to bomb them in the darkness. Do you all recall Yugoslavia threatening you? Did you go to bed at night YOU WERE CALLED? YOUGOSLAVIA THREATENING YOU? DID YOU GO TO BED AT NIGHT AFRAID THAT YOUGOSLAVIA WAS GOING TO INVADE THE UNITED STATES? NOPE. THE GLOBALISTS HAD A PLAN.

AND THE PLAN WAS TO GET RID OF YOUGOSLAVIA. NOW IN YOUGOSLAVIA, MUSLIM EXTREMISTS WERE ATTACKING CHRISTIANS. THAT WAS GOING ON IN YOUGOSLAVIA. AND NATO DECIDED TO STICK ITS

BIG FAT NOSE IN ALL OF IT. WELL, WHAT WAS HAPPENING, DOCTOR, WAS THAT KOSOVO WAS A going on in Yugoslavia. And NATO decided to stick its big fat nose in all of it. What was happening, Doc, was that Kosovo was a Muslim-dominated region of Yugoslavia. Right. And none other than Osama bin Laden was operating there. That's true, yes. Under the auspices of the CIA. And so for some reason the European leaders wanted an Islamic state inside Europe.

This is a really simple version because it goes back many, many years. So there was an Islamic enclave in Yugoslavia. They wanted their independence. And NATO said, you're going to get it. We're going to bomb Christian Yugoslavia until they give up. And that's exactly what happened. So don't believe this propaganda that you're watching. You know, Sean Hannity last night you know i thought he's going to hyperventilate call him for war um it's the same stuff i've heard out of sean hannity for 20 some years do you know how many wars he's called for well he's got two cia he's got he's got double pin from the cia so we'll move on uh The next one is the next one is the next one.

This is NBC. Right. So this is NBC News. This is from 1999. So this is March 24. From March of 1999, Tom Brokaw, I almost said broken jaw, Tom Brokaw and Andrea Mitchell are laying out the case on why this campaign in Yugoslavia has to take place. Yes. Andrea Mitchell, the wife of Alan Greenspan.

Yes. The banksters. The propagandists. So the bankster Alan Greenspan is married to a chief propagandist working at NBC. Right. Which is headquartered at Rockefeller Plaza. No, there's no connections to any of this stuff. Now remember back here, 99, they were trying to sell this campaign against Yugoslavia. It was necessary.

It had to be done. And they used mainstream media to do it. So here's Tom Brokaw. Inside the mind of Serbia's dictator, the man who has brought NATO to war. The attack tonight is aimed in part at breaking Slobodan Milosevic's grip on power, also to bring him to the peace table. He's held that power as president of Serbia since 1989. Before that, he was a gas company executive and a bank director.

He's married and he has two children. In Depth tonight, NBC's Andrea Mitchell on the man the United States says is responsible for this crisis in Kosovo. The CIA calls him the Saddam Hussein of the Balkans, the 57-year-old president of Yugoslavia. President Slobodan Milosevic. Those who know him say he's cunning, shrewd, alternately brutal and deceptively charming. Not to be trusted, they say, especially when he promises peace. We'll do our best to support

every peaceful solution. U.S. officials say he is not a madman, but deeply disturbed psychologically. Both his mother and father committed suicide. The son, observers say, is prone to violent mood swings and foul language when negotiating. At the same time, they say he loves luxury, lives in a palace filled with Rembrandt paintings and priceless Baroque furniture. He enjoys himself, he likes good food, and he's a heavy drinker.

And even after negotiating all night, he is still a natty dresser. His greatest passion, his diehard communist wife Mira. Fiercely ideological and also his most trusted political operative. In fact, some say she all but runs the country. Helped transform her husband from a communist Party hack to a nationalist tyrant. But critics say, unlike Saddam and other dictators with regional ambitions, Milosevic has no vision for his country beyond ethnic cleansing and clinging to power. His priority is getting power, holding on to power. He's very tactical.

In fact, the U.S. blames him for starting three wars in Croatia, Bosnia, and now Kosovo. But President Milosevic, who over the past decade started the terrible wars against Croatia and Bosnia, has again chosen aggression over peace. His sole motivation, those who know him say, a determination to stir up his people's anger against all outsiders. A person that I think manifests power, wants to retain power at all costs. And it has worked. In his country, he is revered for standing up to the West. Elsewhere in the world, he's called the butcher of the Balkans, responsible for the deaths of a quarter of a million of his countrymen.

Officials say two and a half times more than the number of Iraqis killed by Saddam. The real fear, U.S. officials say, is that Milosevic might want a prolonged war in order to consolidate power. One critic says, quote, he is both the arsonist and the fireman. They say creating a crisis, then resolving it, so he is the hero, no matter how much suffering he causes. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington. Tonight, as the bombs fall, the U.S. military believes that Milosevic is hiding out in a deep Soviet-style underground bunker somewhere near Belgrade. I couldn't keep up with the propaganda. He's not a madman, but he's disturbed.

And he likes to wear nice suits. And his wife is a communist. Oh, we got to kill this man. He's the butcher of the Balkans. He's like Saddam. Only worse. He's worse than Saddam. Well, let me tell you what they did.

They killed President Milosevic. NATO killed him. And let me tell you how it happened. They eventually arrested him. Yes. Okay. They arrested, NATO arrested the president of Yugoslavia. They took him to The Hague in the Netherlands to the, you know, the world court.

And they had him locked up in solitary confinement and i'll tell you why i remember this very very vividly they had president milosevic in a solitary confinement cell because he reportedly had flown 600 tons of gold out of the country before NATO got there to steal it. Which they do everywhere. Everywhere they go, they steal the gold. Andrea Mitchell's husband is Alan Greenspan, who was the head of the Federal Reserve. So they wanted Mr. Milosevic to tell them where he hid the gold. And this was in the news, Doc. I'm not making this up.

Right. NATO was demanding that Milosevic tell them where he hid the gold. It got on a plane and it flew out before they stopped it. So one day, if I recall, it was on a Sunday. I think this was on a Sunday. The guard at the Hague looked in the cell and Mr. Milosevic was in the solitary confinement cell totally naked and dead. Well stuff happens Rick. He was naked and he was dead by himself in a solitary confinement cell and the news was he committed suicide.

So one of two things happened. Either they killed him, torturing him to find out where the gold was, or they tortured him and he told them where the gold was and they killed him. Either way, he died. Milosevic's dead. Yugoslavia was erased. And where did Yugoslavia come from in the first place? Either way, he died. Milosevic's dead.

Yugoslavia was erased. And where did Yugoslavia come from in the first place? It was created in the past itself. After World War I. The European countries cobbled together a whole bunch of pieces of other countries and said, let's call that Yugoslavia. And that's what it was. And then when they were done with it, they got rid of it. They cut it up again.

But that's exactly what they did. AND THAT'S WHAT IT WAS. AND THEN WHEN THEY WERE DONE WITH IT, THEY GOT RID OF IT. THEY CUT IT UP AGAIN. BUT THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY DID. BUT PUTIN CAN'T RECOGNIZE A PROVINCE THAT BREAKS AWAY AND DECLARES ITS INDEPENDENCE. THERE'S GOING TO BE WORLD WAR III OVER THIS. NOW IF I RECALL, RICK AND TOM BROKAW AND ANDREA MITCHELL

BROUGHT THIS OUT, THEY SAID, YOU KNOW, ETHNIC CLEANSING, YOU KNOW, MILOSOVICH WAS DOING ETHNIC CLEANSING AND THAT WAS, MILOSOVICH WAS DOING ETHNIC CLEANSING. AND THAT WAS THE CALLING CARD, THE CRY BACK IN 1999, 2000. HE IS COMMITTING ETHNIC CLEANSING, WE GOT TO STOP THIS. WELL, THAT IS A GOOD SELLING POINT TO PEOPLE. YOU DON'T WANT ETHNIC CLEANSING, DO YOU? IT MADE IT SOUND LIKE HE WAS GOING DOOR TO

DOOR KILLING PEOPLE WHO WERE NOT WHITE EUROPEAN CHRISTIANS. THAT'S THE WAY THEY MADE IT SOUND. AND SO THEY MADE IT SOUND LIKE THIS WAS A RIGHTEOUS CAUSE. OKAY, SO IF IT WAS A RIGHTEOUS CAUSE YOU WOULD HAVE NOTHING TO APOLOGIZE FOR WOULD YOU? THAT'S RIGHT. SO THAT BRINGS US TO JENS STOLTENBERG. I LEARNED TODAY TO SAY HIS NAME CORRECTLY. THANK YOU TO A BROTHER WHO SENT ME A NOTICE. JENS today to say his name correctly. Thank you to a brother who sent me a notice. Jens, huh?

Jens, or Jens. So it's pronounced with a Y. Mr. Stoltenberg was the chief of NATO, and he's getting a promotion now. He's going to become a central banker. This is amazing. Yes. going to become a central banker. This is amazing. He did so well over these years bombing countries that now he gets to retire as a bank president, a central bank president. So this is June 2015 and Mr. Stoltenberg finally got around to apologizing for the 1999 bombing of Serbia that killed innocent civilians. Let's watch it. When it comes to the victims of the bombing I will just

restate that I regret that very much because the purpose of the military Jeg har mye å glede meg over, fordi målet med de militære operasjonene vi gjorde i 1999 var å forbyr sivillige liv. Dette var noe som ikke skulle skje. Jeg vil igjen condole alle de som har forlatt deres kjæreste, familien og de nære. once again convey my condolences to all those who lost their loved ones, their family, their close friends, and I regret what happened back in 1999. And this follows the same pattern NATO does too. They do this every single time as well. So they'll instigate some sort of crisis in a country or take legal Islam. NATO instigated that by arming Muslim insurgents. I mean, they did that.

Okay. And then they demonized the leader of the country. He's a bad guy. Milosevic is bad. And he's, you know, he does bad things and he's rich too. And so we can't. And he wears nappy suits. Right.

And so, and then they bombed the daylights out of everybody. Okay. Everybody. Civilians die and everything. And then a few years later, NATO comes out and says, you know what? We probably shouldn't have bombed all the civilians that we did back then. But we didn't know the bombs would kill people. We thought they were love bombs.

And we had no idea that the shrapnel would rip apart the bodies of little children. We've been thinking about it for years, and we are a little sorry. That's the way the warmongers operate. And even as late as last year, you had people apologizing. This is from Euronews. PEOPLE APOLOGIZING. THIS IS FROM EURO NEWS. THE PRESIDENT OF CZECHOSLOVAKIA, MILO ZIMAN, APOLOGIZES TO SERBIA FOR BOMBING YOU. OKAY. SO HIS CONSCIENCE WAS BOTHERING HIM. RIGHT. AND HE SAYS IN THIS, HE WAS TROUBLED BY IT. BUT WASN'T IT A RIGHTEOUS CAUSE?

WEREN'T WE STOPPING ETHNIC CLEANSING? DIDN'T WE STOP THAT EVIL MILOSEVIC FROM DOING ALL THE EVIL THINGS THAT HE WAS DOING RIGHT? BUT HE WOULDN'T BECOME PRESIDENT OF CHECK REPUBLIC IF HE DIDN'T GO ALONG WITH THE WAR. RIGHT. HE EARNED HIS POSITION. HE EARNED HIS PROMOTION. SO IF YOU RECOGNIZE THIS PATTERN YOU SEE THE SAME

PATTERN REPEATED OVER TIME. TAKE FOR INSTANCE LIBYA. ALL RIGHT SO NOW WE COME BACK TO THAT VIDEO THAT WE SHOWED YOU A LITTLE WHILE AGO WITH PRESIDENT PUTIN. THE REPORTER SAID SO YOU KNOW THE TROUBLE WITH THE UNITED STATES AND RUSSIA IS OVER LIBYA OR SYRIA AND PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID NO IT'S NOT SYRIA IT'S YED. OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON LAUNCHED A WAR AGAINST SYRIA. AND THAT SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST AND THEN THEY

WENT AFTER LIBYA. COLONEL QADAFI. DO YOU REMEMBER THE OFFICIAL REASON? THERE WERE PROTESTS. AND HE WAS SUPPRESSING THAT. AND HE WAS NOT LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE AND NATO WAS AFRAID. HE WAS GOING TO ROUGH UP THE PEOPLE SO NATO WAS GOING And he was suppressing them. And he was not listening to the people, and NATO was afraid he was going to rough up the people.

So NATO bombed the country into the Dark Ages and killed a lot of civilians so that the civilians wouldn't get roughed up in the protest. That's NATO logic. Yes. Yes. So let's revisit the NATO war on Libya. Here is Barack Obama, the man who started the war, who started the Syrian war, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, and the man who is responsible for killing tens of thousands of innocent people in those wars. And this is him on ABC News making the case for war in Libya.

And we turn now to the president's speech itself. Hanging over this speech were the shadows of other wars and other presidencies. President Obama tonight sought not only to make it clear that Libya is not Iraq, but also that he is not President George W. Bush or even President Bill Clinton. Tonight President Obama's goal was simple, to explain to a public skeptical about the war he's launched in Libya. What we've done, what we plan to do, and why this matters to us.

It has been 10 days since Mr. Obama ordered U.S. forces into combat in Libya. Nearly 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles launched, more than 1,600 airstrikes. And so the challenge for the president, justify this war, and show Americans that the U.S. role really will be brief and limited. The United States and the world faced a choice. Gaddafi declared he would show no mercy to his own people. He compared them to rats and threatened to go door to door to inflict punishment. It was Muammar Gaddafi, Obama said, who was the main reason for war. He was about to launch a massacre of his own people. It was not in our national interest to let that happen.

I refused to let that happen. And so the attack began. One question has hovered over this mission. How is it in the strategic interests of the United States to go to war in Libya? Robert Gates, Obama's own Secretary of Defense, complicated matters for his boss on ABC's This Week yesterday. Do you think Libya posed an actual or imminent threat to the United States? No, no, it was not. It was not a vital national interest to the United States, but it was an interest. Tonight, President Obama sought to explain. He said that standing by while Gaddafi crushed the rebellion could destabilize neighboring Egypt and Tunisia and cast a shadow over the freedom movement sweeping the Arab world. But in the end, it is really a moral case the president is making for war.

Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as president, I refuse to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action. The action in Libya has turned the tide. Rebel forces have now retaken all the territory they had lost to Gaddafi's troops as allied airstrikes have grounded the dictator's planes and paved the way towards Tripoli. But that may have been the easy part. Today, the rebel advance halted before the city of Sirte, Qaddafi's hometown, where his far better equipped forces have hunkered down. And that leads to another question

for the president. Is helping the rebels get rid of Qaddafi the goal? If we tried to overthrow Qaddafi by force, our coalition would splinter. The dangers faced by our men and women in uniform would be far, our coalition would splinter. The dangers faced by our men and women in uniform would be far greater. So would the costs and our share of the responsibility for what comes next. To be blunt, we went down that road in Iraq. And we aren't doing that again, the president said. That's exactly what Obama did. Obama and Hillary Clinton started that war. Obama said, we're bombing Gaddafi because he's going to destabilize the Middle East.

No, Obama and Hillary Clinton and George Soros and the CIA were destabilized. And the Muslim Brotherhood were destabilizing the Middle East. It started with the Arab Spring in Egypt. And they were spreading it throughout the Arab world to destabilize those countries for what? So that Zionist Israel could conquer the Arab countries and claim greater Israel. That's what it's all about. Obama was working

for the Zionists. So they went after Gaddafi. Gaddafi, look, Gaddafi wasn't a boy scout, but he was running a country that was stable and prosperous. The oil money gave everybody in Libya free medical care, free education, education free college it was a prosperous country now you want to know why they bombed him i'm going to tell you why because this is what i reported back in 2011 when this was going on qaddafi made two demands to to the globalists. First, he said he was going to mint a gold dinar and that there would be a, actually he wanted this all across Africa, Middle East, a gold coin, a gold currency, the dinar. He wanted a gold dinar currency. That was number one.

He didn't want fiat money. Number two, he told the Western thugs, if you want real physical Libyan oil, I don't want your paper dollars. I want real gold. Real oil, real gold. They killed him. It's as simple as that. It really is. And they went in and got his gold.

And they did. These people are thugs. They're thugs. And they kill people. They murder people. They destroy nations. And they're very proud. They're very proud they're able to do this.

And they do it on 2-22-22 at 2-22 p.m. on Tuesday to say, look, we even choose the day, the hour, the month that we're going to announce our strategies. That's the level of arrogance that they have, isn't it? Because there's a connection to their God, Lucifer. And so that was a ritual. What Biden did today, doing it at that hour on this day, that was some type of religious offering to Lucifer. I don't understand it because I'm not a Luciferian. They understand it, but they kill people. They're pedophiles. They're child rapists. They're murderers. They're liars. They're thieves. They're warmongers. And that's their good traits. Okay. So let me give you a little bit of two, a couple more here and then I'm going to wrap it up. So the next one, this And this is Sky News, May 2011. This is NATO hitting Qaddafi's warships.

...craft participated in what they are describing as a major NATO strike against Colonel Qaddafi's navy as part of their operation. These pictures coming from Al Khums, a naval base there, and the concentration of warships, as you can see being targeted in outcomes it's quite close to various other places that they have targeted in the past this the latest from the Ministry of Defence So they're very proud of how accurate they are in their targets. Right? Remember they, and then they bring out the video and said, look how accurate we are.

We can, we can dead center right in that boat. We never miss our target. Never, never, never miss. In fact, NATO put out a big propaganda video. NATO itself put out a propaganda video saying our NATO airstrikes are on target, Rick. They're on target.

So this is from NATO itself showing how proud we are that we can knock the tar out of Libya on target. This used to be one of many large weapons dumps set up under the old regime. Placed in a Tripoli suburb called Ain Zahra, it was targeted by a NATO airstrike. NATO dropped leaflets like this one, as a warning informing Qadhafi forces to put down

their weapons, stop fighting and leave the area. Civilians generally understood these as an indication that the area was going to be targeted, especially with a military compound in the area. Civilians generally understood these as an indication that the area was going to be targeted, especially with a military compound in the area. We were expecting NATO to strike this location, but Qadhafi's forces came and collected the warning leaflets, so we didn't know the exact night of the strike. Nadia explains that when the strike finally did come, it wasn't't heavy-handed which brought appreciation for the way it was carried out. The first strike gave a warning to the residents so automatically they left their houses. As a result there were no accidents. NATO has always stressed its

precision but accidents happen. It said that a weapon malfunctioned, causing a strike to miss its intended target in Tripoli. This man refers to a separate strike in another area of Tripoli. A house was bombed, believed to be a hideout for Qadhafi's operatives. NATO admitted the wrong things they did, such as what happened in Al-Ghararat area, Al-Gharari house. God forgive them their faults. After that, nothing else went wrong. The bombing here resulted in large secondary explosions, throwing shrapnel out into surrounding

shops. But the locals don't feel the blame lies with the alliance. I blame the government. I don't feel the blame lies with the alliance. I blame the government. I don't blame NATO. NATO was striking military targets, so our government should have informed us that this location was a target. The North Atlantic Council recently extended the mission to protect civilians in Libya, although keeping it under constant review.

In the meantime, the National Transitional Council moves closer to finishing the final chapter of the Gaddafi regime. This is NATO Channel reporting from Tripoli. Now, Doc, did those Libyans really say those things, or were they just voiceovers? How would you know? Get a video of a Libyan talking, and then put an English voiceover saying, we're glad they bombed us. I mean, that's what they were saying, right?

Yes. And we really don't blame NATO. But, you know, things happen. And some things went wrong. Right. This is the biggest piece of propaganda I've seen in a while. All right. And so the next one, let's see.

Well, a couple months later. So NATO follows its pattern again. They'll come out a few months later and they'll admit well maybe we might have hit some children you know some babies and incubators or something like that accidentally. But their parents voted for Qaddafi. But we used it with laser precision blowing them up that's what we did American technology let's watch this next video we'll check in with what's happening in Libya

right now because a mistake in Libya NATO mistake is giving a big PR boost this morning to Muammar Gaddafi's regime this morning NATO admits that an air raid on Libya's capital Tripoli killed civilians on Sunday. CBS News correspondent Alan Pizzi is in Tripoli with more. The strike is the first clear evidence that NATO has actually hit civilian targets and

presented the Libyans with a chance to put their case in a way that exceeded their wildest propaganda efforts. The power of the explosion blew a double-story dwelling to a heap of concrete, chunks of rubble and twisted reinforcing bars. NATO said its planes were targeting what a statement called a missile site operated by pro-Qadhafi forces. It appears that one weapon did not strike the intended target due to a weapons systems failure.

A frantic rescue operation pulled out no survivors. Libyan officials said nine people died in the blast and 18 were injured. The site was in the middle of the Souk El Juma area of Tripoli, a suburb known for its anti-regime sentiments. Several people quietly told journalists who were rushed to the scene various versions of how military sites were nearby, but government officials stressed the civilian side. There is no military compound, no command center.

Why should they bomb a place like this? That's a question that will likely add even more strains to the alliance, which is already under pressure because the campaign to oust Colonel Muammar Gaddafi is taking more time and costing more in resources than anyone predicted. The attack is a major propaganda boost for the Gaddafi regime, which has consistently maintained that civilians are being killed while presenting little credible evidence. We hold Prime Minister Cameron, Prime Minister Qozi and President Obama, Prime Minister Berlusconi legally and morally responsible. The minister also called for a jihad against NATO and what he called Western aggressors.

But spokesmen were later at pains to stress that jihad in this case did not in any way imply terrorism. And yet Obama still went on to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Yes. And yet he killed tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands. Well, in Libya, I mean, in Syria, Obama and Hillary Clinton are responsible for hundreds of thousands of Syrian civilians,

including children who've died ever since that war started. And American troops are in Syria today. Today, we have military bases in Syria. Yes. In a country that does not want us, did not invite us, doesn't know how to get rid of the American military. Imagine in your country,

a foreign military base with soldiers and tanks and jets, and you can't get rid of them because they're too big. That's what's going on in Syria today. I'm going to end with number 38. This is from Voice of America. This is fairly recent. It's July 2021. An exclusive look inside the U.S US military base in Syria. This US base is one of several US military installations in northeast Syria, part of US efforts to combat the Islamic State terror group. VOA gained rare access to this facility, where American soldiers are still working to ensure that IS militants do not pose a renewed threat in the region more than two years after the

US forces helped defeat the so-called IS caliphate in eastern Syria. The base is guarded by Kurdish fighters affiliated with a local military force known as the Syrian Democratic Forces, which has been a major US partner in the Syrian Democratic Forces, SDF, which has been a major U.S. partner in the fight against ISIS, also known as Daesh. We support the SDF and their security operations to counter Daesh, to counter ISIS, and this really hasn't been a change to our mission to this point. The fight continues against Daesh. We continuously look at degrading their capabilities, both from command and control and the ability for them to take and or hold any land. To that end, U.S. troops conduct regular patrol missions in the area in coordination with

local SDF fighters. The patrols have a tactical advantage of knowing what is going on within your area. Obviously, if we stay behind these walls, we won't truly understand the severity of what's going on. But also, it is an enjoyable experience because we get to see how welcoming the locals are to us. And they're able to grief their concerns to us of anything that they want us to be aware of that we could potentially help with. U.S. officials say there are about 900 American troops currently deployed in Syria. One final thing, Doc. The U.S. troops are not in Syria to fight ISIS because the United States created ISIS.

The United States, Saudi Arabia, and Israel created ISIS, armed ISIS. It's a ragtag army financed by Western powers. They invaded Syria to bring down the Syrian government. It was to destabilize and defeat the Syrian government to get Bashar Assad out of power so that the Zionists could take over Syria. So the United States is there for one reason, because Putin sent Russian troops to Syria to protect the Syrian Christians. The United States of America and Israel were killing Syrian Christians. Blowing up Christian churches in Syria. And it got so bad that Putin sent Russian soldiers and jet planes to Syria to stop the United States of America from killing the Christians.

At the invitation of? At the invitation of the Syrian government. Right. And so they're furious with Putin. He blocked them in Syria. He blocked them because the Western powers were carrying out a massacre of Syrian Christians. Why? Because Zionism wants Christianity eradicated from the Middle East. Let's be honest and real about this, folks.

Zionism controls the United States of America. Zionism controls the Pentagon, the armed forces of the United States. Zionism is using the American military power to kill Christians. Who did they kill in Yugoslavia, in Serbia? They killed the Christians. This is really easy to figure out what's going on. It's a war against Christ's church. And God has raised up Vladimir Putin to oppose this anti-Christ spirit. That doesn't mean Putin's a perfect man. That doesn't mean it. It says God is using him right now to stop these anti-Christ killers who are waging war for decades against Christian populations. WAR FOR DECADES AGAINST CHRISTIAN POPULATIONS. PLEASE DON'T SUPPORT THIS NATO WAR. NO. DON'T SUPPORT IT. YOU'RE ON THE WRONG

SIDE BECAUSE YOU'RE, I'M TELLING YOU, YOU'RE ON THE SIDE OF SATAN WHEN YOU DO THIS. THEY USE NUMEROLOGY TODAY. IT'S SO OBVIOUS WHAT'S GOING ON HERE. ONE MORE STORY AND I THINK THIS WILL SHOW YOU NUMBER 39. THAT'S HEAVEN'S HARVEST BY THE WAY. It's so obvious what's going on here. Oh, well, one more story, and I think this will show you. Number 39. That's Heaven's Harvest, by the way. Okay. No, 39. Yeah, we've got two 39s.

Syria backs Russian recognition of East Ukraine breakaway regions. Is it any wonder that Bashar Assad yesterday said, we're going to recognize the Ukrainian provinces as free and independent states. He did that to spite the United States. He wanted to say, you're in my country. You're trying to destroy my country. I'm going to back Russia in this because Russia is backing him. Yes.

All right. That's my history lesson for today over time. But I think you've got to, if you're my age or somewhat in this time frame, you'll now remember, oh yeah, that's right, I forgot about bombing Yugoslavia, I forgot about bombing Libya. Dr. But they do the same thing over and over and over again. LIBYA. BUT THEY DO THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. BUT IF YOU'RE YOUNGER I WANT YOU TO SEE IT'S THE SAME TACTICS, THE SAME LIES, THE SAME PROPAGANDA. DON'T FALL FOR IT. THIS REGIME, AND I'M TALKING ABOUT THIS WESTERN REGIME, IT

IS CONTROLLED BY EVIL PEOPLE. THEY'RE EVIL AND WICKED AND RIGHTEOUS PEOPLE IN THESE NATIONS, THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, GREAT in these nations, the United States, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, righteous people in these countries need to stop it. We have to oppose this war machine that's just bringing death and destruction to so many countries. Doc, only God knows how many people have died because of this stuff.

Right. I mean, if it's not your baby, you don't really care, do you? If it wasn't your baby that had its arms and legs blown off, you don't really care, do you? See, this is the way Western people think. When my baby... But one day that baby's going to come home, isn't it?

Yeah, that's right. Because it's going to be your baby that gets blown up by bombs in your country because other countries are fed up to here with it. And one day they just say, just stop them. We've got to shut them down. In America, you're so proud and cocky and arrogant. Your leaders are in defiance of Almighty God. God's going to cut you down.

He's going to cut this country down because of their arrogance against God. This is why I've been crying out for 24 years for repentance before the Lord because of our gross sins as a nation. I'm going to wrap it up. Thank you. That's all for today. I'll be back here tomorrow.

The preceding program was made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com.