TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Judgment at America’s Door as NATO and Russia Gallop Toward Nuclear War

Episode Date: March 22, 2022

Today on TruNews, Western news outlets are reporting that Russian troops in Ukraine are pulling back and retreating toward the Russian border. These reports could be accurate or Western propaganda. Another report published in London claims Vladimir Putin has hidden his family in preparation for nuclear war.  Also, Rick Wiles goes into detail in the word deception taking place in the Body of Christ regarding the Rapture, as he shares more from the second edition of his book, ‘Final Day’.  Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart.  Airdate 3/22/22 

The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com. This is True News, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help us God. I'm Rick Wiles. Western news outlets are reporting today that Russian troops in Ukraine are pulling back and possibly retreating toward the Russian border. These reports could be accurate or Western propaganda. We don't know. Another report published in London claims Vladimir Putin recently has hidden his family in preparation for nuclear war. Doc Burkhardt and I have much to share with you today.

Quite a sobering opening today, Doc. I HAVE MUCH TO SHARE WITH YOU TODAY. AMEN. QUITE A SOBERING OPENING TODAY, DOC. YES, IT IS. AND STARTING OUT, THIS IS FROM THE EXPRESS IN LONDON. IT SAYS, DEPRESSED PUTIN HAS TOLD CLOSE ALLIES TO PREPARE FOR NUCLEAR DRILLS AFTER HYDE'S FAMILY. ALL THESE DIFFERENT STORIES OVER THE PAST WEEK. HE'S DEPRESSED. HE'S SUICIDAL.

HE'S VERY SICK. HE'S DYING OF CANCER. YOU KNOW, ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS HAVE COME OUT. different stories over the past week. He's depressed. He's suicidal. He's very sick. He's dying of cancer. You know, all these different things have come out. I don't believe any of that, but I do believe that he is preparing for nuclear drills. I believe that portion of it. And that he is hitting his family. Right. And so, and for good reason. So on Saturday, Russia launched its unstoppable nuclear-capable Kinzhal hypersonic missile, destroying a military storage facility in Ukraine. In a recent post, the Telegram channel general SVR said senior political figures were warned

on behalf of the president perhaps in their near future they'll participate in practicing evacuation in case of a nuclear war. And it goes on to say all who were contacted with this warning were seriously surprised and concerned about this initiative by the president, but all, without exception, confirmed their readiness to participate. The channel also said the general mental state of Vladimir Putin has recently caused alarm among people in the president's inner circle. Once again, you have to discern the white, gray, and black propaganda along that. But other stories that we're seeing today, though, would somewhat confirm that Russia is preparing for some type of nuclear activity,

either in response to what they're hearing, and we'll talk about some of the activities that NATO is involved with, too, moving missiles around and everything. The other big story that's in Western newspapers and television networks today is that Russian troops are retreating. Again, we don't know if this is true. Could be accurate, could be accurate could be propaganda what I'm concerned about is the possibility that if the stories are true the possibility that they're not retreating because they're losing they're retreating because the Kremlin is about to drop something big on Ukraine and they're moving their troops out of out of the zone that's what worries

me is that this war may be so intense at this point that would they use a nuke would they use small tactical nukes I don't know um it's it's troubling because we're now seeing U.S. senators like Florida's Marco Rubio openly talking about what would be the response of NATO if Russia uses nuclear warheads in Ukraine. And so this is by NBC News. Senators maul the unthinkable, Putin detonating a nuclear bomb. Where did this story come from? This is today, Doc. This is NBC News today. Where did this story come from? Well, this is in response to a new report that's just been published. Senators reacted with alarm to a new report that suggested Russian President Vladimir Putin could deploy a small,

targeted nuclear bomb as his troops get bogged down in a costly, drawn-out battle against defiant Ukrainian fighters. One key senator, Marco Rubio, from here in Florida, said he believes such an attack could force NATO allies, including the U.S., to invoke their collective defense under Article 5 of the alliance's charter and retaliate against Russia, especially if nuclear fallout drifts over the Ukrainian border and kills or sickens civilians living in Poland or other NATO countries. Now, we have more on this, but let's kind of explain what's going on here. Without actually having Russia attack a NATO country, what Senator Marco Rubio is suggesting is if Russia were to deploy, let's say, a tactical nuke and a target in Ukraine, and NATO could make

the case that fallout went across into Poland, let's say, would that activate Article 5? That's the question. And he's saying yes. Right. So as you detonate a nuclear weapon inside of Ukraine, depending on what it is they detonate, even in a demonstration, that would spread radioactive material that would cross borders potentially, said Rubio, who serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee and frequently tweets his analysis of the Russian invasion.

If radioactivity blows across the Polish border, they would argue they've been attacked. He's not the only senator today who is talking about invoking Article 5 of the NATO Charter. Right. Senator Tammy Duckworth spoke up. She's on the Democrat side. A decorated Iraq war veteran who serves on the Armed Services Committee agreed with Rubio. If any of that fall out DEMOCRATS SIDE, DECORATED IRAQ WAR VETERAN WHO SERVES ON THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE AGREED WITH RUBIO. IF ANY OF THAT FALL OUT FROM THAT DRESS OVER, I MEAN, THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE AN ATTACK ON NATO ALLIES. I THINK IT WOULD TAKE. DOC, ISN'T THIS BECOMING A TALKING POINT TODAY? YES, IT IS.

BOTH SIDES, REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT, THEY'RE SAYING THE SAME THING. DID THE MEMO GO OUT TODAY? PROBABLY. AND SO I AL get worried when Republicans and Democrats agree on anything. It's usually an attack on us. And so she went on to say, I think it would take us into a place we have not been since Nagasaki, where an actual nuclear device was intentionally detonated as part of a military campaign, even if it wasn't directed at specific targets. Senator Armed Services Chairman Jack Reed told NBC News, so that's crossing a huge red line. I think the whole world would be not just

shocked, but convinced of the irresponsibility of Putin. So you've got to know that Vladimir Putin is taking this calculus into consideration himself, that if he did deploy a tactical nuke, there is that possibility of drawing NATO into the, for the conflict, which to me seems like he wouldn't do that because he doesn't want to engage NATO into a full, full-fledged contact. But NATO certainly does. NATO wants Russia involved. NATO WANTS RUSSIA INVOLVED. AND SO I DON'T TRUST THE INFORMATION, BUT I HAVE TO, YOU

KNOW, GO WITH WHAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS KIND OF DISHING OUT HERE TODAY IN WHAT WE'RE SEEING. NOW, WE HAVEN'T SEEN RUSSIA MOVING NUKES INTO UKRAINE, BUT WE HAVE SEEN NATO COUNTRIES MOVING NUKES AROUND, HAVEN'T WE? THAT'S RIGHT.

AND SO A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION CALLED NUKE WATCH SPOTTED A NATO countries moving nukes around, haven't we? That's right. And so a nonprofit organization called Nuke Watch spotted a convoy of nuclear warheads being transported on a highway in Great Britain. Right. And this is from Zeni Safak, and it says a British nuclear armed convoy was seen heading to an arms depot in Scotland amid rising tensions between NATO and Russia as Moscow forges on with its invasion of Ukraine. The military convoy, which is said to be carrying up to six nuclear warheads, was spotted on the motorway only a half mile from Glasgow city center as it headed to the Royal Naval

Armaments Depot on Loch Long, reported Nuke Watch. And this is that tweet from nuke watch that they posted here with the photograph. And this photograph was taken back on the 18th. And so the United Kingdom is moving their armaments around, their nuclear armaments around. And so that's just days ago. Right. And so we actually see a NATO country, they're moving nukes. If you're in Russia and you're seeing this, you've got to be thinking they're moving nuclear weapons around. So what's their response going to be? They're going to have to get their nuclear weapons prepared and prepare for drills. But I think they're preparing for more than drills, Rick. It could be that something is about ready to go down here over the next few days.

I'm very much concerned about it. These are troubling times that we're in, and so many people in the general public have no awareness whatsoever that we're this close to nuclear war. I pray, obviously, it doesn't happen. I dread, just absolutely dread the thought of nuclear war. More than anything, Doc, I think I dread surviving a nuclear war. You know, just imagine what life is going to be like. People are not realistic about it. They're just in denial. Right. Once it happens, the survivors will say, what did we do?

Why did we allow these politicians to drive the world to madness? Why didn't we stop them? I think today I notice kind of a a change in tone especially on different social media platforms where they're just talking about nuclear weapons just in general conversation now. Like the water pistols. Right. You know one news outlet says you know Russia won't use nuclear weapons unless it's really threatened. Another news outlet

the next moment will say Anthony Blinken is going to be talking with other NATO reps this week about the use of nuclear weapons. And, of course, President Biden, he's heading to Europe later this week as well. And you've got to know that that's going to come up in conversation as well, too. It just there was a time where you've talked about nuclear weapons and nuclear force kind of in a hushed tone. Doc, we've talked about it for many years, the mysterious deagle.com website, which nobody knows who owns it, who built it, who maintains it. Who still, they don't have the numbers up on the page anymore. Oh, they took them down but it was there over 10 12 years ago and it showed a two-thirds reduction of the american

population by the year 2025 right a sudden depopulation it wasn't gradual it was sudden and again we don't know who produced that website, who maintained it, but I've often wondered is there somebody in the world trying to send a message to everyone, somebody that's an insider, somebody saying, I know something that's going to happen at a particular year. I don't know, But I do know this. Politicians are talking about nuclear war like they're talking about a snowball fight. Right. And that should concern everyone. It's madness. And I don't care your politics, your sexuality, or anything else, we're all going to suffer if a nuclear war breaks out.

And everybody on every side of the political debate, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter where you stand on a lot of issues. We should be united in demanding that there be no even discussion of nuclear war. It ought to be forbidden to even say it. You know, a politician talks about it. We ought to say, shut your mouth. We're not allowing this. I mean, we, the world really needs to deescalate. They do. These weapons need to be destroyed. But mankind is mad and completely out of his mind.

In the revelation of Jesus Christ, the Bible says that Jesus Christ returns to destroy those who destroy the earth. And I believe nuclear weapons and biological and chemical weapons and scalar weapons, all these modern weapons. I believe this is what it's referring to, that the destruction is going to be so great that the Bible says that if God doesn't shorten the days, no flesh would survive. And no flesh means animals and humans. No flesh would survive if God the Father does not shorten the days. That doesn't mean a day goes from 24 hours to 16 hours. I don't know what it means. It means the days of mankind, the age of mankind will be shortened, be reduced, because men are out of control and bringing great destruction upon the world with the weapons that men have made.

Now, we've talked about this very real threat of nuclear war. What is America's spiritual condition right now, today? Well, I think this next news headline says it all. This is from the Daily Mail in London. A woke Walt Disney staff staged a walkout over the company's slow response to Florida's bill, despite Disney CEO Bob Chapek vowing to produce more homosexual media content for children. Right. So all this now, of course, the bill that passed here a couple weeks ago here in Florida.

And it's not don't say gay. Okay. You know what the bill says? It doesn't say gay in it, that's for sure. What it says, Doc, is that public schools in the state of Florida cannot teach homosexual sexuality to children under a certain age. Right. Like in elementary school. That's what it says. It doesn't say teachers can't say gay.

Right. That's a lie. It's propaganda. It says you can't use the schools to promote your radical sexual agenda. But let's not even pay attention to the bill. That's right. What's really important here is that the chief executive officer of Disney promised the homosexual employees of Disney, I'll make it up to you

because we will produce more homosexual content for children. Well, wait a minute. More? Are you admitting you've already produced homosexual content for children all they have yes they have I'm in fact for the conference going on right now there's this new summer movie coming on you animated movie called light year mom about Buzz Lightyear and there's a lesbian couple that kisses in there

home I don't know what that has to do with Buzz Lightyear everything but it was Disney decided to pull that scene out, but from pressure from the gay community. No, their employees. They decided to put the scene back in, and it's going to be in the movie this summer. And in a town hall meeting, the Disney CEO explained to concerned parents that we are going to be producing more content to help integrate the LGBTQ agenda, if you will, into our programming. So Disney is a media molester. That's what they are.

And they've given in to a group of people who represent less than 1% of the population, but control now 100% of family entertainment media. So is America ripe for judgment? Rick, we're more than ripe. We're like the black banana sitting on the counter. We're beyond ripe. With flies. We're rotting.

With fruit flies. Right. Yeah. We're beyond it. We are in a state of rotting decay. There's not much left to the bone as a country that when the ceo of a major children's entertainment company says we're going to make more media content to teach children about homosexuality right that's how far we have fallen as a nation. And it doesn't bother people.

It doesn't bother anybody. And we export this stuff. We push it all through the world. Well, I'll tell you something. I know somebody that does bother. That's Almighty God. He is a holy, righteous God. He is not going to allow American corporations and political movements and and activists he's not going to allow them

to forever continue to defile the minds of children he'll put a stop to it because he's warping the these people are warping the children and drawing them into sin, drawing them into a lifestyle where they may never be saved. Their souls never saved. He's not going to allow this to continue in America. You need to be very, very concerned that God may use Vladimir Putin as a whip to whip this country into submission. You have to be concerned about this. Everybody's hating Putin. Well, you better stop and think,

what if he is God's whip? Yes, and very well could be. I mean, we've crossed so many lines. I don't know if there are any lines left, Rick. There aren't. What's left? I mean, even today, they had the Senate hearings going on for the Biden nominee for the Supreme Court. And she was pressed, and we kind of talked a little bit about this yesterday,

about questions regarding some of her decisions that she's made regarding those that have been charged with child pornography. She's pro-pedophile, Doc. Let's just be real. She's pro-pedophile. And she admits that there are pedophiles that got lighter sentences strictly because they used a computer instead of the U.S. mail. And why does that justify? Well, the idea is that the rule, when the current child pornography laws that are in place now were first installed, that was really pre-Internet, right? To me, child porn is child porn, whether it's mail or internet or whatever. But she's made the case that because there's so much available online that when someone downloads child porn,

it takes a lot more work to mail child pornography than it does to download it. And so therefore, the decisions on sentencing for a lot of people have been based on the volume that they have downloaded. Why isn't the judge upset about the volume of child pornography? That would be a great question, but she doesn't really repress that. And the senators don't ask her that either. They don't ask her. Doesn't that kind of concern you that this guy is downloading 10,000 images, but you end up giving him a lighter sentence

than somebody that mailed 10 pieces of pornography, child pornography. But, well, this is it in her words today. She's testifying before the Senate. As you said, the guideline was based originally on a statutory scheme and on directives, specific directives by Congress at a time in which more serious child pornography offenders were identified based on the volume,

based on the number of photographs that they received in the mail. And that made total sense before when we didn't have the internet, when we didn't have distribution. But the way that the guideline is now structured based on that set of circumstances is leading to extreme disparities in the system because it's so easy for people to get volumes of this kind of material now by computers. So it's not doing the work of differentiating who is a more serious offender in the way that it used to. So the commission has taken that into account. And perhaps even more importantly, courts are adjusting their sentences in order to account for the changed circumstances.

But it says nothing about the court's view of the seriousness of this offense. She's got a warped mind and she has no business being on any court. And this isn't a single incident. She's had a pattern of this over a number of years, and so extending to for about a decade. But you know what? In her testimony and everything, the Senate doesn't press her on these things. You know what? The Republicans are afraid that they're going to be labeled racist if they push too hard on the Jackson nomination. She's going to get the nomination.

We know that. No, I wouldn't say that. I really think she is. I wouldn't say that. I wouldn't. I don't think so, Doc. What would deep-six this nomination? She has to get every single Democrat senator to vote for her.

That includes Manchin of West Virginia. She has to get all 50 Democrats, okay? Now, if a Romney, you could get a Romney or somebody, but you know, Romney's from Utah. He's pushed the envelope pretty far. That man's not gonna get reelected in Utah. He's a one envelope pretty far. That man's not going to get reelected in Utah. He's a one-term senator, and he knows it. I don't think it's that simple.

Lindsey Graham walked out of the hearing today because she was defending her defense of terrorists. And he got them walked out. I don't think she has this. Here's an interesting trivia of her. I don't know what to, you know, it's just odd. It's just odd. I'm not saying anything.

It's just odd, okay? Do you remember the Comet pizza gate sure okay and then after the 2016 election some some young guy went into comet pizza and he shot somebody which was terribly wrong should not have happened she was the judge who handled the Comet Pizza shooting case. It just seems odd that a pro-pedophile judge handled the Comet Pizza case. It's just odd. Well, and another piece of trivia about her, too, she was one of the defending attorneys for the Taliban that were down in Guantanamo. Right.

That's why Lindsey Graham walked out. She was defending terrorists. And in part of her defense, she called Rumsfeld and Bush war criminals. And so not that I don't disagree with her on that. And so it's interesting to see how this is playing out. I'm really convinced that she'll be approved, but we'll see. Well, again, it means every Democrat, including Senator Manchin of West Virginia, voting for her. And it would mean at least one Republican voting for her.

Well, are there any Republicans with backbones anymore? This is an election year. Well, that's true. Yeah, 2022. You know, look, Joe Biden could have nominated other black women judges for this position who would have easily won, but he chose the most radical person on his list. PAUL JAY, JR.: One who's only served on the appellate court for just about a year.

DAVID BROOKS, JR.: Yes. PAUL JAY, JR.: So she really doesn't have that trickle of a system. DAVID BROOKS, JR.: The experience to be on the Supreme Court. PAUL JAY, JR.: Well, let's see what happens here in service. DAVID BROOKS, JR.: But the point where we're going with this is, as America be on the Supreme Court. Well, let's see what happens here. The point where we're going with this is as America is on the verge of nuclear war with Russia, Disney's CEO is promising homosexuals that the company will make more homosexual content for little children to warp their minds. And Joe Biden, who appears to have a problem keeping his hands off little children and not taking showers with his kids

when they were small, he definitely has some questionable habits. He nominated for the Supreme Court the judge who handled the Comet pizza shooting, who is pro-pedophile, who is very soft on putting pedophiles in prison, who is pro-terrorist. I mean, this is the state of America right now. And then who does CNN trot out to defend this radical judge? Their most morally upright news commentator.

Jeffrey Toobin himself. I couldn't believe it when I saw it today, saw this clip. So they're doing commentary on the whole discussion on the rulings that Ms. Jackson's made in the past regarding child pornography and who do they bring out front and center. But the expert on pornography and naked Zoom calls himself, Jeffrey Toobin, watch this. Kate, can I just add one point

about these kiddie porn cases? And this came up, I remember, when I was an assistant U.S US attorney back in the 90s is that when those when those sentencing guidelines were written for those cases this was a time when the people who committed these crimes would order individual photos and and and get and then get them usually through email, and then they would be sentenced based on the number of photos they possessed. This was all pre-Internet.

So once the Internet came in and people got access to hundreds and then thousands of photos, the sentencing guidelines would reflect hundreds and then thousands of photos, the sentencing guidelines would reflect hundreds and then thousands of photos. Federal judges have been struggling with the issue of how do you create a fair system that was designed pre-Internet, yet you have to sentence people post-Internet. And what I thought Chairman Durbin pointed out is that judges across the country, including Republican-appointed judges, have been saying, I thought Chairman Durbin pointed out, is that judges across the country, including Republican-appointed judges, have been saying, look, we can't apply the rules that were designed pre-Internet for an Internet society.

And many judges have been giving somewhat less sentences as a result. And I thought that was a very clear explanation of why Judge Jackson imposed sentences that were all prison sentences. It wasn't like she was letting these people go, but they were somewhat less than the guidelines because the guidelines had not been adapted for the Internet era. Dr. How mentally sick, twisted and perverted does a person have to be to go on national television and defend child pornographers? Right. And for CNN to bring someone out that had been dismissed, I thought he was permanently dismissed, but no, they brought him back. For basically... for basically.

Not basically. He did. He did. And you've got to be thinking, those four female correspondents there, they're sitting there, you've got to be wondering, is he wearing pants or not? You just don't know. You don't know. Because you didn't know the first time. But they're sitting, they are willingly sitting there participating in the defense of light prison sentence for child

pornography. So what difference would it make? It doesn't make any difference at CNN. So. Former Attorney General Bill Barr, this is an interesting story, Said Joe Biden lied to the American people about his son, Hunter Biden's laptop. Bill Barr said, I was very disturbed. Well, he didn't do anything about it. Right. What did you do, Mr. Barr?

We have a video clip from this interview on Fox News. Let's watch it. I want to ask you about Hunter Biden because you write about this in some level of detail in the book. Joe Biden, when he was a candidate, Jen Psaki, both dismissed this

as it's just Russian disinformation. Now, none other than the New York Times has confirmed, yes, indeed, there was a laptop that was dropped off at a shop in Delaware. And yes, indeed, it had emails on it that are now being investigated by the Department of Justice. You say that you yelled at President Trump when he asked you about it. You said, Mr. President, I can't talk about that. I am not going to. Trump protested, you know, if that was one of my kids.

And you said, damn it, Mr. President, I'm not going to talk to you about Hunter Biden, period. You are no longer in office. So let's get you to talk about it. Where do you think this is headed? Well, you know, I'm limited in what I can say because I don't want to discuss any possible ongoing investigations. resisting the idea of injecting a criminal investigation of one of the candidate's children into the race when there hasn't been any definitive judgment over at the Department of Justice. So I made it clear I wasn't going to discuss criminal cases with him, especially ones that he might have an interest in. So I would still do that today. But I was very disturbed during the debate when candidate Biden lied to the American people about the laptop.

He squarely confronted with the laptop, and he suggested that it was Russian disinformation and pointed to the letter written by some intelligence people that was baseless, which he knew was a lie. And I was shocked by that. And fortunately, the DNI came out and said, no, it's not disinformation. The FBI said the same thing. Media ignored it. So when you're talking about interference in an election, I can't think of anything more than that. Knowing what you know of the case, do you think that there is any legal liability for the president here? Perhaps not while he's in office. I wouldn't want to venture an opinion on that. Let me ask it a different way, Bill. So obviously there is the media coverage of this, which obviously is being highlighted, was all over the place and atrocious. And now there's the New York Post, for example, the headline right now is the White House ignores its Hunter problem.

Suddenly, Jen Psaki can't comment on something that she commented on many, many times before. So does the White House have a problem here? Well, I think now that, you know, from a political standpoint, now that this is in people's consciousness, it had been suppressed up till now. Obviously, they they have a hot potato and just to see how they handle it will be interesting so he knew that joe biden was lying yes the attorney general of the united states knew that joe biden was lying but allowed the lie of Russian disinformation to go on. Yes. Doc, I understand why he said that when President Trump was trying to get him to talk privately about the investigation, that he's — I understand him saying, I can't talk about it. Right.

I get that, all right, that he's taking an ethical position as the Attorney General I can't discuss something that could be used in politics however right when he heard Joe Biden with his own ears and a presidential debate lie I believe he had an ethical obligation to release a statement simply saying Joe Biden's statement last night in the debate was not truthful. The laptop is not Russian disinformation. The FBI has a physical copy in possession of the laptop. It is not Russian disinformation. That's all he had to say. Right. has a physical copy in possession of the laptop, it is not Russian disinformation.

That's all he had to say. Right. But even at that point in the debate cycle and everything, the laptop was being touted as a Russian hoax. Yes. And everything else. And so he allowed it.

He allowed it to continue. He allowed that lie to continue so that, I mean, you have to ask, why? Why did he not speak up? I understand ethically he didn't want the attorney general's office to be interjected into a political debate and campaign. But simply making a statement saying Joe Biden lied in answer to that question. The FBI does have the laptop.

There is an investigation. That's all I can say. If he'd said that, Donald Trump would be in the White House. Yes. Donald Trump would be in the White House right now. No doubt in my mind, because the entire cover-up of Hunter Biden would have collapsed in those last two weeks. Instead, we had the cover-up then,

and then for two years, there was just a moratorium of even talking about it. You get deplatformed for talking about it. But then when the New York Times comes out and starts talking about suddenly it's the truth well you know i said the other day doc i didn't think hunter biden would be indicted and it's just because i've become so jaded with how corrupt our system is but i have been thinking about it in recent days. And I'm now thinking, he may be indicted soon,

and this is why the New York Times suddenly said, the laptop is real. Bill Barr says, I was angry. I was shocked. I was shocked. Disturbed. Yes.

They're all changing their tune because the word is out on the street. The grand jury is going to indict Hunter Biden. So the cover up is over. All right. The New York Times had to look at our fearless investigation. I mean, the New York Times coming out two years later saying, we have this fearless investigation of the laptop and we have authenticated that it's real. Big deal. And the irony would be they'll probably win the Pulitzer for this. Yes. And they won the Pulitzer for the story back at the beginning when it was a lie.

Did they get a Pulitzer? Yes, they did. Did they really? Oh my. I get two Pulitzers for the same, telling the same lie twice. But maybe this is why they're all changing their tune in recent days, because there is an indictment coming and they've got to get some cover for themselves. A few more things before we take a break. President Biden made a remark that we are entering a new world order.

That means a new, new world order. Right. The old new world order has died, and we have witnessed the death of the old new world order. And Joe Biden is saying there's a new new world order coming here's mr biden you know we are an inflection point i believe in the world economy not just the world economy in the world occurs every three or four generations as one of them as the one of the top military people said to me in a secure meeting the other day, 60 million people died between 1900 and 1946. And since then, we've established a liberal world order, and that hadn't happened in a long while.

A lot of people died, but nowhere near the chaos. And now is a time when things are shifting. There's going to be a new world order out there. And we've got to lead it. We've got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it. Well, there is a new world order coming, but I'm guaranteed Joe Biden's not leading it. Someone else is leading it from behind. Hey, before we take a break, I do want to show one more thing. We mentioned yesterday about a conference of

Syrian Christians that was convened in Damascus last week by Syrian President Bashar Assad. And he got together the Christian leaders of his country and made a pledge that his government would continue to support and defend the Christians. We have a video clip from that conference with English subtitles on it. And there's some revealing statements here. Now, this is the headline of the news story. Assad said the Zionist Jew Zelensky supports Nazi collaborators this proves that the West has no real values let's watch the video يوجد لديه عدو واحد هو كل من يقف في وجه مصالحه المادية فيعني لا الشيوعية ولا الإسلام ولا النازية ولا الصين ولا روسيا ولا غيرها هم أعداء للغرب

إذا كانوا يلبوا المصالح فهم أصدقاء إذا كانوا يقفوا ضد المصالح فهم أعداء يعني المبادئ صفر لكن آخر حقيقة وهي من شد الحقائق قبحا وقلة من الناس تعرف عنها هي كذبة أن الغرب ضد النازية وأن الصهيونية ضد النازية القلة تعرف بأن النازيين في أوكرانيا وهي منظمات نازية عملت بشكل وثيق مع هتلر أمنيا وعسكريا وعقائديا عندما انتهت الحرب العالمية الثانية أخرج القادة البعض منهم إلى أوروبا والبعض منهم إلى أمريكا وفي الخمسينيات طلبت CIA الإدارة الأمريكية أن يرفع الحضر عن هذه المجموعات النازية لأنها ضرورة لأمريكا في أوكرانيا التي كان جزء من الاتحاد السوفيتي وما يؤكد هذا الكلام اليوم

هذا الكلام التاريخي أن زيلنسكي هو صهيوني يهودي ولكنه يدعم المنظمات القومية المتطرفة التي قاتلت في الحرب العالمية الثانية عندما دخل هتلر وشارك جزء منها في المذابح ضد

اليهود فكيف يكون هذا الصهيوني اليهودي داعم لهذه المنظمات والغرب يدعم هذه المنظمات التي تسمى اليوم منظمة آزوف اليمينية وإسرائيل الصهيونية التي تشتر ذكرى البكاء على ضحايا المحرقة تدعم زعيما يدعم النازية التي قتلت اليهود do you think president Assad gets it he understands I think he's running the world you would never see and hear that interview on American television news channels. They wouldn't allow him to speak. And yet the president of Syria spoke those words before a delegation of Syrian Christian leaders. He's Muslim. His country is Muslim. And he's pledging to support and defend the Christians IS MUSLIM, AND HE'S PLEDGING TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CHRISTIANS WHO LIVE IN HIS COUNTRY, AND HE VERY CLEARLY DESCRIBED WHO IS RUNNING THE WORLD.

AND HE SAID THE THING THAT GETS A LOT OF PEOPLE POLITICALLY EXECUTED. IF YOU BRING UP THE HISTORICAL FACT THAT ZIONISTS IN THE 1930S AND 40S COOPERATED WITH HITLER AND THE NAZI REGIME. ZIONISTS, NOT ALL JEWS, ZIONISTS, THEY COOPERATED WITH HITLER. READ THE TRANSFER AGREEMENTS. IT'S Okay. It's historical facts. So he's just quoting historical documents and then pointing out that you have this paradox, Ukraine now led by a Zionist Jewish man, Mr. Zelensky,

but his government is Nazi. It's just plain and simple. That's what it is. That's what it is. That's what it is. And it's not neo-Nazi, as Rick explained the other day. This is the original Nazis. Yeah, the real ones. The ones from World War II. Yeah, it's their, you know, their grandkids are now in control of the country.

But they're real Nazis. All right. And that's what the Russians are fighting. They're fighting the Nazis. And America not only is supporting the Nazis, America has become Nazi. That's even worse. We've become Nazi here. Yes. Okay. You and I are living in a Nazi regime. Don't believe me? Well, post something on social media today that the Nazis don't like. Okay?

And some people now are finding out what we found out a couple years ago, haven't they? Yeah. So Nazis are pretty nasty, and they don't allow free speech. If you live in, you know, a state like California or New York or Chicago, Illinois, and there's a vaccine mandate, tell the Nazi, the needle Nazis, tell the needle Nazis you're not going to be vaccinated. Watch what happens. You will discover you're living in a Nazi regime. This is not a free country anymore the nazis control america that's the fact and much of the world is waking up to this reality we're going to take a break when we come back we're going to continue our discussion about the second coming of christ is it a two-part event or is it a one single event?

Don't go away. We'll be back in a minute. Having good, nutritious food ready in case of natural disasters or shipping disruptions is part of the wisdom God gives to us. And Heaven's Harvest is your resource in preparedness. Our food kits have a 25-year shelf life and come in a variety of stackable sizes with handles for convenient storage or transportation. The nutritional value of the food is preserved by freeze-drying and not dehydrating it. Heaven's Harvest offers heirloom vegetable seed kits with the highest quality, non-GMO heirloom seeds simply created by nature. With 39 garden staple varieties, you can grow and produce an astonishing yield of

hearty vegetables and fruits that have tremendous flavor. Heaven's Harvest also has water filtration and storage solutions and gardening and other resources that will offer you and your family peace of mind. Visit Heaven's Harvest online at heavensharvest.com. That's heavensHarvest.com or call 800-516-4773. That's 800-516-4773. All right, we're going to be talking about final day and the second coming of Jesus Christ. The question is, is the second coming of Jesus Christ a two-part event? Does Jesus come twice? Because the prevailing doctrine in American evangelical churches is that Jesus will return to earth twice. The first event, they say, is called the rapture.

The second event is seven years later, the second coming. I don't believe it. I don't teach it. It's not in the Bible. But tens of millions of American Christians have been told it is in the Bible. But most of them never read the Bible to find out for themselves whether it's there. They just listen to a TV preacher or radio preacher,

maybe their local pastor, who says the rapture. And they just assume the rapture is in the Bible. But it's not. So I'm reading the emails that are coming in and the ones that i've read so far some of you are struggling with this you you have a you've got a stronghold yes you got a there's a satanic stronghold in your brain about the rapture all right i don't know how to describe this it's it is a satanic stronghold that that there is a rapture okay and it's because the meaning of words and so a lot of christians believe that when they hear the word rapture they're talking about the second coming but when

you when you dig down deeply into the dispensational pre-millennial pre-tribulation zionist eschatology taught by john nelson darby and cyrus scofield and dwight moody you'll find AND CYRUS SCOFIELD AND DWIGHT MOODY, YOU'LL FIND OUT THE RAPTURE AND THE SECOND COMING IN THEIR MINDS, TWO SEPARATE EVENTS SEPARATED BY SEVEN YEARS. SO I'M TRYING TO HELP YOU, I'M TRYING TO HELP YOU BREAK FREE OF THIS MENTAL STRONGHOLD. SOME OF YOU ARE WRITING SAYING,

RICK, I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE CHURCH IS GOING TO BE CAUGHT UP IN THE AIR. AND I JUST WANT TO PUT MY HEAD OUT OF IT. THAT'S NOT IT AT ALL, IS IT? I'M GOING TO SAY IT AGAIN. OF COURSE WE'RE CAUGHT UP IN THE AIR TO MEET THE LORD. IT'S CALLED THE SECOND COMING. RIGHT. IT'S JUST ONE SINGLE EVENT. AND SO THE IDEA, OF COURSE, IS THAT SOMEHOW THEY'VE PULLED OUT SOME SCRIPTURES THAT WERE MEANT FOR THE SECOND COMING AND SAID IT'S SOMETHING ELSE. THAT'S RIGHT. AND THE CONFUSION WITH PEOPLE IS THAT THEY SEE ALL THE CHRISTIAN SCARY MOVIES AND CHRISTIAN

SCARY BOOKS AND EVERYTHING AND HAVE BEEN GIVEN A LINE OF WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. LEFT BEHIND. RIGHT. AND SO NOW THEY'VE GOTTEN ALL CONFUSED given a line of what's going to happen left behind right and so um and now they've gotten all confused about it that's right okay so it comes down to the meaning of words okay and so what propagandists do what deceivers do is that they change the meaning of words and i'm going to show you that that darby and the rapturous you know the evangelical zionists in america and this started in great britain in the 1830s but they changed the meaning of words so the word rapture is not in a holy bible it's just not. You can look all day long. You will not find the word rapture in the Bible. Now let's, let's look at the original Greek manuscripts. What word, what word appears? Because when in first Thessalonians four, chapter 13, verses 13 to 18, okay, that

Paul said, then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the clouds and so shall we be with the Lord. The word caught up this is this is where the confusion is at the the evangelical Christian Zionists say that's the rapture that's the rapture but the word rapture is not there what word is in the Greek manuscript well Well, it's harpazo. And we'll put it up on the screen.

There is the Greek spelling, the English spelling harpazo. And it means to snatch. This is accurate. That's what's in the Bible. Right. To snatch. That's what it says there. And harpazo is in the Bible many times.

Not just this one scripture. Right. It's not a special word of any kind. So it's not like rapture is in, you know, 13 different verses in the Bible. It's not there. I mean, it's not saying, and they were raptured harpazo means they were snatched they were taken it is now listen to this this is important harpazo is a verb it's an action it's a verb it's an action it's not an event it's not a noun It's not an event. It's not a noun. It's not the snatch.

Right. Because if it was a noun, it would be the snatch. It's a verb, an action. Harpazo means to snatch, to grab, to take away, to move quickly. It is an action word now the evangelical zionists removed this word from the greek manuscript this is really important to get this they removed harpazo from the greek manuscript and they inserted a Roman, a Latin word. That word is rapier. It means to

abduct. This is where they get rapture. Right. The word rapture comes from the word rapier. But rapier in Latin, this is where we get the English word rape. Yes. Or kidnapping. Yes. To abduct, kidnap.

Rape. It's a violent word. It refers, it too is a verb. It's an action. It's not a noun. It's not the rapier. It is to abduct, to kidnap, to rape. The Christian Zionists took the Greek word harpazo,

a verb, an action. They replaced it with a Latin word, which means to rape, to kidnap. And then, listen to this, they converted the Latin verb, an action word, they converted it into a noun. To make it an event.

To make it an event. The rapture. Do you see the, it's a word switcheroo. That's what I call it in Final Day. The great word switcheroo. It's like a magician with peanut shells or walnut shells, walnut shells, you know, and they got the pea under the walnut shell. And he's moving them around, okay?

And you got to keep your eye, where's the pea? Which walnut shell has the pea? That's what they've done with these words. And they have everybody so confused. Oh, the rapture, it's in the Bible. Well, where is it? Well, it's right there, the rapture, it's in the Bible. Well, where is it? Well, it's right there, rapture. But it's not there.

But it's not there. Well, where did you get that word rapture? Well, we got it from a Latin word. Well, the Bible wasn't written in Latin. It was written in Greek. Well, we took one Latin word. We took one Greek word and we pulled it out and we put a Latin word in there.

You can't do that. No. But they did it anyway, and that's where we get the idea of the singular event separate from the second coming called the rapture. Doug, what if you were reading the Constitution of the United States of America, and it's in English, and you're reading the Second Amendment, your right to bear arms. And the word the right has been removed. The English word right, and there's a Russian word there. Would that make you stop and go, where did that come from? And why would you do that?

Why would there be one Russian word in an English document? That's what the evangelical Christian Zionists did. They took the original Greek manuscript, they lifted out one word, and they sneaked in and put in a Latin word that means to rape, to kidnap. And then they went even further and they said it's a noun

it's an event it doesn't mean just to abduct it means the abduction and now we get i'm waiting on the rapture and people say it like it's an event. Yes. Like somewhere in the Bible, it talks about the rapture. Like it's there about, just like the Bible talks about the Passover, the crucifixion, the resurrection, and the rapture. But the rapture's not there. What word is there? Well, it's a Greek word, parousia. And so here is the correct Greek word, parousia coming. In old times, when a king or a royal nobleman came to town,

the village would send a delegation out to the town limits to greet the king. They gave him a royal welcome. Out to the town limits to greet the king. Right. They gave him a royal welcome. He's a VIP, a very important person. The king is coming on his carriage, surrounded by soldiers and they've got trumpets and the king has his crown.

And it's just a royal entry of a king coming to the town. And so the town sends a delegation out beyond the town limits to greet the arrival of the king, his presence, to say, you are welcome. We have been waiting on you. This is what the Bible says about the second coming, the parousia of Christ.

When he comes, his presence is here. It is the arrival of the king of kings, the Lord of lords. How do we get there in the clouds to meet him? It's the harpazo. The snatching. The snatching. It's a verb.

It's an action. The harpazo. The church is snatched, grabbed, pulled up into the air to meet the king in his parousia, his arrival, his presence. But what the Christian Zionists did, Darby and Schofield and Moody, they split this one event. They split it into two events and separated it by seven years and we'll have to go into some time why they separated that into seven years because that's a whole other teaching they had to do it yes they had to do it to prop up another doctrine

but let me ask you this question who authorized Darby and Schofield and Moody and the Dallas Theological Seminary and Liberty Baptist? Who authorized these people to split the parousia? Who authorized them to do it? Who gave them the authority to split the second coming of Christ into two parts, separated by seven years?

Who gave them the authority to do it? Because my Bible says it's one. The parousia, the glorious, majestic arrival of the king and all his glory and power and majesty and the snatching away of the church it's one event it's one awesome glorious event it's not two separate events separated by seven years i'm not waiting on quote the rapture I'm waiting on the harpazo to take me up to be there when the king arrives his parousia that's if you can get this into your head you will be able to understand the the deception of the rapture teaching because they have split the second coming of christ into two parts and they they absolutely have no ecclesiastical authority to

do it it was an act of heresy to do it and they've they've interjected confusion in the minds of many, many Christians. And who's the author of confusion? Satan himself. Look, I go into detail in the first chapter. His second coming shall be singular. And by the time you get on chapter one, you will clearly understand that the rapture doctrine is a lie from hell. It's not a lie from, it's not bad theology from a seminary.

It's a lie from hell. It has deceived people. Get the book. It's $19.95. Excuse me. For $100, I'll do a signature and send it out to you. That's it for me, Doc. All right.

Well, we appreciate you tuning in today, and we want you to be here all this week here on True News. And remember, you can order Rick's book, Final Day, on the True News website. Just go there right now, truenews.com. You can see the banner at the top of the page, and you can order it right now. And the price is $19.95. It's the paperback second edition of Rick's book, Final Day. And an autographed copy of the book is also available for your gift of $100 to the ministry. On behalf of Rick and our entire crew here at True News, God bless you.

We'll see you here tomorrow.