TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Justice Kamala Harris and Vice President Hillary Clinton?

Episode Date: January 26, 2022

US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer will retire this year. CNN and NBC were the first news outlets to report the news that Justice Breyer has informed President Biden of his plans to leave the court. At age 83, Justice Breyer is the oldest member currently serving on the nation’s highest court. Biden promised before the South Carolina primary in 2020 — the moment he seized control of the race, thanks to black voters — and again at one of the last Democratic Party presidential primary debates that his first nominee for the Court would be a black woman. Could it be his VP Kamala Harris? We also provide updates on the deepening feud between NATO and Russia over Ukraine. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 1/26/21

The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com. This is True News, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help us God. I'm Rick Wiles. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer will retire this year. CNN and NBC were the first news outlets to report the news that Justice Breyer has informed President Biden of his plans to retire and leave the court. At age 83, Justice Breyer is the oldest member currently serving on the nation's highest court. Dr. Burkhardt and I have our thoughts about this political development, plus updates on the deepening feud between NATO and Russia over Ukraine.

I don't think anybody's surprised that Justice Breyer is retiring. He's 83 years old. Yes. At some point, he was going to leave the court. And obviously, with the situation that the Democrats are in, they know that they're not going to control the Senate in January. This is their last chance to possibly get a confirmation to replace Breyer. If Justice Breyer would retire next year, Joe Biden's not going to get a far-left justice approved, confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

Yes. And there could be a vacancy on the court for two years. So, you know, he was under pressure. There were people telling him, you need to go. It's time to retire. Do this so President Biden can nominate your successor. Okay, but that's politics. That's nothing new.

These things go on all the time with judges. So I'm not surprised. And whoever Joe Biden nominates, if that man or woman is confirmed, first of all, we know it will be a far left justice. No doubt about that. Mr. Breyer was pro-abortion, pro-homosexual rights, went down the line of every leftist on the leftist agenda, and he checked off the box on all of them. So, Doc, if they replace him with another leftist, nothing changes on the court. Right, and that's the way it's going to go. And so, I mean, that's who he's going to nominate. Joe Biden's not going to nominate someone middle of the road when he has that opportunity. What we aren't going to see is we're not going to see the Republicans put these candidates, these nominees through the meat grinder like the liberals did for Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

Well, maybe it's time for the Republicans to play the game like the Democrats. Oh, you were serious. They never do, though. Do they? They never do. Because they don't have backbones. No, they're not. And they don't know how to play politics.

The Democrats are professional political players, warriors. They're professional warriors in politics. And they stick together. Yes, they do. So this thing, you know, there will be a new justice, possibly. I mean, there is the possibility that Joe Manchin refuses to confirm Joe Biden's nominee. There's that possibility.

And that would hold things up over past the election. Joe Manchin could switch to the Republican Party if they continue to insult him and treat him with disrespect. One of these days, he's just going to change his party registration and call Mitch McConnell and say, you're now the you're now the majority leader of the Senate. They know that which may compel Biden to nominate somebody not too far left because Joe Manchin may not go there. So there is a possibility the far left in the Democratic Party will be furious. Well, another thing to keep in the calculus of all this, Rick, is this election year. We've got the elections here in the fall of this year. So they've got to keep their leftist base happy.

But if they nominate someone too extreme, independent voters are going to say, there's another reason not to vote for any Democrats in November. And once again, I'm trying to encourage our true news audience. If you have ever thought about running for political office, 2022 is the year to do it. If you're ready, psychologically, financially, if you've got your affairs in order and this is a time that you can run, do it. You most likely will win, depending on the state that you're in. I mean, if you're running as a conservative in San Francisco, you're not going to win. But in many other places, you have an opportunity to win. I'd really encourage you to run for school board seats.

Yes. Local offices, county commissioner, county council. If you're in law enforcement, you may want to consider running for sheriff. If you have a somewhat liberal type of sheriff in office, the sheriff is a very powerful office. But this is the year. There's going to be a tidal wave of Republicans elected in November. The country is going downhill. Even the Democrats who voted for Biden have buyer's remorse. They don't want Biden to be in power anymore. They don't want the Democrats to be in power. The

Democrats got their victory and they immediately messed up everything. You can't name one thing in this country that's going right. Not one thing is going right. Yes. And the voters know it and they're going to vote against the Democrats. If you're a Republican, you're going to win. That's what happens in a landslide. In 2022 will be a historic, monumental Republican landslide. These things don't happen often. You'd have to go back to the Reagan years. And then from that, you would have to go back to the 1920s for a historical marker of what I think is going to be coming in November 22 for the Republicans. It will be nationwide. Yes, nationwide. It will be a massive Republican landslide.

And it's not just the House seats and the Senate seats and the governorships. Those are all important. And everybody focuses on that. The Republicans will take control of the House. Nancy Pelosi will retire. She will no longer be the speaker. There will be a new Republican majority leader. I don't think it'll be Mitch McConnell. I think they'll get a new majority leader. And there'll be more Republican governors. But then on the more local level, the state legislatures, in every state that is having an election, you're going to see a big sweep of Republicans winning state legislative seats. And then down in the county council,

county commissioner. Yes. Everything, you know, tax collector, sheriff. You know, here in Florida, we have mosquito control board run for trying to get doctor run for a mosquito control. I want to be the mosquito czar. Yeah. You know, so just get in, get in politics this year. This is the year. I think it will be the biggest Republican victory since the 1920s. That's what I'm expecting. How can how could the Democrats win with Joe Biden leading the party with inflation going over 10% right now. Get ready. The Fed is going to start raising interest rates. Housing will stop. Mortgages will skyrocket. Car loans will skyrocket. It's a mess. You got food shortages. The shelves are empty. The people are furious with the Democrats and the news media, and they're going to take out their revenge on them. And now here's the thing. The Republicans will win big and they won't do anything. As usual.

So they'll have this massive victory and they'll squander it. They won't do anything. The only reason you vote for Republicans is because they're not Democrats. Basically. Right. That. The only reason you vote for Republicans is because they're not Democrats. Basically, right. That's the only reason. And then when Republicans get in power, they get polite all of a sudden. They go, oh, we don't want to offend our friends across the aisle or anything like that. And the Democrats are sitting there sharpening their knives.

Saying, yeah, when we get back right now talking on a congressional level that there will be investigations starting in January. That Ron Rand Paul will be investigating Anthony Fauci. And I've heard a list of investigations that will be opened up. This may be different this time. They may go after some of the Democrat corrupt politicians that have lied and deceived, and maybe they'll go after Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. We'll see. But the Republicans will get a mandate.

They'll get a massive mandate to change the direction of the country. And then that will be taking us into 2024. And if the elections aren't rigged nationwide in 2024, there will be a Republican president in the White House. Unless the Democrats have somebody in their pocket that they can say is a real challenger for 2024. Well, let's take a look at this because Breitbart today floated an idea that Joe Biden could get rid of Kamala Harris from the vice presidency and stick her on the Supreme Court. All right. So now this story is

kind of floating out on a number of different outlets now. So President Biden promised before the South Carolina primary back in 2022, the moment that he really saw control of the race, thanks to black voters. And again, at one of the last Democratic Party presidential primary debates, that his first nominee for the court would be a black woman. So nominating Harris could also help Biden and the Democrats solve the problem posed by Harris's unpopularity. So Biden faces questions about his mental and physical abilities, raising doubts about his ability to run for reelection in 2024 or even to serve out his term. So Harris is even more unpopular than Biden, however, making her an unpalatable replacement for Biden.

By nominating Harris to the court, Democrats could create an open slot in the vice presidency. And while they still have control of Congress, all it would take to confirm a successor to Harris would be a majority vote in both houses. That's according to the 25th Amendment to the Constitution. So, the possibility of nominating Kamala Harris to the Supreme Court. That's a really dastardly evil thought. But it's the kind of thing that politicians and political strategists think of because it does solve two problems.

It gets rid of Kamala Harris, sticks her in the Supreme Court. With dignity. Yeah, they give her a graceful way out. Right. All right. She's the first black woman on the Supreme Court. That's her title now. Yeah, that's right.

That's her title. Historical now. Yes. Then it opens up the vice presidency so that Joe Biden can have a vice president who's not grossly incompetent. And who has some power and some name recognition, maybe. And that could help on a 2024 ticket. No, no. Biden's not running in 2024. Only in his dreams.

Okay. Only in his dreams. They're going to take Joe and tell him to sit in the basement in 2024? He'll think he's president. And he'll think he's running. They'll just say, Joe, remember what it was in 2020? You stay in the basement, and we'll fix fix the votes and you'll be the president. So they're going to take him, put him in the basement of the White House, and he'll stay there the whole year.

And he'll just watch videos that have been, you know, he'll watch fake videos of him campaigning. I mean, he won't even know what's going on. I'm joking, but no, they're not going to let Joe Biden run. The Democratic Party will not nominate Joe Biden for a second term in 2024. But if they have a strong vice president, he or she would be a shoe in to get the nomination. And would be an incumbent going into 2024. As a vice president. Right.

But then there's also the possibility that Joe could become so feeble between 2023 and 2024 that he retires and leaves the White house and the new vice president becomes the president now we're really talking an interesting scenario yes so who who could possibly do something this sneaky who could it be well who's the sneakiest person in politics in America? Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton. There she is. And the Hill's asking the question, Hillary 2024, given the competition, she may be the Democrats best hope. And they were speculating on this back a month ago in December. And so so the idea is out there. And when they first put it up, I was like, Hillary in 2024? I'm not sure if America is ready for it yet.

But things are so bad for the Biden administration at this point. Is it possible that they could actually nominate Hillary Clinton as vice president? Name one other Democrat who could possibly win in 2024. The only other person I would say would be Michelle Obama. And that's a possibility too, but... But then she could be vice president under President Hillary Clinton.

What if you had a Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama ticket in 2024? I mean, you may as well just stay at home and not vote. So that would be a fixed election all the way through. And so. But it would be it would be an extremely powerful ticket for the Democrats. Well, we're not the only ones that are actually suggesting this. Life News today. This is a tweet that they put out here about the same time we started making these dots connect. The ultimate disaster scenario for our country, they dump Kamala on SCOTUS, make Hillary VP, Biden

resigns, and Hillary becomes president. Yikes. And just when you thought nothing could get worse. But right now you have, I mean, I don't like dumping on Joe Biden because of his mental condition. All right. We're all going to get elder. How about his bad policies? Can we dump on him for that? Yes. But the main reason people want to get Joe Biden out is because they know he's not fit to be president right now.

Even his supporters know it. So they want to replace him with somebody who is still in control of his or her mental faculties and is not going to say embarrassing things, is not going to have diaper moments at summit meetings. And there's a lot going on with Joe Biden. Did you see him sneak out of the White House yesterday? No. summit meetings. And there's a lot going on with Joe Biden. Did you see him sneak out of the White House yesterday? No. He left the White House. Jen Psaki said he was in meetings at that time where he actually walked across the street to the Marine barracks, said hello to some Marines, and then walked down the street to an ice cream shop. By himself or with Secret Service?

Bought an ice cream cone at the ice cream shop. By himself or with Secret Service? Secret Service. Bought an ice cream cone at the ice cream shop and walked back to the White House. This is about an hour interchange here. So there was an hour where the president was out of the White House yesterday to buy an ice cream. So we're on the verge of World War III, but he wanted an ice cream cone.

And he was out and about doing that. It's things like that that really stand out. That's why they want to put Joe away. They need a strong vice president right now to set the stage for Joe Biden to retire. Hillary Clinton, if she replaces Kamala Harris as vice president, then Hillary Clinton is the vice president of the United States. And at some point she moves into the Oval Office. And before the 2024 election.

Yes. And she will be in the 2024 president. incumbent Democrat. She's she is President Hillary Clinton. Right. And she would any problems that would be coming along with her that could be blamed on Biden and everything, she'd have a fresh slate. She'd be president. Yes. Jen Psaki was responding to questions about the Harris-Skoda's connection here. Here's Peppermint Patty talking to the press today.

What preparations is the White House engaged in broadly in the case of a Supreme Court vacancy? I'm just not going to detail any of that from here. Unrelated to this, you can't detail what, like, doesn't every White House like to get ahead of this in case of a sudden passing in the case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg? None of that you can share? I'm not going to detail internal planning from here, no. Okay. Then let me ask you a couple other questions. Is there any scenario in which the president would select his vice president, Kamala Harris, for the Supreme Court? Again, I'm not going to speak to any considerations, preparations, lists. And as we've stated earlier, and you heard the president say, there's a long history of Supreme Court justices determining

when they may retire, if they retire, and announcing that. And we're going to, that remains the case today. Clearly, you are more wiser than to take those questions. Now notice she didn't deny it. And so that led to further speculation from the White House press pool there to ask, is Kamala Harris going to be the vice presidential nominee in 2024? And this was her response. Thank you. When you were asked about the vice president possibly being selected

as a Supreme Court nominee, you said you're not going to speak to any considerations. Does that mean she is being considered? Again, Peter, I'm not going to speak to the reports of a Supreme Court justice retirement that hasn't been announced. So theoretically, would someone who's- Theoretically. I do like that you preface it. I appreciate that. Just wondering, hypothetically, theoretically, would someone who was an attorney general of a large state and who served with many key Senate votes be an attractive candidate to the president for an open Supreme Court seat? I see what you did there, Peter. But the president has every intention, as he said before, of running for reelection and for running for reelection with Vice President Harris on the ticket as his partner.

But again, I will just reiterate that I have nothing more to offer in terms of specifics or information on the reports this morning. Joe Biden may have every intention of running for re-election, but the Democratic Party has no intention of letting him be nominated. And who is in control of the party? Is this a Joe Biden Democratic Party? Behind the scenes, who's in control? Barack Obama. Obama and the Clintons, I think, share power. I think they both have tremendous power. Joe Biden doesn't have power. He has no power. I mean, when he ran in the primaries, what did he get? One percent of the vote?

Yes. I mean, the last time, the previous time he ran. I mean, he ran for president. I don't know. It started back in the 1980s. And he could never get out of the basement because he has no support. Right. And how he became the nominee.

And how Harris became the vice president. Well, she came in last in the primaries. Is that the qualification? You come in last? Yes. Well, okay, I'm not even going to go there. How she got her California career. But you'd have to ask Willie Brown. But this idea about Hillary Clinton becoming vice president, then perhaps president at some point,

this opens up a whole new scenario because right now we're dealing with Russia. Joe Biden's dealing with the Ukraine crisis and Russia and everything. But Hillary Clinton's had some remarks about Russia in the past, too. Yeah. Well, I mean, she served as a U.S. senator and she served as the secretary of state. And so she has credentials to run for president of the United States. I pulled up a 2016 foreign policy article, Council on Foreign Relations, their magazine, Foreign Policy. I want to remind you of what we were talking about in 2016 regarding Hillary Clinton and Russia.

Let's take a look at this headline. All right. So this headline, this is from September 2016, just right before the election. The Kremlin really believes that Hillary wants to start a war with Russia. And the subtitle, An American Embedded Within Moscow's Top Foreign Policy Brain Trust, explains why Putin and his cadres are backing Trump. times that we started hearing the rumblings that if Russia ever did a cyber strike on the United States response from you know Hillary Clinton was going to be a nuclear strike and so that that was running in the news as well so document right now with the warmongers America's ruling class, they want a war so bad they can't contain their enthusiasm for war.

And they couldn't get one with Donald Trump. And they don't seem to be able to get Joe Biden to commit to a war here. And do you really want Joe Biden as the commander in chief in a showdown with Russia? Do you want Kamala Harris as the commander in chief in a showdown with Russia? Do you want Kamala Harris as the commander in chief? Two very incompetent people. But if you're serious about a war with Russia. And you're a Democrat. And you're a Democrat.

Your best choice is Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton wants a war with Russia. We talked about this in 2016. The Russians were saying, remember the Russians did a civil defense drill in September, October 2016. Something like 40 million Russians went into underground bunkers preparing for a nuclear war with the United States. It was historic, the level that they did that at. It was just shortly. Because they thought Hillary was going to win.

That's right. So the more I think about this, this is really a scary possibility that we're going to see a series of things happen politically. And before you know it, Hillary Clinton is sitting in the Oval Office as commander in chief. Now, that may take two years to play out. I mean, they'd have to. I mean, this year she could become the vice president. It's possible by the end of the year. Right. She's the president.

If if she could push Joe Biden out by the end of the year, she she becomes the the president. And maybe maybe Michelle Obama becomes her vice president. I mean, you could have a totally different political landscape by the end of 22. Do you think by having Hillary Clinton on as VP would re-energize the Democrats? You know, because right now the Democrats are facing 2022 elections with, I mean, it's a giant killer out there. Absolutely. So there's a lot of, I'm not endorsing Hillary Clinton being vice president. I'm just talking politics. But if I were the Democrats,

I'd be really pushing this idea really hard right now. I mean, if they could, they would bring back Barack Obama, but he can't serve again. Although some people have floated the idea that he could serve as vice president. Yes. But that's it. But wouldn't you have more power as shadow president than vice president? Yeah. So, you know, I'm not going to go down that road. If he was the vice president and the president resigned, can he fill out the term of President Biden, even though he served two terms? I don't know. That's something the supreme court would would decide um but obama would be the strongest democrat that they could put in right now right but the second strongest would be hillary clinton and then her vice

president being michelle obama right and that is a ticket that is going to be very difficult for the Republicans. And I don't know if Donald Trump is the person that they want to go up against Hillary Clinton again. But that's another topic. That's where we're at right now. So while we're on the topic of war with Russia, Russia Today reporting that Russia has received a response from the United States government to its security issues. Jake Sullivan, President Biden's national security advisor, who himself could be indicted on the fake Russia investigation. Here we are. We're going to have Russia involved.

No matter how you spin this, Russia is going to be involved in American politics for the next couple of elections. Right. No, no doubt about it. We don't know what the United States said other than there's some very general news reports. But it it didn read, the U.S. has refused all of the Russian demands and has simply said, we're willing to talk. Well, Russia's not, that's not what they want right now. They want action. They want NATO troops and weapons removed from their border.

And they want those guarantees of security. Here's Toss right now. Russia to take measures if West provides no response on guarantees of security. So Russia will take necessary measures should the West fail to provide a constructive response to Moscow's initiatives on guarantees of securities. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said, stating in the State Duma Wednesday, should there be no constructive response, should the West continue its aggressive course,

then, as Russian President Vladimir Putin said repeatedly, Moscow will take necessary response measures, the minister said. In any case, everyone must consider the security of Russia and its citizens an absolute priority, and it will be ensured under any circumstances. So how do you interpret those words? That at this point, it appears that the West has not responded in a positive way that guarantees the security of Russia. So Russia is going to take their next steps there. So what's it going to be?

It says necessary measures. Right. So we see all these weapons being shipped over to Ukraine. This week, nearly a billion dollars worth of weapons from the U.S. alone. Nearly a billion dollars. Well, 600 million, okay? It's approaching a billion. Just from the U.S. alone.

Whether or not there's NATO troops there or not, we're arming the Ukrainians to fight the Russians. Why didn't we could have saved money if we just had the Ukrainians go over to Afghanistan and get all the abandoned U.S. weapons that we left behind for the Taliban? Oh, because the Taliban needs something to fight us with later on, too, Rick. So, Mr. Lavrov, he was talking today and he's not as we mentioned mentioned the other day he's not as a diplomatic as he's been in the past he's getting a little bit edgy edgy he said today that the chief of nato has lost touch with reality and it's hard to take his words seriously right uh so this is a secretary i mean ambassador lavrov responding to remarks by Jen Stoltenberg. So NATO Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg loss has lost touch with reality. And it's difficult to perceive his statement seriously.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters Wednesday commenting on Stoltenberg's words about a potential military buildup on the eastern flank. You know, I've not been giving any consideration to his statements for a long time. In my opinion, he has already lost touch with reality, Lavrov said. So the foreign affairs minister of Russia has just written off the chief of NATO. Right. Let's put the still up, the photograph, the article. I'm going to go back to that one. So the photographer said, Mr. Lavrov, please smile for the photograph.

And Lavrov said, I am smiling. Well, we joke about that. There's actually a, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs actually put out a video this week of clips of Lavrov really smiling because there was a German article that came out earlier this week that said, we can't negotiate with Lavrov. He never even cracks a smile. And so the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had to put out a video, a two-minute video of him laughing and smiling and everything. You mentioned the weapons, and there was a tweet from the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine bragging about the weapons that are arriving in Ukraine. And then this is the third shipment of 200 million in assistance authorized by President Biden, and it arrived last night.

300 javelins included with that. And I noticed that they're not calling it lethal aid anymore. I guess they got some bad press over that. 79 tons of security assistance. Boy, I'd like to get me some security assistance. Well, 300 javelins, the only purpose a javelin has is to kill a tank, basically. It's to blow a hole in a tank and to kill it. And so those are tank killers. And so they've got 300 more. Well, that'll calm things down. And to kill it. And so those are tank killers. And so they've got 300 more. And so. Well, that'll calm things down.

Now, remind our audience, Ukraine is not a member of NATO. It's not even in the process of becoming a member of NATO. And it's not qualified to be a member of NATO because it's a corrupt government. I mean, really corrupt. to be a member of NATO because it's a corrupt government. I mean, really corrupt. And yet we are pumping nearly a billion dollars worth of aid in one week to go against the Russians. So you've got to know that Russia is going to respond in a parallel way. Doug, one thing you and I were talking about this morning

is that one thing that we're seeing in recent days is NATO is not, you know, we're hearing things like Joe Biden's, you know, deploying 8,500 troops. NATO may deploy up to 50,000 troops. And at first, you know, days ago, it was like, we're sending all these troops to Ukraine, but they're not going to Ukraine. They're not going to Ukraine. They're going to Eastern European countries near Ukraine. That way, those troops can go to Ukraine.

No, those troops won't get killed. The Ukrainian army is going to be slaughtered. That's the plan. That's what's going to happen. Because NATO can't afford to lose NATO troops, because then they would lose their support for Ukraine then, right? NATO is not going to war against Russia yet. Not yet. I do not believe, and I'm saying that because I'm looking at what we're seeing in the past 72 hours, where they're deploying these troops to countries surrounding Ukraine.

Okay, you're not really going into Ukraine and preparing to meet the Russian army. No. The Russians are going to go into Ukraine and take out everything that NATO has put there. That's what they're going to do. They're going to destroy all of the weapons, the missile launchers, everything that NATO has put in Ukraine. The Russians are going to go in and destroy it, take it out. And the Ukrainian army, the ones that stay to fight, will be slaughtered, and the rest of them will run and take off, surrender. They'll just disappear.

They're not going to face the Russian army. And the Ukrainian military leader is going to be calling NATO saying, help, help. And NATO is going to say, you're not a member of NATO. Yeah, you can't call up Article 5. Let's check the mail. Did your application come in yet? But you encouraged us to fight Russia. Yes, we did.

Goodbye. We got to go. Phone disconnected. NATO wants somebody to fight Russia. Just not them. Just not NATO. Not yet. They're not ready for that war. But if Hillary were in the White House,

they might do it. Might be another two years until they're ready for that war. But they're not going to do it under Commander-in-Chief Joe Biden. They're certainly not going to do it under potential Commander-in-Chief Kamala. They're certainly not going to do it under, well, potential Commander-in-Chief Kamala Harris. But a bloodthirsty Hillary Clinton, yeah, they would do it.

And she'd have the support of both Democrats and Republicans for that. Oh, yeah, the Republicans are warmongers. Oh, if you want to do warmongering, it is a bipartisan activity. We live in a world where even the progressives on the left are per war. Yes, yes. Well, Russia announced today that they plan on going ahead with their plans about partnerships here in the Western Hemisphere. This is out of RT today. So Russia unveils military plans in Cuba and Latin America.

We talked about this last week a little bit. Putin has agreed on a new collaboration with Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. So we have a presence in the Caribbean, on the South American continent, and in Central America with this. And I would just say, you know, hey, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Do I like the idea of Russians in the Western Hemisphere? I don't like that at all. But you've got to look at it from the Russians' perspective. They don't like NATO on their border. They don't like U.S. troops sitting a couple miles from their border. So what's the difference?

That's why I think this is going to boil for several more years before there is an all-out war. The potential is there right now. But the movement that we've seen in the past, say, 48 to 72 hours, indicates that NATO is— Unwilling? Not ready. Okay. Not ready.

But they would love Ukraine to fight Russia. they would love ukraine to get into this fight why because that that uh increases uh the propaganda that nato has against russia and can set the stage for that attack someday they can always point back to you. Remember what Russia did in 2022? They attacked peaceful Ukraine and slaughtered the people and destroyed all that NATO armament. It also gives NATO the opportunity to observe Russia's defense capabilities too. And because we know Russia's been making some advances here over the past five to ten years, some surprising advances. They want to see how they fight. Right.

See if they've upped their game and if they've got new technology and new techniques. You know, sitting on the sidelines watching two people fight it out would be a great opportunity for that. Maybe the real reason for the whole conflict right now. So they're just baiting Russia in to bring their toys out and show the West what toys they have to work with and how their guys fight. But right now, I don't think NATO is going to go

into war against Russia. But I think after the, whatever Russia does to Ukraine to destroy NATO weapons in Ukraine, that's all we're going to hear about for the next two years. And why NATO must punish Russia. And the great part about Russia destroying all the NATO armaments in Ukraine is we can sell them more weapons later on. Oh yeah, there ain't no business like the war business.

Yeah, you can become a are on too yeah the war there ain't no business like the war business yeah so yeah it's it's man you can become a multi-billionaire on war just ask the the rothschild family they they they finance both sides of wars they had no better plan than that you're you're loaning money to both sides right get both sides in debt to you finance the both sides, and you come out a double winner. The Rothschilds have done that for centuries. So the next one, this is the Deputy U.S. Secretary of State, Wendy Sherman. Who's been getting a lot of press lately. Have you noticed this?

Oh, yes. She's a Zionist. Yes. Just like her boss, Mr. Blinken, a Zionist. And so she's making the prediction. And I believe she's right about it. If anything's going to happen, it'll be very soon. Senior U.S. official predicts Russia will attack Ukraine by mid-February. Now, why is that? Well, from her perspective, she has her own perspective on it.

I have mine. But U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman said Wednesday the U.S. believes Russian President Vladimir Putin remains poised to use force against Ukraine sometime in the coming three weeks. I have no idea whether he's made the ultimate decision, but we certainly see every indication that he's going to use military force sometime perhaps between now and the middle of february sherman told a forum now striking a lighter tone she noted that the beijing olympics are scheduled to start on february 4th and said i think that probably president xi jinping would not be ecstatic if putin chose that moment to invade ukraine and so i heard uh on fox business on Fox Business Radio this morning as I was driving in to work today, Maria Bartiromo, and I forget who the guest was. It might have been Senator Blackburn of Tennessee.

But they were pushing the propaganda, and it was, yeah, Putin, he's been waiting on these Olympics. He's going to act during the Olympics. And I thought, yeah, he's been waiting on these Olympics. He's going to act during the Olympics. And I thought, yeah, right. So Putin for four years has been watching the calendar, marking off the day, saying, boy, when the Olympics come, I'm going to act up. And I'm going to invade a country during the Olympics.

And everybody will just hate me. That's the propaganda they were putting out on Fox Business Radio this morning. Right. Now, there is a practical reason why Vladimir Putin may choose to make an advance in Ukraine over the next three weeks. It's because they're a winter military. And this is an opportune time for a winter military to make a move, because what happens toward the end of February, first of March, weather changes in that part of the world and it makes travel and military

maneuvers much more difficult. But it's interesting to see how they use the Olympics propaganda for this excuse. So we actually have a clip of Wendy Sherman, Deputy Secretary of State, commenting on this connection between Putin and the Beijing Olympics. What will then, I mean, follow? What is your prediction? What is your prediction, actually? Because basically, I don't see also President Putin saying, OK, well, we tried. They said no. What's your prediction? Well, I don't know what's in President Putin's mind. There's only one person who knows that, and that's President Putin.

I suspect even the people around him don't know what he ultimately will do. I think they know the plans of setting up the military to be ready to go and to have plans to make use of the military. But I suspect the president has other plans in mind as well. And I'm not, I have no idea whether he's made the ultimate decision, but we certainly see every indication that he is going to use military force. Sometime, perhaps now and middle of February, we all are aware that the Beijing Olympics begin on February 4th, the opening ceremony, and President Putin expects to be there. I think that probably President Xi Jinping would not be ecstatic if Putin chose that moment to invade Ukraine. So that may affect his timing and his thinking. But Madam President, you eloquently laid out what Russia has already done to Ukraine. And so we talk about a further invasion of Ukraine, because indeed they have

illegally attempted an annex of Crimea, and they have constantly pressed in the east, in the Donbas region, and caused enormous hardship and death to Ukrainian citizens already. They have also pressed institutions inside of Ukraine and tried to undermine the democracy of Ukraine. They have posted all kinds of social media posts to try to change how people think. Well, a lot of disinformation in there. Yes. All I will say is Wendy Sherman is a Zionist who is pushing for war against Russia. Yes. That's all you need to know.

That's what this is about. All right. This is another Zionist-inspired war that will end up in many innocent people dying for no reason other than the zionists want a war so um at some point the world is going to recognize who is causing so much trouble in the world the next one is uh we have still this is is the current coverage of the reach of Russian S-400 systems to shoot down planes and missiles. Right. So I saw this image today. I thought I'd share it with the audience here because this shows the power of the S-400 systems based on, this is just on S-400 systems that are located on Russian soil. Not inside Ukraine. And Belarus. And so there's some in Belarus as well.

Basically, they could knock down a plane all the way from the Black Sea to... Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia. So they could control the entire region if they so chose. They could do it right now if they so chose. This is the ability that Russia has at this moment. Which means that no NATO planes or missiles are going to be flying into that zone without being knocked out. Right. That's what that means.

So that has got to be considered in the whole calculus of all this as well. So I thought I'd share this with our audience to show just the power that Russia has in controlling that region right now. So, well, another story I saw today involving Mr. Smiley, Ambassador Lavrov, he explained to Russian lawmakers today that Russia has made a dramatic decrease in the number of U.S. dollars in Russia's currency reserves. Right. So the ambassador came out to say that the Russian Federation is forced to sharply reduce dollar reserves and intends to reduce dependence on the U.S. currency due to the current U.S. actions. This was announced on January 26 during a speech in the State Duma by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. And according to him, Moscow believes that U.S. actions make financial transactions with the currency risky. And we're striving to reduce dependence on the

dollar, and the Americans are actively helping us in this because they are doing everything to undermine confidence in this currency and make it risky for international settlements in general, not only for the Russian Federation, but for any other country's peace, the head of Russian diplomacy said. Now, he added that Russia is currently sharply reducing its dollar reserves. The country's authorities are stimulating the transition to settlements with partners in national currencies. Now, these actions by Moscow are causing troubling discussions among political scientists and economists, Lavrov concluded. Let's interpret that a little bit. What he's saying, there was an article we put up a couple weeks ago that said if we remove Russia from SWIFT

it could cause incredible havoc across markets. But consider what would happen if Russia chose to leave SWIFT. And that could be a weapon in their hands, especially if they've already established other pathways for settlements with other currencies. Swift is only the transfer mechanism to move money. What he's talking about is they are getting rid of the Russian government is not going to hold U.S. dollars. Right.

They're moving, and they've been doing this for a number of years. They're moving towards doing all of their transactions for goods, for wheat and food and materials that the nation buys. They're going to do it in the currencies of the countries that are either buying or selling. Right. And it eliminates the U.S. dollar. So at some point, the U.S. dollar will no longer be the reserve currency of the world. And when that happens, the U.S. dollar will be as worthless as the paper it's printed on. And suddenly we will discover that there's no gold in Fort Knox.

Right. And that the international banksters stole the gold a long time ago. And you think there's shortages now? You just wait until the U.S. dollar is no longer the global reserve currency. You'll wish you were in Zimbabwe. Go ahead. I was going to say, there was a response in the Russian markets to this.

The ruble collapsed against the dollar and the euro in the evening on the strengthening of these geopolitical risks. And you've got to know that they were responding also to Mr. Lavrov's comments. He said the dollar and euro soared to multi-month highs in the Moscow exchange on Wednesday evening. This as the ruble collapsed against the dual currency basket on news that the U.S. embassy in Ukraine is urging Americans to think about leaving the country immediately due to the difficult situation in the field of security. But you have to know that that can't be the only reason, but the idea of actually pulling

out of the dollar, that's got to impact your attitude on investment in the Moscow exchange. Worldwide, it's going to impact as investors and traders take seriously that there will be serious challenges to the supremacy of the U.S. dollar. Take a look at this next article. This is a Times of Israel. The United States and Europe draw up gas supply plan in case of Russian cutoff of natural gas to Europe. And Russia has already threatened this, that if we take actions regarding SWIFT or anything along that line, that the possible reaction would be cutting off gas.

So Washington allies worry about potential economic and political sanctions over military buildup could lead to Moscow stopping deliveries to continent at the height of winter. And so, Rick, would they really push Russia to the point where they would cut off the gas and oil to Europe? Are they ready for that? If they impose the type of extreme sanctions that Mr. Biden is threatening, and we don't know what they are. It's going to be bad. That's all we know. Hey, it's going to be really bad. But yeah, if they hurt the Russian economy severely, the Russians, I mean, the biggest thing would be they cut Russia off the

Swift Bank system, that Russia cannot move money in and out of the country. At that point, Russia will stop sending natural gas to Europe. And if that happens in the wintertime, a lot of people are going to suffer. And the European politicians will then be facing revolution. That's what happens when people are starving and freezing to death. They overthrow their governments. And people start asking the question. Why are we doing this? I'm shivering in the cold. Why are we dealing with Russia?

And tell us again what this is all about, about Ukraine, about propping up the Nazi government that the CIA imposed several years ago, one of the collar revolutions. People are going to get furious about it. There's a lot of revolutions. People are going to get furious about it. There's a lot of stuff happening. People are getting tired. The COVID

lockdowns, the mask mandates, the vaccine mandates. People are getting fed up with the ruling class. At some point, things could break loose against the ruling elite in the Western nations. And Russia can sit back and just watch revolution and chaos taking place in Europe and the United States and other places. One more story on oil.

This is from oilprice.com oil approaches 90 a barrel on firm demand and ukraine invasion fear so doc we're we're very soon we'll be cresting over a hundred dollars a barrel here in the united states you will see gasoline prices over four dollars a gallon jumped up 20 cents in the past couple days i was shocked this. Got gas at three, it's relative here, $3.40 a gallon. I was like, when did this price jump take place? You're about to see it go up to over $4 a gallon. And this is an election year in the United States and Democratic voters are going to be furious with Joe Biden when they have to pay four or five, six dollars a gallon and then drive to the grocery store and there's no food. Right. That's that's hard to run for to to encourage people to vote for Democrats in November when you're hurting financially. And when people are hurting financially, they don't vote for the incumbents. They vote to get rid of them. And if things don't get better,

that's when it tips over into civil disobedience and then it turns into revolution. That's what the West is facing right now. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a congresswoman from Georgia, she said that Joe Biden is backing Ukraine because the Ukrainians have dirt on Hunter Biden. Well, I don't doubt they have dirt on Hunter Biden. And so this is an interesting story here because it does connect a lot of dots. Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said on Steve Bannon's podcast that President Joe Biden is backing U.S. ally Ukraine in a standoff with Russia because the country has dirt on his son, Hunter. She said, I'm blown away with what we're seeing. The president of the United States, Joe Biden,

is willing to take our military to war against nuclear Russia because of Ukraine, she said. You cannot deny this. It's because Ukraine has the dirt on Hunter Biden. Ukraine has the dirt on Joe Biden, our president, she continued. This is why we can have many of our troops get killed in this war that Joe Biden wants to have happen. And so that's her thoughts. I don't doubt at all that there's a lot of dirt floating around in Ukraine on the Bidens. But the whole sale on this has been not just Joe Biden. All of NATO is on board with this, too. That's right.

But there is something about Ukraine that they don't want to get out. I want to go through some headlines very quickly here before we wrap things up. And the Canadians, the Canadian truck drivers are, are starting to get fed up. Really proud of the Canadian truck drivers after I saw this video today. Cause if anybody can bring these politicians to their knees,

it's our truck drivers. Because all they get, what we're going to show you is a convoy of truckers in Canada protesting the vaccine mandate that Biden and Justin Trudeau are placing on truck drivers. And they're doing a convoy for freedom but if the truck drivers really want to pressure the politicians instead of driving their trucks in a convoy to protest park the trucks just park the trucks park them on the road right in the middle of the road and get out and walk away and bring the country to its knees. Only the truckers can do it. And there's one group of guys I wouldn't mess with, and those are truckers, okay? You make a man, and now you're going to have a fight. And so this is a video from Canada.

Let's watch it. Wow, this is huge., look how they go forever. This is by Atchison outside of Edmonton, heading to Calgary. January 23rd, 2022. Convoy. More than trucks. Lots of cars and trucks. Very impressive. Goes on forever. uh uh Yeah, that's a big 10-4 there, Pigpen. Yeah, we definitely got the front door good, buddy.

Mercy sinks alive. Looks like we got us a con. Had to get C.W. McCall in. That's right. That's right. But seriously. 50,000 trucks,W. McCall in. That's right. That's right. But seriously. 50,000 trucks, Rick. 50,000.

There were 50,000 in that convoy? 50,000 trucks are involved in this convoy headed to Ottawa. What they need to do is when they get to Ottawa is park the trucks and get out. Shut down Ottawa. Just shut down the whole country. Not only do you shut down the capital that there's no traffic moving, but there are no trucks moving to haul goods.

You demand that Justin Trudeau resign. You demand that he get on a plane and flee to China. Or Cuba. Or Cuba to go home to see his relatives. Okay? We've got to start playing hardball with the globalists. We're treating them way too nice.

They need to be treated at the level, well, we treated them at the level they deserve. Well, you know what would happen. They are psychopaths. They have launched a war on the human race globally. And the vaccine narrative is collapsing. The COVID narrative is collapsing. They can't keep it going anymore. People are fed up. Even the people who supported this stuff six months ago are done with it. They're fed up with it. And so the politicians that continue to push this extreme agenda, they are at risk of being run out of their countries by angry people. We've got another one. This is CTV News in Canada, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe. He's backing down and he's announcing, you know, I think we're going to rescind. I looked out my window and I saw 50,000 trucks. I think I'm going to rescind my

Nazi mandates. Let's watch it. Well, minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes.

We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will be back in a few minutes. We will pandemic for for a few reasons first lockdown and vaccinations are are do not seem to be stopping the transmission of omicron the omicron variant but at the same time we are seeing omicron with a much quicker cycle of infection and it seems to be less severe than previous strains particularly if you are vaccinated and have your booster shot. And that's why we are now seeing in some countries, as well as some provinces across Canada, starting to discuss the removal of their remaining measures

that they have in place, their public health measures. They're also starting to talk about how they're going to live with COVID as we move forward through the next number of weeks and months and ultimately into eternity, and how we are going to get our life back to a much more normal semblance of normal. So the great attack on our freedom is coming to an end for this stage. They're going to regroup and come at us again. But we now know their tactics.

And people are going to be prepared for them. They're going to have to do something far more severe and frightening to get people to go along with it. So their game is not working. They're in trouble. The next one, OSHA here in the United States, the Occupational Safety Health Agency, they have rescinded their vaccine mandate for large employers after the Supreme Court told them they can't do it. They quietly took it down from its website and everything without an announcement or anything like that. Basically, it's saying that OSHA will stop requiring large companies to enforce vaccines or testing for COVID-19. The emergency temporary standard will be withdrawn as of Wednesday, according to court documents,

and that the Biden administration is working on a permanent vaccine standard, OSHA wrote, but that's not going to happen. Not every country is backing down. The globalists have some strongholds and they're actually going forward, increasing their Nazi mandates.

This is a story from News Australia. Countries that will soon only let travelers in that have received three doses of a COVID vaccination. Not double jabbed. So fully vaxxed, what they used to call fully vaxxed, people who had two jabs of the coronavirus vaccine that they told you they promised would protect you. A week ago, people who had been double vaxxed could get into these countries. But not anymore. But now the double vaxxed can't get into some countries the double jabbed are unvaccinated you now have to be triple jabbed in order to travel we've got a list of

those countries where the double vaxed are banned right so if i was double vaxed right now i'd be furious be a hopping man and so this is a just a few of the countries that have not rescinded their mandates now are actually upping the requirements. So you've got Spain, France, Netherlands, Switzerland. Switzerland, I love Switzerland. They're up in the game. Greece, Austria, Belgium, another beautiful country, United Arab Emirates, all of them are upping the amount of the gene therapy injections that you have to receive in order to enter their country.

And so we see cracks in the wall, but we also see new walls coming up somewhere else. That's right. Australia, a pediatrician said children as young as 12 should be vaccinated against their parents wishes. You don't get any more Nazi than that. Yes. Your children are our children. We will do with them as we please. You have no rights as a mother and father. The state owns your children.

And that's their attitude. You know, children don't belong to parents. They belong to the state. They belong to the state. They belong to the government. So a Melbourne pediatrician has encouraged doctors to administer COVID-19 vaccines to children as young as 12 against their parents' wishes, arguing it is both ethically and legally permissible. John Massey, professor of pediatrics at the University of Melbourne, says there is no ethical barrier, listen to that, to vaccinating children under the mature minor doctrine. And that providers should not fear

legal repercussions as the federal government has fully identified clinicians and drug makers against any adverse reactions. In other words, you're saying, hey, you can't be sued for it. Just go ahead and go for it. Well, there's no ethical barrier, which means you have no ethics. There's no ethical barrier to prevent an angry father from beating the snot out of you. And I know this is happening. This article talks about Australia, but they're talking about the same age in California right now. And that will likely happen here within the next week or two weeks.

So they're pushing the very same thing in the state of California here in the U.S. Did you live in California? Why? Any of these Democrat-controlled wastelands, you should be selling your house, packing up, and fleeing. It's not coming back. Not ever. Not in your lifetime. We will never see California become the California I knew decades ago. It's not going to happen. It's never coming back in our lifetime.

Not in my lifetime. It's not coming back in your lifetime. Maybe some of you out there in your teens, in your early 20s, you might live long enough to see California return to sanity. It's going to be a long time. Why would you stay there? It's only going to go further down into the toilet bowl. Flee. Go someplace where you can live with some dignity and peace and not be tormented by these psychopaths that have taken control of these countries.

I mentioned the other day that I have a second edition of Final Day, and it is being printed. We will have some here soon. I'm not going to say a date. I'm waiting on the printer to tell me when they will be here. I've really tightened up the book. I've added a lot of new material. I took some stuff out, but I added a lot of new material. A lot of pretty deep stuff about prophecies and the parables.

I'm just explaining the second coming. The second book, the second edition of Final Day, honestly, Doc, you haven't read the manuscript yet. I haven't shown it to anybody. Honestly, it is 10 times better than the first edition. It really is. I really feel good about the second edition. I've added a lot of stuff that the Holy Spirit showed me after I wrote the first edition. Right. Because you just continue, you know, you just continue to seek the Lord and go deeper into the topics. So we are accepting pre-order sales right now. We don't have, don't physically have the new book here yet.

It will be here, I'm thinking, in weeks. It is a paperback. We're sold out of the first edition hardback. The paperback price is $19.95 plus your shipping. And you can go to True News right now and pre-order. Right, just go to the home page. You'll see the banner at the top of the page for Final Day, the second edition, and it'll take you right to it. You can order right now, pre-order

right now. What about signed copies? Oh, yeah. So if you want an autograph, I'm doing the same thing, a $100 donation, and you can get a personally autographed copy of the second edition. If you already read the first edition, I'm telling you the second edition, it is worth you getting a copy of the second edition because of the new stuff that's in the book. There will also be an audio book. I would anticipate that, I'm going to say,

maybe late March, early April. And we get asked about that a lot. Yes, a lot. So we're looking forward to that. And there will be an e-book, and there will be a video course that's coming out this winter. So there's a lot happening. But you can preorder the second edition of Final Day right now, 1995. Go to True News and click on the banner.

And if you want it autographed, make a donation for $100. And I will personally sign it with my blue ink pen. All right? And you'll know that I did it. That's right. All right? It's in blue. If it's anything else.

Yeah, it's in blue. First batch, when they first said it, probably did them in black. But somewhere I switched over to a blue ink pen. Those are the collector's editions. Yeah, yeah. So anyhow, we'll tell you more about it in the days ahead. Thank you so much. We appreciate you very much.

God bless. See you tomorrow. God bless you. The preceding program was made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com.