TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Naked Scandal: Bidens Scurry to Cover Up Glaring Evidence of Corruption

Episode Date: June 23, 2023

The DOJ protecting Hunter Biden, Zelensky preparing a false flag to have an excuse to nuke Russia, and is the Titan a cover up for the Biden's? Join us and find out. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 6/23/23 You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969. It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. Now available in eBook and audio formats! Order Final Day from Amazon today! https://www.amazon.com/Final-Day-Characteristics-Second-Coming/dp/0578260816/ Apple users, you can download the audio version on Apple Books! https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/final-day-10-characteristics-of-the-second-coming/id1687129858 The Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today! https://tru.news/faucielf

You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles. We appreciate you tuning in. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, P.O. whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help us God. A pair of IRS whistleblowers have told congressional investigators that high-level government officials deliberately stalled or blocked a probe into the alleged crimes committed

by Joe Biden's son, Hunter. The revelations come days after the Justice Department announced that the younger Biden had accepted a plea deal in which he will avoid prosecution for misdemeanor charges and a felony charge of possessing a gun while using drugs. One of the whistleblowers, a criminal supervisory special agent, has sought whistleblower protection in order to reveal what he says is evidence of a failure to mitigate clear conflicts of interest in the ultimate disposition of the investigation. He has told lawmakers that he faced roadblocks from the beginning of this probe, including being prevented from interviewing witnesses and was repeatedly stopped from

obtaining search warrants. He also says he was denied access to the Biden laptop, which he said contained evidence of tax violations. Rick, the other whistleblower, an anonymous IRS employee who worked on the Biden case for a year and a half, says she was impeded by similar hurdles. She said her superiors at the time were aware of a possible conflict of interest involving Joe Biden's family, but did nothing to address it. She said she felt she was being blocked from pursuing the case because her bosses wanted it to die. Both whistleblowers have provided detailed testimony that outlines a steady campaign of unequal treatment in enforcing the law,

government interference in the investigation into Biden's actions, and retaliation against those employees who raised concerns. They say their whistleblower protection applications were rebuffed at every stage of the process. And an attorney for the unnamed supervisory agent has written to lawmakers requesting they exercise their constitutional oversight function and provide to Congress information regarding the handling of the investigation into Hunter Biden. He said his client can provide examples of preferential treatment and politics in properly infecting decisions and protocols that would be followed by career law enforcement professionals in cases not involving the son of a political figure. Well, Doc, this story is definitely this week, as they say, has gotten legs. Right. It's a story that's been out there for several years.

But now, this week, even the corporate mainstream media, what they call mainstream, they're starting to ask questions because the evidence is so overwhelming that you can't continue to say it's a hoax, it's Russian disinformation, it's a MAGA conspiracy theory. Now, there's hard evidence that the Bidens accepted not just a couple bribes, massive amounts of money. They're now talking about $20 to $30 million that they think that they can prove Joe and Hunter Biden received from foreign powers. And now you have these whistleblowers who are publicly telling or telling members of Congress, look, we were stopped. We were stopped from the highest levels. And they're naming people at the Justice Department, the FBI, the IRS, and I believe some intelligence agencies involved. That's right, Rick. And one of the ways to gauge the reception of this is when these stories start popping

up on the Alphabet Network's nightly news programs. And now they've started showing up on NBC and CBS nightly news. And so now it's starting to get the attention of what we call the mainstream media. And no apologies from them for calling people like us conspiracy theorists. Right. They never do that. Suddenly they're, you know, the professional news. They've discovered the truth.

Right. So, well, Washington Examiner has this story and this from yesterday. The IRS whistleblowers are claiming that David Weiss was blocked from bringing Hunter Biden charges in Washington, D.C. and California now. Now, Weiss is the U.S. federal prosecutor for Delaware. That's right. So the Washington Examiner reports that atop House, Republican released new details from IRS whistleblowers involved in the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden that alleged the lead federal prosecutor was denied when he tried to bring charges in Washington, D.C. and in California

against President Joe Biden's son. Representative Jason Smith of Missouri, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, held a closed-door executive session Thursday morning in which the committee reviewed multiple whistleblower reports about government misconduct inside the IRS and the Department of Justice and held a press conference shortly thereafter. Now, we didn't get the opportunity to see this yesterday because we were doing the God cast when all this was going on, but we do have portions of that press conference. Here is the first part of that press conference. Here is the first part of that press conference. As I mentioned in my remarks before the executive session,

there are three areas of focus in the transcripts of interviews with whistleblowers. Number one, the federal government is not treating taxpayers equally when enforcing tax laws. Number two, whistleblowers claim the Biden Department of Justice is intervening and overstepping when it comes to the investigation of the president's son. And number three, these whistleblowers report they have faced almost immediate retaliation. Let me provide detail on number one, not one, but two IRS employees are blowing the whistle with evidence that the federal government is not treating taxpayers equally when enforcing tax laws. The whistleblowers were working on an investigation into Hunter Biden that opened in November of 2018 as an offshoot of a separate corporate investigation by the IRS. Let me emphasize, this was an investigation in the ordinary course of work at the IRS. It was not ordered by any individual, any chairman, or any political entity. The testimony

we released today shows the IRS recommended charges against Hunter Biden that included attempt to evade or defeat tax, a felony, fraud or false statement, a felony, and willful failure to file returns, supply information, or pay tax. These tax crimes cover an estimated $2.2 million in unreported tax on global income streams to Mr. Biden and his associates from Ukraine, Romania, and China, totaling $17.3 million from 2014 to 2019. Mr. Biden personally received $8.3 million. Whistleblowers detail foreign payments to Mr. Biden, including $664,000 from the Chinese company State Energy HK, a large diamond worth $80,000 and a Porsche worth $142,000. These payments are just a fraction of the total, but they provide insight into a world of wealth and influence that no ordinary American would recognize. And what plea deal did Mr. Biden just receive? A slap on the wrist for charges that have put other Americans behind bars. As I said, the federal government is

not treating all taxpayers equally. Number two, whistleblowers claim the Biden Department of Justice is intervening and overstepping when it comes to the investigation of the president's son. Despite what whistleblowers described as a clear-cut case for tax liability on these payments, IRS investigators say they found themselves hamstrung internally. The testimony we have just released details a lack of U.S. attorney independence, recurring unjustified delays, unusual actions outside the normal course of any investigation, a lack of transparency across the investigation and prosecution teams, and bullying and threats from the defense counsel. This was a campaign of delay, divulge, and deny. Whistleblowers say reoccurring unjustified delays pervaded

the investigation, including in authenticating a WhatsApp message in which Hunter Biden demands payment from Chinese officials, noting that his father is in the room. And it's that WhatsApp message now that is the center of the storm that's brewing. Because he said twice in that message, my father is seated next to me. He wanted the Chinese official to know, I am sitting in my father's house. He's right here with me right now. Send the money. That's the message.

Send the money. Dad's here. And it was a threatening message. He said, I have a long memory. Yeah, you'll never be able to, depending on the person sitting beside me, you'll never be able to work in this town. This is devastating. This is devastating. I mean, that's just the first half of Congressman Smith's opening statement. That's enough to send the Bidens to the clinker for 50 years.

In normal times. Yes. In normal times. In normal times. If this were what we used to call normal, Biden would have already resigned. The uproar would be so great great he would already be the former president the attorney general would resign it would be a wipe out

because there are so many people the FBI director so many people implicated in this scandal you're talking about two senior IRS investigators going on record under oath saying we were blocked from investigating Hunter Biden. So who were the people? Who were the people that blocked the investigators. They were blocked from interviewing witnesses. They were blocked from accessing the laptop. Every step of the way, they were hindered.

They were blocked. They were told, you can't do this. Meanwhile, the IRS can investigate pro-lifers. They can investigate Donald Trump. They can do all of this. School board. Moms go into school boards to complain about the indoctrination of their children. But everything gets backpedaled when it comes to Hunter Biden. We have another segment from that press conference with Congressman Jason Smith.

Let's watch this one. The whistleblowers revealed IRS investigators were told by U.S. attorney Leslie Wolf that because the evidence would be found in the guest house of former Vice President Biden, quote, there is no way, close quotes, a search warrant for evidence would ever get approved. IRS whistleblowers told this committee that crucial information about the investigation was divulged to Hunter Biden's attorneys. For example, even an investigator, investigators had probable cause to search a Northern Virginia storage unit in which Hunter Biden had stored files. Attorneys for Biden were made aware prior to any search, providing them valuable time

to remove any materials that could be useful evidence. Few Americans qualify for such soft glove treatment from federal investigators. Testimony shows that U.S. Attorney of Delaware David Weiss tried to bring charges in the District of Columbia around March of 2022 and was denied. Weiss sought special counsel status from the DOJ in the spring of 2022 and was once again denied. Weiss sought to bring charges in the Central District of California in the fall of 2022 and had that request denied in January of 2023. Yet U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland told Congress that Weiss had all the authority necessary to pursue the charges.

Well, which is it? Number three, these whistleblowers report they have faced almost immediate retaliation. They say they tried multiple times to sound the alarm internally at the IRS and raise concerns with the Department of Justice prosecution team. Their concerns were not given fair consideration. One of the whistleblowers was passed over for a position when he was more qualified than the candidate selected by IRS leadership. And roadblocks, roadblocks have appeared in the course of their other unrelated investigations. Now that they have testified to Congress, they have been removed from the investigation.

These individuals are risking their careers and reputations to do the right thing, which is to come to our committee, the only committee that can legally receive their testimony and share it with the House of Representatives. In closing, I'll repeat the three key findings from today's release of whistleblower testimony. Number one, the federal government is not treating taxpayers equally when enforcing tax laws. Number two, whistleblowers say that the Biden Department of Justice is intervening and overstepping when it comes to the investigation of the president's son. And number three, these whistleblowers have faced almost immediate retaliation. The scales of justice cannot be tipped in the favor of the wealthy and the politically connected.

No one is above the law. I'd like to believe that, that no one's above the law. In the old America, that was pretty much true. He said that U.S. Attorney Leslie Wolf told the one or both of the IRS agents there was a property that they wanted to search. Right, a storage unit. The storage unit. And Leslie Wolf, the U.S. attorney, said there's no way a search warrant would be approved for that unit because it's Hunter Biden's. Why?

Would they say that about Donald Trump? There's no way. There's no way we're going to search Donald Trump's home. They searched his bedroom. They searched his bedroom. But nobody even wanted to search Hunter Biden's storage unit. He also said Hunter Biden's attorneys were tipped off

about the possible search warrant, given time to clean out the building. And that U.S. Attorney David Wise was denied permission to bring charges against Hunter Biden. And yet today, this very day, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said, Mr. Wise has full authority to do whatever is necessary to fulfill his job. Now, somebody's lying, Doc. Either the IRS whistleblower is lying or Merrick Garland is lying.

Well, we've got a clip of Merrick Garland once again, and this was earlier today, saying that David Wise had full authority to pursue the investigation. So let's hear it in his words one more time. Yesterday, whistleblower testimony came out from an IRS supervisory special agent, current supervisory special agent, who insists he was in a meeting with U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who in October 2022 claimed in front of multiple people that he was told not to pursue the Hunter Biden investigation, not to bring charges in 2022. You said previously you've stayed out of the Hunter Biden investigation, not to bring charges in 2022. You said previously you've stayed out of the Hunter Biden investigation. It's been on David Weiss to figure that out. Can you once and for all shed a little light? There seems to be a little confusion on what's going on here.

I'd be happy to. As I said at the outset, Mr. Weiss, who was appointed by President Trump as the U.S. Attorney in Delaware and assigned this matter during the previous administration would be permitted to continue his investigation and to make a decision to prosecute any way in which he wanted to and in any district in which he wanted to. Mr. Weiss has since sent a letter to the House Judiciary Committee confirming that he had that authority. I don't know how it would be possible for anybody to block him from bringing a prosecution given that he has this authority. And he was never told no.

I would say he was given complete authority to make all decisions on his own. All right. Well, what did they do to Mr. Wise to tell him you need to send a letter? Because obviously, again, somebody's lying. Now you get three stories. You have Garland's story, you have Wise's updated story, and then you have the whistleblower's story of what Wise said earlier. So there are three stories now. You know how you get to it? You put them under oath.

And do you ever think about what swearing an oath to tell the truth? It's basically saying, well, most of the time I'm lying, but I agree that right now I'll tell the truth. Isn't that what swearing to tell the truth is? But anyhow, they need to get these guys locked down because under oath, if you can prove one of them committed perjury, they can go to prison for it. The other big thing that is happening here, Doc, this is, I'm going to go up to number five. This is New York Post. Hunter Biden, this is what we were talking about earlier, was at Joe Biden's Delaware home the same day he used his dad as leverage

in a China business text. They got the evidence of this crime. Right, of the day it happened and where it happened and yet they can't um they can't get an investigation going so the new york post is reporting that photos found on hunter biden's abandoned laptop revealed that he was at his father joe's delaware home on the same day that he used the future president as leverage in a text message sent to a Chinese business associate to close the deal. Hunter Biden sent a threatening WhatsApp message to Harvest Fund Management Director Henry Zhao, saying he was sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.

The message and photos cast fresh doubt upon President Biden's repeated claims that he never spoke with his son about his overseas business dealings. Now, we actually have the text of that communication here on WhatsApp. This is what Hunter Biden wrote to Zhao, supposedly while Joe Biden was sitting right there. So tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand and now means tonight, Hunter Biden said. And Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Jang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me

and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. Sounds like he's in the mafia. This sounds like a mafia guy. So now, as we mentioned before, IRS Supervisory Agent Gary Shapley revealed the WhatsApp message exchange to the House Ways and Means Committee last month, but it wasn't until yesterday that it was made public. Shapley said IRS investigators looking into the First Sons finances obtained the message from the First Sons iCloud account back in August of 2020 via a search warrant. So they've had this message for going on now three years, Rick.

Three years. August 2020 is just weeks after Joe Biden won the Democratic nomination. That's right. Now, Hunter's relationship with Zhao goes way back. It dates back to May of 2014, back to when his father, Joe Biden, was still Barack Obama's number two. Now, the Chinese associate expressed interest that month in launching a company with Rosemont Seneca, the first son's investment firm, according to laptop emails. So he's had a very long relationship with this member of the Chinese Communist Party, and that's been confirmed that Zhao was definitely a member of the CCP. But it's also been confirmed that Joe Biden was seated next to Hunter Biden

while Hunter Biden was twisting this guy's arm and threatening him to do whatever the Bidens had ordered him to do. I don't think it comes out in the text what he was instructed to do whatever the Bidens had ordered him to do. I don't think it comes out in the text what he was instructed to do, but clearly the Bidens, Joe and Hunter Biden, are acting like mafia bosses. Well, that's their business, isn't it? It is their business.

I was just thinking a moment ago when we were watching Mary Garland, the Attorney General, that guy almost became a Supreme Court justice. Yes. Thank God for Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell stopped that nomination. Barack Obama had nominated Mary Garland. And it was Mitch McConnell that stopped it. You got to give Mitch credit for that one. Or that corrupt Garland would be sitting on the Supreme Court right now.

He is corrupt. That man is corrupt and he's evil. He'll go after Catholics spraying abortion clinics. He'll go after moms going to school board meetings. But he won't go after a corrupt president and his son who's receiving money

from foreign governments. So it makes you wonder, what's in it for Merrick Garland? Well, and to show that there's absolutely no care or concern about this, New York Post has this headline here. Hunter Biden beams at White House state dinner, also attended by Merrick Garland amid alleged Department of Justice cover-up in a tax fraud case. Hunter Biden attended the White House state dinner Thursday with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hours after new evidence emerged of an alleged Justice Department cover-up in the tax fraud case against the first son. The roughly 400-person guest list included Hunter and

his uncle James Biden, with whom the first son has partnered on some of his most liquidated foreign dealings, including in China. Do you see anybody there who's saying, get away from me, you freak? No, nobody. They're all glad to be seen with him. We joke around about future President Hunter Biden, but I wouldn't put past anything here. The guy got thrown out of a sex club, but he can't get thrown out of a state dinner. Yeah, he got thrown out of a sex club for being too pervy for a sex club.

But that's just fine for a Biden dinner. Now, this story, as Rick said, has suddenly started growing legs. And there were two specific incidents that occurred today at the White House, one regarding White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre and the other regarding John Kirby. We're going to show you the interchange that the reporters in the White House press room today took on, Ms. Pierre, today, it was not a pretty sight. Watch this. Secondly, the president invited his son Hunter to the state dinner last night. I'm wondering if you could take us into the thinking and decision-making of why the president decided to invite him. I'm just not going to get into family discussion, personal family discussion. As you know, Hunter is his son. I'm just not going to get into it. Let me ask you this. If Hunter Biden wasn't the president's son, would he have invited someone

who had just reached a plea agreement with federal prosecutors? Well, a couple of things. Again, that's his son. He's a family member. It is not uncommon for family members to attend events at the White House. You could look at past presidents. I'm sure you have. So that is not uncommon. As it relates to anything related to Hunter, I'm just not going to respond to it from here. Can I follow up on that? I just called in somebody. Go ahead. So Curly wouldn't answer James's question, though. Are you going to answer the question? Not a reasonable question to ask when the President of the United States was involved, as this message seems to suggest, in some sort of a coercive conversation for business dealings by a Senate. Is that something, if he wasn't, then maybe you should tell us.

So here's the thing, and I appreciate the question. I believe my colleague at the White House Council has answered this question already, has dealt with this, has made it very clear. I just don't have anything to share outside of what my colleagues have shared. And so I would refer you to him and the DOJ. Just not going to comment from here. How do you know the text message facility? What I can tell you is I know that my colleague has dealt with this. He addressed this at the White House Council. I just don't have anything else to share. I just answered the question. I just answered the question. Yes or no, was the president involved in the shakedown attacks?

Stephen, Stephen, I just answered the question. I just said, I just, this isn't, it's not up to you how I answer the question. I just answered the question by telling you my colleagues at the White House Council has dealt with this and I would refer you to them. Go ahead. Can you just remind us what your colleagues said from the White House Council so we have it? I would refer you to them, and they will share their statement with all of you. My question is about your statements from that podium. You stated that the president stands by his comment from the 2020 campaign

that he never once discussed his son's overseas business dealings with his son. And you stood at that podium and you reaffirmed that. Do you stand by your reaffirmation? What I will say is nothing has changed. Nothing has changed. And I will leave it there. Anything else, I will refer you to the White House counsel. Is not a change? I just answered the question. You just asked me, does my statement change? I just told you nothing has changed. That's answering the question. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. Stephen, I'm calling on your colleague right now. Go ahead. Thank you. To follow up on my colleague, is there anything that you can say with regard to this text message and what the president's son was alleging. Was the president there or not? I would refer you to my colleagues at the White House Council.

They have addressed this and I refer you to them. Go ahead. Karine, have you spoken to the president about this? Have you asked him whether he was there with his son on July 30th? This is not a conversation that I've had with the president. Again, I would refer you to the White House Council. Do you plan to have that conversation with the President? No.

Did the President speak with the Attorney General at all last night? I cannot say if the President had had a conversation with the Attorney General last night. What I can refer you to is the White House Counsel's Office as it relates to the allegations. They've already addressed this. This is something for them to deal with. I refer you to the Department of Justice on anything else if you don't want to speak to the White House Counsel's Office. And there was reporting earlier in the week that after the plea agreement was reached by Hunter Biden, that the president felt relieved that that part of it was behind him. Is that true?

I can't speak to that. I cannot speak to the president's mindset. Again, I would refer you to the White House Counsel's Office. What did the White House Counsel say? Well, the one reporter asked, hey, could you remind us what the White House Counsel said? Could you remind us? And she said, well, I'll have to just refer you to the White House Counsel's Office for that. Well, somebody call the White House Counsel and ask, what's your statement? And they're going to say, you need to go to the press secretary. Now, this interchange that Corrine Jean-Pierre went through actually followed a previous exchange by John Kirby. John Kirby had come up to make some announcements and some various things.

And then James Rosen with Newsmax read the text of the WhatsApp message that Hunter Biden had sent. And watch John Kirby's reaction to this, all the way to the end, because you can tell something is up at the White House now. This is something that they're trying to get a handle on. Let's watch this. Documents. Their authenticity nowhere challenged. That included a July 2017 WhatsApp message sent by Hunter Biden to Henry Zhao,

a Chinese Communist Party official, which stated in its entirety, and I quote, I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And Z, if I get a call or a text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman,

I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows, and my ability to forever hold a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction. I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father, unquote. So just a couple of questions about this. First, does this not undermine the president's claim during the 2020 campaign and the reaffirmations of that claim by his two press secretaries since then, that he never once discussed his son's overseas business dealings with him? No, and I'm not going to comment further on this. James, James, let me save you some breath.

If you're going to ask about this, I am not addressing... I know you do, more than I'd like you to have. I am not going to address this issue from this podium. I'm just not going to do it. I'm not going to do it. Thanks, guys. Have a great weekend. Admiral Kirby

had some place to go. And I'll tell you, he's an admiral. That's right. Admiral Kirby and Karine Jean-Pierre both will resign in the very near future. Both of them will resign. They're not going to put up with that stuff.

There's no government paycheck big enough to do that every day. If you think you're going to get up in the morning and go to work and you've got to cover for the Bidens, they've gotten away with it for a couple of years. But now they can't. You've got people across the media that are asking questions. It's not limited. Oh, it's those conspiracy theorist media sites. You can't blame it on Russian disinformation, conspiracy theorists, all that kind of stuff.

You can't blame it on that anymore because everybody knows that's a lie. Those two, they will resign. A couple weeks, a month, maybe two months, they're not staying around for this stuff. I've never seen John Kirby pack up and walk out. He said, have a great weekend. See ya.

I'm out of here. Hey, one more story. Well, let's just take a look at this. This is number 14 14 Wall Street Journal. The U.S. Navy heard what it believed was the Titan implosion days ago. This is really unusual, Doc. A terrible tragedy. Yes. The submarine imploded and everybody killed.

And of course this has been the story that's really sucked all the air out of the room all this week. I mean it's been the story of the week. That's the point. There are people suggesting and we're not doing that. But we are mentioning that there are people suggesting that possibly, possibly commandos,

possibly private forces, sabotaged the submarine in order to create a global news story that would distract attention away from what we just heard about the Bidens. I'm not willing to go there. I'm just saying it's circulating. And it's starting to appear on websites where people are asking the question,

what happened? Here's why. Nobody was thinking this way days ago. But now when you find out that the U.S. Navy knew that the submarine had imploded last week. On Sunday. And they kept their mouth shut about it. And the world was told.

We're searching for them. They're searching. We're hearing tapping. We're hearing noises. They've got oxygen. Yes, for five days. And some media sites were doing countdowns on the amount of oxygen i think it was a news nation right news max or news nation

i think it's news nation they actually had an oxygen countdown how many days until the people ran out of oxygen they wanted everybody to believe these people are going to be found. This is going to be a miraculous rescue. It's going to be a wonderful. And I think all of us were hoping, hoping if there's any, any possibility that these people are alive, that that submarine would be found, that there would be this awesome hallmark movie made from this rescue. Right. And add to that the original Titanic tragedy

and the history involved with it, and you tie it with the submarine called the Titan. That's weird, isn't it? But to find out that the U.S. Navy knew last week that the submarine had imploded. Nobody was alive. And they kept quiet about it. Nobody came out from the Navy and said,

hey, look, you're all hoping that these people are alive. They're dead. We know for a fact that they're dead. This is strange now. This makes it very strange. So according to the Wall Street Journal, so now this isn't some conspiracy strange now. This makes it very strange. So according to the Wall Street Journal, so now this isn't some conspiracy website now. So according to the Wall Street Journal,

a top secret military acoustic detection system designed to spot enemy submarines first heard what the U.S. Navy suspected was the Titan submersible implosion hours after the submersible began its voyage. Officials involved in the search said, now the Navy began listening for the Titan almost as soon as the sub lost communications, and that's according to a U.S. defense official. Shortly after the submersible's

disappearance on Sunday, the U.S. system detected what it suspected was the sound of an implosion near the debris site discovered Thursday and reported its findings to the Coast Guard commander on site. That's according to U.S. officials involved. Now, this is a quote from the journal article. It looks like the Titan imploded on Sunday on its way down to the Titanic shortly after contact was lost at a depth of around 9,000 feet, a person with direct

knowledge of the matter said. The submersible had departed Sunday for what was supposed to be an hours-long excursion to the Titanic shipwreck more than two miles below the ocean surface. Shortly after the voyage began, the sub lost contact with the outside world. As Rick said, now defense officials, Navy officials are saying, we knew about this Sunday. But the news media, I'm going to show you a couple of,

just a selection of articles. Here's the New York Post, June 21st. Remember the banging story? 30-minute intervals between banging noises and an encouraging sign that the Titan crew is still alive. When I heard that, I thought, praise God. I hope these people are alive.

I hope they find them. But they knew. I'm not saying the New York Post knew. They were being fed this story. Right. But the U.S. Navy knew. The Coast Guard was giving out updates saying we're still searching. We're still looking. That's right. That the U.S. Navy knew. The Coast Guard was giving out updates and we're still searching. We're still looking. That's right. That's right.

The Coast Guard was telling they're searching. They were doing press conference. And yet the Coast Guard was told by the Navy that things blew up. It's gone. There's nothing left down there. Here's another one. This is OK. Theanic director james cameron now not only has he directed the titanic movie but he is also he has gone on multiple you know deep submersible dives in fact he has the world record for you know in the mariana trench with him and his team. They went like 38,000 feet down. And so he's been on about more than 100 deep

submersible dives. So he's qualified to talk about it. He's qualified to comment and talk about what was going on. Now, in this particular article, he accuses Ocean Gate of cutting corners, using unqualified people to pilot the vessel, a number of different things. But one thing that I want to bring out here is in an interview with the BBC, he made the comment that he felt, based on his experience with submersibles, he knew by Monday morning it was all lost. So we have that clip here. Let's watch this. I was out on a ship myself on Sunday.

I didn't hear about it until I woke up Monday morning. I immediately got on the phone to some of my other contacts in the deep submersible community. Within about an hour i had the following facts they were on descent they were at 2500 or 3500 meters heading for the bottom at 3800 meters they comms were lost and navigation was lost and i said instantly you can't lose comms and navigation together without an extreme catastrophic event, a high, highly energetic catastrophic event. And the first thing that popped to mind was an implosion. So I felt in my bones what had happened. So this entire week has

just felt like a prolonged nightmarish charade, where people are running around talking about banging noises and talking about oxygen and all this other stuff and their coast guard is out with airplanes. I knew that sub was sitting exactly underneath its last known depth and position. That's exactly where they found it. A long nightmarish charade. He knew it. He knew that there was some type of orchestrated propaganda campaign underway. And you saw his frustration there too. Yes. You know, he's grabbing his head and he's like, like he's trying, that's a body language. He's trying to figure it out because he can't, you know, cognitive dissonance is telling him, why did they do this search? Why did they put on this show?

What was the purpose of it? And even he hasn't come to the conclusion on that. So whenever you see a major news story, you have to ask yourself, all right, they're putting this out there. And it's, you know, all your attention is on it. So what is your attention not on? It's not on Joe and Hunter Biden. That's for sure. You're not talking about their crimes. Doc was in my office this morning. Several staff members were there with me, and we were talking about this this morning. And immediately, when Doc brought up the connection

between the Titan and the Titanic, so you have a submarine named the Titan taking people down to see the Titanic. Right. And we're talking about these mysterious things that don't make sense about this tragedy. And I said, hey, wait a minute. That reminds me of some news stories from 2015 that the Titanic, the investigation into the Titanic sinking was a Masonic cover-up.

And so I instantly found two articles from Great Britain. This is the Times of London, owned by Rupert Murdoch. This is, what's the date? November of 2015. 2015, Titanic cover-up by Freemasons. So this is an actual article in the London Times, not the National Enquirer or anything like that, the London Times.

Does that qualify it for you? The same people that own the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal and Fox News. We pull a few quotes from this article from 2015. And this is the reporting in the article, okay, in the London Times itself. It said, The far-reaching influence of the Freemasons over almost 200 years has been revealed after a secret archive containing the names of nearly 2 million members was opened to the public for the first time. Now, the archive, which runs from 1733 to 1923, shows that this is the London Times

saying this now, that Freemasonry had a foothold in every rank of the establishment with members ranging from royalty to politicians and including judges, bishops, businessmen, senior military officers, and police officers. Now this is where it relates to the Titanic. The records show that the judge who oversaw the British rec commissioner's inquiry into the Titanic disaster, a number of leading investigators, and some of those who escaped censure were all Freemasons. They included Lord Mercy, who oversaw the inquiry, Sidney Buxton, the president of the Board of Trade, which was exonerated by the investigation, two of the expert assessors, and Lord Peary, chairman of the Harlan and Wolfe Shipyard in Belfast, which built the Titanic.

Now, the London Times went on to say that while the revelation may reflect no more than the fact that many members of the establishment were Freemasons it may in the eyes of Freemasonry's stronger critics help to explain why the Titanic investigation was dismissed as a whitewash now the very next day the London Telegraph had this article. Was Titanic inquiry scuppered by the Freemasons? Okay, so this was a conversation of attention that week in November of 2015. Doc, these were front page stories, and I talked about it on True News in November 2015. I remember this vividly. This is like the Warren Report.

The Kennedy assassination, the investigation, the Warren Report. No thinking person believes the Warren Report. And so the investigation of the sinking of the Titanic was as fake as the Warren report. And what we know is that the Titanic investigation was done by Freemasons. I have a feeling that the Warren report was also done by Freemasons. So let's take a look at what the Telegraph said in 2015. Now, it relayed this information.

Some of it's duplicated from the previous article, but a secret archive containing the names of 2 million Freemasons has been made public for the first time on the genealogy site Ancestry, which reveals extensive Masonic involvement into the controversial British investigation into the sinking of the Titanic. It confirms that not only the judge who oversaw the British rep commissioner's inquiry into the disaster and leading investigators, but even though some of those who escaped censor were all Freemasons. Now, Lord, while a U.S. Senate inquiry

into the sinking savaged the white star line and singled out the british board of trade for blame for lax regulations which allowed the scandalously small number of lifeboats fitted on the ship the uk investigation overseen by lord mercy avoided blaming the board of trade now so lord mercy himself, John Charles Biggum, was, the records show, a Freemason, initiated in 1881 at the Northern Bar Lodge in London. Crucially, so too appears to have been the President of the Board of Trade, Sidney Buxton, initiated at Limehouse in East London in 1888, where he was also the local member of Parliament at the time. The names of at least

two of the inquiry's five expert assessors, Professor John Harvard Biles, a specialist in naval architecture, and Edward Chaston, the senior engineer assessor, can also be found in the Masonic archive. Meanwhile, Lord Peary, who was not only chairman of the Harlan and Wolfe shipyard in Belfast, which built the Titanic, but crucially also one of the directors of the White Star's parent company, also appears to have been a Freemason as well. Now, Titanic expert Nick Compton, author of Titanic on Trial, said the Titanic inquiry in Britain was branded a whitewash because it exonerated most of those involved. Only three passengers were interviewed and they were all from first class.

Even Captain Smith was exonerated on the grounds that most of the ships at the time also sped through the ice at full speed with no serious consequences. When we were talking about this particular story this morning about the Titanic, I was saying to one of our fellow staff members, how big a piece of ice do you have to have to break steel? How big does it have to be? How sharp does it have to be? Yeah, how sharp does it have to be?

How big? Try throwing ice at a metal container. What happens? Does the metal go away? Does it break? Does it bend? No, the ice breaks, right? So there's always been suspicion in my mind about the whole Titanic story anyway.

But then in this particular article here, it said other ships were going through ice fields. They were hitting icebergs. They weren't having any problems. Well, who was on the Titanic? Well, you had John Jacob Astor. You had several members of the Guggenheim family. You had some of the elite of the U.S., I guess, economy at the time. What they did have in common was an opposition toward this move to the creation of a Federal Reserve. And so there have been theories out there that maybe the Titanic was sabotage

for the purpose of maybe eliminating some of this opposition to the creation of that later on. Doc, this accusation of Freemasons scuppered the investigation into the sinking of the Titanic. There was another big investigation in London a few decades before, Jack the Ripper. That's right. The investigator was Robert Anderson, 33rd degree Masonason scotland yard he too

uh but you know his critics say he botched the investigation those are the the nice critics others say he deliberately botched the investigation because he was covering up for Freemasons who were involved in the murders. That there was a Masonic connection to the murders that were attributed to Jack the Ripper. But it was, once again, Masonic involvement in killing and investigation. Could the Joe and Hunter Biden investigation, is it possible that Freemasons have blocked the investigation of the Bidens? In my view, yes, it's absolutely possible. But if you ask the average person out there, they don't even believe Freemasons even exist. I mean, they might know their Uncle Dwight that went to the Masonic Lodge and played cards with his fellow lodge members and wore funny hats and stuff like that. That's not Freemasonry.

That's the show horse they put out there to say it's just a social club where we get together and, you know, tell old stories. The real Freemasonry is what is the hidden hand behind so many decisions that are made not just here in our nation, but globally. That's right. And by the way, one other little side note, Robert Anderson of Scotland Yard in the Jack the Ripper investigation. Yes. He was a close, close friend of John Nelson Darby. That's right. He was a member of the Plymouth Brethren Church and he was a prophecy teacher. Robert Anderson?

Robert Anderson. I have some of his books. Robert Anderson, the 33rd degree Freemason was a Bible prophecy expert. I have some of his books. Robert Anderson, the 33rd degree Freemason, was a Bible prophecy expert. I have some of his books. Well, shucks, Rick, who'd have thunk it? Could the rapture be from Freemasons? Well, I might write a book about it. We get about, well, by the clock, I got five minutes.

If you just give me an extra five minutes, we'll tell you what. How many of you out there will give me five minutes? Just give me five minutes. How many of you? Raise your hand. Okay, I said there's five. There's five. That's 10.

There's five. That's 50. Well, I got 20 extra minutes. Okay, all right. Stack it up. Yeah, so we... This is a big story we're about to talk about. This is a really big update on World War III.

I want to get into this quickly. CNN, early stages of Ukrainian counteroffensive not meeting expectations, Western officials tell CNN. Next one, a tweet from Zelensky. This was late yesterday. Yes. Go ahead, Doc. He says, this is President Zelensky of Ukraine. We have just had a report from our intelligence and the security service of Ukraine. Intelligence has received information that Russia is considering a scenario of a terrorist attack on the Zaporozhetsa nuclear power plant. A terrorist attack with radiation leakage.

They have prepared everything for this. Unfortunately, I have repeatedly had to remind that radiation has no state borders and who it will hit is determined only by the wind direction. So we share all available information with our partners, everyone in the world, all the evidence, Europe, America, China, Brazil, India, Arab world, Africa, all countries. Absolutely everyone should know this, international organizations, everyone. There should never be any terrorist attacks on nuclear power plants anywhere. This time, it should not be like with Kharkov. The world has been warned, so the world can and must act. Okay, so we have a, we've got a tweet from

Zelensky warning. He's been advised by his intelligence officers that the Russians are going to attack a nuclear power plant, the same nuclear power plant that the Russian army has been protecting from the shelling from the Ukrainian army. Now the Russians are going to blow it up. Right. According to Zelensky, I'll show you a headline. I'm not going to read the material from the article. This is the Sun. Zelensky warns Russia planning nuclear terror attack to unleash massive radiation. They will show you a map of Russian forces in Ukraine. Doc, what's the significant thing?

All right. So where the power plant is located is located as part of the Russian occupied forces. Russia is in the plant. OK. They're in the plant now. They're guarding the plant. In fact, what they are doing, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, is protecting the plant to prevent another source from shelling the plant, in specifics, Ukraine. So it's really disingenuous um zielinski's part to say that uh russians are going to blow up the power plant they're protecting yes so the the chief of the russian cia called the svr according to reuters he put out this warning today that there are suspicious activity going on, suspicious nuclear activity happening in Ukraine by the Ukrainian military. And Doc will give you the details.

So according to RT, Sergei Naryshkin, the head of Russia's SVR foreign intelligence service, has urged the UN nuclear watchdog and European Union to investigate Ukraine's nuclear activity, which he claims could indicate Kiev is developing a dirty bomb. Naryshkin did not provide evidence to support his allegations, which the International Atomic Energy Agency has discounted, stating that all nuclear material movements have been accounted for. The Ukrainian Defense Ministry has not responded to Narushkin's claims, but has previously accused Russia of being reckless in its control of the separate Zayad nuclear plant in southern Ukraine.

So now what Narushkin is saying is that his service had information that a batch of irradiated fuel had secretly been sent from the Rivne nuclear plant in western Ukraine for disposal at a spent fuel storage facility in Chernobyl. He said the action was suspicious and could only be explained by Kiev intending to create a dirty bomb containing radioactive material with conventional explosives. So you tie this together with the previous story of Zelensky saying that the Russians are going to blow up the plant they're protecting and create a nuclear winter across Europe. Now we also, go ahead. So the next one is a tweet from Dmitry Poliansky and he is let's see Russia's deputy permanent representative to the United Nations and this is what he tweeted today. So he's retweeting a Kim.com accusation that what's happening right now with all these accusations about nuclear power plants being blown up and being a false flag.

He says, we have just drawn attention to these plans of Kiev regime during the UN Security Council meeting. As we had warned on its plans on the Kakova power plant, the dam, the whole of Europe may be easily sacrificed by Zelensky and his blind Russian-phobic sponsors. Don't tell us we didn't warn you. All right, now, I want to jump down to, I want to jump down to, I know for our guys in control room, I apologize because I'm trying to get this done

before we run out of time. I want to jump down to number 59. So I think this happened yesterday. Senator Lindsey Graham and Senator Blumenthal held a press conference. Resolution passed by the U.S. Senate saying that if Russia uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine, it will be considered an act of war against all of NATO. That's right. What's Lindsey Graham and Senator Blumenthal, what are they up to here? It's happening right at the same time Zelensky says, hey, my spy chiefs are telling me the Russians are going to blow up a nuclear power plant. Well, let's hear their words, Rick. See what

they have to say about this. They've got a whole plan laid out there and we'll talk about it. This is number 54 for control, by the way. This is Senators Blumenthal and Graham talking about their new plan to get the war ramped up even further. So we're introducing a resolution today since the Senate resolution that says that if Russia or Belarus or a proxy of Russia explodes a nuclear device inside of Ukraine to stop the counteroffensive or to try to break the will of the Ukrainian people, such an attack should be considered an attack on NATO itself. We're of the belief that a nuclear weapon unleashed in Ukraine

would irradiate large portions of Europe where we have NATO allies. And why are we doing this? President Biden says threat of Putin using tactical nuclear weapons is real. That's like the 20th story down. So with a sense of urgency, we're urging our colleagues here to get serious about what could happen in Ukraine. Moving the tactical nuclear weapons out of Russia to Belarus was unnerving and I think very provocative. The counteroffensive is moving slowly but steadily. They're looking for a break. They will commit the forces that have been trained

by the West, six or eight regiments, thousands of well-trained, well-equipped forces will be put into the battle when they can exploit an opportunity. So the Ukrainians are patient. Russia has fortified their defensive positions. They've mined the whole country. They've been committing war crimes on steroids. Very abusive war being waged by Putin. But we're here to talk about something nobody else seems to want to talk about. I applaud President Biden for putting on the table that the threat of Putin using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine is real. And our message is to those around Putin that if you do this, if you follow his order, if he ever gives it, you can expect a massive response from NATO and you will be at war with NATO.

I can't believe that NATO nations would allow their countries to be irradiated by a nuclear attack emanating in Ukraine, not to consider that attack on the neighboring country and NATO writ large. So if this nuclear power plant blows up with the help of some Western missiles and drones and the thing blows up and it's worse than Chernobyl and radiation is drifting all over Europe, according to Lindsey Graham, NATO will have to nuke Russia

and get some more radiation going. You can't just limit it, Doc. You've got to have a lot of radiation. Well, Rick, I think there's a plan in place. And I'll tell you why I think that. There's an ex-aid of Zelensky that said, we actually had the quote, we didn't get to it today, that said if for some reason Russia makes a nuclear strike on Ukraine,

Ukraine would be admitted to NATO that same day. That it would be admitted in one day. So I'm thinking that they're trying to do this. Now, if we can put up number 55, these are the points of this document that... This resolution. This resolution. So the first thing is it agrees that the deployment of the Russian Federation's tactical nuclear weapons

within the Republic of Belarus is a threat to Ukraine and NATO member states. And views the use of any tactical nuclear weapon by the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility. There it is. Dispersing radioactive contaminants into NATO territory, causing significant harm to human life, as an attack on NATO requiring an immediate response,

including the implementation of Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Oh, my goodness. And urges the current administration to consult with NATO leaders and other European partners to develop a comprehensive response to minimize the threat to civilians and coordinate a diplomatic and military response commensurate with the situation.

Rick, I think they're going to do a false flag attack on that power plant. Really soon. We need to go on eBay and see if we can buy two straitjackets, one for Lindsey Graham and one for Blumenthal. Let's get these guys in straitjackets. Let's get them some help.

They're sick people. They're really sick. They need help. They're sick people. They're really sick. They need help. They're dangerous. I believe the Ukrainian counteroffensive has fizzled. Fizzled? It's popped out. It's popped out. It's done. Lindsey Graham and Joe Biden and the whole gang are desperate.

They're desperate. They need a Hail Mary pass now. And that Hail Mary pass is to blow up a nuclear power plant and then nuke Russia. That's where they're at right now. This is how crazy this world has become. Would the Pentagon, would NATO blow up a nuclear power plant in order to start a nuclear war with Russia? You've got to ask yourself, would they do that? My answer is yes. Yes, they would do it. And the Russians know that they would do it.

I'm just going to, before we wrap up, I'm going to go up to number 45. I found this in a what's this? A Polish news site? The Express.

Yes. This is an interview with the president of Poland, Mr. Duda. And he said if Russia eats Ukraine, even partially, then it will attack the rest of us. We can't let that happen. Now, it's what he said in that interview that's so brazen and shocking, and it got the Russians' attention. We're going to read you the quote. So, Polish President Duda said, Russia cannot be allowed to win because it will continue to advance. This will support its imperialism. She is like a wild animal that will eat a person. If a wild beast devours a man, then they usually say that he should just be hunted down and shot

because he is used to eating human flesh. The same with Russia. If Russia eats Ukraine, even partially, it will attack the rest of Ukraine as soon as it recovers. Russia will then pounce on other countries, on Poland, on the Baltic states, on the countries of the former sphere of the influence of the Soviet Union. Perhaps the West does not understand this, but we know it very well. This is a necessary condition for the successful and just conclusion of this war. So Mr. Duda's suggestion to conclude the war, bring the war to an end, is to classify the entire nation of Russia as a wild beast and shoot it. Like a wild animal. That's exactly what he said. And Mr. Medvedev of Russia had a

response typically we read everything he says verbatim word for word but we can't because some of his words were not they weren't family friendly I'll just put it like that they weren't family friendly so now the just put it like that. They weren't family friendly.

So now the Russians are not happy about Duda's name calling and calling Russia a wild animal. Medvedev wrote in response that in the 17th century, this creature would have simply been brought to Red Square and brutally executed by quartering. He's talking about Duda. And what is quartering? I know what it is, but what is quartering. He's talking about Duda. And what is quartering? I know what it is, but what is quartering? Quartering is, what they would do is they would tie arms and legs up to ropes and basically

they would go in four different directions with the... And your body is now in quarters. Yes. Now it went on to say, but we are humans. We will take revenge in a different way, Medvedev said. It went on in the article to talk about the largest mass, in this article,

bringing out the point about the Strotsky Rebellion, the largest mass execution in Moscow that took place. That was in 1698, where nearly 800 archers were beheaded. And it's interesting that Novosti brought this story out because this particular rebellion that took place was, of course, against the Tsars of Russia and their families. But this had been a group of soldiers, if you will, paid mercenaries who rebelled against the czar.

It's interesting that that... So they cut their heads off. Right. Is that a hint of how the Russian government will deal with the Polish leaders? Well, that, but also another story that's popped up today, too, and that's concerning the Wagner Security Forces in Prigoz wagner security forces apparently progozen is virtually declared war against the ministry of defense but progozen is the is the the paid mercenary paid by the russian government to put his mercenary troops in ukraine

right and now he he has been criticizing Putin for a while. For months, I thought, okay, this is theater. Putin and Prokhorov are working together. They want the West to think that they're fighting. But I'm now starting to think, Doc, that he has been bought off and that NATO has paid him a sum and told him, if you kill Putin in the Kremlin,

we will make you the president of Russia. Well, and there may be some meat on that bone, Rick, because Russian security forces in Moscow are on alert tonight because of supposedly remarks that Progozan had said earlier today. Where this all came up is that there was a strike on Wagner forces, and Progozan is saying that Russian made the strike on them, that it was given by orders of the Ministry of Defense. Was that the drone that took? I saw a video of troops, a concentration of troops that were taken out by a drone. Was that his forces? I hadn't thought about that.

And so I thought Ukraine, I thought Ukraine put the video out saying, look what we did. But Prokofiev has gone on Telegram basically and saying, we'll send people to Moscow. We're going to find the people responsible for what happened here. So we could have fighting inside the Kremlin, inside Moscow this weekend. Right. And a nuclear power plant. And a nuclear power plant. And hey, it's a good time to read this book.

Read it. But even better, skip the final day. Just read the Bible, all right? Get your life right with Jesus Christ. You're running out of time. And I'm running out of time. But I want to show you one more thing. One more thing.

One more. Okay? This is number 52. Mysterious glowing object seen over Poland. And we've got a video of this object. Yeah, so this was seen over the skies of Poland here just yesterday, day before yesterday. And there's been different speculation about what it is.

Some say it's a Chinese rocket coming back down. Others, that's a satellite that's finally drifted out of orbit. But this was seen virtually over the entire nation of Poland. You know what? The Bible talks about signs in the skies. I always look at the sky when I'm out walking my dog Fudge.

I was looking for signs because the Bible says watch for them. What are signs for? Signs are to inform or to warn or whatever. Fearsome signs in the sky. And so I keep my eyes on the sky. And so there's probably a technical explanation for a light in the sky like that,

but Poland better take it as a sign from the Lord that maybe they're on the wrong side of this conflict. Doc, in Final Day, chapter three, starting on page 111, his second coming shall be atmospheric. I wrote a whole chapter about what's going to be happening in the sky on the day that Jesus Christ comes back. All right. And Jesus and the prophets said a lot about what we will see in the sky. So that's the reason we look at the sky. There are signs in the sky.

And the biggest sign will be the sign of the cross, the sign of the Son of Man. I said the sign of the cross. We don't know what it is. The sign of the Son of Man will appear just before Christ himself appears. Go to Amazon and get this book, and the paperback, the audio, and the e-book are available on Amazon. This is a good time to read a book. It's a good time to buy a copy for your loved ones who are not saved. It's a good time to buy a book for your friends who think the rapture is going to take them out before Christ comes back.

This book will set them straight and it's available at Amazon. Thank you for watching. Be, look, be prayerful. Things, things could change rapidly, radically in the next 72 hours. Some very dangerous things are taking place right now. Be alert. Be ready. Be prepared. World War III is underway, and we are detecting tonight some significant changes

in the battlefield in Ukraine. We love you very much. We'll see you on Monday. God bless you. You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles. Thank you for listening. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969.