TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Operation Imprison Trump: Democrats to Arrest President Trump Over January 6 Protest

Episode Date: July 18, 2023

Radical leftist Democrats are not giving up on their determination to send former President Donald Trump to a federal prison. Mr. Trump informed his supporters today that he was formally notified by DOJ special counsel Jack Smith that he may be indicted for a third time. Mr. Smith is investigating matters related to the January 6 protests outside and inside the US Capitol. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 7/18/23 You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969.

You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles. We appreciate you tuning in. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help us God. Radical leftist Democrats are not giving up on their determination to send former

President Donald Trump to a federal prison. Mr. Trump informed his supporters today that he was formally notified by Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith that he may be indicted for a third time. Mr. Smith is investigating matters related to the January 6 protests outside and inside the U.S. Capitol. Let's start with a report by NBC News. Doc Burkhardt is here with me. By the way, I want to thank Eddie DeCunha, who was out here with us for several days after Doc was home resting. And Doc, don't do that to me again, okay? I'll do my best not to fall on the ground. Don't do that again.

But I really appreciate Eddie having the courage to come out here and without any preparation or training, he just said, I'll do it. I know you need help. I'll be out there and i really appreciate eddie being here and helping us out um we get him back in the control room uh he's our sound engineer and so we need him in the control room but i am going to i am going to bring eddie out uh in the coming weeks and months, various assignments, because we want to give him some experience and give him a role in some future podcasting that we're going to be doing in the

coming months. And for those of you who attended our Zoom calls, remember, next Monday, we're opening the doors to our new platform. You know what I'm talking about. I'm not going to tell everybody else yet. But if you attended the Zoom calls, then you know you have an invitation to sign up next Monday. And you'll be getting an email from us on Monday about our new platform. And if you received an invitation to be on a zoom call but didn't have an opportunity to participate well we're going to go ahead and send you another email on monday and you will be given your instructions of how to access your membership in our new platform so be watching

for that next monday very exciting yeah yeah There's a lot of new things happening here. Okay, so, Doc, they're going to arrest Donald Trump for a third time. One more time. Let's arrest him again. So NBC, this is a story. Trump says he's received a target letter from Special Counsel Jack Smith in the January 6th probe. So former President Donald Trump has claimed that he received a target letter from Special Council Jack Smith in connection with the January 6th riot, that's NBC's words, in efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Mr. Trump stated that he was given a short four-day notice to report to the grand jury implying that he may be indicted for yet a third time. It was unclear what specific charges are being pursued and whether anyone else received a target letter as well. He spoke about this. He said, deranged Jack Smith, the prosecutor with Joe Biden's Department of Justice, sent a letter again. It was sunday night stating that i am a target of the january 6th grand jury investigation and giving me a very short four days to report to the grand jury which almost always means an arrest and indictment and mr trump posted this on his true social personal account but that would mean doc that he's he has to go to the grand jury Thursday, this week. That's right.

So that would be, yeah, that's right, by the end of this week. So are they going to arrest him this Thursday? Well, he has to report to a grand jury whether they arrest him or not still, but they probably will. So Mr. Trump said his lawyers gave him the letter, which he called horrifying news for our country on Sunday night while he was with his family after attending the Turning Point event in West Palm. Nothing like this has ever happened in our country before or even close. And so this was a big weekend for Mr. Trump, President Trump. He made a big appearance at Turning Point's event down in West Palm. Straw Poll put him at 88 percent as far as selections are concerned.

So his popularity is still in the stratosphere among influential Republican, the influential Republican base there at Turning Point. I was, you know, I was invited to a meeting at at the at the turning point uh convention with a businessman who was in town um and he i wasn't meeting regarding turning point but he was at the convention he wanted to meet with me and i said sure i'll drive down saturday meet with you when i when i turned into the Palm Beach Convention Center parking lot, there were thousands of people outside. And my first thought was, this thing's over,

and everybody's out here to get on the buses to go back to their hotel. That was my first thought. Right. I parked, got out of my car and went into the, I only got as far as the parking garage elevator. And I heard in the elevator, there was a group of people talking and they said, it's a two to three hour wait to get inside. And I interrupted them and I said, you mean those people aren't leaving? They said, oh no, they're trying to get in i said what's going on they said president trump's speaking today and it's a two to three hour wait to get through security to to hear and see the president so um the man still draws crowds

now i can guarantee you i can guarantee you that if if there were two or three hour waits to get in to see Joe Biden, every mainstream outlet would be crowing about it, would be hollering about it, would be saying, look at this, look at the support for Joe Biden. But if it's Donald Trump, it's nothing but crickets, right? Right. Because you didn't hear about it, didn't see anything about it. But the people stood up and it was hot Saturday. Yes. It was really hot. Hot and humid. see anything about it but the people stood up and it was hot saturday yes it was really hot man hot

and humid and uh you know i've seen the president before and i thought i am not standing out here for three hours in this heat and um you know uh have a heat stroke so i can see president trump but he still draws a crowd and because he draws crowd, the Democrats are determined to put him in prison. Doc, this is about locking up Donald Trump. They are determined to lock him up. I said this in March of 2017, just less than two months after he went into the White House. And back then we're talking about Hillary Clinton. And I said, the race is on to see who goes to prison first,

the Clintons or the Trumps. I didn't realize it was going to end up being the Bidens or the Trumps. Okay. But President Trump immediately when he won the election in 2016, said, oh no, we're not going to investigate Hillary Clinton. She's a nice person. She's a nice woman. And I knew then, oh, you're going to regret this. You are going to regret this. You have no idea how evil they are. You have no idea how vindictive they are you're trying to be um the polite winner and saying i'm not going to i'm not going to lock up my opponent you i bet

he wishes he did but you know what even even if he tried doc he couldn't get an attorney general to do it that's true because every attorney general he appointed turned out to you know to stab him in the back so he couldn't get anything done but the the radical democrats had been on a campaign to put that man in prison what they're doing now i think they've got so many all right three this would be the third federal indictment they've got state indictments coming from georgia there could be new york indictments or maybe they did they indict him i've lost track uh did they indict him in new york i've lost track of who they have yet yeah. I think it's still federal charges.

There's so many different investigations going on. I think what they're going to do is the feds and the state governments that are investigating him are going to make a plea bargain deal with him. They're going to offer him a plea bargain we won't put you in prison for 800 years if you agree never to run for office and never speak in public again about political issues you go into complete total retirement you never talk about anything don't go to a rally don't tweet nothing you'll be on probation for 600 years i think that's what they're going to offer him this is about getting him off the playing field right and destroying his support base demoralizing the trump supporters that they think our man has abandoned us he's finished he's he's lost both legs we have no leader that's what they want and they are putting so much pressure on this man that is he really going to continue to fight them knowing that at any time, just one of these trials,

where they have multiple indictments against him. Right now, there's 71 charges against him. 71. They only need one. They only need to get one to stick. Not all 70, not all 71. They just need to get one. If they can get a conviction on one and get him 5 to 10, 15 years in prison, they've accomplished their goal. He's in his late 70s. He'll die in prison. That's what they want.

But Rick, I wouldn't put it past the ability of Donald Trump to run for president for prison. I wouldn't. I wouldn't bet against him at all. I would not bet against that man at all. And so it's going to be interesting to see how all this plays out here. They're starting, I believe it's next week, down at the federal courthouse in Fort Pierce, the preliminary charges and everything. And so that's coming up very soon. So this is in our neighborhood up here uh and but realistically a lot of these court dates for most of these are going to be out in 2024 some as far out as 2025 uh now they're trying to get this uh one here in florida moving up pretty quick because they know they've only probably only got one shot really before the

general election and they've got to to make sure they do something here. And if he's on, if he's in the trial, he's not out campaigning. That's true. And if a judge slaps a gag order on him, he can't talk to his supporters about what's going on against him. That's the other thing that they will do to him they'll get they'll get gag orders that he can't talk about any of these court cases they'll they'll de-platform his mouth and if he if he says one thing it'll be contempt of court and he'll go to prison

well donald trump's not the only one they're trying to arrest here lately is it no um there's actually stories today about vladimir putin being arrested in the coming weeks if he attends a brick summit in south africa which is ironic because he's one of the leaders of bricks that's right's right but South Africa is a member of BRICS but South Africa is a signatory to the International Criminal Court right so they're between a rock and a hard place there so according to News 24 out of South Africa South African President Cyril Ramaphosa stated in a confidential affidavit that arresting Russian President Vladimir Putin during his visit to South Africa for the BRICS summit would be considered, listen to this, a declaration of war against Russia. Ramaphosa argued that arresting Putin would be unconstitutional and put the national sovereignty, peace, and security of

South Africa at risk. Now, the affidavit was made public after a court ruling with the government initially seeking to keep it confidential due to the interactions with the International Criminal Court regarding the warrant of arrest against Mr. Putin. Mr. Ramaphosa said this, it would be reckless, unconstitutional and unlawful exercise of the powers conferred upon the government to declare war with Russia by arresting President Putin. Mr. Ramaphosa told the court in his affidavit, which he argued should be kept secret, but of course they didn't keep it secret, it would be inconsistent with our Constitution to risk engaging in war with Russia. I have constitutional obligations to protect the national sovereignty, peace, and security of the Republic

and to respect, protect, promote, and fulfill the rights of the people of the Republic to life, safety, and security, among other rights in the Bill of Rights, he said. Now, in arguing for confidentiality, Mr. Ramaphosa quoted a Rome statute article which states that a requested country shall keep confidential a request for cooperation in any document supporting the request confidential except to the extent that the disclosure is necessary to the execution of the request south africa is a signatory to that rome statute which governs the icc so let me explain what's going on here uh president ramaphosa is actually using the regulations of the International Criminal Court to say, we're really not involved in this matter, and our discussions regarding this matter should be kept confidential.

They weren't kept confidential. They were put out there after the court ruled on this. Mr. Ramaphosa said in his affidavit that the DA's demand for the government to arrest Putin was incompetent because the government of South Africa is not cited as a party to the application and no relief can therefore be granted against it. In other words, basically they're saying this is not really our matter here. We need to treat Mr. Putin, President Putin, as a head of state, just like we would anyone else. You know, there were rumblings a few months back that I guess one of the governors in South Africa, one of the states there, had said if Vladimir Putin lands here, we'll arrest him. And that has kind of set off this domino effect that's gone on there in the whole discussion regarding this. Why do you think he said it would be a declaration of war against Russia? Well, because, I mean, you're basically taking a head of state into custody.

You're kidnapping him. But South Africa is an ally of Russia. Was he using that term for the sake of drama or was he serious saying i don't know what russia will do to us we're friends i don't know what they'll do to us well and that's you know a very good question to ask i mean the south african south africa itself is a signatory to the international criminal court and they have been for a number of years even though they have violated some of the terms of the icc but that putting that aside imagine you know a head of state coming to the

united states and then taking them into custody what What would another country think about? Imagine if the British prime minister came here and we arrested him or the president of Brazil or anyone else. Imagine if a Soviet leader had come, and they had in the past. Soviet leaders had come to the U.S. and had visited the U.S. Imagine if we'd taken Fidel Castro into custody, which we would have had every right to do when he visited the U.S. and had visited the U.S. Imagine if we'd taken Fidel Castro into custody, which we would have had every right to do when he visited the U.S., but we didn't. Imagine the problems that there would have been, though. So the question is whether Vladimir Putin will actually attend

BRICS. It's kind of like a 50-50 bet right now. The South African president offered a Zoom call. Right. Why don't you just do Zoom? Do it online. Don't come here. He's caught proverbial rock in a hard place. He's an ally of Putin, but his country is a signatory

to the ICC treaty. And he's wondering, what happens to him? What legal jeopardy is he in if he refuses to arrest Putin? Is he then subject to legal sanctions from the International Criminal court well i think this is all a sideshow regarding the the brick summit coming up it's like arguing if cousin

eddie's going to come to the wedding or not and cause problems because what's really going to happen at the brick summit is going to be world changing yes whether vladimir putin is there in person or not what's going to happen at this BRICS summit will set the course of history for the next 100 200 years yes and that's the bigger story that we're not talking about and that takes us to this next story from Politico Russia amasses 100,000 troops as it seeks a breakthrough according to Kiev not only do they have 100,000 troops moving into formation, but also 900 tanks. That's right. So they're concentrating everything in order to break through our defense.

Our soldiers are firmly on the defensive. They do not allow the enemy to seize the initiative. That's coming from Ukraine's Army Command East spokesman from Surhai, Sheriff Vatia said. Ukrainian Army Land Forces Commander General Alexander Surik confirmed Russia has concentrated its forces to attack

in the Kupyansk direction, but thus far they've been unable to break through. Ukraine's Deputy Defense Minister Hanna Malia, supported that view, saying as soon as we seize the operational initiative and begin to advance, the enemy immediately activates in additional directions to distract and draw forces there. So the Ukrainians here are making statements that, you know, we're fighting, we're making our defenses against Russia,

but what's really hidden in the message there is Russia is outmaneuvering the Ukrainians every step of the way. The one thing, Doc, or two things that we're missing in this material that we just presented, we didn't show what that article said. 100,000 Russian troops and 900 tanks are in motion. What is going on russia's making their first initial offensive into uh really securing uh western ukraine at this point i mean eastern ukraine excuse me and so they're they're making their show of force right now. And 900 tanks is what, about 8% of Russia's tank inventory? Right. They have 12,000 tanks. So they're not short on tanks or anything. We're in the middle of summer and the ground is dry and it's time to start moving.

You know, everything was locked up in the winter and spring. Now we're making the summer and fall offensive. We have a few months here where Russia is going to make some significant advances here over the next couple of months. months and ukraine's in a situation where they have not received enough um ammunition enough you know defense materials from the west to really combat it that's why you see them making attacks at dams and bridges and everything okay so the washington post today has an article saying that the biden administration in washington the west is pressuring Ukraine, give us a breakthrough. You guys, you guys, we have to do something that gives us a breakthrough. We need to break the back of Russia because the BRICS meeting is coming. Right. Okay. And if the Washington Post article is correct, Doc, the West is starting to panic that the Ukrainians can't, they don't have what it takes to make it happen.

That's why Zelensky keeps saying, give us bigger missiles, give us longer range missiles, give us more bombs, give us something. Because they don't have, they don't have what it takes to to defeat the russians on the battlefield and if but the washington post is saying that the biden administration is really pressuring zolinski you've got you've got to pull off something something that's why they try to hit the the bridge right and it happened right after the nato summit yes. So, you know, Zelensky got the orders at the NATO summit. Hit that bridge. Do something because we're in a point where, you know, where we can't keep sending you stuff without having some sort of feedback. When the West stops sending money and tanks and bullets and everything else, when the United united states stops paying when we stop paying for

the the pensions and we're paying for the pensions of ukraine yes when we stop giving billions of dollars to ukraine what happens to ukraine it collapses it's a failed state the war is over and didn't we just authorize another 11.3 billion either late yesterday or earlier today? I think so. But it's a failed state. So it will forever be on the dole. It will be a welfare state that subsidized by the Americans, the British, the French, the Germans. We're going to pay for Ukraine for decades decades it's a failed state at this point so if the war stopped what happens to ukraine russia takes over at this point there's nothing

the ukrainian military collapses the day that the western money stops flowing and i'm not completely convinced that russia wants to take over Ukraine. I mean, that they want the responsibility. That wasn't the purpose of the military operation. I mean, I think they would just be happy to say, hey, we've got the eastern provinces. That's it. We're done. NATO, you figure it out.

You divide this up, but just keep your missiles and stuff out of Ukraine, or we're going to do this all over again. Right. The Russian position is the Nazis have to be eliminated. Yes. And absolutely no NATO military bases in Ukraine. So, Doc, I think the Russians know without a peace treaty, without something in writing that the West agrees to, this fighting is going to continue for decades. It'll go for decades. And maybe not red hot fighting, conflict trouble because until they get a settlement they can't back off and i'm of the opinion they've already got the settlement they already know where

the end of the road is on this they're going to carve up ukraine like a thanksgiving turkey yes and there's going to be a little bit of ukraine left maybe around kiev pol there's going to be a little bit of Ukraine left, maybe around Kiev. Poland's going to get a piece. Romania's going to get a piece. Everybody's going to get a piece of Ukraine. That's right. The spokesperson for the Russian foreign ministry,

Maria Zakharova, she accused London of having its fingers in the attack on the Kerch Strait Bridge on Sunday night. So they're now naming accomplices. So the Kiev regime is using London supplied weapons. Notice that they specified the UK to kill and maim people, making the UK an accomplice in Ukrainian crimes. That's coming from Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova speaking on a comment on the agency's website. It says, quote, the shells and rockets supplied by Great Britain kill and maim, leave orphans, the very children whose protection it supposedly acts.

This makes London an accomplice to these and other crimes of the Kiev regime. And he cannot escape responsibility the commentary says in connection with the sanctions of the British government now this is a significant step because they are specifically calling out the the UK Britain in uh being in cahoots on this primarily this latest attack. And they labeled that attack a terrorist attack. Yes. So that means that the Russians are saying that the Brits are involved in terrorist attacks against Russia.

And that would make Great Britain a terrorist state in the eyes of Russia. Whether you agree with it or not is beside the point. They're laying the groundwork they're laying the legal groundwork to declare great britain a financier of terrorism all right just like you would for let's say iraq or anyone else out there they're they're making the legal case just like we would make the legal case doc yesterday the london times had a headline about the uh cancellation of the uh ukrainian grain deal and i just wanted to show our audience the propaganda fears for global food supply i mean doesn't that sound ominous i know it's the end of the world. That was the front page of the Sunday Times.

Not Sunday, but the Monday Times, the London Times. Fears for global food supply. I mean, you read something like that, it's like, do I need to go out and buy bread? Do I need to go buy cereal? The food supply is drying up. Putin is going to starve everybody everybody that's the propaganda in there but this is what i want you to remember what are the world economic forum slash climate change radicals doing in the netherlands well they're shutting down dutch farmers shutting down the farmers yeah

because cows fart and pigs make gas and everything else and you know growing uh food to feed them that's that's bad too so they're shutting down the dutch shutting down the farms so why don't we see headlines fears of global food supply crisis as netherlands shut down farms right and ironically the last grain ship to leave odessa yesterday as this grain deal closed out wasn't going to you know nigeria or you know some place where people are starving to death in africa or asia no that grain ship was headed to the netherlands the same country that's shutting down the farmers that grow the grain yes well in fact most of the grain most of the majority of the grain

isn't going out to the rest of the world it's going to europe yes well i just wanted our audience to see the propaganda uh let's switch uh let's switch to local um u.s based politics the interesting story uh fox fox news reporting former fbi agent confirms key details of hunter biden whistleblowers testimony and wait until you hear what the fbi did regarding hunter biden it's just it never stops their protection of him they're they're they're coddling of him right the fbi watches out for him go ahead ahead, Doc. So Republicans in the House Oversight Committee revealed that a former FBI agent confirmed that parts of a whistleblower's testimony regarding alleged political interference by the Biden administration in the federal investigation of Hunter Biden,

the accusations suggest that decisions in the case may have been politically influenced and the federal agents were prevented from interviewing Hunter Biden, leading to accusations of a two-tiered system of justice. And that's coming from Representative James Comer. But listen specifically here, what they said happened. The night before the interview of Hunter Biden, both Secret Service headquarters and the Biden transition team were tipped off about the planned interview. On the day of the Hunter Biden interview, federal agents were told to stand by and could not approach Hunter Biden. They had to wait for his call. As a result of the change in plans, IRS and FBI criminal investigators never got to interview Hunter Biden as part of the investigation. Let me repeat that last line.

They never got to interview Hunter Biden as part of the investigation. Okay, so Secret Service and the Biden transition team were involved in obstruction of justice. That's it, plain and simple. Lock them up. Lock them up. They should be going to prison i mean this is obvious obstruction here i mean how much more plain can you make it doc tomorrow there will be something more outrageous today they're arresting donald trump tomorrow there'll be something even more

outrageous than the fbi tipped off or secret service tipped off the biden's i i was outraged the day they went to interview hillary clinton and she served the mice tea and everything july 4th interview and you know we were you we were waiting. This was going to be it. And the FBI, you know, Elliot Ness is going to get Hillary this time. Right. And they never put her under oath that day. No, they didn't. And so they just they just took her for her word. Hillary, we're just going to accept that you're giving us legal answers. You know why? Because if she was under oath and she lied, the lie itself is a crime. Is a crime.

And so rather than have Hunter even have an oath, just don't interview him. That's the easiest thing to do. Give him time to get out of town. cover-up for the Biden showed that there was a two-tiered system of justice and vowed the committee would continue to seek the answers, transparency, and accountability that the American people demand and deserve. I'll just remind Representative Comer, 99% of the time Democrats don't go to jail. So, and that takes us to the next story. The Hill is reporting the Republicans are debating the question of impeaching Attorney General Merrick Garland. I do not believe the Republicans have the backbone to do it. I don't think so either, but they're debating about it. Their impeachment efforts on Attorney General Merrick Garland after Speaker Kevin McCarthy suggested an inquiry against him, surprising some members who had been targeting other Biden officials. Now, McCarthy's focus on Garland stems from allegations of mismanagement of the investigation into Hunter Biden.

However, there is debate within the GOP about the legal basis for impeaching Garland and whether other cabinet secretaries should be reviewed first. McCarthy doubled down on action against Garland last week in a Fox News op-ed. He said, when a prosecutor shields his boss's son from investigators, it smells like a cover-up. Garland's DOJ did not aggressively follow the money. Why? Are they afraid where that trail ends? He said, clearly someone is not telling the truth and Congress has a duty to get answers, aggressively followed the money why are they afraid where that trail ends he said clearly someone is not telling the truth and congress has a duty to get answers mccarthy says yeah he goes on this is a quote from congressman daryl isa i don't know of a chargeable crime it's very very popular with people in the hinterlands isa said when uh asked about members of the freedom caucus and others who have backed the rarely used move of impeaching a cabinet official right there doc that's why the

republicans aren't going to do anything right there isis says i don't know if there's any chargeable crimes here the democrats how about neglig? How about just incompetence? How about you're not doing your job? Impeachment does not require a legal crime. It's whatever you say it is. It's not like outside of Congress, outside of the U.S. government, you know, a law enforcement officer, FBI or so forth, investigating somebody for theft or murder or transporting, you know, drugs across state lines. Those are crimes. When you're talking about impeachment, it's whatever you say it is.

Basically, it's a reflection on your job performance, isn't it? Yes. What did they impeach Donald Trump for? A phone call to Ukraine. Was the phone call illegal? No. They never questioned the legality of the phone call or even the legality of the content of the call. It was his motive.

He was impeached for his motive. What they said was his motive. So I don't think the Republicans will do anything. They blow smoke. They don't do anything. I'm not going to sit around and wait on the impeachment of Merrick Garland. He's going to laugh at them. And if he gets a chance, he'll arrest some of these guys.

You're probably right. Next one, New York Post. Jim Jordan threatens FBI Chief Ray with contempt over the FBI investigating parents and Catholic Church members. Jim Jordan's a good guy. I think he's serious, but he also gets his marching orders from Kevin McCarthy. And he's not going to buck Kevin McCarthy. It all depends on what Mr. McCarthy says. You know, they had the FBI director sitting right in front of them. They have a, you know, they have a sergeant of arms.

The speaker could have said to the FBIbi director arrest that man yeah arrest him now put him down in the jail cell down in the capitol building yes would that have made headlines absolutely it would have and i don't understand why they don't exercise that authority when the fbi director has repeatedly refused to provide documents requested by Congress again and again and again. They should have arrested him. They had him sitting right there. Put the FBI director in the jail cell in the House. But the Republicans are absolute cowards.

They will not been provided. He set a July 25th deadline for the FBI to substantially improve its compliance with the subpoenas or face consequences. Now, let's turn this around, Doc. Let's say the FBI comes, agents come to your house and says, Doc Burkhart, you've got documents we want to see. We're going to give you until tomorrow at 12 noon to turn them over to us and tomorrow 12 noon comes and you're sitting in your recliner sipping on iced tea and the fbi shows up and you say i don't feel like giving them to you what are they going to do to you uh they'll they're going to

handcuff you handcuff me and they're going to and they're going to suv and they're going to handcuff you? Handcuff me and throw me in the back of a bio-SUV. And they're going to search every inch of your house. And they're going to carry your goods out. And they're going to take every document that I have. Every document you have. Not just the ones they request. Because they're the FBI. They do anything they want to do. And here's Congressman Jordan saying,

I'm going to give you another opportunity to substantially improve your compliance with our request. Which you haven't done so far. The memo that he sent over to Christopher Wray says this. After several accommodations, months of persistent outreach by the committee and attempts to negotiate and work with the FBI in good faith, we write to notify you that if the FBI does not improve its compliance substantially, the committee will take action. Action, I say, such as the initiation of contempt of Congress proceedings to obtain compliance with these subpoenas, Jordan wrote. Well, do you know who has to enforce the contempt of Congress procedure?

The Department of Justice they're going to laugh do you think Mary Garland is going to send marshals over to the FBI building to arrest Christopher Wray of course not but if he was a Republican they would

what did they do to Roger Stone what did they do to Steve Bannon Steve Bannon didn't show up for a congressional uh hearing so they put him in contempt of congress and had they would not had him arrested they sure did they sure did but all because they didn't follow the instructions of a congressional committee. Yes. And Christopher Wray has been ignoring the instructions of a congressional committee. He's the chief law enforcement officer, and he's breaking the law.

He has contempt for the branch of government that oversees his performance. He has contempt for them. But he's simply doing what he's told to do. And that is, don't cooperate. Is anybody investigating who tipped off Hunter Biden? I mean, they didn't even question Hunter Biden about the cocaine found in the White House. It wasn't questioned. How about put that rascal on a lie detector? Did anybody think about that?

Just give him a polygraph test. Have you ever brought cocaine into the White House? I wouldn't want to burn up the polygraph. You don't need a polygraph to know that he's a drug addict. Oh, well, why are we talking about this, Doc? Tomorrow, they're still going to be crooked, aren't they? Yeah, they are. They're going to be crooked tomorrow.

Let's go on to London Times. Robert F. Kennedy accused of anti-Semitic COVID conspiracy theory. Boy, he stirred it up this time. And so Robert F. Kennedy, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, has now faced accusations of promoting. Now, this is what the London Times is saying, an anti-Semitic COVID conspiracy theory. During a press event at an Italian restaurant in New York, Mr. Kennedy claimed that COVID-19 may have been ethnically targeted to spare Jewish and Chinese people. He suggested that there is an argument that the virus disproportionately affects certain races, mentioned that Ashkenazi Jews are among the most immune. Now, let's be clear here that report actually exists that report is a real

report it's not a made-up report it's not a theory it's a it's a published report in an authentic medical journal yes so it's not theory but it's actual research that's been done. But sitting there in this Italian restaurant, talking to, you know, at a fundraiser for in New York, he said COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately. And Kenny was speaking to fellow diners at Tony's DiNapoli on Tuesday night. COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese. We don't know whether it was deliberately targeted or not,

but there are papers out there that show the racial or ethnic differential and impact. The claim that, and this is coming from the ADL now, the claim that COVID-19 was a bioweapon created by the Chinese or Jews to attack Caucasians and black people is deeply offensive and feeds into xenophobic and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, the ADL said in a statement. We have no words for this man's lunacy, tweeted Stop Anti-Semitism, a campaign group funded by the ADL. Now, Mr. Kennedy has claimed the Post story was mistaken and complained his remarks were made off the record. He insisted he had never, ever suggested that the COVID-19 virus was targeted at spare Jews. I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered, Kennedy tweeted, with a link to a medical study on the genetic susceptibility to covet 19 as i said there is an actual report that actually exists and i've watched his video

where he's talking and he's just talking casually to diners like you would anyone else there's a report there's a report out there that COVID-19 may have a preference. He said words. He said words out loud. That's right. You can't say words. He said Ashkenazi out loud. That's what he said.

And Chinese in one sentence, which would imply that the Chinese communists and the Ashkenazi Jews may have some knowledge about the COVID bioweapon. Now, that's the explosive thought in that concept. The idea that there are biological weapons designed to attack specific races is an absolute fact this is not a conspiracy theory and the number one developer of bioethnic ethnic weapons is israel because they developed biological warfare agents to kill arabs now if that's not true then london times the same the same newspaper that just reported this story accused bobby kennedy of conspiracy theories they need to go back and retract their 1998 article about the israel Israeli weapon designed to kill Arabs. Because were they spouting off conspiracy theories in 1998?

I read that article in 98. I talked about it in 98, 99, 2000. I talked about that a lot. Was the London Times promoting conspiracy theories when they published that article. They said Israel had created bioweapons to kill Arabs. Well, if they had a weapon, a bioweapon to kill Arabs, would they not make sure that their own country

would not be infected with the with the bioweapon right let's think about it well the new york times uh you gotta appreciate their spin on this robert f kennedy airs bigoted new covid conspiracy theory about Jews and Chinese. Now listen to this is direct quote from the New York Times. A conspiracy filled rant. Now watch the video. He wasn't ranting. He was Bobby Kennedy sitting in a chair eating spaghetti. A conspiracy filled rant by Robert F. Kennedy

that the COVID-19 virus was engineered to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people has stirred up accusations of anti-Semitism and racism in the Democratic candidates. Long shot run for president. Got to throw that in, too. They had the quote that we mentioned before. Mr. Kennedy has made his political career on false conspiracies. Listen to the way the Times phrases this about not just COVID-19 and COVID vaccines, but disproved links between childhood vaccines and autism,

mass surveillance and 5G cellular phone technology, ill health effects from Wi-Fi, and a stolen election in 2004 that gave the presidency back to George W. Bush. Those sound like bullet points on an episode of true news so is this a is this a an unbiased news article or is it an op-ed well it's supposed to be a news article right but it's written it's so slanderous it's so biased that there's no fairness in it at all most of these newspapers and news organizations no longer report news. They just spew propaganda. And if you

get close to actually reporting news, they come after you. And so the only thing Bobby Kennedy did at that banquet is just casually say, I read a report. Yes. You're not allowed to read. You're not allowed it. You're not allowed to do it. You're not allowed to read

and you're not allowed to read out loud and you're not allowed to tell people about what you read. Well, go on, because this, yeah, the New York Times gets even raunchier here. But his suggestion that the coronavirus pandemic spared Chinese people and Jews of European descent strayed into new and bigoted territory. The anger from Jewish leaders over his COVID remarks was immediate. Representative Josh Gottheimer, Democrat of New Jersey, wrote on Twitter,

RFK Jr. is a disgrace to the Kennedy name and the Democratic Party. For the record, my whole family who is Jewish got COVID. We were talking about this earlier today that, yes, there was a number of people in the Jewish community in different parts of the country. And the Freemason ADL. Yes. Now, we quoted that part earlier. This is what the Times full quote said about COVID-19 that we have seen evolve over the last three years. So what they're saying is this idea of an ethnic weapon this is kind of the evolution of this crazy thought of all the different covet 19 conspiracy theories out there and this is just

the latest one i think what there's what they're saying doc is um we've lost the fight to tell people that coronavirus came from a bat and it's now commonly accepted that it was a man-made virus that was that was released either deliberately or accidentally from wuhan lab now they know that they've lost the fight the propaganda fight but think about that though if in the beginning we knew it was a man-made virus absolutely knew it was a man-made virus think about the anger of people at that point there would have been tremendous anger at that point but there was enough confusion and everything going on we didn't know for sure but they said frog in the kettle center they managed

they managed the public they managed the public they they introduced a storyline a bat down at the meat market down there at the old bat market you know those chinese people eating bats and stuff it's no wonder they got coronavirus yeah that was a line that they fit in. Isn't that racist itself? Yeah, but they didn't care because they had a story to go with. And the news media, which is always compliant, always part of it, the news media is not independent. It is part of the operation. It's just a division. It's a subsidiary. It's not like the news media has to be convinced to go with

they're part of it they work together and they went with the bat story and if you said it came from wuhan lab you were deplatformed that's right and now we've pretty much settled it came came from Wuhan. So that's why the New York Times or the ADL is saying this conspiracy theory that has evolved over the last three years. You mean that it was manmade? Because they know it was manmade. They know a lot more about it and they want to talk about it. The ADL, don't ever forget the ADL is Freemasonry. That's right.

It is funded by B'nai B'rith. B'nai B'rith is the largest Jewish Freemason lodge in the world. The ADL is the attack dog of the B'nai B'rith Freemason lodge. So I'm quite proud to be on the hit list of the ADL. I'm very proud of that. If they think that they're shaming me, oh, no way. They're the ones that need to be shamed. I know what they are. I know who they are. And they know that I know who they are. Right. Well, Rick, this isn't the first time that Bobby Kennedy has mentioned anything about this. In fact, back last month, he appeared on Newsmax. We have this article from Daily Wire headline here.

This is from June 21st. So this didn't sneak up on everybody. That's why I think this event last week was a gotcha moment. But this was from last month. Daily Wire, RFK Jr. says china and u.s developing ethnic bioweapons pentagon says ain't nope we're not doing that pentagon said we're not doing it that here's the difference last month he said this and no reaction because he did not say jews that's right that's why the uni said china right the moment you add jews to it you're you are targeted for wipeout that's right so uh we have him a clip of uh rfk jr appearing on

newsmax uh gretta van susteren show, our favorite Scientologist out there. This is back on June 20th, where RFK is talking about ethnic bioweapons. Well, what I worry about is, is a WMD like a virus, like a gain of function, something, do you worry about that? Because I see that as sort of the next, the next big fight, because, you know, those viruses don't see any borders and they're relatively cheap to do this gain of function. I mean, it's just so that's what I worry about more than the big hardware. Yeah, you're exactly right. And we know that the Chinese are developing ethnic bioweapons, bioweapons that are designed to attack people of certain racial types. And we're doing the same thing.

We've been collecting Chinese DNA. We've been collecting Russian DNA specifically for that. This arms race is a catastrophe. You know, in 1969, we had developed by then nuclear equivalency with bioweapons. So we could eliminate the same numbers of people with bioweapons at, I think, 29 cents a death. They calculated, the Defense Department and the CIA calculated at that time. And President Nixon did the most extraordinary thing. He went to Fort Detrick and he said, we are unilaterally ending the bioweapons arms race. We are giving up

all of our bioweapons. We're going to destroy them. We're going to disable the capacity at Fort Detrick and we're not going to make them anymore. And three years later, almost all the nations on the earth signed a charter stopping bioweapons production. And the problem was the CIA continued to do secret bioweapons production in our country. The Russians found out about that and rejigged their program. And then after 2001, we passed the Patriot Act, which reopened the arms race, which basically canceled out Nixon's 1979 agreement treaty and launched a new bioweapons arms race. And everybody else in the world is doing it. And the impacts, as you point out, Greta, are horrific.

We need to stop it. We need to go out to all those nations and we need to say to them, let's get rid of all the bio-webs. Now, was the U.S. collecting DNA samples of the Chinese and Russians? Well, I can't speak about the Chinese, but I know absolutely for sure they were collecting DNA of Russians because the U.S. Air Force posted it on their job site that they're looking for people to help collect samples. Well, Doc, now you're... 2017. You're spreading conspiracy theories. Okay. But we reported that story. We showed on the screen, here is the job posting from the Pentagon. I don't know if the guys can bring it up. I found it real

quick here. Did you really? Okay. But yeah, the U.S. Air Force on FedBizOps posted a position for people to collect Russian DNA samples. I mean, it's really just that simple. That's all it was about. And that's why the Russians talked about it. Yes. It wasn't Russian propaganda. Yeah, Vladimir Putin brought it up in a speech and uh and of course you had a whole bunch of different outlets that report zero hedge reported

on it biz pack review reported on it we reported on it we i think we did a whole practically a whole god cast about if you reported on it then you were accused of spreading russian propaganda but the russians brought it up because they read the job posting. Right. Don't read. Don't talk. And don't say words. Don't say words. Doc,

you know with all the DNA testing that we have today, an enemy, if you're important enough to be taken out because it would it would require the expenditure of money in scientific research and laboratories so forth but if you're important enough to be taken out a government could make a bioweapon just for you. Sure.

If they have your DNA, they can make a bioweapon that only kills you and doesn't kill anybody else. I seem to recall a Secret Service story that they don't allow, like if the president goes to the restroom somewhere, the restroom has to be secure because a foreign enemy could take samples of waste.

Yes. And they do that. And be able to create a weapon directed toward that one individual. I remember years ago, and I was amazed at the creativity of Mossad when I read the article. President Assad of Syria, his father was still a president. And I forget his name. What was Bashar Assad's father's name? I forget his name.

Mr. Assad. Dad. Yeah, Pops Assad. but he was still the president and there was a there was a a meeting of uh of middle eastern political leaders heads of state and there was a masad agent there, a spy, who drilled a hole in the back side of the men's restroom and collected the urine from President Assad when he went to the bathroom so that they could

run tests to know the state of his health. Can you imagine being given that assignment? Leave it. This is your job today. Achmed, we got a job for you. You got to go down to the toilet. But that tells you.

And that was, you know, that was what, 20 years ago? 20, 25 years ago that, you know, they were doing things like that. So, you know today the collection of DNA from political leaders which is why we saw during the COVID pandemic remember how the distance

Putin would put between himself remember that desk that table visitors had to sit like a block away because he wasn't going to get close to anyone he wasn't going to touch her hand he wasn't going to do anything they know how quickly they can be infected and they know how quickly somebody can take a sample you could just if you have a swab in your hand

just by shaking your hand off, you could get enough skin particles on a pad that you've got a foreign leader's DNA. There are things that you can do. And these guys now are paranoid of getting close to people. So weapons can be formed and made in laboratories to take out specific leaders. And nobody knows, hey, the guy died.

And if they can take out specific leaders, they can take out specific segments of the population, too. Of course. And this technology is not new. It's been around for a long time. We operated in biowarfare in the old west. We'd give smallpox to Indians because they didn't have an immunity to smallpox and wipe them out. We had the immunity. That was biowarfare too. That was targeting an ethnic group at that time so ethnic bioweapons have been around for a while that's right now this thing about words and you can get in trouble for words that takes us to the next story remember uh last month nigel farage in great britain said

his bank accounts had been closed by coots that's the name of the bank coots well now the telegraph reported that nigel ferrard's fraudge's coots bank account i just like saying that coots the coots bank account was closed because the bank did not feel that he aligned with their values right and they used foreign sources and foreign opinions in order to determine, you know, basically the profile for Nigel Farage. So the London Telegraph, according to the London Telegraph, Nigel Farage's bank accounts at Coots were closed because the bank felt his views did not align with their values. So documents obtained by Farage show that a reputational risk committee

cited various reasons, including his comments about Brexit, his friendship with Donald Trump, and views on LGBT rights as factors that made him incompatible with Coots. Mr. Farage accuses the bank of lying about the real reason for closing its accounts, claiming that the decision was politically driven rather than based on financial criteria. Now, Coots initially told the BBC, Rick, that it was a financial decision. And so with these documents now, this is a big tell-all. They got caught lying. Right. So minutes of a meeting of Coots Wealth Reputational Risk Committee held in November of 2022 stated, the committee did not think continuing to bank Nigel Farage was compatible with Coots, given his publicly stated views that were at odds with our position as an inclusive organization.

And went on, this was not a political decision, but one centered around inclusivity and purpose. Now, notice how they shroud that. It's not a political decision, but really, when you get right down to it, this whole concept of inclusivity is a political factor. Farage has said that Coutts told him he was not being treated as a politically exposed person. That's a legal term for customers who are deemed risky for political reasons. But the dossier specifically states that he is one. He said, whoever at Coutts thought it clever to feed friendly media outlets outright lies about me sorely misjudged the situation.

He says he is seen as xenophobic and racist and repeats claims that he was a fascist in his school days and says he said things in the past that are distasteful and appear increasingly out of touch with wider society. So bottom line is he said words. Yeah. So you can have your bank account closed now for words. And this is happening in America. It's happened to people I personally know who have had their bank accounts.

I know a gentleman in Texas who banked at Wells Fargo for probably 20 years. I think he had eight accounts, personal and business. And the same week he was appointed as the deputy state finance chairman for the Trump campaign, all of his Wells Fargo accounts were closed. That was in the last election, 2020.

And I would bet he probably banked with Wells Fargo for decades, right? That's what I'm saying, for at least 20 some years, they just closed and they wouldn't answer. They wouldn't tell him anything. They just said, sorry, here's the here's the they gave him cashier's check. Here's your money. Goodbye. I'm surprised I gave him a cashier's check. So, well, so I want to go on. I get it because we're getting close. I got some leftovers that I've been hanging around for a couple of days. I want to go through very quickly and we'll just go through. Go down to number 62.

Senator Manchin of West Virginia is refusing to rule out that he may run for president as a third-party candidate. Right. He's made three trips to New Hampshire over the past several months, and so most recently last week. Do you know about the no-label movement? Yeah, I've read a little bit about it and everything. It's kind of like getting an idea for a unit party type approach. I think he's flirting with that idea. They're trying to get on the ballot in all 50 states.

So he's a moderate Democrat. He's got serious opposition for reelection in 2024. Alex Mooney, I know who he is. I don't know him personally, but I've known of his name for a long, long time because I lived in Maryland and West Virginia, you know, it was across the line. Alex Mooney used to be a Maryland politician. He got fed up with Maryland, went to West Virginia, started a career, and he's in Congress. I hope I'm thinking about the same guy. And he's running against Manchin. And so is Governor Justice. Yes.

And both Mooney and Justice are extremely popular in West Virginia. And I think Manchin is looking at polls, realizing he's going to lose. He's got to run for reelection with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. And he's got to defend the green movement that wants to shut down all coal and oil in West Virginia. He can't win. Right.

He's done. So he's looking at running for president on a third party. Next one. White House or National Security Advisor, National Security Spokesman, Admiral Kirby, said that the Pentagon has a sacred obligation to help members of the armed services murder their babies. And he made a sacred. He made an articulate statement about it wasn't just a casual well this is what we believe no he it was like he practiced and he covered every every sexual deviation lgbtq transgender he got it all. Let's watch. Why is the new DOD policy on abortion critical to military readiness?

I'm really glad you asked that question. No, I mean, I really am. One in five members of the U.S. military are women. 20%. We're an all-volunteer force. Nobody's forcing you to sign up and go. People volunteer to go. You raise your right hand, you say, I'm going to do this for a few years or even for my life, and it might cost me my life to do it. And when you sign up and you make that contract, you have every right to expect that the organization, in this case the military, is going to take care of you,

and they're going to take care of your families, and they're going to make sure that you can serve with dignity and respect, no matter who you are, who you love, or how you worship or don't. And our policies, whether they're diversity, inclusion, and equity, or whether they're about transgender individuals who qualify physically and mentally to serve to be able to do it with dignity, or whether it's about female service members, one in five, or female family members being able to count on the kinds of health care

and reproductive care specifically that they need to serve. That is a foundational foundational sacred obligation of military leaders across the river. Sacred sacred to kill those babies. Your duty, sir, is to protect the United States of America. That's your sacred duty to protect the country country not to advance a radical leftist political agenda jesse waters was tapped by fox news to replace tucker carlson in that time slot at 8 p.m so this week was the beginning of his debut in the Tucker Carlson Times Live. Right. They've redone the whole lineup.

So his mommy called. His mommy called him live on air and gave her little baby boo some instructions of how to behave. How to behave, how to behave. You know, if you want to be a good boy on TV, this is what you do and this is what you don't do. Don't deal with conspiracy theories. Yeah. Don't get in lawsuits.

Don't talk about the Bidens. Let's watch. We have a very special guest on the line, a Democrat, my mom. Mom, how have you? Hello there, mom. How have you enjoyed the show so far? I have enjoyed the show. I want to say congratulations, Honey Bun. We are so proud of you and your accomplishments, and you've worked so hard. Now let's aim to have you keep your job. And to that end, I do have some suggestions. Okay.

Do not tumble into any conspiracy rabbit holes. We do not want to lose you, and we want no lawsuits. Okay. Okay? Yeah. I have a list here. In keeping with the Hippocratic oath, do no harm. We need you to be kind and respectful. You yourself mentioned that humble is a stretch, so I get that. Use your voice responsibly to promote conversation that maintains a narrative thread.

There really has been enough Biden bashing and the laptop is old. Perhaps you could suggest that your people take less interest, for example, in other people's bodies and talk about that. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. We're trying to keep other people's interest away from children's bodies. That was the point of that segment. Mom, I love you. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

I knew this was a bad idea. Seek solution versus fanning the flames. You could encourage that Bedminster friend of yours to return to his earlier career on television. Everyone in his audience could wear a red hat. And I'm sure the ratings would soar, although never as high, my darling, as yours on Jesse Waters' primetime. Good luck. Thank you very much, Mom.

I love you very much. I love you. I'm thinking that a small dinner between 5 and 8 would be the way to go. We've got to go, Mom. I love you very much. I love you. I'm thinking that a small dinner between 5 and 8 would be the way to go. We got to go, Mom. This is just like how things are at home. I love you, Mom. I would be absolutely, I would be too embarrassed to ever do something like that. I got my mommy calling in to True News right now. Mommy's going to tell me

ricky you are getting into trouble with the things you say don't don't don't read headlines from israel anymore you need a job stop talking stop talking about the truth stop just stop what you're doing, okay? Oh, boy. Oh, well, that's his business. Number 72, guys. Let's look at this one. This was kind of strange. Senator Charles Schumer introduced a bill in the Senate to require the U.S. government

to release UFO documents. I'm just going to put the headline up. There you go. Senators move to require release of U.S. government UFO records. What's interesting about this, Rick, is Senator Chuck Schumer is now taking the lead on this

in the Senate. And he says, I'm taking the mantle of Harry Reid. Harry Reid was very interested in this particular issue. But now, nothing brings Democrats and Republicans together like war, or, in this

case, now, space aliens. So, I want one quote out of this. This is number 73. This is Charles Schumer. For decades, many Americans have been fascinated by objects mysterious and unexplained, and it's long past time they get some answers. He said the public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins,

non-human intelligence, and unexplainable phenomena. Gee, Mr. Schumer, do you know something about non-human entities talking to the u.s government and unknown technologies hmm could it be nephilim well then uh we got a little uh video here we'll go back to john kirby back from the white house yeah the guy that has a sacred duty to abort babies. He said UFOs are having a detrimental effect on the U.S. Air Force training operations.

Let's watch. And coordinate the way these sightings are reported. If we didn't take it seriously, of course we do. I mean, some of these phenomena we know have already had an impact on our training ranges for you know when pilots are out trying to do training in the air and they see these things they're not sure what they are and it can have an impact on their ability to perfect their skills it's already had an impact here and we just want to better understand it now Now, we're not saying what

they are or what they're not. We're saying that there's something our pilots are seeing. We're saying it has had an effect on some of our training operations. And so we want to get to the bottom of it. We want to understand it better. So, yes. Do you believe these whistleblowers that have come forward? I'm not going to talk about individual whistleblowers. But you just admitted that they're having an impact. Now, either this is the biggest snow job that's ever gone on that they've been fishing out. It is. Or there's something else going on out there. They're getting ready for the biggest hoax Satan has ever brought on the world they're they're they're

getting us ready for it and a lot of people are going to fall for it a lot of people are going to believe it well i mean you just had the national security advisor national security spokesperson just standing at the white house podium saying space aliens guess what um yeah um yeah ufos have been messing with pilots yeah what and the senate majority leader saying i want to know about non-human intelligence and unexplainable phenomena yeah you probably heard about this uh was it last friday or over the weekend vice president kamala harris talking about climate change yeah last friday and last friday and she said um you know when we reduced

the population now they tried to say she misspoke yeah she didn't mean she meant to say pollution let's let's watch okay let's watch when we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breathe clean air and drink clean water. So let's get rid of kids so our kids can breathe clean air and drink clean water. That's the logic there, right? Yep. water that's the logic there right yep so um i think where she's going with this is that her she's been studying how to reduce the carbon footprint and then she came up with this idea let's just reduce feet

if we have fewer feet we'd have a smaller footprint. Okay. You remember this one from last week. This is number 82. Let's show it here. This is Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in China. And, you know, we were all wondering, why is she bowing to the finance minister of China? I mean, certainly she knows the rules of diplomacy that a diplomat never bows to another diplomat when visiting a foreign country.

This is number 82. If we can show this one. I know I got our guys in control okay so uh now we know why because they came out yesterday this is number 78 she ate uh hallucinogenic mushroom i can't this news is so weird uh the treasury secretary dined on hallucinogenic magic mushrooms in china no wonder she was bowing like a duck she was tripping she was tripping on magic mushrooms this is so the news is crazy have you ever have you ever said think about it in your lifetime have you have you ever said the sentence the treasury secretary is high on magic mushrooms i'm trying to think of walter cronkite saying that the treasury secretary

and that's the way it is. So we got that one. Number 83. Australian Space Agency says strange, mysterious item washed up on a beach. They don't know what it is. Any guess? Any clues?

It's not an ashtray. It's not a snuff box it's what is it the only thing they can determine it's a part of a foreign space launch vehicle but they don't human or non-human they don't specify what foreign entity uh it could possibly be and so it just leaves it open there but these are the days of strange events and things going on all right so we're going to end it with um this last story is from canada it's it's uh it's both negative and and happy the negative in the sense of what happened to this man uh it's a positive uplifting story about what he did that got himself in trouble. Here's the CBC article.

British Columbia man fired from his job after saving a moose calf on the highway. The moose calf was trying to get away from a bear that wanted to eat it. Right. And so this man rescued the calf, and then he was fired from his employer. For violating company protocols. I guess there's a rule about don't left. What page of the manual says don't? Don't allow

moose in the cab. We got a little short report from the CBC television network, and we'll close it out with this one. Where's mom? As I was pulling up to this, was a moose CAF right on the shoulder of the road i watched a couple of vehicles just about hit the calf i just stopped i opened the door and

immediately she was crossing the highway towards me towards the pickup truck i was kind of doing the commentary for it right there um asking her what was going on you know this isn't normal it's not okay you can't get in the truck. You can't just be out here all by yourself. I happened to glance over and there was a bear there. So I just went, oh, I just thought, well, you can't go in the driver's side. That's not going to work. So just kind of herded her around the passenger side.

She was happy as a clam. Pretty glad she wasn't still standing outside with him. Well, you don't want to lick the truck. Come here. And I kind of bonded the whole way back because what else are you. Well, you don't want to lift the truck. Come here. And I kind of bonded the whole way back because what else are you going to do, right? You're in my truck. I'm going to talk to you. I'll admit I didn't sit there for half an hour going over every scenario and who I'd upset.

I just went, you came for help. I got to give you help. So as moments go, this one's a little bit unusual because as heartwarming as you may find that video, the company he worked for has a very different view. Worked for as in they fired him. They said there were a series of events culminating in that which they say violated their policies in terms of dealing with wildlife. They have other details that they have released. And if you're interested, I'm sure you can find it. I'll just leave it at the fact that

that led to him, right or wrong, to get fired. You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles. Thank you for listening. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969.