TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Prince Andrew Accuser Hit by Bus…Only Days to Live

Episode Date: March 31, 2025

Russia accused the UK and France of helping Ukraine destroy a major gas facility in Sudzha, calling it a ceasefire violation and warning of retaliation. Putin, aboard a new hypersonic missile submarine, vowed to “finish off” Ukraine and proposed UN control over Kyiv to install a new government. Meanwhile, the U.S. deployed stealth bombers to the Indian Ocean, JD Vance visited Greenland, a deadly Myanmar quake killed 150+, Utah banned fluoride, and inflation rose to 2.8%.Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 3/31/25Join the leading community for Conservative Christians! https://www.FaithandValues.comYou can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 399 Vero Beach, FL 32961.Get high-quality emergency preparedness food today from American Reserves!https://www.AmericanReserves.com             It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. Now available in eBook and audio formats! Order Final Day from Amazon today!https://www.amazon.com/Final-Day-Characteristics-Second-Coming/dp/0578260816/Apple users, you can download the audio version on Apple Books!https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/final-day-10-characteristics-of-the-second-coming/id1687129858Purchase the 4-part DVD set or start streaming Sacrificing Liberty today.https://www.sacrificingliberty.com/watchThe Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today!https://tru.news/faucielf

You don't have to think the world is ending tomorrow to be realistic. Serious emergencies happen to regular people all the time. For the forward-thinking family men, American Reserves serves as the ideal safeguard. As a father and husband, providing for and protecting my family is my highest priority. With strength in every pack, American Reserves combines variety and durability for any family. Waiting until it is too late will be devastating. Ensure your loved ones are cared for in any crisis by building a storehouse with American Reserves because strength comes from smart preparation. American Reserves,

your ally in emergency readiness. Visit our website and become prepared today. Virginia Jufre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most outspoken former teenage sex slaves risk her life for years, exposing Epstein's horrible crimes. She named names, including Prince Andrew. Well, today, Virginia is fighting for her life with only days to live. This is a tragic story, and this is true news for Monday, March 31, 2025. Let's begin our analysis and commentary of today's news with this unfortunate Daily Mail headline. Jeffrey Epstein, sex trafficking victim.

Virginia Jufri, disturbing Instagram post claims, they've given me four days to live. Doc Burkhart is here. Doc, what are the facts that we know about this story? Well, the Daily Mail is reporting, Rick, that Virginia Jufri, who you see pictured there with a photo from Instagram, who was sex trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and claims she was sexually assaulted by Prince Andrew when she was just a teenager. Says she's been given just four days to live after a car crash. Missed you free, shared a photograph of herself from a hospital bed covered in bruises. She had suffered in a smash with a, of all things Rick, a speeding bus. Posting to

Instagram overnight on Sunday, the sex abuse survivor says she has suffered kidney failure and is begging to see her children one last time before she dies. Quoting from the Daily Mail here, they've given me four days to live, transferring me to a specialist hospital in urology. She captioned the photograph.

This year has been the worst start to a new year, but I won't bore anyone with the details. But I think it's important to note that when a school bus driver comes at you, driving 110 kilometers per hour, as we were slowing down for a turn, no matter what your car is made of, it might as well be a tin can.

She alleged that she was trafficked for sex when she was just 16 after her associate and ex-lover Jelaine Maxwell recruited her from her job as a locker room attendant at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago Resort in Palm Beach, Florida. There's a lot in that. Yes. Which you just read. First of all, why is a school bus traveling at 110 kilometers per hour?

Yeah. To me... It's about 70 miles an hour. Why is a school bus traveling at 110 kilometers per hour? Yeah. To me, It's about 70 miles an hour. Right. That sounds like somebody making a beeline for a target. You just don't see school buses traveling at that rate of speed.

The fact that it's Virginia Jew free and here we are we're waiting on the Jeffrey Epstein records to be released. We're still waiting for the White House to release them. What's happening over there Mr. Trump? Why the delay in releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files. Is Israel's name in it so often that it's taking more time than you expected to redact the names of all the Israelis that are connected to this crime? And then you have this, she was recruited for Jeffrey Epstein by Jisleen Maxwell, who was Epstein's handler for the

Mossad. And where did Ghislaine Maxwell find her? She was working as a locker room attendant at age 16 at Mar-Lago. How did she get a job at Mar-a-Lago at age 16? A lot of questions in this talk. Yes, and you know that she has been one of the most vocal of those that have been known. The problem is there's been so many victims. No one knows where they are Rick. No one knows where they've gone. Well, this one's in the hospital and days to live. I encourage everybody to pray and ask God for a miracle,

spare her life. That poor young woman has been through more than anybody should ever suffer in her few years on life. And for her to end her life this way is extremely tragic. And I pray for God to have mercy on Virginia Jufri and spare her from death and let her live. And if it was an attempted murder, then let her

assassins be discovered. Yes, amen. While we're on the topic of strange things happening involving vehicles, here's the sun. Limo from Putin's car fleet is blown up in huge blast as troops from the paranoid tyrants honor guard search for bombs. Don't you love the way they do the headlines in the UK? One of the limousines Vladimir Putin uses exploded and caught fire in Moscow as the orders came for there to be a bomb search in the sewers nearby and the pat down of his own guards.

And Oras limousine from Putin's official car fleet blew up in a huge blast on a street just north of Moscow's FSB secret service headquarters in Ljubljana. Footage showed that the fire that we have scenes of there which started in the engine of a 275,000 pound, British pounds it is, Oris sonat had spread to the interior of the vehicle. Workers from nearby restaurants and bars had poured into the street to try to help

before the fire services arrived. Stunned onlookers watched on as black smoke billowed out of the front of the destroyed vehicles. The car continued to rage. Now reports did not reveal who was using the car, believed to be owned by Putin's Presidential Property Management Department, when the shocking incident occurred. Now no report has been made about what may have caused the sudden blaze, but those inside the car were not injured. Well, we need to keep in mind that Mr. Zelensky the other day said that Putin doesn't have much longer to live. Said he was going gonna die soon.

Yeah. So, is this an attempt by Ukrainian forces to send a message, or maybe an actual attempt on Putin's life there? Doc, there are no coincidences. I don't believe in them. Another one out of Russia could be a heart attack. A high level Russian official, I would characterize him like a deputy secretary in the cabinet. Not a cabinet secretary, but maybe a second level deputy secretary.

He was playing hockey, and he just dropped over on the... You see him there, there he goes down. Yes, deputy head of the regional administration, Vladimir Anayev, has died in the Archangel Earth region. He suddenly became ill during the city hockey championships. The match involving the team from the region took place on March 29th at the Sports Palace. A few minutes after the start of the game, Mr. Anayev fell on the ice.

And they were doing a live coverage of the event at the time. There he is on the ice and they ended up having to carry him off the ice and of course he passed away from a heart attack. He had not had any collisions or anything like that, Rick. The game had just started a couple minutes earlier. They were just ramping up to get into activity on the ice. So it is an unusual event, especially one to be caught as a live broadcast like this one was. Doug, I've lost count how many people around Vladimir Putin have died in the

past three years, but it's a long list. Somebody's taking out his inner circle. There's no doubt in my mind somebody is picking them off one by one. We'll go down to the next one. This is News Australia. President Trump will go as far as we have to go. He's talking about Greenland. Talking about Greenland. We will go as far as we have to go. Well, you can read a lot into that sentence. And it says President Trump is doubling down on

his desire to take over Greenland. He said, quote, we'll get Greenland. Yeah, 100%. There's a good possibility it could be done without military force, but I don't take anything off the table. Right. And we also have NPR also reporting on this story that President Trump won't rule out military force to take Greenland. The Danish foreign minister scolded the Trump administration on Saturday for its tone in criticizing Denmark and Greenland saying his country is already investing more into Arctic security and remains open to more cooperation with the US. Foreign Minister Lars Rasmussen made the remarks in a video posted to social media after US Vice President JD Vance's

visit last week to the island. Later Saturday though, US President Donald Trump maintained an aggressive tone, telling NBC News that I never take military force off the table regarding acquiring Greenland. That's not the only place in the world that you should worry about. Hang on, dog.

I don't wanna move on to the next one yet. Because this thing's sticking in my craw. I don't hear any of the MAGA people saying beans about attacking Greenland. Everybody's quiet about it. Because no one wants to disagree with President Trump, Rick. That's just it. So we're supposed to be quiet and let him threaten Greenland with a military invasion? I don't want to invade Greenland.

Now if Greenland chooses to join the US, I'm all for it. I really am. I like the idea. I do too. But I don't want to blow up Greenland to get it. Excuse me, I don't want to kill anybody living in Greenland. But the fact that we are saying we will take it by force, first of all, that's coveting. What is it? If that isn't coveting, what's your definition of coveting? You're saying there's a big island, the biggest island in the world, and we want it. It belongs to somebody else, but we don't care. We want it, and we're going to take it.

And if we have to beat the snot out of people to get it, we'll do it, because we're the biggest, baddest guys on the planet. Right. And if we want it, we get it. Is that the kind of country we want to be? Well, Rick, it's not a matter of if that's what we want to be. It's what we are. That's what we are now, isn't it? And I don't like it. And I'm not going

to defend it. And I don't care who gets angry at me, I'm not going to defend it. It's wrong. There's a proper way to acquire Greenland. And Denmark and Greenland must agree to it. And if either one object, then you move on. Right. And you revisit it later. But you don't threaten military force against a peaceful island. And the only reason you're threatening military forces, you're coveting their resources. You want their minerals. It's so brazen.

It sounds like something a mafia thug would say. I don't like this stuff. So you know, the Manga people are going to have to decide, are you going to go with it? Or are you going to speak the truth? What's right, what's fair? You know, if Joe Biden said, hey, we're taking it, we're going to invade, what would be our reaction? Yeah, what would the MAGA people say if it was Joe Biden saying that?

They would be upset. They'd be up in arms about it. And rightfully so. Well, not only is Mr. Trump talking about militarily attacking Greenland, which has never lifted a finger against us. We have any offenses from Greenland, Doc? When's the last time they send a balloon over our military bases or drones? Never. We've always been on good terms with Greenland from what I understand.

So they're not the only place he's talking about bombing. Here's Ynet News, Israel. If Iran doesn't make a deal with the United States, they will be bombing with bombs like they've never seen before. Yes. United States there will be bombing with bombs like they've never seen before. Yes, and the source of this is Ynet News. We'll also have a cut here in just a moment from NBC, but President Donald Trump escalated his threats against Iran Sunday afternoon after the Islamic Republic announced that it refuses to hold direct negotiations with him on a new nuclear agreement that has signaled

that it will agree to indirect talks. President Trump said Sunday in an interview with NBC News that if a new agreement is not reached, Iran will be attacked. Here's that cut from NBC News. On Iran, the president said he's also considering secondary tariffs if Iran doesn't agree to a nuclear deal. Quote, if they don't make a deal, there will be bombing.

And it will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before. And we're already moving B-2 bombers into Sierra Diego out in the Indian Ocean. And in Qatar, there have been numerous aircraft, jet planes, moving military equipment into Qatar over the weekend. So it's likely something's gonna be happening here pretty soon. So Doc, I have this radical concept. What if the United States of America

just mined its own business? Yeah, that'd be great. I do that in my own life. I don't go around looking to pick fights with anybody, even the ones that hate me. And why are we going to bomb Iran with bombs they've never been bombed with before? Why? Because of Israel. Israel's pulling the strings.

Why are we always in a war with somebody? Because of Israel. Why don't we just mind our own business? It's like Ukraine. We're going to get to Ukraine here in a moment. Why don't we just get out? Why don't we just get out of it? And NATO, let's just get out of it.

How about mind your own business. This America first stuff isn't truthful because it's not America first. It's other nations first, particularly Israel. And if we just said to Israel, you're on your own. If you want to anger the Arabs and the Persians, you do it on your own. If you want to anger the Arabs and the Persians, you do it on your own, but don't count on us. We're not getting involved in it. We're going to be at peace with all nations. I bet you then Israel would pony up and start talking peace, wouldn't they? That's right. But it's not that way. Same thing in Ukraine. We're in a world war with Russia? And for what purpose? What is

our involvement? What do we get out of this thing with Ukraine? I would like to see us do what George Washington said. Make no, do not get entangled in foreign alliances. Yes. Just mind your own business. So we're going to bomb Iran with bombing like they've never been bombed before. Yes. Well, of course, Tehran is going to respond to that. Here's a headline out of the Tehran Times. Iran has readied missiles for potential response amid Trump's escalating threats. The Tehran Times has learned that Iran's armed forces have readied missiles with the capability

to strike U.S.-related positions amid ongoing threats of military action from President Donald Trump if Tehran does not agree to a new nuclear agreement on his terms. Many of these launch-ready missiles are located in underground facilities scattered across the country designed to withstand airstrikes. And what would be the targets of those missiles? Well, the same publication has this article as well. 50,000 American forces in 10 military bases are within Iran's reach. A high-ranking commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned on Monday that the U.S. forces in the region are sitting in a glass house and should avoid throwing stones at others.

Brigadier General Amr al-Hajjahzada, commander of IRGC's Aerospace Division, made the murmurks on the sidelines of ceremonies to celebrate Eid al-Fitr. The Americans have 10 military bases in the region, particularly around Iran and 50,000 troops, he said. This means they are sitting in a glass house and when one sits in a glass house he does not throw stones at others. No, that's what we do. We take up all the stones we can find and start throwing them everywhere. So if you listen to Governor Huckabee last week at the Senate hearings on his nomination, you know, he was saying, you know, we have to be prepared to destroy Iran, because Iran is going to attack Israel, and when they attack Israel, then they're going to attack the United States. But what the governor doesn't tell us is that if we were not joined at the hip with Israel,

Iran would not consider the United States an enemy. Dr. Darrell Bock That's right. Dr. Richard Bader Separate from Israel. First of all, it'll save you a lot of money. Billions of dollars. Here's another thing, we're talking about all this money we're going to save. Well, why don't we cut off the money to Israel? Oh, you can't talk about that, Rick. I know. The very people that talk about doge and waste and efficiency. They'll throw $100 bills at Israel. They foam at the mouth at getting money to Israel. What is it? The same people.

What is it about Israel? What is the spell that they've put on the people of America? So we're gonna put 50,000 American soldiers' lives at risk for Israel. Yes, we're going to do it. It's going to happen. So if Mr. Trump starts bombing Iran with bombs

like they've never been bombed before, use his words, what does he think the Iranian military is going to do? Just sit there and take it? Of course not. They're going to not only attack American forces, they're going to attack Israel too. Yes, but they're going to hit 10 military bases in the Middle East. And up to 50,000 American soldiers could lose their lives for Israel.

And what if it turns out that Iran has already cracked the nuclear code? What if that's the case? We've been told for 10 years they were weeks away from having a nuclear bomb. What if they had it years ago? I mean, Israel's kept their nuclear program a secret for all these years. Maybe Iran has too. We'll go back as far as back as I guess late 80s, early 90s when the Soviet Union fell. There were news reports that nuclear warheads in Ukraine disappeared. And that some of them went to China and some went to Iran.

That they were sold on the black market. You know, hey, look, if you were a Russian Air Force general and the Soviet Union just collapsed and you're in charge of an inventory of 200 nuclear warheads, do you think any of those got sold? Probably. I would venture to guess probably a number of them did. So, Doc, I've always assumed that Iran has been in possession of nuclear warheads for

years that they bought from the Soviets. When the Soviet Union collapsed they bought them on the black market. Another one, General Lebed, he was the Russian Air Force general in charge of the suitcase nukes and he said 200 suitcase nukes were missing. Wow. So who got them? Yeah, where are they?

Where are they right now? So, that's a great question. Are they in the USA? Waiting to be deployed? See, you start attacking Iran with bombs like you've never bombed anybody before, they might have a surprise for you. They might have nuclear bombs inside this country. Yes.

And we really have to keep that possibility in mind here. I mean, they said that they could attack Israel and the United States. But you're halfway around the world. How are they going to attack the United States? The only way is if they have the ability to do so within the United States, waiting for the opportunity. Doc, they've known for 30 years that Israel was going to convince the United States to attack them.

They just didn't know when. But they've had a 30-year heads-up. The Persians are smart people. They did not just sit back and go, well, we'll take our chances. No, they prepared. They've got a plan. They have sleeper cells in this country, just like we have sleeper cells in other countries.

That's right. So again, we could see destruction inside our country, plus ten military bases in the Middle East, all for Israel. And an attack on Iran should be a great distraction on everything that seems to be falling apart in Ukraine right now. Yes. So, yeah, let's take a...

Well, before we get to Ukraine, I want to take a look at China. Yeah, boy, there's been a big shift in policy here, hasn't there, Rick? Pete Hegseth, without his socks, is in Japan. I swear, Doc, I looked at one photograph, and I thought, that man is not wearing his socks, okay? You might say, what was that guy doing? He's a secretary of defense. You could put socks on.

He's notorious for not wearing socks, okay? So I don't care what he does, and he's personal. But when you're representing the United States of America, you might want to wear socks. It might have just been a photograph. It just looked like he was sockless. But here he is. This is the London Telegraph. US sets up war fighting headquarters in Japan

for possible China conflict. That's called World War III. Yes. Now, World War III, China fought Japan. That's right. We were actually allies. Excuse me. World War II, China fought Japan. Japan attacked the United States.

But in World War III, we are going to help Japan attack China. Everything's upside down. So the Telegraph says the US will set up a war fighting headquarters in Japan to prepare for a possible conflict with China. There you go. Pete Higgs said the U.S. defense secretary said on Sunday that U.S. troops in Japan would be reorganized to keep the enemy guessing

and create strategic dilemmas for China. He said the upgrade first announced by the Biden administration would help U.S. forces Japan coordinate better with local troops and fears China might invade Taiwan. The article from the London Telegraph said soon we will add additional personnel in Tokyo and at U.S. forces Japan headquarters to conduct activities that will strengthen our bilateral bonds and deepen our operational cooperation. This also means reorganizing US forces Japan into, listen to this, a war fighting headquarters, increasing its staff and giving its commander

the authorities needed to accomplish new missions. He added, as I mentioned in our meeting, America and Japan, we seek peace. But as my first platoon motto says, those who long for peace must prepare for war. We have this clip from Reuters with Defense Secretary Hegseth saying these words. I want to announce that the Defense Department

has started phase one of upgrading US forces Japan to a joint Force Headquarters. This upgrade will improve our ability to coordinate operations with Japan's own Joint Operations Command, or JJOC. Soon we will add additional personnel in Tokyo and at U.S. Forces Japan Headquarters to conduct activities that will strengthen our bilateral bonds and deepen our operational cooperation. This also means reorganizing U.S. forces Japan into a warfighting headquarters, increasing

its staff and giving its commander the authorities needed to accomplish new missions. As I mentioned in our meeting, America and Japan, we seek peace. But as my first platoon motto says, those who long for peace must prepare for war. We must be prepared. So Doc, are we in a war, a wartime economy now, preparing for war with China. I absolutely believe we are. In fact, what we're trying to do is we're trying,

let's clear up all the other wars we got going on. Let's get those knocked down because we gotta get ready for the big game. Yes. The big game in the 2030s, and that's where it is. This visit by Hegseth throughout Asia, but especially in Japan, signals, in my view, a big policy change because basically we are going

to rearm China. We're gonna bring, excuse me, rearm Japan. We're gonna bring Japan up to fighting level strength. US forces there, but also Japanese forces, as is revealed in this article by Kyoto News here that we have. It says Japan and US agreed to urgently boost deterrence amid assertive China. Japanese Defense Minister General Nakatani and his US counterpart, Pete Hickseth, agreed Sunday to accelerate efforts to strengthen the alliance's deterrence

amid China's growing assertiveness in the region while affirming progress and upgrading command frameworks for smoother coordination between the two countries' forces. The agreement reached during Hegson's first visit to Japan as Pentagon chief underscored the strength of bilateral ties even under U.S US President Donald Trump's administration, which has raised concerns about straining the long-standing alliance with demands for increased defense spending. In citing the increasingly severe and complex security environment, Nakatani told a joint press conference with Hegseth after their meeting in Tokyo that the two confirmed a resolution to move forward with a sense of urgency, that

was his words, Rick, on initiatives to reinforce the alliance capabilities to deter and respond. A quote from that article by Kyoto, Hegson said the United States stands together with Japan in the face of aggressive and coercive actions by the communist Chinese and emphasized that his nation is committed to sustaining robust ready Incredible deterrence in the Indo-Pacific including across the Taiwan Strait Rick. We're getting ready for the big show we are and I Recently wrote a book it's in preparation to go to the printer called mega fire and The the book is, actually I'll tell you, it's my final warning.

It's my final warning. I've spent 26 years telling people about this war. This book is my final warning. We are headed towards a colossal war that's probably going to erupt in the early 2030s. I'm estimating we have five to seven years to get ready for it, but those years will go by so fast. Don't don't let the normalcy bias trick you into just thinking, ah, we've got a lot of time, nothing's going to happen. No, this, you can just look at the headlines.

We are now building up the military forces of Japan, which has not had a military since World War II. Right. They had, we since World War II. Right. They had, we wrote the pacifist constitution. Right. And now they've recently changed their military doctrine just within the past year to accommodate, no longer called defense forces either. They're just called the Japanese military now.

That's right. They've dropped the name defense. But this is a whole new tone now, that we are actively throughout the region and using Japan because we have such a strong military presence in Japan, but we're going to expand that exponentially to build a stand-up against China over the next five to seven years. And Mr. Hegseth was also in the Philippines. Yes. Now the next story, London Times, Pete Hegseth, the U.S. will defend Taiwan from Chinese threat.

So he's on record saying if China makes a move against Taiwan, we will go to war with China. And the article quotes this particular instance here, General Nakatani, America is committed to sustaining robust, ready, and credible deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, including across the Taiwan Strait. That was from General Nakatani. It says Japan would be on the front lines of any contingency we might face in the Western Pacific and we stand together to support each other.

That's talking about Taiwan. Yes. So what Mr. Haigseff said is Japan will enter the war on behalf of Taiwan. That's right. It's a world war. It's not the world war is starting. It started three years ago. And now we're going to get to that part.

Talking about the United States, it's not the Ukraine-Russia war, it's the United States-Russia war. And it has been for years. And they're finally admitting it. Here's Sky News. Finnish president reveals Trump running out of patience with Putin over Ukraine's ceasefire. Yes. Trump running out of patience with Putin over Ukraine's ceasefire. Yes, you see pictured there on the screen with President Trump, Finnish President Alexander Stubb. The president of Finland says Donald Trump is running out of patience with Vladimir Putin and is frustrated with him.

The Finnish leader spoke to Sky News after spending the day with the US president and playing golf with him. Alexander Stubb said Donald Trump is the only person who can broker a peace, a ceasefire, because he's the only one that Putin is afraid of. But it's tiring of the Russian leader's tactics. We have this video from Sky News. There's been a lot of talk today about President Trump losing patience with Vladimir Putin. But you've just been playing golf with him. Did he seem angry with the Russian leader over the weekend?

Well, angry is probably the wrong word, but impatient, that's for sure. So I came up with an impression that obviously he's the only person who can broker a peace, a ceasefire, because he's the only one that Putin is afraid of and in that sense respects. And you know, we were talking a lot about the ceasefire and the frustrations he had that Russia was not committing to it because of course we're in a situation whereby the US has proposed a full ceasefire, now a partial one. Ukraine has accepted it and Europe has backed it and there's only one country which is putting on new conditions, typical Russians. So yes, there was a combination of impatience and a tattle of frustration. So is it fair to say there's a kind of penny dropping in his mind that Putin isn't quite

as trustworthy as he might have thought? Well I think, you know, if there was a pendulum of trust and distrust, certainly Russian activity in the past few weeks has proven that we're moving more towards the distrust side of things. But if you listen to the president later after your game of golf, talking to reporters on his plane, he says, I don't think Putin's going to go back on his word. You're talking about Putin. I don't think he's going to go back on his word.

So he still seems to be believing he's a man of his word. As Finns, presumably you have different viewpoints of the Russian leader. He's not to be trusted he's a man of his word. As Finns, presumably you have different viewpoints of the Russian leader. He's not to be trusted, is he? Well, I do think, first of all, that the President of the United States is a very skillful negotiator. And you know, he's trying to find the right balance. And it's always about a balance. But I would be very distrustful. And my message to President Trump when he asked can I trust Putin was no you can't. What did he say in return? Well we'll leave those things out in the golf course. Sure but does he do you think is are you getting the impression from him he's

reevaluating at least the Russian leader? I'm getting the impression that he's analyzing the situation and I think he's been very clear from the beginning. He wants to end this war. He wants to stop this killing. So that's why my message was he's the only one who can do it. And now we need a deadline for the ceasefire. And for me, the deadline would be the 20th of April when he's been in office for three months and also when we have Easter overall, even in Russia.

But that ceasefire must be combined with a really tough stick. And that stick could actually come from Senator Lindsey Graham's proposal with over 50 senators about a colossal package of sanctions. He calls them bone breaking sanctions. So the basic message being, if Putin doesn't abide by the ceasefire, we're going to increase pressure on the sanctions. He calls them bone breaking sanctions. So the basic message being if Putin doesn't abide by the ceasefire we're going to increase pressure on the

sanctions. I think this is a good balance. By the way even big media organizations can make mistakes. Sky News had him listed as the Prime Minister of Finland but he is the President of Finland. So just just for the record. And his tie was crooked. Yes. Anyway. But he was wearing socks. Well, we hope. So, Doc, Lindsey Graham is in the wings, waiting to put bone-breaking sanctions on Russia. From my understanding, what's holding up the ceasefire

is the Russians are saying they will not agree to the ceasefire until the EU and the US agree they will not send any more weapons and ammo and rockets to Ukraine during the ceasefire. That's what's holding it up, to my knowledge. I don't know of another issue. So they're trying to turn this thing that, well, Mr. Trump's, he's getting frustrated, he's angry,

he's fed up with Putin. Well, Putin's not dumb. He's not gonna agree to giving you 30 days to send in weapons, and then the ceasefire's over, and guess what? Ukraine has new weapons. That's right. So, they're going to hold to their position.

We're going to go back to that NBC interview. For some reason, NBC has not released the interview, they just keep telling us what's in the interview. Right. I can't find the actual interview. Right. So the interview was Christian Welker that you supposedly had a phone call with Donald Trump.

This is from Meet the Press on Sunday, or I like to call it Meet the Depressed. But in another cut from that supposed interview that she did with the president, President Trump said that I'm ready to put tariffs on Russian oil, if that's what it takes to push Vladimir Putin a little bit further here. Let's watch this. Just hours ago, President Trump called me to tell me he is, quote, pissed off with Russia's

President Putin and threatened to impose secondary tariffs on Russia's oil. Quote, if Russia and I are unable to make a deal on stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I think it was Russia's fault, which it might not be, but if I think it was Russia's fault, I am going to put secondary tariffs on all oil coming out of Russia.

Mr. Trump said 25% tariffs on Russian oil could happen any moment and told me he plans to speak with President Putin this week. The president told me, quote, I was very angry, pissed off when Putin started getting into Zelensky's credibility and started talking about new leadership in Ukraine. So the warmongers have handed a shovel to Donald Trump and he said start digging and he's digging his hole and he's falling for it and he's he's going right

down the path of being trapped in a war with Russia. Well Rick let me ask you a question if we put 25 percent tariffs on Russian oil who does that impact? No, Doc, he's putting tariffs on secondary. When they say secondary, this means that if you are doing business with Russia, anything you do, you get a tariff. Gotcha.

So, they're going to the people who do business with Russia. So if another country is buying Russian oil, Donald Trump is going to put tariffs on their oil and he's going to put sanctions on those other countries to punish them for buying Russian oil. Why are we doing this? Mr. Trump told us during the campaign he would end this war in 24 hours. Because he wanted an end to all wars. That's what he said. But he's taking us, now we're going to anger Putin. We're going to bomb the Iranians with bombs they've never been bombed with before.

We've got the Japanese, we're gearing them up to fight China. This doesn't have a happy ending. No. So the three major countries that import Russian oil are China, India, and Turkey. Those three countries right there. And so what Donald Trump is saying, if I'm understanding this correctly, Rick, and Turkey. Those three countries right there. And so what Donald Trump is saying, if I'm understanding this correctly, Rick, is that in addition to the current tariffs that we have,

let's say on China, we'll add another 25%. Right. Same for India, same for Turkey, and any other country that we're dealing with. Now, we'll switch over to Mr. Zelensky, because Mr. Trump is upset with Mr. Zelensky also. You know the solution, Mr. Trump? Get out of it. Yes.

Just pack up and leave. And get out of NATO. Yeah, if Europe wants a war so bad, let them fight it. Yes. Tell NATO, you know what? Sign an executive order that says, the U.S. is in NATO, however, if the EU does anything to provoke Russia that causes Russia to attack the EU, we are not involved in an Article 5 war. Just let them know. We're out. But see, I'll tell you why he can't do it.

He's salivating over those trillions of dollars of minerals coveting He's coveting He's coveting he can't let go and so he's being pulled into a quagmire. He's being brought into a sinkhole Because he's coveting another country's resources. He's got to make that deal He's making the deal not just for America but for his rich buddies. They've already celebrated the trillions of dollars they're going to make. So now, a New York Post Trump accuses Zelensky of trying to back out of the Minerals Deal. Of course, you can't believe anything Zelensky says.

The man has no credibility at all. The Russians are saying, get him out and put somebody in that we can work with. And the US and Mr. Trump saying, oh no, we're not ordering Zelensky to leave. Why? Zelensky's, he doesn't even tell the truth to President Trump. Right. So this is Mr. Trump, he's talking to news reporters

and he's saying, Zelensky's got some big problems waiting for him. Zelensky, by the way, I see he's trying to back out of the rare earth deal. And if he does that, he's got some problems, big, big problems. We made a deal on rare earth, and now he's saying, well, you know, I want to renegotiate the deal. He wants to be a member of NATO. Well, he was never going to be a member of NATO. He understands that. So, if he's looking to renegotiate the deal, he's got big problems. Okay, so let me ask you, Rick, what's the downside on this? I mean, what if Zelensky says no deal on the minerals? What are we going to do? Well, this is what I'm saying.

We played the card now. Right. Mr. Trump is being, because he won't let go of those minerals, he won't let go of the war. Who's telling Zelensky to renege on the deal? Europe. Europe. And you can name two.

Great Britain and France. Yes. Starmor and Macron. They've told Zelensky. Here's how to get Donald Trump. Do not cooperate with him. Back out. We'll get you a better deal after the war.

We'll get you a better deal. We'll only take 25%. New York Times, I'm not going to go through everything here, I'm going to kind of summarize it. You see this article, The Partnership, The Secret History of the War in Ukraine. Yes, New York Times of the Weekend actually published two articles related to this, one on Saturday, the other on Sunday. So Doc, they admitted, the New York Times admitted what we've said for three years.

We've been coordinating the war. Yes. In a nutshell, that's what the whole article is about. We have been coordinating missile strikes, troop movements, we've been coordinating from Wiesbaden. And not only that, but the Biden administration was nervous about how far they were going because they feared a nuclear war. That's right.

So we'll go to the next story. This is a key takeaways from that article. And it breaks it down to the main things that were being coordinated by the United States of America. The Pentagon ran the war. Yes. We weren't just sending some text messages over. We were telling them where the Russians were.

We were telling them what kind of equipment they had, what infrastructure they had. We sent them High Mars. We sent them satellite images. We sent them everything. We were running the war. We were at war with Russia. The US identified points of interest, meaning military targets.

That's the way the US phrased it. Hey, here are some points of interest, we're interested in these points on the map, you might want to point some of our Heimars there. That's right. And they called this Task Force Dragon. Task Force Dragon. And when the US got fully embedded and involved, coordinated all of this from Germany,

it helped turn the war for the Ukrainians. And then fully embedded us into the war. We're at war with Russia. There's no doubt about it. World War III started February 24, 2022, and it's a war between the United States and Russia. And we have military advisors in Ukraine, the article says. That's right. We have them in Ukraine right now. The Mirror in London said the Ukraine war almost went nuclear. Well, I guess so. Yes.

We were attacking Moscow. We were attacking Russian military bases and oil refineries and electrical generating plants. And so the general there, his nickname is General Armageddon, and it said the Ukraine war almost went nuclear when Russia's General Armageddon made a chilling proposal. That's right. The gentleman that you see on the screen with Vladimir Putin there is General Sergei Sarovkin. Following Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the general you see pictured there brought up the idea

of using tactical nuclear weapons relatively early on. In fact, his idea was overheard by US intelligence in October of 2022, just eight months after the invasion occurred, according to a new account of America's hidden role in the conflict. Sarovkin wanted to prevent Ukrainian troops from crossing the Danube River and heading for the Russian occupied Crimea Peninsula.

Until that moment, according to the sources, US intelligence agencies had estimated that the chance, listen to this Rick, the chance of Russia using nuclear weapons in Ukraine was at 5 to 10 percent. Now they said if the Russian lines in the south collapsed the probability was 50 percent. Tossing a coin in the air Rick. And what year was that? That was 2022. So how back in 2022 when we were telling you this is going to go to a nuclear war. And people accused us of being fear mongers and drama queens, exaggerating. The truth is, the Biden administration was scared. They had a policy to advance the war, and yet they were scared that it was going to go nuclear. And this article is telling us that it almost went nuclear in 2022.

Be grateful that Almighty God spoke to Vladimir Putin to not accept the general's recommendation. That's all that stood between us and death. We've come close many times to a nuclear war. And this isn't going away. It's actually intensifying. The climax is somewhere in the 2030s. This thing is going to come together in a colossal fireball. That's why I wrote the book, Megafire. I hope it will be out sometime late May, early June.

I think that's probably a realistic time. Hungary's foreign minister wants to know why the European Union is telling people to stockpile food. You know, Hungary has kind of a difficult relationship with the rest of Europe there. This is the Foreign Minister of Hungary Peter Sijarto, he said when we heard Brussels was proposing a 72-hour survival kit for Europeans. We thought was some kind of trolling Sadly, it's not they even showed us what to pack But why in the 21st century should EU citizens prepare a survival kit? There's only one explanation. Brussels is preparing for war.

At a time when there's finally a real chance for a ceasefire and meaningful peace with real Donald Trump's return to office, Brussels is going in the opposite direction, clinging to a failed pro-war policy. Why? Because as long as the war continues, pro-war European politicians can avoid taking responsibility for three years of failure and avoid answering an extremely uncomfortable question.

Where is the money that was sent to Ukraine? We call on the EU Commission to explain why prepare for war and not peace. Finally, a voice of reason in all of this. But he's exactly right, Rick. The only reason why Brussels put out that warning the other day, which was a ridiculous warning. No world war is going to last three days. But to even suggest that, it says in the thinking of the folks down at NATO

headquarters and at the parliament in Brussels, is we're gonna go to war one way or another. With the US, without the US, we're ramping up. They have to go to war to avoid accountability. Yes. Their policies have been insanely stupid and they can't allow any accountability. So they just keep going forward with their insanely stupid plans. Yes. It's like the bankers saying, well, one way to get rid of the malfeasance is to blow up the bank. Right.

Well, now I'm going to show you this video. This is what's causing us to move towards war. This is Emmanuel Macron. Look at him. What is he doing? Oh man, he's strutting. Oh, he's Napoleon Bolapar. Look at him. He's getting his troops ready to attack Russia. These people are fools. Dr. Fools. And Mr. Medvedev today, he's been quiet. He hasn't posted much in recent weeks, but he posted one today, and he called these people running Europe, basically said that they are insane, and then he gave a, at the end, he gave the prescription, the

medicine. Let's read. So it says, A significant number of European politicians have fallen ill with Russelmania, also known as Russiophobia, in an acute form. This mental pathology arises from the bipolar affective exaggeration of Russia's impact on the life of Europe and Europeans. As a rule, it consists of two alternating stages, manic and depressive. The manic stage is characterized by motor excitement, aggressiveness, and the

desire to bully and attack stronger people without measuring their real capabilities with the object of attack. Sometimes it ends with uncontrolled urination and defecation. Examples of patients in the manic stage are patients macron, starbur, stub, and a number of other European politicians. The depressive stage is characterized by melangele, a decline in mental and physical strength, an eating disorder, as well as hypochondria and self-harm. A patient in the depressive stage of Russia mania

is capable of causing harm to himself, including self-sterarm. A patient in the depressive stage of Russia mania is capable of causing harm to himself including self sterilization. Currently it is more observed in women such as Ursula van der Leyen and Kahakalas or in hermaphrodites suffering from drug addictions such as patients Zelensky and Saskasvili. He goes on to say and only the way that Dmitry Medvedev can say it, treatment is symptomatic. Traditional drugs are usually ineffective. The best therapeutic effect was observed during the combined use of strong sedatives such as Caliber, Onyx, Iskandar, and the powerful multi-component tranquilizer, Orishnik. In particular, seriously cases, nuclear

neuroleptics such as Yars and SARMAT can be used, the Satan II missile. Strong said it is to put you to sleep. What Mr. Mvetev said is the people running the West are crazy and we're going to put them to sleep. End of discussion. Doc, they've made up their mind. They're not going to war. The Russians are not going to war. The Russians are going to obliterate Europe. In their minds, they're not going to war.

If you think Russian troops are going to be out there invading France and Germany and they're going to be fighting in the fields and no that's not going to happen. They're going to push a button and they're going to obliterate the West. Yes. End of discussion. They've already made up their mind. One attack. They're not sending tanks. They're not sending troops. They're not sending tanks. They're not sending troops. They're not sending drones. They're sending

nukes on day one. They're not gonna ramp up. There's not gonna be an escalation. They're just going to strike and cut it off and then look at the United States and say, do you want some of this? But the United States isn't going to go to war with Russia. We're going to war with China. Friends, you've got to get yourself into a war mindset

that we are in World War III right now. Another NBC News from that interview, Mr. Trump will not rule out seeking a third term in the White House. He said there are methods to let him do it. Really? Seriously, Mr. Trump, this is crazy talk. Now, are you going to amend the Constitution? I don't think so. You'll never get it done by 2028. Right. There's no way Congress will go for it.

Or the states. Yeah. Not by 2028. So what do you mean, don't roll it out? There are methods. Again, and some people say, oh he's joking. Oh no. No, no, no. He says I'm not joking. He said I am not joking. I'm very serious. So a lot of people want me to do it, President Trump said in a Sunday morning phone call with NBC News. He said, but I mean, I basically tell them we have a long way to go. It's very early in the administration. I'm focused on the current, President Trump added in some of his most extensive comments

to date about serving a third term. When asked whether he wanted another term, the president responded, I like working. NBC News asked about a possible scenario in which Vice President J.D. Vance would run for office and pass the role to Trump. President Trump responded that that's one method, but there are others too. President Trump added, asked to share another method. President Trump simply responded, no. We have that cut from NBC News. President Trump is not ruling out the possibility of seeking a third term, even though it's prohibited by the Constitution's 22nd Amendment.

He's joked about it at rallies. It will be the greatest honor of my life to serve not once, but twice, or three times, or four times. But now, in an exclusive phone interview with NBC's Kristen Welker, he says that there are quote, methods for doing so, and that a lot of people want me to do it. Asked to clarify, he said, I'm not joking, but added, it is far too early to think about it. Asked about one possible method, Vice President JD Vance running for president and then passing

the baton if he won, Trump responding quote, well that's one but there are others too. The president later speaking on Air Force One. I don't want to talk about a third term now because no matter how you look at it, we got a long time to go. But he's already... He's priming... Priming and they're studying. They're coming up with scenarios. Well, Steve Bannon the other day said that he's definitely going to run in 2028. I mean, he said it straight out.

He said, Donald Trump will definitely run in 2028. I don't know where he's getting his information or how they plan that Rick. Well Doc, then the president who will be in the White House for the war with China in 2032 will be Donald Trump. Now, if he pulls this off, but it's unconstitutional, it's illegal, it's crazy. When they're talking about JD Vance, here's what they're talking about. Yes. I call it the Reagan strategy.

JD Vance runs for president, and Donald Trump runs for vice president. Right. On January 20, JD Vance is sworn in. Donald Trump is sworn in. And JD Vance turns and says, I resign. And suddenly, vice president Donald Trump is sworn in as President of the United States. That's what that's what they're planning.

Yes, that's the only loophole in the Constitution that I see. But you could also consider the Zelensky method. Zelensky's president of Ukraine and there hasn't even been an election. In martial law. That's right. But in Zelensky's defense, and I'm not a defender, Zelensky, the Ukrainian Constitution allows for the president to declare martial law and suspend elections. Our Constitution does not. So that doesn't hold water. It worries me, it troubles me that he's talking like this. We're going to conquer Canada, we're going to conquer Greenland, we're going to conquer Panama, we're going to take Gaza and push two million people out. I'm going to run for a third term.

I'm going to bomb Iran like they've never been bombed before. I mean, where does this end? And we're just going into April tomorrow. Yes. It's only been since January 20. Where does this end? What is he going to be saying at the end of this year? Look, maybe my audience likes this stuff.

Well, maybe this is where I'm supposed to separate, because I don't like it. If Barack Obama in 2009 or 10 said, you know, I'm going to run for a third term. Do you know what the conservatives would have been saying? Dictator, dictator. Yes. Tyrant.

The Constitution is the Constitution. And the Manga people claim to be defenders of the Constitution, and the Manga people claim to be defenders of the Constitution, and yet you're trying to think how to violate the Constitution. But, hey, we might just be in an age when what does truth matter? Don't get in the way of a mob. And that's where we're at right now Doc you know what I told you one day about stampede cattle

Any smart cowboy Knows you don't get in front of a stampeding herd of cattle you can't You'll be you'll be trampled the only the only thing you can do is is you'll be trampled. The only thing you can do is turn them and get them to start going in circles until they get so tight they have to stop. But you can't get in front of a stampede of cattle and stop them. Right now the American people might be stampeding and any effort to talk reason and common sense may get you

trampled. So I don't know if there's any point in even say anything about it. Out in Albuquerque, New Mexico, somebody, somebody torched the Republican Party headquarters in Albuquerque. Supposedly it was a Molotov cocktail. We've got KOB TV4. Got a report from them about this act of arson. We begin tonight with the investigation into that the police. I'm not sure if the police are going to be able to report this. I'm not sure if the police

are going to be able to report this. I'm not sure if the police are going to be able to report this. I'm not sure if the police are going to be able to report this.

I'm not sure if the police are going to be able to report this. I'm not sure if the police are going to be able to report this. I'm not sure if the police are going to be able to report this. I'm not what's the very latest here? Well Zach, people were boarding up the

property this morning. Take a look at the damage still left behind though. You see those charred melted doors, the crime scene tape still up here this afternoon and of course the doors do have to be boarded up because they were caught on fire. Now local GOP leaders say that they faced threats before and they probably will in the future, but say it's never okay to escalate things to this type of damage. The Republican Party doesn't stand for any kind of violence. New Mexico GOP Chairwoman Amy Barella looked at the charred front doors of her organization's headquarters Sunday. And the longer she she looked the more damage was found. Albuquerque Fire

Rescue says it responded to calls of the fire just before 6 a.m. Crews were able to put it out in about five minutes but the damage was done. Barrella calls this a targeted attack and unacceptable. This is heartbreaking what this this kind of behavior in the state of New Mexico and across the country has to stop. There was also graffiti on the wall saying ICE equals the KKK. The fire is still under investigation with ATF and the FBI taking the lead. But Borella says she was told it was a Molotov cocktail and says political violence is never the answer. Let's come together and work at the table and fix New Mexico and fix the United

States rather than create this kind of violence. The Democratic party of New Mexico released a statement Sunday saying in part it condemns any violence at the NMGOP headquarters, adding they firmly maintain these acts have no place in democracy. And I'm GOP executive director Leticia Munoz says they're no stranger to threats or violence. We have been receiving many phone calls that are not very nice, threatening type phone calls, cursing phone calls. In 2023 we did receive a bomb threat.

Barella says she won't let this intimidate them. This isn't going to stop our operations. We're going to figure it out. So there was no injuries and there was no one in the building at the time of the fire. But police say there's still been no arrests made and there's still no official cause for what started the fire. An FBI spokesperson says they will not be commenting on the case because it's still

a very active investigation. And you're going to see an increase in these terroristic attacks across the United States because that's the season that we're in, right Rick? We are headed towards civil war and the civil war will bring about martial law in the country. And Mr. Trump will stay in the White House under martial law. And you will be forced to decide, do you support martial law or do you support revolution? That's how extreme it's going to get. You will have to support martial law or revolution. That's how extreme it's going to get. You will have to support martial law or revolution. And we could see it within the next two to four years. Yes,

very quickly. I've got some headlines. I'm gonna go through quickly. I don't want to talk a lot about it. I just want to get these headlines out. Utah becomes the first state to outlaw gay pride flags. However, the law that they passed allows flags of other nations to be displayed in government buildings. I wonder what nation that could be. In France, Marine Le Pen, the conservative leader, is being sent to prison.

She was convicted of what they said was embezzlement. And this is very much like the Democrats' prosecution of Donald Trump. Absolutely. They're locking her up and she cannot run for president. That was the goal. That was it right there. Put her in prison and she's banned by the court from ever running for president. And it's not like she personally took money for her own use. No. That's the impression that you get from the headline there. Rather there was money that was used in her

campaign for the EU that was spent in France. And it's something other politicians and other parties do, but they waited for the opportunity to find something to pin her and 24 officials within her party as well. That's right, but she's facing prison. Prison, yes. So in Europe, Europe that claims to be fighting for democracy in Ukraine, Ukraine that's in martial law,

there is no democracy in Europe anymore. Right. Europe is run by socialist tyrants. Financial Times, look at this headline, it's time for the EU to solve its Viktor Orban problem. And what's the problem? He's president of Hungary, that's the problem. And he's not going along with the Ukraine war.

So they're saying, there's the Financial Times, it's time to solve the Orban problem. We gotta get rid of him. That's what they're saying, he's gotta go. We've gotta get rid of Orban. London Times. Metropolitan police smashed down door of Quaker meeting to arrest activists.

There's a group of young Quakers inside the church, women, they were all women between the ages of 18 and 38 sitting in a circle eating hummus and breadsticks talking about social justice protest and the police raided the Quaker Church and arrested the women and they said they were planning a protest. This was preemptive police action. We prevented them from having a protest. This is London. Look, if you believe in freedom,

we've got to get away from backing the European Union and Great Britain. They have lost their cotton-picking minds. Yes. The next one, London Telegraph. Toddler kicked out of nursery for being transphobic. You know how those toddlers are, Rick. A toddler?

Yes. How old was this child? Three years old was kicked out of the nursery because he was transphobic. Yes, the toddler was suspended from nursery school after being accused of being transphobic or homophobic. UK's Department for Education data show the child, aged either three or four, was suspended from a state school back in 2022-23 for abuse against sexual orientation and gender identity.

So they don't give you the details but my guess is a drag queen was in the school and the little boy said that's a man in a dress and they so he got kicked out of the nursery school. London Telegraph. Police arrest parents who complained about their daughter's primary school in a WhatsApp chat group. Folks, doesn't matter what the details here, there were a group of moms, they were chatting on WhatsApp. And they were being monitored. And they were being monitored by the police because they were saying unkind things about the school administration.

And six armed police officers came and arrested the mothers. This is Great Britain. Doc, when I read the story Saturday, I posted a comment on the website of The Telegraph with that article, and I said, Great Britain has no freedom of speech. You are ruled by mentally ill tyrants. You don't even have freedom of thought. Doc, that post was up there for about two minutes. Oh, they took it down.

They took it down. They took it down. They took it down. Because they were watching the article. That's right. Netanyahu, this is a crazy story. Netanyahu testifies in Cuttergate probe after police summons and his top aides arrested. So Benjamin Netanyahu was in one trial on corruption. He had to leave the corruption

trial and go to another courthouse to give testimony about what's called Cutter Gate, which is where the country of Cutter, the Arab country of Cutter, was paying, secretly paying the salaries of his employee. Yes. And then while this was taking place, two of the police raided his office and arrested two of his aides today. But then Yahusha hangs on to power somehow. Yes. More people will die. More people will die. He'll bomb more people. And number, I want to get down to number 39, Russia battles mysterious virus as severe respiratory case surges. It's a virus, supposedly, that produces high fever and coughing with blood.

The Russians say there's no such thing, but there are reports that this is circulating in Russia right now. Final story, and we'll wrap up and go home. This is the Gold Co. financial report, Wall Street Journal, how to prepare your portfolio for the next market mess. And the Wall Street Journal says, what happens if all goes wrong? Investments designed to preserve your wealth and a stock market downturn can help preserve your sanity too,

allowing you to avoid dumping your favorite stocks as prices tumble. But finding this market insurance has become harder, with Treasuries and perhaps even the dollar no longer offering the protection they used to. No wonder gold is up so much! That's the Wall Street Journal, folks. What should you do, folks? The Wall Street Journal is saying, how do you protect your portfolio?

How do you protect it in the next market mess? It's becoming harder. No wonder gold is up so much in price. I'll tell you what you do. You call GoldCo. Snap out of it. Get busy. Call GoldCo.

844-960-GOLD. Are you gonna wait until Gold is 4,000 an ounce? It's 3,157 today. It's climbing every day. It just was at 3,000 a week ago. That's right. Are you gonna wait until it's 4,000 before you call GoldCo?

Are you waiting to just make sure the price is going up? When are you going to move your retirement portfolio over to gold? Are you going to wait until it's $5,000 an ounce just to make sure? Until the stock market keeps dropping and dropping and dropping? Give GoCo a call, 844-960-GOLD, and ask for the information about how to start a gold portfolio. That's it for today. We'll be back here tomorrow. God bless. God bless you. Here are two massively important products to have in an emergency. Because it's not a matter of if, but when an emergency will happen to you. With years of experience in survival preparedness, let me tell you, these are must haves.

One, high quality and nutrient packed shelf stable emergency food buckets. And two, reliable and long lasting water filtration systems. These essentials will make all the difference in an emergency, supplying your loved ones with all the calories and nutrients they need to survive any scenario. Don't take the risk. Try my favorite America loving brand, American Reserves

for your emergency food supply needs. Good morning everybody, it's Monday and I welcome you to Monday's morning manna. And Dr. Burkhardt and I are here to walk you through the book of Romans. We're in the ninth chapter. Today we're looking at verses six through 13. And this is going to be an important lesson in faith, in your identity in Christ, in knowing who is Israel. That's what we're talking about right now. Who identifies as true Israel?

And what we're teaching is the biblical definition, not modern denominational definitions. So let's pray, ask the Holy Spirit to come and take charge of this lesson. And we'll jump into verse six. Almighty Father, our great, wonderful, gracious, heavenly Father, Father, we gather here today, hungry, desiring to be fed,

seeking wisdom and understanding of your kingdom. We invite the Holy Spirit to lead this Bible study and illuminate our hearts and minds to better understand your word, which would mean that we would better see your Son. In Jesus' name we pray, amen. Amen. Good morning everyone. Welcome to Morning Man. I'm glad to have you here with us no matter where you are in the world from Malaysia to Brazil to Russia and all points in between. Welcome here to this international meeting where we study the word

of God together. If you've got your Bibles, we continue in Romans chapter 9 today, picking back up at verse 6. So let's read along, shall we? I'm reading from the King James Version. Verse 6, Not as though the Word of God hath taken none effect, for they are not all Israel, which are of Israel. Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children. But in Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, they which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God. But the children of the promise are counted for the seed. For this is the word of promise, at this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son. And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived

by one, even by our father Isaac, for the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth. It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. Verse 13. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. God bless the Redeemer's Word today. This is going to be a good lesson.

Amen. Verse 6, not as though the word of God hath taken none effect, for they are not all Israel, which are of Israel. We discussed this verse last Thursday, so I'm not going to spend a lot of time on it today, but it was necessary that we start today's lesson with verse 6, to have the context of the remaining verses. I'll just recap the main things that we discussed last Thursday, that the phrase, �not all Israel, which are of Israel� distinguishes physical descendants from true spiritual Israel. True Israel comprises those who embrace God's covenant through belief, through faith, not just those who are racially descended from Jacob.

So the distinction reveals that God's promises were never meant for all ethnic Israel. Yes. It was never meant to cover all born physically born from Abraham. That's right. If that was the case, then Ishmael would have been part of the promise too, but he wasn't part of the promise. God had elected Isaac. But doc, it was never meant to cover everybody physically descended from Isaac. Yes, that's the point that Paul is trying to make here. It's always been by faith. Believing the promise. It's always been by faith. Faith isn't something new, Faith isn't something new introduced in the new covenant. Faith is as old as the old covenant. What's the basis of the old covenant that Abraham believed? He believed God. He believed the promises that God made. So spiritual Israel transcends racial lineage.

It encompasses all who share Abraham's faith, Jew and Gentile. There's no distinction. Yes. So what we learned from verse 6 is that God's election of the chosen prioritizes faith over physical descent. And it was always that way. It didn't start at Calvary. It started with Abraham. God has always chosen, He's always given priority to those with faith. So the faithful remnant within Israel proves God's promises hold,

that they are fulfilled. His purpose is filled through grace. Faith, not racial lineage, determines covenant membership. Again, that principle did not kick in at Calvary. It was there from the day Abraham believed God. Amen. Which means a lot of people over thousands of years who claimed to be descendants of Abraham were not recognized by God as descendants of Abraham.

You know why? They didn't have faith that Abraham had. You got it. Their standing as citizens of Israel was based on their racial heritage, not their faith in God's promise. Now there's something the Christian Zionists should sit down today and chew on that. Think about it. Just because you're born, physically born, from the heritage of Abraham does not make you an Israelite. Only those who have faith in God's promises, like Abraham. And if you have faith in God's promises today, you would be a servant of Christ. Yes.

If you do not serve Christ, you're not a descendant of Abraham. You're not in Israel. I don't care what your racial background is. God's promises cover all who trust in His Son. That fulfills His universal plan. Because believers must trust God's faithfulness to fulfill His promises.

No faith, no citizenship. That's right, no faith, no promise. How can you receive a promise if you have no faith in the promise or the one who made the promise? Amen. You can't claim it just because you can show a racial line going back thousands of years, that doesn't make you a citizen of Israel.

Verse 7, neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children? But in Isaac shall thy seed be called. These verses that we're studying today, absolutely obliterate Christian Zionism. And this is like a spiritual IED. It just blows it up. Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children. What's there that you can't understand? But in Isaac shall thy seed be called. So Romans 9-7 challenges the assumption, the false teaching that all Abraham's descendants automatically inherit God's promise to Abraham. This right here, this verse alone, absolutely obliterates that, but you have to believe what it says. You have to read it first.

And then you have to reject Zionism and Christian Zionism. Right. Because Zionism contradicts Romans chapter nine. Zionism contradicts the entire New Testament. So in this verse, Paul is distinguishing physical seed from spiritual children. He's spotlighting divine election. In Isaac shall thy seed be called. This reveals God's sovereign choice. This defines our identity.

Because this verse calls believers to trust God's plan. Amen. Rooted in faith, not flesh. So physical descent from Abraham does not ensure covenant inclusion. Now do you understand why I get so upset with Christian Zionism because they're teaching something that contradicts the book of Romans? Yes. They're teaching in these Christian Zionist churches that physical dissent does ensure covenant inclusion.

And actually physical dissent makes that person a higher class than the Gentiles who believe in Jesus. Yes. Absolutely, it's not only unbiblical, but it's racist. And Rick, if you really follow Christian Zionist logic all the way to the end, we have a second-class salvation. Mm-hmm. Yes.

That's why I get upset about it. That's the reason I get upset about it. That's the reason I get upset about it, because it insults my Savior. So God's promise is narrowed to Isaac's line. The seed denotes that those God names as Abraham's true's call, not natural birth. It is a covenant of grace. So believers align with Isaac's lineage through faith, not heritage. God chose Isaac over Ishmael, which highlights God's sovereign right and freedom to choose. Yes, God favored Isaac over Ishmael, but there's a reason. Isaac was born by faith. He was the promised child.

He was the miracle child. It was impossible for Papa and Mama to have a baby. Ishmael was not born of Sarah. Sarah was not capable of having a baby. She was way past the years of giving birth to a child. Yes. Isaac was a miracle child, a faith child. Isaac was produced because Abraham and Sarah had faith in God, God's promise, I'm going to give you a child in your old old old age Beyond Anything that is human possible. I'm going to give you a child and they believe God and

That child was Brought into the world through faith That's why Isaac is The one favored by God. Ishmael was Abraham's child also to another woman. Yes. But Ishmael wasn't born by faith. It wasn't that Ishmael was inferior.

It wasn't that Isaac had a superior gene pool. It was that Isaac was born by faith. That's right. God had said, Sarah shall conceive. Yes. So the phrase, in Isaac shall thy seed be called, speaks of God's purpose, not human merit. Divine selection operates beyond physical ties. It's rooted in grace. operates beyond physical ties. It's rooted in grace. Isaac's birth,

his selection as the child of promise reflects God's unchanging plan. And so we can rest in God's sovereignty. We can trust in his choices. So Isaac embodies the child of promise, born by God's power. Ishmael was born of flesh. Therefore he stands outside the covenant line. That'll blow your mind. Because they're outside the covenant. Right. It's hard. It'd be difficult for Christian Zionists to admit to that.

Very challenging. It's scripture. It's like black and white words there, just on the pages of the Bible. So God's choice of Isaac over Ishmael prefigured faith-based inclusion in the covenant. Right. Spiritual heirs, like Isaac,

arise from God's promise, not by human works. And so we, believers in Christ, we mirror Isaac because we're chosen by grace through faith. Isaac was chosen by God by grace through faith. It was the father and mother's faith that brought about the grace of God to have a child of an old age. There was no faith involved in Ishmael. Again, in terms of genes, DNA, Ishmael and Isaac were equal. They're not, one wasn't a better human than the other.

God didn't look at Ishmael and go, oh, you're inferior. Ishmael was not chosen because he was not born of faith. Yes. Isaac was born through faith. The faith of Abraham and Sarah, that God could make Sarah have a child at age 90. Now do you understand Abraham's faith? Why he is the father of our faith?

He left his home of Ur by faith. He traveled by faith. He lived in tents by faith. He searched for a heavenly city by faith. Everything the man did was by faith. did was by faith. So it's faith not lineage that marks somebody as a child of God. You were born again by promise. You are a promised child. If you're born again in Christ, you are a promised child. Because you placed your faith in what God promised in a resurrected Son of God. Amen. And that makes you a child of promise. Praise God. You mean I don't have to be part of a certain group, Rick? Nope. All you have to do is just have

faith like Abraham. I don't have to do certain things to impress God, do a lot of sacrifices and everything. Do I have to do that too? Nope, nothing. Just be a child of promise. Live in the grace. Amen. God's promises endure. They are fulfilled in Christ for all believers. God is always always highlighting faith and grace. Never human achievement. It's all about Him. It's about believing who he is and what he says and what he's done. He does the works. He did the work on the cross and he said it is done. Yes.

What greater work can we do than that? So trust in God's promise assures you and me of our standing, our standing in the kingdom of God, our standing with God. It has nothing to do with racial heritage. Our faith defines our identity and we are not live in this life at the level we should be living because we don't see ourselves as who we are. Yes, we have an identity crisis. Again, I always go back to Prince William Prince Harry, you know, because they're famous princess in the world. So people can

identify their father is King Charles. Do you think William walks around in London with his head down? Oh, and I'm little Willy. I ain't nobody. I ain't got nothing. Oh, oh, how I hope someday. Do you think he thinks of himself that way? Do you think he thinks of himself that way? No, he walks with dignity, not arrogance. There's a difference. He walks with dignity, with nobility, not arrogance. He knows who he is. He knows that his father is the king. He knows he will inherit everything his father has. It's already done. Why? Because he has his father's promise, who had his mother's promise, and he can go

back thousands of years in England. And the promise was always fulfilled. So he's not wondering. I wonder if my dad is going to renege and not give me everything. We have terrible self-identity as Christians. Amen, we certainly do. We certainly do. And what I have found is that when you start walking and talking as a child of God, knowing who you are, that is what elicits the opposition, the spiritual opposition that comes against you. And it usually comes from religious people. Amen. That's true. So let's go down to verse 8, Romans 9, 8.

That is, they which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. Modern English sounds about the same. That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as a seed. So verse eight defines the true child of God

as those of faith, not fleshly descent. And Paul later on in Galatians confirms that Rick. Galatians 428 says, Now we brethren as Isaac was are the children of promise. I'll say it again. Now we brethren as Isaac was, we are the children of promise. Galatians 428. Pretty clear there yes we must not we must not look down on a Jewish person they have the door is open for them to come back in and And when they do, they get in the express lane. God has an express lane for Jews who believe in Christ. And that's our desire, is to see every not Messianic Judaism, Christianity.

So, Paul continues to contrast the physical lineage with divine promise. Children of the promise. He said, but the children of the promise are counted as deed. So the children of the promise are God's elect, rooted, grounded in grace is Children of the promise are believers who trust they trust their standing in Christ They trust it We trust God that we have right standing with him We do it by faith because his promises are true and

He is faithful to his promise. Children of the flesh. Yeah, children of the promise, children of the flesh. Children of the flesh speaks of Abraham's natural offspring, which would be all Israelites and the descendants of Vishnu. God loves all of them. Loves them equally as He loves you and me. But they're not children of the promise. They can be, but they have to make the choice. That's what Father is waiting for. He loves humans coming to the place in their life. They say, I believe God. I believe.

That's what he's waiting on. I believe. I believe God. I believe his promises. I believe in his son. Any human can come into the kingdom if they believe. can come into the kingdom if they believe. So physical dissent by racial heritage offers no claim of covenant rights.

Everything that's going on in the Middle East and Palestine and Palestine, and Jerusalem, it is based on, we have the right to kill people, we have the right to take land because we have covenant rights. No, no you don't. And I refuse to endorse such a perverted, twisted theology.

How can I teach that theology and teach faith at the same time? That theology contradicts faith. Faith alone aligns with God's plan. God doesn't have plan B. He doesn't have plan A is faith, plan B is Zionism. He doesn't have that plan. Everything is faith. So Isaac's birth represents everybody born of God's grace. Yes.

Everybody born of God's grace. not everybody born with physical DNA from Isaac. The DNA that counts in heaven is faith. God's choice, listen to this, God's choice, not ancestry determines his children. Paul said, count it for the one in charge. So who's the counter? Who did the, who counted for the seed? It's Almighty God.

He reckoned who is seed, the seed of Isaac. God's sovereignty always triumphs natural privilege. Grace always triumphs merit. Faith, not flesh, fulfills God's covenant. And what we learn here is to rest in God's unchangeable purpose, not human effort, because faith marks God's children. It transcends racial lines. Promise-driven sonship requires trusting God's words, not works of humans. And let me tell you something, Isaac's lineage prefigures believers united by faith in Christ.

And as Paul said, just as Isaac was, so are we. Yes, Isaac was a forerunner of the Christian church because God's grace, not race. See, it's grace, not race. Oh, that'll go on a t-shirt, Rick. I like that. Grace not race defines covenant membership. Yeah.

It's grace, stupid, not race. It's grace determines who is in the covenant. Look, you've got, and I don't want to dwell on the Jewish people, but you have people today, just put aside, put aside Jesus Christ in the New Covenant. You have millions of Jews today who don't even have faith in the Old Covenant. Right, they've abandoned it. There is no faith. There's no faith in Abraham. There's no faith in God. There's no faith in God.

And most people who claim to be Jews are non-practicing Jews. Yes, and yet when it comes to the perks and the benefits, oh yes, I'm inherited, I'm entitled. Why? Because of my race, I'm entitled. And yet even in the old covenant time, you were not entitled if you didn't have faith. Amen.

See, they built up a construct that was based on racial benefits. But God never intended it to be racial. God chooses his people by promise. Why? Because spiritual birth, not natural birth, fulfills God's plan, as we see with Isaac. Grace overrides entitlement.

Grace secures believers in Christ. covenant continuity from Abraham to Jesus Christ embracing all by faith. Believers stand as God's seed, were reckoned by his promise. Go back to that reckoning, that counting. Is this making sense today? Is this opening up your mind to understand who God says is a child of promise, of who who you are in Christ. You are. Yes, it's you. Look, I don't believe anybody has a claim on Jerusalem and the land. But if you wanted to use their argument, then the Christians own it.

If you want to use their argument, because we are the rightful heirs of Abraham. But I don't want it. I want New Jerusalem. I want New Jerusalem. I don't want that old Roman city. It's all going to burn and get split by an earthquake anyway. That's right. It's sitting on a fault line. Verse 9, for this is the word of promise. At this time will I come and Sarah shall have a son. For this is the word of promise. At the appointed time I will come and Sarah will have a son.

Verse 9 unveils God's promise to Abraham. It proves his words power. Isaac's birth was a sovereign act by God. He said, at this time, at the appointed time, I will come. Who's coming? Who's showing up? God Almighty. Yes. At the appointed time, I will show up. Abraham, Sarah, listen to me. You can get in bed and practice all you want. You can get in bed and practice all you want. But when I show up at the appointed time, Sarah will have a son.

At this time at the appointed time speaks of God's perfect timing. This is why it brings us back to trusting God's promise. Yes. God made a promise to Abraham and Isaac, and they believed, they trusted, and Isaac was born of faith. They trusted and Isaac was born of faith This is the word of promise So Sarah's

barren womb Yielded to God's Word. Yes Let that sink in this morning. God didn't look at Sarah and go, you old dried up thing, ain't no way you're going to have a baby. Now he looked at her and said, daughter, I say you are pregnant.

God's Word overtook Sarah's physical state. This is why, this is what you need to learn today. Whatever your physical state is in your life, your marriage, your family, your health, your career, whatever it is, God's word has priority over your physical state. Right, it may look impossible to you. That disease that you're dealing with may look impossible. That financial situation that you're dealing with may look impossible.

That family situation you're dealing with may look impossible. That family situation you're dealing with may look impossible. But when God shows up, when God comes on the scene, everything changes. At the appointed time? Yes. See, just be, just hold on, just have faith. The appointed time is coming hold on and believe or believe and hold on and that phrase that phrase the appointed time speaks of god's control of the situation amen that's good yes Yes. You know, Doc, A.A. Allen,

one of his favorite sayings every night in his big healing tent, he would look at a person with cancer or crippled or whatever and he'd say this is your night This is your night Because he knew this is the appointed time You you've had this cancer for years, but this is your night This is the appointed time Why because your faith is touching God tonight?

Why? Because your faith is touching God tonight. You live with the disease for years because your faith did not touch him. But tonight is the night. Your faith is touching him and you're going to be healed tonight. The reason God doesn't act in our lives so many times is because we haven't touched him with our faith. God help us. You'll get a reaction from him if you touch him with faith. Look what happened with the woman who had been sick for 12 years. She touched him with his garment and Jesus said, hey, ho, ho, who touched me?

And the disciples said, everybody's touching you. Everybody's touching you. There's thousands of people here. And you want to know who touched you. But it was her faith that touched him. She didn't even touch his body. She touched his clothing. But faith, there was faith, there was an electric charge of faith that went through his robe.

And he turned and said, who touched me? Why? Because when you touch Jesus with faith, you will get a positive reaction. And you know, I, uh, that particular story, Rick, they, uh, the gospel say that the woman had spent all her money on physicians, every, every dollar, every penny or every shackle, I guess, everything. I, I'm of the opinion that not only did she get healed, but that later on God provided for her financially too.

You know, you're right, Doc, because it's all one package. Yes. And He made everything right. By faith, she reached out. I believe God not only restored her physically, but restored her financially. I wish I could prove it from that passage, but isn't that like God to do that? Yes. Why do we almost seem mean for God to say, well, you're healed but you're broke? Do you know what else He healed for her? Her isolation. healed for her, her isolation. Yes, because no one knew about her.

She had been isolated for 12 years because she was bleeding. And nobody would go near her. She was lonely, isolated for 12 years. God restored relationships. And it was religion that isolated her. Yes. It wasn't her, it was religion that isolated her because the teachers would say, you can't go near her, she's got an issue of blood. So her own family disowned her. Right. She might have had kids and a husband and who knows.

disowned her. Right, she might have had kids and a husband and who knows. So God's election chose Isaac. Yes, praise God. This is important to understand. There were two brothers by two mothers. God chose Isaac over Ishmael. Supernatural birth marked Isaac as God's chosen seed. Hallelujah. Grace, not human effort, governs God's covenant. And so you and I, we mirror Isaac because we are born of God's promise through faith.

We're born again. Our born again experience is by faith. We are just like Isaac. We're chosen by God. We're selected, we're elected because of our faith. So Isaac foreshadowed Jesus Christ who was the ultimate promise fulfilled. Jesus Christ who was the ultimate promise fulfilled. So Isaac's birth ties

believers to the promise of God that makes us heirs of the covenant. That's right. Spiritual seed not physical seed inherits godly promises. Yes. Take that, again, it refutes everything being taught about Zionism today. Spiritual seed not physical seed inherits the promise of God. And I'll argue with any Christian Zionist who wants to argue about it.

The word is the word, and I'm not budging off what the Bible says. But they'll come back and say, yes, that applies to Gentiles. I'm reading here. I don't see anything that distinguishes that, do you? No. And Paul was a Jew.

He was a chief of Jews. Why did, if Paul believed he had automatic inheritance of the promise, why didn't he just stay a Jew? That's right. He gets everything as a Jew. What is he? Why didn't he just go through all this stuff? Right. I'm of the opinion that Christian Zionism is one of the greatest deceptions ever perpetrated on the church. Oh, it's from hell. Because it keeps the gospel from the Jews.

It is birthed in hell. And that's why I give it no respect at all. It's not just another interpretation of the word. No. It is another religion. Yes, it's meant to keep the gospel from the Jews. Look, faith is what links Christians to Isaac's legacy in Christ. God's sovereignty always reigns. He fulfills his promises his way and his way is by faith and he does it according to his timing. And so today grace drives election. Glory. Isaac was elected. And yet Isaac also had to believe. Yes. Elect, but he had to believe by faith.

Yes. And he had to pass that faith on to his son. Yes. And neither Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob were Jews. News flash. What? Now from them later came the tribe of Judah, but they were not, they were not Jews. Because see, it's faith that secures God's blessings, not works, not racial heritage.

Once again, Christians go through life financially hindered because they have a low self image. I'm just a lowly person working through life. You were elected by God to be a son or daughter. Live your life at the level God has given you. It's insulting to him to go through life broke, sick, defeated, depressed. It's insulting. Yes. Why is it insulting? Because he gave his son so that you would have life and have it more abundantly. Glory.

Trust in God's timing. His timing is perfect at the appointed time. timing is perfect at the appointed time. Live as an heir to the promise, and that requires Um, we have time to yeah, okay, let's finish up here verse Verse 10 I do 10 11 12 13. Okay, I better get moving here Um verse 10 and not only this but when rebecca also had conceived by one Even by our father isaac Now this gets interesting. In Romans 9 10, Paul cranks up his argument at another level. He shows that God's choice transcends fleshly descent. Why? Rebecca had twins. Yes. From one father, two boys born to Rebecca, but God chose one. And chose the younger rather than the elder. By all rights, Esau

should have been the child of promise. By all rights. Hereditary rights, that is. This right here does everything to discount the DNA theory. And the cultural customs. That's right. That the oldest has the priority. Because God chose the younger. Well, not the younger, God chose the younger.

Well, not the younger because they were twins. Yes. But he chose the other son. So there's divine will over natural order. Divine will trumps natural order. God's sovereign election shapes covenant identity. Rebecca's single conception by Isaac removes lineage as a factor. Yes. Rebecca and Isaac had sexual relations, she got pregnant. And from that single pregnancy came two boys.

Same father, same mother, two boys. Jacob and Esau. Twins from one father. Jacob chosen, Esau rejected. And that proves that God alone decides who receives the promise. So you've got a contrast between So you've got a contrast between origin, natural order, divine distinction. And God's choice preceded birth and ruled out works and character.

God's election chose Jacob, not Esau. That was by divine decree. Again, it's grace, not birthright that governs God's covenant. So God's choice trumps natural claims. Yes. Because even though they were twins, Esau was born first. Yes. Even though Jacob put his hand out first, but was withdrawn, and then Esau was born first.

So even in their birth, God was foretelling what was going to happen in the future, that the elder Esau would serve the younger, because Jacob was the child of promise, not Esau. So sovereign will defines God's people. We rest in grace chosen by God's call, not by human works and merit and lineage. So Jacob, and merit and lineage. So Jacob, the son of Isaac, Jacob simplifies spiritual believers chosen by faith. And Esau's exclusion those physical dissent lacks covenant power. So God's plan prioritizes spiritual sonship over natural lineage. And this election of Jacob prefigures the inclusive grace from Christ for all believers.

Another shadow, another type. Yes, so to put it like this, the Jews should be receivers of the whole promise. I say Jews collectively. But using this image of Jacob and Esau, Jacob became the child of promise, which it's interesting that Jacob, when he put his hand out when he when Rachel was given birth, they put a scarlet cord around his wrist to mark him, right? As if that scarlet represented the

blood of Christ at some point later on. That there is a promise that's being made to Jacob, that Esau by all natural rights should receive, but God had a different plan, a different objective. Yes. It's reliance on grace that shapes your identity in Christ. I hope by the time we get through this book that there's nobody, no person, no doctrine that can shake your faith in Christ and who you are. It's God's faithfulness that assures your place in the covenant. God chooses that you be in the covenant. Nobody, nobody can alter that. God has chosen for you to be in the covenant.

And so humility flows from this unearned election. It's not entitlement. We're humble because we realize it's by God's grace that he has placed us in the covenant. The same God that placed you in the covenant can remove you from it. So you walk with humility, always expressing your faith in him, always seeking to obey him. So Isaac's line narrows even further. And Jacob's election ties us

to Christ, who is the ultimate seed. Yes. Because we see this pattern of grace that spans from the old covenant to the new covenant. They're not two different books. God's not bipolar. He can go, well, I got an old covenant. Now I'm going to do something new. Faith runs through the whole Bible. Praise God. Faith and obedience. It's God's will that secures your place in the covenant.

Verse 11, for the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to the election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth. Modern English for being not yet born neither having done anything good or bad that the purpose of God according to the election might stand not of works but of him who calls. So verse 11 unveils God's sovereign choice before human actions, no merit. Jacob and Esau, unborn, show that election rests on God's will.

Yes. Jacob was chosen before the two twins were born. That's right. God spoke to Rachel and said, there are two nations in your womb fighting each other, but the elder will serve the younger. God said that to Rachel. So that was the promise for Jacob. So twins not yet born prove God's choice, precedes human effort. No good or evil done excludes merit as the basis for election. That's saying it doesn't matter whether these guys did anything good or bad.

It had nothing to do with it. It's God's will. according to the election represents that God's purpose stands. It's unchangeable. It's God's design. It's his will. And so we, as believers, we find security in God's sovereign choice. Hallelujah.

See, not of works, not of works, nothing good or bad. That just eliminates, it shuts out any consideration of human achievement for the basis of salvation. Election flows from him that calleth, not the deeds of a person that seeks to be the elect. So grace, grace justified. And it justifies today. And it was grace that chose one twin over the other before they were born. So Jacob's choice simplifies believers who were elected before time began. Your salvation was sealed before, not only before you were born, but before the universe was born.

It's humbling, isn't it, Doc? Yes, it is. Doc mentioned Genesis 25-23, the prophecy, the elder serves the younger, two nations, which simply solidifies Paul's argument here that he's making. Verse 12, it was said unto her, the elder shall serve the younger. So this reveals God's sovereign choice that triumphs again, trumps over human merit. The prophecy to Rebekah, the elder serves the younger. It shows that election is by grace, not by tradition, not by culture. God's will, not birthright, defines his people. It was said under her. It's quoting Genesis 25 verse 23. God's voice overrides human customs and traditions.

It was said under her. There's nothing else that's going to be considered. God said under her. There was, it doesn't matter what anybody else said. under her. It doesn't matter what anybody else said. God said under Rebecca. So the elder serving the younger flips human traditions and culture, customs. And again, what does it do?

It showcases grace. I'm gonna skip down here so we can move on. Last verse, verse 13. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. Ooh, that's strong, Doc. Jacob have I love but Esau have I hate it. Oh, that's strong, Doc. It's Bible.

It's the Bible, isn't it? It reveals divine election, not emotion. God's will determines his people's standing. The words, as it is written, he's speaking of covenant favor, not earned affection. What what that speaks of is the rejection from covenant privilege Can you explain this doc these are I mean this is a heavy Verse to close out today's lesson Well Malachi chapter 1 verses 2 and 3 says I have loved you sayeth the, yet ye say wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother, saith the Lord, yet I loved Jacob. And I hated Esau and laid his mountains and his

heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. And so this comparison here, you know, so many theologians and teachers try to make excuses for this word hate. It's hate. In the Old Testament, it's the word for hate. Okay, so let's just let it be. Don't try to say, well, God doesn't hate. Here he does, but he hated Esau in the sense that Jacob was the child of promise. That any promise that God makes, that calling, that election that God makes, that calling, that election that God makes, anything else, doesn't count for anything.

Doesn't mean anything at all. The promise is what counts. What was the basis of God's hatred of Esau? He wasn't a child of promise. It doesn't mean that God didn't bless Esau. He did bless Esau. He gave him lands, gave him, you know, made him a ruler in his own right. But in comparison to the promise, it looked like hate. God loves his promises, Rick, that anything else looks like hate. And he hates anything that is not a faith. Yes.

Anything in religion that is based on human merit, human works, human racial heritage, God hates. Yes. Now that might make it easier to swallow, which means he hates Zionism. He hates Christian Zionism because it teaches that racial heritage has priority in God's economy. And he hates that doctrine.

Because faith, faith always rules. Faith always triumphs. Everything in his economy is based on faith. So, the inclusion of Gentiles represents Jacob's favor over Esau. The gods has a pattern of favoring the lesser. It's a good lesson today. We covered a lot of ground here today. Oh, go ahead. No, go ahead. I don't have anything else to say. No, I had an interesting experience relating to Israel and everything

like this. I had an interesting experience yesterday morning, very early. I was up about 4 or 4 15 Sunday morning, and so I'm just, you know, sitting down, had my Bible open, and my phone pinged, and I got a message from someone I hadn't talked to since at least 2006. But this individual, he used to be part of my worship team when I was pastoring back in Topeka, Kansas. Was at church every single time the door was open, every time. Every single time the door was open, every time. And so he was faithful in attendance. He was there. He heard every message I'd ever preached.

If he wasn't there, it was an unusual thing. And we had a friendship. I'd say it was pretty good friendship. And, but I hadn't talked to him in years, at least since I I guess, 2007. But here it is, four o'clock in the morning, and where he is in the Midwest, it was three o'clock in the morning. And he sends me this message.

He says, That's odd in itself that somebody would text you at 4 a.m. Well let me tell you what he texted me. He said, Doc, I just watched a video where it says that you were condemning Israel and the Jews. Now, I just finished a 100-hour prophecy course, and unless you repent of your ways, Doc, you're going to miss out on salvation. This was a man that, I mean, I would call him a faithful Christian. But now, and he called me pastor. I was his pastor. But not anymore.

He's rebuke you now. He's on a 100-hour prophecy course that says i'm completely wrong and that you know to to message me at three in the morning his time which shows no respect for you at all no but it also means that guy was up till the middle of the night stewing over this i'm gonna send a message to Doc Burkhart right now and tell him that he's wrong. Not only are you wrong, but you're going to burn in hell. That's right. If you lose your salvation, you're damned. So I better start getting in line on the Israel situation. God is going to damn you if you don't support the state of Israel.

That's it. All right. Now you know why I despise Christian Zionism. It is a wicked, wicked evil doctrine that has come into the church, particularly in the last 25 years. Well, I guess you won't be invited to his birthday party. No, probably not. I'd still sing happy birthday to him though if you'd let me, but praise God. Well, I wanted to share that because it just shows you how incendiary this topic is among some people. Well, Trish just said she had a conversation with a gal who said if she didn't believe in the rapture,

she'd lose her salvation. We'll see who's right. Okay, so what is the basis of your salvation? Your faith in the work of Christ on the cross. Yes. Okay. Not your acceptance of somebody's doctrine. And that's what they're teaching. You accept my doctrine or you're damned.

That's right. They're dialing 911 and they're calling the hell wagon to come and get you. All your little carcass down to hell. Sorry, I'm not getting in your hell wagon. My faith is in Christ and I'm unshakable. I will not be moved. I cannot budge. My faith is in Christ. See, this is what I want you to get out of this morning,

manna lessons. Your faith is in Christ. Praise God. Period. Nothing else to discuss. Your faith is in the resurrected Christ. People can have any doctrine they wanna have, but it has nothing to do with your salvation.

Amen. Your salvation is in the resurrected Christ. Okay, we gotta go. Amen. All right, thank you so much for joining us here on a Monday edition of Morning Manna. Starting off another week here with the word of God. What a great

experience here that so much that we're learning here. We invite you to come back again Tuesday morning 8 a.m. Join us live on Faith and Values. We'd love to have you here with us live interacting with people from all over the world studying the Word of God together. If you can't be with us live, you can always catch replays on faithinvalues.com and on various social media platforms you'll hear Morning Man are usually following true news right now. And so, be, but encourage others to tune in. It's the Word of God that makes the changes. And it's also the Word of God that separates too. It separates. I'm reading the chat, Doc, and

I can see this is getting inside our class. Yes. It's getting down inside of you because it's coming out in the chat. And all we're doing, Rick, is reading the word of God. Yes. That's all we're really doing here. That's it. We're just reading the word and People are going it says that Mm-hmm. Yes, it does Alright, let's let's come back tomorrow and see what it says tomorrow. Alright, God bless you We'll see you on the next edition of morning man. Bye