TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Republicans Demand Impeachment of AG Merrick Garland

Episode Date: June 26, 2023

A growing number of Republican officials and party activists are demanding the impeachment of Attorney General Merrick Garland for obstructing a full-scale investigation and prosecution of the Biden family’s criminal activities. However, first we will discuss the wartime drama that captivated the world’s attention last Friday night and Saturday as Russia teetered on the edge of civil war. What happened? Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 6/26/23 You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969. It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. Now available in eBook and audio formats! Order Final Day from Amazon today! https://www.amazon.com/Final-Day-Characteristics-Second-Coming/dp/0578260816/ Apple users, you can download the audio version on Apple Books! https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/final-day-10-characteristics-of-the-second-coming/id1687129858 The Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today! https://tru.news/faucielf

You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles. We appreciate you tuning in. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help us God. A growing number of Republican officials and party activists are demanding the impeachment

of Attorney General Merrick Garland for obstructing a full-scale investigation and prosecution of the Biden family's criminal activities. Doc Burkhardt and I will talk about it today. However, first, we will discuss the wartime drama that captivated the world's attention last Friday night and Saturday as Russia teetered on the edge of civil war. Just what happened? Will we ever know? Well, Dr. Burkhardt is here with me, and we're going to try to figure it out. And you probably have a better idea than I do because it was an unusual weekend, Doc. It was.

And I was watching Friday evening as you were as well as we finished up the Godcast Friday afternoon. Things were just heating up in Russia at the time with Progozin and the Wagner Private Military Company making a move toward Rostov and to Moscow at the time. And then later in the evening, President Putin addressed the country and said, hey, we're going to punish

any uprising that there is. And then they started locking down the highways. Right. You saw the police and military shutting down the highways in certain cities. And it looked like Friday night, it looked like there was going to be an all-out civil war or at least some type of street fighting in Moscow during the night. And there were reports that President Putin was being moved to St. Petersburg and several other key leaders were being moved out of Moscow.

So there was a lot of stuff happening Friday evening going into Saturday morning. I expected Saturday morning when I got up, somebody was going to be dead. I didn't know who it was. Yeah, either Putin or Putin. Right. That's the way I thought, Doc.

But then as everything unfolded, it was like the unexpected happened. It was an uncoup of some kind. But he did capture a city or two. Yes. And took over military bases and was, what, 150 miles from Moscow? Yes. And one of the key military installations for the Ministry of Defense in Rostov, I saw videos of Pergozan

and deputy commanders out on the street having lunch. And I'm like, what's going on? A coup? A rebellion? I mean, what is really happening here? And so we're going to walk you through some of the information. We're not going to pretend to know all the answers because I think this whole situation is still unfolding. But we'll try to pretend to know all the answers because I think this whole situation is still unfolding. But we'll try to pinpoint where all the players are today. The Western media is still trying to obviously milk it for all it's worth. Financial Times, owned by the Rothschilds in London today, traitors must be shot. Vladimir Putin's truce with Wagner. Teeters on the edge. We'll just tell you a little bit of what's in that story. This is the way the Financial Times

was spinning it. So the Financial Times reports that Vladimir Putin's truce with Wagner, a Russian private military company, is on the brink of collapse. The leader of Wagner, Yevgeny Prigozhin, reportedly ordered his mercenaries to stop their march to Moscow after reaching a deal with the Kremlin. Now, the first indication of the deal's fragility came on Monday when state newswires cited sources saying that, contrary to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov's promises, Prigozhin was still under investigation for organizing the mutiny. Now, apparently, President Putin has addressed the nation this evening and assuring the nation that he worked to keep everything bloodless and he's going to fulfill his promises to Progozin and the Wagner Group. But basically, Progozin and the Wagner Group are being moved to Belarus.

And that's the other oddball part of the story. That video we were showing of Mr. Putin speaking, that was his speech tonight to the Russian people. But the Financial Times quoted various Russian citizens expressing their views. Some people were saying, you know, traitors should be shot. Right. Others were supportive of progress. So it's difficult to accurately gauge what was really going on in Russia Friday night, Saturday. This story, number six, Fox News came out with this story. U.S. spy agencies had intel in mid-June that Wagner chief Prokosin was planning armed action

in Russia. And so when I saw this story yesterday as well, Rick, my first thought was, okay, well, this was a CIA operation or an intelligence operation of some kind, encouraging Progozin to make the move and to do everything that he did or didn't do. And so on the one hand, it seemed to answer some questions, but it created new questions. Right. So basically the story said that U.S. American intelligence agencies were aware that Progressive was going to revolt and that they informed President Biden so that he would be ready for any chaotic action that could come out of Russia when this revolt took place. That was the storyline. Whether that's true, others would look at it and say,

well, yeah, you knew about it because you were in on it. The Western intelligence agencies were working with progress in this revolt. It's all speculation. Nobody really knows what took place. And then you've got, well, remember this, Doc, in last month or so when those Pentagon papers were published online. Remember the young military guy that they busted? Oh, yeah. The hacker that, okay. You don't hear anything about that story anymore. No, it's gone but in those documents were were documents that said that prokosin was talking had back channels with zolinski and

ukrainian intelligence agencies right and i remember you and i saying hey if that's real putin's in trouble he's got a snake on his team. But then we also said, how do we know the documents are real? They may have been placed inside the documents and deliberately leaked to get Putin and Prokhorin fighting with each other. But that was just like two months ago. But the inference was

that Prokhorin was playing both sides and i remember you said hey he's a businessman who's right who's going to pay him the most he's up for he's up for sale he's a free he has an army he has an army and he kills people for a living and he'll switch sides sides so then we had um we had a story a week ago and um i think the original story was probably the washington post what we're going to put up on the screen is rt um nato state hosting training camps for coup in belarus oh it was the times the times The Times of London. So it might have been the New York Times. I'm not sure. But anyhow, the story was that Poland had hundreds of Belarusian exiles. Right. Living in Poland, being trained by the Polish military to carry out subversive terrorist activities

in Belarus. Right. And also in Ukraine and in Lithuania and in the Czech Republic. So there were a bunch of these Belarusian exiles, various camps being trained in various countries in Central Europe. Well the idea, Doc, was that they were going to bring about chaos in Belarus so that Lukashenko's government would collapse. Right. That was the main story in that article. The Pentagon documents that Prokosin had back-channel communications with the Ukrainian military and intelligence, that Poland is training terrorists to go into Belarus.

And then you take the events over the weekend where Lukashenko is the one that brokered the peace deal between Putin and Prokosin. Right. And then the result of it is Progozin moving now to Belarus. Right. All right, so let's try to put this together. And again, we're speculating because nobody really knows what happened. I see three or four possibilities. Number one, it's just what it was.

Progozin revolted. Got mad. Got mad, and he marched his troops towards Moscow. That's option number one. Number two, Putin and Rogozin had a plan to dupe the West into making them think that there was a revolt. Right.

To encourage the Ukrainian troops to take a brash action that the Russians could take advantage of. Do a feint. A feint, a rope-a-dope, you know, something that would pull them in. Number three, well, this would be the more cynical idea, and that would be that the CIA, the West, NATO, various intelligence agencies chipped in, came up with a couple billion dollars. How about like $6.2 billion? Yeah, they just found $6 billion last week.

But yeah, let's just use a lower number. How about like $6.2 billion? Yeah, they just found $6 billion last week. But yeah, let's just use a lower number, $2 billion. And they told Prokrasin, we'll pay you $2 billion to kill Putin, and you can become president of Russia. And Prokrasin, and again, we're just speculating. And Prokrasin said, okay, I'll do it. And I want 50%, one billion up front. And when you deposit it in my bank account, I'll march. And when I bump off Putin, then I become president of Russia and I get the other billion. Okay, so that's a possibility. And then there's another possibility that that same scenario happened and he told Putin about it and Putin and Lukashenko came

up with a plan and they said, let's the three of us split the billion dollars. Pretend that you're doing a revolt. Let them send a billion dollars. Pretend that you're doing a revolt. We'll make them billion dollars. Pretend that you're doing a revolt. We'll make them fall for it. All right? That's a possibility. And then there's one more. And that is because this is the part

that doesn't make sense to me. Why would Belarus President Lukashenko invite Prokosin and 25,000 hardened killers, mercenary soldiers. Why would he invite them to move to his little country? Why? That's like super dangerous. You bring in 25,000 men who are trained to kill, and you were inviting them, hey, go on over to Belarus and, you know, let's have some coffee and we'll become friends. So what I'm thinking, Doc, is put number eight back up on the screen. Okay. Poland hosting training camps for coup in Belarus.

Maybe the coup was a lot closer than we think. Did they just move 25,000 soldiers into Belarus to invade Poland? Is this war about to move into Poland? I don't know. I'm just trying to put it all together and connecting dots. It was a strange weekend. I know. And the other thought I had, and you brought up Poland earlier today,

but I thought, well, now you've got seasoned Wagner PMC troops in Belarus. You've got seasoned Russian soldiers out on the eastern flank, if you will, of Ukraine. Now you have an opportunity for a two-prong assault on Kiev from two directions without getting Belarusian troops involved or anything. So that was a thought that came. That's another possibility. But they come at Kiev from two directions. But all weekend long, I was trying to, I was asking the Lord. I said, Lord, what's the discernment on this?

What's, you know, what are the plans? And I didn't get any clear direction on it. I just kept watching and trying to figure out, trying to discern. One thing I do know, no matter how long I'm here or I remain here in this earthly shell, there's going to be wars and rumors of wars. And some wars you just can't figure out. Sometimes wars happen and you don't know why.

But this war started because of what NATO was doing to Russia. And remember, the purpose of NATO at this point is to eliminate the nation of Russia. That's it. And Russia is going to fight to maintain its integrity and its sovereignty. And, you know, Russian President Putin tonight, when he was addressing the people after this deal was made, said that I am committed to the sovereignty and the integrity of our nation. And I'm going to, no matter if that conflict comes from external or internal sources.

So we're definitely going to keep an eye on this. A little tidbit of history I came across over the weekend is that Great Britain and Russia fought over Crimea in the 19th century. Yes. So those two countries have been going at it for a long time over the same piece of land, Crimea. And Russia has

a very long memory. A very long memory. They've only been around for a thousand years. That's longer than Britain's been around. No, England's been around. Well, I mean, they've been growing up

side by side. And going at each other for quite some time. Okay, so let's go to number 13. Sergei Lavrov reports on the signals that he received from the United States about the events around Wagner.

So according to Interfax, the U.S. ambassador to Moscow, Lynn Tracy, has conveyed signals to Russian officials that Washington was not involved in the events surrounding the Wagner group. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated that Tracy's signals included that the U.S. hopes that nuclear weapons will be protected and that American diplomats will not be harmed. Now, Mr. Lavrov said when U.S. Ambassador Tracy spoke to Russian representatives yesterday and passed signals, these signals are probably not secret. They were, first of all, that the United States had nothing to do with it and that the United States hoped that nuclear weapons would be in order, those are Lavrov's words, that American diplomats will not be harmed. It was especially emphasized that the United States proceeds from the fact that everything that happens is an internal fear of the Russian Federation, he added. So he's sending a signal back to him saying this is an internal problem.

We really don't want the U.S. involved in this. He also said he had several telephone conversations at the initiative of my foreign colleagues. Many of them expressed the same thoughts, solidarity, confidence, that we will not allow any attempts to undermine the unity of the state and undermine the success of the special military operation. I actually found Mr. Lavrov's words subdued considering the weekend events and everything, making it very, of course, Russians play it pretty cool anyway. But, you know, Len Tracy wasn't the only one that denied any

involvement with what was going on in Russia. I think we have number seven here from earlier today. U.S. and allies were not involved in Russia. This is from President Biden. We gave Putin no excuse to blame this on the West or to blame this on NATO. We made clear that we were not involved. We had nothing to do with it. This was part of a struggle within the Russian system. But no matter what comes next, I will keep making sure that our allies and our partners are closely aligned

in how we are reading and responding to the situation. It's important we stay completely coordinated. So let me get this situation. It's important we stay completely coordinated. So let me get this right. The U.S. had nothing to do with an attempted coup to bring down the Putin government. Even though we threatened it for a year. We threatened to kill him, assassinate him, and we spent a hundred and some billion dollars to bring his government down but we didn't have anything to do with this not with this this well when would we have something to do with it isn't that what we've been doing for the past year trying to bring down i mean the sanctions everything that we've done that's the objective the objective is to bring down his government lindsey graham has

openly called for putin's assassination I mean, the very fact that Joe Biden had to go in front of cameras and deny that his administration had nothing to do with this coup, that in itself to me is suspicious. Right. Well, London Times, UK must prepare for the sudden collapse of Russia. They're licking their chops. That's right. They can't contain their glee. So, according to the London Times, the UK government has been warned to prepare for the sudden collapse of Russia, that's their words, after a failed coup attempt. The leader of the Wagner Group, Yevgeny Prigozhin, ordered mercenaries to halt their march to Moscow after a last-minute deal with the Kremlin, narrowly avoiding an apparent putsch in the

largest nuclear power in the world. President Putin spared Prigozhin any punishment as part of an agreement that will virtually exile the warlord to Belarus. Now, this is several quotes from that Times article. From the very beginning of the invasion, one of the most obvious scenarios was that the war could lead to political unrest back home in Russia. A senior government source said, a UK government source that is, asked if this would trigger a collapse in the Kremlin. The source said Britain must prepare for a whole range of different scenarios, adding, we have to wait, watch, and see what comes next. This could be chapter one of something new.

Several other world leaders chiming in on this. President Noseda of Lithuania, which will host the NATO summit next month, said that the alliance should be prepared to strengthen its eastern flank. He says if Pergozan or part of the Wagner Group ends up in Belarus with unclear plans and unclear intentions, it will only mean that we need to further strengthen the security of our eastern borders, he said. Now, John Foreman, the former British defense attache in Moscow, said the prospect of Pergozan toppling Putin ranked as a worst-case scenario, adding, You've got to be careful what you wish for. Pergozan is not some sort of liberal, peace-loving Democrat. He's a fascist. Better the devil you know than the devil, risked woefully underestimating Russia.

He said the struggling Ukrainian counteroffensive showed the continued strength of the Russian army's defenses. He said despite the weakened state, arguably of Putin, we're in for a long haul here. And that actually is the worst of all worlds for the West. So once again. We're in for the long haul. Right. So the Western leaders aren't interested in ending the war. I was over at the Israeli papers today, Doc,

looking at things, and I saw a report that Benjamin Netanyahu, Ben-Nate, will visit Ukraine to meet with Zelensky. And actually, this is part of mending fences a bit with Zelensky. The Times of Israel reports that Israeli Foreign Minister Elias Cohen has stated that Prime Minister Netanyahu is considering an invitation from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to visit Kiev. Cohen said there is a good chance that the visit will happen, but no date has been set yet. Now, the foreign ministry plans to reprimand the Ukrainian ambassador to Israel, Yevgeny

Kornitchuk, for criticizing Jerusalem's stance toward Moscow and accusing it of collaborating with Russia. And so that's been a recent event. And this really visit by Benjamin Netanyahu is probably a way to say, well, we're still aligned with you. We're still together with you. Netanyahu is also making another trip. And this one's, I think, more significant. Jerusalem paper is reporting today that Netanyahu is going to visit China next month. That's right.

So the Times of Israel is reporting that Prime Minister Netanyahu is set to visit China next month, signaling growing impatience with Washington as Beijing increasingly throws its weight around in the region. Now, while there, the premier is slated to meet with Chinese leader, with President Xi Jinping and other Chinese leaders. Advanced contacts have been held in recent days between the two leaders' offices to arrange the visit, the sources said. Now, the visit is intended, it says, among other reasons to signal to Washington that Netanyahu has other diplomatic opportunities to pursue. And Israeli diplomatic sources told Zaman Israel, the Times of Israel's Hebrew sister site on Monday. Senior sources described Netanyahu's imminent trip as framework-breaking. Now, the U.S. has long held major sway in the Middle East,

with Israel as one of its most important allies in the region. A pivot to China could shift that relationship, but prove a major boost for Beijing's influence over the Middle East. By hosting Netanyahu, Xi will seemingly broadcast China's seriousness about engaging in the region and its interest in a new relationship with Israel. Now, we have what's called a special relationship with Israel. The U.S. does. They call it a special relationship. It just means you have favored nation status, then you have most favored nation status, and then you have this is our favorite nation status.

And then you got special. Yes. And then there's special. And the two countries that get classified as special, Israel and Great Britain. Right. uh war fever this weekend in this past weekend in pyongyang north korea this report is yonhap news in south korea mass rallies in north korea against the united states held on korean war anniversary and uh so doc they had 120,000 people show up for this anti-American rally over the weekend, and they were chanting slogans about destroying the United States of America. Right.

So Yonhap's reporting that more than 120,000 people participated in mass rallies in the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, to denounce what they claim is a war provocation of aggression by the U.S. And they were doing this on the 73rd anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. That's being reported by the North Korean state media. The Sunday rallies were attended by workers and youth, as well as secretaries of the North's ruling Workers' Party of Korea, Rhee Il-won and Park Tae-sung, according to the official Korean Central News Agency. The KCNA said participants blamed the U.S. for the war and noted that there would have been no such deep-rooted enmity as June 25th and the land of the motherland would not have been stained with innocent blood should the North have had strong power in the past. Now, in what appeared to be an attempt to justify the regime's nuclear missile program,

Casey Nye said that the Korean people have firmly grasped the strongest absolute weapon to punish the U.S. imperialists and the war deterrence for self-defense, which no enemy dare provoke. The participants who held marches and shouted anti-U.S. slogans also warned of taking revenge and giving merciless punishment to the U.S., saying it is their duty to settle accounts with the U.S. imperialists, the case. And that's the part you need to be aware of there. Something are, something new has happened. Something has changed here where the old fires are getting stirred up once again. Anniversaries will do that to you,

but everything they see going on out in the Pacific, in the, you know, in the South China Sea, the whole area of the Korean Peninsula, they're perceiving that as a threat. And they're seeing that as, you know, we're trying to reignite the conflict with North Korea. Doc, you know, a lot of our viewers are probably thinking, well, yeah, the North Koreans, they've been running their mouth for years, yada, yada, yada, yada. They're always going to, they're either shooting off a missile or,

or they're shooting off their mouth, shooting off their mouth, one or the other, you know? And, but here's the thing you have to, you have to keep in mind. Somebody that hates you passionately, vehemently hates you and is convinced that you're going to attack them. And that person has weapons of mass destruction every time they hold an event where they're they've got hundreds of thousands of

people chanting slogans about destroying you you should take them seriously right you can't just dismiss it there'll be a day that kim jong-un or his successor, somebody, somebody will do it. Somebody will push the button and launch a nuclear attack because they're eaten up with this hatred of the United States of America. At some point, they're going to release that anger. And, you know, my concern has always been that you have one flashpoint, and that could be Ukraine, or it could be North Korea, or it could be Iran. You just have one where the nuclear weapons are exchanged, and then everybody gets in the fight. That's my worst nightmare, is that there's one event that triggers multiple reactions in nuclear-powered countries, or nuclear-armed countries.

One more, let's see. London Times. North Koreans vow to pulverize the American empire into dust. We'll skip over, you already know what they're going to say. Yonhap News, North Korea warns Korean peninsula close to brink of nuclear war. Now this one, you might want to pay attention to this one. Right. So Yonhap reported that North Korea's foreign ministry on Monday accused Seoul and Washington of pushing tensions to the brink of nuclear war, akin to the 50-53 Korean War, saying it will continue to bolster its self-defensive capabilities. In a research report released by the Foreign Ministry's Institute for American Studies,

North Korea likened the current military tensions in the region to the night before the outbreak of the Korean War as it slammed the United States and South Korea for their delusional anti-communist military confrontation and rhetorical threats. Now, the North has argued that the U.S. is resorting to the warring hostile acts of wantonly encroaching upon the sovereignty and security of the North more persistently this year than ever before and has reached a threshold that can no longer be tolerated. It then warned that a war on the peninsula would rapidly expand into a world war

and a thermonuclear war unprecedented in the world, causing the most catastrophic and irreversible consequences to peace and security in the region and the rest of the world. Now, like Russia, North Korea has made a vow that it will fight every last man, woman, and child to defend their territory, no matter what happens to everybody else. It doesn No matter what happens to everybody else, it doesn't matter what happens to everybody. You may call it crazy, you may call it whatever, but the fact of the matter, that's what they believe.

That's right. And so we don't believe stuff like that. We think that's all fairytale stuff, when I say collectively. Right. But they absolutely believe it. They march people out in the streets with banners with nuclear rockets on the banner with landing in the U.S. That's what they're taught in school.

That's what they see on television. That's what they hear from their leaders, that the U.S. is trying to destroy them. They're not hearing, oh, let's be friends. Let's build hotels and stuff like that. No, they're hearing the U.S. wants to eliminate North Korea. That's why, Doc, again, for Americans who even know about these things, the tendency is to just kind of brush it off and go, they just got big mouths. But you can't just dismiss it.

When people are threatening to destroy your country with weapons of mass destruction, you have to take them serious. Look, we just came through this past weekend. Only God knows how close the world came to nuclear war. We don't know how close it was. Like you, I thought when we wake up Saturday morning, we may discover there's chaos in Russia. What if Pergozin had taken over a Russian

missile site? That was what I was thinking. What if he used blackmail? What if he threatened to nuke someone unless he got who knows what was going to happen? Or if just Russia collapsed as the government collapsed. Right. And there was just chaos. That's how fast things can get out of control.

And how many of us were ready this weekend? How many of us were ready? This is the moment. This is when things change. Right. And that's what you have to be prepared for. I want to switch our attention to internal American politics. It shouldn't be politics, but it is a political story. New York Post, Hunter Biden prosecutor told six witnesses he could not charge outside the state of Delaware. This is a accusation from the IRS whistleblower. That's right. He said he didn't have the authority to do it. And so the New York Post is reporting that a federal prosecutor investigating the Hunter Biden case reportedly told six witnesses that he did not have the authority to charge the first son outside of

Delaware and had been denied special counsel status. Now, the prosecutor's statement contradicts sworn testimony from Attorney General Mary Garland, who claimed that the prosecutor had the authority to prosecute Hunter Biden in any district he chose. The prosecutor, Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss, allegedly informed the witnesses that he was not the deciding official on whether charges were filed and that the Biden-appointed D.C. U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves would not allow him to charge in his district. Now, a quote from Speaker McCarthy, U.S. Attorney David Weiss must provide answers to the House Judiciary Committee. If the whistleblower's allegations are

true, this will be a significant part of a larger impeachment inquiry into Merrick Garland's weaponization of the Department of Justice. McCarthy said the disparities between the DOJ's statements and Shapley's testimony need to be reconciled and has apparently tapped Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan to lead the inquiry. Just as a reminder to you, here is Merrick Garland when he gave testimony, making it very clear that he gave David Weiss the authority to prosecute any way he saw fit and anywhere he saw fit. Watch this. The U.S. attorney in Delaware has been advised that he has full authority to make those kind of referrals that you're talking about

or to bring cases in other jurisdictions if he feels it's necessary. And I will assure that if he does, he will be able to do that. Does the Delaware U.S. attorney lack independent charging authority over certain criminal allegations against the president's son outside of the District of Delaware? He would have to bring, if it's in another district, he would have to bring the case in another district. But as I said, I promise to ensure that he's able to carry out his investigation and that he be able to run it. And if he needs to bring it in another jurisdiction, he will have full authority to do that. Now, last week we did a story that said that Weiss had apparently tried to pursue both in D.C. and California

cases. And we don't know the status of those cases in California. And in one case in Washington, D.C., he wanted to inspect Hunter Biden's documents in a storage locker, and he was denied. And then Hunter Biden's attorneys were tipped off and given enough time to clean out the documents. Right. So somebody's lying, Doc.

Either the whistleblower at the IRS is lying or the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, is lying. You can't have two people telling their stories and not one of them lying. And the whistleblower named all six of the witnesses, named them all. And so at some point, those people are going to have to give testimony on what they heard at that point. Now, we mentioned what... Go on. No, I was just going to say the same thing. You read in that New York Post article, you read a tweet from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. So I wanted to put that. There it is on the screen.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, we need to get to the facts, and that includes reconciling these clear disparities. U.S. Attorney David Weiss must provide answers to the House Judiciary Committee. So that means Mr. Weiss is going to be subpoenaed to testify under oath. Now, this is where it gets serious. This will be a significant part of a larger impeachment inquiry into Merrick Garland's weaponization of the Department of Justice. So for the first time, at least that I have seen, the Speaker of the House has now officially said the Attorney General Merrick Garland may be impeached. There may be articles of impeachment filed, impeachment hearings,

and then the trial sent to the U.S. Senate, and he could be removed from his office. This has taken a different turn since last week. I don't know. Has there ever been an attorney general impeached in the United States? I'm not aware of my lifetime. Possibly, maybe back after the Civil

War. I don't know. But I don't recall any attorney general ever removed from office. No, not a U.S. attorney. I can't think of anyone. Looking right now, I don't see anyone that's been there. Now, Representative Jason Smith has been on the front line of this pursuit of information regarding Hunter Biden, and he had a series of tweets that he's been firing off since last week. It's the first one here. Hunter Biden profited off his father's name. He didn't report millions of dollars in income from foreign sources. Any ordinary American caught doing that would have faced severe consequences.

Hunter Biden didn't. Why not? Well, we know why not. Went on to say the whistleblowers exposed how the DOJ established a pattern of delaying, divulging, and denying the Hunter Biden investigation. At nearly every turn, officials chose protecting the powerful over exposing the truth to the American people. He went on a further tweet. After Biden was sworn in as president, there were concerns the DOJ wouldn't be an impartial investigator. AG Merrick Garland ignored those concerns and refused to appoint a special prosecutor. Instead, A.G. Garland promised the American people in public testimony that the prosecutor handling Hunter Biden's case, U.S. Attorney for Delaware David Wise, could bring

charges against Hunter Biden outside of Delaware, which now the witnesses are saying he was absolutely locked down on that. And as Rick said, that means somebody is not telling the truth. And the U.S. attorney is going to be compelled to give testimony to the House committee, and that will be under oath. And as an attorney, he knows what is required of him once he's under oath, which is to tell the truth, and if the truth implicates the attorney general, then Mary Garland is going to be facing impeachment.

Right. And the House Republicans have enough just barely. They'd have to get every single Republican to vote for impeachment. They got a margin of, what, four votes right now, four or five votes. So they'd have to get all of them. They could only lose about three votes that would vote no. But, yes, we could have an impeachment of the attorney general before the end of this year. That's a possibility.

Another thing that's been floating around here over the past week is the appointment of a special prosecutor. And Representative James Comer has made it very clear where he stands on that particular issue. Representative Comer from Kentucky is slamming the ridiculous appointment of Hunter Biden's special counsel. And he's got a point because all it's going to do is further delay any investigation, any discussion into Hunter Biden. Who would appoint the special counsel? Attorney General Garland. Mary Garland. So he said, I strongly oppose the appointment of a special counsel.

I think that's the most ridiculous idea that any Republican could think right now. If you support a special counsel, you support and trust Attorney General Merrick Garland to have the sole authority to pick one person who can then take over the investigation and never have to be transparent with the media or Congress until the conclusion of the investigation. The House Oversight Committee has found and shared with the public in the past five months what the Justice Department and FBI have kept secret for five years. So I think we're moving right along, Comer said to Fox earlier today. Well, we've learned more about the Biden crime syndicate in the past year than we've learned in years through the news media. Because the news media worked overtime time to cover it up yes and so mr comer has has really done an outstanding job bringing the truth to the american people so let him continue uh in in his uh investigation uh one more story from new york post uh u.s voters bitter about the nation's direction.

Seventy-four percent of the American people, according to this poll, say that the USA is on the wrong track, going in the wrong direction. Only 20 percent of the American people think things are just wonderful. And this was a poll that was revealed on Meet the Depressed with Chuck Todd Sunday morning. He said a recent NBC News poll has found that 74 percent of U.S. voters believe the country is on the wrong track, with only 20 percent believing it's moving in the right direction. Now, the survey also suggests that a potential rematch between President Biden and former President Trump in 2024 is likely, with Biden leading Trump 49% to 45%, and Trump leading Florida Governor Ron DeSantis in the GOP primary. Additionally, the poll reveals

that 68% of voters are concerned about Biden's health, while only 55% feel the same way about Donald Trump. Now, the last time the voters were that bitter about the nation's course, in 1992 and 2008, the party in control of the White House changed hands. In each of those elections, Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama snatched the Oval Office back from Republicans. So if you're using that as a scenario, then it would say that there's a chance that the Republicans could win the White House back here in 2024 based on that. But in 2022, based on historical records, the Republicans should have won 80, 90 seats in the House, and they barely won a margin of like five seats. So something wasn't normal about the 22 election,

which says that they were skewed, but nobody was willing to talk about it. Everybody was afraid to say, there's something odd about these election results. They defy historical patterns. But who's going to question it, Rick? You can't question it. Now, while President Trump has a growing lead over Ron, excuse me, Governor Ron DeSantis in the GOP primary, the Florida governor does better against President Biden in the general election, the survey showed. Mr. Biden leads Mr. Trump 49% to 45%, but Biden and DeSantis are in a dead heat at 47% each.

All right. I want to bring up something. We talked about this maybe six months ago. How will the handlers, how will the ruling class do a regime change without an election and try to pull off a Houdini magic act with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. And this was about six months ago I told you this, Doc. I said, we've got to go back to the days of Nixon and Agnew. And so what they did is that they brought charges against Vice President Agnew. Over a real estate deal, right? And so what they did is that they brought charges against Vice President Agnew. Over a real estate deal, right?

Well, no, it was over, they accused him of accepting money when he was governor of Maryland. And that was the accusation. And so he resigned. They brought in Gerald Ford, 33rd degree Mason, made him vice president. Then they brought down Nixon. Nixon resigned. 33rd degree Freemason Ford moved up to the White House, the presidency. And then they brought in Nelson Rockefeller as the new vice president.

And without an election, you had Ford and Rockefeller running the country. And I said about six months ago, that's what I'm watching for signs. Kamala Harris, I think her career is coming to an end very soon, her political career. One of several things is going to happen to very soon. Her political career. One of several things is going to happen to Kamala. Best case for her,

she's going to be given an offer she can't refuse. Maybe the president of a college or a think tank or something like that. Some prestigious promotion for life where she's going to be set for life. She's going to take on maybe

a foundation, you know, maybe Bill Gates is going to make her, I don't know, you know, somebody is going to give her a, a cushiony position, a big bucket of money. Yeah. And they're going to move her out of the white house and her, her pride will be intact. That's option number one. Option number two is if she refuses option number one, they bring a scandal against her. Option number three,

that's worst case scenario. She has an accident. Something happens. She just isn't around anymore. I think they'll go with number one. They'll start at number one. I'm watching for signs of Kamala Harris resigning. Now, the question would be, who will they bring in?

Because whoever they bring in as the new vice president, he's going to become president very soon. Like early 2024, that man or woman would be the president. I got three, my three top candidates. Michigan Governor Whitmer. Just imagine her in power. That's scary. That's one candidate. Number two, Gavin Newsom. Yes.

Nice, strong jaw, Hollywood looks. Mm-hmm. Popular in California, real far leftist. He's visited the White House several times when Biden has not been there. Yes. He wants the job. Number three,

Michelle Obama. Michelle Obama would be the strongest one. I don't know if she wants it, but her husband does. He's running the White House now. At least they can move back in and get their old place back. I mean, he's running it now from off-site

through Susan Rice. And then he could make Susan Rice his chief of staff and she'd still be running things for him. But I really, I think Michelle Obama would be the strongest one to replace Kamala Harris. And then she moves, and then Joe Biden resigned. And then the way that they're going to

get Joe Biden out of the White House, the Biden family is going to have a family intervention. And they're going to hold a press conference and say, we went to dear old dad and we said, pops, you know,

you're just getting too old to go out there and campaign and to be president for another four years with all that stress. And why don't you just go out while you're still on top? You finally got to be the president of the United States. Give up running and resign.

Resign and let Vice President Michelle Obama become the president. Enjoy some of that corrupted money that you got all that money. You got all that Chinese money, you know. No, I really think I think we could be stunned that by early 2024, it could be President Michelle Obama and Vice President Gavin Newsom. That changes this whole election, doesn't it? Oh, sure. Gavin Newsom's actually electable, I think. I don't like him,

but I actually think he's electable. He's smooth. He's good looking. He's well spoken. No scandal sticks to him. I mean, you saw the scandals during COVID. Nothing stuck to him at all. It's well-spoken. No scandal sticks to him. I mean, you saw the scandals during COVID. Nothing stuck to him at all. It just rolled off of him.

But it would be interesting to see Michelle Obama move into that position. Would you have to find out her birth certificate? No one ever asked for Michelle Obama's birth certificate. And I'll take it even further. I don't care. You know, at this point, I don't care what people write about me. They've written just about everything about me. If this happens, if this scenario happens, I think if Michelle Obama becomes the President of the United States, and Barack Obama is the first husband, I think they're going to announce that they are and were, they are now and they were then, the first gay slash transgendered couple in the White House.

I wouldn't doubt it. And they will say, they will say, we didn't deceive you. You were not ready for the truth. But now the American people will embrace a transgendered president. And Doc,

there's a sizable portion of the country that would embrace a transgendered president yes especially one that they they're already comfortable with and i would not be surprised that michelle obama ends up in the white house and we're told in the big reveal yes and and now the america has embraced a tranny president things could be very weird uh one more thing on politics uh ron desantis uh well two got two stories on on ron desantis uh florida's largest police union has endorsed uh governor desantis over donald trump and they endorsed president trump in the previous presidential election. So this is a major shift.

So Fox News is reporting that Florida's largest police union, the Florida Police Benevolent Association, has announced its endorsement of Governor Ron DeSantis for president after previously supporting former President Trump. So the union's President John Kazanjian, get that right, called DeSantis the most effective governor in the nation who will prioritize public safety in the White House. The union had previously endorsed President Trump in 2020.

I don't know if you want to go through any of the... No, no, we're good. But it's 30 30 000 members in the florida uh union the florida police benevolent association 30 000 members they've endorsed governor desantis over donald trump um and then one more on on mr desantis uh he released a video on the border crisis and he pledged that he would build the wall and make no excuses about it. We've got that video. We'll show it to you right now. The crisis at the southern border, a record 2.76 million migrants crossed the border during the

2022 fiscal year, shattering the previous annual record by more than one million. Some not old enough to walk, but have already traveled hundreds of miles. There's been this record surge of migrants. Border Patrol agents apprehended more than 10,000 migrants along the U.S.-Mexico border yesterday. A growing humanitarian crisis at the southern border. The drugs coming across the border here

are fueling an unprecedented epidemic across the country, the toll of which could be counted in the skyrocketing number of overdose deaths. What's been happening under President Biden's watch is that so many immigrants who think that it will be easier to enter the United States are concerned about food, they're concerned about... The crisis in the southern border, a record smart spot because it, first of all, it goes against the Biden administration, you know, because their lack of enforcement of border policies. And then without naming Donald Trump says, I'm going to do what Donald Trump wouldn't do or couldn't do when he was president. And that is to actually build the wall. And so without naming names or anything else, you know, this is actually a pretty smart spot. And people resonate with this southern border story because they ask the question,

we're protecting borders in Israel and Ukraine. Why aren't we protecting our own border here? And you show videos of invasions taking place daily. And so it's going to be an issue that as we get closer to 2024, it's going to become more prevalent. Hey, one more story. News Australia.

Digital platforms could be fined $6.8 million for publishing disinformation or misinformation, fake news, whatever. Whatever the government says is fake news, Facebook and Twitter and other platforms could be fined nearly $7 million for each account.

Each account, they could be facing a $7 million fine. But the government will decide what is fake news. So if you post something online that's true about the government, all the government has to do is tell the social media platform, take it down or you're fined $7 million. Guess what's going to happen? They're going to take it down. It's just to happen. They're going to take it down. It's just that simple. They're going to put

pain to any refusal to censor free speech. That's a law now in Australia. The war against free speech is on everywhere. We can't let these people win. We have to speak. We have to continue to resist. We have to defeat them. And the only way to defeat them, it says right here, through the blood of the lamb and the word of our testimony. That's right. That's how we win. The blood of the lamb and the word of our testimony. You got to have a testimony. What is a testimony? It's a true story of what God has done in your life.

Do you have a story? Do you have anything to talk about? Can you tell anybody what God has done in your life? I mean, first of all, he saved your soul. He forgave your sins. You ought to be talking about that till the day you die. What miracles has he done for you? What help?

What blessings? What favor? How has he answered your prayers? Do you have a testimony? You need a testimony. And the way that you get a testimony is to get closer to your creator and to surrender to him

and ask him to use you in this world for his glory. And I promise you, you will end up with a testimony. It usually requires a test. Yes. To get a testimony. Yes, that's the thing. You will be tested and the enemy will come against you. You can count on it.

The enemy will come against you, but God will give you victory and you'll have a testimony. And it's not a testimony if you keep it to yourself. That's right. Brother Charles Parker, my first pastor, used to say, if you sit there and not tell your testimony, it's not a testimony. That's right. It's just a secret you're keeping to yourself. That's right. So God gave you a mouth, lips, tongue, and a voice to glorify him.

Hey, we love you very much. Get a special guest tomorrow. Don't miss tomorrow's True News. Take care. See you tomorrow. God bless you. You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles. Thank you for listening. To find out more information regarding the broadcast,

including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969.