TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - RFK Jr Defends Free Speech…Dems Demand More Censorship

Episode Date: July 20, 2023

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testified today at a US House committee hearing on censorship and free speech. His fellow Democrats vilified the son of former US Senator and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of President John F. Kennedy. Both men were assassinated. Mr. Kennedy’s fellow Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee welcomed him with their political swords ready to slash him to pieces for daring to oppose Dr. Anthony Fauci and the Covid 19 vaccine agenda. Mr. Kennedy responding to the irony that his free speech was under attack at a hearing on censorship. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 7/20/23 You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969.

You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles. We appreciate you tuning in. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, PO Box 690069, Faroe Beach, Florida, 32969. This is True News.

The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help us God. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testified today at a U.S. House committee hearing on censorship and free speech. His fellow Democrats vilified the son of former U.S. Senator and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy Sr. and the nephew of President John F. Kennedy. Both men were assassinated. Mr. Kennedy's fellow Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee welcomed him with their political swords, ready to slash him to pieces for daring to oppose Dr. Anthony Fauci and the COVID-19 vaccine agenda. Mr. Kennedy responded to the irony that his free speech rights were under attack

at a hearing on censorship. Let's start with this headline published by the New York Post. Robert F. Kennedy slams Democrats for bid to censor a censorship hearing. And that's exactly what they attempted to do it's so bizarre doc the democrats don't even hide it anymore no what we're going to show you today it's just really stunning it just they lay it right out there in the open what their agenda is well let's start you you have been looking at uh you watched the kennedy uh testimony today, and I think our first one is, is this his opening remarks? Yes. So let's just jump right into it here with some of the clips from the hearing today. Now, the purpose of the hearing was about the weaponization of the federal government.

And so Mr. Kennedy was one of several panelists that were there. But, of course, he was the target of the Democrats. It was almost like the other panelists weren't there. This first clip is part of his opening remarks. Before he even began to speak, there was a document presented that signed by 102 Democrats that sought to keep him from speaking today. At a hearing. About censorship. Watch this.

I want to start, I want to put aside my written statement for a moment and address one of the points that was brought up, I think an important point by the ranking member, that this body ought to be concerning itself with the issues that impact directly the American people. The rising price of groceries, 76% over the past two years for basic foodstuff. The war in Ukraine, the inflation issues, the border issues, many, many other issues that concern us all as a nation. We can't do that without the First Amendment, without debate. When I gave my speech, my announcement speech in Boston two months ago, YouTube, I talked about all those

issues. I focused on grocery. I focused on the fact that working class people can no longer afford to live in this country. I talked about inflation, all the issues that deeply concern you, and that you've devoted your career to alleviating those issues. Five minutes into my speech, when I was talking about Paul Revere, YouTube deplatformed me. I didn't talk about vaccines in that speech. I didn't talk about anything that was a verboten subject. I just was talking about my campaign and the things, the conversation that we ought to be having with each other as Americans.

But I was shut down. And that is why the First Amendment is important. Debate, congenial, respectful debate is the fertilizer, it's the water, it's the sunlight for our democracy. We need to be talking to each other. This is a letter that many of you signed. Many of my fellow Democrats. I've spent my life in this party. I've devoted my life to the values of this party. 102 people signed this.

This itself is evidence of the problem that this hearing was convened to address. This is an attempt to censor a censorship hearing. is evidence of the problem that this hearing was convened to address. This is an attempt to censor a censorship hearing. And the fight was on from then on. Unbelievable, Doc. It's just unbelievable. Yes. That the Democrats now are out in the open demanding censorship. I mean, we all knew that they were behind the censorship movement, but, you know, they tried to conceal it. Now they're out in the open saying, you better believe we want to censor.

Mr. Kennedy is the only person there who had two members of his family assassinated. That's right. Nobody in that room can say, my father and my uncle were both murdered for their political views. Yes. So you think you're going to scare him? You think you're going to run him off? You're really not going to do it. Now, the battle royale was on, especially with the primary antagonist in the early part of the hearing was Florida Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz. And as soon as Mr. Kennedy finished some of his remarks, she went for the jugular and demanded

that he be shut down, that he be silenced, that he be censored, even in the hearing itself. So this is about two and a half minutes of this interchange here as we start out, where they attempt to censor him right in the hearing today. But I am being censored here through this target, through smears, through misinterpretations of what I've said, through lies, through association, which is a tactic that we all thought we had been discredited and dispensed with after the Army McCarthy hearings in the 1950s. But those same weapons are now being deployed against me to silence me. I know many of the people who wrote this letter. I don't believe there's a single person who signed this letter who believes I'm anti-Semitic. I do not believe that. There is no evidence of that.

I want to say something I think that's more important, and it goes directly to what you talked about, ranking member, which is the need, this toxic polarization that is destroying our country today. And how do we deal with that? We are more, this kind of division is more dangerous for our country than any time since the American Civil War. And how do we deal with that? How are we going to, every Democrat on this committee believes that we need to end that polarization. Do you think you can do that by censoring people? I'm telling you, you cannot.

That only aggravates and amplifies the problem. you can do that by censoring people. I'm telling you, you cannot. That only aggravates and amplifies the problem. We need to start being kind to each other. We need to start being respectful to each other. We need to start restoring the comedy to this chamber and

to the rest of America. But it has to start here. Thank you very much. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, I'd has to start here. Thank you very much. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to raise a point of order. The gentlelady can say her point of order. Point of order pursuant to House Rule 11, Clause 2, which Mr. Kennedy is violative of, I move that we move into an executive session because Mr. Kennedy has repeatedly made despicable anti-Semitic and anti-Asian comments as recently as last week.

Rule 11, Clause 2 says, whenever it is asserted by a member of the committee that the evidence or testimony at a hearing may tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person, or it is asserted by a witness that the evidence or testimony that the witness would give at a hearing may tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate the witness, and it goes on. Mr. Kennedy, among many other things, has said, I know a lot now about bioweapons. We put out hundreds of millions of dollars into ethnically targeted microbes. The Chinese have done the same thing. In fact, COVID-19, there is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately. The races that are

most immune to COVID-19 are- The lady making a motion or speech? I've made a motion to move into executive session because Mr. Kennedy's testimony... Mr. Chairman, I move to table the motion. Well, they tabled that motion, shut it down pretty quickly there. You know, Doc, if the Democrats were in the majority of the House... He would have got shut down. He would have been shut down.

Right. He never would have been shut down right he never would have been invited that's true but had he been invited they would have shut him down in the first five minutes they're not in control they are barely out of control five six seats that's how close the country is hanging on to the constitution i i just think it's so despicable here mr kennedy was saying hey let's have a dialogue let's have a discussion let's talk let's talk about these things we might disagree but at least let's talk about it and the response of deborah washington schultz is no we got to shut you up. Now, the Democrats were out in full bloom today.

They are not hiding this. This clip from Jerry Connolly, he was having his discussion with the RFK. He was actually celebrating the fact that we were censoring information during the peak of COVID. He said basically that censorship was a good thing and censorship in certain cases should be celebrated. Here's Representative Jerry Connolly. Including social distancing. It was not big brother government trying to exercise its will on an innocent population. It was public health measures to protect lives. Again, something should be celebrated.

But no. There's an opportunity to have a conspiracy theory here. There's an opportunity to make political points. And no matter what you may think, Mr. Kennedy, and I revere your name, you're not here to propound your case for censorship.

You are here for cynical reasons to be used politically by that side of the aisle to embarrass the current president of the United States, and you're an enabler in that effort today. And it brings shame on a stor story name that I revere. I began my political interest with your father. And it makes me profoundly sad to see where we have descended today in this hearing. Now, he has called Robert R.F.K. Jr. vile, disgusting, racist, anti-Semitic, anti-gay, anti-science. Those are the words he used. But Mr. Kennedy hasn't called anybody a name.

Right. He's a gentleman. And they're brutes. Yes. They're bullies. and he's a gentleman, and they're accusing him of being a bully. Yet, see, we go back to what we've said for years. Whatever they call you, whatever name that they call you,

whatever they accuse you of doing, that's what they are. It's what they're doing. It's what they are. So the way to know what the radical Democrats are up to is just listen to the things that they say about their opponents. Right. That's what they're doing. Exactly. So Mr. Kennedy brought up a point about all this talk. One of the reasons why he's there testifying is about the weaponization of the federal government,

especially if it relates to social media and things like that. He brought up a new term today, and it's a term I've heard before. It's called malinformation. You've heard of misinformation. You've heard of disinformation. There's now malinformation? Malinformation. So he's going to give us that. He's going to give us the definition of what malinformation is. Listen to this, Rick, if you haven't had that. I've not heard this. It was written for the speech that nobody likes you for. And I was censored not just by the Democratic administration. I was censored by the Trump administration.

I was the first person censored, as the chairman pointed out, by the Biden administration two days after it came into office. It ordered a truthful, and by the way, they had to invent a new word called malinformation to censor people like me. There was no misinformation on my Instagram account. Everything I put on that account was cited in source, the peer-reviewed publications or government databases. Nobody has ever pointed to a single piece of misinformation that I publish. I was removed for something they called malinformation. Malinformation is information that is true, but it's inconvenient to the government. They don't want people to hear. Truth that's inconvenient to the government.

That's malinformation. We deal in that every day. That's what they've been doing to me for years. Nobody has ever accused us of putting out false information. Nobody. Because we document our information. Nobody. Because we document our information. Right. Really good.

We show them the headline. What they don't like is our conclusions, our analysis. Well, now we know. Now we have a definition, Rick. It's malinformation. Because it makes certain people feel uneasy. Truth that's inconvenient. Wow. There was a portion in the

interchange uh later on in the session where uh mr kennedy's trying to make a point and debbie washerman schultz once again it's hard to imagine a democrat asking the chairman of the committee to tell a Kennedy to shut up. But that's exactly what happened today. Watch this. Mr. Kennedy, your bizarre, unproven claim echoes that same historic slander of labeling Jews and Chinese people as a race, and that Jews, and in this case Chinese people, somehow managed to avoid a deadly illness that targets other groups for death.

You do see that, yes or no? You're misstating. and in this case, Chinese people somehow managed to avoid a deadly illness that targets other groups for death. You do see that, yes or no? You're misstating. No, no, no, no. I quoted what you said earlier, and it is directly what you said. So just ask me, yes or no. I was describing an NIH-funded study. No, no, no, you didn't cite any. I was describing an NIH-funded study by Cleveland Clinic scientists.

Reclaiming my time. Reclaiming my time. You did not reference it. Reclaiming my time. Published in USC Medical, which is one of them. The time is mine. I'm reclaiming it. Please ask the witness to stop talking. You asked me a question. Reclaiming my time.

Allow me to answer my question. Mr. Chairman, I'd like about 10 seconds back. The time belongs. You are slandering me incorrectly. The time belongs to the gentlelady from Florida. Mr. Chairman, I'd like 15 seconds back. We will be happy to give you that. Thank you so much.

You did not cite any study like you are citing here now during that conversation. You referenced no study at all. You simply labeled Jews and Chinese people as a race, and you also said that somehow they managed to avoid a deadly illness that targets other groups for death. I knew when he said it at that dinner, the knives were going to come out. And they did.

Remember I said he'd be better off to stick his head in a killer beehive than to make that group angry because once you speak the truth they become enraged that somebody dared to say truth yes you this is the war in this country. Truth is illegal in America now. Truth is prohibited in America. They are determined to make your mouth say things that your head and your heart know are false. And they will not stop until you submit.

This is about submission. It is about submission to their agenda, to their rule. And they are going to go after everybody, even a Kennedy. Nobody is safe. Nobody is exempt from these people. They demand total submission. And that is a sign of a dictatorship.

And that's what this regime has brought to the United States of America. And I think what's happening is that there are people in the Democratic Party who are becoming frightened by what they're seeing. Absolutely. And obviously a lot on the Republican side have seen this for years. If we can come together, if we can come together, if we can come together just for one election

and change the direction of the country, we might be able to save this country from total collapse. If we let that side continue, the country's completely gone. Yeah, because they, I mean, they specialize in the politics of division.

I mean, that's it. That's what they run on. They run on division. Yes. That is it. And I hate to say it, the Republicans benefit from that too because it provides them an enemy.

Sure. That they can go out to their constituents and say, look at those bad people there, those Democrats. But it's a Marxist technique. They learned that in the school of Marxism. You have to divide to conquer. And so when they're in power, there will always be division. There will always be warfare between the population because they have to keep that going for decades to stay in power. Life will be miserable for everybody. And I think this is where we're at. People are saying, living in America has become miserable.

It used to be fun. It used to be nice. It's miserable now to be in America. Even if you disagreed with someone politically, you could still have a dialogue. You could still talk to them, have a conversation with them. Doc, there are things that Mr. Kennedy believes and his opinion that I disagree with, but I respect him. I respect him. And I would be okay with him being the President of the United States. I wouldn't have a fear of what kind of crazy, radical things he would do.

I think there's enough people in this country that are disgusted with the war on the Constitution, the war on values, the war against basic American beliefs that there could be a unity ticket in 2024. I'm going to say this again. There has never been an opening like this since 1860. When the Republican Party appeared in 1860.

The Whig Party disappeared. Right. The Republican Party took over with Abraham Lincoln. It was the Democrat Party at that time that assassinated Abraham Lincoln. It wanted the division, wanted the war but and ironically in that same election you had the Democrats split as well yes you know so you had splits with the Democrats and a split within the Whig Party so you really had four before candidates for president that in that election but there hasn't

been there hasn't been an opening like this since 1860 for a third party. If the right ticket comes together, to me, the unbeatable ticket in 2024 would be Robert F. Kennedy and Tucker Carlson. It would be unstoppable. You couldn't beat that ticket. Those guys would fill up stadiums. You think Donald Trump drew big crowds? Kennedy, Carlson would fill up stadiums. You'd have 50, 60,000 people showing up

for 80,000, 90,000 people for these rallies. It would terrify the regime because they can't cheat that much. The cheating would be so obvious. I mean, right now, I read today, Joe Biden's approval rating is 37 percent. And he's the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination. Right.

37 percent. And Kamala Harris's approval ratings are even lower than that. They're in the low 30s. But we're told Joe Biden is guaranteed to be the nominee. And that Robert F. Kennedy is the long shot. Well, I do think he's the long shot in the Democratic Party. What we're seeing today is that they're out to get him. What they started to do today was political assassination.

Bullets were put in the head and the back of his father and his uncle. What the Democrats are doing to Robert Kennedy Jr. is they're doing political assassination to destroy his name, his reputation, the name-calling, the vilification. This is the first process of taking him down I think he's so shocked by what was done to him today that he must be wherever he's at right now home or or a hotel he must be thinking

do I have a future in the Democratic Party if this is the beginning how are they going to treat me six months from now? What are they going to do if he wins New Hampshire primary? Doc, that was hatred. Yes. That's hatred. Oh, and you haven't seen the half of it yet. And hatred, Jesus said, if you hate your brother, you have murdered your brother.

Hatred and murder go together. Murder comes from hatred. They hate him. They don't just disagree with him. They hate him. They're hating him as much as they hate Donald Trump. Think about it. They despise Donald Trump.

They now have a second person to despise. Robert F. Kennedy. What a life. A life just hating people. Just filled with hatred. Could there be a Trump-Kennedy ticket? It would be powerful. I don't know if the chemistry is there.

Biggest reason? Fauci and the vaccines. Yeah. Big divide there. Donald Trump would never admit that he was wrong about Fauci and the vaccines. Kennedy would be telling him, yes, you were. I don't know if the two could get along. But as a ticket, it would be powerful. Could they come up with a way to put that aside for the campaign? I don't

know. Donald Trump could only serve one term. Kennedy would be guaranteed that 2028 he would be running for president if he were the vice president. It would be a powerful ticket. I think it's less likely than a Kennedy-

Carlson ticket. But that ticket would have to be third party. Right. Because neither the Democrats or the Republicans are going to nominate Kennedy and Carlson. But a third party, that's a possibility. You know, the Constitution Party is still out there. Right. Yes.

I was a member for a while, a long time ago. The Constitution Party, they just should go ahead and nominate Kennedy and Carlson. Just do it. Put them on the ballot. Just do it. Just for the fun of it. Just to shake things up. For the first time, the Constitution Party, actually, they'd be taken seriously.

If they had Kennedy and Carlson as their nominees. Somebody in that party ought to be thinking that way. I honestly think Robert F. Kennedy will be the President of the United States. I really do. I believe he's going to be the President of the United States.

You were calling Donald Trump early on. 2015. Yes. 2015. When everybody else was saying, no way is that happening, no way is that going on, then you started seeing blips on the radar where people said, you know, he could end up winning this thing. And then before you knew it, he had bolted out of the primaries and he was on his way. So it's going to be interesting to see how this shakes out.

Now, one of the other representatives there in Congress, a non-voting member of Congress, mind you, the representative from the Virgin Islands, Stacey Plaskett, was speaking to Robert Kennedy. And I caught this statement of hers. This is really what Democrats believe. They don't really believe in free speech. They really don't believe in the First Amendment because they don't believe that it's absolute. They don't believe in the Second Amendment either. We'll watch this clip, and then we'll have a response to RFK here right afterwards.

So we'll show this one first. Why are we here? Why? You know, that's been the question that quite a number of people have been asking me. Why are you having this hearing? What does this have to do with inflation? What does this have to do with the cost of living? What does this have to do with inflation? What does this have to do with the cost of living?

What does this have to do with the everyday lives of Americans, the thing that the Republican Party said that they would focus on if they had control of the House? Why would the Republican leadership in the committee majority give a hearing and a platform to the witnesses today, specifically to Mr. Kennedy, a man who has recently claimed that COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese. And before that, in his film, Medical Racism, The New Apartheid, that film stated that COVID-19 vaccines do not work for black children because of their, quote, kick at kick ass kind of immune system. That hyper superhuman subhuman kind of language also said he also said even in Hitler's Germany could cross the Alps to Switzerland. You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did to imply Jews in Nazi Germany had more freedoms than unvaccinated Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Now, many of my Republican colleagues across the dice will rush to cover that they have Mr. Kennedy here because they want to protect his free speech, that they do not believe in American censorship. This is not the kind of free speech that I know of. The free speech that is protected by the Constitution's First Amendment. But free speech is not an absolute. The Supreme Court has stated that. And others' free speech that is allowed, hateful, abusive rhetoric, does not need to be promoted in the halls of the people's house. The question I would say is, why are you there? What she said is scary. She said free speech is not an absolute right. Yes.

Which means that none of the rights in the Bill of Rights are absolute rights in her mind. Right, there are options. Including the Second Amendment. In her view, she has an absolute right to free speech, but you don't. Because you disagree with her. Therefore, you don't have an absolute right. She has an absolute right.

And it goes through all the rights in the Bill of Rights. Only certain people have rights to a gun, not you. Only certain people have a right to assemble. Black Lives Matter can assemble and throw Molotov cocktails, but people can't walk through velvet ropes in a state capital, let's say. So the rights are being defined by them instead of by the Constitution itself. They're very scary. They're bullies and they have to be confronted and they have to be defanged. I'm glad you said that because Robert Kennedy was not going to take some of her comments lying down and

extended comments that Representative Plaskett had basically accused RFK Jr. of endorsing what she defined as vaccine racism. And Mr. Kennedy responds to her. Watch this. To you about my opinions on these issues, what you have stated and tried to associate me with through guilt by association is simply inaccurate. Virtually everything, every statement that you just made about me is inaccurate. I have never advised black Americans not to receive vaccines. At one point you say I'm anti-vax and that's a bad thing. The other thing, the other moment you point out that all my children are vax. I'm fully compliant

with the vaccine schedule myself, except for COVID. I took flu vaccines for 20 years straight. I have never been anti-vax. I have never told the public avoid vaccination. The only thing I've asked for, and my views are constantly misrepresented, so that the truth of what I believe is not, we're not allowed to have a conversation about that with the American people which I believe vaccines should be tested with the same rigor as other medicines and medications you tried to associate me a moment ago with the replacement theory which is racist no I did not say you time belongs to the gentleman my colleagues time belongs to the gentleman I denounce that theory. It is racist, and I have never endorsed it or had any association with it. Our film on a medical... A medical apartheid?

Bill Buxton, who is the black CDC official who ultimately exposed the Tuskegee experiment, tried for years and years to appeal to CDC to stop it for 40 years. Finally, he got relief by walking into my uncle's office in the building next door. Teddy held hearings and ended the experiment. I remember that very well. And to say that I created a film that encourages blacks not to get adequate medical care is just completely abhorrent. It's the witness's time. Do not censor the witness. I'm not censoring the witness. I'm not censoring the witness. He's still talking.

It's my time and I've given it to the witness. Do not censor him. I'm not censoring him. If the views that you and others have applied to me, I've attributed to me, if they were actually true, I can see why I shouldn't be able to testify here today. Those are not true. These are defamations and malignancies that are used to censor me to prevent people from listening to the actual things that I'm saying. And I think, ranking member, that we should have a real conversation rather than an exchange of ad hominem attacks. And that's how you respond to bullies. You don't back down.

You stand your ground. You tell them what's going on. Well, Dr., this last video, this is our last video clip of the hearing. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made a very impassioned plea for free speech, and it was so stunning that the chairman, Jim Jordan, Republican, commended him for his defense of free speech rights.

Let's watch it. The founders and the framers of our Constitution knew that democracy was a very inefficient system. It had all of these built-in inefficiencies and difficulties. They said they felt that it would give us the one thing that would give us an advantage over totalitarian systems was this capacity for the free flow of information and a complete lack of control of debate so that ideas that would eventually mature into policies would be annealed in a furnace of debate and then rise through the marketplace of ideas rather than being dictated from above. And that's what would give the energy, the vibrancy, the vigor to democracy. When they invented this democracy, we were the first one in the modern era in 1780. 1865, five other nations had imitated us. Today, it's 190 nations based upon our system. We are supposed to be the exemplary

democracy and the corner foundation stone of our system is freedom of speech. All of the other freedoms depend on it. If we lose that, not only do we lose our democracy in this country, but the entire world loses us as an example. Exactly. I couldn't have said it better. One more story on Robert F. Kennedy. This came out a couple days ago. Coin Telegraph. Robert F. Kennedy vows to

back the U.S. dollar with Bitcoin and gold. It's not in the headline, but he said he would he would back the U.S. dollar with Bitcoin and gold if he's the president. Coin Telegraph reported that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pledged to support the U.S. dollar with hard assets like gold, silver, platinum and Bitcoin could stabilize the American economy and reduce inflation. He proposes a gradual approach, starting with a small percentage of issued T-bills being backed by hard currency doc do you remember one of the things his uncle did just before he was assassinated is that he wanted to reinstate the silver dollar yes and the international banksters were not going to allow that to happen. And then in the irony of things later on, they made a Kennedy silver dollar as if to mock it.

It was actually a silver, you know, I should state it, a silver-backed Federal Reserve note. Right. But it was a hard asset. Yes. And so he said backing dollars in U.S. debt obligations with hard assets could help restore strength back to the dollar, rein in inflation and usher in a new era of American financial stability, peace and prosperity. Rather than backing it with uranium, that is. Kennedy also declared, now this is good too, he would make Bitcoin to U.S. dollar conversions exempt from capital gains taxes. In his view, the proposed exemption would spur investment and incentivize ventures to grow their business in the U.S. instead of other crypto

friendly jurisdictions such as Singapore or Switzerland. And so I like the innovation in his thinking. You're not going to hear that really anywhere else in Washington, are you? No. So what he's proposing is if you hold uh bitcoin and i hope he expands it to altcoins also if you hold cryptocurrency and you convert it to u.s dollars you won't be taxed on it if you invest in the economy right which that would excite a lot of people would be good. So excite a lot of people. Hey, the regime is not only censoring Robert F. Kennedy, but they they are censoring people who are fighting for children who are being trafficked for sex networks. I'm sure you've heard about the Sound of Freedom film,

which has just astounded Hollywood. Yes. It's brought in over $100 million so far. It beat out Harrison Ford and Indiana Jones. look at that headline we just had up there youtube is pulling sound of freedom interviews and reviews they're censoring they're censoring sites on youtube that are doing interviews or movie reviews promoting Sound of Freedom. Right. Now, I'm going to say something. Anybody who is attacking Sound of Freedom is a pedophile or pedophile friendly.

End of discussion. If you are attacking and trying to censor Sound of Freedom, you are either a pedophile or you are friendly to pedophiles. There's no other reason, Doc. And this has even gone so far on YouTube as, let's say, and there are a lot of people that do movie reviews and stuff like that, but if you do a review of Sound of freedom, they've pulled those down. That's what this is about.

Yeah. This is what it's saying. Interviews and reviews. If you're just talking about it in a positive way, YouTube is taking your videos down. Well, then that means somebody YouTube is very pedophile friendly, right?

Let's call them out for what they are. The child molesters. How could you be opposed to sound of freedom? You're either a molester or molester adjacent. One of the two. Well, you know, by attacking sound of freedom, they're outing themselves. We need to keep a list of who is pedo-friendly. Just make a list of everybody that has attacked Jim Caviezel and Sound of Freedom.

Put them on a list. Pedo-friendly. Keep your children from them. Stay away from them. They are pedo-friendly. Nigel Farage got an apology from the CEO of Coots Bank. Yes. How about that, Doc?

So this is from Sky News here. Nigel Farage has received an apology from Coots, a bank that closed his account after a public dispute. Mr. Farage, the former leader of UKIP and the Brexit Party, claimed that his account was closed because his views did not align with the bank's values. The chief executive of NatWest Group, which owns Coots, apologized for deeply inappropriate comments made about Farage and documents prepared for the company's wealth committee, stating that it was not their policy to exit a customer based on legally held political and personal views. Now, NatWest CEO Allison Rose insisted the remarks did not reflect the view of the bank, adding, I believe very strongly that freedom of expression and access to banking are fundamental to our society, and it is absolutely not our policy to exit a customer based on the basis of legally held political and personal views.

I'll hold that just up there for just a moment here. Okay, so the CEO, Alison Rose, apologized for closing his accounts, but she did not reopen his accounts. Neither did she fire the people who closed his accounts, but she did not reopen his accounts. Neither did she fire the people who closed his accounts. She did the minimum to get the bank out of hot water that they were in, but she did not reopen his accounts and she did not fire the people who, who censored him. What she did do was offer Nigel, what was the phrase that they used? Some banking options.

So apparently, maybe they have, maybe they own a Christmas club account. Yeah, something. They've offered him something other than a full banking account at coots but they did not reopen his accounts uh he said he would uh spend the next uh 24 hours uh pondering the offer so i don't know what they offered him but maybe maybe they own a a tiny little bank in some little village in Great Britain, maybe in Scotland. He's got to go to Scotland physically and deposit his money, you know. But they made some kind of offer to him, but they did not reopen his account. Okay, the next one is Sweden.

You know, Sweden is being brought into NATO. Right. Okay. Well, what was the reason that President Erdogan of Turkey, why was he objecting for months to Sweden? Because there were people in Sweden lighting Korans on fire. Burning the Koran. Look, I think burning any religion's books is, it's wrong it's offensive you know talk about I don't know maybe ten years ago there was a pastor here in Florida I remember that story he was really after I came on board yeah he was burning he was

burning Quran's every other tuesday and you know he made a name for himself here in florida you know he'd have a quran burning uh party um it's offensive i i don't want people burning the bible i'm not going to burn the quran i'm not going to burn the talmud i'm not going to burn anybody's religious books because it's an offensive act that's trying to make you mad. You're trying to offend. You're trying to make somebody angry. I'd be glad to have a dignified conversation with a person that believes in those other books

and talk to them about my differences, but I'm not going to burn it. I'm not going to offend them. How am I going to, how would I as a Christian, how would I reach them if I have offended them to the point that they're furious and ready to fight? I can't reach them. So this idea of burning religious books to make a point is wrong. It's offensive. It shouldn't be done. And not to make a pun on it, but it's incendiary to relationships.

Because yes, you're going to provoke a deep emotional reaction. So what Sweden did after they got in NATO is that they legally agreed or permitted the burning of the Quran. Right. After they got in NATO. So people started burning other religious books. And now and now you've got this religious war going. What happened last night in Iraq, in Baghdad, is that a mob appeared at the Swedish embassy and burned it down last night. The whole embassy? I don't know if it's completely gutted. But they did set it on fire.

They did set it on fire. I'll guarantee you nobody went to work there today. They had a big fire there last night. We've got, did we show the London Telegraph? I think we put that up there on the screen. So let's go ahead. We've got a montage of several videos that we gathered on Twitter of showing the fire that took place, the mob around the embassy. This again, this is Baghdad, Iraq last night. يا عليم يا عليم يا عليم يا عليم رب اشرح لي صدري ويسر لي امري

رحل الى اقدم اللسان يفطه قولي اللهم اشهد ان اعداء الله يا One thing you've got to say about the Muslims. They don't take no crap. Christians, you can have transvestites and homosexuals do a mock crucifixion of the lord jesus christ and perform sodomy acts at the cross and hardly any reaction or you can have protesters defecate on a Bible on the streets of San Francisco. You don't do that with the Muslims. I respect them.

They don't put up with that stuff. No, they don't. And I'm not going to condemn them. I'm not going to condemn them. Things are being done deliberately to aggravate them, offend them, insult them. It's being done deliberately. Do you remember the Mohammed cartoons? Yes.

The people who were drawing those cartoons were Zionists. There was a woman that I used to interview in this program quite frequently. And I cut her off when she participated in a very offensive event in Texas. I want to say Garland, Texas. I know who you're talking about now. Okay.

She was trying to make Muslims angry. But that was when, that was during the period where we were trying to make Muslims the enemy of everything going on. Muslims were running around, chopping people's heads off and everything. Remember that? But that's when my eyes started to open up and I started to see the Zionist propaganda, how it works in this country. That's when I started to realize, wait a minute, we're being played as fools.

We've been told since 2001 that we have to hate Muslims. And then I started to realize, no, there are provocateurs who are trying to make Muslims angry so that there will be a fight. So I just want our Muslim friends to know that I woke up years ago. I figured it out. I know the game that's being played.

And, you know, something else is happening in various school districts where they're forcing children to participate in vile, disgusting, so-called sex education classes, which are really pornographic. Right. It's the Muslims who are standing up in the communities saying, you are not going to do this to our children. In America. This is in America.

Right. And in Canada, there is a huge movement among the muslims speaking out of all the grooming lgbt stuff and do you know who trudeau blamed the american right he said he said white people in america made the muslims in canada do this that guy there's another one uh all right i to, I'll just say the headline on number 22, Trump aide William Russell at D.C. courthouse for grand jury appearance. I'm not going to go into the details. Look, President Trump, I misunderstood.

President Trump was not scheduled to be arrested today or tomorrow. He was invited to appear before the grand jury. It was an invitation. They wanted him there to give testimony. And he's not going. He's not going to appear. Which means he will be arrested. It was a trap.

If he went. They were going to question him under oath and use that to arrest him. If he doesn't go, they're going to use that to arrest him. One way or the other. They plan to arrest Donald Trump. Hey, the next one. This is exciting. So there's a company called Public Square.

We've talked about them in the past uh it's um it's it's a conservative christian patriotic own corporation that is uh becoming it it it wants to be the alternative to amazon. Based right here in Florida. Yeah. And this is part of this alternative economy that's rising up. This is a great time to start a business because corporate America has given an obscene gesture to 50% of the marketplace. Right. And say go away. We don't want you. Look what happened to Budweiser. The people said okay we're gone. They don't know what to do now.

The people have left. People have left Target store. Look at Disney. Disney is imploding. Right here in Florida. Disney. Disney World is empty. Disney is planning to sell off assets. They are imploding.

People aren't going to Disney. Something's happening. So Public Square went public today. All right. It's cool. They went public meaning on the right? That's cool. They went public, meaning on the New York Stock Exchange. And Don Trump Jr.

was there for the ringing of the bell, the opening of the New York Stock Exchange on the day that Public Square was now being traded on the floor. I got a video for you from CNBC and poor little Jim Cramer. Oh, he was so disgusted. He didn't know what to do

because on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, the traders were shouting USA, USA, USA. And it was so loud that he couldn't hear himself talk on CNBC let's watch it mortgage increases I mean look the Fed you know Jim percent of sales right now new home, are so much higher than they have been since the 75-year-old sale. You know, these 8,800, this quarter, the main thing you need to know now, and I think really important,

is that home prices are up 40% since 2019, and that's the magic number that the Fed is upset about. 40% increase, and this says, listen, we are going to have more homes, but you're not going to get that price come down. You heard the opening bell here at the big board.

PSQ Holdings is viewing the Aspactus over the Nasdaq. Generic drug company ANI pharmaceuticals. All right. I was going to give a different key this morning, which is high on semi. Let's stay on D.R. Horton.

Obviously, we'll come back to Tesla. Doc, I mean, I know the answer to my question. But if you're doing live television from the stock exchange and that spontaneous eruption happens, why would you not shut your mouth and say, let's go, let's go out and look and see what is going on. This is amazing. Well,

we know the answer. They were cheering Donald Trump jr. They were cheering public square, right? And they were shouting USA. The directors at CNBC in normal times would have whispered in his ear, we're going to the floor. This is amazing. This is unprecedented, but they're not going to do it because it, it's against their narrative and you

notice they didn't even acknowledge public square they they talked about a and i and i was also yes on the floor at the same time but listen nobody was cheering a and i uh they were cheering public square and the values that it represents this This is, hey, this is a sign that there is still a glimmer of hope out there, that there's enough people out there that are saying enough is enough. We're going to speak up. We're going to say things. I think it's more than a glimmer of hope. I think there's a real genuine grassroots movement brewing right now.

That's organic. That's real. That's authentic. That wasn't organized. This is a stock exchange. You're talking about traders cheering on the floor of the stock exchange and shouting USA for a company that is going to challenge Amazon. This is a really good sign people they've reached the point where they're so fed up with the censorship the woke ism the outrageous outrageously offensive values. They're so fed up that they're now turning it from anger and disgust into a positive movement. Why? And my friends, this is why we are part of this movement.

We are launching in the coming weeks a brand new platform. And those of you who have been in our Zoom calls, you know what we're talking about. The rest of you, we're going to tell you about it in the coming weeks. But we have a brand new platform that's going to be released. And we are going to promote Christian faith and family values. And we're not going to apologize to anybody for it. And we're not going to back down. We haven't backed down. We were in the first wave of censorship.

Going back to 2018, they tried to shut us down. You all have no idea. I've never told the true story. I've never told you how close we came to being shut down. I've never told you how many things were done against us. I've never told you the true story. My faith has always been in God. My trust has always been in the name of Jesus Christ. And no matter how close we got to being wiped out, Jesus

Christ would bring us back. Every time. Every single time. I know what it's like to be censored. I know what it's like to be vilified, lied about, smeared, slandered. I had to put up with the character assassination of this regime. But we survived. And now we're launching something new.

And it's not just us. It's a movement across the country. There are millions of people ready for something new. For a revival of Christian faith and family values and free enterprise. And I'm excited about it.

And I'm going to be part of it. And you're going to be part of it. And we're not going to let this, this regime destroy the country that was built over 300 years. Love you very much. We'll see you tomorrow. God bless you. You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles. Thank you for listening.

To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondents is True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida, 32969.