TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Rumor: Putin’s Decoy Limo Attacked by Explosive Device

Episode Date: September 14, 2022

There is a rumor circulating online that there was an attempted assassination of Vladimir Putin today. The story was posted on a Telegram channel managed by Russian critics of President Putin. London���s Mirror newspaper was the first news outlet to report it. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 9/14/22.

The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com. This is True News. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help us God. I'm Rick Wiles. There is a rumor circulating online that there was an attempted assassination of President Vladimir Putin today. The story was posted on a telegram channel managed by Russian critics of President Putin. London's Mirror newspaper was the first news outlet to report it. Let's take a look at their headline. Vladimir Putin's limo attacked in assassination attempt amid Ukraine war. Yeah. I want to make it clear.

This is just a rumor, right? It's all it is. No, to my knowledge, Doc, I don't think anybody in the United States as of right now, today at this hour, I don't think anybody's reporting it. It is in the London papers. Why isn't it here? Yeah, it just has it. We don't care about what happens in the rest of the world, Rick. I guess not.

So let's take a look at what the Mirror is reporting. Of course, they're basing their report on this telegram posting. So Vladimir Putin's car was attacked in what may have been an assassination attempt amid the Ukraine war. And this is according to an unconfirmed claim. The Kremlin leader's limousine was allegedly hit by a loud bang on his left front wheel, followed by heavy smoke. Now, Mr. Putin was unharmed as his car drove to safety, but there have been multiple arrests from his security service. Other bodyguards have vanished amid claims that secret information about the 69-year-old ruler's movements was compromised.

This is according to the General SVR Telegram channel. It's an opposition channel to the Kremlin. Now, according to that channel, Putin was traveling back to his official residence on an unspecified date in a decoy or backup motorcade amid deep security fears. So this compromised five armored cars with Putin in the third, and this is according to this claim. It said, quote, on the way to the residence a few kilometers away, the first escort car was compromised five armored cars with Putin in the third, and this is according to this claim, said, quote, on the way to the residence a few kilometers away, the first escort car was blocked by an ambulance and the second escort car drove around without stopping due to the sudden obstacle. And during the detour of the obstacle in Putin's car, a loud bang sounded from the left front wheel, followed by heavy smoke. Now, it goes on to say in this

posting that Mr. Putin's car, despite problems with control, made its way out of the attack scene to reach the safety of the residents. Subsequently, the body of a man was found driving the ambulance, which blocked the first car from the motorcade. Now, this channel, which boasts an inside track to the Kremlin yet provides no hard evidence for its allegations, said details of the supposed attack are classified. The head of the president's bodyguard service and several other people have been suspended and are in custody, claimed the channel, without naming anyone. Went on to say a narrow circle of people knew about the movement of the president in this Quarters A,

and all of them were from the Presidential Security Service. After the incident, three of them disappeared. These were exactly the people who were in the first car, the motorcade. Their fate is currently unknown. The car on which they were traveling was found empty a few kilometers from this particular incident. And as we said, right now this is all rumor, but it's interesting that if this story is true, Rick, that there may be compromises within the security service of President Putin, enough so that they knew the movements of the decoy transports. Okay, so let's walk through this, and we'll assume that these facts are true, although we can't verify it. So we know that Putin was riding in a decoy car.

So that's the very first fact. He wasn't in the main motorcade. Right. He was in a decoy motorcade. But somebody knew, somebody in his Secret Service detail knew that Putin was not in the main motorcade, that they had him in a decoy. So if this is true, there was somebody on the inside of Putin's security who knew where Putin was at at that very moment. Second thing that I see is that the ambulance, the ambulance blocked the motorcade. Right. But the driver of the ambulance was found dead.

Yes. Who killed the ambulance driver? Well, maybe there were two people in the ambulance. And once they blocked it, they killed the driver. Well, maybe there were two people in the ambulance. And once they blocked it, they killed the driver. Well, what I'm saying is they used the ambulance to block Putin. Right.

So they killed the ambulance driver. Yes. And then the other thing is that the car with the missing security detail, that car was found several kilometers away empty. Did they escape or were they executed?

Well, again, these are questions we don't know the answers to. We don't. But these are the questions inside the story. Right. When you look at this posting, there's some really suspicious details here. And it's very similar to the attack last month on the daughter of, what was it I don't want to say Rokos. You know who I'm talking about. But they blew up her car.

And this apparently hit the front wheel. But they were able to stop the motorcade with the ambulance. Which means they had details of the route that the decoy vehicle was going to be taking and everything. So that would definitely be a deep inside job. Yes. Well, things like this.

So let's say, Rick, you know, let's walk this out. Let's say that an attempt on Mr. Putin's life turned out to be successful. God forbid that happened, because that sounds to me like the beginning of a full-blown World War III at that point. So who would you see stepping into that role immediately if something were to happen to Vladimir Putin?

The three names that come to mind, Medvedev, who was president at one time for one term. And who has heated up here over the past year. Quoting scripture about Armageddon. Yes, and fire from heaven. So I would say he would be the Christian candidate to be president of Russia because he clearly knows the Bible. He knows Bible prophecy. Number two, Sergei Lavrov, the foreign minister, who's a heavyweight in the Russian government, and number three, Petrushev,

who is really Mr. Deep State. Those would be the three that I would think would have the inside track to become the next president. Petrushev would be the most warlike. Right. You know, he used to run the KGB, head of intelligence. You know, he's a deep stater. I would, you know, think of a Russian-speaking Dick Cheney.

So, military complex all the way and everything. Yeah, John Bolton. Right. That would be scary. Whereas Mr. Lavrov would probably be a diplomat that would move things into maybe, of course, you may surprise us too and become a hardliner.

So it'd be interesting to see. I don't want to see it, but it'd be interesting to see what would happen. And Medvedev may think, hey, God has placed me here to go up against the Antichrist. Because that's the way he's talking right now. He is. He thinks we're the Antichrist. Okay, so while we're talking about Antichrist, let's move on to Zelensky and the Nazis.

This is from RT. Zelensky guard appears Nazis. This is from RT. Zelensky guard appears to wear Nazi insignia. All right, so we'll get into this article here. So one of the armed guards of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has been spotted with an insignia resembling a symbol of Nazi Germany of a unit used during World War II. Now, the image shared by the officer of the leader was made during his visit to the recently recaptured town of Izium on Wednesday.

Now, the controversial skull and bones image was featured on the back of a heavily armed Ukrainian trooper who appeared to be part of Mr. Zelensky's security detail during the trip. It can be seen in one of the photos which the president's office released on social media. So the picture that came out, it was the president's own press team that released the picture. Now, the symbol was the insignia of SS units, the part of the Nazi paramilitary Schutzstaffel, responsible for security at the death camps.

It was also adopted by the elite Panzer Division Totenkopf of the Waffen-SS, which was formed from the death camp guards and fought on the Eastern Front and committed multiple war crimes. And so let's go back to that RT still here, the number five. Now, we've got that circled there on this screen, the particular image. It's a skull and bones image, but it's unique to, yeah, it's called the dead head. That's the name that's given it. In fact, in World War II and even until today,

it's called the dead head. It's a skull and bones, but unique in that the skull and bones, the skull is superimposed over the bones. So, Doc, this is not the first time that Ukrainian soldiers have been photographed with Nazi symbols. Right. On their uniforms or on their vehicles. So this is just the latest one.

And it just happens to be a soldier standing behind Vladimir Solinsky. And there is no, you know, misinterpreting what this symbol means. I looked up the Totenkopf symbol here for military trader. This is, you know, the image blown up here a little bit. It says that the Totenkopf, which means death head or the dead head, was one of the most readily recognized symbols of the Nazi SS, Adolf Hitler's elite black guard and ideal Teutonic knighthood, along with other select Germanic political and armed forces of the Third Reich.

The distinctive insignia were worn as cap or collar devices on many unique paramilitary and military uniforms. And once again, this photo was released by the Ukrainian president's office. And so they're not hiding the fact. No. They're not hiding it at all. In fact, it's almost like they're throwing it out there at you and saying, do something about it.

And when you do say something about it, you get labeled a conspiracy theorist. Right. For talking about their photograph that has a Nazi symbol on it. Right. Don't talk about our Nazi symbols that you can readily see. There's another story. This was a Novasti news service in Russia.

Ukraine's Zelensky picture with Nazi dead heads. And there you go. This is a wider shot. And once again, here's Mr. Zielinski out in the field. And what's he doing? Selfies. So when he's not doing Vogue magazine shoots, he's out in the field doing selfies with the troops. Now, the soldier on the far left in that image, too, also has an insignia, too, that is close to the desk goal, but we weren't able to blow that up so you could see it very well. And so it's they just throw it right out in front of you, Rick. It's almost like they're trolling you.

And, you know, like you said, you know, here it is. You know, that soldier could have been turned around the other way. We never would have seen it. Never would have noticed. But he turned around so you could see it. And yet the U.S. news media and the European news media will write articles where they will say Putin's false claims that the Ukrainian army is made up of Nazis or Putin's debunked claims, as though the New York Times debunked it right okay Oh, it's not true because the New York Times is not true

again What they're doing to us is saying We're going to force your mouth To say something that your head your mind and your heart knows is not true. Your eyes see it. You know what it is. You did your research. You know that it's a real Nazi insignia.

You see it on the uniform of a Ukrainian soldier. Your mind says, they're probably Nazis. And yet the media tells you that's not true. You can't say that. You can't think that. Even though your mind says, but it's true. You won't see this happen, but let's say someone showed up at

a rally for President Trump. And on their backpack, they had a deadhead symbol on there. How would our media report that? Well, it's a good idea. So what if we attended a German political event? What if we just flew to Germany and wore a Ukrainian military uniform?

Right. You'd get arrested. You know why? Because they have laws against it. They have laws against Nazi symbols. You can go to prison for wearing that uniform.

And yet Germany's giving them weapons. Yes. Because maybe the people running Germany are still the Nazis. Think about that. Maybe they're just Nazis in business suits. That's why they're arming them. The Nazis are still in power.

What we witnessed over the past two years, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, censorship. Sounds like Nazism. Yeah, sounds like Nazism, doesn't it? It's some kind of ism. People like tyranny. And so we're not surprised that the Ukrainian army is openly displaying

their Nazi allegiance. What's so weird is the denial. Right. When as early as two or three years ago, outlets like the New York Times and others were reporting, you know, there are Nazi battalions over there in Ukraine. Yes. Should we be worried about this?

And now they don't talk about that aspect of it at all, do they? No, they're not worried. They like it. They like it very much. We'll go to number 15. The Washington Post reporting rail systems in the United States brace for shutdowns. Amtrak cancels routes as railroad strike threat nears. So Amtrak is shutting down tonight, Thursday night.

No, today's Wednesday, isn't it? Yes. Today's Wednesday. So it's shutting down at midnight tonight. Midnight going in. Thursday, Thursday midnight. So if you're planning to get on Amtrak tonight after midnight, well, it's not going anywhere. And this is one of those stories that no one seems to really have a concern about,

but it could have potential to really lock down the country. Transit systems across the country were on edge Wednesday amid the threat of a freight rail worker strike, making preparations ahead of possible travel disruptions that could affect hundreds of thousands of rail customers. Amtrak said it is canceling all of its long-distance trains starting Thursday. Now, some regional transit agencies said they are preparing for service stoppages as early as Thursday evening ahead of a possible 12.01 a.m. Friday shutdown. They are wrapping up plans to communicate with commuters if a strike is not averted, and some are working with other agencies to direct people to bus alternatives. And this rail

strike is not just impacting Amtrak, it's impacting all rail traffic across the country. It's one of those, another one of those supply chain speed bumps that we're encountering that almost seems planned, Rick. I know. I mean, it couldn't happen at a worse possible time. Now, the White House has set up a special rail office and everything to try to deal with the impact of a possible rail strike and how they're going to get essential goods like medicines and foods and stuff.

When's the last time you remember a rail strike in the U.S.? Maybe as a kid. I was going to say under Ulysses Grant. I'm trying to remember. It's been so long. I had several relatives as a kid that worked in the railroad. It was big business in the Midwest. And I remember it particularly had to be in the 70s of the strike, but I can't think of any since then. I have to correct myself. I've got to go back.

I'm looking at this story. I right now have my own time frames messed up. Today's Wednesday. I'm one day ahead. Amtrak is shutting down Thursday night midnight Friday not tonight

so Amtrak will be running tomorrow Thursday it's Thursday night at midnight Friday morning that they're shutting down just wanted to make sure we get that cleared up okay this one this broke last night.

Mike Lindell said that the FBI surrounded him at a Hardee's drive-thru and seized his telephone. That's not a Babylon Bee headline there. No, it isn't. That's the real thing. Yeah, well, we were just talking about Nazis. Yes.

And we are in a Nazi police state. You know, Nazism, Communism, Socialism, they're all isms. And now they're all kind of merging into some new kind of ism. A new ism. What does it matter what word is in front of the ism? It's still an ism. It's of ism. A new ism. What does it matter what word is in front of the ism? It's still an ism. It's an ism. And when people who are loyal to their ism get power, then the rest of us lose our freedoms and liberties. So this is part of this FBI purge of Trump supporters.

And it's part of this larger plan right now to go after those that even question anything regarding the election. So this story here, Mike, my pillow, a CEO, Mike Lindell said FBI agents pulled up to his car in a Hardee's drive through in Minnesota and seized his phone. Apparently, as part of the Justice Department's investigation into 2020 election interference. Now, Lindell said he and a friend decided to pick up food at Hardee's in his hometown of Mankato after a fishing trip when three cars pulled up and surrounded his vehicle, blocking him from exiting the drive-thru lane. And I said to my buddy, that's either a bad guy or it's the FBI, Lindell said. Mr. Lindell had... Or could they both?

Yeah, in this particular case. Now, Mr. Lindell had a brief description. They posted it out on various social media platforms. He talks about this here on Rumble. Today, the FBI, you're going to hear this, He talks about this here on Rumble. they could have just what they've done is weaponize the fbi um it's disgusting i don't have a computer everything i do have that phone everything was on there and uh um and they told me not to tell anybody here's an order not to don't tell anybody okay i won't well i am so and later that evening he appeared with with Brandon House on Lindell TV

and had a little bit more to add to the story as well. And we go through a Hardee's drive-thru. We pull around to the back, and we're just about going through it. We pull through the drive-thru to take the order. We pull up, and she says, pull ahead, you know, because they had to make the order if the order wasn't done. We pull ahead, and a car comes perpendicular and parks a little ways in front of us. And I've been around the block and I said to my buddy, I said, that's either a bad guy

or it's FBI. I said that straight up. So I got a lot of questions. One is, how'd they know he was at Hardee's? Well, I mean, they're following him. Right. And following his cell phone ping. Right.

And, you know, why not catch him at his office or at his home or anything like that? But no, they had to do it somewhere in a public setting and everything. Well, I have another question. Why are they seizing his phone? Yeah, that's the basic thing. Why are they seizing his phone? Why is Mike Lindell a criminal suspect? I mean, did they tell him what the charges are?

I mean, he wasn't arrested, but what is the investigation about? It's about the election. Okay. So it's political. In my opinion, yes, it is absolutely political. Are they accusing Mike Lindell of committing a federal crime? To take his phone means that he is a suspect in a federal crime.

Did he commit a federal crime? The FBI needs to, the Justice Department needs to openly say, you're under investigation because we suspect you of committing a federal crime. No, they're phishing. He was on a phishing trip and so is the FBI. That's a good analogy there. They're phishing for any evidence they can find to put Mike Lindell in prison, to put Donald Trump in prison, to put in prison anybody that questioned the legitimacy of the illegitimate president that we have, Joe Biden, whom the FBI will not investigate his crimes. Right. When the evidence, did the FBI seize Hunter Biden's laptop? No, they've been in

possession of it for years. But they didn't seize it, did they? Someone had to give it to him. Did the FBI ever surround Hunter Biden at a massage parlor? When he was picking up some dope? Did they ever follow him? And, you know, as he's just picking up his latest batch of crack, did they surround him and say, give us your phone? No, he's getting away with his crimes because he's protected by the FBI. He's protected by the Justice Department. But if you question this corrupt regime, they're coming after you. They're coming after you. If you question the crime, it makes you a criminal.

If you question their criminal activity, then you are under investigation. Now, this confiscation of Mr. Lindell's phone is part of a broad push that's happened over the past few days. The Department of Justice has issued more than 30 subpoenas. Actually, I saw a source today that said more than 40, all connected to President Trump. So the Department of Justice has issued a flurry of over 30 subpoenas to aides of former President Donald Trump. The Justice Department also seized phones from two top Trump advisors in the investigation,

which aims to probe Trump's unsubstantiated claims. This is Fox News saying this. How do they know that they're unsubstantiated? Because they've got the script, Rick. This is what you know that they're unsubstantiated? Because they've got the script, Rick. This is what you read. It's unsubstantiated. The dozens of new subpoenas mark a rapid escalation in pressure applied to the Trump camp

by the Department of Justice. Now, the Justice Department is investigating allegations of phony Electoral College certifications from 2020 that declared Republicans were the electors voting for Trump and Mike Pence when in fact Democrats had won and voted for President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. And this is the heart of it right here, isn't it? Yeah, this is very important to understand what's going here. The so-called fake electors. You're going to hear a lot about this in the coming weeks, the fake electors. Now, the media and the Democrats are trying to make the public believe that Donald Trump and a group of Republicans had this conspiracy, this scheme. And they were planning when the Electoral College met, which I believe

was December 6th, that these fake electors were going to sneak in, into the meeting and sit down and vote for their respective states. They're fake. I guess they were going to say they were going to lock the other electors up in a closet somewhere. And these fake imposters were going to go in and vote for Donald Trump. Therefore, this was a conspiracy. Now, this is not what was going on. This is what the media wants you to believe. This is what the Democrats want you to believe. And obviously the FBI wants you to believe it too. What it really is about is that the U.S. Constitution says that

the state legislatures send the electors to the electoral college. Now the way that that has been done for many elections in modern times is that states have state laws saying, here's how we're going to choose the electors. But constitutionally, the state legislatures have a final authority. Right.

And they could make the decision to send whatever slate of electors that they want to the electoral college. So what was really going on after the November election before the sham inauguration of sleepy Joe Biden was that there were Republicans who were trying to get their state legislatures,

Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, where there was sufficient suspicion that the Democrats did something crooked with the voting totals. There was suspicion. What they were trying to do is get the state legislatures in those states to not send the electors

to the Electoral College meeting, which would mean that on the day the Electoral College met, Joe Biden would not have a majority, and there would be an impasse. Now it has to go back.

The states have to send their slate of electors. Right. Or the states did send a slate of electors who voted for Trump. There was nothing about this being sneaky, crooked, no impostors were going to sleep. Look, there can't be an imposter if the state legislature sent them. They can't be impostors.

If they're duly sent by the state legislature, they are the electors. And Rick, many states already have two slates of electors every presidential election. Well, yes, that's exactly what this is what I'm saying. They have these state laws. Right. So you vote for the Biden slate or the Trump slate. And whoever they send happens to be probably the party that's in power at that particular time.

Back in Missouri that we had, we had the Republican slate of electors and we had the Democratic slate of electors. Usually what it is is which candidate received the most votes in the state. Okay, this is where, if there's suspicion that candidate A stole the election in that state, then that disqualifies those electors from going to the Electoral College. Sure. And you would want that, right? You would want that. Not the Democrats, not the news media, and not the FBI. They're going to make that a criminal offense for the state legislatures to do what they are empowered to do. It's one of those checks and balances that, for whatever reason, the founding fathers thought of.

It wasn't just to even out the population differences, but what if something did happen? What if something crooked did happen in an election? Why do the Democrats want to get rid of the Electoral College? Because it stands in their way. Right. That's exactly why. And they have to be extra crooked to get around the Electoral College. So if they get away with this, you will never

again hear anybody challenge a stolen election. Right. Because the FBI will criminalize it. They'll come after you. You will go to a federal penitentiary for saying that the election was a fraud. So basically they'll neuter the election. if they can't get rid of the electoral college, they'll neuter it. Yes. Nobody will challenge it. Right. All right. So we're going to hear a lot of this in the weeks ahead because that's the plan. The other thing that they're working on, and they've already got their first victory, and that was with the Arizona, New Mexico County Commissioner, Cooey, I forget his last name, Griffith? I forget, okay. Ontario County, they removed him. A state judge removed him and accused him of insurrection.

Cooey Griffith, yes. Yes, Cooey Griffith, and removed him from his county commissioner seat. And now the leftists have a court decision, even though it's a state court, where a state court has declared the January 6th riot as insurrection. And the reason that that's important is that the 14th Amendment of the Constitution was ratified after the Civil War, and it prohibits Confederate soldiers, anybody who participated in the Confederate rebellion, it banned them from holding office.

I think it's just federal office. I don't think it says, we got to look that up, Doc. I think it's only federal office. And if that's the case, then how did they remove him from a county commissioner's office? That's a great question. That's the other direction that this regime is going in.

So they want to start going down the list of everybody who attended that January 6th rally, even if you were on the outside of the Capitol, if you were there, if you contributed funds to it, if you can be linked to it anyway, they want to get you labeled as an insurrectionist and you will have to resign your public office. Or if you're thinking about running, you will be banned from running. It says under any state. Oh, it does? Any state? Yeah, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. It says, no person shall be a senator or representative in Congress or elector of president and vice president or hold any office civil or military under the United States or under any state who having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress or an officer

of the U.S. or as a member of Congress or an officer of the U.S. or as a member of any state legislature or as an executive or judicial officer of any state to support the Constitution, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same. And so basically he previously swore an oath. He had a previous political office. And so therefore, he's held liable to that. That's interesting. He wasn't convicted.

He was charged with a misdemeanor. Trespassing. Trespassing. Yes. The federal government did not charge him with insurrection. You're right. But a state judge said, I'm going to label you an insurrectionist. He's got to fight that.

Oh, absolutely. He has to fight that. That decision has to be overturned. But that's the strategy. That's where they're going to be going the rest of this year and into next year. The plan is to, they're purging. They're purging the nation of anybody who opposes their corrupt regime that's what this is all about to immobilize you to criminalize you to intimidate you

i mean the fbi is out here grabbing the phones of businessmen who were mike lindell did not commit any crimes he's never been accused of committing a crime they've never suggested he committed a crime but the fbi is treating him like a criminal but the fbi will not arrest hunter biden who we all know is a criminal and they want me to respect this system? What system? This is corrupt. We have to deal with the corruption.

We are a corrupt nation because America's soul has been corrupted. The soul of the nation has been corrupted. You can of the nation has been corrupted. You can't deal with the political corruption until you deal with the spiritual corruption.

Absolutely. That's... And that's the tough part, isn't it? You better believe it. So all this stuff about elections and everything, you can talk about it all day long, but until you deal with the spiritual corruption, you're not going to fix the political corruption.

While we're talking about elections, the other thing I've noticed is, I mean, anybody with a brain knows that the Democrats can't win in November. I mean, look at the economy. Look at Biden himself. Just look at the economy look at biden himself right just look at biden himself look at the economy look at the record look at the the the the border of the united states in texas look look at the condition look at the crime in this country the violence in this country and And you want to tell me that the people of this country are going to go out and vote for Joe Biden's Democratic Party because they want more of it?

We want more inflation. We want more violence. We want more illegal immigrants. You really believe anybody's thinking like that? We've got to get more of this. This is great. This is awesome. No. The people

are not going to vote for Biden's Democratic Party. So they have to steal it again. Maybe 30%. Maybe about 30% of the country's communists. About 30%. Legitimate communists. That would vote Democrat even if they were offering child sacrifices. Absolutely. I'd say about 30%.

Alright. So here's what we're hearing. They were offering child sacrifices. Absolutely. I'd say about 30%. All right. So here's what we're hearing. So remember about two weeks ago, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, President Trump did a rally there. Right, with what, 40, 50 people there? No, President Trump. I mean, President Trump, 10,000 people in the arena.

Tens of thousands of people cheering. The energy level was high. Same night, same city. Joe Biden's there, about 50 people. I mean, you're the president of the United States, and you can't get a crowd? And probably half of that was staff. You can't get a crowd?

You're the president of the United States? And the media wants me to believe that the public is going to vote for Democrats? Again, you want my mouth to say something my brain and my heart know is false. That's what they're trying to do. This is what propaganda does, Doc. Propaganda is to get you to say something that your brain knows is not true. Again, even a Democrat would know, hey, we don't have a chance. Ain't nobody over at the Biden rally.

Over at the Trump rally, they're lined up outside. They're cheering. This is going to be a landslide for the Republicans. So what's the media telling us the past two weeks? It's neck and neck. Yes. Oh, man. The polls show the Democrats have closed the gap. The Democrats are coming on strong. The Democrats are going to close in on the Republicans. It looks like the Republicans are going to blow this election. They had it. They had it. They're going to blow it. You know what the media is doing? They're prepping our minds

to accept the stealing of the election. Right. They want you to, they're getting you mentally prepared to accept the theft. Because if they admit it, there's a huge gap. is a massive gap between what the people are going to vote Republican versus Democrat this might be a 20 25 percent spread well how are you going to

steal if you're admitting that there's a massive gap? If the media said, yeah, we saw 10,000 people at the Trump rally and 50 at the Biden rally, and that means this is going to be a Republican landslide. They can't say it. No. The media didn't even report about the two competing rallies in Wilkes-Barre. They didn't even mention it. Because if they mention it, they are acknowledging that

the Democrats are going to be clubbed like a baby seal on election day. So what are they doing? They're telling you the gap is closing. The voters are thinking about it, and they decided.

They like inflation. They like Biden. They're going to vote for Democrats. They want Biden because they want you to say, wow, maybe my neighbor is going to vote for the Democrats. Maybe my coworker at the office is going to vote for the Democrats. Maybe I thought we were going to win, but maybe we're not. No, because they're going to do another corrupt election. And don't be surprised in November that the Democrats increased seats in the House and the Senate.

And you're going to go, this can't be real. And if you dare say it publicly, you're going to get an FBI visit. Right. And they're going to take your phone. And one of the races that this is so apparent in is the Senate race in Pennsylvania, isn't it? Oh, yeah. With John Fetterman, Alistair Crowley, basically, running for Senate. Anton Lumvey's love job. And no debates, no public speaking thing. The guy had a stroke. And he's suffering from a stroke. Right. He's got something huge growing on his neck, probably

Kamala Harris's running mate in a couple of years. The growth? Yeah, whatever that thing. The growth or him? I mean, it's like it's i mean it's like it's like uncle fester you know madame's family he's creepy he i i don't like i don't like talking about people's physical looks i try to stay away from that but he looks like he's creepy he's creepy fetterman is creepy he gives me the heebie-jeebies when i see him. He looks like Anton LaVey's love child. He's a creep. He just looks satanic to me. Wears black all the time.

He's weird. And you're going to tell me he's going to win the Senate race? That's another of those races where they're, pardon the pun, neck and neck right now. But, you know. Are they? Yeah, that races where they're, pardon the pun, neck and neck right now. But, you know. Are they? Yeah, that's what they're saying. But Joe Biden went to Pennsylvania and 50 people came out. Right.

Where were they? They were all over at the Fetterman rally? No. Yeah, in fact, Mr. Fetterman avoided the Biden rally. Why? Because he wants to at least get a few votes and make it look legitimate. But when the midterm election theft takes place, nobody will dare say anything about it

because the FBI will come to your house and take your phone. Yes. The seizing of the phones is meant as intimidation. The FBI can get their phone records. All they have to do is subpoena Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile. Or call up the NSA. Yes. The NSA has it all.

Don't they have this huge data center out in Utah? Of course they do. That's collecting all of our cell phone information anyway. That's right. And that was my question. Why does the FBI need to take your phone? They have access to all of it. They have it.

So it's an intimidation tactic, isn't it? It's intimidation. That the FBI can take what they want from you. I mean, doesn't that sound like Nazi Germany? It does. It does. What else do we want? Oh, last couple minutes I want to talk about.

Let's jump down to number 33. This is BBC. Stone of Destiny to return to Westminster Abbey for coronation of King Charles III. I haven't talked about the Stone of Destiny for years. This is a fascinating subject.

I know some people will criticize me. They'll send me emails and chastise me for it. But I am fascinated by the rituals that take place in the coronation of monarchs. I'm just a history buff. I like history. Okay, so I, you know, I don't have to be a King Charles fan to want to watch the coronation. Because many of these activities

surrounding the coronation have traditions, meaning going back hundreds of years. It can be, it can go back 2,000 years. This one goes back to the Old Testament Bible. If you believe the story behind the Stone of Destiny. Right.

So an ancient symbolic stone is to be moved from Edinburgh Castle, where it resides now, to London for the king's coronation. The Stone of Destiny, also called the Stone of Scone, which was used in the inauguration of Scottish kings for centuries, was seized by King Edward I and built into a throne at Westminster Abbey in 1296. Also known as the Stone of Scone, it was returned to Scotland in 1996. The queen sat above the stone when she was crowned in 1953,

and it would be featured in the ceremony for her son. Now, just think about this. Charles is going to stand on a stone. Or at least sit on a throne. Yes, a throne. That King Edward I also was there in 1296. But actually, this history extends way further back than 1296. Wales Online, they have the, what is the Stone of Destiny at King Charles III's coronation?

The tradition, some traditions, and with, you've got to really look at it, but some traditions link this rock all the way back to the biblical stone of Jacob from the book of Genesis. Another story, this is a picture of the coronation throne here. So if you can imagine that the stone of scone is embedded within the coronation chair. This is the one that Queen Elizabeth was pictured in from many, many years ago here. But you see that the stone itself is featured under the coronation chair. So you're sitting on the stone, basically. And so it's protected by lions all the way around the symbol of England. And there's supposed to be a banner that goes above the coronation chair that in God's means rule.

And so there's something significant about sitting on the Stone of Destiny. Now, currently, the Stone of Destiny is at Edinburgh Castle. And that's where it sits right now. And we'll stay there until it gets ready to get moved to Westminster Abbey here. The coronation may not take place even until next year. I mean, it could take a while. No, it's scheduled for 10 days from her death. Well, I know the funeral is scheduled 10 days from death.

No, I had heard on the BBC or someplace. They gave a date for the coronation. I stand corrected here. So the Stone of Destiny is an ancient symbol of Scotland's monarchy used for centuries in the inauguration of its kings. Seen as a sacred object, its earliest origins are now unknown. We'll talk more about that here in a moment. They repeat the story here in 1296, King Edward of England seized the stone from the Scots and had it built into a new throne at Westminster and from

then on it was used in the coronation ceremonies of the monarchs of England and then Great Britain. The stone is displayed alongside the crown jewels in the royal palace on the east side of Crown Square. Now, there's a long history, and Rick has touched on this a number of times throughout the history of True News. Bristol Post here has the history and legend of the Stone of Scone.

So what is this? Why are so many people fascinated with this block? And look at it. It's got two handles on it so it can be carried and moved about. Some Scottish legends say that this block of rock is actually the biblical stone of Jacob from the book of Genesis. Now according to the Old Testament, Jacob was using the stone as a pillow when he had his famous vision of a stairway

leading to heaven which became known as Jacob's Ladder. Legends have it that the stone of Jacob was brought to Ireland via Egypt and Spain, either by the prophet Jeremiah or Pharaoh's daughter. It was then reputedly taken to Scotland by Fergus, the first legendary king of Scots around 500 AD. Now, it's believed that the stone spent its first few hundred years in Scotland and Argyll and on the Isle of Iona, the symbolic center of Scottish Christianity and the burial place of 48 Scottish kings, eight Norwegian kings, and four Irish kings. In 841 AD, it was brought to the now-ruined Scone Abbey in Scone near Perth. Now, the red sandstone block was used for centuries in the inauguration of Scotland's kings. Now, it's important to note the red sandstone there because it's not native to the area, okay?

And until King Edward I seized the stone from the Scots in 1296, Edward Longshanks had it built into a new throne at Westminster. We talked about that before, and it's been used in coronation ceremonies. Interesting that here, just in recent history, in the 20th century, it was actually returned to Scotland a quarter of a century ago. However, it was unofficially returned to Scotland by nationalist students in the 50s who audaciously liberated it from Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day in 1950. They stole the Stone of Scone.

It will now return to London for the coronation of Charles III in line with an agreement with the people of Scotland. The stone will be transported from its current home to the abbey in London in time for the coronation. So it's got an interesting history here. Well, to talk a little bit about why they think it was Jeremiah, there's a book of history on Ireland called the Irish Annals or the Irish Histories. And we only have bits and pieces of it.

And some of it is oral tradition. Some of the information is hard to pin down too. But the idea is that the prophet Jeremiah, the Old Testament prophet Jeremiah, toward the end of his ministry, found his way to Egypt. It says, I believe in Jeremiah chapter 43, it says that Jeremiah ended up in Egypt.

And the prophet Jeremiah from Egypt, now this is according to the Irish annals, Irish tradition, that Jeremiah made it, he made his way to Ireland along with his secretary Baruch and along with a daughter of King Zedekiah of Israel who had been married into an alliance with the Pharaoh of Egypt. That's where we get the Pharaoh's daughter story. And so they made their way to Ireland and supposedly brought this stone with them.

Now, the stone we talked about being Jacob's stone. Well, I mean, there's a stone mentioned in the Bible. Right. And so we read Genesis chapter 28 there and it says, He lighted upon a certain place and tarried there all night because the sun was set. And it says, of it and said, I am the Lord God of Abraham, thy father, and the God of Isaac, the land whereon thou liest. To thee will I give thee, and to thy seed, and thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth. And thou shalt spread abroad to the west, to the east, to the north, to the south. And in thee and in thy seed shall the families of the earth be blessed. Goes on to say, and behold,

I'm with thee. I will keep thee in all the places, whether thou goest. I'll bring thee again into this land, for I will not leave thee until I have done that which I have spoken to thee. Jacob awaked out of his sleep and said, Sure, the Lord is in this place, and I knew it not. And he was afraid and said, How dreadful is this place! This is none other but the house of God, Bethel, and this is the gate of heaven. And Jacob rose up early in the morning and took the stone, the singular stone there, that he had put for his pillow, and set it up for a pillar and poured oil upon the top of it. He anointed it. He anointed that stone.

And he called the name of that place Bethel, but the name of that city was called Luz at first. And so Irish tradition has it that Jeremiah brought this particular stone that Jacob had slept on. And that this stone, once again, according to tradition, was the stone that all the kings of Israel sat upon to be coronated upon. Okay.

An example is in 2 Chronicles 23 23 here. So, and they brought the king's son, this was Joash, and put upon him the crown and gave him the testimony and made him king. And Jehoiada and his sons anointed him and said, God save the king. What do they do now when they coronate the king in England? God save the king. Now when Analiah heard the noise of the people running and praising the king, she came to the people and to the house of the Lord, and she looked, and behold, the king stood at his pillar at the entering in,

and the princes and trumpets by the king and all the people of the land rejoiced and sounded with trumpets, also with singers and instruments of music, as such as taught to sing praise. Now, where it says the king stood at his pillar at the entering in, some translations say the king stood on the stone

upon entering in. And there's a couple other examples in the Old Testament where it talks along these lines. So the idea is that every king that was coronated in Israel, not Judah, but Israel in particular, sat or stood upon the stone at their coronation. the belief of European monarchs that they are descendants from the tribes of Israel. Right.

And this fits into all that too. But how did they get the connection with Jeremiah to Ireland? Well, as I mentioned, Jeremiah chapter 43, it talks even, so Jeremiah had left Judah and Israel and had found his way to Egypt.

Even men and women and children and King Zedekiah's daughters and every person that Nebuchadnezzar and the captain of the guard had left would get Eli the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, and Jeremiah the prophet, and Baruch the son of Nariah. They came into the land of Egypt for they obeyed not the voice of the Lord, That name, Tapanhays, actually shows up in the Irish annals, in the Irish histories.

And so that's where they begin the connection. Jeremiah's not mentioned in the Irish annals, though. But there is the name of a prophet mentioned in the Irish annals who claims to be from the land of Judah. And that's where they make this connection. It's fascinating. And, you know, the more you dig into this story, the more interesting it becomes.

I found a passage in 1 Corinthians 10 that, you know, one of the annals that I ran into said that Moses brought the stone, Jacob's stone, into the wilderness with them. They were carrying it around the wilderness. I'd never heard that before. No. But then we found this. It says,

It says, moreover, brethren, I would not have you to be ignorant how that our fathers were under the cloud and all passed through the sea and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea. So you have that symbolism there of baptism. They did all eat the same spiritual meat and did all drink the same spiritual drink for they drank of that spiritual rock that followed them the spiritual rock that followed them and that rock was christ and so the connection that you know some people especially if they're of the belief in anglo-israelism is that when Jesus returns, and this is their belief, that when Jesus returns, he will sit upon the throne, the throne of England, because that's the stone of destiny.

That's the stone that all the kings of Israel sat upon. That's the old British Israel doctrine. But just so we can keep everybody on the right path here, we don't need a rock to declare Jesus as our rock. Right. And even Jesus himself said in Mark chapter 12, he says, Have you not read the scripture?

The stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner. He says, This was the Lord's doing. It's marvelous in our eyes. And Jesus is actually quoting Psalm 118 here, a messianic psalm. And you don't use red sandstone to build a building. It's a rejected stone. If you ever take a look at that rock there, they stone a scone. It's not pretty. It's not fashionable. It's not nice. But it's something that would be thrown away and rejected. I think that even up until Paul's day,

you could probably go maybe even see the stone of destiny. Who knows? Or at least someone knew where it was. But even if it is the stone of destiny, let's say it is. Let's, for the sake of argument, let's say that it is. Jesus is our rock now. We don't need a stone to tell us who our king is. And our king's not going to sit on an earthly throne anyway. We don't need a king anyway. Right, you've got a king.

The only interest in it is its historical past. That's it. So when King Charles III is coronated, whether it's in a week or two or whenever, and I think his mother, I think there was a gap because her father died in his sleep. She was 25 years old. So she immediately became queen,

but I think the coronation was quite some time later. I wasn't around. I wasn't born yet. She became queen a year before I was born. But whenever Charles is coronated, now you're going to see something that other people will not notice. That's right. You'll be able to say to your brother-in-law,

you see that big rock under that throne? Let me tell you about it. That's the stone of destiny. Yes. But the real message is Jesus is the rock. Yes, that's right. One other thing that I read this early this morning is that there's a custom, there's a custom in Great Britain that when, it's not just when a queen or king dies, it's actually it's it's it's an old countryside type of tradition but the queen elizabeth's beekeeper oh this is great store the official beekeeper

had a duty to go to the beehives on the queen's property and announced the death of the queen to the bees yes the down to death of the queen of england to the bees and their colony so another british colony i guess yes yes so you got a bee colony with a queen and you've got the queen's representative telling the bee colony and its queen our queen has. And apparently this tradition has gone on for several hundred years, right? That the royal beekeeper, first of all, what a great gig. What's your job?

Well, I take care of the queen's bees. I bet you do it well. And so the royal beekeeper has to go out to the royal beehive and say, hey, bad news, the queen is dead. Yes. And announce it to the bees. And then they drape the beehives in black.

Right. So that the bees can mourn with the rest of the country. But there is a, the tradition is rooted in a respect for the bees. That they are caretakers of the bees. They need to treat the bees with kindness and respect because the bees have provided honey for the queen or the king. Okay?

That's where it comes from. One final story. I read that Queen Elizabeth bequeathed to Prince William an estate valued at $1.6 billion. Okay. Not a bad estate to start out with in life. $1.6 billion. It's an old, basically a trust, a duchy. It's a duchy.

It's a trust. But it has its portfolio. It has land and real estate and buildings and businesses and so forth. Prince Harry, I don't know if he's going to get anything. Can you imagine the negotiations that are going on right now between Prince Harry and his father, King Charles? Because Prince Harry's writing a tell-all book.

Because that little, you know what he married, Meghan, the troublemaker, they're going to make a fortune on that book. They can't let that book be printed right now. You know that Megan is negotiating with her father-in-law. Would you like to be in that room to hear that conversation?

Can you imagine her demands to stop the printing of the book, stop the publication of this tell-all book? Who knows what she's going to get out of it, but I can guarantee you that negotiation is taking place. King Charles is not going to let that book be published. And don't think that he still doesn't have the power

to shut down publishing anywhere in the world. Yes, you don't want to define that man. He has a temper. He has quiet, very quiet power, okay? He doesn't display it openly. Okay, we're gonna wrap it up. That's it for today. You wanna announce about Greatest Reset?

Yeah, so Greatest Reset, the film Greatest Reset, Beast Rising, it will be released in its entirety on Saturday. You can watch it at truenews.com. The film will be there. It's absolutely free because the Truenews audience paid for it. And so it's free, and we want you to watch it. But tomorrow, Thursday, Friday, we're going to show you some excerpts from it.

And then Saturday, it will be there for you to watch. And you can tell all of your friends, neighbors to watch the film. They don't have to pay anything. Just go to truenews.com. Register it with your email address. That's it. All right, that's all you got to do. And it will be available starting Saturday morning.

So finally. It took a long, long time. I don't want to relive the battles that we had to go through. Doc, I got today as a total somewhere about $115,000 in legal fees

that we paid lawyers to get this movie moved out of purgatory. And that's exactly what it was like. Purgatory. There were things done. I don't want to talk about it. There were things done to stop the release of this movie. We got it out of purgatory. And that's exactly what it was like, purgatory. There were things done. I don't want to talk about it.

There were things done to stop the release of this movie. We got it out of purgatory. But it cost us $115,000, and the bills are still coming in. That's just the invoices that we've paid so far. So there was opposition to releasing this. This movie should have been released in January. That was our intention. And I know some of you were upset with me,

saying, how come the movie never came out? You had no idea. And you know what? You never will know, because I'm not going to tell you, because I can't tell you. Because we're wrapped up in court you because I can't tell you. Because we're wrapped up in court silence. I can't tell you,

but all I can tell you is it cost us $115,000 in legal fees, but we persevered and it's done. And everything's worked out and the film will be released on Saturday.

But Thursday and Friday you'll be able to get a little sneak peek, watch it, and then you'll see the whole thing. And hopefully, we'll make part two.

That's my goal. If we get people who continue to support us, we will make part two. That's my desire. Because we get people who continue to support us, we will make part two. That's my desire, because the greatest reset is about the second coming of Jesus Christ. But this one is part one.

It's basically, it's a subtitled beast rising. It's the rise of the antichrist system. Christ is coming, but first the antichrist must come. We'll see you tomorrow. God bless. God bless you.