TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Secret Service Sniff’n for Clues to Find Source of White House Cocaine

Episode Date: July 5, 2023

The suspicious white powder that Secret Service found at the White House over the weekend has been confirmed to be cocaine, United States media outlets have reported. The discovery prompted a brief evacuation of the complex Sunday evening, while President Joe Biden was spending the weekend at Camp David. Emergency crews were brought in to perform rapid tests on the substance, which preliminarily indicated it was cocaine. The White House reopened soon after, and the powder was dispatched for further testing. It’s not clear exactly how the drug ended up at the White House, as it was discovered by uniformed agents during routine patrols in an area accessible to tour groups.Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 7/05/23

This is true news, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help us, God. The suspicious white powder that the Secret Service found at the White House over the weekend has been confirmed to be cocaine. U.S. media outlets have reported today. The discovery prompted a brief evacuation of the complex Sunday evening while President Joe Biden was spending the weekend at Camp David. Emergency crews were brought in to perform rapid tests on the substance, which preliminary indicated it was cocaine. The White House reopened soon discovered by uniform agents during routine patrols in an area accessible to tour groups. Let's start with this headline published today by London's DailyMail.com. Dr. Burkhardt is here with me as we delve into this mystery, cocaine

in the White House. Let's look at the facts first, what we know about the facts. Sure. And then we'll talk about it. Go ahead, Doc. A uniformed Secret Service agent found a white powdered substance on Sunday evening. Preliminary testing confirmed it was cocaine. The discovery led to an evacuation of the White House and President Joe Biden was not on premises at the time. Now, the substance was discovered in a small zippered bag in a storage facility at the West Wing. The timeline, however, is blurry as it's unclear how long the bag and its contents were at the White House. A source familiar with the investigation said Tuesday that considering the substance was found in a highly trafficked area of the White House,

it could be difficult to track down the culprit responsible for bringing it into the White House. Okay, so just within about the past hour or so, there was a White House press conference to discuss the substance. Anything of importance come out in the press conference? A couple items here. Corrine Jean-Pierre, she did her best to try to obfuscate and avoid answering any questions. And you're going to hear what she says following a lot. She says this is under the Secret Services purview and they will get to the bottom of this.

Watch this. One more on cocaine. How determined is the president to get to the bottom of the broad legal direction of the White House? Secret Service is getting to the bottom of it and that's what matters and it's under their purview. The question was how determined is the president? The president thinks it's very important to get to the bottom of this. That's why Secret Service, which is under their purview, is looking into this and they're going to look into what happened this weekend. So the president thinks it is incredibly important to get to the bottom of this. Will the administration be appealing the injunction?

I just said the DOJ is reviewing this injunction and they're going to look at, they're going to evaluate their options. So it's for their decision to make. Well, and she was asked all sorts of questions related to the cocaine situation. One question that a reporter asked was if it turns out that there's a member of the staff or someone that happened to be in the White House happens to be charged, you know, with possessing cocaine, will the White House stand behind the investigation of that? And so she tried to avoid that question. She said, let's don't get into hypotheticals yet. If the Secret Service determines who brought the cocaine into the White House,

does the White House support the prosecution of this individual? I'm just not going to get into hypotheticals from here. Let the Secret Service the White House. Does the White House support the prosecution of this individual? I'm just not going to get into hypotheticals from here. Let the Secret Service do their job. It's under their purview. We are confident that they'll get to the bottom of it. I'm just not going to get ahead of this right this time. So it's under their purview, and they're going to get to the bottom of it, right? So one other thing that they may, and she said this four times in her address to the press, making it very clear that the president and the first lady were not at the White House. And so let's watch this last clip here.

And secondly, per the entry, go to the holiday. Can you give any more details on where the Secret Service found cocaine in West Wing and how it got there? So, as you know, this is under the preview of the Secret Service. They are currently investigating what happened over the weekend, so I would have to refer you to the Secret Service on all of this. But one thing that I can share, that I'll share a little bit more information, as you know, the President and the First Lady and their family were not here this weekend, as you all reported on this. And as you also know, that they left on Friday and returned just yesterday.

Where this was discovered is a heavily traveled area where many White House West Wing, I should be even more specific, West Wing visitors come through this particular area. I just don't have anything more to share. It is under investigation by the Secret Service. This is in their purview. They're going to get to the bottom of it. Yeah. So, well, Doc, you know, first, I want to say that, you know, I'm not going to speculate that the cocaine was the property of Hunter Biden. We don't know that. We don't know. And that would be pure speculation. And it would be wrong to say it if it doesn't belong to him. So let's just wait.

I don't think we're ever going to find out. This story is going to disappear very soon. Yes. It's going to go away. Some event's going to happen in the very near future that's going to change the headlines. There's going to be a wag the dog moment, and this story's going to disappear. It's going to go up in smoke. It'll be gone.

However, does Hunter Biden have a history of misplacing drugs and guns and laptops? And drug paraphernalia? Yeah. Yes, he does have a history of that. And probably most drug addicts do because they're so high, they're not thinking straight. So it wouldn't just be Hunter Biden. It would be anybody that's a cocaine addict probably leaves behind, you know, various pieces of evidence about their addiction. So it could be anybody into the White House. Yes. They could have been a tourist that stuck it into a cubby because they said they found it like in a cubby hole in a, you know so they want you to think that a visitor a tourist in the white house said i better get this dope out of my pocket and stick it over here and get out of here or brought

it in purposely to create the kind of scenario that we're talking about right now so just for the sake of argument let's go with that That a tourist, a visitor brought in the cocaine. What does that say to you? That says to me that we do not have the top level security at the White House because they can come in with a white powdery substance. In this case, it happens to be cocaine. But on Sunday night, they didn't know what it was.

Could have been anthrax. They called the hazmat team. Could have been anthrax. I'm tired today. So it could have been anything. So you're telling me that the one place on earth that has the highest level of security or supposed to have the highest level of security you know for you're protecting the president the the president's home you're telling me a tourist off the street walked in with a dime bag of whatever made it through security made it through security and had to empty his pockets had to take everything out put it there to to go through the security checkpoint.

And what did he do with the cocaine while he was going through security? Right. Did he palm it? And aren't there dogs? I don't know. Aren't there drug-sniffing dogs at the White House? I would think there would be, but maybe not. Maybe they just hadn't even contemplated the idea of drugs coming into the White House

or maybe only going out. But then you have the problem of, OK, this is the most. I wouldn't want to be the one to try to find out. I mean, would you say, hey, I'm going to test the security today at the White House. Right. I'm going to see what I can take through the security. No normal person thinks like that. And wouldn't you think that the most secure building in the White House has cameras on every corner of that building? Yes.

So you're telling me somebody hid cocaine in, first it was the library, then it's a high-trafficked area or whatever it is, anywhere it could be. No one saw anything. What that says to me is that the person who owned the cocaine was somebody that has easy access in and out of the White House and gets a real lax security check whenever he or she comes in the White House because it's a high-level person with access to go into many places in the White House and they get they get special treatment that's what it says to me that doesn't mean it doesn't mean it's Hunter Biden it could be any senior member of the staff it could be somebody in the National Security Council you don't know who doesn't mean it's Hunter Biden. It could be any senior member of the staff. It could be somebody in the National Security Council. You don't know who it is, but it's somebody that's able to enter and leave the White House without triggering suspicion by Secret Service and police officers.

And they have to go with that story because they go with the story that a tourist dropped it or hit it, then that says that we have the worst security in the world at the White House. That's right. So which story do you think they want to go with? It's somebody that works or is familiar with the White House or somebody dropped a dime bag of cocaine coming off the street.

No, I'll tell you the story they're going to go with is there's going to be a major event somewhere this week. This story is going to go away in a couple of days, maybe within the next 24 hours. Something's going to move it off the front pages of the newspapers around the world. I mean, they did it by arresting Donald Trump. Mr. Biden was up to his eyeballs in in scandals with the Chinese money.

Right. The payoff of the cash transfers. And what did they do? They arrested Donald Trump that week. They always have an event to move the headlines and get get the attention off of the Bidens. So, you know, I seriously doubt we're going to be talking about this by the end of the week. Maybe by tomorrow, we'll have some stories that'll really wake you up.

Well, we do have some more Biden scandal news also coming from the Daily Mail. You know, the two newspapers, Daily Mail and the New York Post. Without them, we wouldn't know any of this stuff. No, because no one else is reporting it. Without those two publications, the public would be in the dark

about this scandal and many other scandals. So as you see this story from Daily Mail, this was over the holiday weekend. This calls into question the integrity of their investigation. This statement by Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson as he slammed the Hunter Biden probe when it was revealed that the prosecutor who signed off on the sweetheart deal previously worked for Hunter Biden's business partner. Right. And you're here. Some other familiar names in this story from days gone by. Daily Mail is reporting that the federal prosecutor signed off on the documents charging Hunter Biden with attacks and gun crimes,

previously worked with one of the first son's business partners. And Daily Mail can reveal Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss officially filed the charges against the president's son last Tuesday after a near five-year probe into his alleged tax crimes and foreign financial dealings. The Daily Mail said that Weiss's deputy, Assistant United States Attorney Derek Hines, signed off on the charging documents alongside his boss and two other assistant U.S. attorneys, indicating he has a central role in Hunter's criminal prosecution. Those facts can't be denied. Now, according to Hines' LinkedIn account, he previously worked as special counsel to ex-FBI Director Louis Free

at his private company Free Group International Solutions, a lobbying and risk management consultancy that teamed up with Hunter on overseas business currently under scrutiny by lawmakers. Mr. Free worked with Hunter on a $3 million job consulting for a Romanian criminal, a deal that is allegedly now part of his federal criminal investigation and is being investigated by Congress. Now, Daily Mail has previously revealed that Free and his firm work closely with Hunter Biden, trying to get the U.S. State Department to help limit the prosecution of Romanian real estate tycoon Gabriel Papaviciui, who was on the brink of a bribery conviction in 2015. So Mr. Free proposed setting up a private consultancy with Hunter and Joe Biden when he ended his vice presidential term, offering

lucrative future work options, including working for overseas clients such as corrupt foreign Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Reza. He also sent $100,000 to a private trust for Joe's grandchildren, though he wrote an email to Hunter saying it was intended for a charity instead. Heinz's LinkedIn says he worked as special counsel for the ex-FBI director at his company, Free Group, in New Orleans, Louisiana, between August 2013 and February 2015. It's unclear what projects he counseled Free on. And it wasn't until 2016 that Hunter started working with Free Consulting for Papa Vichuy. But emails on his laptop show the Biden family had a close relationship with Free, who headed the FBI from 93 to 2001, dating back to when Hines worked for him. Now, Wisconsin Senator Johnson, who spent four years investigating the Bidens

with his colleague Chuck Grassley, said Hines' relationship with Free calls into question the integrity of their investigation. These types of connections to the Biden family pose significant conflicts that must not be ignored, he said to the Daily Mail. I remember Louis Free quite well from the early days of True News. He was the FBI director when I started this program. For the Clintons, right? The whole time through the Clinton years, I think 93 through 2001.

Yes. Both terms of Clinton. Louis Freeh was the equivalent of the Christopher Wray as Christopher Wray. As Christopher Wray covers for the Bidens, Louis Freeh covered for the Clintons. We've had corrupt FBI directors for decades. And when Clinton was Bill Clinton, not Hillary, when Bill Clinton was raking in the money from the Chinese PLA and selling out our national security, Louis Freeh was protecting him.

So I'm not shocked at all that Louis Freeh's name shows up in the story. This is all one big crime syndicate. It's been going on for decades. They've been selling out our national security for decades and involved with criminals around the world. So here we go again. We have another FBI director in the story and in business with a Biden associate. And his employee, Free's employee, is now the prosecutor who signed off on the sweetheart deal that allowed Hunter Biden to escape prison. Isn't a nice club. I know. It's a nice little club that we're in. The world, this country is

run by a criminal cabal. They take care of their boys. Their guys never go to prison. They wear the badges and they come after anybody who investigates them. Right, like people that go to school board meetings and show up at pro-life rallies. Hey, this next story is from CBS News. Former Republican congressman who was on the January 6th Select Committee, Denver Riggleman, is now working for Hunter Biden. That's right, Rick.

So CBS News is reporting that Hunter Biden has reportedly hired former Republican Congressman Denver Riggleman as an advisor to his legal team. Riggleman previously served as a technical advisor to the House Select Committee probing the January 6th Capitol riots. He's now working with Biden's lawyers to address congressional inquiries and GOP claims about his business dealings by using data analysis. Now, we're going to explain what it is he's doing here. Riggleman said in a statement Tuesday that he and his associates are working with Hunter Biden's attorneys. I and my forensics data and telephony team are conducting data investigations and analysis for Hunter Biden's legal team, Riggleman said,

with a concentration on data across a spectrum. Now, Riggleman's work with Hunter Biden was confirmed on Tuesday by Kevin Morris, a lawyer and confidant of the president's son. Denver has been assisting us with data analysis since late last year. He is an invaluable resource and we have made tremendous strides in untangling the

massive amount of corruption and disinformation involved in this story. There will be much more coming to the public. And on Monday, Riggleman was at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C. with a meeting with Hunter Biden's lawyers. And then on Tuesday evening, he was at the White House as one of the members of the Hunter Biden team invited to celebrate the July 4th holiday. So you get to stay at the Four Seasons and then you get to go party at the White House. But what I find interesting about this, Mr. Riggleman, though, is they say they're digging in for trying to sort through tons of data, tons of data. And what do you, I have my opinion what they're doing. What do you think they're doing? They're not looking into data involving Hunter Biden. Correct. They're looking into data

involving people investigating Hunter Biden. Absolutely. They're digging for dirt. That's what they're doing. They're looking for dirt on the people investigating Hunter Biden. They're going to make it painful and expensive to go after the Bidens. They're going to let the Ron Johnsons and the other senators and congressmen, they're going to let them know

you're going to pay a price for investigating Hunter Biden. And every reporter that ever reported on the laptop story, they're going to be digging into those sources. So the guys at the New York Post, they got to watch out now. They got to make sure that they did everything right, everything legal. And all the people that had copies of the laptop, of the hard drive of the laptop, like Giuliani and others, you've got to know they're sorting through all that data as well. Doc, you go back to the Clinton years. The reporter who did the most investigative work to uncover and reveal and expose the Clinton corruptions

was a young reporter from Britain, from Great Britain. His name was Ambrose Evans Pritchard. You know who he is. He wasn't a financial writer. He was an investigative reporter. But life in America became too dangerous for him, especially after his reports on the death of Vince Foster. And Ambrose Evans Prashard made a decision, I think I'd like to go back to London

and just work for the Daily Telegraph. And he left. He packed up and he left, and he became a financial expert and writes fantastic financial news analysis stories for the Telegraph. He doesn't do investigative reports anymore. Whatever threat the Clinton cabal made, it convinced Evans Pritchard that's not a career

he wants to follow. This is what they're doing now. The cabal is going after anybody that's investigating the Hunter Biden, Joe Biden scandals. Because it takes in, not just the Bidens, it takes in a vast network of criminals, white-collar criminals,

respectable, influential, highly educated businessmen and politicians who have a lot at stake. And if they get caught their whole empire collapses and they're going to go after them this next story this is a good one this is this is encouraging a federal judge ordered the biden white house to limit contact with social media companies in In other words, a restraining order. A federal judge put a restraining order on the Biden administration and said, stop calling and emailing and meeting with social media companies for the purpose

of censoring Americans. This is a really good turn of events in the cause of freedom of speech. So according to the Wall Street Journal, a federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction that restricts the Biden administration from communicating with social media companies about online content. And the order was issued after the judge ruled that government officials policing of social media posts likely violated the First Amendment. The case raises questions about the limits of government scrutiny of social media content on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. So the judge's injunction came in a lawsuit led by the Republican attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, who alleged that the Biden administration fostered a sprawling federal censorship enterprise in its effort to stamp

out what it viewed as rampant disinformation circulating on social media. So the government, the lawsuit claim pressured social media platforms to scrub away disfavored views about COVID-19 health policies, the origins of the pandemic, the Hunter Biden laptop story, election security, and other divisive topics. So a quote here from this judge, the evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario, wrote Judge Terry Doughty, an appointee of former President Donald Trump in his ruling. He said, quote, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to the Orwellian Ministry of Truth.

By the way, he issued this order on the 4th of July. He said, you know, I'm going to the office today and I'm going to make a ruling about freedom today, about freedom of speech, about the First Amendment. And so he went to the office and made the injunction, Rick. Well, congratulations to the judge it's encouraging to know that there are still judges who believe in the constitution and still make rulings based on the constitution that's encouraging yes they're not all corrupt they're still good judges but see even the journal here in this article they said uh terry doughty who was a trump appointee and just make it sound like all right let's throw some stink on this on this judge because that's exactly what they're doing isn't it they're trying to uh minimize this ruling by

saying well he's a trump appointee therefore his ruling is tainted because he was appointed by donald trump now during the 2020 election controversy in the aftermath of the election, and there were many allegations that the election was rigged, that illegal things happened. One of the most outspoken people in America at that time was Attorney Lynn Wood. What has happened to Mr. Wood? You don't hear much from him these days. Well, the cabal went after him. You oppose them. You question their operation.

You dare to say that an election was rigged and they're going to come after you. And that's what they did with Lynn Wood. Here's the story that appeared today. So this is in Newsweek. Newsweek is reporting that Lin Wood, the lawyer who was part of former President Donald Trump's legal team, has retired from the legal profession and agreed to never practice law again. So Mr. Wood requested his status with the State Bar of Georgia be transferred to retired. So he says, I understand that this request is unqualified, irrevocable, and permanent, Wood wrote to the Bar's general

counsel and executive director. I further understand and acknowledge that if granted retired status, I am prohibited from practicing law in the state and in any other state or jurisdiction and that I may not apply for readmission. So he's basically cut himself off from law from this point forward. Okay. They cut him off. Well, yes, they did. They destroyed his career. They said, we're going to destroy you. We're going to remove your ability to practice law. You will never go in a courtroom again. You're going to open up a hot dog stand. You're going to do something other than argue cases in a court of

law. They destroyed the man's reputation and his career. Now, he's doing this in response really to the proceedings that are going on in Georgia. Wood is facing potential disbarment hearings in Georgia for supporting false claims of voter fraud. For supporting? Yes. And who says they're false? Was there ever an investigation? Newsweek says it is. Newsweek. Well, Newsweek said it's false. They debunked it. The only thing Lynn Wood did was call for an investigation. Right. So there's been this ongoing probe in Georgia. It began in 2021 after the state Baris Disciplinary Board received information suggesting, suggesting Wood violated professional conduct rules. Not that he had done it, but suggesting that. So if a lawyer calls for an investigation of possible corruption in a presidential election, that

is now grounds to be disbarred. This is the new normal now. If you question an election and you're a lawyer, you will be disbarred. Or you'll retire. Yes, well. But that's only if you question the election of a Republican. I mean, of a Democrat.

If it's the other way around, you'll get a seat on the Supreme Court. Yeah, they reward you for it. But look what they've done to him. Doc, he didn't do anything criminal. Tell me what Linwood did that is worthy of this kind of punishment. Well, you and I both know he did nothing to deserve that. But he said things.

That was his crime. He said words. Words. He said words. And words will get you destroyed now in this new paradigm that we're living in. Just words. Words and thoughts will get you destroyed. Meanwhile, somebody's walking around in the White House with Coke. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden receives millions of dollars from the Chinese

Communist Party. Meanwhile, the Biden family collects tens of millions of dollars from foreign entities. But they're not they're not suffering any consequences at all. The one thing, of course, Linwood was known for was questioning the election. That's the big thing. Yes. So that's a crime. That in their mind, of course, it's not a crime. But in their minds, it's criminal for you to even suggest that there's anything anything wrong with the election. Listen, there have been problems with the election since people ever had elections, okay? So you can't question any election?

Is that where we're at now? To this day, 2023, Hillary Clinton still questions the 2016 election. In her mind, she won. Al Gore still believes he won 2000. But they can do that. Why? Because they have a deal. That's right.

Big D Democrats. Okay. Well, while we're on this topic of the 2020 election, another Newsweek story, pro-Trump, excuse me, not that one. Let's see, where is it here?

27. What is this one? That's the post that Donald Trump put on social. Oh yeah, I'm sorry. I was going to the Oath Keeper. This is what President Trump posted today on Truth Social. So President Trump said, Massive prosecutorial misconduct is currently taking place in America.

The weaponization of law enforcement cannot be allowed to happen. Crime and inflation are rampant. Our borders are open. Our elections are rigged. Our economy is in shambles. Our energy independence is gone. Our leader is mercilessly mocked, and our country is being destroyed both inside and out.

Do the people of this once great nation even have a choice but to protest the potential doom of the United States of America in 2024? Well, the leftist media immediately went to work today and said Donald Trump called for insurrection. I didn't hear insurrection anywhere in there. Well, that's how they read it. This is why Donald Trump has to be locked up. He's got to be put away. He's telling people to go to the streets and riot again. That's how they're interpreting it. And then the Washington Times interviewed Stuart Rhodes,

who is in prison because of January 6th. And he sent a message to donald trump and said you're going to be found guilty you're going to prison that's right the washington times reporting that stewart rhodes the leader of the oath keepers militia group convicted of seditious conspiracy warned former president donald trump that he will be found guilty if he goes to trial and everyone around him is demoralized and more likely to testify against him. Speaking from the DC Department of Corrections facility detention facility, Rhodes suggested the government is working to turn Donald Trump's inner circle against him as part of a plan to convict him. Mr. Rhodes predicted that Mr. Trump would face

a left-leaning judge and jury in the District of Columbia during his trial. So Mr. Rhodes sent a grave warning to Mr. Trump, you're going to get railroaded. You're going to be found guilty if you try to go to trial. So everyone's been demoralized and more likely to take a plea deal and agree to test a lie against President Trump. Now, Stuart Rhodes says this,

I didn't enter the Capitol, but I'm still found guilty by a D.C. jury of obstructing an official proceeding, even though I didn't even go inside, he said. And I was found guilty of seditious conspiracy, although they had zero evidence of an actual plan. They just used my speech. It will be the same thing with President Trump. And they threatened witnesses with life in prison, said Rhodes, and that's what's going to happen to President Trump as well. And I agree with Stuart Rhodes. He can say that because he's in prison.

Right. I mean, he knows how they're skewing the truth. And he's just being very blunt with Donald Trump, saying, if you think you're going to get a fair trial, that's not going to happen. Not in D.C. Not in D.C. Not in D.C. Well in D.C. But they are moving it. Although I don't know which one, which trial he's referring to because

the Mar-a-Lago case, well, see, this is different. There's so many Trump trials coming up. There'll be one in Georgia, one in New York State, one in D.C., and one here in Florida. One way or the other, they're going to put the guy in prison. That's their plan. He can't evade all of me. I mean, in their mind. It'd be amazing if Donald Trump manages to escape all of these traps.

I hope he does. I hope he does. But they have laid so many traps for this man. I don't know how he gets out of all of them. My advice to him is call upon the name of the Lord. That's what he needs to do, Doc. He needs to call upon the name of the Lord. He needs to do it out in the open in public that he is calling on the name of Jesus Christ to save him and to save the country. I hope he does it.

While we're on the subject of the cabal, last Friday one thing I've seen over many years of doing this program is that late friday afternoons especially on friday afternoons before a three-day well it wasn't a three-day whenever it's a holiday a lot of places had a four-day holiday uh which lie fourth and they took off July 3rd. What government agencies and politicians do is they they sneakily release public documents that they have to release. And they hope by doing it late Friday afternoon while everybody is going home, nobody will see it.

That's what the Biden White House did late Friday afternoon. One more time, they refused to release the John F. Kennedy assassination records. What are they covering up? Why are they refusing to release? It's been 60 years. And they're still covering up what happened. They're still blocking the American people from reading government documents. Right. And you can go to yourself, you can go to the White House website and you can see the memorandum on certifications regarding disclosure of information and certain records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. That's right. It's a long memo. For a memo, it's really, really long. But it goes into detail about why they still want to keep some, in fact, most of the documents tied up now for a while longer, is there are still military and diplomatic considerations, it says later down in the memorandum. So it's been 60 years. Wait, military and diplomatic

considerations? Yes. I thought Lee Harvey Oswald did it. Well, that's the story, right? That's the propaganda story they gave us so president biden has certified the temporary continued postponement of public disclosure of redacted information in a small number of records covered by that it's not a small number it's a lot of number uh and so the uh once again uh it's getting punted down the field again for who knows how long. I'll tell you, Doc, if it was released, it would usher Robert F. Kennedy Jr. into the White House. Well, I don't know what these documents could reveal that RFK Jr. hasn't already said out loud. It would validate what he has said out loud.

And they can't do it. They'll end up with another Kennedy in the White House. And, you know, it's not that they're protecting the people who were involved. It's the power structure, the agencies, the cabal. The American people would see that the country really was overthrown in 1963. That a secret cabal killed the President of the United States, got away with it, and has run this country for 60 years. We've been living in a dictatorship for 60 years. And now it's to the point that if you even question who they're putting in the White House as the fake president, they're going to destroy you. They'll put you in prison. That's how far we've gone. They're not even pretending anymore to be nice.

If you question them, they're going to crush you. And the perfect example is Donald Trump. He wasn't supposed to win. That's right. But he won anyway. It was so overwhelming that even they couldn't cheat enough. They couldn't cheat enough. Right. But they did in 2020.

And that's why I don't have a lot of hope for 2024. I just don't. Although I believe justice would be a Kennedy back in the White House to show this cabal, you didn't win after all. That would be the justice in all of this. If Robert Kennedy could somehow pull it together and muster enough support to overcome their corruption and get in the White House. But if he goes after them like he says he's going to do it, he better have God's protection on him. That's all I can say. Let's take a look at World War III. I'll show you July 4th article.

This is Russia Today. Russia nuclear giant claims Ukrainian attack on power plant is imminent. And when they say imminent, they mean like today, July 5th. So according to a senior Russian official, there are concerns of an imminent attack on the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant in Ukraine by Ukrainian forces. Now, the official claim that the attack could involve either long-range, high-precision munitions, suicide drones, or a tactical ballistic missile fire filled with radioactive waste. However, it should be noted that there is disagreement and skepticism surrounding these claims with the International Atomic Energy Agency

and the White House, stating that they have not seen any indication of an imminent threat. But if you were to hear Vladimir Zelensky, it was like, this is the end of the world. It's happening. It's going to happen. Now, on July 5th, literally overnight, while it's still dark, Ukrainian forces will attempt an attack on the Zaporozhye plant with long-range, high-precision munitions, as well as suicide drones. And this is according to an interview by Rosaya24 speaking to Renat Kachar, a senior aide to

the head of RosEnerGladim, a subsidiary of Russia's state-owned atomic energy giant Rosatom. The official cited intelligence data received by the industry so it's it's the uh the energy industry that has determined this yes and provide that information to uh the russian government so doc this was either going to happen last night or tonight it's already it's already evening in russia now right And he was saying overnight. So they're, what, eight hours ahead of us? Yes. And so it's, what time is it there now? Well, it's overnight.

It's past midnight there now. So I wouldn't be shocked to hear by sometime later this evening that something happens at the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. Okay, so now think about this. This propaganda has been going on for a year and a half. The Russians are in control of that power plant. Okay, so now think about this. This propaganda has been going on for a year and a half. The Russians are in control of that power plant. Right. It's part of the territory that they seized. They have Russians running the power plant.

Yes. The power plant is necessary to provide electrical power to the region, but they also don't want the Ukrainians to do anything crazy with the power plant. The propaganda that has been fed to the Western nations for a year and a half has been, the Russians are going to blow up the power plant. Tell me what their motive would be in that. Where's their motive in that? Well, it's just propaganda.

Why would the Russians blow up a power plant that their people are running and guarding and providing electricity to the Russian-speaking area around the power plant? It's like, why did the Russians blow up

Nord Stream? Why did they blow up the dam? They didn't. It was not in their interest. Or blowing up their own bridges last week that they were guarding. And so we saw for a year and a half Western newspapers talking about the Russians

shelling the power station. So few people thought this through. They just read the headlines. So you got Russian troops guarding the power plant. You got Russian technicians running the power plant.

And you got, according to the Western newspapers, you got Russian soldiers on the outside firing mortars at the power plant. This is crazy. It was the Ukrainians who were she at the power plant. This is crazy. It was the Ukrainians who were shelling the power plant,

trying to create a nuclear disaster. So, for some reason, the Russians believe that they have intelligence showing that the Ukrainians are going to strike the power plant and create a radiological dirty bomb.

It would be a Chernobyl. Don't forget, Chernobyl was in Ukraine. That's right. It'd be 10 times worse than Chernobyl. I mean, that's what Mr. Racha said later in an interview today. Then how would that benefit the Russians? It doesn't benefit the Russians. It doesn't.

It's just, it's the Russians. It doesn't benefit the Russians. It doesn't. It's the propaganda. Now, so we'll show you the London Times. Russia could blow nuclear power station and blame Ukraine, says Zelensky. Right. So Ukrainian President Zelensky has

warned of a possible new evil. This is the new phrase he's using today, in which Russia could blow up the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and blame it on Ukrainian forces. They're going to blame it on Ukrainians, Rick. According to Ukrainian military intelligence reports, Russian troops have occupied the site and placed objects resembling explosives

on top of the power units since March of last year. Now, this warning comes after the recent destruction of a dam in southern Ukraine, which Zelensky believes could incite the Kremlin to commit this new evil, as he calls upon the world to stop it. So we have a video clip. He's not a very good liar. No, he's not. It's hard for him to keep stories straight. So now we have a short clip here. This Зараз від нашої розвідки ми маємо інформацію про те, що на даху кількох енергоблоків Запорізької атомної станції російські військові розмістили предмети, схожі на вибухівку. Можливо, щоб імітувати удар по станції, можливо, у них якийсь інший сценарій.

Але в будь-якому випадку світ бачить і не може не бачити, що єдиним джерелом небезпеки для Запорізької атомної станції є саме Росія. І ніхто інший. Now, really, he needs something to happen this week, Залишитись осторонь. Бо радіація нікого не залишає осторонь. as soon as possible. And Biden needs to get the cocaine story off the headlines. Right. And so, God forbid this happening, but boy, everybody's attention would be on, you know, nuclear radiation fallout going out across Europe if something were to happen at that power plant tonight. We'd be talking about nothing else than that.

And then everybody would be twisting themselves into contortions saying, why didn't we bring Ukraine into NATO sooner? Why didn't we do it? This is our fault. We're so guilty. And they could decide in a day. I remember the story from last week. They can decide in a day to add Ukraine to NATO in a day.

It's taken Sweden and Finland, what, 15 years to get admitted but ukraine they could get it done one day if there happened to be something bad that happened in a nuclear power plant don't rule it out doc i'm going to jump down to number 41 this is rt uh dimitri This is RT. Dmitry Medvedev proposes how Ukraine conflict could end in days. And he gives two scenarios, one negotiation and one annihilation. This is what Mr. Medvedev said. So according to RT.com, Dmitry Medvedev, former president of Russia, says that the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine is only sustained by Western arms shipments to Ukraine.

Mr. Medvedev said the conflict could end in days if Western countries simply stopped supplying weapons and munitions to Ukraine. But he also warned against U.S. nuclear weapons deployment to Poland, stating that it could trigger a nuclear conflict itself. Now, if NATO, this is Mr. Medvedev, primarily the U.S. and its vassals, had stopped supplying weapons and munitions to Ukraine, the Russian special military operation would have ended in mere months. And this is Mr. Medvedev speaking to TASS. It can still end in days, however, if Washington and its allies stop the delivery he added. But he goes on to say, Medvedev said that any war, regardless of its scale, could end very quickly

if a peace treaty is signed or if one does what the Americans did in 1945 by using their nuclear weapons and bombing Japanese cities. The U.S. strikes did stop hostilities at the time, though he noted that the price was 300,000 civilian lives. So he's presenting two drastically stark different scenarios here, Rick, that we could sign a peace treaty or we could do, follow the American example, stop wars, nuclear bomb somebody. Yeah. And he also threw in Poland. Yes. A warrant against a U.S. nuclear weapons deployment to Poland stating that it could trigger a nuclear conflict. That's because last

week, Poland formally applied for the nuclear weapons sharing program. Right. Where the U.S. would share. That sounds sounds so sweet doesn't it we're going to we're going to share our arsenal of nuclear weapons with uh with poland uh joe biden hasn't signed off on this yet but you you know i mean you can assume it's already a done deal they've been talking all year about getting nukes to Poland. So Medvedev said, well, there could be a nuclear war if American nukes get sent to Poland. So you got two possibilities of nuclear war in a statement, Doc.

One is with Ukraine and one is with Poland. Right. You could have a peace treaty with Ukraine and solve that war and still have a nuclear war involving Poland. Because he's now saying, hey, our demands are changing. You put nukes in Poland, we still have a war. We're not going to stop, even if we have a peace treaty with Ukraine, we're not going to allow nukes in Poland. Yeah, because you're right back to where the whole conflict with Ukraine started. Where it started, last year.

He also wrote a very long op-ed piece for a Russian newspaper called The Era of Confrontation. And we have several of the more stark quotes out of that op-ed. We feel it's really important that you hear what Nived have said because he's openly talking about a nuclear war with the West. Let's go through them, Doc. So the tectonic rift that has formed in the understanding of the future in different parts of the world will only worsen. You don't have to be a visionary to understand

that the confrontation phase will be very long. The confrontation will last for decades. One of the ways to resolve it is the Third World War. But it is obviously bad because the victors are not at all guaranteed further prosperity as it happened after the previous world wars. So most likely there will simply be no winners. After all, it is impossible to consider as a victory the world in which a nuclear winter has come.

Million plus cities lie in ruins. There is no electricity due to an exorbitant electromagnetic pulse. And a huge number of people died from a shockwave. Light radiation, penetrating radiation, and radioactive contamination were terrible epidemics and famine reign. And here I will note one thing that politicians of all stripes do not like to admit. Such an apocalypse is not only possible, but also quite likely. That's it right there, Doc.

That this apocalypse is not only possible. Nevedov said, as of right now, July 2023, it's quite likely. I think everybody should take him very serious

at reading these words. Because politicians certainly don't. They don't really think nuclear war is a real thing. So it goes on to say, indeed, we are ready to look for reasonable compromises, as the president of Russia has repeatedly said. They are possible, but with an understanding of several fundamental points. First, our interests must be taken into account as much as possible. There should no longer be any anti-Russia in principle, otherwise everything will end very badly sooner or later. The Kiev Nazi regime must be annihilated. It is legally banned and civilized Europe as fascist,

thrown like a rotten piece of lard into the dustbin of world history. What will replace it, we do not know, as well as what will remain in the former square. But the West will have to accept this if it does not want an apocalyptic end to our imperfect situation. Right. Digest what he said. He said, we can settle this war, but Russia's interests must be taken into account, which means their national security.

Right. That means Ukraine can't be in NATO, can't be Western nuclear weapons in Ukraineraine and the west can't continually be trying to knock russia out right this anti-russia uh agenda to de-platform russia that has to stop where he said if you don't do that everything will end very badly sooner or later right in other words russia's saying we're not going to tolerate it. There's an end to our patience. There'll be a day we just annihilate you.

So he says the... But even if we solve that issue, we solve the second issue. Right. So he said the Nazi government in Kiev, Ukraine, he didn't say has to be replaced. He said annihilate it. Annihilate. That's a strong word. Annihilate it.

In other words, we're not going to let them reconstitute and come back at us in another form, in another time. They have to be completely eliminated. He said, thrown like a rotten piece of lard into the dustbin of world history. So we don't know what's going to replace it. We don't know what kind of government is going to come into Ukraine. But this last line, but the West will have to accept this if it does not want an apocalyptic end to civilization. The Russians are saying, these are our terms. And if you refuse to accept these terms, civilization will end.

And if they compromise on either one of those terms, if Russia does, Russia ceases to exist right and they know that they know that the west will just continue to grind them down for decades right so he's saying we're going to put an end to this and we're going to have a settlement that we can live with and if we don't civilization will end all civilization will end. All civilization will end. And he described it earlier. Electromagnetic pulse, famines, radiation, nuclear winter. He gave a description of what the world's going to look like in the aftermath of a nuclear war if the West refuses to accept Russia's terms.

Now, he goes on in this particular op-ed to explain further some items that have to be considered. Secondly, all the hard-won results of total confrontation should be enshrined in a new document such as the Helsinki Act, which ended the well-known 1975 Conference of the Year. Only Helsinki itself, alas, is not suitable for obvious reasons. Now, for us, Finland is a hostile country created once by thoughtlessness, by Lenin, and now joining NATO. With Finland and others like it, like Poland, the Baltic countries, and of course Britain, it would be better to temporarily suspend diplomatic relations altogether,

or at least lower their level for the time being. In other words, we're looking at a division of Europe here. Thirdly, it's likely that a careful reassembly of the UN and other international organizations will be required. Okay, can I just, can I just pause right there? Medvedev just said that the United Nations is going to be abolished or radically changed. This is going to be part of their demands. A careful reassembly of the United Nations

and other international organizations will be required. That would be the International Criminal Court, the IMF, the World Bank. Right. The whole New World Order apparatus. They're not going to accept it.

These are their new terms for peace talk. A year and a half ago, it was just no NATO bases in Ukraine. Stay away from our borders. The Russians' demand now is get rid of the United Nations. Yes. This thing has moved light years in a year and a half. Well, it goes on in this article to say it is possible only with full respect for the rights of the permanent members of the Security Council. Otherwise,

it will be completely ineffective. And then the UN will sink into oblivion as an institution that has not lived up to the hopes of free peoples. I'm not talking about the fate of today's international freaks like the ICC, the Council of Europe, or the OSCE, they are already in the stinking dustbin of world development. So he's making it clear that there is coming a confrontation one way or another that's going to end either into a peace treaty and a resolution of these issues, or we're likely to face direct nuclear confrontation. There's going to be a confrontation. Something is going to end up at the end.

And really, there is no middle road here, is there? No. They're demanding a total comprehensive restructuring of the world order. And they're saying, without it, we will end civilization. How do you bargain with those demands? The West has got to

bend a knee to the demands of Moscow or face annihilation. But they brought it on themselves. Russia's now, they've reached a point where the Russians are saying, we can't go back to the state of the world before the Ukraine war. Because it's out in the open. See, it's like what COVID did. COVID brought the freaks out in the open. Right.

Made them easily identify. The Nazis came out. Now we know who the Nazis are in America and in Europe. We know who they are. And this war has brought the global Nazis out into the open. And now Russia knows who they are. And they're saying, hey, no way we're going back to where we were at before the war because Russia knows who they are and they're saying in no way we're going back to where we were at before the war because we know what they are we know what their agenda is

we know that their plan is to destroy us so we we can't go back and and act like we don't know it we know what they're up to and their plan is to destroy Russia. And so they're saying either we get this new world order established or we eliminate civilization because we're not going to capitulate. We're not going to give in to it. This is an incredible

stage of history, Doc. Has there ever been a time like this where a nuclear armed nation has said accept these terms to restructure the world order or we destroy everybody. Because that's what the Russians are saying. I'm not defending Russia. I'm just simply explaining their point of view.

From Russia's point of view, this is a fight for their survival. But we put them in this position. The West put them in this position. They weren't thinking and talking like this a year and a half ago. I hope our audience really understands that the only end game for this is either total peace or total war in this. There is no middle ground there's no going back to handshake diplomacy with russia after this we either have i mean we're putting ourself we have put ourself in a place where we have to destroy russia at some point really or the russians have to destroy us because the west has they've raised the stakes so high that the Russians understand

that if they show any weakness NATO and the Western banking establishment will eat them, completely devour them so they know what they're up against I can't think of any time in world history that we've

had something this stark staring us in the face. And most people aren't aware of it. Most people have no idea that this is taking place, that the Russians are making these demands. A couple more stories before we close up for today. Daily Mail reporting that Britain only has 40 tanks. This can't be real. They only have 40 tanks. What happened to all their equipment?

It went to Ukraine. It went to Ukraine. So this is what they're facing right now. I'm not going to go into the whole story. You can read it at the Daily Mail. Reuters reporting NATO has extended Jens Stoltenberg's term by one year. They want him back at the central bank, but he can't go back to the Rothschild central bank because Rothschild needs him running NATO. So they gave him a one year extension extension on his war contract on his war contract

and some things are coming out about the people who were behind the scenes jockeying to get his job there were a lot of different people like boris johnson and others who wanted that job well the one big one was uh Wallace, the minister of defense. Now, look at this story. This was from the Belfast, Ireland Telegraph over the weekend. Joe Biden blocked Ben Wallace's NATO leadership bid over Wallace's time that he served in the British army in Northern Ireland. Okay, so Northern Ireland, there's been a long, long running controversy between the Irish Republican army and the British government.

And decades ago, the prime minister had to send in troops, British troops into Northern Ireland to put down the violence that was taking place. If this is true, they're saying that Joe Biden, who is a Roman Catholic. And claims Irish heritage. And claims to be Irish. Okay. That he was so upset that he's had this vendetta against Wallace for decades. That Wallace was a soldier in Northern Ireland. That's the story. So that was published in

Belfast, Ireland. Then this next story came out and this is the Telegraph today. Joe Biden blocked Ben Wallace from top NATO job after the controversy over F-16s. Right. I don't know which one's true. Might be both. Might be both. Or did they come out with this one today to cover up the first one that made Biden look really vindictive.

So this one claims that Biden was angry with Wallace because Wallace went ahead and made promises to Zelensky that Great Britain was going to train pilots to fly American-built F-16s. Now, the next one is London Telegraph. This says Joe Biden is pushing for Ursula von der Leyen to be the next chief of NATO, or she's not going to get the job for at least a year because they extended Stoltenberg's contract. So the idea in this story is that Mr. Biden pushed for Ursula von der Leyen to eventually step away from the EU commission and take over as NATO chief. Now, von der Leyen's people are saying, no, we've never had any interest in this position. We've not jockeyed for it. We've not sought it or anything like that uh it's um it's not a job for me now or in the future um but accordingly there were private talks going on between the biden white house and vanderlinde at some point um what's her background is it also

banking too well i know she's been a member of the German government. Oh, put another German in charge of NATO? Yeah. They had that work out last time. One more story I want to show you. Because we're talking about Nazis. Nazis in NATO. Nazis running the COVID lockdown operation.

They're just new Nazisis and this story though oh this is really nazified a finnish economic minister resigned after calling for climate abortions they finally came out and said what I said they were thinking privately. Right. You need to kill babies to save the environment. Right. They finally got one of them to actually said it. Said it out loud.

But they're going to start with the black ones first. Well, they've been doing that for decades. Yes, I know that. Planned Parenthood. But, you know, now they're coming right out and saying it. So Finnish economic affairs minister Wilhelm Janila resigned on Friday after he said something out loud after a speech he had given as a freshman member of parliament resurfaced. In the address, he recommended the country sponsor climate abortions for African

women in order to save the planet. He said it would be justified for Finland to shoulder its responsibility by promoting climate abortions. Finn's party politician declared in 2019, saying, climate abortion would be a small step for a person, but a giant leap for humanity. The party is known for its opposition to the idea that Finns should have to dramatically alter their lifestyles to fight climate change and argues they already pollute markedly less than their european peers so let's just kill babies so we don't have to change the way we live no sooner had janella been sworn into his position last tuesday than euro news reported his appearance

at the 2019 event organized by far-right groups which one researcher described as a who's who of neo-nazis in finland well if they were nazis they weren't far right they were far left far left the scandals have not stopped poly up since then culminating in a vote of confidence on wednesday which he narrowly won even as prime minister peter orpo warned him he had to change his behavior to keep serving in the cabinet. He ended up resigning over that. So he got aborted. He got politically aborted. That's right.

Before we close, I want to remind you, if you have received an email invitation to attend one of my special Zoom call meetings, the next one is tomorrow night, Thursday night 7 p.m eastern i'm going to try to have some uh later in the next couple weeks at different uh times because i know we have people you know that are on the west coast pacific time we get people with actually all over the world who want to be in these zoom call meetings but it's not fitting their schedule i'm going to try to do several more but tomorrow night thursday night 7 p.m if you received an email invitation it's invitation only so if you did not receive an email invitation then you can't get into the meeting. So who did we invite? We invited the people that support True News.

And we're giving our supporters the first glimpse of a brand new home for this organization. And I'm very excited about it. I want you to see it and encourage you to be there tomorrow night at 7 p.m. Eastern on this Zoom call. And I'll give you all the details.

The call lasts about one hour. And, you know, you can send us questions and, you know, we'll do our best to answer as many questions as we can in one hour. God bless. Love you very much. See you tomorrow. God bless you.