TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Seymour Hersh: U.S. Drone Technology Used to Attack Crimean Bridge
Episode Date: July 27, 2023American technology played an important role in Ukrainian attacks on Russia’s Kerch Strait Bridge according to sources who spoke to investigative journalist Seymour Hersch. This allegation comes ami...d reports that NATO has warned European nations that the risk of a confrontation on the Black Sea with Russia is increasing.Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 7/27/23You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969.It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. Now available in eBook and audio formats! Order Final Day from Amazon today! https://www.amazon.com/Final-Day-Characteristics-Second-Coming/dp/0578260816/Apple users, you can download the audio version on Apple Books!https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/final-day-10-characteristics-of-the-second-coming/id1687129858Purchase the 4-part DVD set or start streaming Sacrificing Liberty today.https://www.sacrificingliberty.com/watchThe Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today! https://tru.news/faucielf
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles.
We appreciate you tuning in.
To find out more information regarding the broadcast,
including prayer and financial support,
please visit our website at truenews.com.
Our mailing address for all correspondence is
True News, PO Box 690069,
Faroe Beach, Florida, 32969. This is True News.
The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
So help us God.
American technology played an important role in the Ukrainian attacks on Russia's Kerch Strait Bridge.
According to sources who spoke privately to investigative journalist Seymour Hersh,
this allegation comes amid reports that NATO has warned European nations
that the risk of a confrontation on the Black Sea with the Russian Navy is increasing.
Let's start with this article published by RT.com.
The headline, U.S. played critical role in Crimean Bridge terror attacks, according to Seymour Hersh.
Doc, what does Mr. Hersh have to say about this today?
Of course, Mr. Hersh is a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, but he is alleging that the U.S.
played a critical role in enabling Ukraine's two attacks on the Kerch Bridge.
And this is according to a source within the American intelligence community.
The source critical of the Biden administration accuses it of a lack of oversight, suggesting it is allowing Ukrainian President Zelensky to act freely, escalating conflict and risking potential retaliation from Russia.
This shouldn't surprise us by any stretch of the imagination because Ukraine doesn't have the ability to do these things without Western help.
Washington, this is a quote from RT, enabled both Ukrainian
attacks on the Kirch Bridge. He's quoted as saying the Biden administration's role in both attacks
was vital, he declared on Substack. Of course, it was our technology, an American official told
Hirsch, referring to the drone that damaged the bridge on July 17th. The drone was remotely guided and half submerged like a
torpedo. So ask if the U.S. intelligence, excuse me, ask if the U.S. intelligence community considered
the possibility of Russian retaliation for the bridge attack. Hershey's source replied, quote, we don't think that far. Our national strategy is that
Zelensky can do whatever he wants to do. There's no adult supervision, end of quote,
according to the source. Now, let me ask you, Rick, do you really believe that's true? Yes.
Do you think they just let him go willy-nilly, or do you think they're telling him to do these things?
I think it's a combination of both.
I think they're giving him...
No, you know, I'm going to correct myself.
If the U.S. provided technology for the attacks, it's because we wanted Zelensky to attack the bridge.
Right.
If we supplied drones...
Then there has to be intelligence to guide the drones.
That's right.
It's not coming from the Ukrainians.
That's right.
They don't have the ability.
And this isn't like his rubber ducky in his bathtub.
Right.
You're talking about a drone capable of exploding
and bringing down a massive bridge so um no i i would say absolutely
the uh the biden administration i think what they're doing doc is secretly they're giving
zielinski the technology and then acting on the surface like... The decisions are the Ukrainians.
Hey, you know, we're just supplying him with what he needs to win the war.
We're not telling him what to do with it.
But privately, they are.
Right.
Well, now Washington has supposedly asked Kiev
not to use U.S.-provided weapons to strike Russian territory,
but insists that Crimea,
as well as the regions of Kherson, Zaporizhia, Donetsk, and Lugansk, are actually Ukrainian
territory and therefore legitimate targets. This amounts to complete permissiveness for Kiev and
risk escalating the conflict, Russia's ambassador to the U.S. warned. This was back in January.
According to the article, the U.S. has
no real idea of what Zelensky and his crowd are thinking, the official added, asserting that the
Ukrainian leader has no plan except to hang on. He also speculated that U.S. support for Kiev is due
to Zelensky's knowledge of Biden and not just because he was taking care of Biden's son.
It was an interesting comment to be made there in the article.
That implies Zelensky is using his knowledge of Hunter Biden and his deals in Ukraine as leverage over Joe Biden to get the technology, the weapons, and the support that he needs to attack Russia.
Yes.
And behind the scenes saying, if we start talking about what we know.
Your political power collapses in the United States.
So they're holding that over.
Right.
That's a dangerous game to play especially with somebody like biden joe biden is
not the uh it's not the he's he's not the the the guy that i think most of us thought he was
for decades he's much more dangerous and we're going to see this here in a few minutes when we
start talking about the biden corruption there's a story, Doc, if what I'm talking about is the call that I mean, the visit that James Biden made to Jill Biden's former husband.
We're talking about that later in the program.
And they've been pressuring that guy for years.
That's mafia like tactics.
So next story. This is national news. And they've been pressuring that guy for years. That's mafia-like tactics.
Next story.
This is national news.
NATO warns Russia of miscalculation and escalation in the Black Sea. Remember a week or two ago we told you that Russia had issued a, basically, well, it was a formal legal warning that they were going to exercise their right to stop ships in the Black Sea and inspect them to make sure that they're not carrying weapons or ammo to Ukraine.
And so yesterday, NATO issued this warning.
Yes. issued this uh warning yes and uh doc it's it's uh the warning that was put up by nato and then
also by uk we've got a tweet from the ministry of defense in london right um both of these together
are warning signs that that um both sides are getting ready for a naval confrontation in the
black sea as if something's going to happen.
I'm going to go to number eight for control here.
Russia's recent attacks against Ukrainian ports pose substantial risk to the stability of the Black Sea region,
which is of strategic importance to NATO.
And that's coming from the alliance of Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
NATO is also stepping up surveillance and reconnaissance in the Black Sea, including with maritime patrol aircraft and drones.
And that's according to the NATO-Ukraine Council statement.
This is also something new, too, that there are regular meetings of what they call the NATO-Ukraine Council, Rick. NATO allies noted that Russia's new warning area in the Black Sea with Bulgaria's exclusive economic zone has created new risk for miscalculation and escalation, as well as serious impediments of freedom of navigation.
Now, Russia has issued a notice to air missions warning of naval military exercises in the Black Sea in an area that includes the exclusive economic zone of Bulgaria, who happens to be a NATO member.
The notices are alerts sent to pilots of changes that could affect their flight route.
Moscow has warned that ships heading to Ukraine's Black Sea ports could be considered military targets
and is getting ready to enforce a blockade on Ukraine.
And that's according to the UK's Ministry of Defense. And it appears that
Russia is moving forward with some of that. We have this from the Eurasian Times, originally
reported by Nikkei out of Japan. Russia is deploying their Sergei Kotov to the Black Sea
to patrol and intercept commercial military ships. And that's coming from the British Ministry of Defense as well.
So Russia has deployed their warship Sergei Kotov to the southern Black Sea.
And the British Defense Ministry is saying warning of potential Russian actions against commercial vessels.
The corvette is tasked with patrolling the shipping lane between the Bosphorus and Odessa, the ministry says in an intelligence update.
There is a realistic possibility that it will form part of a task group to intercept commercial vessels Russia believes are heading to Ukraine. A day earlier, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky talked by phone on the possibility of Russian forces adding merchant ships to their list of targets in the Black Sea.
British Ambassador to the UN Barbara Woodward told reporters.
Now, we have this tweet, and this is from the British Ministry of Defense.
This was what they were putting.
They're saying that it appears that Russia's Black Sea fleet is on the move. And they're saying Russia's Black Sea fleet has
altered its posture since Russia pulled out of the Black Sea grain initiative. They didn't pull out
in preparedness to enforce a blockade on Ukraine. And it gives some additional information there
about the Sergei Khodov.
Look at that one line, Doc. There is a realistic possibility that it will form part of a task
group to intercept commercial vessels Russia believes are heading to Ukraine. This is an
official notice released from the Ministry of Defense in London, stating that it is the viewpoint, the analysis of the British military, that Russia is going to stop and board and inspect commercial ships in the Black Sea. We're just,
I mean, I don't know if we're days,
weeks away from a confrontation.
Because if somebody doesn't back down,
there's going to be some ships that go down.
You can have a naval battle on the Black Sea.
If you think about just prior to the outbreak of World War II,
if London had issued a telegram
that went out to the world and said, we believe that the Germans are going to stop, board, and inspect ships.
Something like that, just before the outbreak of hostilities in World War II, it was a warning.
Anybody paying attention at that time
would have known, hey, heads up.
This is getting serious.
Britain is about to have a confrontation.
At that time, we'd have been Germany.
Well, right now, Britain's about to have
a confrontation with Russia.
Doc, this is serious. We could experience a naval battle in coming days or weeks. It
literally can happen in the next several days. I hope it doesn't, but the stage is being set. And both sides have issued public statements.
Russia has sent out their legal notice.
Like we've said many times, the Russians do things legally.
They've sent out the legal notice.
Beware, our military is patrolling the Black Sea.
If you're headed to Ukraine, we're going to stop you.
And we have the right to do it under international law.
They've notified every country that's using the Black Sea.
Now, Great Britain has sent out a legal notice from its Ministry of Defense notifying NATO nations.
There is a realistic possibility. notifying NATO nations,
there is a realistic possibility that this warship
that's just been deployed
to the Black Sea
is going to be part of a task group
that's going to intercept
commercial vessels.
And isn't it interesting
if you look back through
history in the 20th century, really,
how major conflicts started as a result
of one ship sinking. Yes, that's what I'm saying.
Lusitania, the Arizona. I mean, really, there are more at Pearl Harbor
than just Arizona, but Arizona was the rallying ship, really.
They sang, you know, the Arizona, you know, we got a memorial there and everything.
The Lusitania was the same thing.
It's why America got into the war.
And the Maine as well.
I mean, so that was, you know, each of those led to major conflicts.
And so, and in my opinion, some of those conflicts were engineered, but that's just simply opinion.
Okay.
Would we possibly see an engineered conflict like this?
It's possible.
It's possible.
I hope not.
We regularly follow Dmitry Medvedev on his Telegram channel. And you can always count on Mr. Medvedev
to post something colorful.
Colorful, stinging, sarcastic.
Yes, sarcastic, you know.
Sometimes prophetic.
Today, he implied that NATO leaders,
Western political leaders, are reptiles.
Now, I'm sure he meant it in a loving way, that he's just joking.
But then you have to wonder about Mr. Medvedev.
He's a senior official in Russia, and he deliberately, he's very careful about the words that he uses. Yes. And he called them
reptiles. Here's his tweet. Just came out a couple
hours ago. Yeah, so this is a post on Telegram and on Twitter.
Number 17 for control. In the U.S., again, paranoid
search for aliens. Claims of hidden remains
with non-human biology. Look at those faces.
The biological substances are alive. They are among us.
And these reptilians are clearly not people.
That was all he said. He probably
generated more questions than answers there.
You have to ask is this a joke
is he being sarcastic or is he implying that the russian intelligence agencies and military
know something that the rest of us don't know because here's why. Some years ago, I don't know what, four years ago, during the height of the Syrian war, the Syrian foreign minister, or it could have been the Syrian ambassador to the United Nations. He was a high-level Syrian diplomat. On two
different occasions,
he implied
that the Syrian army
had encountered
biologically
altered men
on the battlefield.
Yes.
And there was another quote that Putin made about that the soldiers that the West was supporting in Syria,
I don't remember the exact words, but he referred to them eating human hearts.
Yes.
This came from Putin.
He said they eat human hearts.
What are we releasing on these battlefields?
What secret technology are we using?
And do the Russians know about it?
Why did,
why did,
did Medvedev,
was he just insulting
the Western leaders saying,
I'm going to call you reptiles?
Or was he saying,
I'm just going to say it.
I know what you are.
You're a reptilian.
I didn't write this stuff.
Folks, I just come out here.
I just come out here and tell you what happened today.
A major world figure, the former president of Russia, called leaders of the West reptiles.
I'll just leave it at that. We'll move on to the next topic. While we of the West reptiles.
I'll just leave it at that.
We'll move on to the next topic.
While we're talking about reptiles.
And aliens.
And aliens.
Well, let's look at Rupert Murdoch's newspaper in London, the Times of London.
And what does Mr. Murdoch put on his front page today?
Whistleblower claims government cover-up of alien life.
Of course.
Why are they talking about it? Why times of london into conspiracy theories because that's what we're told right
if you talk about that if you have any conversation about that that's a conspiracy theory but now it's
in the mainstream so does do the editors and writers at the times of l London, do they wear tinfoil hats?
Do the editors and writers at the Washington Post and the New York Times and NBC, are they now wearing tinfoil hats?
What's going on over there, Doc?
Well, I think it's planned release, but according to a whistleblower,
the U.S. government has been involved in a long-term conspiracy to conceal evidence of alien life and reverse engineer UFOs.
The whistleblower, David Grush, claims that the government has been collecting crashed alien spacecraft and evidence of extraterrestrial life since the 1930s.
Another witness, Ryan Graves, a former U.S. Navy pilot, testified that sightings of unidentified anomalous phenomenon,
commonly known as UFOs, are frequent and that certain elements within the U.S. government
have more knowledge about UAPs than they publicly disclose.
Now, here's a brief portion of that interview that occurred.
Watch this. As we convene here UAP are in our airspace but they are grossly underreported.
These sightings are not rare or isolated they are routine. Military air crew and commercial pilots,
trained observers whose lives depend on accurate identification are frequently witnessing these phenomena.
Parts of our government are aware of more about UAP than they let on, but excessive
classification practices keep crucial information hidden.
Since 2021, all UAP videos are classified as secret or above.
This level of secrecy not only impedes our understanding, but fuels speculation and mistrust.
Pilots are reporting UAP at altitudes that appear above them at 40,000 feet,
potentially in low Earth orbit or in the gray zone below the Kármán line,
making inexplicable maneuvers like right-hand turns and retrograde orbits or J-hooks.
Sometimes these reports are reoccurring,
with numerous recent sightings north of Hawaii and in the North Atlantic.
As we looked around, we noticed that we saw some white water off our right side.
It's important to note that the weather on this day was as close to perfect as you could
ask for off the coast of San Diego.
Clear skies, light winds, calm seas, no white caps from waves.
So the white water stood out in a large blue ocean.
All four of us, because we were in F-18Fs so we had pilots and WIZO in the back seat,
looked down a small saw white tic-tac object with a longitudinal axis pointing north-south
and moving very abruptly over the water like a ping-pong ball.
As we pulled nose onto the object within about a half mile of it, it rapidly accelerated
in front of us and disappeared.
Our wingmen, roughly 8,000 feet above us, lost contact also.
We immediately turned back to see where the white water was at and it was gone also.
So as you started to turn back towards the east the controller came up and said sir you're not gonna
believe this but that thing is at your cat point roughly 60 miles away in less
than a minute. Do you believe UAPs pose a potential threat to our national
security? Yes and here's why. The technology that we faced was far superior
than anything that we had and you could put that anywhere. If you you had one you captured one you reverse engineered it you got it to work
you're talking something can go into space go someplace drop down in a matter
of seconds do whatever it wants and leave and there's nothing we can do
about it nothing well the Daily Mail also had a story as well we didn't get an opportunity to touch on this yesterday, but during the testimony, this is number 24 control.
Mr. Grush was asked if people were murdered to cover up for E.T. technology.
Now, Mr. Grush also claimed that the U.S. has been in possession of UFOs since the 1930s and has been secretly back engineering them.
He also said, this is number 22, that he had been told by multiple credible intelligence officials that the U.S. government had recovered non-human aircraft that had biological pilots inside them. The former U.S. intelligence agent also said that he knows of multiple
colleagues who were physically injured by UFOs either after encountering them or working on them
as part of the special access programs. Here's that testimony. Thank you all very much. Have
you faced any retaliation or reprisals for any of your testimony or anything
on these lines? Yeah, I have to be careful what I say in detail because there is an open
whistleblower reprisal investigation on my behalf, and I don't want to compromise that
investigation by providing anything that may help provide somebody information. But it was very brutal and very unfortunate,
some of the tactics they used to hurt me both professionally
and personally, to be quite frank.
It's very unfortunate, as they say, when you're over the target.
That's when they do the most firing at you.
Do you have any personal knowledge of people who have been harmed or injured
in efforts to cover up or conceal these extraterrestrial technology yes personally have you heard have anyone been murdered that you would
that you know of or have heard of i guess i have to be careful asking that question i directed
people with that knowledge to the appropriate authorities maybe in a um if we could get in a confidential area,
a SCIF, we could talk about that.
But unfortunately, we were denied access to the SCIF,
and that's very unfortunate in this scenario.
I wonder if these non-biological creatures
are non-binary.
Are they cis or gendered?
Or I don't even know all the terms now.
Really, where do they fall out in the alphabet gender diversity issue?
I mean, we want diverse aliens, don't we?
I don't.
I mean, seriously, at the state of where we're at right now do we want a bunch of
straight aliens here male and female straight aliens don't we want to have aliens of all kinds
of genders this is what we're going to be presented with doc i'm not kidding you they're
going to they're going to tell us these people have come from a planet that has 500 genders.
On the flip side of that, Babylon Bee put out a video here about three or four weeks ago
where an alien is coming and talking to leaders of the U.S.
And all the leaders of the U.S. are identifying themselves by their gender.
And the alien is asking them, why are you doing this?
There's only two genders here.
There were like five or six represented there.
And he gets on his little microphone and says, we're going to have to go ahead and blow this place up.
You know, they're way too confused.
But let's talk about what are we witnessing here?
I believe this is the grandest hoax that's ever been perpetrated on the human race.
I believe that there is some technology that exists that we had access to.
I think we've had it.
We stole it from Tesla and from others that we have been working with for years.
And they've rolled it out by saying it's aliens, flying saucers.
Because did flying saucers all of a sudden start appearing in the 1930s and 40s?
Why didn't they show up in the 20s?
Why didn't we have them out in the old west or during the American Revolution?
This is one of the interesting things that came out of this hearing,
that the U.S. government has about ufos since the 30s i thought it was
only the fifth 40s and 50s now it's the 30s um if there's anything going on that is extraterrestrial then I would say it is demonic.
It's spiritually of the dark side of the universe.
Yes.
It is Nephilim.
It is not space aliens.
You know, I could be persuaded that Nephilim have,
I mean, according to Enoch, Nephilim gave technology to man
thousands of years ago. How to make weapons? Well, could they still be doing it? Do we still have
Nephilim teaching men how to kill other men? Look at where our weaponry is at now. We're at the
point we can just destroy the entire civilization so um it's either something
at that level or it is a massive hoax which again is spiritual because it would be used to crush
destroy people's faith in god right the Christian religion, and to shock people into
accepting a new world order
based on so-called alien values.
Right. They're smarter than us, Rick. That's what they're going to say.
Right. We need their help. Humanity has run
amok. We need their help to guide us and direct us to take us to that next level of evolution.
So what am I what I'm saying to our audience is I'm not buying into any of this stuff, but I am. I am. preparing myself for the arrival of the massive hoax and it's getting really close because when
you have congressional hearings right and i mean we should be handing out tinfoil hats to all these
congressmen i think we ought to maybe there was something i could do true news we had to send
tinfoil hats to everyone on the committee and say, hey, here are true news.
We don't wear them anymore.
You guys need them.
We'll send them to the Washington Post and ABC television.
We don't use these tinfoil hats.
We were doing this back when we were on shortwave.
Here.
They're in our closet.
You guys are now talking about aliens.
Wear these tinfoil hats.
But you know what?
They never present the evidence of aliens.
No, not yet.
Not yet, but they're going to.
They're going to,
and they're going to use other technology
to make you believe there's an alien standing there.
Whether it's holographic,
whatever they're going to do,
they are going to use technology to make
humans believe that space aliens have arrived and are walking around on the planet
and there's a lot of gullible people and notice how these stories they come in waves every few
years it's as if they're testing the waters to see what the acceptability is now. How far
can we go with the story where people are no longer just
putting it on a shelf and walking away from it? Okay, you want the ultimate panic?
The ultimate panic
that even the most
hardened anti-vaxxer would have trouble resisting.
When they tell you that these wonderful aliens that are visiting the planet,
you know, this is after months or even a couple of years of aliens walking around,
giving speeches, hearing on TV shows.
Speaking to the UN.
Yeah, speaking to the United Nations, you know, whatever, going to concerts.
And then we're told that they have brought alien viruses.
They didn't mean to, but they have viruses that they are immune to, but we're not.
And then they describe a sickness that's so hideous.
It's worse than zombieism.
It's zombieism on steroids.
And there is now a worldwide...
What did the WHO say?
They are setting up global emergency powers for something that could occur in space.
They did say that.
So they introduce, they tell us,
that a zombie virus is loose.
It came from the aliens from space.
And it's going to
kill the entire human race.
But these
wonderful, kind
aliens
show Dr. Fauci
how to make
the vaccine.
Because they got the vaccine
in the spaceships.
Okay.
And now it's mandatory
that every human receive
the alien virus vaccine.
It's got to be all or nothing this time.
Everybody has to get inoculated.
Everybody has to get jabbed.
Because if you don't, you'll be executed.
Right. Because you're a danger
to the rest of us. They'll actually say
refusal to be vaccinated means execution.
A death sentence.
We're in the last days.
I haven't pitched my book for a long time.
We got new people.
You don't even know about my book.
Final Day, the 10 Characteristics of the second coming of Jesus Christ.
You can get it on Amazon.
It's in the paperback version.
It's in the audio version and the e-book version.
Ten characteristics.
It's not a book about the last days.
It's a book about the very last day, the day that Christ comes back.
What happens?
What goes down when jesus comes down
that's what's in the book and it's totally different than any other book about the last days
and i'm working on another book um it's a good time to talk about it i'm just going to give you
a little tease about the book so in in the first this is the second edition
and in the first edition which was a hardback the first two chapters were about the origin
of the rapture doctrine the secret rapture and and i went into detail about John Nelson Darby and Cyrus Schofield and all that stuff that went down.
So I didn't put it in the second edition.
And I know some people were disappointed.
And I saw things online that people, without talking to me, posted things online about why I took it out.
Some people said I was pressured.
No, I wasn't pressured.
I did it all by myself.
I took it out.
Other people said he took it out to water his book down so he would sell more books.
No, that's not why I took it out.
I took it out so I could write another book.
That's why. Yes. I took it out so I could write another book. That's why.
I can testify to that.
I took it out of the second edition
because I'd already made a
decision. I'm going to write an entire
book on those
first two chapters that was in the first edition.
That's what I'm doing right now.
And
hopefully it will be out this fall making great progress
on it and I'm going to tell you more about it in about two weeks but I'm going deep deep deep into
the Masonic occult origin of the rapture doctrine that's going to be in this new book that's coming out. That brings me back to the space aliens.
So Rael told me, remember Rael?
This was back in the early 2000s.
Rael was the founder of the Raelian religion.
We probably should, with all this UFO
stuff, we probably should replay
my interview with Rael.
It was all audio.
So Rael
founded the Raelian religion.
And he was from France.
I was the
second person to
interview him.
Barbara Waters was first.
I was second.
And Art Bell was third.
And
Ray L told me
of how he met
space aliens
while he was hiking in the French Alps.
And he had this encounter with aliens. and he said that they told him that he
had been selected for a special mission again this was early 2000s and they told him that they were
going to give him the technology to clone humans right that was what the purpose of the that's why
he was that's why he was in the news because he said they cloned the first human.
Right.
And cloning was hot in the news at the time.
And nobody had cloned a human.
They had cloned a sheep, Dali, Dali the sheep.
Right.
But nobody had cloned a human.
So Rael said he cloned a human.
Of course, he never brought the cloned baby out.
But that's what he claimed. So everybody was trying to interview him. So I interviewed him.
He told me about the encounter he had with the aliens and they told him that they chose him
to be taught about cloning and that when cloning of humans is accepted on Earth.
The aliens would come back.
And that was very important. They would not come to Earth and make themselves known
until cloning was accepted by science on planet Earth.
Are we there?
We're there.
Cloning's not a controversy.
It's not a controversy.
You talk about cloning, nobody's going to...
Right.
Nobody's going to write articles about it anymore.
It's not a big news story anymore.
Genetic manipulation is common now.
Barbara Walters, if she was around,
she's not going to do an interview about cloning.
Our bells...
It's old news now.
So Raelle told me that the aliens would come back when cloning is accepted
and that they would land in Jerusalem.
Oh, this gets really interesting.
He said that they're going to land in Jerusalem and build an embassy.
Hmm.
Could this be the third temple?
And this embassy is going to be the place of world peace
and world government.
And from this embassy in Jerusalem,
they are going to teach mankind how to have a world government.
Now, do you understand why I don't believe any of this garbage coming out of the Pentagon about UFOs?
Because they're deceivers.
At the top of the Pentagon, they're deceivers. At the top of the Pentagon, they're deceivers.
You have Satanists in high-level positions in the Pentagon.
Satanists.
High-level Freemasons.
Occultists in the Pentagon.
Not just the Pentagon, they're everywhere.
They're building their world government.
And they're going to use
the alien hoax
to scare
7 billion humans into
accepting it.
That's where they're taking us.
Yes. This is the biggest
hoax that has ever happened.
And
Lucifer,
he is going to tell humanity,
I'm your daddy.
Yes.
You're descended from me.
We seeded this planet.
That's something else
Ray Al said too.
What is the Masonic religion?
Who is their God?
Lucifer.
In a Masonic religion,
they worship Lucifer as light.
They flip it around
that our God, Yahweh,
is evil
and Lucifer is good.
That's what's taught
in the Masonic religion.
And if some of you are Masons,
and I know we have Masons because you write to me, and
you don't believe that, that's because you haven't gone to a final degree.
And your eye, your third eye hasn't been opened yet.
The kundalini spirit hasn't gone up your spine and opened up your third eye.
Because that's part of the third degree. It's in the third degree.
So the masons are getting ready
to bring out Lucifer and he will be embodied
in a man that we call Antichrist.
He'll be the one that the aliens anoint to rule the world.
They will choose one and say that's him. There he is aliens anoint to rule the world. Yes. They will choose one and say, that's him.
There he is.
This guy will lead the world.
All right, let's go back down to Earth.
We go from aliens to Ted Cruz.
Sorry, Ted, didn't mean, I'm not associating you with Ted Cruz.
So, let's see.
We pick up here at number 24.
We didn't do this, did we?
No, not yet.
Okay.
This is a tweet from the House Oversight Committee.
And, Doc, can you read what they're saying in here this because this is a they're pointing out um what what it is is that hunter biden
admitted in a another court trial recently that he worked for a chinese company you're right so
he admitted it in court right so in the transcript from hunter biden's plea agreement hearing so
this is just the other day hunter admits that ccplinked CEFC chairman Ying Zhengming was his business
partner. They highlight that in the yellow. Who was your partner? The defendant, that being Hunter
Biden, I don't know how to spell his name. Ying Zhengming is the chairman of that company.
So even in his own testimony, he makes the connection that he was in partnership with a Chinese company.
That alone should be a violation of the FAIR Act right there.
But he's a Democrat and the son of the President of the United States.
No one makes a big deal about that unless you happen to be a Republican.
But a year ago, that was conspiracy theory.
Right. You were promoting disinformation if you said Hunter Biden worked with the Chinese.
Now. You could be deplatformed for saying it. Now it's public knowledge that the House Oversight
Committee can tweet or X or whatever they're going to call it now. But now it's right out in the open.
All right, I want to go to Ted Cruz now.
So Senator Cruz of Texas was on Newsmax. This is yesterday after the implosion of Hunter Biden's plea bargain.
And Senator Cruz pointed out that the White House changed its storyline about Joe Biden talking to Hunter Biden
about business deals. Here's Senator Cruz. What about, I don't know, Devin Archer is going to
testify that he had witnessed, firsthand witnessed of Hunter Biden calling Joe Biden his father and business dealings were
transacted. And that's only a few days away. That may have something to do with what happened today.
Yeah. So it has a ton to do with it. And this was the other half of what I discussed in my
podcast today is is the White House dramatically changed its story yesterday on Joe Biden's involvement
with Hunter Biden's overseas corrupt business deals. For years, what Joe Biden on the campaign
trail had said and what the White House has said is Joe Biden has never discussed business dealings
with Hunter, has never discussed, never discussed, never discussed. That's what they said over and
over and over and over again. As you noted, Devin Archer is getting ready to testify to the House that Joe Biden discussed
it over two dozen times, including talking repeatedly with these overseas oligarchs who
were paying Hunter. The White House realized they had a problem. So yesterday, when Karine
Jean-Pierre was asked, she said, I've answered this question a thousand
times. I'm going to tell you the exact same thing I've said every time before.
She said Joe Biden was never in business with Hunter Biden. Now, mind you, that's not what
she said every time before. What she said before is Joe Biden never talked to Hunter
about his business deals. And last night they tried to flip it to, well, he wasn't in business with Hunter. They weren't formally
partners. It was an attempt to run away from their repeated lies that he'd never discussed
the corrupt overseas business deals with Hunter because the House is hearing testimony this week
that Joe Biden did many, many times. And I'm going to tell you, most of the corporate media
utterly ignored the
dramatic switch of story from the White House yesterday. So, Doc, the storyline now is,
well, of course, they're father and son. And Hunter said, Dad, if you had the opportunity
to do a business deal with a Chinese energy corporation, how would
you handle it? I need some fatherly advice. And Papa Joe told his son how to handle that.
But Papa Joe wasn't in business with him. He just talked about it.
But Rick, I seem to recall President Biden saying, I was never, I never spoke to my son. What he said last week was, no!
That's right. You know that? He was asked. He got angry. He shouted,
no! The reporter said, have you ever talked to your son about
business? No! No, you were in business
with him. And they're trying to change the story now
because the evidence is mounting and they're
not going to be able to hold on much longer in this next segment from newsmax senator cruz said
it's time it's time to have an impeachment inquiry so the the i word is now being openly used by
senior republicans in the Senate now.
In the Senate.
The House impeaches.
The Senate convicts or quits.
The Senate is the jury.
The House is the prosecutor, the grand jury that indicts.
The Senate is the courtroom, the jury that decides whether the impeached president is guilty or not.
Whether he's convicted of crimes that lead to impeachment.
They do the conviction.
So this is what Senator Cruz said about impeaching Joe Biden.
Yeah, look, I think the House needs to open an inquiry into impeaching Joe
Biden.
I have called for Alejandro Mayorkas to be impeached.
I have called for the House to move forward on impeaching Merrick Garland.
And I think, with Joe Biden, it depends on what the evidence proves.
If you read the FD 1023, the FBI report that details the allegations from the confidential
human source, if those allegations are true, then Joe Biden
as the sitting vice president solicited and received a multibillion-dollar bribe from
a foreign national in exchange for official favors as vice president of the United States.
If that's true, he is guilty of bribery. And, of course, he should be impeached and removed
from office. We don't know if those allegations are true.
They are merely allegations.
The House needs to investigate it.
If they're proven to be true, he should be impeached, he should be prosecuted, and he
should go to jail.
I will say this.
The evidence keeps mounting up, and, every day, it looks worse and worse and worse for
Joe Biden's direct culpability in official corruption.
JOHN YANG, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul also talked about impeachment, had a somewhat more cautious
viewpoint, which is, you know, like Rand Paul, bring us the evidence. Let's not make
rush to judgment. Show us the evidence and then we'll make a decision when the evidence is
presented. He was on Fox Business.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is threatening an impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
His California Democrat colleague, Congressman Adam Schiff, claims that Republicans are the
ones obsessed with impeachment. Watch this.
Support an impeachment inquiry into President Biden's possible involvement in his son hunter's
business i think the republican desire to impeach someone anyone no matter whether there's any
evidence just shows how they have descended into chaos here yeah Yeah, Adam Schiff talking about Republicans descending into chaos, Senator.
A great deal of irony.
The pot here calling the kettle black.
The guy who impeached Trump with no hearings.
They just went straight to the floor and impeached the president.
This is a guy who had no respect for the Fourth Amendment rights of his colleagues,
who illegally searched their phone records.
This is a man without any semblance of any kind of respect for the rule of law.
I do agree with one thing, though, is I think we should be better than the Democrats.
The Democrats immediately rushed to impeachment without hearings, this and that.
I think there needs to be continued investigation.
I think that we need to listen to the 17 tapes. THIS AND THAT. I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE CONTINUED INVESTIGATION. I THINK THAT WE NEED TO LISTEN TO THE 17 TAPES.
APPARENTLY TWO OF THE TAPES HAVE PRESIDENT BIDEN ON THEM AND MAYBE 15 TAPES WITH HUNTER
BIDEN ON THEM.
THOSE TAPES NEED TO BE LISTENED TO.
IF THE FBI HAS THOSE, WE SHOULD LISTEN TO THOSE AND MAKE A JUDGMENT.
BUT I THINK IT WOULD BE BETTER TO GATHER MORE EVIDENCE BEFORE AN IMPEACHMENT.
IF THERE'S GOING TO BE IMPEACHMENT, LET'S HAVE QUITE A BIT OF EVIDENCE OUT THERE THAT
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY BEHIND THIS. BECAUSE I DON'T REALLY WANT TO IMPEACH EVERY PRESID. IF THERE'S GOING TO BE IMPEACHMENT, LET'S HAVE QUITE A BIT OF EVIDENCE OUT THERE THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY
BEHIND THIS.
BECAUSE I DON'T REALLY WANT TO
IMPEACH EVERY PRESIDENT THAT
COMES FORWARD.
I THINK THE DEMOCRATS SET A
TERRIBLE PRECEDENT IN IMPEACHING
DONALD TRUMP JUST BECAUSE THEY
DIDN'T LIKE HIM BASICALLY.
AND BOTH OF THEIR IMPEACHMENTS
FELL FLAT AND MADE THEM LOOK, I
THINK, TERRIBLE.
BUT I THINK IT'S NOT GOOD FOR
THE REPUBLIC TO KEEP IMPEACHING
PRESIDENTS AND INDICTING
PRESIDENTS.
ALL OF THIS STUFF IS
DESTRUCTIVE. THE OTHER SIDE SAYS, OH, THEY WANT TO, THEY'RE FOR PRESERVING DEMOCRACY. It's not good for the republic to keep impeaching presidents and indicting presidents. All this stuff is destructive.
The other side says, oh, they want to, they're for preserving democracy.
They're pitting everyone against each other and they're destroying the fabric of our republic.
So I think we have to be careful not to fall into the same trap.
So you don't feel like you have enough evidence.
You've got whistleblower testimony.
You've got bank records indicating millions of dollars coming from foreigners to shell companies that eventually made their way to Biden family member accounts.
And all of that is somewhat persuasive. I would want to find more and I would keep
pressuring the FBI. The FBI has been withholding things. You know, the whole interview and the
whole existence of these tape recordings of Hunter Biden and his father was an extraordinarily
explosive bombshell.
And I think we now need to listen to them and keep gathering information. I'm not saying never,
but there's two stages. There has to be enough evidence to impeach. Then there has to be enough
evidence to convict. And so I think that these are high bars and they were meant to be so because
in a political divide with a country evenly divided, we're all at each other's throats.
It can't always be about impeaching the president
we don't like from the other party.
There are signs of corruption,
but I think the House has a great deal of power to find more,
and I want them to continue the investigation.
Doc, I think Senator Paul and Senator Cruz
are playing good cop, bad cop.
Senator Paul being the good cop.
Slow down, everybody.
We need
more investigations.
In other words,
we're going to drag this out a long time
and we're going to dig deep
and we're going to keep
questioning people and getting more
evidence if this is going to be so
over. And then Senator Cruz is a bad
cop. Let's get him now.
Let's arrest.
Let's convict.
Let's take him to jail right now.
They're playing good cop, bad cop.
And this is going to go on for months.
I had a different take on it.
I thought Rand Paul was more subdued than he has been in the past.
But they did burn down his Bowling Green headquarters last weekend, too.
That's an interesting point.
Yeah, and they broke his back.
So by stepping out as a peacemaker, maybe he can appease those that really hate his guts,
but you don't want to appease people that hate your guts.
But it was just an observation.
I forgot about that.
I forgot.
That's good, doc you you're becoming
cynical becoming you work here long enough cynicism is watching these people okay so
i'll show you an example we talked about this a few minutes ago jill biden's ex-husband claims that the Biden crime family targeted him for years.
This is Mr. Bill Stevenson. He was married to Jill Biden and he appeared on Newsmax also and told the story. So we had the New York Post.
In a recent interview,
Dr. Jill Biden's ex-husband, Bill Stevenson,
claimed that the Biden crime family has targeted him for years
and expressed concern
that they were doing the same
to former President Donald Trump.
Mr. Stevenson alleged that he was pressured
and threatened during his divorce with Jill
in the mid-1970s and later indicted
for a minor tax charge due to Joe Biden's political influence.
Here is a video clip from Newsmax.
Here is where the problem was.
Frankie Biden of the Biden crime family
comes up to me and he goes,
give her the house
or you're going to have serious problems.
I looked at Frankie and I said,
are you threatening me?
And needless to say,
about two months later,
my brother and I were indicted
for that tax charge for $8,200.
I can't let them do this to a president that I love and respect.
I can't let them do this to our country.
Doc, Joe Biden was acting, and Frank, his brother Frank,
they were acting like mafia thugs in the 1970s.
Saying to him,
give Jill the house.
She's going to marry Joe. She's divorcing you. Give her the house or you're going to have trouble. And he says to Frank Biden
in the 1970s, are you threatening me?
And several months later, he's indicted on tax charges.
Are you telling me that Joe Biden in the 70s had that kind of political power that he could get the IRS to arrest somebody?
Well, he was a senator in the 70s, wasn't he?
Yes.
How deep is this corruption? How deep is this corruption how deep is this crime network in the irs in the state department
in the justice department and i think the more we learn we learn that there's multiple
crime networks that are intersecting together you had the clintons you got the obamas you got
the bidens you probably have others at different levels, but they're all intersecting.
They're crime families.
Right.
It's just like in the mafia.
They're crime families.
So this morning, NBC News broke in with a breaking news report
that President Trump's lawyers met with the special counsel
and were informed that he's facing a possible indictment, another arrest, this time over,
interfering in the 2020 elections, trying to change the election results. This is the
NBC breaking news report that came out early this morning.
Out of Washington, where there are new developments in the investigation into the
events surrounding the 2020 election, a grand jury convened by special counsel Jack Smith
is looking into former President Donald Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the results of the
2020 election. Trump received a letter a little more than a week ago notifying him that he was a target of that investigation. And now we are learning a vote on whether to
indict Trump could come as soon as today. For more, we're joined by NBC News justice and
intelligence correspondent Ken Delaney. And so, Ken, the grand jury has recently been hearing
from witnesses. What can you tell us about that? Good morning, Joe. That's right. They heard last week from William Russell, a special assistant to the president, not a household name,
but someone apparently who was asked questions about President Trump's state of mind
and his knowledge about the extent to which he knew there wasn't fraud in the election.
And that's just an example of how this investigation has been chugging along,
even as Donald Trump
got that target letter, which means we are, in fact, on indictment watch.
And we know that this grand jury meets on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
So as you said, it's possible it could vote today.
We don't know.
It's a secret process.
But given that Donald Trump got a target letter and almost all recipients of target letters
are indicted, we are watching for action today and this week, Joe.
So it's a wag the dog effect. The Bidens are being exposed for the quirks that they are.
So what do they do? So wag the dog technique. Bill Clinton used to do this. Every time more evidence came out about him, he'd bomb another country.
What we're seeing here is instead of bombing another country, they just arrest President Trump.
I mean, by the time this is over, President Trump will be arrested about 400 times.
Because they've got to get the headlines changed.
Right.
They've got to get, got to quit talking about the Bidens.
Got to quit talking, let's talk about Trump now.
Because the news media, they just need the reason to make the change.
They're more than willing to do it.
They just got to get out of the spin cycle that they're in and get back to beating up Donald Trump.
One more, Eddie, I'm going to jump down to number 35.
I'm only going to show the headline and the intro.
So this is Forbes. Guess what, Doc?
That wonderful Department of Justice will not pursue campaign finance charges against Sam Bankman Freed.
Yes. All that hundreds of millions of dollars that he stole from the clients and we know went to campaigns
and he financed democrat campaigns with the stolen money yes and the justice department today said
you know what we're just not going to we're going to drop the charges we got too many other things
to do we got to put trump
in prison we don't have time to deal with this little small fry we're just going to let him go
we'll slap his knuckles on some security issues but we're not going to open up that can of worms because the money was flowing to the democrats stolen money the 2020 excuse me the
2022 election was financed with stolen money that flowed through that crook's hands
and today the justice department dropped the charges um i'm going to try to It was just interesting
the reasoning on that is they said
that they couldn't pursue this
because of a treaty with the Bahamas.
Yeah, right.
The Bahamas said they would not
extradite him on this charge.
He's still over in the Bahamas?
Is he still there?
They haven't brought him over here yet?
I thought they brought him to New York. Did he go back?
He appeared.
That's a great question.
What has this got to do with extraditing him?
Because that's in the story, that the Bahamas would not extradite him on this charge.
Right.
So did they let him go back to the Bahamas?
Unbelievable.
Hey, we're going to end with something more lighthearted.
I've got to get into a habit of doing something that makes you smile at the end of this stuff.
I can make myself laugh all day as I do this.
I try not to let it get me depressed.
So I want to show you, Eddie, I'm going to jump down to the UN story.
Yeah, 65.
65.
65.
65.
So this is the Financial Times in London.
United Nations head warns of global boiling in July, set to be the hottest month ever that's just a frightening headline
boiling the head of the united nations is warning of global boiling in the summertime
so one of the places i i like to go to online? I only use YouTube these
days
for one of just a few
reasons. I basically despise
YouTube. I use
it to find videos on something
I got to do, some do-it-yourself things.
You know, it's good. You can find
things on YouTube.
You can fix problems pretty quick.
All right?
Or I try to find really old videos
something I want to watch
from decades ago
or I like to find
comedy
something to make me laugh
and so one of my favorite places to go on YouTube
is Dry Bar Comedy
and they've got some great comedians there it's all clean And so one of my favorite places to go on YouTube is Dry Bar Comedy.
And they've got some great comedians there.
It's all clean, no vulgarity.
It's just family-friendly comedy.
And you can check them out.
I'm not promoting Dry Bar Comedy.
They've got a channel on YouTube.
A lot of great comedians there.
And so one of them that I discovered and I had never heard of him was James Gregory.
And very funny. He's just a good old country boy from the south.
And I had never heard of him, but he's been out there for decades doing stand-up comedy. This is a little clip of him talking about global warming.
Remember, the United Nations chief just said,
it's summertime, it's boiling.
We've got a global crisis.
Here's James Gregory.
And one more thing about intellectuals.
Well, more so than the rest of us.
We all could be somewhat concerned.
They're just overly concerned, overly concerned
about this thing called climate change or global warming.
Let me tell you folks about global warming,
especially you young folks out there.
Don't worry about it.
And I'll tell you why.
Just trust me on this.
For as long as I have been alive, it's been hot
in the summer.
Now this right here is almost unbelievable.
Some summers have been hotter than others.
You know what it is?
It's just weather.
There's so many things in this world that we should worry about.
But we worry about things we should not worry about, and the weather is one of them.
Let me give you an example.
I didn't see this on the TV news.
This was in the USA Today just a couple of days ago.
We all know that usually August is the hottest month of the year.
And they're predicting that this coming August, for the month of August,
is going to be about two degrees hotter than the previous August.
Well, let's take a minute and think about that here's what we should ask ourselves
why is that even in the news
laughter
talk about that
here's all they're saying
they don't mean tomorrow
next week, next weekend,
but seven months from now.
Seven months from now, it might be two degrees hotter
than it was five months ago.
What's gone is gone.
And between now and August, we all might get hit by a big old truck.
You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles. Thank you for listening.
To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is
True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969.