TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Syria May Be Divided in Deal to End Ukraine War
Episode Date: July 12, 2022Russian President Vladimir Putin will fly to Tehran next week. He will meet with top Iranian officials and Turkish President Erdogan. Yesterday Doc Burkhart and Rick Wiles talked about a plan to give ...western Ukraine to Poland. Now Putin is going to Iran to meet with Turkey’s president. Is there another secret deal to split up Syria in the work? In the first segment, we follow up on the blockbuster story that broke over the weekend that 4Chan hackers got into Hunter Biden’s iCloud account with references to Pedo Pete. Who is Pedo Pete? Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 7/12/22It’s the Final Day! The day when Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. You can order the second edition of Rick’s book, Final Day! https://rickwiles.com/final-day
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you.
To find out how you can help, visit nothing but the truth, so help us God.
Russian President Vladimir Putin will fly to Tehran next week.
He will meet with top Iranian officials, including the Iranian president and Turkish
President Erdogan. Yesterday, Doc Burkhardt and I talked about a plan to give western Ukraine to
Poland. Now Putin is going to Iran to meet with Turkey's president. Is there another secret deal
in the oven? Doc and I will talk about it in a few minutes. First, we want to follow up
on the blockbuster story that broke over the weekend that 4chan hackers got into Hunter
Biden's iCloud account. My, my, my. Look at what they found. References to Pedo Pete who is pedo Pete doc Burkhart is here to tell us what
else we know about this story right Rick so we talked about this story yesterday
and the development as both this past weekend 4chan had hacked the backup
password on hunter Biden's iPhone there's been no word from the Biden administration or
Biden family members that the information being released is false. Why would they talk about it?
The media is not going to ask him any questions. Have you seen one news story? Oh, not on one.
I mean, let's say one television network, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC. Has anybody mentioned Petto Pete? No. And if they do,
it'll be two years from now and they'll get a Pulitzer Prize for it. So in the meantime,
we're two years ahead of the story here. And so as I was saying over the weekend,
the information, there was a total dump over 400 gig of porn and messages and everything else.
And hidden in some of these messages on the iPhone backup is this tag of Peto Pete.
And so PJ Media, they asked this question, who is this Peto Peter on Hunter Biden's iPhone. The most significant recent discovery is that Hunter
Biden had tagged someone in his contact list with the name Petto Peter. While it was not entirely
clear who Petto Peter is referencing, according to Red State's Nick Arama, there were a variety
of conversations that were accessed that appeared to be conversations between various members of the Biden family. So who is Petto Peter is the question. According to Red State, there are two
possibilities being bounced around and people examining the data seem to believe it's either
Joe Biden or Hunter Biden. Why would Hunter Biden reference himself that way? That would be my question. It goes on in PJ Media's
article there to say, the main reason people speculate that pedo Peter is Joe Biden is because
of a past report that Joe Biden wrote to several people close to him via email, including his son
Hunter, using the pseudonym Peter Henderson, in reference to a fictional Soviet Union-era spy
who infiltrated the U.S. government
in several Tom Clancy novels.
That detail is weird on its own,
but it certainly gives credence
to the Joe Biden is pedo Peter theory.
As you mentioned, Rick,
you're not going to hear any of this talk
on any of the outlets,
no matter if they're conservatives or not. You're just not going to hear any of this talk on any of the outlets, no matter if they're conservatives or not.
You're just not going to hear talk about this because they won't legitimize the information
from the laptop because basically if they did, the government would collapse.
I mean, if they were able to start reporting on this, they'd have to question Joe Biden
about this. And consider the
possibility that an international network of pedophiles is running Western nations. Right.
Now, Rick, take heart, because the Secret Service is involved in this discussion.
So they're investigating to find out who is Peto Pete? No, not exactly. They're
looking to see who hacked the account and found out about Peto Pete. So this from NBC News,
Secret Service says it's aware of alleged Hunter Biden iCloud hack. See, they won't even acknowledge
that the information is legitimate.
Well, then why is there an investigation
if it's alleged?
Right.
So the Secret Service said Monday,
it's aware of a potential hack of an iCloud
owned by Hunter Biden,
the son of President Joe Biden,
after some of its alleged contents
were posted to the online forum 4chan.
And they said, quote,
at this time we are not in a position
to make public comments on potential,
it doesn't even say they are investigating,
on potential investigative actions,
but I can assure you the Secret Service,
along with other federal law enforcement partners,
are aware of the social media posts
and claims referencing Mr. Biden,
U.S. Secret Service spokesperson,
Anthony Guglielmi said in a statement.
So they're not going after Hunter Biden.
No, they're they're going to launch a possible investigation into the person who hacked his iCloud account and told the whole world that Hunter Biden really is a very sick, demented pervert.
And that his father goes by the name Petto Pete.
Right.
So the Secret Service is going to punish the person who revealed the truth.
Right.
That's what we have here, right?
You've got it.
That explains it.
And so where is this going to head?
Well, as long as you've got the Secret Service involved here, Rick.
The power of the federal government protecting pedophiles.
Right.
As it has in the past.
Like Jeffrey Epstein.
So do we get the government we deserve, Rick?
Apparently so.
Apparently so. Apparently so.
Well, according to the New York Post,
the majority of Democrats and young Americans
want to abolish the United States Supreme Court.
Does that tell you how radical this country has become?
This is, when I saw this story earlier this morning, Rick,
it just blew me away.
And this is, you know, from the Heartland Institute, this poll.
The majority of Democrat voters, people who vote Democrat,
believe the Supreme Court is a racist, sexist institution
that ought to be abolished,
according to a new poll commissioned by the Heartland Institute.
And in a clear threat to
the court's future almost as many young people aged 19 to 39 feel the same way whether democrat
or republican now the national survey of over a thousand u.s voters split strongly down party
lines with 53 of democrats in favor of abolishing the current Supreme Court and replacing it with a new
democratically elected court with justices chosen by the American people directly, and 33 percent
strongly in favor. Just 21 percent of Republicans and 38 percent of independents favored the
proposition. The fact that 21 percent of Republicans even allowed that thought to enter their brains.
One-fifth of the Republican voters would abolish the Supreme Court.
And I would say, what percentage of those 1,000 U.S. voters, Rick, do you think have actually read the Constitution?
Maybe 1%. Maybe. maybe 1% maybe do they understand what the purpose is Supreme Court is that it was
supposed to be above the political phrase
well and not be a you know the judges
are not elected and they have lifetime tenure right so that they're
immune to political pressure yes but what the Democrats are doing
weaponizing the Supreme Court. Right.
So they're now paying people something like a $250 bounty
for citizens in Washington, D.C.
to report to a radical communist group
the restaurants,
the location of Supreme Court members
and their families.
Brett Kavanaugh just recently
had to go out the back of a restaurant because he was being hurt.
Morton's Steakhouse in D.C.
That was Morton's?
That was Morton's.
Morton's actually allowed that?
Wow.
Morton's, the corporation, is being extremely quiet.
The CEO has sent out a memo to all managers saying, zip your lips. We don't talk.
But they're bracing for the backlash that they allowed a conservative Supreme Court justice to eat in their restaurant.
That's the day we live in?
They're afraid of the mob.
They're afraid their restaurants will be burned down.
Instead of men standing up being men and just putting down this communist revolution,
instead, grown adult men are afraid of Marxist communists,
afraid that they're going to be intimidated,
afraid that their businesses will be targeted,
vandalized, even burnt to the ground.
No, there's only one way to deal with a communist revolution.
And that is to put it flat on its back.
That's it.
There is no other way.
They don't reason.
No. If they don't get their way, they burn something down.
They burn't reason. No. If they don't get their way, they burn something down. They burn something down.
So you have to put them down on their backs,
and you have to crush a communist revolution.
I've been saying this for years.
This thing will have to be crushed.
You cannot allow them to continue to act this way.
They're destroying the republic.
You know, Martin Armstrong told me,
oh, I would say probably 10 years ago, Doc,
that the U.S. Constitution would be abandoned,
I think he said, by the year 2032,
somewhere in the early 2030s.
That was shocking to me.
Because he was basing that on not his own political feelings,
but on cycles.
And he said,
the current U.S. government,
the system of government,
will not survive the 2030s.
There will be a new constitution.
Now, it could be a really good constitution. It could be a really bad
constitution. All he's saying is there's going to be a new constitution.
What I pointed out
back in 2020 is that if you look
at the communist revolution in Mexico,
which if I recall the years, I think it was, oh, wow, I had my history wrong.
Was the Communist Revolution 1910 or 1917? I forget.
Seems like it's in that window. But there was about a span of seven to eight years between the revolution and a new Mexican constitution.
Where there was just total anarchy during those years?
Well, not total anarchy, but a lot of civil unrest.
But the communists finally got a new constitution about seven to eight years after they carried out the revolution so they operated for a season under the old constitution but the communists had taken over
mexico right it took them about seven to eight years to throw the old constitution in the trash
can so if we take that as a marker, the communist revolution in America
was 2020. That means 2027, 2028, they're going to trash this Constitution. They're doing it right
now. So this next election, 2024, is absolutely critical to the pathway that we take beyond that period of time.
And we know already it's going to be a fight.
Because the Democrats are going to lose big here this fall in 2022.
And so they're going to be blood red ready to go in 2024.
Right.
If the elections are fair.
I don't even know.
But for there to be a significant portion of the population that actually would seek to abolish the Supreme Court, it really just blows your mind that that's the case.
So, see, they've gone beyond packing the court.
Now they want to get rid of it.
They want to unpack the court. They want to pack it up and send it away. Right, and have it democratically elected positions of the court.
Well, that would ruin everything about what the Supreme Court is.
Imagine Nancy Pelosi on the Supreme Court.
Just think of the most radical Democrats, and they get elected to the Supreme Court.
That's what you would have if this proposal would go into effect.
But in their new Constitution, that's what they're going to propose.
So if they can rig the elections, they'll control the court.
So that's the direction they're taking us.
If they give the right to vote to millions of illegal immigrants in the country,
they can win these elections. And they have. the right to vote to millions of illegal immigrants in the country? Yes.
They can win these elections.
And they have.
And they have been winning them.
Jill Biden, she didn't help the Democrats this week.
She said that Texas Hispanics are unique as breakfast tacos.
And that really set things aflame.
That's a very racist statement.
It was racist.
From a Democrat. I'm just shocked.
So the First Lady's remarks were to progressive Hispanic voters in San Antonio
seeking to make inroads with the Latino community.
Now, Mrs. Biden has apologized for her remarks and has tried to make amends of
all this, but this has really got all the social media outlets really stirred up today. Marco
Rubio today, I don't know if you happened to see what he posted on Twitter. He said, this is me, and it had a picture of a taco.
And so there have been different outlets
and different personalities that have come out today.
We are not tacos.
Now, I'm in favor of tacos myself,
and so no matter how you get it, breakfast, lunch, or dinner.
I like Hispanics and tacos.
So there's no conflict for me at all.
It's just a weird statement for her to make.
Yes.
Can you imagine a Republican saying that?
No.
Can you imagine Donald Trump saying that?
I mean, they would go nuts.
I can imagine him saying it.
Well, actually, I could imagine him saying it.
But it's the reaction that he would get.
They would tear him up.
Of course, if Eric Trump or Don Jr. had a laptop with porn on it,
they'd be in prison right now.
So there's no rule of law.
The rule of law has, why even have a court system now?
The courts are only for conservatives.
And it's to lock up conservatives.
Right.
Because leftist Democrats no longer have to obey the law.
I mean, this is where we're at.
The rule of law has been demolished.
So you might as well get rid of the court system.
In this case with Jill Biden, it's the rule of media.
The media is not going to criticize her.
They'll report on it.
Maybe a couple of conservative outlets, she'll make her apology,
and they'll brush it under the rug and move on to the next January 6th thing.
That's right.
One thing, Doc, that the media is happy about is that the Biden
administration is taking steps to weaponize abortion. Yes. And they're claiming federal
jurisdiction over hospitals. And you know how they're using it? Medicare and Medicaid.
And they're saying... We told people this two years ago.
We did. They're saying
if your hospital accepts
Medicare or Medicaid or any kind of
federal payments, you have
to do abortions at that hospital
regardless of
whether abortions are legal or
illegal in that state. Right. So this is
CNBC, the headline there. Doctors must provide abortions and legal or illegal in that state. Right, so this is CNBC, the headline there,
Doctors Must Provide Abortions and Medical Emergencies
Regardless of State Law, Health and Human Services says.
Some quotes from that particular article,
Federal law, this is the statement
and their reasoning here.
Federal law preempts state abortion bans
in cases where women face medical emergencies
associated with pregnancy. HHS Secretary Xavier
Becker told health care providers. All he's doing, Doc, is he's just
imposing his Talmudic beliefs. Yes, that's right. He is
Jewish. And so he's keeping the Talmud in
effect in all hospitals in America.
And as a Talmudic Jew, he's holding to that.
Hospitals that decline to provide abortions in these cases could have, listen to this,
their Medicare provider agreements terminated or face financial penalties, Becker said.
They're just going to push it until there's a civil war in the country.
They don't back down.
They don't obey the Supreme Court.
When the Supreme Court doesn't go their way,
we'll just get rid of it.
We'll just abolish the Supreme Court.
So in essence, has the federal government
just federalized every hospital
and every clinic in North America?
They did it during COVID. They did it during COVID.
They did it during COVID.
Now think about it.
A child that needed a kidney transplant
was denied a transplant for months.
The child finally got the transplant
because the child was not vaccinated.
And I think the father was. Parents were not vaccinated. And I think the father was.
Parents were not vaccinated.
So they denied a medical emergency treatment
for a child to push
because they were going to stick to their rigid ideology
about the COVID vaccines.
They're willing for people to die.
I flip this around now. They will stick to their rigid ideology to make sure people die with abortion. It's a party of death. The Democrat Death Party. That's what they are the democrat death party euthanasia abortion
let's go down the list they are the party of death they're the party of lawlessness
of communism of anarchy i mean they ought to be they ought to be shut down as a criminal operation.
They are a rogue operation.
If they were outside of the USA operating in another country,
the U.S. State Department would list them as a subversive terrorist organization.
The Democratic Party.
Yes, they would.
So now the HHS has circumvented
the efforts of so many in the pro-life community in this.
So Texas, Florida, Tennessee, many states
that are passing abortion laws.
The federal government is now telling hospitals
in those states it doesn't matter what your state law says. You have to obey Washington.
Yes. And if you don't kill the baby, we'll take
the federal money from you. Well, some hospitals need to tell them, take it. But they won't.
No, they won't do it because they get too much money they want the
money they want the money so they'll kill babies to get the money it's just that's that's i'm
reminded of the story of right before the flood where it says in the bible their thoughts were
evil continually.
Yes.
And that's what we're seeing again here.
Exactly.
All right, can't kill babies this way, so let's kill babies this way.
Yes.
It doesn't matter if it's in a state that doesn't allow abortion.
We're going to find a way to kill those babies.
That's right.
And we'll abolish the Supreme Court also.
We'll do whatever we have to do to make sure that we can kill babies.
And if someone was going out and hunting babies,
they would be, of course,
people would be, you know, up in arms.
Well, I don't know if they would or not nowadays,
but, you know, if they were hunting them down,
you know, there'd be condemnation.
But that's exactly what the Democrats are doing.
They're hunting down unborn children.
They're trying to find unborn children to kill them.
They're obsessed with killing unborn children. That means they're demon-possessed.
They're demon-crats.
Just a change over to the war scene.
Jerusalem Post, Iran preparing to supply Russia with drones, according to the White House.
This is an interesting story that President Putin has requested Iran to supply Moscow with drones to be used in Ukraine.
There's a lot.
I get a lot of questions about that.
Is the Russian military running out of drones?
Or is the Russian military holding back its best drones
and they don't want to bring them out?
So they're going to buy a supply from Iran?
Or are they looking for a military partner?
That's another possibility.
Or are they doing a transfer of funds?
Iran, you have drones we need.
We have something you need.
Let's, in other words, barter.
Is Russia bartering?
Is Russia sending wheat to Iran in return for drones?
That's where I lean.
It's a trade.
It's like, we've got all this stuff. And you've got all this stuff. It's a trade. It's like, we've got all this stuff,
and you've got all this stuff.
Let's just trade.
We'll send ships full of wheat to Tehran.
You send ships full of drones to Moscow.
And it could also be strengthening that BRICS bond
that's been established, too.
And maybe they're paying for it in some type of cryptocurrency.
Well, a clue to this may be in a news story that we came across that is talking about
President Putin making a visit to Iran. And he's going there to meet with President Erdogan
of Turkey, or Turkey-A as they're trying to pronounce it now.
And the headline here, Jerusalem Post says Russia's Putin to meet Erdogan and Rasi next
Tuesday to discuss Syria. And Rasi is the president of Iran. Yes. But they're going to
there to discuss Syria. Yes, which is interesting.
All right, so let's read the quote from the Jerusalem Post here.
We'll have some more thoughts on this.
Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet his Turkish counterpart Tayyip Erdogan
and Iranian President Ebrahim Rassi to discuss Syria during a visit to Tehran next Tuesday.
It will be only Putin's second foreign trip since the start
of Moscow's armed intervention in Ukraine on February 24th, following a trip to Central Asia
at the end of June. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said three leaders from the three
guarantor states of the Astana process designed to find a peace settlement in Syria, will hold a trilateral meeting.
Okay, those three countries, Russia, Turkey, and Iran.
Right, to discuss Syria.
To discuss Syria.
So what did we talk about yesterday?
Well, yesterday we were talking about the potential, or at least the plan in place, the legislation in place to divide up Ukraine.
And give Western Ukraine to Poland.
Yes. So Western Ukraine would be under the protection of Poland,
essentially be a part of Poland.
Which makes it part of NATO.
Right. And Eastern Ukraine either becomes its own independent enclave or several different enclaves.
Or Russian territory.
Or Russian territory.
And we also learned yesterday that Russia is inviting Ukrainians to become Russian citizens.
They are fast-tracking the process.
But Ukraine is passing legislation to give Poles living in Ukraine special status.
Citizenship, essentially.
So something interesting is going on there in that arena with Russia.
And at the same time, Putin is leaving Moscow to fly to Iran
to meet with the president of Iran and the president of Turkey.
To talk about Syria.
To talk about Syria.
So let's take a look at a map.
This is the border of Syria and Turkey.
And what you see there in the green area is Turkey.
What is that?
Tannish orange, whatever. That area is Turkey. What is that? Tannish, orange, whatever.
That area is Syria.
And you can see up at the top,
there's Aleppo.
So Turkey is presently
militarily controlling that region
where you see the arrows.
Turkish military troops are in control of that part of Syria.
Right.
And they have been for at least a couple years now.
Yes, yes.
So is Erdogan seeking a deal that he gets legal ownership of that part of Syria?
Well, and that's a possibility.
Remember, you've got,
so you've got Turkish troops in portions of Syria.
You know you already have Russian troops in Syria.
Iranian troops.
Right, Iranian troops.
American troops.
So.
We have American troops there.
Right.
And most likely.
Uninvited, of course.
Yes, a NATO sal Yes. A NATO salad
of various countries are also
at the American basis.
Probably Brits and
French and
Dutch and so forth.
So
we're starting, what
Doc and I are looking at here today is
are there two deals underway simultaneously to solve two wars?
At the same time.
Yes.
Both which involve Russia and both which involve NATO to some degree.
Yes, because Turkey is a NATO member.
Right.
Okay.
Ukraine is not NATO, but Poland is NATO. So we'll take another look. This next map
is the map of oil pipelines in Syria. So to the upper right, that is the oil-producing region of Syria.
Right.
Northeastern Syria, which the United States has taken control of.
Right, yes.
And there are two major pipelines, one oil, the other natural gas.
They extend from the upper right-hand corner of the screen down toward Lebanon in that direction.
You have other pipelines which come from the east.
We're talking about from Iraq and from Iran,
and that is a major flow that goes all the way out to the Mediterranean.
This is a significant area, not only as far as oil fields are concerned,
but you've got a number of different pipelines that are bringing oil in from other regions from the east as well.
Doc, we can see in the gray area Iraq.
So that northwestern part of Iraq that borders Syria, this is the Kurdish area right so Turkey has been at war
with the Kurds because the Kurds want their own independent state and and so
the Turkish Kurdish war has been going on for literally a couple decades the
PKK which are Kurds you know they're they're tagged as terrorists right but
the Kurds will say no they're patriots they're fighters for our freedom but
Turkey says no they're they are terrorists and even so strongly they
felt about that,
they were opposed to the admission of Finland and Sweden into NATO
because of the presence of what Turkey says is the PKK in those two countries.
They're electing them to office there.
Do you remember the biblical archaeologist Ron Wyatt?
Oh, yes.
So he got kidnapped by the PKK.
By the Kurds.
By the Kurds.
Okay.
So how many decades ago has that been?
That was in the 90s, right?
80s or 90s, I don't recall.
I would say, yeah, probably the 90s.
But the reason that they kidnapped him and they were kidnapping other Westerners wasn't
to harm them, they just needed ransom money.
They were just funding their operation.
But he got kidnapped by the PKK.
When my son Jeremy was doing biblical archaeology in that region,
that was a major concern,
that he would get kidnapped by one of these rogue organizations
that were in the mountain regions of Turkey near the Iranian border.
And fortunately, it didn't happen to him. But one of his hiking partners, climbing partners,
went back to Mount Ararat alone a year or two later and never came home.
Wow.
He was from Scotland. He never came home. Wow. He was from Scotland.
He never came home.
They never found him.
My son Jeremy paid for a rescue team
to search Mount Ararat.
He did that for his friend's mother,
his parents, just to help their hearts
have peace of mind that somebody searched for them.
But it's a dangerous area. It's a very dangerous area to go to that's just a little personal side light but the kurds
occupy like you said they're not a nation they're a people group and they actually occupy portions
of turkey syria iraq and iran a general area there. So Turkey has a Kurdish problem,
and several other countries have a Kurdish problem.
Iraq has a Kurdish problem.
Syria has a Kurdish problem.
It's interesting.
I don't know a lot, so I don't,
if there are Kurds watching us, and there probably are,
I don't want to act like I'm an expert on Kurdistan, because I'm not.
This is where it's interesting.
Some people say that the Kurds are ethnically Persians, which would make them from Iran.
Right. Persians which would make them from Iran right others say that they are Jewish
that they're one of the Lost Tribes of Israel well and go ahead well and there
is actually scientific evidence that would point to a relation between the Kurds and Jews.
This is number 17B for control.
This is from back in 2001, okay?
Study finds close genetic connection
between Jews and Kurds.
And so there is a connection there,
at least genetically, they would say,
between general Jewish people groups and the Kurds.
If I recall, Doc, the Israeli Jews refer to the Kurds as cousins.
Right.
And that actually goes back to the story of the origin of the Kurds.
And that goes all the way back to, you know, this is Talmudic, you know, interpretation of this,
that Solomon had an angel or an angel that was under the command of Solomon.
And a number of angels had sexual relations with Jewish women.
And that produced this people group.
Which would make them the Kurds.
Right.
And we talked about that back in 2019.
We did a whole show on that.
And in fact, it came about as a result that we came across,
I don't know where the article was,
that somebody referred to the Kurds as Jewish cousins.
And we thought, well, that's odd.
Where did they get that?
And then we started doing the background on it.
So now you have, and there's been a close relationship between Israel and the Kurds.
And the Kurds have kind of had a de facto protection
from the U.S. and NATO as well.
So there's a lot of factors at play
within this area and within this region. Well, the U.S. and NATO as well. That's right. So there's a lot of factors at play within this area and within this region.
Well, the U.S. and NATO promised the Kurds independence.
Right.
It was supposed to happen at the end of the Iraq War, and they never got it.
So the Kurds feel like they were used.
They got betrayed by NATO.
They never got their independent state.
But now this meeting with Russia, Iran, and Turkey, where they talk about Syria,
what are you suggesting that perhaps Russia and Turkey are going to be talking about here
in this meeting? Are we looking at something similar to Ukraine?
Yes, and I think they're going to be linked together.
I think for the two deals to come together, both of these deals are going to have to work out.
That's my hunch.
So you have Mr. Erdogan, President of Turkey.
Turkey is a member of NATO.
Right.
He just blocked Finland and Sweden from joining NATO. The reports were that he then
cleared it. But then I saw other reports that said he's back to putting roadblocks up again.
So I'm not sure where that stands. But NATO wants Finland and Sweden in. But Mr. Erdogan was throwing a temper tantrum about it.
So you have Mr. Erdogan representing NATO, but he has his troops in Syria,
kind of doing his own war. And the United States has troops in Syria doing its own war.
Who started that war? Well, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Who told them to do it? Well, we can only guess who their puppet masters are. But back in 2011, they started
that civil war in Syria. They wanted to crash Syria. Two years later, the same people started a civil war
in Ukraine.
Yes, the same group.
The same group, Obama and Clinton
and John McCain and Victoria Nuland.
Because they weren't getting any traction
in the Syria situation.
Exactly, there you go, Doc.
So what happened?
Putin came to the rescue of syria in 2011 there was going to be a
nato invasion of syria and then there were and you speculated if i remember right there was a phone
call yes likely i mean doc we went we did true news whatever day that was in 2011 we signed off
and said the war is tonight the battleships were lined up, the planes, everything.
The French were involved.
The whole NATO armada was ready to invade and pound Syria.
We went to bed that night saying, well, goodbye, Syria.
Wake up in the morning, there's no war.
Obama stood down.
The report was that the French, I think it was the French fighter jets on carriers were ready to take off.
Yes, I remember that story.
They were told to stand down.
Something happened.
And my speculation was Putin called Obama and said, if you do it, we fight for Syria.
And Obama backed down.
He blinked.
What happened then?
They moved the fight to Ukraine immediately.
Trouble started in Ukraine. John McCain, Victoria Nuland, and others went to Kiev and told the neo-Nazis,
if you overthrow this democratically elected government,
the United States of America will endorse your revolutionary government.
And so just like we were supporting terrorists in Syria, we started supporting terrorists in Ukraine.
You got it.
So, and it was amazing how the stories just changed.
It was like they took a page and said,
alright, we're gonna hold off on Syria for a while,
let's do Ukraine.
Yes, that's exactly what happened.
And that's what we've been dealing with.
So we're now in Ukraine and they got the war.
But we still have this unresolved issue of Syria.
And so they've not been able to stop Putin and the Russian army.
There's a report today in the Washington Times that Washington has informed Zelensky that the flow of weapons may slow down.
Oh, I believe that. But they're actually concerned that the U.S. has sent so many weapons to Ukraine
that it's weakening America's national defense.
And we've wasted, and they're also concerned about smuggling.
You know, those upstanding, honest Ukrainian politicians,
they wouldn't think of selling U.S. weapons on the black market, would they?
First of all, you have to convince me that the weapons arrived.
That's the first thing.
They even made it there?
Yeah.
You'd have to convince me of that first.
I believe all this funding and everything, they've been sending the money.
Oh, yes. They've been doing that.
But I'm
with you. Even if they did receive
it,
there's already reports of that.
And so...
So anyhow, Doc, all this is coming
together right now.
The West is frustrated.
They've not been able to stop the Russian
military.
We're getting just propaganda.
Right.
Well, I thought Putin was dying.
How's he going to fly to Tehran?
Did he just get better?
Did he stop shaking?
Did his cancer go away?
Did he get back in his right mind?
Because we were told he was crazy, too.
Maybe he got all that poison flushed out of his system.
Oh, maybe, yeah.
Maybe he had a holistic doctor
that put him on some type of regimen
and got that toxin flushed out of his body.
But anyhow, he appears to be well enough to go to Tehran.
So the propaganda is not working right now.
And the Russian military is taking control of eastern Ukraine.
That only leaves western Ukraine.
Kiev and the rest of western Ukraine,
which is where the wheat comes from.
Okay?
Wheat harvest is in western Ukraine.
So Poland,
Poland used to control western Ukraine after World War I. Which I didn't know
until you pointed that out to me the other day. Yeah. Every time they have a big war, they just
change boundaries. I mean, the whole Middle East basically was created after a war. Right. After
World War II. And it had nothing to do with ethnicity or tribes or anything. It said, hey, let's put a line right here.
Where was Saudi Arabia before World War II?
Just a whole bunch of nomadic tribes wandering around the desert.
Yes.
All those countries were created by the globalists.
Basically, the Western globalists created these countries.
So they do it all the time.
They got rid of Yugoslavia.
They got rid of Czechoslovakia.
You've got the Czech Republic, but where's Czechoslovakia?
It's gone.
They got rid of it.
So is Russia getting into the remapping game now?
I think so. I came across a story yesterday that, I think maybe I mentioned it, Colonel
House, Edward House, who was Woodrow Wilson's handler.
Right. It was his handler.
His aide. Yes. That House in World War I wanted to
break up Russia.
Oh, into four countries.
Into four countries after World War I.
He wanted to break them up.
He said, we can't allow Russia to be big and strong.
Isn't that the same plan?
Aren't the globalists still working on the same plan?
Yes.
Just to break up Russia,
to turn it into smaller countries.
That's why they've got all these sanctions on Russia.
Putin knows this stuff.
He knows what they're doing.
So yesterday I said the war will go on.
The warmongers will make billions of dollars.
War is a fabulously profitable business to be in.
So the warmongers are going to clean up right now.
But both sides will have to pour it on.
Buildings will be blown up. Cities will be destroyed.
Civilians will die.
Soldiers will fall on the battlefield.
It doesn't matter to these people. It doesn't matter to these people.
It doesn't matter.
The carnage will continue until the pain
is so bad on each side
that they are forced to go to a table and say,
okay, let's draw new lines.
We're gonna create some new countries.
And I think Erdogan sees it and says, this is my best chance.
Because how could he use Syria to do something over in Ukraine?
Because he's NATO.
Yes.
And he can be the stinker in all this,
because he could just say,
NATO, you want to attack Russia?
I'm not going to participate.
I'm going to veto it.
Wouldn't he also, being a member of NATO, wouldn't he have something to say about Poland adopting Ukraine?
Absolutely.
I mean, he'd have to sign off on that too, wouldn't he?
And he also knows all the stuff
that's being talked about at the NATO meetings.
Is Erdogan 100% NATO?
I mean, he's a member.
His country's a member.
But is he himself, is he 100% NATO?
No, I don't believe that at all.
He's 100% Erdogan.
Yes.
All right?
He is for Erdogan, and he's for Turkey.
He wants Turkey to be a major power.
He wants it to be the dominant.
He also sees, oh, I just thought about that.
He sees a NATO, an Arab NATO coming.
Doc, we didn't think about that today.
President Biden's leaving for Israel and Saudi Arabia tonight for meetings.
And Israel, there is a story today that Israel will become a stronger partner with NATO.
It's not a member of NATO,
but they're already pumping out the propaganda that Israel... They get a franchise.
Yes, Israel is a strategic partner of NATO in the Middle East.
And don't they have an office in Brussels
at NATO headquarters, if I recall?
Yes, they do.
And the U.S. military and the Israeli military have just merged their intelligence operations.
That's right.
Under President Trump.
So President Erdogan knows that there's an Arab-NATO military alliance coming.
Who seized the NATO military base several years ago,
back, what was that,
2016, 2017?
No, it was Erdogan.
Yeah.
The Incirlik Air Base.
Incirlik.
And he almost kicked out NATO.
It looked like NATO,
it looked like Turkey
was going to leave NATO
and what, join Russia.
Right.
So they held on to him.
They got him back into the club.
But he keeps
straying. And who's he meeting with?
Putin
and Raisi of
Iran. Well, these are the two
enemies of NATO.
I mean, isn't Iran
and Russia, aren't these the countries
NATO plans to bomb, blow up?
But Erdogan's our guy, our NATO guy, Rick.
Surely he won't sell us out for anything, would he?
Of course he would.
He has in the past.
Or he's also being sent as an emissary.
And that's a possibility, too, although he hasn't acted like an emissary very much.
But it may be that they,
it may be that the NATO leaders are saying
the only person who can talk to Putin
is Erdogan.
So let's give him some instructions.
Let's find out what does he want.
Erdogan comes back, says,
I want a chunk of Syria.
And I want to make sure the Kurds never get their state.
Unless the Kurds become a NATO country.
Yes.
And now you have NATO right there in the middle.
And you have a NATO spot right in the middle of...
But if they're creating an Arab NATO, they have to deal with the Kurds.
I mean, that's going to, I would say, if they're going to create an Arab NATO,
then that organization is going to be responsible for the Kurds.
All this stuff, I think, is getting worked out behind the scenes.
And Poland, which is NATO, is saying, we want to get me some Ukraine.
It's all up for grabs.
I'm thinking now, based on our conversation today, Rick, and the information that we've got out here,
is they're winding this thing up.
And like you said, there's going to be conflict.
There's going to be bullets that fly.
There's going to be bullets that fly. There's going to be people that die.
There's going to be decoration days established and memorials built and everything
for the people that died as a result of all this.
But they've got to move to the next war,
and they can't deal with the next war until they finish what's going on here.
And the next war we know is Taiwan and China.
That's the next area.
Or it's Iran.
Or it's Iran, and now you got Mr. Erdogan.
What if he vetoes the war with Iran?
That leaves China.
Well, and-
That leaves China and Taiwan.
But if you do a conflict with Iran, you have to deal with China
because the Chinese pipelines are going through Iran all the way to the Mediterranean.
And you're going to have to deal with Russia if you attack Iran.
So a lot of deals are being made.
The way I see it, Doc, the world is on a path that one of two things is going to happen either we're going to have a
nuclear war or some nations are going to disappear one way or the other nations are going to disappear
either through nuclear bombs or through negotiations but through the negotiations
several nations are going to disappear or be greatly altered.
So that Syria may end up being Damascus and a few other cities, and that's Syria.
That's it.
Who controlled Syria after World War I?
France.
Yes.
France controlled Lebanon.
Right, and French is still the second language in Syria to this day.
What?
Yeah, street signs.
You have street signs in Syria.
In French.
I didn't know that.
Yes.
That was how heavy an influence France had there.
Their foreign legion was in Algeria and in Syria.
Algeria.
I didn't know that street signs were in Syria and France.
That's interesting.
We're going to go through a couple other headlines very quickly because we're down.
This is a fascinating topic today, though.
I hope people learned a lot on this.
Yep.
I think we're ahead of the curve, and we'll be proven right on this.
Jerusalem Post, Russia building a new laser weapon to disable foreign satellites.
And I believe it's already built, but the Jerusalem Post is saying Russia is developing a new laser system
in the greater Caucasus mountain range that will disable foreign satellites passing over Russian territory.
An open source investigation published last week by the Space Review found.
Construction of the Kalina project, which started in 2011, is underway
in the Krona, which means crown, space surveillance
complex located in the Chapal Mountain Peak. The report found
by analyzing recent satellite imagery from Google Earth and documents
from Russian industrial contractors. Now it says that Kalina's
goal, as written in a bank
guaranteed document from January 2014, is creating a system
for the functional suppression of electro-optical systems
of satellites, in other words, to knock out satellites
using lasers.
The space security complex, as it is described
in a 2017 document, is a special, you get the special quantum optical system to be used for electro-optical warfare, according to Precision Instrument Systems, a Russian scientific and industrial corporation who was given the contract for the project by the Russian Defense Ministry. Now, the Kalina features a new telescope
used to accurately aim laser beams at satellites
housed in a specially constructed building
built to withstand earthquakes up to magnitude seven.
The laser beams are routed via mirrors
and enter the telescope through an opening on its side,
after which they're reflected back,
causing them to form an image
of the targeted object in a detector.
So it's Russian Star Wars.
Yes, it is.
I want to show you the next one, number 24.
This is the report itself, Space Review,
a Russian ground-based laser to dazzle imaging satellites.
I'm not going to read.
We've got a number of quotes,
but because of time,
I'm going to skip over it.
But I wanted you to see
the source of the Jerusalem Post article
is the publication,
The Space Review.
The next one is number 28.
This is from ABC Television Australia.
Shell oil halts production
on floating gas platform prelude amid worsening
industrial disputes, basically a labor dispute. Another labor dispute, shutting down gas production.
We had one, where was it? Norway. Norway. Right. And that was going to impact the U.K. Now you have another labor problem.
Now you're talking about another area of the world.
From Japan.
Japan malls plan to conserve gas amid fear of LNG supply shortages.
Well, this is because Russia nationalized a shell oil-owned LNG facility in Russia.
And Japan imports 9% of their gas for their total national supply.
9% is imported, but 100% of that 9% comes from that facility in Russia.
Now, I don't know if you happened to catch this in that article. If we could put that quote up,
that's number 30. It says there that they were concerned, there's concern among officials that
imports of liquefied natural gas from Russia and the U.S. could soon dry up. So now that was the first time I had caught that,
that there was issues that there was going to be problems
with shipping liquefied natural gas from the U.S.
Any thoughts on that?
No, I didn't know about that.
The only thing I can think of is maybe the reasoning is
that all of our natural gas resources would be focused here on domestic supply and they wouldn't have the ability to export there. But it was enough to
concern Japanese officials regarding both lack of imports from Russia and the United States.
That's a very interesting point. From DW.com in Germany, fearing Russia, Russian gas cutoff, Germans prepare for cold
winter. I'm going to skip down to one quote. This is number 34. And this talks about the
potential economic impact that this would have on the German economy if Russia does not turn the gas back on.
Here's what happened Monday, this past Monday.
Right.
Russia turned off a gas pipeline.
They said, hey, we have to do maintenance.
We're going to be checking the pipe.
Yeah, checking for leaks.
Yeah, so we're not going to be shipping any gas
to Germany for the next two weeks.
Well, the Germans are afraid
that Putin's
never gonna turn it back on.
We found a maintenance issue.
Yeah, we're gonna have to.
Probably gonna be shut down for months.
Or maybe a year.
Well, in that study published at the end of June,
the Economic Research Institute prognosed,
looked at the consequences of a complete halt
to Russian gas supplies, meaning that Germany
would have to make do with supplies from other countries and the gas volumes it has already stored to
date. The study found that after four weeks, this is their study now, what
they're saying the repercussions, after four weeks there would no longer be
enough gas for everyone. Since according to the law private households, social
services, and district heating suppliers would continue to be supplied,
the stop would primarily affect the industry.
Sectors such as steel, crude iron, chemicals, and glass would be particularly hard hit,
with production expected to fall by around 50%.
The entire economy would be affected. Prognos estimated that if Russian gas supplies were to fail, Germany's economic output
could drop 12.7% by the end of the year.
Essentially sending Germany in free falling
into not necessarily a recession,
but maybe even a depression at that point, Rick.
Yes, and that's what this next BBC article says.
Germany fears Russia gas cup may become permanent.
And the German economy minister, Robert Haback,
warned that EU countries had to be prepared
in case gas shipments did not resume.
He accused the Kremlin of using gas as a weapon. Mr. Habeck admitted Germany had
become too dependent on Russian gas. He described that as a grave political mistake. This is number
37. If Russian supplies were suddenly cut overnight, this could tip Germany into a major recession because entire industries
rely on gas and most German homes use it for heating. A leading energy market analyst,
Henning Gleustein of Eurasia Group, warned that if Nord Stream 1 doesn't come back on at all,
let's say by early August, we think that the German government
will have to raise its gas alert level to the third level, which is the maximum level.
That would be suspending the wholesale gas market and the government and regulators stepping in as
the distributor of natural gas. So that will effectively mean rationing next winter.
What happens in Germany will spread over the rest of Europe if it gets that bad because of the
geographical location in the middle of the EU. He told the BBC, Germany's gas storage facilities
are currently 64% full, according to German broadcaster ZDF.
And then it goes on to the next quote. One more, Doc. Industry experts quoted by German media say
the chemical sectors would be the hardest hit by a gas shortage. It accounts for 15% of Germany's
gas consumption, and disruption could lead to shortages of goods such as fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, detergents, cosmetics.
German households and key services such as hospitals will be prioritized for gas supplies under a government emergency plan.
So if that pipeline doesn't come back on, Germany essentially has to federalize the entire energy industry in Germany
and start rationing fuel supplies, natural gas, and everything.
Yes, that's exactly.
I'm going to show you another one.
These are all basically the same theme.
This is from the Times of London.
Germany faces nightmare winter as Russia shuts down Nord Stream 1.
And what was interesting in that story, too, it says France is really in the same boat as Germany, too, Rick.
This is number 43 for Control France.
France is also bracing itself for the worst with an attempt to model how the disruption might cascade through its own industry.
Let's prepare for a total cutoff of Russian gas today.
That is the likeliest option.
Bruno Le Maire, the French finance minister,
told a conference in Aon Province,
we have to anticipate it and put ourselves
in the order of battle from this moment.
In other words, they have to go into wartime mode.
That's what he's really saying.
They're in war economy.
Right.
We're in World War III. Yes. President Biden
said it's a time of war. Brazil.
Would you consider Brazil to be an American ally?
A friend of America? President Bolsonaro? Especially during
the Trump years. Conservative, Christian. Pro-life. Pro-life.
He's the president of Brazil.
Where is he getting his diesel fuel right now?
He's running for reelection right now.
And he's up against a socialist, former socialist president.
Is that Lula?
Was Lula Brazil?
I forget.
All right.
But he's running for president, running for reelection.
So he's under political pressure right now with the cost of living, the inflation and
everything.
So diesel is a big deal and he's got to bring down the price of diesel.
First of all, he's got to make sure there is diesel fuel.
That they can't run out of diesel.
So where is he buying his diesel fuel?
We'll show you. This is from Bloomberg.
Brazil, America's ally.
President Bolsonaro close to buying diesel from Russia.
Because it's cheaper.
The deal would come after Bolsonaro visited President Vladimir Putin back in February,
just days before Russia invaded Ukraine,
in a bid to ensure a steady supply of fertilizer exports to Brazil.
And so not only is Brazil looking to increase diesel purchases from Russia,
they had already negotiated a deal on fertilizer from Russia. And Putin said, we're only going to sell natural resources to our friends.
Yes.
So they consider Brazil a friend.
And Brazil is the first country in BRICS.
Yes.
BRICS.
Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.
That's right.
I'm going to show you one more.
I want you to see firsthand what the impact of the globalist foreign policy,
the ruling elite of the West, their brilliant foreign policy
as they've pushed the world close to nuclear war.
They've disrupted the world economy.
They have sanctions on Russia.
Supplies have dried up.
Natural resources are disappearing.
Energy prices are up.
Food is skyrocketing.
And you know why? The major cause of it, Rick, is that the president and the prime minister,
they're some of the biggest fans of the World Economic Forum.
You're talking about in?
In Sri Lanka.
That's right.
So we're going to show you.
What the policies.
What these policies are doing in these smaller countries,
because these smaller countries, they're collapsing.
Their economies are collapsing.
They cannot handle
the skyrocketing prices
for food and energy.
This is Sri Lanka.
This happened over the weekend.
But people got fed up
with their World Economic Forum
socialist president.
Now, the Democrats should understand,
that's an insurrection.
Right. That's the home of the president of Sri Lanka.
And he's not there anymore.
No, he's out of the country this afternoon. Well, you know what? He got to the airport, and he tried.
They wouldn't stamp his passport.
He wanted to go to the VIP lane, and they said, you ain't no VIP anymore.
One more video we want to show you here.
This would be number 50 for control.
This is what happens when people get really, really upset at your government.
The Democrats should pay attention to this.
They're holding their January 6th.
Democrats really should pay attention because what happened January 6th was not an insurrection.
If there was an insurrection, you idiots wouldn't be there right now.
Right.
This is an insurrection that we're going to show you. And it looks like all of Sri Lanka came out.
You know what? That just shows me that the average folks can take over the government
and make the socialist communist president and his flunky
cabinet flee the country right all right so maybe maybe he maybe he took shelter in davos
maybe klaus swab maybe he's rooming with klaus he could be you don't know but all globalists
take note that people are getting fed up with your policies. That's it for today. Thank
you for watching True News. We appreciate you telling people about us. Spread the word. Tell
people that there is a Christ-centered, independent news source that's been reporting the truth for
over 23 years. It's called True News. We'll see you tomorrow. God bless you.
The preceding program was made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support
of listeners just like you.
To find out how you can help,
visit www.truenews.com.