TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Treason: Hillary Clinton Hacked White House Servers to Smear President Trump

Episode Date: February 14, 2022

President Donald Trump said it is bigger than Nixon’s Watergate scandal.  He accused Hillary Clinton of committing an act of treason. What’s it about? The big story today is the bombshell news story that exploded over the weekend about Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the FBI’s role in the fake Russia-hacked-the-2016 election narrative. We have lots of information today to share with you, plus the latest information about the Freedom Convoy in Canada, and NATO’s frustrations in starting a war with Russia.  Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart.  Airdate 2/14/22 

The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit nothing but the truth, so help us God. I'm Rick Wiles. President Donald Trump said it is bigger than Nixon's Watergate scandal. He accused Hillary Clinton of committing an act of treason. What's it about? The big story today is the bombshell news story that exploded over the weekend

about Special Counsel John Durham's investigation into the FBI's role in the fake Russia hacked the 2016 election narrative. We have a lot of information to share with you today, plus the latest information about the Freedom Convoy in Canada and NATO's frustrations in starting a war with Russia. We're going to start with the Durham investigation. And I'm telling you, this is huge. This is a mega story. And the news media is doing their very best. They are.

To pretend it didn't happen. Right. I don't know how they're going to continue to cover it up. So let's take a look at what's happening. First, the Daily Mail. This is Donald Trump responding over the weekend. It's bigger than Watergate. Vindicated Trump vents over special counsel report that proves Hillary Clinton campaign did spy on his 2016 campaign and paid a company to hack the Trump Towers and the White House

servers. And this is coming from no less than John Durham's investigation. And so Mr. Trump is questioning what Republicans plan to do about the spying, claiming it's an insult to the Republican Party and to the nation. We're going to dig into this story here as we open up today's Godcast. Rick, is it bigger than Watergate? Absolutely. It's the biggest scandal that's ever happened in the United States of America because intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies

at the national level conspired with the Democratic Party and the Democratic presidential nominee to spy on the Republican candidate. And when he became president, they also continued to spy. They hacked White House servers. And last time I checked, Doc, you go to prison for that kind of stuff. I mean, it's not just that they hacked into Donald Trump's privately owned servers. They hacked the servers for the office of the president. That is a national security breach. And that is spelled out specifically in the Durham report. And that is the kind of crime that the FBI should be investigating, except they actually participated in the crime.

Right. of the scandal. An interesting story reveals that basically three-fourths of the Democrats in the United States of America, Democratic voters, want Hillary Clinton investigated. They want to know the truth. Doc, if these numbers are correct, this is a major sea change for the Clinton legacy. It is, Rick. New York Post is reporting that a surprisingly large share of Democrats want to see Hillary Clinton investigate over her possible role in manufacturing dirt to try to tie Donald Trump to the Kremlin, a new poll shows. Now, this survey, conducted by Technometrica Institute of Policy and Politics in New Jersey

last month, polled 1,308 Americans about the mushrooming investigation by special counsel John Durham into the FBI's probe of Trump's alleged links to Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign. Rick, nearly three out of four of those polled who are following the story said they think it's important prosecutors investigate Clinton for her role in the Russiagate

scandal along with her top campaign advisors. That's a significant number of Democrats, Rick. Dr. Dawkins, notice this poll was taken before this story was released. That's true. Dr. The poll was taken last month. Now this mega story has been released, which has caught Hillary Clinton red-handed. I mean, she is in it. So is James Comey, the former director of the FBI. There are a lot of big names that are embroiled in this scandal that it will take

an act of Houdini to get out of this, which I'm not ruling it out. I mean, Hillary hasn't gone to prison for any of the crimes she's ever committed. Right. But she's going to have to do her greatest Houdini escape this time. She's caught red-handed. The very thing that Donald Trump said, do you remember how the media laughed at Donald Trump? When he said, they're spying on me. And the news media, CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post, New York Times, they laughed and mocked him. He's crazy. He's loony.

He thinks that they're spying on him. Well, they were spying on him. And the FBI and the CIA knew about it. In fact, they were participating in it. They were participating in it. Now, these are things that we talked about back in 2016, 2017. So when I read these quotes, Rick, I'm reminded of the coverage we had, and we were saying the same things. They're showing up in the Durham Investigation Report. Now, Doc, does it make more sense why True News has been attacked

so viciously for years? Yes, it really does. So, Fox News is reporting the Clinton campaign paid to infiltrate Trump Tower White House servers to link Trump to Russia. That's not a Fox News claim. That's from Special Counsel John Durham. Well, somebody, Doc, has — somebody on the inside of this investigation has fed the information of Fox News. And Fox News has done an outstanding job reporting it this weekend. But clearly they have an insider in the investigation that's giving them the details. And it's devastating to Clinton and the Democrats. Right.

Well, let's walk our audience through this so they get a full understanding of exactly what it is that John Durham is accusing Clinton operatives and Democratic operatives of actually doing. So lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to infiltrate servers belonging to Trump Towers and later the White House in order to establish an inference and a narrative to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia. And this is a filing from Special Counsel John Durham. Durham filed a motion on February 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent.

Sussman has pleaded not guilty to that particular accusation. Now, this indictment against Sussman, he says, he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September of 2016, less than two months before the 2016 election, that he was not doing work for any client when he requested an HELLA meeting in which he presented purported data and white papers that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Alpha Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin. All right, let's go back to the first one. Let's go back and let's walk through this.

So the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to infiltrate servers at the Trump Tower. Now, here's a really big one. The White House. Yes. That's a criminal offense. It's a criminal offense to hack anybody's servers. But the White House? But the President of the United States.

That's the kind of stuff you normally would get sent away for life. Okay, right now, Doc, why don't you hire a technology company to hack Joe Biden's servers at the White House? Oh, Secret Service would be on my back like a tick on a hound dog. I mean. For you. Yes. But not Hillary. Hillary, this happened 2016 and 17. Who covered it up? The FBI, the CIA, and a host of other. And the media.

And the news media, all working together. So Michael Sussman is a very influential attorney. He's a Jewish attorney employed with a major law firm that's deep in this scandal. And the scandal will also lead to Jake Sullivan, who is the current national security advisor to Joe Biden, who's trying to get us in a war with Russia. I'm just going to say that. He's coordinating the offensive in Ukraine for us. Yes. And later, I'm going to talk about why I think they want to start a war with Ukraine. Just keep this in mind. Sullivan, Jake Sullivan, national security advisor, is in this scandal. All right, so let's go to the next slide.

We just recovered it. Okay, so the indictment against Sussman said he told then FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016 that he was not doing work for any client right so there's where the lie is yes when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented purported data and white papers so he presented to the fbi well he's he presented this so-called evidence right that linked trump to this Russia alpha bank. But they were in the Trump servers to plant the evidence. Right. And then where they have him right now, where they have Sussman right now, is lying on this point right here, that he was not doing work, when in fact he was representing a client.

In this particular case, he was representing the Clinton campaign, correct? Yes. Okay. And so when he presented this information, initial information to the FBI, it was as if he was doing it as a good citizen, right? Rather than as on behalf of a client. So Durham's filing on February the 11th in a section titled factual background reveals that Sussman had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive

that we'll name here in a little bit, and a U.S.-based Internet company in the Clinton campaign. Durham's filing said Sussman's billing records reflect that he repeatedly billed the Clinton campaign for his work on behalf of Russia Bank One allegations. I don't know if this is a fact. I've not had a chance to research this. My guess, Doc, is that the technology company that did the hacking probably had a federal contract to provide internet security services to the Obama White House. That's how they knew how to get into the White House servers. Ah, now that's sneaky. That's good. Now we're going to link Obama to the scandal.

I see. Yeah. Who else? James Clapper? Right. Well, that would make sense. James Comey? Brennan? Don't leave up Brennan. These guys, the intelligence officials under the Obama administration were actually running an illegal intelligence operation against the sitting president of the United States to carry out a coup, an overthrow of the US government. You want to talk about insurrection? That's the insurrection. Which is why they were so surprised that Donald Trump won the

election in November 2016. And then they had to get to work to destroy him. Yes. And I'm going to tell you, I defended Donald Trump throughout that entire time, even though I have disagreements with President Trump on some matters. But in that particular issue, Doc, it was so obvious that an intelligence agency-led coup was underway. And as an American citizen, if you believe in this country and you believe in the Constitution, you could not allow it to take place. It didn't matter who the president was. It wouldn't matter if it was Joe Biden or anybody.

No, it was a coup. You can't allow intelligence agencies to infiltrate the White House computers and plant fake evidence. You don't have a country anymore. Right. You don't have a republic anymore. You don't have a republic anymore. And that's what these criminals were doing. And it was led by criminals from the Obama White House. Hillary was part of it, but it was really the Obama intelligence agency lineup, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, that gang. They did this. They're the ones that are facing indictment and imprisonment.

So they at least facilitate it, provide the pathway for it, if not hate it and embed it along the way. So, well, the filing by John Durham revealed that Sussman and the tech executive had met and communicated with another law partner who was serving as general counsel to the Clinton campaign. So this is the direct connection here. Sources told Fox News that lawyer is Mark Elias, who had worked at the law firm Perkins Coie. And we've, of course, talked about Perkins Coie a number of times here on True News and its various connections to the Clintons. Now, in connection with these efforts, Tech Executive One exploited his access to non-public and or proprietary Internet data. In other words, he hacked it.

The following states, Tech Executive One also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract. So now you've got a U.S. university involved. Tech Executive One tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish an inference, a narrative tying then-candidate Trump to Russia, Durham states. In doing so, Tech Executive One indicated that he was seeking to please certain VIPs, referring to individuals at Law Firm One, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton

Campaign. So the university had a pending research contract with the U.S. government, so they wanted to please the Obama administration that would award the contract. Right, and so they went out of their way to mine internet data, to establish an infrared, not that it existed, but to establish it. Yes. To create it.

So now you've got another player involved here. You've got some university out there that has been linked directly to being involved with this, Rick. Yes. So it'd be interesting when everything comes rolling out to know what university that is as well. So now Durham also writes that during Sussman's trial, the government will establish that

among the internet data tech Executive One and his associates exploited was the DNS system, the domain name system of internet traffic pertaining to a particular healthcare provider, Trump Tower, Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building, and here's the big one, folks, the executive office of the President of the United States. Incredible. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. We have the evidence now to prove what we suspected all along.

Yes. That the FBI, the CIA, the Director of Intelligence Office was spying on the President of the United States. Right. They were the ones leaking his phone calls. They were the ones writing the so-called insider. Remember the insider? I'm an insider. Right.

It gets published by the New York Times. These were the people who were doing it. Right. It was a classic CIA operation to destabilize a president, except they usually do it in other countries. This time, they did it to a sitting U.S. president. And they did take him down. They did take him down with a rigged election in 2020. Now, the same people who are telling you today that it's a conspiracy theory that the elections were rigged in 2020.

Those are the same people who told you in 2017 it was a conspiracy theory that the FBI and the CIA spied on President Trump. Oh, and that Russia hacked the election, too. Remember, they were the ones saying that we did get hacked in 2016. Yes created that. But the point I'm making, Doc, is the very people who told the American people, don't listen to anybody. This was back in 2017. Don't listen to anybody who says that Trump is being spied on. That's ridiculous. That's a conspiracy theory. The FBI would never do something like that to the President of the United States. They're the same people who today are telling you there's no way the votes were changed in 2020. Well, the evidence is now out that they indeed did spy on President Trump. And most likely four or five years from now, the evidence will come out they rigged the

election in 2020. Right. Well, one of the very first people that had anything to say about a possible hack, at least public out there, was Devin Nunes. I remember back in February of 2017. And he got shut down pretty quick, if I recall, during that first couple weeks of February after the inauguration, where he said, hey, the president's being spied upon. Well, no one would believe him then. Well, former chief investigator of the Trump-Russia probe for the House Intelligence Committee, under then-Rep. Devin Nunes, Kash Patel said the filing definitely shows that the Hillary Clinton campaign

directly funded and ordered its lawyers at Perkins Coie to orchestrate a criminal enterprise to fabricate a connection between President Trump and Russia. Per Durham, this arrangement was put in motion in July of 2016, meaning the Hillary Clinton campaign and her lawyers masterminded the most intricate and coordinated conspiracy against Trump when he was both a candidate and later President of the United States, while simultaneously perpetuating the bogus Steele dossier hoax," Patel told Fox News, adding that the lawyers worked to infiltrate Trump Tower and the White House servers.

And if you remember, Rick, everybody on the Clinton team, they were tweeting out there on social media and everything else saying, look, there's a connection between Donald Trump and the Russian Alpha Bank. I mean, we've got computer science. I still remember Hillary Clinton saying computer scientists have confirmed a link between Donald Trump and the Russian bank. Now we know that that was a completely coordinated social campaign. She paid for it to be done. Right.

Like she paid for the dossier. John McCain was involved in it. He can't bring his old dead carcass out of the grave to cross-examine him, but he was involved in it. There are Republicans that are involved in it. You may see that the Bushes were involved. Who knows how far this is going to go? But what he just said was that Hillary came up with this plan in the summer of 2016, at the time of the nominations of the conventions. She was already cooking this plan.

And when she lost, what they were doing is that they were planning the fake evidence, hoping they could take him down in the election. But if they didn't, they would just move to plan B and that would be the force him to resign. But he wouldn't resign. He wouldn't resign. He wouldn't go down.

What did they have to come up with? COVID. COVID, one of the reasons, one of the reasons for COVID was to justify the mass mailing of ballots. Which definitely impacted the 2020 election. Yes. We know that by their own admission, remember the story that appeared? It was a Newsweek, I forget the publication, shortly after the 2020 election that talked about the cabal, where they called themselves the cabal. How they

manipulated the news, how they prevented people from discussing issues, how they massaged everything, all the narratives. They called themselves a cabal. That was part of the coup. The tech companies, Twitter, Facebook, the media, CBS News, NBC News, ABC News, CNN, MSNBC, all of them, New York Times, all of them involved. And what John Durham may if he takes it that far he may be indicting news executives for participating in a crime hmm well it's interesting that Jeff Zucker stepped down this past week maybe he knows something's coming up here pretty soon doc is one thing for a reporter to be fed fake information and he or she assumes it's correct because of the status of the source who gave it.

That's one thing. I mean, you didn't vet it. You went ahead and distributed it. Okay. You're partially guilty because you didn't do your background. Didn't verify the information. But when the news organization knows that it's fake, and they were actually in meetings with the conspirators over a year or three years or four years to keep the narrative

going, then they are an accomplice to the crime. And I think we're going to see people at CNN and MSNBC and the New York Times and the Washington Post, I think we could see some of them indicted for participating in it. There are going to be indictments that come out of this. How many, we don't know yet, but there will be some. Someone's going to fall. Well, former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe had something to say about this. He actually met with Special Counsel John Durham and says more than one occasion and told him that there was evidence in intelligence to support the indictment, the indictments

of multiple people in his investigation to the origins of the Trump Russia probe. Fox News first reported in October 2020 that Ratcliffe provided nearly 1,000 pages of material to the Justice Department to support Durham's investigation. Sources told Fox News this week that during his meetings with Durham, Ratcliffe, who served as a congressman and as a former U.S. attorney

for the Eastern District of Texas, said he believed there was enough evidence in those materials that he provided to indict multiple people. The sources pointed to one key piece of declassified intelligence which Fox News first reported in October 2020 revealing that intelligence community officials within the CIA forwarded an investigative referral on Hillary Clinton purportedly approving a plan concerning US presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers investigative referral on Hillary Clinton, purportedly approving a plan concerning U.S.

presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server. There's so much in that statement right there. Sources told Fox News that the CIA memo, also known as a CUI OL a counterintelligence operational lead was properly forwarded to the FBI and to the attention of then FBI director James Comey and then deputy assistant director of counterintelligence Peter struck let's leave that up there for just a moment yeah Rick help us walk through here so the CIA had had, probably on some hints or some cooperation with the Clinton campaign, this investigative referral, right?

Well, my question is, why was the Central Intelligence Agency involved in issues involving a U.S. political campaign? Well, I guess they would, if you're, I'm playing devil's advocate here, but I would say because of the suspicion of Russians hacking the election, that brings the CIA into the situation. But the CIA memo said it would serve as a means of distracting the American public

from the use of Hillary Clinton's private email server. Now that's where it gets very confusing. So somebody at the CIA knew that the purpose of the Russian information was to create a diversion from the investigation of Hillary Clinton. And who was in charge of the Clinton investigation? James Comey. Right. Who read the report, went before the American people,

live television, and said, I mean, we all remember that day. Comey read the report, the summary, and we're all sitting there going, he's going to indict Hillary. He's going to point at Hillary. He's going to call for her indictment, her arrest, and then he said, no reasonable prosecutor would take this case. And we're like, what? What are you talking about? So he was given a report that he couldn't hide, but what he did is simply say, but nobody will touch this report. No reasonable person would indict Hillary Clinton. James Comey was involved in it. He let her slide.

In that campaign, instead of doing his job as the director of the FBI, he should have slapped handcuffs on her. She should have been taken away to a holding cell for the information that the FBI had on her. But instead, he allowed Hillary Clinton to slip out one more time. And we have a copy of the redacted CIA memo. Doc, I'll let you YOU READ THROUGH SOME OF THIS. WELL, WHAT THE ACTION IS THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF YOUR BUREAU. AND THIS IS FROM THE C.I.A. SENDING IT OVER TO THE F.B.I. IN PARTICULAR TO PETER STRUCK, THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR COUNTERINTELLIGENCE.

AND IT'S DATED SEP's dated September 7, 2016. Yes. And so it is asking or providing exclusive use of your bureau, the FBI, for background investigative action or lead purposes as appropriate. Please provide a copy of this memorandum to FBI Special Agent. And the name is involved there too. But a copy of this was also sent to James Comey as well. THERE TOO. BUT A COPY OF THIS WAS ALSO SENT TO JAMES COMEY AS WELL. BASICALLY WHAT IT LAYS OUT THE CASE FOR HERE IS, REMEMBER EVERYBODY LAUGHED AT THE IDEA OF THE NAME CROSSFIRE HURRICANE WHEN IT WAS FIRST REPORTED. THEY POO-POOED IT. THEY WROTE IT OFF. THEY SAID IT DOESN'T EXIST. THEY FINALLY ADMITTED THAT IT EXISTS. WELL, THIS IS IN THE DOCUMENTATION IN THE FILING THAT JOHN DURHAM admitted that it exists. Well, this is in the documentation in the filing that John

Durham had presented. It says, per FBI verbal request, CIA provides the below examples of information on the cross-hurricane fusion cell has gleaned to date. And it says, an exchange discussing U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's approval of a plan concerning U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server. And then they tied in, remember, Guccifer 2.0? Yes. According to open sources, Guccifer 2.0 is an individual or group of hackers whom

U.S. officials believe is tied to Russian intelligence services. Also, per open sources, Guccifer 2.0 claimed credit for hacking the DNC this year. Now, where is Guccifer 2.0, Rick? Well, where's Guccifer 1? Because there were supposedly two, but Guccifer 1. What did he say about Hillary? He was, I don't know if he was Russian or Eastern European. He hacked into Hillary Clinton's computer, and he said what? He said she was a witch.

Yes, that's right. He said she's evil. She's a witch. She's doing something. I mean, he literally accused her of practicing occult witchcraft. So he was arrested and he was extradited to the United States. Right. And then, remember from his jail cell, he sent a letter to Fox News and he went into what he saw on Hillary's computer, which was very, very bizarre, evil,

wicked stuff, and then he just was shipped back to Europe. Yes. It was over. Done. And nobody ever talked about his letter. Anyhow, that's when I hear Guccifer, that's what I think about. But then they tie Guccifer 2.0, which convinces me that Guccifer 2.0 was probably a creation of the CIA for purposes just like this, Rick, in order to facilitate this kind of thing happening. Just this document alone, just this alone, should be enough to bring down Clinton forever.

But like you said, Rick, Clintons tend to have Teflon skin. Comey, John Brennan, and Clapper all need to be indicted, convicted, and sent to prison for the crimes that they committed against the sitting president of the United States, Donald Trump. I've got one, before we take a break, I've got one really, really far out possibility. Remember what we said at the beginning, that Jake Sullivan, who is the current national security advisor to Joe Biden, he is the lead dog in setting the stage for NATO to go to war against Russia over Ukraine. Sullivan is up to his eyeballs in this scandal. Is it possible that this theory that's been floating around for four or five years, that the Democratic National Committee servers

were not in Washington DC, they're in Ukraine. Where did Hunter Biden do most of his corrupt business deals? Ukraine. And, Doc, you and I have suggested that maybe Ukraine is the place corrupt American politicians outsource their corruption. It's done in Ukraine. They put the servers there. They cut their money deals there. It's where they go. And what happens in Ukraine stays in Ukraine.

Yes. Unless there is a special counsel investigating your corruption. Do they need to blow up all the evidence in Ukraine? Well, war would certainly do that. Do they need to blow up all the evidence in Ukraine? Well, war would certainly do that. And would war be a cover to blow up the buildings that have servers and files and evidence? It's really a far out idea. But so is their insistence to start a war.

Yes. When Russia doesn't want a war and Ukraine doesn't want a war, but the Biden administration wants a war. And who's running the Biden administration? The old Obama team. Susan Rice is there. Blinken is an Obama alumni. They're all, it's an Obama team. So are they trying to get a war started

with Russia and Ukraine so that they can implode some buildings and destroy evidence? I don't know. Just an idea I have. That's the way my brain thinks because I've been watching these people for 24 years, and I see how evil and conniving and sneaky and devious they are. There's nothing that they won't stop at. We're going to take a break for a message from our sponsor, Heaven's Harvest. We'll be back with an update about Canada and also with Russia and Ukraine. Don't go away.

Having good, nutritious food ready in case of natural disasters or shipping disruptions is part of the wisdom God gives to us. And Heaven's Harvest is your resource in preparedness. Our food kits have a 25-year shelf life and come in a variety of stackable sizes with handles for convenient storage or transportation. The nutritional value of the food is preserved by freeze-drying and not dehydrating it. Heaven's Harvest offers heirloom vegetable seed kits with the highest quality, non-GMO heirloom seeds simply created by nature. With 39 garden staple varieties, you can grow and produce an astonishing yield of hearty vegetables and fruits that have tremendous flavor. Heaven's Harvest also has water filtration and storage solutions, and gardening and other resources that will offer you and your family peace of mind. Visit Heaven's Harvest online at heavensharvest.com. That's heavensharvest.com or call 800-516-4773. That's 800-516-4773.

Hey, welcome back. One more thought regarding that story we just talked about. So the attorney Sussman is employed, he's a partner with the law firm Perkins Coie. Well, that law firm is also involved in another big case. Perkins Coie is representing Virginia Jufri, who's one of the victims of the Jeffrey Epstein child sex ring, which was an operation of the Israeli Mossad Intelligence Agency. I've always been concerned about that, that Virginia Jufri unknowingly hired a wolf to defend her from the wolves. And if Virginia is watching, I hope she thinks about this

because they're not to be trusted. They're absolutely, look, they work with intelligence agencies. Why would they not be working with the Israeli intelligence agency? Certainly. Okay. Jeffrey Epstein's, that entire scandal was about a blackmail operation to entrap influential American men to have them videotaped having sex with teenage girls so that they could blackmail them in government roles and get whatever policies they needed, whatever decisions that they needed.

They had the dirt on them. And that was all run by the Israeli Mossad intelligence agency, and most likely with the cooperation of the CIA. I think it was working so well, they probably did a joint operation with Mossad. All right, on the next one, we want to talk about Ukraine. So we'll start with what happened over the weekend. The first is from the White House. This is a readout of President Biden's call with President Putin on Saturday. And so on Saturday, President Biden spoke with President Vladimir Putin of Russia about the escalating military buildup on the borders of Ukraine. President Biden was clear

that if Russia undertakes a further invasion of Ukraine, by the way, they haven't invaded Ukraine, the United States, together with our allies and and partners will respond decisively and impose swift and severe costs on Russia. President Biden reiterated that a further Russian invasion of Ukraine would produce widespread human suffering and diminish Russia's standing. President Biden was clear with President Putin that while the United States remains prepared to engage in diplomacy, in full coordination with our allies and partners, we are equally prepared for other scenarios. There you go. That's the line I wanted you to see. Right. Other scenarios. All right. So what other possible scenarios are there, Rick? World War III. Yes. Well, Joe Biden has a lot to cover up in Ukraine, a lot.

So both personal and political. You better believe it. His crooked, corrupt son was doing a lot of business deals for Papa Biden in Ukraine. So, you know, the old man would like to blow up Ukraine. There's a lot of people there, Doc, that could talk. And Joe Biden, you know, war could take care of it. You know, while you're in a state of war, snipers can take out people, hit men. Yes.

Hey, they died in a war. Stuff happens. The enemy did it. Yeah. The Russians did it, you know. We were going to call that witness, and now he's dead. Putin killed the witness. These he's dead. Putin killed the witness. These guys are evil. They're wicked. And Biden has, there's enough dirt in Ukraine to put Biden in prison for a thousand years and his son for another 2,000 years. This is all tied to Ukraine. Yes.

All of it. Everything we're talking about here today, now it starts to make sense about why they want a war with Ukraine. So the next one is, this also happened over the weekend, Novosti news service in Russia, American submarine enters Russian WATERS. RIGHT. SO THE NAVASTIA ARTICLE HEADLINE DOESN'T TRANSLATE

WELL TO ENGLISH. BUT THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, RICK. AN AMERICAN SUBMARINE ENTERED RUSSIAN TERRITORIAL WATERS IN THE KRERALS REGION. AND SPECIAL MEANS WERE USED AGAINST IT, THE MINISTRIAL

DEFENSE SAID. SO BACK ON FEBRUARY 12TH, SATURDAY AT 1040 MOSCOW TIME, A U.S. NAVY SUBMARINE OF THE VIRGINIA TYPE WAS DISCOVERED IN THE AREA OF THE PLANNED EXERCISE OF THE PACIFIC FLEET FORCES IN THE TERRITORIAL WATERS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NEAR EUROPE ISLAND OF THE KURIL RIDGE, THE AGENCY SAID.

THIS WOULD BE AKIN TO FINDING A, YOU KNOW, A RUSSIAN SUBMARINE in U.S. territorial waters, say, you know, off the coast of Seattle or Long Beach or Alaska or anything like that. So this is a big deal. This is a very big deal. So who's the aggressor here? The U.S. Navy submarine. So the crew of the submarine was given a message in Russian and English via underwater communication. You are in the territorial waters of Russia. Surface immediately. The foreign warship was given a message in Russian and English via underwater communication, you are in the territorial waters of Russia, surface immediately. The foreign warship ignored the demand, and in accordance with the guidelines for the protection of the state border of the Russian Federation in the underwater environment,

the crew of the Pacific Fleet frigate Marshal Shapochnov used appropriate means, the message says. The American submarine used a self-propelled simulator to double the target on radar Marshal Shapochnov used appropriate means, the message says. The American submarine used a self-propelled simulator to double the target on radar and acoustic control means and left Russia territorial waters at maximum speed. So U.S. Navy submarine was in Russian waters. Did you hear that on CNN this weekend? No. MSNBC? No.

How about Fox? Do you hear that on CNN this weekend? No. MSNBC? No. How about Fox? Did you hear it on Fox? Well, Doc, the average American, if you told the average American citizen, they would say, so what? We're America. We can do anything we want to do. Well, that's the attitude, isn't it? It is the attitude.

America can do anything it wants to do. It doesn't have to respect other people. They don't have any rights. They don't have the same rights America has. That's the attitude of the American people, because that has been pounded into their brains from the ruling class establishment that owns the news media in this country. But let's flip the script again. If there was a Russian submarine sitting off Long Beach in the territorial waters of the U.S. We'd have to blow up. Right. Why? Because the U.S. can do anything. We're America. That's right.

Now, I think last week I threw out the idea that Vladimir Putin may be secretly working on a peace treaty with Ukraine. Right. Well, guess what happened? Here's our big story this morning. Russia welcomes Ukraine offer to suspend NATO bid. An Ukrainian diplomat has indicated that Ukraine may be prepared to abandon its plans to join NATO. So, Doc, what I speculated last week could happen was happening. And Russia and Ukraine, they have private back-channel lines of communication. They're trying to work out a peace settlement that does not involve war. Right. Well, the U.S. markets this morning responded positively to this headline because it meant that there's not going to be a war. But right away, the warmongers went to work.

Oh, man. And they've been working all day long. All day long, they went to work to say, this isn't true. Ukraine is going to join NATO. Why? Because the Western countries are offering hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine today. Yes. We offered a $1 billion loan to Ukraine. German Chancellor Schulz is in Ukraine today, offered a $150 million loan to Ukraine. And there are a couple other nations that are adding to the financial kitty as well.

So they're going to get their war one way or another, even if they have to buy it. And whose money are they using to do this? They're using my money, which makes me mad. So now President Zelensky of Ukraine today, at first it appeared as if he was going to go along with it. But as the day has worn on here, it has just been to the point now, Rick, where he's like saying the invasion is still on for Wednesday. He had a speech to the nation today, getting this information from our researcher right now, in a speech to the nation, saying that on Wednesday, that's the day of the planned invasion.

What we're going to do that day is we're going to have a national holiday. We are going to raise our flags. We're going to have a day of unity in Ukraine. And so that's the current plan for President Zelensky. But in his remarks, he's saying that the date for the invasion is Wednesday. So even he is going along with it now. Where is he getting the date? Did Putin send it to him and say, we're coming in on Wednesday?

It might have come with the check from the U.S. From the billion dollars. Right. Yeah. Unbelievable. Well, one final story on Russia. This is TASS News Agency. President Lukashenko of Belarus said Western nations want to spark a conflict in Ukraine, but not to fight it themselves. He's a very wise man.

He says, I see that your Ukrainian politicians begin to bucket the West common course. You see, I know for sure what the West needs here today. They need to spark a conflict, Lukashenko said during the meeting with Ukrainian politician Alexander Moroz, according to Bieta. You know, they are able with other people's hands. It is better to fight with other people's hands, other people's lives. Let Ukrainians die, the Russians, the Belarusians die. It's all far away. And he's right. We fight far away wars. We don't fight wars close to home. Yeah. Well, let's continue all of this praying

that the warmongers will be stifled and frustrated in their ability to start World War III. I want to ask you a question. Let's say we come to Wednesday and there's not an invasion. Will we see President Biden come out on Thursday and say, look what I did? Yes. I stopped the invasion by the Russians. Yes. Is that what we're going to see happen? Yes.

The threats, my tough threats, frightened Putin. I mean, Nancy Pelosi made some kind of crazy remark where she said something like, well, even if Putin never intended to invade, we know the sanctions worked. She was in the bottle a little bit too long today. Wow. We're going to change now over to the COVID wars. First we'll start in France.

As you know, there was a French convoy for freedom that was moving its way towards Paris where they got met by the police of Paris with tear gas. We've got some video of the French convoy as it made its way towards the capital city. Now, of course, they weren't met with open arms by French police there.

They actually deployed tear gas against the Freedom Convoy, so much so that it was winding up inside of restaurants and civilians who were just around not involved in the freedom convoy at all they were being impacted by this watch this this is seen along some of the restaurants and shops on the Champs-Élysées in Paris as the police try to disperse the French Freedom Convoy. The I'm so glad the NATO nations are fighting for democracy around the world. Truly, Rick. You tear gas people who show up in the capital city to express their displeasure with government policies. How do you greet them? Tear gas. Right.

So the motto of France is liberty, equality, and fraternity, Rick, but didn't see any of that exhibited there today. And the same thing happening in Canada as well. Yeah, so the Ambassador Bridge reopened after police moved in on the weekend. And a number of the protesters fled the scene when the police arrived. Others were eventually persuaded to leave. So the bridge is open again for traffic. The truckers, you know, I think they made some strategic errors there. They should have drove the trucks onto the bridge and parked them on the bridge. How are you going to move them off the bridge? Yeah, you'd have to move each one individually, which would take time and effort and tie things up even more. Yeah, and where are the American truckers? Where are they?

Where are you guys? Where are the American truckers? Why aren't you blocking the bridge on the American side and standing with the truckers in Canada? A lot of talk, no action. But they did get results because province after province after province in Canada announced the end of the vaccine mandates. Well, over in British Columbia, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have arrested anti-mandate protesters there as well. So police began arresting the protesters blocking the roadway to the Pacific Highway border crossing, and that has also been shut down for about a week itself there. So people are now reacting to

the arrest. I'm surprised how quickly it went down, Rick, that it's now there are still protesters in Ottawa, still protesters in Toronto and everything. And the next thing that's happening is Trudeau is going to seize dictatorial powers to make sure there are no future protests. That's right. This is being reported today in Canadian news outlets. Trudeau plans to invoke Emergencies Act in response to protests. Right. So Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has told his caucus that he will invoke never-before-used Emergencies Act

to give the federal government extra powers to handle anti-vaccine mandate protests across the country. Now, this Emergencies Act, which replaced the War Measures Act in the 80s, defines a national emergency as a temporary, urgent and critical situation that seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians and is of such proportions or nature as to exceed the capacity or authority of a province to deal with. Now it gives special powers to the Prime Minister to respond to emergency scenarios affecting public welfare, including natural disasters to emergency scenarios affecting public welfare,

including natural disasters and disease outbreaks, public orders such as civil unrest, international emergencies, or war emergencies. That's a pretty broad brush to paint with there, isn't it? Yeah. It comes down to Trudeau's going to declare martial law. He's not going to use those words, martial law. He's going to say he is implementing the Emergencies Act of Canada. That's never been used ever by any other prime minister. So he's going to use it against his own people. There's no calamity. There hasn't been an earthquake. There hasn't been a tornado. no, protest against his policies. So he's going to take on dictatorial powers so that he can break the back of anybody

who dares to protest him. This is why we had to learn from this folks. See when the truckers gave up on the weekend, this past weekend, you could be certain the very next thing will be a heavy hand. Because the globalists never retreat. No. They're constantly in advance. Yes. You can't let them win.

You just can't let them win. You have to break their back. Is there anything you can do with these people? They're tyrants. And bullies only understand one thing. And so the people are going to — so now to do another convoy, to do another protest, you're going to be declared a domestic terrorist. And would Prime Minister Trudeau have the power to do that under the —

He's going to have apparently extraordinary dictatorial powers to order even the military to go in against protesters. Well, Jack Lindsay, an associate professor in the Applied Disaster and Emergency Studies Department at Brandon University in Manitoba, said one of the first steps in invoking the Emergency Act is the government has to show that a state of emergency exists. It says, under the act, the government is prohibited from taking direct control of police forces, Lindsay said. They do have the grounds to regulate and prohibit public assembly, wow, and travel, and then regulate or prohibit the use of specific properties, he said.

All right. Let's break this down. I know very little about Canadian law, but I'm looking at this and I can read between the lines. I can read the lines. I don't have to read between them. Under the act, the Canadian government is prohibited from taking direct control of police forces, but they do have the grounds to regulate and prohibit the public from gathering to protest. Yes. And to control or stop travel. Which means they could take control of the highways. If you restrict travel, is that not martial law? You close the highways? That's martial law.

And to regulate or prohibit the use of specific properties. Properties, does that mean real estate properties? Or does that mean? Or public, where maybe you had access before, you know, a public, like a park maybe, or something like that. But then they come out and say, no, you can't use this area. They could designate that for anything, couldn't they? But hey, Canada is a member of NATO, and NATO's fighting for democracy around the world. Except at home. Except he acts like his father, Fidel Castro, who didn't tolerate dissent in Cuba. The next one, this is from Newsweek, Give Sin Go. This is the Christian-based crowdfunding platform.

It was hacked over the weekend, and the names of the donors were published on the Internet. Yes. Now, they had accumulated more than $8 million of funding to support their cause. Actually, it was closer to $10 million by the time you did all the math. And so right now, that money's not moving anywhere at this time. But the worst thing, Doc, is the names of the people who gave the money, not public knowledge. AT THIS TIME. BUT THE WORST THING, DOC, IS THE NAMES OF THE PEOPLE WHO GAVE THE MONEY ARE NOW PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE.

WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT THE PEOPLE UP IN CANADA ASKED FOR BEFOREHAND. THEY WANTED TO KNOW WHO WAS GIVING THE MONEY. RIGHT, SO NOW THEY KNOW. ALSO, THE MONEY GIVEN, THE ORIGINAL $10 MILLION

THAT WAS GIVEN THROUGH GOFUNDME, OKAY, I HAVE ANOTHER NAME FOR THEM. I have another name for them. I just can't say it. It's a Christian show and I can't say it. But I can't get it out of my mind now. So there was $10 million donated and they originally released $1.4 million but the truckers never got the money. That's right. The money was held in escrow at TD Bank, Toronto Dominion Bank, which we have them here in Florida because there's so

many Canadians that spend winter here in Florida. So we have Canadian banks in Florida, TD Bank. If you bank with TD Bank, get your money out. Because let me tell you what TD Bank did. That $1.4 million donated to the truckers that they held in escrow, they gave it to the Canadian government. That's exactly right, Rick. Handed it right over to them. Dirty, stinking scumbags at TD Bank.

Don't get your money out of TD Bank. Don't ever do business at TD Bank. Don't get your money out of TD Bank. Don't ever do business with TD Bank. They just showed you what they are. And they stole the money and gave it to the Canadian government. What else do we have here? So, okay, this is another one from Canada. CTV News.

A vaccine-fearing British Columbia dad cannot share COVID-19 media posts with his child, according to a judge. Right, so a father can't show his own child social media post. About the vaccine. Right. So a British Columbia judge has ordered a vaccine-fearing, listen to that, father, not to share any social media posts related to COVID-19 with his young child. So in this ruling published online this week, Judge Kathleen Heinrichs also barred the dad from discussing COVID-19 vaccination with his 11-year-old son or supplying the child with other information about the vaccine or the disease. Have you ever heard of anything this outrageous? Where you can't talk to your child?

About health? About a health issue? What is in the so-called vaccine that they are defending so much? Well, we all know, don't we? It's not a vaccine. It's an operating system. Right. And now parents are barred by judges from even discussing it with their children.

But we've got freedom, Doc. Yes. Canada is in NATO. NATO is fighting for democracy around the world. This is democracy? That's democracy around the world this is democracy that's democracy western democracy look at that so as in previous cases covered by ctv news the anti-vaccine a vaccination parent who worries the extremely rare risk associated with the vaccine outweighed the benefits failed to present a convincing argument in court. According to the decision, J.W. put forward a number of documents, links, and purported expert opinions attempting to support the inefficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine,

none of which was taken into serious consideration by the judge. There are problems with the admissibility of information that is printed from the Internet or submitted with the intent of offering an opinion to the court without meeting the requirements of expert evidence, Heinrich wrote. In other words, she just didn't even consider the father's case at all for concern about his child. Oh, you mean how, like the co-inventor of mRNA, Dr. Robert Malone, is recommending that children not be vaccinated with it, that dad can't show that to his child? No, because it wasn't presented the right way or it wasn't presented in an evidentiary way. Not that the information is false, it just wasn't presented the right way. But the pharmaceuticals information,

you can share with the children. Right. Pfizer. You can give your children Pfizer's information. Yes. You can give it to the children. Yes. You can bypass the parents and give it directly to the children. But parents can't talk to their children about the outcome. what a police state it's becoming. Another member of the Canadian military special forces under investigation.

So a Canadian Army officer in New Brunswick, he's currently under investigation, Rick, after calling for other military members and police to rise up over vaccination and pandemic restrictions. Major General Stephen Kludowski spoke in uniform in a seven-minute video Thursday describing government actions during the pandemic as tyranny. He went on to describe vaccination for COVID-19 as genocide. Daniel Libutile, we talked about him last week, the head of media relations for Canadian forces,

confirmed in an email that Kludowski is an active member of the military based at 5th Canadian Division Support Base in Gagetown. We are investigating the incident and will be taking appropriate action, Laboutier said in the statement without specifying what that action may be. That action will more likely be court-martialed. Kludowski describes measures meant to reduce the spread of COVID-19 as being imposed by government traitors. And he said it correctly. And he said it in uniform, too. So there's a few brave souls still left out there. Few.

Very few. Very few. The general public has been, their minds have been taken over by the globalist propaganda. They can't even think straight. They don't even remember why they were in a free country. They've lost sight of it. They've been captured.

Their minds have been captured. And how do you reason with somebody whose mind has been captured by propaganda? That's the effectiveness of propaganda. You don't have to shoot people to take control of a country. You capture their minds. Right. Okay? So Canada has fallen. The United States has pretty much fallen. Most of the Western world has fallen. And there's a resistance movement inside each country, and it's up AND THERE'S A RESISTANCE MOVEMENT INSIDE EACH COUNTRY. AND IT'S UP TO US TO FIGHT WITH

ALL OF OUR MIGHT TO HOLD ON TO FREEDOM AND TO HOLD ON TO HUMANITY BECAUSE WE'RE NOT JUST UP AGAINST A POLITICAL MOVEMENT OR A PHARMACEUTICAL AGENDA. THIS IS A DEMONIC AGENDA. THIS IS TO CHANGE HUMANITY. WE WRESTLE NOT AGAINST FLESH AND Well, we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against spiritual powers, wickedness in high places. That's right. Yeah, nephilim. That's

what we're dealing with, the nephilim. We're going to wrap it up at this point. Thank you for watching this Monday edition of True News. As always, we thank you for your prayers, your financial support, and we always ask you to tell your friends and loved ones and co-workers about True News. Tell them that there is a truly independent news source that is available to them, and you can help us grow. God bless. We love you very much. We will see you tomorrow. God bless you. The preceding program was made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com.