TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Trump’s Vision for Greenland Shocks EU’s Socialist Establishment

Episode Date: January 8, 2025

Three large wildfires have burned over 4000 acres in California’s Los Angeles and Ventura counties. The three biggest fires are the Palisades Fire, the Eaton fire, and the Hurst fire. Over 1000 homes and other buildings were destroyed by the Palisades fire. Over 80,000 residents have been evacuated. The fires were exacerbated by severe drought conditions and hurricane-force Santa Ana winds. Wind gusts reached up to 100 mph in higher elevations, creating extremely dangerous fire weather.Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 01/08/2025Join the leading community for Conservative Christians! https://www.FaithandValues.comYou can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 399 Vero Beach, FL 32961.Get high-quality emergency preparedness food today from American Reserves!https://www.AmericanReserves.com             It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. Now available in eBook and audio formats! Order Final Day from Amazon today!https://www.amazon.com/Final-Day-Characteristics-Second-Coming/dp/0578260816/Apple users, you can download the audio version on Apple Books!https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/final-day-10-characteristics-of-the-second-coming/id1687129858Purchase the 4-part DVD set or start streaming Sacrificing Liberty today.https://www.sacrificingliberty.com/watchThe Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today!https://tru.news/faucielf

You don't have to think the world is ending tomorrow to be realistic. Serious emergencies happen to regular people all the time. For the forward-thinking family man, American Reserves serves as the ideal safeguard. As a father and husband, providing for and protecting my family is my highest priority. With strength in every pack, American Reserves combines variety and durability for any family. Waiting until it is too late will be devastating. Ensure your loved ones are cared for in any crisis by building a storehouse with American Reserves.

Because strength comes from smart preparation. American Reserves, your ally in emergency readiness. Visit our website and become prepared today. Three large wildfires have burned over 4,000 acres in California's Los Angeles and Ventura counties. The three biggest fires are the Palisades Fire, the Eaton Fire, and the Hearst Fire. Over 1,000 homes and other buildings were destroyed by the Palisade Fire alone. Over 80,000 residents have been evacuated. The fires were exasperated by severe drought conditions and hurricane Hurricane Force Santa Ana winds, wind gusts reaching up to 100 miles per hour in higher elevations that created extremely dangerous fire conditions.

This is true news for Wednesday, January 8, 2025. Let's begin our analysis and commentary of today's national and international news by looking at this very tragic article published by Los Angeles TV station KTLA. Palisades fire in Los Angeles destroys 1,000 structures. No containment. Yes. Dr. Darrell Bock This is, the videos that I've seen today are, you used the word apocalyptic. Yeah. Dr. Darrell Bock Very tragic. Beyond comprehension that a fire spreads so quickly and burned down so many homes. Yeah, so what you're watching right now is various scenes from social media, people who are being

directly impacted specifically by the Palisades fire. You see it comes right up to people's patios and everything. And of course, homes are burned down too. Look at the sparks flying as they're running into the streets. Now look at this one. Can you imagine looking at your patio and seeing this scene from hell? I mean this... And he's still in the house.

You're still there. Why are you... Yes, you've... Extremely disturbing, tragic, a lot of Americans without homes today. That figure 80,000, that was early today. Right. So I don't know what the figure is as of right now.

And where's the mayor of L.A. right now, Rick? The mayor is in Africa. And she's visiting Ghana. Attending the presidential inauguration there. Right. And her city is burning. And, you know, she defeated California billionaire Rick Caruso, who was a real estate developer. Right.

And on the city's water board. Yes. And that's important for what we're going to talk to you about here in just a moment. But she defeated him. The Democratic Party, Barack Obama, everybody came to her rescue and pushed her across the finish line. She has no experience in her life other than politics. That's the only thing that woman has ever done, politics. She's never had a real job, never owned a business,

never managed a business, never had a payroll, just politics. And this is what you get. Now, you might say, well, wait a minute. Why is it her fault that the city's on fire? Well, the deeper you dig into this story, it's not the... It's the... It's systematic of California politics. A collapse of government structure. Yes.

When you put incompetent people in every office in California, when I say every, you know, when a majority, the vast majority of the offices of California from the statehouse down to the city council. Right. And they're held by incompetent people who are dedicated to an ideology. Of a DEI. Yes. A diversity. Equity.

And inclusion. These are the hallmarks of government. And this is what you get. The city fire chief is a lesbian. She was chosen to be fire chief for her sexuality, not for her competence in fighting fires. So there she is, Kristen Crowley. This is 2022. She was named the first female and openly gay fire chief.

Well, how's that working out for you right now? You know, there's video of her in the gay pride parade. She's there handing out gay flags and all that kind of stuff. In her uniform. As you see here, this is

ABC Channel 7. That's a year or two ago. She's excited to be a lesbian fire chief. Where is she right now? What is she doing? Her city's burning. She doesn't know what to do. She came out earlier today and said,

we just don't have enough fire personnel. Why not? Why don't you? Because the Los Angeles County, LA County prioritized- The mayor cut the budget. Yes, by $17 million. Yes, the mayor cut the budget of the fire department. So Rick Caruso, I mentioned him, the billionaire real estate developer who ran for mayor and lost. He said, he told this, he told to Fox TV 11.

He said, Los Angeles looks like a third world country. When you listen to him, he's live on television last night. He said, there's no water in the fire hydrants. Yes, and that's the case today. Now, this is why I pointed out he had been a member of the Los Angeles County Water Board. He knows what he's talking about. He's a developer. He's a billionaire, made his money developing real estate.

He served on the water board. He said, there's no water in the fire hydrants. What's going on here? Well, that then leads to Gavin Newsom. Right. Who destroyed dams in the state. Yes. To save a fish.

To save a smelt. Yes. They build everything around climate change, around DEI, but they are totally incompetent in governing. They can't govern anything. The only thing

that they're good about, the only thing that they excel in, well, two things. Politics and division. Yes. That's it. Oh, and I would add a third, wasting money. Wasting money.

They're very good at that. I want you to listen to this video clip, Fox TV 11 with Rick Caruso. This is what he told the station last night. My heart goes out, obviously, to the people with their homes and watching the small businesses around us go up in flames. This is people's livelihoods. So it's devastating. But what is most concerning to me is our first responders and our firefighters who are trying to battle this. there's no water in the palisades. There's no water coming out of the fire hydrants. This is an absolute mismanagement by the city.

It's not the firefighters' fault, but it's by the city. And I'm going to be very honest. We've got a mayor that's out of the country, and we've got a city that's burning, and there's no resources to put out fires. So if you look at your pictures, you don't see the firefighters there because there's nothing they can do. And it looks like we're in a third world country here. And we've got a lot of tough questions that we need to ask the mayor and the city council and our representatives and the county representatives. Why didn't you work to mitigate this? What was your brush mitigation program?

I heard you earlier talking about it's been dry because there hasn't been rain. That's not the biggest problem here. The brush up in these hills that are controlled by the city and the county, I would beg you that if they haven't been handled, mitigated, pruned, removed for probably 30 or 40 years, this was a disaster waiting to happen. And what's predictable is preventable. And who's paying the price are all of these people in their homes and their businesses tonight. Now, we'll rebuild, but the majority of this community is going to have a tough time rebuilding their lives. When you see, we're going to show you in a moment here some more of the devastation.

But I want to show you a clip from Joe Rogan. This is maybe six months ago. Well, actually, shorter than that, about three months ago. Three months ago? Okay. Yeah, it was the interview President Trump did with Joe Rogan. This is maybe six months ago? Well, actually, shorter than that, about three months ago. Three months ago? Okay. Yeah, it was the interview President Trump did with Joe Rogan. Oh, it was the one just before the election? Yes. Okay. So three months ago, President Trump was on Joe Rogan's podcast. And in that conversation, He was talking about California's wildfire threat and the management of forest and water resources.

You know, the man knows what he's talking about. He knows what he's talking about. You compare him to these incompetent nincompoops that have high positions like governor and mayor, they don't know what they're doing. They have no idea what they're doing. They're driven by ideology. And their ideology is stupid. Doc, people have lost their entire lives other than their physical.

They've lost everything because of the stupidity of these politicians. See, when you allow stupid, incompetent people to run things, there's a price to pay for it. There's a terrible price to pay for it. I was going to say, take these far leftists and put them in, just get a big insane asylum and put them in there. Well, isn't that where they're at now in California? No, but lock them up in four walls and tell them, say, okay, you're a king, you're a governor, you do anything you want to do in here. The walls are padded. Do anything you want. Just don't come outside.

Don't come outside with the normal people. See, I think it's actually part of judgment on us. Oh, I agree with you on that. Part of God's judgment on America is that we are ruled by idiots. Yes. By the insane. We have put the insane in power. When are people going to realize we've elected insane?

This has nothing to do with their party. They are insane. They're literally insane people. And we're letting them rule over us. I want to show you this Joe Rogan podcast from months ago during the campaign. This is Donald Trump talking about the problems that's going to lead to what just happened in the past couple of days in California. They said, we have no water. I said, do you have a drought? No, we don't have a drought. I said, why don't you have no water? Because the water isn't allowed to flow down. It's got a natural flow from Canada all the

way up north of water, more water than they could ever use. And in order to protect a tiny little fish, the water up north gets routed into the Pacific Ocean. Millions and millions of gallons of water gets poured. I could have water for all of that land. Water for your forests. You know, your forests are dry as a bone. It's common sense. Yes.

But then you say if it was common, everybody would have it, right? Everybody would have it. But we need another word for it. How about wisdom? Just competence? Except that the policies, the DEI policies and all of that, everything, the climate change policies, they're intentional, Rick. It's not that they're stupid or dumb. It's intentional. To destroy the country.

Yes. I said when Barack Obama entered the White House, I said it before, during his campaign in 2008, I said this man is going to be a human wrecking ball. He's going to deliberately destroy the country. And he did. And he stayed in the White House through Joe Biden. And he tried to get a fourth term with Kamala Harris. Right. To do what? Continue to wreck and destroy the United States of America with policies that are insane.

But they're not insane to him. They're deliberate. They're intentional. That's right. We're the ones who are crazy to let these people get away with it. And that's it. And I've seen a lot of people posting on social media, a lot of celebrities, some even conservative celebrities, saying, oh, this is horrible here. What's going on?

I saw a post by James Wood and by Richard Grinnell, former acting director under Donald Trump. And both of them said, boy, look, the fires are just horrible and everything. But you're still there. Yes, you're still living under it. You're still there. You're paying half your salary in California to support insanity. Yes. And he won't leave.

He will not leave. I personally think the state's under judgment has been for a number of years. Ever since they passed a state law that mandates that children, all the way down to kindergarten, have to be indoctrinated with the homosexual agenda. And I believe that's when the judgment really fell on California and things really started to go, really go south. really started to go south. I want to switch topics. We'll go north.

To Greenland. Greenland. President Trump yesterday said he would not rule out using U.S. military force to seize Greenland. Yes. Now, he didn't say he would use it. He said, I would rule it out. But he got into the news headlines. Yes.

The idea, it's a possibility, he would use military force to seize Greenland. We'll show you the clip from the press conference. The world on fire that you mentioned, but let's start, if we could, with your references to Greenland and the Panama Canal, so forth. Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of these areas, you are not going to use military or economic coercion? No. And can you tell us a little bit about what your plan is? Are you going to negotiate a new treaty? Are you going to ask the Canadians to hold the vote?

What is the strategy? I can't assure you. You're talking about Panama and Greenland. No, I can't assure you on either of those two. But I can say this. We need them for economic security. The Panama Canal was built for our military. I'm not going to commit to that now.

It might be that you'll have to do something. Look, the Panama Canal is vital to our country. It's being operated by China. China. And we gave the Panama Canal to Panama. We didn't give it to China. And they've abused it. They've abused that gift. It should have never been made, by the way. Giving the Panama Canal is why Jimmy Carter lost the election, in my opinion, more so maybe than the hostages. The hostages were a big deal. But if you remember, and nobody wants to talk about the Panama Canal now because,

you know, it's inappropriate, I guess, because it's a bad part of the Carter legacy. But he was a good man. Look, he was a good man. I knew him a little bit, and he was a very fine person. But that was a big mistake. Giving the Panama Canal to Panama was a very big mistake. We lost 38,000 people. It cost us the equivalent of a trillion dollars, maybe more than probably the most expensive. They say it was the most expensive structure, if we call it a structure, which I guess you can ever built. And giving that away was a horrible thing. And I believe that's why Jimmy Carter lost the election, even more so than the hostages, those two things. Of course, the Panama Canal, built by, you know, under the administration of Teddy Roosevelt. Right.

Theodore Roosevelt obviously was a very strong personality. And Congress never appropriated, Congress never passed a bill to build the Panama Canal. Maybe they did later, but Roosevelt said, I'll have it built by the time they meet. Right. And that was his attitude.

We're going to go in there, we're going to build the canal and Congress, if they want to pass a bill later, they can do that, but we're going to have the canal built. But the key thing that we heard in here is that President Trump said, I cannot rule out that I would not use military force on Panama, on the Panama Canal and Greenland. Right.

And the argument that he makes in that, which would open the door to military activity, is national security. He brought that up several times in the press conference about the national security issues related to the Panama Canal, and then started several times, made the case about the national security issues related to Greenland. And a lot of people may say, what's the deal with Greenland now all of a sudden? Well, I'll tell you what the big deal is. China and Russia are opening up Arctic sea lanes. There you go. You got it. And Greenland has... They are making a move at the North Pole.

And Greenland has one of the largest legal claims on the Arctic. That's right. So whoever controls Greenland... That's right. ...controls the Arctic. That's it right there. Plus the minerals. Yes, and everything else that's related to it. And it's the largest island in the world.

And it's in North America. Honestly, I don't know why it wasn't part of the United States. I've never studied the history of Greenland. Well, it's been a part of Denmark, if you want to say, since the 1700s. It's a colony. Yeah. But Canada is a colony. Yes. These Canadian politicians talking about, we are a sovereign nation.

No, you're not. Who's your head of state? King Charles. That's right. Who's on your money? You're not. Who's your head of state? King Charles. That's right. Who's on your money? You're not a sovereign nation. You're a British colony. So Donald Trump is serious about Greenland.

You know, the first time he said it, I just thought, oh, he's trolling people. No, he's not. I really believe the U.S. is going to end up owning Greenland. Well, a reporter asked him, Rick, would he use military force, therefore, against Canada? Okay. Because he made a national security issue without saying he would use military force about Greenland and Panama. So he shifted his tone when it came to Canada and military force. We have this clip where the reporter asked him about Canada specifically.

The leader of the Conservative Party in Canada said, under no circumstances will I ever be the 51st state. Maybe he won't win, but maybe he will. To David's point, you had suggested that you were considering military force to acquire Panama and Greenland. Are you also considering military force to annex and acquire Canada? No. Economic force. Because Canada and the United States, that would really be something. You get rid of that artificially drawn line,

and you take a look at what that looks like. And it would also be much better for national security. Don't forget, we basically protect Canada. But here's the problem with Canada. So many friends up there. I love the Canadian people. They're great. But we're spending hundreds of billions a year to protect it. We're spending hundreds of billions a year to protect it. We're spending hundreds of billions a year to take care of Canada. We lose in trade deficits. We're losing mass. We don't need their cars. You know, they make 20 percent of our cars. We don't need that. I'd rather make them in Detroit. We don't need the cars. We don't need their lumber. We have massive fields of lumber. We don't't need their lumber we have to unrestrict them because stupid people put you know restrictions on but i can do that with an executive order

we don't need anything they have we don't need their dairy products we have more than they have we don't need anything so why are we losing 200 billion dollars a year and more to protect canada and i said that to as i called called him, Governor Trudeau. I said, listen, what would happen if we didn't subsidize you? If we didn't, because we give them a lot of money. We help them. As an example, we're buying icebreakers. And Canada wants to join us in the buying of icebreakers.

I said, you know, we don't really want to have a partner in the buying of icebreakers. We don't need a partner. But. No right. Nope. right to claim to a subcontractor? No right. Nope. No right.

When he's talking about the money spent to defend Canada, primarily he's NORAD. Yes, that's right. The missile shield. Yes. So – Canada doesn't have its own nuclear weapons. It doesn't have its own NORAD or anything like that. And this has gone back, you know, we've provided that. It has a very limited military.

Right. And obviously Donald Trump isn't going to attack Canada. But I do believe he's going to collapse their political and economic system. Okay? He really is. He's made up his mind that he's taking Canada, Greenland, Panama, and I believe Mexico. I believe that's coming. And between Mexico and Panama,

you have Costa Rica. Yeah. So Costa Rica will get gobbled up just in the action that's taking place. But he's not creating, this is not the globalist, I don't think this is the globalist plan. They had a plan. The. They had a plan.

The globalists had a plan. They had a plan to rule the whole world and they were going to divide the world up into various components and they would rule the whole world. Donald Trump's mentality is I'm going to gobble up all the countries around us and we're going to be

we're going to be the 800 pound gorilla and what are you going to do about it and really that's kind of the tone that's being set now because now you have other countries that are making hay about Donald Trump talking about Greenland right so we have this from

the BBC here Germany and France warn warn Trump over threat to take over Greenland. Sure. So Mr. Schultz and Macron are threatening Donald Trump. What are they going to do? If he used military force, if he had Marines land in Greenland, what are they going to do about it? They can't do anything.

They're certainly not going to go to war with the U.S. over Greenland. They're not going to. And they don't have the military capability to without us backing them up anyway. But Denmark is a NATO member. Yeah. So would that be in Article 5? Yeah, Article 5? If they so chose to do it, but...

Who are you going to call in to fight the United States? Because what Donald Trump would do, he would simply withdraw from NATO. Right. He would say, you know, I think, Doc, he's... I think he plans to collapse the European Union. I believe that's part of his strategy. He's going to collapse them, the European Union, not the individual nations. I think he's going to destroy the European Union.

And I also think he's aiming to implode Great Britain because this fits in with why is Elon Musk using his clout to go after the pedophile networks in Great Britain? Yes. They are seeking to bring about a political implosion that brings down the whole upper echelon of British politics, business, media. I mean, Elon Musk, he tweeted the other day a picture of Savile. Oh, Jerry Savile? Yes, Savile. Yeah, it was Savile, the pedophile that worked for BBC. Yes. And BBC knew about it.

And covered it up. Covered it up for years, okay? And Elon Musk tweeted a picture of him and said, I want to remind you, you know, BBC, you know, pay this man. You did it before BBC. Yes. So they're going, they're using the pedophile networks as the way to bring down the political establishment in Great Britain. Great Britain controls Canada. If you want Canada, bring down Great Britain.

You see the strategy? Oh, yeah. And if you take down Great Britain, you also can get New Zealand and Australia. That's true. And the Falklands. And the Falklands. Because I said today he would get the Falklands. So we'll go back here to this BBC article on France and Germany.

Germany, France have warned Donald Trump against threatening Greenland. German Chancellor Scholz said the principle of the invulnerability of borders applies to every country, no matter whether it's a very small one or a very powerful one. The French foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrault, said, quote, there is absolutely no question that the European Union would let another nation of the world attack its sovereign borders. Schultz said that there was a certain incomprehension about statements coming from the incoming U.S. administration. Schultz said, NATO is the most important instrument for our defense and a central of the transatlantic relationship.

The French foreign minister said, if you are asking me whether I think the United States will invade Greenland, my answer is no. But have we entered into an era that sees the return of the survival of the fittest? Then the answer is yes. So we should allow ourselves to be intimidated and overcome with worry? Clearly not. We must wake up, build up our strength. Well, your strength comes from the United States. Right. If Trump pulls out of NATO, what are you guys going to do? It'll take you a decade to form a European army.

And they don't have the fight. They don't even have reserves of natural gas. And if Trump would cut off, if he would put sanctions on them and cut off natural gas to Europe? Oh, yeah. I mean, they've painted themselves in the corner. I think he's going to bring down the European Union, but I also believe he's going to bring down the British Empire. And the fact of the matter is the European Union, they can't even agree on cheese prices in the Union. What makes you think they're going to be able to get together and form any kind of military anyway, even if they really desired to do so? They have desired, but they've been talking about it as long as I've been doing this program. Right.

EU super state and EU army and all that kind of stuff, and they haven't been able to bring it together. Donald Trump's going to pull the plug on them. That thing's going to go down, and Europe's going to go back to being individual nations, very small individual nations, which is what they should be. The whole globalist plan was we're going to homogenize the entire European continent and bring it into one political entity, it's not going to work. It hasn't worked.

You know, let France be France. Let Germany be Germany. Let Switzerland be, Switzerland hasn't joined yet. But let each, let the European nations be what they are. But the plan was homogenize them, bring them together, force them to become one union. But I think Donald Trump is going to implode the European Union, and he's going to implode NATO, and he's going to implode the British Empire, the Commonwealth. There's no empire but the Commonwealth.

You take out the Commonwealth, he gets Canada. And Australia and New Zealand will come begging. He'll obviously get Greenland with the European Union in disarray. There won't be anybody to defend Denmark. Who is going to fight him? I think where he's going, Doc, is his plan is to create an America union. Right? No, I believe that too. It's different than what George W. Bush wanted. Bush was part of it. He was doing it the Bilderberg way. Right.

So that the world globalists would be in charge of America. So the globalist plan is no borders. But the Trump plan is, yes, borders. But big. But big borders. Expanded borders. You got it now. The big. But big borders. Expanded borders. You got it now. The United States of the world.

We're going to have borders, but we're expanding the borders. Okay, so you mentioned yesterday the Monroe Doctrine. Right. So President Monroe back in the 1820s established the20s. Yeah. Established the Monroe Doctrine. And this was to kind of set the boundaries, you know, because you had European nations that were, you know, still meddling in affairs. Colonizing. In the Western Hemisphere. They were colonizing here. That's how Denmark got Greenland.

And so they kind of the, you know, the agreement was under the Monroe Doctrine is we'll stay in the Western Hemisphere. We won't meddle in affairs in Europe or anything like that. You European nations, you don't meddle in affairs in the Western Hemisphere. Conveniently, there was the Atlantic Ocean that separated the two, and that worked effectively for nearly 200 years. But now, you know, that's... So, Doc, Mr. Trump is not reviving the Monroe Doctrine. No. He's introducing the Donrow Doctrine. This is the Donrow.

It's the new doctrine. It's the Donald Trump Doct doctrine that America owns all of America. And he hasn't said it yet, but his plan is before he leaves the White House, America will go all the way to Chile. Yeah, it'll go all the way down to the direct passage. Yes. And who knows where else it might end up with, too.

I can see in a very short period of time nations in Africa, maybe even Europe, approaching the U.S. and saying, you know what? We like your vision. We like what you're doing and everything. We want to be a part of this. That's where I'm going. He is going to create an American BRICS. Yes, I like that.

You mentioned that the other day. And nations will line up to join the American BRICS. Yes. So you'll have the BRICS, which are Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Brazil is in America. South America. They're going to have to make a decision. Are they with China and Russia, or are they with the United States? That's the hard ball.

He's going to play with everyone. But I believe he's going to create an American BRICS, whatever name they're going to give it. But it will be an economic alliance. You're either in or you're out. That's the way he'll put it. You're either in or you're out. If you're out, you get nothing. If you're in,

you get all the goodies. You get all the benefits. Including military protection? Yes. It's a protection racket, Rick. Oh, it is. He is a New York real estate developer. We take you over and we'll protect you so that nobody takes you over. Isn't that how it works? But he's going to – I really believe this is going to happen in the next four years.

This is going to be – we're witnessing history. He is not going to let anybody get in his way. He's made up his mind. He will not tolerate another insurrection like the deep state did to him during his four years. And then the four years after he left, they still continue to try to put him in prison, to kill him. He's not going to allow it to happen again. And we're going to see some real hardball tactics used because he is not going to let his opponents get the upper hand. They got the upper hand right at the beginning of his administration.

Yes. At the very beginning. They had his phones tapped. They had everything. And, of course, you were infiltrated by the swamp critters that he vowed to get rid of. And Kash Patel, as the FBI director, is going to go after some people. Right. Because you don't have to tell Kash Patel what they did. He already knows.

And he's going to go after them. And you're going to see some very prominent names be indicted. And I think you're going to see people fleeing the United States. I really do, Doc. I believe you're going to see people fleeing, people who were complicit in sedition against the president. Because that's what they did. It was sedition. They committed acts

of sedition to destabilize his presidency. And if he can prove it, if he can get his hands on the evidence, they're going to file, they're going to go after them with charges of treason. Yes. And you know what they do to traders? They hang them. That's right.

That's what we're going to see. Wall Street Journal. Trump imagines new spear of U.S. influence stretching from Panama to Greenland. I believe it's larger than that, but this is where the journal takes us. President-elect Trump's calls to take control of Greenland, Canada, and the Panama Canal, and this is according to the journal, reflect his fascination with a 21st century version of an old idea that great powers should carve out spheres of influence and defend their economic and security interests by imposing their will on smaller neighbors. The article goes on to say that Canada, the United States, that would really be something.

You heard Donald Trump say this in the video clip that we had. You get rid of that artificially drawn line and you take a look at what that looks like and it would be much better for national security. Now, I'll skip down to 11b, guys. We just haven't seen anything like this, at least in my lifetime, from a president of the United States. That's coming from Chuck Hagel, the former Republican senator and defense secretary during Obama's administration. This is very, very autocratic. And that is why it is so concerning what Trump is saying and how he's acting. Well, Chuck Hagel was one of the premier Republican globalists. He was a senator, okay?

And he was deeply involved in the globalist network. So I'm not surprised to hear him talk like that. Doc, I don't believe Donald Trump plans to militarily invade Greenland. I don't think so either. I don't think he has to. But I'm not ruling it out. But if the people of Greenland had I don't think so either. I don't think he has to. But I'm not ruling it out.

But if the people of Greenland had a referendum, there are only 55,000 residents. Right. Right. 20, what, 26,

27,000 votes? Well, that's, 27,000 votes? Well, that's counting children, all right? So if there was a referendum and a majority of the adults of Greenland voted to join the United States, that is a legitimate referendum. Sure. Is that not what happened in Crimea?

That's exactly. I'm glad you brought that up. Okay, so now. And the four. And Donetsk and Ukraine. That's right. So how could President Trump say to President Putin, I don't care if you guys had a referendum.

I don't care 90% of the people in Crimea voted to join Russia. We're not going to allow it. I don't think he's going to say that. But how could he if he's planning to take Greenland? I think it's just the opposite. I think he's going to say to Putin, hey, you gave me a great idea. Yeah. I'm going to do your Crimea thing.

How about you? You keep Crimea. You keep the Dneska, you know, provinces and everything. You just don't get in the way on the Greenland deal. So what if he says Xi Jinping? I'll tell you what. We'll have a referendum in Taiwan. And if the people of Taiwan vote to join China, I'll for it.

Do you see where this could go? Oh, sure. You could have Taiwan, I mean, assuming that the majority of the people said, yeah, we're going to join, we're going to go join the mainland. You would have a legitimate reason to say that's the will of the people? Yes. All right. So for him, if he can pressure Denmark into holding a referendum, and I think that's his plan. That's why Don Jr. went there yesterday.

That's why they were posting videos of young citizens of Greenland saying, we love America. We want to be American. Wearing MAGA hats. Right. So I think the plan is to pressure Denmark into giving in, hold the referendum. They're going to lose the referendum. And then suddenly, you know, within a year, Greenland's going to be a territory of the United States of America. And maybe a state.

And a state. And I can't wait to see at Greenland State University and their football team at Trump Arena, are they going to be in the SEC or in the Big Ten? That's what I want to know. This is going to be amazing, Doc. I came across another funny video last night on Twitter of Justin Trudeau resigning. You know, the video the other day when he announced his resignation. He announced he's going to resign. He's still the prime minister.

He announced he's going to resign when they choose his successor. But here's the spoof on it. Last night over dinner, I told my kids about the decision that I'm sharing with you today. I intend to resign as party leader, as prime minister, after the party selects its next leader through a robust, nationwide, competitive process. Well, say what you want about artificial intelligence, but it can make some pretty funny videos. It's an AI video. It's generative AI. Now, this next story.

Strange story. Yes. James O'Keefe published this today saying that an insider at the Veterans Administration told him that the Department of Health and Human Services has requested or ordered the VA hospitals to supply as many doctors and nurses and first responders as possible for January 20. That's right. All right, let's watch. An internal memo from the Veterans Administration surfaced containing an unusual request, support for the upcoming presidential inauguration. A high-level source inside the Department of Veterans Affairs has disclosed a memo from the Executive Director, Office of the Emergency Management within Veterans Affairs. The source inside the VA said the source deployment request did not occur for the last two inaugurations. We spoke to the source inside the VA to ask if this is something that's typical.

So can you just talk a minute about this being typical or not typical within the VA, them doing these sorts of things for the past few inaugurations? What concerned me was that this has never been requested before, especially not from HHS. What we have, you know, what I saw to me was a little bit unnerving. I've been in the VA for several inaugurations, and this was the first time they have ever asked for Demp's personnel. First time they've ever asked for personnel. For an inauguration, yes.

Why do you think that is? I have no idea. That's why I decided to send that memo to you, Because I believe that there's something unnerving about it. I'm not 100% sure, but my gut says this is not normal, and it's not. The memo details a formal request from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, or ASPR. It calls upon the Veterans Administration to provide critical medical support for the event.

Specifically, they sought the deployment of paramedics, registered nurses with expertise in emergency and medical surgical care, and licensed medical practitioners, including MDs, DOs, NPs, PAs, specializing in emergency medicine. The memo is signed by Derek Justad, who is the executive director for the VHA Office of Emergency Management.

We ask, is this request part of a standard protocol for inaugurations, or is there a specific reason for the heightened medical readiness? We sent an email to the email address provided on the memo, and we have not yet heard back. Troubling. I mean, it could be that the Trump transition team is taking no chances. Yeah, but this is coming from the Biden administration making this request. Yes, but it would be, I'm just saying that the Trump team asking the Biden administration

to do it. Yeah. Well, you know, the other day you mentioned that, you know, you'd rather see Donald Trump do a private ceremony. Yeah, I do.

I don't feel good about it. I don't feel good about him doing a public inauguration. I mean, they've tried twice to shoot him. I don't need to doing a public inauguration. I mean, they've tried twice to shoot him. I don't need to see a public inauguration. Joe Biden had one. That was secret.

Essentially, yeah. They put a big fence around it and only, what, 150, 200 people were able to attend, right? So what was the point? Yeah. So do an inauguration ceremony in a highly secured building. Right. And televise it, you know, so every American can watch it. You can still do a speech, do everything. Do the inauguration in Texas. Do it in Louisiana. Go someplace outside of D.C. Do it in

Iowa where they're going to have the... Or Greenland. Yeah, in Greenland. You do it in Greenland. But it is troubling. I hope it's simply because they're being extremely cautious and taking no chances. But the fact that they haven't done this before. I mean, I'm sure there were medical

personnel at inaugurations before, but that this request— Well, this would be for mass casualties. That's right. That's what I'm talking about. If you're trying to get as many doctors and nurses and first responders, that's for mass casualties. That's for some large explosion. Which, once again, I would be unnerved too if I saw a memo like that, because my natural inclination would be, is somebody planning a mass casualty event on January 20th? That's right. That's right. I'm not saying there's going to be one, but I'm just saying they're preparing for one.

Yes. I want to get back to the Trump plan to take down Great Britain and Europe. I go to BBC, Gordon Brown, former prime minister, poor guy, he still looks like he's always been crying. He looked like that when he was a prime minister. Looked like he was always crying. Always felt so sorry for him. Gordon, what's wrong? Why are you so sad today?

Every time I see him now, I'll be thinking about it. He's so sad. He's sad now because of the accusations that Elon Musk has been making here. Former Prime Minister of the UK, Gordon Brown, said allegations made by Elon Musk about how he dealt with child grooming gangs while he was Prime Minister. Mr. Brown says they're complete fabrication. Now, Elon Musk shared online claims that the former labor prime minister had issued a circular to UK police forces, effectively telling them not to prosecute rape gangs. The multi-billionaire owner of X also claimed that current prime minister, Keir Starmer was deeply complicit in the mass rapes in exchange for votes. Now, a spokesperson for Gordon Brown said there was no basis for the allegations made

against him. Now, notice he didn't deny the allegations. He says there's no basis for it. Now, over the past few days, Elon Musk has been posting lists and excerpts on X, and it has created quite the crisis in UK. Yeah, we've got two tweets from Elon Musk. This is from today. So there is, look at this. This is Elon Musk saying, Starmer, the prime minister, the guy there in the photograph,

Starmer is evil. He's not saying he's corrupt. He's a bad, when you call someone evil, you've taken it to another level. Here you have the world's richest man who owns Twitter, X platform, saying the prime minister of Great Britain is evil, that he covered up the rape of children. Why are they doing it? My view is they are taking down the British government. Yes, and it's going to go all the way to the world. Because the British, what have we been saying?

We, not just me, those of us who our eyes are open to the corruption of the ruling class. What have we been saying for decades? The West is run by satanic pedophiles. Yes. We've been saying it. I think Elon Musk and Donald Trump know it. You're right. And I believe that the reason why the Brits are so hell-bent, really, on keeping this information on the download is I believe it goes all the way to Buckingham Palace.

Yes, it does. It does. It's not at the prime minister level. It's all the way to the royal family. Yes. They're all corrupt. And it's not political corruption. It's moral corruption.

They are deeply wicked. And why did Putin, we played that video the other day. He said it last summer. The vampire ball is ending. You've been stuffing your bellies with human flesh. Yes, and drinking blood. And drinking blood, but the vampire ball is coming to an end. What does Putin know?

And is Putin involved in this with Musk and Donald Trump? Is Donald Trump going to say to Putin, you take Europe? I'm taking America. You take Europe. And we'll have the UK as kind of the, you know, the sentry sitting off the European coast. It'll be part of America, too. All the islands. Doc, he hasn't talked about the Caribbean islands yet.

Yes. The islands are American. Yes. You know what I've said to years ago? The islands were the doorsteps. They were the steps to the American continent. And I think Cuba is going to be taken over by the U.S. And all the British islands over there in the Caribbean.

All the islands are colonies. Because if Donald Trump can take Greenland, then Russia could take Cuba, right? That's right. Then they're not going to let that happen. There's not one, well, in my view, there's not one Caribbean island that's free and independent. Yes. Barbados would say

they are, okay. But one way or the other, either they report to the crown and on, you know, islands that are connected to Great Britain, the king, King Charles, has a governor on those islands. Yes. For the purpose of watching over them to tell the king what's going on.

The first time I heard this, I was in St. Kitts. This was probably back around 2008, and I was riding in an SUV with a high-level Kittian government official, a dear friend. He passed away last year, and we were into downtown at an intersection, and this Rolls Royce went through the intersection. I'm like, whoa, who has a Rolls Royce on this island? It's a tiny little island. Yes. And he goes, oh, Rick, that's the governor. I said, the governor?

I didn't know you had a governor. You got a prime minister. He goes, no, that's the queen's governor. I said, what does the governor do? He tells the queen what we do. That's basically it. So they have governors on all these islands. France has islands.

The Netherlands has islands. They have Aruba. Yeah. And Bonaire. Well, the Dutch have Bonaire. Who did I say? I said the Netherlands. Did I say the French? Yeah. Oh,onaire? Well, the Dutch have Bonaire and... Who did I say? You said the French. Did I say the French?

Yeah. Oh, I'm sorry. No, the French have Martinique. Right. Okay. But the Dutch have Aruba and Bonaire. Curaçao. Curaçao.

All right. So, all the islands are European colonies. Now, if Mr. Trump, if he attacks them as saying the end of colonialization is over, they're ours. Okay. Well, they're sitting right by the Gulf of America.

Doc, I would tell you that the Caribbean people would be delighted. You've got in Antigua, you have a massive, massive Chinese military operation in Antigua. Oh, yes. And of course, you and I, we've been in the Caribbean several times. China has definitely put their footprint in the Caribbean. Get ready. You're going to hear Donald Trump talking about taking the islands.

That is a national security threat. Oh, agreed. China is building. See, what he's doing. Okay, now the more I talk, the more I like what he's doing. He is instilling the Don Roe Doctrine that's telling China, we're going to expel you. We're going to expel you from the Americas. From Alaska, from Greenland, from the Arctic to the Antarctic.

From the Panama Canal? Get out. Get out. You're making inroads for the purpose of collapsing us. So he's going to play this hard. What's he going to do with Taiwan? Because as Xi Jinping uses his logic,

Taiwan belongs to them. I mean, historically, the island is Chinese. So the Chinese government has a legitimate claim to Taiwan. Probably a more legitimate claim than we do for some of the stuff that we take. That's right. That's right. But the fact of the matter is, I think this is what we're seeing here, Rick, is a reshaping of world orders.

Oh, yeah. We're not done here. Yeah. We got more. Watch this, okay? I'm going to get a few minutes. I don't want to go over. Ynet News, Israel prepares for Trump's return and a joint attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. What I want to point out is you have not heard Donald Trump say,

I plan to bomb Iran. What you have heard are Jewish newspapers say for him, this is what we hope he's going to do. I don't believe he has told them privately, I'm going to bomb Iran. I believe they're doing a propaganda pressure on him. To set him up that he would agree once he's in the White House, okay, go ahead, let's do it. But I don't think that's his plan, but it's Netanyahu's plan. Remember, Netanyahu was a propaganda minister before he became the prime minister. He was in charge of propaganda. That's right.

He's still a propagandist. Next one. On this article also points out what we said yesterday. The deputy commander of the U.S. Central Command, Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, has been in Israel making plans for something, some kind of joint military operation. Now, look, we're talking about nations enlarging their borders, not erasing their borders, expanding their borders. The Israeli foreign ministry today published a map. It's no longer a conspiracy theory. I was accused of anti-Semitism, Jew hatred, misinformation when I talked about greater Israel years ago.

I said they have a plan for greater Israel. Oh, he is spreading anti-Jewish tropes. He's trying to create hatred. That was published by the Israeli government. They're taking what they say, this is a biblical map of the borders of ancient Israel, and this is where we're going. Oh, yeah, it does take other countries, like Jordan. You're right. And on the official Government X account from their Israeli-Arabic department of

the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, they went through a complete historical argument on, I don't agree with it, but they went through justifying this map that you just saw of the first step toward greater Israel. This isn't greater Israel, but this is the first step toward it. So, Doc, this world war is a clash between greater and greater, greater Israel, greater America, greater China, greater Russia, greater Turkey. That's what this war is about, World War III. It's nations becoming greater. Expanding their borders.

And that's why you have a world war, because different countries are seizing land from other countries. And China has been doing this now for 10 to 15 years with their presence in the South China Sea, building airstrips and everything on contested islands. So China's been in active mode on this, and now America's entering the picture. And we're not done with the border alterations. Look at this Turkey Today newspaper article. Ukraine says it's ready to fill a vacant seat in the European Union and NATO if Hungary

shifts its alliance towards Russia. In other words, why don't you kick Hungary out of the EU and NATO and replace their empty seat with Ukraine? Now, is Hungary planning to align with Russia? I would see it more likely to align with the U.S. I do, too. I do, too. I could see Orban.

How many times has he been to Mar-a-Lago? No, at least twice. Yes. Now, this is Zelensky's idea. Oh, sure. Okay. This is Zelensky talking out as, you know what. But it's just the fact that they're saying, hey, let's kick out Hungary.

Now, months ago, somebody high official in Poland, I don't remember if it was the president or prime minister or whoever, somebody said, we've got to kick Turkey out of NATO. That came from Poland a few months ago. So there are some legs of this story. Either Hungary or Turkey getting kicked out of NATO. Who did I say? We started with Hungary, but you mentioned Turkey. But that has come up in discussion.

To kick out Turkey and to kick out Ukraine, I mean Hungary. Okay. So these topics have been brought up. We're witnessing a rearrangement of the world map. Yes. That happens in world wars. Look at a map of nations pre-World War I.

Then look at a map of nations after World War I. Then look at a map of the world after World War II. Yes. Boundaries change. New countries appear. Right.

There are new alliances that are formed. We're now in World War III. And boundaries are going to change. We're witnessing it. It is amazing to see. One more here, I think, before we close here. Newsweek, NATO allies to unveil plans for Ukraine up to 2027.

So they've got a plan until 2027. That's what they think. And Lloyd Austin, the outgoing Secretary of Defense, says, according to Newsweek, we'll create a plan to shore up Ukraine's military through 2027 with meetings with NATO countries this week. So he's running around the world right now meeting with NATO countries,

saying, we've got to hurry up. Trump's coming in just days. We've got to get more weapons, more money, more bombs to Ukraine. We've got to move it quickly. That's what this is all about. We've got to get enough weapons

and money to Ukraine to keep this war going through 2027. That means through 2025, 26, and 27. They're trying to stretch out that war three years. It's not going to work because I tell you what, Trump's just going to pull the plug on NATO. Doc, if his plan is the enlargement of America and he plans to take some European land that's in America, he's going to tell the Europeans, we're done with you. We're not defending you.

We're not paying gazillions of dollars to defend you. We're not stationing troops in Europe. I have worked out a deal with Russia. They will never attack us. You're on your own. Doc, what prevents him from negotiating a treaty with Russia that Russia will not attack America? How does that change everything? It radically changes everything.

Why do we need NATO? Right. And really, when you get down to it, Rick, we need Russia more than we need NATO. And I'll explain my reasoning here. Because the next adversary is China. Yes. If Trump brings Russia over to our side, that changes everything. And now China is on the defensive.

China's like, oh, wait a minute. We're in the corner. They're coming after us. So the NATO strategy at this point has been let's take out Russia so we don't have to fight Russia and China in the next war. And Trump is going to be, let's bring Russia in. Yes. And give them a to be, let's bring Russia in. Yes. And give them a few things, maybe Europe. You can have Europe.

It's not the first time we were allies with Russia, is it? No, it wouldn't be. I'm just saying, we are witnessing amazing things, and this is history in the making. And it's astounding to watch. It is absolutely astounding to watch. I've got one more thing. I've got it before I close up here. Let me find this.

By the way, the Qatar and the UAE gave Jared Kushner $1.5 billion investment capital. I was looking for, oh, yes, number 24. This is a Russian news article. He's Vestia, but I wanted you to see the headline. This is a Russian news article translated to English. His Vestia news, golden year, precious metal prices to break all records. And gold increased by 30%.

In 2024. 30% increase in gold in the past year. Yes. And so this is an article in the Russian Izvestia News saying that Russian economists are expecting gold prices to continue to climb through 2025. That there is a high demand for gold. And it says demand for the precious metal increased. But the key was the continuous purchases by central banks.

Why are they after gold? Because the world is going to be completely changed. A brand new system is being developed right now. And I believe gold is going to rule in the post-World War III era. Hey, I'm very happy to tell you, very pleased, I got word last night, Doc, Gold Co. has signed up to stay with True News throughout 2025. All right. Okay? Well, that's a good year for it then.

And Gold Co. is very, very pleased with the True News audience. That makes me happy. Because we didn't know. Because our agreement was until the end of the year. And they contacted us yesterday and said, we're staying with True News. Good. We like your people. All right.

So thank you, folks. All of you who have contacted Gold Code, get in touch with Gold Code. There's the number, 844-960-GOLD. truenews4gold.com. There's the QR code. You just saw a Russian news article saying, hey, over here in Russia, we're expecting gold prices to go up, up, and up because a lot of people are buying gold. Look at what the headlines are saying and then make your decisions. Make your

economic financial decisions on the trends that you see taking place. We have World War underway. It's underway right now. We're in World War. Nations are being challenged. We're watching the President of the United States say, we're going to take countries for our national security. Folks, we're in a world war right now. Make sound, wise financial decisions while you can still do it.

All right? Go coach the folks to talk to. Gotta go. Love you very much. We'll see you tomorrow. God bless you. Here are two massively important products to have in an emergency. Because it's not a matter of if, but when an emergency will happen to you. With years of experience in survival preparedness, let me tell you, these are must-haves.

One, high-quality and nutrient-packpacked shelf-stable emergency food buckets. And two, reliable and long-lasting water filtration systems. These essentials will make all the difference in an emergency, supplying your loved ones with all the calories and nutrients they need to survive any scenario. Don't take the risk. Try my favorite America-loving brand American Reserves for your emergency food supply needs.