TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Ukraine Struck Crimea Bridge With Missiles Made in Great Britain

Episode Date: June 22, 2023

Ukraine launched a missile strike on a bridge linking the northern part of Russia’s Crimea Peninsula and the Kherson Region. Russian officials said Storm Shadow missiles supplied by Great Britain were used to hit the bridge. Vladimir Saldo, acting governor of the Kherson Region, said several bridges were hit by Storm Shadow missiles. He said there were no casualties but the road surfaces of the bridges had been damaged. The attack came a day after Russia’s defense minister Sergei Shogui warned the West against striking Russian territory with long-range missiles. He said Russia would respond by attacking decision making centers. We'll be covering the latest on WW3 and much more on this edition of TruNews! Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 6/22/23 You can partner with us by visiting TruNews.com/donate, calling 1-800-576-2116, or by mail at PO Box 690069 Vero Beach, FL 32969. It’s the Final Day! The day Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. Now available in eBook and audio formats! Order Final Day from Amazon today! https://www.amazon.com/Final-Day-Characteristics-Second-Coming/dp/0578260816/ Apple users, you can download the audio version on Apple Books! https://books.apple.com/us/audiobook/final-day-10-characteristics-of-the-second-coming/id1687129858 The Fauci Elf is a hilarious gift guaranteed to make your friends laugh! Order yours today! https://tru.news/faucielf

You are listening to True News with Rick Wiles. We appreciate you tuning in. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support, please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, P.O. Box 6, and nothing but the truth, so help us God. Ukraine launched a missile strike on a bridge, actually two bridges, linking the northern part of Russia's Crimea Peninsula and the Kherson region. Russian officials said storm shadow missiles supplied by Great Britain were used to hit the bridges. Vladimir Saldo, acting governor of the region, said several bridges were hit by storm shadow missiles.

He said there were no human casualties, but the road surfaces of the bridges had been damaged. The attack came a day after Russia's defense minister, Sergei Shagou, warned the West against striking Russian territory with long-range missiles. He said Russia would respond by attacking decision-making centers. Let's start with a look at this article published by the London Telegraph today. As you see the headline, storm shadow missiles blow massive hole in key Crimea bridge. Doc, the Western newspapers are elated. They're crowing about it. Glowing about it, yes. They're just absolutely ecstatic that this happened.

They're fools. They have no idea the fury that is going to be unleashed by Russia on them someday. But let's take a look at what the Telegraph said today in London. Well, the London Telegraph is reporting that Ukraine has reportedly used British storm shadow missiles to attack a major supply route for Russian troops linking Crimea to the front line. The Chonhar crossing in the northeast of Crimea is one of the two key highways and bridges linking the peninsula with the southern Ukrainian mainland. Now, the strike has caused heavy damage to the bridge, as. Now, the strike has caused heavy

damage to the bridge, as Rick mentioned, which is likely to impact the supply of Russian troops fighting in the area, depending on who you ask. Russia has vowed to retaliate against bridges in Ukraine and Moldova. Now, Vladimir Saldor, a Russian appointed head of the occupied parts of the Kherson region where this occurred, said it was a senseless barbaric attack perpetrated by the Kiev regime on orders from London. So wanted to bring that out. Soto claimed the Ukrainian army used British storm shadow missiles to target the bridge. Kiev terrorists want to intimidate Kherson residents, but they will not succeed, he said in a statement. Now, Ukraine did not immediately claim responsibility for the attack, but a spokesman for the Ukrainian military intelligence indirectly confirmed Kiev's role.

The only thing I can say is there will be more of this. That's coming from Andrei Yusov, a spokesman for Ukraine's military intelligence directorate. We also have this report from the Wall Street Journal. Ukraine strikes bridge supplying Russian troops. And the Wall Street Journal's perspective on this, Ukraine has reportedly targeted a bridge in eastern Ukraine that was being used by Russian forces to transport troops and equipment to the front line. Now, the strike is seen as a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict between the two countries, which has already claimed over 13,000 lives.

Now, the move comes amid rising tensions with Ukraine accusing Russia of amassing troops on its border in the annexed territory of Crimea. The attack on the bridge is likely to further strain the already fragile relationship between the two nations. So Rick, we have, like you said, the West is just excited about these developments and everything's happening. Just a day after General Sogo said, I mean, issued a very stern warning saying, do not use western long-range missiles to hit our territory it was like they were rushing to do it the next day i mean what within 48 hours of the warning yeah less or less let's look at the map number eight let's take a we'll show where the bridge is located there's

two bridges i want to reiterate there were two bridges hit today. Right. So the red strike there is where the storm shadow missiles hit the bridges in the southern part of Ukraine as it bordered Crimea there. Now, if you notice a little bit further to the west there, that one key straight there is where the Kerch Strait Bridge is. And so that is going to be a significant place of probably you're going to see within, I would say, probably within a week that there will be an attempt to attack the Kerch Strait Bridge at that point. What do you think the Ukrainians are doing, Doc?

I think what they're doing right now is they're dialing it in, if you will. They're practicing. They're saying, all right, we've taken out these smaller bridges. We're learning how to do this, or whatever intelligence they're getting from the UK. But they're finessing their attack. And so the next thing to see, the next thing to watch for, they didn't completely destroy the bridges. I mean, the Russians are saying they can still move military troops on them. It's some problems for civilians. Ukrainians would say something different on that line.

But the fact of the matter is the big kahuna, the big enchilada, if you will, is the Kerch Strait Bridge. That's where the major transport is, but it's also the place where the Russians have made it clear, you strike the Kerch Strait Bridge and you take it out, we're out for blood, basically, at that point. Maybe the objective was not to destroy these two bridges last night, but to simply prove to themselves that they could hit them. Maybe they're going to come they're calibrating their aim and judging what it would take to destroy the bridge.

Right. So we may see additional attacks on those two bridges now that those bridges are damaged because all they have to do is just hit the other lanes and cause the bridge just a... It doesn't have to collapse from beneath. It just needs that the lanes of the bridge collapse and the bridge is severed into two pieces.

There's no traffic going across. Right. Okay, so... But I think you're right. We're going to see the Kirch Strait Bridge hit any day. And it could be this weekend. It could be sometime in the next week or two. But they're moving. They're in that direction.

And if you noticed, Doc, what you read earlier in that London Telegraph, a spokesman for the Ukraine military intelligence director, Mr. Yusof, said, The only thing I can say is that there will be more of this. And the governor, the Russian governor of Kherson, said they did it on orders from London. Now, when you hear that, what do you think? The decision-making center for the storm shadow missiles is in London, you know? Now, Ukraine has not actually fired Russians, I mean, excuse me, British storm shadow missiles

onto Crimean territory yet. But this is about as close as you can get. I mean, the bridge to Crimea. And Interfax reports that several bridges, two bridges in particular, were taken out. That's number nine for control. But then there's an ongoing investigation to find just to confirm that it was, you know, what kind of explosive was being used. And of course,

what the Russians are doing is they're making the case that if it was indeed storm shadow missiles and the Russians confirmed that, then the next stop is going to be either Crimean territory or the Kerch Strait Bridge. Doug, on interfaction, I saw two articles side by side, and I don't know if there's a connection between the two, but I just want to put them up on the screen. The first one, this was interfacts. This is number nine. Bridges on administrative border between the Kursan region and Crimea came under rocket fire. Now let's go to the next one. An earthquake, 4.6 magnitude, recorded on the southern coast of Crimea.

Right. So the bridges were on the northern coast? Yes. So if we want to put number eight back up on the screen, I can show you the bridge there is the red dot on the screen, of course. But the earthquake occurred in the lower left-hand corner of the Crimean Peninsula there, just off the, Sebastopol is there. And just off the coast of Sebastopol. What do you think, Doc? Natural earthquake or man-made generated earthquake? Well, I don't believe in coincidences,

and so there's been speculation that the earthquake in Turkey was caused by maybe an earthquake ship. This earthquake occurred off the coast of Crimea in about the same time as the attack on the bridges. Did you ever see the video? And I don't know if it's real. I asked people in the Middle East, is that real or not?

What is this? Immediately, like in the day or two after the big Turkish earthquake, there were videos appearing on TikTok and other social media sites of, it was like some kind of big airship. I hadn't seen the airship one. You hadn't seen this thing?

No, not the airship one. Oh, this was weird. There was like some type of airship going across the skyline, like a UFO, just really bizarre. And people were stopped in the streets looking at it. And that this occurred minutes before the earthquake. No kidding. No, I hadn't seen that one.

And, you know, this was sent to me by people in the Middle East saying, hey, look at this. This is what's around on social media here in the Middle East. Middle Easterners, Arabs, were convinced that this airship, and it wasn't an airliner. It was a slow-moving... Like the Goodyear blimp. Yeah, like a blimp, but it uh elongated um fan tail coming out of it uh you know like a contrail in the sky and if if i recall it was in the evening it was at nighttime it was strange looking and um you know what people were noticing is, and they said, what was this thing? And it came across the city at the same time of the earthquake, just minutes before.

If you know something about it, contact us, send it to info at truenews.com and tell us about it. So I don't want to make a big deal of the earthquake happening basically at the same time the bridges were attacked. But it would be awful convenient that if the bridges were attacked. On the north. Earthquake on the south. Maybe just enough to bring some bridges down. Well, the next one is from Wall Street Journal. U.S. ramps up howitzer shell production to supply Ukraine and replenish stockpiles. Right. According to the Wall Street Journal, Rick, the U.S. has increased the production of a key artillery shell to help

alleviate a global shortage of ammunition that threatened to squeeze Ukrainian forces as they battle Russia. The U.S. Army's acquisition chief said that the move will also replace U.S. stockpiles. The increased production of the Howitzer shell comes as Russia intensifies attacks on Ukraine, with Moscow itself becoming the target of drone strikes for the first time in the war. Now, Doug Bush, who's the Army's Assistant Secretary for Acquisitions, Logistics, and Technology, said in an interview that the U.S. is currently producing around 24,000 Habertsburg shells each month, up from about 14,000 a month before Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Now, the U.S. Now, look at this number, Rick. The U.S. wants to hit monthly output of between 70,000 and 80,000 shells a month by early 2025 fiscal year.

He says we're on a very rapid path to get really high numbers, Bush said. Now, the U.S. has drawn down some of its own stockpiles of the ammunition to supply Ukraine. Bush said those stockpiles are more robust than many people believe and that they will return to pre-war levels quickly. So despite winning U.S. government contracts to produce at full throttle, defense giant Lockheed Martin still expects it will take another 18 to 24 months before all of its munition production lines are operating at maximum capacity. And that's coming from Frank St. John, the company's chief operating officer. Those are long cycle product belts, he said in a separate interview. Ukraine is now consuming a year's worth of production for some munitions in a single

month, St. John said. So this is, we're investing a lot of weaponry, and we are planning on investing a whole lot more. Doc, they're looking at if artillery shell production was 14,000 a month before the start of the Ukraine war, and by 2025, they want 80,000 shells per month. That's a six-time increase. Six-fold increase, yes. How many more wars do they have planned? That tells me there's going to be a lot more wars in 2025. Or there's going to be a lot bigger war coming.

The theater of war is going to be expanded. Oh, I think if we get through this one without a nuclear disaster, I think the moment the West recognizes they've lost Ukraine, they're going to open up another war someplace very soon. The Baltics? Yeah. It's Moldova, Kosovo. They're going to come after Russia from another direction. They're just going to start the whole process over.

We're going to go back to 2014 and the Nazi takeover of Ukraine, and the U.S. will just start the war over again. With another hapless country. They'll find another stooge president, another puppet regime, and they'll start attacking Russia from another direction. And they may swing back to Syria. That's true, too. And so, I mean, when they're looking at producing 70,000 to 80,000 howitzers a month, that's the equivalent of six of these wars going on at the same time doc the financial times is reporting that top biden administration officials are meeting with government officials from developing nations who are very skeptical of the Western war operation in Ukraine. That tells me that they're losing the public relations battle. Yes. So Joe Biden's top national security aide will fly to Denmark this week at the behest of Kiev's government

for an unannounced meeting with representatives of several developing countries that have not condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Jake Sullivan, the White House National Security Advisor, has agreed to attend the meeting in Copenhagen with officials from countries including India, Brazil, South Africa, and others, according to people familiar with the plans. The list of attendees has not been finalized and could change before the gathering, one of the people cautioned. We just mentioned three of the big, one of the people cautioned. We just mentioned three of the big ones in BRICS.

Yes. So there's a lot that's involved here as far as the things that are changing here over the next few months. One of the people familiar with the plan said, following the Ukrainian request, Washington has been encouraging China, India, Brazil, Turkey, and South Africa to attend this unannounced meeting. Now, quoting the Financial Times here, with the war expected to rage into next year, Western officials worry about preaching the virtues of Ukraine's resistance to the converted without making sure their arguments have wider appeal. Only little do we realize how much the rest of the world is not convinced, said one European official. They are not convinced. It's a terrible thing to acknowledge. So like you said, Rick, we're losing, when I say we, I mean the United States is losing the war of being able to get the rest of the world

on board with this war right it's not like the Kuwait war it's not like the war against Iraq you know the coalition of the willing you got to give the late President George Herbert Walker Bush I got to give him credit for the way he assembled that coalition. I'm not endorsing the war. I'm just saying as an impartial observer, just looking at what President Bush did. I'm talking about the senior Bush. It was brilliant.

He started talking about the coalition of the willing. He had how many countries? I lost track. I don't remember anymore how many countries were, at least on paper, had committed support for the attack on Iraq to liberate Kuwait. And it was brilliant in the public relations department because no one dared to oppose it. And so they went in, they accomplished their mission, and they got out. And you remember when General Schwarzkopf was chasing the Iraqi army down the highway, and a lot of people were upset with President Bush for calling off the pursuit because General Schwarzkopf wanted to chase them all the way into Baghdad and wipe them out. And President Bush called it off and said, no, we accomplished our mission.

We're going home. He went in. He did a precision attack, accomplished his mission, and got out before he got burned. Right. That way he can claim victory. He claimed victory. Okay. Mr. Biden, he's getting in deeper and deeper and deeper in his pride. I don't think so much Biden, he doesn't even know what he had for breakfast.

But the people in the White House that run the White House, their pride, the Jake Sullivans and so forth, the Blinkins and these guys, their pride is so great. They can't lose this thing. Victoria Nuland.

I mean, what is her, just what is Victoria Nuland's thing about Ukraine? She's been pushing for this war for a decade. Oh, she's heavily invested in Ukraine. What is it? What is it about Ukraine and Victoria Nuland? What's Jake Sullivan got at it? These guys are players.

They were involved with Biden inraine when he was vice president yes they know where a lot of skeletons are are buried in ukraine involved with uh with uh joe biden well two things i took away from this particular article rick are first of all that jake sullivan is doing this meeting at the request of the Ukrainians. It's not Joe Biden saying, hey, get together with all these different countries and everything and talk to them. Zelensky's calling the shots. Yes. So Zelensky, you know, basically said to the Biden administration and Jake Sullivan,

hey, we're losing the propaganda war out here on these countries. The other thing, too, is the countries that he's speaking to, and you touched on this, are the BRICS nations. The majority of the BRICS nations have not sanctioned Russia at all, have not participated in the Russian sanctions, because Russia's part of BRICS. And there's a rule within BRICS, this is another article we'll get to later, that if a country

engages in that kind of economic warfare, they can't be a member of BRICS. And so I don't know if Jake Sullivan thinks he's going to talk China, India, and Brazil into coming on board with sanctions against Russia. I doubt that's going to happen. So what's the real purpose of this meeting? Joe Biden has been today and yesterday courting India. Right. Meeting with Prime Minister Modi. Right. Holding hands as they walked off the dais today.

I guess doing yoga together. Yeah, I don't know. I don't know what they're trying to get these countries to do. But I don't see them breaking away from BRICS and lining up with the United States. Hey, Ben Wallace, the defense minister of Great Britain, has dropped out of the race to be the next secretary general. I don't know if he's dropped out or if he was pushed out, depending on how you look at it there. I think, yeah, we all know. And the reason is, Ian Stoltenberg is going to stay on. Right. And that's the endorsement from President Joe Biden on that. So UK Defense Secretary Ben Wallace has reportedly withdrawn

his candidacy for the role of NATO Secretary General, and that's according to the London Telegraph. This comes as the current leader, Jens Stoltenberg, is expected to stay in the position after U.S. President Joe Biden expressed his support for him. Now, Wallace had previously been backed by U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak for the role, but has now ruled himself out. NATO has yet to decide on a replacement for Stoltenberg with a decision expected at a mid-July summit in Lithuania. That's not going to happen, Mr. Wallace said, who has previously said he would like the job. Speaking to The Economist, he said, maybe they want a prime minister, he added. No, they want a banker. That's what they want.

But it's interesting, Doc, that he said that. Because in that statement, he's not just saying, I'm withdrawing because Jens Stoltenberger is going to stay in the job. He said maybe they want a prime minister. He's a defense minister. So who's they? And why do they want a prime minister and not a military guy? Well, that's a great question. And so there's a limited number of people that would fit Boris Johnson, former prime minister.

Boris Johnson wants the job. Yes. Maybe he got the nod and nobody knows about it. Maybe Boris Johnson is the one who got nominated to replace Stoltenberg. We don't know. But hey, the next one, this is number 23. Emmanuel Macron wants to be invited to the BRICS summit in South Africa.

We saw this story pop up actually yesterday and a very interesting story here. RT is reporting that France has formally requested to attend the BRICS summit in South Africa in August as an observer. That's according to French Foreign Minister Catherine Kalana. If granted permission, France would be the first G7 country to attend a summit held by the bloc. Now the 15th summit of the BRICS group of large emerging economies will be held in Johannesburg from August 22nd to 24th. South

African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor believes France's participation would be an innovation within the current BRICS participation model that would amplify the global reach of the BRICS forum. We have a quote from that particular article. I inform my counterpart of the president's availability and interest in pursuing dialogue that France maintains with the BRICS. That's coming from Kelowna, the press conference in Pretoria on Tuesday after meeting with her South African counterpart. So Macron wants to go to Johannesburg for the BRICS meeting. So how's this going over inside BRICS?

Well, for some members of BRICS, they say this is an inappropriate move. In this report by RT, French President Emmanuel Macron's attendance at the upcoming BRICS summit in South Africa would be inappropriate. And that's according to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov. Ryabkov cited France's efforts to isolate Moscow and its support for NATO's goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia in the Ukraine conflict. As host of the summit, South Africa would have the right to invite Macron, although it would be important for Pretoria to consult other BRICS members beforehand. Well, Doc, this would be like Russia asking

NATO if they could attend the next NATO summit. Really, that's what it would be like. And you get the same reaction. Sure. This is highly inappropriate. We don't need you here here but what do you think's behind emmanuel macron's attempt to be invited to to the bricks is he is he trying to go there to be um to to just find out what the bricks nations are talking about so he can go back to the West and tell them? Or is he thinking that France needs to jump ship and join the BRICS? Well, let's answer this by asking, what's the original purpose of BRICS?

It's a financial coalition of nations. As an alternative to the Western banking system. In the Western banking system, And the Western banking system, you cannot separate it from the Rothschilds. And Macron worked for Rothschilds. And I would maintain still works. Still works for them. He just happens to also be president.

So, okay, so Doc, is this a sign that the Rothschilds are taking very seriously the real possibility that they're going to lose control of the world money system? Well, I would respond with there has been significant change in Emmanuel Macron since his visit to China. That something happened on that China trip. Something changed. The position of France changed somehow. Now we

see France moving toward, I don't think they're trying to get into BRICS, but they want to know what's going on. They want to at least build a pathway to it. Maybe the Rothschilds are seeing the future. And I said, you know what? We're not going to stop them setting up another financial system. So the best thing to do is to make a connection. And this war, the reason for this war was to stop the financial system. Yes.

So have the Rothschilds concluded they've lost the war? Well, they've reinvented themselves several times over the centuries. That's what I over the centuries that's what i'm saying that's what i'm saying is the rothschild banking dynasty ready to force forsake the west and say hey we've milked this thing for all we could get out of it for 500 years it's it's time to go eastward and money is money it's not tied to a continent. So it's going to be interesting to see

how this plays out, especially at the upcoming BRICS summit here and whether or not they actually allow. You know, one of the other aspects of the BRICS summit coming up is whether or not Vladimir Putin will attend because South Africa is a signatory to the

ICC and there's an arrest warrant out for Vladimir Putin. And so is there a scenario where Macron would end up at the BRICS summit, but Putin won't be there? It's going to be a bit of drama fleshing out but you know um emmanuel macron is extending himself out in other areas too there's a summit currently underway that is looking and once again here the money is involved here so there's a pierce summit that's going on to overhaul the global financial system for what they're saying is climate solidarity there's a new phrase climate solidarity. There's a new phrase, climate solidarity. Right. Basically, what they're trying to do is overhaul the global financial system. So he's back to working for the Rothschilds. That's right. So France 24 is reporting that this summit in Paris has a goal

of overhauling the global financial system to, what they say, promote more climate solidarity with the South. And when they're called Southern nations below the equator. Now, this summit organized by the French government is bringing together finance ministers from the group of seven industrialized nations, as well as representatives from other countries and international organizations. Now, their goal was to create a new financial system that, according to them, will help developing countries transition to a low-carbon economy and cope with the impacts of climate change.

So on Wednesday, 13 political leaders, including Mr. Macron, President Joe Biden, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva wrote that they are urgently working to fight poverty and inequalities. So this is how they're framing the story of this particular summit. They put it out there, climate change will generate larger and more frequent disasters, Rick, and disproportionately affect the poorest, most vulnerable populations around the world. These challenges cross borders and pose existential risk to societies and economies.

We want our system to deliver more for our planet. Basically, Rick and I have been hearing this tale of green money for now. I think the first time we heard it was at a Mobile World Congress, maybe 2018, where they really started touting the green financial system and how money is being used to help, quote, developing nations

to combat climate change. Even though they, if you use their logic, these developing nations to combat climate change, even though they, if you use their logic, these developing nations have done nothing to impact the climate. Logic would say, if you use their argument, to reduce the carbon footprints of the developed nations. Well, they plan to give the developing nations climate reparations. Yes, right.

So they're going to take money from the developed nations like America and give it to developing nations in Africa and Latin America and so forth and call it climate reparations. What it really is, is old-fashioned Marxist wealth distribution. Yeah, redistribution of wealth. And we have a quote from that article, which is

putting this right out there. G7 countries in 2021 considered reallocating $100 billion in special drawing rights. That's the IMF reserve currency that is proportional to a country's capital. And to give that to those developing countries for the purpose of combating climate change. And now they're also saying to reduce debt as well. So, and Emmanuel Macron is right in the middle of all of this. At the, you know, so once again, you got the Rothschild banking representative showing up maybe later in August at the BRICS summit and of course organizing this right now France is positioning itself as a player moving into the next generation Rick if they can survive what's going on in Europe right now. Well, I think Mr. Macron sees Germany wounded because of the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines.

And Germany is suffering because of the reduced supply of energy to the country. I think he's seeing an opportunity for France to step in and become the powerhouse of Europe. We've got one more story. This is from France 24. Macron says, the global lending system must adapt to fight climate change. And when you hear this, that the banking system must adapt to fighting climate change. What that means is that loans, investments will be based on whether your project, your company is green. Yes. How green is it?

How green. And if you're not green according to their standards, you're not going to get any money. And we've heard this for several years at these conferences where they've said we have to cut off the flow of investment capital to oil companies, gas companies, utility generating, electricity generating plants. They're going to starve them. And then they're going to do this to farmers. And where I see the first inkling of that in Holland. They're going to starve farmers. They're going to cut the capital off of them. Farmers won't be able to get loans. They will starve out the farmers these people are

committed to a radical extreme remaking of world civilization yes and they're using money to do it so um we've got a uh a short video is number 36. This is from France 24 television. And this is a report that they put out today about are here in Paris for a two-day financial summit. The goal, seeking better responses to try and tackle poverty and climate change. While the summit does not have the power to make formal or binding decisions, its purpose is to give a strong political impetus. Earlier, French President Emmanuel Macron made opening remarks. Let's cross now to our senior reporter, Catherine Norris-Trent, who's covering the summit for France 24. Hello to you, Catherine. Tell us a little bit more about that speech from Emmanuel Macron. Hello, Will. Emmanuel Macron opening this summit said that no country should have to choose between

economic development and fighting climate change and that he's bringing all these actors together in Paris to try and basically get them all to talk to each other and work out how to do business better and more intelligently. So as well as around 40 heads of state or government, you've got ministerial delegations from many other countries and you've got aial delegations from many other countries and you've got a whole raft of international institutions and financial institutions so from the world bank the world trade organization the international monetary fund and lots and lots of private sector participants and also environmental campaigners too so now they're going to be sitting down in

roundtable discussions to work out how in concrete terms they can make it possible for the developing world to grow their economies, restructure their debt, but also fight climate change. rising grain prices, think of course of the war in Ukraine, rising energy prices and the world coming out of the COVID era with a lot of developed countries trying to shore up their own economies too. So very lofty ambitions for this summit. It isn't expected to come up with any kind of concrete or binding pledge though. It's more a roadmap heading into the G20 in September in India and the COP28 environmental summit at the end of the year in Dubai. I got two things I want you to hear about that summit that's taking place today. According to France 24, Emmanuel Macron has called for a global lending system that can adapt to fight climate change at a summit, listen to this, aimed at reimagining the world financial system.

They're going to take over the world. They want to reimagine the entire global financial system. When I hear politicians and activists talking about reimagining, doesn't that sound so wonderful? So lofty, so warm, so hopeful. You've got to reimagine it, okay? I mean, Black Lives Matter was talking about reimagining police agencies, law enforcement. OK, what that really meant was we're going to get rid of all the cops and we're going to give the guns and the badges to Black Lives Matter activists. That's what that meant.

OK, so Macron called this conference to reimagine the world financial system. That means he and the people he works for, i.e. the Rothschilds, want a new financial system. And then, Doc, it says, Macron added that the current system was not well suited to address the world challenges. Now listen to this. Yes. And that the world needs a public finance shock to fight these challenges. A public finance shock? You mean like the collapse of the financial system?

And I think COVID was part of that plan too, Rick. I believe it was. In order to, all right, let's test. Let's see how far we can, how far we can push the financial system. And now they've determined we can do this. We can drop this thing and we can rebuild everything. But it's a shock.

Yes. They've got something planned that's a shock. And out of the shock, in the aftermath of the shock comes this new global financial system. This is why we follow all these conferences.

I know a lot of podcasters don't talk about geopolitical news at all. But folks, you have to understand that there are powerful people meeting every day to change the world that we're living in. And they're making decisions that are impacting you, whether you realize it or not. And will impact the life that you live for the rest of your life and your children and your grandchildren. They want to form their own world. They want the world that they want, not what you want. They don't care what you and I think and what we want. They want to create a world in their image.

Right. And they use lofty phrases like reimagining the world financial system. But they also said it needs a public shock. It needs a public finance shock. Well, the Great Depression was a financial shock. It needs a public finance shock. Well, a Great Depression was a financial shock. Is that what they had in mind, a global depression? Except it would be much bigger than that. They continue to use climate change as the global boogeyman, you know, to scare every country in the world. And if the

countries aren't scared of the boogeyman, they realize that there's a check at the end of the line. There's going to be some money that's going to be transacted at some point in the future. And they say to themselves, hey, let's get on the climate change train and let's go ahead. They're going to dish out the money anyway. We may as well get some of it too. We got one more story, Doc. This is Reuters. Came out a couple of days ago. The International Monetary Fund is working on a global central bank digital currency platform. It's a mouthful. IMF working on a global central bank digital currency platform, they're getting ready to roll out a worldwide system to facilitate the transfer of central bank digital coins. Right. So we've reported on this in the past that all the different central banks around

the world, each one of our are developing their only their own CBDCs, but there needs to be an interchange that takes place. And so the IMF was working on that. So the International Monetary Fund is reportedly working on a platform for central bank digital currencies for CBDCs, and this according to Reuters here, the platform would allow central banks to share knowledge about CBDCs and collaborate on research and development. Now, the IMF has been studying CBDCs since 2016, as previously warned, that the rise of digital currencies

could pose risk to financial stability, only for central banks, by the way. The move comes amid growing interest in CBDCs from central banks around the world, with China already testing its digital yuan. Now, they have a statement here. It says, CBDCs should not be fragmented national propositions. To have more efficient and fairer transactions, we need systems that connect countries. We need interoperability. That's coming from IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva.

Speaking Monday at a conference attended by African Central Banks in Morocco, if countries develop CDBCs only for domestic deployment, we are under utilizing their capacity, she added. And so basically what that translates to is we've got to get all these central banks operating on the same platform here. And so, and the IMF is basically saying to the, to all these different banks around the world, we are the answer for that. So CBDCs can aid financial inclusion and reduce remittance costs, said Georgieva, as transfers cost an average of 6.3%, totaling $44 billion a year. Now, she said that the need

for CBDCs, they need to have asset backing. So, Drever also stated that cryptocurrencies are a viable investment option when backed by assets, but without asset support, they become speculative investments. Now, of course, IMF is ardently opposed to any cryptocurrencies out there at all that give the freedom of one-to-one transactions. Rick, I should be able to transact financially with you privately without the interference of anyone else. That should be the freedom of financial transaction. But what that does is that cuts out the ability for these banks, the super banks really, to make money. It also cuts out the ability of globalists to know every detail of your life and to control you. While you were talking about the IMF story, I just made notes linking these three stories together.

A global financial shock would enable globalists to reimagine the world's financial system by introducing CBDCs as new currencies. One, two, three. You got to have a shock? Yes. Then you reimagine a new system, which they've already done. And then you give the a new system which they've already done and then you you give the people the solution problem reaction solution create the problem global financial shock give them give them the the you know the desire, the craving. Give us a solution.

Problem, reaction, solution. The problem is the financial shock, the crash. But that is something they created. Yes, they created. They anticipate the reaction of the public. This is the skilled ability of the manipulators to use propaganda they they know they anticipate what the general public reaction will be to the problem so they create a public financial shock in the world system they know what the reaction is going to be, which is going to be fear and

panic and chaos. And then they offer the world a solution. You know what? There's another connection in the stories that we have today, Rick, and that is look who Jake Sullivan is targeting. Look who Macron is targeting. Look who Georgieva is targeting. They're going out to these nations now that have not been on board with this whole Russian boondoggle that they've been trying to run, that these nations have been convinced we're not going to do sanctions on Russia. We're not going to do this. So now Jake Sullivan's meeting with top tier BRICS and then Macron's meeting with a whole bunch of African leaders. And trying to get into the BRICS meeting.

Right. And then you have Georgieva providing a solution. Where is she at? She's at Rabat, Morocco, speaking to African leaders, African financial directors and everything. Once again, all these different countries that have been kind of sitting outside on the sidelines here. I think it's too little too late. The IMF was the creature of the old New World Order.

It knows that its days are numbered. And I don't see how they can roll out. I mean, if it's their plan to roll out, you know, a digital currency, a master currency, if you will, they better hurry up because the BRICS are going to do something. I just thought about something. What's the nickname for the U.S. dollar? Sawbuck? Greenback?

Greenback. Right. They're going to introduce a green coin. Hey, folks. That ties all this together. That's what I mean. Folks, the greenback is now just a green coin. It's still green.

You like it, don't you? It's green. It's a green coin. You probably heard that Joe Biden called Xi Jinping a dictator. I take this as seriously as I do professional wrestling. So this story from TASS, Beijing will give a decisive answer to Biden's words about Xi Jinping. What are you going to do? Cut his pay? Cut off his allowance?

Yeah, I mean, they're going to cut off his allowance? He works for China. This is all theater. They're not fighting. They're not arguing. This is all for your entertainment. So you're telling me in professional wrestling

when they take the middle chair and they smack it, you know, against Andre the Giant. It's not real. It's not a real chair? And when Joe Biden calls Xi Jinping a dictator, it's not real. Because he wants the money to keep flowing.

And is the response from the Chinese real then? No. This is all theater. Right, because when they came out today with this big, huge statement, we don't have really time to go through it all, This is all theater. Right, because when they came out today with this big, huge statement, we don't have really time to go through it all, but they said, the Chinese embassy in Washington said that our government and people will not accept any political provocations

against China's top leader and will give a decisive response to them. We call on the American side to immediately take serious action to eliminate the negative consequences and comply with its own obligations. Otherwise, it will have to bear all the consequences. They're offended. Offended, I say. They're not offended. It's all theater. Biden works for China. They're not arguing. They're not fighting. While we're talking about Biden, let's get down to the juicy stuff about Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden was a member of an elite LA sex club, but got kicked out for being a scumbag. And that's coming from the founder of the sex club,

too. So according to the Daily Mail, Hunter Biden was reportedly a member of Sanctum. That was an exclusive Los Angeles sex club. However, he was later expelled from the club for his behavior, male hunter biting was reportedly a member of sanctum that was an exclusive los angeles sex club however he was later expelled from the club for his behavior which was described as disrespectful and unpleasant by damon launer the club's founder launer himself was banned from the club listen to this after he publicly revealed hunter's membership the club has a strict policy of never disclosing its members' identities, and any violation of this rule results in a permanent ban. The revelations were made in a recent profile of Lawner in the Los Angeles Times. Lawner said

he decided to sell the club years ago to new owners because his lifestyle had ruined his relationship with his family. He told the LA Times he has since attended events but only to show friends what it's like inside and lifted the lid on one of the club's members, breaking a taboo. He said, Hunter was a member at Sanctum and I canceled his membership after one party because he's a scumbag, he wrote on Instagram in a now-deleted post. The current ownership of the elite club took issue with Lawner's claim and banned him from its events that he once hosted. And he had a response to this, posting what I did on Instagram about Hunter was me letting people know that the type

of behavior that he exhibited was something that upsets me. This came from a guy who started a sex club, Rick. La The lawyer told the LA Times after its reporters followed up with him, I knew that the consequences could be me not being part of sanctum anymore, but I was willing to take that risk. Listen, when you offend a sex club owner because your behavior is so bad.

He calls you a scumbag. He calls you a scumbag. He says, man, we can't allow that kind of behavior in our sex club. You've gone too far. Hunter Biden bringing down their standards. New York Post. U.S. government has approved the first laboratory grown meat chicken made from animal cells so

here it is folks this is it um you are only going to know whether you're eating real meat if you absolutely know the source of the meat, like a local farmer. If buying food now in a grocery store, buying it at a restaurant, you are not going to know if it's real meat or fake laboratory grown meat. It's now entering the food chain. Yes. So as Rick's saying, the New York Post is reporting that the U.S. has approved the nation's first lab-grown meat chicken made from animal cells, which could transform the food industry. The chicken was produced by Eat Just Inc., a San Francisco-based food tech company, and is made from cells grown in a bioreactor. The meat is said to have a taste and texture like that of conventional chicken and is already available in restaurants in Singapore.

Instead of all that land and all that water that's used to feed all of those animals that are slaughtered, we can do it in a different way. And that's coming from Josh Tetrick, co-founder and chief executive at Eat Just, which operates what is called Good Meat. Good Meat, which already sells cultivated meat in Singapore, the first country to allow it, turns masses of chicken cells into cutlets, nuggets, shredded meat, and satays. But don't look for this novel meat in grocery stores anytime soon. The culturally vetted chicken is much more expensive than meat from whole farm birds

and cannot yet be produced on the scale of traditional meat. That's coming from Ricardo San Martin, director of Alt Meat Lab at the University of California at Berkeley. But then why are they building that massive factory? Is it North or South Carolina? I think in North Carolina. They're going to scale up, Rick. Of course they are. They're going to scale up. Now, Upside, based in Berkeley, operates a 70,000 square foot building in nearby Emeryville. On a recent Tuesday, visitors entered a gleaming commercial kitchen where Chef Jeff Weaver was sauteing a cultivated chicken filet. Listen to how they put that, a cultivated chicken filet. Doesn't that sound wonderful? In a white wine butter sauce with tomatoes, capers, and green onions.

The finished chicken breast product was slightly paler than the grocery store version. Otherwise, it looked, cooked, smelled, and tasted like any other pan-fried poultry. Tastes like chicken, right? That's right, and that's what Amy Chin, the chief operating officer of the company, said. The most common response we get is, oh, it tastes like chicken. And so. But it's not chicken. But it's not chicken.

You thought it was chicken. I can't believe it's not chicken. All right. So I want to connect these stories. We talked about imagining a new global financial system. The world financial system needs a shock. Why does it need a shock? So that the people will accept a reimagined financial system. Right. Okay. In that green financial system that they're building, and these people are the most extreme

radical environmentalists that I've ever breathed. They're not really, they don't care about the environment. They're using the environment to gain control of the world. That's right. That's what it's about. It's about power. If you are a farmer or a rancher who raises livestock,

they're going to put you out of business. That's right. You need to know that. This is why these people have to be stopped. They plan to put you out of business. Oh, for the first couple of years, you'll be competing. At your local grocery stores,

there'll be fake meat and real meat. In the restaurants, there'll be fake meat and real meat. You're not going to know the difference because they're not going to tell you. The U.S. government is not going to require labeling be fake meat and real meat you're not going to know the difference because they're not going to tell you the u.s government is not going to require labeling on fake meat i guarantee you doc it's not going to be and if they do it's going to be very tiny print and so not going to be there so you're not going to know whether the meat that you're ordering in a restaurant or buying at a grocery store,

you're not going to know whether it's real or fake. But at some point, they're going to have enough distribution of the process, big enough market share and a big enough lobbying base in Washington. They're going to put you out of business like they're shutting down the farmers in the Netherlands right now. They're down the farmers in the Netherlands right now. Right. So they're telling the farmers in the Netherlands, either you accept our buyout of your farm or we're going to condemn your farm and seize it. That's right. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's government policy today in the Netherlands. And it's coming to america and canada and all of europe that's their that's their reimagined financial system so no farmers so reimagine the world and re-imagine a world

without cows reimagine a world without pigs reimagine a world without chickens that's where they're reimagining and they're using uh, as we saw with Macron earlier at that summit that he's doing, financial pressure, basically drying up the lending so that the lending in the world only goes to those who submit to the agenda. And don't think they can't do that. They already do it here in the U.S. through the banking system and the energy companies. Well, they're shutting down the energy companies. Right. So coal companies

can't get financing. They're doing that now. So they're doing it to the coal companies. They're doing it to electrical generating plants. They're doing it to the oil and gas industry. They're going to make gas stoves illegal. They're doing their green energy economy. They're doing it right now. While we're sitting here

talking about it, they are doing it. This is why they have to be stopped. They're radical. They're extremists. They are out of control and they are hell bent on running the world. And they have plans to reimagine you. They're reimagining your children. They're changing them. They're changing their genders. They're reimagining them. Yes. We don't believe your boy is a boy. We believe your boy is a girl. Maybe your boy is something that's never been around before. I mean, you're not allowed to say anything. Doc, we didn't show it yesterday. We had a video from Great Britain. A high school student was kicked out of his class for saying in the class that there are only two genders. And the teacher kicked him out of the class.

I think he was banned from, I don't know if he was banned from the school or just the class. But anyhow, there's a video of the teacher telling the student, that is your opinion. You are not allowed to say your opinion in this class because your opinion contradicts government policy. And the boy kept saying, there's only two genders. And the teacher's like, why do you continue to say that? You're in violation of government policy. So I don't think the teacher himself believes it. But he's saying.

But he's been Nazified. Right. I'm going to obey the government. The government says there are only, I mean, there are now multiple genders. I am going to accept it. It's like a robot. Right. That's how they're reimagining society. And if you don't

go along with it, they're going to cut the money off to you. They'll take this down to the personal individual level where your CBDCs don't work. You don't have any more money, cash in your pocket. You only have digital coins floating around in the universe. That you can't use. And they just turn them off. Individual coins that are invisible, invisible coins will have an invisible on and off switch. And if you misbehave, misspeak, misthink, they'll turn off your invisible coins. And you have now been frozen out of the green economy, which is a gay economy, which is a transvestite economy, which is a communist economy. It is an anti-Christ Luciferian economy.

You will be frozen out. That's the plan. This is why we have to stop them. There's no middle ground here. There's no gray area. They must be stopped. They must be opposed. This is it, folks. This is the battle. We finally have reached the point where there can be no more compromise. There can be no more tolerance of their agenda. They must be stopped. End of discussion. I got one more for you. I got a lot more I'd like to show you, but I'll save it for tomorrow.

The Guardian. Oh, good. Synthetic human embryos created in groundbreaking advance. See, they don't even need you anymore either. Yeah. They don't need your egg or your sperm. And they don't need your womb. They're going to reimagine humans.

Humans will be synthetic. Fake humans with no souls. There's going to be another race of people on the planet. Yuval Harari told us that. He did. Okay. And now they have a breakthrough where they have created synthetic fake human embryos that were created without a human donor. Think about that. Not a sperm,

not an egg. So according to a report from The Guardian, scientists have created synthetic human embryos using stem cells, which sidesteps the need for eggs or sperm. The model embryos are said to resemble those in the early stages of human development and could provide a crucial window on the impact of genetic disorders and the biological causes of recurrent miscarriage. They always paint it up nice. However, the work raises some serious ethical and legal issues as the lab-grown entities fall outside of current legislation in the UK and most other countries. The article goes on to say, Professor Magdalena Zernike-Getz of the University of Cambridge in the California Institute of Technology described the work in a plenary address at the International Society for Stem Cell Research at their annual meeting in Boston. Listen to what she says here. We can create human embryo-like models by the reprogramming of embryonic stem cells,

she told the meeting. We can create people, is what she's saying. Our human model is the first three lineage, listen to this, three lineage human embryo model that specifies ammion and germ cells precursor cells of egg and sperm it's beautiful and created entirely from embryonic stem cells listen that it's beautiful she says nice frankenstein so like frankenstein but robin lovel badge the head of stem cell biology and developmental genetics at the francis crick in London said, the idea is that if you really model normal human embryonic development using stem cells,

you can gain an awful lot of information about how we begin development, what can go wrong without having to use early embryos for research. But the question, of course, becomes, what are these embryos? What are they? And when these embryos grow up and become adult humans,

are they human or another species? Do they have a soul? Because souls come from God, the creator. Right. I don't think these things are going to have souls. I mean, you've eliminated the direct human lineage. Yes. You've eliminated.

You've cut, you've developed a new species, really, that is cut off from the current human genome. Satan's plan is to eliminate everything God created in Genesis. Yes. Including humans.

Satan wants to reimagine. Yes. Creation. And then he will have soulless humans that worship him. That's the world he has reimagined. That's what we're up against. You won't hear this anywhere else, folks. I guarantee you. Mighty. Mighty is the name of Jesus Christ.

Mighty is the name of Jesus Christ. Pick up your cross. We will engage the enemy. We will defeat the enemy. We will carry the banner of Jesus Christ. We will not fear. We will not tremble. We will not run. We will not hide. We will not compromise. We will advance. And the gates of hell cannot prevail against the church. It's not hell attacking the church. It's the church attacking hell. Right. And the gates of hell cannot prevail. It can't stop us. We will win. We will win. And Christ will return. If you've not read that book, Final Day,

please go to Amazon and get a copy. The print copy is available, the e-book, and the audio book at Amazon. Just search Final Day, Richard Wiles,

you'll go to our page. Get the book. They'll ship it to you right away. And seriously, think about becoming a financial supporter of True News this year. Man, we're on the front line. Can you think of anybody else out there that's having the impact that we're having, saying the things that we say? If you can, support them. Seriously, if they're doing something, then support them.

But those of you who can support us, please get behind us this year. We're halfway through 2023. Would you make a commitment to Almighty God that you'll support True News the remaining months of 2023. Bolster us, support us, strengthen us, that we can keep going and enlarge and grow and reach more people. I hope you do that. Take care. We'll see you tomorrow. God bless you. You have been listening to True News with Rick Wiles. Thank you for listening. To find out more information regarding the broadcast, including prayer and financial support,

please visit our website at truenews.com. Our mailing address for all correspondence is True News, PO Box 690069, Vero Beach, Florida 32969.