TRUNEWS with Rick Wiles - Zelensky Wants NATO to Nuke Russia

Episode Date: October 6, 2022

Nuclear war lunacy is infecting more politicians. This time it is Ukraine’s former TV comedian Volodymyr Zelensky who is calling for nuclear war. And even crazier is the news that Mr. Zelensky is the leading candidate to be honored with the Nobel Peace Prize. Mr. Zelensky participated in a forum hosted by Australia’s Lowy Institute, where in his presentation he called for NATO to carry out a preemptive first strike on Russia. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 10/6/22It’s the Final Day! The day when Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. You can order the second edition of Rick’s book, Final Day!  https://rickwiles.com/final-day

The following program is made possible by the faithful prayers and financial support of listeners just like you. To find out how you can help, visit www.truenews.com. This is True News, the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth, so help us God. Nuclear war lunacy is infecting more politicians today. This time it's Ukraine's former TV comedian, Vladimir Zelensky, who is calling for nuclear war. And even crazier is the news that Mr. Zelensky is the leading candidate to be honored with the Nobel Peace Prize. Mr. Zelensky participated in a forum hosted by Australia's Lowry Institute. Here is a video segment from his presentation when he called for NATO to carry out a preemptive first strike on Russia using nuclear weapons. Важливо визначати застосування росією ядерною зброєю. Але, що важливо, я ще раз звертаюся до міжнародної спільноти, як це було до 24-го. Превентивні удари, щоб вони знали, що з ними буде, якщо вони застосують. А не навпаки. Чекати ядерних ударів росією, щоб потім сказатих ти так Ну ось тримай від нас переглянути застосування свого тиску ось я вважаю що повинна робити над переглянути порядок застосування так That was no mistake in translation there or anything. This has been verified, you know, and the Russians are responded to it.

We'll talk about that here in just a moment. Zelensky wants NATO to nuke Russia. Yes. Where are we? I mean, this is, think how fast we have moved here. What planet are we on right now? We were just talking to a friend here in the office today about how fast things have changed over the past week. And then from yesterday to today, how quickly they've changed.

Unbelievable. responded, obviously, to a call by Zelensky for NATO to nuke Moscow. Kremlin spokesman World should take note of Zelensky's call for preventive nuclear strike on Russia. And this is from Sputnik here. During an online conference at Australia's Lowy Institute, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky called on NATO to carry out preventive nuclear strikes on Russia in order to deter Moscow from using nukes. The Russian side has repeatedly stressed that there can be no winner in a nuclear war and it should never be unleashed. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has urged the entire world to take note of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky's call for a preventive nuclear strike on Russia. Peskov told Sputnik that Zelensky's statements about preventive nuclear strikes against Russia cannot be ignored by the international community, since they are nothing short of a call to start a world war,

which will entail catastrophic repercussions. These are the countries, the U.S. and the U.K., that de facto direct Kiev, manage its activities, and talk about their intentions to defend Ukraine to the bitter end. Therefore, they are responsible and should be held accountable for this person's actions and statements and this regime, Peskov said. Now, Maria Zakharova, spokeswoman for the Russian foreign ministry, for her part, has warned that the West is fomenting a nuclear war while an unstable Zelensky has turned into a monster. Every single person on this planet should realize that Zelensky, a puppet and an unstable character who has been pumped with weapons, has turned into a monster who could be used to destroy the planet, Ms. Zakharova said on her Telegram channel. Now speaking at Australia's Loyal Institute via video link, Zelensky urged NATO to launch

pre-emptive strikes on Russia instead of waiting for Russia's nuclear strikes. In the entire context here, what should NATO do? It should eliminate the possibility of Russia using nuclear weapons. But what is important, I once again appeal to the international community, as it was before February 24th, preemptive strikes are important so that they know, they being the Russians, know what will happen to them if nuclear weapons are used.

It should not be vice versa, as in to wait for Russia's nuclear strikes, Zelensky said. So Rick, this is where we're at right now, where the president of Ukraine is calling on NATO now to do a preemptive strike on a nuclear power, Russia. I'm at a loss for words. I'm just at a loss for words, Doc. I don't know what else to say. The world is teetering on the edge of a horrific catastrophe in which a billion people could die in a matter of hours. And there's not one responsible leader in the world trying to calm down this madness.

There's nobody calling for peace. There's nobody telling Russia and Ukraine and the United States and Great Britain and the EU to knock it off. Settle the dispute, end the war, and stop this crazy talk about nuclear war? There's not one person. Nobody. I mean, you've got people on the left that want a war, you've got people on the right that want a war. And the people in the middle are caught in the middle.

They, you know, if they do get information of any kind, which most of the time they don't, it's like, well, you know, that's the way it goes. We're not gonna have a nuclear war. We haven't had one yet. We're not gonna have one in the future either. But things are so much different now. The temperature is increasing in this frog pot.

In a matter of days, we have watched the dialogue move so far towards an okra war it just literally since last Friday since Putin speech last Friday this is only Wednesday doc I mean I don't know what are we going to be talking about next Monday where do you go from here at this point?

You go to an actual deployment of weapons. That's where you go. That's next. I mean, why hasn't, see, if Biden was any kind of a leader, which he's not, Biden should be smacking down Zelensky saying, stop this talk. But they can't do that. They've bet everything on him and they've put him out there so they've said you can say anything you can pick your own targets you can do whatever you want to do I think they're telling him to say these things

I wouldn't put that past him either I don't think it's that he's out of control I think he's very under control. He is saying what he's told to say. And he's setting the stage for nuclear war. And at this point, what is Russia's, what are their options at this point? What do you do when you're being threatened with a preemptive first strike? What do you do? You put yourself in Russia's place. You're being threatened with a preemptive first strike. So you've got to calculate, well, what do I do at this point? Do I do a preemptive first strike?

And is that what the bet is? They're betting, NATO's betting that Russia's going to blink in this, you know, thermonuclear chicken that we're playing here? I always go back to a Charlie Brown cartoon. I always have this image in my mind. All right, so Charlie Brown's knocked out cold. He's on the playground. He's passed out.

Nancy's standing there. She's still got smoke coming off her fist. Teacher says, Nancy, why did you hit Charlie? And she said, because he was thinking about hitting me. That's where we're at right now. One side, the other side's going to say, they're thinking about hitting us. I'm just going to go ahead and hit them. If I were in the Kremlin, I would be telling Putin, they're going to hit us any moment.

They're getting ready to strike. Somebody, there's a hand somewhere, Doc. I mean, we know ultimately it's Satan. Right. But there's a force, there's an entity that is heating this dispute up red hot, making both sides believe that the other side is going to hit them with nuclear weapons. Somebody wants this war.

Somebody wants a lot of people to die. You mentioned that article, it mentioned Maria Zakharova. She's the press secretary for the Russian foreign ministry. This is what she put out on her telegram today. And so she's quoting several leaders in the region here and commenting on it. She quotes Polish President Duda. The problem is, first of all, that we do not have nuclear weapons and there is no indication that we, Poland, will get it

anytime soon. There is always the potential to participate in nuclear sharing. We talked about this yesterday. We discussed with American leaders whether the United States is considering such a possibility. The topic is open. Now she's quoting President Lukashenko of Belarus. What does this mean, that we are really facing an attack with tactical nuclear weapons? We need to take action. We don't have it. And then President Zelensky, NATO must launch preventive nuclear strikes against Russia. And she says, the West is fomenting a nuclear war. Every person on the planet should realize

that the weapon-pumped puppet and unbalanced character Zelensky has turned into a monster whose hands can destroy the planet. So, now from Izvestia here, the foreign ministry called Zelensky's statement about a strike

on the Russian Federation a fulminant of nuclear war. The West is feeling a nuclear war at the hands of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky. And as we pointed out there on the Zakharova telegram channel there. Well, former President Medvedev spoke out also, and he posted this on his Telegram channel. And he didn't hold back. Zelensky announced the need for preventive nuclear strikes on Russia. And he says polite psychiatrists should give this idiot a preventive craniotomy

until he caused more trouble for his people and everyone else. And basically he's saying Zelensky's nuts. You need to open up his skull and see what's inside. It's just, it's mind-boggling that this is happening. I want to go down to number 13.

CNN is reporting that Zelensky is the favorite to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Yes. And second favorite is Navalny, opposition candidate in Russia. But the big favorite is Vladimir Zelensky.

So if you start a nuclear war, you get a peace prize. Right. Well, if you start a war, you get qualified. President Obama got it. Yeah, he tore up Syria and Libya, and they gave him the peace prize.

But he's the favorite right now. The winner of the Nobel Peace Prize will be announced on Friday. I always thought the peace prize was about peace. It used to be. Not pieces of the world. Well, Mr. Zielinski also won another contest. This is a Jerusalem Post.

Every year they nominate the 50 most influential Jews in the world. And as you can see right there, number one, and we'll go to a close-up here in the next still, number one of the most influential Jews in the world is none other than Zelensky. Beating out even the prime minister of Israel right now. So yeah, he's the number one Jew right now, as far as influential Jew. According to the Jerusalem Post. Yes. They announced this. That's their headline. The man who's calling for nuclear war. Right. Number 16, the ambassador to the United States responded to the Pentagon's statements about

possible strikes on Crimea. Right. So we recall our story from yesterday that it had come out in that announcement from the Pentagon about the $625 million military package to Ukraine in that conversation there that they left open the possibility for strikes in Crimea. Well, the reporter said Ukraine needs missiles that will reach Crimea, and the Pentagon official said the weapons that we gave them will reach Crimea. Right. And so they responded yesterday and they continue to respond today.

Moscow will adamantly defend Crimea and the new territories as an integral part of the country in the event of possible strikes on the peninsula, which were announced by the Pentagon, said Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov, said, I am firmly convinced that we will defend our Crimea, notice he says, our Crimea and new territories as an integral part of our country. In this, our actions will be adamant, he said on Channel One. Antonov has previously warned that American politicians are mistaken in believing that the willingness of the Russian leadership to defend the country does not extend to Crimea. He also noted that by supplying weapons

to Ukraine, the United States is testing Russia's strength. Doc, we've witnessed in the last three years some profound things in the world. 2020, a global pandemic was unleashed in the world. Coronavirus. Man-made. Definitely man-made. And so was the response. It was in the can before the virus was out of the can. The lockdowns, the mask mandates, the vaccine mandates, the messenger RNA vaccines, which are not vaccines, but change the DNA of the recipients. Operating systems. Yeah. Operating systems injected into humans, which make them non-humans. And then, you know, the detention camps, the quarantine camps like we saw in China and Australia, the vaccine passports, the tracking mechanisms to track people, their movement in their cities. All this was unleashed on the world. And the really big story out of it, which nobody

talks about, is how many people have died from the vaccines. Because here are people dropping dead every day from the fake vaccines. But you can't talk about it because they're not reported as vaccine-related deaths. They're heart attacks, there are strokes. There's a lot of people who are just having, who are falling ill, diseases, organs failing, and nobody is associating the fact that the vaccine has turned off their immunity. And now they're vulnerable to various diseases. And so there's a huge die-off.

Here in America, the lifespan of the average American has dropped. The one business that's booming in America right now is the mortuary business. Yes, unfortunately, yes. Funeral homes can't find enough morticians to keep up with the dead bodies that are coming in. Life insurance companies are paying out massive amounts in cash payouts on policies because we're seeing death rate up maybe 40% with some of these companies compared to other years. People are dying.

Was COVID, was it a plan, a plandemic to reduce the population and was it carried out by the the green communists who are these radicals who believe that they are they were born for the purpose of of stopping climate change and changing human behavior, implementing a new, not only a new financial system, but a new social system. Right. And managing a population by reducing it. Yes. Significantly. Yes. And eventually altering the people who do survive, changing them into non-human beings. So my son, Jeremy, is the one who showed me the next two things that I'm going to show you. Because I've got to tell you, Jeremy, Doc, this is the honest truth.

I would say March or April of 2020, when the virus had just started, he's sitting on Jeremy's patio at his home, and he said, Dad, I'm going to tell you something. You're going to eventually find out that this coronavirus, at that time, coronavirus had only been out for a couple months. He said, Dad, I'm telling you, you're going to find out someday that this virus was man-made and released by the radical environmentalists to reduce the human population on the earth.

He said, I'm telling you, I really believe, even I had trouble at that time believing that these radical depopulation people really would do it. I knew that they wanted to. Yeah, that wasn't a problem with me. I knew that they talked about it. They dreamed about it. They wrote books about it. But they would actually carry it out.

And actually have a plan. And it was actually in motion. That was difficult to believe. It is now. So now, if you remember back in, where was it, sometime in 2021, right after the trucker protest in Canada and suddenly they just announced

the pandemic's over. It's all done. It's over. And you and I sat here and we said, they just changed the channel. Right. We're going to something different. We went to war. So we suddenly had, within weeks, we're into war with Russia.

Is this war engineered for the purpose of reducing the human population? Are the radical green communists into stage two of their plan to reduce the human population? That COVID was just the warm up. That was the beginning. So my son Jeremy shared this with me over the weekend and this first one is from 2011. Huffington Post, February 26, 2011. Could a small nuclear war reverse global warming. 2011, they were asking this question. Let's look at some of the quotes in this HuffPost article. So nuclear war is a bad thing, right?

Well, scientists from NASA and a number of other institutions have recently been modeling the effects of a war involving 100 Hiroshima-level bombs, or 0.03% of the world's current nuclear arsenal according to National Geographic the research suggests five million metric tons of black carbon would be swept up into the lowest portion of the atmosphere the result according to NASA climate models could actually be global cooling wait let's just stop there. Was NASA doing this modeling because

they wanted to prevent nuclear war? Or were they doing this modeling because somebody in the government said, tell us what would happen if we had a nuclear war? What would be the effect on the climate?

That's the question. And they likely had another agenda. Now, it goes on in this particular article. It says, in more tropical areas, temperatures could fall 5.4 to 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit. But the likelihood of disaster over reversing global warming is a more imminent concern, according to Time. And then from Time magazine, even a small exchange of nuclear weapons between 50 to 100 Hiroshima-sized bombs, which India and Pakistan already have in their arsenal, would produce enough soot and smoke to block out sunlight, cool the planet, and produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history. So in addition, the extreme weather caused by even a mild nuclear winter

would have a tremendous effect on crops and famines, including creating a 10% global decrease in precipitation. According to National Geographic, the soot could also cause tremendous harm to the ozone layer, allowing more ultraviolet rays to reach Earth. Now while the global cooling caused by superpower on superpower war could be catastrophic, could be, hence the term nuclear winter, a small-scale war could have an impact on the world climate, says National Geographic. Models suggest that though the world is currently in a warming trend, small-scale war could lower global temperatures 2.25 degrees for the two to three years following war i guess in two or three years we'd have to have another war to keep those temperatures down

what they're proposing here doc in 2011 they're saying if we can keep this to a small nuclear war we can cool the planet right it's just a small nuclear war not not a big one. Is this what the green communists are doing to us right now? Are they trying to launch a small-scale nuclear war? They think they're going to contain it, they're going to control it, for the purpose of lowering the temperature of the planet and reducing a lot of humans. A lot of useless eaters out there. We also got a video my son showed me last weekend. And this is a scientist talking about the effects on the climate from a nuclear war

and how the temperatures would be brought down. And Professor, if an all-out nuclear war breaks out between the U.S. and Russia, I mean, I understand that between them each got about 4,000 strategic nuclear weapons, but help us paint a picture of the worst-case scenario. What would happen in the days and months following a nuclear detonation? Well, we've looked at two kinds of scenarios here. One is a war between Pakistan and India involving a few hundred nuclear weapons of low yield. And we've also looked at a war between NATO and Russia involving around 2,000 nuclear weapons

of higher yield. And so the Russian and the American weapons, there's about 2,000 that are actually deployed and could potentially be fired very quickly. And the other 2,000 you mentioned are in storage, and it'd take quite a while to bring those out. But even a small number of these weapons is incredibly dangerous. So Russia only has 200 cities with 100,000 people. The United States only has 300 cities with more than 100,000 people in them. So it doesn't take very many weapons to attack every city in the opposing country. So we right now with these 2000 weapons we can attack, the US and Russia could attack each city with more than 100,000 people in it with eight nuclear weapons. This is ridiculous because one nuclear weapon is enough to destroy a city.

So there's a vast amount of overkill in these weapons. And could you help us understand or if you could elaborate on the term nuclear winter, how it's caused and how far reaching are the implications? Right. So what happens in a nuclear explosion is there's a bright burst of light. It's like bringing a piece of the sun down to the ground. And that bright burst of light can start everything on fire. And there's also a blast wave that comes out and knocks down buildings and ruptures gas lines and things like that, which can cause additional fires. So when you look at the debris around Hiroshima, it wasn't caused by

the bomb blast, it was caused by a firestorm that released 1000 times the energy of the bomb from burning everything in that city. So what concerns us as climate scientists is that all those fires are going to generate a gigantic amount of smoke and that smoke will rise into the upper atmosphere and into the stratosphere where it never rains. We've actually seen this happen twice in the last couple of years from large fires in Australia and in British Columbia where smoke from fires went into the stratosphere and they stayed there the smoke for a year and could be easily observed by satellites but in the case of a nuclear conflict we would have thousands of times more smoke than from these forest fires and the smoke will absorb

sunlight in the stratosphere and keep it from reaching the lower atmosphere where we live so we think a war between NATO and Russia will reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the ground by about 80 percent. It'll be about 20 percent of the light left. And as a consequence, there would be rapid cooling at the Earth's surface. And so at mid-latitudes, for example, in the Ukraine and Iowa, which are major grain growing regions, we think the temperatures would drop within a few weeks below freezing. And there wouldn't be a day in the next two years in which it wasn't below freezing. So it would take a couple of years to get above freezing. This would totally eliminate agriculture at mid-latitudes. And, you know, it caused problems even in countries at lower latitudes,

depending on how they grow their crops and what crops they have. So we took the climate calculations that we have for this war between NATO and Russia. We looked at every country in the world to see how they would be affected. And basically what we found is that Russia would lose 98% of its population by the second year. The United States will lose about 96 or 97% of its population. China would lose about 98% of its population. Canada would lose 98% of its population. They all have it in common that they're relatively high latitude countries. It's's already cool they already have short growing seasons their agriculture would be eliminated if you look at places like indonesia and thailand they lose 50 to 75 percent of their population and an important assumption in here is that

transport stops because whatever people find to grow, they keep because their populations are starving. So this would be very bad for a country like Singapore, which doesn't grow much food and it's totally dependent on food transport. So basically probably no one would send any food to Singapore in a situation like this and they would keep it for themselves. I think that of about 6 billion people that were assumed in this model, that 5 billion would die within the second year, and things would continue to be bad for several more years. All right, Professor.

I'm afraid we have to leave it there for now, but thank you very much for your expertise. That was Owen Bryantoon, Professor at Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and also the fellow at the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado Boulder. So Nobel Peace Prize nominee Zelensky, he wants the nuclear war. 98% of the American people will be dead in two years.

That's what, Now do you understand why I'm so worked up about this war? Two percent of the people survive. That's it. Two years later, two percent of the American people are alive. This is insane,

Doc, that this is going on. We are rushing into a nuclear war. It's going to wipe out 98% of the population of this country. 98% of the Russians, 98% of the Chinese. Maybe 50% of the population of other countries. And really most of it, not even from the nuclear strikes themselves. From starvation. Because the global supply chain

will be shut down. And the temperatures will drop to below freezing for two years. So the next time you hear Sean Hannity or Lindsey Graham talking about we need to assassinate Putin, we need to take out the Russians. Just think about

what they're proposing. What the end looks like. Because 98% of us won't be alive two years later. If you survive the blast, you won't survive the next two years

because you'll starve to death. And if you have any food, any neighbor that's alive will come after you. This is a nightmare. And I keep waiting to wake up and go, oh, it was only a bad dream. We're really not this close to nuclear war. I know some of you are thinking, man, Rick's really worked up about nuclear war. You better believe

I am. You better believe it. Doc, the public has no idea how bad it's going to be. If they did, people would be talking about it. Right. And the politicians would stop sending the weapons to Ukraine. Yes. You tell your congressman and senator, you stop sending. You cut it off. You stop voting to send the weapons.

This is sending us to destruction. These politicians aren't hearing from anybody. They're not hearing any complaints at all from voters saying, we don't want to be in this war. Right. You're right. They're not hearing anything at all. If it is, it's a little bitty voice. And if you do speak up, you're immediately called a Russia lover, a Putin lover. You're unpatriotic. You're for Russia. No, I'm against nuclear war. I don't want anybody to die in this nuclear war.

I want this to stop. It's total madness what these politicians are doing right now. Well, what's to prevent NATO from giving nuclear weapons to Ukraine? Nothing right now. Well, what we've learned yesterday, Doc, is that Poland and the United States are talking about sharing. We're going to share our nukes. Isn't that so sweet?

That's just so nice. We're going to share our nukes. Did you know that they were talking about sharing nukes? They don't belong to you. We're just sharing them with you. Right. They're just sharing them with you. Right. They're just sitting here.

Wow. Okay, so let's take a look at what's going to happen to Europe this fall and summer, I mean this fall and summer, this fall and winter in relation to the cutoff of oil and gas to the continent. Because you go back to around June of this year, I predicted that by fall there's going to be gas rationing in Europe. It's here. And the warnings are becoming more dire every day

because they can't hide it much longer. The weather's changing. And the governments are going to do gas rationing. They're going to do electricity blackouts. They're preparing for social unrest in Europe. Didn't have to happen. This is the making of bad foreign policy by the politicians, by the CFR and the Bilderberg Boys and the World Economic Forum and all these freaks who think that they are born to rule the world.

They brought us to the brink of disaster. I'm not happy about it. I'm not happy about it. There's no reason for this suffering. There's no justification for it, Doc. But it's still going to happen, Rick. I mean, it's going to happen. Even if they were able to fix everything today, it's still going to happen.

Well, NBC News says that the probe, the investigation into the Nord Stream pipeline leaks, has strengthened suspicions of sabotage. Well, that's what the Swedes are believing. Sweden's domestic security agency said Thursday that its preliminary investigation of leaks from two Russian gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea has strengthened the suspicions of serious sabotage as the cause, and a prosecutor said evidence at the site has been seized. The Swedish security service said the probe confirmed that detonations caused extensive damage

to the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines last week. Authorities had said when the leaks off Sweden and Denmark first surfaced that explosions were recorded in the area. Now, the agency which said what happened in the Baltic Sea was very serious didn't give details about its investigation, but in a separate statement, Swedish prosecutor Mats Lundqvist said seizures have been made at the crime scene and these will now be investigated. Lundqvist, who led the preliminary investigation, did not identify the seized evidence.

He said he had given the directives to temporarily block the area and carry out a crime scene investigation. You notice they're not naming any names or pointing any fingers at anyone in particular, but at the same time, they'll turn right around and they'll say Russia blew up their own pipeline. And that's where this investigation is going to lead as well and in the united states the news media the same people who told you that covet came from bat soup right and that the vaccines would prevent you from getting covet and that nobody was killed or harmed by the vaccines and lockdowns were good and mandates were great and mass stopped the virus and that we were to believe the science we believe this those are the same news media that's telling you now that Russia blew up its own pipeline. And if you question it, they question your patriotism. Well, I know

where I'm patriotic and to whom I'm patriotic to. The news media is not patriotic to the United States of America. They are patriotic to the New World Order. And so when they say you're not patriotic, it means you're not a slave to the new world order. That's what it means. They're all in. They're just upset there's a lot of Americans who aren't in. That's a good observation. That's what makes them mad.

You haven't submitted to it. They have. They gave up their soul. Why haven't you? Yeah, why haven't you given up your soul well they uh they are saying that the ukrainians were behind the assassination of uh daria dugina um that happened what about a month ago right car bomb right so this is an interesting story that the u.s is even commenting on this at all right now. The United States intelligence agencies believe parts of the Ukrainian government authorized the car bomb attack near Moscow in August that killed Darya Zagina, the daughter of a prominent Russian nationalist.

An element of a covert campaign that U.S. officials fear could widen the conflict. Now, listen to this quote here, Rick. They made a special effort to say this. The United States took no part in the attack, either by providing intelligence or other assistance, officials said. American officials also said they were not aware of the operation ahead of time and would have opposed the killing had they been consulted. Afterward, American officials admonished Ukrainian officials over the assassination, they said. They were admonished, Rick. Well, maybe Putin killed her. He blew up his own pipeline.

Well, that's what we, in fact, they were floating those stories out at the beginning there. They were saying elements of the Russian government did it as a false flag operation to try to gin up more conflict. But this is interesting. Why do you think they're coming out with this now? Why is the U.S. saying this now? I don't know it said the american officials who spoke about the intelligence did not disclose which elements of the ukrainian government were believed to have authorized the mission who carried out the attack or whether president vladimir zelensky had signed off on the mission

it was just interesting this story comes up now where the u.s is laying saying you know they could have veered completely away from this rig, not said anything at all. Because most people have forgotten about it. Right. But they made an effort to give it to the New York Times and say, run this story. I think there's more to it.

I agree. There's more to it. You found a political ad today that's being aired throughout the United States by the Lincoln Project, a far- left political action committee that pretends to be Republican, but they're really far left Democrats. And in this ad, it's insinuating that if you want war,

which is a good thing in the eyes of the Lincoln Project, if you want a war with Russia, then you want to vote Democrat because the Republicans are for Russia. But the truth is the Republicans want war with Russia. Yes. Let's watch the ad. When Vladimir Putin invaded a peaceful Ukraine, his brutal shock troops committed hideous war crimes against women, children, and the elderly. He bombed cities, towns, and villages.

America and the world gave Ukraine weapons, supplies, and intelligence. The Ukrainians put their courageous soldiers in the line of fire. With great sacrifice, this alliance broke the invasion, pushed it back, liberated millions. Victory for Ukraine is in sight, but the war isn't over. And the new front is in Washington, where mega-republicans want a Putin victory. They'll cut off aid to Ukraine if they take power. You heard that right. They want America to switch sides, help Putin win, threatening us with nuclear annihilation.

It's sick. It's wrong, it's MAGA. If they win in November, Putin wins, and the blood will be on our hands. It's sick, it's wrong, it's MAGA. They had Tucker Carlson in there, Marjorie Taylor Greene. These Republicans, they're for Putin. Don't you want to bomb Putin and vote Democrat? But the truth is, if you vote Republican, you're going to get war too.

Right. Because both parties are for war. They're both the war party. Let's get back to the crisis in Europe. A lot of stuff came out in the news today in London and throughout Europe about blackouts and rationing. So this is the Times of London today, UK winter blackouts morning, if energy imports dry out. You notice how they drip this information out, Rick? They said, blackouts, but they're not going to be big blackouts.

They're going to be short blackouts. Months ago, there was not going to be any blackouts. Now, there's going to be little blackouts. Right, and what's going to be a week from now. So Liz Truss refused to rule out the prospects of blackouts this winter after the National Grid warned that power supplies

could not be guaranteed. Speaking in Prague today, where the Prime Minister is discussing the energy crisis with European leaders, Truss was repeatedly asked about the possibility of energy shortages in the coming months. She insisted that Britain had a good supply and was in a much better position than many other countries,

but refused to guarantee that blackouts could be avoided. So this afternoon, the National Grid raised the prospect of rolling blackouts if Britain cannot import enough energy from Europe this winter. Millions of households could have their electricity cut off for three hours at a time if there's not enough gas to supply power plants, forcing emergency plans for scheduled disconnections of customers to be put into action. Britain may need imports of gas from continental Europe to meet demand in a cold winter, but these imports could be at risk because of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. So Great Britain may need to import gas

from Europe. Well, where is Europe getting it since they blew up the pipeline? That's right. And the other pipelines are shut off. So the plan for rolling blackouts would need to be signed off by the government and the king, Rick. Oh, King Charles. Yes, who would have to approve an emergency order by the Privy Council under an archaic legislative mechanism. The National Grid insisted that a shortage of gas was unlikely, but warned that even if gas supplies were adequate, household electricity supplies could still be at risk if temperatures plummet, if there is insufficient wind, and if there are no power imports from mainland Europe. Well, all three of those things are likely to happen. Depending on the success of this scheme, National Grid warned that it may need to interrupt supply to some customers for limited periods in a managed and controlled manner. Your lights are going off, Rick. If the company believes that power cuts are imminent,

it plans to hold an emergency public information campaign with the government involving press conferences on national radio and adverts on billboards and social media sites urging people to use less energy. The next stage would be for customers to be cut off for periods of three hours, according to a ROTA, with different customers disconnected on different days. Supplies to hospitals and priority business sites, as well as households that are registered as vulnerable customers, would be protected. So where we were, like Rick said, just a few weeks ago, no blackouts. We've got plenty of supply. We'll tighten our belts. We'll throw a blanket on.

We'll wear a sweater. Now they're talking about small blackouts, rolling blackouts, random blackouts. The UK, their new prime minister, Liz Truss, she's so confident about Britain's energy supplies that she traveled to Prague to talk to other European leaders about the energy crisis. about the energy crisis. Do you see the irony? I mean, she's trying to tell the people in Great Britain, don't worry, we're okay. But by the way, I'm over here in Prague.

We're having an emergency meeting to figure out what to do. Right. Next one, this is France 24. France unveils plans for avoiding winter power cuts. Due to Ukraine war. Once again, they throw the Ukraine war in there. Due to their inept management of world affairs. The French government announced a package of measures on Thursday aimed at curtailing energy consumption nationwide

to avoid possible power cuts or energy shortages as Russia's invasion of Ukraine disrupts gas supplies to Western Europe. The French government on Thursday launched a package of measures aimed at cutting the country's energy consumption by 10 percent in the hope of getting through the winter without power cuts. Now the energy transition minister Agnes Pannier-Morinache a crowd, which included several cabinet ministers, business leaders, and other officials, that the target was only the first step towards an objective of cutting energy use by 40% by 2050. Now, here they are in an energy crisis, and they're still committed to their global energy green goals yes so which is making me think this is all part of the plan right so urgent action is needed she said

calling for a general mobilization in favor of restraint and energy use which should lead to a 10 reduction energy use within two years compared to its 2019 level. Our fight does not end with the winter of 22-23, she added. Which is saying you're going to be cold in 24 and 25. Yes. Now to avoid shortages, the government recommended a host of measures including less heating and lighting, more remote work for staff and government services, and boosting carpooling. A key recommendation is to cap indoor temperatures at 66 degrees Fahrenheit, although, as Penny Arunachai says, there will be no temperature police. So, Rick, take heart.

There's not going to be temperature police, okay? Checking on compliance. Households, businesses, and administrations should also start heating two weeks later in this autumn and winter and end heating two weeks earlier than usual. The temperature of indoor sports facilities will be cut by two degrees and that of water and public swimming pools by one degree. But no temperature police, Rick. But there will be temperature snitches. I guarantee you that. You know, while they probably don't need temperature police, Rick, but there will be temperature snitches.

I guarantee you that. You know why they probably don't need temperature police? I'm just guessing because I have a feeling that the number of smart meters is very high. Yes. They don't need the police to go door to door. They'll just control your temperatures from headquarters. Right. You won't be able to adjust your thermostat.

Well, the Prime Minister of Belgium is worried about social unrest, rioting this winter. Right. He said that Europe risks a huge reduction in industrial activity and social unrest if it does not act quickly to bring down energy prices as winter approaches, the Belgian prime minister said. Without an intervention on gas markets, we are risking a massive deindustrialization of the European continent,

and the long-term consequences of that might actually be very deep. Okay, yeah, just hold it right there, Doc. Deindust industrialization of the European continent. The whole continent. Which means the factories of Europe are going to shut down.

Which means they're not producing... Not just shut down. Disappear. Right. De-industrialized. So this is a big deal that they're talking about. D'Cruz warned that governments had to be prudent not only to counter soaring inflation, which is largely being fueled by energy price rises,

but also to contain the risk of social unrest. He said, our populations are getting invoices which are completely insane. At some point it will snap. I understand that people are angry. People don't have the means to pay it. And so now they're talking about, you know, basically an energy bailout for all of Europe,

which essentially means that, you know, all the governments will take over control of all the energy and so and where's the where's the government's getting the money to bail out the utility bills of the people the money comes from taxes taxes come from the people who can't pay their utility bills right okay so you pay their utility bills how do they pay their taxes and how do they you know even generate taxes if they're not working? If you've been deindustrialized.

Look, this is a radical restructuring of human civilization. This is World Economic Forum policy in action. They're restructuring the planet. Human civilization. Why? They're going to bring forth robots. Automation. You don't need people. And you don't need factories. Everything's going to be built new from the ground up. It's creative destruction. They're destroying the old order. The new order is rising up. It's going to be real messy, real painful, real ugly.

But these people are insane, and they're going for it, Doc. They're going for it. They're like, we have it. We finally have arrived at the point that we can impose the new New World Order. The old New World Order, post-World War II, is over. It's done. They have declared that the old New World Order is finished. They're now implementing the new New World Order. new world order. And there's going to be a lot of misery

and suffering and destruction in the transition to their new dystopian world order. But that's not going to be painful for those at the top at all. Well, that's what they think. That's their thinking.

That's what they're thinking. But the Israelis, they've already figured out what to do. Machine guns run by artificial intelligence. So you don't even have to have a soldier out there to shoot the people who are rioting because they're fed up with the way they're being treated. It'll just be a robot gun that's going to shoot the people. Doc, these people are really sick

it's really sick um the next one uh this is reuters german gas regulator slash gas use for risk winter crisis so we kind of touched on this story a little bit last week um where the german gas regulator they're having a problem people aren't cutting back on gas usage german households and small businesses last week used nearly 10 percent more gas than the four-year average for that week germany's network regulator said on thursday warning germany risked a winter crisis unless significant cuts were made. The head of Germany's federal network agency, which would be in charge of gas rationing in

the event of a supply emergency, repeated his warning a week ago that consumption was too high. He said, we will struggle to avoid a gas emergency this winter without at least a 20% savings in private households, businesses, and industry. They've got to cut it back one-fifth, Rick. Klaus Mueller of the Bundesagentur told Reuters. That was pretty good. I practiced on that one.

The situation may become very serious if we do not significantly reduce our gas consumption. So now they're dealing with a new problem, Rick. And you know what that problem is? Humans. Because up to this point, it's been sort of, hey, come on, cut back on your gas usage. Remember,

we're all in this together. Turn down that thermostat. Do all the things. Just stay warm. But human nature sometimes comes into conflict with what those in control want. Are you saying the people are rebelling?

Well, not that I think part of them are, but there's another factor that's at play here. It's gotten colder earlier in Germany. That's what I was thinking. Have the temperatures changed earlier? They have. Because they have here in Florida.

Yes. We're a month ahead of our fall weather. Right now, the weather is great here in Florida, isn't it? Yes. I mean, this week, it's been just some of the best weather. But this usually doesn't happen until the end of October. That's right. And so, similar things are happening in Europe.

I've mentioned before, there's snow on the ground in Poland right now. There are lower article, Germany faces prospect of slashing energy exports, the grid operator warns. They're saying Germany's gonna have to consider not sharing its electricity with other European countries. Right, and this is going to cause a tremendous problem across Europe Germany may have to slash electricity exports to France and other countries this one to prevent a breakdown of its power grid a senior executive of the

country's largest grid operator is warned Hendrik Neumann chief technical officer of Amprion the biggest of Germany's four power grid operators said a temporary halt could even become necessary to avoid electricity shortages and bottlenecks in a last resort. However, he said such a scenario was likely to be for a matter of hours rather than days. Once again, it's going to happen, but short term. Okay, don't worry about it, Rick. A couple hours every day.

Right. A couple hours. Now, let me throw this in. About a month ago, European Union bigwigs were talking about how the EU nations are going to have to share their energy. Right. And if they don't voluntarily share, we're going to have to step in with the hammer and, you know, throw our weight around. And we're going to make them share their energy. You want to bet that...

You and what army? I mean that literally. What army is going to enforce that? Let's wait until December and see how many countries say, you know what? We're keeping what gas we have, what electricity we have,

what oil we have. We're we have, what oil we have. We're not sharing it with anybody. Right. And then what do you do with a country like Hungary, which is still importing Russian gas, natural gas, fuel oil, still importing under an exemption. So are we going to be a month or two down the line here where Germany or France are going to say, hey, Hungary, you know, you've got energy. What you're seeing in this article with the Financial Times is they're saying Germany's going to cut off France. Right.

After they had made that agreement about a month ago, yeah, we're in this together. We're going to work all the way through. They didn't last very long. So an outage or reduction of German electricity exports may worsen supply shortages in France, where almost half of the country's 56 nuclear power plants

are currently off the grid. And who did that? The French government. The Greens. The French government is pressing state utility group EDF to honor a scheduled restart this winter of all 32 nuclear reactors that had gone offline at some point this summer for maintenance and

because of corrosion problems. France imported 6,000 gigawatt hours of electricity from Germany in January to March, equal to 5% of the country's total power production in the quarter. And that's according to think tank Frahoffer ISC, a five-fold rise compared to the same period last year now we are assuming a highly stressed situation during the coming winter no one told the financial times adding that the energy crisis caused by the war in Ukraine was only one of several overlapping issues other headaches include the shutdowns of the French nuclear power plants and disrupted coal deliveries caused by low water on main rivers things just aren't going right in europe

they can blame the war all they want to but even these other factors rick would they would have been in the same boat maybe not as severe but they'd be in the same situation they shut down their own power plants they didn't come up with an alternative when the water levels were low over the summer. They had a drought, couldn't deliver coal. That put them short. And so it's a trifecta of problems for them. You got it.

The next one is from Marketplace. Chemical giant BASF is under threat after Russia turns off gas. Probably the biggest manufacturer in Germany. Right. And this is quoting from that article on Marketplace. It says, if this will be a really cold winter, if, we will have a substantial problem. Then there will not be enough natural gas," said Ole Habaie, an energy analyst with SEB Bank in Oslo, Norway. A really cold winter

will be really difficult to deal with, no doubt about it. It would be really difficult for German manufacturers and especially for one company. the chemical giant BASF needs a continuous supply of vast quantities of natural gas, both as a source of energy and as raw material. Its main plant at Ludwigshafen in the state of Rheinland-Palatinate uses as much gas as the whole of Switzerland. Think about that.

Just one plant uses more than the entire nation of Switzerland. But under German law, if the country has to ration its reserves, homes and hospitals will get priority. The government would have to shut down the supply to big industrial consumers, and definitely BASF will be one of those, said Professor Stephan Lechtenbaumer of the Wuppertal Institute. Lots of tough words today. If the shutdown was only a few days, it wouldn't matter too much. But if they shut down for a month or even more, then they would really

be in trouble. Okay, so now we're back to the de-industrialization of Germany. Is somebody carrying out is World War III a continuation of World War II? World War II is a continuation of World War I.

In both of those wars Germany was severely punished. Is Germany being severely punished in World War III? Well it certainly appears that way. I mean, if you were to take a 30,000 view look at everything that's going on, you've got the shooting war in Ukraine.

But where is the real war taking place? What area of the world is really being impacted by everything that's going on? The country that's being damaged the most is Germany. Right. Primarily Germany. And that, in fact, impacts the entire European continent. And when you talk about de-industrialization, those factories are not coming back online. It means it's over. Right. And the country's economy is permanently damaged and changed. Is this on purpose? Is there somebody, a group of people, or one individual with a lot of power that is orchestrating events to completely wipe out Germany as a major country. If you recall, Doc, under Angela Merkel,

Angela was getting cozy with Vladimir Putin. Right, there would be no Nord Stream 2 if it wasn't for Angela Merkel. Exactly. Germany was moving towards Russia. There was talk that Russia and Germany may, that they may have entered into some treaties, that the friendship was growing so well between those two countries. And there were powerful people and entities trying to stop Germany from participating with Russia in building Nord Stream pipelines.

All of a sudden, the pipelines are blown up. They're history. And now it looks like the industrial base of Germany is going to be history. Is somebody carrying out revenge on Germany? Who is it? Is it Great Britain? Is it King Charles? Is it Great Britain? Is it King Charles? Is it the city?

The hub of Great Britain? Not the city of London the city. The city that's inside London. There's something much deeper going on. Charles said to save the planet from climate change would require a military campaign.

Well, it sounds like we're about ready to start one. So we all try to figure out, well, what does that look like? A military campaign to save the planet from global warming? Is this just, is this, you know, is he just using military terminology to describe a political movement? Or was King Charles actually talking about a war?

Great Britain right now isn't suffering that much. It's Germany. Germany's taking the hit. Now, look at this next article, Remix News. Germany could go from an industrial country to an industrial museum. Think about that. So Germany's at risk of going from an industrial country to an industrial museum

due to the federal government's energy policy, warned the president of the German Chemical Industry Association, Markus Stallmann. Now, according to him, Germany is at risk of frequent power shortages because renewable energy is insufficient to meet the country's energy needs. Pointing to wind power, he said that Germany would need

to build 10 wind turbines daily, daily, to implement the energy transition. Ten? Yes. Every day? Every day. And it takes energy to build those wind turbines, too. It also takes steel. So one of them needs 4,000 tons of steel.

That's half an Eiffel Tower. That means five Eiffel Towers every day. And that for the next eight years, Stalman said. And to underline the problem, Germany's steel industry is already under severe threat, with plants shutting down across the country due to soaring energy costs. The question then becomes whether Germany can even secure enough affordable steel to build the necessary number of wind-powered turbines. Even if Germany could manage over the next eight years, it does not solve the energy crisis

the country is confronting both now and over the coming years. And so they're still committed to the green energy policy. Let's build more fans. I mean, that's what a wind turbine is, just a fan. But, Doc, is this by design? Are the green communists orchestrating this war crisis to force the deindustrialization of Europe countries to give up on fossil fuels, nuclear power, and go to wind and solar. You know, solar's not going to work that well in Europe.

That's right. It's just, you know, it works in places like Florida. Right, where we have multi-acre solar farms here all over the state. We have sun on cloudy days. Yes. So if we don't have sun, we can always burn sawgrass down here, too. We've got several sawgrass plants here as well. Okay, one more here.

Oil prices. Now, remember, this article we just looked at said they've got a steel problem. They can't get enough steel. Here's oilprice.com. US automakers are struggling to secure steel supply. Right, and that's because the smelters are shutting down in places like China and Europe because of soaring energy costs.

So you see the domino effect that all this has. all we had to do was not get involved in Ukraine. But we did, and perhaps it was by design. We are preparing ourselves mentally and economically for what is sure to be a recession that's ahead of us here, and that's not gloom and doom talk. That's just being, you know, prepared. Here's an article from Daily Caller. Almost all CEOs are preparing for a recession.

More than half are considering layoffs. It says that over 90% of CEOs at large American companies believe that a recession will occur within the next 12 months with a majority planning to rework investments with social goals or lay off employees to compensate. That's according to a Wednesday report by accounting firm KPMG. 90 percent, Rick, of CEOs are absolutely convinced that we're moving into a recession. And half of them are planning to reduce their workforce. So if we avoid a nuclear war, we're still facing a severe financial crisis for the next several years. If it's like past recessions,

we're looking at 18 months to two years. And I think that we're repeating the 1970s and 80s with the inflationary, stag inflation, stagnant economy, and inflated prices. So if you're in the workforce, if you're in your 20s, 30s, 40s, whatever age, and you're going to be in the workforce for the coming years, this is my advice. Get really, real serious about your job performance. The great attitude adjuster is coming. We got a lot of people that they're not old enough to ever experience a financial crisis. And I can tell you as an employer that the attitude of American employees is the worst I've seen in my lifetime.

I've never, ever encountered problems in trying to hire people that we have dealt with attitudes the younger that they are the worst the attitudes the the entitlement mentality the it's just a challenge it is a challenge now I have the best team anybody could ever ask for. But we had to weed out a lot of people. I'm just being honest with you. We had to weed them out to get it to the place where we had an A team, okay?

If you're not on the A team, let me tell you, even the B team won't make it. you're down on the F D and C team you're in trouble and I'm talking about your attitude and your performance if you got a if you got a I don't care attitude about your job or I'll do what I want to do if you have that kind of attitude, you're not going to make it. You're going to be eliminated because you'll be the first to go. Employers will keep the employees that they say, I absolutely can't afford

to let that one go. We have to keep him. We have to keep her. So you want to get really serious about your job, step up your performance, ask your employer, what is it I can learn to do? Tell me some other jobs.

See, this attitude, I'm only going to do the minimum. I'm only going to do the minimum. That's not going to cut it. Not going to work. You better do more than the minimum. You need to go to your employer and say, hey, give me some more work. Give me some more assignments. What else could I do for you?

Right. All right. You might say, well, they're not paying me more. No, they're paying you. Okay. They're paying you. You want to just stay paid. In a financial downturn, you just want to stay on the payroll. So step it up, bring your game up a couple of notches and become the number one employee in your company.

You'll keep your job. And if you don't keep your job there, there'll be other companies that will grab you because they're going to weed out the weak and try to hire the strongest people that they can hire right now. Right now, employees have had the power, really, for the past year because the contraction in the labor market and everything. And the COVID money. Right.

That's going to rapidly change here. The next three months will change everything. And by assuming that there's not a thermonuclear war by then, by the time we get into the first quarter, after the first of the year, after the Christmas season especially, when revenues drop, when sales drop, when companies are looking at their reports from the past 12 months, and they're saying, you know, if we want to survive the next 12, we're going to have to move out. But I believe you'll start seeing those cuts in December, honestly.

I do, too. Massive layoffs because the retail season is going to be in the tank this year. It is. So it's going to be, like Rick said, it's going to be an attitude adjustment for those of us who've been through these ups and downs. We're a little bit better prepared mentally, but it's still going to be an attitude adjustment for those of us who've been through these ups and downs. We're a little bit better prepared mentally, but it's still going to be tough. But for those that are younger, you haven't gone through this. And there be some people, you know, my dad, you say it just goes in one ear and out the other with you, doesn't it? I wish I'd listened more when I was a kid. But listen to Rick right now, really and honestly.

You go a year without a job and you'll get an attitude adjustment. You'll change your attitude. You go six months a year, a year and a half without work, you'll change your attitude. Next job you get, you'll be really grateful to have a job. And a lot of the stupidness that employers have been dealing with in recent years.

You know what employers, when CEOs get together and talk, you know what they talk about? They talk about the most ridiculous stuff that comes out of employees. They go, I can top this story. Let me tell you what this one did. You have no idea. You have to be an employer at some point in your life to know what companies deal with. It's just, it is outrageous. The behavior, the mindset, the mentality of modern workers these days, it is unbelievable.

Just unbelievable. Doc, you've seen it is unbelievable. Just unbelievable. Doc, you've seen it? Yes. I could write a book about it. And I could write the sequel. Doc's been there with me, you know? It's like, okay, never saw that one before, never heard that attitude before.

Don't do this right now, all right? Wise up and be the best employee. You know, you should be, whether it's a downturn or an upturn, he should be the best. Especially Christians. They should be the best employees. Maybe you're not perfect, but at least you're in there. The effort is there. You're working as unto the Lord as the Bible says. That's what the attitude ought to be. That's right. If you're a Christian, you have a duty to do your very best. It's your obligation.

Do your work as unto the Lord, and He'll reward. And if your current employer doesn't recognize it, somebody else will, and they'll offer you a job. All right? So we're going into an employer's market. Okay?

The employer will be in the driver's seat because there will be very few job openings. And it won't be like it's been for the last several years. You know, we've had for the last, since COVID, we've had the great resignation.

People in their 20s and 30s have just resigned, just said, I quit. Well, what are you going to do? I don't know. This is happening. Just Google great resignation. Well, the great resignation is going to come to a screeching halt in the next couple months where people just quit their jobs to say, well, I think I'm just going to travel around

the country. I'm going to paint pictures. How are you going to pay your bills? Well, apparently they're still getting COVID money. I mean, it's really been baffling to employers, but it's in the tens of millions of people quit their jobs this year without having another job. Right. And yet the unemployment rate doesn't go up. And the unemployment rate doesn't go up.

Which means that companies are finding ways to do without those employees. The unemployment rate doesn't go up because they don't apply. Apparently, they just disappear off the employment rolls, or the government's padding the numbers. I don't know, but we hear it everywhere from employers. You talk to restaurant owners, you talk to any service company,

they're like, I can't get anybody to work. Right. I hear it all the time. I mean, some really sad stories of employers saying, I can't find anybody to come to work. How are these people paying their bills? How are they living? I don't understand it.

Apparently, there's so much free government money out there, but that's going to come to an end. At some point, the system cracks, and they can't keep distributing free money to people for not working. Well, anyhow. Get ready. You don't have to worry about it if you work.

Right. Work hard. That's my advice. Show up ahead of time. Work later. Be the best in your company. You won't lose your job. I'll see you tomorrow.

God bless you. Love you very much.