UBCNews - Business - Pomodoro or Time Blocking? Which Actually Works Best for Deep Focus

Episode Date: March 22, 2026

So, have you ever felt like you're doing everything right with your schedule, blocking out time, setting timers, but you're still not getting into that deep focus zone? Today we're tackling a... question that plagues so many high-performing entrepreneurs: Pomodoro or time blocking? Which one actually delivers on deep work? The Real John Briggs City: Draper Address: 38 13775 South #210 Website: https://therealjohnbriggs.com/

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:05 So have you ever felt like you're doing everything right with your schedule, blocking out time, setting timers? But you're still not getting into that deep focus zone? Today, we're tackling a question that plagues so many high-performing entrepreneurs. Pomodoro or time blocking? Which one actually delivers on deep work? That's the million dollar question, right? And honestly, I think we've been asking the wrong question.
Starting point is 00:00:30 Because here's the thing. Both methods can work, but they're not magic bullets. The real issue is that most people are micromanaging their time when they should be managing their tasks. Okay, so break that down for us. What's the difference between time management and task management? Time management is the mechanics of blocking, scheduling, shuffling things around on your calendar. It's got diminishing returns pretty quickly. Task management, though, that's about ruthless prioritization.
Starting point is 00:01:02 I've worked with thousands of entrepreneurs, and I've worked with thousands of entrepreneurs, and I've never met anyone who struggled with time management but was actually great at prioritization. Mm-hmm. Makes sense. Exactly. If you've got blocks of time set aside for focus work, that's probably enough. You don't need to be accurate down to the minute. What matters more is knowing which tasks deserve those blocks in the first place. Right. So let's talk about the techniques themselves. For anyone not familiar, the Pomodoro technique uses these fixed 25-minute work intervals followed by five-minute breaks. The idea is to maintain focus and reduce fatigue. Research actually shows our brains can maintain optimal focus for about 20 to 45 minutes before
Starting point is 00:01:47 experiencing fatigue, so Pomodoro aligns pretty well with that. Yeah, and it works great for certain tasks. If you're someone who gets easily distracted or you've got work that can be broken into smaller chunks, Pomodoro adds this sense of urgency. You're racing against the clock, which can make intimidating tasks feel more manageable. But there's a catch, right? I mean, what about tasks that need extended uninterrupted focus? That's where the rigidity becomes a problem. A 2224 study actually found that those forced Pomodoro breaks led to quicker increases in fatigue and faster decreases in motivation compared to self-regulated brakes. So if you're deep in strategic planning or solving a complex problem, that timer going off every 25 minutes can actually pull you out of flow.
Starting point is 00:02:38 Which brings us to time blocking. This method dedicates specific time slots to different tasks throughout your day. You're basically making appointments with yourself to get work done, which helps eliminate multitasking and promotes deeper focus. Time blocking is powerful for deep work because it protects large chunks of time. Some entrepreneurs aim for a five to two ratio, five hours of deep work daily and two hours of shallow work. But here's the downside. It requires accurate estimation of how long tasks will take. And once your schedule is set, it's pretty rigid. If something unexpected comes up, your whole day can fall apart.
Starting point is 00:03:17 And let me guess. Most people aren't great at estimating task duration. You got it. Underestimate and you're overworked and stressed. overestimate and you're wasting time. I remember early in my business, I'd block out two hours for what I thought was a simple task, finish in 30 minutes,
Starting point is 00:03:36 and then just waste the rest scrolling through emails feeling productive when I wasn't. Oh, I've definitely been there. That false sense of productivity is dangerous. It really is. Plus, if you're not careful about planning breaks into your time blocks, you can end up burning out.
Starting point is 00:03:53 That point about task estimation sets up our next piece. finding what actually fits your work style. But first, a quick word from our sponsor. If you're a coach, consultant, or service-based entrepreneur tired of the hustle, the real John Briggs offers practical frameworks and training to help you build a healthier business with more personal freedom. Learn straightforward strategies to reduce overwhelm,
Starting point is 00:04:18 simplify decisions, and design systems that protect your time and energy while driving consistent growth. Find out more at the time. the real john briggs.com. Picking up on task estimation, how do you handle choosing the right method when everyone's work style is so different? It comes down to the nature of your tasks and how you personally work best. If your tasks require deep, uninterrupted focus or your handling complex projects, time blocking might suit you better. But if your task can be divided into smaller parts or you tend to get distracted, Pomodoro might be your go-to. What about combining them? I've heard
Starting point is 00:04:56 people talk about blocking out time and then using Pomodoro intervals within those blocks. Yeah, that hybrid approach can be a productivity powerhouse. You get the structure of time blocking with the focus boosting benefits of Pomodoro. It's flexible and adapts to different tasks throughout the day. Really, you're getting the best of both worlds, or at least trying to. There's also this newer technique called Flomodoro. Have you seen people using that? Flomodoro is interesting because it's more flexible. than traditional Pomodoro. Instead of rigid 25-minute intervals, you work for as long as you can maintain focus, and then take breaks proportional to how long you actually worked. The idea is to align with your natural attention span and flow states rather than forcing yourself into a fixed structure.
Starting point is 00:05:44 That sounds ideal, but I'm guessing there's a trade-off? Definitely. Flomodoro can be incompatible with strict time-blocking and calendar planning. Plus, constantly monitoring your energy levels to decide when to take breaks can actually increase your cognitive load. So while it's flexible, it requires more self-awareness and discipline. Right, exactly. So to everyone listening, what's the biggest mistake you see people making when they try these techniques? Um, I'd say falling into urgency trapping. Do you see that a lot? Absolutely. People prioritize urgent tasks over important ones. It's like being on a boat that's leaking.
Starting point is 00:06:24 You're so busy bucketing out water that you never plug the hole. If you're always working on what's urgent without considering whether future you will still have these urgent matters, you're in a negative spiral. That's urgency trapping in a nutshell, reacting instead of preventing. I see. Go on. Sometimes you've got to bite the bullet. Take the loss now to put yourself in a position where you can recover that loss later when you don't have so much urgent stuff on your body. plate. Focus on tasks that aren't necessarily urgent, but if completed, would make other urgent tasks unnecessary. That's a mindset shift for sure. What about the environment? How much does
Starting point is 00:07:04 that play into deep work? Environment makes a huge difference. My number one tip is to identify what distracts you and change the environment. So those distractions don't bother you in the first place. Are you getting enough sleep? Is your workspace cluttered? Are notifications pinging constantly? You know, some offices use a color-coded Post-it note system on monitors. It's a physical do-not-disturb sign everyone respects. That's clever, simple but effective. Right. Deep work should be the outcome of setting up the right conditions. People will block it out on their schedule and say, this is important. But if the quality isn't there because the environment's wrong, that time doesn't produce the outcome you need. So prioritization, environment, then the
Starting point is 00:07:52 the method. Those are the three layers. Exactly. And remember, prioritization is brutal sometimes. When the stakes are high, there's no situation where you feel good about what you've prioritized. It's just a matter of picking what feels the least bad. But if you're honest with yourself about what's possible, you avoid the cycle where your to-do list just constantly grows and you feel terrible. Have you ever hit triple digits on a to-do list? Because I definitely have. Oh, I've been there. Once you hit triple digits, it's like, well, your life is over. At least it feels that way. So for our listeners trying to choose between these methods, Pomodoro, time blocking, or even Flomodoro, what's your final take? There's no definitive winner. Each method has unique strengths and potential drawbacks. The choice depends on your individual needs, your work style, and the nature of your tasks.
Starting point is 00:08:46 but whatever method you choose, focus first on effective prioritization and creating a distraction-free environment. Those two things will make any technique work better. Because the ultimate goal is to be productive, not just busy. Exactly. Choose wisely and conquer your day.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.