UNBIASED - August 12, 2024: Trump Campaign Hacked, the Controversy Behind Harris' Rally Photo, New Poll Shows Harris/Trump Standing in Battleground States, FDA Denies MDMA for PTSD Treatment, and More.
Episode Date: August 12, 2024Welcome back to UNBIASED. In today's episode: Trump Campaign Hacked, Microsoft Releases Report Re: Foreign Influence in Election (1:41) NY Times/Sienna College Poll Shows Harris Leading in Two Battl...eground States, Trump Leading in 1. Here's Some Context (5:12) Was Harris' Rally Photo AI-Generated? Answering Your Question (7:56) FDA Denies Bid to Approve MDMA for Treatment of PTSD (10:43) New Violent Crime Survey Shows Decreases in 70 Major Cities (12:35) Biden Announces New 'Time Is Money' Initiative (13:43) Quick Hitters: Elon Musk to Interview Trump Tonight at 8pm ET, RFK Jr. Says He Has Enough Signatures to Appear on Ballot in All States (16:27) Support ‘UNBIASED’ on Patreon. Watch this episode on YouTube. Follow Jordan on Instagram and TikTok. All sources for this episode can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Kick off an exciting football season with BetMGM, an official sportsbook partner of the National Football League.
Yard after yard, down after down, the sportsbook born in Vegas gives you the chance to take action to the end zone and celebrate every highlight reel play.
And as an official sportsbook partner of the NFL, BetMGM is the best place to fuel your football fandom on every game day. With a variety of exciting features,
BetMGM offers you plenty of seamless ways to jump straight onto the gridiron
and to embrace peak sports action.
Ready for another season of gridiron glory?
What are you waiting for?
Get off the bench, into the huddle, and head for the end zone all season long.
Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions.
Must be 19 years of age or older.
Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. Gambling problem? For free assistance,
call the Conax Ontario helpline at 1-866-531-2600. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement
with iGaming Ontario. Welcome back to Unbiased, your favorite source of unbiased news and legal analysis.
Welcome back to Unbiased. Today is Monday, August 12th, and this is your daily news rundown. If you
love the unbiased approach that this episode provides and you feel more informed after
listening, please go ahead and leave my show a review on whatever platform you listen,
share the show with your friends, and if you're watching on YouTube, please go ahead and hit that thumbs up button and subscribe to the channel. All of those
things really help me out, so thank you very much. A couple of reminders for those that have been
around for a while, but also a few things I would like to tell those that may be new here. First of
all, welcome. So happy to have you as part of the Unbiased family. That also goes for those of you
who have been here for a while, of course. So happy to have
you all here. Number one, the first reminder, my news cycle ends around 3 p.m. every day. That's
just so I can get these episodes out to you by the end of the workday. So any news that breaks
after 3 p.m. will usually be covered in the next day's episode. Number two, each episode is anywhere
from 15 to 20 minutes. Sometimes it might be longer, sometimes episodes might be shorter, but the sweet spot is right
there between 15 and 20 minutes.
And number three, and most important, always remember that listening to nonpartisan news
almost guarantees you're going to hear something that you don't like.
But that's also the beauty in it.
We want to challenge ourselves to think critically, to form our own opinions, to try to take out
that implicit bias whenever we're listening and having hard conversations, and we'll be
better off for it.
So those are my reminders.
And now without further ado, we can get into today's stories.
Former President Trump's campaign said over the weekend that some of its
internal communications had been hacked back in June. This acknowledgement came after Politico,
the news outlet, began receiving emails from an anonymous sender containing documents from
inside Trump's campaign. Now, the acknowledgement from Trump's campaign came just two days after Microsoft had released this report about Iran's influence in this year's election and specifically their interference in a political campaign, though Microsoft didn't identify specifically which campaign.
The Trump campaign now says it was theirs. So Microsoft's report reads in part, quote, foreign malign influence concerning the 2024
U.S. election started off slowly but has steadily picked up pace over the last six months due
initially to Russian operations, but more recently from Iranian activity.
Over the past several months, we have seen the emergence of significant influence activity
by Iranian actors.
Iranian cyber-enabled influence operations have been a
consistent feature of at least the last three U.S. election cycles. Iran's operations have
been notable and distinguishable from Russian campaigns for appearing later in the election
season and employing cyber attacks more geared toward election conduct rather than swaying voters. Recent activity
suggests that the Iranian regime, along with the Kremlin, may be equally engaged in election 2024.
End quote. That report then details specific activity that the Microsoft Threat Analysis
Center has picked up on. And I do have that report linked for you if you want to read it for yourself. But the part that's relevant to this story is this, quote, in June 2024, Mint Sandstorm,
a group run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Intelligence Unit, sent a spear phishing
email to a high ranking official of a presidential campaign from a compromised email account of a
former senior advisor. The phishing email contained a fake
forward with a hyperlink that directs traffic through an actor-controlled domain before
redirecting to the listed domain. On June 13th, Mint Sandstorm also unsuccessfully attempted to
log in to an account belonging to a former presidential candidate. End quote. The report
also details other hacking attempts that have
taken place recently, including at the county level in an unspecified swing state. But according
to Politico, on June 22nd is when it received its first email from that anonymous AOL account
containing internal communications from Trump's campaign. Included in the documents was a 271-page research document that the campaign
had done on J.D. Vance, dated February 23rd, another research document about Florida Senator
Marco Rubio, who was also in the running as a potential VP pick for Trump. When the anonymous
sender was asked how they obtained the documents by Politico, they replied,
quote, I suggest you don't be curious about where I got them from.
Any answer to this question will compromise me and also legally restricts you from publishing
them, end quote.
At this point, we don't know the scope of the information obtained through the hack,
but again, if you want to read Microsoft's most recent report
about election interference from foreign countries, it is linked in the sources section
of this episode. Continuing on the political front, a new New York Times Siena College poll
released over the weekend polled voters in three battleground states, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
and Wisconsin, and shows Harris polling better
than Trump in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and Trump polling better than Harris in Michigan.
Now before we get into this, I'm first going to give you the numbers, then I'm going to
give you a little bit of context because polls can be tricky, but this particular poll was
reported by almost all of the outlets, so I wanted to touch on it and give a little
bit deeper of an explanation outside of just the numbers. So the New York Times Siena College poll was conducted
between August 6th and August 9th of roughly 1,900 total registered voters between Wisconsin,
Pennsylvania, and Michigan. When asked if the election were held today, who they would vote for,
50% of registered voters in Wisconsin said Harris, whereas 46% answered
Trump. So a four point difference there. In Pennsylvania, 49% said Harris, 46% said Trump,
a three point difference. And in Michigan, 45% said Harris, 48% answered Trump, also a three
point difference, but in Trump's favor this time. Notably, the margin of error in that poll was
between four and five points. Keep in mind that all of these polls vary. It depends on who's doing
the polling. As an example, Insider Advantage and Trafalgar Group just conducted a poll, same dates
as the New York Times poll, of roughly 800 likely voters in these states. And their results showed Trump up by one in Wisconsin,
up by two points in Pennsylvania, and down by only two points in Michigan. So don't put so much
weight on one poll or the other. Now, to give you a little bit of context, because we all like
context, the three states that were the main focus in this New York Times poll, so Wisconsin,
Pennsylvania, and Michigan,
are part of what's known in elections as the blue wall. The blue wall is the name given to 18 states that the Democratic Party won in every election from 1992 to 2012. But the reason that these three
states are the focus in this election is because in the last three elections, these states have flip-flopped. So in 2012, President
Obama won these three states specifically. Then in 2016, Trump won those three states. And then 2020,
Biden won those states. And as we know, the presidents that took those three states in each
of those elections ended up winning their respective election. Now that's not to say that those states are the key to the office. It's just to say that those three states are important and that's why those three
states specifically were the focus of this particular poll. Staying on the Harris-Trump
topic, but switching gears a little bit, let's talk about Harris's Detroit rally over the weekend and debunk
some of the claims surrounding attendance. Not going to spend a ton of time on this one, but I
did get quite a few requests to clear the air, so let's do it. Harris and Walls held a rally at an
airport over the weekend and posted pictures of the crowd that greeted them when they departed
Air Force Two. A Truth Social user reposted the same photo of the crowd that greeted them when they departed Air Force Two.
A Truth Social user reposted the same photo of the crowd, but seemingly zoomed in on the plane's engine, which has this sort of reflective paint and showed no crowd in the reflection. And this
Truth Social user claimed that Harris's picture was fake because you couldn't see a crowd at all
in the engine's reflection. Trump then shared that
post on Truth Social and wrote in part, quote, has anyone noticed that Kamala cheated at the airport?
There was nobody at the plane and she AI'd it and showed a massive crowd of so-called followers,
but they didn't exist. She was turned in by a maintenance worker at the airport when he noticed
the fake crowd picture, but there was nobody there, later confirmed by the reflection of the mirror-like finish on the vice presidential
plane. End quote. Harris's campaign then posted Trump's post to X and wrote, quote,
one, this is an actual photo of a 15,000 person crowd for Harris walls in Michigan,
and two, Trump has still not campaigned in a swing state in over a 15,000 person crowd for Harris walls in Michigan. And two, Trump has still not campaigned
in a swing state in over a week, dot, dot, dot, low energy, question mark, end quote.
So the question has become, was Harris's crowd fake? The answer is no. Here's why. The angle
of the picture looks like it was taken from inside the air hangar where the rally was ultimately held
and where people were gathered. We know that there were tons of people in that hangar because we have video footage and pictures from not only rally goers, but also news networks
that attended that rally. If you want to look at some of the pictures and videos yourself,
I of course have some links for you in the sources section. But all of this to say there was a crowd
in Detroit. As for the exact numbers, that I don't know. The campaign
says it was 15,000. Obviously campaigns, whether it's Trump's campaign or Harris's campaign,
exaggerate their numbers a little bit. So we could probably take that with a grain of salt,
but a crowd was there. Also note though, that now following this battle back and forth, there are AI generated
images and videos of the crowd going around on platforms like X.
So just be aware of that.
But as for the original image posted by the Harris campaign, it doesn't seem to be altered
in any way.
And there is proof of a crowd through outside third party video footage and photos.
The next story, this one isn't so political.
It's that the FDA denied a bid to allow MDMA to be used in the treatment of PTSD.
MDMA is more commonly known as ecstasy or molly, and it's definitely used as a party
drug, but it also has use in the treatment of mental disorders like PTSD.
One reason that MDMA has been used in therapy is because it's an intactogen, which is
a class of psychoactive compounds that are differentiated from classic psychedelics in a
way that they tend to increase self-awareness, which leads to introspection and personal
reflection. On top of this, studies have shown that MDMA or ecstasy or molly actually diminishes
the brain's fear response. So this allows people and
patients to access and process painful memories that they wouldn't typically be able to. One
trial submitted by the drug maker that petitioned the FDA found 71% from the treatment group no
longer met PTSD criteria after being treated with a combination of MDMA and talk therapy.
That's compared to 48%
from a group taking a placebo. However, as with any drug, it also comes with its downsides and
its risks. And as the FDA said, the data provided was not enough. In order for the FDA to approve
a drug, they have to find that the research and data submitted by the sponsor show that the drug is safe and effective for its
intended use. Nine of the 11 FDA advisors said the available data did not show the effectiveness of
the drug and expressed other concerns that included the treatment not offering long-lasting benefits,
concerns about the way the studies were designed, the potential for heart problems, injury, and abuse, and whether psychotherapy
contributes to treatment benefit and if psychotherapy is even necessary.
So the FDA did deny that bid.
And in other news, a new violent crime survey, including 70 different major cities in the
United States, showed an overall decrease in violent crime between the first half of 2023 and the first half of 2024.
So as I said, the survey, which was led by the major cities chiefs association,
surveyed 70 different law enforcement agencies from 70 different major cities
around the United States and compared the first six months of 2023 to the first six months of this year. Overall, homicides dropped by roughly 850,
rapes dropped by about 1,400,
robberies dropped by about 3,000,
and aggravated assaults by about 7,000.
The cities that saw the biggest decrease in homicides include Baltimore,
Boston, Dallas, Detroit, and Philadelphia,
whereas the cities that saw the biggest increase in homicides include Atlanta and Charlotte. When looking at rapes, the cities that saw the biggest
decrease were Louisville and Philadelphia, whereas the cities that saw the biggest increase
were Nashville, Cleveland, and Fort Worth. And those stats are available in the sources section.
Today, the Biden administration announced a new initiative
called Time is Money aimed at, quote, cracking down on all the ways that corporations add
unnecessary headaches and hassles to people's days and degrade their quality of life, end quote.
Included in the effort are seven different actions. The first action is making it easier to cancel subscriptions
and recurring payments. So the FDA has proposed a rule that would require companies to make it
as easy to cancel a subscription or service as it was to sign up for one. The second action is
ending airline runarounds by requiring automatic cash refunds. This one we've actually already
talked about a little bit, but this is the Department of Transportation's new rule that requires
airlines to pay you back in cash should you opt for that option when your flight is either canceled
or significantly changed. The third action is making it easier to submit health insurance
claims online rather than by mail. The fourth action is a rule
that would require companies to let customers talk to a human by pressing a single button rather than
having to go through a lengthy automated process on the phone. The fifth action is a rule proposed
by the FTC that would stop marketers from being able to use fake reviews, suppress negative reviews, and pay for positive reviews.
The sixth action is a plan from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to deem certain
uses of chatbots and AI voice recordings as unlawful, specifically in the banking and
financial sector. And the third action is a plan by the Department of Education to issue new
guidance to schools on how they can
help make school processes less time-consuming for parents. This is things like communicating
with teachers, viewing school policies, and completing forms and permission slips. Now,
remember, the Biden administration, or any administration for that matter, oversees and
has authority over the executive branch,
which includes all of these agencies that we just spoke about. So it's, you know, the CFPB,
the DOE, the DOT, many, many others. And what this time is money initiative means
is that the Biden administration has essentially directed these various agencies within the
executive branch to propose new rules in order to target
these particular issues. Once those rules are proposed, they have to go through the rulemaking
process, which is set forth under federal law, and then those rules may or may not be finalized,
which is what would then lead or not lead to change in all of these areas we just spoke about.
So that's how the rulemaking process works.
That's what this initiative means. And now let's finish with just a couple of quick hitters. Number
one, Elon Musk will be having a conversation with Donald Trump tonight. That's Monday night
at 8 p.m. Eastern time. That conversation will be broadcasted live on X. But if you can't catch it
live and you have an interest in tuning in, I'm sure it will be available on X afterwards,
probably and most likely on Elon Musk's X account. And independent presidential candidate RFK Jr.
announced that his campaign now has all of the signatures needed to get on the ballot in every state. This doesn't mean that he is currently on every state ballot, just that he's met the
signature requirements for each ballot. Basically, if you are an independent wanting to run for president, each state has a minimum number of
signatures needed for you to be eligible. And then once that threshold is met, the candidate
will submit their petition to appear on the ballot in each respective state. That is what I have for
you today. Thank you so much for being here. Have a great night and I will talk
to you tomorrow.