UNBIASED - December 18, 2024: Ethics Committee to Release Gaetz Report, Indiana's First Execution in 15 Years, SCOTUS Takes TikTok Case, Mangione's Many Murder Charges in NYC, and More.
Episode Date: December 18, 2024Welcome back to UNBIASED. In today's episode: Clarification: Update to Yesterday's Story About Wisconsin School Shooting (1:02) Supreme Court Sets TikTok Arguments for January (1:55) Luigi Mangione... Indicted on Multiple Murder Charges in NY (4:05) House Ethics Committee Votes to Release Gaetz Report (7:50) Indiana Carries Out First Execution in 15 Years (10:27) Quick Hitters: Congress Avoids Government Shutdown, House Passes Bill to Create Congressional Time Capsule for 2276, Supreme Court Introduces Lottery System, Fed Cuts Rates, GrubHub Settles for $25M, Disney Cuts Gender Identity Storyline, GenZ Will Spend 112 Days on Phones in 2024, Mastodons Full Jaw Found in NY Yard (14:16) Listen/Watch this episode AD-FREE on Patreon. Watch this episode on YouTube. Follow Jordan on Instagram and TikTok. All sources for this episode can be found here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome back to Unbiased, your favorite source of unbiased news and legal analysis.
Welcome back to Unbiased. Today is Wednesday, December 18th, and this is your second to last
daily news rundown of Unbiased Season 2. But don't worry, we're coming back on January 6th
for Season 3. The show is going to be better than ever. Now, one ask that I have of you,
and I'll remind you again tomorrow,
but if you love Unbiased and you are grateful to have found this show and you listen on
a podcast platform like Apple Podcasts or Spotify, please, please as this season comes
to a close, I would love if you could leave my show a five star review about why you love
it. Many of you reach out and ask what you can do to support me and I usually offer three ways.
One way is to engage with my advertising sponsors,
the others through Patreon.
And then the third way is by letting others know
how much you love this show.
And one of the ways that you can do that is through reviews.
So thank you very much in advance.
It is so, so appreciated.
And now without further ado,
let's get into today's stories.
Starting with a quick update and revision to yesterday's episode, you know I never,
ever want to give you guys false information, so it's really important that I clarify this.
In reporting on the Wisconsin school shooting yesterday, I very quickly mentioned that a
second grade student had called the shooting into the police.
That is false.
It was a second grade teacher, not a student.
The Madison police chief originally said that it was a second grade student, but then issued
a correction yesterday saying, quote, yesterday, after looking at the computer aided dispatch
system, it seemed as if a call came from a second grader.
It actually read that the call came from a second grade teacher.
That was a mistake.
That's my responsibility and I apologize and I clarify that today."
So please just note that clarification.
And now a quick TikTok update.
And as a follow up to yesterday's episode, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in TikTok's case against the government on January 10th. In yesterday's episode where I
covered TikTok filing this emergency request with the court, I noted that
there were essentially four routes that the Supreme Court could take. So the
Supreme Court could have either granted TikTok's request to pause the lower
court's ruling and just immediately set the case for arguments.
They could have granted TikTok's request,
but waited for TikTok to file a formal petition for review
and then decided whether they would get the case
on the calendar.
They could have denied TikTok's request,
but still immediately set the case for arguments,
or they could have denied TikTok's request,
waited for TikTok to file a formal petition for review,
and then decided whether or not
they would take up the case.
The justices went for option C, sort of.
They basically said,
we're not gonna grant or deny your request.
We're gonna wait to rule on the request
until we hear arguments,
and we're not gonna wait for you
to file a formal petition for review.
We're just gonna treat this request as a petition for review and get this case on the calendar,
schedule it now for arguments on January 10th.
Per the court's instruction, TikTok and ByteDance will have until December 27th at 5 p.m. to
file their brief with the court.
The government has until January 3rd at 5 p.m. to file their reply.
And then January 10th is when the court will hear
oral arguments from both sides,
and they'll issue their decision at some point after that.
With cases like this,
it's hard to say how soon the justices will rule.
It could be as short as a week after arguments,
but it also could take as long as a couple of months.
If they haven't issued a decision by January 19th,
which is the deadline for TikTok to either sell or be
banned, then the justices will likely temporarily pause the enforcement of the ban until they're
ready to release that decision. So that is what you can expect there, but you will certainly be
hearing an update from me on January 11th, which will be one day after arguments are had and I can
kind of fill you in on where the justices are leaning.
According to a newly released indictment,
Luigi Mangione, the suspected killer
of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson,
has been indicted on a slew of charges in New York.
So we have first degree murder,
two counts of second degree murder,
two counts of second degree criminal possession of a weapon,
four counts of third degree criminal possession of a weapon, one count of fourth degree criminal possession of a weapon, four counts of third degree criminal possession of a weapon, one count of fourth degree criminal possession of a weapon, and
one count of second degree criminal possession of a forged instrument.
Now that sounds like a lot and it is, let's be real, but don't worry, we are going to
get into what all of this means, but first I want to give you a little bit more context.
So last week I mentioned that Mangione was facing multiple charges in New York, including
murder charges, but he hadn't yet been indicted.
Now he has.
So when we talk about an indictment, what that means is that the prosecutor has presented
evidence to a grand jury, and then that grand jury decided that the evidence presented was
sufficient for an indictment, and that indictment was
written up and unsealed.
Now, let's talk about that first charge, murder in the first degree.
First degree murder is always the most severe form of homicide with the most severe penalties,
but the definition of first degree murder varies by state.
So in New York, there are two ways you could be charged with first-degree murder. You either intentionally killed, specifically a law
enforcement officer, a correctional officer, or a judge, or two, you
intentionally killed any person while also carrying out certain serious
felonies like kidnapping or terrorism. In Mangione's case, he is accused of
intentionally killing Brian Thompson while also carrying
out an act of terrorism.
And I know many of you are probably wondering how this shooting classifies as an act of
terrorism considering it is a bit different than what we typically think of as terrorism.
But here's why.
In New York, the crime of terrorism is defined as any act that is committed with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian
population or influence the policy of a government through intimidation or coercion. This terminology
was actually enacted at post-9-11. Now, he's also facing two counts of second-degree murder,
one of which includes an act of terrorism as well. The other does not.
And you might also be wondering why he's charged with both second degree and first degree murder.
It's essentially a way for the prosecution to cover all of their bases, right? Second degree
murder still requires intent like first degree murder, but it is a slightly less severe charge
with slightly different elements. So if a jury finds that Mangione is not guilty
of first degree murder, a jury could still charge him
or find him guilty of second degree murder.
He also faces two counts of second degree criminal
possession of a weapon.
The first count is for possessing a loaded firearm
with intent to use it unlawfully against another person.
The second count is simply for possessing a loaded firearm outside of his house or place
of business.
The four counts of third degree criminal possession of a weapon relate to unlawfully possessing
a weapon, whether loaded or not.
And then the final charge of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree
is because of that fake New Jersey driver's license that he had.
Mangione is still being held in Pennsylvania while he awaits extradition to New York.
He is set to appear at an extradition hearing in Pennsylvania tomorrow.
And his lawyers are now saying that he will not fight extradition despite saying earlier that
he would.
So that may make the extradition process go a little bit quicker.
Now, in a change of course, the House Ethics Committee has voted to release its report
on former Representative Matt Gaetz.
As we've discussed many times, the Ethics Committee was investigating allegations that
Gaetz had sex with a minor and used illicit
drugs.
But that investigation came to a stop when Gates stepped down from his congressional
position in the wake of his recent nomination for attorney general.
Shortly after Gates resigned, the Ethics Committee voted not to release their report but said
that they would revisit it once the report was finalized and that they did, and this
time around they voted to release it.
What this tells us is that at least one Republican lawmaker voted with Democrats to release the
report.
And the committee says that the release will come sometime before Christmas.
Gates released a statement on X after this vote, writing, quote, The Biden-Garland DOJ
spent years reviewing allegations that I committed various crimes.
I was charged with nothing, fully exonerated,
not even a campaign finance violation.
And the people investigating me hated me.
Then the very witnesses DOJ deemed not credible
were assembled by house ethics to repeat their claims
absent any cross examination or challenge
from me or my attorneys. I've had no
chance to ever confront any accusers. I've never been charged. I've never been sued. Instead,
House Ethics will reportedly post a report online that I have no opportunity to debate or rebut as
a former member of the body. In my single days, I often sent funds to women I dated, even some I
never dated. but who asked?
I dated several of these women for years. I never had sexual contact with someone under
18. Any claim that I have would be destroyed in court, which is why no such claim was ever
made in court. My 30s were an era of working very hard and playing hard too. It's embarrassing,
though, not criminal, that I probably partied, womanized,
drank and smoked more than I should have earlier in life. I live a different life now, but
at least I didn't vote for continuing resolutions that fuck over the country."
Now unfortunately Unbiased will likely be on break by the time that this report does
get released, so I won't be able to cover it in an episode, but I will try to do at least something just to fill you guys in. Maybe post a video to social
media, something along those lines. So if you are not following me on social media yet,
now is a good time to do that. My handle on both Instagram and TikTok is JordanIsMyLawyer.
Let's take our quick break here. When we come back, we'll talk about Indiana's first execution
in 15 years and some quick hitters.
Last night, the state of Indiana carried out its first execution in 15 years.
Joseph Corcoran, whose final words were, quote, let's get this over with, end quote,
was convicted of quadruple homicide in 1997 and executed last night via the lethal injection.
I will talk more about the lethal injection,
but let's first talk about Corker and himself
and what he did.
So five years before he was convicted
of that quadruple homicide,
he was actually charged but acquitted
in the murders of his parents.
Then in 1997, five years after the acquittal,
he woke up one afternoon,
heard his brother and three other men
talking about him downstairs,
which prompted him to grab a rifle and kill all four men.
Afterwards he walked to a neighbor's house, asked her to call 911, returned home, and
waited on the porch for the cops to show up.
Court documents quote him saying, quote, they made me mad.
I shot them all.
End quote.
Now, Corcoran's attorneys say he
should have never stood trial due to insanity or incompetency, that his mental
illness predated the murders. But when Corcoran's attorneys tried to file a
post-conviction appeal on the basis of incompetency, Corcoran himself refused to
sign it and therefore his conviction was never reviewed. But the reason that Corcoran's attorneys never stopped with this incompetency defense is because people deemed to be incompetent
cannot be executed. So later in 2003, Corcoran's attorneys argued at another hearing that
Corcoran was incompetent and
in support of this presented testimony by three mental health professionals who each diagnosed him with schizophrenia.
The court rejected the argument and found that Corcoran was competent enough to waive
his appeals.
Most recently, earlier this month, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that Corcoran's attorneys
failed to prove that anything has changed since he was deemed to be competent and therefore his execution could proceed.
And in finding that, the court pointed to a recent affidavit signed by Corcoran himself in which he stated that he wanted to abandon his appeals
and he attested to the fact that he understood the consequences of being executed.
Since Corcoran's conviction in 1997, the Indiana Supreme Court has reviewed his case seven times,
and the Supreme Court of the United States
has reviewed the case three times,
each time the conviction and sentence were upheld.
So now a little bit on the lethal injection,
let's talk about that.
The lethal injection varies by state.
Some states use one drug, other states use two,
some states use three, some states use three.
Nebraska even uses four.
Indiana uses one.
It's a lethal dose of pentobarbital.
The short story with the lethal injection and the reason the death penalty generally
has slowed down in the United States in recent years is because the United States is having
a harder time obtaining the drugs as time goes on.
And this is really just because we've relied
on other countries to get our drugs for decades,
but over time, these other countries like the EU
banned the death penalty
and therefore stopped supplying us with drugs.
And now we have a low supply.
So what states do now is they try to get these drugs
from compounding pharmacies here in the United States,
but that has also led to issues
with the actual drugs themselves.
So long story short,
Indiana has not executed an inmate in 15 years,
but just announced about six months ago
that they were able to obtain Warpenta-Barbatol.
So this execution follows that announcement.
Just before the execution,
Corcoran was asked whether he was ready to go, to which he responded,
quote, not really. Let's get this over with, end quote. And according to the Department of Corrections,
he requested Ben and Jerry's ice cream as his last meal.
Now for some quick hitters, let's start with some congressional news.
Congress has passed what's called a continuing resolution, which will keep the government funded into March and avoid a partial government shutdown on December 20th.
The bill that was passed today includes an increase to congressional salaries from 174,000 to 243,000 to reflect the cost of living changes since 2009, more than $100 billion in disaster aid, $10 billion in economic assistance to farmers,
restrictions on US investments in China, a requirement that ticket sellers and hotels
disclose their full prices up front, the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over a sports
stadium in DC, a commitment from the government to pay the entire cost of rebuilding Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge,
an extension of the Homeland Security Act, which authorizes officials to track drones and disrupt their control, and more.
And the House of Representatives has passed legislation that will allow for the creation of a time capsule
to be buried on the Capitol's West Lawn on America's 250th
birthday in 2026. Per the bill, the capsule is to be opened on July 4th, 2276,
when the United States turns 500. The bill still needs to pass the Senate and
get the president's signature, but if passed, the architect of the Capitol will
be responsible for preparing the capsule and the contents of the capsule will
include books, manuscripts, miscell contents of the capsule will include books,
manuscripts, miscellaneous printed matter, memorabilia, relics, copies of important legislative
and institutional milestones of Congress, a message from the current Congress to the
future Congress, and more.
And now moving on to some news out of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has launched a pilot program in which members of the public can apply
for courtroom seating
through a fully automated online lottery.
As of last week, members of the public
can start accessing the lottery for the February 2025 session
through a link on the court's website.
The deadline to submit an application is 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
four weeks before the start of the February session, and four weeks before the start of the February session and
three weeks before the start of the session, the court will notify
applicants by email whether or not they got a ticket or have been placed on the
waitlist. I do want to note that currently anyone can attend arguments
at the Supreme Court. They are open to the public. So starting at February 2025,
the court will still provide some seating to the public on
a first-come first-serve basis, but this program is for those that want to ensure they'll be
able to attend.
And this is of course more so mainly for the controversial cases that tend to draw a bigger
audience and therefore those who just show up may not get a seat.
The Fed agreed to cut interest rates one more time this year, which will lower the federal
funds rate to a range between 4.25% and 4.5%, a two-year low.
Projections released today show officials expect to make fewer rate reductions next
year, with most showing two cuts if the economy grows at a steady rate and inflation continues
to decline. And GrubHub,
a food delivery service, has agreed to pay $25 million over allegations that it tricked users,
delivery drivers, and restaurants in an effort to grow its business more rapidly. The FTC and the
Illinois Attorney General have accused the delivery company of hiding the real costs on its app,
leading to a final price that was often
double what was originally advertised, inflating hourly pay rates and ads that were well above
what drivers would realistically earn, and regularly listing restaurants on their platform
without the restaurant's knowledge to gain national scale. The company has denied the
allegations against it, but said the settlement is in the best interest of the company.
And Disney has decided to cut a storyline in an upcoming show about gender identity.
An episode of Disney Pixar's Win or Lose show, which centers around a coed middle school
softball team in the run-up to its championship game, was going to center around the gender
identity of a trans character.
However, Disney officials say now that while the character will still be in the show, it has decided to cut the storyline
revolving around the character's gender. In a statement, Disney said, quote, When it
comes to animated content for a younger audience, we recognize that many parents would prefer
to discuss certain subjects with their children on their own terms and timeline."
And in some rather unsettling news, a new report released this week from Gen Z research firm DCDX says Gen Z will spend 112 complete days on their phones in 2024.
Notably, the sample size wasn't huge. The firm gathered screen time submissions from 234 Gen Zers aged 16 to 27,
but found daily average screen time rose in 2024 by over 15 minutes, amounting to 7 hours,
22 minutes, and 43 seconds.
What's interesting is that while Gen Zers aged 16 to 20 spent more time on their phones,
those aged 21 to 27 saw a bigger increase year over year.
DCDX also looked at what applications Gen Zers are spending so much time on.
TikTok came in first place, Instagram came in second, and messages came in third.
I do have that report linked for you in the sources section if you're interested in reading more.
And finally, some cool news.
Let's end this episode on a fun note. A New York homeowner recently discovered a complete mastodon jaw in
their backyard. Mastodons, which diverged from early ancestors of the modern
elephant, are said to have appeared first between 2 and 23 million years ago, but
went extinct around 11,000 years ago. The New York homeowner reportedly found two teeth
hidden by the leaves of a plant and then dug more to find two additional teeth just below the surface.
Officials and staff from the New York State Museum and SUNY Orange Community College excavated the
rest and uncovered a complete jaw, a piece of a toe bone, and part of a rib.
That is what I have for you today. Thank you so much for being here.
Have a fantastic night, and I'm sorry, but also relieved to say that I will see you tomorrow for the final
episode of season 2 of Unbiased. biased.