UNBIASED - Week in Review: September 26-October 2, 2022
Episode Date: October 3, 2022(0:25) Intro(2:00) CBO Releases Cost Estimate of Loan Forgiveness Program(4:58) Agreement on Last Minute Interim Spending Bill to Avoid Government Shutdown(8:46) GOP Announces Commitment to America Ag...enda Ahead of Midterms(15:56) Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022Links to sources can be found at www.jordanismylawyer.com. This episode is sponsored by Good Party: https://goodparty.org/?utm_source=pod&utm_medium=paid&utm_campaign=sep_2022_jordan-is-my-lawyer_independent_general&utm_content=independent_general&utm_term=general Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Kick off an exciting football season with BetMGM,
an official sportsbook partner of the National Football League.
Yard after yard, down after down,
the sportsbook born in Vegas gives you the chance to take action to the end zone
and celebrate every highlight reel play.
And as an official sportsbook partner of the NFL,
BetMGM is the best place to fuel your football fandom on every game day.
With a variety of exciting features,
BetMGM offers you plenty of seamless ways to jump straight onto the gridiron
and to embrace peak sports action.
Ready for another season of gridiron glory?
What are you waiting for?
Get off the bench, into the huddle, and head for the end zone all season long.
Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions.
Must be 19 years of age or older.
Ontario only.
Please gamble responsibly.
Gambling problem?
For free assistance,
call the Connex Ontario helpline
at 1-866-531-2600.
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement
with iGaming Ontario.
You are listening to the Jordan is My Law podcast. This is your host Jordan and I give
you the legal analysis you've been waiting for. Here's the deal. I don't care about your
political views, but I do ask that you listen to the facts, have an open mind and think
for yourselves. Deal? Oh, and one last thing. I'm not actually a lawyer.
What's up guys? Happy Monday. I am currently recording into my lavalier mic, which is like if you follow me on TikTok, it's that little mic I wear sometimes during my TikTok videos.
The thing is, is I'm out of town. I went to New York City just, you know, for a trip and then we
came and saw my in-laws in New Jersey.
And so I'm working with what I got.
I don't have my podcast equipment, but that's okay.
Got to work with what we have sometimes.
So with that, we're still going to have a regular episode.
It will be a little bit shorter than normal, but we're still going to cover the current events and the law.
So not to worry there,
you may just have to deal with some audio quality that's not as great as what you're used to.
So with that, let's get into today's stories. This episode is brought to you by Good Party.
With the midterms fast approaching, Good Party is here to help. Good Party isn't a political party,
but it's a movement to help good independent candidates run and win. Good Party isn't a political party, but it's a movement to help good, independent candidates
run and win. Good Party promotes thinking outside of the traditional two-party system
and helps good, independent-minded people like you find good, independent candidates. Our country
deserves representatives who will put politics aside and pass laws that will serve all of us,
not just the two-party leaders or big money donors.
Go to goodparty.org today to learn more about the independent candidates in your state ahead of midterm elections.
So last week, the CBO, otherwise known as the Congressional Budget Office, released its cost estimate of suspending student loan payments and canceling debt.
So recently, President Biden announced his loan forgiveness plan, and the CBO estimates that the cost associated with this loan forgiveness program will be around $400 billion.
On September 26, the director of the Congressional Budget Office issued a letter
regarding the cost of suspending loan payments and canceling debt, and in that letter discussed
the estimated costs as well as what factors went into finding out what the estimated cost will be.
The letter did say that the estimation is highly uncertain. It depends on various things,
and the CBO will continue to update us as more is found
out over time. So the letter says that the cost of debt cancellation is essentially the present value
of the borrower's projected repayments of student debt before accounting for the cancellation,
minus the present value of repayments after doing so. And some of the numbers that factored into
the CBO's estimation were the following. So as of June 30th, 2022, 43 million borrowers held
in total $1.6 trillion in federal student loans. About $430 billion of that $1.6 trillion will be
canceled. And again, that's an estimate. None
of these numbers are set in stone. This is just what the CBO estimates. For the roughly 37 million
borrowers with direct loans from the federal government, the CBO estimates that 95% of those
borrowers meet the income criteria for eligibility. So remember when President Biden
announced the loan forgiveness plan, in order for an individual to be eligible, they had to have
income less than $125,000 as their single income or a jointly married income of under $250,000.
So the CBO says that of the 37 million borrowers with direct loans from the federal government, 95% of them meet the income criteria.
So they have an income less than that $125,000 or $250,000 if married.
65% of the income-eligible borrowers will apply for the debt cancellation, and 45% of the
income-eligible borrowers will have their entire outstanding debt canceled.
So those are some of the factors that went into this calculation.
As I said, the CBO says that they will provide updated information in its baseline projections
early next year, but as of now, they're estimating that this
program will cost around $400 billion. And if you're interested in reading this letter yourself,
again, I have it linked on my website, jordanismylawyer.com, in the podcast episode
description webpage for this episode, as I usually do. Now, on Friday, with 11 hours to spare,
President Biden signed a spending bill that averted a government shutdown.
So the government, if you didn't know, was actually set to shut down on Saturday morning
if an agreement on federal spending wasn't reached in Congress. But luckily there was an interim
funding bill to hold over the government until mid-December because the reality is the chambers
of Congress were not coming to an
agreement regarding government funding. And so this bill was put forward to basically say that
the current levels of spending will be maintained and the funding will be extended through December
16th so that basically both chambers of Congress can have more time to agree on a broader budget
deal. Some of the things that this interim funding bill includes is $2.5 billion
in aid for natural disasters, $1 billion in funding a low-income home heating program,
$20 million in emergency funding to address the water crisis in Mississippi, and $12 billion in aid for Ukraine. The bill also allows for reauthorization of FDA
user fees for another five years. If you're not familiar with an FDA user fee, it's basically a
fee paid to the FDA by companies that produce certain human drug and biological products, and it supports the FDA, essentially.
It keeps the FDA going. So originally, the hurdle in getting the bill to pass the Senate
was actually centered on very specific language that was set forth by one senator in particular,
Senator Joe Manchin. And this language would overhaul how the government approves permits
for energy production. And the reason that this language was included in the bill is because
allegedly him and Senator Chuck Schumer agreed that if Manchin supported the Inflation Reduction
Act, he could include his permitting legislation to the continuing resolution. So he did. He supported
the Inflation Reduction Act, despite saying he wouldn't support such an act. And in turn,
he was able to include this energy permit language in the funding bill. But there was
bipartisan opposition to Manchin's proposal, and that was blocking an
agreement from happening. So Senate Republicans were bitter over Manchin voting to pass the
Inflation Reduction Act after saying he wouldn't support it, and Senate Democrats were concerned
about the environmental impacts of his energy permit proposal. Once this language was taken
out of the bill, the bill became much easier
to pass. And the Senate passed it on Thursday. The House passed it on Friday by a vote of 230 to 201
with 10 Republicans joining all Democrats. And President Biden signed it later that afternoon.
So that was done Friday afternoon. Saturday morning was when the government was set to
shut down if an agreement wasn't reached. Now, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the floor on Thursday
that, quote, this is common sense bipartisan legislation. I'm glad we came to a timely
conclusion and didn't go right up to the brink and risk a shutdown. Millions and millions of
people can breathe easy knowing that we have done this in a timely way and the money to continue the
government will be there,
end quote, which I think is interesting. He said, I'm glad we didn't go right up to the brink, but I mean, Friday afternoon kind of is right up to the brink, but that's okay. The most important
thing is that an agreement was reached and now the funding will continue into December.
There won't be a government shutdown and hopefully, you know, in the meantime, some sort of agreement can be reached.
Now, the next topic is actually just over a week old.
I know these are usually a week in, you know, a week in review, but I felt that it was important
to talk about ahead of midterms because the GOP agenda is something we should all be informed
on regardless of how we're voting.
And if you follow my TikTok, you heard me talk about this a little bit, but I'm going to discuss it in a little bit more detail on here. So the agenda is
called Commitment to America, and it's basically built on four pillars, those being a strong
economy, a safe nation, a future built on freedom, and an accountable government. And under each of these four pillars are little excerpts as to how
the GOP plans to achieve these four goals. And basically, and again, this will be linked on my
website so you can read this for yourself. But in order to build a strong economy, the GOP says it
will fight inflation and lower the cost of
living, and it plans to do this by curbing wasteful government spending that is raising the price
of groceries, gas, cars, and housing, and growing our national debt. It also plans to increase take
home pay, create good paying jobs, and bring stability to the economy through pro-growth tax
and deregulatory policies. The GOP also says it
will build a strong economy by making America energy independent and reducing gas prices,
and it will do this by maximizing production of reliable, cleaner, American-made energy and
cutting the permitting process time in half to reduce reliance on foreign countries,
prevent rolling blackouts, and lower the cost of gas and utilities. And the
final little excerpt under the strong economy pillar is to strengthen the supply chain and end
dependence on China. And to do this, the GOP says it will move supply chains away from China,
expand U.S. manufacturing, and enhance America's economic competitiveness, and cyber resiliency. So then the second pillar is a
safe nation. And under that, you have secure the border, combat illegal immigration, reduce crime,
protect public safety, and defend America's national security. So in order to secure the
border and combat illegal immigration, the GOP plans to fully fund effective border enforcement strategies,
infrastructure, and advanced technology to prevent illegal crossings and trafficking by cartels,
and end catch-and-release loopholes, require legal status to get a job, and eliminate welfare
incentives. Now, to reduce crime and protect public safety, the GOP plans to support 200,000 more police
officers through recruiting bonuses and oppose all efforts to defund the police, crack down
on prosecutors and district attorneys who refuse to prosecute crimes while permanently
criminalizing all forms of illicit fentanyl.
And lastly, the GOP plans to defend America's national security by supporting our
troops, investing in an efficient, effective military, establishing a select committee on China,
and exercising peace through strength with our allies to counter increasing global threats.
Then that third pillar is a future built on freedom, and to do that, the GOP says it will
make sure every student can succeed
and give parents a voice, achieve longer, healthier lives for Americans, and confront big tech and
demand fairness. So let's go back to the first excerpt, make sure every student can succeed and
give parents a voice. To do this, they say they will advance the parents' bill of rights, recover lost learning from school closures, and expand parental choice so over a million more students can receive the education their parents know is best, and defend fairness by ensuring that only women can compete in women's sports. Now to achieve longer, healthier lives for Americans, the GOP plans to personalize
care to provide affordable options and better quality delivered by trusted doctors, lower prices
through transparency, choice, and competition, invest in life-saving cures, and improve access
to telemedicine. And then the last little excerpt under A Future Built on Freedom is to
confront big tech and demand fairness, and this will be done by providing greater privacy and
data security protections, equip parents with more tools to keep their kids safe online,
and stop companies from putting politics ahead of people. And then that last pillar, the fourth
pillar, a government that's accountable, that is basically founded on preserving our constitutional freedoms, holding Washington accountable, and restoring the people's voice.
So to preserve our constitutional freedoms, the GOP says it will uphold free speech, protect the lives of unborn children and their mothers, guarantee religious freedoms, and safeguard the second
amendment. So notice that is where the abortion issue lies. So they're keen on protecting the
lives of unborn children and their mothers. What this typically looks like is banning abortion,
either totally or after a certain time frame, but ensuring that mothers always have the exception
in the case that their life is at risk. When I posted this on TikTok, I did have someone comment
that they didn't see anything on this sheet about abortion. That is, you know, where that lies.
But again, this isn't in elaborate detail. It's just kind of a one pager on what the GOP plans to do.
So then still going off of an accountable government, the GOP plans to hold Washington accountable by conducting rigorous oversight to rein in government abuse of power and corruption, provide real transparency and require the White House to answer for its incompetence at home and abroad, and save and
strengthen Social Security and Medicare. And finally, in order to restore the people's voice,
the GOP plans to end special treatment for members of Congress by repealing proxy voting,
increasing accountability in the election process through voter ID, accurate voter tolls, and observer access. So that is commitment to
America in a nutshell. Again, that is the GOP's agenda. And as always, it's just important to
be informed no matter which side you stand on. Now, Nancy Pelosi has called commitment to America
an extreme MAGA agenda, and President Biden has called it a thin series of
policy goals with little to no detail, and he thinks it leaves out important issues like Medicare,
Social Security, and the right to choose. You can look at this agenda almost as a guide for what
the Republican Party would work towards if they regained the majority after midterms. And again, as I've been saying,
it's just really important for everyone to be informed and know what we're voting for or what
we're voting against. Obviously, even midterms matter. So if we can, we should all be voting.
And the final topic today is in regards to the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022.
It's something that both Democrats and Republicans have seemingly agreed
on, and it is headed to the Senate floor for a vote. It just passed the Senate Rules Committee
on Tuesday, and it's expected to pass with comfortable margins given verbal support from
not only Senator Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, but also other Senate Republicans as well.
In short, this bill makes it harder for an election
to be overturned. Basically, the media portrays this bill as a bill that will prevent another
January 6th from happening. But that is just an indirect impact of the bill. So it's not a bill
directly aimed at the events of January 6th. I i mean it did come about because of january 6th
but i just want to clarify like when the media says that this bill prevents another january 6th
that's not its intended role its intended role is actually to do much more than just that so let's
talk about what the bill actually does the bill reforms and modernizes the 1887 Election Count Act to ensure
that electoral votes counted by Congress accurately reflect each state's public vote for president.
Okay, sounds great. How does it do this though? So there's basically six modifications or reforms
that are being made to ensure that this happens. One is that the Electoral Count Act of
2022 will identify each state's governor as responsible for submitting the Certificate
of Ascertainment identifying that state's electors. Now this change addresses the potential for
multiple state officials to send congress conflicting groups of electors
so it automatically by default says this is the state's governor's responsibility
no one else's and the state governor's submission trumps everything else the only exception is if
the state's laws or state's constitution in effect on election day says otherwise, you know, says
someone other than the governor is responsible for submitting the certificate of ascertainment.
But according to this election count reform act, it is the governor's responsibility and no one
else's. The second reform that's being made is that this new law would provide for expedited review of certain claims
related to a state's certificate identifying its electors, which include a three-judge panel with
a direct appeal to the Supreme Court. This is purely for efficiency purposes. If there is a
claim, it will get handled very quickly. The next change that this law would make, obviously if this
becomes a law, is that it requires Congress to defer to slates of electors submitted by a state's executive.
So it basically gives Congress a clear-cut answer if and when any confusion arises.
Now the fourth kind of main change that this bill will put into effect is that it clarifies the role of the vice president. So it really affirmatively states that the vice president
does not have any power to solely determine, accept, reject, or otherwise adjudicate disputes
over electors. That the vice president's role per the constitution is solely ceremonial. They don't
have any right or any power to anything in regards to disputes over electors.
Now, the fifth change is that this act would raise the threshold for an objection to electors,
and it would raise it to at least one-fifth of the members of Congress. So currently,
only a single member of both chambers is needed to object to an elector or slate of electors.
So basically this change would reduce the likelihood of frivolous objections by ensuring
that these objections are broadly supported, right? By one-fifth of the members of Congress,
both the House and the Senate. And then the last thing that this bill changes is that it strikes a provision of an old 1845 law that could be used by state
legislatures to override the popular vote in their states by declaring a failed election.
So as you can see, there's just some changes that are being made to this old outdated 1887
act that makes it harder to, you know, call an election into question. And again, this has
bipartisan support so far. When this bill was voted on in the Senate Rules Committee, the only
senator that voted against it was Ted Cruz. He said that it, quote, decreases the ability of
Congress to address instances of fraud, end quote. But other than that, there are multiple Republican senators who have voiced
their support for it, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. And, you know, you have
Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith from Mississippi who voted to decertify Pennsylvania and Arizona's
electors on January 6th, and she was among the seven Republicans who voted for the bill in the Senate Rules Committee. Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas, also a Republican, said that he's looking it over,
and Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky said that he's open to reforms, adding that the Senate's
legislation is more reasonable than a competing bill passed by the House last week, Senator Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, who's also a Republican, said that he's, quote, never been nuts about reform, but added that he's going to look at it really carefully.
And it's certainly a noble effort and that he thinks the people working on it are really good people who just want to be helpful.
So as you can see there, you know, this this isn't just something that Democrats want. The Republican senators are also open to it and are considering it. Some have already voiced their support of it. So it is expected to pass the Senate. And then obviously, you know, we'll see what happens from there. But so far, looks like there's bipartisan support. And, you know, I think we can all agree that bipartisan
support is nice. Rare, but nice these days. So those are the four stories for today. I hope you
guys stuck with me. Again, I'm really sorry if my audio quality was off today. I'm just working with
what I got and I just want to give you guys a friendly reminder that if you haven't already,
please leave my podcast a review on whichever platform you listen obviously five stars is ideal but i can only ask for so much
from you guys and um i really appreciate you i appreciate you being here and i will talk to you
soon Bye.