Unchained - How Small Bitcoin ETF Issuers Will Compete With the Likes of BlackRock - Ep. 595
Episode Date: January 16, 2024Thursday was a momentous day in crypto as the first SEC-approved spot Bitcoin ETFs finally began trading after more than a decade of waiting, and by almost all accounts, it was a huge success, with mo...re than $625 million in inflows on the first day of trading. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan and VanEck head of digital assets research Matthew Sigel joined Unchained to discuss their approaches towards selling their products in the market, the challenges of competing with larger firms like BlackRock and Fidelity, the fee wars and where those are headed, the importance of specialist expertise in the crypto investment space, and how Bitcoin prices might react to all the new supply in the market. Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Fountain, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Pandora, Castbox, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, or on your favorite podcast platform. Show highlights: Why Matt Hougan regards the first week as a massive success for Bitcoin How Matthew Sigel emphasizes the costs and benefits ETFs offer to retail investors The strategic marketing approaches of VanEck and Bitwise aligning with Bitcoin community values The reasons for Bitwise's standout performance in the first days of trading, according to Matt Whether the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs will reshape the broader ETF landscape Matt's perspective on why some financial institutions resist Bitcoin, and their eventual openness to crypto Whether the established players in finance feel threatened by the rise of open source technologies Whether Gary Gensler’s statement after the approval is “totally crazy” Why data for the various ETFs in the market should be analyzed on a weekly or monthly basis The ongoing fee competition and how smaller entities can compete against giants like BlackRock and Fidelity Grayscale's strategies to remain competitive with higher fees and the possibility of launching a new, low-fee ETF How investment advisors might adapt to these new crypto products and the potential for mainstream adoption Matthew’s predictions for when BTC investors, both short-term and long-term, will take profits Why they are both closely monitoring Ethereum's performance and the prospects for a spot ether ETF in the market Thank you to our sponsors! Arbitrum Foundation Popcorn Network Guests: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise Asset Management Previous appearances on Unchained: Why a Spot Bitcoin ETF Will Probably Launch No Later Than January 10 Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Assets Research at VanEck. Links Previous coverage of Unchained on spot Bitcoin ETFs: Why Some Brokerage Firms Are Blocking Access to Spot Bitcoin ETFs Why Spot Bitcoin ETFs Are Likely to Finally Start Trading on Thursday Why the SEC May Want Cash Creation of Spot Bitcoin ETFs Why It Looks Like BlackRock Could Win America’s First Spot Bitcoin ETF Will a Spot Bitcoin ETF Finally Get Approved? The 4 Factors That Will Determine Which Spot Bitcoin ETFs Win Market Share How Much Money Will Flow Into Bitcoin ETFs? Here’s One Projection Approval: Unchained: Spot Bitcoin ETFs Finally Receive SEC Seal of Approval What Officials, ETF Issuers, and Others Are Saying About the SEC's Spot Bitcoin ETF Approvals Laura Shin’s op-ed on Unchained: Why Spot Bitcoin ETFs Are (But Mostly Aren't) a Big Deal for Crypto David Z. Morris’ op-ed on Unchained: The SEC’s Bumbling Bitcoin ETF Rollout Was Perfectly On-Brand First days of trading Unchained: Spot Bitcoin ETFs Record $4.6 Billion First Day Trading Volume Spot Bitcoin ETF Inflows Topped $625 Million on First Day in ‘Phenomenal’ Debut, Led by Bitwise Vanguard Isn’t Allowing Customers to Buy Spot Bitcoin ETFs Visit Unchained for more links and details Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
One thing that traditional finance does is they sort of look down on crypto because they have
different names for the same things is very ticker.
Holdel could be translated into traditional financies as buy and whole, which is the most
august investing strategy of all time, right?
Hi, everyone.
Welcome to Unchained.
You're a no hype resource for all things crypto.
I'm your host, Laura Shin, author of The Cryptopians.
I started covering crypto eight years ago and as a senior.
editor at Forbes was the first main-train meter porter to cover cryptocurrency full-time.
This is the January 16th, 2024 episode of Unchained.
Streamline your Defy with VaultCraft, the ultimate on-chain toolkit for deploying custom
automated defy products on any EVM chain.
Join Volcraft's referral program, unite with the community, and supercharge your crypto.
Details on VaultCraft.io.
Arbitrins leading layer-2 scaling solutions can provide you with lightning-fast transactions at a
fraction of the cost, all while ensuring security rooted on Ethereum. Arbitrim's newest edition,
Orbit, Enables you to build your own tailor-made Layer 3. Visit Arbitrim.io today.
Betmoot activated. The scorebet app here with trusted stats and real-time sports news.
Yeah, hey, who should I take in the Boston game? Well, statistically speaking.
Nah, no more statistically speaking. I want hot takes. I want knee-jerk reactions. That's not really
what I do. Is that because you don't have any knees? Or...
The score bet.
Trusted sports content, seamless sports betting.
Download today.
19 plus, Ontario only.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or the gambling of someone close to you,
please go to conicsonterio.ca.
With Amex Platinum, you have access to over 1,400 airport lounges worldwide.
So your experience before takeoff is a taste of what's to come.
That's the powerful backing of Amex.
Conditions apply.
Local news is in decline across Canada.
And this is bad news for all of us.
With less local news, noise, rumors, and misinformation fill the void.
And it gets harder to separate truth from fiction.
That's why CBC News is putting more journalists in more places across Canada,
reporting on the ground from where you live,
telling the stories that matter to all of us.
Because local news is big news.
Choose news, not noise.
CBC News.
Today's topic is the launch of the spot Bitcoin ETC,
Here to discuss are Matt Hogan, Chief Investment Officer at Wyss Asset Management, and Matthew Siegel,
head of digital assets research at Vanek.
Welcome, Matt and Matthew.
Thanks for having us, Laura.
Excited to be here.
So we're recording late Friday afternoon, but after the bell, which, by the way, Matt was part of ringing,
which he can tell us about in a moment.
But at this point in time, we've actually seen two full days of trading of the spot Bitcoin ETFs.
And across the two days, we reached.
$7.7 billion in volume.
I'm pretty sure this is just a record for any ETF.
And each of you work at one of the different ETF issuers.
So why don't we just get your initial thoughts about these first two days?
And Matt, Hogan, why don't we start with you?
And if you want to make any comments about ringing the bell, feel free.
Yeah, it was, you know, this has been a historic week for Bitcoin, for Bitcoin ETFs,
obviously, for Bitwise.
And to cap that historic week, we were able to ring the bell on the New York Stock Exchange with giant Bitcoin signs behind us.
And as a sort of a symbol of how far crypto has come and where it's going, I think that was a great moment.
But I think any way you look at this week, it has to be a huge success.
If you look at it from the perspective of investors, between last week and this week, they've been able to reduce the fees they pay for accessing crypto in a fund structure by 80 to 90%.
that's a massive win.
If you look at it from people who haven't yet invested,
it's now gotten so much easier for mainstream Americans
to access Bitcoin in a wrapper that they're familiar with.
And if you look at it from Bitcoin's perspective,
from my point of view,
this is a necessary milestone on the path to where Bitcoin is going.
This opens up the market,
gives us more regulatory certainty,
brings in new investors and will introduce a huge swath of people to Bitcoin for the first time.
So I think it's been a fantastic week. The initial trading has been great. I'm sure we'll get into that,
but I'd call it a success. And before we turn to Matthew, I do want to ask you because you have
such a long history with ETFs. And you know, you started in crypto, I believe six years ago.
So if you could just talk from a personal perspective and even explain to the listeners your history with
the ETFs, I think that would be super fascinating for people. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, I had a 15-plus
year career history in ETFs before moving to Bitwise six years ago. I did a lot there. I was
CEO of ETF.com. I created the first ETF data and analytics system. I even won a lifetime
achievement award in the ETF industry. There is a connecting thread between ETFs and crypto, which I've
been reflecting on today. When I started in ETFs, ETFs are today like the mother's milk of
of investing or the Apple Pie of investing.
Everyone uses them.
Everyone loves them.
But when I started in ETFs, they weren't that.
They were called weapons of mass destruction.
There were congressional hearings about them destroying American entrepreneurialism.
But I saw in ETFs the ability to make the fund industry more efficient.
And along with a lot of other people, were able to participate in the growth of that industry.
And that's actually what drew me into crypto as well.
You saw this new technology that could make financial.
They could make finance more efficient, but which people didn't understand and were afraid of
and had caustic comments about.
And I thought it had the potential to advance from there.
And this is a big milestone moment.
Just on the ETF front, we've been working on a spot Bitcoin ETF for five years at BitWise.
We've done 30 plus meetings with the SEC.
Sometimes the end of the tunnel kept moving further and further away.
So there is a huge relief to finally get through the tunnel.
And now the fun part begins.
Now's the part where we build. So this is this is a great day. And Matthew, what are your thoughts
after these first two full days of trading? Yeah. So first, a caution to the audience that you're,
you're going to hear Matt and I agreeing a lot because we've brought pretty similar products
here to market. And although we're going to compete on, you know, the spot Bitcoin ETF side,
Bitwise and Vanek are partners in other ventures. And, you know, crypto is a small world. And, you know,
we are all going to make it is a reality in this case.
So Matt, I know you were down at the NYC this after you may be away from the tape.
So just more some more kind of tactical observations on how these things actually traded today.
We were pretty happy to see that the premium to net asset value that the shares were
trading at came down quite dramatically for all these products.
They're trading at less than 1% premium.
They're, you know, trading well, lots of volume.
This is like the biggest ETF launch we've ever had.
And we're really optimistic that these products are going to unlock a lot of demand
because of these cost savings for retail and the security for institutional.
So it's a long game here.
Congrats to Bitwise on, you know, some of the big numbers in the couple days.
We're going to see the advisor community start to,
allocate into this space, you know, not in a matter of days, but it's going to be months and
quarters. And some of the brokers who haven't yet listed these products, and, you know, we can
name check them if we want to. But those are among our closest relationships, and we know from
talking to them, and I'm sure Matt does as well, that the accessibility is coming and the passive
flows are coming. And we think in the end, the retail investors could save 80, 90 percent
compared to what they're doing if they're just buying blindly on Coinbase. And when was the last
time a cost savings like that didn't catalyze wider adoption of a new technology? So we've put
significant capital of our own balance sheet to work, the largest seed investment of any of the
issuers at 72 million. And given where fees have had it in these products, you know,
we're going to make it up in the price appreciation. So yeah, it's been a great week, busy week,
looking forward to the 5 o'clock hour here. And for the listeners on audio, you will not be able
to see, but Matthew is wearing a hodal cap. And like it's, in a way I actually feel like some of the
questions that I had for each of you in terms of your positioning are sort of captured in the
images because so Matt Hogan, you know, he has the suit because he just came from ringing the
bell. But the Hodel cap, I feel, is very part and parcel of how Vannock has positioned itself.
So maybe we can kind of transition into that. But one thing I noticed, so both of you,
both of your organizations are making donations to Bitcoin core development. Vennack committed to
donating 5% of the Bitcoin ETF profits to Bitcoin Brink, which I guess they support open source
development on Bitcoin. You're also making an initial donation $10,000. And then Bitwise will be
donating 10% of the profits to Bitcoin Brink, OpenSats, and the Human Rights Foundation, which
they actually do a lot of work around Bitcoin Core Development too. So, you know, how did you
guys come to that decision? Separately, but we just recognize that Bitcoin is a public good,
and we want to give back to the space and make sure that that public good flourishes. So,
we're not tourists in this space. We have tried to bring spot Bitcoin ETF to market for
seven years and when that was looking impossible, we went out and built a whole lot more products
in the space as well. We have 18 different strategies. We're building in the NFT space. We're writing
research and just want to make sure that any benefit that we get goes back into the open
source community. I kind of was, grew up professionally.
as a technology investor and with some core beliefs and observations that open source tends to take
market share over the long run and that relies on, you know, people working nights and weekends.
And in the case of a for-profit venture like Vanek, which is, you know, embracing disruption here,
we want to give back to the Bitcoin core as well.
I would echo what Matt said.
You know, one thing that's similar, I think I could say,
Matt, you can correct me if I'm wrong between Vanek and Bitwise, is that we both care deeply
about crypto and we're both deeply anchored in the crypto ecosystem. Vanek has been doing it for many
years. Bitwise has also been doing it for seven years. It has multiple strategies in the space.
This isn't our first or only Bitcoin fund. And if you care about this industry, this movement,
this community, you do want to give back to it. And I think we are the only two ETF issuers.
today with this sort of commitment. And I think it's a signal about how much we care about Bitcoin
and about crypto. And I think it's important that there are asset managers in the market that
care about Bitcoin and crypto. If you think about the impact that a company like Coinbase has had,
which clearly cares about crypto in the public ecosystem. The market deserves asset managers
who care as well. And this is sort of a symbol of that. And Matt, I did want to ask you about
your first day rollout. I'm sure you saw Nate Geraci of the ETF store. I had some very
kind words for Bitwise's first day. He tweeted on Friday morning, in my opinion, Bitwise just put on a
masterclass in how to launch an ETF from pre-launch marketing to seed money to fee positioning,
to capital markets, to post-launch marketing, an absolute clinic. So tell us about how those
plans came together. How were you thinking about the launch? How did you decide to put all those
elements together for that strong first day? Yeah, you know, this is a challenging market to launch
into. There are 11 players, including some very large firms like BlackRock and Fidelity with
huge reach and huge brand. And so we felt we had to stack every advantage we could on our side.
What are the advantages we can stack? We can do brand ads to make people more aware of bitwise.
So an example of a brand ad we did was the ad with the most interesting man in the world talking about Bitcoin.
And I think that raised Bitwise's profile.
We can be aggressive on pricing because we're building for the long term.
And we've already built the infrastructure to run crypto funds.
And so the incremental cost of adding a new crypto fund on top of that is not that high.
We already trade Bitcoin.
We already work with custodians.
We already have a sales team.
We already do research.
We've been fortunate to build a billion dollar.
asset manager doing that. So the incremental costs are not that high so we can price aggressively
lower. And then we've been working in this market and talking to the potential buyers of this
ETF about crypto for seven years. So we have a lot of relationships. We're deep in the market.
And so we just thought on every single one, we have to stack every advantage we have to even have
a shot at competing with the Black Rocks and Fidelity of the world. And it's very early days.
but we were really pleased that we led the market on day one flows.
We've been competitive on volume, very tight spreads.
But that was sort of the exegis of it.
We felt the competitive pressure,
and we felt we had to do everything we could because it was really important,
and we're pleased at the early returns.
It's kind of funny to watch the East Coast, West Coast nature of it as well.
I mean, I think of you guys as a West Coast shop,
your big ticket came from the West Coast,
which tends to lead on technology, right?
Street doesn't want to disrupt itself.
You know, half the big broker's not involved.
So, yeah, it's fitting.
I love that.
I think that's right.
Yeah.
Can you talk about that a little bit more?
Because before the ETF launches, I saw, I think it was Eric Balchunas of Bloomberg
Intelligence was talking about how there were certain big ETF players that were sitting
this out.
And he was saying like, oh, I think State Street is going to regret sitting this out.
And, you know, there were, obviously, you know, Vanguard came out and said that they weren't
going to do this.
maybe it's just part and parcel of their philosophy, but for a number of the other ones,
and we even saw it, of course, afterward where the platforms weren't letting their customers
trade in this. So can you talk a little bit about how you think the launch of Bitcoin
ETFs are going to just change the playing field for ETFs generally, especially as more
crypto ETF products come aboard? Here's one we might not agree on that. Let's see. I'm not so sure
that when Bitcoin's at 100K, there's going to be that many more people who don't hate it,
frankly, right?
Like, this is a very small asset class.
It takes a little bit of capital to move it.
And unfortunately, with the statements that we've seen, you know, out of the regulator and
then even out of someone like Vanguard, just denigrating an asset class, taking a view on a commodity
in a way that they never have before.
Like, that's just a no-coiner attitude.
And some percentage of these folks are going to have that because that's the DNA of parts
of Wall Street.
And that'll be like a slower progression.
You know, that said, there are some of these firms.
And like UBS is a good example.
When UBS was listed on Twitter as not making these funds available, and they're just
taking it slow.
if you have 10 million in assets on UBS, you can buy it. They're going to move that to one billion.
They're going to put out a new asset allocation model that's, you know, not 60, 40, but maybe it's
60, 38, 2 or, you know, something along those lines. And there will be incremental improvements,
but I still think we're going to run into, you know, obstacles. The political battles are not
one. The legal matters are not settled. So it'll be piece by piece.
I think we're pretty close to agreeing, although maybe I'm a little bit more optimistic.
I do think that when you have Larry Fink on TV talking about Bitcoin and Ethereum and seeing value in those assets, and when you have, you know, whether it's, whether it's Goldman or other people making markets in these funds, I think it normalizes Bitcoin and then moves on to normalize crypto.
You have Bank of New York being the administrator for many of these ETFs, right?
So nothing happens overnight.
But I do think it starts to change the game.
And Vanek knows this more than anyone.
But before the gold ETF, gold was a fairly alternative asset.
It really wasn't considered in the mainstream.
Gold people were called gold bugs and they talked about tinfoil hats.
And Vanek had, I think, the first gold miner fund in the world.
But they were fairly unique.
And now gold can sit down at the dinner table with stocks and business.
bonds and real estate and private equity and no one raises their eyebrows. I do think crypto will get
there, but I agree it won't be overnight. I think we made progress, but it won't be overnight.
Can both of you just explain, though, what it is that the banks have, excuse me, have against either
Bitcoin or the Bitcoin ETFs? I don't know if I fully even understand what it is.
Is it just because it's such a new thing? Yeah, I don't know if I fully grasp why.
I'd love to hear what Matt thinks, but I'll take a shot. I think there are two levels at which I
see it. The charitable level is it's an unknown unknown risk. They don't know what could go wrong,
but they've been anchored on 10 years of stories about what's wrong with Bitcoin and crypto.
And so they just see potential risk that might appear that they're not aware of and therefore
they protect themselves by saying no. I think that's part of it. I think there is part of the
deeper distrust of crypto that speaks to its disruptive nature to their core business,
which I think is a sort of slow undercurrent under it. But I think mostly they just hear
the chairman of the SEC talking poorly about Bitcoin and they sense risk. They couldn't tell you
what risk it is, but they sense risk. And they're anchored in a world where Bitcoin is
is full of negative stories. And it'll take some time to get over that.
Yeah, I mean, I think banks are just captured by definition by the state, and there is a part of our political body right now that has a very controlling nature towards everything and assumes that any anonymous tool must be used for bad and will highlight the bad and wants to account for every penny of an individual.
transaction when, you know, their own military as an example can account for $800 billion.
And that's not going away. Both sides are digging in their heels, right? The administration
just put out an executive order that, you know, wants to define how much math you're allowed
to do on your computer if you publish that, you know, to the web. So this, it's kind of a meme about the
pivot to AI that happened from crypto a year ago. But I think there's something much deeper to it.
And we're going to have some research out on this topic shortly. So maybe we can talk about that
later. But it's the same compute that's going to power AI as was oriented towards Bitcoin.
To some extent, the energy is fungible. And if we're going to be regulating AI,
in a kind of walled garden approach and not letting the open source models bloom.
That's, you know, very similar to open source money in a way.
And I think there's, you know, a lot of political headwinds that are going to have to get
fought in the courts.
And that's, you know, that's why the U.S. is lagging on this issue until it gets sorted out.
Let me just, I actually, I do agree with that.
I think it's important.
I'm excited to hear the research.
I'm going to add a little bit of optimism and sunshine to it because that is my nature.
In terms of how these doors get open, if you back up a while, the only asset managers that were in this space, there were two kinds.
There were startups like Bitwise, and then there were privately held firms.
One thing that's unique about Faneck and Fidelity is that they're not publicly traded entities.
And so they were able to do what they thought was actually right, which included moving into crypto.
And of course, startups like BitWise could move into crypto.
But as an indication of the progress we've made, we now have more mainstream people following in our footsteps.
We have the Black Rocks and the Invescos, et cetera.
So I do think we will get there, but I do agree there is a deep-seated control aspect that is threatened by open source technologies.
This is such a fascinating conversation.
I did ask Eric Balchunis and James Sefer, and I think Nate Jirachi was.
I think Nate Geraci was in the same conversation about the fact that these, you know,
some of these brokerages were not allowing their customers to invest in some of the spot Bitcoin
ETFs. And Eric just said, oh, actually, this is not that uncommon, you know, leaving Vanguard aside
simply because they're sort of in their own category. He was saying for some of these other,
like City, Merrill, Wells Fargo, et cetera, he was saying that basically it's a little bit almost like a pay-to-play
situation, you know, they just want you to jump through little hoops and see what they can get out of it
to let you in on their platform. Or like how much of a delay do you think we'll see before these
are more widely available and how much of it is that, you know, kind of typical just sort of like
negotiating versus this attitude that we're talking about. Yeah, I think most of the major brokerages
will become available within the next year. I do think even those are opening a crack and you're going to have
11 firms meeting with the national account offices at Morgan and Merrill and UBS and Wells,
et cetera.
And there's going to have overwhelming demand to get access to this asset, which is the best
performing asset in the world over the last one, three, five, and ten years has low correlations
of stock and bonds.
And they're commercial beasts, and they will open up to it.
I do think there are certain organizations that will take a philosophical stance and
dig in their heels and only come kicking and screaming into the space.
Vanguard may very well be one of them.
They were actually relatively slow to move into ETFs as well, believe it or not, back in the day.
But I think eventually everyone will get there.
But most of the platforms, if the door is open 30% today, it'll be open 80% or 90% I think within a year.
And it will cost firms like Banach and Bitwise some effort and some money, but it will be worth it.
and we will get there.
Oh, interesting.
Wait, so you actually think Vanguard will eventually get in?
A long enough time horizon, I think they will get in.
But that could be many years.
And Matthew, any thoughts on how much of it is just a typical negotiation versus this
attitude toward Bitcoin specifically?
I don't.
I tend to agree with Matt there.
I mean, we noticed that Vanguard tried to couch their opposition.
kind of from an investment philosophy.
So, you know, we penned a recent op-ed kind of rebutting the idea that Bitcoin lacks
intrinsic value and looking at the momentum factor as a long-term predictor of excess returns in the market.
And, you know, what is the momentum factor really is just a good meme going viral because it's good?
and the way that kind of memes and corporations endure over time is very similar to how organisms and cities kind of evolve.
You know, Darwin called that survival of the fittest.
And in crypto, it's respect the pump.
And, you know, both of those tie back to this, like, the efficacy of the momentum factor.
So, you know, two-thirds of US GDP comes from intangible assets.
what is really the intrinsic value there, but the goodwill that society assigns to, you know,
the entity in question, the asset, the equity, well, what have you. So, you know, we assume that
the $500 million that people paid to send transactions across the Bitcoin network last year were
rational transactions. And they got utility in return for using this permissionless asset that's,
that's always on. So, you know, that's our response to Vanguard, is like,
Give us a better thesis than just lax intrinsic value because there's all kinds of stuff that you can say that about.
Oh, I just have to jump in there.
One thing I agree with that.
One thing that Matt said that I loved is momentum factor is respect the pump.
It is absolutely true.
One thing that traditional finance does is they sort of look down on crypto because they have different names for the same things is very ticker.
Holdul could be translated into traditional financies as buy and whole, which is the most
august investing strategy of all time right you're very responsible you buy and hold but you enable it
something different or memeable and suddenly it's a joke it's it really is about semantics at some
level they really are the same thing and i can't can't wait to read that paper yeah actually that's
such an amazing insight because i just realized that um that is kind of that whole vanguard slash
bogelehead philosophy so it's so fascinating that um yeah you just meet this connection between
two things that I had thought of is very different that I'm realizing now are actually the same thing.
Well, we have so many interesting things to dive into about the ETOs themselves, but I really have
to ask one more question about kind of this negativity that we're seeing because obviously,
you know, SEC Chair Gary Gensler, he was kind of forced into this and he very begrudgingly
approved the ETS. You know, he was the deciding vote, but in his statement he basically said
the court's making me do this. And I just want to read the last two paragraphs of the statement
that he released about, the approvals, because they were quite negative. He said, quote,
though we're merit neutral, I'd note that the underlying assets and the metals ETPs have
consumer and industrial uses. While in contrast, Bitcoin is primarily a speculative, volatile asset
that's also used for illicit activity, including ransomware, money laundering, sanction evasion,
and terrorist financing. While we approved the listing and trading of certain spot Bitcoin
ETP shares today, we did not approve or endorse Bitcoin. Investors should remain cautious about
the myriad risks associated with Bitcoin and products whose value is tied to crypto.
How typical is it for the chair to make these kinds of statements about an asset that forms
the basis of an ETP that they've approved?
No, it's totally crazy. It's like a signing statement. I mean, it sounded like when your third
grader does something wrong and you make him write an apology letter. And he's like, I'm sorry,
I beat up Johnny, but he was really mean and he's not a nice guy.
I've never seen it before.
It's a very strange statement to make about an asset.
And honestly, that one and the one from Commissioner Crenshaw really set me back thinking
about why is this asset so divisive in the community?
You know, it's a relatively small asset.
It's less than a trillion dollars.
And yet they feel required to make these enormous statements.
It's very strange.
I'd also note, you could just substitute the dollar in that sentence,
and it would still read just fine, money laundering, et cetera.
True.
All right.
Well, we won't also mention Elizabeth Warren,
who had her own choice remarks that were, you know, not that different.
But we are now going to turn to all the other details around the ETFs,
but first we'll take a quick word from the sponsors who make this show possible.
Defi just got way easier with Waltcraft.
a blockchain infrastructure for building, deploying, and monetizing non-custodial yield strategies in a few clicks.
Forget spending months of R&D, capital, and human resources when you can now instantly launch your crypto fund with Valkraft on any EVM chain.
From wallets and institutional service providers to a non-DFID gens,
Volcraft supercharges your crypto assets by enabling instant cross-chain yield strategies that you can deploy in one minute.
Now anyone can supercharge their crypto portfolios with custom tailored defy strategies.
Join VaultCraft's referral program, unite with the community, and supercharge your crypto.
Details on VaultCraft.io.
Arbitrum stands at the forefront of innovation as the premier suite of layer two scaling solutions,
bringing you lightning-fast transactions at a fraction of the cost, all with security rooted on Ethereum.
From Defy to gaming, Arbitrum 1 plus Nova is home to open to.
over 500 projects. And with the recent launch of orbit, Arbitrum welcomes you to build your very
own tailor-made layer three, or, as the Arbitrum ecosystem calls it, an orbit chain, directly on
the Arbitrum tech stack. Designed with you in mind, Arbitrum empowers you to explore and build
without compromise. Propel your project and community forward by visiting Arbitrum.io today.
Investing is all about the future. So what do you think is going to happen?
coin is sort of inevitable at this point.
I think it would come down to precious metals.
I hope we don't go cashless.
I would say land is a safe investment.
Technology companies.
Solar energy.
Robotic pollinators might be a thing.
A wrestler to face a robot?
That will have to happen.
So whatever you think is going to happen in the future,
you can invest in it at WealthSimple.
Start now at WealthSimple.com.
Now streaming on Paramount Plus,
it began on the shores of New Jersey.
the calls of gym, tan, laundry, reverberated north to Canada, where a new type of party animal resides.
They move as a herd migrating to their favorite watering holes, asserting dominance by flexing, grinding, and twerking.
Coupling is quick, steamy, and sometimes in hot tubs.
When morning arrives, they do it all over again.
Canada Shore, new original series, now streaming on Paramount Plus.
Back to my conversation with Matt and Matthew.
So something that's so fascinating to me is here we are recording late on a Friday.
But we noticed, or I noticed at least, that this morning when commentators were talking about the data for day one,
they were noting that there would be a bit of a delay and that that data might be incomplete.
And some of these didn't give a full timeline of when we might get the most solid data.
So can you explain just a little bit?
Because obviously crypto people were so used to just having
kind of immediate data. So can you just talk a little bit about how that works and, you know,
why there's a delay and when you think will typically get solid data for each days of trading?
Really, that's a question like for the data providers. I think that in the case of Grayscale,
the reason why there later is because it hasn't been an ETF and there's folks who have already
subscribed to that fund and they need to redeem. And the accounting of that just takes a little longer
than the usual ETF, which can report basically after the close.
So I think as things settle out, as we start to go through, you'll see the data for fund flows
appear like on the financial terminals like Bloomberg in the evenings after the close or like
overnight.
And in these early days where there were some of these side agreements that were struck,
like it may just the accountants may take an end.
extra day or things may settle T plus one, but it's not going to be an issue going forward.
Do you agree with that, Matt?
I agree with that for the most part.
I mean, there is a lot of weirdness under the hood, right?
Because to get into technical details, different issuers can have different cutoff times
for people who are creating baskets of shares.
Ours may be 2 p.m.
Others may be 12.
For some of these ETFs, it's the day before.
So in order to create new shares, you have to put in an order more than a day.
ahead of time. Additionally, market makers can facilitate sales on the open market and then not
settle those for a significant period of time because market makers have additional settlement
windows. So some of the trading activity, if you're confused by like how much these
ETFs traded the first day versus how much creation there was, that could be because market
makers haven't gone through the process of creating shares yet. They're just net short and
hedged and they'll eventually do that. It's really best to look at, I know, people have been following
this so breathlessly. So the words I'm going to say are going to make people uncomfortable. It's best
to look at flows on a weekly or monthly basis. It sort of blends it out and you can assume they're
all in there. You know, one of the reasons we're in crypto is because the legacy financial system is so
sclerotic and weird. And it definitely is sclerotic and weird underneath the surface. Oh, my gosh,
weekly and monthly.
I know.
Just, yeah, I mean, I actually used to cover personal finance.
So it's not the same thing as covering finance.
But I'm a little bit like, oh, I don't remember any of this.
But yeah, it feels super archaic to me.
So one other thing, obviously, which really is kind of the real story here, is we've had
this massive fee war that has taken place over the course of few weeks.
and I'm not even going to try to recall all the different price changes because it just felt like for, you know, the last few days before we launched that there was a new update, you know, with new sweeteners being added by different people.
You know, as of launch day, BitWise managed to start as the lowest cost provider at 20 basis points.
And, you know, honestly, then it changed the next morning and now Franklin Templeton is undercutting BitWise.
Which you know, we've just, that's just one of the many times that this has happened in the last week.
So, you know, I just wondered, do you feel that that will continue or now that we've launched,
you feel like that's going to slow down or just talk a little bit about these fee wars?
Yeah.
It was exhausting to constantly engage in the game theory every day of where different people would end up.
And then to think you have it settled only to wake up the next day and do it all again.
It was like a terrible version of Groundhog Day.
I do think now that we've gotten so far down, these are extraordinarily cheap.
To put this in context for non-ETF folks, the largest gold ETF charges 40 basis points,
so twice as much as our Bitcoin ETF.
20 basis points or in the 20 basis point range is a really low cost ETF.
So I don't expect these fee wars to continue at the pace they have been going.
I think everyone was jockeying for initial position and initial trading volume.
But you never know.
I will say that the winner in all of this, as difficult as it makes life for Matt and I,
is the investor, right?
As you mentioned, in a literal sense, from a week ago to today,
the fees to invest in a fund vehicle for Bitcoin have fallen by 90%.
That is just enormous.
So they're the winners.
But yeah, it was an exhausting process.
But I don't think you'll continue to see feet cuts every day.
You never know, but I would be surprised.
I also wondered, how does a smaller company like Bitwise, like Vanna, compete against the
likes of, you know, of Franklin Templeton, which their essence that our management is $1.5 trillion.
Black Rock has $9.1 trillion, fidelity, $4.5 trillion.
And, you know, fidelity on top of that, they benefit from custing their own Bitcoin.
You know, they don't have to pay this outside custodians.
So just talk a little bit about your.
strategies for your two companies or how you're thinking about that competition?
Yeah. So you probably have noticed our social media presence improve in recent quarters.
And we made a lot of relationships behind the scenes through seven years of trying to bring this
product to market, launching a couple of private liquid token strategies. We've got a business
in Europe that has considerable assets in ETF. So we have a lot of. We have a lot of
all these relationships, but it was like, how do we create a network where everyone can see that
and just see the work that we're doing? And we found social media to be helpful in that regard
to just highlight that we're not tourists in the space. We want to serve as the bridge between
tradfi and crypto. Keep putting out excellent research, which I think that we're doing.
if you read our models on Solana and Ethereum, you know, they brought kind of new elements to the story.
So that's kind of our view is get embedded with the community, put our own capital at risk, invest alongside of our clients.
You know, our seed was the largest of any of the issuers.
And, you know, we'll make money when the coins go up ourselves.
So I think all these products like are very affordably priced and consumers going to do very well
versus buying Bitcoin on spot right now.
And these flows are pretty, you know, pretty decent.
And in November and December, crypto ETPs, you know, as they were in Europe and Canada,
had about a billion dollars per month in inflows.
And that's an interesting number because at the current Bitcoin issuance,
rate. There's also about a billion dollars a month per Bitcoin. So just the European ETPs were
taking up like almost 100% of new issuance. Imagine, you know, after having, I think there's just a lot
of prospect for these markets to grow. They're tiny parts of global capital markets, very few
institutional players, but growing. And now you've got, you know, 11 ETAs.
in the market all at about the same price.
I don't think anyone, I don't know, but I don't think anyone's going to go lower unless
there are more custody solutions that come in and make that part of the business more
affordable.
I know that's some of the questions that you had on Twitter, like ahead of this podcast, where,
you know, why aren't there more custody options?
90% of the issuers are using one.
And then, you know, part of that goes back to the regulatory headwinds in the same.
space. Yeah. Yeah. And I will say about the social media presence that I definitely noticed
the VanekX account gives off CMS intern vibes. That's how it appears to me. So definitely
whoever's running that account has kind of gotten some of the lingo down. So Matt, what about you?
How would you say that Wise is trying to compete with the bigger players? Yeah. I have a little secret
about the ETF world, which is that specialists tend to win in specialist areas of the market,
the largest gold mining ETF run by Veneck. In commodity futures, Deutsche Bank and U.S.
commodity funds launched at the same time. U.S. commodity funds was eight guys in Oakland,
and U.S. commodity funds crushed Deutsche Bank. In MLPs, Master Limited Partnerships,
which are a high-income segment of the energy space, that was dominated by Ilarian,
which was a group of folks down in Texas,
even though J.P. Morgan and others were in the space.
And the reason specialists went over time,
they're really two.
One is that specialist expertise matters.
So, for instance, when we brought in $237 million in cash
and went to work in the market,
it wasn't our first time trading Bitcoin.
We've been doing it for seven years.
We have the most Bitcoin trading counterparties
and close to the most APs of any product on the market.
And so the execution we're able to get, I think, is truly exceptional.
And so that specialist expertise matters.
But the other reason it matters is that every day a bitwise, you know, 60 plus people are going to wake up and all they're going to care about is Bitcoin and crypto.
So when my 20 plus person sales team is out there meeting with advisors, they're talking about Bitcoin and crypto.
They're not talking about real estate or large cap stocks or microcap stocks or.
or bonds or mutiny bonds or bank loans.
They're only talking about crypto.
They're only thinking about crypto.
And I just don't think that's going to be true of the larger issuers.
So if I were handicapping this race, not surprising that the biggest brands in the space also did well from a volume perspective.
But over time, I actually feel relatively confident that specialists will win because people want specialist expertise and specialist areas of the market.
I'll give you one little funny.
anecdote from yesterday morning because I heard you ask Laura, I think you asked Eric in the spaces,
like why was Van Ex CTF a little bit late to open?
Oh yeah.
And the reason was that we had so many retail orders that our lead market maker got overwhelmed.
So we had zero orders over 7,000 shares yesterday, which is about $400,000.
So like all of our business was retail and our own money.
not a single one of our kind of institutional relationships hit yet, right? I think those are,
those are coming. But that's just an indication that, like, we did, the social media, you know,
it works. I had people in my DM sending me screenshots of their, of their purchases. And, you know,
this will pay dividends in the long run. That's so interesting. Yeah. Well, another thing that we
discussed in that it was the spaces that we also released as the podcast. So however you consumed it,
it was one or the other. But, you know, the, so the Black Rocks of the world, they had lined up,
you know, a bunch of capital. Black Rock lined up $2 billion. And Eric Baltunas was saying that this is
their marketing strategy effectively, that they've done this for, you know, ESG products that
they've released before. But that then basically at a certain point, you have to separate that out
from the organic demand. So is what you're saying here is that you guys feel like you
you're tapping into organic demand while they've kind of just done this thing for launch day that
will get them the headlines, but maybe it won't sustain.
Is that what you're?
Exactly.
It was 100% organic demand.
It was the biggest ETF launch we ever had.
So, you know, we're feeling decent over here.
And Matt, like, do you feel basically that the Black Rocks of the world are going to be
counted out at a certain point?
Oh, no.
I think they'll get their share.
And honestly, I'm glad that they're in the space.
I think it is a rising tide that lifts all boats.
I think they will get their share.
But I just mean that over years, I think people will want to be able to call someone who's an expert in crypto and work with someone who's an expert in crypto.
And, you know, we have tens of thousands of conversations with advisors every year about crypto.
And we've been doing it for seven years.
And I think those are going to are going to bear fruit.
So they'll definitely be a big player.
And BlackRock will be a big player.
But usually in the ETF market, specialists are able to carve out leadership positions that I'm.
I think over time we'll see that in Bitcoin as well.
And then what about Grayscale, which they are in their own category?
Because they're a specialist, but they started off huge.
And their outflows were not as big as people were predicting on day one.
They had $95 million in outflows.
I don't know if either of you saw updated numbers.
Actually, it's probably too early.
But I just wondered, do you feel even with their high fee of 1.5% that there's still somebody who's competitive
simply because of their liquidity?
Or like, how are you thinking about that competition with them in particular?
I mean, Grayskill is an OG in the space.
You know, you can't fly out of Newark or JFK without seeing their ads.
And that's a pretty large asset pool.
So, you know, they may not compete with on new incremental flows into this current Bitcoin
ETF, but I'm sure they've got some things up their sleeves.
And like to Matt's point, all of the crypto specialists,
who made it through this bare market are going to make it by definition.
So there's going to be more than one product here with a billion would be my guess.
There may be more than one with more than 10 billion.
You know, if the price goes up, especially, we're all going to be fine.
Yeah, I think that's right.
I would just add, yeah, Grayscale has, you know, exceptional professionals running it.
They're going to do just fine.
They have a huge advantage and they are crypto OG.
And, you know, all of us who brought Bitcoin ETFs to market owe them a debt.
for challenging the SEC, and I'm very thankful for their leadership.
Now, their parent company also has some debts that need to get sorted.
Yes, which, yeah, that's a big question mark.
But both are you sides up my question?
Because I did ask, how do you think about competing with them?
We both probably have Do Not Disparage in our kind of social media guidelines.
So, yeah, it'll be hard to get us to kind of talk specifically to anyone competitor.
Okay.
Well, one question, maybe this is like another, frankly, for me, this is just a very interesting thought experiment because Eric Maltunas talked about how he felt they were in a really difficult position because here they were. They, you know, had $27 billion in assets under management out of the gate. They were making this very rich 2% fee off of that. And, you know, he felt they were in quote, quote, a bind. And that's why they just dropped to 1.5. And, you know, James Seifert, his.
you know, counterpart of Bloomberg Intelligence had a theory that Grayskill would just launch a cheaper
version of the same product because he noted that they have the rights to the ticker BTC.
So, you know, if you had been in Grayscale shoes, I'm just wondering, is there anything
you would have done differently or I'm just curious?
I mean, I think that's a classic strategy from the ETF playbook.
It was created by iShares, which had a high-priced emerging markets ETF.
and launched a low priced version of it
so it could keep the assets and the high priced
even as it competed for new assets in the new version.
So that is a tried and true strategy.
It's a reasonable and viable strategy.
You know, I think there's been a huge amount of price compression
thanks to the fee war that you referenced
amongst the 11 that launched.
So that is a difficult path to run.
But, you know, a bind is probably not the right word
for starting a giant race with a $26 billion headstart.
If that's a bind, it's not a bad one.
So I think they had a challenging question to solve,
and they solved it in this way,
and they're a large player in the market,
and I think there'll be a large player in the market for a while.
Yeah, I guess their strategy was vindicated
if the outflows were only $95 million on day one.
Well, yeah, we'll see how that shakes out.
I mean, I'll break my own rule since it's after five on a Friday,
And after their fee drop came out, we had a phone call from a top-page shareholder at GBTC.
And I mean, there's no doubt that the existing shareholders, this was an additional incentive to move.
And I think you'll see some outflows from that that far exceed the $94 million.
And like both of us on this call, they're going to pick up some of that would be my guess.
That's certainly right.
Remember, look over weeks, not over individual days.
Right.
Okay.
Yeah.
So I will definitely be on the watch for that because, you know, they've just been, like,
their story is so fascinating.
Somebody, not me, because I'm supposed to be writing a book, should write a big article
about Grayscale because obviously they were the ones who, you know, made this moment happen.
But then, yeah, I think a lot of their own investors probably feel a little bit burned in
multiple different ways. I do have one question, actually, just for Matthew, about the Hodel ticker.
I mean, this goes back to the earlier conversation about the, you know, trying to be part of the
community and have that, the lingo down. But how did you guys decide on that ticker?
Jan loves the meme and wanted the ticker.
Jan Vanek, the CEO.
Excuse me, CEO, owner of the firm. So, you know, Matt referenced earlier, being a private company, we have a lot of flexibility. And it's a great privilege to work for, you know, private company with one guy with this much conviction. So, you know, if we want something and there's a case for it, it gets done.
Well, that is a great story just to know that he was the one who, did he come up with it or did he just choose amongst a list in to,
is that? So we've launched, you know, 100 plus ETFs and the name, picking a name is, is,
I haven't been involved in that many of them, but picking a name is one of the fun parts. There's
always a group email chain and there's, you know, a whole algorithm of what is available,
what may be available, what isn't available. And, and everyone chimes in. I'm sure, Matt, you've,
you've gone through that as well. So Hodel, we made it happen. And then, so, you know, as we've
discuss, you were kind of positioning yourself one way. And then Matt, Eric Palchita's described
you guys as trying to position yourself as the vanguard of the crypto investing world. And I did notice
on the first day of trading, you tweeted that BitB was, quote, the lowest cost Bitcoin ETF in
America. So would you agree that that's how you're trying to position yourself? And if so, you know,
is it literally just about always being one of the cheapest? Or how does that become a profitable
strategy. The Vanguard of Crypto took on different meeting over the last couple of days. So I'm not sure.
I think I want to disassociate from that if that's okay. Look, we think for simple products,
costs really matter for investors. And this is a simple product that buys Bitcoin and puts it
in an institutional custodian. And so providing value to investors is something that we think about
very seriously. And when we were designing the product, that was first and foremost in our mind.
right our core value is what would the customer want and uh they would want a low cost
etf in this sense but where bitwise sits it's a crypto specialist that serves financial advisors
and financial professionals uh and helps them gain exposure to this new asset class that's what we've
been doing for seven years we we created the first crypto index fund we've had a lot of other
first the first defy fund the first nfti fund i believe uh in the u s and uh and in this case this was the best
vehicle to provide. So, you know, it feels to me like each of you are positioning ourselves
slightly differently to attract slightly different investors. So just talk a little bit about that long
game plan. Like, you know, at a certain, so we're at this moment in time where for sure we can say
the cryptic community is still quite small. And even though it's obviously a lot bigger than it was
when all of us got into the space, we're already starting to see a little bit of differentiation.
But I imagine, you know, a year from now, two years from now, it's going to be even bigger.
So who are you, how are you thinking about who is going to start investing here?
And, you know, how are you thinking about how you're going to appeal to whatever segment you're choosing?
Yeah, I mean, I'd start with the ETF.
One of the beautiful things about ETFs is that they can be owned by individuals and pension funds, the same exact fund.
That's one of the beautiful things.
Like, I own the same equity ETF as Millennium Management, one of the most sophisticated hedge funds.
because ETFs deliver institutional pricing for everyday investors.
That's essentially how to think of an ETF.
It's an institutional price.
It's the price that the largest investors in the world would pay available to my uncle.
And from that perspective, our ETF can be used by a variety of people, by retail investors, by traders, by hedge funds, etc.
But the focus of Bitwise is on financial advisors and RAs, family offices and institutions,
That's who we're architected to serve, and that's who we primarily serve.
But the beauty of a low-cost ETF is it can serve anyone and everyone, and we're seeing
all different sizes of flows into our product.
I mean, it's a very similar answer, right?
You're talking to pretty much to direct competitors going after similar parts of the market.
You know, the difference is that we see ourselves as a macro-thematic shop that's trying to
consistently bring new products to market in a range of asset classes. And given the firm's
DNA as a gold mining manager and, you know, and adherent to kind of hard money Austrian
economics, it just so happens that right now on a portfolio basis of the 90 billion,
there's a lot of those assets in resources and emerging markets. And we see digital
assets as the next evolution, really, of emerging markets. That's where the penetration is rising,
you know, the fastest. And the clients, you know, with whom that kind of macro message resonates,
they've been with us for decades. And, you know, we're going to be able to offer them solutions
in this new asset class. You know, personally, a lot of my time is focused on the other coins
besides just Bitcoin and trying to figure out, you know, which tokens have,
the best chance of returning value back to the holders and building a sustainable platform
that can take market share. And, you know, there's a hundred plus of these tokens to look at.
So, you know, my day to day is more around digging into those business models and trying to come up
with the KPIs, the indicators that are going to predict success and get to know who these new
customers are going to be. So, yeah. Well, one of the keys, I believe, is the financial advisors
in the U.S. who control, I think, maybe $64 trillion. This is the stat I got from Statista.
This is a hard number to track down. So hopefully that is somewhat reliable. But how are you
approaching those kinds of conversations? And what are those conversations like? Are they savvy about
this, completely clueless? You know, are they listening to?
the likes of, you know, Vanguard and, you know, these other players that are disparaging Bitcoin? Or,
you know, what are you seeing in terms of reception? I mean, it's, there's interest, but many of
these advisors, and the number that I have is closer to 30 trillion. Whatever number you use,
it's still a very, very large number. A lot of them are on platforms that have not yet approved
these products. And they need some kind of air support in the form of,
allocation models that include Bitcoin and digital assets.
And that's where kind of a conversation around UBS as an example, like we can see that
the work is getting done on those models.
And there will soon be a framework that gives the advisor community the ability to start
buy a Bitcoin ETF and put it in a client portfolio without necessarily asking the client's
permission, as long as the client has kind of seen the body of work that goes into these asset
allocation models. That's going to be really, I think, the tipping point for when the passive
flows from the advisor community can really start to turn on. And optimistic that that's going to
happen. We've done a couple, like hundreds of meetings in the space, educating the advisors
and their platforms about how these products are architected and what the investment case is.
And it's a very willing audience, extremely willing audience.
It's just mechanically, they can lose their jobs for putting their clients into this previously.
And now we're at a point with these products where they may not.
Yeah.
And I would just add maybe to give people context on what to expect.
You know, we've been serving this community for seven years.
So we've seen a familiar format.
And there is a timeline that happens.
What the timeline is, is you meet an advisor because they have some level of interest,
and you spend six months educating them on crypto over the course of multiple meetings.
And then they allocate in their personal account and watch it for a little bit.
And then they allocate for one or two clients who've asked them specifically about crypto.
And then eventually they allocate across all of their clients at a very small percentage,
often below 1%, and then over time, that graduates to be 1%, 2.5%, or 5%.
Now, not all advisors go through that journey, but many of them do, but that is a multiple year journey.
And so if you think about where we were before ETFs, there was only a small sub-segment
of that $30 trillion that could even go through that journey.
Now, there's huge interest, right?
People want to learn.
But there's only a small segment that could go through that journey, but they were.
that's how we built a billion dollar asset manager at bitwise.
Now, everyone can go through that journey.
And what that means for flows is you're going to see the flows from this audience build over time
and eventually be very substantial.
You know, how substantial, I think these ETFs that maturity could be taking in, you know,
$10 billion a year in flows, which is really a substantial amount.
To put that in context, the next having is going to reduce supply by $7 billion a year.
So it's like more than a halving every year of supply demand imbalance.
But you're going to have to see them all go through this lengthy journey from education to testing to a few clients to many clients to upleveling the portfolio.
And that'll take it'll take more than a year for sure.
It might take two.
And are either of you seeing that attitude that we discussed earlier like the Gary Gensler, you know, Trot-Fi kind of attitude?
or are they just, you know, open but not informed?
You know, they're a diverse bunch.
So people have different attitudes.
For sure, there are people who want to hear and who don't want to hear.
But to give you an anecdote, I was fortunate enough to write the CFA Institute's first ever
guide to Bitcoin, blockchain, and crypto.
CFA Institute is like a community of people who take extra tests to prove they're smart about
analyzing the world.
And it's the most downloaded research document that they've ever produced.
or at least it was last time I've checked.
Yeah, I think it's chartered financial analyst or something.
That's right.
There's huge demand.
Do some of them have Gary Gensler's attitude or Warren Buffett's attitude or Charlie Munger's attitude?
Of course.
But some of them are also very open and most of them are curious.
At the end of the day, what they are mostly is entrepreneurs looking to build their business.
So if their customers want it, they will figure out a way to do it.
That is actually really the catalyst.
list and the customers are going to want it.
Crypto is very popular.
On X, somebody asked at what point there would be a Bitcoin supply shock?
Do you, Matthew, I saw you responded that you have done math on that.
If you could give us your answer, but also explain what a supply shock is.
Yeah.
I mean, I think that that person was referring to like, if the Bitcoin ETF flows exceed
expectations, won't there just be no supply and the price could go parabolic and like at what
price might that happen. That's kind of how I read that question. So, you know, some of the math
behind that we kind of got into, which is that there was a billion dollars in crypto ETF flows in
November and December each and, well, combined with the micro strategy purchases. And that's 100%
of new of new Bitcoin issuance taken up just with ETS. Now, the point, I think the great question
is, when do sellers come out and sell into that? And, you know, maybe we,
some of that just yesterday morning with the price at 49K. But there's two indicators that we can look at
on the blockchain to get a sense. And one is the profits earned by short-term holders in aggregate.
You may have heard of this MV-R-V market value to realized value ratio. And you can look at it
for short-term holders, those who've held Bitcoin for less than half a year. And then you look at it
for long-term holders. And the series are really interesting. For the short-term holders,
when the aggregate gain gets to be about 1.2, so 20%, then you tend to see profit-taking.
And that's exactly the level that we hit in early January, coincident with the launch of these
ETFs. And what's happened so far? Well, a little bit of sell the news, not too much.
I think the bigger question is on a long-term basis.
If you look at that market value to realize value on a long-term basis,
usually the sellers don't materialize until the ratio is 10x.
So the 10-bagger meme is totally real.
People hold on for those types of returns.
And then once they get a 10-bagger, they take profits.
And we are nowhere near that point on the long-term holder ratio.
So, you know, our view is that this bull cycle is very much ahead of us, that the November and
December rally was as much about the weaker dollar as it was about those ETF flows.
And there were so many macro contributors to that weak dollar narrative with the BRICS group expanding,
like five more countries joined the BRICS.
You had Nigeria reversing its previous bank ban.
banks weren't allowed to do business with crypto companies. Now they are. You had the Saudi
cleric who acknowledged that Bitcoin was permissible in this new declaration. And then the Argentina
momentum where Bitcoin is, for all intents and purposes, like legal for contract settlement.
And we think that they're going to become the fifth country to start mining Bitcoin for
their own reserves, the head of the largest private oil and gas company in Argentina,
which has been mining Bitcoin, he just moved to YPF, which is the state-owned company.
So it looks like they're going to join the party here.
So I think on the short-term basis, we were at the level where people were primed to sell
into further strength.
But for the long-term holders who now make up a record share of all Bitcoin north of 70%,
they're holding on for the 10-bagger, and they're a long way from that.
So this year looks like a solid year.
We think Bitcoin will make all-time high in Q4.
Like after a contentious election, a record number of global citizens are voting in elections this year.
More than nearly 50%.
It's an all-time high, 200 years of history.
With these elections comes a lot of opportunity for change, disruption, and more kind of pro-Bitcoin policies.
Interesting.
All right. So here we have the first two days of trading, obviously the end of one long journey and now the start of another. And I just wanted to ask you, you know, at this point, there are probably certain questions that are still in your head about how this is all going to play out. So I was curious to see what it is that you're kind of watching or looking out for going forward.
I'm really watching the ETH-BTC pair, which, you know, East has been a pretty notable underperformer in November and December.
And just in the last few days, we've had this big mean reversion.
I think people are kind of looking forward to whether they'll be an Ethereum spot ETS in the U.S.
And maybe that would be the next narrative for the market.
But that performance dispersion between BTC and ETH had gotten really extreme.
There's so many catalysts for Ethereum with the fork later this quarter that should make
transaction costs much cheaper for L2s.
So encouraged to see ETH bouncing here.
And I think that's one of the big question marks for the first half of the year for some of us
crypto PMs.
Wow. I love that. Also very bullish for ETH. I think people really underestimate the long-term impact of EIP 4844. I think it's transformational and is going to lead to sort of a massive Cambrian explosion of new apps and uses that is going to be wonderful to see. So I'm very bullish about ETH. I think it's been squeezed narratively and now it's becoming unleashed. My big question right now is how are advisors going to react?
I've spent the last two days on media and podcasts and haven't had a chance to talk about these Bitcoin ETFs, which for what it's worth, for regulatory reasons, you can't sell ETFs before they exist.
So it's not like we were having conversations about BitB last week. Those conversations start now. And next week, there are tens or maybe hundreds of billions of dollars of wealth that I'm meeting with in my calendar. I was just looking, an incredible set of meetings.
And I'm really excited to see how this ETF resonates with that group.
I think by the end of next week, I'll have a real feel on whether they're likely to come in very soon or whether it will take months or years.
So I'm also very excited for the weekend and relaxing, but I'm excited for next week to tackle that as well.
All right.
Yeah.
Well, you know what, you guys?
It's 5.45 p.m. Eastern on a Friday.
and this has been an amazing conversation,
and I thank you so much for doing this at the end of what I'm sure has been a long few weeks for you.
Before we go, where can people learn more about each of you and your work?
You can find me on Twitter X Matthew underscore SIGEL,
and I use a recovering CFA in my handle so, Matt, we can talk further about CFA at some point.
There's more to say on that topic.
I'm sure there is. I'm also on X Twitter, Matt underscore Hogan, which is H-O-U-G-A-N, or Bitwise investments or BitB-E-E-T-F.
You can find us there, too.
Perfect. Well, it's been a pleasure having you both on Unchained.
Thanks, Laura.
Thanks so much for joining us today to learn more about Matt, Matthew, and the launch of the spot Bitcoin ETFs.
Check out the show notes for this episode. Unchained is produced by me, Laura Shin, with all
from Kevin Fuchs, Matt Pilcher, Juan Aranovich, Megan Gavis, Nelson Wong, Shashank, and Marka Curia.
Thanks for listening.
Unchained is now a part of the Coin Desk Podcast Network.
For the latest in digital assets, check out markets daily, five days a week, with host
Noel Atreson.
Follow the Coin Desk Podcast Network for some of the best shows in crypto.
