Unchained - Unconfirmed: Was Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Entitled to a Meeting With the SEC? - Ep.271
Episode Date: September 10, 2021Ephrat Livni, a DealBook business and policy reporter at the New York Times, discusses Coinbase’s fight with the SEC over its Lend product and El Salvador’s adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender. Sh...ow highlights: why Coinbase is unhappy with what it calls the SEC’s “sketchy” behavior how Coinbase’s Lend product is structured and why it might be a security why Ephrat considers Coinbase’s reaction to the SEC’s decision on Lend to be “trolling” what we can learn from SEC chair Gary Gensler’s letters with Senator Elizabeth Warren what legal precedence the SEC is leaning on in its decision about Lend how to explain the SEC’s choice to not meet with Coinbase in Washington why Ephrat thinks Brian Armstrong sounds entitled Why even pro-Bitcoin groups in the US take issue with El Salvador’s adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender why Ephrat thinks Bitcoin is not a practical payment mechanism for El Salvadorans how El Salvadorans have reacted to the law why Ephrat believes El Salvador’s mandate to accept BTC is philosophically problematic for Bitcoiners Thank you to our sponsors! Crypto.com: https://crypto.onelink.me/J9Lg/unconfirmedcardearnfeb2021 Digital Asset Research: https://digitalassetresearch.com Sorare: https://sorare.com Episode Links Ephrat Livni Twitter: https://twitter.com/el72champs New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/by/ephrat-livni Coinbase Brian Armstrong tweet thread: https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/1409555338836078592 Coinbase blog: https://blog.coinbase.com/the-sec-has-told-us-it-wants-to-sue-us-over-lend-we-have-no-idea-why-a3a1b6507009 Coinbase Lend: https://www.coinbase.com/lend Howey and Reves test: https://securities-law-blog.com/2014/11/25/what-is-a-security-the-howey-test-and-reves-test/ Bitcoin and El Salvador CoinDesk coverage: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/09/07/as-el-salvador-enacts-bitcoin-law-locals-remain-confused-about-implementation/ Wall Street Journal coverage: https://www.wsj.com/articles/bitcoin-comes-to-el-salvador-first-country-to-adopt-crypto-as-national-currency-11631005200 CNN coverage: https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/06/business/bitcoin-price-el-salvador-intl-hnk/index.html CBS coverage: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bitcoin-el-salvador-legal-currency/#:~:text=As%20legal%20tender%20in%20El,subject%20to%20capital%20gains%20tax. Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/technology/it-guy-in-chief-president-tries-fix-el-salvadors-bitcoin-woes-2021-09-08/ Jerry Brito’s opinion: https://twitter.com/jerrybrito/status/1405660809024393221 Survey results: https://www.reuters.com/technology/majority-salvadorans-do-not-want-bitcoin-poll-shows-2021-09-02/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, all, before we begin, two quick announcements.
First, the Unchained Survey is out now, and I'd so appreciate it if you could give us your thoughts
and how Unchained is doing and what we could do better.
Plus, I've got some questions for you about my upcoming book launch and the articles that I'm
already starting to write.
Two lucky survey respondents will receive a BTC candle, which is scented with Satoshi
Wood, Musk, Musk, Tulip bulbs, and Finite Minerals.
Head to SurveyMonkey.com slash R slash Unchained 2021 to fill out the surveyors
made today. Again, that's surveymonkey.com slash R slash unchained 2021.
Second, I'm excited to announce that I'm now writing a Facebook bulletin newsletter,
joining the likes of Malcolm Gladwell, Malala Yousafzai, and Adam Grant, among others.
This is different from the daily email, which is mostly links out to news and recommended
reads and a brief summary of usually one news item. The Facebook newsletter will contain news
and feature articles by me. My first post is already up and out there, and every Friday you will also
find the text and links to the weekly news recap at the end of every Unconfirmed.
Please subscribe to laura shinn.b bulletin.com. Again, you can sign up for my Facebook
bulletin newsletter at laura shinn.b bulletin.com. And now on to the show. Hi, everyone. Welcome to
Unconfirmed, the show that reveals how the marquee names on crypto are reacting to the
week's top headlines and gets the insight scoop on what they see on the horizon. I'm your host,
Laura Shin, a journalist with over two decades of experience. I started coming crypto six years ago,
and as a senior editor at Forbes was the first mainstream meter reporter to cover cryptocurrency full-time.
This is the September 10th, 2021 episode of Unconfirmed.
The crypto.com app pays you up to 8.5% interest on your Bitcoin.
Get $25 when you download the crypto.com app with code Laura.
The link is in the description.
Looking for NFTs that are useful and fun? Try So Rare.
The largest NFT-based fantasy game. You can collect, trade, and compete with officially licensed
digital cards of soccer players from over 160 clubs on SoRare.
That's S-O-R-A-R-E.com.
Looking for crypto market data that meets institutional standards,
digital asset research delivers curated and vetted crypto market data.
Get crypto pricing and verified volume data,
crypto-asset reference data, and token and blockchain event tracking.
Learn more at digitalassetresearch.com.
Today's guest is Ifrat Livni.
a deal book business and policy reporter at the New York Times. Welcome, Efraud. Hi, thanks for having me.
This was a big week in crypto news, both on a global stage and here in the U.S. Let's start talking
about the conflict between Coinbase and the SEC, which began with a tweet storm by Coinbase CEO Brian
Armstrong and a blog post by the chief legal officer Paul Gruel. What did they say?
What did they say? They were unhappy because, so,
Coinbase has a product that is sort of like a somewhat resembles a bank account and
it would allow people to get a high yield, like high interest on their deposits.
And they asked the SEC for, they told the SEC they were planning to like release this.
And that SEC said it could generate litigation.
And Coinbase, which likes to say that it really, really wants to follow the rules, got mad and
started trolling a regulatory agency online.
And when you when you say trolling, you know, what I mean is that they, that they did go,
so Coinbase went to the SEC, they asked, they introduced their product, they asked how
would the agency respond to the product.
The agency said this could run a foul of securities laws.
And then Coinbase's response was to go on Twitter and to post on their own blog.
their estimation that it was their product is not a security and also to the chief executive in his
Twitter's red had a lot to say about how the agency's behavior was sketchy and he had questions
about the chairman and it seemed it was arguably it was arguably trolling a regulatory agency on social
media. Yeah, one thing I would say is when Brian introduced his thread as saying that he was going to
describe sketchy behavior, he did go on to talk about how when he went to D.C., he tried to talk to a number
of regulators and the SEC was the only one that refused to meet with him. And that when the SEC
told them that the agency felt that their lends product was the security, that it would not give clarity
into the reasoning. And so I think that was, you know, what he was describing as sketchy.
But let's dive into this lent product. How is that product structured and how does that
compare to traditional securities or lending products?
Well, so I think there's a whole, one of the questions I think right now is that it's not,
nothing is actually finally settled. And the products are new and they raise new questions.
and all of the law is about characterization and categorization.
So on the one hand, Coinbase's argument was like, this is not at all like a security.
How is lending like a security?
It's like a bank account.
Well, okay, you don't want to be an investment vehicle.
You want to be a bank, but a bank would be highly, highly regulated.
They would have a lot of different demands if Coinbase was running right from a regulatory
perspective, there would be a lot of demands if Coinbase was running a bank in terms of like
risks and guarantees and reserves and all kinds of things. And so while it is true that the SEC has not
made necessarily made it very clear, and a lot of this stuff is popping up relatively quickly.
So, and government does not operate. Rulemaking does not happen quickly by necessity. And people
would not be happy if it did. And so, so there is a space right now.
where I feel like there are a bunch of products that straddle lines and they haven't been characterized.
And businesses sometimes advance one characterization in one context because it's useful.
And so Coinbase did talk about its lend product like a bank account, like an account, like an account.
I'm not totally sure if it would want to be talking to banking regulators instead of the SEC.
You know, because it's not clear yet. It's not clear. And it's not entirely clear where they, how the ecosystem will evolve and develop and who should be in charge of all these things.
Yeah, I actually reached out to a few different crypto lawyers and hilariously I got really different answers.
There were some who felt it was definitely security. There were others who felt that it was not. And or or rather that the law was so unclear that it, that it, that, that,
it was it was not something that could be determined at this moment.
And I think the cases that they were citing was the Howie case, which most listeners of mine will know,
because that was what was applied during the ICO period.
And that has the four prongs in an investment contract in a common enterprise with an expectation of profits,
dependent on a third party.
And then there was a new one that I haven't heard of or hadn't heard of before called Reeves,
which had to do with notes.
And I think I did see another lawyer maybe bringing up one other one.
I didn't talk to that person.
But the point is, like, I think, you know, as we've been saying,
it's not totally clear.
And obviously maybe Coinbase has one set of arguments and the SEC has another.
So what do you think that this whole, I guess, conflict says about how the SEC is going
to regulate crypto lending going forward?
So I think we, honestly, I just don't think we know or they know or anything else.
I mean, I'm certain that they know more than I do, yeah, about what they're going to do.
But my sense from some of the statements, so there was an exchange between SEC chair, Gary Gensler and Senator Elizabeth Warren over the summer, an exchange of letters.
There was like a lot of discussion about all kinds of products, including lending and borrowing.
there was a call for more authority, like Gensler said,
we need more authority from Congress to regulate.
Now, what specifically, like, what more do they need?
I mean, to me, that indicates that there's a recognition,
that there are products or developments that are not currently covered under the law
as it is written.
And that to some degree, for example, the argument that Coinbase made
that, like, these old laws don't fit or whatever,
maybe they're right. Maybe the old laws don't fit. Maybe new laws have to be written. I mean,
that's also one of the big debates. Like, do we fit everything into how things are or do new tools need
new rules? I mean, everything is unsettled. From a legal perspective, it's, to me, it strikes me as
very early to make any determination. And I think Coinbase is trying to win the popular fight.
You know, like that they're making the argument online because otherwise,
why are we going to, we're not going to go around debating securities law, unless they make into a topic that we want to debate because, you know.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And given that Gensler did ask for this extra authority to regulate this area, I do think that, you know, maybe there is merit to this idea that the law is not clear on what the Lent product is.
but I did wonder then for this alleged behavior of the SEC that, you know, was like what Brian called sketchy, but, you know, whatever, you know, to whatever extent it was, you know, sketchy or whatever you want to call it, their refusal to meet Coinbase or whatever. What do you think that says? Like, do you think it says that perhaps the SEC is kind of working things out and just not ready to say something? Or do you think that they're, yeah, just waiting for more.
authority or what do you think is going on there?
I think there are two different views of whether, like how to interpret whether or not
a government official will meet with a business person.
And there is a view that the business community would no doubt take that business and
government must work together and it is, you know, and that the government should open its
doors to business people who want to discuss and communicate.
Well, that's one view.
There's also a view that government must.
have a certain dignified distance from industry in order to create rules that are, because government
is not just there to promote industry, it is also there to protect consumers and facilitate
societies. You know, like they're not just there for the advancement of innovation. And so I,
I don't actually think it's that problematic. I think there is a view of the SEC saying, no, we're not
talking to crypto companies, that's very honorable.
That doesn't mean it's not honorable to talk if they were going to engage,
and they do engage on specific issues, you know, that's also fine.
But I don't think that the arrival of the chief executive from California,
the first cryptocurrency company, frankly, some of the language in his thread showed,
some of the language in Armstrong's thread showed a sense of entitlement about what the government might owe that I don't know if it's shared by all Americans.
I don't know that all Americans feel that the cryptocurrency industry is owed or deserves anything in particular.
Should they be treated fairly?
Sure.
But it's, I found it unseemly.
Frank, I'm sorry to say.
Brian's tweet storm, you mean?
Yes, but I'm in, I'm in Washington, D.C.
I, you know, so it's hard.
So obviously I love it.
Like, you know what I mean?
I'm all by government.
But I do, I think that there are two views.
And I don't think it's necessarily problematic for the SEC to take a step and say, like,
at this time, we are not necessarily engaging in this way.
Okay.
And just a quick wrap, wrap up.
this before we move on to the next topic, what are Coinbase's options going forward?
Or do you have any insight into what it'll do next?
In terms of what?
In terms of lend?
Yeah.
So they declined to speak to me about it.
So I don't know what their plans are.
And I can't imagine.
I cannot imagine.
I can't.
I will not speculate on what their plans are.
Okay.
Well, in a moment, we are going to switch gears and talk about El Salvador because that was also huge news, but first a quick word from the sponsors who make this show possible.
With over 10 million users, crypto.com is the easiest place to buy and sell over 90 cryptocurrencies.
Grow your crypto with crypto.com earn, which pays up to 8.5% interest on your Bitcoin and 14% interest on your stable coins.
When it's time to spend your crypto, nothing beats the crypto.com visa card.
which pays you up to 8% back instantly and gives you 100% rebates for your Netflix, Spotify, and Amazon Prime subscriptions.
Download the crypto.com app now and get $25 by using the code Laura.
The link is in the description.
Does your firm need rigorously vetted crypto market data that's aligned with the latest regulatory standards?
Since 2017, digital asset research has delivered high-quality crypto data to institutional clients like Futsi Russell,
and Bloomberg.
Digital Asset Research offers clean crypto asset prices and verifiable volume data that's
calculated from highly vetted sources, crypto asset reference data, and an events calendar
that tracks token and blockchain events like hard forks, soft forks, and client and application updates.
Crypto data from digital asset research is available through refinative or directly at
Digitalassetresearch.com.
Back to my conversation with Efrat Livni.
So let's turn to the other big news of the week, El Salvador and Bitcoin. Tell us what happened there.
So a Central American nation adopted Bitcoin as legal tender. And so that's the first country in the world to adopt Bitcoin as a currency. So they're adding Bitcoin to the dollar, which is they adopted in 2001. And it was arguably a history.
day for, I mean, certainly a historic day for cryptocurrency, right? I mean, I would say so.
And I think it was a thing, you know, what, there were, there's a lot of debate about the,
the merits of the, of the adoption and the process of adoption. But there's, I think, little
question that it was a big day for Bitcoin. It was like a big event for a country to adopt this
project. Yeah. So talk a little bit about kind of the question.
questions it raised or the controversy around it, what were some of those issues?
So one, I think we could start with the way that the adoption was announced.
So it was announced by the president, Naibu Kelle, in a Bitcoin conference.
So a recorded announcement in a Bitcoin conference in Miami in English.
So the people of El Salvador heard about it.
second, it was passed very quickly thereafter with minimal debate.
While the little bit of debate was happening in Congress, Buckele was on a social media chat
with American Bitcoin enthusiasts.
And the reason I raised that is that there is something, the project is being advanced
as a project for financial inclusion.
And the vast majority of Salvadorans do not have bank accounts.
And it is true that arguably, like a mobile phone-based financial system could improve the economic life of some Salvadorans.
But there is a question about the way Buckele moved on this and also, like, his motivations are, it's, who is he wooing?
Like, it could be great for El Salvador.
door. But there are reasons to be wary. And so when you say it could be great, what are some of the,
I guess, the pros of having adopted Bitcoin as legal tender? So arguably, if you see Bitcoin not as,
if you don't think about, because Bitcoin is not a practical payment mechanism, right? It's, it's volatile.
It's like, it's almost everything you don't want in a currency for, for daily use. Yeah?
And so, but if you see Bitcoin as a, like a stand-in for blockchain, like let's say we talk about Bitcoin because that's what we know.
But what we mean is that a whole financial system exists on the blockchain where people are able to just arguably like the Lenn product and things like that where there are accounts, where you can borrow crypto, like you can borrow money based on your crypto.
and you don't need the credit checks and you don't need the same interaction with institutions.
Theoretically, this is, I mean, that's the promise of crypto theoretically is that it, you know,
it brings billions into the financial, into a alternate financial system.
So, but how did the El Salvadoran people react to the adoption of Bitcoin as legal currency?
So it is my understanding that it was.
was there's, you know, I mean, there's a range.
There's a range, surely, yeah.
But there, but there were protests.
A part of the protests, I think, so the, in conjunction with the protests about Bitcoin,
people were also protesting the passage of a bunch of laws about whether, you know,
how quickly you, that you can fire prosecutors and judges over age 60.
And so that law, which is more recent than the Bitcoin law,
was also passed very quickly and with minimal debate.
And so I think in the eyes of people who are worried about Buckele,
these actions indicate that whatever he's saying about economic liberation
or any other kind of liberation, he's arguably autocratic.
So there are protests.
They're not aimed solely at Bitcoin.
In terms of the general population, I think, based on the poll,
in the national newspaper, people are not that interested.
The vast majority of people said they would not want to transact in Bitcoin.
Like it's something like three quarters.
Yeah.
Yeah, I saw the same poll.
So, yeah, one other issue was I did see some pro-Bitcoin groups in the U.S.
protesting what is called Article 7 in the Salvadoran law, which says, quote,
every economic agent must accept Bitcoin as payment when offered to him by whoever acquires a good or service.
So was for the protests, which I know you said had also do with this other law, but was that part of the reason they were protesting?
Or like what were their reasons for protesting Bitcoin?
I think their reasons are more general.
It's a more generalized.
But there are a couple of problems with the with the Bitcoin law from the perspective.
of even Bitcoin enthusiasts in the United States.
And so it is this mandate.
Now, number one, you have a government, you have a payment mechanism that was designed
to operate outside the total government control of money being co-opted by a government
and then mandated.
And that is why the Article 7 thing is like a double frustration for Bitcoin fans.
It's like not only did the government take a money that was supposed to be outside of government, which, you know, you can argue whatever.
There are arguments either way, but they adopt this non-governmental decentralized money as money that the government recognizes and then mandates its use when it was designed for choice.
And it's very problematic philosophically for Bitcoin.
Like people are cheering this movement on, but the mode in which it's a mode in which it's,
happening is undermining the very reason for Bitcoin's being. It's complicated, right? I mean,
it's... Yeah, I know. One of the people that I saw tweeting about that, and he wrote an article on
this in CoinDesk, is Jerry Brito, who's the head of Coin Center, which the whole reason,
you know, for Coin Center as being, is to advocate for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.
it here in the U.S. And so it was interesting that, you know, he really took objection to that.
So I spoke to him and one of the things that was really interesting was that he raised that
and he says this is like sort of moral philosophical problem. But then he's, he also was concerned.
He's like on a practical level. Like we are what is this is not really work yet as a payment
mechanism. So that is, you know, there, there are a lot of confidence.
in Americans going abroad and advocating for things that in societies that they may or may not
completely understand.
Yeah, I mean, I did see, yeah, some people who happen to be there now demonstrating how
they're paying for things at coffee shops and stuff using the Lightning Network.
So perhaps they've found the places where it's working out well.
But, yeah, so going forward, what developments or storylines are you going to be,
watching for in terms of, you know, what happens with Bitcoin and El Salvador?
So, well, there are a bunch of things. I mean, price volatility is interesting, right?
I mean, this now a country has taken on the risk of, you know, whatever, the same risk that
investors do at a totally different scale. So that's interesting. I mean, that's something to
follow. I think the extent to which this works or doesn't work, we'll be watching. You know what I mean?
We'll be watching. I don't think that there will be a determination of whether it's a success or failure
for quite some time. And maybe both arguments will be made simultaneously all the time, which on some level,
they are being made right now. Yes, yes. That's par for the course in pretty much all corners of the
world in the internet. Okay, well, this has been a great discussion. Thank you so much for coming on
Unconfirmed. Thank you. Thanks for having me. Bye, this one. Don't forget, next up is the
weekly news recap. Stick around for this week in crypto after this short break. Do you love sports
collectibles or fantasy sports? So Rare is blending this together to create an entirely new gaming
experience powered by its community. So Rare cards are officially licensed NFTs from over 160 clubs,
including Regal Madrid, Paris Saint-Germont, and Liverpool, and built on Ethereum.
You truly own your collectibles.
They are productive gaming assets that will generate rewards if you're a good fantasy player.
Join So Rare and connect with your favorite teams, live the game with passion, and earn weekly prizes.
Thanks for tuning in to this week's news recap.
First headline.
The SEC has begun investigating DFI-Stolwart Uniswap.
Uniswap Labs, the developer behind the biggest decentralized exchange,
UNISWAP is reportedly being investigated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Wall Street Journal initially broke in the news, citing sources familiar with the matter.
According to the report, the SEC is probing into how investors use the trading platform,
which has $6.5 billion in values locked, and how the exchange has marketed itself.
The regulator has not yet issued subpoenas and is only requesting that developers voluntarily
supply information. Jake Trevinsky, General Counsel at Compound Labs,
noted that the news, quote, shouldn't worry anyone too much yet.
An investigation is not an allegation of wrongdoing.
It's just how the SEC gathers information.
In addition to Uniswap, the SEC's division of enforcement has also sent letters to multiple
crypto startups in an effort to start understanding the crypto lending space.
That plus the SEC's wealth notice to Coinbase about its potential lend product could
indicate the regulator is setting its sites on lending.
Next headline. Bitcoin may have hit $39,000.
but the bull market is still intact. After staying above $50,000 for the 48 hours prior,
Bitcoin dropped 10% on Tuesday, its largest dipped since May. At one point, the digital currency
fell below $40,000 on the crypto exchange, Wobie, marking the low point for Bitcoin across
major exchanges during Tuesday morning's flash crash. Data from Coinbase shows the daily low for Bitcoin
bottoming out at $42,830, while Bitcoin plummeted down to $39,818.
on Whope. Bitcoin was far from the only crypto to experience a dip. The total cryptocurrency market
cap fell to a low of $1.95 trillion Tuesday, limiting $400 million or 17% between midnight and 10 a.m.
According to the bloc's Larry Sermak, starting at roughly 9.20 a.m., over $2.6 billion worth of
leveraged positions were liquidated in just one hour, with the primary culprit being in the
cryptocurrency trading platform by bit. Data from blockware intelligence shows that a total of
$3.22 billion in long liquidations cascated across the futures market on Tuesday, wiping out a
total of $4.4 billion in Bitcoin futures open interest. Notably, Bitcoin's supply held by both
strong hands and short-term investors increased during the dip, and exchange in flows and
Navlows remained somewhat steady. Based on the on-chain numbers, blockchain analyst Will Clemente concluded
the swipeout was almost completely fueled by an over-leverage in the system. He added,
broader market dynamics have only increased. The bull market is not over. Remember, we had 8 20% plus
pullbacks from March 2020 to March 2021. I don't see anything to be concerned about.
Speaking of a bull market, the British Banking Giant Standard Chartered released a crypto report on Tuesday,
revealing a very optimistic outlook for both Bitcoin and Ethereum. The bank values Bitcoin in the price
range of $50,000 to $175,000 in the long term and ether at a range of $26,000 to $35,000.
At current prices, standard chartered expects Bitcoin to 3x and ether to 10x. Next headline.
Ukraine becomes the latest country to legalize cryptocurrency.
On Wednesday, the Ukrainian Parliament passed a law that would legalize and regulate digital assets.
Previously, in Ukraine, cryptocurrencies existed in a legislative gray area,
as it was neither legal nor forbidden to own crypto assets within the country.
If signed by President Vladimir Zelensky, the law will protect crypto holders and exchange platforms from fraud.
In contrast to El Salvador, which made Bitcoin legal tender, virtual assets cannot be used as payment or exchange.
Instead, the bill allows crypto businesses to officially work in Ukraine and pay taxes.
Next headline. Lute, blute, more loot, and copycat oots proliferate.
On August 27th, Vine co-founder, Dom Hoffman, dropped a 7,778 piece NFT collection of randomized adventurer gear.
The NFTs, which Hoffman refers to as bags, each contain eight lines of text describing equipment or loot for a supposed adventurer.
From that string of text, the idea is for developers to develop games around the loot, interpreting and including the loot characteristics however they wish.
The bags were quickly snatched up and hoarded, with only 2400 accounts getting the initial mint.
At publishing time, Lute's price floor is eight ether, over $25,000.
Last Friday, for everyone who missed out on Lute 1.0, Dom dropped an additional 1.3 million
bags of loot in a project the community has dubbed more loot, which is free to mint minus the gas fees.
The project has a dynamic supply increasing in a tenth of Ethereum's block rate, allowing the
Lute Metaverse to expand with Ethereum if it sustains its current popularity.
Shortly after Lute's successful launch, Blute, or based loot, dropped a parody of the text-based
NFT collection. Instead of containing items like
Lights tier, heavy boots of protection,
Blute added a bit of color to its bags with items like the ERC 20
poor maxi skirt of rugging. Blue quickly
caught on and ranks as the seventh most popular NFT project over the
past week by volume. The loot copycats did not stop there.
On Saturday, two text-based NFT projects titled
the completely pointless
NFT collection, and
first, a collection of 5,000
algorithmically generated satirical
first-ever honorific NFTs
combined to raise over
390Eth, which is roughly
$1 million for charity,
thanks to the new NFT fad.
Next headline.
Sol leapfrogged two crypto-OGs this week.
After hitting $100 less than two weeks ago,
Solana's native token,
Sol has exploded above $200
marking an 80% gain over the past seven days. During Seoul's rapid ascent, the token leapfrogged
two crypto-oGs, Doge and XRP, and now sits as the sixth largest coin by market capitalization.
At a $60 billion market cap, Seoul is approximately a $9 billion or 13% increase away from passing
both USDT and B&B to move in a fourth place. Packing the top three, however, will be more difficult,
as Cardano's Ata token has a $20 billion market cap advantage, while Ethereum and Bitcoin
stand head and shoulders above the rest of the market at $400 billion and $850 billion respectively.
Next headline. FTX adds NFTs and Steph Curry to its ever-expanding repertoire.
On Monday, FTX launched a new NFT product that allows customers to mint directly onto the exchange.
According to CEO Sam Finkman-Fried, each NFT,
will be cross-chain compatible with both Ethereum and Solana.
For now, the NFTs can only be sold through the FTX marketplace,
through a withdrawal feature, which will be live in a few weeks.
FtX charges a hefty spread on its new product,
taking 5% from the buyer and 5% from the seller on each sale.
In related news, less than 24 hours after NBA superstar, Steph Curry, tweeted,
Just Getting Started in the Crypto Game, y'all got any advice?
FTX announced that Curry would be joining the exchange as a global ambassador.
Curry will be joining other sports stars including Tom Brady and Trevor Lawrence as FTX partners.
In related exchange news, Binance U.S. announced that Brian Schroeder, a former Ant Group and Uber exec, will take on the role of president.
Next headline. MasterCard bets big on blockchain analytics.
On Thursday, MasterCard announced its acquisition of Cipher Trace, a blockchain analyst.
analytics firms specializing in finding illicit transactions. Disclosure, CipherTracuse is a previous
sponsor of the show. With the purchase, MasterCard will now be able to track over 900 cryptocurrencies.
In a press release, Aja Bala, president of cyber and intelligence at MasterCard, said, quote,
with the rapid growth of the digital asset ecosystem comes the need to ensure it is trusted and safe.
Our aim is to build upon the complementary capabilities of MasterCard and CipherTrace to do just this.
The news comes a few months after MasterC said it would begin piloting the use of USCC as a bridge between crypto spenders and cash-lopping merchants.
MasterCard intents to let merchants accept crypto by year's end.
Next headline.
Former CFTC Commissioner Brian Quintens joins A16Z as advisor.
Brian Quintens, who spent his last day as a CFTC commissioner at the end of August, is joining the crypto wing of the VC firm A16Z.
During Brian's stint at the CFTC, spanning from 20.
2017 to August 2021, he was known for being pro-crypto, advocating for a light regulatory touch on the burgeoning industry.
In a blog post, Andresen Horowitz's general partner, Katie Hahn, wrote,
We are grateful that Brian is joining the team to help in our work of translating crypto for the policy community and translating policy for the crypto community.
Next headline. The Sevens NFT drop went off with quite a few hitches. The Sevens NFT collection, a much-anticipated Ethereum
NFT drop suffered a minting mishap that resulted in one user scoring 15% of the 7,000 NFTs,
while the rest of the community engaged in gas fee wars.
Essentially, Ethereum user 1Eath shop founded a vulnerability in the 7th smart contract,
allowing him to size-step the limiter mechanism and mint 1,000 NFTs using a minor extractable
value bribe.
According to a blog post from the 7s, 1Eth shop spent over 500 eath or well above $1 million
to pull off the maneuver.
However, as a fan of the Project One Eathshop has offered to return half of his NFTs to the
official marketplace for the Sevens team to redistribute as they see fit.
At publishing time, no decision has been made on how to distribute the recently returned
NFTs. In other NFT news, this time in reference to a more successful sale, a collection
of 101 Biotte Club NFTs sold for $24.39 million on 30,000.
Thursday in an auction at Sotheby's. That outperformed even the most optimistic estimates.
Sothebyes also sold a collection of 101 board ape kennel NFTs for $1.835 million.
All right, time for fun bits. You can walk a mile in Satoshi's shoes thanks to Adams.
Adams, a shoe company, has partnered with the Human Rights Foundation and Morgan Creek's Anthony
Popliano to release the model 00-0-0-Bitcoin-themed shoe. The stylish piece of four,
wears almost entirely black, with only a splash of orange depicting the Bitcoin logo on the
outside of the shoe, and 21 million printed on the sole. The bottom of the shoe is adorned with
We Are All Satoshi. According to the website, Adams started accepting BTC last year. A majority of the
profits will go to the Human Rights Foundation's Bitcoin Development Fund. The sneakers are available
for pre-order until September 29th. All right, thanks for tuning in. To learn more about FRAT,
Coinbase is tussled with SEC and El Salvador's adoption of Bitcoin.
Be sure to check out the links in the show notes.
Unconfirmed is produced by me, Laura Shin,
with help from Anthony Yoon, Mark Murdoch, and Daniel Ness.
Thanks for listening.
