Up First from NPR - Blanche Confirmation Hearing, US and Strait of Hormuz, ICE Vehicle Stops

Episode Date: July 15, 2026

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche will be on Capitol Hill today for his high-stakes confirmation hearing to lead the Justice Department permanently. President Trump has talked about the US fully controlling the Strait of Hormuz. But for the US military that means much more than imposing yet another blockade on the key waterway. The third fatal ICE shooting in a week is now prompting a policy shift at the agency. According to Senator Angus King, ICE will now suspend most vehicle stops during enforcement operations.Want more analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.Today’s episode of Up First was edited by Andrew Sussman, Anna Yukhananov, Alina Hartounian, Mohamad ElBardicy, Alice Woelfle, and Ziad Buchh.It was produced by Paige Waterhouse and Nia Dumas.Our director is Christopher Thomas.We get engineering support from Neisha Heinis. Our technical director is Carleigh Strange.And our Supervising Producer is Michael Lipkin.(0:00) Introduction(1:49) Blanche confirmation hearing(5:38) US and the Strait of Hormuz(9:32) ICE Vehicle stopsSee pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces a Senate confirmation hearing today. Democrats accuse him of weaponizing the Justice Department for President Trump. A few Republicans have concerns about his track record. Does Blanche have the numbers? I mean Martinez, that's Lela Fadl, and this is up first from NPR News. A deal between the U.S. and Iran was supposed to mean that the Strait of Hormuz is open for business. Now President Trump has ordered a blockade. He says the military will take control the water.

away, but is that possible without boots on the ground? And ICE is putting a temporary pause on most traffic stops after agents shot and killed two people in a week. Stay with us. We'll give you the news you need to start your day. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche will be on Capitol Hill today for his confirmation hearing to lead to Justice Department on a permanent basis. It is a high-stakes moment for Blanche, given that he has a narrow path to confirmation in the Senate, where Republicans have a razor-thin. majority. NPR justice correspondent, Ryan Lucas, is covering this. Ryan, should be a spicy one today. Yeah, I expect us to be a tense hearing today, and that's because in this second Trump administration,

the Justice Department has been in turmoil. It has been at the center of a number of political fires storms, and Blanche himself has been in the thick of all of it. He is seen as a Trump loyalist. He previously served as Trump's personal attorney. And then when Trump returned to office, he named Blanche to be the number two official at the Justice Department. Blanche then became acting attorney general in April after Trump pushed out his first attorney general, Pam Bondi. Trump has liked what he's seen from Blanche in the past couple months. He nominated him for the job full time. But Democrats, and it has to be said, a few Republicans, have concerns about Blanche's track record over the past 18 months at the department. And so I expect him to get tough questions

about that today. What do you think will be the focus of what the senators will try to grill him about? Well, like, Democrats have a whole bunch of issues that they're going to want to get into with Blanche. They say that he has destroyed the Justice Department's traditional independence from the White House. They say that he's made it subservient to the president, weaponized it to go after Trump's perceived political enemies. And there's a long list of Trump critics who have faced DOJ investigations or prosecutions, perhaps most notably former FBI director James Comey, who has been indicted twice by this Justice Department. Democrats also have questions about Blanche's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, whether the Justice Department and Blanche, specifically,

specifically did anything to try to shield President Trump from embarrassment in those files. And then there's the $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund that the department agreed to set up as part of a settlement with Trump to end his lawsuit against the IRS. Yeah, and that's the anti-weaponization fund that the Justice Department says is not going forward. That's right. The fund has been scrapped, yes. But the part of the settlement that shields Trump and his family from audits of past tax returns, that remains in place. And Democrats' views. that as exhibit A of what they say is Blanche working in Trump's interest instead of the public interest. It's also worth noting here that a federal judge this week blasted both Trump and

the Justice Department over the settlement. The judge said Trump's lawsuit was brought in bad faith in order to manipulate the judicial process and try to use the court to provide a degree of legitimacy to the eventual settlement. You know, right, I remember Republicans were opposed. There were some at least. So we're opposed to this anti-weaponization fund. Does that mean that Todd Blanche might be in trouble? Well, look, you're right. There were Republicans who pushed back forcefully against the anti-weaponation fund, and that played a big part in Blanche's decision to declare the fund dead. One Republican senator who spoke out against that fund was North Carolina's Tom Tillis. He is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee that Blanche is going to be appearing before today. It's unclear at this point which way Tillis will ultimately fall on Blanche's nomination. But what is clear is that Democrats are united in opposition and that means that Blanche doesn't have. a lot of room for air here. Remember, Republicans have a very slim majority in the Senate, even more so since Kentucky's Mitch McConnell remains out because of health issues. And so that means that only a

couple of GOP defections could kill Blanche's nomination. So I'm going to be watching for how Blanche tries to thread that needle to keep every Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee and those in the full Senate as well, on side with his appearance today. All right. That's NPR's Ryan Lucas. Ryan, thanks. Thank you. Since the start of the conflict with Iran, President Trump has said a lot of things about the Strait of Hormuz. He said the key waterway was in great shape after U.S. forces decimated Iran's navy. Later, he said the strait was not America's problem and other nations needed to sort it out. And more recently, that a preliminary peace deal meant the strait was open for business.

But Iran has stymied the administration at every turn. Now a U.S. naval blockade is back in place. And Trump says he will take over the strait, though he backed true. on the administration charging a kind of transit fee. We've got Pentagon correspondent Tom Bowman here with us to sort it all out. Good morning, Tom. Good morning. Okay, so Trump says he wants to take over the street.

What would that mean, Tom, from a military perspective? Well, full control for the U.S. would mean that you had to eliminate or severely reduce Iran's power to fire drones or missiles at commercial ships. Iran has hit at least seven commercial ships in the past week, damaging some. And the U.S. says nearly a dozen crew members are killed, wounded, or missing. That has predictably led to ship transit. It's slowing to around a dozen each day, down from 30 or 40 a day several weeks ago and well below the 130 before the war started. Now, the U.S. in the last few days, has hit Iranian drone bases, missile sites, radar, other military sites.

But retired military officers and analysts I talk would say you'd have to increase those attacks by a factor of three or four times. for weeks to maybe get that threat reduced to a level where commercial ships can start moving at decent level. So will that happen? You know, we'll have to see. But recent U.S. strikes really have not accomplished enough because Iran is not only attacking those commercial ships, but also U.S. bases in Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain. Those countries have said their defenses have knocked out those Iranian missiles and no word in any damage from the U.S. side. You know, Leila, a guy I know on Capitol Hill said, it's like two. bucks locking horns.

Can the U.S. drastically reduce that Iranian drone and missile threat with more intensive bombing? You know, it's hard to say Iran has thousands of drones and missiles as well as fast boats that can lay mines. Again, it may take weeks or longer for a stronger bombing campaign. And the big question, if I'm a shipowner or an insurer, do I feel comfortable moving through the strait? Is the threat reduced enough?

Only they can answer that. Here's another thing, Leila. The U.S. is now guiding ships. through this southern path in the Strait of Hormuz just off Oman, not escorting them, but basically in the area and saying, hey, here's a safer route. That's the route. Iran is attacking, saying ships have to come through their approved route closer to their shoreline. Analysts tell me that the U.S. will have to expand that Oman route for ships,

and they may have to actually escort the commercial ships like we saw during the tank war in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war. that's very time-consuming and takes probably a lot more ships to serve as escorts. Realistically, Tom, how much is feasible without boots on the ground? You know, President Trump and others have raised that possibility. The Marines have studied this for decades, including seizing the main Iranian oil facility on Karg Island. You know, it's doable, and you could take out the military facility, sees the oil infrastructure as a bargaining chip. You might have casualties, though.

Others say you don't have to put boots in the ground, but simply blockade it. or bomb the military targets. What about NATO getting involved in helping open the street? Well, France and Britain have talked about this, a multinational maritime mission to secure the strait. They will only do that they say when the conditions stabilize, and of course, they're not stable now. That's NPR's Pentagon correspondent, Tom Bowman.

Thank you, Tom. You're welcome. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency says it's pausing most vehicle stops in its enforcement operations. Those are the kind of stops that led to two kill. in a week. Fathers in Texas and Maine were killed after ICE officers fired into their vehicles. NPR, Sergio, Martina's Beltran, joins us to talk about all this. Hi, Sergio. Hey, Leila. So tell us more about what this policy shift means. Yeah, I mean, this could mark a significant

change. The last two deaths stemmed from traffic stops that includes the fatal shootings of Joanne Sebastian Durand Guerrero in Maine this weekend, that of Lorenzo Salgado-Arault in Texas last week. The Department of Homeland Security accused Durang Guerrero of being a public safety threat and Salgado Araujo of weaponizing his car to run over an ICE officer, neither of them was the intended immigration enforcement target. And no video evidence has been presented to back up DHS's claims. Yesterday, NPR confirmed that the agency will pause, at least for now, conducting traffic stops. TheHS told NPR it will not discuss enforcement tactics, so we don't yet know all the details of this change, but the Office of U.S. Senator Angus King

tell us this is happening. Now, there have been a lot of big questions, as you kind of mentioned here, about whether deadly force should have been used in these cases and whether these men posed any danger. What's DHS's policy on the use of deadly force? So DHS has accused Duran Guerrero in Maine of attempting to flee the scene. The agency's policy says deadly force cannot be used solely to prevent someone from fleeing unless the person poses a significant threat. Paul Honker is a former chief counsel for ICE in Dallas. The standards and principle are clear. A person has to pose an imminent threat

of harm to use deadly force. Honker says whether the person poses an imminent threat is always from the perspective of the officer. Why were the agents in both Texas and Maine not wearing body cameras? I mean, that was the expectation after other killings. That was, as you might remember, after the deadly shootings of U.S. citizens of René Good and Alex Prady in Minneapolis, DHS said it was going to quickly deploy body cameras to agents across the country. Well, that hasn't happened. Only about half of the field officers have body cameras, according to DHS. The agency is blaming Democrats in Congress and the partial government shutdowns for these. But the agency is once again vowing to deploy body cameras for all agents in the next 60 days. Still, Leila,

advocates, politicians, and community members are calling for independent investigations into these shootings. Serja, the interesting thing that you mentioned is that the victims in Texas and Maine were not the intended targets of ICE when the officers attempted to pull them over. Is that a coincidence? Not really. This is a result of a shift in approach by the Trump administration. Under previous president's collateral arrests were not happening as much. That is the arrest of people who were not the intended targets of the federal immigration. agents. So, for example, agents would go to a home to arrest a specific person. If others around

them were undocumented, but not criminals, ICE officers typically ignore them. But because President Trump has an ambitious goal of arresting millions of immigrants, ICE agents have been feeling the pressure of arresting anyone who is undocumented and of pulling over anyone who might be suspected of being in the country illegally. And that could lead to killings like this. That's NPR, Sergio Martinez-Beltron. Thank you, Sergio. You're welcome. Before we go, we'd love if you join the thousands of people who are helping create a time capsule of American stories. Morning Edition and StoryCorps are teaming up for Connect 250 and experiment in human connection. Meet someone new. Share a meaningful conversation. You can sign up right now at connect250.org.

And that's up first for Wednesday, July 15th. I'm Leila Falded. And I'm May Martinez. Today's up first. Today's up first was edited by Andrew Sussman, Anna Yukoninoff, Alina Hartunian, Mohamed Elbar, D.C., Alice Wolfley, and Ziat Butch. It was produced by Page Waterhouse and Nia Dumas. Our director is Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Nisha Highness. Our technical director is Carly Strange, and our supervising producer is Michael Lipkin. Join us again tomorrow.