Upgrade - 241: The Tweaky Features
Episode Date: April 15, 2019Disney finally unveils its streaming service at a price that makes us wonder just what game Apple thinks it's playing; we get a sneak peek at some possible new iPad features for iOS 13; and Jason and ...Myke ponder the major changes due for the Mac this fall with the departure of iTunes and the arrival of Marzipan.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
from relay fm this is upgrade episode 241 today's show is brought to you by kiwi co
luna display and squarespace my name is mike hurley and i'm back and of course jason snell
is here hi jason snell hi mike hurley welcome Upgrade program. Thank you. I would like to thank John
Syracuse for filling in last week. I always enjoy
listening to Upgrade. Upgrade's a good podcast,
so it's sometimes nice when I
get to just appreciate it as an Upgradian
instead of a... How'd I do with the
theme music last time?
It felt pretty right to me. I tried to
emulate the Mike Hurley creative
choices with the theme music last week.
Well, what i would say is
i didn't start it and think oh jason so you must have done the right job right because usually
you'll put in like variant b or something right so i appreciate i appreciate uh that but nobody
cares about this literally except for me and you so we should go into hashtag snell talk and we
have a question from dylan and dylan wants to, Jason, what do you prefer, day travel or night travel?
I prefer flying early in the morning.
And getting up is terrible, but I can do it.
It's fine.
I don't like getting up at four in the morning or whatever
and going to the airport,
although there's no traffic four in the morning
and the lines are not terrible four in the morning.
But I prefer
to do that for a few reasons. One is I live on the edge of the Pacific ocean, which means
almost all of my travel is to the East. And, um, the later you travel, the later you get there,
like leading to the fact that if you travel too late, you are getting, it's an overnight flight,
it's like a red eye,
and then you're getting there the next day.
And the problem is I don't live there.
And you don't,
flying a red eye when you don't have a destination
where you can just kind of go home is not good
because then it's 6 a.m.
and you're on the streets of Boston or wherever
and you can't go to your
hotel your hotel won't take you in for another um you know eight hours nine hours yeah you're just
and so just a zombie with a suitcase wandering the streets i've done that it's not good um
and so the red eye is not really practical for me, for something other than, I suppose,
like if we came back from Hawaii on a red eye, which I've never done, that might work.
The other big thing is that if you go in the morning, the planes generally, with the exception
of red eye flights, generally the airlines reset their planes in the morning and the
plane has been sitting overnight at the gate or in a hangar or wherever, but it's ready to go.
You haven't had a chance for your flight to get delayed because the plane that your flight is on
is delayed somewhere else in the country. It's already there, which means that early in the
morning, there are fewer delays and it's more reliable to fly in the morning. So I generally
try to fly first thing in the morning if I can manage it some jason snell travel hacks right there that's oh yeah oh yeah
deep deep stuff so the people tune in for i very quickly when i'm going to america i like to leave
early in the morning when i'm coming home i like to leave late at night i fly overnight to europe
yeah overnight to europe from the west coast it's such a long flight that it's really the only only
way to do it and because it's I know that's a red eye,
but because it's an overnight flight to Europe,
by the time I get to Europe,
it's already in the afternoon most of the time.
I did once fly in to London and we got in at 6 a.m.
Again, no place to go, just a zombie.
Not good.
Don't want that.
So this actually ties into a programming note.
We're going to be a day late next week because Jason is traveling.
Nothing's happening.
There's no...
Well, we don't know of any big news.
We're not holding the episode because there's a new iPhone.
No, there are no embargoes that I can...
If I have an embargo...
No, here's the thing.
If I have an embargo, if I have something that is secret i can't say
that i have it it's like the canary clause in one of those contracts where like if you stop
talking about it then maybe it's true um but if i don't have one and i say i don't have one
i'm not lying because i wouldn't lie i would deflect or something right but i wouldn't lie
about it i don't have anything do i have to ask you the question? Is that how it works?
I'm going to a wedding.
Oh, okay. Okay.
I'm going to a wedding on Easter Sunday, basically, and I'm not getting back until
Monday afternoon. And so we're going to do the podcast on Tuesday morning and release it
afterward. So just one day late next week, is what I'm saying. It'll be very similar to the
one last week where we had to record late and released it late.
In this case, it'll be a day late.
It'll be okay.
It'll be a good episode, though.
I'll be awake, which I wouldn't be
if we were recording it the day after a wedding
while in a hotel room.
So that's why we're delaying it.
We're delaying it because we care.
Yep.
If you'd like to send in a question
like Dylan did to open the show,
hashtag Snell Talk is the way to do that.
We use Google Docs here at the Upgrade program.
And as I look at it right now,
the ghost of John Syracuse is hovering over this Google Doc.
So it can only mean that it is time for follow-up.
Do you see his little face there up in the corner?
Yeah, I do.
He's hovering over us now, which is terrifying.
What's exciting, Mike,
is that means that we're in one of his 1000 open tabs yeah
yeah i feel like i need to start leaving him some little messages or something i don't know
um you've uh published your imac review we've spoken a ton about this imac over the last few
weeks but i just kind of wanted to get the sense from you like i have two little questions for you
one is do you recommend this this imac after having using it and two um i've heard you mention this in a couple of places you mention
it in the article too about the and i've heard this said in other places as well like the idea
that there is a potential logic that a bigger change is coming to the iMac which is why this
one has mostly remained the same except for some of the internals.
I just wanted to test the water of,
do you think that there could be
any wishful thinking in there?
So there are my two things.
One, would you recommend it to people?
And two, do you think a change coming soon
could be a little bit of wishful thinking?
So the review is,
I mean, it's almost like an essay,
especially since I wrote
about some of the performance stuff
on Macworld before. It's kind of like an essay on the state of the imac right now
more than it is anything else um i do think that if you are torn between the base model imac pro
and and specking up a high-end imac that unless you have some very particular need for some aspect of the iMac Pro, you shouldn't get the base model.
I feel like the high-end iMac is so much cheaper for basically the same performance.
Even if you put in the RAM and the SSD and everything and the high-end video card and
all of that, you're still going to save $1, dollars, $800 over the iMac pro. And that's real money
for the differences being like, unless one of those differences really matters to you.
So I feel like what this really has done is, is kind of pushed the iMac pro. Like if you want to
an iMac pro and are going to spec it up to the, like the 10 core model or one of the even more
expensive models, then yes, of course, get the iMac Pro.
But if you're just thinking, well, maybe I could eke out the $5,000 model,
I think you should seriously consider not doing that.
Now, I have the base model iMac Pro, and I'm happy with it.
But part of that is that I do podcasts, and the fan is silent in this.
And that's sort of reason enough for me.
But even so, it would still be a harder decision.
Plus, if you don't need the RAM, you can actually buy less RAM because the base model iMac comes with 32 iMac Pro.
And I think the iMac, you can spec lower than that.
So there's other ways to save money as well. And it comes with a terabyte SSD in the iMac Pro, and I think the iMac, you can spec lower than that. So there's other ways to save money
as well. And it comes with a terabyte SSD in the iMac Pro. And if you wanted to save money,
you could do that and save even more. I think my larger view of these iMacs, and we have
discussed it at length here, is this is the 2012 design. Something's got to give. The fact that this is the last new Mac without a T2
processor in it suggests to me that this is, I mean, I feel like it's inevitable that there will
be a new iMac that will be very different technically. And it's unclear when that will
come. And will that be, will this just continue to be an Intel Mac until Apple switches to ARM?
Or will there be a new generation
that is an Intel iMac
that has presumably smaller bezels
and a rethought cooling system
and no spinning hard drives
and stuff like that?
I feel like that change is inevitable,
that this is the end of the line
and that this feels like
modern processors in old tech.
And, you know, that's fine.
It's a really good computer and very powerful, and you can spec it up to a lot.
And if you need an iMac, I'd say go ahead and get it.
But at the same time, I do look at it and think it's kind of an outlier at this point.
It's not a modern Mac in some senses.
In some ways, that might be good.
There are probably going to be things, to be things several years out from now. There are going to be things it
can't do because it doesn't have a T2 processor. There's probably going to be things that it can
do that modern Macs are shut away from because Apple's like, no, no, no. You can't, I don't know,
running old operating systems and things like that. I don't know. It's a quirky thing where it's not what you expect from a brand new Mac in 2019. But that said, a lot of that stuff is for the
future and is charting Apple and its general direction with computers. And it doesn't take
away from the fact that it is, you know, they have great screens. You can power up that 4K iMac if
you don't need a giant screen in your face. That 4K iMac can be made pretty powerful too, including having powerful graphics and not the super high-end ninth generation Intel processors, but a pretty powerful processor in it.
So, you know, they're good.
I just think on the larger story, this is Apple kicking the can down the road a little bit and
i you know i'm a little frustrated by that but i am you know i don't think it really affects whether
it's a good computer or not i just i'm a little frustrated and it makes me wonder why they're
doing it and it may be as simple as they have other mac stuff that they're working on and the
imac sells pretty well as it is. And
they don't want the iMac to maybe get painted in the corner like the MacBook and the MacBook Air,
where the added expense of a brand new iMac without spinning hard drives as an option
would mean that the whole iMac line got more expensive and that they would be, you know,
I think they're price conscious with the iMac because they sell a lot of base model iMacs.
It wouldn't shock me if they take the 27-inch and do a new version of that in the future
that is modern. Isn't that how the Retina started? Yeah, the 5K came in 2014. I'd forgotten this
because I bought the 5K iMac and it's right when I started as an independent. The next year, the 4K iMac, the 21.5 got Retina. So that may happen again where we see a totally brand new 27-inch iMac or other dimension, who knows, and that the 21.5 can stay down there in the price line with the non-retina version and even a retina version with spinning discs.
And that'll be a cheaper one.
And that will allow them to price up the big one.
I also guess in a funny way,
the iMac Pro is kind of like that too, right?
Where it's just like, it's the very top end,
like size-wise, the most expensive one.
And they did a bunch of weird stuff to it,
which will eventually, some of it will find its way
into the product lineup, you'd assume, right?
Looking at the way that things have gone in the past.
I would assume.
Although it's weird because I feel like the iMac really needs an external redesign.
And maybe it doesn't.
Oh, I agree with that.
But it's seven years old, right?
And we live in a world where everybody's pulling in the bezels.
And the funny thing about the iMac Pro is internally, I think it is what Apple wants Macs to be because it's got the T2 and it's SSD only.
Externally, it's just a space gray version of the 2012 design.
So it's not there either.
But it's possible that, yeah, it's possible that we don't know the final fate of the iMac
Pro either, right?
Like it was designed in a world where there was no Mac Pro, but there is going to
be a Mac Pro. So it's also not impossible that the iMac Pro is a one-off. Yeah, one and done.
They do a new iMac 27 that has the ability, maybe they even design it so that they can sell a,
you know, a high-end thing that's even more high-end than what's in the iMacs today.
And they say, beyond this, you should just get our external display on a Mac Pro,
because the need for the iMac Pro goes away in that scenario.
On last week's episode, you noted a Ming-Chi Kuo report that suggested that the
mythical 16-inch MacBook Pro was delayed. It turns out that report was incorrectly translated.
It turns out that report was incorrectly translated.
The report was mostly about the external monitor.
And when it was originally translated from Ming-Chi Kuo,
it was believed that he was saying that the MacBook Pro was coming later,
but it's actually not mentioned at all. So there is currently nothing to suggest that the MacBook Pro
is going to not meet its original
timeframe, whenever that may be.
So basically, the idea of it not coming out this year, there's nothing to say that now.
Right.
That was a, we mentioned it very briefly last week in that interim where there were these
initial reports saying that he said it wasn't going to happen.
And then we got
a better translation it said that's totally wrong and that's not what it says at all and last piece
of follow-up uh we'll talk about this more over the coming weeks for sure as of this morning
jason's uh 2018 ipad pro bridge keyboard arrived yeah bridge sent me one that they say is one of
the first ones off of the final remember i, a couple months ago I had a prototype.
They say the final, and they're producing them,
and they're going to start fulfilling orders.
It looks like it's going to happen in early May.
I think if you order now, it's coming for May,
but I believe they originally said that some would start shipping in April,
which seems possible.
Yeah, I don't think that's going to happen.
I think that it's all going to be shipping in early May.
And it looks good so far.
Although, again, I ran a little typing test on it
and I typed it at full speed and it worked.
But I want to live with it for a while.
I will say that having the old bridge on the old iPad Pro,
it kind of ruined me to the point where I am in those
situations now with the smart keyboard.
And I'm like, OK, I'm just not super enthusiastic.
And the smart keyboard's fine, but I find myself longing for the better keys of the
bridge keyboard.
So I'm looking forward to trying it out.
And I'm very excited about that.
It's getting a little warmer weather, doing doing more work outside in the backyard
it's very nice to have that set up with a with the bridge keyboard so i'll report more as i use it
all right so let's talk about disney plus so uh there was a investor meeting this past week
where Disney gave a bunch of details about Disney+.
So I'm going to run through a bunch of these
and then we can kind of wrap it up a little bit
just to keep everyone on the pages of what we do here
in the Upstream segment of Upgrade.
So it's going to be launching in the US on November 12th.
It will cost $6.99 a month or $69.99 a year,
which is a really nice price.
By the end of year one, there will be
7,500 episodes of TV
shows. Some that will be
currently on-air, some off-air,
so like some effectively vault stuff.
There will be 25
original series, all by the end of the first
year. And one of the key things
I think that brings that
total number up to 7 500 is all 30
seasons of the simpsons will be on disney plus um there will be 400 movies on the service as well
10 will be original again all within the first year it's ad free so that that price that's 699
a month that's all it is there's no ads they're putting it everywhere they can smart tvs games consoles
it's on the web it's in apps according to bob eiger they're going to put it on apple platforms
probably the apple tv but we don't know how much it will be yet international rollout is going to
be happening steadily they're going to be hoping to be doing west europe and the asia pacific also
in q4 because uh so by the end of the year
and then Eastern Europe and Latin America
in 2020
but the reason that
they're staging it out a little bit is they need
to wait for rights to expire
in those regions
as expected they're locking up
the big movies so you're only going to be able
to stream movies like Captain Marvel, Toy Story 4
Avengers Endgame and Frozen 2 on Disney Plus, it's the're only going to be able to stream movies like Captain Marvel, Toy Story 4, Avengers Endgame, Frozen 2,
and Disney Plus. It's the only place you'll be able to
stream them. And they previewed
a bunch of original programming, including
some new stuff. So the things
that they spent some time talking about
was Jon Favreau's Star Wars series,
The Mandalorian. There's a Rogue One
prequel, starring Diego Luna.
A Clone Wars series, a Monsters
Inc. series called Monsters at Work,
and then there's a bunch of Marvel stuff,
including a Loki TV show,
a show called WandaVision,
which is Wanda and the Vision,
The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,
and Hawkeye.
And those four shows all include
the A-list movie actors replacing their roles.
Yep.
Pretty big, right?
They're not kidding around pretty good i i should
say for for clarity's sake that when we say um you can only stream them on disney plus my
understanding is that you know they're still gonna sell you know you still be able to go to it's not
the only digital place you'll be able to get them and rent it and all that stream them you only have
a streaming service it'll be they going to wait for all the Netflix contracts
to expire and things like that
and then they will disappear
from Netflix.
And Captain Marvel
is the first
where they,
it is the first movie
that is not touched
by their contract on Netflix.
So it will never go to Netflix
and all the rest of them
will slowly just drip off
of Netflix and disappear.
And I imagine,
you know,
the same thing is going to happen
to all of the Disney animation stuff and all the Pixar stuff. It's all going to drain out
of Netflix and then reappear on Disney Plus, along with all those movies that Disney puts in the,
you know, the vault where they don't sell them for a while. Those are all going to be on this
service. But the big thing here is the price, right? Like this is a super aggressive price.
It's way less than other services like Netflix, especially charge. It's way less than anybody really expected Apple to charge.
And Apple has no catalog and just some originals that are not tied to these mega brands that
Disney owns. And I talked about this with Tim Goodman last week on our TV podcast that we do.
And, you know, he believes, and I think he's right, that this is a real wake-up call,
if they didn't expect it already, for Apple, that it's hard to imagine how Apple can come
into the market with something at $9.99 or $14.99 when all they have is originals.
And it's starting to make me reconsider. Not sure I believe
the people who are like, well, the only way they need to do they just need to give it away for free.
Like, I'm not I still don't believe Ben Thompson wrote about this today. Like that Apple's business
model is, is like Amazon's is really to kind of like build a nice home where they can resell all of these other streaming services. And I, you know, that's true, but they also want to make money on their own
service. I do think that this makes it harder. Now I, I just, I don't think Disney, I think
Disney cares so much about this, that they're willing to take a loss on this in the short term
in order for the larger benefits. i would put money down that in
five years disney plus costs a whole lot more than seven dollars a month yeah yeah but to go out with
that not say it's introductory but they'll raise the price in two or three years right not say it's
an introductory rate because it's technically not they can just they'll just have to raise the price
later but with this so aggressively with so much content um that i think i saw somebody say if you're a
child or were once a child this is this is for you and they had slides in their presentation
showing the demographic reach in in terms of age and gender of their properties and they're like
here it is for disney here it is for pixar here it is for marvel here you know and they went
through them here it is for star wars and then they for marvel here you know and they went through them here it is
for star wars and then they did the final overlay which is like so here is our demographic reach for
the service as a whole and that slide was basically like it's every everybody are you are you alive
then we are gonna hit are you getting it yet this isn't just one demographic reach yeah so i do think that in in to put it in apple terms if i'm
apple um there's no way there's no way that i can price my service above disney plus and expect it
to be taken seriously um they might still do it but like i i feel like they're gonna have to dig
deep like if they want to grow i also also think, and Tim mentioned this last week,
I also think if I look at this,
I think Apple really does.
If Apple is really in on this and truly wants to compete with Disney,
with Netflix,
with Warner Media,
if they want to be at that level,
and I'm not sure they do,
maybe they do just want to be a little more and i'm not sure they do maybe they do just want to be um a little more
like amazon and create an ecosystem that's got some originals and resell channels and just kind
of be that but if they want to be more if they really want to want to up their game and compete
at this level they're you know tim's point and i agree with him is they're going to have to start
buying um companies that have intellectual property, right?
Because Apple is making deals with companies that have intellectual property like Amazing Stories or something like that.
And with stars, not stars, the cable channel, stars like Reese Witherspoon, to make shows.
Disney owns Star Wars and Marvel and the whole disney intellectual property catalog
and and it makes you it makes me think that if apple really wants to play at that level they're
going to have to start buying entertainment companies with with catalogs with with back
catalog content and intellectual property content but let me ask you though jason what's left there's
stuff out there um you know it's not you you know, I think they could potentially make a move for Sony.
I'm not an industry, you know, entertainment industry business investment expert here.
But like Sony is a weird thing where Sony says they're committed to it, but it's sort of like a very weird business.
CBS and Paramount, the whole Viacom stuff um they could they could
swallow that if they if they wanted to like they've got the money to buy some of these
companies that are not if it's not owned by disney or warner or comcast i'd say it's kind of up for
grabs yeah i guess there's stuff out there it does you kind of get what i'm saying it's not a lot
it's not necessarily the blue chip stuff right and we and we when i mentioned warner like uh i had this
discussion again and blue disney has a lot of the blue chip stuff but warner if it wanted to for its
streaming service it has batman it has harry potter oh warner have an incredible like honestly
i said this before you put harry potter
in this conversation and we're talking a different game now because that is a massive franchise and
and i don't know who i need to talk to at warner to convince them to make a harry potter tv show
uh but they gotta do it at some point i think right right for streaming and and the same is
true for like i mean game of thrones that has been the HBO strategy, but that is a Warner property and they could do some other stuff with that too. So they've got them. And that's the power of it. So for Apple, I'm not sure they want to play at this level and I'm not sure they want the overhead, the burden of owning a whole studio.
owning like a whole studio and i think this is going to be a real test of what apple really wants to do here yeah because there's there's two ways well there's three ways for them to go one
way for them to go is to be like look this is really just a hobby and we just we're going to
make some shows but it's not uh you know it's not a major tentpole of our business and it's just part
of part of our thing i i think i think you're right but that's the that's
the kind of option zero option one is we're gonna be doing this resell and also a bunch of originals
and we'll build a catalog up over time but what and we're gonna be you know in playing in that
game with the kind of niche uh streaming channels as well as our own reselling of other people's
stuff and that's what we're gonna do which might be okay but it's never going to set the world on fire or they need to
load up and say well we're in this we're in this to be an entertainment powerhouse and because the
fact is the entertainment giants are enormous now and they have gotten bigger. Disney's buying Fox, most of Fox. Comcast buying Warner.
They are huge with deep pockets.
And they have intellectual property.
And they know that they need to win the streaming wars or they're in deep trouble.
And so if Apple wants to be in that fight at that level, they can do it.
But they're going to have to spend billions on intellectual property.
They can't make it work by just licensing some stuff here and there.
So if they wanted to buy a bunch of loose studios that are out there, then they could do that.
If they want to buy Viacom and CBS, then they can pick up Star Trek and they can do that. I mean, you can already see
CBS on its own is sort of like, we're going to build a whole streaming service on the back of
Star Trek. And even though there's only one show there now, they're like five shows in development.
And that is not as effective for CBS because they've got nothing else in that vein anyway.
else in that vein anyway they're trying um whereas disney can say we've got star wars and marvel and pixar and disney and net geo right so uh it's a it's a challenge for cbs as a smaller company
and and viacom it's sister company basically um and they're they're floating out there and i think
it's going to be what we are focused on apple here so we talk about like apple needs to decide if it wants to step up if i'm um anybody
else so justin marks who is the uh showrunner of counterpart uh one of my favorite shows of the
last decade uh two seasons on stars and then canceled and he was tweeting about this because
it you know nobody could find his show nobody Nobody knew about his show. It wasn't really
marketed very well. Nobody could see it. You have to sign up for this totally separate thing.
And so he was coming from that perspective when he said, if you're one of these small players
without the money to put in the game, forget it. He said, maybe I'm a little bit better,
but forget it. And I think he's right. i think um rightly or wrongly and i don't
think it's great if you're if you're a a niche player in like a genre like um like shutter for
horror or brit box or am or acorn or crunchy roll um maybe right because that is it you're you're
feeding a very specific audience but if you're sort of like stars and you're like oh we just do
shows that people like i don't know i don't know if in the long But if you're sort of like Starz and you're like, oh, we just do shows that people like, I don't know.
I don't know if in the long run if you're going to be able to make that work.
So that's part of this.
And Starz is, I think, Lionsgate.
So there's just a real question about, like, if these small entertainment companies are going to have to, if there's going to be a run of purchases or mergers or something in order to give them the scope that they need uh or if they're
going to get picked off by the other big fish in this which could also happen amazon and apple
yeah but also you know comcast and netflix and uh and disney and warner those are all out there too
i think that maybe it's because of stuff like this why
we didn't find out any pricing information
about Apple TV Plus.
It wouldn't have been the only reason, but I reckon
there's a reason. I'm also starting
to adjust my
thinking on this.
I don't think that Apple TV
Plus will be straight up free,
but I think you will
get it with any other service you pay for
so like if you pay for apple music you'll get it or if you pay for apple arcade you'll get it
i think that's the most likely scenario honestly if i if i had to pick one scenario right now i
would say that apple video apple tv plus will cost something like 9. or $799, but it will really not be that if you
buy any other Apple service. That'll be either free or it will be almost nothing, but maybe even
free just so, you know, Apple Music subscribers get Apple TV Plus. And that fits, actually it
fits both models right because
it fits the people who say they're going to give it away and it fits the people who say they can't
give it away they got to charge for it well they'll do both they'll give it away essentially
give it away i don't think no i i agree i agree so they will charge you for it if the it's literally
the only apple service you want they will charge you for it i think that's the most likely scenario
but that they will either deeply discount or give away if you are an existing subscriber to something else
or maybe just like music or something like that and this is it puts the uh hulu deal that spotify
made into some extra context right yes where if spotify's biggest competitor is starting a TV service that they may give away for free with your Apple Music subscription, they can differentiate, right?
Because you can't differentiate on a music catalog.
You can only differentiate on other stuff like premium TV shows that are exclusive or podcasts that are exclusive for Spotify's side.
podcasts that are exclusive for Spotify side. And they made the deal with Hulu where they're,
you know, if you're a Spotify member, you can get the ad supportive version of Hulu, which still has a charge for free. And I write it like, that's the kind of way to survive right now
is you gotta, you gotta do that because their competitors totally going to do that.
So it's, it's very interesting, very interesting stuff. It is going to be a wild ride,
So it's very interesting, very interesting stuff.
It is going to be a wild ride.
But I think Apple, I think we need to watch Apple and see what their, you know, what level of player do they want to be here?
Today's episode is brought to you by KiwiCo.
When you're looking for fun activities for kids, it's a bonus if it's something that
they can learn from as well.
But finding projects that are actually fun whilst also being educational is hard to do.
And that is where KiwiCo comes in.
They have an amazing selection of hands-on projects for kids of all ages.
Here's how it works.
You sign up for a KiwiCo subscription, and every month you receive a crate full of exciting projects to take part in.
These projects have been designed to encourage confidence and creativity.
There are hundreds of hands-on projects covering science, technology, engineering, art, and math. They have crates for all ages.
There's an option for kids from ages zero to 16 plus, and there's even a crate called the Eureka,
which is for everyone from ages 14 to 104. So when I say kids for all ages, I also mean people of my
age too. But Jason, I know that you got a KiwiCo crate. I want to know what crate you got
and what you thought of the pieces and the projects
and the instructions and that kind of stuff.
So I've got the Tinker Crate here,
which is for teenagers and up.
And I am up.
And it is a kit for a walking robot.
And it's very cool.
So it's got an electric motor in here,
in the packaging, electric motor with a battery so it's got an electric motor you can hear the packaging
electric motor with a battery um it's got a bunch of little gears and little parts and it's got some
cardboard uh pieces for particle board maybe pieces for the legs and the idea is you get a
little assembly project where you uh where you put the guy together uh piece by piece and you
know attach it all and you've made something and then you turn it loose in your house and it terrorizes your cat. I think that's pretty much
the plan. And I haven't assembled it yet, but I suspect I will be doing that this week. And it's
adorable. And if you want a head, you can use basically provide your own spherical object. So
like stick a tennis ball on the top or the head is not functional the head is to just
make it more uh personified so you can use a uh you can use a tennis ball or a balloon or something
and give yourself a a terrifying robot face or a happy robot face depending you can change the way
your kids play with kiwi co go to kiwico.com slash ahoy and get your first crate free now let me spell that for you that is k-i-w-i-c-o
dot com slash a-h-o-y k-i-w-i-c-o dot com slash ahoy it's a great way to encourage learning in
a way that your kids are going to enjoy our thanks to kiwico for their support of upgrade and all
of relay fm so i every morning, every Monday morning,
I sit down and I plan out what we're going to talk about
and I take a look at the things you recommend
and I take a look at the news
and I had a whole document ready.
And then a couple of hours before we recorded today,
friend of the show, Guillaume Rambeau,
who's at 9to5Mac,
published a, I'm going to say,
German-like report about iOS 13.
This is a very interesting report. I'm going to say German-like report about iOS 13.
This is a very interesting report.
It's full of tantalizing information.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You know,
Guillermo Rambo and Steve Troughton Smith have made their name by analyzing things that have been,
that have been like sent out from Apple accidentally or hidden in places.
That may be true here.
He's not revealing how he got this information,
but it says, according to people familiar with the development,
which makes it seem like these guys have stepped up their game
or people inside Apple have noticed them.
I am expecting it's a combination of all of that.
Knowing the way, because steve tratton smith is credited with helping uh gear with the article and knowing how they work
and the fact that he is now part of nine to five i expect it as a combination of all of that like
that there is some code mining there is some sources and that kind of stuff um but this is a
we're going to go through all the
kind of the major things that i mentioned in this article but just at the top level this feels like
a very complete list of things like the the stuff that we're going through i can imagine apple
standing on stage and saying this is ios 13 and that being it and that's when i say it's almost
like german like in that it reminds me of the way that mark german has done stuff in the past especially at nine to five mac he would write lots of reports like pretty much
just like this one right and this is not to um belittle anything that's been done here but it's
just i think it's actually a uh a compliment because you know mark german kind of owned this
space for a very long time and i think it's interesting to see
um somebody else uh other people kind of stepping up and putting their name on this stuff and again
we will see what happens right like we will see how right or wrong this ends up being but i feel
like this is a this feels like a list that i look at and be like, yeah, that makes sense. So yeah, I think the only question I've got,
I tend to believe what they're reporting
is probably true again with the caveat.
And we mentioned this last week,
the caveat that things can change, right?
Like there's intent for this to be an iOS 13
doesn't mean it will because something could happen
and they could decide not to ship something.
It's entirely possible that things will fall out.
But I'm inclined to believe that this is all real.
I'm also inclined to believe that it's not necessarily everything.
So I don't view it as maybe like a complete list,
but that it is a list of things that are currently planned to be in iOS 13
when we see it at the announcement at WWDC.
When I say it's a complete
list it's like you could show me this and i would be content with it but like i i expect there's
more because plus there's pieces that are completely missing from like there's nothing
here about shortcuts and i'm expecting that they will do something with that right you know there's
nothing here about marzipan and that's going to affect the ipad in other ways but just as like a
here are your tempo features for ios i can see some of this stuff being the majority of it.
So let's go through it.
System-wide dark mode, including a high contrast option similar to macOS.
So there's two parts of it here.
System-wide dark mode, that's amazing.
High contrast is an option in macOS display settings, which basically puts big thick lines or thicker lines around a lot of things.
I actually use high
contrast um because i like the way it looks right you know this this to me feels like two things you
have a dark mode for people that want to use it and then high contrast which is another accessibility
option that is added in to go along with the dark mode um system-wide dark mode is something people wanted for a long time it feels
like something it feels like it's something that's difficult to implement but feels like a low-hanging
fruit right it feels like something that make a lot of people very happy and would make your
products look amazing on the oled screens that they have yeah also the since mac and ios are going to share apps and mac has a dark mode this
allows the dark mode stuff to be equivalent across yep which makes perfect sense right like it's like
when you start tying you know you feel like um you know the meme of charlie day from always sunny
with the string in the room right and like you're just tight putting all the stuff together but when you start when you think about um when you think about marzipan and then
you think about all of the other things that can can come away from that if you start thinking
about there has to be a bridge between ios and the mac stuff like this starts to fall out it's
like well what do you do about dark mode well you have to have one is what you have to do. So I think that's really interesting.
I'm excited for a dark mode. So this is one that is, okay, multiple windows on the iPad.
So this is something that Mark Gurman has been talking about for a while, like windows on the
iPad. Now I'm going to need to just read this quote verbatim from the article because i can't i don't think i can do a good job of summing it up right so i'm just gonna read it
each window will also be able to contain sheets that are initially attached to a portion of the
screen but can be detached with a drag gesture becoming a card that can be moved around freely
similar to what an open source project called PanelKit could do. These cards could be stacked on top of each other and used as a depth effect
to indicate which cards are on top and which are on the bottom. Cards can be flung away to dismiss
them. So I took a look at what Rambo referenced PanelKit. And the way that I would describe this
thing is, you know, when you're in an app and you get a little pop over. So maybe you type in the search field and you get a little pop up and you can see the results falling down into it.
Imagine being able to tap that and drag it away.
Right. So now it becomes its own little floating window over the top of the application.
And I will put a link in the show notes to the GitHub project panel kit, which has a little animated GIF, which can show, which shows you what it looks like. And it might give you an idea for that.
The thing that confuses me though, and there still isn't really any kind of, um,
explanation for like, what do windows mean? What does that mean? Right. And, and, uh, I feel like
nobody really knows yet. Right. Like it's like, oh, there's going to be Windows.
Yeah, but what does that mean, though?
Like, that's the key part,
that right now it feels like nobody's seen it,
but people are talking about it.
Yeah, our chat room is pointing out
that the guy who built Panel Kit works at Apple now.
Hey-o, hey-o.
Which is funny.
So, yes, we had this conversation a while ago about like
what does a multi-window world look like it's presumably not the mac although one of the
things that this enables is a conceptual window like which is uh i don't know what that is but
the idea is that you say okay my app has a window and it's a marzipan app um it doesn't necessarily
mean that that
window behaves the same way on the mac as on ios potentially right like on the mac it might be a
window like on the mac right because windows windows could just be the renaming of what we
currently have right they could just call every section in multitasking it's just its own window
right like it doesn't mean free floating with open closed dialogues like it's you know i think
more likely it means something that's more like what we think of as ipad multitasking where you've
got uh tiles of of instead of different apps you've got tiles of different windows um it's
possible that it's it's tabs that would be another way to do it i just cannot imagine right which is
what people think.
There is a way that you could see an iPad app in front of your desktop, like in front of your home screen.
I just can't imagine that.
And I think that's what people's minds jump to when they say Windows a lot of the time, right?
Well, sure, people are thinking about the Mac or Windows.
And I think this is much more what is the iPad, what's Apple's conception for a next generation kind of like
flexible interface? And why do you need windows in an app? And the best example, and Safari does
this now, but the best example is what if I have a text editor with two documents I want to have
open, three documents I want to have open. You can't really do that. You can switch among them,
but it's like not, the system doesn't let you do what you can do on the Mac, which is just have
multiple documents open. And they could be in a picker, they could be in tabs, they could be Yes, they could be in overlapping windows. And I would be surprised if Apple says, Sure, just make a bunch of windows and have them overlap. I doubt that is going to be the approach. But the the little floaters that have taken the popovers and dragging them out is interesting because that is going to create a layered interface potentially,
but you would have to want to do that to yourself.
And in some apps that would be super convenient because you,
you want a floater that you can refer to or tap on,
but you want to be able to kind of move it around where it needs to be.
So it isn't obscuring content in other places.
And it would then also be analogous to the
to a floating palette on the mac which would be a positive new undo gesture so this would be a
three finger tap onto the keyboard and then sliding left and right to undo undo or redo
now okay okay okay all right. No, all right.
All right.
I'm unhappy with this because what do I do
when I need to undo something that's not text?
Right.
Now, this is a great idea for text.
Like, yes, brilliant.
But this doesn't solve the problem, right?
Like, the problem is not solved here.
You've just augmented the issue.
If there's no keyboard, you still have to shake to undo, presumably.
The thing I use shake to undo for the most is misfiling or misdeleting an email message in mail.
Yeah.
Where I swipe the wrong way and I'm like, oh, no.
And then I have to shake my ipad which is ridiculous i'll also point out there's already an undo button on the
keyboard on the keyboard yeah it's already in the little quick bar i don't understand i don't
understand this i don't really know what i don't think it's solving the what i will say is i have
like i had like a whole big thing I wanted to talk about,
this undo thing at some point, and I haven't got the energy for it.
But I think that the undo situation on iOS is more of a perceived problem
than an actual problem.
I think people think it's an issue more than it actually is an issue
because it is possible to undo text with the keyboard, right?
But people know that the shake to undo exists.
So they're like, oh, shake to undo.
That's ridiculous.
It was like, yeah, but like, what do you do, right?
Do you want to put in control center?
Like, where are you going to put it?
Now, if you have a keyboard, you can use command Z most of the time,
but there has to be some kind of like system-wide way of doing it.
This still isn't that.
This doesn't solve the problem.
It's nice to have more ways to do it.
It's nice to do more like trackpad-like things with iOS,
but this is not a fix to undo,
which is probably not too big of a problem in the first place.
I mean, I know that shaking your iPad is silly,
but it doesn't bother me that much, in all honesty.
But that's my feeling on the whole undo situation.
But I don't think that this gesture fixes what people want fixed,
because for the keyboard, it's redundant, right?
Like, it's a redundant thing.
It's a button, which is way easier than a gesture anyway.
And it's also, now we have a three-finger gesture.
That is a very even if
they they say oh well they'll put up a thing that teaches you how to use it like still counting the
fingers it's kind of a power user gesture yeah there's already the two finger put on the keyboard
to move the cursor around the screen so now we're going to add a three-finger gesture that will let
you undo back and forth rather than just tapping the undo button. It does.
I mean, again, maybe it's the way that this has been reported.
And then when we see it, we'll say, oh, that makes much more sense.
But it's like, oh, it's actually system wide, right?
Like you can do it in any app and it will work, right?
Like whatever, we'll see.
But even then it's an obscure, you know, multi-finger gesture.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yes.
Safari to automatically request desktop websites in quotes when necessary now this is a feature we have both really wanted but i am really keen to see what the details are
of that like how does it know yeah is there is there a list of sites like youtube where it's
like no no just always do it that Apple provides. Or what
I've wanted for a while is what Safari on the desktop has, which is a whole bunch of per domain
settings that you can change. And you can say, don't autoplay video on this site and all of that.
And that's what I'd really like to see in Safari on the iPad so that I could say, always load the
desktop version of this site, block, you
know, don't autoplay video on this site and all of that stuff and have it all be available
on a per site basis.
Because that seems to make the most sense, right?
Is that you get frustrated that a site keeps pushing you into mobile view and you just
say, don't ever do that again.
Well, here's what I would like.
I would like that so I could tell it, but I want Apple to use their differential privacy
data to know if people are
doing this and then just do it. Oh yeah. That's, that's nice. If, if some, everybody forces it
into desktop mode, we're going to just make it a rule that that gets forced into desktop mode.
So then for most users, they never need to set the, uh, set the websites themselves,
right? Because it should just be doing it on its own yeah because it'll learn from user behavior and i that would be uh fantastic it's a question about uh ios productivity right that's
one of the big things here and there's a bunch of stuff we've already spoken about here which
will make huge you know they're like they're big points and there was some stuff about like
trying to come up with collaboration systems so that like third-party apps can can have better
collaboration within them font management is one of these things
like custom keyboards that i never thought i would see in ios yeah you can do it now but you have to
install a profile that contains fonts which is bananas and they say that there's just going to
be a setting and you're going to have a be able to have a font picker and there'll be links to it
and you can you'll be able to install
custom fonts this will make me so happy jason because like i have you know i deal with a lot
of paperwork and i like to use custom fonts and i have to install these like 10 individual profiles
using like an app like any font every single time i get a new device and i always forget and it takes
forever and it's just like the worth i hate it i only do it like once a year but i put it off for like six months right yeah and so i will be very
happy to be able to do real font real font management on ios see finally you'll be able
to do real font management but like i am genuinely excited about it um upgrades to mail including smart categorization features and a read later queue who woke up
at apple and decided that they were going to try and make an actual like 2019 mail app
what is going on like this is wild to me i'm i'm very pleased about it right like so smart
characterization would be like this is a newsletter this is important right that the stuff that you see in gmail the stuff that you
see in lots of third-party apps read later is snoozing right but these types of features coming
to mail that is really exciting because do you know what everybody all mail applications are bad
and apple could make theirs a lot better than it is already
and and a lot of us just use mail on ios right a lot of us do not chase the endless trying to find
the ideal mail client and i i just use mail and it's not very good and i would love for it to be
better and this this is the type of stuff they should be. These are like table stakes for making a modern mail app is using smarts and adding features.
So very excited about that.
New gestures to allow for the selection of multiple items in collection and table views.
Basically, this means a gesture which is similar to clicking and dragging.
So like if you're in like numbers or whatever, you click and drag.
So it looks like they're trying to create gestures to make that sort of stuff easier and being able to drag and drop that around
i like the sound of that right like let's try and be a bit more nimble here and and we have
10 point devices i know that this stuff gets complicated but these are power user features
for work stuff so i think that sounds fun uh redesigned reminders app new volume display ui which is
brilliant so no longer that big square in the middle would hope or maybe it's just a bigger
square we don't know right like maybe maybe the volume thing is now just the entire screen who
knows uh so yeah they're kind of i think the big things to take away from guillermes uh brilliant
report i would say yeah the redesign reminders app
he also throws in is going to be on the mac too which makes me believe that that'll be a marzipan
app um this fall which is i'm gonna miss when they give this an actual name i like marzipan
as a name unless it never has a name i mean it's possible that it'll never have a name and it'll
just be you know ui kit on mac right but then that's what we'll have to call it right like eventually over time we'll just start calling
it ui kit on the mac and move away from marzipan but i do i do love marzipan yeah but jason is
there anything missing for you from this report is there stuff that you think you should have seen
but didn't i was gonna say and some of this has to do with the nature of their sources right like
they are detailing some
very specific system level things. However, I will just point out that this report doesn't
seem to mention anything about changes to the files app, to how the iPad accesses files,
to if we're going to see the iPad Pro with that nice USB-C port have more ability to access USB-C devices,
including devices that have file systems on them. One of my pet peeves about iOS right now,
and I just noticed it's not here, not mentioned at all. Not mentioned that it's not coming,
just not mentioned. So I'm just going to put it out there that that's one of those areas,
file stuff and USB-C in general that, you know, audio
stuff goes in there too. How do they handle microphones and other external devices that
are sort of handled in a very simple way now because of the assumptions made in the early
days about an iPhone OS that are maybe not as valid with the iPad. I'm just saying it'll be
really sad if this all comes out and I'm'm gonna have to wait another two years or forever two years and up in order to uh do what i want to do with my ipad
i'm gonna choose to believe that there are lots of files changes and they just got missed in this
report because i can't i can't conceive of there being no updates to that system
because it needs them.
It desperately needs them.
There are just bugs and weirdness in it,
and it could be and should be and needs to be a lot better.
It's just a fundamental...
I'm not one of these people that feels like
they have to fundamentally rethink the way that files are.
I don't think you need to go to a file based structure completely.
Right.
I don't mind the hybrid system that they've got right now.
Like sometimes you think in apps, sometimes you think in files, because that's how my brain thinks.
Maybe because I've just gotten used to iOS, but they're just the files that needs a lot of work.
And I want to see Apple work on that.
But I will say this report is making me very excited for June.
There's a lot of stuff in there
that I think I'm going to have a lot of fun playing with,
so I'm really excited.
For sure.
Yeah.
All right, today's episode is also brought to you
by our friends over at Luna Display,
the makers of the hardware solution,
the only hardware solution that can turn your iPad
into a wireless display for your Mac,
meaning you'll have a second display that is mega portable
with basically zero lag and stunning image quality
that also has the benefits of an iOS device.
Like you can use your Apple Pencil,
you can use your fingers on this screen,
which then becomes the second
monitor for your Mac. Setting up extra screens can be super fiddly, but Luna Display is so easy.
You just plug in their lovely dongle into your Mac and you're good to go. Plus, everything works
over Wi-Fi, but if you're away from a Wi-Fi connection, maybe you're traveling around,
you can use a USB cable to connect it to, and you'll still be able to get that wonderful
second display for your Mac. It's so simple to to get set up and you're going to love that extra screen real estate when you have
it lunar display is a complete extension to your mac it will also work with external keyboards so
you could use like the smart keyboard folio which i do and it will work right like it's not just
touch and stuff like that it will all work which is great um i i'm so impressed with lunar display
i use it every single day now.
Listeners of this show will know I have Luna Display in my headless Mac Mini.
That's how I use that Mac Mini.
I use it for various tasks.
I use it to help me jump over hurdles that sometimes iOS falls down on,
and it's become an indispensable part of the way that I get my work done.
I'm so, so happy with it.
And they're always updating it.
They're doing a bunch of stuff like the new Liquid Video Engine,
which brings significantly reduced latency and a faster screen refresh rate as well.
Listeners of this show can get an exclusive 10% discount on Luna Display. If you go to lunadisplay.com, that is L-U-N-A-D-I-S-P-L-A-Y.com and use the promo code UPGRADE at checkout,
you will get that 10% off. That is lunarDisplay.com and promo code Upgrade at checkout
for an exclusive 10% discount.
Go there right now and upgrade your setup.
You're going to love it.
Our thanks to Lunar Display
for their support of this show
and all of RelayFM
and my working life every day.
It's wonderful.
Jason, I want to talk to you about iTunes.
This has been the talk of the town over the last week.
We all kind of figured this was coming.
It even came up on the show last week, right?
Hence the title of the whole episode,
kind of being about iTunes and QuickTime and all that sort of stuff.
But then there was another report at 9to5Mac
by friend of the show, Guillaume Rambos.
This is the Guillaherme Power Hour today
on Upgrade.
The next major Mac OS version will
include standalone music, podcasts, and
TV apps. We knew the TV app was coming.
Books will get a major redesign.
There's some basic details in there, plus some icons
as well. Kind of just like, more
kind of like fuel for the
fire that something like this
is going to be uh happening which means
the breakup of itunes a thing that we've spoken about forever um there was a very good debate i
think uh on atp this week um with a sentiment which i can totally understand from marco of
you don't know what you've got until it's gone about itunes and i've been thinking this myself a little bit recently where it's like when it when it's dead what actually happens and we spent some time
talking about this last week on connected as well where you know like me and federico
we just use apple music right and right if there's an apple music, it's going to be better than the really bad Apple Music support that iTunes has.
Right. Because it's very bad. It's super weird in places.
The searching is terrible. The way that you browse feels it feels like it's loading a web browser inside of iTunes, which I'm sure is what's happening.
Like it's it's a nightmare, not a nightmare it's it's not nice right and for me as just a complete apple
music user i would quite like apple music the ipad app on my mac but i understand so you've got people
like steven and then people like marco people like john i don't know how much do you use like these
types of features of like the more typical itunes features adding in your own music, doing more categorization, looking at more information, like all that kind of stuff.
And so the idea over the last few years of it's time to break up iTunes was build an actual new music player, right?
Like that's what this has always been for the last few years.
Like pull the music features out of iTunes, pull the podcast features out of iTunes, make apps for them.
pull the music features out of iTunes,
pull the podcast features out of iTunes,
make apps for them.
It wasn't until now,
because now this is what's probably going to happen,
is let's just have the iOS app.
Like no one was thinking that because that wasn't a thing we thought about
until last year that this would even be a thing.
So now when the conversation is
iTunes is going to get broken up
into a bunch of distinct applications,
everyone knows what that means now.
What that means now is we're getting the iOS versions.
I think at the core of what Marco talked about and what John also talked about, and I like what John had to say.
I thought that was – I was building up all sorts of comments while listening to Marco and then John said them all.
So I was like, all right, okay, then we're good.
I think the reality, right, reality hits here.
This is the cold reality of it's not going to be some idealized, brilliant new Mac app that set of Mac apps that Apple is writing.
It's going to be Marzipan and it's going to be maybe new updated versions of what's
in iOS 12, but that's what it's going to be maybe new updated versions of what's in iOS 12, but that's what it's going to
be. And you get that reality and suddenly it's not your ideal dream app. It is what you already
have been using on the iPad all along, if you have an iPad. And I think at the core of it,
if I'm going to dissect what Marco and John were both saying, especially. It's a lack of confidence in Apple in terms of Apple's interest in building apps that have depth for users who demand more depth than the average user.
Is the way I would maybe put it. Like that Apple in the past designed apps
that were for the masses,
but also had tweaky features for the power users.
And that Apple of the last decade
feels much more like an Apple
that is not interested in the tweaky features
or is too overwhelmed
with whoever is building their apps
to devote time to that,
that they struggle to update
and build their apps as it is,
which I think I agree, actually,
I think is actually high on my list
of my problems that I have
with the way Apple is run today
is that they seem to not be as focused
on their apps as they should be, that the apps they
provide are not as good as they should be, and that they could be better. And it's not the fault
of the people working on them. I get the distinct impression that there are not as many people
working on them, and there's not as much attention devoted to them as there should be at a top level
priority level. But I see that point, which is Apple partly distorted by the fact that Apple making decisions because Apple's been
focused on mobile and it comes from that root decision of the iPhone OS is where iOS came from.
It came from the small screen iPhone and Apple shifting its philosophy because the user it was
trying to reach in 2000 is not the user it's trying to reach in 2019 or even in this decade.
And something like smart playlists
feels like a last decade Apple to me,
which is that Apple seems to have decided,
regardless of the iPhone thing,
that it doesn't want to focus on tweaky user features.
It wants to keep things super simple.
Apple don't make products for the crazy ones anymore.
They actually make them for everybody.
Yeah, I mean, this goes back to something
that we've talked about a lot,
which is the Apple of today is reaching an audience
that is massively larger than the Apple of a decade ago
and even more so of two decades ago and i i think the problem is that
that means i don't i don't think the size of the power user base has changed accordingly i think
that as a percentage it keeps getting smaller and there's a really strong argument to be made
that um that the tweaky stuff shouldn't be prioritized because there's so many other
things to do that aren't the tweaky stuff the problem is if you're one of the people who uses the tweaky stuff it's frustrating which
is totally get it and a lot i am one of those people too right we all do and as well like i
want to say i just wanted to add on this as well right like because there is like this i i was
talking to atp as i was listening to it because yeah me too i agree i actually do agree with the
majority of what marco was saying but the the power user stuff exists in the same way on iOS.
Like the way he is describing himself being a power user on the Mac.
I feel that way about iOS.
Like I know the things you do that aren't shown.
I know the keyboard shortcuts that exist that people don't think exist.
Right.
I know keyboard shortcuts that exist that people don't think exist, right?
Like I know the way that you would do a specific drag and drop to get this to work.
Like I know how to get shortcuts to work the way that I want, right?
It is nowhere near as complex. It is nowhere near as surfacable as well.
Like the power user stuff is easy to find on the Mac.
But there are those types.
It's not gone from iOS.
It's just very different.
But there are these types of power user features
because I'm using them.
Yeah, yeah.
They're different and they don't go as low level
as some of this stuff does.
I mean, Marco does a lot of his work
and I do a lot of my work with shell scripts
and things that are running that iOS doesn't do that.
And that's frustrating because you do hit a wall.
But you're right.
There are power user features.
And the proportions are very different, right?
The proportions of power users in the Mac is way higher, which I understand.
But I think the core problem here is Apple's philosophy of what its apps should be. And the fact that Apple is also a, you know,
as a company, kind of a control freak, which means they spent a lot of time talking about
it wouldn't be a problem if any app could have access to the Apple Music Library,
because then you could just write an app that was better for power users that would tweak it.
And that would be an alternative. But there isn't an alternative. And the thing you've got is sanded
down to this amazing smoothness, but it also means
that it's like a featureless surface and you can't get a toehold.
You can't get a grip if you're somebody who's trying to do something a little bit out of
alignment with what they envision the use of their app as being.
And I can see that.
At the same time, and this is me being a little optimistic here, but Apple has spent the last 10 years building a, or 15 years really almost, behind the scenes, building a completely new operating system, a completely new app platform.
Modifying that operating system to work on larger screens with the iPad.
Dealing with the early days of the smartphone era where it was a huge arms race in terms of feature development.
And now it's more mature, but back then it wasn't. And they've got all that going on,
and they need to write versions of their apps for this new platform, and they're maintaining the
Mac. And is it any wonder that the Mac stuff got left by the side of the road, largely? It's not.
But we live in an era now
where the arms race for smartphone stuff has lessened,
that Apple is aggressively moving
toward this single app platform
across its operating systems.
And I think that's a real opportunity.
I think that's an opportunity for Apple now
to invest more effort
in its apps in general. And because of Marzipan, that means that it's able to invest that effort
in stuff that will be seen on the Mac and the iPad too, in a way that maybe it didn't do when
it was so focused on keeping the iPhone pushing forward. And I think that
could benefit Mac users and iPad users. And we'll see, right? It could be the same old story,
but I feel like there's at least a ghost of a chance that now that Apple doesn't have to
either implement the same feature twice in two different code bases or somewhat shared code
bases. But you get my
point, like, oh, we need to update this feature for the Mac and for iOS. And sometimes they're
like, forget it. And they just wouldn't do it on the Mac. With Marzipan, this era, that ends.
That ends. And instead, whoever's in charge of reminders writes one app. and that deploys on the mac and it deploys on ios and and for apple
music i think you know like john and i talked about last week ipad users benefit because a lot
of the stuff the mac metaphors will be extended to the ipad as well when we talk about tear off
popovers and things like that and the ipad will become more capable too because now you're able
to target two platforms now if you like you're thinking, I might write an iPad, I might focus on the iPad
version of my app, or this is an app that really requires the iPad. You're like, eh, iPad, I'm not
really going to go there. But if suddenly you can write that app and you can target the Mac and the
iPad simultaneously, that's a way bigger market. And I feel optimistic that developers of these kind of apps are going to look at Marzipan and say, oh, this is great. I can make an app that runs on the iPad and the Mac. And no, it may not feel like a classic Mac app, but it may get more better apps on the platforms. And that part is good. So, you know, I'm not saying that, you know, people who use Apple Music on the Mac this
fall are not going to be like, ew, gross.
What is this thing?
It's totally going to be a bumpy ride, even if they add features to it.
But in the long run, I think that there are a lot of positives from the Mac.
I don't disagree with Marco that one of the great concerns here is that the Mac just becomes an operating system
that it doesn't have any of those features that appeal to people who want to dive a little deeper.
And I hope that Apple will take this opportunity now that they've rejiggered their app platform
to let Mac and iPad users who want a little bit more get a little bit more out of it.
Now that they're out of this decade-long period where they've been building a second operating
system and a second app platform and in this huge arms race with Android, that starting from now,
they can actually put a little more time into that stuff.
It would be just a great waste and a shame if effectively the Mac becomes just a different
screen size target for iOS, right?
Like that would just be a waste.
I agree.
It would be a waste.
Like I agree.
Although I will say, I will say that, that as the owner of a 12.9 inch iPad pro, I also
think it would be a shame if the power given to a user with a 12-inch macbook air was not given to
me oh 100 you mean you know i'm coming at it from that point jason i said i care about the most
right and that's why i am excited i'm in the club of people who are excited about the possibility
of marzipan because of what it could do to my ipad right like Like all of this potential in new applications and in power,
I could have stuff
that I'm used to using on my Mac,
on my iPad and vice versa.
And that is incredibly exciting to me.
Also, by the way,
we're talking a lot about iTunes
and Apple Music,
like the podcast app on the Mac
is going to be way better
than the iTunes podcast experience,
in my opinion.
Yes, that's why it doesn't get brought up. But you won't have to use it because Marco is going to be way better than the iTunes podcast experience, in my opinion.
Yes. That's why it doesn't get brought up.
But you won't have to use it because Marco's going to do Overcast,
presumably, in Marzipan if he can, and that will be even better.
But like, there are lots of other benefits here.
I do think there's a lot of mystery about what happens with device sync
and does that go away.
What I would like to see, I mean,
obviously iTunes is going to stay around hidden in a folder somewhere for a while or downloadable or whatever it is but like what
i would like to see i think there are some fairly basic things that apple could do in ios and mac os
to make all of the things that currently exist in terms of all or almost all of the things that
exist in terms of device management um that that people might want could just be taken out and put in the OS. Like in terms of
maybe you get file access, you know, if they really do have the ability to like share files,
so I could see the contents of my iPad and drag a file into it. Do I need iTunes to do that? Or
could these devices just talk to each other? And you can airdrop now,
but I wonder if there are some other ways of doing things just to keep them in sync.
So there's other stuff they can do. I don't think we're rid entirely of iTunes.
Windows is still a big question, is what are they going to do on Windows for this?
They could just keep iTunes for Windows around forever. I don't know.
Or they could go to a web interface for most of it and reduce the Windows app to a device syncing app. There's some details here that we're going to have to deal with. But there is a lot of
potential benefit. But there's no doubt, you know, anytime you go through a change like this,
there's going to be a huge set of feature aggressions. And I think it's interesting
that John Syracuse in that ATP episode came down basically the same place I've come down on uh iTunes match or people who don't subscribe to Apple Music which is I don't see how it's a
it's actually a big progression for iOS as well to let the music app accept audio files and put
them in the library and then upload them if you're using iTunes Match or Apple Music, and add them to your collection. That's not an earth-shattering UI change to do to that app.
And then you've got the ability to open a Mac with the music app and add your library and have it
just work as if you had synced it using iTunes for people who don't use Apple Music. I feel like
that's a feature that if it's not there this fall, will probably be there eventually. And then,
and that's an example of something that presumably would come over to iOS and would be a benefit for
if you've ever bought like an indie album on Bandcamp or something and gotten a zip file and
been like, uh, what do I do with this on ios and the answer is there's nothing you can
do with it you can unzip it but then you've just got some mp3 files you can't get them in your
music library that from that direction it would be nice if that was that was a uh new feature of
ios that would be a good thing i know that this is going to come up a lot like this isn't the last
time we're going to talk about this because it's's actually, it's not about iTunes, right? We all see this, right?
Like this is nothing to do with iTunes.
In microcosm,
it is the story of what's going to happen this fall.
Yeah.
And progressively,
but the big blow is going to happen this fall
when a new version of macOS ships
and it's got a whole bunch of apps
that come from iOS
and they're not going to be,
you know, even if they kind of look like macOS,
they're not going to be the same. They're going to be of look like Mac, they're not going to be the same.
They're going to be really different.
You know, I don't want to have to keep
reiterating this constantly.
This is so much more than all of that.
Like, this is the future of Apple,
one way or another.
Because, like, we believe, right,
it starts here, then we get ARM Macs.
Then what happens?
And, right, you know, there's that german report a few months ago where he spoke about like it's ipad this year but then next year it's iphone
and the year after that is universal applications right like this this starts now it's you know it's
kind of started last year right we started to find out about it but now it's like okay we're building up to like everything changing in june good and bad so
whilst we are talking about itunes specifically it's so much more than that and there's gonna be
a lot of like people's identities being challenged yeah yeah for sure this is going to be in fact and and and
for i know um so many of our listeners it's great by the way i am you know teenager and up right i'm
up um this is going to be like the os 10 transition was in a lot of ways where in a two, three year period, the Mac of, you know, before and the Mac of after is almost unrecognizable.
And when you're in that and then you get past it and you're like, oh, yeah, this is my Mac now.
But when you're in that period, it's weird and it's rough and it does challenge your identity because you're like, I always do it this way.
Like there were so many people when Mac OS X came out that they're like, why does the Apple menu not show the contents of a folder or an alias that I put somewhere in the file system?
And like as an OS X user today, you'd be like, that's bizarre.
I don't even know what you're talking about.
Why would the Apple menu do that?
I have no idea what you're talking about.
But that's what it did under classic Mac OS.
And people were really bent out of shape about it.
And it's going to be, I mean, that's just a silly example.
But like, yes, it is your identity as a person who is confident with your technology, who has spent maybe years bending the technology to do exactly what you want to do in the way you want to do it.
You've bent it.
It's bent you a little bit.
You have come to a comfort level.
And then Apple is going to roll in over the next two or three years and make you really uncomfortable.
And, you know, again, I think there will be good and I think there will be bad. And I think there will be a lot of frustration.
I think the good news, and I got to say this based on my history in all the chip transitions
and the OS transition that have happened on this platform, on Apple's platforms in the past,
the good news is if you can learn to balance your enthusiasm for the new, you've been accustomed.
I mean, maybe you've already taken a hit with the MacBooks over the last three years, but
generally you're accustomed to this enthusiasm for the new.
Oh, I want to get the new.
I want to get the latest and greatest.
If you can temper that a little bit, you can survive a transition because nobody's making
you move.
And that's an important point here is that if one of the things
that happens in these transitions
is people stay behind for a while.
And I would not be shocked
if that happens here
where people are like,
you know what?
I'm going to keep my old iMac
that still runs Mojave
and I'm going to stay there for a while
with my 32-bit apps
and with my stuff that isn't from iOS
and with my iTunes. I'm just going to hang out here for a while with my 32-bit apps and with my stuff that isn't from iOS and with my iTunes.
I'm just going to hang out here for a while.
And that happens in big transitions.
And that's okay.
Like, I, you know, we had devices running classic Mac OS for years at Macworld because we, like, they were where our page layout got done.
And they just didn't want to move because, like, the software wasn and they just stayed there and we made it work and then eventually they came across
and it was a funny moment where the editors had been living on os 10 for like four years
and then the production team moved to os 10 and they're like how does this work and we're like oh
yeah let me tell you all about it because we had been living it. That's going to happen and it's going to get frustrating.
But if you can learn to temper your desire to push forward and use the latest and greatest,
it can serve you well in transitions like this. If you've got something vital that you do and it's jeopardized by the new way, the solution is not to use the new way. And you'll be able to
do that for a while, I think. So something to keep in mind. I don't know how this transition
is going to go exactly, but having been through a bunch of them, it's something to keep in mind.
Like I know we all as tech enthusiasts want to push forward and use the latest and greatest.
There is no harm in stepping off the carousel for a while and and and letting it turn a few turns without you but and i will say
if you do want to stay on the carousel the best thing you can try and have is an open mind
yeah that's always the case right like like things will be you know again it's gonna get weird it's
gonna be it's gonna get weird there are gonna be things that are great and they're gonna be things that are terrible that's gonna happen they're gonna be things that
you're like why did they do this why like the number picker right one of the things that
happened on twitter is that guillermo rambo posted a tweet or or maybe steve trotten smith did and he
uh replied to it but it was one of these things was like wouldn't it be funny if marzipan didn't
shake that change that number picker from mojave, where you've got the iOS thing with the spinning things that you have to use a mouse to like click the spinning things to set a date?
It's this ridiculous thing that should not be on a Mac.
And the strong implication there is that maybe it's still there.
And we're going to have stuff like that.
We're like, why would you do this?
And that's going to happen. There are also going to be things where you're like, oh,
this is really cool. And that's going to happen too. It is going to get weird. You are absolutely
right. And some patience, open-mindedness, because part of this is you've got that way
that you've bent your tech to your will, and it's bent you to it a little bit and you found this comfortable
place to be there is a new there may very well be not 100 guarantee there will be a new place to be
it's not going to be like your old place though it's not going to work the same
and getting there is frustrating now first off you don't have to go there right away like i said
but um but it can be frustrating to build up that new thing. And then once you build it up,
you're like, oh, what was the problem? Seriously, OS X did that to so many people where OS X,
the rules are totally different from classic Mac OS, but there were lots of benefits and there
were some things that really lagged behind and we all found a new equilibrium. And I think that
will happen with Marzipan and potentially with ARM coming down the road as well. But it's going to be weird for a while, for sure. And there's going to be frustration and that's okay. Like, and so I heard that from Marco, like, I get it. And he's not wrong. There's, I think there's some good and there's some reason to be optimistic, but there's going to be stuff that's really frustrating. And I, my honestly listening to Marco, my core worry, and I do actually have this as a
concern. My core worry is that where Apple's going, Apple is so unconcerned with the needs
of power users that in the end, if you want to be an old school computer user with all of these things that are features that you expect from your
desktop or laptop computer that in the next decade there will come a time when apple even says yeah
if you want to do stuff like that you should just buy a pc but how how do you balance that worry
of what apple's going to do with the same company who bent to the will of the pro user to create a new Mac Pro, an iMac Pro, and to, we believe, based on rumors, fix the MacBook Pro?
That is the reason for optimism, is that whoever got, while this marzipan stuff is going on, some group within Apple made the decision
that they actually need to serve pro users. And that gives me hope, right? Because that Apple
doesn't want to send power users to Windows. That Apple wants to keep them on the Mac.
And as long as that Apple has a say in what happens on the Mac. And maybe it's outside marzipan, right? Maybe marzipan is just the, the, uh, marzipan. It's maybe it's like the frosting on a cake. Um, maybe it really
is. And that underneath on the Mac, they have all the other things that you expect in the Mac and
they don't go away and they do get improved. Maybe that's the case. Maybe that is their strategy is
marzipan is for everybody, but the mac is still going to have the
power underneath and i hope that's the case because i don't want apple to drive power users
off of their operating systems because i am one and i don't want to go i'm not interested in like
all these people talk about the macbook keyboards and they're like oh i could just go to windows
i'm like yeah that's a deal breaker i'm not going to do that i'm not interested in that
but it doesn't mean that i'm not frustrated by the current state of affairs. Today's show is also brought to you by Squarespace.
Make your next move with Squarespace because they will let you easily create a website
for your next idea with a unique domain name, award winning templates available to you and so
much more. They are the all in one platform that will let you put your next project online.
No matter what type of website you want to create, Squarespace have all the tools.
If you want to create a blog, portfolio, an online store,
they have all of it.
If you want to create a site for a community event,
maybe for a big party, a wedding,
they have all of the templates
and all of the functionality you're going to need
to make that so easy to do.
There's nothing to install or patch or upgrade.
You don't need to know any coding.
You don't need to worry about any of it.
Even if you do know how to build a website,
but you just can't be bothered
to do all of the really fiddly stuff,
Squarespace do all of it.
It's beautiful.
It's easy to use.
You can have a website going in like 20 minutes, right?
You just go in,
you choose one of their beautiful templates.
You customize.
It's like with customization,
going in and changing colors,
changing fonts.
It's so easy to do.
I am such
a big fan of Squarespace. I've been using them for like 10 years now, maybe probably more than
that, actually. And I have other projects in my life that I want to do, and Squarespace is where
they will live because I know how to use it. It's so simple. They have 24-7 customer support.
You can get a unique domain name, just register it all within Squarespace. It's fantastic. They've
won tons of awards. They win an award from me. You win the Mike Hur register it all within Squarespace it's fantastic they've won tons of awards
they win an award from me
you win the Mike Hurley I like you Squarespace award
you can go and try it out right now
with no credit card required
go to squarespace.com upgrade
you can get a free trial there
you can actually build your entire website
so you know what you're going to get
you can see all the functions
and then when you're ready to put it live to the world
you just sign up one of our plans
to start at just $12 a month but if you use the offer code
upgrade you will get 10 of your first purchase of a website or domain and show your support for
this show that is squarespace.com upgrade and the code upgrade for 10 of your first purchase
our thanks to squarespace make your next move make your next website let's do some hashtag
ask upgrade questions to round out this week's
episode. First one comes from MT Walker
and they want to know, should I
hold out for the mythical, magical,
modular Mac Pro or should I settle
for an iMac Pro? I'm currently using a
2013 Mac Pro with 12 cores,
64 gigabytes of RAM, and
a D700 GPU.
I don't know what some of that stuff means, Jason,
I'm not going to lie, but in
Matt's tweet, they posted
an image of an activity
monitor, and it was doing some
Adobe Media Encoding stuff. It looks like
they're a Premiere Pro user, and it
seems like basically they need all the power
they can get.
Yeah, I...
It
depends, as it always does, on how long you're willing to wait because i think at
this point we're two months out from possibly hearing more details about the macro at least
understanding a little bit more about what it might be and you might not want to make your
decision it might be that you see that and you're like no the iMac pro is probably good for me
and and then you go for it um but you know leading from what I think you were going to say
I wouldn't unless you are having significant issues I wouldn't want to move right now
yeah I think that's right that there there is um there is a thing coming in a couple of weeks a couple of months that may tell us more
and so that more information is good also the iMac pro yeah you know hasn't been updated
since December 2017 when it was released which means I don't think there's new stuff for it but
it means that if it's going to be updated, presumably that would happen at some point, and it hasn't been.
So keep that in mind, what I said earlier about how the high-spec iMac will kind of reach the low-spec iMac Pro.
That said, iMac Pro is great.
It will.
You can buy it with lots and lots of cores and lots of RAM, and that's all good.
I think you could get it.
I think the other thing to keep in mind
is what your feeling is about monitors
because all the rumors are that the new Mac Pro
will come alongside a new Apple monitor
that will be presumably newer, bigger, sleeker,
more beautiful.
And if you want that monitor, then wait, because you can you'll
be able to get that with the with the the Mac Pro, although presumably a modern iMac will drive that
monitor to just fine as a second monitor. So there's a lot of stuff going on here, I would
say if you can afford to wait and find out what the deal is with this Mac Pro, and then make a judgment then. Go ahead and wait.
Because I think the iMac Pro is great, and it will serve you well. But if you can wait a couple
of months, wait and see, because that may answer your question. And it would be a shame to commit
now to buy the iMac Pro that's been sitting out there for more than a year, when in two months,
you'll know, hopefully, a little bit more about whether the Mac Pro will suit you.
Here's an interesting question from Eric. What's happened to Photoshop for iPad?
We haven't heard about it in a while, and we're a third of the way through the year.
Two thirds of the year remains. all they said was 2019 yeah i
would not be surprised if this is a wwdc thing uh it might not be it could come out any day or
it could come out uh at wwdc it could come out announced for ios 13 yep it's for as we kind of
said at the time i think still might need some
stuff that's not in ios yet right like that they know is coming because they're working together
right like we that was very clear from the original announcements that like apple and dobi
working very closely together on some of this stuff and i think helping push each other forward
in for this stuff um yeah i agree like it is strange that we haven't
heard about it at all for a while right like there's not really been anything else it came
out with such a bang and it was all this like it felt like for a few weeks always getting this
information and then it stopped and you know i can understand what has been the avenue like where
would they have what was the outlet for showing it? Or maybe there just isn't much more to show. So I understand where it's like, huh, what happened to
that? I always thought it would be out by now. Like my mind, I don't remember the, offhand,
I don't remember that if they gave any kind of timeframe, it was probably just 2019. But I always
kind of thought, oh, well, if they've announced it in like August, September, we'll have it by the end of Q1.
But that didn't happen.
And I think that, you know, probably a lot of people like me thought that, right?
Like they're announcing it like six months early and we'll get it.
It's definitely happening.
You know, like we've had quite a few versions of this question asked to us, Jason.
And many of them are kind of like it's obviously been canceled.
It's like, no, no, no, no, no, no.
This is happening because it's too important for both companies now.
Not only did they announce it, but like there's a reason they're doing it in the first place.
And that hasn't changed.
But, yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if, like you, we get more about it in June with a date
for when we're likely to see it come out for the iPad.
Daniel asks,
Do you know of a way to transfer music
from an iPod Touch 3rd generation to a MacBook Pro?
I've been trying to figure out a way to transfer my mom's music
from her old iPod Touch to her iPhone 7 plus. I think about this one.
I have a couple of options. And I think they'll work. And maybe you can tell me if I'm right or
wrong. There are apps like I Explorer, which I haven't used in a long time. This is one of those
applications that like, will let you get in to anos device and kind of tinker around and you never
really know what to think about with apps like that but i have used this one in the past for
similar kinds of things where it's like well there's a thing that i need and i need to do
and i haven't got any other way of getting to it or doing it like messages backups or whatever right right um but my other thought was if you
signed up for iCloud music library wouldn't that just do it i don't think it'll upload from the
iPod touch really okay i don't think so because i was wondering i don't know maybe would it merge
the the libraries but then i was worried about like oh but what if it
then just deleted it all so um things like i explorer like i explorer has a trial uh i would
give that a go and see if that will do it if that doesn't do it maybe look into something like high
cloud music library but proceed with caution i think would be would be my thought on that one this is a tricky one i mean another one that i thought jason was like if you did an itunes backup would that carry
over possibly the question is can you then back up an old old ipod touch to a brand new iphone
or will there be a you know will that work where you can just restore the backup even though it's
from the older operating system?
It's possible if it's...
Depends on what those files are and where they're from.
Yeah, yeah.
So this is a very interesting question.
But I don't know the answer,
but I know of a couple of ways to do it.
There's another app which has been recommended
by Justin in the chat room called iMazing.
iMazing, yeah.
I don't remember which one of these I've used, honestly,
but they seem to be by and large the same kind of thing.
But again, these apps are doing weird things,
so always proceed with caution on that.
That would be the upgrade recommended use.
Mihir asks, did you get your Avengersgers end game tickets i'm wondering if there
will be a following monday uh mike at the movies special what did you get your tickets jason i
haven't bought any tickets but that's not going to preclude me from being able to see it i don't
live in a place where movie theaters sell out and you get reserved seats so okay i did and i get to see it on the 25th of april because
tax cuts uh for disney means that uh a lot of these movies are shot in the uk which means that
they uh either premiere here or they come out a little bit earlier um so i'll be seeing it on the
25th uh in the afternoon like it comes out midnight 25th here right but i yeah i don't think
i could do a midnight a midnight stream a midnight three hours it's a three-hour movie mike yeah i'm
not keen not keen on that so i'm just gonna go see it on the 25th which i'm very excited about
yes i i will see it that weekend too so we're not going to be doing Mike at the Movies about it on this show.
That's true, actually.
We aren't.
No.
We aren't.
And the reason we aren't is because, you know, you never know. But the plan is that the following weekend's Incomparable episode will include one Mike Hurley.
On his first ever main and comparable show appearance,
which I am so very excited.
And for a reason I can't describe really nervous about.
So that's going to be a whole thing.
It doesn't really happen to me anymore,
Jason,
but like that's a different arena.
It's like more Mike's weird movie opinions guide him through the show.
Only you can find out.
So that that's going to be, is that that?
Is it that weekend or the next weekend?
I don't remember.
It's the following Saturday.
Great.
So you will have a week to think about it, ponder it.
It's very possible I'll go see it again.
And maybe see it a second time.
Yeah.
And finally, Daniel wants to know, I want to get a new Mac Mini.
Do you think it will be able to drive the new Apple monitor
at full resolution and frame rate,
or should I wait until it's announced to be sure?
I think it will.
Yeah, I'd be super surprised.
I'd be super surprised.
Look, I think there's a reason that they colored that Mac Mini space gray.
It is more focused as a Pro machine.
I mean, they really kind of did say it as that,
and the laptops will be able to use that thing i would be i would be flabbergasted if there
is a mac that is released right now that that can't power it because that just seems wild to me
so yeah i mean keeping in mind that that mac mini can drive um a pretty powerful display, right? It can drive, it's rated for
5120 by 2880 resolution.
So yeah, I would be shocked if it can't.
I can't guarantee it.
It can do like a couple of monitors, right, as well.
Like it's, you know, it's got some real throughput.
Yeah, it can do up to two displays where one of them is 5120 by
2880 and the other one is 4096 by 2160 that's a lot of pixels so to you know is it going to be
able to drive via thunderbolt 3 uh this thing i i i've got to think it will.
If you would like to submit a question for a future episode,
you can send out a tweet with the hashtag
AskUpgrade and it will be included
into our document and maybe
we'll answer it on the show.
Thank you so much to everybody that has sent one in.
Thank you to Squarespace, Lunar Display, and KiwiCo
for their support of this week's episode.
Thank you for listening.
If you'd like to find Jason's work online, you can go to sixcolors.com or theincomparable.com. Jason is
at jsnell, J-S-N-E-L-L on Twitter. I am at imike, I-M-Y-K-E. And this show is a part of RelayFM,
where you'll find many shows, some I am on, some Jason's on, and some are hosted by neither of us,
but by equally talented, if not more talented individuals.
We have many wonderful shows at RelayFM.
If you only listen to Upgrade, or maybe listen to Upgrade and one other,
go take a look, because I bet there's something else that you would love.
We'll be back next week.
Remember, we're going to be recording and releasing on Tuesday for no reason other than travel.
Yep.
No conspiracy theories, please.
You can make them, but understand that they are uh they're not true it's just a regular episode i'm going to travel for a family wedding
that's what they want you to think goodbye everybody say goodbye jason snell
goodbye everybody the black dog barks at midnight. Wink wink.