Transcript
Discussion (0)
from relay this is upgrade episode 535 for October 28th 2024 today's show is brought
to you by Squarespace FitBot and Notion my name is Mike Hurley and I'm joined by Jason
Snow hi Jason hi Mike how are you? Good, busy week.
This is gonna be a very busy week
and it's already started off busy
and we're gonna get busier I think.
I think it's gonna be a huge, huge week.
I'm a little apprehensive about it.
It's gonna be, there's a lot.
It's like this isFest 2024 this week.
Well, we're obviously going to talk about the Mac stuff
and Apple's intelligence, but it's just like,
one of these things of like, you know,
I was talking to my wife last week and it's like,
could we have family visiting this week?
And I'm like, okay, this is a couple of weeks ago.
I'm like, well, I reckon there's going to be an Apple event
one day, the week that they're coming.
And I'll do my best to like, you know,
we'll work around that.
But now I'm like, I don't know what to expect now.
Obviously that's not happening, right?
We know that now, but it's like, I just don't know what the rest of this week is.
But what I do know at least is I'll just be recording my shows in the days I'm supposed to be recording them and fitting in all the things I'm going to fit in.
Yeah, you'll catch what you can.
Different for you.
It's wild. I mean, so we'll cover what we can. Different for you. It's, it's, it's wild.
I mean, so we'll cover what we can today.
Yes.
But we will only be able to cover today, day one of MacFest 2024, which will
continue for a few more days, as far as we can tell.
So several days, according to John Turnis.
And of course the, the earnings, right? The, we have the earnings on Thursday. So several days, according to John Turnis.
And of course the, the earnings, right? The, we have the earnings on Thursday.
And then Apple financials is on Thursday.
So I, if I had to make a prediction,
it will be that Mac Fest 2024 last three days.
And then there's Money Fest quarterly on Thursday,
which is also Halloween.
And then Friday is, I don't know,
recovery day, it's leg day, something like that.
They did say there's three announcements,
so we can assume it's one day after another.
But anyway, we'll get to all of that
because we've got to start out with a Snell Talk question.
This one comes from John, who wants to know,
and this is kind of in reference to,
we were talking about-
Is it John Ternes?
I don't know.
Me and you were talking a couple of weeks ago
about the idea of not, not
really thinking that we would be able to retire fully.
But John wanted to know, would you like to live on a beach in Hawaii
when you do choose to retire?
Um, yeah, I think it's unlikely that I would be able to afford to live by the
beach.
Yeah.
Like I don't want to live like on the beach just with no home and just laying
on the beach.
I don't want to do that.
But, uh, in general, yes, that would be a wonderful place. I don't want to live like on the beach just with no home and just laying on the beach. I don't want to do that.
But in general, yes, that would be a wonderful place.
I would love to do that.
That is one of the dreams, but I would say that feels to me like an unrealistic dream.
Dreams can be unrealistic.
You can just have them.
You never know where your life's going to take you.
Like a little condo in Hawaii. That mean, yeah, that would be awesome.
That would be great.
About as good as it could get, I think, for retirement.
Yeah, my slightly more plausible,
but also implausible dream is actually
to have a little condo in San Diego.
Yep.
And then, what I've said to Lauren a bunch of times is,
I kinda wanna be the, the, the regular
at the Padres games where they're like, Oh, there's this old guy who's just always there.
And he, and he, and he watches the baseball games and he lives like across the street
and he just comes over and watches the games and goes back.
He's just, that's what he does with his retirement.
And I kind of want to be that guy.
I do.
I kind of want to be that guy.
But, um, and, And why the Padres and not
the Giants you say it's because the weather is much, much better in San Diego. That's why. Come on.
Come on. But anyway, beach in Hawaii would be fantastic. Every time I go to Hawaii,
I think about it. But yeah, I mean, who knows? Thank you, John, for basically getting me to
admit yes, that is one of my dreams
If you'd like to send in a question to help us open an episode of upgrade
Just go to upgrade feedback calm and you can send in a snow talk question of your own
To give you an example of the business of today's episode. We're gonna talk about your iPad mini review in follow-up
So you reviewed a whole new product you said a couple of things that I thought were really talk about your iPad mini review in follow-up. So you reviewed a whole new product, you said a couple of things that I thought were really nice
about the iPad mini. I read a couple of quotes from you. The iPad mini is
already a niche product within a niche product line. It's likely that Apple will
never want to slice things even thinner than it already has. And what's great
about the iPad mini ultimately is also what limits it. It's a small iPad with plenty of power. It fits in places that other iPads just don't.
Look, I wrote four or five thousand words about the iPad Mini last week,
which is funny because I thought I had basically nothing to say about it,
almost nothing to say about it. But you know, you find things... I wrote the review and I'm like,
how did I get two thousand words out of this? And then my editor at Macworld was like, can you write your column this week about the iPad Mini? I'm like, how did I get 2,000 words out of this?
And then my editor at Mackerel was like,
can you write your column this week about the iPad mini?
I'm like, what do I even say about it?
But I found something to say about it.
So yeah, so the first part, niche of a niche, right?
It's a niche iPad and the iPad is a niche Apple device,
really, if you think about it.
And then I get the people who say, I really wish that the iPad mini was more
like an iPad Pro than an iPad Air. But again, I feel like then you're saying it's a niche of a niche
of a niche. Like it's too far, it's cutting it too thin. And Apple probably looks at the sales figures
and just doesn't believe that a Pro iPad mini is going to be, you know, a seller that's worth making.
And then also, as I mentioned in the piece, think of the capitalization. If you've got a capital P
pro and a lowercase M mini, and then now they're in the same product name, like it's madness. You
can't do it. So there's that part. And, you know, the other thing, the piece I ended up writing for Macworld, part of
what I said is like, look, if you want a really super pro thing, that's kind of like an iPad mini,
uh, wait for the fold out iPhone because although it's not quite the same, I'm sure that will be a
very expensive, but very pro, very nice product that will get you a, a screen that's probably not that far off from an iPad mini
screen and it's also an iPhone. And I just thought that was funny to think about. Like the closest
you'll ever get to a pro iPad mini is probably a fold out iPhone whenever that happens. So,
you know, it's what we've been saying about the iPad mini. It's what we said last week. It's
a mini with a new chip so it can do Apple
intelligence and otherwise they basically didn't do anything except dilute the colors and
you know it's good that it's there. Like the Mac Mini, it is a it is a it fits in very specific
niches and it's not just you know use case wise it's also physical size wise so and given the
price like I also wouldn't advocate
for a pro iPad mini because then it wouldn't cost
what it costs now.
Right now it's a pretty good value because it's cheaper
than the iPad Air by a bit, but a pro version of it
would be very expensive and I don't think it's a good idea
and I don't think they would make two.
No, I don't either.
There's a want, right?
Like I understand the want I would want, right? You know,
there to be a pro product, but what you actually, the wish you have to have is that technology moves
faster. That's all you need to wish that. Because eventually the iPad mini will be an OLED screen,
right? Like eventually it will be. I would argue that the number one thing the iPad mini should probably progress at that it hasn't for, you know, a version now is anti-glare and screen brightness.
Right? Like I still would argue that one of the uses of the iPad mini is as a reader.
And that is one of those places where like where is a Kindle better than an iPad mini?
And the answer is reading it outside.
I mean, we were just talking about it last week, right?
Like Amazon seemed like they're getting a bit more aggressive
with Kindles now.
So that weirdly I could imagine, as you're saying,
that being a thing that actually lights a fire
under the iPad mini team, that the Kindle,
which is really like, weirdly,
that is the only real competitor for any iPad I feel like like
Apple has no competition in tablet computers. They just it's just not that. Yeah. Right.
Like they don't have it like the closest would be what surface. I just don't think that's
the same customer. I don't think people are choosing between iPads and surfaces. I mean,
yeah. And the Android tablets, I'm sure they sell in some quantity,
but it's not relevant.
It's not competition.
I just, I really don't imagine people are seriously
weighing up iPad or a Galaxy Note tablet or whatever.
And my various forays into using Android devices
for readers, I can, you know,
Android apps are fine on phones,
but they're terrible on tablets.
Anything larger than a phone size, it just falls apart.
I mean, again, not every Android app, right?
But just generally, I was very disappointed.
It's a very different story than the iPad, so.
They just don't have it there.
But like, I do feel like the iPad mini
and the Kindle are in direct competition.
I think to a certain degree they are, yeah.
And the Kindles are getting more expensive, right?
I mean, that's the other thing is that
when you start talking about a higher end Kindle
like that paper white signature edition
that's got the light sensor and all of that,
and they're starting to have like,
other rereaders are getting pens now, right?
So that you can do markup and things like that.
They are starting to get close to each other.
And that's really interesting.
And I think that there is some threat there from Apple.
And I, again, I just think that's one of those areas
that Apple, they have made strides in anti-glare
and screen brightness and things like that.
But on the mini of all devices,
I think they need to push it, but not this time.
Not this time.
Well, I mean, they pushed it, but not this time. Not this time Well, I mean they pushed it
Just not in the way that yes, I mean they had to do that, right?
I mean, I think we would agree they made you got it
You if you're gonna make this Apple intelligence push, you gotta have your products be able to support it, right?
What otherwise what are you doing? Yeah, and it was the weird outlier
I feel like it was kind of the outlier the iPad iPad that, that, no, that, that will get it when it gets it. Yeah.
Continuing the Ted Lasso news updates in an interview with Variety,
Warner Brothers CEO Channing Dungy said this,
Dungy said this, we have always been clear that we weren't,
we had always been clear that there wasn't going
to be more Tad Lasso if Jason Sudeikis and team
weren't feeling excited about it.
And I can tell you firsthand that he's in a place
where he's feeling really excited and feels good about it.
Yeah, this is more than what we've been hearing,
which is that they're gearing up.
This is her saying, we wouldn't do it without Jason Sudeikis
being excited and he's excited.
And again, as I said before,
maybe he's excited about the money they're paying him.
That's the cynical view.
And I think there's probably some truth in that.
I think he probably, you know, look,
there's the fact that it's successful,
so they wanna pay him more to do it.
And there's also the fact that he's thinking
about other projects.
And maybe he has that thought of like, you
know, this is the thing that I'm, I'm going to be remembered for. And I, I could keep, I maybe I can come up with an
idea. He's a creative person. Maybe we can do something where we can do some more of this, and that's fine. But this
is, this is the CEO of Warner Brothers TV saying, you know, we're working on it. So this is the clearest sign yet that this
is happening, which it is. They're gearing up. The whole thing is happening. So it's
just a matter of that they haven't announced what it is and all of that, which seems like
they will do when they can.
Yep. Vimeo for Vision OS now supports immersive video,
and Vimeo are releasing an immersive video of their own
that they've made to celebrate it
that's coming in November.
And Upgradian Greg contacted us to share
that TV producer Andy Greenwald recently said
on his podcast, The Watch,
that Apple is commissioning more filmmakers around town
to make content with big budgets.
Yeah.
All right.
These are, I think these two things are unrelated,
by the way, I don't think Apple is commissioning for Vimeo.
No, I'm sorry, maybe I did a bad job there.
I just lumped them all together as immersive content.
I wasn't trying to say that they were LinkedIn anyway,
but it's just like a more immersive video coming to.
So there's a Vimeo app with immersive stuff in it,
which is like, great.
Where's YouTube app?
Still not there, but I think that we all believe
that it's coming.
I heard somewhere that the YouTube app
was coming in February.
Yeah.
And that was part of why Juno got pulled.
Juno was killed.
Yes, and then separately, it sounds like Apple is indeed,
after we were talking about that immersive video, um, submerged that, uh, that Apple, Apple made that there's
more money and more filmmakers trying these projects.
So that's good.
They should.
Great.
This episode is brought to you in part by our friends at Squarespace, the
all-in-one website platform for entrepreneurs to stand
out and succeed online. Whether you're just getting started or managing a growing brand,
you can stand out from the crowd of a beautiful website, engage with your audience and sell
anything, your products, services or even the content you create, because Squarespace
has everything you need all in one place and all on your terms.
You can make the most of design intelligence from Squarespace, which takes their two decades
of industry-leading design expertise with cutting-edge AI and machine learning technology
to help you unlock your strongest creative potential by making it easier than ever before
to build a beautiful, more personalized website tailored to your unique needs.
You can craft a bespoke digital identity that you can use across the web with Squarespace
and their design intelligence system.
One of the reasons I have used Squarespace
for like 15 years is because how easy they make it
to start with the design of your website.
And they have these really awesome templates
and great tools to allow you to design
and tweak to your heart's content.
But now with design intelligence,
they're making it even easier to begin
then giving you the full ability to customize it
to the exact way that you want.
But it's about making it easier than ever before
to get started.
Squarespace Payments is the easiest way
to manage your payments all in one place.
Onboarding is fast and simple.
You can get started in just a few clicks
and receive payments right away.
Plus you can give your customers more ways to pay
by choosing from popular payment methods like Klarna, ACH Direct Debit, Apple Pay, Afterpay
and Clearpay as well depending on where you're located. You can even collect payments for
Squarespace invoicing, which means you can spend more time focusing on growing your business.
You can invoice your clients and get paid for your services right within Squarespace.
That then turns leads into clients' proposals, estimates and contracts. Plus, simplify your workflow and manage your services business
in one platform. It really is the one place to go if you're starting a business online.
Go to squarespace.com and you can sign up for a free trial today. When you're ready to launch,
go to squarespace.com slash upgrade to save 10% of your first purchase of a website or domain.
That is squarespace.com slash upgrade when you sign up and you'll get 10% of your first purchase of a website or domain. That is squarespace.com slash upgrade when you sign up
and you'll get 10% of your first purchase
and show you support for the show.
A thanks to Squarespace for their support of this show
and all of Relay.
Apple Intelligence is out now.
iOS 18.1 is coming out today.
Yep, Mac OS 15.1 as well.
Yes, oh yeah.
I always just think of iOS 18.1,
but it's the point ones on the different platforms.
iPad OS, iOS, Mac OS,
they're all out now with the first set
of Apple Intelligence features.
I'm gonna run through these real fast
to kind of just remind everybody what's in them,
because we've spoken about this
quite a bit over the last few months.
Writing tools, the new Siri design
that has some updated understanding,
better photo search and memory creation,
notification summaries, the reduce interruptions
focus mode, smart reply and mail messages,
which I have never seen once.
I have never seen this feature,
like where it pops up the little sheet and lets
you choose and it will write. I've never seen this. I don't even know where it is supposed
to be. Priority mail messages. This is where it shows that an email is a priority. Email
summaries and transcription in notes. So how are you feeling about 18.1? I know you just
put out a big article on Six Colors as we were going live today.
Yeah, Dan and I did a, we collaborated on, because there's a lot in there on a, I mean,
I called it the Apple Intelligence 0.1 review, which is weird, right?
But like, and I've been calling it like first wave of features.
You know, it's a mixed bag.
It's a mixed bag.
I find that, okay, first off,
they showed developer beta of 0.2 last week, right?
So that's a big thing.
Yeah, we're gonna talk about that for sure.
And what I'll say about it now is,
I think it was really smart, right?
Because when they're releasing point one,
they're also pointing at point two and saying,
and also these features.
And it's just like them having a public beta of point one
when they ship the iPhone.
They are trying to make the story about the next thing
so that you don't think of the gestalt of the thing as just what's shipping, but also about what's about to ship, which you could
say that that's sort of marketing and a little bit cynical, but you could also say that they,
those are real features that are coming soon.
They're not promises that are unclear.
They're like code that shipping, even though it's not shipping to everybody.
And then I would assume fairly soon
there'll be a public beta of 0.2
and people will be able to opt into that as well.
So that when they're talking about Apple intelligence,
they can talk about, well, this is now
and this is coming and you can, you know,
it's already available for developers and it's next up.
And I think that that's smart
because it changes this conversation
and lots of conversations to not just be about 0.1. Point, it's also funny because I think that that's smart because it changes this conversation and lots of conversations to not just be about 0.1.
The point, it's also funny because I think if you had shipped the 0.1 and 0.2 features
together, it would be much more impressive because the 0.1 features do feel a little
like the ones that were ready and maybe even would have been part of the OS release
without the Apple intelligence push.
Some of them, um, you know, the Siri stuff is not really improved in point one.
Other than the look, it's not really any different.
Like the changes that they are saying are a fun demo, but like, I'm not really
sure is a thing that people were running into that they had to constantly like trip over themselves to ask Siri questions.
I just I'm not convinced that that is really a thing that people were doing, like having conversations with Siri.
There's going to be improved Siri in point two and really in point four, right?
Next year is when a lot of the stuff that we wish Siri would be better at will be better at.
So it's going to take a lot of time. But okay, so summaries are useful.
And I know we've talked about this before,
but just to get it out there again,
I find summaries useful and they're not 100% useful,
but summarizing conversations, summarizing notifications,
summarizing emails in the preview
instead of the first two lines of text can be very useful.
And I don't find it detrimental. And I had, in my example, I know a lot of
people have had similar examples. My example was the multiple alerts I get from my home irrigation app that my
front yard drip irrigation is turned on and is going to run and is now has now run and is off. And that gets turned into a single thing that says drip irrigation ran
and concluded at 7 58 PM.
It's like, yep, swipe done.
Right.
I don't need that co coalescing that into one summary is great.
Yeah.
I feel like this is a thing that like, especially online right now, like this
feature, people are really having a good time making fun of it, like, you know,
like, and there's just like lots of memes and engagement bait around
like, I'm going to post this thing or whatever, you know, like there was this one that was
going around about a message, you know, while person is breaking up with you, da da da da
da. And Joanna Stern had an interview with Craig Federighi and mentioned that to Craig
and I really liked Craig's response, which was kind of like, well, yeah,
I mean, it works better with some places than others, but realistically,
nobody should be getting broken up with by a text anyway.
Like no matter how you get that notification, it's never a good one.
But my feeling is this is actually in point one,
the absolute best feature is the notification summaries.
It doesn't work for all types of apps.
Like, for example, you know, I get, I get notifications for overcast.
I just have them go to notification center. So I know when my podcasts are posting overcast
notifications includes the kind of description of the episode, long descriptions of podcast
episodes that are essentially unrelated to each other does not make sense for a notification
summary. But the thing is you can just turn them off individually for certain apps. So my recommendation for people that install in point one today for the first time is give
it a bit of time in the notification summaries.
I can guarantee there's going to be at least a handful of applications where you're going
to be like, oh, this is better.
Like similarly, Jason, I have a car home security system.
I have like a notification when the doors open and close.
And like I just saw it then it was like multiple status changes door recently closed. It's like that's kind of all I need to know. Right? Like I
don't need to see open closed, open closed, open closed. Right? Like this is a better system for
that. But you kind of just got to see where it ends up working for you. Yeah. Other features,
photos cleanup is finally here. It's good.
It should have been here years ago.
It shouldn't require Apple Intelligence-level hardware to run.
But they did a good job.
It's pretty good at removing stuff from the background, and it does this thing.
One of the things that I've noticed about this, and this really continues in point two,
is Apple's really leaning into the stagecraft of Apple Intelligence, where everything's
got that Apple
intelligence rainbow glow thing and clean up is one of those places where it
doesn't just give you a tool when you tap clean up in the editing mode in
photos it scans your photo for things it thinks you would be likely to want to
remove and then makes them do a shimmer effect and you can just tap on them to remove them. Now, that's not
necessary. But they, I think it's part of the showmanship here is they want to like give you examples of like, you know, how
about this guy who's standing in the background, maybe we could get rid of him. And, but it's a good feature. It's a good feature. It's just interesting to see how they play it. And
then, you know, for me, the one that really, I think makes me
think a lot is writing tools, which in point one, you know, so
okay, I, I'm a writer, I have been a writer for a long time.
And I'll just say, if I give a paragraph I've written
to writing tools and have it rewrite it,
it makes it worse.
Bottom line, it just makes it worse.
But that's what LLMs do.
LLMs are all about flattening it to the middle.
They are the most mid of things.
Like that, it's all about the middle.
It's the aggregate of all of internet language, right?
All of language.
It will be the middle.
So you're gonna get something, the middle.
So it does stuff that's, you know,
it replaces words with other words that are synonymous,
which is, it feels very much like a student
who's trying to file off the edges of a thing
that they're plagiarizing
so that it doesn't seem like they're plagiarizing it.
They'll just, it'll just swap in synonyms.
I'm like, why?
Why did you even do that?
And it simplifies things and it makes things more cliched.
And so, easy for me to say,
but that was my personal experience with it.
However, I do think it's really important to say,
a lot of people, not the people who are writing
about Apple intelligence, by the way, for obvious reasons,
a lot of people struggle with written material.
That's not their strongest thing.
I know you use AI for some podcast writing, right?
I do.
I use it for quite a lot of things
because I'm not a writer.
I'm not a writer.
And you're not comfortable with that form.
And yet there are lots of things that require writing. Things that sometimes I have to write get seen by lots of people
and I am very insecure about posting some of this stuff because like you know like it
was all in good fun but like there has been a there was a point where a bunch of friends
of mine were collecting screenshots of all of my spelling mistakes. And like that
was just like a thing. And it was like one of these things where it's fun when it's a
joke between friends, but then it like expands out into the world. And like, I think now
I am insecure about like my writing. And so I like to be able to have systems where I
can say like, here is a piece of text that I'm writing, can you check this for me?
And I would say in point one,
the proofreading is fine, but it's not super great.
It's better in point two,
because you can describe your changes.
But obviously you would never use these tools
because you are a writer in the same way
that I would never use a tool
that would produce a podcast for me.
Right. So, and this is my point is, I know that, but I want to point it out because I do think that there are some people are like, oh, I don't know why.
And it was a good thought experiment for me because it was like, okay, if I give it something I write, it drains it of personality and kind of makes it boring.
But there are lots of people, lots of very smart people, in fact, but writing is not their thing. I, you know, my dad was a very smart person and he was
a terrible writer. He like, he just couldn't do it. He couldn't spell it. He couldn't,
he just couldn't. It wasn't a thing that he could do. And also I haven't even gotten
to it yet, but the other very clear application here is people are not comfortable in English
because English isn't their primary language. And there's a lot of that too. So I think
that I think that there's a lot of this that is going to be really great for a lot of people because it's going to give
you a safety net. You select your text, it just comes with your computer, comes with your phone, you select the text,
and you say, rewrite this, or make it friendly or make it professional. Like how many 20 year olds are out there who are applying for an internship or a job
or something, and they suddenly have to write an email
to their prospective employer, and they have no idea
what it means to be professional.
And I say that as a parent of two kids in their 20s now,
like they have no idea, they have no idea.
And sometimes they send us their things
that they're writing and
say, you know, can you look at this and see if
it's okay. So imagine being able to just go, can
you make this professional? Cause I don't know how
to do that and have it do it. I think that's great.
Obviously with all these tools, you should look at
the output and make sure that you're comfortable
with what you get out of it. But I do think that
there are a lot of people who are just completely
at sea when it comes to written language in English, in this case, more languages to come. But I do think that there are a lot of people who are just completely at sea when it comes to written language, in English, in this case, more languages to come. But, and I think that that's great. So I think that there's a lot to be said for writing tools. And it's very easy to be cynical about it, if you're somebody who's comfortable with writing, but but think of everyone else, I'd say think outside yourself yourself and think of all the different applications to this.
Now, a friend of mine, who is also a professional writer, his comment to me about it when we
were talking about it this weekend was, and I hadn't thought of this, is like, you know,
sometimes somebody sends you an email and you're really angry about it and you write
an angry response. And he said, there is some value in selecting it
and saying, make this professional
or make this friendly.
Everybody's had that email that they sent
that they wish later that they hadn't sent.
Right.
Now you still have to think about running it through the AI.
I do think that there's a mode that is undoubtedly coming,
which will allow your apps of choice to say,
this looks a little
angry.
I know it used to be way back when Eudora actually had a semantic analysis feature,
believe it or not.
And Eudora has been gone for so long now, but it had a semantic analysis feature back
in the early 2000s that would actually show you little spicy peppers.
If you were really, really angry,
it would be like, oh, there's three peppers here.
And I think you could set a threshold where it warned you
and was like, are you sure you wanna send this spicy email?
But I think that will come back.
I think that there'll be more semantic analysis with AI
where they will say, would you like me
to make this more professional?
Because this seems to be in a professional context.
But I hadn't thought of that.
And that's a good one.
It's like, take a step back from the ledge.
You have a lot of feelings. But if you run it through
the AI, guess what's going to happen? All those feelings are going to get pulled out
of it because that's what it does. It flattens it back down. And if what you're trying to
send is boring and, and not bad, but like boring and it's doing a job and it needs to
convey something, but that's all it needs to do. You can get that out of this. And there's
a lot of value in that for a lot of people.
I still want to talk more about this, but I want to just very quickly
jump to the 18.2 part because I can, I need to reference that to make my point.
So 18.2 is now out in the developer beta.
One of the features is enhanced writing tools.
So these are, it allows you to describe the change that you want to make to
existing text.
And you can also generate text completely from nothing with Chet GPT.
So the reason I want to mention this is for me, what I find to be very valuable with these tools is you're able to prompt them.
And what I don't like about the 18.1 writing tools is they're very, you are just pressing a button
that describes a prompt that Apple wrote.
Right, they wrote prompts and you press the button
and the prompt goes in.
Exactly, and in 18.2,
you can also try to write the prompt yourself.
Yeah, because the experience I have with chat GPT
is I will say, keep the tone of this message,
keep the tone of this text the same,
recommend some adjustments.
And what I find then is I have a much better hit rate of getting something to still sound
like me.
Like it's just maybe giving me some different words or rewriting it, putting some different
punctuation or grammar in place to make the overall sentences read better, right?
And for me as well, like when I do this stuff,
I don't just take the output of it and just like paste it into whatever I want. I treat it as like
a back and forth really. Like, and I'll often still go in and make changes to what it's given me,
but I get to a point where I feel a little bit more comfortable with the text. And so
having these tools built into the system is really interesting.
And, and I want to play around with them more.
Um, but I do like that now you have a little bit more, um, a little bit more
say in what the change can be.
And you can see why they did it this way, right?
And point one, it's sort of like, we got all the guide rails, all the guard rails
in place, we're gonna, we're gonna make it just super safe and simple.
And then in point two, they're like, all those other things are still there, but
if you want to take control, it'll slide up a little keyboard that'll do the AI
sparkle thing that they do, that's more showmanship, and you can direct it better.
Also, the proofread tool is okay.
It's not as good as Grammarly, it needs to improve,
I got some false positives,
but it's nice to have it, right?
It's nice to, again, for free in the system
to offer that is nice.
And then the other stuff like summary,
sometimes you wanna read a summary of something
and see if you wanna read it.
Sometimes you wanna get a summary so that you can summarize it for someone else and
that it does the, again, I would say it does the initial work and then you need to look
at it and make sure it properly summarizes it.
But I think that's interesting.
The key points one makes me laugh, but I think it's super useful, which is a lot of people
have bosses who are addicted to the executive summary. I used to have bosses
who were like this. And it's like, you know, imagine there's a thousand word memo that's going around and then your
boss is like, ah, ah, ah, ah, summarize it for me. It's like, ah, the executive summary. Well, you know what, you do
key points. And it literally makes a bulleted list with like bold items and then explanations
of each of the bold items. And like it's building an executive summary, which again, you need to go
over as a person who's doing this to your boss, because some of them may not be key points,
and you may want to remove those, right? A little bit of editing work is always a good idea with
stuff that's generated by AIs. But I look at that
and I think somebody thought, oh my God, we can use the AI to generate an executive summary. It's
such a great idea. And then you know what? I love that they baked in a couple of text utilities into
writing tools too. So the idea that if you've got something that's just people are writing text and
it's literally like thing colon number, thing colon number. And you're like, this should be a table.
But they're like, yeah, but I don't know how to make a table.
And all the controls are different
when you're in table mode and all that.
You literally select it and say table.
And it just makes it a table or a list.
If you've got like a paragraph that lists 15 things in it,
that's just, you know, here are the things we need.
This, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this.
You know, like, you they're here are the things we need this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, you know, like, you can select it and say list, and it turns it into a bulleted list of those things instead
properly formatted.
And again, it's a little thing, but like, it's great, like, in to intelligently take text and make it something
reformat into something more useful.
I think that's really smart.
So there's a bunch of perfectly good features in there. It's just a little bit basic. It's just because it's number
one. It's V1. It needs to be better. But there are things in it that are good and there are things
in it that are okay. 18.2 also introduces the first round of image tools,
which includes Image Playgrounds,
which is the AI art generation system,
Genmoji, which is a generative AI emoji creation system,
and Image Wand, where you can take a sketch
of something of an Apple Pencil
and have it turn it into something else.
Yep, something funny happened with this.
Okay.
Something very funny happened.
The people who downloaded this beta immediately,
you have to sign up and say,
please allow me to do image generation.
The people who downloaded it right away
got the image generation.
And as far as I can tell everybody else
who downloaded it after that first initial burst,
just, it's just not on.
It's just not turned on for anybody else.
So I've got a little bit more context than that.
Okay.
Some people have gotten in,
because I know some people who were in what I am in,
which is the, you're in the wait list, who got it.
Yes.
Who, like I downloaded the beta as soon as I could
and went on the list.
But I know people that have now gotten in
after having been on the wait list, you know, like for a few days
So and Apple said...
So they have stopped the waitlist, but the waitlist...
Very slow.
Like I haven't gotten this feature.
Very slowly trickling in.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So I think Apple gave statements to a couple of people, so Chance Miller at 95 Mac was saying that like Apple said that they're letting people in very slowly basically.
And they're gonna continue to let people in.
That's a statement I got too, which was, I was just asking, hey, is this normal?
And is there any way for me to use this feature?
And the response was the boilerplate Apple will, you know, here's how this works.
And it's like, okay, I guess that's my answer.
You know, the first thing I was going to do was send a Mike themed emoji to you.
Oh, God. First you. First thing.
First thing.
I've seen some of this stuff and like,
it ain't good, man.
So like the image playground stuff is just bad.
Like I just don't like any of the examples that I've seen.
I've had sent to me, me, right?
So friend of mine made images of me and sent them to me.
And they just don't look good.
Like they look like versions prior.
It's basically played out the way that I thought,
which is the stuff that they are showing now
looks like old versions of AIR.
Like for example, there was a
cartoony character of me and my eyes were just these like swirly blue things,
which it's got that other. Oh, I've seen this kind of thing before.
Like I hate to tell it to you, but you are, your eyes are swirly blue.
Oh no. Yeah. What I've seen hands with six fingers.
Yes. You know, I've seen all this kind of stuff like from image playgrounds.
And I, you know, it's just, it ain't good. Like that's, it's just not good. And I don't,
I'd hope that they at least were going to do a good job and they haven't done a good
job. So I don't understand the point of this. I really don't. Of the three of them, the
one I'm least interested in is image playground. Because honestly I've got chat GPT. I've got
like, I can generate images all I want already.
And I don't, I mostly don't.
And they'll look better.
They'll look better.
And they'll, and they will look better.
However, Genmoji intrigues me because I like emoji.
I like the fact that you can use Genmoji as tap backs and things like that.
And the idea that you're training on Apple's emoji design language to generate dynamic new emoji in a very constrained
set of styles, a very constrained style, emoji style, I think has the first potential to
be fun and probably the ones that are bad are not going to be as bad and you'll just
hit reload and get a different one.
So I'm kind of interested in seeing how that goes and have some optimism there.
And then image wand is the one that I think is funny because I actually think image wand could be great because I am
terrible at drawing things and
I'm intrigued by the idea that I could do a very terrible sketch and then circle it and have it
have them generate something that looks better.
I'm not sure whether the thing that looks better
will make me happy or not, unclear.
But as somebody who can't draw,
I'm kind of intrigued by that idea.
The problem, this is a marketing thing.
The problem is Apple's marketing
is beautiful hand-drawn sketches
that then get turned into AI art when you circle them. Apple's marketing is beautiful hand-drawn sketches
that then get turned into AI art when you circle them.
Because they can't dare to have something that looks bad.
They can't dare it.
That's right, they can't bear to have
a butt ugly super bad stick man sketch from Jason.
That they're like, look at this crappy sketch
by this guy who can't draw.
Ooh, magic.
Well, I read in that situation, right,
where they're like, the things that are the prior
to the AI look good and in post look bad.
Yeah, they did the thing.
It was like a Buddhist temple or something.
And they're like, this sketch is gorgeous.
And they're like, screw that sketch.
Now it's AI generated.
I'm like, no, no, no, the sketch was beautiful.
Fix my bad art. Don, fix my bad art.
Don't fix that good art.
But again, so I'm looking forward to seeing if it's capable of doing that, or if the truth is that my art is so bad that not even the AI can save it.
I don't know. I don't know.
I just sent to you in a message.
I don't think I'm going to publish this yet because I don't know what kind of metadata these files have in them.
And like this was sent to me from somebody else.
This is an image of me.
And like, you can see, like, do you see what I'm saying?
It's totally you.
But you can see it's me, right?
You can see it's me.
But like, it just looks bad.
Right, like a boss in a Pixar movie.
This was quote, Mike as an angry CEO was the prompt that was given.
Oh, you don't look angry.
You look I looked very disturbed, very upset.
Yeah, you look like, yeah, one of your one of your employees
just set the office on fire.
And you're thinking about being blamed for it by the board of directors.
Yes, that's what this image is
Yeah, okay, but you see what I mean
Also, gemmoji right gemmoji are cool in a way, right because you can make emoji of anything you want
But I've noticed a weird trend with the gemmoji that I have received in messages
You know when you're using Photoshop and you want to remove the white background from an image
and you kind of like use the tools,
but you don't really do a great job
and there's like a little bit of white left around it.
This is how every Jemmoji looks for me
because I use my iPhone in dark mode.
So like there's something going on with Jemmoji
where they're not entirely transparent.
They're alpha channel is not right.
It's like, I don't understand what they're doing,
but like there's like,
whatever is making these emojis
leaving like a little white edge around them
that doesn't look good.
So yeah, very strange.
But like the idea behind it is great.
Like, you know, I could send an emoji of a, you know,
a duck wearing sunglasses if I wanted to.
Like, and I do like that idea.
That is a cool system.
And I do think people are going to really dig it,
but I just wished that the image playground part
just wasn't there.
Cause I don't think that that is it.
Anyway, we'll talk more about this when me and you can actually get access to it. Sure. That's. But anyway, we'll talk more about this
when me and you can actually get access to it.
Sure, that's true.
Yeah, we'll talk.
I'll just say as an aside,
one of the ways that they could solve this
is by not letting you model your images
on people in your photos library.
Saying no, but instead they're like, yeah, use it.
If they're in your photos library, they're fair game.
And it does feel a little, do you feel a little violated
by having an image of you sent to you by someone else?
If it wasn't from someone that I trusted so much,
then yes, I would.
Yeah.
But like, if an acquaintance just started sending these
to me, like not like a close friend,
then I'd feel weirded out by it.
And it's a thing like anybody could make these for me.
Anybody. Cause, you know, anyone
can make these for anyone. Cause as long as you have pictures on the internet,
people can just download images and just make something of you.
And I can't get my head around that.
I will say that
ZMNOX in the chat
posted an image of, because they've got it,
of a genmoji.
And it's a duck with sunglasses and dressed like,
basically I'm gonna say like a Miami vice character, right?
It's a, it's a t-shirt and a jacket
and it's a light colored jacket and it's, they're cool, man.
And yeah, that's pretty good, which is why I encourage
that genmoji might be something fun.
So, yeah.
ChatGPT integration in 18.2.
So this is in a couple of ways where you can pass off commands
from, well Siri will pass commands, right, to ChatGPT
where it thinks it can't answer something.
You can also ask Siri to do things like you can say,
hey, show me, you know, tell me what's on
the screen right now. And it will basically take a screenshot, send it to chat GPT and
describe to you what it's looking at.
Siri will prompt each time chat GPT is going to be invoked. You can disable this if you
want to in settings. But it will still do it for images and files no matter what. But
it, you know, so you can, you can have it just seamlessly go to chat, GPT, get you the
answer and return it.
It always tells you that chat GPT has been invoked either by saying it.
If you're, if you're speaking to Siri, it will say like this came from chat GPT or if
you're looking at the screen, then it will give you like a little disclaimer at the bottom.
Because I signed in with my OpenAI account,
I now have a setting where, well, I now have a thing
where I just have like 20 new chats they're called on the,
because every single conversation I'm having
that's going via the system is being saved in my account.
But they're all just labeled as new chat,
which is very funny to me.
That's less good.
In my kind of experience, really, it's, I've found like a, that speaking,
I'm trying to find a way to phrase this, like speaking to Siri is not the
same as speaking to ChatGPT.
Like there are questions that ChatGPT can answer via say like, say type to Siri.
The Siri just doesn't answer like, but you can, it, what I type to Siri, that Siri just doesn't answer. Like, but you can...
What I'm saying is I'm not sure how great a job the Siri system is doing rooting the questions,
because there are things that I've asked Siri where it's like,
oh, I don't know the answer to that.
But if I put GPT or chat GPT in the question,
you say I'm using type to Siri,
it will route it and give me the answer that I need.
You know what I mean? It's like this there you can still see the seams of this
I think you know, it feels that what I was gonna say is that it feels like a very beta integration, right?
the idea here is I
Think they're it's a work in progress, right and whether they think it's fine or not
I don't know but I would imagine they don't because it just doesn't seem quite all there
it's there but the connectivity
is kind of shaky. And, you know, it needs to be better. But so
yeah, I have connected my chat GPT account on one device and
not on the other so I can kind of see both experiences. But
it's, yeah, it's, it's okay.
I was also surprised that I was, I was asking Siri questions that it would not pass to chat GPT and just give me answers.
And some of those were okay. And some of those weren't great. Even if I have chat GPT logged in and turned on, because it wants, it's, it's take on at first before it goes to the other one.
So I don't know, it's a work in progress,
I guess is what I'll say about it.
Yeah, also this version of JetGBT that Apple is using
is via the OpenAI API.
So it's not connected to the internet.
So the world knowledge that it has is limited
to the point where the knowledge cuts off.
Oh yeah, and that actually is one of those things
that struck me that it needs to,
they need to address one way or another,
which is in the long run, what you really want
is the ability to query the internet
and get information back.
And right now what you've got is Siri,
which is not smart, can query the internet.
Chat GPT, which is smarter and is using a version
baked, baked, you know, a year ago or six months
ago or whatever.
It can't look up things and what, and the ideal AI
assistant is smart, but uses reference sources that are trusted, that are out in
the world and can look things up and then summarize them for you or answer them for
you.
And right now they're kind of in between.
It's just a little weird.
This version 18.2 also includes visual intelligence, which I've used a little bit and I'm not really
sure what I'm supposed to use it for
And support for more English languages. It feels like it's not all there I I don't know whether I'm using it in the wrong circumstances, but like I started using it and it just says like
What are the two prompts it's like what
Or why I'm like what huh? What it's these two buttons that you're supposed to do things with.
I'm like, I don't know what these are.
Three buttons.
There's a camera button.
There's a question mark button.
And there's an image button.
And the question, like the question bubble button,
like speech bubble button, will ask
chat GPT for what you're looking at.
And if you do the photo with the magnifying glass,
it will query Google image search
but it's like I don't want to make the decision here. Ask or search is it?
It just feels it feels confused. I think I have some suspicions that they want this to be more
integrated with for example with Google's, and they don't have that
integration yet. So they're just using a reverse image search, which is something. But like,
the idea here is that visual intelligence should see your image and say, okay, here's
what's going on. And instead, what I get is a still photo that's temporarily there, and
then I can respond with image or huh and maybe or my understanding is
if it's text it will like say or translate right okay but like I don't
know it just doesn't feel quite right it needs to be more and better and more
intelligent and it's just again it's developer beta one of first version of
this feature and that's fine but like it was
I was disappointed at how basic it seemed. So the Upgradians will be happy
to know that they can look in the show notes and get that image of the Angry
Mike CEO because I've gotten consent from a friend of mine who made it. I
just wanted to make sure because I don't know it's weird to get consent for an
image that was made of me without my consent but nevertheless that there is a a, consent's important, you know what I'm trying to say?
I agree.
I feel like maybe you have the rights to this, but that's fine.
I just didn't want to put them on blasting, you know what I mean?
This is a weird, we're in a weird time right now, but nevertheless, if you want to see
it, it will be in the show notes.
I put it in the Discord too, in case you want to see what angry Mike CEO looks like.
Then you've got that.
Yep.
He's not angry.
I'm telling you, the building is burning down.
And he may be responsible.
More, more English languages are supported in this version too.
We've got what Australia, UK, Canada, there are
a couple others, New Zealand maybe. But it's good news for you, I guess, because you could
use UK English.
Yeah, I switched everything back, which I was happy about. So now I can have all of
the settings back the way that I want them without having to think about it anymore.
So I'm happy for that. There is one, there is one of, there is one of a feature that I was excited about, which is a 18.2 feature,
but not, I don't believe zap intelligence feature, which is the male categories.
You know, you get like male sort of categories, yes,
but it's on the iPhone only. I know what is going, why,
what is going on? Why would you do this? I don't, I'm,
I am so frustrated by this
because I think it's actually really good,
but I can't rely on the system if it's only on my iPhone.
What are they doing?
I don't know.
I don't understand it.
And like, I could maybe understand it to like,
oh, you know, mail on the Mac is complicated
and it's old code base and it's gonna take some time
to figure it out there.
But here's the thing. It's not on the iPad either.
And it's literally the same app.
What are you doing?
I don't get it.
I don't understand it.
It is a great feature, I guess,
for people who only ever view email on their iPhone in mail.
But what?
It's too bad.
Yeah, cause it's really nice.
I'm sure it'll come eventually,
but I don't get why it's iPhone only.
It seems so weird and arbitrary.
I don't think it's coming in this version.
Like I don't think it's coming in 18 at all.
I went and took a look at the product pages
and both iPadOS 18 and Mac OS 15
have zero reference to this at all.
So this is a next year thing.
And I'm like, wow, why
gang? Why bother? Right? No one was expecting you could do anything for mail because you
barely do anything for mail. Why did you do it this way? I'm so frustrated about it because
it's genuinely really good. And it, I don't, I cannot understand why they do this where
they're like, they bring these apps together as if they look and act the same, but then
split the functionality and they're still doing this.
I kind of can't believe that they're still doing this.
We'll have more to say, I expect in the coming weeks, I think, especially when the two of
us get access to the image tools.
This episode is brought to you in part by FitBot.
If you're looking to change your fitness level, it can be hard to know where to get started. That's why I'm pleased to let you know that FitBod
is an easy and affordable way to build a fitness plan just for you. Everybody has their own
path with personal fitness, which is why FitBod uses data to make sure they customize things
to suit you perfectly, adapting as you improve, making sure every workout is challenging while
pushing you to progress the way you want. Your muscles improve when they work in concert with your entire musculoskeletal system.
Overworking some muscles while underworking others can negatively impact your results,
which is why FitBud tracks your muscle fatigue and recovery to design a well-balanced workout
routine just for you.
Superior results are achieved when a workout program is tailored to meet your unique body,
experience, environment and goals.
FitBud stores all of this in your FitBod Gym profile, tracking your muscle recovery, making sure
that you avoid burnout and keep up your momentum. FitBod have certified personal trainers who
have fine tuned and analyzed billions of data points from all of the information that they've
collected from exercise science to make sure that they're building the best possible workouts for you.
And I really love how easy FitBud makes it for me
to learn new exercises with their videos
that they have in the app,
where I can see an exercise shot from multiple angles
to make sure that I'm learning it in the right way.
FitBud is really easy to use
and integrates your Apple Watch or Wearer Smartwatch
and apps like Strava, Fitbit and Apple Health.
Personalized training of this quality can be expensive, but FitBod is just $12.99 a
month or $79.99 a year, but you can get 25% off your membership by signing up at fitbod.me
slash upgrade. So go now and get your customized fitness plan at fitbod.me slash upgrade. That
is F-I-T-B-O-D dot me slash upgrade for 25% off your membership. Thanks to FitBard for the support of this show and Relay.
So last week, Greg Joswiak tweeted that we can expect a quote exciting week of
announcements for the Mac this week. And today there was a newsroom article and
a 10 minute video video which was kind of
buried on the iMac product page showing off a brand new iMac. So well brand new
in quotes. It's the M4 iMac. It is featuring an M4 chip which has this
chip is made up of four performance, six efficiency cores, and a 10 core GPU.
I guess this is the first Mac, right, that has the M4 in it,
just like the base M4.
This is just in the iPad so far?
Yes.
Would we expect the performance to be the same?
Yes.
Yeah?
I think so.
If the cores are the same, the performance
will be pretty much the same, yeah.
OK.
Starts off at 16 gigabytes of memory as standard, can be configured up to 32 gigabytes.
There are new shades of the existing colors.
Hurrah, they have remained vibrant.
They did not suck all the color out of these colors.
USB-C peripherals are now available.
They're color matched for the iMacs and there's also USB-C peripherals on the Apple Store.
This iMac can now get a nano display texture if you want it.
It features a new 12 megapixel center stage camera.
All four USB-C ports have Thunderbolt 4 support.
You can pre-order today.
It's available November 8th, still starts at 12.99.
What are your thoughts?
Okay, the performance is going to be good.
Going from 8 cores to 10 cores, M3 to M4.
One of my top complaints about the M1 iMac design, which has continued on,
was that it got, if you remember, it got introduced right after Center Stage came out,
and it didn't support it because it had a bad webcam, not high resolution enough.
So now they finally got the 12 megapixel
center stage camera in there.
Like they should have had it last time, they didn't,
but they have it this time, so that's good.
That they upgraded the iMac webcam is very good.
I am surprised, especially since this was a draft pick of mine.
I, after the last rev, I really thought they weren't going to change the colors
because they seemed happy to just continue them.
And instead what they did is they kept the colors as like their names,
but change the shades.
Um, and in a good way, they change the shades.
And in a good way, they look really nice. They don't look watered down and boring.
So that's good, that's good news.
And then, nanodisplay texture, like, okay.
I guess everything gets the nanodisplay texture option now,
but that's great if somebody,
IMAX can be in weird places with bright lights
behind them and all of that that and you can't see.
And so for them to have the ability to, right, like it's just iMacs get placed in environments
and some of those environments are not ideal, but it doesn't matter, you're not going to change the
environment, the iMac has to go there. So having a nano display texture option I think is interesting
for that scenario more than maybe like a pro using
just an M4 to do something professional is probably a less
likely scenario, not impossible, but less likely. So you know,
it's a nice, it looks like a nice upgrade. And we got, unlike
the colors, which did change a little bit, we got exactly what we expected
with the USB-C addition to the peripherals,
which is nothing changed
except it went from Lightning to USB-C.
Yeah, it's a shame.
Nothing changed.
It was an opportunity to change something.
Nothing changed, which I'm not that surprised by. I do look at them.
You live in hope, but I'm not surprised.
Yeah, I mean, these new shades are good.
For example, the yellow is more yellow.
The one that I have, which is the yellow, was quite goldy, which I quite liked, but
it had more of a goldy vibe.
I would like to see these in person, but they do look good.
I'm happy they kept the whole range, because I think the whole range is really nice.
And I think it's good that they kind of updated it.
It's really interesting to put the nanotexture on this.
I guess at this point,
they've worked out this process enough
that they can do it anywhere.
My expectation, because I was wondering like,
oh, are they putting the iPad version on it,
which I found out at the event which I spoke about, it was like
some chemical process that they used instead of the etching. But I think it might be the
etching version because if you get the nanotexture display, they ship a polishing cloth in the
box with it, which would suggest that it is the etched version. Maybe they've got that
information on the website somewhere and I just haven't found it yet.
But this is nice, I would say.
John Turner says in the video
that it is the first of three announcements this week,
and also says join us tomorrow
for another exciting Mac announcement.
Yeah, how about that?
Stay tuned, kids.
I find it really weird that they went through the effort
of producing this video,
which I've got a link to in the show notes.
It's hard to find. But it is just a section of what would be a full video.
And if they're going to do this two more times, I don't really, I don't understand why they're
doing it this way.
Why not just put it all together and, and treat it like a thing?
I don't, I don't know.
We'll see, but it's weird.
It's not at the top of Apple's website.
It just is iMac learn more.
They could put a video embed there,
or they could say watch the video.
And then on the iMac page,
it just after, when you scroll down,
it says watch the announcement.
Again, it doesn't even have-
It's on their YouTube page now too.
I just said in the-
But it doesn't like, it should be front and center.
Yeah.
And it's not, it's just nowhere.
It's really weird, right?
It's, I don't know, I don't know.
It's an interesting experiment.
I'll give them that, but I feel like if you're gonna do
a 10 minute long product video, which by the way,
is, I mean, it's not just an iMac video.
The first four minutes of it, five minutes of it
is Apple Intelligence, right?
Like, it's also the video
that introduces Apple intelligence features that are shipping on the iMac. So it's not
just an iMac video. It feels much more like part of a larger whole, but it's just an iMac
video. I just don't, yeah, again, I'm glad they made it. It's a perfectly good, it's the same kind of like
production value as their other videos.
It just seems buried and it's weird.
The press release similarly, like, I don't know.
The press release doesn't have a link to it anywhere,
I think.
I don't get it. I don't get it. No. I don't get it.
It's very weird. Yep, but at least they made it. I mean I prefer watching that to reading the press
release. So I'm excited that the next two days I expect there to be video. They should get more
videos, more Apple intelligence videos probably too. Who knows. So I guess we're in this weird
thing. We may as well like just, should we just look at the drafts, the cool card?
And like we might as well just do this now
and then next week we'll finish it.
I think this puts it at, you get two points so far.
The new iMac, I'm gonna say that the new iMac
does come in the same colors as before.
Oh, interesting, okay.
Thank you.
Unless you think it doesn't.
I mean, I don't know because they are the same color names.
So the spread is exactly the same.
But they're different shades.
So you could argue that if the shades changed,
the color changed.
You could also argue that the color names stayed the same,
but the shades changed and the shade is not a color.
Maybe not then.
Because I guess, here's what I would say.
If they would have called it green
and removed all the saturation,
we would have said it changed, right?
I mean, if they called it green and made it silver,
yes, we would have said that.
But if it's still green.
I think I've changed my opinion of mine.
I'm gonna say easily we got one all so far.
I think that's fine.
Yes, that's where I have it.
I think I have it as one all,
and I would argue minus one to each of us as well.
I think we've missed one and gotten one so far.
Which one have I missed?
Release date given for first Apple intelligence features,
because it came out and they just said,
let me demo Apple intelligence.
I'm not sure they gave a date.
And that's what we said is they needed to give a date
and instead it just released.
They did do a second newsroom post today.
They were like, hey, it's today.
So I don't know.
That seems pushing it to me.
You think so?
What if they did an event and they're like,
it's available today.
That's not a.
Let me, I'll put it this way.
I would not have agreed to this as a pick. If the pick
was literally, they will put out a press release that says that Apple intelligence is available
today.
What?
Of course they were going to do that.
But these are all, are we grading this on the newsroom posts or on the videos?
I mean, that's a good question too.
That's what we haven't decided.
So let's, there's no point to litigate it yet.
But what we know is we've both scored one point each
and the rest, we'll leave it up to next week to decide.
What a funny way to, this is like hilarious.
Don't even know how to score it.
Like, what is the winner?
Like is the newsroom post the winner or the video's the winner?
What do they do to our videos?
Like we just don't know.
So we'll decide this next week.
I do think you get the tiebreaker though,
cause there's no event.
Although if I was being litigious,
I would say a three day product release event is an event.
But they haven't sent an invitation to this.
Oh, I agree. Yeah.
I agree.
I agree.
Well, let's just see how it goes over the next few days before we really dig into the
points scoring person ship.
It may not matter, but the beauty of the upgrade draft scoring is sometimes we score very generously
because it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter at all.
Yep.
Saddle up, partner.
Let's hit some room around up. Yee-, partner. Let's hit some rumor roundup.
Yee-haw.
Let's do it.
Let's ride out there.
There's been some reporting from various sources about the potential slim iPhone 17 that will
debut next year, which is also known as the iPhone 17 Air.
I like that name.
Joe Racinell, a week or so ago at Mac Rumors, has pulled together the following expected
specs from a variety of
sources. This phone would feature a 6.6 inch display, an A19 chip, not a Pro chip, but it
would be made with the same process as the current A18 Pro. So it would be basically like an 18 Pro
but called an A19. It will have a dynamic island, face ID, a single rear camera, which is a 48 megapixel
sensor, a 24 megapixel front camera, an Apple made 5G modem, 8 gigabytes of RAM, an aluminum
frame of a noticeably different design.
And this is the expectation now is that this would actually replace the plus phone.
So there would be no plus phone.
There would just be this in its place.
Right. Well, and A19 will be in the in the iPhone 17 as
well right that's it's the same thing as this year they're gonna use the same
process but with an updated chip yeah and they'll be presumably a19 and a19
pro and the air will get the a19 that the base iPhone 17 would also get so it
really is replacing the plus in the lineup with this thinner phone.
What I wonder is where in price does it land though?
I know, right?
This could be the most expensive iPhone,
depending on just how fancy they make it, you know?
It's true, could be.
It's got a single camera.
I feel like it's not,
it doesn't come across to me as super high end
other than that it looks different and it's thinner. So I think it's not it doesn't come across to me as super high-end other than that it
looks different and it's thinner so it I think it's a good question is this a
thousand dollar phone I think fashion is what they're going for here I think
that's what they're gonna attempt to hit I think my my expectation is they're
gonna try and make this phone feel like a piece of jewelry and if they do that
maybe it's the most expensive one this is the statement iPhone I don't know I
don't know like this this set of specs doesn't really help me nail that down one way or another,
but it is suggesting it's going to be very different. And I do find it... I wonder if
they, with this phone, they will crack the problem that they have had with that second
slot that they have yet to be able to solve? All right, it's a good question.
I mean, they clearly they've decided that differentiating by size is not enough.
No, it has to be.
So they're going to differentiate somehow other ways.
I'm going to say I'm going to say this feels like a thousand dollar phone to me.
Just a gut feel here is that it feels like
it's probably priced similar to the Pro,
but with different features.
Not a 1500, $1400 phone, but maybe,
I mean, it's possible.
It really depends on the details, right?
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
I guess maybe similarly, or just like along with this, in a memo to staff announcing the
promotion of Richard Dinn to VP of product design for the iPhone, John Turner said that
the upcoming iPhone roadmap represents, quote, the most ambitious in the product's history.
Yes.
Is that anything?
I don't know, but it could be like, as we've, as we can assume this phone is the gateway
to a folding iPhone.
Yeah.
Let's put it this way.
The last five years of iPhone have not been ambitious.
Good call.
Right?
Yeah.
12, 13, 14, 15, 16 has been pretty, I mean, since the iPhone 10,
would we say that the roadmap is super ambitious?
I mean, it's been camera upgrades,
not that they haven't done stuff,
but it's like camera upgrades and processor upgrades.
Like they've done some stuff,
but I wouldn't call it super ambitious.
I certainly wouldn't say most in the product's history,
unless you're just hyping. So if he's serious here, I think, yeah, I think that that that is what
we're thinking is they're doing a thin phone, they're going to do some foldables, who knows
what else they've got in the mix. And that is much more ambitious. Yeah.
Mark Gurman has yet again, shared more details about Apple's smart home device and his power
on newsletter.
But this is actually like good stuff.
Yeah.
So this is about the one expected next year,
the cheaper one.
The screen is expected to be pretty small,
described as about the size of two iPhones side by side
and will be a square screen.
It will be attached to a base that
will make it look reminiscent
to the iMac G4. The device will run a new operating system that will include some iPad
like apps including FaceTime notes and calendar. It's also meant to be well suited to videos
and photo slideshows. The device's primary purpose will be serving as a hub that can control various smart home accessories.
This is the product expected to launch next year with a higher end version with a robotic limb!
Robotic!
Something coming in 2026. I am so hyped for this product.
Like, if it's just this, I want it so bad.
So, I don't know if this is something about Mark
Erman or something about his sources, but I find it
funny that it took all this time to get to the base
will probably be a speaker because he's been
describing this thing as a screen, right?
A smart display.
Yeah.
And I wonder if that's just the way that it's been
described to him because all along I've thought this has to be a HomePod speaker too, right? I mean, it has to do both. If it's just an iPad on a stand without a good speaker, then what are we even doing here? And then why would you have a big base? The big base is to provide some weight so that it will be anchored down, but also it's gotta be a speaker.
So I feel like that's gotten a short shrift, but at least here he's kind of acknowledged that,
that yeah, it'll probably be a speaker. Like probably. I don't understand this product if
the base is not a speaker, because that's like part of it. This is the HomePod with an iPad
kind of grafted onto it, running a simplified version of one of Apple's OS's that will run apps and
do all this stuff and be a home controller and be an Apple intelligence Siri thing and like all of
those things need to be in this product. But if that's what it is, it sounds like a good product.
I want one. I think he just described this product before, but he's described it as the expensive one,
right? Of being like it's on an arm
and it will follow you and stuff.
And now, and he always said the little one
was just gonna be a screen.
And now he's saying that the little one is like this.
So what I think this is gonna be is
there is the mini version and the regular version.
This is the mini version.
And then the regular version, it looks the same,
but the arm moves and it's bigger.
And that's the one that comes second.
Yeah, that makes sense.
That is a strategy that makes sense.
And I do wonder if it literally is Mark Gurman's vision
into this is coming from a source
that doesn't have the whole picture
or hasn't described aspects of it.
And so he's been saying sort of like it's a smart display
where we've all along kind of assumed
that it's gonna be a HomePod with a screen,
not just a screen,
because that's an iPad, right?
And so, yeah, sounds great.
As somebody who had an Echo Show for years
and has a Google Home Nest, whatever, Mini,
in my kitchen now,
I would like an Apple One of those instead, please, right?
Especially if it does Apple if it does Apple intelligence
and if it can run like all the video apps
that are on Apple TV and, and iPad, you know,
like apps as this says, so that you can get that stuff
on there, great, let's do it.
I'm ready.
I'll get in line now.
This episode is brought to you in part by Notion.
There is so much to love about Notion.
I mean, I would say I love using Notion every day.
So a Cortex brand, we use Notion for collaborating as a team.
I use it as where all of our information goes.
It's how I keep track of all of the projects that we're working on.
It's something that I have started using because it was introduced to me, but my assistant
is something that we could use to kind of collaborate with. And then the more I've used
it, the more and more stuff I have put into it. I've also played around a little bit of
Notion's AI tools. Like one of the things that I like, we keep minutes of our meetings
that we have, you know, like people are keeping notes and writing down, you know, like updates
to projects and stuff. And at the end, I can say,
tell me the action items that are here
and Notion's AI will go through
and give me the action items
at the bottom of my meeting notes.
The new Notion AI is a single AI tool that does it all.
You can search across Notion and other apps,
generate documents in your own style,
analyze PDFs and images and chat with you about anything.
Notion is a perfect place to organize your tasks, track your habits, write beautiful documents and collaborate with your team. And the more content
you add to Notion, the more Notion AI can personalize its responses for you because unlike
generic chat bots, Notion AI already has the context of your work. Notion AI is connected
to multiple knowledge sources. It uses AI knowledge from GPT-4 and Claude to chat with you about any topic.
It can search across thousands of Notion documents in a second
to quickly answer any question.
And with AI connectors that are now in beta, Notion AI can search across Slack
discussions, Google Docs, Sheets and Slides, and more tools like GitHub
and Jira are coming soon.
Notion is used by over half of the Fortune 500 companies.
So you'll be in great company. It's also used by me, and I hope that you consider that
good company. Try Notion for free today when you go to Notion.com slash upgrade. It's all
lowercase, notion.com slash upgrade to try the powerful, easy to use Notion AI today.
And when you use our link, you'll support the show. That is Notion.com slash upgrade
our thanks to Notion for their support
of this show and Relay.
It's time for some Ask Upgrade questions.
Choo, choo, choo, choo.
First one comes from John who asks,
have either of you considered exploring YouTube
in a more direct form than posting things
like podcast recordings?
That's a good question.
I mean, Six Col colors has a channel.
Okay.
Um, and there's stuff there.
Um, but it's a, it's a very large amount of work.
And in the end, when I've tried it, I felt like it didn't really provide
a direct benefit for my job and I've got to focus on the stuff that does.
And so, you know, you really, if you wanna be making money on YouTube,
you need to spend your time building up YouTube.
And I think a lot of us have experimented
and done the math and then said, this doesn't make sense.
So, and also I am a solo worker, it's just me here.
And for video, you kinda start to need help. And like I get a solo worker. It's just me here. And for video, you kind of start to need help.
And like I get a product to review.
I gotta review it.
I gotta write it.
If I gotta do a video, I have to shoot the video myself
and edit it myself.
And like I can do all those things.
I have those skills, but it's a lot.
It's a lot.
So in the end, I largely prioritize other things.
I always think, I'll say this, I always think about it.
I always think about like,
if I get an Apple product in advance,
do I make a video review and post that
as well as my written review?
My written review I have to do,
and then we're gonna podcast about it.
But like, is there room in there for a video review?
Unfortunately, most of the time, there's so much going on
that all I can do is get the video or get the written review done. I don't have any
extra time to do the rest of it. And in those cases, the YouTube video goes down immediately.
Like that's, that's it. Dan Moran and I do some live streams. So that's an example where
we do try to do it for Apple results, also for new products
that are dropping under embargo, if I've got the product,
or I will try to do some of that.
And that's a little less heavy lift
because it's just a live stream
and we're sitting there talking
and I'm showing stuff off that's on my desk
and that's a lot easier to do. So I do some of that. But, you know, that's, and then over on the incomparable side, I mean, we do all
our D&D stuff is streamed. But like, in terms of the tech stuff, that's the truth of it is, if I wanted to stop writing
articles and post YouTube videos instead, I could do that. But I feel like it's not that it would, it would kind of break
videos instead. I could do that, but I feel like it's not that it would, it would kind of break my existing business and I have no feeling like it would actually replace that
with something new that would be better. And so there's no point. I just stay with what
I've gotten. That's just sort of where I am. What about you?
Yeah. I mean, like obviously YouTube works if that's the thing you want to do, right?
But like for us, we're already doing things that are successful. So adding in, adding
in YouTube in like a native way that you want
to do YouTube is a lot of work, right? Yeah. And it's hard to do. I have over the years,
I've, I mean, I've done every kind of video type of thing that you could imagine. Like
I've explored all of them just to see what I like. Like I've done vlogs, I've done video
reviews, I've streamed. Ultimately, I just don't enjoy doing this as much as I love podcasting. So like
I just focus on that. Like that's that's kind of where I am. I do think that for the product
stuff with Cortex brand, I might start doing some new kind of video stuff. I recently did
a thing on my channel where I showed off some projects that we're working on and I found
it to be like a really interesting and helpful thing to do.
So like I could imagine maybe doing more stuff like that in the future.
But again, they're like, quote unquote, low budget stuff, right?
Like it's not intensely produced stuff is not really what I'm planning to do for right
now because I just want to be able to, if I'm going to do these things to kind of just
do them on my own, where if I get help, I can make them better, but it's not really what I'm, I don't know how core
this would be to the business right now, so.
And I think people don't understand,
or a lot of people don't understand with video,
when you're a professional media person
and a professional content creator,
the expectation is that the work you do
will be at a professional level.
Yeah. Here's the thing.
I write articles that are professional.
We do podcasts that are professional.
To generate a video that is not up to the same equivalent standard,
which is a professional looking video,
if it's a little ramshackle,
because we're not professional video makers,
and we're doing this kind of like as
extra time. The fact is, I know you think, Oh,
well, I would be understanding. I know that
fact is the audiences aren't the audiences expect
you to have a very high quality video presentation.
Yep. And that means so the bar is high and, and
I can't, you know, that is one of my issues is if I'm going to do a video, it has to look good.
It has to be good. And that's even more work than a kind of shoddy video because as a content creating
professional, people hold me to a higher standard, fair or unfair, even about video. And so that makes
it even harder to do because I'm not gonna be able to,
without a huge amount of work,
get something that's even close to being at the level.
That's why I like live streaming,
is that a live stream, the bar is not as high
as a pre-recorded video.
Still to do it well, you've got to put some effort in, right?
Like, so you've got to buy some lights and stuff like that.
But yeah, it is like, that's why I like it too,
because it's like, you get to like a, you get the base and then the content is
just, it's actually just kind of like podcasting a lot of the time, really.
We can do that. But yeah, like video reviews and stuff like that is like for,
for, for us would is, is a bigger production because if you, you know,
you're right, like we are, we have an audience already.
So I kind of feel this way about like a lot of projects that I have started over the years.
And now I think I've kind of got my head around a little bit more that the audience's expectations
are higher and my expectations are higher.
So I have to feel like I can make myself and everybody else happy of any new endeavor that
I try to go for.
And that becomes harder and harder over time.
So it might just be best to just stick to one I'm good at.
I have honestly thought about the idea of,
so I reviewed the iPad mini last week,
and it was, you know,
I literally reviewed that in an afternoon
because I got it Monday during the show.
People who listen live know I went to get a package.
Yes, that was an embargoed iPad mini from Apple.
And then I spent the afternoon with it
and the evening writing a review.
Fortunately, Lauren was working an evening.
So I just, I did dial that.
But that was a quick turnaround
because one, I didn't feel like I had that much to say
about it because it wasn't that different.
And two, that got me out at the embargo time,
which I like to do if I can do it. And there wasn't that much to say. I would have not posted it that fast if I felt more. There's no way I was going to make a video, right? But I did think about like in other circumstances. And I think about this all the time with, with, with product reviews is, is there an interim stage where I'm essentially writing
my script when I write my blog post, my written review,
and could I make a video that involves some B-roll
of the product that I would have to shoot
in proper lighting and all those things,
that would be extra work,
but some B-roll of the product and me looking at my camera,
essentially reading a version of my review as a script. What would that,
that's like a video version of a blog post. Is, would that be good? I don't know. Would it be
better than the blog post and better than the podcast about it? Probably not, but some people
might rather watch the YouTube video. So I think about that stuff. But again,
even that requires like, I got to get a setup where I'm comfortable looking at a script and
reading it while it looks pretty natural that I'm looking at the camera. So am I building a
teleprompter thing? Or am I just reading it off of my eye or my studio display? Right? Like it gets,
it gets a lot more complicated. So even something as simple as that, where I'm trying to
lower the bar and not write a new video script, but just take my existing blog and blog post and read it and shoot some
b-roll like, but okay, now I've, it's already more complicated. So yeah, it's, it's interesting. I think you and I both think about it.
And I try to pick my spots like with the live streams.
I feel like that's a better fit is hopping on a live stream.
I've got a camera above my desk.
I can hop on a live stream.
And if I've got a new product, I can show it off
and I can take questions live.
And if Dan's gonna be there, he can feed me questions
and we'll talk and we'll, you know, I'm, that's, I'm a little more comfortable with that.
It's a little more like this.
It's a natural extension of what we do.
Yeah.
I think so.
Mike wrote and said, I'm loving the photo shuffle home screen that I've put on my phone
in the past.
When I saw a photo in a widget that I wanted to share, I could tap on it to open photos
and share them with my family. Is there a similar way to share photos from the lock
screen of an in screenshotting the lock screen widgets and everything? So if you
use the photo shuffle lock phase, yeah lock screen, you'll see images go through
right? There is actually a way to get to that image but it is weirdly complicated
and the only reason I know how to do this
is I saw underscore do it once.
So if you see an image on your lock screen
and you're like, that's a lovely lock screen of my family.
I want to send it to my wife or whatever.
You long press on the lock screen to go into the edit mode.
You hit customize, you hit the three dots
and then show photo in library.
I don't know why they make that as complicated as
it is, but it's the thing that you can do. You know what I mean? I feel like if
you use the Photoshop lock screen, there should just be a button on the
lock screen that's like press this button and go to this image, you know? But
or like maybe even have it as like a lock screen widget type, right? That could
pop up if you use that or something.
But it's funny to me that you can do it,
but it's that complicated.
There is no way to do it that I found
on the watch face version,
just in case anybody wants to know.
And Connor wrote in and said,
given the lack of changes to the new iPad mini,
would I be better off buying a 2021 iPad mini
and saving some money?
My primary concern is the jelly scrolling issue from the 2021 model.
I don't think I care about Apple intelligence in the new chip.
Well, first off, we don't know if there's more jelly scrolling or not.
Almost everybody says there isn't, but then some people say that there is.
And I really believe here's the thing about jelly scrolling.
I think it's a perception issue where there is a very,
very small lag that some people can perceive
and some people can't.
And if you're concerned,
if your primary concern is jelly scrolling,
you shouldn't buy an iPad.
Well, I mean, you should,
you should go to the Apple store and look at an iPad mini,
but you shouldn't buy the 21 model because it's got jelly scrolling according to the people who
see jelly scrolling. But how do you know, you know, you don't even know if you're one of the
people that could see it. I know. Well, that's why you got to go to the Apple store. I, so that's
my answer is if you're really worried about it, I guess you go, you should get an iPad air instead.
It's very hard to tell. Most of us can't see it. It seems like it might be less on this model,
but that some people claim they can still see it.
I'm not entirely sure they aren't at this point
seeing an effect that is, it's just so, I don't know.
I mean, I don't wanna say that it doesn't exist,
but I'm starting to think that it's a feature
of computer displays that some people notice
if they really look closely, more than it's a flaw of anything. But I just don't know.
I see the jokes going on my iPad Mini. It's fine. Like I see it. I've always seen it. It's fine.
I wanted them to fix it because it shouldn't be there for that money. And I think what they've
done is improved it. But all devices are susceptible to this
because it's just a device controller.
It's not like the iPad mini is specifically, there's a problem with it.
It's just every computer can have this issue with the display controller.
Just whatever they did in the 2021 model made it more susceptible than others.
I just feel like, as Jason has said, go and try and see one of these devices and see if you see it.
But even if you do, I don't think it's a reason not to buy it. You really have to be scrolling
fast to see it. And are you really doing it that often? Like scrolling quickly?
It's a thing that exists, but I don't think it's a reason to not buy
either of these products.
I had a 2021 iPad mini that I used for like three years
every day and loved it.
And I could see the jelly scrolling.
It wasn't a problem.
Let's get real here too.
The issue with the iPad mini's display is that it's 60 Hertz.
Yeah.
And honestly, that's the thing I couldn't get over.
Yeah.
Is that I was scrolling to look at the jelly scrolling
and I was like, God, it's so terrible.
Because it's 60 Hertz.
And I'm used to an iPad Pro that's at 120.
And first off, Apple should,
we are all in agreement here, I think.
Apple should give their non-promotion displays
a frame rate update.
Go to 90 maybe.
But that's the thing that I found disturbing and distracting about the iPad mini a frame rate update, go to 90 maybe. Yeah.
But that's the thing that I found disturbing and distracting about the iPad mini
is just that 60 frames is not great
because it's all scrolling.
See, I think all scrolling on the iPad mini is bad
because I think it's 60 frames is bad.
So it's very hard for me to see it.
But like, again, I believe David Pierce.
David Pierce seems like a solid guy. I like his work and he says he see it. But like, again, I believe David Pierce. David Pierce seems like a solid
guy. I like his work. And he says he sees it. And a few other people say they see it.
So I think the answer is you got to be super sensitive to it. You got to be looking for
it. And then once you notice it, my understanding is you never don't notice it. And like the
bottom line for Connor is if you're concerned with jelly scrolling, don't buy an iPad mini.
Just don't.
Because we know it does it.
Or if you're really, the 21 we know does it.
Or at the very least, go to an Apple store if you can,
look at a 24 model and see if you can see it or not
before buying one.
That's all I can say.
If you would like to send in your questions for Ask Upgrade,
please go to upgradefeedback.com where you can also send us in your follow for Ask Upgrade, please go to Upgradefeedback.com
where you can also send us in your follow-up
and general feedback about the show.
You can check out Jason's work at SixColors.com.
I reckon it's gonna be a busy week over there,
so go check it out.
You can hear Jason here on Relay
and at TheIncomparable.com.
You can listen to me here on Relay as well, obviously,
and check out my work at QuartexBrand.com.
You can find us online.
Jason is at Jsnell. I am at I Mike.
I am why K.
E. You can watch clips of this show on
tick tock, Instagram and YouTube.
But we're at upgrade relay.
Thank you to our members who support us
about great plus.
Your support really does mean a lot to us.
So if you if you would like to get ad
free longer versions of the show each
and every single week, go to get upgrade
plus dot com. We're going to talk about Jason's holiday lights in today's upgrade plus segment. Yeah, we are. ad-free longer versions of the show each and every single week, go to getupgradeplus.com.
We're going to talk about Jason's holiday lights in today's Upgrade Plus segment.
Yeah, we are. Oh boy. Okay. Okay. This is more than I thought.
We're going to talk about Jason's holiday lights today.
Strap in everyone, getupgradeplus.com. Thank you to Notion, FitBot,
and Squarespace for their support of this episode.
But most of all, thank you for listening. We'll be back next week. Until then, say goodbye, Jason Snow. Goodbye, Mike Hurley.