Upstream - [TEASER] China Pt. 1: A Socialist Introduction w/ Jason Hickel
Episode Date: February 18, 2025This is a free preview of the episode "China Pt. 1: A Socialist Introduction w/ Jason Hickel." You can listen to the full episode by subscribing to our Patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/upstreampo...dcast As a Patreon subscriber you'll get access to at least one bonus episode a month (usually two or three), our entire back catalog of Patreon episodes, early access to certain episodes, and other benefits like stickers and bumper stickers—depending on which tier you subscribe to. access to bi-weekly bonus episodes ranging from conversations to readings and more. Signing up for Patreon is a great way to make Upstream a weekly show, and it will also give you access to our entire back catalog of Patreon episodes along with stickers and bumper stickers at certain subscription tiers. You’ll also be helping to keep Upstream sustainable and allowing us to keep this project going. The world that we all grew up in is no longer a reality—although, in many ways, those in power are grasping onto it with the desperation of drowning men flailing, lashing out—furious, terrified, and in denial of what is staring them in their faces: imminent death. The rest of us are watching this process unfold before our very eyes—also terrified, but seemingly powerless. It’s a weird time to be alive. But when has it ever not been? As we watch, experience, and feel the collapse of the state that we live within—or for those of us not currently living in the belly of the beast, the imperial world that this state rules over—it feels like an important time to explore this collapse. Specifically, it’s an important time to understand what’s happening in the imperial world order, and in order to do that, we must understand China. In this conversation, we’ve brought on a regular guest—a guest who you all know and love—Jason Hickel, to talk about China.  Jason Hickel is a professor at the The Institute for Environmental Science and Technology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, the author of the books The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions and Less is More: How Degrowth will Save the World. In this conversion we first take a brief dive into modern Chinese history, looking at the pre-revolution period, the 1949 communist revolution itself, the Mao period, the Deng period, and the Xi period. We analyze what the rise of China means in terms of the current world order and the implications for the United States. We tackle some common questions and dispel some common myths about China—like, is China capitalist? Is it imperialist? We analyze some current events like trade wars and Tiktok bans, and finally, we explain why it’s crucial not to fall into the trap of U.S. propaganda when it comes to how we on the Western left analyze China. Artwork: Berwyn Mure Further resources: The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and Its Solutions, Jason Hickel Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save The World, Jason Hickel "Unequal exchange of labour in the world economy," (Nature Communications) Hickel, Lamos, Barbour "Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015," (Global Environmental Change) Hickel, Dorninger, Wieland, Suwandi "Plunder in the Post-Colonial Era: Quantifying Drain from the Global South Through Unequal Exchange, 1960–2018," (New Political Economy) Hickel, Sullivan, Zoomkawala "Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown: an equality-based attribution approach for carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the planetary boundary," Jason Hickel (The Lancet) Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present, Utsa Patnaik and Prabhat Patnaik Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism’s Final Crisis Paperback, John Smith "Capitalist reforms and extreme poverty in China: unprecedented progress or income deflation?" Dylan Sullivan, Michail Moatsos & Jason Hickel Related episodes: (Chinese) Socialism vs (U.S.) Capitalism Better Lives for All w/ Jason Hickel How the North Plunders the South w/ Jason Hickel The Divide – Global Inequality from Conquest to Free Markets with Jason Hickel International Development and Post-capitalism with Jason Hickel How Degrowth Will Save the World with Jason Hickel The Green Transition Pt.1 – The Problem with Green Capitalism Upstream is a labor of love — we couldn't keep this project going without the generosity of our listeners and fans. Subscribe to our Patreon at patreon.com/upstreampodcast or please consider chipping in a one-time or recurring donation at www.upstreampodcast.org/support If your organization wants to sponsor one of our upcoming documentaries, we have a number of sponsorship packages available. Find out more at  upstreampodcast.org/sponsorship For more from Upstream, visit www.upstreampodcast.org and follow us on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Bluesky. You can also subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
A quick note before we jump into this Patreon episode.
Thank you to all of our Patreon subscribers for making Upstream possible.
We genuinely couldn't do this without you.
Your support allows us to create bonus content like this and provide most of our content for free
so we can continue to offer political education media to the public and help to build our movement.
Thank you, comrades.
We hope you enjoy this conversation. China does not in fact pose any kind of actual military threat to the people of the United
States or Europe, and indeed the sole reason for Western fear mongering is because China
is just achieving economic sovereignty, and this is basically undermining the imperial
arrangement that Western capital accumulation depends on. is just achieving economic sovereignty. And this is basically undermining the imperial arrangements
that Western capital accumulation depends on.
And for the West, this is just not on.
They're not willing to let this happen.
And that's why they went to go to war.
It's actually wild to consider that they're willing
to flirt with the possibility of global nuclear warfare
in order to maintain the conditions for capital accumulation.
That's effectively what we're facing.
I think we have to be clear about that. It's a disaster and none of us should accept it. You're listening to
Upstream. Upstream. Upstream. Upstream. A show about political economy and society that invites you to
unlearn everything you thought you knew about the world around you. I'm Della Duncan. And I'm Robert Raymond. The world we all
grew up in is no longer a reality, although in many ways those in power are
still grasping onto it with the desperation of drowning men. Flailing,
lashing out, furious, terrified, and in denial of what is staring them in their
faces. Imminent death. The rest of us are
watching this process unfold before our very eyes, also terrified but seemingly
powerless. It's a weird time to be alive, but when has it ever not been? As we watch,
experience, and feel the collapse of the state that we live within, or for those
of us not currently living in the belly of the state that we live within, or for those of us not
currently living in the belly of the beast, the imperial world that this state rules over,
it feels like it's an important time to explore this collapse.
Specifically, it's an important time to understand what's happening in the imperial world order.
And in order to do that, we must understand China.
In this conversation, we've brought on a regular guest, a guest who you all know and
love – Jason Hickel – to talk about China. Jason Hickel is a professor at the Institute
for Environmental Science and Technology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, and the author of the books, The Divide,
A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and Its Solutions,
and Less is More, How D-Growth Will Save the World.
In this conversation, we first take a brief dive
into modern Chinese history,
looking at the pre-revolution period,
the 1949 communist revolution itself, the
Mao period, the Deng period, and the Xi period.
We analyze what the rise of China means in terms of the current world order and the implications
for the United States.
We tackle some common questions and dispel some common myths about China.
Like is China capitalist?
Is it imperialist?
We analyze some current events
like trade wars and the TikTok ban.
And finally, we explain why it's crucial
to not fall into the trap of US propaganda
when it comes to how we on the Western left analyze China.
And now here's Robert in conversation with Jason Hickel.
All right, Jason, it's wonderful to have you back on the show.
Hey, Robbie.
Thanks. Good to be back with you.
Yeah, you are definitely one of our most popular guests
and quite a frequent guest, actually, which is really exciting.
And our episodes with you are always a lot of fun, extremely informative.
Our listeners always have a lot of great responses.
So it's really great to have you back on and especially for such an interesting topic.
So before we jump in to China, I love it just in case there are any listeners out there who
aren't familiar with you, if you could introduce yourself and just talk a little bit about the
work you do. Yeah, sure. So I'm a professor at the Institute for Environmental Science and Technology
at the Autonomous University in Barcelona, and a visiting professor at the London School of Economics. And my research
focuses mostly kind of on imperialism and ecology in the capitalist world economy,
with kind of a particular focus on how we can achieve post-capitalist transformations,
and also how global south countries can achieve sovereign developments kind of delinking from
imperialist exploitation, so that we can ensure good
lives for everyone within planetary boundaries. And we also have a big
research project that's based at ICTO, where I work, with a couple dozen
researchers that are all working on these issues too, so it's quite an exciting
team. I've written a couple of books related to these topics that people can
check out if they want to. One is called The Divide, a brief guide to global inequality and its solutions.
And more recently, Less is More, How Degros Can Save the World.
Incredible.
And I just want to underscore the research that's coming out of your research team is
like phenomenal, and you're doing such incredible and important work.
So thank you so much for everything that you do and for sharing a little bit about it.
Today we're here to talk about China.
And I'm wondering if we could start
with just a brief history of modern China.
So we are planning on getting into the history more
in the next few months or so with,
I'm not sure if you're familiar actually with Kenneth Hammond,
but he has a couple books out. We're going to be diving a lot deeper into the history.
So for now though, I do think it might be helpful for a brief history, just for anybody who really
doesn't know much or anything at all about Chinese history. It might be helpful to help orient them
and give sense to maybe some of the things that we may reference as
we move forward. So like, yeah, maybe you could just guide us
through the period prior to the revolution briefly, and then
talk about the revolution itself, you know, the period of
marketization of the economy, and just anything else that you
think might be helpful to set the stage as we move forward?
Okay, yeah, cool.
So yeah, I think this is important because
in my experience, most people in the West
actually have very little knowledge of Chinese history.
And to me, this is sad because it's actually
this extraordinary story of how oppressed masses
of workers and peasants rose up
against capitalist imperialism,
fought against not only the national reactionary
forces, but also against the US, Britain, and France, like the most powerful states in the world
at the time. They managed to win against incredible odds, and they succeeded in establishing a socialist
society that is still with us today, which has achieved actually really incredible things. So,
it's an amazing story. And so I think that it's useful to kind of start with that. Now, the difficulty of course, is that China's history
is thousands of years old. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to skip like most of it. And just
we're going to focus on kind of the more recent modern period right around the turn of the 19th
century. This is where I think that the story becomes quite relevant. So this is during the
Qing dynasty, which was a long period of
political stability, during which China became the major manufacturing powerhouse in the world
economy. At this time, China accounted for something like more than 30% of total global
manufacturing output, which is huge. You have Britain and Western Europe that were consuming
massive quantities of really high quality goods from China
at the time, like tea and silk and porcelain, things like that. But China was only accepting
payments in silver, right? They refused to accept European goods in exchange for their exports,
partly because they considered European goods to be basically inferior in terms of their technology,
but also because they wanted to protect their national industries from being undermined
by foreign competition. So it was effectively like, you might say, a kind of protectionist
economy.
So the Europeans were forced to finance their trade with China using silver, which they
plundered from their colonial territories in Latin America. So you get a sense of how
the world system is
shaping up here. And of course, they were using the labor of enslaved people in Latin America,
both indigenous and also African enslaved people, to obtain the silver. So basically,
we have a situation where Europe is plundering silver from Latin America virtually for free,
and then using it to buy real goods from China, which they therefore obtained effectively for free.
So this was a crazy system that was massively beneficial to Europe. It provided them with an
enormous windfall of basically free goods and propped up their material consumption.
Now here's what happened. So by around the middle of the 1800s, Europe had lost control of most of its colonies
in Latin America. Their silver began to run dry, and they needed some other way of financing their
massive imports from China. So they started to sell opium. Now, opium didn't grow in Europe,
of course. The Europeans forced their colonial subjects to grow it in India and the Middle East,
and then they sold it in China
illegally to finance their purchases of Chinese goods. So in other words, European states and
companies basically turned to trafficking drugs, right? The opium was also massively addictive and
had a major negative effect on the health of the Chinese population, and actually created a kind of
trade deficit actually that sucked silver back out of China and ended up impoverishing the population. So it was a total disaster for China. The
Chinese authorities started to crack down on the drug trade as any reasonable state would do that
wants to protect this population. And in response, Britain and France invaded China in the 1830s and
1840s with the explicit goal of forcing open the Chinese market. And owing to
their superior naval power, they managed to defeat the Chinese military. So this is where
basically imperialism knocks on China's door, right? So these are called the Opium Wars,
which is true but also false because they weren't really ultimately about opium as such,
they were actually ultimately about gaining control over China's economy, which is exactly
what they did. After the Europeans won the war, they basically established China as part of the colonial
periphery, alongside India and Southeast Asia and later Africa, etc. They divided the country
up into spheres of influence controlled by variously like Britain, France, Germany, and the other imperial powers.
And they imposed a series of unequal treaties on China that pushed Chinese tariffs down
and therefore let in European manufactured goods, right, which was basically their core
objective. This undermined domestic production, it deindustrialized the Chinese economy, and
it turned China into a kind of captive market for European capitalists.
So there were several other things that happened during this time, like the British basically
established a system of indentured servitude, which is wild actually, this is an important
history, I think it's totally neglected. They were basically shipping indentured Chinese workers
around the world to work on their colonial plantations, especially after slavery was
formally abolished. This is how they took up the slack in the labor force for their labor requirements.
And finally, I think it's important to note that the Europeans also, in fact, directly
colonized several territories within China, including most famously Hong Kong. And I think
this is an important piece of history because Westerners today often assumed that Hong Kong
is like a separate country that China wants
to seize, but in reality it is a Chinese territory that was colonized by Britain in the 19th century
and remained colonized until 1997, if you can believe it. I think this is bizarrely
forgotten in our historical memory. So this is kind of the background to the Chinese Revolution,
right? The society was brutally subjugated by the imperialist
powers. The people were totally emiserated. Wages collapsed. Workers and peasants struggled to meet
even basic subsistence requirements. Famines became much more common. The Qing dynasty basically
disintegrated and China became kind of a patchwork of warring factions. It was an extremely dire
situation. And not
surprisingly, all of this triggered massive discontent among the Chinese working class,
who came to understand, correctly, that the only solution to this crisis was ultimately to
undertake a revolution, remove the imperialists and their their stooges, and regain worker control
over the productive forces of the nation. So the Chinese Communist Party,
the CCP, was founded in 1921, inspired by the success of the Russian Revolution, which had just
taken place a few years earlier. So you can see a direct relationship there. And they formed the
People's Liberation Army in 1927. Now, the other major guerrilla force that emerged during this time
was the Kuomintang, or the KMT,
which was a right-wing nationalist party that was viciously anti-communist. So the Communist Party
ends up in the Civil War with the KMT, and this attracts international attention. So the Soviets
support the communists in China, and the United States supports the KMT because they're desperate
to do everything possible to prevent China from swinging to the left. But the communists, who were led by Mao
Zedong, who was a revolutionary from a peasant family, had the benefit of very
strong popular support among China's massive peasantry and working class, and
as a result they managed to win the Civil War against the KMT, and in 1949 they
established a new government called the People's Republic of China, which is the government that continues to operate in China today.
Now just briefly here, the KMT, this is an interesting little side story for the KMT,
it was under the command of a guy called Xi'an Kaisheng. The KMT retreats to the island
of Taiwan and claims to be the only legitimate government of China. And this is a crucial
part of the story because remember, Taiwan was part of China. The defeated KMT basically seizes control of the
island, institutes a military dictatorship that ruled there for nearly 40 years, and during that
period brutally repressed socialists and communists and executed tens of thousands of people for the
political views. It was basically like a violent
fascist regime that had the explicit support of the United States, who saw it as an opportunity
to set up a kind of forward base against revolutionary China, right? And I think this
is important because a lot of people have this kind of naive view of the US relationship with Taiwan.
The story that we're normally told by our media is that the US is supporting this tiny,
fledgling democracy that is threatened by its big bad neighbor, but in reality, Taiwan
represents clearly a separatist movement that is supported by the US, which wants to use
it to destabilize China.
So to grasp the stakes of this, I guess for American listeners, you'd have to imagine after the US Civil War, imagine the Confederates seize, let's say, South Carolina, establish
a military dictatorship there with the direct support of Russia, let's say, and then claim
to be the only official government in the United States.
I mean, obviously, this is a totally absurd scenario and obviously not be tolerated by
the US government.
That gives you a sense for what's going on with the history of Taiwan in this whole story.
Let's get back to the story of mainland China, which is what we're here to talk about.
What happened after the revolution was actually remarkable.
Maoist China experienced the most rapid sustained increase in life expectancy of any population
in documented global history, which is actually extraordinary to consider.
We're talking massive improvements in social indicators. And this occurred because the communists were able
to mobilize the productive capacities of the nation, the considerable productive capacities
of the nation, to roll out things like public health care, public education, and to implement
universal access to important things like nutritious food and other essential goods
at affordable prices, which allowed them to massively accelerate human development. Now, of course, everybody knows about
the Great Famine that occurred in the late 1950s. I want to briefly touch on this. This is very
clearly a massive disaster. And it happened because the planning system at the time lacked
robust democratic mechanisms that would enable people on the ground to kind of feed back on policy implementation. So this was a major error. It was
like unintentional effects of the way the planning system was organized. It was an
error and the Chinese leadership recognized that fact and they learned
very serious lessons in the wake of it. They learned that basically democratic
participation is crucial to good planning and they implemented this in the
future which is why similar events did not occur.
And I want to emphasize here that despite this catastrophe, China's social outcomes
during the Maoist period were incredibly impressive.
We have UN data from 1980, right at the end of the Maoist period, which shows that China's
social indicators dramatically outperformed capitalist countries with similar levels of
income. So China had lower
mortality rates, higher life expectancy, better education, better health outcomes, better
electricity access, better nutrition, lower inequality, etc. etc. etc. And in fact, this
was famously recognized by the Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen at the time who wrote in the
1980s, and I quote, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that communism is good for poverty removal.
Which is interesting to consider when you realize that Amartya Sen has since been kind
of depoliticized and kind of claimed by liberals. I mean, he was clearly in the 1980s very in
favor of communist and socialist policy in the global south.
And one thing he did in his writing is he illustrated China's success by doing a direct
comparison of India. And this is useful because India achieved independence at roughly the same
time as the Chinese Revolution happened. In fact, China was actually poorer than India at that time,
so in the late 1940s. But communism enabled China to shoot rapidly
ahead in terms of human development, so that by the end of the Maoist period, China's life expectancy
was 10 years higher than India's, which is an extraordinary gap. And today, China's life
expectancy is one of the highest in the Global South and higher than in the USA. So really
impressive achievements on the human development front. I also briefly want to mention what they achieved in terms of gender because I think this is important
and also overlooked. So the communist revolution achieved very rapid progress against gender
inequality. They very quickly established the right of women to determine their own marriages,
and the right of women to divorce, and the right of women to education, land, and economic independence,
they legalized abortion in 1953. So this is just a few years after the revolution. By the way,
in many European countries, this did not occur until the 1980s, just to give you a sense for
how ahead of the curve they were. They established community cafeterias, they established public
childcare facilities, and the idea here was specifically to reduce the
burden of domestic labor on women. And they established job guarantees that ensured women
had access to paid employment, and they used democratic wage-setting mechanisms to purposely
reduce the gender pay gap. These are impressive reforms, and what's interesting is that by the
1980s, again, this is using UN data, we see that China was outperforming the USA and Europe
in terms of gender wage equality. And in fact, China's performance on this indicator in the
1980s, get this, was better than what the USA and Europe achieve today, which I think
is a remarkable story that deserves our attention. So basically in sum, I mean, when you think
about the achievements of the
revolution, these are incredible world historical achievements. In fact, even the US was forced to
admit this in the 20th century. There were key figures in the US government who wrote that
communism was working extremely well in China and provided a kind of model that everyone else in
Asia wanted to copy. They realized it was wildly popular in Asia at the time. And we know that the US took extreme measures to crush communist aspirations in China,
including with the invasion of Vietnam, the invasion of Cambodia, the invasion of Korea,
with just spectacular violence, right? Carpet bombing these countries. And China in particular
has always been in the sights of the imperialist powers. The US and Western
Europeans have fundamentally never forgiven the Chinese people for the revolution. They desperately
want to crush it to this day, and they've literally surrounded China with military bases ready to
attack at a moment's notice. In fact, before this episode, I was counting US military bases,
and I counted almost 200 active military bases on China's borders. I was counting US military bases, and I counted 200, almost 200, active
military bases on China's borders. This is active US military bases on China's borders, which is
actually wild when you think about it. I mean, there's few nations in the world that would
they would accept that kind of threat to their integrity and sovereignty.
So that's, I mean, that's a part of history of China since the Imperial Age and the revolution.
But obviously there's much more we can explore.
Yeah, thank you so much for that.
And just to pick up on that last point, I actually was just reading about the Korean War.
And, you know, of course, Chinese soldiers were involved with that at some stage as well.
The amount of bombs that were dropped on North Korea, I believe, was the most per
capita amount of bombs dropped on any country ever in the history of the world, basically.
And it killed over a million civilians in North Korea.
So the idea that China is somehow an aggressor towards the United States, right, which is
the narrative that's built in
order to justify a lot of the, you know, trade wars and sort of warmongering that's taking place
right now is just historically and currently just so inaccurate that it does have violence to reality
really. And then a couple other things I wanted to just sort of like pull on and sort of underscore
from what you were sharing with that really helpful history.
I think just when we look at the development of socialism as sort of a long-term process,
and I'm reading this book right now which looks at sort of all of the different attempts
at socialism starting from the 1848 revolutions in Europe all the way up to more into the
present and we learn lessons, you know, as a socialist movement through each of these 48 revolutions in Europe all the way up to more into the present.
We learn lessons as a socialist movement through each of these experiences.
The Chinese revolution was a really fascinating development in socialism in terms of both
the theory and the practice of building socialism.
One of the things that Mao did, which was really important, was he really put the priority on,
as a revolutionary class, onto peasants, which was something that was not quite as clear.
And then also just his incredible ability to conduct guerrilla warfare was really astounding
and a huge achievement in terms of learning how to fight against, like you mentioned, the right-wing nationalist,
vicious Kuomintang, which had actually massacred many of the communists and was just a really
evil force and could have taken the country in a horrible direction. So it's really quite a
remarkable history. And thank you so much for sharing so much. I know you're not a historian of China,
but you obviously have a lot of depth in your knowledge of the history there. So thank you so
much for sharing that. And you had touched a little bit on the development of China economically,
and you had mentioned in our correspondences that one thing that you think
would be an interesting point to touch on is that this idea and we've talked about this in
previous episodes with you is sort of the drain right from the south to the north from the
periphery to the core. So on that note I'm wondering if you could talk a little bit about
China's position in the capitalist world economy,
bringing it a little bit more into the present and building on and maybe providing any kind of specific examples to bring this idea further down to eye level, this idea of unequal exchange and
how China still does suffer a drain to the core. Yeah, yeah. So actually actually this brings me to answer a question that you asked
earlier, which I didn't actually get to touch on, which is about the liberalization period in China,
which is kind of the precursor to understanding its current position in the world economy.
So basically during the Maoist period, China was effectively locked out of the world economy,
right? Now, the way that we normally hear about this from Western propaganda is that
this is because Mao wanted to pursue autarky and basically closed China off. But this is actually
a false narrative. In fact, Mao wanted to trade with the rest of the world, but the US prevented
it by sanctioning China and effectively imposing a kind of blockade similar to what they're currently
doing in Cuba. And the US objective was basically to what they're currently doing in Cuba, right? And the US
objective was basically to crush the Chinese economy, which failed, but it did massively limit
China's developments because they couldn't buy the capital goods that are necessary for advanced
manufacturing. But this changed in the 1980s. So this is after the death of Mao, when Deng Xiaoping
rises to the leadership of the Communist Party. And Deng's view is basically that China needs
access to foreign capital if it wants to accelerate its development of the productive forces. So Deng
decides to strike a bargain with the devil. He agrees to implement structural adjustment programs
in China in direct alignment with the World Bank and the IMF. Now China had a reasonable level of
bargaining power because it was a fairly large
economy, etc. It was able to avoid the more extreme shock therapy that completely crushed
most of the other countries in the global south that suffered structural adjustments.
And China retained public control over finance and industrial policy,
which is crucial. But still, the reforms quite severe. So they privatized state companies, they dismantled many of the price controls that China had been using,
and they dismantled the public provisioning systems that were established during the socialist era, etc.
Now, this had several important effects.
One is, of course, that China did in fact gain access to foreign capital, so that's that.
But all of the privatization and the abolition of the price controls led to huge inflation,
and it was a massive shock to the working classes who were suddenly basically unable
to afford rent and food.
And in fact, this ended up triggering huge protests against the capitalist reforms, which
culminated in demonstrations at Tiananmen Square in 1989.
And this is an interesting part of the story because most Westerners assume that the Tiananmen Square in 1989. And this is an interesting part of the story,
because most Westerners assume that the Tiananmen Square protests were against communism, but in
fact exactly the opposite is true. They were protesting against the US-backed capitalist
reforms. They thought the reforms were going too far and they wanted to retain the socialist
policies of the Maoist era. In the end, the state suppressed the protests and proceeded
with reforms as per the IMF and World Bank agreements. And the US basically saw this as a
massive victory. So it's important to remember that the West was facing a crisis of capital
accumulation in the late 1970s, and they desperately wanted to liberalize China. They saw this as a way
basically to gain access to a massive pool of cheap labor and restore
their profitability. That's exactly what happened. As soon as China was forcibly open, then American
companies were able to relocate industrial production over to China, where they could
produce the same goods they were producing before, but with much lower labor costs, which enabled
them to massively increase their rate of profit,
and this effectively resolved the crisis of Western capital accumulation at the time.
This was a clip from our Patreon episode with Jason Hickel.
You can listen to the full episode by becoming an Upstream Podcast Patreon subscriber.
As a Patreon subscriber, you will have access to bi-weekly episodes ranging from conversations
to readings and more.
Signing up for Patreon is a great way to make Upstream a weekly show, and it will give you
access to our entire back catalogue of Patreon episodes, along with stickers and bumper stickers
at certain subscription tiers.
Sign up and find out more at patreon.com forward slash Upstream podcast.