We Can Do Hard Things with Glennon Doyle - Are You a Dopamine Addict? | Dr. Anna Lembke

Episode Date: August 12, 2025

436. Are You a Dopamine Addict? | Dr. Anna Lembke Dr. Anna Lembke, the Medical Director of the Stanford Addiction Medicine Program, join us to discuss why common fixes for feeling better are actually making us feel worse. Dr. Lembke explains the science behind the brain's pleasure and pain processing and the dopamine balance.  -The four C’s of dopamine addiction and whether you have one  -How to begin to detox from dopamine addiction  -The surprising reason you might want to spend an entire day looking forward to nothing Anna Lembke is the medical director of Stanford Addiction Medicine, program director for the Stanford Addiction Medicine Fellowship, and chief of the Stanford Addiction Medicine Dual Diagnosis Clinic. She is the recipient of numerous awards for outstanding research in mental illness, for excellence in teaching, and for clinical innovation in treatment. She sits on the board of several state and national addiction-focused organizations, has testified before various committees in the United States House of Representatives and Senate, keeps an active speaking calendar, and maintains a thriving clinical practice. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What's better than a well-marbled ribby sizzling on the barbecue? A well-marbled ribby sizzling on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart shopper and delivered to your door. A well-marbled ribby you ordered without even leaving the kitty pool. Whatever groceries your summer calls for, Instacart has you covered. Download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart, groceries that over-deliver. Dearest Pod Squad, welcome back to We Can Do Hard Things.

By the end of this episode, you are going to understand why all of the things we're doing to make ourselves feel better or making us feel worse. And we're going to fix it, okay? In the next 50 minutes, we're going to fix that until you're going to fix that. how to actually make yourself feel a little bit better and not get tricked. To do that is the only person who could really help us do that. And her name is Anna Lemke. And she is here with us. She is the medical director of Stanford Addiction Medicine, program director for the Stanford Addiction Medicine Fellowship and chief of the Stanford Addiction Medicine Dual Diagnosis Clinic.

She is the recipient of numerous awards for outstanding research and mental illness for excellence in teaching and for clinical innovation in treatment. She sits on the board of several state and national addiction focused organizations, has testified before various committees in the United States House of Representatives and Senate keeps an active speaking calendar and maintains a thriving clinical practice. I'm tired even reading your bio. So well done. Okay. So we are trying to make sure that every single one of our episodes kind of swirls around one question, okay, that we can answer by the end of the episode, because we have, through 15 years of this, figured out that every time anyone tells us a story or a problem, or we tell it to each other, we're really

asking one of like 20 human questions, okay? And one of them seems to be what people say to us over and over again in different variations is, how do I feel better? I just want to feel better. And what we figured out is this question is sort of revealing an underlying problem, which is we don't feel great, okay? On a regular basis, we don't feel great. And to feel better, we try all these like quick consumption fixes that actually make us feel worse and on and on. forever. So in your book, you start with a list of these things like drugs and food and news and gambling and shopping and gaming and texting and sexting and Facebooking and Instagramming. And you say that these are all symptoms of our personal and cultural problem. So can you tell us

what our problem is? Wow. Okay, tall order. I mean, I agree with what you said. For me, it really comes down to understanding how our brains process pleasure and pain, recognizing that pleasure and pain are co-located in the brain, so the same parts of the brain that process pleasure, also process pain. And they work like opposite sides of a balance. So imagine something like a teeter-totter and a kid's playground. When we're at rest, hypothetically, that teeter-totter is level with the ground. when we do something pleasurable, it tips one way, and when we do something painful, it tips

the opposite way. Now, that is a vast oversimplification. Let me just emphasize. I mean, we can experience pleasure and pain simultaneously during sex, when we're eating spicy foods, when we're watching a complex piece of art. But at its most basic level, we are wired over millions of years of evolution to reflexively approach pleasure, avoid pain, and this pleasure pain balance metaphor tells us something really important about how our brains get us to do that. So essentially, that level balance is what neuroscientists call homeostasis. So that is our baseline level of happiness. okay i mean we vary in that like right i'm at baseline i'm i think a more unhappy person my husband

is a happier person i'm really glad i'm married to him and that people like him exist right yes but whatever it is that's the pleasure pain balance that we were given and dopamine is our reward neurotransmitter it's not the only neurotransmitter that is to say brain chemical involved in that process. But it is the final common pathway for all reinforcing, rewarding, pleasurable substances and behaviors. So when we do something that is pleasurable, which we're all seeking, right, to approach pleasure and to avoid pain when we do something that's pleasurable, that releases dopamine and the brain's reward pathway. And that pleasure pain balance tilts to the side of pleasure. Yay. The problem is that there are certain rules governing this balance. And the first and most

important rule is that the balance wants to remain level. And that with any deviation from a level balance or homeostasis, our brains will work very hard to restore a level balance. That process is called neuroadaptation. Okay. And essentially when we have an increase in dopamine firing in response to something pleasurable. Our brain will react by down-regulating dopamine transmission. For example, down-regulating dopamine production. But it doesn't just go to baseline. It goes below baseline into a dopamine deficit state. You might think of that as these little neuroadaptation gremlins hopping on the pain side of the balance to bring it level again. But the gremlins like it on the balance. So they don't get off as soon as we're level. They stay on until we're

tilted an equal and opposite amount to the side of pain. That's the come down, the hangover, the Blue Monday, or just that moment of craving, right? Wanting to have one more glass of wine, smoke one more joint, watch one more Netflix episode, read one more chapter in my romance novel. Now, if we don't have more of whatever it is, which by the way, for most of human existence, we didn't have more of that stuff, then the gremlins get the message, hey, my work here is done. they hop off the pain side of the balance, and homeostasis is restored. But if we continue to consume our drug of choice over days to weeks to months to years, those gremlins multiply. They get bigger. They get stronger. They call their friends. Pretty soon they are camped out on the pain

side of the balance. And now we've entered into addicted brain, where we have essentially changed our hedonic or joy set point, such that we need more of our drug in more potent forms, not to tilt to the side of pleasure and feel good, but just to get out of pain and feel normal. And this is the vortex of addiction. It explains why people continue to use their drug of choice, even when they can objectively see that their lives are better when they're not using it. it's why people will relapse and it's why people describe a state of kind of constant craving particularly when they first try to give up their drug of choice because when we first give it up those gremlins that have accumulated crash down to the side of pain and that craving feels like

it will never end. Can I stop just to make sure we totally, okay, no, just because that was so important and I don't want people to lose, there was a hundred things that's so important, but let's make sure we understand the just initial seesaw or teeter-totter. So you're saying, tell me where I'm wrong about this. Our whole brains, the thing we want the most is to be even, Stephen, everything's level. That's homeostasis. We're like in a settled place. Okay, wait, let me stop you there.

Because that's not what we want. That's what our brain wants. What we want is pleasure. What we want is pleasure. Yes. We are working on different things. Okay, so what we want is pleasure, but our brain's job is trying, our brain is doing its job inside of us and its job is to stay level. So when we go for pleasure, one side of the teeter-totter, it goes towards pleasure. So the other side goes, it's like, uh-oh, now the other side is up. So our brain has to dump, has to stop the dopamine or dump something

else to stop the dopamine from flowing and put it on the other side of the seesaw so that it counteracts. It's even more than the pleasure, right? Because it's got to be that weight plus more to make it net out even. That's what you're saying? Right. So for every pleasurable stimulus, right? I mean, probably not every single kind of joy, but for these kind of quick pleasures that release a lot of dopamine all at once, the brain compensates and in essence overcompensate. but with initial exposure, you get, yeah, an equal and opposite reaction, and then you go back to homeostasis. But with repeated exposure, that initial deviation to pleasure gets weaker and shorter in duration, but the after response gets stronger and longer. And this is really

the key, that there is with repeated exposure, an emphasis on the pain side, and ultimately can kind of get stuck there. Okay. So is this... The reason for the, like in Buddhism or is this the reason for trying to live your life with non-attachment or non-desire to like escape this entire paradigm of pain versus pleasure to kind of override it and live in whatever pieces before we reach towards desire or need for pleasure? Yeah, it's great to invoke the Buddha because the Buddha's, life story parallels this pleasure pain balance. He grew up in a very wealthy family. He had everything provided for him, and he found he was unhappy. So he went out into the world. He looked for

wisdom. And at some point, he pursued extreme asceticism. So he pursued pain, did not, you know, he didn't eat food, did all the things that people do. And then found gradually that didn't do it either. And then ultimately had this moment of awakening, sitting under, I can't remember the name of the tree, recalling a moment in his childhood when he had been sitting under a similar tree, his father plowing in the distance, and just felt a kind of natural contentment that he was not striving for. You know, it just sort of came to him. And that was his moment of realization. It's not about pursuing pleasure, pursuing pain. It's about finding that middle way. my interpretation is letting the joys come with the unfolding of experience rather than striving for

them. The difficulty is that we are natural strivers. I mean, we are seeking dopamine. We're wired for that pursuit piece of it. And, you know, sometimes, you know, if you think about, well, why would Mother Nature make a pleasure pain balance that makes us tilt to the side of pain? Why not just tilt the pleasure and more pleasure. Well, it's not that Mother Nature is trying to be cruel. It's that this pleasure pain balance is genius for a world of scarcity and ever-present danger, where we need to keep striving and putting out effort and suffering in order to survive, in order to get food, clothing, and shelter. The problem is it's woefully mismatched for the world that we live in now. We're at the touch of our fingertips, swipe right, swipe left. We get a whole fire hose of dopamine to our reward

pathway. I just want to like bring this into a personal reflection and what your work has really done to change my life. I'm almost 10 years sober. I lived a life as a professional athlete. And I didn't realize that dopamine was in fact the thing that I was chasing all along. It was covered up by booze and attention and, you know, winning gold medals, et cetera. And one of the things that I've found so fascinating and almost it might be the most important thing that I've learned in my recovery is that learning about dopamine and the process of what the brain is going through while seeking pleasure and also experiencing pain. It's like so many of us that live with addiction have and carry this incredible amount of shame with us because it feels like, why can't I do this?

Like, what is wrong with me? There's some sort of moral or something wrong with me personally. And when I read your work and have been obsessed with it and I've just, I've sent all of the podcasts I've listened to you to all of my addicted friends, like listen to this because it deshamed me because it's like my brain, though it might be more susceptible to others for this search of dopamine, yeah, it just took so much. much shame away and I just think that your work is so important and made it feel more scientific than moral than moral yeah well thank you for that that's very very moving for me I can't

really put into words you know that how much that that is really moving and thank you for saying that it just it gives me a lot of inspiration to keep going in my work so one of the ways that I think about mental illness is because the weird thing about mental illness from the perspective of evolution is if these are really maladaptive brain states or types of brains, why hasn't Mother Nature, you know, gotten rid of them? Why is it that about 10 to 20 percent of the population will struggle with severe mental illness in their lifetime? Why is there schizophrenia? Why is their bipolar disorder. And what I've come to believe, and this is pure speculation on my part, is that the kinds of illnesses that remain endemic in human societies are actually advantageous

traits in different circumstances. So if you think about people who are prone to addiction, essentially these are people who are willing to work harder than anybody else to get their drug of choice. And if you're looking at, you know, hundreds, thousands of years ago, hundreds of thousands of years ago, those were going to be the most valuable people in a tribe, right? The people who were willing to, you know, run further, work harder, search longer in order to get the scarce resources that the whole tribe needed to survive. So I don't look at people with addiction as in some ways having, that something's wrong with them. I look at them as having like bionic, supersonic pleasure pain balances

that are mismatched for our current environment. But on the other hand, if folks with addiction can get into recovery in this crazy hyper-stimulated, drugified world that we live in, oh my goodness, those folks have tapped into some incredible wisdom that we could all benefit from. And I quote my friend in theologian, Kent Dunnington, who says that addicts are modern-day prophets who show us who we really are.

And I really love that because I believe that to be true. I like to think that I've helped people in my career, but honestly, I've learned more from my patients than I think they've learned from me. Hey, we know you probably hit play to escape your business banking, not think about it. But what if we told you there was a way to skip over the pressures of banking? By matching with the TD Small Business Account Manager, you can get the proactive business banking advice and support your business needs. Ready to press play?

Get up to $2,700 when you open select small business banking products. Yep, that's $2,700 to turn up your business. Visit TD.com slash small business match to learn more. Conditions apply. Okay. So the problem seems to be, I have two questions. First of all, are people born with different level sets of homeostasis? Like you just said, I tend to be a person who's less happy at a normal state. My husband tends to be something. someone who's more happy. Is that something that's universal, that some people just have a lower level of happiness? And are those people the ones that tend to seek pleasure more and thus end up in addiction? Yeah, it's a great question. It gets to the kind of state or trait phenomenon. You know, are these inborn traits that people have, though they'll always go back to whatever

their baseline level of dopamine firing is? Or are these state phenomenon? as a result of, you know, environmental stressors or other stressors. And again, this is speculation. But my sense is that it's both state and trait. So I do believe that some people are born with just kind of like lower levels of pleasure. And those people are often diagnosed as having mental illness. Sometimes it's episodic, right? They'll have an episode and then they'll go back. So I do think, and we do know that the risk of addiction, I mean, there are many risks of addiction, right? There are poverty, unemployment, co-occurring mental illness, access to your drug of choice. Those are all risks. But there is also very likely an inherited or biological risk of

addiction. That's complex and polygenic. That probably is related to baseline levels of dopamine firing. We know, for example, if you have a biological parent or grandparent with addiction, you're a more likely to develop addiction yourself, even if raised outside of that substance using home. So when we're trying to differentiate nature versus nurture, that's, you know, one of the types of experiments or studies that people look at. So I'm thinking back to your seesaw where now this behavior has happened so for so long, over such a long period of time, that the gremlins are camped out. They don't just come in to level the seesaw. They live on the pain side of the seesaw now when you were talking about that. Is this, like I'm thinking back to

during my drinking days, and I haven't had a drink in five years, but during that time, it was, I felt so overwhelmed and so down and so like I just needed a break. from all of it that I would drink, but then I would feel even more down and anxious and like I needed a break and therefore I couldn't not drink because that side of the cycle became even more anxious as the cycle continued. Is that part of what you're talking about? How like, so then I wasn't just drinking because I wanted to drink. I was drinking because of the anxiety that was increasing because of my drinking. Right. So you are highlighting a very important point, which speaks to how this cycle gets perpetuated. So once you've changed your hedonic set point, those gremlins are

camped out on your pain side of the balance. The physiologic drive to restore a level balance or go back to homeostasis is one of the most powerful physiologic drives that organisms have. And the fastest way to get there is to drink some more. Because when you drink some more, you put that something on the pleasure side of the balance and you temporarily go back up to homeostasis. So, of course, with alcohol readily available or whatever your drug is, you will be extremely tempted to do that because that is the fastest way. to get back to homeostasis. The problem is that in the long term,

all that does is add more gremlins to the pain side of your balance. So then you sink deeper and deeper and deeper into that hole. And again, this is a simplified metaphor, but it speaks to that addiction vortex and why people with addiction or whatever, wherever they are on the spectrum of compulsive overconsumption, why they feel like their drug of choice is self-medicated, their depression, their anxiety, their irritability, insomnia.

Because in the immediate use, it can often still do that. Although what is fascinating is, again, with time, that deflection to the pleasure side gets so much weaker and so much shorter that it can get to a point where it doesn't work at all. And yet the euphoric recall of what the drug used to do is so powerful that people, you know, people will go back to it again and again. And one way to think about this is that we have very vivid recall, like deeply stamped into our hippocampus of initial deflection to pleasure or to pain, but we have almost no memory of the gremlins. So all we remember is the pleasure. We don't

remember the pain that follows. And we also misremember the pleasure because it stops being pleasurable and yet we still want to do it. I love your term, maybe you should title this entire episode. Where are you on the spectrum of overconsumption? Because it is very easy to say, are you addicted or not? Are you an addict or not? And then say, I'm not an addict. And then you're off the hook of this entire pleasure pain situation. In fact, are we not living in a culture that has figured out this pleasure pain situation in all of our brains. And many people, companies have created many variations of quick fixes for us when we feel lower than we should to reach for. There's a million different things, right, that people use. It doesn't have to be that you're a severe addict like me or Abby.

if someone's listening right now and they find themselves, they don't think they're an addict, but they do know that they are on the spectrum of overconsumption. They know this because every time they feel a certain way, they reach for their phone, or they go to Instagram, or they shop, they online shop. What is happening in that moment and what should they do differently? What is a long-term fix? That's not a short-term worsening. Yeah.

Well, I mean, the long-term fix, is actually to restore homeostasis. And the way to do that is to abstain from our drug of choice for long enough for those gremlins to hop off and for homeostasis to be restored. But if we've been accumulating those gremlins on the pain side of the balance for years, it can take a really long time

for them to get off and for homeostasis to be restored. I will often present to patients, try abstaining from your drug of choice for 30 days. It's not that I think 30 days is a cure for addiction. That would be incredibly naive. But interestingly, on average, that is the amount of time it takes for folks to begin to get out of that vortex of craving and see the light at the end of the tunnel. Because people with addiction, when they're in their addiction, will often see only two choices. I keep using my drug and I'm miserable.

Or I stop using my drug and I'm miserable. But we need to offer them, and it's really a leap of faith, there's a way to stop using your drug and with time to be not miserable. Can you walk through those steps of like, I think it's so helpful to give people a vision of like if you can do it for 30 days. This is what to expect, week one, week two, week three. I mean, because it is a lot of faith. And when it starts breaking bad, people might say, well, shit.

see, I knew it would be this bad and then they stopped. So tell us like what happens week one and week two and week three of that period of time. And let's just say it's something more benign or universal. Like you've decided you're going to quit social media because that's something that you feel like is your dopamine razor and lower. And how might that feel? And I just want before we get into that, I think it's really important to figure out how do you know when your dopamine? is when you're seeking something that is going to increase your pleasure of dopamine system and get that started to unbalance your teeter. Like, how do you know what it is?

Like, what are some symptoms or things that we can be looking out for before we even get to the month of abstinence? Yeah, great, great point. Let's start there. So we talk about the four Cs, control, compulsion, craving, and consequences. out-of-control use would be like I planned to only have one drink and I had four. I plan to just watch one TikTok video and two hours later I was still watching. Shit.

Okay. Compulsion is a lot of our mental real estate occupied with thinking about using the drug as well as a narrowing of our focus and our pleasure spectrum. So looking forward to it all day, planning on it. If we're doing it secretly, which commonly happens, then hiding our use. And that can also start to be. part of the drug itself, the adrenaline that we get from the secret life and hiding our use. So that's the compulsion and also the automaticity. Craving is interesting. Craving can

manifest in different ways. People can get sudden stomach aches and feel like the only solution to my stomach ache or my nausea or my dizziness is to use. But more often, craving comes in the form of an elaborate narrative that our brains can manufacture in a nanosecond telling us why we really should use after all, even though we committed to not using. And it's an elaborate. It can be like, this is a stupid thing. I'm not really addicted. I'm in pain. I deserve this. Nobody loves me. I need a reward. This is the only way to reward myself. And these are very, very convincing narratives that, you know, get a life of their own and are difficult to get away from. And then consequences is really like the heart of addiction. And often we don't see.

see the consequences. It's harm to others, harm to ourselves, and really subtle decriments in mood and increases in anxiety that happen slowly and insidiously over time that we especially don't attribute to our drug of choice because when we use, we temporarily relieve those like we were talking about, right, because we temporarily get back to homeostasis. But in the long run, we're just making ourselves more mentally unwell. The other thing to look for is tolerance, which is to say we need more of our drug over time to get the same effect or more potent forms or now we have to combine two drugs together like we have to smoke and watch TikTok at the same time in order to feel pleasure because just watching TikTok or just smoking doesn't work so that kind of

cumulative compounding of many and like we see this culturally like we used to all like to go to the movie theater you know I'm I'm old enough that's true and watch a movie together and then we got our devices and then it had to be my movie I'm going to watch my movie and then it was like well just watching the movie isn't even if I need to be watching the movie and on my smartphone and eating a cupcake and smoking a joint it was just yeah and this is the cumulative effect and then of course withdrawal can be a physical symptom that's when we try to stop our drug but the universal symptoms of withdrawal from any addictive substance are actually psychiatric symptoms anxiety irritability insomnia depression and craving again intrusive thoughts narratives or

physical sensations. So Amanda, you ask, how do we prepare people for like a dopamine fast or an abstinence trial of four weeks? The most important thing that I tell my patients, and barring nothing else, this is the most important thing I say, you will feel worse before you feel better, but that is not the way you're going to feel for the rest of your life. Yes, that's it. When you take the pain off the pleasure side of the balance, the gremlins will crash down to the pain side. And it will take Take those gremlins a while to get the message that you're not using your drug of choice anymore. And then it's time for them to hop off of pain set of balance and for homeostasis to be restored, not through repetitive use, but through the gremlin's hopping off and upregulation of our brain's own production of our feel good neurotransmitters like endogenous opioids, endogenous cannabinoids, endogenous gabas, serotonin, and dopamine. So how long does that usually take if we're working with 30 days? During what period of time in that 30 days do people typically stop feeling like shit and start to feel a little bit like? And what do they feel like? Like what does that feeling feel like when it emerges? Because it's probably not been there for a very long time. How do people describe the new emerging feeling? So the first 10 to 14 days people feel really, really lousy.

And again, it's not necessarily primarily physical, although it can be if it's something like an opioids or alcohol. But there's just a lot of intense craving, intense dysphoria, irritability, insomnia. And then when they, if they're able to get through that part without using, which is really hard, but if they're able to do it, by weeks three and four people just begin to notice it's not 24-7 craving, right? Or they start to notice some lightness or just some hopefulness about the future. Now, I want to emphasize that on average, we see clinically that it takes 30 days to start to feel

better. But for some people, it might actually be a lot longer. It might be three months. It might be a year, sometimes going out to a year and a half, which is super hard, because now you've got somebody like in a dysphoric state for a long time wondering, like, am I ever going to feel better? And is this even worth it? And that's where we can step in with counseling patients, hope, peer recovery, you know, so that they can have hope seeing other people who have made it further, who feel better, and they're not the only ones. That's very disshaming as well. But also, you know, we can sometimes use non-addictive psychiatric medications to help with people. Or the reason that medications like buprenorphine and methadone maintenance are used to treat opioid use disorder is because

they allow people to return to homeostasis so they can put their energy into other aspects of their recovery and their life. The new BMO VI-I-Porter MasterCard is your ticket to more. More perks, more points, more flights, more of all the things you want in a travel rewards card, and then some. Get your ticket to more with the new BMO ViPorter MasterCard. and get up to $2,400 in value in your first 13 months. Terms and conditions apply.

Visit bemo.com slash V-I. Porter to learn more. So this is why, this is the science of why meditation in our everyday life, or especially in recovery, is not just woo-woo, but extremely. helpful scientifically, right? Because when I think about how hard meditation is and how important it is in my life, really what it is is me just learning to not attach to cravings. Because it's really just me going, I know you want to get the hell out of here, I know this is not pleasurable, I know you'd rather check your phone, I know, and surviving it so that that's what we can practice outside of meditation, right? It's like a breaking of the pleasure.

pleasure pain cycle. Is it like growing in a strength of homeostasis in a way? It feels like that's strengthening the teeter-totter to stay balanced. They're not reaching. It's like the spiritual idea of like, yeah, of Buddhism or I shall not want. That's the translation in my religion. Like is that what's happening in meditation? Are we breaking free from the cycle? Yeah, it's a great question. What is happening in meditation when we're tolerating all of the thoughts and all of the feelings and not trying to run away from them and not trying to change them? I think that's right. We're trying to figure out how do I live in a homeostatic balance and not reach for pleasure and not reach for pain? How do I just let myself be and experience the unfolding?

So I think that's exactly right. and it gives us the capacity to watch these urges, to surf the urge, to watch the craving, to detach ourselves from it. There's also some evidence that meditation enhances dopamine and can lead to the release or upregulation of endogenous opioids, which are pain relievers. So there you have a kind of a natural, potentially natural source of reward, a sort of healthier dopamine that's obtained not through these intoxicants that give this immediate spike of dopamine, but through effortful engagement with quite a bit of

upfront pain, that then as a secondary effect leads to joy or pleasure. And let me just say that, you know, those gremlins are agnostic to what the initial stimulus is. We know that when we press on the pleasure side, they will jump on the pain side. But it turns out that if we press on the pain side, not too hard and not too fast, but just to the right amount, Those gremlins will actually go on the pleasure side, and we will get our dopamine indirectly by paying for it up front. And this is things like the runners high, which is, you know, sports are initially toxic to cells, but what happens is the body senses injury in response to exercise and then

upregulates feel-good neurotransmitters like serotonin, endogenous opioids, dopamine. Same thing with ice-cold water plunge. That's painful, but it causes the body to upregulate those feel-good neurotransmitters. so we're getting these, you know, good feelings by doing the hard thing first, you know, which is why this name of your podcast is perfect. I do want to emphasize, though, people can get addicted to pain, right? So the striving, you know, and like as Abby was talking about, we've also drugified sports. Like if you think about sports in its purest form, we wouldn't really get addicted to that.

It would be completely in tune with our natural state and the way. in which movement is medicine and we were meant to move. But now you take sports and you combine it with fame and money and social media, all of those performative, you know, social validation aspects. And you've got yourself a very potent drug. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, honestly, and I've just recently started calling my retirement a recovery from pro sports

because there's this false story about what I would. living, and I think a lot of it was just a dopamine, a craving to get the dopamine hit over and over again. And no wonder why I became addicted to alcohol and prescription pain medicine because that was a way to keep the dopamine going long after the game ended. I mean, and I'm telling you, like, this was such a relief to me because I just thought, and I look around at all my other teammates, and I'm like, well, they're not addicted. What's wrong with me? I wanted to ask about how do we do it, how do we do life in a way that is, and I don't want to say normal, but healthy. How do we interact with our brains in a way that we're creating the dopamine?

That's the question. Yeah. If we're not going to become monks, how do we do it? One way is monkhood, right? Just attaching from desire completely. If we're not going to have months. And how do you access any joy or any pleasure without the tilt. Like, if you're playing with your kids and you're having a moment of joy, are you like, well, oh, no, the gremlins are coming. Like, is it anything? Anything that is pleasurable? No, it's not anything, right? So I think the kind of complex, deep joy that relates to being connected to other humans in a powerful and intimate way that's healthy, that relates to, you know, having meaning and purpose in life. Those are, I think, are what we are striving for.

So if you think about how to be healthy, so much of our life now is organized around engineering our own pleasure or getting a break from pain right when we're done with this, you know, to go get the pleasure. And I think that's where we go astray. One of the goodunkin experiments that I sometimes do, and you might want to try it, is imagine going through your whole day not looking. forward to anything. Oh my God. Right. Which is kind of weird, right? But bear with me for a second. So, you know, like whatever it is, that morning cup of coffee or that, you know, that person

you're going to see or whatever. Imagine, okay, today I'm, that, and all of a sudden, everything shifts. Because if I'm not projecting myself into the future, towards some expectancy, I'm really forced to be right here and now. And then it takes on a qualitatively different feeling. Like, for example, like if I were now looking forward to, like, you know, podcasts make me a little nervous. So I'm looking forward to this podcast, some part of my brain being over. So then I won't have to deal with the nerves anymore. But that's a terrible thing because the moment I shift away from that, I'm like, oh, here I am. I'm just with you all. And there's no other place to be. And then I'm fully present and it's a wonderful experience, right? So I think those are the kinds of shifts we have to

try to keep in mind. The other thing that I would say is that I think we're taught to try to engineer these pleasures and we're told that if we're not happy, something's wrong with our spouse or something's wrong with our job or something's wrong with, you know, our brain. But instead, if we embrace this idea that like life really is hard. And you know, you started Glenn and you started out by saying the recurring theme in the podcast is that a lot of people are unhappy a lot of the time. That is a truism, you know, going all the way back to Buddha that we keep running away from. Yeah. But if we embrace that idea and we share it openly and we're not alone in our suffering, it's much easier to bear. And if we organize,

the meaning and purpose of our lives, not around striving for happiness, but around striving for meaning and purpose. However, we find that, for me, it's through, you know, values-based life, trying to live according to my values, trying to do the right thing even when I don't want to. Like, that's a good day. You know, that's a good day for me. So I think, like, culturally, we need to really shift around what we're striving for. And Abby, you know, I'm really curious. Sports have become so central to so many young people's lives. And I love sports. And I think they're by and large, really healthy. But we've also drugified sports. So even at a very young age, you know, we have this very individualistic sort of striving. You know, you've got to get into college on you got to get recruited and then this and the that. And now we have name and likeness. And what would you say to young? young athletes today. I mean, given what your life trajectory, you have so much wisdom. What would you say to these young athletic strivers? I'm really curious. It's a good question.

We have one in our family. We have a junior in high school. She plays soccer. And, you know, it's hard to say because so much of my life, there's so much beauty in what I was able to experience. And it also came at an incredible cost to my wellness, to my health, to my body. And I was talking about this as Glenn in the other day. Like I wouldn't, I don't know if I would change anything. Yeah. But knowing the statistics around the probability of our daughter playing professional soccer, though she's going, she's been recruited and she's committed to a college, the statistics of her going beyond that are so low that it's like we need to broaden our children's interests deeply. The individualization of sport, I mean, every top athlete in the world

at the Olympic level statistically plays multiple sports. And what it does, it gives the body a break. It allows their body to develop and move in different ways, et cetera. But like get interested in art, you know, make sure that you're covering a very broad spectrum of things that they could be involving themselves in. So I don't really have a good answer because our culture is what it is. And I understand parents, we all, myself included, fall victim to the pressure of not wanting your kid to be left behind, quote unquote. But it's complicated. And I think if we take this dopamine conversation at heart, really like talking to our kids about screen time, really talking to our kids about what excites them and what they're thinking and how they're

processing it. You know, I'll tell you one cool story that just happened is that the little ones they get on this. It is a dopamine thing. Right. The more goals, the more people watching, the more the college thing, that whatever, the winning. And I can sense. in my kids, a deep fear of when it goes wrong. When people stop loving them because they are human. When people, when it all comes crashing down and they're like holding their breath. But recently we had an experience where what happened to our kid on the field is what you just never want to happen. We'll just leave it that way.

It just happened. Just didn't go well. And we watched her, I am just going to tell you that I thought I was going to die. Like I... That Glennon, she herself thought that it was happening. Watching your kids. I get it. I hear you.

As a mother, I totally hear you. Yeah. And then something really wild happened, which is that she was awesome. I mean, she was horribly sad, and it was awful. And then several hours later, there was this strange relief or euphoria. And I'll just tell you this just happened yesterday. Okay. Very cool.

And what I said to Abby this morning. and said to Amanda, because she was writing this wave with me last night, was I think she just discovered the invincibility of surviving the unsurvivable. What you've told yourself is the worst because waiting for the other shoe to drop or believing that everyone thinks that loves you, loves you because you're amazing is untenable. So you have to not be amazing. You have to fail. you have so that you can survive it and everyone can love you through it and then you can breathe because you know all you have to do is keep showing up and doing the hard thing yes and even when you are human people will love you and hold you yes and i think the key ingredient there is that she is surrounded by

people who love her just for who she is and not for her accomplishments and that is the difference between the kids who will sink and swim in this. And I also think just speaking from personal experience, but also talking to, you know, many peers, we as parents can get so narcissistically invested in our kids' achievements that we want it more than they do. Exactly. We're on the dopamine cycle.

Right, we are. Our drug of choice is their performance. You got it. You got it. And it's so easy to fall into it. Like, you know, my kids will come home. And it's all I can do. do not to say to them, how'd you do? And what did the coach say? And it's just so awful. It's so,

I hate myself for that. I hate it. Same. Because it just like, it just perpetuates the trap for them too. But anyway, we're all a work in progress. Well, and one thing I would say to that, something that I was conscious and intentional about when our kids were getting into sports, I never wanted to say, I am proud of you. Uh-huh. Yep. I say, I am happy. I am happy. for you. Yeah. And I love watching you. But the pride thing really trips me up because this is like the insinuation that I'm only going to be proud of you or like it's just a weird word that we Oh, I love it. I love it. That's such a pearl. That is such. And I have I have said I am proud of you. Yeah. I'm done. Yeah. Thank you. I am. Thank you. So happy for you because it just puts

the so happy for you. Yeah. John has a good one from. that to my husband. He will, he never says, when people say, like, how did you guys do for the team? Whatever. He says, they won. They did. Like, because the culture right now is we won the tournament. It sounds like, we didn't win anything. That's right. We're parents, the children on the field did something. Yeah, right. There's no we. Yeah, that's another good one. Very good. Yeah, I will admit that last night, and I know we have to wrap, but when all this went down, And I did say to our daughter, I usually, when you win, when you do all the things, I'm happy for you. I'm happy. Last night, I was proud of you. Just watching you leave it all out there, not have it go as you want, hugging all your teammates, walking off the field with your head held high. Just the trying. Last night, I was proud of her. Yeah, it was in the trying. Yeah. But which was interesting because it was a horrific loss for them.

But I just want to say that, and I think what's so cool about what you just said and how you wrapped it up for us before is that it kind of seems to me like the problem is that we think there's a problem that we have to fix. Like the problem is that there's no problem. There's just life. And it doesn't feel good sometimes. Yes. Yep. We were wired for pain and for striving. And when there's nothing really that we have to strive for, we are confused. Yeah. So that's it. It's just our brains. And it's okay to feel confused. And we actually don't have to reach for all the quick fixes because if there's not a problem, there's just life, then it doesn't need to be fixed. Yes, exactly. We love you, Pod Squad. You can do hard things. Bye.

thanks doc for coming on you're the best oh my gosh my pleasure this was very meaningful for me thank you me too me too bye bye if this podcast means something to you it would mean so much to us if you'd be willing to take 30 seconds to do these three things first can you please follow or subscribe to we can do hard things following the pod help you because you'll never miss an episode and it helps us because you'll never miss an episode. To do this, just go to the We Can Do Hard Things show page on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Odyssey, or wherever you listen to podcasts, and then just tap the plus sign in the upper right hand corner or click on follow. This is the most important thing for the pod. While you're there,

if you'd be willing to give us a five-star rating and review and share an episode you loved with a friend, we would be so grateful. We appreciate you very. much. We Can Do Hard Things is created and hosted by Glennon Doyle, Abby Wambach, and Amanda Doyle in partnership with Odyssey. Our executive producer is Jenna Wise-Berman, and the show is produced by Lauren Lagrasso, Alison Schott, and Bill Schultz.