We Can Do Hard Things with Glennon Doyle - Couples Therapy: The Tools You Need with Dr. Orna Guralnik

Episode Date: November 15, 2022

1. What we are really fighting about when we’re fighting about the dishwasher. 2. We can stop asking whether what’s missing is a “want” or a “need” – and the question to ask instead.  3. How to use what most frustrates you about your partner to bring you closer. 4. How to start thinking of our partnerships as our own mini political systems. 5. What to do if your partner won’t go to therapy, or if you’re feeling invisible in your relationship. About Dr. Guralnik: Dr. Orna Guralnik is a psychoanalyst and writer, who serves on the faculty of NYU PostDoc, National Institute for the Psychotherapies, the Stephen Mitchel Center, and the editorial boards of Psychoanalytic Dialogues and Studies in Gender & Sexuality. Her writing centers on the intersection of psychoanalysis, dissociation, and cultural studies. She has completed the filming of four seasons of the Docu-series Couples Therapy, airing on Showtime. TW: @DrGuralnik IG: @ornaguralnik To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

And to be loved, we need to be normal. Welcome to We Can Do Hard Things. Today we have a very special to us, to Abby and me, and to a lot of the world. Yes. Dr. Orna Guralnik. She is a psychoanalyst and writer who serves on the faculty of NYU Postdoc, National Institute for the Psychotherapies, the Steven Mitchell Center, and the editorial boards of psychoanalytic dialogues and studies in gender and sexuality. Her writing centers on the intersection of

psychoanalysis, dissociation, and cultural studies. She has completed the filming of four seasons of the Dock You Series couples therapy airing on showtime. Oh my god, that's my favorite. I know. Abby and I watch just wrapped, wrapped. We love the show. We love the couples on the show and how they work things out or don't. And we truly are enamored with you. Wow. Yes. And I know that a lot of people have become enamored with you, and it's a very interesting phenomenon.

And I know that's not what you're most comfortable with. You're there to show the work. True. Back with you. True. But before we start, I do need to tell you that Abby just found the things that I have Googled about you. Okay.

I have Googled, what kind of dog does Orna have? Does Orna take new clients? Where are Orna sweaters from? Where do I get Orna scarves? Articles about how Orna listens like that and how is Orna so calm? I'm speechless. Yeah. And how is Orna so calm? I'm speechless. Yeah. The calmness, I would just love to start out with because it makes me think of this part

of I read in my grandmother's hands by Resma Mannichem where he says something like they think they're coming to me for answers but they really come to sit with someone who has a settled nervous system. Does that ring any Bell with you? Rings many bells. DW Winnecott talked about the containing environment. He talked about it more as sort of the maternal environment, the responsibility of the maternal environment to provide for the Fussy infant, where if you provide a containing present environment for someone who's fussy, their nervous system will calm down. They'll have the space to make sense of their own experience.

So in a certain way, I guess you could think of the analyst, the analyst role as doing that. That's one of their roles is to simply provide an environment in which the other person can sort out what's going on with them. My own, what you're calling my calmness, it is the result of like many years and analysis myself. Oh, that's interesting. The show, it takes these fussy people. We're all fussy. We're fussy as hell.

Yep. And then they sit and they wait in that little hallway, which is like the fussy purgatory. I love that place. The canal, right? The canal. What happens there? The canal. The canal.

And then they're birthed into your room and the room. It's a womb. Yeah. The pup and the little dog bed and the colors in there and your soft sweaters. I love this description. It's so beautiful. And we feel it when we watch, right? Yeah. It's like we finish our Fussy day and our Fussy arguments. And then when we turn it on, when we get to your room, in the hallway, we're stressed because they're still fussed. Yeah. Those couples are still fussed. And that's why they have all those like, in the hallway, they have the little puzzles. Yeah. So they can stop

bitching at each other and they can just focus on their puzzles. And then there's some magic that happens in that room. So therapy can be expensive and hard to access, right? Yes. Let's say you had several minutes with millions of people who are listening and would love to know what would love some of that womb in their own Fussy houses. What would you say to them that might be most helpful to people trying to figure out how would you democratize therapy in a few minutes? Wow, that's a good one. First of all, yes, therapy historically, it's been kind of an expensive thing that differentiates that follows like a certain kind of class system in terms of who can and cannot have access. Now, hopefully that is changing. That's one of the objectives of our show, the series.

But it's also changing in the second world at large. People are more and more aware of needing to find ways to democratize therapy. And a lot of really interesting initiatives going on in that respect. But if I had to try to put together some words that would serve as like a very preliminary kind of container about couples, I would say that it would be great for people to think of both the challenge and beauty of their couplehood as the challenge of

dealing with otherness. Right? We don't connect to our partners to find ourselves. I mean, what's the point? That's not interesting. There's no growth in that. There's nothing new in that. There's nothing to be had by just having a relationship just with oneself. That's just narcissism, which you know leads nowhere. So this thing that we do, which is

that we reach out towards the world and fall in love and want to connect with someone else, means we are inviting otherness into our lives. And that is important. That is the thorn that will make you grow, that will make you heal and go beyond yourself. So that's the journey. The journey is to negotiate otherness. And in the crisis that always gets created between a couple, it's always ultimately a

crisis about otherness. How do you deal with the fact that your partner is different from you? So it's what you need and it's what you will struggle with. It's in a way you could think of the fact that you're you could imagine it that you're creating your own many political system. So what kind of political system do you believe in? What are your ethics about difference? And try to have that guide you. Holy shit. That's interesting. So we need to become more political system less evangelists for our own way. Love it, exactly.

Ah. Yes. And isn't that interesting because when you think about the otherness, it either leads to this pattern of kind of righteous, I am correct, and you are wrong blame, psycho, or it leads to, I see that you are other and incorrect, and therefore, I have married the wrong person. Well, those two are kind of the same way of thinking.

Right. They're both, one is right, one is wrong, and you need to either squash difference or get rid of difference. But none of that involves opening up to difference and figuring out how do you live with difference? How do you live with both understanding who you are and who your partner is and figuring out a third way that will involve both. Hmm. A third way. We just need a Disney movie. We need a Disney movie where the princess set meets her princess, other princess. Yes. And then says, now we negotiate our political system of otherness. Instead of you complete me happily ever after, right? She needs to sit down with Dr. Orna. Dr. Orna needs to come in after the wedding and sit down with Nico and negotiate the otherness. It's good. Okay, go ahead. I think before the wedding.

Maybe before the wedding. Yes, you could. Yeah, what is the fear that underlies this issue of otherness? So I'm not necessarily mad because you do X and I do Y. I am deeply disturbed by this because I have some fear of what? That is huge. That is a huge question. You can try to answer that question on many layers. I mean, some people say that we were kind of wired to understand the world by creating differences in our mind. We have to create distinction to be able to even have any kind

of thought. So there's some way that we always have to like separate what's this and what is it not? So what I am is not you. What you are is not me. So there's some way that it's kind of inherent. But then what is the fear? There could be all sorts of fears.

And you could talk about like early childhood fears that get triggered like what is the fear? If I depend, will that other abandon? If that one is other than me, is there immediately the question of who is better? Is there immediately a question of hierarchy is in power? If we're different who's on top? Who's exploiting who? Is there a fear of the person's otherness means I'm not entitled to exist? There are many ways that you can imagine like what this difference and what the fear brings up. And then there's the question of your life experiences and how you've been indoctrinated to

respond to difference, right? If you're, if it's good, let's say the political system you grew up in invites dealing with difference by way of oppression, then that's what you think. Other oppress. If you're growing up in a society in which otherness is like you seek to harmonize, then you'll have a very different kind of reaction to otherness. It's actually a great question, like to try to harmonize, then you'll have a very different kind of reaction to otherness.

It's actually a great question, like to try to answer it like in a deep way, like what is the existential fear that otherness brings up? Because you know, that underlies like racism, it underlies, underlies homophobia, every kind of difference obviously can is a riddle. Like how are you gonna respond to that? What is the fear of otherness?

Dang, start with a big doozy. Yeah. I mean, I think it's also interesting the way you're talking about it from a political system and otherness. And I think especially in the last few years, we have experienced a huge polarization and many people are experiencing it in their own homes. And even if they're not politically polarized with their partners, one thing I love about your work is you honor feminist theory within your psychoanalysis.

So there's this whole idea of an awareness of the political reality within the realities of our relationships. And so what have you seen? That's a major otherness. If you're in like I am, a opposite sex marriage, and you're having like I am, a opposite sex marriage, and you're having a very different experience

of the last four years, just by nature of who you are, then I have had. I have noticed myself, these resentments, these kind of anger that I have to experience being a second-class citizen in this country,

and you never will, and therefore you cannot understand me. You are so other. Have you seen that more in the last? Absolutely. Yes. Absolutely. I mean, first of all, what's happening now in the states?

I mean, it's not only happening in the states, it's happening in Europe, it's happening in Israel, it's happening across the world. It's like a disease. But this business of more and more extreme polarization, you know, and we can see it like between Democrats and Republicans, red and blue. But when that is the way of thinking that has marked our time, then it will make its way, of course,

into like gender dynamics. It will make its way into the smallest difference around how to load the dishwasher. When people are in the mindset of what I would call splitting, and I'll explain what I mean, it goes everywhere. It goes in relationships between parent and children. It's really a disease. And what I mean by splitting in that, that goes to this question of difference and response to differences. The British analyst, Melanie Klein, I mean, many years ago really emphasized

this primary defense that we all come into the world with or start our life with, which is this trying to distinguish good from bad internally. There are things that feel good and things that feel bad. There's the breast that is giving milk and then the empty breast that is keeping the baby hungry. And those differences between good and bad are very important, like we need to preserve the good inside us and then project the bad outside of us. It's sort of a basic way of organizing an experience. And with time and with the development of mind, one can integrate good and bad and say,

oh, mom is both feeding and sometimes not there. Our partner is both this wonderful person that provides a lot of warmth and sometimes not available. And it's the same person and the good feelings that get created in us are the same. We are the same person that feels both love and hate. So the integration of this good and bad is like developmentally where we want to be. So going back to your question of, for example, gender differences and completely different ways of experiencing the world, ultimately what you want is for people to be able to understand that their inner experience of goodness and badness is the same. I mean, it's not the same, but it lives within the same container.

When I work with couples on, for example, on gender differences on how, let's say, patriarchy shapes their experience in the world. People come into the negotiation or into the conflict assuming that, for example, women assume that they're the only one suffering from patriarchy. Men suffer from patriarchy. Tremendously, they're robbed of so much by having to split and perform this kind of masculine to split and perform this kind of masculine role. And they have to split off all within them that has to do with femininity. And it empties them out. Like any kind of splitting ultimately empties you out.

Women suffer too. Not only do they suffer the oppression of patriarchy, but they suffer of having to like split themselves off of all the goods that the whatever we want to imagine is masculinity is. So you want to bring people into the understanding that deep, deeply felt understanding that we're everything. And these splits are artificial. They rob us. who likes fancy things. But I grew up working class. My parents were immigrants with factory jobs. And because of that, I think about class a lot. And I wanna talk about it. That's what we're doing on my new podcast, Classy.

And what did you all eat? You know, trailer food. I was like, girl, we're not doing that anymore. You'll hear from people who told me awkward, I was like, girl, we're not doing that anymore. You'll hear from people who told me awkward, embarrassing, and strangely intimate things about what class means to them. She said, you know, for the house cleaner, I hide the tag on the $6 bread. And I just thought, don't you think she knows that you're wealthy?

You're hiding the tags from yourself. Classy. A new podcast from Pineapple Street Studios. Available now, wherever you get your podcasts. So, is splitting playing a role then? Is splitting like I am a girl so I act this, I am a girl, so I act this way. You are a boy, so you act this way. I am a Christian, so I believe these things.

You are a whatever. Is it identity roles? Yeah. Yes, there are identity roles that force us to occupy certain aspects of ourselves and then dissociate from other aspects. Disavow, lose touch with, push aside, and then feel compelled to see whatever we've pushed aside in the other and then try to control that other because it's really scary to constantly have to disavow stuff in yourself. So you got to like see it in the other and then get a grip on that other control.

Yeah. So a woman who has squashed her own ambition says to another woman, I just don't like the way something about her or a man who has hidden all of his femininity and homosexual, whatever is the one who teases the other person about their gayness. Is that related to maybe in a couple where one person feels responsibility for the logistical business of running a family and so has to avow that because they feel obligated and then therefore squelched the human part. So the machine part is adopted. The human part, the sexual, the curious, the joyful

is squashed and therefore I'm resenting that in my partner. Exactly. Because I have split. Exactly. Exactly. There was a couple like that on the show a couple of seasons ago, Michael and Michal. It was such a classic example of that, where one of them was like, you know, the hyper functional. All she could think of was like how to get the family moving and her husband was all about like, wait, what about fun? What about relaxing vacation? Like hang out with the kids, and they were so split between them.

And she forgot. She loves having a good time. Like, you know, my, what we call a paradoxical intervention with them was like, Mikhail, you have to take two hours a day and do nothing. Nothing. Like, play on your phone. You cannot be productive for two hours a day. And that was like a magical intervention. Because suddenly

she was like, Oh, actually, I love doing that. And he was suddenly like, Oh, my God, I've given up all these like functional roles that I actually love doing too. Hmm. What is a paradoxical intervention? And how does a couple do one on themselves? A paradoxical intervention, it comes from the cognitive behavioral world, but it's when you instruct a person to do exactly the opposite of what you ultimately think is going to happen. So let's say if you want a person to take more responsibility for finances, you paradoxically instruct them to spend as much money as possible. With the idea that you're then kind of you're scrambling the system and other things kind of get evoked

in them. You break them out of certain patterns in a way you allow for the opposite to emerge. So how can a couple do that on themselves? For example, if you feel compelled to yell at your wife for putting her shoes in the wrong place. You feel compelled to do that. Instead of doing that, every time you feel compelled to do that, go up and give her a hug. It's wonderful. Opposite game. Yeah, the opposite. Because then she doesn't have to put her shoes in the wrong place to punish you for withholding your love. For example, yeah, you're both suddenly released from something. That's so interesting. Do you feel that the new or unnew version of toxic masculinity is passivity.

Because I'm just, I do feel that way. I'm just, I think we're all looking for toxicity in the wrong place. I don't think it's too obvious. It has morphed from the yelling and the screaming. So, okay. A non-friendly way of describing that is as toxic. That passivity is another way of asserting a certain kind of dominance. It's toxic in its own way.

I encourage myself not to split and to try to understand all sides. So I've given a lot of thought to this, like, kind of new form of masculinity that is indeed on the face of it, defined by passivity. And lots of things are happening, I think, in gender politics and in the distribution of roles. But one your gender well have been scrambled. Like, society is no longer asking of men simply to be a breadwinner or simply to be dominant and foolish about anything else. So a major defining role has been removed. On the other hand, there's still all sort of like very powerful fantasies, phallic fantasies, like fantasies of what masculinity is. And I think it gets really confusing.

When on one hand, there's this great pressure to perform some kind of masculinity. On the other hand, the clear coordinate of what that is, have been devalued. Women are making more money than men. They're taking on positions. I mean, there's no longer an expectation

that women will just subserv and take a secondary role. So, how is a man to perform masculine? And what are they supposed to do? It'll take a few generations to socialize men to actually find other ways to bring themselves into society and be valuable like to connect with other parts of themselves. So they're left with a kind of a vacuum while there's still a great deal of pressure to perform something. And I think men are confused and paralyzed. I mean, this is a great generalization. I mean, they're sure, of course. Yeah. But that's what I think of this passive situation.

I can feel myself understanding passivity in this way because it's like the structure of being dominant, being the breadwinner is very clear. And now when you take that away and then you're left in this other pot of like, I could decide all of these other options, it's scary. It's like, wait, where do I even fucking begin? So it makes me feel like picking the kids up from school. So you're not like me with what I just did. I just split.

Yeah. That why you're such a good listener. Are you always avoiding splitting? Because sometimes when I watch you do the show and I think clearly she's gonna tell that guy, he's a jackass. Like clearly that's the next thing to do. And you just have this way of double down,

get deeper, deeper, deeper. And is that what you're doing? You're resisting judgment. Wow. What are you doing? I think that's a good question. I think after so much analytic training and work, I think there is kind of a almost like already now

a built-in suspicion of splitting. I don't believe it anymore. I'm, when I find of splitting, I don't believe it anymore. I'm, when I find myself splitting, you know, I can listen to the news and I'm like, ah, you know, monsters. And then I'm like, come on, you know better. Try to understand what's, what are their fears? Where are they coming from?

What's motivating that side? And there's also something else that helps, which is that when I sit with couples, my patient, the unit that I'm treating is the couple. So I see each of them as, each of the participants, I see them as just a part of a whole. of the participants, I see them as just a part of a whole. But I'm trying to listen to as what's happening in the system. Not what's, I mean, sometimes I kind of take a pause from that and I dig into each person's individual history and go in there. But then I kind of zoom back out and I'm like, okay, but how is this part of the system as a whole, is this system thriving or is the system stuck?

And how do I help the system? Yeah. He's growing. Can you talk a little bit about what commonly you see in your work as proxies for bigger issues? If there's all of this confused dynamics in a relationship, what are the things that we go to to give that meaning? Like we fight about sex, we fight about money. What are those things and then what are they representing that are bigger?

Yeah, I understand. Obviously, different therapists will listen in on different interpretive paradigms, but I can tell you that for me, there are a few layers that I listen for and assume underlie certain fights about sex, money, dishwasher. There's the one of, I mean, I guess to me might seem obvious, maybe it's not obvious to listeners, but which is childhood histories, like how are each one in the couple reenacting childhood issues, whether it's traumas or unresolved dilemmas or patterns or unresolved attachment questions, how are they reenacting it with their partner to try to figure something out for themselves? So that's one one layer that I go to. Then there is the layer of, if you want to go even beyond that, like, what are

intergenerational stuff that couples are trying to resolve between them. Maurice Aparius, he's a wonderful analyst and writer, talks about these intergenerational errands that are passed down generational errands that are passed down that still need to be resolved So that's something that I keep in mind. That's why you know some family therapists like start any kind of family therapy with these like elaborate Genograms where they go like way back like several generations to understand what are the forces that are influencing the particular family unit? Wow. Can you give us an example of a, you called it a generational errand?

Errant, yes. Yes, that's that. What is an example of one of the? An example, this is a couple that we filmed a couple of seasons ago. They actually, they're not on the show yet, but hopefully they'll make it. And this is an African-American couple.

She was describing how she comes from many, many generations in which the men never stuck around. The women were always left alone to raise the family, to raise the kids. And a great deal of resentment that has been passed down intergenerational. And with this particular partner that she had a wonderful, wonderful relationship with her current partner, but she did feel like there's a certain kind of debt that he owed her that is not between them. It's something that has been passed down from generations of women that have been abandoned. Now, of course, you cannot separate that from the larger history of like what it means to be black in America.

And so it's not just intergenerational. It's, of course course immediately tied to the social political system in which these families grew up. I'm working now with a couple where one of the couples, he's like first generation Mexican American. And he's always been the translator for the parents. Like he's the one that knew English, he's the translator, and the partner he chose is deaf. So he's working on the business of translating, bringing someone into current culture. So he's bringing the deaf into the hearing culture. It's kind of amazing and gorgeous

to notice these kind of intergenerational transmissions of errands that people are tasked with and then they live out in their current relationships. And then there's the layer of power and sociopolitics that you want to listen in for. And it's always there between couples. Like there's always some negotiation about class. There's always negotiation about gender,

even in gay relationships, there's negotiation about gender. Mm-hmm. Who gets the bugs? That's right. Negotiation in this family. Exactly. Yeah. So those are the layers that I listen for myself.

Beautiful. Would it be okay with you if we played some questions from our Pad Squad that they sent in for you? Sure. Wonderful. Okay. First, let's hear the first one. I could just listen to her talk all the days. My question for you today is, what is the difference between a once and a need in a relationship and how does that play out?

If we don't get a need net, if you don't get and want met, do that become a need or vice versa? And then if I don't get my needs met, do I even want my partner anymore? This is all very confusing. And as someone who's highly codependent, how do I separate the two? Interesting.

There's this thing in the zeitgeist in culture now, which is this like want versus need. It seems to be like something that's out there in the world. I'd have to think about what is it that people are trying to figure out by making that distinction. It's not a distinction that I use, the distinction between want and need. But I think it's a question of which comes up between couples of legitimacy. Like what is a legitimate ask? And what is not?

What do I have a right to be mad about versus what am I supposed to just accept as normal? Yeah, that's a very good question and it's always going to be there. I don't think it's something that you can simply resolve within yourself because it's something that you can simply resolve within yourself because we're full of wishes and wants and desires and needs and that's our humanity. I think it's a question that should be figured out intersubjectively. Like in a certain context, a certain need becomes a want because you're asking for something that is exactly very difficult for your partner to offer. In another environment or with another dynamic between a couple, something that might feel like a desperate need suddenly becomes a very easy want. It really depends on the dynamic and the contours of each person. So I don't think it's a simple question of like, oh, is my need or my want legitimate?

Should I work on it on my own or not? I think it depends on who your partner is. What are their, you know, I'm thinking for example, a very classic thing or like, like, if your partner is like, let's say somewhat like neuroatepico like they're somewhat on the spectrum and they don't exactly use the language of affect of emotion the way you do. It's it's much more confusing for them. In those situations, the ask for a certain kind of like verbal empathy, which is like a very basic wish, ask need. For some people, that's like, what are you talking about?

I don't know how to do that. It's like milk from a rock. And it's not because they're withholding, it's not because a power dynamic, it's just like, they're not wired that way. It's like a very complicated ask for them. So in that situation, what would be like another context, a very legitimate wish, it's a more complicated one. So what do you do with that? It's, you have to think of it intersubjectively. On the other hand, in other couples, it can be someone who's very capable of being empathic and verbally available, but because of a certain dynamic that got created, I don't know, too much criticism, power,

this that or the other, the fountain is closed. And then it's a very different kind of conversation. I'm wondering what the third way is in this question because she's saying, do I need to change my needs or do I need to change my partner? What is the third way for her to be thinking about this as opposed to those two? Right, I'm gonna operate with a goodwill assumption that change the partner is not really the third way.

I mean, sometimes it is, but let's start from how do we work it out. First of all, trying to figure out between two people, what is going on here is what you're asking really something that your partner, it's just not in their making, they're not made that way, that's a very difficult ask from them. Think of it of like, you know, asking someone who wears glasses to take off their glasses and see better without glasses. It's just kind of possibly the wrong ask, in which case the third way is, how do you figure out the thing you need

and not bring it to your partner but take it somewhere else? How do you see your partner for who they are? And what can you focus on in what's going on between you and your partner that is kind of an open channel and an ask that will bring a lot of good exchange between the two of you. Rather than ask your partner to take off their glasses and see, talk to them about like, you know, listen to music together. What are good places in which you exchange

goods between you? There's some kind of connotation about need and want to. I don't know what this means, but I noticed in my yoga class recently that every time the yoga teacher says, use these blocks to the class. Use these blocks if you need them. Nobody uses the blocks. But if she says, use the blocks if you want them. So many people use the blocks. And meaning people don't want to feel like they need. Yes, I think if she says need, everybody thinks, I don't want to, I don't, I don't want to be the one who needs.

I'm not weak. I should be able to do without this. Yes, or which is what this lady is saying in her question, I should, what can I do without so that I don't? That's what I just like, that's why I just like the want. Like why not just use the want all the time. It feels like there's a lot of agency in it. Maybe what you're all talking about is how certain, I don't know what word to use needs wants certain kind of wishes to use a neutral word. Evoke and people a sense of deficiency.

That's right. Yes. They need to kind of work around that rather than sit in that and understand, like have, you know, understanding compassion, like have a way to sit with that feeling of deficiency without like getting worked up, feeling like they're demanding or asking for too much, like sit with themselves with what's going on there before it becomes an intersubjective issue. I'm talking about women and the deficiency that that we have all felt along the whole of our lives to not even have the ability to consider wishes.

And so I think having to work on this stuff to pull it up for ourselves, I mean, it's like that scene in the notebook, like, what do you want? Right? And I think that it's hard for so many of us to really nail that down and to then give that away and have to expect that your partner is going to give you for this marriage or this relationship to work. There feels like your vulnerability, all of the things. Yeah, and to talk about it in terms of gender, it's again going back to the idea of splitting. I mean, all that has to do with vulnerability need has been split and kind of dumped

into the feminine. So there's just like so much shame around that. Yep. Let's hear from Keaton. I'm Keaton and I have a silly little question for you. Amongstory short, how do you tell someone that you love so deeply that they are annoying. I have a boyfriend of about five years who gets so very interested in niche topics and loves to share what he's learned with me, which I love, but my word can he go on and on. It just so happens that he picks the moments where if I'm doing the dishes or making the bed or I'm actively involved

in something and he will just talk at me. It's like I don't need to be there. He just wants to get this information that he's so excited about. So am I the problem? Is it my issue that my brain and ears grow legs and run away from the situation. When he starts telling me about a new political issue that he've discovered, I love him so much. I don't want to hurt him, but sometimes I just have to say, I don't want to be talked at right now.

Give me any advice you have, or just tell me I'm the problem and shut up. Love you so much. Oh, Keaton, Glenin'm the problem and shut up. Love you so much. Oh, Keaton, Glenin is feeling your pain right now. This is trying your husband big time. Doctor, I just wanna tell you yesterday, and I'd even know if you know this.

Yesterday, we went on a three and a half mile walk, okay? I tried an experiment where I thought, I'm gonna just respond in grunts or one word answers and see if she even notices that I'm not wanting to have this conversation. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. She talked for an hour and 10 minutes at me and never picked up on the fact that I just... Mile two I picked up for sure.

But you kept going. I didn't. You said I'm gonna stop talking and then five minutes later you start talking ahead kept going. I didn't. You said, I'm going to stop talking. And then five minutes later, you should talk to him. I walked ahead of you. I walked ahead of you. OK, anyway, let's talk about Keaton. I love it.

First of all, I appreciate the impulse to be kind. Yes. That's great. That's great. And I guess to some degree, we're talking about like self-absorption versus relatedness. We have this concept in the analytic world. You're probably familiar with the concept of transference, right? There's also the concept of counter-transference, which is what the analyst feels, what their experience is while sitting with their patient.

And we consider counter-transference a very important source of information. So if you're feeling one way or another with your partner, you might be struggling with something with the feeling, like let's say boredom or I wanna run away, but you also have like really important information for your partner in that feeling.

And the question is, how do you archfully and kindly use that information to send back feedback to your partner? If one of you is self-absorbed or talking on and on and not reading cues, that's important information. I think you'd want to know that you're doing that. I mean, you can still choose to keep doing that, but it's important information. I think you'd want to know that you're doing that. I mean, you can still choose to keep doing that, but it's important information. So rather than run away, find the right time to, and the artful way, to translate your experience into information for your partner. Like, when you go on and on, I feel irrelevant. I feel like I'm not in the picture. I'm not

exactly sure what to do with myself. What's going on between us in those moments? That is interesting because that's what it is. It's not like you're annoying. That's not what I'm thinking. I'm thinking, why isn't she noticing that I'm not wanting this? And I actually think she is noticing, which I was right about, right? You are noticing it's just not as important as you continuing the thing. Well, when I noticed, even though you don't believe that I didn't stop talking, when I noticed, I made adjustments. Okay. When I noticed, I made adjustments. Okay, great.

But isn't there another step to that too, Dr.? Because so let's just say theoretically, Abby's going on and on. Glenin is not present in it. And Glenin is thinking, why is Abby not noticing that I do not exist in this moment and therefore my existence is not important to her in this moment. And therefore, my existence is not important to her in this moment.

But then when Abby feels that, Abby might be thinking, why when I share, does Glennon disappear? And why is she not in it with me? Exactly. First of all, there are a lot of assumptions already there. But you want to translate that into a question for the two of you. Like what is going on?

I'm feeling like, Lynn, and you can say, I'm feeling like I don't exist. I don't know if that's what's going on, but I feel like I'm not existing in this moment for you. You're caught in your own story. And Abby, you might say, well, you're not sending me enough cues. I don't actually know where you are with this. And maybe I am lost in my own mind. And I'm kind of using you as a vessel. But the truth of the matter is you're not giving me enough cues. So if you if you responded, I'd know who my audience is and I had a desk better.

You've already left the scene. Yeah. And I would just like, a heads up. We were going on a walk, which is where we do a lot of our talking about what we do on the show. So I thought, I was like, here we go. We're going to creatively brainstorm about future episodes. And so I'm just talking about whatever comes into my mind.

And she's not responding. And I could have said, babe, I just needed some time. But instead, I'm doing like, why isn't she noticing, why isn't she noticing when I could have just said, hey, let's just, I just needed some quiet. Sure. Yeah, that would help. Okay, how about, so. Thanks, Keaton. Sorry that we stole your question. Sorry, Keaton. We had some issues. Thanks, Kim. Sorry that we stole your question. Sorry, Keaton. We had some issues. Hi, this is Joe. I am 28 years old and I've been married for five years and I'm struggling because before I got married, I completely fell in love with someone else and my current husband is a great guy. We have a great relationship. We had a great relationship before. I love someone else, but we were in a very strong, conservative environment, Christian environment

and marriage was the obvious right next step for us. This other person came into my life and I completely fell in love with them. My husband knows about all of this and that person is no longer in my life but five years later we have two kids and I'm still struggling with the feelings of love and the feelings of loss and the feelings of grief from that relationship and feeling like I discovered more and real love after finding my first love. Is that make any sense? Yeah, basically, my question is, how do you move on when it's so fucking hard?

Thanks, appreciate it. Yeah, it's a cool painful. Obviously, there's no easy answer to this. I can just think out loud. And if I was like in conversation with this person, I would want to, first of all, try to distinguish between, is this a question of courage, the courage to leave, what I guess sounds like more of a communal self,

a self that is consistent with the community you grew up in, your Christian environment, family, is it a question of like the courage to abandon that part of oneself to go for true love or passion or excitement, is it that kind of choice? Or is a more useful way to think about it in, like a symbol for the thing that, the fantasy of the thing, the fantasy of perfection, or the fantasy of going back to the womb, or going back to childhood, or going back to the country you came from. People have all these fantasies of where it could have should have been better and where real life is and not dealing with current life as the reality of our very difficult lives that we actually live. So is this true love kind of a really a fantasy that one refuses to let go of that serves the function of always drawing this

person away from life as it is. Wow. Let's hear from Ashley. Hi, I'm Ashley and I'm wondering how to know when you've lost yourself in a relationship. So I have been in a relationship for over a year now and it has been one of the best things. One of, I've just learned so much. It's been so loving and fun. But I'm also thinking that I might be losing myself in the relationship. For example, last night my partner told me that he had

like done that activity with friends and we had planned to do that activity together. And it just like really hurt my feelings. I felt jealous of his friend. I felt jealous that he did that. I felt jealous that maybe I don't have as many friends that I used to or like really any at all. I'm going to be honest. And I don't have someone to go do that with besides him. So I think that's probably a sign that I'm lost in the relationship. But I guess what are the signs that you're lost in a relationship? What can you do to get out of that?

Interesting. Sounds like this person is already doing a lot of the work. Yeah. So keep doing that work. And I guess the work is a strong feeling comes up. And often the indicator that, mm, there's something to investigate is the feeling of blame. And then rather than indeed just go after the person like turning it back to herself and asking, like, what's going on for me?

What am I feeling? Okay, I'm feeling jealous of what he's doing. How do I turn that question back towards myself and ask myself what's missing in me? I mean often this this lost in the relationship symptom is some way that some question that should be turned to the self is interpersonalized. It's put into the relationship, like your partner is supposed to fulfill something or answer something that you're not doing the work of answering to yourself. And it sounds like this person is already doing that work. So, great. It's a good example of what it means to try not to get lost

in a relationship. Yeah, it's like the fact that she's asking this question means that she's doing the work and that maybe she's a little less lost than she thinks. Yeah. It's interesting that both this one and the one prior where we talked about wants and needs, it's like part of the answer may mean

that we're searching for something within the relationship that we can access and maybe only can access outside of the relationship. And that's not a deficiency, that's just the way we were made. Yes. Or inside of ourselves, access inside of ourselves as well.

Yeah, right. There's a, an inclination to what I call interpersonalized certain issues to turn it into a relationship issue when it's not. It's something else. Interpersonalized. That's good. Can we hear from Caitlin? Hi, this is Caitlin. Please, can we talk about sleeping with our own mounted fighter? I've been with my boyfriend for two years. To date, I have never been able to successfully sleep in the same bed as him. Our sleeping habits are different.

Pisa Heavie-Sleeper and Light Sleeper. He's sore. I don't. The sound of a bird will wake me up and he could sleep through a hurricane. I feel the weight of expectations to just do the same. Be unconscious on the same piece of furniture or a whole eight-hour, and I cannot do it. It's causing deep anxiety, stress, and humiliation and shame in my 30-something life. He sees this as an act of love and connection. The harder I try to sleep in the same bed to meet his need, the more unlikely it is that I sleep. So I wanna know who ever decided that this was a thing.

And do you have any advice? Thank you. Good for you, Caitlin. Thank you, Caitlin. It's good. Let's hear it. Yeah, it's great. I love the way she's phrasing the question.

This is good. To be unconscious on the same piece's phrasing the question. This is good. To be unconscious on the same piece of furniture for eight hours. How does that become a symbol of love? How does that become a thing? Yeah. That's great. So again, just going to think out loud. This is no, there's no cut or answer to something like that.

But I would pursue two different questions, two different ways of thinking about this. I mean, one would be, yeah, whoever decided that's a thing. There's plenty of ways to live life, and not everyone needs to live in this kind of, put it all in one box, all in one bedroom, all in one apartment. Plenty of people choose to be in a romantic relationship and not live together, not sleep together, give a lot of space. People have different needs in terms of how much together and measurement they need and how much space they need. And I'm like figure it out. There's not one way to live life. That's on one hand. So whoever decided that's a thing is a very good question.

It doesn't have to be a thing. But I'm also thinking, you know, sleeping, being unconscious on a piece of furniture is a time when we are indeed very vulnerable. And trusting, right? And, and you might want to ask yourself, what is scary about that? What is your unconscious telling you about like,

what could happen to you if you let loose and fall asleep in the presence of another person. What are the dreads that come up around that? What is the kind of mixing up the sleeping together threatens? That wouldn't take it as simply like being very sensitive as far as hearing, although who knows, maybe that person is like a highly sensory person, but maybe there's more to it. Maybe that unconscious has something to say. Fascinating. We always end with a teeny segment called the next right thing,

which is just one little thing that if people don't try anything else, that they can do. And even though it's called we can do hard things we like that for this to be an easy thing. Is there some way to operationalize the embracing of otherness? Like what does that look like or sound like in a relationship because it sounds like that's the main thing that we have to forget the complete me and celebrate the otherness that relationships insist we celebrate. How do we do that? What do we say? What do we stop doing? What do we do today? That's a good one. How would I operationalize it in a nugget? Maybe

is that in a nugget, maybe challenge yourself to think of the thing about your partner that is the little bit of the story from which the most growth can happen. I believe that's it. Mm-hmm. That's good. We love you, Dr. Orner. After this, can you send me an email about where you get your sweaters and scarves? And are you taking your clients?

Right. All the answers to my Google searches. That would be great. You're the best. You're wonderful. Thank you for your show. I actually think that, well, you know this, but it's making a big difference for so many people

who can't get to therapy, but need your brilliance. So thank you for making that show. Everybody, you can catch it on Showtime. Couples therapy. It's a good time. All right, we can do hard things like operationalize otherness and consider other people's annoyances as the thorn from which our growth will come.

Thank you so much. So much. This has been fabulous. Really wonderful questions. Thank you for pushing me to the edge. Oh, that's great. That's what we tend to do to people. And we will see you back here.

And we can do hard things. Bye. Okay. Bye-bye. I give you Tish Melton and Brandy Carlyle. I walked through a fire I came out the other side. Now the other side I chased desire I'm mine, I walk the line Cause we're adventurous and heartbreak So man, a final destination That will stop asking directions

Some places they've never been And to be loved we need to be known We'll finally find our way back home Through the joy and pain That our lives bring We can do our thing I hit rock bottom it felt like a brand new star I'm not the problem sometimes things fall apart and I continue to believe the best people are free and it took some time but I'm finally fine

Cuz we're adventurous and heartbreak A final destination We stopped asking directions So places they've never been And to be loved we need to be known We'll finally find our way back home And through the joy and pain That our lives bring We can do a heart

This world finished her rose and heart breaks on my way Michael lost but we're only in that Stopped asking directions Some places may've never been And to be loved we need to be long We'll finally find our way back home And through the joy and pain That our lives breathe We can do hard things

Yeah, we can do hard things Yeah, we can do hard things We can do hard things is produced in partnership with Cadence 13 Studios. Be sure to rate, review, and follow the show on Apple Podcasts, Odyssey, or wherever you get your podcasts, especially be sure to rate and review the podcast if you really liked it. If you didn't, don't worry about it.

It's fine. you