We Can Do Hard Things with Glennon Doyle - How JD Vance Became a "Butler for Billionaires" with Kara Swisher

Episode Date: July 31, 2024

Glennon, Abby, and Amanda are joined by renowned tech journalist Kara Swisher to expose the deep connections between tech billionaires, like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, with JD Vance and Donald Trump. The conversation explores JD Vance's background, key tech industry players’ influence on the Republican presidential ticket and beyond, and the broader implications for the American people. On Kara: Kara Swisher is host of On with Kara Swisher and co-host of the Pivot podcast. She’s editor-at-large at New York Magazine and a CNN contributor. Considered the top reporter in the tech game and called “Silicon Valley's most feared but revered journalist,” Swisher has established herself as the oracle of the tech world with unrivaled access to the industry's most significant leaders. She’s the author of the New York Times bestselling memoir, Burn Book: A Tech Love Story. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Welcome to We Can Do Hard Things. We are in We Can Do Hard Things mode. It's our era. It's our era. We are awake. We are alive. We are ready to go. We're alive, awake, alert, enthusiastic. We're alive, awake, alert, enthusiastic. We're alive, awake, alert, enthusiastic. We're alive, awake, alert. We're alert, awake, alive. We're alive, awake, alert, enthusiastic. That's for you, Kamala.

Okay, so we'll send that to the Kamala team and see if they want to use it. Yeah, I mean, I think it's winning. It's hashtag. It's winning. I'm trying so hard to come up with a good slogan. I've heard, yes, we cam, which I'm not sure about that one. I made up one last night in bed, which was keep Kamala and Carrie on.

I'm not there yet. I'm not there yet. I'm not going to give up till I come up with something good. All right. Who is our guest today? Today we have Kara Swisher, who is the host of On with Kara Swisher and co-host of the Pivot podcast. She's editor at large at New York Magazine and a CNN contributor. She's considered the top

reporter in the tech game and called Silicon Valley's most feared but revered journalist. I think that tracks. I revere her and I'm also a little scared of her. Swisher has established herself as the Oracle of the tech world with unrivaled access to the industry's most significant leaders. She's the author of the New York Times bestselling memoir, Burn Book, a tech love story. Welcome Kara Swisher. Tell us all the things about JD Vance. And the tech bros who own him.

Kara, I'm gonna explain why it is that I needed you to come here today. Okay. I come from the Christian world. Okay. I was in evangelical, whatever movement church for a long time. Okay. I'm aware. Yeah.

Now this thing happened when I was in my early twenties, which is that I was listening to what was coming from the pulpit and there was a lot of, you'll be shocked to know there was a lot of misogyny and racism and homophobia coming from the pulpit. And I have actually really committed to the Bible, like have read the Bible and it's very intensely into Scripture. And so what was coming from the pulpit felt very different than what I understood was the root of the thing. And so I started meeting with people, thinking that I was just gonna get an explanation

that would make it make sense. And what I started to understand is the higher that I met with people, my sister will remember this as a hard time in our lives, the more I understood, oh, the higher the people get, the less they even care about these issues. They don't care. Yeah.

They have created a group of people who think that this is based upon, we all care so much about abortion. But actually, what I learned over time was that that church and many movements are created by people who create these banner issues in order to incite and entice people into following them. They create believers.

Yeah, marketing, it's called marketing. Yes, it's called marketing. But then they don't actually, they have completely private separate agendas in separate meetings, right? With separate priorities. So this is how we got Reagan and the religious right united under, because of Falwell and racism and segregation in schools.

So what I know is that you can't really understand a movement until you understand the hidden agenda of the leaders behind it. So what we're asking you to do is come here today and tell us about the hidden agenda of JD Vance and Trump as it connects to Silicon Valley and the tech world. I'm all for it. I don't think it's very hidden though. I'm not sure it's hidden.'t think it's very hidden though. I'm not sure it's hidden.

Well, okay. I think it's pretty much in plain sight. Unhide it even more. Yeah, I mean, the Post has this thing, democracy dies in darkness, but I think it dies in the full light of day. I think they're not hiding any of their intent. They think they're very clear.

They say it over and over again. They're doing it explicitly. They may be doing it in unusual ways by posting like Bill Ackman was posting, because he's part of their little cabal right now. He's a hedge fund manager and certainly that makes him an expert on DEI. But they're posting it rather explicitly what their goals are, which is control, I think, pretty clearly and money making and the ability to slime people in order to get to those goals.

And so the first line of my book was, so it was capitalism after all. And I think if you start with that premise, you'll pretty much have your answer to almost everything they're doing. Okay, so JD Vance writes Hillbilly Elegy. He does. Okay, he comes from Appalachia, is that true?

No, that is not true. He comes from the suburb of Dayton. His family does, his family does. It comes from the suburb of Dayton. His family does. His family does. My grandmother grew up in rural West Virginia. I don't call myself a hillbilly, but okay, sure. I mean, he certainly had roots there, so did I, but has nothing to do with my life. He grew up in a relatively, for that area, affluent actually.

His family made quite a bit of money for that area. And then he went, of course, to Yale and et cetera, et cetera. So I find him to be an elite. I would call him an elite if I had to pick. It's been a long time since he's been down in the holler, you know, making cornpwn grits, but okay. You know, it's nonsense. It's the equivalent of us saying that, I mean,-grandfather was a coal miner in Pennsylvania. So was mine Oh, really? I didn't know that so we are as hillbilly as JD Vance's. That's correct. That is correct You mentioned Yale. So JD Vance is at Yale and he meets Peter Thiel at Yale. At Yale as a student. When he comes to speak and that

moment he calls a very big moment, which I would not argue because it created the rest of his life. Well, he got a sugar daddy right there. And I think what's interesting is a lot of these men that I've dealt with in Silicon Valley, a lot of men in general, they try to like bring up these smart young men. You know, they all have like a passel of them and you've seen that. It doesn't matter where it is. And he was the latest in that particular version and Peter does that a lot.

He does a lot of mentorship stuff and he's created the Teal Fellows and so he creates sort of a cult following among those people and JD is one of them and he rides that train for as long as possible and until this, till right now. And one of the things I really appreciated, which I've been trying to get out is he wasn't a very successful tech investor at all, in fact. And this is with Yale and the help of Peter Thiel, and he still wasn't successful. That's during a boom time. That sells me a lot. It means he's a bad investor. And some people he's worked with who I've talked to, he just wasn't good at his job. And then Peter

got him all his jobs. Rachel Matto calls him Peter Thiel's intern, perpetual intern. And then Peter paid for his Senate candidacy and got Trump to endorse him, which got him to win. And so he's had a very lackluster Senate career so far, completely inexperienced for the job, if you're thinking of experience. And then he slingshot him into this using the help of other tech billionaires because Trump is easily convinced. I think they dragged Don Jr. in who's not the sharpest tack in the box. And so he probably thought it was cool

to hang out with Elon Musk and let's listen to him. And here we are with this guy. You just gave such a beautiful overview, a whole overview. Can we break that down into little chunks? Because that's the whole story that you just told, and let's chunk it out. So he's at Yale, Peter Thiel is there, he meets him. Can you tell us who Peter Thiel is, first of all? Peter Thiel is a very talented investor in Silicon Valley. Some of his stuff has worked, some of it hasn't.

But he's definitely, there's no question he's talented. He has a point of view, largely to do with the destruction of current government. That's really, he wants to burn it all down. He's been like that since college, really. He was very famous in college for being a disrupter, and that's fine. He had several people like David Sacks and some others around him at the time. I got acquainted with him because he was an investor in Facebook and other things around

Silicon Valley, but he's certainly done well. He's very good at tax tricks. He did a lot of tax tricks to keep money that he made. He's been sort of a lone wolf in Silicon Valley, but he's certainly done well. He's very good at tax tricks. He did a lot of tax tricks to keep money that he made. He's been sort of a lone wolf in Silicon Valley. I think they're non-political for the most part, and he was political. And so he funded Facebook. There's a, you know, he was one of the early people,

not the only person, and a bunch of other stuff, including Palantir, including Andrew Hall, I guess. I think he's in that one. Founded PayPal, right? Co-founder of PayPal? He's one of the founders. Yes. He was a critical one. Elon was not a founder of PayPal. If people have to stop saying that, they merged a company called X.com

into PayPal because they were competing and they were both sort of losing. And so you can't have two competitors in the same space. So they merged together. And Elon was kind of zeroed out by Peter. Peter is smarter than anyone, I would say, if I had to pick. And so they managed to sell it off to eBay, which was a big win for them. They were lucky because they were not headed in a good direction, but eBay thought they needed it and that's what saved them. And then they look like geniuses, which they saw the opportunity and they took it. And then they parlayed that into this

mythology around themselves. So Vance barnacles himself to Teal. He decides to go from Yale. This is the Hillbilly guy. Decides to go from Yale to venture capitalist position in Silicon Valley. Yeah, he had several. He had a company. He worked for Mithril, he was unsuccessful there. He worked for Steve Case, he was only there 18 months, unsuccessful. And Steve has said it explicitly. And he said he didn't really work there, right? Isn't he on record for saying like, he sort of didn't work much. He didn't work much. Yeah. He said it to me, actually. And, you know, Ron Klain was there, who was Chief of Staff to Biden. Steve was really interested in an important thing, which was talent across the country in places that weren't Silicon Valley and New York and Austin. And so JD

was the natural person to hire after Hillbellyology is we're going to reach down into the small towns and find entrepreneurship everywhere, which was a laudable task for sure. But the first company that executive was on record saying that he gave Vance the job as a favor to Peter. Yes, they all did. They all did. He's Peter Thiel's intern. It's like that guy that, you know, he or my dad told me to hire me.

And that's the kind of thing. And then he goes after the last job. Then he says, I want to go into politics. And Thiel gives him what, for the time, is a record-breaking investment. Yes, $15 million. $15 million. $15 million. He scored with a very small amount of money for Peter to get his own senator.

He got his own senator essentially. And he's three years on the job. Okay, so bring us to the moment where Trump is deciding who to have for VP. Well, all these tech people got involved in it, you know, got super involved. Elon's been moving ever rightward for a couple of years now. And David Sachs, someone who was also at PayPal, he was at school with Peter Thiel and he ran a bunch of different companies in Silicon Valley. He's sort of a middling entrepreneur, I would call him.

He had a company called Yammer that he sold to Microsoft. It was Microsoft then sort of mothballed it really, pretty much. Just a typical entrepreneur. Again, not the top level, but fine. He wrote a book in college with Peter that I got him to apologize for because he called rape belated regret in the book. You can find the story. He apologized for saying so, so he didn't mean to say it that way, but he did say it that way. I know, right? Yes. That's not exactly a slip of the tongue stumble into conversation.

Not all of it. Yeah, I know. I agree. There was this pack of people at Stanford that were trying to be like disrupty and contrarian. There was another one named Keith Raboy and he's gay and as is Peter and I think they yelled, die of AIDS to a professor who was liberal. They just like to be contrarian, right? No matter who they were. Jesus. JD got money from Peter to do this. This is pretty much.

And so it's kind of a pretty easy straight line. At the same time, he got influenced by a bunch of philosophers and bloggers and theorists that are very troubling. I don't have the names right at my hand tip, but there are a bunch of people who have Patrick Deneen is one, but as you get deeper into them, they get rather problematic. There's one blogger who is talking about slavery being good and all kinds of stuff. You know, you just have to read it. It's really wacky once you get into it.

And this is stuff that Vance, you know, really embraced and Peter also being one of the people he really embraced. So do you believe that Peter actually believes this shit? Yes. So Peter as a gay man. Mm-hmm. Yeah, we've had encounters, a lot of encounters. We have a, there's a long video of us arguing about, for example, well I don't know if it's on the video but we had a meeting where I did it, we were talking about Facebook at the time actually but after the camera went off, he was talking about gays getting special rights. And I said, equal rights.

And he said, special rights. And I said, well, I have children. And so I feel like I should have equal rights to straight people around adoption and everything else. And he now has kids, of course, but he's a conservative and sort of a way out there. And one of his big ideas, and there's a bunch of theory people around that he also admires,

is the idea that the United States should be run by a CEO, an all-powerful CEO in the version of Mark Zuckerberg or anybody else where you can't fire them. Dictators, what you would call it in politics, right? It's because they can make better decisions than the government. He feels that the government is too, the bureaucrats have too much power. Look, that's a long time conservative thing. And so he's the joke that you've got to sort of get rid of it all and have it run like a company is or most things in government should be made private.

And oh, look, I have a defense company that I can get money from taxpayers from. So what's really fascinating is they all like insult government and then take government contracts or, you know, manipulate the tax system or, you know, in Elon's case, he took a loan that saved Tesla from the Obama administration. He paid it back, but, you know, we should have taken stock, obviously, you know, the state's government should have. But, you know, he avails himself to government when it suits him and he insults it when it suits him.

Is it the racism that unites? Is it the, I mean, we know that Vance has promoted this kind of a little bit more sterile version of the replacement theory, which is, you know, white people are, it's a liberal plot to get rid of white people through immigrants. Is that what unites all of them under this umbrella? They each have their own sad little journey to where they are, I think. You know, whatever it happens to be. I mean, there was a long biography written of Elon, which I thought was just typing what Elon said. I thought it was a very long press release. His story is that his father was terrible to him and therefore he must take out his childhood promise

on the rest of us for the rest of his life. Although, I think he should just personally seek therapy. They each have a different story, right? I'm not a therapist, but I suspect JD Vance's mom's drug problems probably contributed to the way he is. He had to really be scrappy, of course, dealing with a consistently problematic parent. He did have the support of his grandmother, of course, who was a character, it sounds like. But each of them have their own little particular journey and demons that plague them, I think.

He is scrappy in his inconsistency dances. I feel like he's like a, he's kind of like a tofu. Like I feel like he takes on whatever identity makes him more. He did that with, I have to say, when I had met him, he was very anti Trump, like too much almost, right? I was like, style it back. Okay. Like, look, you know, he, I have never called Trump Hitler. I think I studied Hitler in college.

It was my minor Nazi studies and propaganda. That is, that's a real term to say he called him America's. He could be America's Hitler. I was like gobsmacked when he said that. I was like, okay. But he went way far than most people, you know, than anybody so far in that group that I saw of the Never Trumpers. And then it suddenly, when it suited him to,

when he was, I would say, not doing well in the tech investing space to make his next leap, he's a chameleon and he changed his colors and then became the other way. Now, the question is, does he really, really believe it now? He might. He might have, you know, a lot of these people get red-pilled into that. I think Elon certainly believes a lot of the conspiracy nonsense he's been quite exercised over. Does it matter what he believes if he's owned by, if all of his jobs, including his job

as Senator that he's only had for three years, is a direct result of Peter Thiel's investment? I think he thinks he's not bought. He sees it as the way on his way up the slippery pole essentially. And so this gives him a boost. And you have to kind of at some point believe what you're saying if you're going to say it over and over again. I don't think he's suddenly going to convert to liberalism again. But he was, especially for a tech person, he was quite vehement against Trump.

Like he went out of his way, which I think very few of them do. Usually they say nothing. That's my experience with a lot of those people. But he certainly was quite vehement on the topic. We've had friends who suddenly have gotten right-wingy. I have a bunch of friends who suddenly like, Trump's not so bad. And it's like, how'd that work? And I mostly, if you trace it rather simply, it usually has to do with money, taxes, things like that. And again, the opening of my book was about that, was about how all these tech people went to Trump Tower, even though they had decried them to me each personally, to get the tax breaks they so desperately wanted or the money repatriated, the income repatriated

into the United States or less regulation. And that trumped everything. So you think you're saying that the slippery slope from, of course we do not support this dictator to be Trump, to, oh, he's not that bad. You've seen that. You've experienced that with friends. Oh, yeah.

Oh, yeah. Tons of them. Which when you peel it back, it's always, they say, tax breaks? I think it is. And I think a little bit of, you know, if I had to trace some of Elon's stuff, it's to one event,

because he went on and on about it to me, when Biden didn't invite him to that EV summit, because unions, he can't, he couldn't, because he's a union supporter and Tesla's virulently anti-union. And so he had GM there, I guess, for whatever. He lost his mind. I am the father of...

Like, it was crazy. He was very angry about that. And the eldest son that he didn't get his due, I think COVID kind of we were in an interview and he was really demented about COVID early on. He was like, it's only going to kill 10 people. I have looked at all the studies and I was like, well, last time I checked you weren't a medical doctor. So I'm going to not take your word for it. And historically speaking, these kinds of things usually kill a million people. That's usually the number. Like I feel like, you know, and then he got, he tried to, he threatened to leave an interview. And I thought that was weird at the time because he wasn't really like that. He wasn't, you know, foot stampy tantrum. Well, now he is all the time, but he wasn't. So

COVID did something. He started to talk about the deep state and I'm getting in the way of his business. And, you know, he started to surround himself with people of that ilk. He was somewhat like that, but not, it was a very small part of his, it was mostly stupid penis jokes. It really wasn't, you know, who cares? Like, although I always found a man at the time he was in his forties, a man in his forties still making boob jokes. I was always like, huh, wow, you really need to grow up or something. Maybe he's 52, 53 now, I guess. It's funny that you say about that personal kind of insult

of not being included in Biden's EV summit, because the same thing I heard about, I'm wondering if you found this to be true also, of Vance's quick shift when Hillbilly Elegy was made into a movie and it was panned. Well, it was a bad movie. It was a bad movie, but you know, the LA people, the New York people all were like terrible making fun of this movie and that that coincided very closely with his, I am anti-elites, I hate,

it was almost like a, you made fun of me. I'm sure that irritated him. I mean, he got so much kudos for the book. Again, there were other books that were better. And I do think he created, he's a very good writer, FYI, but some of it is embellished, I would say. Embellished, you know, it has to be. He's telling a dramatic story.

And I think a lot of people are really attacking for like all this stuff that isn't like he really isn't a hillbilly. And he sort of played into a trope about hillbillies, right? He really did. I mean, if you want to talk to an actual hillbilly who actually made it and is of good humor, one might turn to Dolly Parton, right? Who actually did grow up in those circumstances and doesn't think that people from that area are irreparably damaged. She treats them with respect. These tropes that we have about different groups and definitely people from Appalachia, you know, that's what he played into and it was successful. It is though, that's always his vibe. Even in Hellbilly Elegy, I remember

reading that long, long ago and And I remember distinctly feeling uncomfortable and feeling like, oh, this is not for people. This is not for them. No. Because there was a self blaming vibe of it. Yeah. There was a very distinct like, well, this is if we did better.

I love what Tom Nichols said when he said that it's he described his book as the smugness of a man who escaped a shipwreck and now has some thoughts about the swimming techniques of the people behind him who drowned. Yes. Yes, that's correct. Yeah, that's a really good way to put it. These areas do have people like JD Vance. We have immigrant stories like that. I got out of wherever, Sudan, Ireland, Italy, whatever, and I made it. That's terrific. I just think the idea of slagging the people who didn't is unkind, would be my way of thinking about it.

So, if we've established all of these connections for the American listening to this, what do we say to the question of how is JD Vance's deep connection to these tech billionaires a problem for Americans if that ticket gets elected? Well, he's a butler for billionaires who have their own interests, right? That's what I call them, butler. I'm sure he doesn't like that. So good. I mean, he's such a strange guy.

I mean, at one point after he became more conservative, what was interesting is at one point he tweeted at me and I should have saved the tweet, but he was like, liberals don't believe in the future, right? Something like that. JD Vance tweeted this? At me, yes. Okay. I'm a favorite of their little group.

They recently attacked me for something else the other day. They like to attack a high profile lesbian. That's their favorite activity. Who disagrees with them. What he tweeted was something along the lines of liberals don't believe in the future. And I think I wrote back, I said, well, I have four kids and you just have two. So I believe in the future twice as much as you do. No response.

No response. So, you know, they're just all performative. They're all performative. The whole thing is performative from these people. What from a policy perspective does being a butler for billionaires mean? What will he be advancing as the butler for billionaires in office? Oh, tax breaks. They want no cyber laws.

They want no regulation. So anything that would advantage him, any defense contracts, privatization of things, just hand over, like oligarchs, hand over the state blank kind of thing that helps us and let's try to hinder our enemies. So I would expect that he try to get the Trump administration to go after open AI, but not Elon, right? You know, one thing that's interesting is Elon is quite behind in AI compared to open AI, which he used to work with and now he's angry at. He sued them and then un-sued them, got rid of the lawsuit. But he's quite behind. Like if you notice what was really interesting, that union guy, Sean O'Brien, I'm so brave talking about unions here at the Republican convention. He didn't mention Tesla. He mentioned Amazon,

who's a Trump enemy, right? Not Tesla, who is the most virulently anti-union company in tech. Period. End of story. How funny that he didn't mention. How brave of you, Sean. How brave. What a brave thing for you to do. It's so ridiculous.

That's so interesting. It's down not only to like, we are going to pass policies for billionaires. It's we are going to pass policies for these particular handful of billionaires. Probably, that's what they'll do. You can watch them do it in their tax and stuff like that, the attacks on say, Elon's attacks on open AI are just so obvious. He's just hurt that he got kicked out essentially,

or he left in a huff and then they're like, see you later, don't let the door hit you on the way out. It's like the EV conference. Right, yeah. He's personally aggrieved. Yes, yeah. He's personally aggrieved. Yes, he's a long time aggrieved person. He really is. He's got a lot of aggrievements.

Because being the world's richest man is such a... It's hard. It's a burden, really. It's a burden. Yeah. So when these guys are in meetings behind the scenes, when they're on phone calls, when they are, when the Theels and the Musks and the Trumps

and the Vances are on phone calls, or sitting are, when the Theels and the Musks and the Trumps and the Vances are on phone calls or sitting around a table. Sure. Okay. Yeah. Are they talking about only business? Are they talking about how to get tax cuts? Are they talking about how to personally become more powerful and rich? Probably not.

Or are they talking about, we need mass deportation, we need anti-abortion? How does their conservative agenda? I don't think they have any values. I think you mistake this. I think they just now, I think for sure, Elon's been really red-pit. Like he's now, he loves conspiracy theories now.

They were on this idea that there were two shooters with the Trump thing. I don't quite know why they're kind of like grassy knolling it. And then suddenly now Biden is weekend at Bernie's and Kamala put out the letter. That's their new thing with no proof whatsoever. They just, people are saying like, and of course when he appears, I don't know what they're going to do while he's been drugged or I don't know. This is such a fucking nonsense. It's just ridiculous. And because they're terrified, because actually this invigorates and energizes.

So they do anything to cheat. Like now Republicans are trying to stop the money flow, saying he can't give the money to De Camilla, which will just piss off, say, Lorraine Powell Jobs or Sheryl Sandberg or Reid Hoffman, who are just as rich as them and they'll give more money. Whatever. Good luck. Good luck with that.

You know, Elon uses lawsuits a lot to slow people down and then ends up either dumping them or losing them often. That's one of their techniques. Peter is much more successful at lawsuits than Elon, but they use them as a tool. Okay. But do you believe that they believe in this extreme conservative agenda? Do you believe that they even believe in mass deportation, in women's rights being repealed in all of that?

Is that important to them or is that just the banner that they're putting out? I don't think they care. Some of them do believe in certain things. Some of them don't individually. I just don't think they have a value system that you and I might have. I think they think they have a value system that you and I might have. I think they think they're golden gods. And someone told me, which I thought was actually true, that the problem with Elon is he thinks he's, you know, I did an interview where he talked about that we're maybe

all in a simulation, that this isn't real. I think sometimes I think they think that, that they actually like several of them believe that by the way, Tony Shay who died. Absolutely. It was like Kara were in the simulation. I'm like, okay, Tony, you know, he's the one that ended up dying and sadly tragically, he was a lovely guy, but really was quite bent mentally. But so Elon believed there was a simulation possibly, and that this isn't real. And one person pointed out to me that he thinks he's and I think this is true, I thought that was the best explanation. He's living in a video game and he thinks he's ready player one. He's the main character in the video.

So nothing matters. He has no empathy. He has no, you know, talk about someone who has a trans kid being so vile about trans issues and pretending it's because he cares about kids. If he cared about kids, he wouldn't be so vile to his child. It's sad. And I've been in touch with several family members and you know, that poor kid, the Paul Pelosi thing that he did, that's where I really got when he that was just why? What would possess you? That's just really, that's a choice at some point.

It's so interesting though, and it helps to sympathize with people who are actually do have a set of values and are trying to present a case against this other thing that you just constantly feel like you're grabbing sand and there's nowhere to hold on to. And that is the point. It's just chaos, say whatever, have no value. Create this. I think they do have a disdain for government. They don't like the system and they think they're smarter.

That is not a fresh thing from... They just think they can do government better. But some certain things don't avail themselves with tech solutions. And by the way, they don't have the greatest record of safety. They don't have the greatest record. It's literally as if chemical companies had no rules on them. You know what they do? They would pollute things because they're capitalists. Exactly. And the regulations, I mean, and that's what they're promising to do in this

administration is they're promising the industries that have rules now. They're saying that they're going to go in and take all of those away too. But what a better way if you believe that government is a stupid idea and that the best case is that it doesn't exist, then your best choice is to put yourself in the decision making power of the government. That's right. And they find it easy because it's so cheap. Politicians are such cheap whores. I mean, they really, you know, it didn't cost, it only cost them $15 million to get them

into office. That's not anything to Peter. The way it was done, it sounds like to me that Trump was sort of veering different ways. And you know, when you're rooting for Rupert Murdoch's choice, you know things are fucked, right? Like Doug Burgum would have been fine. Like he's certainly competent and a toady, but whatever. He's certainly competent. He's certainly not incompetent. And same thing with Marco Rubio. Not a fan, but not incompetent, if you want to be fair to people. If you're interested in actually governing. Governing, that's correct.

There were people, but if you're interested in not governing, this is your choice. What was interesting, it sounds like he made that choice on Sunday after he got shot. So he's probably on painkillers. He's probably like having his son going and Elon Musk calling him and petting him all day long. And oh my God, Elon Musk is calling me, right? You can see how they could easily. And that Rupert Murdoch was mean to me. I'm not going with the he. You could, this is how decisions are made. Just FYI. In some way, I said to someone that weekend, I said, I almost feel sorry. I almost feel sorry for Trump because I wouldn't turn my back on any of these people. I think Trump is just the vehicle for them and they just, they pump them up with, oh sir, you know,

the, oh sir, you're so smart. Aren't you amazing? And he's just a vehicle. Same thing with Bannon. He's a vehicle. Bannon called him a vehicle. At least Bannon's being honest about what he's doing, which is using Trump as Trump has no values whatsoever. Like zero, they would say. If it suited him tomorrow to say everyone can have an abortion on demand, he'd do it if it suited him. He doesn't care.

Well, he wants to be cool. Trump wants to be cool, and that's the highest value, and he equates cool with rich and powerful. So when he's in that room, and he literally in a recent fundraiser where Vance was in the room, and all the billionaires were in the room, he said, who should I pick for VP? And they said Vance. And he's like, so I'll make the cool people think I'm cool.

I don't think the calculus is that, but like who's easier to control than someone who all you have to do is make them feel cool? Very easy. Yes, I agree. No, he just needs to be petted. That's all you need to do is say you're so smart or so attractive. You're so virile with this guy. So it's, he's kind of pretty easy. He's kind of an easy one. I do think actually of all of them, I think Trump really does think we waste money on wars. I think where it falls is this idea that at some point the world is an ugly place and we do have to intervene. Imagine this group being in charge during Nazism. There was an America First group that was very powerful and it was Henry Ford, it was

Charles Lindbergh, it was all kinds of powerful people. The guy who ran the Chicago Tribune, which was Colonel McCormack, Tom, what I think is Tom McCormack. There was a group like this back when that was doing the same stuff. But in that regard, I do think Trump, that is his inclination is to not be globally involved. These people take it to an extreme. What do we need to save anybody for? Why do we need to intervene anywhere?

Different people have a version of America that's different. Well, if you're in a simulation, I mean, it really feels that way. If you're in a simulation, that sort of nihilism, like nothing matters, people don't matter. That is what they have been trying to wear us into. I feel it. Yes, that's correct. And so it's either nothing matters or something matters. Well, it's capitalism at its ugliest, right? There's a version of capitalism. I'm a capitalist. You're an entrepreneur, right? It's a question of what kind of capitalism do you want? Do you have to do it where everybody loses but you? Or can you do it in a way that's much more generous, where you lift a lot of people up? That's my version of capitalism, is that the

more people do better, the better you do, right? The better audience, the better educated, the better this, the better, the more stable world. Do you believe right now that the leadership of whatever might be next in the Republican Party, we believe is a chaos and a nothing matters simulation situation? I think it's a Trump party. I wouldn't call it the Republican Party. Okay. Well, they're uniting over there.

Some of them are. There's a whole lot of discontent underneath. Mike Gallagher, who was on the China committee. Boy, don't I agree with him on lots of things, but he's a really intelligent someone you can have a discussion with about it. He left the party. He quit. You know why?

Because he didn't want to be part of the permanent kiss ass crowd, right? He wants to run for president someday when Trump is gone, as inevitably he will be. And so he didn't want to sully himself with these people at this point, which is what JD Vance is willing to do, right? He's willing to bend his knee to these people. That's the danger of Vance for me, is that there is, I think, a very naive perspective that used to be true, which is when Trump is gone, Trumpism is gone. Because it is a cult of personality, because it is all him, and then we will revert to the Republican Party of your.

Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. There's got to be any your. It's going to be a different Republican Party, right? But Vance is the one. He is. No, he's not. No, he's not. He's not.

There are so many times. There are. No, I don't think he is. I don't think he's up to the task because everything he's failed upward. He doesn't excite people in the same way that Trump does. And look, I am not pro-Trump, but when he started running in 2016, I had watched Every Apprentice. I understood his appeal. He was self-deprecating. He was funny. He was interesting. He seemed like he told it to man. He was a poor person's version of a rich person, right? Like, oh, he must be successful,

even though the facts were not, that wasn't the case. Talk about failing upward. And I did understand his appeal and he's a, you know, in a very, in the way Reagan was, he's one of these spectacular political preachers, whether you like him or not, he's definitely appealing. And I'm not so sure it survives him, certainly not with his own children. If that side is chaos and nothingness and a simulation, do you in your conversations with your friends behind the scenes believe that there is a there there on the other side? On the Democrats?

Yes. Or the Republicans? On the Democrat side. Do you believe that there is a set of values that they are navigating? I do. They're different. They're different. Years ago, Nancy Pelosi asked me to come speak in front of the Democratic caucus. It was out at a hotel in Virginia, one of those big

old empty hotels. And I brought my son, who at the time was one of my kids, was maybe 12, something like that. And I spoke to them and we stayed there for the day, right? And we're just sort of witnessing everything. And my son goes up to Nancy Pelosi, he goes, none of these people agree with each other and they're all arguing and they're all different arguments and this and that. And she goes, that's the beauty of it. Like we are allowed to disagree in this group. We don't have to be in lockstep in this cultish kind of cultish personality. There was a cult around Reagan, same thing. And she goes,

and I'm the one who knocks grandma who knocks them into line, which she's clearly done in this case. Yeah, she has. And you know, I think that's the case. This was, everyone's like, oh, it's so dysfunctional. I don't think it's dysfunctional to have done this this way. It was a lot of disagreement that got a little bit testy, that's for sure. But so what? I think it's very healthy to have these, you'd never see this. There are tons of people in the Republican Party who really think Trump is problematic and terrible and et cetera, et cetera. And they just can't speak up. Our party has the problem is we speak up too much, right? There's too much speaking up. And I

think that's healthy. I do think that's healthy, even if it presents as dysfunctional. Me too. Me too. All right, Kara, how are you feeling in this moment about the direction the Democratic Party is going right now? I feel good about it. I really like Kamala Harris. I've known her since she was a DA in San Francisco. I know her very well. First of all, it starts off woman of color, so therefore she starts 10 yards behind, right,

no matter what she does. And I think people will start to really, if they get a really good taste, will be very interested in her. She's a really interesting character. I think she's got a real chance. I really do. People are dying for a choice that's not too old men, you know? And I think Dwighton did a real thing here. Yeah, he did. Can you imagine giving up the frigging presidency? I mean, people should not have given him such a hard time. That's a tough thing to do. And he did it.

It was a really beautiful thing for him to do. Yeah. Okay. I know last thing. Who do you think's the most effective VP pick for her? Probably Mark Kelly. Ah, but don't we need him? I agree totally.

But don't we need him in the Senate? No, no, because Katie Hobbs will appoint the senator. He gets to stay senator. Okay. Same thing with JD Vance. If he doesn't win, he gets to stay senator. And if he doesn't, Katie Hobbs is the one that appoints the Democratic governor, appoints him. God, he'd be so good. He'd be so good. He would be my choice. You know, obviously I'd love a Buttigieg one because he's so, he's such a killer debater. But it's probably a little too much

for people gay. Although, you know, I think that I hate to say it, but there's you know, there's anti gay stuff. No Cooper, you don't think North Carolina Cooper is another one, I suppose. I don't know much about him. I think that's harder because then we have a governor there. Same thing with Shapiro. I've interviewed him. I haven't interviewed Cooper yet, but I spent a lot of time with Shapiro. We did a great long interview last year. Really impressive and very well liked. My brother is a Republican and he likes him. Like there's, he's liked by a lot of people and I think he's really astonishing. He's an astonishingly talented person. I would love a Gretchen Whitmer

Kamala thing. Like just come on everybody. Let's have women. We're all in. If it wasn't such a risk, if it wasn't such a risk, she's're all in. If it wasn't such a risk, if it wasn't such a risk, she's the obvious one. If it wasn't, she's such a talent. Talk about a talented, a natural politician. She's such a natural. People love her in Michigan, even if they don't like her, right? She's one of those same with Shapiro in Pennsylvania. You've got Gavin, you've got the governor of New Mexico is fantastic. She's a spark plug. You've got Pritzker. What about Beshear?

Westmore. Beshear? They're all talented. They're all like the Democrats have a real bench. And unfortunately for the Republicans is they're killing their top ones, right? Nikki Haley isn't talented. Whether you like her or not, she is talented. Same thing with Mike Gallagher.

There's a spate of people who are super talented that I think would be very appealing to people if they just got Trump out of the way. But Vance is not the way to go on any of this. So. Cara, thank you. No problem. Good luck. Don't look worried. Why are you worried today? Have a little moment of joy. My wife is like this. She just came home. She goes, I'm finally just stop fucking complaining and get there. Go for it. Stop it.

I feel delighted. I know. Not just delighted. I feel like, you know how when you're like maybe, maybe, but you're worried about having your own hope because you think your hope is going to break your heart. Doesn't matter. That's the only way to go. And then it happened. They don't care. They don't care on the other side. Let me just say, just stop complaining. Okay. This is what we got. This is our chips people. Like play it through.

Exactly. We are all in. We don't have time to F around. We are all in. That's right. Anyway, thank you guys so much. Thank you. Bye Pod Squad. If this podcast means something to you, it would mean so much to us. If you'd be willing to take 30 seconds to do these three things. First, can you please follow or subscribe to We Can Do Hard Things? Following the pod helps you because you'll never miss an episode and it helps us because you'll never miss an episode. To do this, just go to the We Can Do Hard Things show page on Apple Podcasts,

Spotify, Odyssey, or wherever you listen to podcasts, and then just tap the plus sign in the upper right-hand corner or click on follow. This is the most important thing for the pod. While you're there, if you'd be willing to give us a five-star rating and review and share an episode you loved with a friend, we would be so grateful. We appreciate you very much. We Can Do Hard Things is created and hosted by Glennon Doyle, Abby Wambach, and Amanda Doyle in partnership with Odyssey. Our executive producer is Jenna Wise-Berman,

and the show is produced by Lauren Legrasso, Alison Schott, Dina Kleiner, and Bill Schultz.